HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 24, 21712-21722, June 14, 2002

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 277/24/21712    most recent M202140200v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ditzel, H. J. Articles by Jensenius, J. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ditzel, H. J. Articles by Jensenius, J. C. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Cancer-associated Cleavage of Cytokeratin 8/18 Heterotypic Complexes Exposes a Neoepitope in Human Adenocarcinomas^*

Henrik J. Ditzel^§, Merel C. M. Strik, Morten K. Larsen^¶, Antony C. Willis, Ahmad Waseem^**, Karin Kejling^¶, and Jens C. Jensenius

From the  Department of Immunology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, ^¶ Biomedical Laboratory, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark,  MRC Immunochemistry Unit, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, OX1 3QU Oxford, United Kingdom, ^** Head and Neck Cancer Research Program, Guys, King's, and St. Thomas' Dental Institute, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom, and the  Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Aarhus, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark

Received for publication, March 4, 2002, and in revised form, March 26, 2002

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

The intermediate filament network in simple glandular epithelial cells predominantly consists of heterotypic complexes of cytokeratin 8 (K8) and cytokeratin 18 (K18). In contrast to other cytokeratins, K8 and K18 are persistently expressed during malignant transformation, but changes in cell morphology are accompanied by alterations in the intermediate filament network. To study molecular changes, K8 and K18 were purified from surgically removed colon cancer and normal epithelia tissues. Western blotting and amino acid sequencing revealed the presence of abundant K8 and K18 fragments, truncated at the N terminus, from cancerous, but not normal, epithelial cells. The fragmentation pattern indicates proteolysis mediated by several enzymes, including trypsin-like enzymes. The cancer-associated forms of K8 and K18 are specifically recognized by the human antibody, COU-1, cloned from the B cells of a cancer patient. We demonstrate that COU-1 recognizes a unique conformational epitope presented only by a complex between K8 and K18. The epitope is revealed after proteolytic removal of the head domain of either K8 or K18. A large panel of recombinant K8 and K18 fragments, deleted N- or C-terminally, allowed for the localization of the COU-1 epitope to the N-terminal part of the rod domains. Using surface plasmon resonance, the affinity of COU-1 for this epitope was determined to be 10⁹ M¹, i.e. more than 2 orders of magnitude higher than for intact heterotypic K8/K18 complexes. The cellular distribution of truncated K8/K18 heterotypic complexes in viable adenocarcinomas cells was probed using COU-1 showing small fibrillar structures distinct from those of intact K8/K18 complexes. Previously we demonstrated the binding and subsequent internalization of recombinant Fab COU-1 to live cancer cells. We have thus characterized a cancer neoepitope recognized by the humoral immune system. The results have biological as well as clinical implications.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

The 10 nm intermediate filaments (IF)¹ provide resilience in response to mechanical stress by forming a stable network attached to specific desmosome cell-cell contacts (1). IF can be classified into groups expressed in higher eukaryotes in a tissue-specific and cell type-restricted pattern (2, 3). In epithelial cells, IFs consist of stoichiometrically equal amounts of type I (smaller and acidic) and type II (larger, neutral, or basic) cytokeratin polypeptides, which form strongly interacting heterodimers (4-6). Cytokeratin 8 (K8) and cytokeratin 18 (K18), type I and II, respectively, are the major components of IFs of simple or single layer epithelia, such as those of the intestine, the liver, and the breast ducts, although cytokeratin 19 (K19) is also present and forms heterodimers with K8 (2, 5). The assembly of IF involves several association steps where the -helical rod domain of the cytokeratin molecules plays the central role (7-9). The head and the tail domains are not thought to be part of the filamentous backbone but to protrude laterally and contribute to profilament and IF packing, and to IF interaction with other cellular components (10-12). Cotransfection of head-deleted K8 and K18 resulted in formation of a dispersed non-fibrillar pattern, whereas cotransfection of a combination of one headless plus one intact cytokeratin resulted in formation of cytoplasmic granules or fibrils (12). More detailed analysis showed that only short and irregular IF was generated when K8 and K18 were N-terminally truncated by deleting the first 66 amino acids of K8 and K18, whereas only tetramers were generated when a major part of the H1 domain was removed (13).

During cell transformation and tumor development, the cell type specificity of K8 and K18 is conserved, making them useful as clinical histopathological markers (2, 14, 15). Interestingly, it has been found that oncogenes, which activate the Ras signal transduction pathway, stimulate K18 gene expression through transcription factors, such as members of the ETD and AP-1 families, including jun and fos (16-18). The continuous and sometimes even increased expression of K8 and K18 in tumor cells, while many other proteins, including other cytokeratins, are lost, may be the result of constitutive activation of the Ras pathway. Supporting the notion that K8 and K18 play a role in the tumorigenic phenotype, increased expression of K8 and K18 has been found at the invasive front of some tumors (14). In addition, an association between K8 and K18 expression and increased invasiveness and metastatic properties through special interaction with the extracellular environment has been observed (19-21).

Previous work from our group and others (22-25) has indicated that K8 and K18 may be modified in cancer cells and used as immunodiagnostic markers and therapeutic targets for adenocarcinomas. In the present study, we detail the composition of K8/K18 filaments in viable cancer cells.

	EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Antibodies-- The human monoclonal antibody (HmAb) COU-1 was produced and purified as described (26). In brief, COU-1 is secreted by the hybridoma cell line, B9165, derived by fusing human lymphoblastoid cells (WI-L2-729-HF2) with lymphocytes from mesenteric lymph nodes from a colon cancer patient. B9165 was grown in protein-free medium, and COU-1 was purified from the culture supernatant by affinity chromatography on Sepharose-coupled monoclonal antibody (mAb) against human µ-chain (HB57, ATCC, Manassas, VA) and further purified by gel permeation chromatography. IgM purified from normal human serum (Cappel, Cochranville, PA) was used as a control. Murine mAbs, M20 directed against normal K8, CY-90 directed against normal K18, and A53-B/A2 directed against normal K19, were obtained from Sigma.

ELISA-- ELISA wells (Costar, Cambridge, MA) were coated overnight at 4 °C with fractions from the purification of cytokeratin or with different recombinant K8/K18 complexes (5 µg/ml) in PBS, pH 7.4. The wells were washed twice with PBS, blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 1 h at 37 °C, and incubated with COU-1 for 2 h at 37 °C. Plates were washed 10× with PBS, 0.05% Tween 20 (PBS/Tween), and bound antibody was detected with alkaline phosphatase (AP)-labeled goat anti-human -chain (Sigma, 1/1000) in PBS/Tween. Bound antibody was visualized with para-nitrophenyl phosphate (Sigma) at 1 mg/ml, 1 mM MgCl₂, 10% (w/v) diethanolamine, pH 9.6, and read at 405 nm.

Cell Culture-- The human breast adenocarcinoma cell line MCF7 (ATCC) was maintained in minimum Eagle's medium (Invitrogen), supplemented with 10% FCS, non-essential amino acids, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1 mM HEPES buffer, 100 units of penicillin/ml, 100 mg of streptomycin/ml, and 2 mM L-glutamine. The human colon adenocarcinoma cell line colo137 (kindly provided by Dr. P. Ebbesen, Aarhus University, Denmark) and the human melanoma cell line M21 (kindly provided by Dr. R. Reisfeld, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla) were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen), supplemented with FCS, penicillin, streptomycin, and L-glutamine as above.

Purification of Cytokeratin from Normal and Malignant Tissue-- Cytokeratin was extracted from fresh, surgically removed, colon cancer tissue or normal colon epithelia using a procedure taking advantage of the insoluble filamentous structure of cytokeratins and other cytoskeletal proteins in buffer at physiological salt concentrations. Tissue samples (1-5 g) were minced with shears and homogenized in 10-30 ml of Tris-buffered saline (TBS: 10 mM Tris, 0.14 M NaCl, 15 mM NaN₃, pH 7.6) containing 1% (v/v) Emulphogene (Sigma) using a blade rotor (Euro Turrax T20b basic, IKA Labortechnik, Staufen, Germany) 3× for 5 s at 27,000 rpm on ice. Enzyme inhibitors, 5 mM iodoacetamide, 10 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 mM EDTA (all Sigma), 5 mM cyclocapron (Kabi, Stockholm, Sweden), and 10 units of aprotinin (Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany) per ml, were included in the buffers during homogenization, sonication, and ion-exchange chromatography. The suspension was pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, washed twice in TBS containing 1% Emulphogene, and resuspended in buffer A (10 mM Tris, pH 8.6, containing 0.1% (w/v) SDS, and 0.05% (v/v) Emulphogene). The suspension was sonicated 3× for 15 s on ice and centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was applied to an anion-exchange column (20-ml Q-Sepharose Fast Flow column, QFF, Amersham Biosciences and The Upjohn Co.) pre-equilibrated with buffer A. After washing the column with 10 column volumes of buffer A, bound proteins were eluted with a linear gradient to 1 M NaCl in buffer A. Fractions of 1 ml were collected and further analyzed by SDS-PAGE/Western blotting and by ELISA. For ELISA 10 µl of each fraction was added to wells containing 10 µl of SM2 beads (Bio-Rad) in 100 µl of TBS, followed by incubation and detection with COU-1 as described above. The beads bind the detergent and thus allow for the direct coating of the proteins in the fractions.

SDS-PAGE and Western Blot Analysis-- Electrophoresis was performed in a discontinuous buffer system on 8-cm 4-20 or 10% (w/v) polyacrylamide gels for analysis and on 15-cm 14% polyacrylamide gels for N-terminal sequencing (27). Samples were mixed with 2× sample buffer (4% SDS, 0.2% bromphenol blue, 100 mM dithiothreitol, 20% glycerol in 100 mM Tris-buffered saline), boiled for 5 min, and electrophoresed. Protein bands were visualized with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. Separated proteins were also electroblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (PVDF, Immobilon P, Millipore, Bedford, MA) at 100 V for 1 h on ice, using transfer buffer (10% (v/v) ethanol, 25 mM Tris, 200 mM glycine, pH 8.6). Prior to transfer, the membrane was soaked in ethanol for 2 min, and the membrane and the gel were incubated in transfer buffer for 10 min. Following transfer, the membrane was blocked for 2 h in Western blot buffer (50 mM Tris, 350 mM NaCl, 15 mM NaN₃, 0.1% Tween 20) and washed 3× with Western blot buffer and incubated with COU-1 antibody (5 µg/ml), mouse K8 antibody (diluted 1/2000), mouse K18 antibody (diluted 1/2000) or goat anti-GST antibody (diluted 1/1000, Amersham Biosciences and The Upjohn Co.) overnight at room temperature. The membrane was washed in Western blot buffer and incubated with AP-conjugated rabbit anti-goat IgG antibody (diluted 1/1000, Sigma) or AP-conjugated rabbit-anti-human IgM antibody (diluted 1/500, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) for 2 h at room temperature. Following 3 washes in PBS, the membrane was fixed with 0.2% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 15 min at room temperature and washed in PBS. Bound AP conjugate was visualized by nitro blue tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate BCIP (Bio-Rad). MCF7 or colo137 cells, resuspended in SDS sample buffer and sonicated were used as control antigen. A low range protein marker (Bio-Rad) was used to estimate the molecular weight of the fragments.

Amino Acid Sequencing and Amino Acid Analysis-- The procedures were as described by Crawford et al. (28). For N-terminal sequencing, purified cytokeratin was run on SDS-PAGE and electroblotted onto PVDF membranes prior to detection with Coomassie. The different bands were excised from the blot and sequenced in an Applied Biosystems 470A protein sequencer (Applied Biosystems Inc., Forster City, CA). Sequences similar to cytokeratins were searched for in GenBank^TM/EBI/DDBI/PDB databases using the BLAST program.

Expression and Purification of Recombinant K8 and K18 Proteins-- Escherichia coli DH5a harboring plasmids encoding a panel of K8 and K18 proteins were analyzed. The panel consisted of cDNA encoding the full-length and several N-terminal- and C-terminally deleted fragments of K8 and K18, cloned as GST fusion constructs into a modified pGEX-2T vector, as described (29). The transfected E. coli cultures were grown in Super Broth medium, supplemented with 20 mM MgCl₂ and 50 mg of carbenicillin/ml, at 37 °C until A₆₀₀ reached 0.6. Protein expression was then induced with 1 mM isopropyl-1-thio--D-galactopyranoside (Sigma) and 4 µM cAMP, and the cultures were allowed to grow for an additional 3 h at 30 °C. The bacteria were pelleted at 4,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. For SDS-PAGE, the pellet was resuspended in sample buffer and sonicated 5 × 10 s before electrophoresis. For purification of recombinant K8 or K18, the pellet of a 400-ml culture, grown and processed as described above, was resuspended in 50 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM -mercaptoethanol, pH 8.0) containing 1 mg of lysozyme/ml and incubated for 30 min at 4 °C. The suspension was sonicated 3× for 20 s and pelleted at 20,000 × g at 4 °C. The pellet was washed twice in a high salt buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 2 M NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 5 mM -mercaptoethanol, 1% Nonidet P-40, pH 8.0) and once in lysis buffer. The pellet was subsequently washed twice in lysis buffer containing 2 M urea and stored at 4 °C in lysis buffer containing 8 M urea.

Heterotypic Association Assay-- Panels of different C- or N-terminally deleted or intact K8 and K18 proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane, as described above. After blocking, the membrane was incubated for 16 h at 4 °C with 100 µg of purified K8 or K18 per ml of PBS, 2% bovine serum albumin, 4 M urea. If K8 proteins were transferred to the membrane, it was subsequently incubated with a purified K18 protein, and vice versa (29, 30). The membrane was washed with PBS, incubated with COU-1 (5 µg/ml) in Western blot buffer containing 10% FCS for 2 h at room temperature, and developed as described above.

Surface Plasmon Resonance-- The kinetics of COU-1 binding to heterotypic complexes of recombinant intact K8 or K18 and fragments thereof were determined by surface plasmon resonance measurements using the BIAcore instrument (Biacore Inc., Piscataway, NJ). The sensor chip was activated for immobilization with N-hydroxysuccinimide and N-ethyl-N'-(3-diethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide. The heterotypic cytokeratin complexes were coupled to the surface by injecting 50 µl of a 50 µg/ml sample. Excess activated esters were quenched with 30 µl of 1 M ethanolamine, pH 8.5. Typically, 3000 resonance units were immobilized. Binding of COU-1 to immobilized heterotypic cytokeratin complexes was studied by injecting COU-1 in a range of concentrations (0.5-80 µg/ml) at a flow rate of 5 µl/min using HBS-P buffer (0.01 M HEPES, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.005% (v/v) surfactant P20, pH 7.4, Biacore Inc). Dissociation at the end of the association phase was with a buffer flow rate of 20 µl/min. The cytokeratin surface was regenerated with 10 mM HCl, 1 M NaCl, pH 2.0, and remained active for 10 measurements. The association and dissociation rate constants, k_on and k_off, were determined from a series of measurements, as described previously (31). Association and dissociation constants were deduced from the kinetic data using the Bioevaluation program version 3.1 (Biacore Inc.).

Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy-- Cells were seeded into Lab Tek chamber slides (Nalge Nunc, Naperville, IL) and allowed to grow and adhere to the glass slides for 48 h at 37 °C, 5% CO₂. Cells were fixed with ice-cold 96% ethanol for 5 min, washed 3× with PBS, and blocked with 10% normal goat serum in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. COU-1 (5 µg/ml in PBS) together with either mouse anti-K8 antibody (1/1000 in PBS) or mouse anti-K18 antibody (1/1000 in PBS) were added to the cells and incubated overnight at 4 °C. After washing with PBS, the cells were incubated with FITC-labeled goat anti-human -chain and Texas Red-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (1/200) in PBS (both from Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. The cells were washed with PBS 3× for 5 min, and the slides were mounted with anti-fading reagent in PBS/glycerol (Slow Fade^TM, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Results were analyzed using an MRC-1024 confocal laser scanning microscope (Bio-Rad) attached to a Zeiss Axiovert 100TV. As a control, all experiments were also performed omitting the primary antibody or including species and isotype-matched control immunoglobulin instead of the primary antibody. In addition, differential interference contrast images of the analyzed cells were obtained.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

Purification of Cytokeratins from Colon Cancer Tissue and Normal Colon Epithelium-- To study the composition of the K8/K18 filaments in normal and malignant glandular epithelia and to determine the basis for the adenocarcinoma-specific binding of HmAb COU-1, total cytokeratin was separately purified from fresh tissue of surgically removed colon cancer tissue and normal colon epithelia using the procedure described under "Experimental Procedures." Following separation by QFF anion-exchange chromatography, the fractions containing COU-1 reactivity were found in the first and second peak of the gradient (fractions 41-48) as determined by ELISA (Fig. 1A). Western blot analysis demonstrated reactivity of COU-1 with three main bands in the same fractions (Fig. 1B). These three bands represented only a portion of the proteins with molecular masses in the 41-46-kDa range found in these fractions, as revealed by Coomassie Blue staining of the SDS-separated gels (Fig. 1C). Western blot analysis and Coomassie Blue staining of cytokeratin purified from colon cancers of four patients revealed a similar pattern of protein bands, reactive and non-reactive with HmAb COU-1.

View larger version (48K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1.   Purification of cytokeratin from colon cancer tissue. A, elution profile (A280, solid line) of cytokeratin-enriched material from a QFF anion-exchange column eluted with a linear gradient to 1 M NaCl (dashed line). Fractions containing reactivity with COU-1 in ELISA (30-53) were observed in the first and second peaks of the salt gradient. B, Western blot-stained with COU-1. C, Coomassie Blue staining of the elution fractions (41-50) demonstrated COU-1 reactivity with 3 bands at molecular masses of 41-46 kDa. H, colon cancer tissue lysate; S, material applied to the QFF anion-exchange column. Extract of the colon cancer cell line Colo137 (C137) was included as control.

Cytokeratin was also isolated from normal colon epithelia obtained from three individuals using the same purification procedure to compare the nature of the K8/K18 in colon cancer versus normal colon tissues. Tissue lysates and purified cytokeratin preparations (QFF eluate) from the two sources were examined by Western blotting used a panel of K8-, K18- and K19-specific antibodies. When approximately equal amounts of cytokeratin from cancer and the normal epithelia were analyzed, protein bands (in the 41-46-kDa range) of equal intensity were observed following staining with the murine K18 antibody (CY-90), which recognizes a linear epitope in the C-terminal part of K18 (Fig. 2). In contrast, when the same preparations were stained with COU-1, protein bands (in the 41-46-kDa range) were only observed in the cytokeratin preparations from the colon cancer tissue and not from the normal colon epithelia (Fig. 2).

View larger version (45K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2.   Western blot analysis of cytokeratin purified from colon cancer tissue or normal colon epithelia under identical conditions and stained with COU-1 or murine anti-K18 mAb. Tissue extract (homog) and anion-exchange chromatography-purified material (QFF) at dilutions 1/1, 1/10, and 1/100 were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. Whereas the anti-K18 antibody stained the proteins with similar intensity in the cytokeratin preparations from normal and malignant colon epithelia, COU-1 only stained proteins from the cancer tissue (three bands of about 41-46 kDa) and not proteins from the normal epithelia.

Amino Acid Sequencing Revealed N-terminal Truncated Fragments of Both K8 and K18 from Viable Cancer Cells-- To determine the nature of the different K8/K18-like proteins found in the colon cancer tissues, purified cytokeratin preparations from primary colon cancer tissues of three patients were individually separated on large 14% polyacrylamide gels, the proteins blotted, and Coomassie Blue-stained. In addition, a cytokeratin preparation purified from the human colon adenocarcinoma cell line colo137 was also separated, the proteins blotted, and Coomassie Blue-stained. Fig. 3A shows a typical blot of a colon cancer tissue sample, displaying ~10 bands. Strips of the blot were incubated with either mAb M20 (K8), CY-90 (K18), or COU-1. At this increased separation, 5 bands showed COU-1 reactivity. Additional bands, not stained with COU-1, were stained either with the anti-K8 mAb, the anti-K18 mAb, or both (Fig. 3A). All 10 bands were N-terminal sequenced, revealing that the bands, except one, corresponded to different forms of K8, K18, and K19 (Fig. 3B). The additional band was identified as migration inhibitory factor-related protein 8 (MRP8, also known as calretinin), a calcium-binding protein that has been suggested to bind cytokeratins (32). Most of the bands represented N-terminally truncated K8 or K18, with the identified amino acid sequence starting at residues 23-76. The N-terminal truncations of K8 corresponded to residues 23, 40, 66, and 76, whereas the truncations of K18 corresponded to residues 50 and 68. Significantly, the K8 and K18 truncations were found at the same residues in three different primary colon cancers and the human colon adenocarcinoma cell line colo137, indicating that the truncations were caused by specific proteases. Analysis of the sequences surrounding the cleavage sites suggests that at least two proteases are responsible for the cleavage, including one trypsin-like protease. The bands recognized by COU-1 were the N-terminally truncated K8 and K18. Interestingly, not all the N-terminally truncated K8 and K18 proteins were recognized by COU-1. For example, no COU-1 binding was observed to N-terminally truncated K8 protein where the first 22 amino acid was missing nor did the antibody react with intact K8 or K18. The latter two were identified by staining with K8 and K18 antibody, respectively (bands 1 and 3 in Fig. 3A), but not by N-terminal sequencing, because they were N-terminally blocked (K18 contains an acetylated serine at its N terminus).

View larger version (46K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3.   SDS-PAGE separation and N-terminal sequencing of cytokeratins purified from colon cancer tissue demonstrate N-terminally truncated K8, K18, and K19. A, PVDF membrane of SDS-PAGE-separated and purified cytokeratin stained with Coomassie Blue (a), with COU-1 (b), mouse anti-K8 antibody (c), and mouse anti-K18 antibody (d). B, N-terminal amino acid sequence of proteins isolated from colon cancer tissues. In addition, the reactivity of the different isolated cytokeratin fragments with the three antibodies is shown.

Mapping the COU-1 Epitope Using Complexes of Recombinant K8 and K18 Fragments-- To detail the nature of the epitope recognized by COU-1, it was mapped using a panel of recombinant intact as well as N- and C-terminally deleted K8 and K18 polypeptides expressed as GST fusion proteins (Fig. 4). Initially, the panels of K8 and K18 fragments were separated by SDS-PAGE and blotted onto PVDF membranes. To ensure that equal amounts of K8 and K18 polypeptide were loaded on the gels, gels run in parallel were stained with Coomassie Blue, and blots were stained with an anti-GST antibody (Figs. 5A and 6A). Subsequent analyses of Western blots with COU-1 surprisingly showed that COU-1 did not bind to any of the individual K8 or K18 fragments nor to the intact K8 or K18 molecules (Figs. 5B and 6B). In each experiment, MCF7 cell lysate was also included as a positive control, demonstrating bands at molecular masses of 41-46 kDa. Due to the control experiments, we could conclude that the lack of signal with COU1 was not due to insufficient amounts of K8 or K18 loaded on the gel or incomplete transfer of proteins. In addition, the panels of K8 or K18 fragments were recognized by conventional mAbs anti-K8 and anti-K18, respectively. The anti-K18 reacted strongly with K18-(1-356), K18-(1-385), and intact K18, but not with K18-(1-312), indicating that its epitope was located in the region 312-356 (Fig. 5C). We next examined the binding of COU-1 to heterotypic complexes of K8 and K18, which were formed by incubating Western blots of the panel of K18 fragments with intact purified K8 (Fig. 5D). COU-1 bound strongly to complexes formed between intact K8 and K18-(1-213) through K18-(1-385), only weakly to intact K8/K18-(1-187) and intact K8/intact K18, and no binding was seen to intact K8/K18-(1-72) and intact K8/K18-(1-124) (Fig. 5D). Likewise, blots containing the panels of K8 fragments were incubated with intact K18 before staining with COU-1, revealing strong staining of complexes formed between intact K18 and the K8 fragments K8-(1-129) through K8-(1-403). In contrast, COU-1 bound weakly to intact K8-(1-483)/intact K18 and not at all to K8-(1-65)/intact K18 or K8-(1-85)/intact K18 (Fig. 6C).

View larger version (27K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4.   Schematic representation of K8 and K18 N- and C-terminal deletion series. Shown is the secondary structure of the cytokeratin polypeptides, as predicted from the amino acid sequence, with a central rod domain flanked by a non-helical N-terminal head domain and a non-helical C-terminal tail domain. 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B are the -helical subdomains of the rod interspaced by linkers L1, L12, and L2. The fragment names indicate the starting and ending residues of the fragment. All fragments were expressed as GST fusion proteins. The reactivity of the fragments with COU-1 after incubation with the complementary keratin is shown in parentheses.

View larger version (34K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5.   Analysis of recombinant K18 fragments. A panel of C-terminally deleted K18 fragments expressed as GST fusion proteins were run in parallel on SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membranes, and stained with either a goat anti-GST antibody (A), COU-1 (B), or a mouse anti-K18 antibody (CY-90) (C). In addition, a PVDF membrane containing the SDS-PAGE-separated K18 fragments was incubated with purified intact K8 prior to staining with COU-1 (D).

View larger version (59K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6.   Analysis of recombinant K8 fragments. A panel of C-terminally deleted K8 fragments expressed as GST fusion proteins were run in parallel on SDS-PAGE, stained with Coomassie Blue (A), or transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were either directly stained with COU-1 (B) or incubated with purified intact K18 prior to staining with COU-1 (C).

Because the N-terminal sequencing demonstrated that both K8 and K18 in colon cancer were truncated, we wanted to study the binding of COU-1 to K8/K18 heterotypic complexes where both K8 and K18 were truncated. In parallel, Western blots containing the C-terminally deleted fragments surrounding the COU-1 epitope on K18 were incubated with K8 fragments surrounding the K8 part of the COU-1 epitope or intact K8. As shown in Fig. 7A, strong binding of COU-1 was observed to K18-(1-124)/K8-(1-129). In contrast, the epitope recognized by COU-1 is not, or only minimally, exposed on K18-(1-124)/intact K8 or K18-(1-124)/K8-(1-233) (Fig. 7, B and C). We also reversed the setup described above such that Western blots of the C-terminal deleted fragments of K8 were incubated with the fragments of K18 surrounding the COU-1 epitope. As shown in Fig. 7, D-F, the epitope recognized by COU-1 was equally exposed when K8-(1-129) was complexed with K18-(1-124), K18-(1-187), or K18-(1-213). No COU-1 binding was observed to any of the heterotypic complexes containing K8-(1-85) or K18-(1-72). Taken together, these results confirm that the epitope recognized by COU-1 involves the K8 region 85-129 and the K18 region 72-124. As shown in Figs. 4 and 8, this region involves the C-terminal part of the N-terminal head domain and the N-terminal part of the first helical domain, 1A, of the -helical rod domain of both K8 and K18. The results further demonstrate that this epitope is poorly exposed on heterotypic complexes of intact K8 and K18, even when intact K8 is complexed with K18-(1-124). As depicted in Fig. 8, the COU-1 epitope is revealed when the first domain, A1, of the -helical rod is not in its normal coiled-coil structure. This can be caused by truncation removing essential contact points for the existing association, leaving the COU-1 binding region of the K8/K18 complex in an unfolded state.

View larger version (75K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 7.   Generation of the COU-1 epitope. PVDF membrane blots containing SDS-PAGE-separated C-terminally deleted K18 or K8 fragments were incubated with different purified C-terminally deleted K8 or K18 fragments to allow the formation of K8/K18 complexes prior to staining with COU-1. A-C, the blots with recombinant K18 fragments deleted C-terminally in the proximity to the COU-1 epitope, K18-(1-72), K18-(1-124), K18-(1-187), and intact K18 were incubated with two different K8 fragments deleted C-terminally in the proximity to the COU-1 epitope, K8-(1-129) (A), K8-(1-233) (B), or intact K8 (C). The epitope recognized by COU-1 is absent or only minimally exposed on K18-(1-124)/intact K8, K18-(1-124)/K8-(1-233), or intact K18/intact K8. In contrast, strong binding of COU-1 was observed to K18-(1-124)/K8-(1-129). D-F, in the reverse setup, blots with K8 fragments C-terminally deleted in proximity to the COU-1 epitope K8-(1-85), K8-(1-129), K8-(1-233), and intact K8 were incubated with the fragments of K18 deleted in the proximity to the COU-1 epitope K18-(1-124) (D), K18-(1-187) (E), and K18-(1-213) (F). The epitope recognized by COU-1 was equally exposed when K8 fragment 1-129 was complexed with K18-(1-124), K18-(1-187), or K18-(1-213). No COU-1 binding was observed to any heterotypic complexes containing K8-(1-85) or K18-(1-72).

View larger version (28K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 8.   Schematic representation of the cleavage sites in the N-terminal head domains and the adjacent rod domains of K8/K18 heterotypic complex in cancer. The three-dimensional structure of K8 and K18 has not been resolved. A indicates the positions where K8 and K18 are proteolytically cleaved (arrows). The positions of the residues that are post-translationally phosphorylated (PO4, P) or glycosylated (GlcNAc, G) are also indicated. B indicates how removal of the N-terminal head domain, as observed in vivo in cancer cells and in vitro using recombinant K8/K18 complexes, may cause a conformational change allowing COU-1 to access its epitope. C-terminal deletion of the major part of one of the two cytokeratin proteins may also induce the COU-1 epitope, as shown by in vitro testing a panel of recombinant K8/K18 complexes.

COU-1 binding to a panel of heterotypic complexes consisting of N-terminally deleted K8 and K18, missing the first 129 amino acids or more (Fig. 4), combined with intact K8 and K18 were also tested using the heterotypic Western blot assay. However, in contrast to the results with the murine K8 and K18 mAbs, no COU-1 binding was observed to any of these N-terminally deleted heterotypic K8/K18 complexes, indicating that the COU-1 epitope was located within the N-terminal 129 residues (data not shown). Because the N-terminal sequencing data and the recombinant mapping data indicated that the COU-1 epitopes were well exposed when the first 65 amino acids of K8 and the first 49 amino acids of K18 were missing (Fig. 8), we generated two additional N-terminally deleted fragments, K8-(66-483) and K18-(50-430) as GST fusion proteins. As shown in Fig. 9, significantly stronger COU-1 binding was observed to K8-(66-483)/K18-(50-430) and K8-(66-483)/intact K18 than to intact K8/K18-(50-430) or intact K8/intact K18. Similar COU-1 binding was achieved with C- and N-terminally truncated K8/K18 fragments when the GST was removed from the fusion proteins by thrombin cleavage (data not shown).

View larger version (77K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 9.   COU-1 binding to heterotypic complexes containing N-terminally deleted K8/K18. Blots of SDS-PAGE-separated intact K8 or K8-(66-483) were incubated with purified K18-(50-430) (A) or intact K18 (B) prior to staining with COU-1. Likewise, blots of K18-(50-430) and intact K18 were incubated with purified K8-(66-483) (C) or intact K8 (D) prior to staining with COU-1. COU-1 strongly stained bands of about 75 kDa (K8/K18 proteins + the GST fusion protein) corresponding to K8-(66-483)/K18-(50-430) and K8-(66-483)/intact K18, whereas only weak staining was observed corresponding to intact K8/K18-(50-430) and intact K8/intact K18.

The COU-1 Epitope Is Not Exposed following K18 Cleavage by Adenovirus Proteinase-- The adenovirus L3 23-kDa proteinase promotes specific cleaving of the N-terminal domain of K18, while leaving K8 intact in adenovirus-infected HeLa cells (33, 34). This cleavage results in the removal of region 1-73 of the head domain of K18 and the disassembly of the cytokeratin network into spheroid globules. Cytokeratin K8/K18 from HeLa cells infected with adenovirus and from uninfected HeLa cells were purified and separated by SDS-PAGE. Coomassie Blue staining of the gel demonstrated an additional band with a molecular mass of 41 kDa in the adenovirus-infected HeLa cell preparation, corresponding to cleaved K18. Incubation of Western blots of the adenovirus-infected HeLa cells with COU-1 or anti-K8 or anti-K18 mAbs resulted in staining only with the anti-K8 or anti-K18 mAbs but not with COU-1 (data not shown), indicating that the cytokeratin fragments found in the adenocarcinomas were not a result of adenovirus infection.

K8 and K18 Polypeptides Associate in Vitro during Western Blot Processing-- The results above indicate that the COU-1 epitope is presented only by heterotypic K8/K18 complexes and not by individual K8 and K18 molecules. This appears to conflict with the observed COU-1 binding to cytokeratin on Western blots of SDS-separated cancer cell lysates where the K8/K18 complexes would be expected to remain dissociated. A possible explanation was that during the incubation steps, part of the different cytokeratins dissociate from the membrane and subsequently attach to and form stable heterotypic complexes with their complementary cytokeratin still bound to the membrane. To examine this hypothesis, half of a Western blot of colon cancer colo137 cell lysate was fixed with ethanol before incubation with the antibodies, whereas the other half was processed as usual without fixation. Staining was observed with mAb anti-K18 on both the fixed and the unfixed blots, whereas staining with COU-1 was observed only on the unfixed blot. Our earlier immunohistochemical studies showed that ethanol fixation of tissue sections had no effect on the COU-1 antigen. To confirm that the COU-1 epitope was not affected by the ethanol treatment, we simulated the staining of Western blots by dot blots of the cancer lysate with or without fixation and found staining with COU-1 on both. The conclusion from this series of experiments is that indeed formation of cytokeratin heterodimers takes place during the processing of the Western blot and that such heterodimer formation by partially truncated cytokeratin is required for the formation of the COU-1 epitope.

Affinity of COU-1 for Truncated and Intact Heterotypic K8/K18 Complexes-- COU-1 binding to the different recombinant heterotypic K8/K18 complexes was estimated by ELISA. Purified recombinant fragments of K8 or intact K8 were mixed with purified recombinant fragments of K18 or intact K18 in a molar ratio of 1:1 in urea. The samples were then dialyzed against PBS to allow the formation of the heterotypic complex and coated at 5 µg/ml on ELISA plates. Intact K8 was combined with K18-(1-124), K18-(1-187), K18-(1-213), and intact K18. In addition, intact K18 was combined with K8-(1-65), K8-(1-85), K8-(1-129), and K8-(1-233). In accordance with the results from Western blot analysis, COU-1 bound with various intensity to all the complexes, except to K8-(1-65)/intact K18 and intact K8-(1-85)/intact K18. Fig. 10 shows the titration of COU-1 on three of the heterotypic complexes, demonstrating significantly stronger binding to the fragmented K8/K18 than to the intact K8/K18 complexes.

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 10.   Binding of COU-1 to recombinant K8/K18 complexes evaluated by ELISA. Heterotypic complexes, generated by combining purified recombinant K8-(1-129) or intact K8 with purified recombinant K18-(1-124) or intact K18 in equimolar ratios, were coated at 5 µg/ml on ELISA plates and incubated with serial dilutions of COU-1. Bound COU-1 was detected with an AP-labeled anti-human  antibody and para-nitrophenyl phosphate.

We extended this inquiry by measuring the kinetic parameters for the binding of COU-1 to different recombinant heterotypic K8/K18 complexes by real time biospecific interaction analysis using the surface plasmon resonance technique. COU-1 exhibited high affinity binding to the heterotypic complexes of K8-(1-124)/intact K18 and K8-(1-124)/K18-(1-124). The kinetic parameters for K8-(1-124)/intact K18 were k_on = 1.7 × 10⁵ M¹ s¹, k_off = 1.2 × 10⁴ s¹, with derived association (K_a) and dissociation constants (K_d) of 1.4 × 10⁹ M¹ and 7.1 × 10¹⁰ M. The binding of COU-1 to K8-(1-124)/K18-(1-124) was slightly lower with k_on = 2.8 × 10⁵ M¹ s¹, k_off = 3 × 10⁴ s¹, with derived K_a of 9.5 × 10⁸ M¹ and K_d of 1.5 × 10⁹ M. In contrast, COU-1 exhibited an ~100-fold lower binding to intact K8/intact K18 with k_on = 9.1 × 10³ M¹ s¹, k_off = 5.0 × 10⁵ s¹, and K_a and K_d of 1.8 × 10⁷ M¹ and 5.5 × 10⁸ M, respectively.

Probing the Cellular Distribution of Truncated Heterotypic K8/K18 Complexes Using Confocal Microscopy-- To evaluate the cellular distribution of normal K8 and K18 compared with truncated K8/K18 heterotypic complexes, breast and colon cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and colo137) were costained with COU-1 and either mAb anti-K8 or anti-K18 and analyzed by high resolution confocal microscopy (Figs. 11 and 12). The melanoma cell line M21, known not to contain K8, K18, or K19, was included as control. Anti-K8 and anti-K18 both stained long fibers of IFs forming complex interconnecting networks in both adenocarcinoma cell lines. The fibers emanate from a perinuclear ring, from which the filaments appear to connect to the nuclear surface and extend throughout the cytoplasm, terminating at the plasma membrane. In contrast, COU-1 exhibited a speckled pattern in the two adenocarcinoma cell lines, with staining of short filament fragments and rod-like particles, indicative of fragmented IF. No staining with any of the three antibodies was observed in the melanoma cell line.

View larger version (55K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 11.   Subcellular distribution of N-terminally truncated K8/K18 recognized by COU-1 and intact K18 recognized by a murine anti-K18 antibody. Ethanol-fixed MCF7 breast cancer cells were incubated with COU-1 (A and E) and anti-K18 (B and F). Bound COU-1 was detected with FITC-goat anti-human -chain antibody (green) and bound anti-K18 with Texas Red goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (red). Differential interference contrast images (D and H) were included to visualize the composition of the cells. Partial colocalization, as visualized by yellow in the merged images (C and G), was observed between the two antibodies. N-terminally truncated K8/K18 complexes identified by COU-1 were predominantly found in newly formed, proliferating cancer cells (arrows), whereas stable K18 structures were present in equal quantities in all cells (arrowheads).

View larger version (66K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 12.   Subcellular distribution of N-terminal-truncated K8/K18 recognized by COU-1 and K18 recognized by a murine anti-K18 antibody in MCF7 breast cancer cells. Cells were processed and stained by COU-1 (A and E) and anti-K18 (B and F) as described in Fig. 11. Differential interference contrast images (D and H) were included to visualize the composition of the cells. Whereas whole intermediate filaments were stained with anti-K18 (arrowheads), COU-1 (arrows) only stained short fibrils and globular structures. Some colocalization of the two antibodies, as visualized by yellow in the merged images (C and G), was observed.

Examination of the staining pattern of MCF7 cells within cell clusters revealed that only the peripheral, newly formed, proliferating cells were strongly positive for COU-1, whereas all cells were stained with K8 and K18 mAbs (Fig. 11). Within the proliferating cells of a cluster, COU-1 staining was most prominent at the cell surface facing away from the cluster. In contrast, anti-K8 and anti-K18 stained the intermediate filamentous network throughout the cells. The speckled COU-1 staining was seen in close association to the intact intermediate filament network, as determined by overlay of images stained with COU-1 and anti-K8 or anti-K18 (Fig. 12).

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

In this study, we investigated the composition of cytokeratin heterotypic complexes found in malignant and normal glandular epithelia. N-terminally truncated forms of K8/K18 complexes were identified only in cancerous epithelia, whereas intact K8/K18 complexes were observed in both normal and cancerous simple glandular epithelia. Breakdown products of K8 and K18 in carcinomas have been observed by others (22, 35-37), but a detailed biochemical analysis of these breakdown products and their possible functional role in cancer cells has not been undertaken. Our finding that K8/K18 is cleaved in the N-terminal part of the two proteins at identical sites in cancers from different patients suggests that specific proteases are involved. We have found only one other study where K8 or K18 fragments from cancers were analyzed by N-terminal sequencing. That study identified truncated K8 missing the first 75 amino acids in a lung cancer, i.e. a truncation identical to one of those we observed (36). Examination of the amino acid sequences at the cleavage sites on K8 and K18 revealed some homology. The cleavage sites at amino acids 22 and 40 on K8, and at amino acid 50 on K18, all contained the (S/F/V)XSRX(S/V) consensus sequence, suggesting that the enzyme responsible for these cleavages is a trypsin-like protease. Analysis of the amino acid sequences in the vicinity of the cleavage sites revealed one other site on K8 that had the same general sequence (amino acid 32, GSRI) but was not cleaved. This suggests that the amino acids at P3 or P1' positions of the substrate are also influencing the recognition by this protease. We were unable to identify a consensus sequence (TAVT, SPLV, and TGIA) at the three remaining cleavage sites on K8 and K18. A protease that requires less stringent recognition conditions or several different proteases may be responsible for these cleavages. A possible candidate may be elastase, which accepts valine, leucine, and isoleucine in the P1 position. The possibility that these K8 and K18 fragments were generated during the purification of cytokeratin from the tissue samples cannot be excluded, but several observations indicate that this is unlikely. Degradation of cytokeratins by Ca²⁺-activated proteases, which on two-dimensional gel electrophoresis appears as a typical "staircase" pattern, has been described when nucleases were used for cytokeratin purification (37). However, nucleases were not used in our purification, and a mixture of five enzyme inhibitors was present at all times. Moreover, cytokeratin fragments were not observed following purification of cytokeratin from normal colon epithelia using identical purification conditions. Furthermore, COU-1, which only recognizes the truncated form of K8/K18, as discussed below, detects its epitope in cancerous but not in normal epithelia when tissue samples are minimally handled and immediately fixed.

In contrast to the earlier views, the maintenance of the cytokeratin network in epithelial cells is now known to be a dynamic process involving constant restructuring by assembly and disassembly of intermediate bundles (38). Microinjection of biotin-labeled cytokeratin or transfection with fluorescence-labeled cytokeratin has demonstrated an inward-directed flow of diffuse material at the cell periphery moving in the form of dots and thin filaments toward the deeper cytoplasm, where it coalesces with other filaments and filament bundles (39). Although this process occurs in both normal and malignant epithelial cells, our results and those of others (40) indicate the presence of a second degradation pathway specific for cancer cells. This pathway may be ubiquitin-dependent.

A second finding of this study was that a human antibody, COU-1, cloned from a tumor-draining lymph node of a colon cancer patient, specifically recognizes the N-terminal truncated form of K8 and K18 when the two cytokeratins form a heterotypic complex. Previous analyses (26, 41) of COU-1 reactivity were interpreted to indicate selective reaction with K18. The COU-1 epitope, in addition to being localized intracellularly, is also found on the cell surface of cancer cells (25). COU-1 as well as recombinant Fab COU-1 were internalized upon binding to the cells. Also other studies (24, 42, 42-44) have found modified K8 and K18 on the surface of cells and shown that they may act as putative receptors or cofactors to cellular receptors. Modified K8 exposed on the surface of breast cancer cells were thus found to bind plasminogen and tissue plasminogen activator (24, 42, 44), whereas K18 exposed on the surface of hepatocytes might act as a receptor for thrombin-antithrombin complexes (43).

Increased levels of intact and fragmented K8/K18, initially identified as tissue-polypeptide antigen, have been reported in sera of cancer patients, and several clinical studies have found increased levels of tissue-polypeptide antigen in various cancers, including colon, breast, and prostate (45-47). Furthermore, a kit (CYFRA 21-1, Roche Diagnostics) is currently being marketed in some parts of Europe for specific detection of a lung cancer-associated K19 fragment (48, 49). The assays used for these measurements have employed antibodies that recognize both the intact and the fragmented forms of K8, K18, and K19. It seems likely that the use of an antibody, such as COU-1, that specifically recognizes the cancer-associated cleaved K8/K18 would increase the specificity of such assays. It has been assumed that the circulating cytokeratin fragments were a result of tumor cell necroses, but intact and fragmented K8 and K18 are released by non-necrotic adenocarcinoma cell lines into the tissue culture media (22, 50). This suggest that K8/K18 are proteolytically cleaved in viable cancer cells and that active release of fragmented K8/K18 occurs, although a pathway for the export of these cytoplasmic proteins has not been identified. In agreement with this we found labeling of viable cells by COU-1. Costaining of cancer cells with COU-1 and conventional anti-K8 and anti-K18 demonstrated that COU-1 stained various fibrillar and spheroid structures closely associated with the CK8/CK18 network. Similar abnormal cytokeratin staining pattern was found by Bader et al. (12) when cytokeratin-devoid mouse 3T3-L1 cells were stably or transiently transfected with cDNA encoding K8 or K18 without the N-terminal head domain. The head and the tail domains are not thought to be part of the filamentous backbone but to protrude laterally and contribute to profilament and IF packing and to interact with other cellular components (10-12) Cytokeratins lacking the head and tail domains are capable of coiled-coil and higher order lateral interactions but are deficient in filament elongation (13, 51, 52). Thus, the headless K8 and 18 formed varying proportions of fibrillar and granular structures, including dispersed granules.

Proteolytic cleavage of K18 in association with apoptosis has been reported (53). However, the cleavage sites for the apoptotic proteases, caspase-3, -6, and -7, are located in the conserved L1-2 linker and in C-terminal tail domain and are quite distant to the N-terminal cleavage sites we have found in viable tumor tissue. Recently, an antibody (M30) was reported to recognize a neoepitope only exposed in apoptotic cancer cells and not viable or necrotic cells (54). This neoepitope is exposed when the C-terminal tail domain was liberated after cleavage by caspase-3, -6, or -7 into 26-, 22-, and 19-kDa fragments. The cleavage sites observed in colon cancer cells are also different from the one reported for adenovirus-infected HeLa cells, where the 73 most N-terminal amino acids of K18 were removed (33, 34). Surprisingly, no COU-1 binding to cleaved K8/K18 heterotypic complexes from infected HeLa cells was observed, whereas COU-1 bound K8/K18 complexes where the 67 most N-terminal amino acids of K18 were removed. This suggests that additional removal of 6 amino acids may cause conformational changes that prevent COU-1 from binding. Finally, changes in the K8/K18 heterotypic network have been observed in Mallory bodies, which are characteristic cytoplasmic inclusions in hepatocytes associated with alcoholic hepatitis and other chronic hepatocellular injuries including cholestasis and various metabolic disturbances (55-57). The Mallory bodies consist predominantly of K8 and variable amounts of K18 assembled in a nonfilamentous manner as well as nonkeratin components, such as the M_M120-1 antigen and ubiquitin. A murine mAb K_M54-5 that specifically recognizes a neoepitope as a result of these K8/K18 conformational changes has been reported (58). This epitope was present on both individual native K8 and K18 and only available for antibody binding when K8 and K18 were dissociated and thus seems to be distinct from to the COU-1 epitope.

In conclusion, our biochemical analyses show that a unique conformational neoepitope is generated in viable adenocarcinoma cells, but not in normal epithelia cells, upon specific proteolytic cleavage of the K8/K18 complex. The epitope is specifically recognized by a human monoclonal antibody COU-1 isolated from a cancer patient, which is one of the few human antibodies that have made it into clinical use, and showed successful imaging of tumors in colon cancer patients. The identification of the unique epitope elucidates the cancer selectivity of the antibody. An increasing body of evidence indicates that K8/K18 is intimately associated with cell migration and invasiveness, and fragmentation of K8/K18 may influence these processes. The missing N-terminal head domain of K8/K18 contains several important phosphorylation sites, including Ser-33 and Ser-52 on K18, which has been associated with filament reorganization and distribution and important for K18 binding to 14-3-3 proteins (59, 60). The biological implications of the N-terminal cleavage of K8/K18 and the identification of proteases involved in this process warrant further study.

	FOOTNOTES

^* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

^§ To whom correspondence and reprint request should be addressed: Dept. of Immunology, IMM2, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037. Tel.: 858-784-8157; Fax: 858-784-8360; E-mail: hditzel@scripps.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 28, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M202140200

	ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: IF, intermediate filaments; K8, cytokeratin 8; K18, cytokeratin 18; HmAb, human monoclonal antibody; mAb, monoclonal antibody; FCS, fetal calf serum; AP, alkaline phosphatase; QFF, Q-Sepharose fast flow; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride membranes; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; GST, glutathione S-transferase.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES