Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M200113200 on April 4, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 24, 21730-21739, June 14, 2002
The Human Papillomavirus 16 E6 Protein Binds to Tumor Necrosis
Factor (TNF) R1 and Protects Cells from TNF-induced Apoptosis*
Maria
Filippova
,
Helen
Song
,
Jodi L.
Connolly§¶
,
Terence S.
Dermody§¶**, and
Penelope J.
Duerksen-Hughes

From the
Department of Biochemistry and
Microbiology, Center for Molecular Biology and Gene Therapy, Loma
Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California 92354 and
the Departments of § Microbiology and Immunology and
** Pediatrics and the ¶ Elizabeth B. Lamb Center for
Pediatric Research, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine,
Nashville, Tennessee 37232
Received for publication, January 4, 2002, and in revised form, March 27, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
High risk strains of human papillomavirus
(HPV), such as HPV 16, cause human cervical carcinoma. The E6 protein
of HPV 16 mediates the rapid degradation of p53, although this is not
the only function of E6 and cannot completely explain its transforming potential. Previous work in our laboratory has demonstrated that transfection of HPV 16 E6 into the tumor necrosis factor
(TNF)-sensitive LM cell line protects expressing cells from TNF-induced
apoptosis in a p53-independent manner, and the purpose of this study
was to determine the molecular mechanism underlying this protection. Caspase 3 and caspase 8 activation were significantly reduced in
E6-expressing cells, indicating that E6 acts early in the TNF apoptotic
pathway. In fact, E6 binds directly to TNF R1, as shown both by
co-immunoprecipitation and mammalian two-hybrid approaches. E6 requires
the same C-terminal portion of TNF R1 for binding as does TNF
R1-associated death domain, and TNF R1/TNF R1-associated death domain
interactions are decreased in the presence of E6. HA-E6 also blocked
cell death triggered by transfection of the death domain of TNF R1.
Together, these results provide strong support for a model in which HPV
E6 binding to TNF R1 interferes with formation of the death-inducing
signaling complex and thus with transduction of proapoptotic signals.
They also demonstrate that HPV, like several other viruses, has
developed a method for evading the TNF-mediated host immune response.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
High risk strains of human papillomavirus
(HPV),1 such as HPV 16, cause most cases of human cervical carcinoma (reviewed in Ref. 1). HPV
16 codes for two oncogenes, E6 and E7. The E7 protein functions by
binding to and inactivating the tumor suppressor protein Rb, while E6
is best known for mediating the rapid degradation of the tumor
suppressor p53. Whereas this activity clearly contributes to the
oncogenic potential of E6, this viral protein has additional biological
and transforming activities that appear to be independent of p53
(2-10). Mechanisms of E6 action probably involve interaction with
cellular proteins, and indeed, the HPV E6 protein has been reported to
interact with a number of cellular proteins in addition to p53 and
E6-AP (reviewed in Ref. 11). These include proteins involved in the
regulation of transcription and DNA replication, such as
p300/CREB-binding protein (12, 13), IRF-3 (14), hMcm7 (15, 16), and
E6TP1 (17); proteins involved in apoptosis such as Bak (18) and c-Myc
(19); proteins involved with epithelial organization and
differentiation such as paxillin (20) and E6BP/ERC-55 (21); and
proteins involved in cell-cell adhesion, polarity, and proliferation
control that contain a PDZ binding motif
(X(T/S)XV) such as hDLG (22, 23), hScrib
(24), MAGI-1 (25, 26), and MUPP1 (27). However, for most of these
binding partners, the effect of the E6 interactions on the virus life
cycle or its capacity to transform host cells is not well understood.
Another area not yet well understood is the molecular mechanism(s)
underlying the lack of a vigorous immune response to papillomavirus infections. Papillomaviruses are persistent viruses that remain in
their hosts for long periods of time and elicit a weak or undetectable specific immune response and little or no inflammatory response. It may
well be that one or more of the interactions between virus and cellular
proteins contribute to this evasion of the host immune response.
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is capable of inducing apoptosis of cells
infected by some viruses (reviewed in Ref. 28). Current understanding
of molecular mechanisms responsible for TNF-mediated apoptosis begins
with the binding of the trimeric TNF molecule to the 55-kDa TNF
receptor 1 (TNF R1). This initiates interactions between TNF
R1-associated death domain (TRADD) and Fas-associated death domain
(FADD), which in turn interact with procaspase 8 (FLICE) to activate
the caspase cascade, ultimately resulting in apoptosis (for reviews,
see Refs. 23-25). The complex responsible for initiating this process
is known as the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC). TNF does not
induce apoptosis of every cell to which it binds; in fact, most cells
are protected (29). The reason for this is that TNF also triggers a
separate, protective pathway involving activation of NF-
B
transcription factor family members, which counteracts the cytolytic
actions of TNF in many cells (30, 31). The effect of TNF on a given
cell, therefore, is determined by the activity in both the proapoptotic
and the prosurvival pathways.
In previous work, we found that transfection of HPV 16 E6 into
TNF-sensitive mouse fibroblast LM cells resulted in a blockade of
TNF-induced apoptosis by a p53-independent mechanism (32). In this
study, we tested the hypothesis that E6 mediates this apoptosis
blockade by interacting with one or more proteins in pathways triggered
by TNF signaling. We demonstrated that E6 interacts with TNF R1 and
interferes with its capacity to bind TRADD and to transmit a
proapoptotic signal. These findings provide a mechanistic explanation
for the capacity of E6 to protect cells from TNF-triggered cell death
and also suggest that papillomaviruses have developed a way to evade
this arm of the host immune system.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Reagents--
Lyophilized human recombinant TNF-
(R & D
Systems, Minneapolis, MN), was dissolved into serum-free minimal
essential medium to yield a 1 µg/ml stock, aliquoted, and stored at
80 °C until use.
3-[4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT)
(Sigma) was dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline to yield a 5 mg/ml
stock and stored at 4 °C until use. Mitomycin C (Sigma) was
dissolved in Me2SO to yield a 5 mg/ml stock and
stored at 4 °C until use. Cycloheximide (Sigma) was prepared as a 5 mg/ml stock and stored in aliquots at
20 °C prior to use.
C2-ceramide (Biomol, Plymouth Meeting, PA) was dissolved in
Me2SO to yield a 25 mM stock solution and stored at
20 °C prior to use. Anti-HA was obtained from Roche Molecular Biochemicals.
Cell Culture--
LM (mouse fibroblast), U2OS (human
osteosarcoma), U937 (human histiocyte/monocyte), and NIH3T3 (mouse
fibroblast) cells were obtained from the ATCC (Manassas, VA). LME6
cells were derived by co-transfection of LM cells with pSV2neo an
pSG16E6, which encodes the E6 gene from HPV 16 (32). LM and NIH3T3
cells were cultured in minimal essential medium (Invitrogen).
LME6 cells were cultured in minimal essential medium containing G418
(800 µg/ml) (Invitrogen). U937 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640, and U20S cells were cultured in McCoy's 5A medium (Invitrogen). All culture medium was supplemented to contain 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen).
Plasmids--
pSV2neo contains a gene for G418 resistance (33).
pSG5 is a eukaryotic constitutive expression vector (Stratagene, La
Jolla, CA) that includes the early region SV40 promoter for in
vivo expression and the T7 promoter for in vitro
transcription. pSG16E6 (a gift from Lamonis Laimins, Northwestern
University Medical School, Chicago, IL) is derived from pSG5 and
incorporates the wild-type sequence from the E6 gene of HPV type 16.
A plasmid expressing epitope-tagged HPV 16 E6 was generated by first
inserting the cytomegalovirus promoter (from pC1 neo, Promega, Madison,
WI) into the BglII-EcoRI site of the promoterless plasmid pEGFP-1 (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA). The PCR
product of E6 (derived from plasmid pSG16E6) was then cloned into HA
tag Bluescript KS in both the sense and antisense orientations, and the
sense and antisense versions of HA-E6 were then cloned into the pEGFP-1
plasmid by exchange with enhanced green fluorescent protein at the
XhoI-NotI site. The resulting plasmids then had the HA epitope tag appended to the N terminus of E6 in either the sense
(pHA-E6 S) or the antisense orientation (pHA-E6 AS).
The pNF-
B-luciferase plasmid (pNF
B-Luc) includes the consensus
sequence for NF-
B binding fused to the sequence encoding firefly
luciferase (Stratagene). pE-CMV-SEAP was constructed by exchanging the
green fluorescent protein reporter gene from plasmid pEGFP-1
(CLONTECH) with the gene encoding secreted alkaline
phosphatase (SEAP) from the plasmid pSEAP-enhancer
(CLONTECH). The SEAP
XhoI-XbaI fragment was cloned into the pEGFP-1
XhoI-NotI site after blunting the XbaI
and NotI sites using the Klenow fragment. The
cytomegalovirus promoter was cloned from pC1-neo (Promega)
(BglII-EcoRI) into the
BglII-EcoRI site of the pE-SEAP plasmid.
The gene encoding the death domain of human TNF R1 (gift of Carl Ware,
La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology) was cloned into the
HindIII site of the pVP16 plasmid from the Mammalian Two-Hybrid System (CLONTECH) in frame with the
activation domain. This plasmid, pVPTNF R1 DD, codes for amino acids
185-456 and was used to test the binding of E6 and TRADD to the TNF R1
death domain. Removal of the SacII-XbaI fragment,
coding for the C-terminal 41 amino acids and including the putative E6
binding site, created a plasmid coding for a truncated version of the
TNF R1 death domain (amino acids 185-415; pVP TNF R1
DD). Human
TRADD (gift from Carl Ware, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and
Immunology) and E6 (PCR product as described above) were cloned into
the pM plasmid from the CLONTECH Mammalian
Two-Hybrid System to generate pMTRADD and pME6, respectively.
Transfections--
Transfections were carried out using Fugene
VI (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), as directed by the
manufacturer. For transient transfections, cells were analyzed 48 h post-transfection. For stable transfections, clones were passaged
into selection medium containing G418 (500 µg/ml) 72 h
post-transfection. Individual clones were selected, grown, and analyzed
for protein expression by immunoblotting.
Treatment of Cells with TNF, Mitomycin C, and Ceramide--
To
measure cell survival following TNF treatment, cells were seeded into
96-well plates (1 × 104 cells/well) and allowed to
adhere overnight. TNF (final concentration of 1 or 5 ng/ml) was then
added in the presence or absence of cycloheximide (final concentration
as noted for individual experiments), and the cells were incubated for
16 h prior to measuring the number of viable cells by the MTT
assay (described below).
To determine the ability of cells to accumulate increased levels of p53
following DNA damage, cells were treated with mitomycin C and assayed
for the resulting p53 levels. Cells were seeded into 24-well plates
(1 × 105 cells/well) and allowed to adhere overnight.
Approximately 24 h later, mitomycin C was added to a final
concentration of 10 µg/ml medium. 16 h later, cells were
harvested, and the lysates were analyzed for p53 by ELISA (described below).
To determine cell survival following ceramide treatment, cells were
seeded into 96-well plates (2 × 104 cells/well, 50 µl total volume) and allowed to adhere overnight. For the adherent
U2OS cells, the medium was then removed and replaced with medium
supplemented to contain 2% serum. For the U937-derived cells
(suspension), serum-free medium was added to each well to yield a final
serum concentration of 2% (total volume of 250 µl). Ceramide was
then added to the indicated final concentration, and cells were
incubated for 16 h prior to measurement of the number of viable
cells by the MTT assay.
Cell Death Assay--
The cell death detection ELISA (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) was used to measure mono- and oligonucleosomes
in the cytoplasmic fraction of cell lysates according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Cell lysates were added to wells to which
the anti-histone antibody had been fixed adsorptively. Nucleosomes in
the sample bound via their histone components to the immobilized
anti-histone antibody. Anti-DNA peroxidase, which binds to the DNA
portion of the nucleosomes, was then added. The amount of bound
peroxidase was determined photometrically by measuring absorbance at
405 nm after the addition of 2,2'-azino-di(3-ethylbenzthiazolin
sulfonate) as substrate. Each point was measured in triplicate, and
results were normalized to the untreated control. Because the different
cell lines each displayed different levels of background cell death,
this normalization provided a better comparison between the lines.
Cell Viability Assay--
Two different versions of the MTT
assay were used: one for adherent cells (LM and U2OS-derived cells) and
one for suspension cells (U937-derived cells). For adherent cells, the
incubation medium was removed and exchanged for 80 µl of fresh
medium. 20 µl of MTT was then added (5 mg/ml stock), and cells were
incubated at 37 °C for 3 h. The medium was removed, and 150 µl of Me2SO was added and allowed to incubate for 10 min.
The solution was mixed by pipetting, and the absorbance of each well
was determined at 490 nm.
For suspension cells, plates were centrifuged (1000 rpm for 10 min) to
pellet the cells near the bottom of the wells. The top 240 µl of
medium was removed, leaving 60 µl/well, and 15 µl of MTT (5 mg/ml
stock) was added. The cells were incubated at 37 °C for 3 h.
Two volumes (150 µl) of isopropyl alcohol/HCl (400 µl of HCl
plus 100 ml of isopropanol) was added, and the cells were
incubated for 10 min. The solution was mixed by pipetting, and the
absorbance of each well was determined at 490 nm.
Immunoblot Assays--
Cells (2 × 106) were
lysed in 100 µl of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 1 µM dithiothreitol, 100 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride). One tablet of protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) per 10 ml of buffer was added just prior to use. The
protein concentration in cleared lysates was measured using the BCA
assay (Pierce). Lysates (40 µg/lane) were subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE
and transferred to Immobilon P membranes (Millipore Corp.). After
treating membranes with 5% nonfat milk or 1% BSA, rat anti-HA
peroxidase-conjugated antibodies (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) were
applied (1:500 dilution or 0.05 µg/ml in TBST (50 mM
Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Tween 20)). After
incubation with rocking (room temperature, 2 h), membranes were
washed with TBST. Detection of HA-E6 protein was performed using the
chemiluminescent SuperSignal West Femto or Pico Maximum Sensitivity
substrate (Pierce). To detect TNF R1, membranes were probed with
monoclonal anti-TNF R1 (H-5) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa
Cruz, CA), diluted at 1:1000 in TBST plus 1% BSA, followed by
ImmunoPure Antibody (anti-mouse) conjugated with horseradish peroxidase
(Pierce). Detection of the truncated TNF R1 death domain fused to VP16
was achieved using monoclonal anti-VP16 (14-5) (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) as the primary antibody (1:300 dilution in TBST plus 1%
BSA) and ImmunoPure Antibody (anti-mouse) conjugated with horseradish
peroxidase (Pierce) as the secondary antibody.
Immunoprecipitations--
Cells (2-5 × 106)
were lysed in 500 µl of lysis buffer, and cleared lysates were
incubated with 2 µg of either monoclonal anti-HA antibody (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) or anti-p53 (DO-7) antibody (Novacastra
Laboratories) at 4 °C for 1 h with rotation. Protein A-agarose
slurry (50 µl) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was added to each lysate,
and lysates were incubated for 3 h at 4 °C. The protein A
slurry was then washed three times with lysis buffer, followed by one
wash with high salt buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM EDTA, 1 µM dithiothreitol) and one wash with buffer lacking NaCl.
The precipitates were fractionated by 12% SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotting
was performed as described above.
Reverse Transcriptase-PCR--
The reverse transcriptase
polymerase chain reaction was used to analyze the U2OS and U2OSE617
cell lines for the presence of message coding for E6. 3.5 µg of total
RNA was isolated from each cell line and used as a template. cDNA
was synthesized using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase
(Invitrogen) and an oligo(dT) primer (Amersham Biosciences). Primers
for the 5' and 3' ends of E6 (5'-GCACCAAAAGAGAACTGCAATGT-3' and
5'-TGGGTTTCTCTACGTGTTCTTGAT-3') were used to amplify the
468-nucleotide PCR product for the E6 cDNA, using one-twentieth of
the total cDNA reaction mixture. To control for possible
contamination by genomic DNA, parallel reactions were run using 0.175 µg of total RNA in the absence of the reverse transcriptase enzyme.
Reaction mixtures were separated on a 4.5% NuSieve GTG-agarose gel
(FMC BioProducts).
p53 ELISA--
Cells were assayed for p53 by ELISA as described
previously (34). Cells were lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM
Na2HPO4, 17 mM NaH2PO4, 68 mM NaCl, 1% Triton
X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, pH 7.4, with 1% aprotinin
added before use), and lysates were stored at
80 °C for no more
than 1 week prior to analysis. Monoclonal antibody pAB122 (hybridoma
obtained from ATCC; antibodies were purified from the culture
medium using protein A-Sepharose) was used as the primary or capture
antibody, biotinylated anti-p53 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) was used
as the detection antibody, and glutathione S-transferase-p53
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used as a standard. Each sample was
measured in triplicate, and the results were normalized to the amount
of protein present in each sample. Protein concentration was determined
by the bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA assay) (Pierce).
Caspase 3 and 8 Assays--
Cells (LM, LME6, U2OS, or U2OSE612)
were plated onto 100-mm plates at a density of 2-5 × 106 cells/plate and incubated overnight. TNF (1 ng/ml for
LM and LME6 cells; 5 ng/ml for U2OS and U2OSE612 cells) was added,
along with cycloheximide (5 µg/ml) in the case of the U2OS and
U2OSE612 cells. Cells were harvested by trypsinization at designated
intervals and lysed in 160 µl of Caspase 3 Lysis Buffer (Sigma).
Protein concentrations were measured using the BCA method (Pierce).
Caspase 3 activity was measured using the Caspase 3 Colorimetric Assay
Kit (Sigma) as directed by the manufacturer. Cell lysates (20 µl for
the LM and LME6 cells; 25 µl for the U2OS and U2OSE612 cells) were
incubated with substrate (Ac-DEVD-pNA) in the presence or
absence of the caspase 3 inhibitor Ac-DEVD-CHO. Absorbance at 405 nm
was determined ~3 h following initiation of the reaction. The
activity in wells treated with inhibitor was subtracted from the
activity in untreated wells, and the activity was normalized to the
amount of protein present in each sample. Caspase 3 activity in treated
samples was expressed as a percentage of caspase 3 activity in the
untreated parental cells. Three plates of treated and untreated cells
were measured for each time point.
Caspase 8 activity was measured using the Caspase 8 Assay Kit
(Calbiochem) according to the manufacturer's instructions, using 50 µl of cell lysate per well, using IETD-pNA as the
colorimetric substrate, and in the presence or absence of the caspase 8 inhibitor Ac-IETD-CHO. Absorbance at 405 nm was determined ~6 h
following initiation of the reaction, and calculations were performed
as described for the caspase 3 assay.
Co-immunoprecipitations--
U2OSE612 cells (5 × 106) were either untreated or treated with TNF (5 ng/ml)
plus cycloheximide (5 µg/ml) and lysed using 500 µl of lysis
buffer. Cleared lysates were incubated with 2 µg of monoclonal
anti-HA antibody or DO-7 anti-p53 antibody for 1 h at 4 °C with
rotation. Protein A-agarose slurry (50 µl) was added to each lysate,
and lysates were incubated for 3 h. Each sample was washed three
times with the lysis buffer, followed by one wash with high salt buffer
(50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 0.1%
Nonidet P-40, 1 mM EDTA, 1 µM dithiothreitol)
and one wash with the high salt buffer lacking NaCl. The precipitates
were fractionated by 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a membrane, and TNF R1 was detected by immunoblot using monoclonal anti-TNF R1 antibodies.
Mammalian Two-hybrid Binding Assay--
The mammalian two-hybrid
binding assay was performed according to the manufacturer's
instructions (CLONTECH). cDNAs encoding E6,
TRADD, the C-terminal region of TNF R1 (990-1541 bp, including the
death domain), and fragment 990-1414 bp of the TNF R1 were cloned into
the pVP16 and pM vectors. The indicated combinations of vectors were
then transfected into U2OS cells (5 × 105/well,
six-well plates) along with the CAT-expressing reporter plasmid using
FuGene VI (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) as directed by the
manufacturer. 48 h following transfection, CAT activity was
measured colorimetrically using a commercially available CAT-ELISA kit
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals) as directed by the manufacturer.
NF-
B Assays--
The electrophoretic mobility shift assay for
NF-
B activation was performed as described previously (35, 36). LM
and LME6 cells (5 × 106) grown in 75-ml tissue
culture flasks were either untreated or treated with TNF (1 ng/ml) and
incubated for 16 h. Nuclear extracts were prepared, and 10 µg of
nuclear extract protein was incubated with a 32P-labeled
oligonucleotide consisting of the NF-
B consensus binding sequence
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology) (0.5 µg) at 4 °C for 20 min. Nucleoprotein complexes were subjected to electrophoresis on native 5%
polyacrylamide gels, dried under vacuum, and exposed to Biomax MR film
(Eastman Kodak Co.).
For the reporter gene assay, cells (4 × 104/well)
were plated onto 24-well plates and allowed to adhere overnight. Cells
were then cotransfected with pNF-
B-luciferase and pE-CMV-SEAP (for normalization of transfection efficiency) using Fugene 6 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) according to the manufacturer's protocol. 48 h post-transfection, the culture medium was changed, and TNF (2 ng/ml) was added to half the wells. Medium was again changed 16 h
following TNF treatment. SEAP activity was measured in 20 µl of
conditioned media using a commercially available assay kit (CLONTECH) following 2 h of SEAP secretion.
The cells were then lysed, and the level of luciferase expression in
cell lysates was determined using the Luciferase Assay System (Promega)
according to the manufacturer's protocol. Cells were washed twice with
phosphate-buffered saline and lysed in 100 µl of lysis buffer
(supplied with kit). Prepared Luciferase Assay Substrate (50 µl) was
then mixed with 20 µl of cell lysate, and the luminescent signal was
measured using a Turner luminometer. The level of luciferase expression was normalized to the level of SEAP activity and reported as a percentage of the activity in untreated cells.
 |
RESULTS |
Transfection of HPV 16 E6 into Mouse and Human Cells Provides
Protection from TNF-triggered Cell Death--
Our laboratory has
previously shown that TNF-sensitive, mouse fibroblast LM cells are
protected from TNF-induced cell death by the HPV 16 E6 protein in a
p53-independent manner (32). In contrast to the LM cells, NIH3T3 mouse
fibroblast cells must be treated with cycloheximide or actinomycin D to
become sensitive to TNF. To determine whether E6 can protect NIH3T3
cells as well from TNF-induced apoptosis, NIH3T3 cells were
co-transfected with pSV2neo and either the empty plasmid pSG5 or the
E6-encoding plasmid pSG16E6. Pools of stably transfected cells were
selected and either untreated or treated with TNF and/or cycloheximide.
The extent of apoptosis was assessed using the Cell Death ELISA (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) (Fig. 1). The
results demonstrate that cells transfected with pSG16E6 are protected
from treatment with TNF and cycloheximide in comparison with those
transfected with the empty plasmid.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
E6-mediated protection from TNF is not
limited to LME6 cells. NIH3T3 cells were transfected with the
indicated plasmids and subjected to selection with G418. The resulting
stable pools were untreated or treated with TNF (1 ng/ml),
cycloheximide (25 µg/ml), or a combination of TNF and cycloheximide.
After incubation for 16 h, cell death was assayed using the Cell
Death ELISA.
|
|
To provide further evidence for the protective effects of E6 and to
obtain sets of stably transfected, clonal human cell lines for further
study, we transfected a plasmid encoding epitope-tagged E6 (HA-E6) into
the human U937 cell line (histiocyte/monocyte). An epitope-tagged,
antisense version of E6 was used as a negative control. Following
selection in the presence of G418, individual clones were isolated.
Clones were screened for expression of the transfected protein (HA-E6)
by immunoblotting and tested for apoptosis in response to TNF. Although
these cells are somewhat sensitive to TNF in the absence of
cycloheximide, their sensitivity increases significantly in the
presence of the protein synthesis inhibitor. Cycloheximide was
therefore included in the culture medium in order to provide a more
stringent test of the ability of E6 to protect cells from TNF.
Untransfected U937 cells as well as a clone expressing the sense
version of HA-E6 (U937E61) and a clone transfected with the antisense
version of HA-E6 (U937AS) were therefore treated with either
cycloheximide alone or cycloheximide plus TNF for 16 h, and the
number of viable cells was measured by the MTT assay (Fig.
2A). As expected, the clone
transfected with the antisense version of HA-E6 was as susceptible to
TNF as was the parental line. However, the clone transfected with the
sense version of HA-E6 experienced protection from TNF. Expression of
the HA-E6 protein in the U937E61 cell line was confirmed by immunoprecipitation (Fig. 2B).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
HPV 16 E6 provides protection to human U937
cells from TNF-induced cell death. U937 cells were transfected
with either sense or antisense versions of epitope-tagged HA-E6, and
stably expressing clones were selected and characterized.
A, the response of U937-derived clones to TNF. Untransfected
U937 cells or cells stably expressing either sense (U937E61) or
antisense (U937AS) versions of epitope-tagged HA-E6 were treated with
cycloheximide alone (1 µg/ml) (open bars) or
with cycloheximide plus TNF (5 ng/ml) (closed
bars). After 16 h of incubation, the percentage of
viable cells was determined by the MTT assay. Measurements were made in
triplicate, and the error bars represent the S.D. B,
expression of HA-E6 in U937-derived clones. The indicated cells were
lysed, and the expression of HA-E6 was detected by immunoprecipitation
using anti-HA antibodies.
|
|
Similar experiments were performed with the U2OS cell line. As
anticipated, expression of the sense version of HA-E6 (U2OSE62, U2OSE612, and U2OSE617), but not the antisense version of the protein
(U2OSAS) provided protection from TNF-triggered cell death (Fig.
3A). Untransfected U2OS cells
as well as the three clones transfected with HA-E6 were analyzed for
expression of HA-E6 by immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation (Fig.
3B, top and middle panels).
Whereas no reactive band was found in lysates of U2OS by either
technique, as expected, clones U2OSE62 and U2OSE612 gave strong signals
at the expected migration position for HA-E6. Clone U2OSE617 gave a
weak signal by immunoblotting but no detectable signal in the
immunoprecipitation analysis, suggesting that the amount of HA-E6
expressed in this clone was less than that expressed in clone U2OSE62
or U2OSE612. To confirm the expression of E6 in the U2OSE617 cells,
reverse transcriptase-PCR was performed (Fig. 3B,
bottom panel). Interestingly, even the more
modest expression of E6 in U2OSE617 was sufficient to inhibit
TNF-induced apoptosis.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
HPV 16 E6 provides protection to human U2OS
cells from TNF-induced cell death. U2OS cells were transfected
with either sense or antisense versions of epitope-tagged HA-E6, and
stably expressing clones were selected and characterized. A,
the response of U2OS-derived clones to TNF. Untransfected U2OS cells or
cells stably expressing either sense (U2OSE62, U2OSE612, U2OSE617) or
antisense (U2OSAS) versions of epitope-tagged HA-E6 were treated with
cycloheximide alone (10 µg/ml) (open bars) or
with cycloheximide plus TNF (5 ng/ml) (closed
bars). After incubation for 16 h, the percentage of
viable cells was determined by the MTT assay. Measurements were made in
triplicate, and the error bars represent the S.D.
B, expression of HA-E6 in U2OS-derived clones. The indicated
cells were lysed, and the expression of HA-E6 was detected by
immunoblotting (top panel) and
immunoprecipitation (middle panel), using anti-HA
antibodies. Expression of HA-E6 in U2OSE617 was confirmed by reverse
transcriptase-PCR, with lanes 1 and 3 serving as negative controls for possible contamination by genomic DNA
(bottom panel). The arrows indicate
the expected migration position of the indicated products.
C, biological activity of HA-E6. The level of p53 was
measured in the indicated clones before and after treatment with
mitomycin C by ELISA. Measurements were made in duplicate, and the
error bars represent the S.D.
|
|
Following DNA damage, the cellular level of the p53 tumor suppressor
typically increases severalfold and activates genes involved in DNA
repair, blockage of the cell cycle, and the induction of apoptosis,
thus preventing the replication of damaged DNA. One of the best
characterized activities of the E6 oncogene is to mediate the rapid
degradation of the p53 tumor suppressor. To verify that the
epitope-tagged HA-E6 protein is biologically active and able to degrade
p53, we treated HA-E6-expressing and -nonexpressing cells with the
DNA-damaging agent mitomycin C and measured the resulting p53 levels.
When untransfected U2OS cells were treated with mitomycin C, the level
of p53 increased ~10-fold (Fig. 3C). However, this
increase in p53 was abolished in U2OS-derived cells expressing E6
(U2OSE62 and U2OSE612). Clone U2OSE617 expressed a reduced but still
detectable level of p53 following mitomycin C treatment, most likely
due to reduced levels of E6 in these cells (Fig. 3B). These
results indicate that the transfected HA-E6, like wild-type E6, is able
to significantly decrease the level of cellular p53.
HPV 16 E6 Suppresses Caspase 3 Activation--
One possible
explanation for the ability of E6 to protect expressing cells from TNF
was that it interfered with the TNF-triggered apoptotic pathway.
Therefore, we investigated whether E6 is capable of inhibiting caspase
3 activation. LM and LME6 cells were treated with TNF for various
intervals and lysed. The lysates were assayed for caspase 3 activation
using a colorimetric assay (Fig.
4A). The results demonstrate
that TNF treatment results in activation of caspase 3 in LM cells, with
a maximum level observed at about 12 h. However, no such
activation was observed after TNF treatment of LME6 cells. Similar
results were obtained in experiments using the U2OS and U2OSE612 cells
(Fig. 4B). Caspase 3 was activated by TNF earlier in U2OS
cells than in LM cells (3 versus 12 h), probably due to
the inclusion of cycloheximide in the assays using U2OS and U2OSE612
cells. These results indicate that the influence of HPV 16 E6 on the
TNF pathway occurs at or prior to the activation of caspase 3.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Caspase 3 and 8 activation is suppressed in
E6-expressing cells. A, LM and LME6 cells were treated
with TNF (1 ng/ml) for the times indicated and then lysed. Lysates were
analyzed for caspase 3 activity using Ac-DEVD-pNA as
substrate in the presence and absence of the caspase 3 inhibitor
Ac-DEVD-CHO. The activity in wells containing the inhibitor was
subtracted from that in wells lacking the inhibitor and then normalized
for the amount of protein added to each well. Activity is expressed as
the percentage of caspase activity in untreated LM cells. Each time
point was measured in triplicate, and error bars
represent the S.D. B, U2OS and U2OSE612 cells were treated
with TNF (5 ng/ml) plus cycloheximide (5 µg/ml) for the times
indicated and then lysed. Lysates were analyzed for caspase 3 activity
as described for A. Activity is expressed as the percentage
of caspase activity in untreated U2OS cells. Each point was measured in
triplicate, and error bars represent the S.D.
C, U2OS and U2OSE612 cells were treated with TNF (5 ng/ml)
plus cycloheximide (5 µg/ml) for the times indicated and then lysed.
Lysates were analyzed for caspase 8 activity using a colorimetric assay
kit, with IETD-pNA as substrate and Ac-IETD-CHO as
inhibitor. The activity in wells containing the inhibitor was
subtracted from that in wells lacking the inhibitor and then normalized
for the amount of protein added to each well. Activity is expressed as
the percentage of caspase activity in untreated U2OS cells. Each point
was measured in triplicate, and error bars
represent the S.D.
|
|
HPV 16 E6 Suppresses Caspase 8 Activation--
Caspase 8 acts
upstream of caspase 3 in the TNF-triggered apoptotic pathway. To
determine whether E6 influences activation of caspase 8, we assayed its
activity in U2OS and U2OSE612 cells before and after treatment with TNF
plus cycloheximide (Fig. 4C). The results indicate that
expression of E6 suppresses activation of caspase 8 in U2OS cells.
Therefore, E6 blocks caspase 8 activation, suggesting that E6 blocks
signals that emerge from the TNF receptor.
HPV 16 E6 Binds to the TNF R1--
To examine the possibility that
E6 binds directly to TNF R1, we immunoprecipitated proteins from
lysates of U2OS cells stably expressing HAE6 using antibodies directed
against either p53 or HA. Anti-p53 was chosen as an irrelevant antibody
to be used as a negative control, since these cells do not express p53
due to E6 expression. Precipitated proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to a membrane, and immunoblotted using antibodies directed
against either the TNF R1 or HA (Fig.
5A). In a separate experiment,
the blotting antibody proved capable of identifying an in
vitro transcription and translation product for the full-length TNF R1, as well as a truncated version of TNF R1 lacking the C-terminal 41 amino acids, verifying the specificity of this antibody (data not
shown). These results demonstrate that the anti-HA·HA-E6
immune complexes formed also include TNF R1, providing evidence that a
cellular E6·TNF R1 complex exists in cells.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
HPV 16 E6 binds to the TNF R1.
A, TNF R1 co-immunoprecipitates with HA-E6. Lysates of U2OS
cells stably expressing HA-E6 were immunoprecipitated with either
anti-p53 DO-7 (lane 1) or anti-HA antibodies
(lane 2). Following separation of the
immunoprecipitated proteins by SDS-PAGE and transfer to membranes, the
membranes were probed with either anti-TNF R1 (top) or
anti-HA (bottom). The arrowhead shows the
expected migration position of TNF R1. B, the C-terminal 41 amino acids of TNF R1 are required for binding to both E6 and to TRADD.
Sequences encoding the death domain of TNF R1, the truncated version of
the TNF R1 death domain, TRADD, and HPV 16 E6 were cloned into the bait
or prey plasmids of a mammalian two-hybrid assay kit. The indicated
combinations of plasmids were then transfected into U2OS cells, along
with a reporter plasmid coding for CAT, and expression of the CAT gene
was measured colorimetrically using a CAT-ELISA kit. The indicated
values represent the mean of two independent experiments, with four
measurements taken for each. Error bars represent
the S.D. Inset, the truncated TNF R1 death domain is
expressed in U2OS cells. Proteins from lysates of U2OS cells, either
untransfected (lane 1) or transfected with a
plasmid that encodes the truncated version of the TNF R1 death domain
(lacking the C-terminal 41 amino acids) fused to the activation domain
(pVPTNF R1 DD) (lane 2), were separated by
SDS-PAGE and transferred to a membrane, and the membrane was probed
with antibodies directed against the activation domain. An
arrow indicates the expected migration of the fused
protein.
|
|
To confirm these results, we cloned cDNAs encoding E6 and TNF R1
(death domain only) into bait and prey plasmids of a mammalian two-hybrid system. Each set of test plasmids was transfected into U2OS
cells along with a reporter, CAT-expressing plasmid. Expression of CAT
under these conditions indicates an interaction between the two test
proteins. We also tested the binding of TRADD to TNF R1, since this
well established binding interaction could serve as a positive control.
In these experiments, neither plasmid alone was capable of inducing
expression of CAT (data not shown). The results from the test plasmids
show that there is a strong association between the death domain of TNF
R1 and E6, comparable with that between the TNF R1 and TRADD (Fig.
5B, leftmost two bars).
These results confirm those from the co-immunoprecipitation experiment
and verify that E6 can bind to the TNF R1.
The C-terminal 41 Amino Acids of TNF R1 Are Required for E6
Binding--
The TNF R1 sequence contains two (E/D)LL(L/V)G motifs,
shown by Elston et al. to be an E6-binding motif (37). This
sequence occurs twice, at amino acids 419-422 and 429-433
(PRREATLELLGRVRDMDLLGCL) of the death
domain. To test the possibility that the region containing this site
might be required for TNF R1/E6 binding, DNA coding for the C-terminal
41 amino acids of TNF R1 was removed from the expression plasmid, and
the binding of this truncated version of TNF R1 to both HPV 16 E6 and
to TRADD was tested using the mammalian two-hybrid system (Fig.
5B, rightmost two bars).
The results demonstrate that binding of the truncated version of TNF R1
to both HPV 16 E6 and TRADD is significantly reduced. Expression of the
truncated version of the TNF R1 death domain in these cells was
verified by immunoblotting (inset). Thus, these results
suggest that the binding site for both HPV 16 E6 and for TRADD is at
the C-terminal, cytoplasmic tail of TNF R1.
HA-E6 Interferes with Cell Death Triggered by Transfection of TNF
R1--
Transfection of cells with TNF R1 leads to cell death in a
number of cell types. If HPV 16 E6 blocks signal transduction by binding to TNF R1, E6 should interfere with apoptosis triggered by TNF
R1 transfection as well as that induced by TNF. To test this
prediction, parental U2OS cells and the E6-expressing clone U2OSE612
were transiently transfected with either the full-length (TNF R1 DD) or
truncated (TNF R1
DD) versions of the TNF R1 death domain, and cell
viability was measured by the MTT assay (Fig.
6). As anticipated, the truncated version
of TNF R1 was incapable of inducing significant cell death in either
cell line, consistent with the proposed role of the C-terminal domain
in binding to TRADD. The full-length version of the TNF R1 death domain
did induce significant cell death in the parental U2OS cells. However,
the U2OSE612 clones experienced complete protection from cell death
induced by overexpression of TNF R1 death domain, consistent with the
proposed role of E6 in blocking TNF R1-mediated signal
transduction.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
HA-E6 inhibits TNF R1-induced cell
death. U2OS and U2OSE612 cells were transiently transfected with
plasmids encoding either the complete TNF R1 death domain (TNF R1 DD)
or a truncated version of the TNF R1 death domain that lacked the
C-terminal 41 amino acids (TNF R1 DD). After incubation for 48 h, the percentage of viable cells was measured by the MTT assay.
Measurements were made in triplicate, and the error
bars represent the S.D.
|
|
HPV 16 E6 Does Not Decrease the Level of TNF R1--
Degradation
of some, but not all, of the proteins to which E6 binds is accelerated
in the presence of E6, resulting in a significantly decreased
steady-state level of the protein. For example, the binding of HPV 16 E6 to E6AP and p53 promotes the rapid degradation and loss of p53 (38),
while the binding of E6 to IRF-3 does not result in either the
ubiquitination or degradation of IRF-3 (14). To examine whether E6
decreases the level of cellular TNF R1, we compared the steady-state
levels of TNF R1 by immunoblotting in cells expressing or not
expressing E6 (data not shown) and found that the levels of TNF R1 are
not significantly lower in cells expressing E6.
HPV 16 E6 Inhibits TNF R1/TRADD Interactions--
To determine the
mechanism by which the binding of HPV 16 E6 to TNF R1 inhibits
TNF-induced apoptosis, we examined whether E6 alters the binding of TNF
R1 to TRADD, one of the earliest steps in TNF-mediated apoptotic
signaling. This seemed likely, since the C-terminal 41 amino acids of
TNF R1 are required for both E6 and TRADD binding. If E6 blocks the
binding of TNF R1 to TRADD, the TNF R1/TRADD binding signal should be
reduced in the presence of E6. To test this prediction, we used the
mammalian two-hybrid system to examine TNF R1/TRADD binding in three
cell lines, the parental U2OS cells (E6 negative) and the
stably-transfected, E6-expressing U2OS derivatives U2OSE62 and U2OSE66
(Fig. 7). In these experiments, the
binding of TNF R1 to TRADD was significantly reduced in the presence of
E6. In a control experiment, interactions between p53 and the SV40 T
antigen were not reduced in U2OSE66 cells in comparison with U2OS cells
(data not shown), indicating that the decrease in TNF R1/TRADD binding
in these cells cannot be accounted for by alterations in the capacity
of these cells to support the two-hybrid system. Therefore, these data
are consistent with a model in which binding of E6 to TNF R1 interferes
with the recruitment of TRADD and subsequent assembly of the DISC and generation of proapoptotic signals.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
TNF R1/TRADD interaction is inhibited by HPV
16 E6. Bait and prey plasmids encoding the TNF R1 death domain and
TRADD, along with a CAT-expressing reporter plasmid, were transfected
into the indicated cells. 48 h following transfection, cells were
lysed, and lysates were colorimetrically assayed for CAT expression
using a CAT-ELISA kit. The indicated values represent the mean of two
independent experiments, with four measurements taken from each.
Error bars represent the S.D.
|
|
HPV 16 E6 Is Not a Major Inhibitor of the Mitochondrial Apoptotic
Pathway--
Our finding that E6 binds to TNF R1 and inhibits
signaling through TRADD does not exclude the possibility that it may
affect other apoptotic pathways as well. Since TNF has been shown to activate the mitochondria-mediated apoptotic pathway of at least some cells (39, 40), it seemed possible that E6 might block TNF-induced
apoptosis by inhibiting this pathway. To address this possibility, we
treated E6-expressing and control cells for 24 h with ceramide (25 µM), which is an activator of the mitochondria-mediated apoptotic pathway. Cell survival was monitored by the MTT assay (Fig.
8). Ceramide induced equivalent levels of
apoptosis in E6-expressing and control cell lines, providing evidence
that E6 does not inhibit mitochondria-mediated apoptosis.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effect of ceramide on E6-expressing and
nonexpressing cells. LM mouse fibroblast cells (A),
human U2OS osteosarcoma cells (B), and human U937
hematopoietic cells (C) were untransfected or transfected
with sense or antisense (AS) versions of a plasmid encoding
E6 (LME6) or epitope-tagged HA-E6 (U2OS- and U937-derived
clones). Following isolation of stable clones, cells were untreated
(open bars) or treated with 25 µM
ceramide (closed bars) for 24 h, and cell
survival was monitored by the MTT assay. Measurements were made in
triplicate, and error bars represent the
S.D.
|
|
HPV 16 E6 Does Not Up-regulate the NF-
B-mediated Protective
Pathway--
When TNF binds to its receptor, both proapoptotic and
prosurvival pathways are activated. The pro-apoptotic pathway proceeds via the adaptor proteins TRADD and FADD, through activation of initiator caspases such as caspase 8, activation of effector caspases such as caspase 3, cleavage of cellular substrates, and finally, apoptosis. The protective pathway also begins with TRADD but then diverges and requires additional proteins, such as RIP, TRAF2, and
NF-
B (reviewed in Ref. 41). It was therefore possible that E6 might
exert its antiapoptotic effects by up-regulating the protective,
NF-
B pathway. To test this possibility, we treated LM and LME6 cells
with TNF (1 ng/ml) and assessed NF-
B activation by electrophoretic
mobility shift assays as previously described (35, 36) (Fig.
9A). The results demonstrate
that NF-
B is activated in both the LM and LME6 cells, with two waves
of activation occurring at about 20 min and then again at about 4 h. These results suggest that whereas NF-
B activation does occur in
LM cells, it is inadequate to prevent TNF-induced apoptosis. In
addition, the level of NF-
B activation does not differ significantly
between the two cell lines, providing evidence that up-regulation of
NF-
B plays at most a minimal role in the mechanism by which E6
protects cells from apoptosis induced by TNF.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
NF- B is activated in
both LM and LME6 cells. A, following treatment of cells
with TNF (1 ng/ml) for the indicated times (h), nuclear extracts were
prepared and incubated with a 32P-labeled probe containing
the NF- B consensus binding sequence. Proteins were separated by gel
electrophoresis, dried, and exposed to film. Activated NF- B
complexes are indicated with arrows. B, LM and
LME6 cells were co-transfected with plasmids encoding the luciferase
reporter gene fused to the NF- B consensus binding sequence
(pNF- B-luciferase) and secreted alkaline phosphatase (pE-CMV-SEAP).
Following treatment with TNF (2 ng/ml) for 16 h, the levels of
SEAP secretion and luciferase activity were measured. The expression of
luciferase was normalized to the expression of SEAP for each culture,
and the resulting activity is expressed as a percentage of the activity
observed in untreated cells. Six measurements were made for each
condition, and the error bars denote the
S.D.
|
|
To confirm these results, we used a reporter gene assay to measure the
capacity of NF-
B to enhance transcription of luciferase from a
reporter plasmid before and after TNF treatment of LM and LME6 cells.
Consistent with our previous results, we found that TNF treatment
induced NF-
B-directed luciferase expression in both cell lines (Fig.
9B). Therefore, the capacity of E6 to protect cells from
TNF-induced apoptosis cannot be explained by a significant up-regulation of the NF-
B-mediated protective pathway.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Our previous work had shown that E6 can protect expressing cells
from TNF, and the purpose of this study was to identify the molecular
mechanism(s) underlying this protection. We found that HPV 16 E6 binds
to TNF R1 and affects the transmission of proapoptotic signals
triggered by TNF. The binding of E6 to TNF R1 was demonstrated by both
co-immunoprecipitation and the mammalian two-hybrid system. The binding
is significant, with the signal from the two-hybrid system
approximating that observed for the well established TNF R1/TRADD
interaction. We hypothesize that the binding of E6 to TNF R1 hinders
the sequential interactions required to form the DISC. This inhibition
in turn would be predicted to inhibit activation of initiator caspases
(such as caspase 8), leading to suppression of effector caspases (such
as caspase 3) and blockade of apoptosis. Our results are
consistent with this model. The experiment shown in Fig. 7 indicates
that TNF R1/TRADD binding is reduced in the presence of E6, and the
experiments shown in Figs. 1-4 and 6 provide evidence that E6 blocks
transmission of apoptotic signals. Hence, E6 prevents both TNF R1/TRADD
binding and proapoptotic signal transduction.
This work demonstrates that the C-terminal 41 amino acids of TNF R1 are
required for E6 binding (Fig. 5), TRADD binding (Fig. 5), and
generation of proapoptotic signals (Fig. 6). This suggests that the
binding sites for TRADD and HPV 16 E6 are topologically proximate. The
region of TNF R1 critical for generation of apoptotic signaling was
previously localized to an 80-amino acid region near the C terminus of
the protein (42). Our results are consistent with these previous
findings and add the functions of TRADD and E6 binding to this general region.
The capacity of E6 to bind to the TNF R1 death domain may be due to the
presence of the previously identified E6-binding motif, (E/D)L(L/V)G,
since two copies of this motif are localized in the C-terminal 41 amino
acids. The existence of these sequences in a region of TNF R1 required
for E6 binding provides further evidence for the E6 binding affinity of
this motif. It should be noted, however, that this motif is not present
in all E6-binding proteins. Therefore, there must be additional binding
sites with affinity for E6.
We were able to demonstrate that protection against TNF-induced
apoptosis by HPV 16 E6 occurs in cells of different species (mouse and
human) and tissues (fibroblast, osteosarcoma, and histiocyte/monocyte) (Figs. 1-3) (32), providing evidence of its generality. These results
differ from those obtained earlier, where it was reported that either
the bovine (43) or the human (44, 45) version of E6 sensitized cells to
TNF-triggered cell death. This difference probably resulted from
alternate signaling pathways being engaged in the two systems, with our
studies finding clear evidence of caspase activation following TNF
treatment, indicating an apoptotic form of cell death, whereas Liu
et al. (44) determined the mode of death to be necrosis.
Interestingly, the E6 in our system did cause p53 degradation, as
expected, whereas p53 was not degraded in the previous system. Binding
of E6 to TNF R1 could conceivably result in either sensitization or
resistance to TNF, depending on how the presence of E6 affects
downstream events. Under some conditions, blocking the apoptotic
pathway, as we have shown E6 to do, may shift cells into a necrotic
pathway (46). Relevant factors affecting this shift could include the
cell type, the dose of TNF, and the amount of E6 expressed. Following
inhibition of the apoptotic pathway by E6, differences in such factors
between the experimental systems could result in either cellular
resistance, as we have found, or in a shift to necrosis, such as that
observed by Liu et al. (44).
Interestingly, the results of our experiments using clone U2OSE617
suggest that the level of E6 expression is important in determining its
biological activities. The experiment shown in Fig. 3B
indicates that this clone expresses a low, although detectable, level
of HA-E6. This level of E6 expression is sufficient to completely protect these cells from TNF-induced apoptosis (Fig.
3A) yet insufficient to completely eliminate the DNA
damage-induced increase in cellular p53 (Fig. 3C).
We were unable to detect significant differences between E6-expressing
and E6-negative cells in their response to ceramide, which excluded
significant interference by E6 in the pathway leading from
mitochondrial activation to apoptosis. Furthermore, we were unable to
detect significant differences in the induction of the NF-
B-mediated
protective pathway in E6-expressing and E6-negative cells. These
results emphasize the importance of E6/TNF R1 binding in the observed
modulation of TNF sensitivity in E6-expressing cells.
Interestingly, although E6 binds to the TNF R1 and inhibits
transmission of the apoptotic signal, it does not abolish activation of
NF-
B (Fig. 9). In this respect, E6 may act in a manner similar to
that observed for the hepatitis C virus core protein (47). Also, the
sensitization effect of E6 reported by Liu et al. did not
occur by altering TNF-induced NF-
B activation (44). One possible
explanation for our finding is that NF-
B is activated by TNF using a
mechanism that does not require TNF R1/TRADD interactions.
To survive and propagate, viruses have developed numerous ways to avoid
destruction by the host immune system. The means by which they have
done so are now known to encompass a wide ranging and diverse set of
molecular mechanisms that can target several different steps of
multiple immune pathways. Some viruses encode proteins that disable
only one or a few of these mechanisms. Others encode one or several
proteins that can systematically target cellular defenses at several
levels (reviewed in Ref. 48).
Several viruses have developed strategies to block TNF-mediated host
responses. Adenovirus encodes four proteins that prevent TNF-mediated
apoptosis (49-53), and three adenovirus proteins cooperate to prevent
apoptosis induced by the closely related molecule, TRAIL (54). Some
poxviruses encode secreted proteins that are similar to the TNF
receptor (55-57), and the binding of the Shope fibroma T2 protein to
TNF inhibits the cytokine from binding to its receptor (58). The
poliovirus protein 3A inhibits TNF-induced apoptosis by eliminating
cell surface expression of the TNF receptor (59), and the hepatitis C
virus core protein binds to the death domain of TNF R1 and suppress
signaling from TRADD (47). Our results provide evidence that HPV 16 also blocks TNF-mediated apoptosis and that it does so by blocking
interactions between TNF R1 and TRADD.
Including TNF R1, the number of E6-binding cellular proteins has now
reached over a dozen. With few exceptions, most notably the E6/E6AP
interaction, the roles of these binding interactions in virus
replication and virus-mediated pathology are incompletely understood.
Papillomaviruses are persistent viruses that remain in their hosts for
long periods of time. The papillomavirus-specific immune response is
either weak or undetectable, and little or no inflammatory response is
elicited by papillomavirus infection. The capacity of E6 to protect
cells from TNF may be an important factor in this lack of a host
inflammatory response and thus contribute both to the persistence of
this virus and to its oncogenic potential. Moreover, our finding that
TNF RI is a binding partner for E6 suggests additional approaches for
the development of therapeutic agents for cervical cancer. It is
possible that small molecules capable of interfering with E6/TNF R1
binding might increase the sensitivity of E6-expressing cervical cancer
cells to either endogenous or therapeutic doses of TNF or to
conventional chemotherapeutic agents that lead to TNF release.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Dr. Carl Ware for helpful and
critical discussions of this work as well as the plasmids coding for
TNF R1 and TRADD.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by the National Medical
Technology Testbed and Loma Linda University (to P. D.-H.), as well as
Public Health Service award AI50080 and the Elizabeth B. Lamb Center
for Pediatric Research (to J. L. C. and T. S. D.). Additional support was provided by Public Health Service Awards CA68485 for the
Vanderbilt Cancer Center and DK20593 for the Vanderbilt Diabetes Research and Training Center (to J. L. C. and T. S. D.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: Dept. of Immunology, The Scripps Research
Inst., La Jolla, CA 92037.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biochemistry and Microbiology, Center for Molecular Biology and Gene Therapy, 11085 Campus St., 105 Mortensen Hall, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354. Tel.: 909-558-4300 (ext. 81361); Fax:
909-558-0177; E-mail: pdhughes@som.llu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 4, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200113200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HPV, human
papillomavirus;
TNF, tumor necrosis factor;
TRADD, TNF R1-associated
death domain;
FADD, Fas-associated death domain;
DISC, death-inducing
signaling complex;
MTT, 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide;
HA, hemagglutinin;
SEAP, secreted alkaline phosphatase;
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay;
pNA, p-nitroanilide;
CAT, chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase;
CHO, aldehyde.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Howley, P. M.,
Munger, K.,
Romanczuk, H.,
Scheffner, M.,
and Huibregtse, J. M.
(1992)
in
Multistage Carcinogenesis
(Harris, C. C., ed)
, pp. 239-248, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL
|
| 2.
|
Pan, H.,
and Griep, A. E.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
2157-2169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Song, S.,
Gulliver, G. A.,
and Lambert, P. F.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
2290-2295[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Fogel, S.,
and Riou, G.
(1998)
Virology
244,
97-107[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Spitkovsky, D.,
Aengeneyndt, F.,
Braspenning, J.,
and von Knebel Doeberitz, M.
(1996)
Oncogene
13,
1027-1035[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Inoue, T.,
Oka, K.,
Youg-Il, H.,
Vousden, K. H.,
Kyo, S.,
Jing, P.,
Hakura, A.,
and Yutsudo, M.
(1998)
Mol. Carcinog.
21,
215-222[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Klingelhutz, A. J.,
Foster, S. A.,
and McDougall, J. K.
(1996)
Nature
380,
79-81[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Veldman, T.,
Horikawa, H.,
Barrett, J. C.,
and Schlegel, R.
(2001)
J. Virol.
75,
4467-4472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Pim, D.,
Thomas, M.,
Javier, R.,
Gardiol, D.,
and Banks, L.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
719-725[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Lopez-Ocejo, O.,
Viloria-Petit, A.,
Bequet-Romero, M.,
Mukhopadhyay, D.,
Rak, J.,
and Kerbel, R. S.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
4611-4620[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Mantovani, F.,
and Banks, L.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
7874-7887[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Patel, D.,
Huang, S. M.,
Baglia, L. A.,
and McCance, D. J.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
5061-5072[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Zimmermann, H.,
Degenkolbe, R.,
Bernard, H.,
and O'Connor, M.
(1999)
J. Virol.
73,
6209-6219[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Ronco, L. V.,
Karpova, A. Y.,
Vidal, M.,
and Howley, P. M.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2061-2072[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Kuhne, C.,
and Banks, L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
34302-34309[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Kukimoto, I.,
Aihara, S.,
Yoshiike, K.,
and Kanda, T.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
249,
258-262[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Gao, Q.,
Srinivasan, S.,
Boyer, S. N.,
Wazer, D. E.,
and Band, V.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
733-744[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Thomas, M.,
and Banks, L.
(1998)
Oncogene
17,
2943-2954[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Tross-Mesilaty, S.,
Reinstein, E.,
Bercovich, B.,
Tobias, K. E.,
Schwartz, A. L.,
Kahana, C.,
and Ciechanover, A.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
8058-8063[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Tong, X.,
and Howley, P. M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4412-4417[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Chen, J. J.,
Reid, C. E.,
Band, V.,
and Androphy, E. J.
(1995)
Science
269,
529-531[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Lee, S. S.,
Weiss, R. S.,
and Javier, R. T.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
6670-6675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Kiyono, T.,
Hiraiwa, A.,
Fujita, M.,
Hayashi, Y.,
Akiyama, T.,
and Ishibashi, M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
11612-11616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Nakagawa, S.,
and Huibregtse, J.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
8244-8253[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Thomas, M.,
Glausinger, B.,
Pim, D.,
Javier, R.,
and Banks, L.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
5431-5439[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Glausinger, B. A.,
Lee, S. S.,
Thomas, M.,
Banks, L.,
and Javier, R.
(2001)
Oncogene
19,
5270-5280
|
| 27.
|
Lee, S. S.,
Glausinger, B.,
Mantovani, F.,
Banks, L.,
and Javier, R. T.
(2000)
J. Virol.
74,
9680-9693[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Wong, G. H. W.,
Kamb, A.,
and Goeddel, D. V.
(1992)
Antiviral Properties of TNF
, Raven Press, New York
|
| 29.
|
Shepard, H. M.,
and Lewis, G. D.
(1988)
J. Clin. Immunol.
8,
333-341[CrossRef][Medl |