|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M202152200 on April 8, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 24, 21786-21791, June 14, 2002
The Presence of an Iron-Sulfur Cluster in Adenosine
5'-Phosphosulfate Reductase Separates Organisms Utilizing Adenosine
5'-Phosphosulfate and Phosphoadenosine 5'-Phosphosulfate for
Sulfate Assimilation*
Stanislav
Kopriva §,
Thomas
Büchert¶,
Günter
Fritz ,
Marianne
Suter**,
Rüdiger
Benda ,
Volker
Schünemann ,
Anna
Koprivova§§,
Peter
Schürmann¶¶,
Alfred X.
Trautwein ,
Peter
M. H.
Kroneck¶, and
Christian
Brunold**
From the Institute of Forest Botany and Tree
Physiology, Albert-Ludwigs-University, D-79085 Freiburg, Germany,
¶ Fachbereich Biologie, Universität Konstanz, D-78457
Konstanz, Germany, Biochemisches Institut, Universität
Zürich, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland, ** Institute
of Plant Sciences, University of Berne, CH-3013 Bern, Switzerland,
 Institut für Physik, Medizinische
Universität zu Lübeck, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany,
§§ Plant Biotechnology,
Albert-Ludwigs-University, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany, and
¶¶ Laboratoire de Biochimie, University of
Neuchâtel, CH-2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland
Received for publication, March 5, 2002, and in revised form, April 4, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
It was generally accepted that plants, algae, and
phototrophic bacteria use adenosine 5'-phosphosulfate (APS) for
assimilatory sulfate reduction, whereas bacteria and fungi use
phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate (PAPS). The corresponding enzymes,
APS and PAPS reductase, share 25-30% identical amino acids.
Phylogenetic analysis of APS and PAPS reductase amino acid
sequences from different organisms, which were retrieved from the
GenBankTM, revealed two clusters. The first cluster
comprised known PAPS reductases from enteric bacteria, cyanobacteria,
and yeast. On the other hand, plant APS reductase sequences were
clustered together with many bacterial ones, including those from
Pseudomonas and Rhizobium. The gene for APS
reductase cloned from the APS-reducing cyanobacterium
Plectonema also clustered together with the plant sequences, confirming that the two classes of sequences represent PAPS
and APS reductases, respectively. Compared with the PAPS reductase, all
sequences of the APS reductase cluster contained two additional
cysteine pairs homologous to the cysteine residues involved in
binding an iron-sulfur cluster in plants. Mössbauer analysis
revealed that the recombinant APS reductase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa contains a [4Fe-4S] cluster with the same
characteristics as the plant enzyme. We conclude, therefore,
that the presence of an iron-sulfur cluster determines the APS
specificity of the sulfate-reducing enzymes and thus separates the APS-
and PAPS-dependent assimilatory sulfate reduction pathways.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
For all living organisms, sulfur is an essential element with many
different functions. It is found in reduced form in amino acids,
peptides, and proteins and in iron-sulfur clusters, lipoic acid, and
other cofactors and in oxidized form as sulfonate group-modifying proteins, polysaccharides, and lipids. Reduced sulfur compounds, such
as hydrogen sulfide, serve as electron donors for chemotrophic or
phototrophic growth in a large and diverse group of Archae and
bacteria, including purple and green sulfur bacteria (1). On the other
hand, oxidized sulfur compounds such as sulfate can function as a
terminal electron acceptor in respiration to support the growth of
sulfate-reducing bacteria (2).
The majority of sulfur in living organisms is present in the reduced
form of organic thiols. For their synthesis, inorganic sulfate is
reduced and incorporated into bioorganic compounds in a pathway named
assimilatory sulfate reduction. Before reduction, sulfate is activated
with ATP to adenosine 5'-phosphosulfate
(APS),1 which can
subsequently be converted into phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate (PAPS) using a second ATP. Either form of activated sulfate can be
reduced to sulfite and reduced further to sulfide by sulfite reductase.
Sulfide is incorporated into an activated amino acid acceptor, such as
O-acetylserine, O-acetylhomoserine, or
O-succinylhomoserine, to form cysteine or homocysteine
(3-5).
The assimilatory sulfate reduction pathway is present in plants, fungi,
and yeast and in a wide range of eubacteria but is missing in metazoa.
It was generally accepted that chemotrophic bacteria and fungi utilize
PAPS for reduction to sulfite in a reaction catalyzed by a
thioredoxin-dependent PAPS reductase, whereas
photosynthesizing organisms reduce APS directly (3-9). The boundary
line between APS- and PAPS-utilizing organisms was not sharply defined,
however, because among phototrophic bacteria and cyanobacteria, both
APS- and PAPS-reducing species were described (8, 9). The plant APS
reductase (APR), recently cloned from Arabidopsis thaliana,
is a protein composed of two distinct domains: an N-terminal part is
homologous to the Escherichia coli PAPS reductase (encoded
by the cysH gene), and a C-terminal part is similar to
thioredoxin with a function modified toward glutaredoxin (10-12). This
enzyme is identical to the previously described APS sulfotransferase
(13) and contains a [4Fe-4S] iron-sulfur cluster as a cofactor (14).
APS reductase is a highly regulated enzyme, and it is considered to
have a major control on the flux through assimilatory sulfate reduction
in plants (3, 15).
However, the plant APS reductase is completely unrelated to the
dissimilatory APS reductase found in both sulfate-reducing and
sulfide-oxidizing bacteria and archaea (16, 17). This dissimilatory APS
reductase (EC 1.8.99.2) catalyzes both the reduction of APS to sulfite
and the oxidation of sulfite and AMP to APS. This enzyme is a 1:1
heterodimer of a 75-kDa FAD-binding -subunit and a
20-kDa -subunit binding two [4Fe-4S] centers (16). Also, the
electron paramagnetic resonance spectral properties of the iron-sulfur
clusters from both types of APS reductase are completely different (14,
16).
Very recently, a third type of APS reductase was identified in several
sulfate-assimilating bacteria, such as Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, Ralstonia, Burkholderia, and
Allochromatium vinosum (18-20). This novel enzyme is
homologous to the PAPS reductase from E. coli and is even
more homologous to the N-terminal part of plant APS reductase. However,
the enzyme is missing the C-terminal part of the plant protein and
requires thioredoxin as an electron donor. The major difference between
these bacterial APS reductases and PAPS reductase from E. coli or Salmonella typhimurium is the presence of two
additional cysteine pairs as in the plant enzyme (Fig. 1). Three of
these Cys residues bind the FeS center in the plant APS reductase (14).
From this finding, two questions arise: 1) does the bacterial
assimilatory APS reductase contain an iron-sulfur center? and 2) are
the additional Cys residues a marker for distinguishing APS- and
PAPS-dependent sulfate reduction?
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
[35S]APS was prepared from
[35S]SO (Hartmann
Analytic) according to Li and Schiff (21) with recombinant ATP
sulfurylase from A. thaliana2 and inorganic
pyrophosphatase (Sigma) (21). Oligonucleotide primers were synthesized
at Microsynth GmbH (Balgach, Switzerland).
Phylogenetic Analysis--
The GenBankTM and The
Institute for Genomic Research sequence data bases were screened
with the BLAST software with the N-terminal portion of A. thaliana APR2 as a query sequence. The sequences were aligned by
using the CLUSTALW program. The phylogenetic analysis was performed
with the Treecon software (22). The tree was constructed by the
neighbor-joining method (23) using the Dayhoff matrix. Protein
parsimony analysis was performed with the PHYLIP software (24).
Enzyme Assays--
APS and PAPS reductase activities were
measured as production of [35S]sulfite, assayed as acid
volatile radioactivity, formed in the presence of 75 µM
[35S]APS or [35S]PAPS, respectively, and 4 mM dithioerythritol and 4.5 µg of recombinant thioredoxin
m from spinach as reductants (25). The protein concentrations were
determined with the Bio-Rad kit, with bovine serum albumin as a
standard. The measurements were performed in duplicates with two
independent protein preparations. The data are presented as means ± S.E.
Protein Overexpression in E. coli--
The PAPS reductase of
E. coli (26) and APS reductases of Pseudomonas
aeruginosa (27) and Rhizobium meliloti (18) were overexpressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) strain by the pET14b
expression system and purified with the His·Tag® system (Novagen)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. For the preparation of
57Fe-labeled P. aeruginosa APR E. coli harboring the expression construct was grown in M9 medium
containing 0.4% glucose in which 56Fe was replaced by
57Fe. Metal foil consisting of 57Fe (94.7%
enrichment; Glaser, Basel, Switzerland) was dissolved in HCl,
neutralized, and added to the culture medium at a final 57Fe concentration of 20 µM.
Cloning of APS Reductase from Plectonema--
DNA was isolated
from 0.5 g of Plectonema strain 73110 cells according
to the standard procedures (28). The major part of the APR coding
region was amplified from the DNA by PCR with primers derived from
regions conserved in plant APR and bacterial PAPS reductase sequences
as described by Suter et al. (13). The PCR product
was cloned by the TA cloning kit (Invitrogen), and three independent
inserts were completely sequenced on both strands. The sequence was
deposited in GenBankTM under accession number AF214038.
Determination of Iron--
The iron content of the proteins was
estimated by spectrophotometry after reaction with
tripyridyl-s-triazine (29). The measurements were performed in
duplicates with two independent protein preparations. The data are
presented as means ± S.E.
Electronic Spectra--
UV-visible spectra were recorded on a
Lambda 16 Instrument (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) equipped with a
temperature-controlled cell compartment.
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance--
Electron paramagnetic
resonance spectra (X-band, 9.5 GHz) were recorded on the ESP 300 spectrometer (Bruker) and evaluated as described previously (30). The
temperature was maintained with the Helitran system (Air Products).
Mössbauer Spectroscopy--
Mössbauer spectra were
recorded using a conventional spectrometer in the constant acceleration
mode. Isomer shifts are given relative to -Fe at room temperature.
The spectra obtained at 20 mT were measured in a bath cryostat (Oxford
MD 306) equipped with a pair of permanent magnets. For the high-field
spectra, a cryostat equipped with a superconducting magnet was used
(Oxford Instruments). Magnetically split spectra were simulated within the spin Hamiltonian formalism (31); otherwise, spectra were analyzed
by least-square fits using Lorentzian line shape.
 |
RESULTS |
Evolutionary Relationships of APS and PAPS Reductase--
To
characterize the evolutionary relationships among APS- and
PAPS-reducing enzymes, we used the sequence of the N-terminal domain of
APR2 from A. thaliana to retrieve related sequences from the
GenBankTM and The Institute for Genomic Research databases
by the BLAST program. All of these proteins are characterized by a
highly conserved (KRT)ECG(LI)H motif (Fig.
1) containing a catalytically active Cys
residue (32, 33). In addition, a number of related proteins of unknown
function were found in several archaebacteria, including Methanococcus jannaschii, Pyrococcus horikoshii,
and Pyrococcus abyssii. These large proteins contained
segments of ~200 amino acids that were 22-27% identical with both
plant APS reductases and PAPS reductase of E. coli preceded
by a 150-200-amino acid domain with no homology to other proteins.
Because these proteins did not contain the essential (KRT)ECG(LI)H
motif, and because the APR-similar domain showed a 20-25% identity
also with the CysD subunit of ATP sulfurylase from enteric
bacteria, these archaea proteins were not included in the analysis.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Comparison of amino acid sequences of mature
APR2 from A. thaliana, APS reductase from P. aeruginosa, and PAPS reductase from E. coli. The sequences were aligned with the program
CLUSTAL. Asterisks identify identical residues, and
arrows mark the additional Cys in APS reductases. The
conserved APS and PAPS reductase signature is
underlined.
|
|
Fig. 2 shows a neighbor-joining tree of
APS and PAPS reductase-related sequences. The phylogenetic tree is
divided into two major branches. The first branch contains a cluster of
APS reductases from plants and algae, together with several bacterial
enzymes; the other one was subdivided into clusters comprising fungal
PAPS reductases and well-characterized PAPS reductases from enteric bacteria and cyanobacteria. However, such a tree topology does not
reflect the phylogenetic relationships based on the 16 S rRNA genes.
Only the Gram-positive bacteria, fungi, and -proteobacteria appeared
to be monophyletic. In contrast, two species of -proteobacteria were
found outside of the major -proteobacterial group clustered with
-proteobacteria and A. vinosum, a -proteobacterium.
Only -proteobacteria could be found in both major branches of the phylogenetic tree. The sequences of the new bacterial assimilatory APS
reductases from Rhizobium, Ralstonia,
Burkholderia, and Pseudomonas were all positioned
on the major cluster containing the plant APS reductases. Also, the
sequence of CysH from Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, which
most probably encodes an APS reductase (34), was found in this cluster.
Although the overall bootstrap support of the neighbor-joining tree
topology was only around 50%, phylogenetic analysis using the protein
parsimony method resulted in a maximum parsimony tree with an almost
identical topology (data not shown). We hypothesized, therefore, that
the nod separating the two major branches in this phylogenetic tree
represents the border between APS- and PAPS-reducing species,
respectively.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Phylogenetic analysis of APS and PAPS
reductases. The protein sequences were retrieved from
GenBankTM by the BLAST software and aligned with the
program CLUSTAL. The neighbor-joining tree was constructed with the
PHYLIP software package. The horizontal dashed line
separates the APS and PAPS reductase subclusters. The taxa are
color-coded as follows: Viridiplantae, green;
fungi, brown; Archae, light blue; Firmicutes,
gray; -proteobacteria, black;
-proteobacteria, blue; -proteobacteria,
orange; cyanobacteria, red; -proteobacteria,
green; non-sulfur bacteria, Thermus/Deinococcus group,
magenta.
|
|
To test this hypothesis, we cloned and sequenced part of the gene for
putative APS reductase from an APS-reducing cyanobacterium, Plectonema strain 73110 (8). We predicted that the position of the Plectonema enzyme in the phylogenetic tree would be
in the same branch as plant APS reductases and assimilatory APS
reductases from Pseudomonas and Rhizobium, but
not as the PAPS reductases from other cyanobacteria,
Synechococcus, and Synechocystis. Indeed, as
shown in Fig. 2, the Plectonema APS reductase clusters with that of P. aeruginosa close to the plant APR proteins. This
result indicated that, indeed, solely from the sequence of the
cysH gene and its position in the phylogenetic tree, one
could predict the sulfonucleotide specificity of the corresponding protein.
Biochemical Characterization of APS Reductase from P. aeruginosa--
A closer examination of the APS and PAPS reductase
sequence alignment used for the phylogenetic analysis revealed that the major difference between sequences in the two branches is the presence
of two strictly conserved Cys pairs in the APS-reducing enzymes
(compare Fig. 1). These Cys pairs were proposed to coordinate an FeS
cluster in plant APS reductases (14). It was thus plausible to expect
the same function of these amino acids also in the prokaryotic enzymes.
Therefore, the APS reductase from P. aeruginosa was
overexpressed in E. coli by the pET expression system and
purified as a yellow-brown protein, similar to the recombinant APR from
A. thaliana (14). The recombinant protein displayed an APS
reductase activity of 2.1 µmol min 1 mg 1
with dithioerythritol and thioredoxin m as reductants; the activity decreased to 10% when thioredoxin was omitted from the reaction mixture (Table I). The optical spectrum
of the P. aeruginosa protein was identical to that of the
APR from Arabidopsis (Fig. 3),
indicating that it possessed the same cofactor as the plant enzyme.
Accordingly, 3.2 ± 0.4 nmol Fe/nmol protein were determined in
the P. aeruginosa APS reductase. On the other hand, similar to previous reports (32), the recombinant PAPS reductase from E. coli was isolated as a colorless protein without bound
iron (Fig. 3).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Optical spectra of purified recombinant APS-
and PAPS-reducing enzymes. PaCYSH, 20 µM
APS reductase from P. aeruginosa; EcCYSH, 20 µM PAPS reductase from E. coli;
AtAPR, 15 µM APS reductase from A. thaliana. The recombinant proteins were overexpressed in E. coli by the pET14b expression system (Novagen) and purified by the
His·Tag® system.
|
|
To prove indisputably that the Pseudomonas enzyme also
contains the iron-sulfur cofactor, Mössbauer spectroscopy, which
in experiments with the plant APR turned out to be the method of choice
(14), was used. The spectra were essentially identical with those
obtained with the plant protein (14). The Mössbauer spectrum of
P. aeruginosa APR obtained at 4.2 K in a small field of 20 mT (perpendicular to the -beam; Fig.
4a) exhibited an asymmetric quadrupole doublet. This asymmetry indicates that the iron sites in the
cofactor are structurally different. Applying a strong field of 7 T
(perpendicular and parallel to the -beam; Fig. 4, b and
c) at 4.2 K showed that the iron sites form a diamagnetic cluster. This information, together with the isomer shift and the
quadrupole splitting EQ of the asymmetric doublet, which takes the values ~0.45 mm s 1 and
EQ ~1.2 mm s 1 (see below), strongly
points to the presence of [4Fe-4S]2+ clusters (31). The
quantitative analysis of the measured spectra was based on the
assumption that, as in the plant enzyme, only three Cys residues were
binding to the metal cluster (14). It was assumed that three iron sites
exhibit the same and EQ values, which, however, may
differ from the corresponding values of the fourth site. Thus, the fit
comprises two doublets with an area ratio of 3:1.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Mössbauer spectra of APR from
P. aeruginosa. Mössbauer spectra
of APR from P. aeruginosa taken (a) at 4.2 K in a
field of 20 mT perpendicular to the -beam and in a field of 7 T
applied (b) perpendicular and (c) parallel to the
-beam. The solid lines represent (a) a fit and
(b and c) simulations with parameters according
to case (I) (see the text), and the dashed and dotted
lines represent the subspectra according to a subsite ratio of
1:3. The enzyme was dissolved at a concentration of 73.7 µM in 20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mM imidazole.
|
|
Two different fits have been performed in view of the fact that the
asymmetry of the quadrupole doublet (Fig. 4a) could be accounted for by two symmetric doublets with either (I)
1 ~ 2, EQ,1 EQ,2, or (II) 1 2,
EQ,1 ~ EQ,2.
With start parameters corresponding to case (I) and (II), respectively,
the obtained parameter sets are as follows: (I), 1 = 0.46 mm s 1, EQ,1 = 1.02 mm
s 1 (75%), 2 = 0.43 mm s 1,
and EQ,2 = 1.34 mm s 1 (25%); and (II),
1 = 0.49 mm s 1, EQ,1 = 1.09 mm s 1 (75%), 2 = 0.33 mm
s 1, and EQ,2 = 1.14 mm s 1
(25%).
Because the two cases yield practically the same goodness of fit, only
the results for case (I) have been presented in Fig. 4. Both parameter
sets were used to simulate the magnetic pattern of the spectra measured
at a magnetic field of 7 T (Fig. 4, b and c).
Again, there is no obvious preference for either case.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The properties of APS reductase from P. aeruginosa are
very similar to those of the C-terminally truncated plant APR, lacking the thioredoxin-like domain (12, 14, 19, 33). The enzyme produces
sulfite from APS but not from PAPS, and the activity is stimulated by
thioredoxin m but is not absolutely dependent on this compound. The
reported Vmax of the Pseudomonas APR,
5.8 µmol min 1 mg 1 (19), is almost
identical to that of the N-domain of APR from Arabidopsis,
5.1 µmol min 1 mg 1 ,2 being
~8 times lower than the Vmax of recombinant
APR from Lemna minor (13). The recombinant proteins are
colored yellow-brown and bind 3-4 nmol Fe/nmol protein. Further
biochemical analysis of the P. aeruginosa APR revealed that
the enzyme possessed a diamagnetic [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster at
the active site, exactly like the enzyme from higher plants (14). The
properties of this cofactor, as interpreted from the Mössbauer
spectra, are essentially identical with those of the
[4Fe-4S]2+ cluster of APR from L. minor, which
was discussed in detail by Kopriva et al. (14). Similarly as
in the plant protein, one of the individual Fe subsites is different
from the other three because it is either tetragonally
FeS3X-coordinated, with X being a non-sulfur ligand (C, N,
O) or trigonally sulfur-coordinated. The previously described
assimilatory APR from Sinorhizobium meliloti (18) also
contains the FeS cofactor, as revealed by the dark yellow-brown color
of the recombinant protein and the fact that the enzyme binds 4 nmol
Fe/nmol protein (data not shown). Remarkably, dissimilatory APS
reductases of sulfate-reducing bacteria and archaebacteria, such as
Desulfovibrio and Archaeoglobus, respectively (35, 36), or sulfur-oxidizing phototrophic bacterium A. vinosum (37) also contain [4Fe-4S] centers, although these
enzymes are not otherwise related to the assimilatory APS or PAPS
reductases. The role of the iron-sulfur cluster in the reaction
mechanism of assimilatory APRs is not clear, but nevertheless, it seems that the ability to reduce APS is linked to the presence of an iron-sulfur cluster in the enzyme.
These findings have far-reaching implications for understanding the
evolution of sulfate assimilation. In contrast to earlier reports
(6-9), the results reported previously (18-20, 34) and presented here
demonstrate that APS-dependent assimilatory reduction of
sulfate is not connected to oxygen-evolving photosynthesis but is
present in a large range of eubacterial taxons. From the bacterial
species included in the phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2), preferential
reduction of APS over PAPS was confirmed in the -proteobacteria
Pseudomonas, A. ferrooxidans (34), and A. vinosum (9); -proteobacteria Burkholderia and
Ralstonia (19); and -proteobacteria S. meliloti and R. tropici (18). Furthermore, because no
homologues of APS kinase are present in the completely sequenced
genomes of Neisseria meningitidis ( -proteobacteria) and
Geobacter sulfurreducens ( -proteobacteria), one can
conclude that these species also possess an APS reductase. In the
neighbor-joining tree, the CysH sequences of all these species are
found within the large cluster containing the plant APR sequences (Fig.
2). In addition to the species mentioned above, three subclusters are
part of the tentative APR cluster: the Archae, Firmicutes, and
-proteobacteria. In these organisms, either both APS and PAPS
reductase activities were measured or nothing is known about the
sulfonucleotide utilized for reduction (9, 19). The hypothesis that
this large cluster represents APS reductases was strengthened by the
cloning of the CysH gene from the APS-reducing
cyanobacterium Plectonema. Whereas the previous reports and
experiments confirmed the APS-dependent activity predicted
from the position of the corresponding sequences in the phylogenetic
tree, a known enzymatic activity was the starting point in this case
(8). Indeed, as expected, the Plectonema APR was clustered
together with the APS-reducing enzymes of Pseudomonas and
not with the other cyanobacteria that form a small subcluster in the
PAPS reductase cluster of the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2). Because
all enzymes from the tentative APR cluster contain the two additional
Cys pairs (Fig. 1), which, in at least four species, bind an
iron-sulfur cofactor that seems to be essential for reduction of APS,
we conclude that these Cys pairs might serve as a marker for
distinguishing between APS- and PAPS-dependent reductases.
The first bacterial species in which sulfate assimilation was
investigated were the enterobacteria E. coli and S. typhimurium (4). The sulfate assimilation in these species
requires synthesis of PAPS. PAPS-dependent sulfate
reduction was also observed in yeast (5) and several cyanobacteria (8);
in contrast, plants, algae, and phototrophic bacteria utilized APS
directly (6-9). It was thus believed that the APS pathway was
dependent on oxygen-evolving photosynthesis and that the PAPS pathway
was ubiquitous in nonphotosynthetic bacteria (3, 38). However, the
results presented here indicate that the PAPS pathway in prokaryotes is
restricted to only a few groups of -proteobacteria and
cyanobacteria. Because APS-reducing species are also found among
cyanobacteria and -proteobacteria, a horizontal gene transfer must
have played an important role in today's distribution of the two
enzyme activities (39). Interestingly, the evolution of dissimilatory
APS reductase was also affected by frequent horizontal gene transfers
(40). An important question arises: was the ancestral sulfate
assimilation APS- or PAPS-dependent? The APS
reductase pathway seems to be the original one because: 1) APS
reductase was present in the evolutionary ancient sulfate-reducing bacteria and Archae, 2) the reduction via APS requires one ATP less
than that via PAPS, and 3) the domains similar to APS and PAPS
reductase in the archaebacterial proteins, e.g. the
M. jannaschii hypothetical protein MJ0973
(GenBankTM accession number Q58383) or P. horikoshi PH0268, contain the Cys residues required for the
coordination of an iron-sulfur cluster (41).
Using protein signature sequences, a linear succession was proposed in
which the various phyla evolved from a common ancestor in the following
order: Firmicutes, Deinococcus/Thermus
group, cyanobacteria, Spirochetes, Aquificales + Chlamydiales + green sulfur bacteria,
+ -proteobacteria, -proteobacteria, -proteobacteria, and
-proteobacteria (42, 43). If the original gene encoded an APS
reductase, the distribution of the reductases can be easily explained
by assuming the evolution of PAPS reductase after separation of
-proteobacteria and a single horizontal gene transfer event into the
cyanobacteria. On the other hand, if the original gene encoded PAPS
reductase, the evolution of APS reductase would have to occur several
times independently, or the horizontal gene transfer would have taken
place at least four times. Obviously, the former scenario is more
plausible; therefore, we conclude that the APS reductase pathway is the
original pathway of sulfate assimilation. Why there are two pathways of
sulfate reduction in bacteria still remains an open question. The
evolution of a PAPS reductase, which does not need the iron-sulfur
cluster, might have been an adaptation to an iron- and/or sulfur-poor
environment or to increasing concentrations of oxygen in the atmosphere
because the iron-sulfur center is unstable in air. However, an
evolutionary advantage of one pathway over the other remains to be
shown, as discussed for the dissimilatory APR in A. vinosum
(44).
Plant APS reductase comprises three domains: a chloroplast-targeting
peptide, an APS reductase part, and a C-terminal thioredoxin-like domain. The gene thus most probably originated from a fusion between genes for APS reductase and thioredoxin. Because all APRs isolated or
cloned from higher plants, as well as the APR from the green algae
Enteromorpha intestinalis (45), have the same structure, this fusion must have occurred early in the evolution of plants. The
close relation of the Plectonema APS reductase to the plant enzymes also implies that plants obtained the gene for APS reductase from the chloroplast ancestor. As discussed above, the ancient sulfate
assimilation pathway in cyanobacteria was most probably APS-dependent; therefore, the gene acquired by the original
symbiont would be that of APS reductase. The cyanobacterial gene was
then allocated to the plant nuclear genome through endosymbiotic gene transfer and supplemented with the sequence encoding the targeting peptide, such as genes coding, e.g. for Calvin cycle enzymes
(46).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. J. Hoffemeister (Institute of
Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research Gatersleben) and Dr. M. Aragno
(University of Neuchâtel) for B. subtilis and
Pseudomonas stocks, respectively; Dr. I. Delic-Attree
(Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Grenoble) for the
P. aeruginosa cysH cDNA clone; and Dr. W. Martin (University of Düsseldorf), Dr. A. Meyer (University of
Freiburg), Dr. A. Schmidt (University of Hannover, Dr. H. G. Trüper (University of Bonn), and Dr. C. Dahl (University of Bonn)
for critical reading of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants from the Swiss National
Science Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institute of Forest
Botany and Tree Physiology, Georges-Köhler-Allee Geb. 053/054, 79085 Freiburg, Germany. Tel.: 49-761-2038303; Fax:
49-761-2038302; E-mail:
Stanislav.Kopriva@ctp.uni-freiburg.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 5, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M202152200
2
S. Kopriva, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
APS, adenosine
5'-phosphosulfate;
APR, adenosine 5'-phosphosulfate reductase;
PAPS, phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate;
T, tesla.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Trüper, H. G.,
and Fischer, U.
(1982)
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.
298,
529-542[CrossRef]
|
| 2.
|
Postgate, J. R.
(1984)
The Sulphate-reducing Bacteria.
, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom
|
| 3.
|
Brunold, C.
(1990)
in
Sulfur Nutrition and Sulfur Assimilation in Higher Plants
(Rennenberg, H.
, Brunold, C., De
, Kok, L. J.
, and Stulen, I., eds)
, pp. 13-31, SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands
|
| 4.
|
Jones-Mortimer, M. C.
(1973)
Heredity
31,
213-221[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Marzluf, G. A.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
51,
73-96[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Tsang, M. L.-S.,
and Schiff, J. A.
(1975)
Plant Sci. Lett.
4,
301-307[CrossRef]
|
| 7.
|
Schiff, J. A.,
and Saidha, T.
(1987)
Methods Enzymol.
143,
329-334[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Schmidt, A.
(1977)
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
1,
137-140[CrossRef]
|
| 9.
|
Schmidt, A.,
and Trüper, H. G.
(1977)
Experientia (Basel)
33,
1008-1009
|
| 10.
|
Gutierrez-Marcos, J. F.,
Roberts, M. A.,
Campbell, E. I.,
and Wray, J. L.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13377-13382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Setya, A.,
Murillo, M.,
and Leustek, T.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13383-13388[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Bick, J.-A.,
Åslund, F.,
Chen, Y.,
and Leustek, T.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
8404-8409[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Suter, M.,
von Ballmoos, P.,
Kopriva, S., Op,
den Camp, R.,
Schaller, J.,
Kuhlemeier, C.,
Schürmann, P.,
and Brunold, C.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
930-936[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Kopriva, S.,
Büchert, T.,
Fritz, G.,
Suter, M.,
Weber, M.,
Benda, R.,
Schaller, J.,
Feller, U.,
Schürmann, P.,
Schünemann, V.,
Trautwein, A. X.,
Kroneck, P. M.,
and Brunold, C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
42881-42886[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Leustek, T.,
Martin, M. N.,
Bick, J. A.,
and Davies, J. P.
(2000)
Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.
51,
141-165[CrossRef]
|
| 16.
|
Fritz, G.,
Büchert, T.,
Huber, H.,
Stetter, K. O.,
and Kroneck, P. M.
(2000)
FEBS Lett.
473,
63-66[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Kappler, U.,
and Dahl, C.
(2001)
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
203,
1-9[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Abola, A. P.,
Willits, M. G.,
Wang, R. C.,
and Long, S. R.
(1999)
J. Bacteriol.
181,
5280-5287[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Bick, J. A.,
Dennis, J. J.,
Zylstra, G. J.,
Nowack, J.,
and Leustek, T.
(2000)
J. Bacteriol.
182,
135-142[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Neumann, S.,
Wynen, A.,
Trüper, H. G.,
and Dahl, C.
(2000)
Mol. Biol. Rep.
27,
27-33[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Li, J.,
and Schiff, J. A.
(1991)
Biochem. J.
274,
355-360
|
| 22.
|
Van de Peer, Y.,
and De Wachter, R.
(1993)
Comput. Appl. Biosci.
9,
177-182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Saitou, N.,
and Nei, M.
(1987)
Mol. Biol. Evol.
4,
406-425[Abstract]
|
| 24.
|
Felsenstein, J.
(1989)
Cladistics
5,
164-166
|
| 25.
|
Brunold, C.,
and Suter, M.
(1990)
in
Methods in Plant Biochemistry
(Lea, P., ed), Vol. 3
, pp. 339-343, Academic Press, London
|
| 26.
|
Krone, F. A.,
Westphal, G.,
and Schwenn, J. D.
(1991)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
225,
314-319[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Delic-Attree, I.,
Toussaint, B.,
Garin, J.,
and Vignais, P. M.
(1997)
Mol. Microbiol.
24,
1275-1284[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 29.
|
Fischer, D. S.,
and Price, D. C.
(1964)
Clin. Chem.
10,
21-31[Abstract]
|
| 30.
|
Riester, J.,
Zumft, W. G.,
and Kroneck, P. M. H.
(1989)
Eur. J. Biochem.
178,
751-762[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Trautwein, A. X.,
Bill, E.,
Bominaar, E. L.,
and Winkler, H.
(1991)
Struct. Bonding
78,
1-95
|
| 32.
|
Berendt, U.,
Haverkamp, T.,
Prior, A.,
and Schwenn, J. D.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
233,
347-356[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Weber, M.,
Suter, M.,
Brunold, C.,
and Kopriva, S.
(2000)
Eur. J. Biochem.
267,
3647-3653[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Tuovinen, O. H.,
Kelley, B. C.,
and Nicholas, D. J. D.
(1975)
Arch. Microbiol.
105,
123-127[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Speich, N.,
Dahl, C.,
Heisig, P.,
Klein, A.,
Lottspeich, F.,
Stetter, K. O.,
and Trüper, H. G.
(1994)
Microbiology
140,
1273-1284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Lampreia, J.,
Moura, I.,
Teixeira, M.,
Peck, H. D., Jr.,
Legall, J.,
Huynh, B. H.,
and Moura, J. J.
(1990)
Eur. J. Biochem.
188,
653-664[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Hipp, W. M.,
Pott, A. S.,
Thum-Schmitz, N.,
Faath, I.,
Dahl, C.,
and Trüper, H. G.
(1997)
Microbiology
143,
2891-2902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Kredich, N. M.
(1993)
in
Sulfur Nutrition and Assimilation in Higher Plants
(De Kok, L. J.
, Stulen, I.
, Rennenberg, H.
, Brunold, C.
, and Rauser, W. E., eds)
, pp. 37-47, SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands
|
| 39.
|
Martin, W.
(1999)
Bioessays
21,
99-104[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Friedrich, M. W.
(2002)
J. Bacteriol.
184,
278-289[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Leustek, T.,
and Bick, J. A.
(2000)
in
Sulfur Nutrition and Sulfur Assimilation in Higher Plants
(Brunold, C.
, Rennenberg, H., De
, Kok, L. J.
, Stulen, I.
, and Davidian, J.-C., eds)
, pp. 1-15, Paul Haupt Publishers, Bern, Switzerland
|
| 42.
|
Gupta, R. S.
(2000)
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
24,
367-402[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Gupta, R. S.
(1998)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
62,
1435-1491[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Sanchez, O.,
Ferrera, I.,
Dahl, C.,
and Mas, J.
(2001)
Arch. Microbiol.
176,
301-305[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Gao, Y.,
Schofield, O. M.,
and Leustek, T.
(2000)
Plant Physiol.
123,
1087-1096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Martin, W.,
and Schnarrenberger, C.
(1997)
Curr. Genet.
32,
1-18[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kopriva, K. Fritzemeier, G. Wiedemann, and R. Reski
The Putative Moss 3'-Phosphoadenosine-5'-phosphosulfate Reductase Is a Novel Form of Adenosine-5'-phosphosulfate Reductase without an Iron-Sulfur Cluster
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 3, 2007;
282(31):
22930 - 22938.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Iwanicka-Nowicka, A. Zielak, A. M. Cook, M. S. Thomas, and M. M. Hryniewicz
Regulation of Sulfur Assimilation Pathways in Burkholderia cenocepacia: Identification of Transcription Factors CysB and SsuR and Their Role in Control of Target Genes
J. Bacteriol.,
March 1, 2007;
189(5):
1675 - 1688.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Shen, S. Sayeed, P. Antalis, J. Gladitz, A. Ahmed, B. Dice, B. Janto, R. Dopico, R. Keefe, J. Hayes, et al.
Extensive Genomic Plasticity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Revealed by Identification and Distribution Studies of Novel Genes among Clinical Isolates
Infect. Immun.,
September 1, 2006;
74(9):
5272 - 5283.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. KOPRIVA
Regulation of Sulfate Assimilation in Arabidopsis and Beyond
Ann. Bot.,
April 1, 2006;
97(4):
479 - 495.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Barbe, D. Vallenet, N. Fonknechten, A. Kreimeyer, S. Oztas, L. Labarre, S. Cruveiller, C. Robert, S. Duprat, P. Wincker, et al.
Unique features revealed by the genome sequence of Acinetobacter sp. ADP1, a versatile and naturally transformation competent bacterium
Nucleic Acids Res.,
October 28, 2004;
32(19):
5766 - 5779.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kopriva and A. Koprivova
Plant adenosine 5'-phosphosulphate reductase: the past, the present, and the future
J. Exp. Bot.,
August 1, 2004;
55(404):
1775 - 1783.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Hartmann, P. Honicke, M. Wirtz, R. Hell, H. Rennenberg, and S. Kopriva
Regulation of sulphate assimilation by glutathione in poplars (Populus tremulaxP. alba) of wild type and overexpressing {gamma}-glutamylcysteine synthetase in the cytosol
J. Exp. Bot.,
April 1, 2004;
55(398):
837 - 845.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Berndt, C. H. Lillig, M. Wollenberg, E. Bill, M. C. Mansilla, D. de Mendoza, A. Seidler, and J. D. Schwenn
Characterization and Reconstitution of a 4Fe-4S Adenylyl Sulfate/Phosphoadenylyl Sulfate Reductase from Bacillus subtilis
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 27, 2004;
279(9):
7850 - 7855.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Snoeck, C. Verreth, I. Hernandez-Lucas, E. Martinez-Romero, and J. Vanderleyden
Identification of a Third Sulfate Activation System in Sinorhizobium sp. Strain BR816: the CysDN Sulfate Activation Complex
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
April 1, 2003;
69(4):
2006 - 2014.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Williams, R. H. Senaratne, J. D. Mougous, L. W. Riley, and C. R. Bertozzi
5'-Adenosinephosphosulfate Lies at a Metabolic Branch Point in Mycobacteria
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 30, 2002;
277(36):
32606 - 32615.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Koprivova, A. J. Meyer, G. Schween, C. Herschbach, R. Reski, and S. Kopriva
Functional Knockout of the Adenosine 5'-Phosphosulfate Reductase Gene in Physcomitrella patens Revives an Old Route of Sulfate Assimilation
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 23, 2002;
277(35):
32195 - 32201.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|