![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 24, 21955-21961, June 14, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Membrane Biology Laboratory, Institute of Molecular and
Cell Biology, 30 Medical Drive, Singapore 117609, Singapore
Received for publication, March 11, 2002, and in revised form, April 2, 2002
Sec34p/Grd20p has been implicated in endoplasmic
reticulum (ER)-to-Golgi transport and/or post-Golgi trafficking events
and exists in a protein complex consisting of at least eight subunits in yeast. Although the mammalian counterpart (Sec34) of Sec34p has been
molecularly identified, its role and interacting partners remain
undefined. In this study, we have prepared antibodies specifically against the recombinant N-terminal fragment of Sec34 that recognize a
polypeptide of about 93 kDa and label the Golgi apparatus. In a
well-characterized semi-intact cell assay that reconstitutes transport
of the envelope glycoprotein (VSVG) of vesicular stomatitis virus from
the ER to the Golgi apparatus, anti-Sec34 antibodies inhibited the
transport in a dose-dependent manner. The inhibition by
anti-Sec34 antibodies could be neutralized by a noninhibitory amount of
the antigen. Large-scale immunoprecipitation of rat liver cytosol with
immobilized anti-Sec34 antibodies has co-immunoprecipitated GTC-90 and
ldlBp, two peripheral Golgi proteins previously shown to exist in
separate protein complexes. Two mammalian homologues (Dor1 and Cod1) of
the yeast Sec34 complex were similarly recovered in the Sec34
immunoprecipitates. When expressed in transfected cells, epitope-tagged
ldlCp and Cod2 were co-immunoprecipitated with anti-Sec34 antibodies
with efficiencies comparable to that observed for tagged ldlBp, Dor1,
and Cod1. Direct interactions of Sec34 with ldlBp and ldlCp were
further demonstrated in vitro. These results suggest
that Sec34, GTC-90, and ldlBp/ldlCp are part of the same protein
complex(es) that regulates diverse aspects of Golgi function, including
transport from the ER to the Golgi apparatus.
Protein transport from the
ER1 to the Golgi in mammalian
cells involves several key steps (1, 2). Cargo proteins and components
necessary for downstream steps are first exported from the ER exit
sites via the action of COPII components (3, 4). COPII vesicles and/or
clusters of COPII vesicles are believed to undergo homotypic fusion to
form pleiotropic transport intermediates (1, 5). The ER exit sites and
transport intermediates have been collectively referred to as the
intermediate compartment or the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (2,
6). The heterotypic fusion of the transport intermediates with the
cis-Golgi results in the delivery of cargo proteins to the Golgi
apparatus. Many proteins originally identified in yeast have now been
shown to participate in ER-to-Golgi transport in mammalian cells (2, 7), and more proteins regulating ER-to-Golgi transport in mammalian cells are expected to exist.
SEC34 and SEC35 were identified as genes whose
products are necessary for protein transport from the ER to the Golgi
in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (8). More detailed studies
of Sec34p and Sec35p have suggested that they function as components of a protein complex that acts as a tethering factor to ensure the proper
docking and fusion of transport intermediates with the Golgi apparatus
(9-12). In addition, the TRAPP protein complex (13) and Uso1p (14-16)
have similarly been shown to function in tethering for the same
transport event. Although the spatial, temporal, and mechanistic
relationships among the Sec34-Sec35p complex, the TRAPP complex,
and Uso1p have yet to be fully characterized, the importance of the
tethering process in ensuring faithful docking and fusion of transport
intermediates with the target compartment is becoming more recognized
in several trafficking events (17-19). Although the mammalian
homologue (Sec34) of Sec34p has been molecularly identified (20), its
role in membrane traffic in mammalian cells remains to be established,
and its interacting partners remain to be explored.
GTC-90 was purified as a component of a novel protein complex in
mammalian cells that is required for intra-Golgi transport in
vitro (21). Although the GTC-90 protein complex is known to
include several other different subunits, their identities are unknown,
and the functional aspects of the GTC-90 complex in other transport
events remain to be examined.
Low density lipoprotein receptor is responsible for the clearance of
serum low density lipoprotein particles, and diverse mutations in its
gene are associated with familial hypercholesterolemia (22). Due to its
importance, understanding the pathway and mechanism underlying
low density lipoprotein receptor trafficking has been an active area of
cell biology. Genetic approaches have been used to create and identify
several mutant lines of Chinese hamster ovary cells, including
ldlA-ldlI (23-25). The genes mutated in some of these mutants (such as
ldlA, ldlB, lldC, ldlD, and ldlF) have been identified
(26-30). Biochemical and cell biological characterizations of ldlBp
and ldlCp have revealed that they are components of the same protein
complex (28, 30). Both ldlBp and ldlCp are necessary for maintaining
normal structure and function of the Golgi apparatus, although the
precise function remains to be investigated.
Using antibodies against the recombinant Sec34 N-terminal fragment,
evidence is presented to support a role for Sec34 in ER-to-Golgi transport in mammalian cells. Significantly, the observation that antibodies against Sec34 could co-immunoprecipitate GTC-90, ldlBp, and
others suggests that Sec34, GTC-90, ldlBp, and ldlCp are part of the
same protein complex(es) that may regulate diverse aspects of the Golgi
functions, including ER-to-Golgi transport.
Materials--
All cell lines were obtained from the American
Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads
were purchased from Amersham Biosciences. Fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin (IgG) and
Texas Red-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG were from Jackson
ImmunoResearch. Restriction enzymes were all purchased from Roche
Molecular Biochemicals. Local New Zealand White rabbits were purchased
from the Sembawang Laboratory Animals Centre (Singapore). Freund's
adjuvants (complete and incomplete) were from Invitrogen. The human
cDNA clones KIAA1134 and KIAA1381 were kindly provided by the
Kazusa DNA Research Institute. Human expressed sequence tag clone
accession number AA439818 was generated by the Washington
University-Merck Expressed Sequence Tag Project and made available by
the IMAGE consortium via Research Genetics Inc. (Huntsville, AL).
cDNA clone AI492237 was purchased from Invitrogen. AK026305
cDNA clone was provided by the NEDO (New Energy and
Industrial Technology Development Organization) Human cDNA
Sequencing Project. Synthetic oligonucleotides were ordered from
Research Genetics (Singapore).
cDNA Cloning of Human Sec34--
Full-length human Sec34
cDNA was assembled by first obtaining a 1.8-kb fragment from
cDNA clone AK026305 by digestion with XhoI and
NsiI. This fragment, which contains the 5' coding region of
Sec34, was ligated to an ~3.6-kb fragment obtained from cDNA clone AA439818 by digestion with XhoI and NsiI,
which also includes the vector pT7T3D-Pac. An additional 1.8-kb
fragment was obtained from cDNA clone AA439818 by digestion with
NsiI alone. These fragments were ligated to construct an
overall 4.3-kb Sec34 cDNA in pT7T3D-Pac vector.
Expression Constructs for myc Epitope-tagged Sec34, Dor1, Cod1,
Cod2, ldlBp, and ldlCp Myc-Sec34--
Sec34 cDNA in pT7T3D-Pac
vector was digested with XhoI and NotI, and the
resulting fragments were digested with BglI to obtain an
~2.5-kb fragment that contains the entire coding region of Sec34.
This fragment was blunt-ended and ligated to pDMyc-neo vector (31)
pre-cut with XbaI and blunt-ended. For Myc-Cod2, primer 1 (5'-GAG-CTC-GAG-CGG-GCA-GAG-GGC-AGC-GGG-GAA-GTG) and primer 2 (5'-GGC-ATC-TGC-AAC-TTG-AGC-TCT-TAT-CTC-TAA-TTT) were used to amplify a
450-bp fragment from the KIAA1134 clone, and the resulting PCR product
was digested with XhoI and SacI. This fragment
was ligated to another fragment retrieved by digesting KIAA1134 with
SacI and NotI, together with the pDMyc-neo vector pre-cut with XhoI and NotI. For Myc-ldlBp, primer
3 (5'-GAG-CTC-GAG-CGG-GTG-GGC-GAA-CGG-TAC) and primer 4 (5'-TAC-ACA-TGT-GGA-TCC-ATT-TCT-GCA-GC) were used to amplify an ~1-kb
fragment from KIAA1381, and the resulting PCR fragment was digested
with XhoI and BamHI. This was ligated to a
fragment retrieved from KIAA1381 by digestion with BamHI and
NotI, together with pDMyc-neo vector pre-cut with
XhoI and NotI. For Myc-ldlCp, primer 5 (5'-GGC-CTC-GAG-CGG-GAG-AAA-AGT-AGG) and primer 6 (5'-GGT-CTA-GAC-GAG-AGG-CTG-CTC-TGC-TGT-TGC) were used to amplify the
entire coding sequence of ldlCp from IMAGE clone AI492237 by PCR, and
the resulting product was digested with XhoI and
XbaI and ligated into the corresponding sites of pDMyc-neo
vector. For Myc-Dor1 and Myc-Cod1, plasmids SDOR1M1 and SCOD1M4, which
express Dor1 and Cod1, respectively, with triple myc tags at the C
terminus were kindly provided by Dr. Sean Munro (32).
Expression and Purification of Recombinant GST Fusion
Proteins--
For production of recombinant GST fusion proteins,
primer 7 (5'-ATT-GGA-TCC-ATT-ATG-GCG-GAG-GCG-GCG) and primer 8 (5'-CGG-CTC-GAG-CGG-ACT-TGT-GAG-GGT-CTG-TAG-TGT-GTT) were used to
amplify the coding sequence for residues 1-276 of Sec34. This PCR
product was digested with BamHI and XhoI. Primer 9 (5'-CTC-CCG-GGT-CAT-CAG-TTA-CTG-AAA-AGG-GAT-CCT) and primer 10 (5'-CGG-CTC-GAG-CGG-TCC-ATG-AAG-ATC-TGC) were used to retrieve the region coding for residues 277-552 of Sec34. The PCR product was digested with SmaI and XhoI. Primer 11 (5'-CCC-GGA-TCC-CCC-ATG-TGG-TAT-CCT-ACG-GTT-CGA-AGA) and primer 12 (5'-CGG-CTC-GAG-CGG-TTT-AGA-AAC-TGA-CAG-CAG-AAG) were used to amplify
the sequence coding for residues 553-828 of Sec34. This PCR product
was digested with BamHI and XhoI. The bacterial
expression vector pGEX-4T-1 (Amersham Biosciences) was digested
accordingly and ligated with these PCR fragments. The ligated plasmids
were transformed into DH5 Preparation and Affinity Purification of Sec34
Antibodies--
400 µg of GST-Sec34/F1 was emulsified with Freund's
complete adjuvant and injected subcutaneously into two local New
Zealand White rabbits. Booster injections with the same amount of
antigen in Freund's incomplete adjuvant were administered every 2 weeks. The rabbits were bled 10 days after the second and subsequent boosters. For affinity purification, the antiserum was first diluted with an equal volume of PBS and then incubated for 2 h at 4 °C with GST coupled to cyanogen bromide-activated Sepharose 4B (Amersham Biosciences) to remove antibodies against GST. The flow-through was
then incubated overnight at 4 °C with GST-Sec34/F1-coupled beads.
The beads were washed extensively, and Sec34-specific antibodies were
eluted with low pH elution buffer as described previously (34).
Immunoblot Analysis--
Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and
electrotransferred onto Hybond C+ nitrocellulose. The blots were then
incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in blocking buffer (5% skim milk
and 5% fetal bovine serum in PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20). The
blots were incubated in blocking buffer containing primary antibodies
for 1 h at room temperature, followed by three washes (5 min each)
with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20. The blots were then incubated with
either goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibody conjugated to
horseradish peroxidase (Jackson ImmunoResearch). After three washes in
PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20, SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescence
Substrate (Pierce) was added, and the blots were processed according to the manufacturer's protocol. For the blocking experiment shown in Fig
2A, 50 µg of proteins extracted from Golgi-enriched
membranes or cytosol was electrophoresed and transferred to a filter.
After blocking, the filter was immunoblotted with 2 µg of
affinity-purified Sec34 antibodies or with 2 µg of Sec34 antibodies
preincubated with 20 µg of recombinant GST-Sec34/F1, GST-Sec34/F2, or
GST-Sec34/F3.
Immunofluorescence Microscopy--
Cells were grown on
coverslips overnight to 50-80% confluence, rinsed twice with
phosphate-buffered saline with 1 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2, and processed as described
previously (34, 35). Sec34 antibodies (5-10 µg/ml) in fluorescence
dilution buffer (PBSCM with 5% normal goat serum, 5% fetal bovine
serum, and 2% bovine serum albumin, pH 7.6) were used. 0.5 µg of
GST-Sec34/F1 was used to neutralize the antibodies.
In Vitro ER-to-Golgi Transport Using Semi-intact Cells--
The
ER-to-Golgi transport assay using semi-intact cells was an assay
modified according from a previously reported procedure (7, 36) and was
performed as follows. Briefly, normal rat kidney cells grown on
10-cm Petri dishes as a confluent monolayer were infected with a
temperature-sensitive strain of the vesicular stomatitis virus,
VSVts045, at 32 °C for 1 h and then at the restrictive temperature of 40 °C for another 2 h. The cells were then
subjected to perforation on ice by hypotonic swelling and scraping.
These semi-intact cells were then incubated in a complete assay mixture (40 µl) containing 25 mM Hepes-KOH, pH 7.2, 90 mM KOAc, 2.5 mM MgOAc, 5 mM EGTA,
1.8 mM CaCl2, 1 mM ATP, 5 mM creatine phosphate, 0.2 IU of rabbit muscle creatine
phosphokinase, 25 µg of cytosol, and 5 µl (25-30 µg of protein;
1-2 × 105) of semi intact cells. Additional reagents
were added as indicated. For a standard assay, samples were incubated
for 90 min at 32 °C, and transport was terminated by transferring
samples to ice. The membranes were collected by a brief spin and
solubilized in 20 µl of 0.2% SDS, 50 mM sodium citrate
(pH 5.5). After boiling for 5 min, the samples were digested
overnight at 37 °C in the presence of 2.5 units of endoglycosidase
H, and the reaction was terminated by adding 6× concentrated gel
sample buffer. The samples were separated on 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide
gels and transferred to a nitrocellulose filter. Immunoblot analysis
was performed with anti-vesicular stomatitis virus antibodies (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals). For antibody inhibition of transport assay,
Sec34 antibodies were added into the complete assay mixture and
incubated on ice for 60 min to allow diffusion of antibodies into the
semi-intact cells.
Large-scale Immunoprecipitation--
300 µl of protein
A-Sepharose CL-4B (Amersham Biosciences) was washed in PBS and used to
bind 500 µg of rabbit anti-goat IgG (Pierce) or 500 µg of
anti-Sec34 antibodies separately for 2 h at 4 °C. The
antibodies were cross-linked to the beads with 50 mM
dimethyl pimelidate in 0.2 M sodium borate, pH 9, overnight at 4 °C and then washed in 0.2 M sodium borate, pH 9, and incubated with 0.2 M ethanolamine, pH 8, for 2 h
at room temperature. The beads were washed with PBS and finally
in 0.5% TX-100 in gradient buffer (20 mM Hepes, pH 7.3, 100 mM KCl, and 2 mM EDTA). 50 mg of rat liver
cytosol was first incubated with the beads bound with control rabbit
IgG in gradient buffer with 0.5% TX-100 for 2 h at 4 °C. The
supernatant was then incubated with the beads bound to Sec34 antibodies
overnight at 4 °C. The beads were then washed three times with
gradient buffer containing 0.5% TX-100 and then finally with gradient
buffer without TX-100.
Transfection and Analytic Immunoprecipitation--
293T cells
were grown on 60-mm dishes to 40-60% confluence. 1 µg of myc-tagged
ldlBp, ldlCp, Dor1, Cod1, and Cod2 DNA was used for transfection with
Effectene Transfection Reagent, according to the manufacturer's
instructions (Qiagen). The next day, the cells were washed twice with
PBSCM. 150 µl of PBS containing 1% TX-100 and complete
EDTA-free protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Diagnostics) was added, and
the cells were then scraped with a cell scraper. The cells were rotated
at 4 °C for 15 min and then spun down at 4000 rpm for 10 min. Sec34
antibodies (5 µg) were added to the supernatant and incubated at
4 °C for 2 h. Next, protein A-Sepharose CL-4B beads were added
and left to bind overnight at 4 °C. The beads were then washed three
times with PBS and 1% TX-100, washed with PBS and 0.2% TX-100, and
finally washed with PBS and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Immunoblot analysis
was performed with anti-myc monoclonal antibodies.
In Vitro Translation and Binding Experiment--
TNT T7 Quick
Master Mix (Promega) was used for in vitro translation
according to manufacturer's protocol. In a 100-µl reaction, myc-tagged Sec34 and each of the myc-tagged ldlBp, ldlCp, and Cod2 were
co-translated for 2 h at 30 °C. 20 µl of each reaction was
used for co-immunoprecipitation with 10 µg of anti-myc antibodies (rabbit polyclonal IgG) (Upstate Biotechnology) or 10 µg of
anti-Sec34 antibodies bound to protein A-Sepharose beads in gradient
buffer with 0.1% TX-100. After 1 h at room temperature, the beads
were washed five times with gradient buffer with 0.1% TX-100 and
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography together with 2 µg of
in vitro-translated product (10% starting material).
Characterization of Antibodies against Sec34--
Due to the
established role of Sec34p in ER-to-Golgi transport in yeast and our
general interest in ER-to-Golgi transport in mammalian cells, we used
the amino acid sequence of Sec34p to search for its putative mammalian
counterpart by BLAST searches (37). Several cDNA sequences encoding
polypeptides homologous to various regions of Sec34p were uncovered.
The complete coding region of human Sec34 was assembled from various
cDNAs and confirmed by DNA sequencing (GenBankTM
accession no. AF332595). During the course of our work, the molecular
identification of human Sec34 was independently reported (20).
Examination of the deduced 828 amino acid sequences suggests that Sec34
could be roughly divided into two regions (Fig.
1A). The N-terminal one-third
is highly homologous to counterparts from other species such as yeast,
fly, and worm and has the potential (particularly residues 126-211) to
form coiled-coil structures. The C-terminal two-thirds is homologous to
EEA1 (Fig. 1B), a well-established tethering factor that
regulates endosome fusion (38). The structural relatedness of Sec34 to
a well-defined tethering protein provides some structural evidence for
Sec34 to function as a tethering factor. To define the functional and
biochemical aspects of Sec34, we expressed recombinant Sec34 in three
separate fragments (residues 1-276, Sec34/F1; residues 277-552,
Sec34/F2; and residues 553-828, Sec34/F3) fused to GST (Fig.
1A). GST-Sec34/F1 was used to raise antibodies against
Sec34. As shown in Fig. 1C, affinity-purified Sec34
antibodies recognized a polypeptide of about 93 kDa in both membrane
(lane 1) and cytosol (lane 5) fractions derived
from rat liver. Detection of this polypeptide by the antibodies was abolished by preincubation of the antibodies with GST- Sec34/F1 (Fig.
1C, lanes 2 and 6) but not with
GST-Sec34/F2 (lanes 3 and 7) or GST-Sec34/F3
(lanes 4 and 8), suggesting that the antibodies are specific for Sec34 and that Sec34 is present in both cytosolic and
membrane fractions. Using these antibodies in immunofluorescence microscopy, Sec34 was seen to be enriched in the Golgi apparatus (Fig.
1D, a) marked by the Golgi SNARE GS28 (Fig.
1D, b) (39, 40) in HeLa cells. Furthermore,
the Golgi labeling of Sec34 (Fig. 1D, d) but
not GS28 (Fig. 1D, e) was abolished by
preincubation of the antibodies with GST-Sec34/F1, further confirming
the specificity of the antibodies. These results are similar to those
reported previously (20) and suggest that our antibodies are specific for Sec34.
A Role for Sec34 in ER-to-Golgi Transport--
Because evidence
for a functional role for Sec34 in ER-to-Golgi transport in mammalian
cells is lacking, we investigated the potential transport function of
Sec34 by using a modified semi-intact cell assay that reconstitutes
protein transport from the ER to the Golgi (see "Experimental
Procedures" for details). NRK cells were infected with a
temperature-sensitive mutant vesicular stomatitis virus (VSVts045) at
32 °C for 1 h followed by incubation at 40 °C for 2 h
to accumulate its envelope protein (VSVG) in the ER. Cells were then
permeabilized by scraping in hypotonic buffer and used to reconstitute
transport of VSVG by supplementing them with exogenous rat liver
cytosol and an ATP-regenerating system at 32 °C. Transport of VSVG
to the Golgi was measured by monitoring the conversion of its
endoglycosidase H-sensitive glycans to endoglycosidase H-resistant
forms of the entire population of ER-arrested VSVG molecules as
revealed by immunoblot analysis. There are two advantages in this
modified assay as compared with the original protocol (7). The first is
that no radioactive materials were used. The other is that instead of
measuring a small fraction (the radiolabeled pool) of total VSVG, this
assay measures the synchronized transport to the Golgi of almost all
VSVG molecules accumulated in the ER. As shown in Fig.
2, VSVG remained as the endoglycosidase
H-sensitive ER form when the transport reaction was performed on ice
(Fig. 2A, lane 1; Fig. 2B, lane
1) or in the absence of cytosol (Fig. 2A, lane
2; Fig. 2B, lane 2). Between 60% and 90% of total
VSVG was converted into the endoglycosidase H-resistant form when the transport assay was conducted in the presence of complete mixture at
32 °C (Fig. 2A, lane 3; Fig. 2B, lane 3).
Addition of antibodies against GST (Fig. 2A, lanes 4-6) did
not inhibit this transport, whereas the addition of antibodies against
Sec34 (Fig. 2A, lanes 7-10) inhibited the transport in a
dose-dependent manner. Clear inhibition was observed in the
presence of Co-immunoprecipitation of GTC-90, ldlBp, Dor1, and Cod1 from Total
Cytosol by Anti-Sec34 Antibodies--
To define the molecular
mechanism underlying the action of Sec34, we have performed large-scale
immunoprecipitations using rat liver cytosol (Fig.
3). As compared with rabbit anti-goat IgG
(Fig. 3, lane 2), antibodies against Sec34
immunoprecipitated several distinct polypeptides (lane 3) as
resolved by SDS-PAGE. We focused our mass spectrometric analyses on
polypeptides that are larger than the IgG heavy chain because
polypeptides of smaller sizes are commonly detected by large-scale
immunoprecipitations due to nonspecific interactions of abundant
cytosolic proteins. As shown in Fig. 3, GTC-90 (21) and ldlBp (28), in
addition to Sec34, were identified in the Sec34 immunoprecipitates. The intensities of ldlBp and GTC-90, as revealed by Coomassie Blue staining, were stronger than that of Sec34, suggesting that the Sec34
polypeptide might be poorly stained or that other subunits are present
at higher abundance in the complex. The quantitative and specific
recoveries of ldlBp and GTC-90 by anti-Sec34 antibodies from total
cytosol suggest that Sec34, GTC-90, and ldlBp are components of the
same protein complex(es). Furthermore, two mammalian homologues (Dor1
and Cod1) of the yeast Sec34p-Sec35p complex (32) were also detected in
the Sec34 immunoprecipitates (Fig. 3), supporting the hypothesis that
they are part of the mammalian complex. To rule out the possibility
that some interesting components may be overlooked, we have also
analyzed other polypeptides migrating faster than that of IgG heavy
chain. These mainly represented abundant cytosolic proteins such as
actin, three ribosomal subunits, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase, and glutathione peroxidase. In addition, an
uncharacterized protein with GenBankTM accession no.
XP_034431 was identified. Although we cannot exclude the possibility
that some of these proteins may be involved in Sec34 function, the
presence of abundant cytosolic proteins such as actin,
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, and ribosomal proteins in
this low molecular weight region indicates that their presence is
likely due to nonspecific interactions.
Co-immunoprecipitation of ldlCp and Cod2--
While our study was
in progress, the yeast Sec34p-Sec35p complex was characterized in
detail (32). It contains eight subunits: Sec34p, Sec35p, Dor1p, Cod1p,
Cod2p, Cod3p, Cod4p, and Cod5p. Cod4p corresponds to GTC-90 in
mammalian cells. Some structural relatedness between Sec35p and ldlCp
was noticed, indicating that Sec35p could be a candidate for the
functional counterpart of mammalian ldlCp (32). Mammalian homologues of
Dor1p, Cod1p, and Cod2p, but not Cod3p or Cod5p, were also identified,
and the epitope-tagged mammalian Dor1 and Cod1 were detected in the
Golgi apparatus upon transient expression by transfection (32). No apparent structural or functional yeast counterpart of ldlBp was found
in the yeast Sec34p-Sec35p complex. Because GTC-90, ldlBp, Dor1, and
Cod1 were recovered in the anti-Sec34 immunoprecipitates, we examined
whether other potential subunits (ldlCp and Cod2) of the mammalian
complex(es) could be immunoprecipitated by anti-Sec34 antibodies (Fig.
4). 293T cells were transiently
transfected with constructs expressing Myc epitope-tagged ldlBp, ldlCp,
Dor1, Cod1, or Cod2. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with
anti-Sec34 antibodies and analyzed by immunoblot to detect the tagged
proteins. As positive controls, cells transiently expressing myc-ldlBp, myc-Dor1, and myc-Cod1 were immunoprecipitated with anti-Sec34. About
5% of myc-ldlBp (Fig. 4, lanes 1 and 2),
myc-Dor1 (lanes 5 and 6), or myc-Cod1
(lanes 7 and 8) could be recovered by anti-Sec34 antibodies. Under identical conditions, they were not
co-immunoprecipitated by other control antibodies (data not shown).
These results further support our conclusion that they are specifically
co-immunoprecipitated by Sec34 antibodies. Importantly, myc-ldlCp (Fig.
4, lanes 3 and 4) and myc-Cod2 (lanes
9 and 10) were co-immunoprecipitated by anti-Sec34
antibodies with efficiencies comparable to that observed for myc-ldlBp,
myc-Dor1, and myc-Cod1, supporting the notion that these other proteins
are indeed subunits of the same mammalian complex(es). Consistent with
our interpretation that polypeptides smaller than the IgG heavy
chain were present in the Sec34 immunoprecipitates due to their
high abundance and nonspecific interactions, myc-tagged XP_034431 was
not co-immunoprecipiated by anti-Sec34 from lysates prepared from
transfected cells (data not shown).
Direct Interaction of Sec34 with ldlBp or ldlCp--
We next
investigated whether Sec34 could interact directly with any of the
other subunits. Myc-Sec34 was co-translated with myc-ldlBp, myc-ldlCp,
or myc-Cod2 using the in vitro translation system. The
translation reactions were then subjected to immunoprecipitation using
Sec34 antibodies or anti-myc antibodies. As shown in Fig. 5, myc-Sec34 and myc-Cod2 were both
effectively immunoprecipitated with anti-myc antibodies (lane
3). However, myc-Cod2 was not co-immunoprecipitated by anti-Sec34
under the conditions in which myc-Sec34 was efficiently immunoprecipitated (Fig. 5, lane 2), suggesting that
myc-Cod2 and myc-Sec34 do not interact directly. Interestingly, both
myc-ldlBp and myc-ldlCp, upon co-translation with myc-Sec34, could be
efficiently (30-50% of co-expressed protein) co-immunoprecipitated by
anti-Sec34 antibodies (Fig. 5, lanes 5 and
8, respectively), suggesting that both ldlBp and ldlCp
could interact directly with Sec34.
Sec34, GTC-90, and ldlBp/ldlCp have been independently identified
by different approaches. Sec34 was identified based on a genomic
approach to search for the mammalian homologue of Sec34p (Ref. 20 and
this study), which has a well-defined role in ER-to-Golgi transport in
yeast (9-12). GTC-90 was previously identified as a component of a
novel protein complex that participates in intra-Golgi transport using
an in vitro biochemical assay (21). ldlBp and ldlCp were
originally identified by a genetic approach (22-25) and subsequently
shown to exist in the same protein complex that regulates Golgi
structure and function (28, 30). One of the most important discoveries
of the present study is that Sec34, GTC-90, and ldlBp/ldlCp are
components of the same protein complex(es) (we tentatively refer to
this as the Sec34-GTC-90-ldlBp complex). This is based on several lines
of observations. Firstly, GTC-90 and ldlBp (as well as Dor1 and Cod1)
could be efficiently and specifically co-immunoprecipitated from rat
liver cytosol by antibodies against Sec34. Secondly, upon expression by
transient transfection, myc-tagged ldlBp, ldlCp, Dor1, Cod1, and Cod2
could be similarly co-immunoprecipitated by anti-Sec34 antibodies.
Finally, direct interaction of Sec34 with ldlBp and ldlCp could be
demonstrated in the absence of other subunits using in
vitro-translated proteins. While this work was in progress, the
yeast Sec34p-Sec35p complex was shown to consist of eight subunits:
Sec34p, Sec35p, Dor1p, Cod1p, Cod2p, Cod3p, Cod4p, and Cod5p. Mammalian
homologues for Dor1p, Cod1p, Cod2p, and Cod4p, but not Cod3p or Cod5p,
have been also identified (32), and GTC-90 appears to be the
counterpart of Cod4p. An ~110-amino acid region of ldlCp was found to
be homologous to Sec35p, indicating some relatedness between ldlCp and
Sec35p (32). Interestingly, no homologue for ldlBp was identified in yeast, suggesting either that there is another subunit that remains to
be uncovered in the yeast Sec34p-Sec35p complex or that ldlBp could be
a functional counterpart of either Cod3p or Cod5p. Although we favor
the possibility that ldlBp (980 amino acids for mouse protein and 962 amino acids for human protein) is not a functional counterpart of Cod3p
(417 amino acids) or Cod5p (279 amino acids) due to the lack of
similarity of their amino acid sequences and the huge differences in
sizes, additional studies are needed to establish this point. Because
myc-tagged ldlCp can be co-immunoprecipitated with Sec34 upon
expression by transient transfection and a direct interaction between
Sec34 and myc-ldlCp could be observed, ldlCp is indeed a component of
the Sec34-GTC-90-ldlBp complex. Because ldlCp (731 and 738 amino acids
for mouse and human protein, respectively) is much larger than Sec35p
(275 amino acids), and the observed sequence homology (24% identity
over a region of 110 amino acids) is limited, additional evidence is
required to resolve whether ldlCp is the structural and/or functional
counterpart of yeast Sec35p. The direct interaction of ldlBp or ldlCp
with Sec34 suggests that Sec34 harbors structural information for
direct interaction with ldlBp and ldlCp in the absence of other subunits.
The other potential subunits (Dor1, Cod1, and Cod2) of the mammalian
Sec34-GTC-90-ldlBp complex were similarly confirmed immunologically and/or biochemically as components of the Sec34-containing protein complex(es). Both Dor1 and Cod1 were recovered in Sec34
immunoprecipitates. Epitope-tagged versions of Dor1, Cod1, and Cod2,
upon expression by transient transfection, could be
co-immunoprecipitated by anti-Sec34 antibodies at efficiencies
comparable to those observed for ldlBp and ldlCp under similar
conditions. In summary, six other proteins (ldlBp, ldlCp, Dor1, Cod1,
Cod2, and GTC-90/Cod4) in mammalian cells are shown here to be present
in the Sec34-containing protein complex(es), with ldlBp and ldlCp
having the ability to interact directly with Sec34. It remains possible
that these proteins, together with others that have yet to be
discovered, may form distinct complexes or subcomplexes. If we assume
that a functional counterpart of ldlBp exists in yeast, then at least
two other proteins (Cod3 and Cod5) remain to be discovered for the
mammalian complex(es). However, if ldlBp is a functional counterpart of Cod3 or Cod5, then we have uncovered all but one of the components of
the mammalian complex.
The function of the Sec34-GTC-90-ldlBp complex in mammalian cells
remains to be explored. In view of all available results, it could be
suggested that the Sec34-GTC-90-ldlBp complex may have a general role
in the Golgi apparatus that regulates several trafficking events,
including ER-to-Golgi transport, various intra-Golgi transports, and
possibly endosome-to-trans-Golgi network traffic. The role of
Sec34p and Sec35p in ER-to-Golgi transport has been well established in
yeast (9-12). Using a modified assay that reconstitutes synchronized
transport of almost all ER-arrested VSVG to the Golgi, it was shown
that anti-Sec34 antibodies could exhibit dose-dependent
inhibition. Furthermore, the inhibition could be neutralized by a
noninhibitory amount of the antigen. We have thus provided evidence
that Sec34 plays a similar role in ER-to-Golgi transport in mammalian
cells, although the temporal and other mechanistic aspects of its
action remain to be explored. Although a role for Sec34p or other
subunits in intra-Golgi transport in yeast has yet to be investigated,
the purification of GTC-90 complex using an in vitro
intra-Golgi transport assay suggests that this complex could be
intimately involved in intra-Golgi transport (21). A role for Sec34p in
endosome-to-TGN transport has been reported, and this was the basis for
which Sec34p was independently identified as Grd20p (41). Although it
has been suggested that the role of Sec34p/Grd20p in endosome-to-TGN
transport could be due to an indirect effect due to its role in
ER-to-Golgi transport (10, 12), the recent identification of the Sec34p complex and the relatedness of this complex with Ypt6p function indicate that the Sec34p-Grd20p complex might have a direct role in
endosome-to-TGN transport (32). Detailed studies of this complex and
its individual subunits using genetic, biochemical, and cell
biochemical approaches in both yeast and mammalian cells will provide
additional understanding of its function and mechanism as well as the
general organization and regulation of Golgi structure and function.
We thank Dr. Sean Munro for the generous gift
of constructs expressing myc-tagged Dor1 and Cod1, Kazusa DNA Research
Institute for providing KIAA1381 (ldlBp) and KIAA1134 (ldlCp) cDNA
clones, the NEDO Human cDNA Sequencing Project for AK026305, and
Dr. Tang Bor Luen and Paramjeet Singh for reading the manuscript.
A recent report has independently
demonstrated that Sec34/Cog3, GTC-90/Cog5, ldlBp/Cog1, ldlCp/Cog2,
Dor1/Cog8, Cod1/Cog4, Cod2/Cog6, as well as a novel component (Cog7)
are components of the same protein complex referred to as conserved
oligomeric Golgi (COG) complex with the eight subunits named Cog1-8
(42).
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 2, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M202326200
The abbreviations used are:
ER, endoplasmic
reticulum;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
TX-100, Triton X-100.
Sec34 Is Implicated in Traffic from the Endoplasmic Reticulum to
the Golgi and Exists in a Complex with GTC-90 and ldlBp*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
cells, and ampicillin-resistant colonies
expressing the GST fusion proteins were screened as described previously (33). Purification of GST fusion proteins was performed as
described previously (34).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Characterization of Sec34 antibodies.
A, domain organization of Sec34. The 828-residue
Sec34 can be divided into the N-terminal one-third that is conserved
among proteins from various species and has the potential to form
coiled-coil structures; whereas the C-terminal two-thirds is homologous
to EEA1. The regions from which various GST fusion proteins were
derived are indicated. B, the C-terminal two-thirds of
Sec34 is homologous to EEA1. Residues 301-810 of Sec34 were aligned
with residues 610-1109 of EEA1. Identical residues are shown in
red, whereas conserved residues are shown in
pink. C, antibodies raised against
GST-Sec34/F1 specifically recognize a 93-kDa protein. The 50 µg of
Golgi-enriched membrane fractions (lanes 1-4) and 50 µg
of total cytosol (lanes 5-8) derived from rat liver were
resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to filters. The filters were
incubated with either Sec34 antibodies alone (lanes 1 and
5) or in the presence of GST-Sec34/F1 (lanes 2 and 6), GST-Sec34/F2 (lanes 3 and 7),
or GST-Sec34/F3 (lanes 4 and 8).
D, anti-Sec34 antibodies label the Golgi apparatus.
HeLa cells were fixed, permeabilized, and double-labeled with Sec34
antibodies (a and d) and monoclonal antibodies
against Golgi SNARE GS28 (b and e). The Golgi
labeling of Sec34 (d) but not GS28 (e) was
abolished by prior incubation of the antibodies with GST-Sec34/F1. The
merged images are shown in D, c and f.
Bar, 10 µm.
3 µg of anti-Sec34 antibodies, and the transport was
almost completely inhibited by 7 µg of antibodies (Fig.
2A, lane 10). The inhibition by Sec34 antibodies
is specific because it could be neutralized by a noninhibitory amount
of GST-Sec34/F1 (Fig. 2B, lanes 5 and
7), but not by GST (Fig. 2B, lanes 4 and 6). These results suggest that Sec34 is important for
ER-to-Golgi transport in mammalian cells.

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Sec34 antibodies specifically inhibit
ER-to-Golgi transport in vitro. A,
in vitro ER-to-Golgi transport assay was performed either on
ice (lane 1) or at 32 °C (lanes 2-10) in the
absence (lane 2) or presence of rat liver cytosol
(lanes 1 and 3-10) supplemented with the
indicated amounts of GST antibodies (lanes 4-6) or Sec34
antibodies (lanes 7-10). The upper form
represents VSVG, whose N-linked glycans are resistant to
endoglycosidase H digestion, whereas the lower form
represents the ER form, whose N-linked glycans have been removed by
endoglycosidase H. B, in vitro transport was
performed either on ice (lane 1) or at 32 °C (lanes
2-7) in the absence (lane 2) or presence of rat liver
cytosol (lanes 1 and 3-7). The inhibition
exhibited by anti-Sec34 (7 µg) was neutralized by a noninhibitory
amount of GST-Sec34/F1 (3 µg) (lanes 5 and 7)
but not by GST (3 µg) (lanes 4 and 6).

View larger version (64K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Co-immunoprecipitation of GTC-90 and ldlBp
(as well as Dor1 and Cod1) by anti-Sec34 antibodies. Rat liver
cytosol (50 mg) was immunoprecipitated with 500 µg of Sec34
antibodies (lane 3) or rabbit anti-goat IgG (lane
2) immobilized on protein A-Sepharose beads. The immune complexes
collected on the beads were washed extensively. The immunoprecipitated
proteins were released by boiling in SDS-PAGE sample buffer and then
resolved on by 10% SDS-PAGE. Molecular size markers are shown on
lane 1. Polypeptides larger than the IgG heavy chain
were first excised and subjected to mass spectrometric analysis. The
amino acid sequences of tryptic peptides of ldlBp, GTC-90, Dor1, and
Cod1 are indicated on the right. The identity of the Sec34
band was established by immunoblotting analysis. Mass spectrometric
analysis of polypeptides smaller than the IgG heavy chain was performed
and revealed the presence of abundant cytosolic proteins that could be
due to nonspecific interactions.

View larger version (77K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
ldlCp and Cod2 are present in
Sec34-containing protein complex. 293T cells were transiently
transfected with constructs expressing myc epitope-tagged ldlBp
(lanes 1 and 2), ldlCp (lanes 3 and
4), Dor1 (lanes 5 and 6), Cod1
(lanes 7 and 8), or Cod2 (lanes 9 and
10). Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with Sec34
antibodies. 5% of each lysate (odd-numbered lanes) and the
immunoprecipitates (even-numbered lanes) were resolved by
SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immnoblot with anti-myc antibodies to detect
the co-immunoprecipitated proteins. These myc-tagged proteins were not
co-immunoprecipitated by control rabbit IgG or antibodies against Bet3
(data not shown).

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Direct interaction of Sec34 with ldlBp and
ldlCp. Myc-Sec34 was co-translated with myc-Cod2
(lanes 1-3), myc-ldlBp (lanes 4-6), or
myc-ldlCp (lanes 7-9) by in vitro translation
reactions in the presence of [35S]methionine. The
translation products were immunoprecipitated with either Sec34
antibodies (lanes 2, 5, and 8) or
anti-myc antibodies (lanes 3, 6, and
9). The immunoprecipitates and 10% of the respective
translation reactions (lanes 1, 4, and
7) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
Note Added in Proof
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 65-6778-6827;
Fax: 65-6779-1117; E-mail: mcbhwj@imcb.nus.edu.sg.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Allan, B. B.,
and Balch, W. E.
(1999)
Science
285,
63-66 2.
Hong, W.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
2831-2839[Abstract]
3.
Tang, B. L.,
Ong, Y. S.,
Huang, B.,
Wei, S.,
Wong, E. T., Qi, R.,
Horstmann, H.,
and Hong, W.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
40008-40017 4.
Tang, B. L.,
Zhang, T.,
Low, D. Y.,
Wong, E. T.,
Horstmann, H.,
and Hong, W.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
13597-13604 5.
Xu, D.,
Joglekar, A. P.,
Williams, A. L.,
and Hay, J. C.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
39631-39639 6.
Hauri, H. P.,
Kappeler, F.,
Andersson, H.,
and Appenzeller, C.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
587-596[Abstract]
7.
Zhang, T.,
and Hong, W.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
27480-27487 8.
Wuestehube, L. J.,
Duden, R.,
Eun, A.,
Hamamoto, S.,
Korn, P.,
Ram, R.,
and Schekman, R.
(1996)
Genetics
142,
393-406[Abstract]
9.
Kim, D. W.,
Sacher, M.,
Scarpa, A.,
Quinn, A. M.,
and Ferro-Novick, S.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
3317-3329 10.
Kim, D. W.,
Massey, T.,
Sacher, M.,
Pypaert, M.,
and Ferro-Novick, S.
(2001)
Traffic
2,
820-830[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Van Rheenen, S. M.,
Cao, X.,
Lupashin, V. V.,
Barlowe, C.,
and Waters, M. G.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
141,
1107-1119 12.
Van Rheenen, S. M.,
Cao, X.,
Sapperstein, S. K.,
Chiang, E. C.,
Lupashin, V. V.,
Barlowe, C.,
and Waters, M. G.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
147,
729-742 13.
Sacher, M.,
Jiang, Y.,
Barrowman, J.,
Scarpa, A.,
Burston, J.,
Zhang, L.,
Schieltz, D.,
Yates, I. J.,
Abeliovich, H.,
and Ferro-Novick, S.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
2494-2503[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Cao, X.,
Ballew, N.,
and Barlowe, C.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
2156-2165[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Nakajima, H.,
Hirata, A.,
Ogawa, Y.,
Yonehara, T.,
Yoda, K.,
and Yamasaki, M.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol
113,
245-260 16.
Sapperstein, S. K.,
Lupashin, V. V.,
Schmitt, H. D.,
and Waters, M. G.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
132,
755-767 17.
Guo, W.,
Sacher, M.,
Barrowman, J.,
Ferro-Novick, S.,
and Novick, P.
(2000)
Trends Cell Biol.
10,
251-255[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Pfeffer, S. R.
(1999)
Nat. Cell Biol.
1,
E17-E22[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Waters, M. G.,
and Pfeffer, S. R.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
11,
453-459[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Suvorova, E. S.,
Kurten, R. C.,
and Lupashin, V. V.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
22810-22918 21.
Walter, D. M.,
Paul, K. S.,
and Waters, M. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
29565-29576 22.
Hobbs, H. H.,
Brown, M. S.,
and Goldstein, J. L.
(1992)
Hum. Mutat.
1,
445-466[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Hobbie, L.,
Fisher, A. S.,
Lee, S.,
Flint, A.,
and Krieger, M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
20958-20970 24.
Kingsley, D. M.,
Kozarsky, K. F.,
Segal, M.,
and Krieger, M.
(1986)
J. Cell Biol.
102,
1576-1585 25.
Malmstrom, K.,
and Krieger, M.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
24025-24030 26.
Kozarsky, K. F.,
Brush, H. A.,
and Krieger, M.
(1986)
J. Cell Biol.
102,
1567-1575 27.
Guo, Q.,
Vasile, E.,
and Krieger, M.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
125,
1213-1224 28.
Chatterton, J. E.,
Hirsch, D.,
Schwartz, J. J.,
Bickel, P. E.,
Rosenberg, R. D.,
Lodish, H. F.,
and Krieger, M.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
915-920 29.
Kingsley, D. M.,
Kozarsky, K. F.,
Hobbie, L.,
and Krieger, M.
(1986)
Cell
44,
749-759[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Podos, S. D.,
Reddy, P.,
Ashkenas, J.,
and Krieger, M.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
127,
679-691 31.
Seet, L.-F.,
and Hong, W.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
42445-42454 32.
Whyte, J. R.,
and Munro, S.
(2001)
Dev. Cell
1,
527-537[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
34.
Lowe, S. L.,
Wong, S. H.,
and Hong, W.
(1996)
J. Cell Sci.
109,
209-220[Abstract]
35.
Subramaniam, V. N.,
Krijnse-Locker, J.,
Tang, B. L.,
Ericsson, M.,
Yusoff, A. R. b. M.,
Griffiths, G.,
and Hong, W.
(1995)
J. Cell Sci.
108,
2405-2414[Abstract]
36.
Balch, W. E.,
McCaffery, J. M.,
Plutner, H.,
and Farquhar, M. G.
(1994)
Cell
76,
841-852[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Altschul, S. F.,
Gish, W.,
Miller, W.,
Myers, E. W.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1990)
J. Mol. Biol.
215,
403-410[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Zerial, M.,
and McBride, H.
(2001)
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.
2,
107-117[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Subramaniam, V. N.,
Peter, F.,
Philip, R.,
Wong, S. H.,
and Hong, W.
(1996)
Science
272,
1161-1163[Abstract]
40.
Nagahama, M.,
Orci, L.,
Ravazzola, M.,
Amherdt, M.,
Lacomis, L.,
Tempst, P.,
Rothman, J. E.,
and Sollner, T. H.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
133,
507-516 41.
Spelbrink, R. G.,
and Nothwehr, S. F.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
4263-4281 42.
Ungar, D.,
Oka, T.,
Brittle, E. E.,
Vasile, E.,
Lupashin, V. V.,
Chatterton, J. E.,
Heuser, J. E.,
Krieger, M.,
and Waters, M. G.
(2002)
J. Cell Biol.
157,
405-415
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Kubota, M. Sano, S. Goda, N. Suzuki, and K. Nishiwaki The conserved oligomeric Golgi complex acts in organ morphogenesis via glycosylation of an ADAM protease in C. elegans Development, January 15, 2006; 133(2): 263 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Oka, E. Vasile, M. Penman, C. D. Novina, D. M. Dykxhoorn, D. Ungar, F. M. Hughson, and M. Krieger Genetic Analysis of the Subunit Organization and Function of the Conserved Oligomeric Golgi (COG) Complex: STUDIES OF COG5- AND COG7-DEFICIENT MAMMALIAN CELLS J. Biol. Chem., September 23, 2005; 280(38): 32736 - 32745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Loh, F. Peter, V. N. Subramaniam, and W. Hong Mammalian Bet3 functions as a cytosolic factor participating in transport from the ER to the Golgi apparatus J. Cell Sci., March 15, 2005; 118(6): 1209 - 1222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. N. Zolov and V. V. Lupashin Cog3p depletion blocks vesicle-mediated Golgi retrograde trafficking in HeLa cells J. Cell Biol., February 28, 2005; 168(5): 747 - 759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Oka and M. Krieger Multi-Component Protein Complexes and Golgi Membrane Trafficking J. Biochem., February 1, 2005; 137(2): 109 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Loh and W. Hong The Binary Interacting Network of the Conserved Oligomeric Golgi Tethering Complex J. Biol. Chem., June 4, 2004; 279(23): 24640 - 24648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Oka, D. Ungar, F. M. Hughson, and M. Krieger The COG and COPI Complexes Interact to Control the Abundance of GEARs, a Subset of Golgi Integral Membrane Proteins Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2004; 15(5): 2423 - 2435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||