![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 25, 22191-22200, June 21, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical
Sciences, Setsunan University, Hirakata, Japan 573-0101
Received for publication, October 29, 2001, and in revised form, March 19, 2002
cAMP signaling, activated by extracellular
stimuli such as parathyroid hormone, has cell type-specific effects
important for cellular proliferation and differentiation in bone cells.
Recent evidence of a second enzyme target for cAMP suggests divergent effects on extracellular-regulated kinase (ERK) activity depending on
Epac/Rap1/B-Raf signaling. We investigated the molecular mechanism of
the dual functionality of cAMP on cell proliferation in clonal bone
cell types. MC3T3-E1 and ATDC5, but not MG63, express a 95-kDa isoform
of B-Raf. cAMP stimulated Ras-independent and
Rap1-dependent ERK phosphorylation and cell proliferation
in B-Raf-expressing cells, but inhibited growth in B-Raf-lacking cells.
The mitogenic action of cAMP was blocked by the ERK pathway inhibitor
PD98059. In B-Raf-transduced MG63 cells, cAMP stimulated ERK activation and cell proliferation. Thus, B-Raf is the dominant molecular switch
that permits differential cAMP-dependent regulation of ERK
with important implications for cell proliferation in bone cells. These
findings might explain the dual functionality of parathyroid hormone on
osteoblastic cell proliferation.
In mammals, parathyroid hormone
(PTH)1 is the most important
hormone affecting bone growth and resorption. It shares the
PTH/PTH-related protein (PTHrP) receptor (PPR) with PTHrP (1-8), the
only other known endogenous ligand for PPR. A series of gene disruption
studies of PTHrP and/or PPR in mice (9-12) has indicated that PTH
action on PPR can generate either bone-forming or bone-resorbing
signaling, reflecting the complexity and heterogeneity of the
osteoblast population and/or the regulatory microenvironment.
PPR belongs to the class II G-protein-coupled receptor subfamily of
receptors (7). PTH-(1-84), the natural hormone, and its congeners
(e.g. PTH-(1-34)) strongly couple with PPR to activate adenylate cyclase and generate a cAMP signal (8). Several lines of
evidence indicate that this signal activates ERKs
(extracellular-regulated kinase) in the pathway that promotes
bone growth in vivo and in vitro (13-17).
However, how cAMP activates ERK is still unknown. The most important
target of cAMP is protein kinase A (PKA), but activation of PKA is
known to counteract the Ras/Raf-1/MEK signaling pathway (18-20) that
is essential for activation of ERK and stimulation of cell
proliferation (21-23). Thus, we have been in search of the pathway
linking the cAMP signal to ERK activation.
Recently, a second enzyme target of cAMP, cAMP-guanine nucleotide
exchange factor (cAMP-GEF)/Epac, emerged as a Rap1-specific GEF (26,
27), indicating that cAMP can modulate ERKs via the Epac/Rap1/B-Raf pathway in a PKA- and Ras-independent manner (24-27). We now show that a variety of bone cell lines, clonal and primary, constitutively express the components of this pathway in a cell type-specific manner. Modulation of cell proliferation through cAMP
signaling is regulated primarily by the expression pattern of B-Raf
splice variants, and B-Raf appears to function as a molecular switch in
this signaling system. The decisive role of B-Raf first identified in
this study may explain the long-known dual functionality of PTH
signaling in bone.
Materials--
MC3T3-E1, C3H10T1/2, C2C12, and ATDC5 were
purchased from RIKEN Cell Bank (Ibaraki, Japan). ROS17/2.8 was obtained
from Dr. Gideon Rodan (Merck), MG63 from Dr. Akifumi Togari
(Aichi-Gakuin University, Nagoya, Japan), and MLO-Y4 and MLO-A5 from
Dr. Lynda Bonewald (Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX) (28), MC3T3-E1 subclone4 (MC4) from Dr. Renny T. Franceschi (University of
Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI) (29), and PC12 cells from
Dr. Akemichi Baba (Osaka University, Osaka, Japan). Human PTH-(1-34)
was a gift from Suntory Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). HA-tagged N17Ras, V12Ras,
N17Rap1, and V12Rap1 were from Dr. Daniel Altschuler of University of
Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh, PA) (30). HA-tagged Epac 1 and -2 cDNA were
obtained from Dr. Johannnes L. Bos (University Medical Center Utrecht,
Utrecht, The Netherlands) (31). FLAG-tagged B-Raf vector was kindly
provided by Dr. Deborah Morrison (National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD).
Cell Culture--
Primary osteoblastic cells were cultured as
described previously (32). MC3T3-E1 was cultured in 10% fetal calf
serum (FCS)/ RNA Analysis--
Total RNA was extracted using guanidinium
thiocyanate/phenol/chloroform method as reported by Chomczynski and
Sacchi (34). Brain and calvaria were isolated from male ddY mice
(Shimizu Experimental Supplies, Kyoto, Japan) and RNA samples were
extracted. Northern blot analysis was performed under high stringency
conditions as described previously (32). In brief, total RNA (20 µg)
was electrophoresed in 1.2% agarose-formaldehyde gels, transferred on
nylon membrane filters (Hybond N+, Amersham Biosciences,
Buckinghamshire, UK), and hybridized with 32P-labeled
cDNA probes. cDNAs encoding PPR and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase cloned by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were used as
probes (32). After the final wash, the membrane was exposed to a BAS
imaging plate (Fuji Film, Tokyo, Japan), and the relative signal
intensity was estimated. For reverse transcription-PCR, a 0.5-µg RNA
aliquot was reverse transcribed at 37 °C for 2 h in a 20-µl
reaction volume containing 200 units of Superscript II (Invitrogen,
Gaithersburg, MD), 4 µM random primers, 500 µM dNTPs, and 5 mM dithiothreitol. PCR was
performed using one-tenth of the reverse transcription reaction volume
and 30 pmol of following oligonucleotides. For Epac1, Epac1-F,
5'-GCTTCCTCCACAAACTCTCA-3', Epac1-R, 5'-AACGCTGCCATCACCTCTCT-3' (AN:
NM_006105); for Epac2, Epac2-F, 5'-AGCCTTATCCCATCTTTCTA-3', Epac2-R,
5'-CTGACTGTATTCGCCTCCAC-3' (AN: NM_007023); for HPRT as an internal
control, HPRT-F, 5'-GTTGAGAGATCATCTCCACC-3', HPRT-R,
5'-AGCGATGATGAACCAGGTTA-3'. PCR was performed using Taq DNA
polymerase on the following schedule: denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 64 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 2 min on a TAKARA PCR thermal cycler MP system (Shiga, Japan); 30 cycles
for the Epac and 20 cycles for the HPRT. Half of each reaction product
was loaded onto a 2% agarose gel in 1 × Tris acetate-EDTA
buffer. The number of cycles selected for each primer pair produced a
linear relationship between the amount of input RNA and resulting PCR products.
cAMP Assay--
Cells were washed twice with incubation buffer
( Cell Growth
Assay--
3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium
bromide (MTT) activity was measured using a colorimetric assay (35). Cells were plated in 96-well plates at a density of 30,000 cells/well. Cells were treated with or without various agents for 4 days. The cells
were then gently washed twice with 100 µl of phosphate-buffered saline and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h after the addition of 100 µl of 0.5 mg/ml MTT. Then, 50 µl of solubilizing solution
containing 20% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 50% dimethylformamide,
2% acetic acid, and 2.5% of 1 M HCl, pH 4.7, was added to
extract the dark blue crystals. After complete extraction, the
absorbance was measured on a Bio-Rad Model 550 microplate reader
(Bio-Rad, Hemel Hempstead, UK), using a test wavelength of 570 nm and a
reference wavelength of 655 nm. Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd)
incorporation assay was performed using the colorimetric BrdUrd Cell
proliferation Kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany)
according to the manufacturer's protocol as described previously (36).
There was no difference in either assay in the number of dead cells between the cell lines determined by a trypan blue exclusion assay. FCS
was reduced to 1% for all treatment conditions.
Establishment of Stable Transformants--
The day before
transfection, cells were plated on 35-mm dishes at a density of
105 cells/ml, and then transfected by FuGENE 6 (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) according to the manufacturer's protocol as
described previously (37). The vector containing both the green
fluorescent protein and neomycin-resistant genes, pEGFP-N1
(CLONTECH, Valencia, CA), and the respective
vectors were co-transfected in the cells. Subconfluent cells were
trypsinized and plated at low density before selection. Subsequently,
cells were selected by culturing them in the presence of 400 µg/ml
G418 for 3 weeks. Three clones of each mutant from MC4 and MG63 were
isolated. In this study, number 004, N17Rap1 MC4; number 005, V12 Rap1
MC4; number 001, N17 Ras MC4; number 021, N17Rap1 MG63; number 008, V12
Rap1 MG63; number 015, B-Raf MG63 were used.
Immunoblotting--
Cells were solubilized in Tris-HCl buffer,
pH 6.8, containing 3% SDS and 10% glycerol and the protein
concentrations were estimated using a BCA protein assay kit. The sample
was mixed with 0.1% bromphenol blue and 0.05% 2-mercaptoethanol,
boiled for 5 min, and then loaded (equal amounts of protein/lane) on 10% gels. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes for Western blotting, using antibodies against Epac1 (C-17), Epac2 (M-18), B-Raf (c19) (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), Rap1 (clone3; Transduction Labs,
Lexington, KY), and phospho-ERK1/2, ERK1/2 (New England Biolabs,
Beverly, MA), and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody as
described previously (37). As a positive control, PC12 cell lysates
were used. For selection of clones, anti-HA antibody (Y-11; Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc.) or anti-FLAG antibody (M2; Sigma) were used.
Statistical Analysis--
Unless otherwise described,
statistical analyses were performed using Student's t test.
A p value of less than 0.05 was considered to be
significant. Two-way analysis of variance was performed to determine
statistical differences between cultures according to time in culture.
Epac, Rap1, and B-Raf Expression--
B-Raf exists as a number of
isoforms that are expressed primarily in neural and endocrine tissues
(26, 38). Although the 95-kDa B-Raf isoform is found in both brain and
spinal cord, its presence in bone cells has not been systematically
explored. We measured B-Raf protein expression in cultures of
fibroblast C3H10T1/2, osteoblast MC4, chondrocyte ATDC5, two osteocytic
clones MLO-Y4 and MLO-A5, two osteosarcoma cell lines, ROS17/2.8 and
MG63, and myoblast C2C12 cells by Western blotting using an antibody
specific for B-Raf (Fig. 1C,
lower panel). ATDC5, MC4, C3H10T1/2, and the two types of
MLO cells had both the 95- and 62-kDa B-Raf splice variants, and C2C12,
MG63, and ROS17/2.8 cells expressed only the 62-kDa isoform.
Additionally, Epac1 and Epac2, two isoforms of Epac, and Rap1 protein
expression were investigated (Fig. 1). In vivo bone
expressed Epac mRNA (Fig. 1A). Similar Epac mRNA expression was observed in brain and PC12 cells. Epac2 expression was
detected in all cells (Fig. 1B). In contrast, Epac1 was not detected in ATDC5, C2C12, and ROS17/2.8, and Rap1 expression was limited and weak in C2C12 and ROS17/2.8 cells. Either expression pattern of 95-kDa B-Raf, Rap1, or Epac, however, failed to show any
notable change during maturation (Fig. 1D,
right), while ERKs (p44 and p42) were gradually decreased
(Fig. 1D, left). Taken together, these results
suggest that, among cell types tested, only primary calvaria cells
predominantly express the 95-kDa B-Raf isoform while the other limited
lines the 62-kDa isoform alone and this allows cell type-specific cAMP
signal transduction and diverse proliferative reactions.
PPR Expression and cAMP Accumulation Triggered by
PTH-(1-34)--
Next, we performed Northern blot analysis using
specific probes for PPR and examined cAMP accumulation levels triggered
by PTH-(1-34) in some clonal cells (Fig.
2). PPR mRNA expression was detected
in ATDC5, MC3T3-E1, and MC4 cells. The MC4 cells expressed 10-fold more
PPR mRNA compared with other lines (Fig. 2A). As
expected, PTH-(1-34) dose-dependently stimulated cAMP accumulation in these cells (Fig. 2B). In MC4, cAMP
accumulation levels were ~100-fold compared with ATDC5 and MC3T3-E1.
On the other hand, the increased cAMP induced by PTH-(1-34) was
negligible and barely detectable in MG63, C3H10T1/2, and the two MLO
cell lines (data not shown), although high enough to suppress ERK
activity and cell proliferation (refer to Figs.
3B and 6A). In
development model using primary osteoblastic cells, Northern blot
analysis showed that PPR mRNA expression levels were gradually
increased up to 21 days and then gradually decreased (Fig.
2C). Similar results were reported in the MC3T3-E1 and ATDC5
developmental culture system (17, 39). In contrast, expression of ERK
had a peak at the start of culture. Since the Epac pathway is expressed constantly, the ERK level peaked at the start may be an important variable to assure proliferative response toward cAMP signal that increases the cell number, as the main determinant of bone mass. These
results suggest that increased intracellular cAMP is perhaps the major
PTH-induced signaling mechanism in these osteoblastic cells during cell
proliferation.
cAMP Stimulates ERK Phosphorylation in 95-kDa B-Raf-expressing Bone
Cells--
To determine the consequences of elevated intracellular
cAMP on bone cellular ERK activity, we measured ERK activity using antibodies specific for the active phosphorylated ERK. For these experiments, a variety of agents that can increase intracellular levels
of cAMP or act as a cAMP analogue, forskolin, dibutyryl-cAMP (Bt2cAMP), and
8-(4-chlorphenylthio)-cyclopencyladenosine, were used. Only
clonal cells expressing 95-kDa B-Raf, PTH-(1-34), forskolin, Bt2cAMP, and 8-(4-chlorphenylthio)-cyclopencyladenosine
(8-CPT) increased the activity of ERK 2-12-fold more than in
unstimulated cells (Fig. 3, B and C, and data not
shown). Maximal activation by 1 nM PTH-(1-34) occurred
rapidly, within 5-30 min and its activation was reduced by a higher
concentration of the peptide (Fig. 3A). IBMX increases cAMP
levels by inhibiting its degradation by cAMP phosphodiesterase. IBMX
also potentiated ERK activity (Fig. 3C), indicating that the
potentiation was due to increased intracellular cAMP.
PTH-(1-34)-induced ERK phosphorylation was completely inhibited by the
ERK pathway inhibitor PD98059. When cells were treated with H89, low
concentrations of PTH-(1-34)-induced ERK activation were not affected,
while increased ERK activation was observed with high concentrations of
the peptide (Fig. 3D). These results suggest that PTH
stimulates intracellular cAMP accumulation, cAMP then activates Rap1
via GEF molecules, both Epac dependently and PKA independently, which
in turn leads to B-Raf activation and results in ERK activation.
Therefore, PKA might inhibit cAMP-mediated ERK activation when excess
intracellular cAMP accumulates. In our preliminary experiments,
calcitonin also stimulated cAMP-ERK signaling mechanisms in two MLO
cell lines that express functional calcitonin
receptors.2 Therefore,
cAMP-induced ERK activation by other hormones and factors was thought
to be a common regulatory pathway in bone cells.
cAMP Stimulates ERK Phosphorylation and Cell Proliferation in
95-kDa B-Raf-expressing Cells--
In neuronal cells, cAMP signaling
has an important role in cell differentiation and survival through a
Rap1-B-Raf expression-dependent mechanism (24). Activated
ERK provides a mitogenic and a differentiating signal in many cell
types (22, 23). To determine whether cAMP stimulates cell
proliferation, we examined cell proliferation of bone cells assessed by
MTT and BrdUrd incorporation assays. MTT activity and BrdUrd
incorporation were directly correlated with the counted cell number of
MC4 and MG63 cells in our preliminary experiments, thus growth was
estimated using the MTT method. There was no correlation,
however, between MTT activity and BrdUrd incorporation in ATDC5
and gene-transduced cells. Therefore, the BrdUrd method was used to
measure cell proliferation (data not shown). PTH-(1-34), Bt2cAMP, and forskolin stimulated BrdUrd
incorporation in two B-Raf-expressing bone cell lines in a low
concentration range (ATDC5 and MC4; Fig.
4, A and B). With
increased ERK activity, IBMX also potentiated cell proliferation in
basal and cAMP-stimulated conditions (Fig. 4C), indicating
that growth potentiation was due to the increase in intracellular cAMP.
The ERK pathway inhibitor PD98059 inhibited cAMP-triggered ERK
activation and cell proliferation (Figs. 3D and
4D). Basal cell proliferation of MC4 was not affected by 1 µM PD98059. The PKA inhibitor H89 (1 µM)
did not affect low concentrations cAMP-induced cell growth (Fig.
4D), indicating that if the PKA signaling pathway was
inhibited, the mitogenic action of cAMP was not blocked because the
signaling pathway of the Epac remained active. In contrast to
the low concentration effects of cAMP, high concentration cAMP-induced
cell proliferation was normalized to control levels. H89 did not affect
the low concentration cAMP stimulation, whereas it potentiated the high
concentration cAMP-mediated activation of cell growth. Thus, PKA might
function to inhibit cell proliferation via ERK signal-induced
mechanisms only with high concentrations of intracellular cAMP.
Regulation by Rap1 in 95-kDa B-Raf-expressing Cells--
Because
Rap1 is a transducer of cAMP-mediated regulation of ERK, we next tested
the hypothesis that the cAMP effect on ERK activity and MC4
proliferation is the result of Rap1 activation. We established MC4
overexpressing dominant negative N17Rap1 or the constitutively active
V12Rap1 mutants, and mutants of Ras were generated and several
independently isolated clones analyzed for Rap1 expression by Western
blotting using HA antibody. All clones demonstrated elevated Rap1 or
Ras expression compared with vector-transfected control lines (data
not shown). ERK activation by PTH-(1-34), Bt2cAMP, and
forskolin was observed in Ras mutant clones, whereas it was completely
blocked in N17Rap1-transduced MC4 cells, and accelerated in
V12Rap1-transduced cells (Fig.
5A). Thus, cAMP actions on ERK
were mediated via Rap1 activation and activated Rap1 induced ERK
activation. We next tested the hypothesis that the mitogenic effects of
cAMP were the result of Rap1 activation. The increased cAMP-induced
cell growth was blocked in N17Rap1 but not in N17Ras clones, and
accelerated growth was observed in V12Rap1 (Fig. 5B),
demonstrating that Rap1 functions to stimulate ERK activation and cell
proliferation in B-Raf-expressing cells.
cAMP Suppresses ERK Phosphorylation and Cell Proliferation in
95-kDa B-Raf-lacking Cells--
Ras-dependent signaling
activates ERK, but can be blocked by cAMP-dependent
activation of Rap1 in many cell types (19). Thus, cAMP should decrease
ERK activity through a negative Rap1 effect on Ras signaling in 95-kDa
B-Raf-lacking cells. Consistent with this idea, cAMP reduced ERK
activity in B-Raf-lacking cells. In MG63 and ROS17/2.8 cells,
PTH-(1-34), forskolin, and Bt2cAMP suppressed ERK
activation (Fig. 3B and data not shown). To determine the
effect of cAMP-mediated down-regulation of ERK activity on cell
proliferation in B-Raf-lacking cells, MTT activity was measured in MG63
cultures exposed to treatments that modify ERK activity. Consistent
with our prior observation that cAMP decreased ERK activity, cell
proliferation was inhibited by cAMP and its inhibition was not blocked
by H89 in either a low or high concentration of forskolin (Fig.
6, A and B, and
data not shown), suggesting that PKA does not participate in the
modulation of cell growth in B-Raf-lacking skeletal cells. PD98059 only
blocked proliferation of MG63 cells to 70% of control levels (Fig.
6B), suggesting that ERK is an important mitogenic signal in
MG63 cells.
Regulation by Rap1 in MG63--
In B-Raf-lacking MG63 cells, cAMP
suppressed ERK activation. Because Rap1 is activated by cAMP, we tested
whether the inhibitory effects of cAMP on ERK activity and cell
proliferation were the result of Rap1 activation. We established MG63
cells that overexpress mutant Rap1 proteins. Clones were generated and
several independently isolated clones were analyzed for HA-Rap1
proteins. All clones had elevated Rap1 expression compared with
vector-transduced control lines (data not shown). To determine how
overexpression of mutant Rap1 would affect ERK activity and
proliferation, the clones were analyzed by phospho-ERK Western blot
analysis and BrdUrd incorporation assay. Basal levels of ERK activity
were decreased in V12Rap1-transduced cells (Fig. 6C).
Increased ERK activation, however, was observed in clones containing
the N17Rap1 mutation. These results suggest that Rap1 suppresses ERK
activity. To elucidate whether N17Rap1-induced ERK activation results
in increased cell proliferation, cell growth of the clones was analyzed
(Fig. 6D). In N17Rap1 clones, increased cell proliferation
correlated with increased ERK activity and suppressed growth in
V12Rap1, directly demonstrating that Rap1 functions to inhibit ERK
activation and cell proliferation in B-Raf-lacking MG63 cells.
Conversion to B-Raf-expressing MG63 Cells--
As Rap1 appears to
mediate the cAMP growth inhibitory signal for B-Raf-lacking MG63 cells,
we determined whether the critical difference in Rap1/cAMP signaling
was dependent on the presence or absence of B-Raf. For these
experiments, we generated stable MG63 clones expressing the 95-kDa
isoform of B-Raf. Basal levels of ERK activity were similar in vector-
and B-Raf-transduced cells (Fig. 6C). ERK activation by
forskolin, however, was observed only in B-Raf-transduced clones. Thus,
introduction of the B-Raf protein alone is sufficient to convert cAMP
from a negative to a positive regulator of ERK. Finally, we determined
whether the increased levels of ERK activity resulting from B-Raf
overexpression were associated with increased cell proliferation. Basal
growth levels were increased in B-Raf clones compared with
vector-transduced control cells, and dramatically increased cell
proliferation by forskolin were observed in B-Raf-transduced clones
(Fig. 6D). These data indicate that one functional outcome
of the molecular switch provided by B-Raf is increased ERK activation
and cell proliferation in MG63 cells.
cAMP Signaling Pathway to Induce PTH-induced Proliferation in Bone
Cells--
In a wide variety of tissues (40), cAMP signaling is known
to activate the ERK signaling pathway, thereby up-regulating cell
proliferation and/or viability. As confirmed with cells of bone origin
expressing PPR in this study, PTH action on PPR generates a cAMP signal
and stimulates cell proliferation. Because activation of the classic
target of cAMP, PKA, is inhibitory to cell proliferation (18-21), and
consistent with the inhibition of cell proliferation observed with a
high concentration of forskolin (Fig. 4D), this suggests
that the cAMP signal activates a hitherto unidentified cascade upstream
of the ERK junction to stimulate cell proliferation. Our most striking
observation was that, in mouse bone cells, the cAMP signal was
propagated through a new route to the ERK junction to control cell
proliferation, not via other classic pathways (e.g.
Ras-Raf-1, PKA-CREB). The functional outcome, stimulated or inhibited
proliferation of bone cells, solely depended on the cell type-specific
expression of the ratio of two B-Raf splicing variants. In this new
route, cAMP directly and specifically activates Epac (27), a cAMP-GEF,
which then acts on Rap1, an antagonist of Ras-dependent
signaling (41-43), and blocks Ras-dependent activation of
Raf-1 in the presence or absence of the short form of B-Raf (41,
44-46). In cells that express the Raf isoform, B-Raf, cAMP is known to
activate ERK via the activation of Rap1 (24, 47-52). Thus, two splice
variants of B-Rafs function as a molecular switch in the activation or
inhibition of the MEK-ERK pathway, and in our study, cAMP-mediated
inhibition of proliferation of MG63 cells was due to the predominant
expression of 62-kDa B-Raf. This is the first report to show that
molecules in this pathway are constitutively expressed in bone clonal
cell lines and possibly in bone tissue in vivo and that
these molecules play a major role in directing the cell reaction to the
cAMP signal that is generated by PPR stimulation.
Relationship of New Signaling Pathway to Other Known
Pathways--
Quite recently, Swarthout et al. (53)
reported that in the UMR106 rat osteosarcoma cell line and calvarial
osteoblasts, subnanomolar PTH-(1-34) increased ERK activity in a
manner sensitive to PKC inhibitor (GF109203) and MEK inhibitor
(PD98059) but resistant to PKA inhibitor (H-89), suggesting the
participation of the PKC pathway in the activation of ERK. During the
course of our study (data not shown), we also tested whether PKC lies
upstream along the pathway leading to ERK activation. However, we were
unable to inhibit cAMP-induced ERK activation with PKC inhibitors
(calphostin and staurosporine) although they prevented cell
proliferation. These differences may reflect the significant degree of
heterogeneity in downstream signaling via G-protein-coupled receptors
between different cell types, as shown in Fig. 1, or they may simply
reflect the different experimental conditions used. Further studies are needed to conclusively determine the role of PKC in the mechanism of
action of PTH. To be stressed, however, is our observation that primary
calvarial cells with presumably less homogeneity than clonal cell lines
express 95-kDa B-Raf constitutively and predominantly, and this
expression pattern remained unchanged during 1 month or more of culture
in vitro, in which time the osteoblasts proliferated,
matured, and mineralized as previously reported (32). It is highly
possible that the expression pattern of given proteins are destined to
change depending on variables in the in vivo environment.
However, if the constant expression pattern of 95-kDa B-Raf in primary
cells is physiological, our observations of varying B-Raf isoforms in
clonal cell lines may indicate the abnormality and/or diversity of
these clonal cell lines. To evaluate the physiological meaning of our
results thus, our next steps should be a detailed analysis of this new
signaling pathway in bone tissue in vivo as well as
evaluations of PTH signaling in transgenic mice in which the key
molecule(s) of this new pathway are depleted or overexpressed.
Another area of interest pertains to growth modulation by cAMP-mediated
classical PKA signaling. The potential downstream signaling targets of
PKA in bone are the cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB) (56)
and AP1 (57, 58). PKA phosphorylates and activates CREB, and PTH
activates AP1 family members such as Fos/Jun. Although these
PKA-associated molecules are involved in bone development, recent
evidence suggests a role for AP1 and CREB in differentiation rather
than in proliferation (59). Our data indicate that the inhibition of
PKA does not block cAMP-induced mitogenic action in cells of bone
origin, regardless of whether the cells express or lack 95-kDa B-Raf.
H-89, however, affected the growth inhibition produced by a high
concentration of cAMP, suggesting that in the presence of high
concentrations of cAMP, PKA may function in 95-kDa B-Raf-expressing
cells to limit excessive growth.
The Role of the New Pathway in PPR-regulated Control of Bone
Growth--
The dual functionality of PTH action on bone metabolism
has been previously noted in three cases. 1) The pattern of internal production or external dosing of PTH influences whether it is catabolic
or anabolic in clinical and experimental situations (54, 55). 2) PTH
has either catabolic or anabolic effects on mineralization in cultured
osteoblastic cell lines, depending upon the timing and duration of
action of PTH during the cell maturation stage (12-17, 32). 3)
Finally, PPR stimulation has been shown to have either catabolic or
anabolic effects during development, depending upon which cortical or
trabecular bone is involved (12). This study describes a fourth example
of the dual functionality of PTH on bone metabolism. The anabolic
effects previously described may arise from the synchronized maturation of cells and from mineralization promoted by extended cell viability. It is possible that the Epac/Rap1/B-Raf pathway identified in our study
as a key determinant of the effects of PTH signaling can explain the
dual functionality of PTH that has been previously described, because
cell type-specific expression of members of the pathway could drive a
diverse functional outcome. We observed a constant expression pattern
of a predominant variant in a primary cell line throughout its
differentiation and maturation, while expression levels of PPR and ERK
changed to some extent, but not in a manner sufficient to explain the
dual functionality of the PTH signal. Further studies as described
above are expected to more fully explain the mechanisms for the dual
functionality of PTH signaling.
In conclusion, we have presented evidence indicating that normal bone
cells of mouse calvaria as well as a variety of bone-related clonal
cell lines constitutively express a signal transduction pathway
including Epac, Rap1, and B-Rafs upstream of the MEK-ERK cascade. This
pathway integrates the cAMP signal to promote or inhibit cell
proliferation in a PKA- and Ras-independent manner. The expression
pattern of the members of the pathway, especially the B-Raf splice
variants (95 and 62 kDa), varies in a cell type-specific manner in
clonal cell lines and possibly in normal osteoblasts, and it determines
whether the final effect of cAMP is to increase or decrease cell proliferation.
We thank Dr. Toshihisa Komori and Dr.
Kiyokazu Ogita for insightful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript.
*
This work was supported in part by a grant-in-aid for
Encouragement of Young Scientists from the Ministry of Education,
Science, and Culture of Japan.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 15, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110364200
2
T. Fujita, T. Meguro, R. Fukuyama, H. Nakamuta,
and M. Koida, unpublished data.
The abbreviations used are:
PTH, parathyroid
hormone;
PTHrP, parathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related
protein;
PPR, PTHrP receptor;
cAMP, cyclic adenosine monophosphate;
PKA, protein kinase A;
ERK, extracellular-regulated kinase;
GEF, guanine nucleotide exchange factor;
FCS, fetal calf serum;
DMEM, Dulbecco's minimum essential medium;
IBMX, 1-methyl-3-isobutylxanthine;
MTT, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide;
BrdUrd, bromodeoxyuridine;
Bt2cAMP, dibutyryl-cAMP;
PKC, protein
kinase C;
HA, hemagglutinin;
CREB, cAMP-response element-binding
protein.
New Signaling Pathway for Parathyroid Hormone and Cyclic AMP
Action on Extracellular-regulated Kinase and Cell Proliferation in
Bone Cells
CHECKPOINT OF MODULATION BY CYCLIC AMP*
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-minimal essential minimum (
MEM); C3H10T1/2 was
cultured in 10% FCS/basal medium Eagle's; PC12, C2C12, and MG63 were
cultured in 10% FCS/Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM),
ROS17/2.8 and ATDC5 were in 10% FCS and 5% DMEM, F12,
respectively. MLO-Y4 and MLO-A5 were cultured in 5% FBS, 5%
FCS/
-MEM on collagen type I-coated plates as described previously
(33).
-MEM containing 0.5 mM 1-methyl-3-isobutylxanthine
(IBMX) and 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin) and incubated for 30 min at
37 °C in the same buffer containing various concentrations of test
agents. The reaction was terminated with trichloroacetic acid. cAMP was
measured by radioimmunoassay (Amersham Biosciences) and the protein
concentrations were estimated using a BCA protein assay kit (Pierce).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Epac, Rap1, and B-Raf expression in bone-like
cells. A and B, the expression of Epac1 and
Epac2 in bone. Transcripts encoding Epac1 and Epac2 were analyzed by
reverse transcriptase-PCR using specific primer pairs, yielding
amplified cDNA products of 304 and 333 bp, respectively. Amplified
products were verified by subcloning and sequence analyses. In addition
to brain and PC12, Epac1 and Epac2 were expressed in bone and
bone-related clonal lines. C, Rap1 and B-Raf expression in
bone-like cells. Using PC12 lysates as a positive control, Rap1
(upper) and B-Raf (lower) expression was
examined. Cell extracts were loaded detecting for Rap1 (5 µg) and for
B-Raf (10 µg). Rap1 was expressed ubiquitously, but the 95-kDa form
of B-Raf was restricted. In C2C12, MG63, and ROS17/2.8, only the 62-kDa
form of B-Raf was detected. D, developmental expressions of
Rap1, B-Raf, and Epac in primary calvarial osteoblastic cells. Cell
lysates were prepared on the indicated day of culture. Rap1, B-Raf, and
Epac were not regulated during osteoblast development, while ERKs (p44
and p42) were gradually decreased. Data are representative of four
separate experiments.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
PTH/PTHrP receptor mRNA expression levels
and cAMP accumulation induced by PTH. A, PTH/PTHrP
receptor (PPR) mRNA expression levels. mRNA receptor expression
was analyzed by Northern blot of RNA prepared from ATDC5, MC3T3-E1, and
MC4. The blot was hybridized with cDNA encoding PPR and exposed to
x-ray film for 8 days without an intensifying screen. The expression
levels of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)
as an internal control are indicated. B, accumulation of
intracellular cAMP by PTH-(1-34) in ATDC5, MC3T3-E1, and MC4 cells.
cAMP levels per protein concentration were determined as described
under "Experimental Procedures." The values are mean ± S.E.
of three experiments. C, developmental expressions of PPR
mRNA in primary calvarial osteoblastic cells. Total RNA was
isolated the indicated day of culture. Two independent experiments were
performed and gave similar results.

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Regulation of ERK activity by cAMP in bone
like cells. A, PTH-(1-34), Bt2cAMP
(Db-cAMP), and forskolin (FK) stimulated ERK
phosphorylation in ATDC5. Lysates (50 µg of proteins) from cells
untreated or treated with 100 nM PTH were examined for the
indicated times (left side). Indicated concentrations of
PTH-(1-34) were prepared (right side). B,
PTH-(1-34) stimulated ERK phosphorylation in ATDC5 and MC4, but
suppressed phosphorylation in MG63 and ROS17/2.8. Cells were treated
with the peptide for 10 min. C, MC4 cells were treated with
agents at different concentrations for 10 min. D, effects of
1 µM H89 and 1 µM PD98059 on PTH-(1-34)-
and forskolin-stimulated ERK phosphorylation in MC4. Cells were
preincubated at 37 °C with either protein kinase inhibitors for 30 min before the addition of stimulants. Similar results were obtained
from three independent experiments.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Growth regulation by cAMP in B-Raf-expressing
cells. Cell proliferation was determined by seeding 30,000 cells
from each line in 96-well plates in quadruplicate estimated by MTT or
BrdUrd incorporation assay as described under "Experimental
Procedures." PTH-(1-34), Bt2cAMP (Db-cAMP),
and forskolin (FK) stimulated cell proliferation in ATDC5
(A) and MC4 (B). C, 0.1 nM
forskolin-induced mitogenic action was potentiated by 100 µM IBMX in MC4 cells. D, effects of H89 and
PD98059 on forskolin-induced cell proliferation. Proliferation by
forskolin (10 nM) was inhibited completely by PD98059 (1 µM). H89 (1 µM) did not affect 10 nM forskolin-induced growth, whereas it potentiated 1 µM forskolin-induced growth in MC4 cells. WT,
wild type. #, versus forskolin alone; *, versus
control: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01;
and ***, p < 0.005; #, p < 0.05. n = 6. The values are mean ± S.E. of four
experiments.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
ERK and growth regulation by Rap1 in MC4
cells. A, cAMP-induced activation of ERK in N17Ras- or
N17Rap1-transduced cells. Forskolin (FK) stimulated ERK
phosphorylation in N17Ras clones, but inhibited ERK phosphorylation in
N17Rap1 clones. V12 Rap1 activated ERK phosphorylation.
B, there was increased BrdUrd incorporation in V12 Rap1
clones, and forskolin (1 µM) inhibited growth in N17Rap1
but not N17Ras clones. Vec, vector-transduced control
line. #, versus forskolin alone; *, versus
control: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01;
and ***, p < 0.005; #, p < 0.05. n = 6.

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Regulation of ERK and growth by Rap1 and
B-Raf in MG63 cells. A, PTH-(1-34),
Bt2cAMP (Db-cAMP), and forskolin (FK)
suppressed cell proliferation in MG63. B, effects of H89 and
PD98059 on cell proliferation. Growth was inhibited by PD98059, while
H89 did not affect either basal or stimulated cell growth.
C, ERK activity in V12Rap1-, N17Rap1-, or B-Raf-transduced
cells. D, there was increased BrdUrd incorporation in
N17Rap1 and B-Raf clones, but BrdUrd incorporation was suppressed in
V12Rap1 clones. The inhibition of BrdUrd incorporation by forskolin (10 nM) was diminished in N17Rap1. Vec,
vector-transduced control line. #, versus B-Raf; *,
versus control: *, p < 0.05; **,
p < 0.01; and ***, p < 0.005; ##,
p < 0.01. n = 6. Similar results were
obtained from four additional experiments.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology,
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Setsunan University, Nagaotoge-cho
45-1, Hirakata, Japan 573-0101. E-mail:
t-fujita@pharm.setsunan.ac.jp.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Habener, J. F.,
Posenblatt, M.,
and Potts, J. T., Jr.
(1984)
Physiol. Rev.
64,
985-1053 2.
Mannstadt, M.,
Juppner, H.,
and Gardella, T. J.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
277,
F665-F675 3.
Juppner, H.,
Abou-Samra, A. B.,
Freeman, M.,
Kong, X. F.,
Schipani, E.,
Richards, J.,
Kolakowski, L. F., Jr.,
Hock, J.,
Potts, J. T., Jr.,
Kronenberg, H. M.,
and Segre, G. V.
(1991)
Science
254,
1024-1026 4.
Abou-Samra, A. B.,
Juppner, H.,
Force, T.,
Freeman, M. W.,
Kong, X. F.,
Schipani, E.,
Urena, P.,
Richards, J.,
Bonventre, J. V.,
Potts, J. T., Jr.,
Kronenberg, H. M.,
and Segre, G. V.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
2732-2736 5.
Bringhurst, F. R.,
Juppner, H.,
Guo, J.,
Urena, P.,
Potts, J. T., Jr.,
Kronenberg, H. M.,
Abou-Samra, A. B.,
and Segre, G. V.
(1993)
Endocrinology
132,
2090-2098[Abstract]
6.
Schipani, E.,
Karga, H.,
Karaplis, A. C.,
Potts, J. T., Jr.,
Kronenberg, H. M.,
Segre, G. V.,
Abou-Samra, A. B.,
and Juppner, H.
(1993)
Endocrinology
132,
2157-2165[Abstract]
7.
Marinissen, M. J.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(2001)
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
22,
368-376[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Gardella, T. J.,
and Juppner, H.
(2001)
Trends Endocrinol. Metab.
12,
210-218[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Karaplis, A. C.,
Luz, A.,
Glowacki, J.,
Bronson, R. T.,
Tybulewicz, V. L.,
Kronenberg, H. M.,
and Mulligan, R. C.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
277-289 10.
Lanske, B.,
Karaplis, A. C.,
Lee, K.,
Luz, A.,
Vortkamp, A.,
Pirro, A.,
Karperien, M.,
Defize, L. H. K., Ho, C.,
Mulligan, R. C.,
Abou-Samra, A. B.,
Juppner, H.,
Segre, G. V.,
and Kronenberg, H. M.
(1996)
Science
273,
663-666[Abstract]
11.
Lanske, B.,
Amling, M.,
Neff, L.,
Guiducci, J.,
Baron, R.,
and Kronenberg, H. M.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
104,
399-407[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Calvi, L. M.,
Sims, N. A.,
Hunzelman, J. L.,
Knight, M. C.,
Giovannetti, A.,
Saxton, J. M.,
Kronenberg, H. M.,
Baron, R.,
and Scipani, E.
(2001)
J. Clin. Invest.
107,
277-286[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Ishizuya, T.,
Yokose, S.,
Hori, M.,
Noda, T.,
Suda, T.,
Yoshiki, S.,
and Yamaguchi, A.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
99,
2961-2970[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Partridge, N. C.,
Bloch, S. R.,
and Pearman, A. T.
(1994)
J. Cell. Biochem.
55,
321-327[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Sabatini, M.,
Lesur, C.,
Pacherie, M.,
Pastoureau, P.,
Kucharczyk, N.,
Fauchere, J. L.,
and Bonnet, J.
(1996)
Bone
18,
59-65[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Hilliker, S.,
Wergedal, J. E.,
Gruber, H. E.,
Bettica, P.,
and Baylink, D. J.
(1996)
Bone
19,
469-477[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Schiller, P. C.,
D'ippolito, G.,
Roos, B. A.,
and Howard, G. A.
(1999)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
14,
1504-1512[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Wu, J.,
Dent, P.,
Jelinek, T.,
Wolfman, A.,
Weber, M. J.,
and Sturgill, T. W.
(1993)
Science
262,
1065-1068 19.
Cook, S. J.,
and McCormick, F.
(1993)
Science
262,
1069-1072 20.
Graves, L. M.,
Bornfeldt, K. E.,
Raines, E. W.,
Potts, B. C.,
Macdonald, S. G.,
Ross, R.,
and Krebs, E. G.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
10300-10304 21.
Sevetson, B. R.,
Kong, X.,
and Lawrence, J. C., Jr.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
10304-10309
22.
Whitmarsh, A. J.,
and Davis, R. J.
(2000)
Nature
403,
255-256[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Graves, L. M.,
Guy, H. I.,
Kozlowski, P.,
Huang, M.,
Lazarowski, E.,
Pope, R. M.,
Collins, M. A.,
Dahlstrand, E. N.,
Earp, H. S., III,
and Evans, D. R.
(2000)
Nature
403,
328-332[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Vossler, M. R.,
Yao, H.,
York, R. D.,
Pan, M-G.,
Rim, C. S.,
and Stork, P. J. S.
(1997)
Cell
89,
73-82[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
York, R. D.,
Yao, H.,
Dillon, T.,
Ellig, C. L.,
Eckert, S. P.,
McCleskey, E. W.,
and Stork, P. J. S.
(1998)
Nature
392,
622-626[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Kawasaki, H.,
Springett, G. M.,
Mochizuki, N.,
Toki, S.,
Makaya, M.,
Matsuda, M.,
Housman, D. E.,
and Graybiel, A. M.
(1998)
Science
282,
2275-2279 27.
de Rooij, J.,
Zwartkruis, F. J. T.,
Verheijen, M. H. G.,
Cool, R. H.,
Nijman, S. M.,
Wittinghofer, A.,
and Bos, J. L.
(1998)
Nature
396,
474-477[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Kato, Y.,
Windle, J. J.,
Koop, B. A.,
Mundy, G. R.,
and Bonewald, L. F.
(1997)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
12,
2014-2023[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Wang, D.,
Christensen, K.,
Chawla, K.,
Xiao, G.,
Krebsbach, P. H.,
and Franceschi, R. T.
(1999)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
14,
893-903[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Altschuler, D.,
and Ribeiro-Neto, F.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
7475-7479 31.
de Rooij, J.,
Rehmann, H.,
van Triest, M.,
Cool, R. H.,
Wittinghofer, A.,
and Bos, J. L.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
20829-20836 32.
Fujita, T.,
Fukuyama, R.,
Izumo, N.,
Hirai, T.,
Meguro, T.,
Nakamuta, H.,
and Koida, M.
(2001)
Jpn. J. Pharmacol.
86,
405-416[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Fujita, T.,
Izumo, N.,
Fukuyama, R.,
Meguro, T.,
Nakamuta, H.,
Kohno, T.,
and Koida, M.
(2001)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
280,
348-352[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Chomczynski, P.,
and Sacchi, N.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
62,
156-159[CrossRef]
35.
Takuma, K.,
Fujita, T.,
Kimura, Y.,
Tanabe, M.,
Yamamuro, A.,
Lee, E.,
Mori, K.,
Koyama, Y.,
Baba, A.,
and Matsuda, T.
(2000)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
399,
1-8[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Fujita, T.,
Meguro, T.,
Izumo, N.,
Yasutomi, C.,
Fukuyama, R.,
Nakamuta, H.,
and Koida, M.
(2001)
Jpn. J. Pharmacol.
85,
278-281[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Fujita, T.,
Izumo, N.,
Fukuyama, R.,
Meguro, T.,
Yasutomi, C.,
Nakamuta, H.,
and Koida, M.
(2001)
Jpn. J. Pharmacol.
86,
86-96[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Gonzalez-Robayna, I. J.,
Falender, A. E.,
Ochsner, S.,
Firestone, G. L.,
and Richards, J. S.
(2000)
Mol. Endocrinol.
14,
1283-1300 39.
Shukunami, C.,
Ishizeki, K.,
Atsumi, T.,
Ohta, Y.,
Suzuki, F.,
and Hiraki, Y.
(1997)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
12,
1174-1188[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Luttrell, L. M.,
Daaka, Y.,
and Lefkowittz, R. J.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
11,
177-183[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Cook, S. J.,
Rubinfeld, B.,
Albert, I.,
and MacCormick, F.
(1983)
EMBO J.
14,
3475-3485
42.
Kitayama, H.,
Matsuzaki, T.,
Ikawa, Y.,
and Noda, M.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
4284-4288 43.
Palsson, E. M.,
Popoff, M.,
Thelestam, M.,
and O'Neill, L. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
7818-7825 44.
Boussiotis, V. A.,
Freeman, G. J.,
Berezovskaya, A.,
Barber, D. L.,
and Nadler, L. M.
(1997)
Science
278,
124-128 45.
Hu, C. D.,
Kariya, K.,
Kotani, G.,
Shirouzu, M.,
Yokoyama, S.,
and Kataoka, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
11702-11705 46.
Hu, C. D.,
Kariya, K.-i.,
Okada, T., Qi, X.,
Song, C.,
and Kataoka, T.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
48-51 47.
Wan, Y.,
and Huang, X. Y.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
14533-14537 48.
Dugan, L. L.,
Kim, J. S.,
Zhang, Y.,
Bart, R. D.,
Sun, Y.,
Holtzman, D. M.,
and Gutmann, D. H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
25842-25848 49.
MacNicol, M. C.,
and MacNicol, A. M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
13193-13197 50.
Vaillancourt, R. R.,
Gardner, A. M.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
6522-6530 51.
Okada, T., Hu, C. D.,
Jin, T. G.,
Kariya, K.,
Yamawaki-Kataoka, Y.,
and Kataoka, T.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
6057-6064 52.
Ohtsuka, T.,
Shimizu, K.,
Yamamori, B.,
Kuroda, S.,
and Takai, Y.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
1258-1261 53.
Swarthout, J. T.,
Doggett, T. A.,
Lemker, J. L.,
and Partridge, N. C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
7586-7592 54.
Dempster, D. W.,
Cosman, F.,
Parisien, M.,
Shen, V.,
and Lindsay, R.
(1993)
Endocr. Rev.
14,
690-709[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
55.
Dempster, D. W.,
Parisien, M.,
Silverberg, S. J.,
Liang, X.-G.,
Schnitzer, M.,
Shen, V.,
Shane, E.,
Kimmel, D. B.,
Recker, R.,
Lindsay, R.,
and Bilezikian, J. P.
(1999)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
84,
1562-1566 56.
Montminy, M.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
66,
807-822[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
57.
Ruther, U.,
Garber, C.,
Komitowski, D.,
Muller, R.,
and Wagner, E. F.
(1987)
Nature
325,
412-416[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
58.
Wang, Z. Q.,
Liang, J.,
Schellander, K.,
Wagner, E. F.,
and Grigoriadis, A. E.
(1995)
Cancer Res.
55,
6244-6251 59.
Ionescu, A. M.,
Schwarz, E. M.,
Vinson, C.,
Puzas, J. E.,
Rosier, R.,
Reynolds, P. R.,
and O'Keefe, R. J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
11639-11647
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. K. Huang, S. H. Wettlaufer, J. Chung, and M. Peters-Golden Prostaglandin E2 Inhibits Specific Lung Fibroblast Functions via Selective Actions of PKA and Epac-1 Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., October 1, 2008; 39(4): 482 - 489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Li, I. B. M. Konings, J. Zhao, L. S. Price, E. de Heer, and P. M. T. Deen Renal expression of exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac) 1 and 2 Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2008; 295(2): F525 - F533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Wang, Y. Yang, and P. A. Friedman Na/H Exchange Regulatory Factor 1, a Novel AKT-associating Protein, Regulates Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase Signaling through a B-Raf-Mediated Pathway Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2008; 19(4): 1637 - 1645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Provot, G. Nachtrab, J. Paruch, A. P. Chen, A. Silva, and H. M. Kronenberg A-Raf and B-Raf Are Dispensable for Normal Endochondral Bone Development, and Parathyroid Hormone-Related Peptide Suppresses Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Activation in Hypertrophic Chondrocytes Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2008; 28(1): 344 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |