Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111145200 on March 27, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 25, 22231-22239, June 21, 2002
A Ligand-inducible Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor/Anaplastic
Lymphoma Kinase Chimera Promotes Mitogenesis and Transforming
Properties in 3T3 Cells*
Gina
Piccinini
,
Roberta
Bacchiocchi
,
Michela
Serresi
§,
Caterina
Vivani¶,
Silvia
Rossetti
,
Claudia
Gennaretti
,
Damiano
Carbonari
, and
Francesca
Fazioli
From the
Laboratory of Cellular and
Molecular Biology, Institute of Internal Medicine and ¶ Institute
of Urology, University of Ancona, Via Tronto 10/A,
60020 Ancona, Italy
Received for publication, November 21, 2001, and in revised form, February 21, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Oncogenic rearrangements of the anaplastic
lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene, encoding a receptor type tyrosine kinase,
are frequently associated with anaplastic large cell lymphomas.
Such rearrangements juxtapose the intracellular domain of ALK to 5'-end
sequences belonging to different genes and create transforming fusion
proteins. To understand how the oncogenic versions of ALK contribute to lymphomagenesis, it is important to analyze the biological effects and
the biochemical properties of this receptor under controlled conditions
of activation. To this aim, we constructed chimeric receptor molecules
in which the extracellular domain of the ALK kinase is replaced by the
extracellular, ligand-binding domain of the epidermal growth
factor receptor (EGFR). Upon transfection in NIH 3T3
fibroblasts, the EGFR/ALK chimera was correctly synthesized and transported to the cell surface, where it was fully functional in
forming high versus low affinity EGF-binding sites and
transducing an EGF-dependent signal intracellularly.
Overexpression of the EGFR/ALK chimera in NIH 3T3 was sufficient to
induce the malignant phenotype; the appearance of the transformed
phenotype was, however, conditionally dependent on the administration
of EGF. Moreover, the EGFR/ALK chimera was significantly more active in
inducing transformation and DNA synthesis than the wild type EGFR when either was expressed at similar levels in NIH 3T3 cells. Comparative analysis of the biochemical pathways implicated in the transduction of
mitogenic signals did not show any increased ability of the EGFR/ALK to
phosphorylate PLC-
and MAPK compared with the EGFR. On the contrary,
EGFR/ALK showed to have a consistently greater effect on
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity compared with the EGFR,
indicating that this enzyme plays a major role in mediating the
mitogenic effects of ALK in NIH 3T3 cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The ALK1 proto-oncogene
encodes a 200-kDa membrane-spanning tyrosine kinase receptor that
is most closely related to leukocyte tyrosine kinase, a member of the
insulin receptor superfamily (1, 2). Only very recently pleiotrophin
(PTN) has been identified as a high affinity ligand for ALK (3). No
function has been ascribed for ALK; however, its restricted expression
in neural tissue suggests that this receptor might play an important
role in the normal development and function of the nervous system (1, 2).
Oncogenic rearrangements of ALK have been detected with a high
frequency in anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), a subgroup of
non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (4-8). Over half of these lymphomas are
characterized by the chromosomal translocation t(2;5)(p23;q35) that
results in the production of an 80-kDa chimeric protein in which
the N-terminal region of the nuclear protein nucleophosmin (NPM) (9,
10) is fused to the intracellular region of ALK, including the tyrosine
kinase domain (7). Similarly to other genes responsible for activating
receptor tyrosine kinase oncogenes, NPM is constitutively expressed in
all tissues and activates the catalytic domain of ALK through
dimerization (11). p80npm/alk shows oncogenic activity in
rodent fibroblasts (11, 12) and induces a lymphoma-like disease in mice
(13). ALK is not expressed in normal hematopoietic cells; ectopic
expression of the truncated ALK protein in lymphoid cells, as a result
of the t(2;5)(p23;q35) translocation, is more than coincidental and
solidly linked to a mechanistic role for this gene in transformation.
Interestingly, several other oncogenic rearrangements of ALK have been
recently identified in ALCLs, suggesting multiple mechanisms for ALK
activation in lymphomagenesis. Molecular characterization of such
alternative chromosomal translocations have identified the nonmuscle
tropomyosin gene, the TRK-fused gene, the
5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase/IMP
cyclohydrolase (ATIC) gene, the clathrin chain polypeptide-like gene,
and the moesin gene as variant fusion partners with the ALK gene
(14-19).
In addition, somatic rearrangements of ALK, generating ALK fusion
oncoproteins, have been detected with a high frequency in inflammatory
myofibroblastic tumors (20); these data, together with the observation
that ALK is expressed in a significant portion of human cancer cell
lines (3), suggest a potentially wider role for ALK product in the
genesis of neoplastic processes.
Very little is known about the physiological role of ALK or how its
subversion might contribute to the malignant transformation. In PC12
cells, activation of a chimeric receptor possessing the intracellular
domain of ALK induces neurite extensions, suggesting a role in the
transduction of differentiative signals (21). The possibility that ALK
is involved in the regulation of cell proliferation is suggested by the
observation that adoptive expression of either NPM/ALK or ATIC/ALK in
an interleukin-3-dependent murine pro-B lymphocyte cell
line is sufficient to bypass the events normally regulating cell
division, causing sustained proliferation in the absence of
interleukin-3 (17, 22). Finally, the recent identification of PTN as
the ligand for ALK has clearly proved the ability of this receptor to
deliver mitogenic signals inside the cells.
In contrast to the situation for most of the receptor tyrosine kinases,
the biochemical events involved in the signal transduction triggered by
normal ALK are largely unknown, except for some evidence deriving from
studies of ALK oncogenes (11, 12, 22-24). This line of investigations,
relevant for the comprehension of the molecular basis of ALK-associated
diseases, has been so far hampered by the lack of a known ligand for
the alk proto-oncogene. A strategy to circumvent this
problem derives from the engineering of chimeric molecules containing
the extracellular ligand-binding domain of the epidermal growth factor
receptor (EGFR) and the intracellular region of ALK. Such an approach
has been successfully used to analyze the signaling properties of
ligand-orphan receptors and the structure-function of several receptor
tyrosine kinases (25-31).
We have therefore engineered a chimeric EGFR/ALK molecule to study ALK
biological and biochemical activities in a fibroblast target cell. We
demonstrate that overexpression of such a chimera is associated with a
ligand-dependent expression of the transformed phenotype.
In addition, the EGFR/ALK chimera was significantly more efficient at
inducing cell transformation and DNA synthesis than the wild-type EGFR
when activated by EGF. Comparative analysis of the biochemical pathways
implicated in the transduction of mitogenic signals did not show any
increased ability of the EGFR/ALK to phosphorylate PLC-
and MAPK
compared with the EGFR. On the contrary, EGFR/ALK was much more
efficient than EGFR at inducing PI3-K activity; the up-regulation of
PI3-K activity following activation of ALK can explain, at least in
part, the stronger mitogenic potency of ALK in NIH 3T3 cells.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Engineering of Eukaryotic Expression Vectors--
The EGFR/ALK
expression vector was engineered starting from a previously described
modified version of the long terminal repeat (LTR)-EGFR 5M vector in
which a novel SalI site was generated in the sequence of the
EGFR cDNA immediately following the transmembrane region (32). The
SalI site and a unique MluI site located in the
LTR vector downstream of the natural stop codon of the EGFR cDNA
were used for the recombination. To obtain the EGFR/ALK chimera, we
initially amplified, by recombinant PCR, the entire intracellular domain of ALK in the region corresponding to amino acids 1058-1620 (numbered as specified by Morris et al. (1)). Amplification was carried out with primers designed to introduce an in-frame SalI site at the 5'-end of the amplified sequence and an
MluI site at its 3'-end. The sequences of the primers used
were TATCGTCGACTGTACCGCCGGAAGCAC (5' primer) and
ATACGCGTCAGGGCCCAGGCTGGTT (3' primer). After digestion with
SalI and MluI, the PCR-amplified sequence was
ligated to the 10.4-kb SalI-MluI fragment from
the LTR-EGFR 5M, containing the EGFR cDNA depleted of the sequence
encoding for its intracellular domain. This recombination procedure
generates a modification of the ALK sequence corresponding to codon
1058. To restore the proper amino acid sequence of the intracellular
portion of ALK, oligonucleotide-primed site-directed mutagenesis was
performed according to the method of Kunkel (33) using a commercially available kit (Bio-Rad). Single-stranded DNA template was generated by
subcloning a BamHI-BamHI fragment from the
LTR-EGFR/ALK vector into M13mp18. After modification of the desired
sequence, the BamHI-BamHI fragment was cloned
back into the vector. The resulting LTR-EGFR/ALK expression vector is
predicted to encode a protein containing the entire extracellular and
transmembrane domains of the EGFR joined to the intracellular domain of
ALK.
The LTR-NPM/ALK expression vector was obtained by cloning the open
reading frame of pcDNA3-NPM/ALK (a kind gift of Prof. P. G. Pelicci, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy) into the LTR-2
expression vector (34). Recombinant PCR was used to amplify the entire
NPM/ALK sequence (7) using primers designed to yield the NPM/ALK
cDNA flanked by unique XhoI and MluI sites, at the 5'- and 3'-ends of the PCR product, respectively. The sequence of the primers used were GGAAGATCTATGGAAGATTCGATGGACATG (5' primer) and
ATACGCGTCAGGGCCCAGGCTGGTT (3' primer). After digestion with XhoI and MluI, the PCR-amplified fragment was
cloned between the homologous sites of the LTR-2 vector. This
recombination yielded to the LTR-NPM/ALK expression vector. The
EGFR/ALK and NPM/ALK expression vectors were sequenced in both strands
of the regions that underwent genetic manipulations to verify that the
predicted structures were achieved after the recombination procedure.
Cell Culture and Transfection Assays--
NIH 3T3 and NR6 mouse
fibroblasts were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Invitrogen) and
transfected with circular DNA according to the calcium phosphate
precipitation technique (35) as modified by Wigler et al.
(36). Transformed foci were scored at 2-3 weeks. Where indicated, EGF
(Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, NY) (20 ng/ml) was added at
day 14, and foci were scored at day 21. Transforming efficiency was
calculated in focus-forming units/pmol of added DNA (FFU/pmol) after
correction for the relative molecular weight of the respective plasmid
and normalization for the efficiency of colony formation in parallel
dishes subjected to selection in mycophenolic acid-containing medium.
The expression vectors used in the transfection experiments were
LTR-EGFR/ALK (described above), LTR-EGFR 5M (32) and LTR-NPM/ALK
(described above). All of the vectors contained the eukaryotic
resistance marker Escherichia coli gpt. Cells expressing the
E. coli gpt gene were selected for their ability to grow in
the presence of mycophenolic acid (37).
The 3H incorporation assay was performed as described
previously (26). Briefly, NIH 3T3 transfectants, grown to confluence in
24-well poly-L-lysine-treated plates (Costar), were
serum-starved for 72 h in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium,
containing transferrin (5 µg/ml) (Becton Dickinson) and
Na2SeO3 (10
8 M) and
then stimulated for 22 h with either 1% (v/v) FBS or EGF at the
indicated concentrations in the presence of 4 µCi/well of
[methyl-3H]thymidine (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech). Background was measured in parallel assays in which cells
were treated with [methyl-3H]thymidine in the
absence of mitogens. Trichloroacetic acid-precipitable radioactivity was extracted and determined by scintillation in a
Beckman
-counter. Data are expressed as a mitogenic index calculated as the fraction of stimulation obtained in the presence of EGF with
respect to the stimulation obtained in the presence of nonsaturating concentrations of an optimal mitogen (1% FBS). The mitogenic index was
calculated as follows: ((EGF cpm
background cpm)/(1% serum cpm
background cpm)) × 100.
When appropriate, 100 nM wortmannin (Sigma) was added to
the serum-starved cells 1 h before the addition of EGF and
maintained at the same concentration throughout the experiments. Stock
solution of the inhibitor was prepared in Me2SO and diluted
so that the final concentration of Me2SO in culture medium
never exceeded 0.02%.
Soft Agar Assay--
Single cell suspensions from NIH 3T3
transfectants were plated at 10-fold serial dilutions in semisolid
medium containing Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented
with 10% FBS and 0.5% sea plaque agarose (FMC BioProducts). Visible
colonies comprising >100 cells were scored at 14 days. Where
indicated, EGF was added at a concentration of 20 ng/ml.
Protein Analysis--
Cells grown to subconfluence in
poly-L-lysine-coated dishes were incubated overnight in
serum-free medium supplemented with transferrin (5 µg/ml) and
Na2SeO3 (10
8 M) and
then exposed to growth factors at the indicated concentrations for the
indicated lengths of time at 37 °C (see figure legends). Lysis was
performed in a buffer containing 1% Triton X-100, 50 mM
HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM EGTA, 10 mM sodium orthovanadate, 2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 50 µg/ml aprotinin, and 10 mM NaPPi. For immunoprecipitation procedures, cellular lysates were incubated with appropriate concentrations of
antibodies for 2 h at 4 °C under gentle rotation, and
immunocomplexes were recovered by adsorption to protein G bound to
Sepharose beads (Amersham Biosciences). After several washes with
buffer containing 0.1% Triton X-100, 20 mM HEPES, 10%
glycerol, and 150 mM NaCl, SDS-PAGE sample buffer (30%
glycerol, 5% SDS, 0.1 M Tris, pH 6.8, 8%
2-mercaptoethanol, and 0.01% bromphenol blue) was added, and samples
were boiled for 5 min. Lysates or immunoprecipitated proteins were then
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose filters. For
Western blotting procedures, filters were incubated for 2 h at
42 °C with TBS (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl) containing 5% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA).
Filters were then incubated with a primary antibody at adequate
dilutions in TBS containing 0.5% BSA for 2 h at room temperature.
Blots were then extensively washed in TTBS (20 mM Tris-HCl,
pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20) and then
immunodetected either with 125I-protein A (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) (0.2 µCi/ml) or with 125I-labeled
anti-mouse-IgG (0.2 µCi/ml) (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in TBS
containing 0.5% BSA.
In some experiments, filters were incubated with biotin-labeled GST or
GST fusion protein (5 × 10
8 M) in TBS
containing 0.5% BSA for 2 h at room temperature. Filters were
then extensively washed in TTBS and then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-neutravidin (Pierce) at 0.025 µg/ml and then subjected to
ECL reaction (Pierce) according to the manufacturer's directions.
The monoclonal antibody recognizing the intracellular domain of ALK
(ALKc) was kindly provided by Prof. B. Falini (Institute of Hematology,
University of Perugia, Italy) and Prof. P. G. Pelicci (European
Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy) and was previously described (38).
Ab-1, the monoclonal antibody directed against the extracellular domain
of EGFR, was purchased from Calbiochem. The rabbit anti-peptide
polyclonal serum recognizing the EGFR carboxyl-terminal tail (residues
985-996) was previously described (39). A commercially available
anti-phosphotyrosine (anti-Tyr(P)) monoclonal antibody (Upstate
Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, NY) was also used. Other antibodies
used were anti-PLC-
(mixture of six monoclonal antibodies) and
anti-mitogen-activated protein kinase (anti-MAPK), both available from
Upstate Biotechnology. For some experiments, we used the
anti-phospho-MAPK polyclonal antibody, which specifically detects
phospho-p44/p42 MAPK (Thr202/Tyr204) (New
England Biolabs, Inc.).
Binding Assay--
For Scatchard analysis, 105
cells/well were seeded in 24 poly-L-lysine-treated tissue
culture plates (Costar). The day after, culture medium was replaced
with binding medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, and 0.2% BSA). After 2 h of
incubation at 37 °C, cells were shifted to 4 °C and incubated
with 125I-EGF over a range of concentrations from 0.016 to
16 nM for at least 4 h at 4 °C. Assays were
performed in triplicate wells, and specificity of binding was
determined by parallel experiments in which a 100-fold molar excess of
unlabeled EGF was used to compete with the tracer. After incubation
with EGF, cells were washed six times with ice-cold binding medium and
solubilized with 10 nM NaOH, 1% SDS. Radioactivity was
measured in a Packard
-counter.
The number of receptors per cell and their dissociation constants
(Kd) for EGF were determined from Scatchard plots. Analysis of the binding was performed with the LIGAND software.
PI3-K Assay--
For measuring receptor-associated PI3-K
activity in vivo, quiescent transfectants were mock-treated
or exposed for 10 min to EGF (100 ng/ml) or PDGF-BB (Upstate
Biotechnology) (100 ng/ml) at 37 °C and instantly lysed in 1%
Triton X-100 lysis buffer (see above). Immunoprecipitation of total
cellular protein was then carried out with the anti-Tyr(P) antibody.
Following three washes with 1% Nonidet P-40 (Nonidet P-40) in
phosphate-buffered saline, two washes with 0.5 M LiCl in
0.1 M Tris, pH 7.6, and two washes with TNE (10 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM
EDTA pH 8.0), immunoprecipitates were resuspended in 40 µl of
reaction buffer (25 mM HEPES, 1 mM EGTA) and
monitored for PI3-K activity by their ability to phosphorylate
phosphatidylinositol (Sigma) in the presence of
[
-32P]ATP (30 µCi/sample) (Amersham Biosciences), 5 mM MgCl2, and 30 µM ATP, which
specifically inhibits phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase activity (40). The
reaction was allowed to proceed for 15 min at room temperature and was
stopped with 100 µl of HCl 1 N. Following organic solvent
extraction, the chloroform phase was quantitatively subjected to thin
layer chromatography analysis.
Expression, Purification, and Labeling of GST Fusion
Proteins--
The pGEX-Grb2 and pGEX-Grb-2/SH2 vectors were kindly
provided by Prof. P. G. Pelicci and have been previously described
(41). Expression of GST and GST fusion proteins was induced in log
phase growing bacteria upon treatment with 1 mM
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside for 4 h.
Bacteria were recovered by centrifugation, resuspended in
volume lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 2 mg/ml lysozyme, 2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 50 µg/ml aprotinin), and lysed on
ice by sonication. Lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 8000 rpm
in a Sorvall SS34 rotor. The resulting supernatant was incubated with
glutathione-agarose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) overnight at 4 °C
with gentle rotation. The resin was washed with excess PBS and then
incubated with 20 mM glutathione (Sigma) for 30 min at room
temperature to elute GST proteins. Eluted proteins were then conjugated
with biotin as described (42).
 |
RESULTS |
Construction and Expression of an EGFR/ALK Chimeric
Receptor--
To test the biological and biochemical activity of the
ALK kinase under conditions of controlled ligand-induced activation, we engineered an EGFR/ALK chimeric molecule possessing the
extracellular and transmembrane domain of EGFR and the intracellular
portion of ALK (see "Materials and Methods" and Fig.
1). The EGFR/ALK recombinant molecule was
placed under the transcriptional control of the Moloney murine leukemia
virus LTR promoter into the LTR-2 expression vector (34), which also
contains the Ecogpt transcription unit and thus allows
selection of transfected cells in mycophenolic acid (37). The EGFR/ALK
expression vector, which had the potential to encode a 1245-amino
acid-long protein with a predicted molecular mass of ~140 kDa, was
transfected into NIH 3T3 cells. For comparison, we transfected the same
cells with the LTR-EGFR 5M expression vector (32).

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of NPM/ALK, EGFR,
EGFR/ALK. The structure of the proteins synthesized by the
LTR-NPM/ALK, LTR-EGFR, and LTR-EGFR/ALK expression vectors are
depicted. The indicated SalI site was used to join the
sequences encoding the extracellular and transmembrane domain of EGFR
(amino acid residues 24 to +657 of the original sequence (61)) to
that encoding the intracellular portion of ALK (amino acid residues
1058-1620, numbered as specified by Morris et al. (1)), in
the EGFR/ALK chimera. Empty boxes indicate EGFR
sequences; filled boxes indicate ALK sequences;
dotted boxes indicate NPM sequences. The
transmembrane region (TM) of EGFR is represented by a
dashed box.
|
|
Mass cell populations (NIH-EGFR/ALK and NIH-EGFR), derived after marker
selection, were subjected to immunoprecipitation with Ab-1, a
monoclonal antibody that recognizes the extracellular domain of human
EGFR, and analyzed by immunoblot using antibodies specific either for
the cytoplasmic domain of EGFR (Fig.
2A) or for the intracellular
domain of ALK (Fig. 2B) or for anti-Tyr(P) (Fig.
2C,
-PTyr). Results have shown that the
EGFR/ALK chimera was efficiently expressed in the transfectants as a
150-160-kDa protein, and it became heavily phosphorylated on tyrosine
in a ligand-dependent manner. In another series of
experiments, we compared Tyr(P)-containing proteins in NIH-EGFR and
NIH-EGFR/ALK transfectants. As shown in Fig. 2D, there were
qualitative differences in the pattern of Tyr(P)-containing proteins
observed upon EGF triggering of the two cell lines. These data clearly
indicate that the EGFR/ALK chimera was correctly synthesized and
processed to the cell surface, where it was capable of interacting with EGF and transducing an EGF-mediated signal via the ALK-specific signaling pathway.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Expression and EGF-dependent
autophosphorylation of EGFR/ALK in intact cells. Control NIH 3T3
transfected with the LTR-2 vector alone (N) or NIH 3T3
transfected with the wild type EGFR (E) or the EGFR/ALK
chimera (E/A) were used. When indicated (+),
intact cells were treated with EGF (100 ng/ml) for 10 min at 37 °C.
Total cellular proteins (1 mg) were immunoprecipitated with Ab-1
antibody, which recognizes the EGFR extracellular domain and analyzed
by immunoblot with a polyclonal serum raised against a
carboxyl-terminal peptide of EGFR (A); a monoclonal antibody
recognizing the intracellular domain of ALK (B); or an
anti-Tyr(P) ( -PTyr) antibody (C).
D, total cellular proteins (100 µg) were fractionated by
electrophoresis and subjected to immunoblot analysis with the
anti-Tyr(P) antibody. Molecular mass markers are indicated in
kilodaltons.
|
|
To confirm the expression of EGFR/ALK on the cell surface and to
characterize its affinity to EGF, we have evaluated the EGF binding
properties of the EGFR/ALK and wild-type EGFR. As shown in Table
I, both NIH-EGFR/ALK and NIH-EGFR cells
displayed two classes of receptors, with dissociation constants
(Kd) in the range of 6.2-6.4 nM (low
affinity) and 0.09-0.1 nM (high affinity). In addition,
the quantitative partition of high versus low affinity sites
in these two marker-selected mass cell populations were similar;
therefore, they were selected for further analysis.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Analysis of the 125I-EGF-binding properties of NIH-EGFR and
NIH-EGFR/ALK cells
125I-EGF binding was assessed by Scatchard analysis over a
range of concentration from 0.016 to 16 nM in triplicate
wells. Specificity of binding was controlled in a parallel competition
experiment by using a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled EGF. Data were
analyzed with the LIGAND software.
|
|
Biological Activity of EGFR/ALK--
We next analyzed the
biological effects of the described EGFR/ALK chimera on the phenotype
of NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. It has been reported previously that NPM/ALK is
capable of transforming NIH 3T3 (12), Fr3T3 (11), and Rat-1 (22)
fibroblasts. Under our experimental conditions, the LTR-NPM/ALK
expression vector displayed readily detectable transforming activity in
NIH 3T3 cells, inducing about 8 × 103 FFU/pmol of
added DNA (Table II). The EGFR/ALK
expression vector was also capable of inducing malignant transformation
of NIH 3T3 cells; the appearance of the transformed phenotype was,
however, conditionally dependent on the administration of EGF. In fact, in the absence of exogenously added EGF, the EGFR/ALK expression vector
showed an efficiency of transformation of about 20 FFU/pmol of DNA;
when the assay was performed in the presence of EGF, the transforming
activity of the EGFR/ALK chimera was strongly increased to about 5 × 103 FFU/pmol of DNA. It is noteworthy that the LTR/EGFR
was much less potent than the EGFR/ALK expression vector, despite
comparable levels of protein expressions (data not shown).
As an independent approach toward assessing the conditional nature of
the growth alterations induced by the LTR-EGFR/ALK construct, we
investigated the ability of transfected NIH 3T3 cells to display anchorage-independent growth, a property known to correlate well with
the malignant phenotype (43). Following transfection and marker
selection, a mass cell population expressing a comparable number of
receptors (see Table I) was suspended in semisolid medium. In the
absence of EGF supplement, NIH-EGFR/ALK displayed only a low
colony-forming ability of around 1.85% (Table II). However, upon the
addition of EGF at the concentration of 20 ng/ml, we observed a
dramatic increase of colony formation (16.9%) with a shift toward
large, progressively growing colonies. In comparison, NIH-EGFR-transfected cells displayed a clonogenic capability in semisolid medium of around 12.73% in the presence of EGF (Table II).
The results in the transformation and soft agar assays were paralleled
by those obtained in a DNA synthesis assay. For these experiments, we
used two marker-selected mass populations displaying a comparable
number of EGF-binding sites (see Table I). Fig. 3 shows the EGF dose-response profiles of
these two cell lines; NIH-EGFR/ALK cells exhibited a 2.5-3-fold
increase in maximal mitogenic response relative to NIH-EGFR. However,
both cell lines displayed comparable ED50
(ED50) for EGF (about 0.1 nM), indicating that
different levels of mitogenic signaling were achieved by the same
receptor occupancy and most likely due to different ability of ALK and
EGFR to couple with signaling pathways.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Dose-response analysis of
[3H]thymidine incorporation upon EGF stimulation of
quiescent NIH-3T3 fibroblasts expressing either wild type EGFR or the
EGFR/ALK chimera. Cells expressing comparable levels of receptors
(see Table I) were serum-starved for 72 h and then stimulated for
22 h with either 1% fetal bovine serum or the indicated
concentration of EGF, in the presence of 4 µCi of
[methyl-3H]thymidine/well. Data from
triplicate wells are expressed as the ratio [(EGF cpm background cpm/1% serum cpm background cpm)] × 100. Open circles, NIH-EGFR; solid
circles, NIH-EGFR/ALK. Results are typical and
representative of three independent experiments performed in
triplicate.
|
|
Similar results were obtained when EGFR and EGFR/ALK were expressed in
NR6 cells, which are devoid of endogenous EGFR (44) (data not shown).
PLC-
Phosphorylation by the EGFR/ALK--
As an approach to
investigating the biochemical basis for the greater mitogenic potency
of EGFR/ALK than EGFR in NIH 3T3 cells, we compared their ability to
couple with known pathways implicated in mitogenic signal transduction.
One such pathway, leading to hydrolysis of inositol phospholipid, is
initiated by tyrosine phosphorylation of PLC-
by receptor tyrosine
kinases. Complex formation of NPM/ALK and PLC-
in vivo
has been shown previously by coimmunoprecipitation experiments in large
cell anaplastic lymphoma cells (22). Therefore, we investigated the
ability of EGFR/ALK chimera to phosphorylate PLC-
on tyrosine
residues. NIH-EGFR/ALK and NIH-EGFR cells expressing comparable levels
of receptors were treated with EGF for 10 min at 37 °C prior to
lysis. Equal amounts of cellular proteins from either cell lines were immunoprecipitated with a mixture of anti-PLC-
monoclonal antibodies and then subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-Tyr(P) antibodies. As shown in Fig. 4, EGF stimulation of
NIH-EGFR/ALK induced tyrosine phosphorylation of PLC-
. However, the
extent of PLC-
tyrosine phosphorylation in NIH-EGFR/ALK cells was
much lower than that of NIH-EGFR under the same conditions of ligand
stimulation. Since neither the level of immunoprecipitated PLC-
nor
the levels of receptors were different in the two cell lines examined,
we concluded that the EGFR/ALK chimera was less efficient in
phosphorylating PLC-
than wild-type EGFR.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
In vivo tyrosine phosphorylation
of PLC- by EGFR/ALK. NIH-EGFR/ALK and
NIH-EGFR cell populations expressing comparable levels of receptors
(see Table I) were serum-starved for 16 h and then stimulated for
10 min at 37 °C with 100 ng/ml EGF (+) or mock-treated ( ) and
lysed thereafter. Total cellular protein (3 mg) was immunoprecipitated
with a mixture of six monoclonal antibodies against PLC- .
Left panel, two-thirds of each immunoprecipitate
was analyzed by immunoblot with an anti-Tyr(P) ( -PTyr)
antibody. Right panel, the remainder of each
immunoprecipitate was analyzed by immunoblot with the anti-PLC-
antibodies. Molecular mass markers are indicated in kilodaltons.
Comparable results were obtained in three independent
experiments.
|
|
Effects of ALK Activation on MAPK--
An important metabolic
cascade regulating cell proliferation is started by activation of the
raf kinase, which in turn leads to a series of events
culminating in the activation of MAPK. To test whether EGFR/ALK is able
to cause activation of MAPK, we first analyzed its electrophoretic
mobility, since retarded SDS-PAGE migration of MAPK correlates with its
activation (45, 46). In NIH-EGFR cells, EGF stimulation resulted in
almost all of p42 and p44 MAPK migrating with a higher
Mr (Fig.
5A). A less pronounced mobility shift was observed in EGF-treated EGFR/ALK cells (Fig. 5A). Moreover, the extent of p42 and p44 MAPK gel
retardation was comparable in EGF-treated NIH-EGFR/ALK and control NIH
3T3 cells, thus being probably due to the activation of endogenous mouse EGFR. PDGF-BB treatment, on the other hand, resulted in a
complete band shift of both isoforms of MAPK in all of the analyzed cell lines, despite the presence of nearly 10-fold less PDGF receptor than EGFR and EGFR/ALK. To better evaluate the degree of MAPK activation in NIH-EGFR/ALK, lysates from NIH-EGFR and NIH-EGFR/ALK were
analyzed by immunoblotting with an anti-phospho-MAPK antibody that
specifically recognizes p42 and p44 MAPK only when activated by
phosphorylation at Thr202 and Tyr204. As shown
in Fig. 5B (upper panel), the active forms of
MAPK were readily detectable in NIH-EGFR cells treated with EGF or PDGF
BB, as well as in PDGF BB-stimulated NIH-EGFR/ALK. Conversely, background levels of activated MAPK were revealed in NIH-EGFR/ALK following EGF stimulation (Fig. 5B, upper panel).
Since the observed differences were not due to sample variations (Fig.
5B, lower panel), we concluded that EGFR/ALK
kinase is inefficient at causing activation of MAPK in NIH 3T3
fibroblasts.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effects of the EGFR/ALK chimera on MAPK
activity. A, control mock-transfected NIH 3T3
(N) or the NIH-EGFR (E) and NIH-EGFR/ALK (E/A)
transfectants were either mock-treated ( ) or treated with EGF 100 ng/ml (+E) or PDGF-BB 100 ng/ml (+P) for 10 min
at 37 °C. Total cellular proteins (30 µg) were resolved by 13%
SDS-PAGE and then subjected to immunoblot analysis using anti-MAPK
antibody. B, NIH-EGFR (E) and NIH-EGFR/ALK
(E/A) transfectants were either mock-treated ( )
or treated with EGF 100 ng/ml (+E) or PDGF-BB 100 ng/ml
(+P) for 10 min at 37 °C. Total cellular proteins (50 µg) were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE and then subjected to immunoblot
analysis using an anti-phospho-MAPK (upper panel) or
anti-MAPK (phosphorylation state-independent) (lower panel)
antibody. Positions of p42 and p44 MAPK are indicated on the
left.
|
|
Effects of EGFR/ALK on PI3-K Activity--
One of the immediate
cellular responses to stimulation by different growth factor receptors
is the activation of PI3-K. This enzyme catalyzes the production of
3-phosphoinositides, which act intracellularly as important second
messengers (47).
We therefore analyze the ability of the EGFR/ALK chimera to couple with
the PI3-K-activated signaling pathway in comparison with that of EGFR
expressed at similar levels. In addition, since both NIH-EGFR/ALK and
NIH-EGFR cells expressed PDGF receptors at comparable levels (data not
shown), we used PDGF-BB stimulation as an internal control.
As shown in Fig. 6, PI3-K activity was
readily detectable in anti-Tyr(P) immunoprecipitates of both
NIH-EGFR/ALK and NIH/EGFR cells treated with PDGF-BB, in agreement with
the notion that the PDGF receptor is very efficient at coupling with
this signaling pathway (48). Anti-Tyr(P) immunoprecipitates obtained
from EGF-treated NIH-EGFR/ALK revealed high levels of enzymatic
activity comparable with those observed following stimulation of the
same cells with PDGF-BB. In contrast, a low level of PI3-K activity was
detected in anti-Tyr(P) immunoprecipitates from EGF-treated NIH-EGFR
(around 7.19-fold stimulation over unstimulated NIH-EGFR cells). From these results, we conclude that the ALK kinase can couple with the
PI3-K signaling pathway much more efficiently than the EGFR.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effects of the EGFR/ALK chimera on PI3-K
activity. NIH-EGFR/ALK and NIH/EGFR transfectants expressing
comparable levels of receptors (Table I) were either mock-treated or
treated with EGF (100 ng/ml) or PDGF-BB (100 ng/ml) for 5 min at
37 °C. Total cellular proteins (1.5 mg) were immunoprecipitated with
the anti-Tyr(P) monoclonal antibody, and the PI3-K activity was
measured on the immunoprecipitates as described under "Material and
Methods." Results are expressed as -fold stimulation over control
(unstimulated) values for each cell lines; values represent means ± S.E. (n = 3).
|
|
To determine the importance of PI3-K activity in the transduction of
mitogenic signals delivered by the EGFR/ALK chimera, we examined the
effect of the specific PI3-K inhibitor wortmannin on the EGF-induced
proliferation. As shown in Fig. 7, this
inhibitor dramatically reduced the mitogenic response of EGFR/ALK
(about 60% inhibition), whereas the effect on NIH-EGFR cells was
substantially insignificant (data not shown). The results clearly
establish that activation of the PI3-K pathway is a critical step for
the mitogenic signals mediated by the EGFR/ALK. However, the lack of a
complete DNA synthesis inhibition by wortmannin indicates that
mitogenesis is only partly dependent on a functional PI3-K activity.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of the PI3-K inhibitor wortmannin on
EGF-induced mitogenesis in NIH-EGFR/ALK cells. Cells were
serum-starved for 72 h and then either left untreated ( ) or
pretreated for 1 h with 100 µM wortmannin ( ) or
with Me2SO as control ( ) before stimulation with the
indicated dose of EGF in the presence of 4 µCi of
[methyl-3H]thymidine/well for 22 h.
Results are expressed as a mitogenic index calculated as indicated
under "Materials and Methods"; proliferation of NIH EGFR/ALK cells
in the presence of 1% FBS is referred to as 100% proliferation.
Results are representative of four independent experiments, performed
with triplicate wells for each of the indicated EGF concentrations as
well as for the controls. Similar results were obtained with the PI3-K
inhibitor LY 294002 (data not shown).
|
|
Association of EGFR/ALK with Grb-2--
The oncoprotein NPM-ALK
has been shown to recruit specific signaling molecules, such as Grb2,
IRS-1, and Shc in fibroblasts; only the interaction between NPM/ALK and
Grb-2 seems to be essential for NPM/ALK-induced transformation, since
NPM/ALK mutants defective for binding with IRS-1 and Shc, but not with
Grb-2, were still capable of inducing cell transformation (11, 12, 22).
The possibility has been suggested of a direct association of Grb-2 with NPM/ALK despite the absence of a putative Grb-2 recognition sequence in the intracellular domain of ALK (12). Therefore, this
possibility was investigated in our model system. To this aim, we
performed the far-Western blot analysis using GST-Grb-2/SH2 fusion
protein. Lysates obtained from NIH-EGFR/ALK and NIH-EGFR were
immunoprecipitated with the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody Ab-1 and
transferred to nitrocellulose filters after SDS-PAGE. Filters were
incubated with biotin-labeled GST-Grb-2/SH2, followed by incubation
with horseradish peroxidase-neutravidin and ECL detection. As shown in
Fig. 8, GST-Grb-2/SH2 was able to
efficiently bind wild-type EGFR as previously reported (49); on the
contrary, association of Grb-2 to EGFR/ALK was very weak and detectable only when a 3-fold higher amount of proteins was immunoprecipitated. By
the use of a GST-Grb2 fusion protein, we obtained comparable results;
specificity of the reaction was confirmed by replica filters incubated
with biotin-labeled GST (data not shown).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Direct binding of Grb-2 to EGFR/ALK
chimera. NIH-EGFR/ALK (E/A) and NIH-EGFR
(E) cells expressing comparable levels of receptors (see
Table I) were serum-starved for 16 h and then either left
untreated ( ) or stimulated with EGF 100 ng/ml (+) for 10 min at
37 °C. Total cellular proteins (1 mg from NIH-EGFR cells; 3 mg from
NIH-EGFR/ALK) were immunoprecipitated with Ab-1 and then subjected to
far-Western blot analysis with affinity-purified, biotin-labeled
GST-Grb2/SH2. Protein complexes were detected with horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated neutravidin and ECL reaction. The electrophoretic
mobility of markers for protein molecular mass (kDa) is indicated on
the left. The arrows indicate the position of
EGFR/ALK and EGFR.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Chimeric receptors have been widely employed to analyze the
biological and biochemical properties of ligand-orphan receptors. A
large body of evidence indicates that the biological properties of such
molecules depend on their cytoplasmic domain, and therefore they
faithfully replicate the behavior of their wild-type counterparts from
which the intracellular domain was derived (25-31). In addition, many
constructed chimeras possessing the extracellular domain of EGFR have
been shown to be expressed at the cell surface as two classes of
receptors with high and low affinity for EGF binding comparable with
those of wild-type EGFR (26, 27, 50, 51).
In the present study, we sought to analyze the selective advantage, if
any, that overexpression of a ligand-inducible ALK receptor might
confer to cells in a model system. For our studies, we used the
established mouse NIH 3T3 fibroblast cell line, a system widely
employed to assess the transforming and biological activities of
oncogenes; furthermore, it has been already shown that these cells
express only few EGFRs/cell and therefore are essentially not
responsive to EGF (52). We constructed chimeric EGFR/ALK receptor
molecules and have shown that they were correctly localized to the
plasma membrane of NIH 3T3 cells, where they bound EGF with
dissociation constants (Kd) in the range of 6.2-6.4
nM (low affinity) and 0.09-0.1 nM (high
affinity), as has been previously reported for cells expressing wild
type EGFR (53, 54). We also demonstrated that EGF induced tyrosine phosphorylation of EGFR/ALK as well as a specific set of cellular proteins; therefore, the EGFR/ALK chimera allows us to dissect ALK
catalytic function in an inducible system. Moreover, the availability of cell lines expressing similar levels of either EGFR/ALK or EGFR
allowed us to analyze the biological and biochemical activities of
these kinases under conditions in which the cellular responses to EGF
were solely dependent on the coupling of either kinase with its own
signaling pathways.
The EGFR/ALK chimera was much more potent at inducing cell
transformation than the EGFR when activated by EGF; in addition, we
demonstrated that the EGFR/ALK chimera conferred upon the recipient cells a 3-fold-increased responsiveness to EGF compared with EGFR. However, the ED50 of EGF was comparable in the two cell
lines, indicating that different levels of mitogenic signaling were
achieved by the same receptor occupancy. Thus, the greater ability of
the ALK kinase to function as a mitogenic signal transducer provides a
mechanistic basis of its greater transforming activity than the
EGFR.
A number of studies have described the association of the oncoprotein
NPM/ALK with P13-K, PLC-
, Shc, IRS-1, and Grb-2. These studies have
indicated the importance of PLC-
and PI3-K for the oncogenic
potential of NPM/ALK, whereas association with Shc and IRS-1 seems to
be dispensable (11, 12, 22, 23, 24). Specific interaction with Shc and
Grb-2 have also been shown for ATIC/ALK, a different ALK oncoprotein
(16). Conversely, the role of the cytoplasmic molecules involved in the
control of the mitogenic signaling mediated by native, membrane-bound
ALK are completely unknown. While this work was in progress, Stoica
et al. (3) reported that PTN acts as a high affinity ligand
for ALK; in this work, the authors also showed tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1, Shc, PLC-
, and PI3-K following PTN stimulation of SW-13 human adrenal carcinoma cells overexpressing wild type ALK. Obviously, further investigations are required to evaluate the molecular relevance of these intracellular substrates in mediating the mitogenic action of ALK under conditions of controlled ligand-induced activation.
Using our model system, we showed, indeed, that the EGFR/ALK chimera
was able to phosphorylate PLC-
in response to EGF stimulation. However, in NIH-EGFR/ALK, the level of PLC-
tyrosine phosphorylation was much lower compared with that obtained in similarly treated NIH-EGFR cells. Therefore, despite its stronger mitogenic and transforming ability in fibroblasts, ALK did not show any increased ability to phosphorylate PLC-
compared with the EGFR. Obviously, our
results do not address directly whether phosphorylation of PLC-
is
necessary for the mitogenic action of ALK; however, the low
stoichiometry of PLC-
phosphorylation described for
ligand-activated wild-type EGFR renders this possibility very
unlikely (26). This conclusion seems to contrast with previous results
reported by Bai et al. (22), which suggested the importance
of PLC-
activation for the mitogenic activity of ALK, since
knock-out of this single pathway was sufficient to significantly
inhibit NPM-ALK-mediated transformation in BA/F3 cells and Rat-1
fibroblasts. However, it is worthwhile noting that a PLC-
binding-deficient NPM-ALK mutant had no effect on transformation
activity in Fr3T3 fibroblasts (11). Thus, it has been suggested that
PLC-
activation depend on the cell type specificity; our results are
in agreement with this possibility.
Surprisingly, in our model system, the EGFR/ALK chimera does not induce
activation of the MAPK pathway, since we have not been able to detect
EGF-stimulated MAPK phosphorylation in NIH-EGFR/ALK cells under
conditions in which MAPK phosphorylation was easily detected in
EGF-treated NIH-EGFR. In addition, PDGF treatment resulted in a
complete band shift of both isoforms in all of the analyzed cell lines,
despite the lower levels of receptor expression (2 × 106 EGFR/ALK per cell versus 1 × 105 PDGF receptors per cell in NIH-EGFR/ALK cells).
Although the activation of MAPK represents a critical step in the
regulation of cell proliferation by a large number of receptor tyrosine
kinases, evidence exists that mitogenesis could be routed through
alternative pathways (31). Taken together, these results indicate that
the stronger mitogenic potency of the ALK kinase than of the EGFR in
NIH 3T3 cells must involve pathways other than those activated by
PLC-
and MAPK tyrosine phosphorylation.
Interestingly, the finding that EGFR/ALK can couple with the PI3-K
signaling pathway much more efficiently than EGFR indicates that this
enzyme might play a major role in mediating the mitogenic effects of
ALK. Indeed, wortmannin strongly inhibited the EGF responsiveness of
NIH-EGFR/ALK cells, while it was almost inefficient on NIH-EGFR
cells. The importance of the PI3-K pathway for the mitogenic signaling
of ALK is strengthened by recent reports indicating that PI3-K is
essential for NPM-ALK transforming ability (23, 24) and are consistent
with earlier studies of Souttou et al. (55), who showed that
the PI3-K pathway is critical for the mitogenic signaling of PTN.
The Shc/Grb-2 pathway is particularly relevant in oncogenic signal
transduction, since it might act as a molecular switch controlling
cellular functions such as mitogenesis (56, 57) and cytoskeleton
rearrangement (58), which are unbalanced in cancer cells. Previous
works have demonstrated that Shc and IRS-1 are recruited and activated
by NPM-ALK as well as by the membrane-bound wild-type ALK following
in vivo stimulation with pleiotrophin (3, 11, 12). However,
mutations of the Shc and IRS-1 functional docking site did not result
in a reduced oncogenic activity of NPM-ALK; interestingly, the
observation that such a mutant was still able to co-precipitate Grb-2
revealed the possibility of a direct Grb-2/ALK association despite the
absence of a putative Grb-2 recognition sequence in the cytoplasmic
region of ALK (12). However, the details of Grb-2/ALK interaction in
living cells have not been further characterized. The data of the
far-Western blot analysis using GST-Grb-2 fusion protein indicate a
very poor binding of activated EGFR/ALK chimera to Grb-2. In contrast,
by coimmunoprecipitation experiments, we were able to observe Grb-2/ALK association in our model system (data not shown). Therefore, we conclude that recruitment of Grb-2 by membrane-bound, ligand-activated ALK takes place indirectly through the formation of ternary complexes, which might involve additional proteins other than
Shc.2
Analysis of human neoplasia suggested that quantitative alterations in
the expression levels of receptor tyrosine kinases might suffice to
overcome normal growth regulation and in this way contribute to
malignant transformation (59). These findings have established a direct
causal link between growth factor receptors overexpression and
cellular transformation. Our present study provides a mechanistic basis
for ALK gene amplification in human malignancies. These results acquire
a particular interest in view of the recent observation that
coexpression of PTN and ALK occurs in different human cancer cell lines
(60). Therefore, analysis of PTN and ALK coexpression in cancer cell
lines should be further characterized to evaluate the role of ALK in
the genesis of neoplasms other than ALCL.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Prof. A. Rappelli for
continuous support and encouragement during the course of this work. We
thank Prof. P. P. Di Fiore for helpful discussions and
suggestions. We also thank Prof. P. P. Pellicci and Prof. B. Falini for providing the anti-ALK monoclonal antibody. The expert
technical assistance of M. Cesaroni is also acknowledged.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by a grant from the Associazione
Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Supported by a Fellowship from Fondazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
39-071-2206144; Fax: 39-071-2206125; E-mail:
fazioli@popcsi.unian.it.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 27, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111145200
2
G. Piccinini and F. Fazioli, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ALK, anaplastic
lymphoma kinase;
ALCL, anaplastic large cell lymphoma;
EGF, epidermal
growth factor;
EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
PLC-
, phospholipase C-
;
PI3-K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase;
PTN, pleiotrophin;
Tyr(P), phosphotyrosine;
NPM, nucleophosmin;
ATIC, 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase/IMP cyclohydrolase;
LTR, long terminal repeat;
FBS, fetal
bovine serum;
FFU, focus-forming units;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
TBS, Tris-buffered saline;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor;
IRS-1, insulin receptor
substrate-1.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Morris, S. W.,
Naeve, C.,
Mathew, P.,
James, P. L.,
Kirstein, M. N.,
Cui, X.,
and Witte, D. P.
(1997)
Oncogene
14,
2175-2188[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Iwahara, T.,
Fujimoto, J.,
Wen, D.,
Cupples, R.,
Bucay, N.,
Arakawa, T.,
Mori, S.,
Ratzkin, B.,
and Yamamoto, T.
(1997)
Oncogene
14,
439-449[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Stoica, G. E.,
Kuo, A.,
Aigner, A.,
Sunitha, I.,
Souttou, B.,
Malerczyk, C.,
Caughey, D. J.,
Wen, D.,
Karavanov, A.,
Riegel, A. T.,
and Wellstein, A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
16772-16779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Mason, D. Y.,
Bastard, C.,
Rimokh, R,
Dastugue, N.,
Huret, J. L.,
Kristofferson, U.,
Magaud, J. P.,
Nezelof, C.,
Tilly, H.,
and Vannier, J. P.
(1990)
Br. J. Haematol.
74,
161-168[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Stein, H.,
Herbst, H.,
Anagnostopoulos, I.,
Niedobitek, G.,
Dallenbach, F.,
and Kratzsch, H. C.
(1991)
Ann. Oncol.
2,
33-38[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Kadin, M. E.
(1994)
J. Clin. Oncol.
12,
884-887[Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Morris, S. W.,
Kirsten, M. N.,
Valentine, M. B.,
Dittmer, K. G.,
Shapiro, D. N.,
Saltman, D. L.,
and Look, A. T.
(1994)
Science
263,
1281-1284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Shiota, M.,
Fujimoto, J.,
Semba, T.,
Satoh, H.,
Yamamoto, T.,
and Mori, S.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
1567-1574[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Borer, R. A.,
Lehner, C. F.,
Eppenberger, H. M.,
and Nigg, E. A.
(1989)
Cell
56,
379-390[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Chan, W. Y.,
Liu, Q. R.,
Borjigin, J.,
Bush, H.,
Rennert, O. M.,
Tease, L. A.,
and Chan, P. K.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
1033-1039[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Bishof, D.,
Puldorf, K.,
Mason, D. Y.,
and Morris, S. W.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
2312-2325[Abstract]
|
| 12.
|
Fujimoto, J.,
Shiota, M.,
Iwahara, T.,
Seki, N.,
Satoh, H.,
Mori, S.,
and Yamamoto, T.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
4118-4186
|
| 13.
|
Kuefer, M. U.,
Look, A. T.,
Puldorf, K.,
Behm, F. G.,
Pattengale, P. K.,
Mason, D. Y.,
and Morris, S. W.
(1997)
Blood
90,
2901-2910[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Lamant, L.,
Dastugue, N.,
Puldorf, K.,
Delsol, G,
and Mariame, B.
(1999)
Blood
93,
3088-3095[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Hernandez, L.,
Pinyol, M.,
Hernandez, S.,
Beà, S.,
Puldorf, K.,
Rosenwald, A.,
Lamant, L.,
Falini, B.,
Ott, G.,
Mason, D. Y.,
Delsol, G.,
and Campo, E.
(1999)
Blood
94,
3265-3268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Trinei, M.,
Lanfrancone, L.,
Campo, E.,
Puldorf, K.,
Mason, D. Y.,
Pelicci, P. P.,
and Falini, B.
(2000)
Cancer Res.
60,
793-798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Ma, Z.,
Cools, J.,
Marynen, P.,
Cui, X.,
Sieberrt, R.,
Gesk, S.,
Schlegelberger, B.,
Peeters, B., De,
Wolfe-Peeters, C.,
Wlodarska, I.,
and Morris, S. W.
(2000)
Blood
95,
2144-2149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Touriol, C.,
Greenland, C.,
Lamant, L.,
Puldorf, K.,
Bernard, F.,
Roussel, T.,
Mason, D. Y.,
and Delsol, G.
(2000)
Blood
95,
3204-3207[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Tort, F.,
Pynol, M.,
Puldorf, K.,
Roncador, G.,
Hernandez, L.,
Nayach, I.,
Kluin-Nelemans, H. C.,
Kluin, F.,
Turiol, C.,
Gelsol, G.,
Mason, D.,
and Campo, E.
(2001)
Lab. Invest.
81,
419-426[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Morris, S. W.
(2001)
Br. J. Haematol.
113,
275-295[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Souttou, B.,
Brunet-De Carvalho, N.,
Raulais, D.,
and Vigny, M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
9526-9531[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Bai, R. Y.,
Dieter, P.,
Pescel, C.,
Morris, S. W.,
and Duyster, J.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
6951-6961[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Bai, R. Y.,
Ouyang, T.,
Miething, C.,
Morris, S. W.,
Peschel, C.,
and Duyster, J.
(2000)
Blood
96,
4319-4327[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Slupianek, A.,
Nieborowska-Skorska, M.,
Hoser, G.,
Morrione, A.,
Majewski, M.,
Xue, L.,
Morris, S. W.,
Wasik, M. A.,
and Skorski, T.
(2001)
Cancer Res.
61,
2194-2199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Riedel, H.,
Dull, T. J.,
Honneger, A. M.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
2943-2954[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Fazioli, F.,
Kim, U.-H.,
Rhee, S. G.,
Molloy, C. J.,
Segatto, O.,
and Di Fiore, P. P.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
2040-2048[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Herbst, R.,
Lammers, R.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
19908-19916[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Yan, H.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Chao, M. V.
(1991)
Science
252,
561-563[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Seedorf, K.,
Millauer, B.,
Kostka, G.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
4347-4356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Obermeier, A.,
Bradshow, R. A.,
Seedorf, K.,
Choidas, A.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1993)
EMBO J.
13,
1585-1590
|
| 31.
|
Santoro, M.,
Wong, W. T.,
Aroca, P.,
Santos, E.,
Matoskova, B.,
Grieco, M.,
Fusco, A.,
and Di Fiore, P. P.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
663-675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Lonardo, F., Di,
Marco, E.,
King, C. R.,
Pierce, J.,
Segatto, O.,
Aaronson, S. A.,
and Di Fiore, P. P.
(1990)
New Biol.
2,
992-1003[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Kunkel, T. A.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
488-492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Di Fiore, P. P.,
Pierce, J. H.,
Kraus, M. H.,
Segatto, O.,
King, C. R.,
and Aaronson, S. A.
(1987)
Science
237,
178-182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Graham, F. L.,
and Van der Eb, A. J.
(1973)
Virology
52,
456-467[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Wigler, M.,
Silverstein, S.,
Lee, L. S.,
Pellicer, A.,
Cheng, Y.-C.,
and Axel, R.
(1977)
Cell
11,
223-232[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Mulligan, R. C.,
and Berg, P.
(1981)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
78,
2072-2076[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Falini, B.,
Bigerna, B.,
Fizzotti, M.,
Pulford, K.,
Pileri, S. A.,
Delsol, G.,
Carbone, A.,
Paulli, M.,
Magrini, U.,
Menestrina, F.,
Giardini, R.,
Pilotti, S.,
Mezzelani, A.,
Ugolini, B.,
Billi, M.,
Pucciarini, A.,
Pacini, R.,
Pelicci, P. G.,
and Flenghi, L.
(1998)
Am. J. Pathol.
153,
875-886[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Di Fiore, P. P.,
Segatto, O.,
Wexler, D,
Fazioli, F.,
Pierce, J. H.,
and Aaronson, S. A.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
2749-2756[Abstr |