JBC Oz Biosciences

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111145200 on March 27, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 25, 22231-22239, June 21, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/25/22231    most recent
M111145200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piccinini, G.
Right arrow Articles by Fazioli, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Piccinini, G.
Right arrow Articles by Fazioli, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A Ligand-inducible Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor/Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Chimera Promotes Mitogenesis and Transforming Properties in 3T3 Cells*

Gina PiccininiDagger , Roberta BacchiocchiDagger , Michela SerresiDagger §, Caterina Vivani, Silvia RossettiDagger , Claudia GennarettiDagger , Damiano CarbonariDagger , and Francesca FazioliDagger ||

From the Dagger  Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Institute of Internal Medicine and  Institute of Urology, University of Ancona, Via Tronto 10/A, 60020 Ancona, Italy

Received for publication, November 21, 2001, and in revised form, February 21, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Oncogenic rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene, encoding a receptor type tyrosine kinase, are frequently associated with anaplastic large cell lymphomas. Such rearrangements juxtapose the intracellular domain of ALK to 5'-end sequences belonging to different genes and create transforming fusion proteins. To understand how the oncogenic versions of ALK contribute to lymphomagenesis, it is important to analyze the biological effects and the biochemical properties of this receptor under controlled conditions of activation. To this aim, we constructed chimeric receptor molecules in which the extracellular domain of the ALK kinase is replaced by the extracellular, ligand-binding domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Upon transfection in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, the EGFR/ALK chimera was correctly synthesized and transported to the cell surface, where it was fully functional in forming high versus low affinity EGF-binding sites and transducing an EGF-dependent signal intracellularly. Overexpression of the EGFR/ALK chimera in NIH 3T3 was sufficient to induce the malignant phenotype; the appearance of the transformed phenotype was, however, conditionally dependent on the administration of EGF. Moreover, the EGFR/ALK chimera was significantly more active in inducing transformation and DNA synthesis than the wild type EGFR when either was expressed at similar levels in NIH 3T3 cells. Comparative analysis of the biochemical pathways implicated in the transduction of mitogenic signals did not show any increased ability of the EGFR/ALK to phosphorylate PLC-gamma and MAPK compared with the EGFR. On the contrary, EGFR/ALK showed to have a consistently greater effect on phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity compared with the EGFR, indicating that this enzyme plays a major role in mediating the mitogenic effects of ALK in NIH 3T3 cells.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The ALK1 proto-oncogene encodes a 200-kDa membrane-spanning tyrosine kinase receptor that is most closely related to leukocyte tyrosine kinase, a member of the insulin receptor superfamily (1, 2). Only very recently pleiotrophin (PTN) has been identified as a high affinity ligand for ALK (3). No function has been ascribed for ALK; however, its restricted expression in neural tissue suggests that this receptor might play an important role in the normal development and function of the nervous system (1, 2).

Oncogenic rearrangements of ALK have been detected with a high frequency in anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), a subgroup of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (4-8). Over half of these lymphomas are characterized by the chromosomal translocation t(2;5)(p23;q35) that results in the production of an 80-kDa chimeric protein in which the N-terminal region of the nuclear protein nucleophosmin (NPM) (9, 10) is fused to the intracellular region of ALK, including the tyrosine kinase domain (7). Similarly to other genes responsible for activating receptor tyrosine kinase oncogenes, NPM is constitutively expressed in all tissues and activates the catalytic domain of ALK through dimerization (11). p80npm/alk shows oncogenic activity in rodent fibroblasts (11, 12) and induces a lymphoma-like disease in mice (13). ALK is not expressed in normal hematopoietic cells; ectopic expression of the truncated ALK protein in lymphoid cells, as a result of the t(2;5)(p23;q35) translocation, is more than coincidental and solidly linked to a mechanistic role for this gene in transformation. Interestingly, several other oncogenic rearrangements of ALK have been recently identified in ALCLs, suggesting multiple mechanisms for ALK activation in lymphomagenesis. Molecular characterization of such alternative chromosomal translocations have identified the nonmuscle tropomyosin gene, the TRK-fused gene, the 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase/IMP cyclohydrolase (ATIC) gene, the clathrin chain polypeptide-like gene, and the moesin gene as variant fusion partners with the ALK gene (14-19).

In addition, somatic rearrangements of ALK, generating ALK fusion oncoproteins, have been detected with a high frequency in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (20); these data, together with the observation that ALK is expressed in a significant portion of human cancer cell lines (3), suggest a potentially wider role for ALK product in the genesis of neoplastic processes.

Very little is known about the physiological role of ALK or how its subversion might contribute to the malignant transformation. In PC12 cells, activation of a chimeric receptor possessing the intracellular domain of ALK induces neurite extensions, suggesting a role in the transduction of differentiative signals (21). The possibility that ALK is involved in the regulation of cell proliferation is suggested by the observation that adoptive expression of either NPM/ALK or ATIC/ALK in an interleukin-3-dependent murine pro-B lymphocyte cell line is sufficient to bypass the events normally regulating cell division, causing sustained proliferation in the absence of interleukin-3 (17, 22). Finally, the recent identification of PTN as the ligand for ALK has clearly proved the ability of this receptor to deliver mitogenic signals inside the cells.

In contrast to the situation for most of the receptor tyrosine kinases, the biochemical events involved in the signal transduction triggered by normal ALK are largely unknown, except for some evidence deriving from studies of ALK oncogenes (11, 12, 22-24). This line of investigations, relevant for the comprehension of the molecular basis of ALK-associated diseases, has been so far hampered by the lack of a known ligand for the alk proto-oncogene. A strategy to circumvent this problem derives from the engineering of chimeric molecules containing the extracellular ligand-binding domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the intracellular region of ALK. Such an approach has been successfully used to analyze the signaling properties of ligand-orphan receptors and the structure-function of several receptor tyrosine kinases (25-31).

We have therefore engineered a chimeric EGFR/ALK molecule to study ALK biological and biochemical activities in a fibroblast target cell. We demonstrate that overexpression of such a chimera is associated with a ligand-dependent expression of the transformed phenotype. In addition, the EGFR/ALK chimera was significantly more efficient at inducing cell transformation and DNA synthesis than the wild-type EGFR when activated by EGF. Comparative analysis of the biochemical pathways implicated in the transduction of mitogenic signals did not show any increased ability of the EGFR/ALK to phosphorylate PLC-gamma and MAPK compared with the EGFR. On the contrary, EGFR/ALK was much more efficient than EGFR at inducing PI3-K activity; the up-regulation of PI3-K activity following activation of ALK can explain, at least in part, the stronger mitogenic potency of ALK in NIH 3T3 cells.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Engineering of Eukaryotic Expression Vectors-- The EGFR/ALK expression vector was engineered starting from a previously described modified version of the long terminal repeat (LTR)-EGFR 5M vector in which a novel SalI site was generated in the sequence of the EGFR cDNA immediately following the transmembrane region (32). The SalI site and a unique MluI site located in the LTR vector downstream of the natural stop codon of the EGFR cDNA were used for the recombination. To obtain the EGFR/ALK chimera, we initially amplified, by recombinant PCR, the entire intracellular domain of ALK in the region corresponding to amino acids 1058-1620 (numbered as specified by Morris et al. (1)). Amplification was carried out with primers designed to introduce an in-frame SalI site at the 5'-end of the amplified sequence and an MluI site at its 3'-end. The sequences of the primers used were TATCGTCGACTGTACCGCCGGAAGCAC (5' primer) and ATACGCGTCAGGGCCCAGGCTGGTT (3' primer). After digestion with SalI and MluI, the PCR-amplified sequence was ligated to the 10.4-kb SalI-MluI fragment from the LTR-EGFR 5M, containing the EGFR cDNA depleted of the sequence encoding for its intracellular domain. This recombination procedure generates a modification of the ALK sequence corresponding to codon 1058. To restore the proper amino acid sequence of the intracellular portion of ALK, oligonucleotide-primed site-directed mutagenesis was performed according to the method of Kunkel (33) using a commercially available kit (Bio-Rad). Single-stranded DNA template was generated by subcloning a BamHI-BamHI fragment from the LTR-EGFR/ALK vector into M13mp18. After modification of the desired sequence, the BamHI-BamHI fragment was cloned back into the vector. The resulting LTR-EGFR/ALK expression vector is predicted to encode a protein containing the entire extracellular and transmembrane domains of the EGFR joined to the intracellular domain of ALK.

The LTR-NPM/ALK expression vector was obtained by cloning the open reading frame of pcDNA3-NPM/ALK (a kind gift of Prof. P. G. Pelicci, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy) into the LTR-2 expression vector (34). Recombinant PCR was used to amplify the entire NPM/ALK sequence (7) using primers designed to yield the NPM/ALK cDNA flanked by unique XhoI and MluI sites, at the 5'- and 3'-ends of the PCR product, respectively. The sequence of the primers used were GGAAGATCTATGGAAGATTCGATGGACATG (5' primer) and ATACGCGTCAGGGCCCAGGCTGGTT (3' primer). After digestion with XhoI and MluI, the PCR-amplified fragment was cloned between the homologous sites of the LTR-2 vector. This recombination yielded to the LTR-NPM/ALK expression vector. The EGFR/ALK and NPM/ALK expression vectors were sequenced in both strands of the regions that underwent genetic manipulations to verify that the predicted structures were achieved after the recombination procedure.

Cell Culture and Transfection Assays-- NIH 3T3 and NR6 mouse fibroblasts were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Invitrogen) and transfected with circular DNA according to the calcium phosphate precipitation technique (35) as modified by Wigler et al. (36). Transformed foci were scored at 2-3 weeks. Where indicated, EGF (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, NY) (20 ng/ml) was added at day 14, and foci were scored at day 21. Transforming efficiency was calculated in focus-forming units/pmol of added DNA (FFU/pmol) after correction for the relative molecular weight of the respective plasmid and normalization for the efficiency of colony formation in parallel dishes subjected to selection in mycophenolic acid-containing medium. The expression vectors used in the transfection experiments were LTR-EGFR/ALK (described above), LTR-EGFR 5M (32) and LTR-NPM/ALK (described above). All of the vectors contained the eukaryotic resistance marker Escherichia coli gpt. Cells expressing the E. coli gpt gene were selected for their ability to grow in the presence of mycophenolic acid (37).

The 3H incorporation assay was performed as described previously (26). Briefly, NIH 3T3 transfectants, grown to confluence in 24-well poly-L-lysine-treated plates (Costar), were serum-starved for 72 h in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, containing transferrin (5 µg/ml) (Becton Dickinson) and Na2SeO3 (10-8 M) and then stimulated for 22 h with either 1% (v/v) FBS or EGF at the indicated concentrations in the presence of 4 µCi/well of [methyl-3H]thymidine (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Background was measured in parallel assays in which cells were treated with [methyl-3H]thymidine in the absence of mitogens. Trichloroacetic acid-precipitable radioactivity was extracted and determined by scintillation in a Beckman beta -counter. Data are expressed as a mitogenic index calculated as the fraction of stimulation obtained in the presence of EGF with respect to the stimulation obtained in the presence of nonsaturating concentrations of an optimal mitogen (1% FBS). The mitogenic index was calculated as follows: ((EGF cpm - background cpm)/(1% serum cpm - background cpm)) × 100.

When appropriate, 100 nM wortmannin (Sigma) was added to the serum-starved cells 1 h before the addition of EGF and maintained at the same concentration throughout the experiments. Stock solution of the inhibitor was prepared in Me2SO and diluted so that the final concentration of Me2SO in culture medium never exceeded 0.02%.

Soft Agar Assay-- Single cell suspensions from NIH 3T3 transfectants were plated at 10-fold serial dilutions in semisolid medium containing Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 0.5% sea plaque agarose (FMC BioProducts). Visible colonies comprising >100 cells were scored at 14 days. Where indicated, EGF was added at a concentration of 20 ng/ml.

Protein Analysis-- Cells grown to subconfluence in poly-L-lysine-coated dishes were incubated overnight in serum-free medium supplemented with transferrin (5 µg/ml) and Na2SeO3 (10-8 M) and then exposed to growth factors at the indicated concentrations for the indicated lengths of time at 37 °C (see figure legends). Lysis was performed in a buffer containing 1% Triton X-100, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM EGTA, 10 mM sodium orthovanadate, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 50 µg/ml aprotinin, and 10 mM NaPPi. For immunoprecipitation procedures, cellular lysates were incubated with appropriate concentrations of antibodies for 2 h at 4 °C under gentle rotation, and immunocomplexes were recovered by adsorption to protein G bound to Sepharose beads (Amersham Biosciences). After several washes with buffer containing 0.1% Triton X-100, 20 mM HEPES, 10% glycerol, and 150 mM NaCl, SDS-PAGE sample buffer (30% glycerol, 5% SDS, 0.1 M Tris, pH 6.8, 8% 2-mercaptoethanol, and 0.01% bromphenol blue) was added, and samples were boiled for 5 min. Lysates or immunoprecipitated proteins were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose filters. For Western blotting procedures, filters were incubated for 2 h at 42 °C with TBS (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl) containing 5% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA). Filters were then incubated with a primary antibody at adequate dilutions in TBS containing 0.5% BSA for 2 h at room temperature. Blots were then extensively washed in TTBS (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20) and then immunodetected either with 125I-protein A (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) (0.2 µCi/ml) or with 125I-labeled anti-mouse-IgG (0.2 µCi/ml) (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in TBS containing 0.5% BSA.

In some experiments, filters were incubated with biotin-labeled GST or GST fusion protein (5 × 10-8 M) in TBS containing 0.5% BSA for 2 h at room temperature. Filters were then extensively washed in TTBS and then incubated with horseradish peroxidase-neutravidin (Pierce) at 0.025 µg/ml and then subjected to ECL reaction (Pierce) according to the manufacturer's directions.

The monoclonal antibody recognizing the intracellular domain of ALK (ALKc) was kindly provided by Prof. B. Falini (Institute of Hematology, University of Perugia, Italy) and Prof. P. G. Pelicci (European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy) and was previously described (38). Ab-1, the monoclonal antibody directed against the extracellular domain of EGFR, was purchased from Calbiochem. The rabbit anti-peptide polyclonal serum recognizing the EGFR carboxyl-terminal tail (residues 985-996) was previously described (39). A commercially available anti-phosphotyrosine (anti-Tyr(P)) monoclonal antibody (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, NY) was also used. Other antibodies used were anti-PLC-gamma (mixture of six monoclonal antibodies) and anti-mitogen-activated protein kinase (anti-MAPK), both available from Upstate Biotechnology. For some experiments, we used the anti-phospho-MAPK polyclonal antibody, which specifically detects phospho-p44/p42 MAPK (Thr202/Tyr204) (New England Biolabs, Inc.).

Binding Assay-- For Scatchard analysis, 105 cells/well were seeded in 24 poly-L-lysine-treated tissue culture plates (Costar). The day after, culture medium was replaced with binding medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, and 0.2% BSA). After 2 h of incubation at 37 °C, cells were shifted to 4 °C and incubated with 125I-EGF over a range of concentrations from 0.016 to 16 nM for at least 4 h at 4 °C. Assays were performed in triplicate wells, and specificity of binding was determined by parallel experiments in which a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled EGF was used to compete with the tracer. After incubation with EGF, cells were washed six times with ice-cold binding medium and solubilized with 10 nM NaOH, 1% SDS. Radioactivity was measured in a Packard gamma -counter.

The number of receptors per cell and their dissociation constants (Kd) for EGF were determined from Scatchard plots. Analysis of the binding was performed with the LIGAND software.

PI3-K Assay-- For measuring receptor-associated PI3-K activity in vivo, quiescent transfectants were mock-treated or exposed for 10 min to EGF (100 ng/ml) or PDGF-BB (Upstate Biotechnology) (100 ng/ml) at 37 °C and instantly lysed in 1% Triton X-100 lysis buffer (see above). Immunoprecipitation of total cellular protein was then carried out with the anti-Tyr(P) antibody. Following three washes with 1% Nonidet P-40 (Nonidet P-40) in phosphate-buffered saline, two washes with 0.5 M LiCl in 0.1 M Tris, pH 7.6, and two washes with TNE (10 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0), immunoprecipitates were resuspended in 40 µl of reaction buffer (25 mM HEPES, 1 mM EGTA) and monitored for PI3-K activity by their ability to phosphorylate phosphatidylinositol (Sigma) in the presence of [gamma -32P]ATP (30 µCi/sample) (Amersham Biosciences), 5 mM MgCl2, and 30 µM ATP, which specifically inhibits phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase activity (40). The reaction was allowed to proceed for 15 min at room temperature and was stopped with 100 µl of HCl 1 N. Following organic solvent extraction, the chloroform phase was quantitatively subjected to thin layer chromatography analysis.

Expression, Purification, and Labeling of GST Fusion Proteins-- The pGEX-Grb2 and pGEX-Grb-2/SH2 vectors were kindly provided by Prof. P. G. Pelicci and have been previously described (41). Expression of GST and GST fusion proteins was induced in log phase growing bacteria upon treatment with 1 mM isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside for 4 h. Bacteria were recovered by centrifugation, resuspended in <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>100</DE></FR> volume lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 2 mg/ml lysozyme, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 50 µg/ml aprotinin), and lysed on ice by sonication. Lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 8000 rpm in a Sorvall SS34 rotor. The resulting supernatant was incubated with glutathione-agarose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) overnight at 4 °C with gentle rotation. The resin was washed with excess PBS and then incubated with 20 mM glutathione (Sigma) for 30 min at room temperature to elute GST proteins. Eluted proteins were then conjugated with biotin as described (42).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Construction and Expression of an EGFR/ALK Chimeric Receptor-- To test the biological and biochemical activity of the ALK kinase under conditions of controlled ligand-induced activation, we engineered an EGFR/ALK chimeric molecule possessing the extracellular and transmembrane domain of EGFR and the intracellular portion of ALK (see "Materials and Methods" and Fig. 1). The EGFR/ALK recombinant molecule was placed under the transcriptional control of the Moloney murine leukemia virus LTR promoter into the LTR-2 expression vector (34), which also contains the Ecogpt transcription unit and thus allows selection of transfected cells in mycophenolic acid (37). The EGFR/ALK expression vector, which had the potential to encode a 1245-amino acid-long protein with a predicted molecular mass of ~140 kDa, was transfected into NIH 3T3 cells. For comparison, we transfected the same cells with the LTR-EGFR 5M expression vector (32).


View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic representation of NPM/ALK, EGFR, EGFR/ALK. The structure of the proteins synthesized by the LTR-NPM/ALK, LTR-EGFR, and LTR-EGFR/ALK expression vectors are depicted. The indicated SalI site was used to join the sequences encoding the extracellular and transmembrane domain of EGFR (amino acid residues -24 to +657 of the original sequence (61)) to that encoding the intracellular portion of ALK (amino acid residues 1058-1620, numbered as specified by Morris et al. (1)), in the EGFR/ALK chimera. Empty boxes indicate EGFR sequences; filled boxes indicate ALK sequences; dotted boxes indicate NPM sequences. The transmembrane region (TM) of EGFR is represented by a dashed box.

Mass cell populations (NIH-EGFR/ALK and NIH-EGFR), derived after marker selection, were subjected to immunoprecipitation with Ab-1, a monoclonal antibody that recognizes the extracellular domain of human EGFR, and analyzed by immunoblot using antibodies specific either for the cytoplasmic domain of EGFR (Fig. 2A) or for the intracellular domain of ALK (Fig. 2B) or for anti-Tyr(P) (Fig. 2C, alpha -PTyr). Results have shown that the EGFR/ALK chimera was efficiently expressed in the transfectants as a 150-160-kDa protein, and it became heavily phosphorylated on tyrosine in a ligand-dependent manner. In another series of experiments, we compared Tyr(P)-containing proteins in NIH-EGFR and NIH-EGFR/ALK transfectants. As shown in Fig. 2D, there were qualitative differences in the pattern of Tyr(P)-containing proteins observed upon EGF triggering of the two cell lines. These data clearly indicate that the EGFR/ALK chimera was correctly synthesized and processed to the cell surface, where it was capable of interacting with EGF and transducing an EGF-mediated signal via the ALK-specific signaling pathway.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Expression and EGF-dependent autophosphorylation of EGFR/ALK in intact cells. Control NIH 3T3 transfected with the LTR-2 vector alone (N) or NIH 3T3 transfected with the wild type EGFR (E) or the EGFR/ALK chimera (E/A) were used. When indicated (+), intact cells were treated with EGF (100 ng/ml) for 10 min at 37 °C. Total cellular proteins (1 mg) were immunoprecipitated with Ab-1 antibody, which recognizes the EGFR extracellular domain and analyzed by immunoblot with a polyclonal serum raised against a carboxyl-terminal peptide of EGFR (A); a monoclonal antibody recognizing the intracellular domain of ALK (B); or an anti-Tyr(P) (alpha -PTyr) antibody (C). D, total cellular proteins (100 µg) were fractionated by electrophoresis and subjected to immunoblot analysis with the anti-Tyr(P) antibody. Molecular mass markers are indicated in kilodaltons.

To confirm the expression of EGFR/ALK on the cell surface and to characterize its affinity to EGF, we have evaluated the EGF binding properties of the EGFR/ALK and wild-type EGFR. As shown in Table I, both NIH-EGFR/ALK and NIH-EGFR cells displayed two classes of receptors, with dissociation constants (Kd) in the range of 6.2-6.4 nM (low affinity) and 0.09-0.1 nM (high affinity). In addition, the quantitative partition of high versus low affinity sites in these two marker-selected mass cell populations were similar; therefore, they were selected for further analysis.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Analysis of the 125I-EGF-binding properties of NIH-EGFR and NIH-EGFR/ALK cells
125I-EGF binding was assessed by Scatchard analysis over a range of concentration from 0.016 to 16 nM in triplicate wells. Specificity of binding was controlled in a parallel competition experiment by using a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled EGF. Data were analyzed with the LIGAND software.

Biological Activity of EGFR/ALK-- We next analyzed the biological effects of the described EGFR/ALK chimera on the phenotype of NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. It has been reported previously that NPM/ALK is capable of transforming NIH 3T3 (12), Fr3T3 (11), and Rat-1 (22) fibroblasts. Under our experimental conditions, the LTR-NPM/ALK expression vector displayed readily detectable transforming activity in NIH 3T3 cells, inducing about 8 × 103 FFU/pmol of added DNA (Table II). The EGFR/ALK expression vector was also capable of inducing malignant transformation of NIH 3T3 cells; the appearance of the transformed phenotype was, however, conditionally dependent on the administration of EGF. In fact, in the absence of exogenously added EGF, the EGFR/ALK expression vector showed an efficiency of transformation of about 20 FFU/pmol of DNA; when the assay was performed in the presence of EGF, the transforming activity of the EGFR/ALK chimera was strongly increased to about 5 × 103 FFU/pmol of DNA. It is noteworthy that the LTR/EGFR was much less potent than the EGFR/ALK expression vector, despite comparable levels of protein expressions (data not shown).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Biological activity of EGFR/ALK chimera in NIH 3T3

As an independent approach toward assessing the conditional nature of the growth alterations induced by the LTR-EGFR/ALK construct, we investigated the ability of transfected NIH 3T3 cells to display anchorage-independent growth, a property known to correlate well with the malignant phenotype (43). Following transfection and marker selection, a mass cell population expressing a comparable number of receptors (see Table I) was suspended in semisolid medium. In the absence of EGF supplement, NIH-EGFR/ALK displayed only a low colony-forming ability of around 1.85% (Table II). However, upon the addition of EGF at the concentration of 20 ng/ml, we observed a dramatic increase of colony formation (16.9%) with a shift toward large, progressively growing colonies. In comparison, NIH-EGFR-transfected cells displayed a clonogenic capability in semisolid medium of around 12.73% in the presence of EGF (Table II).

The results in the transformation and soft agar assays were paralleled by those obtained in a DNA synthesis assay. For these experiments, we used two marker-selected mass populations displaying a comparable number of EGF-binding sites (see Table I). Fig. 3 shows the EGF dose-response profiles of these two cell lines; NIH-EGFR/ALK cells exhibited a 2.5-3-fold increase in maximal mitogenic response relative to NIH-EGFR. However, both cell lines displayed comparable ED50 (ED50) for EGF (about 0.1 nM), indicating that different levels of mitogenic signaling were achieved by the same receptor occupancy and most likely due to different ability of ALK and EGFR to couple with signaling pathways.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Dose-response analysis of [3H]thymidine incorporation upon EGF stimulation of quiescent NIH-3T3 fibroblasts expressing either wild type EGFR or the EGFR/ALK chimera. Cells expressing comparable levels of receptors (see Table I) were serum-starved for 72 h and then stimulated for 22 h with either 1% fetal bovine serum or the indicated concentration of EGF, in the presence of 4 µCi of [methyl-3H]thymidine/well. Data from triplicate wells are expressed as the ratio [(EGF cpm - background cpm/1% serum cpm - background cpm)] × 100. Open circles, NIH-EGFR; solid circles, NIH-EGFR/ALK. Results are typical and representative of three independent experiments performed in triplicate.

Similar results were obtained when EGFR and EGFR/ALK were expressed in NR6 cells, which are devoid of endogenous EGFR (44) (data not shown).

PLC-gamma Phosphorylation by the EGFR/ALK-- As an approach to investigating the biochemical basis for the greater mitogenic potency of EGFR/ALK than EGFR in NIH 3T3 cells, we compared their ability to couple with known pathways implicated in mitogenic signal transduction. One such pathway, leading to hydrolysis of inositol phospholipid, is initiated by tyrosine phosphorylation of PLC-gamma by receptor tyrosine kinases. Complex formation of NPM/ALK and PLC-gamma in vivo has been shown previously by coimmunoprecipitation experiments in large cell anaplastic lymphoma cells (22). Therefore, we investigated the ability of EGFR/ALK chimera to phosphorylate PLC-gamma on tyrosine residues. NIH-EGFR/ALK and NIH-EGFR cells expressing comparable levels of receptors were treated with EGF for 10 min at 37 °C prior to lysis. Equal amounts of cellular proteins from either cell lines were immunoprecipitated with a mixture of anti-PLC-gamma monoclonal antibodies and then subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-Tyr(P) antibodies. As shown in Fig. 4, EGF stimulation of NIH-EGFR/ALK induced tyrosine phosphorylation of PLC-gamma . However, the extent of PLC-gamma tyrosine phosphorylation in NIH-EGFR/ALK cells was much lower than that of NIH-EGFR under the same conditions of ligand stimulation. Since neither the level of immunoprecipitated PLC-gamma nor the levels of receptors were different in the two cell lines examined, we concluded that the EGFR/ALK chimera was less efficient in phosphorylating PLC-gamma than wild-type EGFR.


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   In vivo tyrosine phosphorylation of PLC-gamma by EGFR/ALK. NIH-EGFR/ALK and NIH-EGFR cell populations expressing comparable levels of receptors (see Table I) were serum-starved for 16 h and then stimulated for 10 min at 37 °C with 100 ng/ml EGF (+) or mock-treated (-) and lysed thereafter. Total cellular protein (3 mg) was immunoprecipitated with a mixture of six monoclonal antibodies against PLC-gamma . Left panel, two-thirds of each immunoprecipitate was analyzed by immunoblot with an anti-Tyr(P) (alpha -PTyr) antibody. Right panel, the remainder of each immunoprecipitate was analyzed by immunoblot with the anti-PLC-gamma antibodies. Molecular mass markers are indicated in kilodaltons. Comparable results were obtained in three independent experiments.

Effects of ALK Activation on MAPK-- An important metabolic cascade regulating cell proliferation is started by activation of the raf kinase, which in turn leads to a series of events culminating in the activation of MAPK. To test whether EGFR/ALK is able to cause activation of MAPK, we first analyzed its electrophoretic mobility, since retarded SDS-PAGE migration of MAPK correlates with its activation (45, 46). In NIH-EGFR cells, EGF stimulation resulted in almost all of p42 and p44 MAPK migrating with a higher Mr (Fig. 5A). A less pronounced mobility shift was observed in EGF-treated EGFR/ALK cells (Fig. 5A). Moreover, the extent of p42 and p44 MAPK gel retardation was comparable in EGF-treated NIH-EGFR/ALK and control NIH 3T3 cells, thus being probably due to the activation of endogenous mouse EGFR. PDGF-BB treatment, on the other hand, resulted in a complete band shift of both isoforms of MAPK in all of the analyzed cell lines, despite the presence of nearly 10-fold less PDGF receptor than EGFR and EGFR/ALK. To better evaluate the degree of MAPK activation in NIH-EGFR/ALK, lysates from NIH-EGFR and NIH-EGFR/ALK were analyzed by immunoblotting with an anti-phospho-MAPK antibody that specifically recognizes p42 and p44 MAPK only when activated by phosphorylation at Thr202 and Tyr204. As shown in Fig. 5B (upper panel), the active forms of MAPK were readily detectable in NIH-EGFR cells treated with EGF or PDGF BB, as well as in PDGF BB-stimulated NIH-EGFR/ALK. Conversely, background levels of activated MAPK were revealed in NIH-EGFR/ALK following EGF stimulation (Fig. 5B, upper panel). Since the observed differences were not due to sample variations (Fig. 5B, lower panel), we concluded that EGFR/ALK kinase is inefficient at causing activation of MAPK in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts.


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effects of the EGFR/ALK chimera on MAPK activity. A, control mock-transfected NIH 3T3 (N) or the NIH-EGFR (E) and NIH-EGFR/ALK (E/A) transfectants were either mock-treated (-) or treated with EGF 100 ng/ml (+E) or PDGF-BB 100 ng/ml (+P) for 10 min at 37 °C. Total cellular proteins (30 µg) were resolved by 13% SDS-PAGE and then subjected to immunoblot analysis using anti-MAPK antibody. B, NIH-EGFR (E) and NIH-EGFR/ALK (E/A) transfectants were either mock-treated (-) or treated with EGF 100 ng/ml (+E) or PDGF-BB 100 ng/ml (+P) for 10 min at 37 °C. Total cellular proteins (50 µg) were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE and then subjected to immunoblot analysis using an anti-phospho-MAPK (upper panel) or anti-MAPK (phosphorylation state-independent) (lower panel) antibody. Positions of p42 and p44 MAPK are indicated on the left.

Effects of EGFR/ALK on PI3-K Activity-- One of the immediate cellular responses to stimulation by different growth factor receptors is the activation of PI3-K. This enzyme catalyzes the production of 3-phosphoinositides, which act intracellularly as important second messengers (47).

We therefore analyze the ability of the EGFR/ALK chimera to couple with the PI3-K-activated signaling pathway in comparison with that of EGFR expressed at similar levels. In addition, since both NIH-EGFR/ALK and NIH-EGFR cells expressed PDGF receptors at comparable levels (data not shown), we used PDGF-BB stimulation as an internal control.

As shown in Fig. 6, PI3-K activity was readily detectable in anti-Tyr(P) immunoprecipitates of both NIH-EGFR/ALK and NIH/EGFR cells treated with PDGF-BB, in agreement with the notion that the PDGF receptor is very efficient at coupling with this signaling pathway (48). Anti-Tyr(P) immunoprecipitates obtained from EGF-treated NIH-EGFR/ALK revealed high levels of enzymatic activity comparable with those observed following stimulation of the same cells with PDGF-BB. In contrast, a low level of PI3-K activity was detected in anti-Tyr(P) immunoprecipitates from EGF-treated NIH-EGFR (around 7.19-fold stimulation over unstimulated NIH-EGFR cells). From these results, we conclude that the ALK kinase can couple with the PI3-K signaling pathway much more efficiently than the EGFR.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effects of the EGFR/ALK chimera on PI3-K activity. NIH-EGFR/ALK and NIH/EGFR transfectants expressing comparable levels of receptors (Table I) were either mock-treated or treated with EGF (100 ng/ml) or PDGF-BB (100 ng/ml) for 5 min at 37 °C. Total cellular proteins (1.5 mg) were immunoprecipitated with the anti-Tyr(P) monoclonal antibody, and the PI3-K activity was measured on the immunoprecipitates as described under "Material and Methods." Results are expressed as -fold stimulation over control (unstimulated) values for each cell lines; values represent means ± S.E. (n = 3).

To determine the importance of PI3-K activity in the transduction of mitogenic signals delivered by the EGFR/ALK chimera, we examined the effect of the specific PI3-K inhibitor wortmannin on the EGF-induced proliferation. As shown in Fig. 7, this inhibitor dramatically reduced the mitogenic response of EGFR/ALK (about 60% inhibition), whereas the effect on NIH-EGFR cells was substantially insignificant (data not shown). The results clearly establish that activation of the PI3-K pathway is a critical step for the mitogenic signals mediated by the EGFR/ALK. However, the lack of a complete DNA synthesis inhibition by wortmannin indicates that mitogenesis is only partly dependent on a functional PI3-K activity.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Effect of the PI3-K inhibitor wortmannin on EGF-induced mitogenesis in NIH-EGFR/ALK cells. Cells were serum-starved for 72 h and then either left untreated () or pretreated for 1 h with 100 µM wortmannin (black-square) or with Me2SO as control (open circle ) before stimulation with the indicated dose of EGF in the presence of 4 µCi of [methyl-3H]thymidine/well for 22 h. Results are expressed as a mitogenic index calculated as indicated under "Materials and Methods"; proliferation of NIH EGFR/ALK cells in the presence of 1% FBS is referred to as 100% proliferation. Results are representative of four independent experiments, performed with triplicate wells for each of the indicated EGF concentrations as well as for the controls. Similar results were obtained with the PI3-K inhibitor LY 294002 (data not shown).

Association of EGFR/ALK with Grb-2-- The oncoprotein NPM-ALK has been shown to recruit specific signaling molecules, such as Grb2, IRS-1, and Shc in fibroblasts; only the interaction between NPM/ALK and Grb-2 seems to be essential for NPM/ALK-induced transformation, since NPM/ALK mutants defective for binding with IRS-1 and Shc, but not with Grb-2, were still capable of inducing cell transformation (11, 12, 22). The possibility has been suggested of a direct association of Grb-2 with NPM/ALK despite the absence of a putative Grb-2 recognition sequence in the intracellular domain of ALK (12). Therefore, this possibility was investigated in our model system. To this aim, we performed the far-Western blot analysis using GST-Grb-2/SH2 fusion protein. Lysates obtained from NIH-EGFR/ALK and NIH-EGFR were immunoprecipitated with the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody Ab-1 and transferred to nitrocellulose filters after SDS-PAGE. Filters were incubated with biotin-labeled GST-Grb-2/SH2, followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-neutravidin and ECL detection. As shown in Fig. 8, GST-Grb-2/SH2 was able to efficiently bind wild-type EGFR as previously reported (49); on the contrary, association of Grb-2 to EGFR/ALK was very weak and detectable only when a 3-fold higher amount of proteins was immunoprecipitated. By the use of a GST-Grb2 fusion protein, we obtained comparable results; specificity of the reaction was confirmed by replica filters incubated with biotin-labeled GST (data not shown).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Direct binding of Grb-2 to EGFR/ALK chimera. NIH-EGFR/ALK (E/A) and NIH-EGFR (E) cells expressing comparable levels of receptors (see Table I) were serum-starved for 16 h and then either left untreated (-) or stimulated with EGF 100 ng/ml (+) for 10 min at 37 °C. Total cellular proteins (1 mg from NIH-EGFR cells; 3 mg from NIH-EGFR/ALK) were immunoprecipitated with Ab-1 and then subjected to far-Western blot analysis with affinity-purified, biotin-labeled GST-Grb2/SH2. Protein complexes were detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated neutravidin and ECL reaction. The electrophoretic mobility of markers for protein molecular mass (kDa) is indicated on the left. The arrows indicate the position of EGFR/ALK and EGFR.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Chimeric receptors have been widely employed to analyze the biological and biochemical properties of ligand-orphan receptors. A large body of evidence indicates that the biological properties of such molecules depend on their cytoplasmic domain, and therefore they faithfully replicate the behavior of their wild-type counterparts from which the intracellular domain was derived (25-31). In addition, many constructed chimeras possessing the extracellular domain of EGFR have been shown to be expressed at the cell surface as two classes of receptors with high and low affinity for EGF binding comparable with those of wild-type EGFR (26, 27, 50, 51).

In the present study, we sought to analyze the selective advantage, if any, that overexpression of a ligand-inducible ALK receptor might confer to cells in a model system. For our studies, we used the established mouse NIH 3T3 fibroblast cell line, a system widely employed to assess the transforming and biological activities of oncogenes; furthermore, it has been already shown that these cells express only few EGFRs/cell and therefore are essentially not responsive to EGF (52). We constructed chimeric EGFR/ALK receptor molecules and have shown that they were correctly localized to the plasma membrane of NIH 3T3 cells, where they bound EGF with dissociation constants (Kd) in the range of 6.2-6.4 nM (low affinity) and 0.09-0.1 nM (high affinity), as has been previously reported for cells expressing wild type EGFR (53, 54). We also demonstrated that EGF induced tyrosine phosphorylation of EGFR/ALK as well as a specific set of cellular proteins; therefore, the EGFR/ALK chimera allows us to dissect ALK catalytic function in an inducible system. Moreover, the availability of cell lines expressing similar levels of either EGFR/ALK or EGFR allowed us to analyze the biological and biochemical activities of these kinases under conditions in which the cellular responses to EGF were solely dependent on the coupling of either kinase with its own signaling pathways.

The EGFR/ALK chimera was much more potent at inducing cell transformation than the EGFR when activated by EGF; in addition, we demonstrated that the EGFR/ALK chimera conferred upon the recipient cells a 3-fold-increased responsiveness to EGF compared with EGFR. However, the ED50 of EGF was comparable in the two cell lines, indicating that different levels of mitogenic signaling were achieved by the same receptor occupancy. Thus, the greater ability of the ALK kinase to function as a mitogenic signal transducer provides a mechanistic basis of its greater transforming activity than the EGFR.

A number of studies have described the association of the oncoprotein NPM/ALK with P13-K, PLC-gamma , Shc, IRS-1, and Grb-2. These studies have indicated the importance of PLC-gamma and PI3-K for the oncogenic potential of NPM/ALK, whereas association with Shc and IRS-1 seems to be dispensable (11, 12, 22, 23, 24). Specific interaction with Shc and Grb-2 have also been shown for ATIC/ALK, a different ALK oncoprotein (16). Conversely, the role of the cytoplasmic molecules involved in the control of the mitogenic signaling mediated by native, membrane-bound ALK are completely unknown. While this work was in progress, Stoica et al. (3) reported that PTN acts as a high affinity ligand for ALK; in this work, the authors also showed tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1, Shc, PLC-gamma , and PI3-K following PTN stimulation of SW-13 human adrenal carcinoma cells overexpressing wild type ALK. Obviously, further investigations are required to evaluate the molecular relevance of these intracellular substrates in mediating the mitogenic action of ALK under conditions of controlled ligand-induced activation.

Using our model system, we showed, indeed, that the EGFR/ALK chimera was able to phosphorylate PLC-gamma in response to EGF stimulation. However, in NIH-EGFR/ALK, the level of PLC-gamma tyrosine phosphorylation was much lower compared with that obtained in similarly treated NIH-EGFR cells. Therefore, despite its stronger mitogenic and transforming ability in fibroblasts, ALK did not show any increased ability to phosphorylate PLC-gamma compared with the EGFR. Obviously, our results do not address directly whether phosphorylation of PLC-gamma is necessary for the mitogenic action of ALK; however, the low stoichiometry of PLC-gamma phosphorylation described for ligand-activated wild-type EGFR renders this possibility very unlikely (26). This conclusion seems to contrast with previous results reported by Bai et al. (22), which suggested the importance of PLC-gamma activation for the mitogenic activity of ALK, since knock-out of this single pathway was sufficient to significantly inhibit NPM-ALK-mediated transformation in BA/F3 cells and Rat-1 fibroblasts. However, it is worthwhile noting that a PLC-gamma binding-deficient NPM-ALK mutant had no effect on transformation activity in Fr3T3 fibroblasts (11). Thus, it has been suggested that PLC-gamma activation depend on the cell type specificity; our results are in agreement with this possibility.

Surprisingly, in our model system, the EGFR/ALK chimera does not induce activation of the MAPK pathway, since we have not been able to detect EGF-stimulated MAPK phosphorylation in NIH-EGFR/ALK cells under conditions in which MAPK phosphorylation was easily detected in EGF-treated NIH-EGFR. In addition, PDGF treatment resulted in a complete band shift of both isoforms in all of the analyzed cell lines, despite the lower levels of receptor expression (2 × 106 EGFR/ALK per cell versus 1 × 105 PDGF receptors per cell in NIH-EGFR/ALK cells). Although the activation of MAPK represents a critical step in the regulation of cell proliferation by a large number of receptor tyrosine kinases, evidence exists that mitogenesis could be routed through alternative pathways (31). Taken together, these results indicate that the stronger mitogenic potency of the ALK kinase than of the EGFR in NIH 3T3 cells must involve pathways other than those activated by PLC-gamma and MAPK tyrosine phosphorylation.

Interestingly, the finding that EGFR/ALK can couple with the PI3-K signaling pathway much more efficiently than EGFR indicates that this enzyme might play a major role in mediating the mitogenic effects of ALK. Indeed, wortmannin strongly inhibited the EGF responsiveness of NIH-EGFR/ALK cells, while it was almost inefficient on NIH-EGFR cells. The importance of the PI3-K pathway for the mitogenic signaling of ALK is strengthened by recent reports indicating that PI3-K is essential for NPM-ALK transforming ability (23, 24) and are consistent with earlier studies of Souttou et al. (55), who showed that the PI3-K pathway is critical for the mitogenic signaling of PTN.

The Shc/Grb-2 pathway is particularly relevant in oncogenic signal transduction, since it might act as a molecular switch controlling cellular functions such as mitogenesis (56, 57) and cytoskeleton rearrangement (58), which are unbalanced in cancer cells. Previous works have demonstrated that Shc and IRS-1 are recruited and activated by NPM-ALK as well as by the membrane-bound wild-type ALK following in vivo stimulation with pleiotrophin (3, 11, 12). However, mutations of the Shc and IRS-1 functional docking site did not result in a reduced oncogenic activity of NPM-ALK; interestingly, the observation that such a mutant was still able to co-precipitate Grb-2 revealed the possibility of a direct Grb-2/ALK association despite the absence of a putative Grb-2 recognition sequence in the cytoplasmic region of ALK (12). However, the details of Grb-2/ALK interaction in living cells have not been further characterized. The data of the far-Western blot analysis using GST-Grb-2 fusion protein indicate a very poor binding of activated EGFR/ALK chimera to Grb-2. In contrast, by coimmunoprecipitation experiments, we were able to observe Grb-2/ALK association in our model system (data not shown). Therefore, we conclude that recruitment of Grb-2 by membrane-bound, ligand-activated ALK takes place indirectly through the formation of ternary complexes, which might involve additional proteins other than Shc.2

Analysis of human neoplasia suggested that quantitative alterations in the expression levels of receptor tyrosine kinases might suffice to overcome normal growth regulation and in this way contribute to malignant transformation (59). These findings have established a direct causal link between growth factor receptors overexpression and cellular transformation. Our present study provides a mechanistic basis for ALK gene amplification in human malignancies. These results acquire a particular interest in view of the recent observation that coexpression of PTN and ALK occurs in different human cancer cell lines (60). Therefore, analysis of PTN and ALK coexpression in cancer cell lines should be further characterized to evaluate the role of ALK in the genesis of neoplasms other than ALCL.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Prof. A. Rappelli for continuous support and encouragement during the course of this work. We thank Prof. P. P. Di Fiore for helpful discussions and suggestions. We also thank Prof. P. P. Pellicci and Prof. B. Falini for providing the anti-ALK monoclonal antibody. The expert technical assistance of M. Cesaroni is also acknowledged.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by a grant from the Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Supported by a Fellowship from Fondazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 39-071-2206144; Fax: 39-071-2206125; E-mail: fazioli@popcsi.unian.it.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 27, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111145200

2 G. Piccinini and F. Fazioli, unpublished results.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; ALCL, anaplastic large cell lymphoma; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PLC-gamma , phospholipase C-gamma ; PI3-K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PTN, pleiotrophin; Tyr(P), phosphotyrosine; NPM, nucleophosmin; ATIC, 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase/IMP cyclohydrolase; LTR, long terminal repeat; FBS, fetal bovine serum; FFU, focus-forming units; BSA, bovine serum albumin; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; IRS-1, insulin receptor substrate-1.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Morris, S. W., Naeve, C., Mathew, P., James, P. L., Kirstein, M. N., Cui, X., and Witte, D. P. (1997) Oncogene 14, 2175-2188[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Iwahara, T., Fujimoto, J., Wen, D., Cupples, R., Bucay, N., Arakawa, T., Mori, S., Ratzkin, B., and Yamamoto, T. (1997) Oncogene 14, 439-449[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Stoica, G. E., Kuo, A., Aigner, A., Sunitha, I., Souttou, B., Malerczyk, C., Caughey, D. J., Wen, D., Karavanov, A., Riegel, A. T., and Wellstein, A. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 16772-16779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Mason, D. Y., Bastard, C., Rimokh, R, Dastugue, N., Huret, J. L., Kristofferson, U., Magaud, J. P., Nezelof, C., Tilly, H., and Vannier, J. P. (1990) Br. J. Haematol. 74, 161-168[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Stein, H., Herbst, H., Anagnostopoulos, I., Niedobitek, G., Dallenbach, F., and Kratzsch, H. C. (1991) Ann. Oncol. 2, 33-38[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Kadin, M. E. (1994) J. Clin. Oncol. 12, 884-887[Free Full Text]
7. Morris, S. W., Kirsten, M. N., Valentine, M. B., Dittmer, K. G., Shapiro, D. N., Saltman, D. L., and Look, A. T. (1994) Science 263, 1281-1284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Shiota, M., Fujimoto, J., Semba, T., Satoh, H., Yamamoto, T., and Mori, S. (1994) Oncogene 9, 1567-1574[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Borer, R. A., Lehner, C. F., Eppenberger, H. M., and Nigg, E. A. (1989) Cell 56, 379-390[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Chan, W. Y., Liu, Q. R., Borjigin, J., Bush, H., Rennert, O. M., Tease, L. A., and Chan, P. K. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 1033-1039[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Bishof, D., Puldorf, K., Mason, D. Y., and Morris, S. W. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 2312-2325[Abstract]
12. Fujimoto, J., Shiota, M., Iwahara, T., Seki, N., Satoh, H., Mori, S., and Yamamoto, T. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 4118-4186
13. Kuefer, M. U., Look, A. T., Puldorf, K., Behm, F. G., Pattengale, P. K., Mason, D. Y., and Morris, S. W. (1997) Blood 90, 2901-2910[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Lamant, L., Dastugue, N., Puldorf, K., Delsol, G, and Mariame, B. (1999) Blood 93, 3088-3095[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Hernandez, L., Pinyol, M., Hernandez, S., Beà, S., Puldorf, K., Rosenwald, A., Lamant, L., Falini, B., Ott, G., Mason, D. Y., Delsol, G., and Campo, E. (1999) Blood 94, 3265-3268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Trinei, M., Lanfrancone, L., Campo, E., Puldorf, K., Mason, D. Y., Pelicci, P. P., and Falini, B. (2000) Cancer Res. 60, 793-798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Ma, Z., Cools, J., Marynen, P., Cui, X., Sieberrt, R., Gesk, S., Schlegelberger, B., Peeters, B., De, Wolfe-Peeters, C., Wlodarska, I., and Morris, S. W. (2000) Blood 95, 2144-2149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Touriol, C., Greenland, C., Lamant, L., Puldorf, K., Bernard, F., Roussel, T., Mason, D. Y., and Delsol, G. (2000) Blood 95, 3204-3207[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Tort, F., Pynol, M., Puldorf, K., Roncador, G., Hernandez, L., Nayach, I., Kluin-Nelemans, H. C., Kluin, F., Turiol, C., Gelsol, G., Mason, D., and Campo, E. (2001) Lab. Invest. 81, 419-426[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Morris, S. W. (2001) Br. J. Haematol. 113, 275-295[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Souttou, B., Brunet-De Carvalho, N., Raulais, D., and Vigny, M. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 9526-9531[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Bai, R. Y., Dieter, P., Pescel, C., Morris, S. W., and Duyster, J. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 6951-6961[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Bai, R. Y., Ouyang, T., Miething, C., Morris, S. W., Peschel, C., and Duyster, J. (2000) Blood 96, 4319-4327[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Slupianek, A., Nieborowska-Skorska, M., Hoser, G., Morrione, A., Majewski, M., Xue, L., Morris, S. W., Wasik, M. A., and Skorski, T. (2001) Cancer Res. 61, 2194-2199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Riedel, H., Dull, T. J., Honneger, A. M., Schlessinger, J., and Ullrich, A. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 2943-2954[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Fazioli, F., Kim, U.-H., Rhee, S. G., Molloy, C. J., Segatto, O., and Di Fiore, P. P. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 2040-2048[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Herbst, R., Lammers, R., Schlessinger, J., and Ullrich, A. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 19908-19916[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Yan, H., Schlessinger, J., and Chao, M. V. (1991) Science 252, 561-563[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Seedorf, K., Millauer, B., Kostka, G., Schlessinger, J., and Ullrich, A. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 4347-4356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Obermeier, A., Bradshow, R. A., Seedorf, K., Choidas, A., Schlessinger, J., and Ullrich, A. (1993) EMBO J. 13, 1585-1590
31. Santoro, M., Wong, W. T., Aroca, P., Santos, E., Matoskova, B., Grieco, M., Fusco, A., and Di Fiore, P. P. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 663-675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Lonardo, F., Di, Marco, E., King, C. R., Pierce, J., Segatto, O., Aaronson, S. A., and Di Fiore, P. P. (1990) New Biol. 2, 992-1003[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Kunkel, T. A. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 488-492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Di Fiore, P. P., Pierce, J. H., Kraus, M. H., Segatto, O., King, C. R., and Aaronson, S. A. (1987) Science 237, 178-182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Graham, F. L., and Van der Eb, A. J. (1973) Virology 52, 456-467[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Wigler, M., Silverstein, S., Lee, L. S., Pellicer, A., Cheng, Y.-C., and Axel, R. (1977) Cell 11, 223-232[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Mulligan, R. C., and Berg, P. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 78, 2072-2076[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Falini, B., Bigerna, B., Fizzotti, M., Pulford, K., Pileri, S. A., Delsol, G., Carbone, A., Paulli, M., Magrini, U., Menestrina, F., Giardini, R., Pilotti, S., Mezzelani, A., Ugolini, B., Billi, M., Pucciarini, A., Pacini, R., Pelicci, P. G., and Flenghi, L. (1998) Am. J. Pathol. 153, 875-886[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Di Fiore, P. P., Segatto, O., Wexler, D, Fazioli, F., Pierce, J. H., and Aaronson, S. A. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 2749-2756[Abstr