JBC Origene Your Gene Company

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M200338200 on March 27, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 25, 22240-22250, June 21, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/25/22240    most recent
M200338200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Toompuu, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, H. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Toompuu, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, H. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The 7472insC Mitochondrial DNA Mutation Impairs the Synthesis and Extent of Aminoacylation of tRNASer(UCN) but Not Its Structure or Rate of Turnover*

Marina ToompuuDagger §, Takehiro Yasukawa||, Tsutomu Suzuki||**, Terhi HakkinenDagger , Johannes N. SpelbrinkDagger , Kimitsuna Watanabe||**, and Howard T. JacobsDagger Dagger Dagger §§

From the Dagger  Institute of Medical Technology and Tampere University Hospital, FIN-33014 University of Tampere, Finland, the § National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, Akadeemia tee 23, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia, the || Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Graduate School of Engineering and the ** Department of Integrated Biosciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan, and the Dagger Dagger  Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, United Kingdom

Received for publication, January 11, 2002, and in revised form, March 1, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The 7472insC mitochondrial DNA mutation in the tRNASer(UCN) gene is associated with sensorineural deafness combined, in some patients, with a wider neurological syndrome. In cultured cybrid cells it causes a 70% decrease in tRNASer(UCN) abundance and mild respiratory impairment, previously suggested to be due to decreased tRNA stability. When mitochondrial transcription was blocked by ethidium bromide treatment, the half-life of the mutant tRNA was not significantly different from that of wild-type tRNASer(UCN). Over-expression of mitochondrial translational elongation factor EF-Tu also had no effect on the mutant phenotype. However, during recovery from prolonged ethidium bromide treatment, the synthesis of the mutant tRNASer(UCN) was specifically impaired, without polarity effects on downstream tRNAs of the light strand transcription unit. We infer that the mutation acts posttranscriptionally to decrease tRNASer(UCN) abundance by affecting its synthesis rather than its stability. The extent of aminoacylation of the mutant tRNA was also decreased by ~25%. In contrast, the mutation had no detectable effect on tRNASer(UCN) base modification or structure other than the insertion of an extra guanosine templated by the mutation, which was structurally protected from nuclease digestion like the surrounding nucleotides. These findings indicate a common molecular process underlying sensorineural deafness caused by mitochondrial tRNASer(UCN) mutations.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

More than 50 pathological mutations in mitochondrial tRNA genes have now been reported and validated (Ref. 1, see also www.gen.emory.edu/mitomap.html), and the molecular effects of many have been at least partially elucidated via the creation of rho 0 cybrids (fusions to cells lacking endogenous mitochondrial DNA, see Ref. 2) or other cell culture models. Heteroplasmic mutations, such as A3243G or other tRNALeu(UUR) mutations found in cases of MELAS1 (mitochondrial encephalomyopathy with lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes) and other syndromes or A8344G and T8356C found in cases of MERFF (myoclonic epilepsy with ragged-red fibers), tend to have severe quantitative and/or qualitative effects on mitochondrial protein synthesis and respiratory function (3-6). They are associated with abnormal base modification (7-9), decreased aminoacylation (4, 8, 10-12), and reduced steady-state levels of the corresponding tRNAs (5, 6, 8, 11). Mutations in tRNALeu(UUR) are associated frequently with defective RNA processing (6, 13-15) and also shortened half-life (8) of the affected tRNA. By contrast, mutations affecting tRNASer(UCN), which are frequently homoplasmic or implicated pathologically only at high levels of heteroplasmy, have rather modest effects on mitochondrial function and are generally associated with mild or tissue-restricted pathological states, principally sensorineural deafness.

The 7472insC mutation is one such mutation. Clinically, most subjects have an apparently non-syndromic hearing impairment (16), with a minority suffering a more widespread neurological disease including ataxia and myoclonic seizures (16-18), sometimes with a measurable deficit of cytochrome c oxidase (18). In 143B osteosarcoma-derived cybrid cells, homoplasmy for the 7472insC mutation produces only a very modest biochemical phenotype, comprising a small decrease in complex I activity (17) and a growth deficit in galactose medium when the mutation is present in combination with a diminished copy number of mtDNA (19). Effects on mitochondrial protein synthesis are minimal, with only a slight quantitative decrease in mitochondrial translation products detectable by pulse labeling (19), an effect mildly exacerbated by doxycycline treatment (19). The only clear molecular effect of the mutation that can be seen in cybrid cells is a decrease of ~70% in the steady-state level of tRNASer(UCN) (19), an effect shared with the A7445G deafness-associated mutation (20, 21). Unlike the case of the latter, which has been studied only in lymphoblastoid cells, 7472insC produces no systematic change to the level of the upstream (ND6) mRNA, leading to the suggestion that its effects are most likely on the half-life of tRNASer(UCN) rather than on its processing (19). Electrophoretic analysis of [14C]serine-labeled tRNA also suggested only a minimal effect on aminoacylation.

To investigate in further detail the molecular effects of the 7472insC mutation, we applied a variety of assays. These compared 143B osteosarcoma-derived cybrid cell lines homoplasmic for the mutation with those containing only wild-type mtDNA derived from the same patient. Mitochondrial tRNA half-lives and synthesis rates were measured via the use of ethidium bromide (EtBr) to block new transcription of mtDNA (8). Effects on aminoacylation were studied using oxidation-circularization of tRNA (12) combined with minisequencing to determine the ratio of mutant to wild-type tRNA in the final product mixture. Effects on base modification were studied by primary sequence determination of tRNASer(UCN) (22, 23) and on secondary/tertiary structure by partial RNase digestion under non-denaturing conditions. Possible effects on tRNA stability were also investigated by overexpression of mitochondrial EF-Tu. These assays revealed a pronounced decrease in the rate of synthesis but not the half-life of the mutant tRNA, combined with a small but clear decrease in the extent of aminoacylation. Because of the absence of polarity effects on the synthesis of downstream tRNAs of the light strand transcription unit, the mutation is inferred to act posttranscriptionally. Only very subtle effects on structure or stability were found. Considered alongside previous findings on the A7445G mutation (20, 21, 24), a consistent picture emerges of mtDNA mutations that impair tRNASer(UCN) maturation producing sensorineural deafness as their primary clinical phenotype.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Lines and Culture-- 143B osteosarcoma cell cybrids homoplasmic for the np7472insC mutation or for wild-type mtDNA from the same individual were as described previously (17, 19). Specific cell lines used in the experiments are indicated in figure legends. Except where indicated, line 43 was used as the source of control tRNA and line 47 was used as the source of mutant tRNA. Cells were routinely cultured in media supplemented with uridine and pyruvate as described previously (19) and passaged weekly.

Oligonucleotides-- Custom-designed oligonucleotides were purchased from DNA Technology (Aarhus, Denmark) or Genset (Paris, France) and are as follows (all shown as 5'-3'). For Northern and dot-hybridization: Ser11-AAGGAAGGAATCGAACCCCCCAAAGCTG (np 7451-7478 of human mtDNA, Ref. 25); Leu21 (Ref. 6)-GTTTTATGCGATTACCGGGC (np 3263-3244), Gln-GAATCGAACCCATCCCTGAG (np 4341-4360), Tyr-ATTTACAGTCCAATGCTTCACTC (np 5857-5879), Asn-CACAAACACTTAGTTAACAGC (np 5679-5699), Lys-AAAGGTTAATGCTAAGTTAGC (np 8304-8324), and 5S1 (Ref. 8)- GGGTGGTATGGCCGTAGAC (np 294-276 of GenBankTM entry X71797); for purification of tRNASer(UCN): Ser-Bio, with 3' biotinylation-AGCCAACCCCATGGCCTCCATGACTTTTTC (np 7485-7514 of human mtDNA); for RT-PCR of circularized tRNASer(UCN): cser1-TGGCCTCCATGACTTTTTC (np 7496-7514); and cser2-ATGGGGTTGGCTTGAAAC (np 7496-7479); for minisequencing: cser3-CTTGAAACCAGCTTTGGGGGG (np 7486-7467), and cser4-AAGGAAGGAATCGAACCCCCC (np 7451-7471). For RT-PCR cloning of the human mitochondrial EF-Tu cDNA (from the TUFM gene), BamHI/TufA51- CGCGGATCCACCACAATGGCGGCCGCCACCCTGCT and HindIII/TufA33-stop-GGGAAGCTTTCAACCCCATTTGATATTCTTC; for analysis of the presence of the TUFM transgene in transfected cell clones by PCR and its expression by RT-PCR: BGH-TAGAAGGCACAGTCGAGGC and TufA-52: GTTCTCCCTGACTTGGAACATGGCCTGT; for analysis of the presence and expression of empty vector in transfected cell clones: BGH (as above) and T7-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGG.

Miscellaneous RNA and DNA Manipulations-- Total RNA was prepared from cells using the Trizol method as previously described (19). For sequencing, about 500 or 1000 A260 units (depending on the purpose) of total RNA were extracted from 100-200 9-cm plates of semiconfluent cells (~109 cells) by Trizol extraction (Invitrogen). Total RNA was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9.0, to deacylate tRNAs. After this treatment, the pH was adjusted to 7.5, and RNA was fractionated on 1 × 45-cm DEAE-Sepharose fast flow columns (Amersham Biosciences) as described previously (8). Fractions enriched for tRNASer(UCN) were monitored by dot hybridization with oligonucleotide Ser-11. Oligonucleotide labeling, hybridization, and wash conditions were as used previously (19). tRNASer(UCN) was finally purified by selective hybridization using a solid phase 3'-biotinylated oligonucleotide probe (Ser-Bio) followed by gel electrophoresis as described previously (26). The final yield of tRNASer(UCN) for sequencing was estimated at ~0.5-1 µg. RT-PCR used 0.0125 A260 units of random hexamers and Invitrogen M-MLV-RTase. Except where indicated, PCR and RT-PCR reactions used 55 °C for the annealing step. Northern blotting to oligonucleotide probes used the same conditions as described previously (19). Acidic gel electrophoresis to distinguish aminoacylated and non-aminoacylated tRNAs, as well as alkaline deacylation, were as described previously (10).

RNA Sequencing and Structure Analysis-- tRNASer(UCN), purified from cybrid cells with or without the 7472insC mutation, was sequenced by a combination of partial RNase digestion (22) and thin-layer chromatographic analysis of 5'-postlabeled nucleotides (23) with modifications as described (8). Briefly, for the partial digestion method, the tRNA was labeled at the 5' end with [gamma -32P]ATP (185 TBq/mmol, Amersham Biosciences) and T4 polynucleotide kinase (MBI Fermentas) or at the 3' end with [32P]pCp (110 TBq/mmol, Amersham Biosciences) and T4 RNA ligase (MBI Fermentas) followed by gel-purification and partial digestion under denaturing conditions. The nucleotide-specific RNases used for partial digestion were RNase T1 (USB), specific for G, RNase U2 (Amersham Biosciences) specific for A > G, RNase CL, i.e. from chicken liver (Sigma), specific for C, RNase A (USB), which cuts at C and U, RNase PhyM (Amersham Biosciences), which cuts at A and U, plus RNase ONE (Promega) and RNase T2 (Sigma), both of which are not base-specific. The procedures for the chromatographic method were as described previously (8). Briefly, the tRNA was incubated at 95 °C for 1.5 min in water to induce single site, random cleavage. The 3'-half-fragments were 5'-labeled with [gamma -32P]ATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase and electrophoresed in denaturing polyacrylamide gels. The ladders of 5'-32P-labeled fragments were then cut out one by one and eluted from the gel. Each of the 5'-labeled fragments was then digested completely by RNase P1. The resultant 5'-labeled nucleotides from each fragment were analyzed individually by two-dimensional TLC with two different solvent systems (23) on 10 × 10-cm plates. Solvent system A consisted of isobutyric acid/concentrated ammonia/H2O (66:1:33 by volume) in the first dimension and 2-propanol/HCl/H2O (70:15:15 by volume) in the second dimension. In solvent system B, the first dimension was the same as that used for system A, but 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 6.8/ammonium sulfate/1-propanol (100 ml:60 mg:2 ml) was used for the second dimension. For enzymatic probing of differences in secondary/tertiary structure, the 5' end-labeled tRNA was refolded in 20-30 µl of renaturation buffer (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH7.5) by cooling from 95 to 35 °C at 2 °C per min and then digested with specific RNases at 37 °C in the same buffer. Approximately 5000 cpm of labeled RNA was used in each reaction. Alkaline digestions (in 50 mM Na2CO3, pH 9.0) were carried out on non-renatured tRNA heated to 95 °C and immediately quenched on ice. Intactness of the RNA to be used in enzymatic digests was checked electrophoretically after renaturation.

Aminoacylation Analysis by Oxidation-Circularization Assay-- The extent of aminoacylation of tRNASer(UCN) was measured using the oxidation-circularization assay, essentially as described by Börner et al. (12) but with the following modifications. Total RNA was isolated by Trizol extraction from cells grown to 90% confluence and dissolved on ice in 0.1 M NaOAc, pH 5.0. In some experiments, small RNAs were isolated from 25 µg of total RNA, using chromatography on DEAE-Sepharose fast flow (Amersham Biosciences). Eluates were divided into four aliquots, precipitated, and used for two sets of oxidation-circularization reactions. RNA preparations from control and mutant cybrids were mixed in various arbitrary proportions, giving ratios of wild-type to mutant signal in the final assay of between 0.2 and 3. cDNA was synthesized from circularized tRNASer(UCN) using primer cser1 and then amplified with primers cser1 and cser2 (92 °C, 2 min; 30 cycles of 94 °C, 30 s, 55 °C, 30 s, 72 °C, 30 s; final extension at 72 °C, 5 min). RT-PCR products were isolated by 10% PAGE, eluted, and purified (PCR purification kit, Qiagen). Quantitation of the ratio of mutant to wild-type product from total and aminoacylated (oxidation-resistant) RNA was carried out by minisequencing using the ABI Prism SNaPshot ddNTP primer extension kit (PE Biosystems) under the conditions recommended by the supplier. Extension primers cser3 and cser4 (for opposite strands) were used to analyze all products.

tRNA Half-life and Synthesis Measurements-- For half-life measurements, cell cultures were seeded at equal densities, giving 60-70% confluence, on 6-cm plates 14-16 h before the experiment. They were then incubated in fresh medium containing 250 ng/ml of EtBr for the times indicated in the figures. For synthesis measurements, cells were seeded at 50% confluence on 9-cm plates 14-16 h before the experiment and then incubated in medium containing 250 ng/ml of EtBr for two days after which they were passaged into fresh medium on 6-cm plates. Medium was again replaced after 5-6 h of recovery and then daily until cells were harvested at the times indicated in figures. Cells were either seeded initially at different densities so that they reached approximately the same final densities at the time of harvesting or else were passaged once more, reaching different final densities according to the time at which they were harvested. The two sets of data thus obtained were indistinguishable. Total RNA was isolated by Trizol extraction, separated on 12% PAGE/7 M urea/TBE gels, and analyzed by Northern hybridization. Northern blots were quantitated by phosphorimaging as described previously (19).

Cell Transfection and Expression Analysis-- The mitochondrial EF-Tu cDNA was amplified from human HEK293T cell cDNA in an RT-PCR reaction using the primers BamHI/TufA51 and HindIII/TufA33 (4 min at 94 °C, then 30 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 1 min at 58 °C, 3 min at 72 °C, with a final extension of 15 min at 72 °C). The product was digested with BamHI and HindIII and cloned into BamHI/HindIII-digested pcDNA3.1(-) Myc/His A (Invitrogen). Clones were sequence-verified against GenBank accession no. X84694 using BigDye terminator chemistry (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with a combination of vector-specific and mtDNA-specific primers. Sequencing products were analyzed by capillary electrophoresis on an Applied Biosystems 310 Genetic Analyzer using the manufacturer's software. The final TUFM clone (or empty vector) was transfected into 143B osteosarcoma cybrid cell lines 43 (control) and 47 (7472insC mutant), seeded on 9-cm plates and grown to 50-60% confluence. For each transfection, 4 µg of DNA and 40 µg of LipofectAMINE (Invitrogen) were diluted in 4 ml of Opti-MEM (Invitrogen) and added to cells washed with Opti-MEM. After 5 h 8 ml of fresh medium was added, and after 24 h cells were placed under selection in 1.6 mg/ml Geneticin (Invitrogen). After 1 week of selection cells were passaged to obtain single clones, which were picked and regrown in 6-well plates. The presence and expression of a transgene was tested by PCR and RT-PCR, using the primers described above.

Western Blotting-- Whole cell lysates from transfected cell clones were processed for Western blotting essentially as described previously (27). Cells from a 6-cm plate were lysed in 50 µl of PBS/1% Triton-X100/2.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, vortexed, incubated on ice for 30 min, and centrifuged for 2 min at 14,000 × gmax. Protein concentrations were measured by the Bradford method (28). For detection of EF-Tu mouse monoclonal mAb-68 (1:500 dilution) (Ref. 29, a kind gift of Frank Henkler) and goat or horse anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase (1:10000 dilution) antibodies were used. Detection of PAK1 (p21-associated kinase) used rabbit polyclonal PAKalpha C-19 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:5000 dilution) and horse anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase (1:10000 dilution) antibodies. Fluorographs were analyzed by densitometry.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The 7472insC Mutation Has Only a Minimal Effect on tRNASer(UCN) Structure-- To evaluate the structural effects of the 7472insC mutation, the primary sequence of tRNASer(UCN) from two different control cybrid cell lines was first determined (Fig. 1) via a combination of partial RNase digestion of end-labeled tRNAs (Donis-Keller method, see Ref. 22) and TLC of postlabeled mononucleotides derived from a standard, stepwise degradation procedure (Kuchino method, see Ref. 23). The tRNA was first purified by DEAE-Sepharose chromatography, followed by affinity hybridization to a specific biotinylated oligonucleotide immobilized on streptavidin-coated beads (26). Modifications of four kinds were detected at five positions of the tRNA. Two pseudouridines were found, one located in the anticodon stem (conventional position 28 based on the scheme given in Ref. 30, actual position 25 numbered from the 5' end), the other in the T-loop at conventional position 55 (actual position 51), adjacent to a ribothymidine (conventional position 54, actual position 50), giving the conventional TPsi C motif. In the anticodon loop, two additional modifications similar to those found previously in bovine mitochondrial tRNASer(UCN) (31) were found: 3-methylcytosine at conventional position 32 (actual position 29) and N6-isopentenyladenosine (i6A) or 2-methylthio-N6-isopentenyladenosine (ms2i6A), which the solvent systems used for TLC do not resolve, at conventional position 37 (actual position 34). This modified base is probably ms2i6A because bovine mitochondrial tRNASer(UCN) has exclusively ms2i6A at this position.2 The wobble base U (conventional position 34, actual position 31) was found to be unmodified.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Primary sequence and proposed secondary structure of human mitochondrial tRNASer(UCN). a, the tRNA sequence, shown in conventional clover-leaf form, as deduced by a combination of single nucleotide analysis as in b and partial RNase digestions as exemplified in Fig. 2 using both 5'- and 3'-labeled tRNA. The sequence is numbered, for clarity, from the 5' end. Numbering of the modified nucleotides in b is shown according to the conventional scheme (30), with actual numbering shown in parentheses alongside. Sequencing of tRNASer(UCN) independently purified from each of two control cybrid cell lines (lines 34 and 43, see Ref. 19) gave identical results. The unorthodox secondary structure, with a 6-bp anticodon stem and only one nucleotide between the acceptor and D-stems, is the one proposed earlier for mammalian mitochondrial tRNASer(UCN), based on structural studies of the bovine tRNA (31). The nucleotide analysis (phosphorimaging output) is shown for the five positions at which modified 5'-nucleotides were detected. For each position, two different solvent systems were used, A in the left-hand panel, B in the right-hand panel as described under "Experimental Procedures." The identities of the 5'-modified nucleotides were deduced from standard chromatographic maps, as illustrated (see Ref. 23). All assignments were also consistent with partial digestions (Fig. 2) based on known RNase specificities and electrophoretic properties of RNA fragments containing modified nucleotides. Note the presence of additional nucleotides in the chromatograms, which are due to contaminating fragments in the excised bands from the RNA ladder. Modified nucleotides, which are poor substrates for end-labeling by T4 kinase, can appear as relatively minor species in the chromatograms; this is a recognized feature of the technique (23). Modified nucleosides are abbreviated as follows: Psi , pseudouridine; T, ribothymidine; m3C, 3-methylcytidine, i6A, N6-isopentenyladenosine; ms2i6A, 2-methylthio-N6-isopentenyladenosine. The wobble-base U (conventional position 34, actual position 31) is unmodified. The modification at conventional position 37 (actual position 34) is assumed to be ms2i6A (see "Results").

The equivalent tRNA was extracted from cells homoplasmic for the mutation and analyzed in parallel, via partial RNase and alkaline digestions (Fig. 2). No differences in the digestion patterns were seen, except for the presence of the additional G templated by the inserted nucleotide pair that defines the mutation, which lies within a homopolymeric tract spanning from the extra loop through the T-stem. All of the modifications identified by TLC produce characteristic changes in RNase sensitivity and/or mobility that allow their presence to be unambiguously scored by the partial RNase digestion method. In every case, the digestion pattern of the mutant tRNA indicated that the modified base detected by TLC in the wild-type tRNA was present also in the mutant tRNA.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Sequence comparison of tRNASer(UCN) from control and 7472insC mutant cybrid cell lines. a, a portion of the alkaline ladder and RNase T1 digest of the 5'-labeled tRNA from control cybrid cell line 43 (denoted c) and mutant cybrid cell line 47 (denoted m). The characteristic abnormal spacing associated with three of the modified nucleotides (conventional numbering) is seen clearly in the alkaline ladder for both control and mutant tRNA. b, partial digestions of the same 5'-labeled tRNAs with each of five ribonucleases. The portion of the gel shown covers all of the modified nucleotides. Nuclease specificities were as expected from the literature, except that the available preparations of RNase U2 cut weakly also at pyrimidines. RNase CL was found to cut only weakly at some Cs adjacent to another C, and weakly also at some Us. RNase A was very variable in activity at different positions. RNase ONE, although largely nonspecific, was found to cut only weakly or not at all at most Gs. Control RNA from cybrid cell line 34 was also sequenced using RNase PhyM, which gave concordant results. The enzyme is no longer available from any source. The only reproducible difference between the mutant and control tRNAs is the inserted G templated by the 7472insC mutation itself. In both samples, the modified adenosine at conventional position 37 (actual position 34), the modified cytidine at conventional position 32 (actual position 29) and the ribothymidine at conventional position 54 (actual position 50) are not cut with any enzyme tested. The unmodified wobble-base U-34 (actual position 31) is cut as normally by RNases A and T2, and also very weakly by RNase CL, in both samples. The pseudouridines at conventional positions 28 (actual position 25) and 55 (actual position 51) are cut efficiently by RNase T2, but not by RNase A and only weakly or very weakly by any other enzyme. All nucleotides outside the region shown were cut as predicted, based on the known properties of the enzymes, in both control and mutant tRNAs.

Partial RNase digestion carried out on non-denatured, 5'end-labeled tRNASer(UCN) from homoplasmic mutant and control cybrid cells also revealed only very subtle differences attributable to the mutation (Fig. 3). Like the other guanosines of the T-arm and extra loop, the inserted G was protected from digestion by RNase T1. The T-arm and extra loop were almost entirely inaccessible to all nucleases tested in both mutant and control tRNASer(UCN); therefore it is not possible to ascertain whether the inserted G creates an additional base pair in the T-stem or is found in the extra loop or T-loop. However, the mutation appears to cause no major structural disturbance.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Nuclease sensitivity of tRNASer(UCN) under non-denaturing conditions. a, summary of data from partial digestions using RNases T1, U2, T2, A, and CL in many different experiments. Control and mutant tRNAs gave essentially identical results. Filled circles indicate residues that were strongly cut by at least one of the diagnostic nucleases (or by RNase T2, in the case of some A residues because under non-denaturing conditions RNase U2 gave poor signals). Open circles indicate weakly reactive residues. The approximate position of the additional G, templated by the inserted nucleotide pair of the mutant mtDNA, is arrowed. Because the whole region is protected from digestion by any of the nucleases tested, in both mutant and wild-type tRNAs, it is not possible to ascertain whether the extra G forms an additional base pair in the T-stem or contributes to the extra loop or to the T-loop without significantly disturbing the tertiary structures in which these loops participate. b, a sample of the data on which a is based. Digestions of tRNASer(UCN) from control (denoted c) or mutant (denoted m) cybrid cells, with each of three informative RNases. For clarity, the top and bottom halves of the gel are shown separately. Note that the extra G in the mutant tRNA is not accessible to RNase T1, but that the very poorly accessible cytidines at conventional positions 56 (T-loop, actual position 52), 61 and 62 (T-stem, actual positions 57 and 58) are even less digestible by RNase CL in the mutant tRNA, although RNase A does not distinguish the two substrates in this region. The accessible guanosines of the anticodon (G-35 on the conventional scheme, actual position 32) and at the base of the acceptor stem (G-7, using conventional or actual numbering) are arrowed for reference.

The 7472insC Mutation Decreases the Extent of Aminoacylation of tRNASer(UCN)-- Although earlier analyses (19) concluded that any effects on aminoacylation must be minor, we adopted a modified version of the oxidation-circularization assay described by Börner et al. (12) to obtain more precise information. The need for this indirect assay arises from the fact that the aminoacylated and non-aminoacylated tRNASer(UCN) cannot be separated electrophoretically. The assay distinguishes aminoacylated from non-aminoacylated tRNA on the basis that periodate oxidation renders the latter incapable of being circularized by RNA ligase, whereas the former is protected by the amino acid and can be circularized after subsequent deacylation. The amount of wild-type versus mutant RNA in the circularized product can then be determined by RT-PCR using a reverse transcription primer that anneals adjacent to the 5' end of the tRNA and hence will only use circularized RNA as a template. We used fluorescent minisequencing to compare the amount of mutant and wild-type product derived from the total and aminoacylated RNA fractions. To exclude any systematic error from the choice of primer or fluorescent labels used for minisequencing, we analyzed each product twice, using unrelated primers (and different dNTP labels) for the two strands. The assay was originally developed for studies of heteroplasmic cells, whereas the 7472insC mutation in the test cells was homoplasmic. To circumvent this problem, we created various arbitrary mixtures of RNA from cybrid cells containing wild-type and mutant mtDNA and then used the assay to compare the ratio of mutant to wild-type product in total RNA and aminoacylated RNA for each such mixture. This approach is valid because the assay merely determines the ratio between the aminoacylation efficiencies of mutant versus wild-type tRNA.

As shown in Fig. 4, the proportion of mutant tRNA in the aminoacylated fraction relative to its proportion in unfractionated RNA, was uniformly around 75%, regardless of the mixing ratio used, at least across the 6-fold range employed. Minisequencing on the two strands gave essentially identical results (77.3 ± 3.8% using the coding-strand primer, or 73.0 ± 3.9% using the non-coding strand primer), as did several different RNA preparations or prior purification of the small RNA fraction by DEAE-Sepharose chromatography. The mutation therefore causes a 25% decrease in steady-state aminoacylation of tRNASer(UCN) in the 143B cell background. It should be noted, however, that the assay assumes that all of the aminoacylation that has occurred is by the correct amino acid (serine). Any mis-aminoacylation of the mutated tRNA would have been overlooked. Nevertheless, a substantial level of mis-aminoacylation would very likely have been detected electrophoretically in earlier studies because acylation of the 14 other mitochondrial tRNAs tested has produced a mobility shift detectable on acidic polyacrylamide gels (32).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Extent of aminoacylation of tRNASer(UCN) in control and mutant cybrid cells using the oxidation-circularization assay. The results plotted are from a total of 17 different experiments, using different, arbitrary mixtures of RNA from control and mutant cells and based on four independent RNA isolations from each source. In each case, the ratio of mutant to wild-type product was analyzed by RT-PCR and fluorescent mini-sequencing using primers for each strand (open circles, coding-strand primer; filled circles, non-coding strand primer). For each RNA mixture, parallel samples were analyzed that had and had not been deacylated in vitro prior to the oxidation step. Arbitrary mixtures are appropriate because the assay measures only a ratio, namely that of the proportion of mutant tRNA that is aminoacylated to the proportion of wild-type tRNA that is aminoacylated. It also assumes that the amount of unreacted (deacylated) tRNA is a small and constant proportion of the whole. The fact that the data points lie on a straight line confirms the validity of the approach. Despite the very different relative fluorescence signals for the diagnostic chain terminators on the two strands, the relative proportion of mutant to wild-type signal in aminoacylated RNA versus total RNA was virtually identical for the two strands in all samples analyzed. The line of slope 0.75 represents an unweighted mean ratio of all data points. Identical results were obtained when RNA samples were processed further to purify short RNAs, confirming that the differences between mutant and control RNAs are unlikely to result from differential lability during extraction. RT-PCR performed on the circularized products routinely generated a low proportion of apparently dimerized product, but this did not differ according to the ratio of input mutant and wild-type tRNAs, and in fact the minisequencing ratios obtained from excised, presumptive dimer bands were invariably identical to those obtained from monomer bands excised in the same experiment.

The 7472insC Mutation Has No Effect on the Half-life of tRNASer(UCN)-- Although the aminoacylation defect is modest, the observation is similar to that for the A3243G mutation on tRNALeu(UUR), which results in defective aminoacylation (8, 10-12) and is associated with a >70% decrease in the abundance of the tRNA in cybrid cells at or near homoplasmy for the mutation (6, 11). In the latter case, the mutation also causes a large decrease in tRNALeu(UUR) half-life (8). We therefore tested whether the 7472insC mutation similarly affects tRNASer(UCN) stability in cybrid cells. We used EtBr to block mitochondrial RNA synthesis as described previously (8, 33, 34). Wild-type and mutant cybrids were initially treated with EtBr at various concentrations, and total RNA was extracted at various time points after the addition of the drug. Northern blots of these RNA samples, fractionated on urea-polyacrylamide gels, were probed for mitochondrial tRNALeu(UUR) and tRNASer(UCN) and for 5 S rRNA as a loading control. We selected the lowest concentration of EtBr (250 ng/ml) that appeared to give complete inhibition of mitochondrial RNA synthesis (i.e. above which the profiles of tRNA degradation were indistinguishable) and then repeated the experiment a sufficient number of times using these conditions to minimize the effects of experimental variation. Within the margins of error, the half-lives of both tRNASer(UCN) and the control tRNA, tRNALeu(UUR), were the same in 7472insC mutant and wild-type cybrid cells. The different steady-state levels of tRNASer(UCN) in mutant and wild-type cells must therefore be due to differences in the rate of synthesis of the tRNA, not its stability.

During prolonged EtBr treatment, mitochondrial protein synthesis should be rapidly shut down due to the short half-lives of mitochondrial mRNAs (35). To check whether this was accompanied by tRNA deacylation under conditions of ATP depletion, which might have influenced the relative stability of the mutant and wild-type tRNAs, we checked the aminoacylation status of mitochondrial tRNALys and tRNALeu(UUR) electrophoretically. The latter remained aminoacylated throughout the 24 h of EtBr treatment, although tRNALys gradually became partially deacylated (Fig. 5b). Although aminoacylated and deacylated tRNASer(UCN) cannot be distinguished electrophoretically, the aminoacylation difference between wild-type and mutant tRNA allowed us to use the oxidation-circularization minisequencing assay to detect changes in aminoacylation during the course of the experiment. The relative extent of aminoacylation of the mutant tRNA was slightly lower after 24 h of EtBr treatment than in untreated cells (Fig. 5c), implying that a small amount of deacylation was occurring. However, this does not appear to have affected the half-life of the tRNA. On the other hand, the fact that the changes in aminoacylation are modest means that the minimal effects of the mutation on tRNA half-life are not an artifact attributable to deacylation.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Decay kinetics of mitochondrial tRNAs in control and 7472insC mutant cybrid cells. a, tRNA levels were determined from phosphorimaging of Northern blots probed with oligonucleotides specific for tRNASer(UCN) and tRNALeu (UUR) using RNA isolated from cells at different times during EtBr treatment. RNA levels expressed as a fraction of the signal obtained from a panel of replicates taken at zero time (the time at which EtBr was added) were converted to logarithms on the assumption of first-order decay kinetics. All hybridization signals were normalized against 5 S rRNA as loading control. The data plotted represent the mean ± S.D. of five separate experiments. Lines of best fit (least squares method) are shown, r2 for the four panels (clockwise, from top left) being -0.990, -0.985, -0.967, and -0.989, respectively. No significant differences in tRNA half-life were inferred between control and mutant cybrids or between the two tRNAs. b, analysis of the effects of EtBr treatment on aminoacylation of mitochondrial tRNAs by acidic gel electrophoresis and Northern hybridization. Samples deacylated at pH 9 denoted as `d'. Graphical values, shown alongside the gel image, are based on densitometric analysis. c, analysis of effects of EtBr treatment on relative aminoacylation of mutant versus wild-type tRNASer(UCN), by oxidation-circularization-minisequencing assay, as in Fig. 4. Each data point is the mean of at least 4 experiments, using both sense- and antisense-strand oligonucleotides for minisequencing.

As a further test of the effect of the mutation on tRNASer(UCN) stability we made use of the observation that moderate over-expression of mitochondrial elongation factor EF-Tu in yeast, via manipulation of its gene dosage, can complement a variety of mutations affecting mitochondrial tRNAs (36, 37). EF-Tu binds aminoacyl-tRNAs in a ternary complex with GTP, acting as a molecular chaperone to facilitate their delivery to the acceptor site of the ribosome. The complementation activity of yeast EF-Tu is presumably based on the stabilization of mutant aminoacyl-tRNA structures that are otherwise unstable. We transfected an EF-Tu expression construct into cybrid cells containing either wild-type or 7472insC mutant mtDNA, picked colonies, and verified the presence and expression of the transgene by PCR and RT-PCR. We then tested the expression level of EF-Tu by Western blotting and measured the representation of tRNASer(UCN) by Northern blotting in stably transfected clones compared with those transfected with only the empty vector. Based on analysis of a panel of such transformants (Fig. 6), modest (up to 3-fold) overexpression of mitochondrial EF-Tu in cybrid cells had no effect on the decreased abundance of tRNASer(UCN) associated with the 7472insC mutation, consistent with the above findings from EtBr-treated cells that the mutation did not grossly affect the structure or turnover of the tRNA.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effects on cybrid cells of overexpression of mitochondrial EF-Tu. a, Western blots of whole cell extracts (75 µg per lane) from several of the control and 7472insC mutant cybrid cell clones that had been transfected either with empty vector (A, clones a) or an EF-Tu expression construct (E, clones e) for human mitochondrial EF-Tu. Blots were probed for EF-Tu and, as loading control, for p-21-activated kinase 1. EF-Tu levels in cells transfected with the EF-Tu expression construct were typically two to three times higher than those in cells transfected with empty vector. b, Northern blot of RNA from empty vector or EF-Tu expression construct-transfected cybrid cell clones probed for tRNASer(UCN). Lanes representing the parental cybrid cell lines are denoted (-). As loading control, an oligonucleotide probe for tRNALeu(UUR) gave approximately equal hybridization in all lanes (not shown). c, levels of tRNASer(UCN) in the same cells based on phosphorimaging analysis of a series of Northern blots such as those shown in b normalized against tRNALeu(UUR) and expressed as a percentage of the signal from several replicates from the control cybrid cell line 43. Control cybrid cells and clones are shown as open bars, 7472insC mutant cybrids and clones as filled bars. Clones with EF-Tu expression levels more than twice that of untransfected or vector-transfected cells, based on normalized densitometric analysis of Western blots, are denoted by asterisks. The maximum increase of EF-Tu was 2.8-fold over control cells. Normalization of Northern signals against G3PDH or ND1 mRNAs gave essentially the same results. For clarity, error bars are not shown because generally these are mean values from just two or three Northern blots that were in reasonably close agreement (within the range of variation of the parental line, i.e. no more than ± 5% of the control cell value).

The 7472insC Mutation Impairs the Synthesis of tRNASer(UCN) but Not That of Downstream tRNAs of the Light Strand Transcription Unit-- The above results suggest that it is the synthesis of tRNASer(UCN), rather than its turnover, that is affected by the mutation, raising the additional question of whether the effect is transcriptional or posttranscriptional. To address these questions directly we followed the resynthesis of mitochondrial tRNAs in wild-type and mutant cells depleted of mitochondrial transcripts by prolonged EtBr treatment (Fig. 7). EtBr was removed after 48 h, and the cells allowed to recover for a further 7 days. After correcting for the loading control (5 S rRNA), the signal for each tRNA was normalized to its level in untreated control cells always included on the same gel blot. The data plotted in Fig. 7 represent the means from six experiments. No systematic effects were observed that depended on cell density or the time at which cells were passaged. The heavy strand-encoded tRNALeu(UUR) was again included as a control to reveal any effects attributable to mtDNA copy number or other inherent properties of the mitochondrial transcription system in control versus mutant cell lines. To detect any polarity effects on the downstream tRNAs of the light strand transcription unit, we also probed for tRNATyr and tRNAGln. All tRNAs returned to their starting levels within 5-7 days of recovery, typically with a small "overshoot."


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Effects of the 7472insC mutation on mitochondrial tRNA synthesis. a, schematic diagram of the 16.6-kb LSTU of human mtDNA, indicating the approximate positions of the eight light strand-encoded tRNAs and ND6 mRNA with respect to the light strand promoter PL. Asterisks indicate the light strand-encoded tRNAs whose synthesis was studied in the experiments. b, phosphorimaging analyses of Northern blots of four mitochondrial tRNAs during EtBr treatment and recovery. All Northern signals were first normalized against the loading control (5 S rRNA) and then expressed as a fraction of the signal for the tRNA in question from untreated control cells, replicates of which were included on every blot. Solid circles and lines, control cybrid cells (line 43). Open circles and dotted lines, 7472insC mutant cybrid cells (line 47). All data points are the means and standard deviations of at least six experiments (where error bars are not visible they are contained entirely within the plotted data points). Zero time point indicated is the time EtBr was added. EtBr treatment was terminated after 2 days (indicated by vertical arrows), but tRNA levels continued to drop and only began to recover after a further day. In general they reached starting levels after 5 days of recovery. The inclusion of a heavy strand-encoded tRNA, tRNALeu(UUR), controlled for any copy number differences between the cell lines or arising from the EtBr treatment. The steady-state level of an additional, light strand-encoded tRNA, tRNAAsn, was also very similar in mutant and control cybrids (not shown).

The rate of resynthesis of tRNASer(UCN) in mutant cells, as judged by the recovery profiles shown in Fig. 7, was approximately one-third of that in wild-type cells. For the other tRNAs, control and mutant cells gave very similar recovery profiles. For all of the tRNAs analyzed, including the heavy strand-encoded control, tRNALeu(UUR), both the starting and final levels reached were slightly lower in the mutant than control cells, which indicates a small effect of mtDNA copy number. We conclude that the synthesis of the tRNASer(UCN) is specifically impaired by the mutation, but the absence of polarity effects on downstream, light strand-encoded tRNAs indicates that the effect must be posttranscriptional.

To investigate this further, we probed Northern blots with oligonucleotides for tRNASer(UCN) and the regions immediately upstream and downstream (antisense transcripts of COXI and COXII). To control for possible cross-reaction to other transcripts, we tested two different oligonucleotides for a given gene. We detected no high molecular weight precursor-like transcripts, even at the longest exposure times (data not shown). This applied to both mutant and wild-type cybrid cells. The relevant RNA processing intermediates must therefore be heterogeneous and/or of very low abundance and do not accumulate in mutant cells to higher levels than in control cells.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Primary Effects of the 7472insC Mutation on Mitochondrial Gene Expression-- Previous studies of 143B osteosarcoma cell cybrids homoplasmic for the 7472insC mutation (19) indicated that the mutation is associated with approximately a 70% decrease in the steady-state level of tRNASer(UCN) compared with control cybrids. The cells exhibit a modest, quantitative deficit of mitochondrial protein synthesis (19) and mild respiratory impairment (17, 19). These earlier findings left open several key questions regarding the primary effect of the mutation, to which the present study provides clear answers.

In cells treated with EtBr, the half-life of the mutant tRNA was indistinguishable from wild-type. This finding assumes that EtBr treatment blocks mitochondrial RNA synthesis completely, but does not directly affect RNA stability. This is supported by the fact that across a wide range of concentrations (150 ng/ml to over 1 µg/ml), EtBr treatment gave essentially the same decay profiles for mitochondrial tRNAs. Another assumption is that the RNA used as loading control, 5 S rRNA, is unaffected by the treatment. Use of an alternate loading control in some experiments, a probe for a cytosolic tRNA (19, 38), gave similar results (data not shown). The half-life of tRNALeu(UUR) as measured in these experiments (~18 h) is somewhat shorter than inferred previously in HeLa cell cybrids (8), probably reflecting cell type differences in gene expression that influence tRNA half-life.

In contrast, the 7472insC mutation profoundly and specifically affected the synthesis of tRNASer(UCN) during recovery from EtBr treatment. Quantitatively, the effect was similar to the decrease in steady-state level (in both cases ~70%). Because turnover was unaffected, simple first-order kinetic considerations support the view that this decreased synthesis is sufficient to account for the effects of the mutation on the tRNASer(UCN) level. In previous experiments, we found that ND6 mRNA, encoded upstream of tRNASer(UCN) in the light strand transcription unit (LSTU), was not systematically affected by the mutation (19). The absence of any effect on downstream tRNAs of the LSTU confirms that the effect of the mutation is posttranscriptional. In principle the defect could be in processing of the primary transcript or in a late step of maturation, such as CCA addition, possible 3' end trimming, or the rate of base modification.

Although we cannot exclude an interference with processing at the termini of tRNASer(UCN), the absence of detectable precursor accumulation in mutant cells suggests that the mutation most likely affects the efficiency of a later step in tRNASer(UCN) maturation. Because the mutant tRNA has the same termini as wild-type tRNASer(UCN), any effect on RNA processing would have to be quantitative rather than qualitative, although it cannot be excluded that the mutation promotes mis-processing and that incorrectly processed transcripts are turned over very rapidly. Structural studies indicated only very subtle differences in the region of the extra loop/T-arm that may conceivably extend or bend the T-arm. The combined length of the acceptor and T-stems is a critical determinant for pre-tRNA processing by RNase P in Xenopus (39) and also by mammalian 3'-tRNA endonuclease (40). Nuclear and mitochondrial RNase P appear to be identical in human cells (41), and the same may be true of 3'-tRNA endonuclease (42). The A7445G mutation has recently been shown to block processing of pre-tRNASer(UCN) by mitochondrial 3'-tRNA endonuclease in vitro (24). However, in the same assay, a substrate with the 7472insC mutation was not processed at a rate that was substantially below wild-type.3 An interference with 5' pre-tRNA processing remains a plausible mechanism, but effects on later maturation steps seem more likely. Testing this will require the development and validation of appropriate in vitro assays.

The finding of a reduced extent of aminoacylation raised the possibility that inefficient charging of the mutant tRNA might contribute to its decreased abundance. However, partial deacylation during prolonged EtBr treatment was not accompanied by any detectable destabilization of the mutant tRNA. We conclude that the poor aminoacylation of the mutant tRNA is unlikely to have any bearing on its decreased steady-state level: the two are independent effects of the mutation.

The length and orientation of the extra arm, but not its specific nucleotides, are known to be important for the interaction of tRNASer with seryl-tRNA synthetase in both Escherichia coli (43) and humans (44). However, a G insertion equivalent to the 7472insC mutation did not block in vitro aminoacylation of a bovine tRNASer(UCN) substrate by bovine mitochondrial seryl-tRNA synthetase recombinantly expressed in E. coli (45). The reaction showed only a small change in kinetic parameters, consistent with the modest decrease in aminoacylation efficiency in vivo reported here.

The combined effects of the 7472insC mutation on tRNA synthesis and aminoacylation reduce the steady-state level of aminoacylated tRNASer(UCN) by ~75-80%. This is probably sufficient to account for the modest protein synthesis deficiency and respiratory phenotype and may also explain why the mutation only causes a severe disease when homoplasmic or at high percentages of mutant mtDNA. The fact that the impairment in protein synthesis is modest suggests that tRNASer(UCN) may be present in excess in normal cells, which may be of critical importance in understanding the tissue specificity of the phenotype. The drop in abundance may not be critical unless some other component of the mitochondrial protein synthesis apparatus is limiting.

Other mitochondrial tRNA disease mutations, such as A3243G, profoundly affect base modification (7, 8), and lack of wobble-base modification seems to correlate with a more severe effect on protein synthesis (8, 46). A3243G also has a more drastic effect on aminoacylation both in vivo (12) and in some cybrid models (10, 11), as well as affecting tRNA stability (8). However, in cells 80-90% heteroplasmic for A3243G the combined effects on the level of functional, aminoacylated tRNAleu(UUR) may be similar to the effects of homoplasmy for 7472insC on tRNASer(UCN). This level of heteroplasmy for A3243G also has only modest effects on mitochondrial functions in cybrid cells (3, 6), but is indisputably pathological.

A Similar Pathogenic Mechanism for Deafness-associated Mutations Affecting Mitochondrial tRNASer?-- The molecular effects of two deafness-associated mitochondrial mutations, A7445G and 7472insC, are strikingly similar (19-21, 24, and this paper), suggesting a similar underlying pathogenic mechanism, based on impaired synthesis of (aminoacylated) tRNASer(UCN).

Three other pathological mutations have been found in the same gene, mapping to consecutive residues on the 5' side of the aminoacyl stem (18, 47-49). T7512C has been reported in association with a disease similar to the extended phenotype of 7472insC (18), elsewhere described as "MERFF/MELAS overlap syndrome" (49). T7511C and T7510C are found in families with maternally inherited hearing impairment (47, 48). These mutations each disrupt base-pairing, converting an A-U to a G-U base pair. The C12258A mutation in the acceptor stem of mitochondrial tRNASer(AGY) has also been implicated in syndromic deafness (50, 51). Helix-destabilizing mutations in another mitochondrial tRNAIle have recently been shown to impair aminoacylation (52). Disruptions of base-pairing in the middle of the acceptor stem might also impair RNA processing based on in vitro processing of a Drosophila pre-tRNA substrate (53). Pathological mutations in mitochondrial tRNASer may therefore affect aminoacylation, RNA processing, or both, leading to a similar end result.

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Mitochondrial tRNA Disease-- Mutations affecting tRNASer(UCN) mainly cause sensorineural deafness, whereas mutations in other mitochondrial tRNA genes are usually associated with wider, multi-system disorders. This might reflect the rather unusual situation of tRNASer(UCN) within the LSTU, separated from other functional transcripts on either side by several kilobases. Virtually all other mitochondrial tRNAs are immediately adjacent to another same-strand transcript on one or both sides, the only other prominent exceptions being tRNAGln and tRNAPro (see Fig. 7). Because of this punctuation model of mitochondrial RNA synthesis (54), virtually all mutations that affect tRNA processing will have multiple effects on adjacent transcript(s).

Although both A7445G and 7472insC manifest primarily as hearing impairment, both are associated, at least in some individuals, with a disorder affecting other tissues. In A7445G families many individuals suffer also from palmoplantar keratoderma (55, 56).4 In 7472insC families some individuals have a wider neurological syndrome including ataxia and myoclonus (16-18), sometimes associated with a clear cytochrome c oxidase deficiency (18). The wider but distinct features of these disorders may be attributable to specific effects of each mutation on processes other than on the synthesis of tRNASer(UCN). In the case of 7472insC the aminoacylation defect may produce tissue-specific features in individuals where the expression of, for example, mitochondrial seryl-tRNA synthetase (serine-tRNA ligase, SARSM) may be limiting. The recent identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the SARSM gene (57) may provide a useful tool to assess whether the clinical phenotype of 7472insC disease shows linkage with the locus, provided enough families can be collected. In turn, the specific features of A7445G disease may be attributable to effects of the mutation on the expression of the upstream gene of the LSTU, ND6 (21), which are not shared with 7472insC (19).

In yeast, a variety of mitochondrial tRNA gene defects, including at least one example of an apparent RNA processing defect, are suppressible by modest increases in gene dosage of TUFM, encoding mitochondrial EF-Tu (36, 37). The suppression mechanism is unknown, although the steady-state level of the affected tRNA is invariably increased. In the case of 7472insC no such suppression was found, consistent with the minimal effects of the mutation on tRNA structure and turnover; although it is possible to hypothesize an undetected effect on the translational properties of the tRNA without an increase in its steady-state level. However, it would be virtually impossible to detect this reliably, using currently available techniques. Alternatively, there may be species differences in the interaction of EF-Tu with tRNA or mitoribosomes, or EF-Tu may already be present in excess, although a recent estimate (58) suggested otherwise. In either case, our finding suggests that overexpression of TUFM may not be a useful general strategy for correcting the effects of mitochondrial tRNA mutations in humans.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Jaanus Remme for advice regarding structural analysis of tRNAs and Anja Rovio for invaluable technical assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported financially by grants from the Academy of Finland, Tampere University Hospital Medical Research Fund, and a grant-in-aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science, and Technology of Japan.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Supported by a graduate studentship of the Finnish Ministry of Education.

§§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 358-3215-7731; Fax: 358-3215-7710; E-mail: howy.jacobs@uta.fi.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 27, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200338200

2 T. Suzuki, T. Suzuki, and K. Watanabe, unpublished data.

3 L. Levinger, personal communication.

4 G. A. Vernham, personal communication.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: MELAS, mitochondrial encephalomyopathy with lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes; MERFF, myoclonic epilepsy with ragged-red fibers; EtBr, ethidium bromide; np, nucleotide pair; RT, reverse transcription; LSTU, light strand transcription unit.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Di Mauro, S., and Andreu, A. L. (2000) Brain Pathol. 10, 431-441[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. King, M. P., and Attardi, G. (1988) Science 246, 500-503
3. Dunbar, D. R., Moonie, P. A., Zeviani, M., and Holt, I. J. (1996) Hum. Mol. Genet. 5, 123-129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Enriquez, J. A., Chomyn, A., and Attardi, G. (1995) Nat. Genet. 10, 47-55[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Masucci, J. P., Davidson, M., Koga, Y., Schon, E. A., and King, M. P. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 2872-2881[Abstract]
6. El Meziane, A., Lehtinen, S. K., Hance, N., Nijtmans, L. G. J., Dunbar, D., Holt, I. J., and Jacobs, H. T. (1998) Nat. Genet. 18, 350-353[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Helm, M., Florentz, C., Chomyn, A., and Attardi, G. (1999) Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 756-763[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Yasukawa, T., Suzuki, T., Suzuki, T., Ueda, T., Ohta, S., and Watanabe, K. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 4251-4257[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Yasukawa, T., Suzuki, T., Ishii, N., Ueda, T., Ohta, S., and Watanabe, K. (2000) FEBS Lett. 467, 175-178[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. El Meziane, A., Lehtinen, S. K., Holt, I. J., and Jacobs, H. T. (1998) Hum. Mol. Genet. 7, 2141-2147[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Chomyn, A., Enriquez, J. A., Micol, V., Fernandez-Silva, P., and Attardi, G. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 19198-19209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Börner, G. V., Zeviani, M., Tiranti, V., Carrara, F., Hoffmann, S., Gerbitz, K. D., Lochmuller, H., Pongratz, D., Klopstock, T., Melberg, A., Holme, E., and Pääbo, S. (2000) Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 467-475[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Kaufmann, P., Koga, Y., Shanske, S., Hirano, M., Di, Mauro, S., King, M. P., and Schon, E. A. (1996) Ann. Neurol. 40, 172-180[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Bindoff, L. A., Howell, N., Poulton, J., McCullough, D. A., Morten, K. J., Lightowlers, R. N., Turnbull, D. M., and Weber, K. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 19559-19564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Rossmanith, W., and Karwan, R. M. (1998) FEBS Lett. 433, 269-274[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Verhoeven, K., Ensink, R. J., Tiranti, V., Huygen, P. L., Johnson, D. F., Schatteman, I., Van Laer, L., Verstreken, M., Van de Heyning, P., Fischel-Ghodsian, N., Zeviani, M., Cremers, C. W. R. J., Willems, P. J., and Van Camp, G. (1999) Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 7, 45-51[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Tiranti, V., Chariot, P., Carella, F., Toscano, A., Soliveri, P., Girlanda, P., Carrara, F., Fratta, G. M., Reid, F. M., Mariotti, C., and Zeviani, M. (1995) Hum. Mol. Genet. 4, 1421-1427[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Jaksch, M., Klopstock, T., Kurlemann, G., Dorner, M., Hofmann, S., Kleinle, S., Hegemann, S., Weissert, M., Muller-Hocker, J., Pongratz, D., and Gerbitz, K. D. (1998) Ann. Neurol. 44, 635-640[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Toompuu, M., Tiranti, V., Zeviani, M., and Jacobs, H. T. (1999) Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 2275-2283[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Reid, F. M., Rovio, A., Holt, I. J., and Jacobs, H. T. (1997) Hum. Mol. Genet. 6, 443-449[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Guan, M. X., Enriquez, J. A., Fischel-Ghodsian, N., Puranam, R. S., Lin, C. P., Maw, M. A., and Attardi, G. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 5868-5879[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Donis-Keller, H. (1980) Nucleic Acids Res. 8, 3133-3142[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Kuchino, Y., Hanyu, N., and Nishimura, S. (1987) Methods Enzymol. 155, 379-396[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Levinger, L., Jacobs, O., and James, M. (2001) Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 4334-4340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Anderson, S., Bankier, A. T., Barrell, B. G., de Bruijn, M. H., Coulson, A. R., Drouin, J., Eperon, I. C., Nierlich, D. P., Roe, B. A., Sanger, F., Schreier, P. H., Smith, A. J., Staden, R., and Young, I. G. (1981) Nature 290, 457-465[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Wakita, K., Watanabe, Y., Yokogawa, T., Kumazawa, Y., Nakamura, S., Ueda, T., Watanabe, K., and Nishikawa, K. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 347-353[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Spelbrink, J. N., Toivonen, J. M., Hakkaart, G. A. J., Kurkela, J. M., Cooper, H. M., Lehtinen, S. K., Lecrenier, N., Back, J. W., Speijer, D., Foury, F., and Jacobs, H. T. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 24818-24828[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Wells, J., Henkler, F., Leversha, M., and Koshy, R. (1995) FEBS Lett. 358, 119-125[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Sprinzl, M., Horn, C., Brown, M, Ioudovitch, A., and Steinberg, S. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 148-153[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Yokagawa, T., Watanabe, Y. I., Kumazawa, Y., Ueda, T., Hirao, I, Miura, K. I., and Watanabe, K. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 6101-6105[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Enriquez, J. A., and Attardi, G. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 8300-8305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Knight, E. (1969) Biochemistry 8, 5089-5093[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Zylber, E., and Penman, S. (1969) J. Mol. Biol. 46, 201-204[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Gelfand, R., and Attardi, G. (1981) Mol. Cell. Biol. 1, 497-511