![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 25, 22314-22319, June 21, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§,
¶§,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
§§
From the
Centre de Recherche INSERM, EMI 0116, 163 avenue de Luminy, Campus de Luminy, BP 172, 13276 Marseille cedex 9, France, the ¶ Departmento de
Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires,
Paraguay 2155, 1121 Buenos Aires, Argentina, the
Diabetes
Unit, Centre Médical Universitaire,
1211 Genève 4, Switzerland, the ** Department of
Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, and the

Departamento de Química
Biológica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad
de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria,
1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina
Received for publication, February 19, 2002, and in revised form, March 19, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
p8 is a nuclear DNA-binding
protein, which was identified because its expression is strongly
activated in response to several stresses. Biochemical
and biophysical studies revealed that despite a weak sequence
homology p8 is an HMG-I/Y-like protein, suggesting that p8 may
be involved in transcription regulation. Results reported here strongly
support this hypothesis. Using a pull-down approach, we found that p8
interacts with the general co-activator p300. We also found that,
similar to the HMG proteins, p300 was able to acetylate recombinant p8
in vitro, although the significance of such modification
remains to be determined. Then a screening by the two-hybrid system,
using p8 as bait, allowed us to identify the Pax2
trans-activation domain-interacting protein (PTIP) as another partner of p8. Transient transfection studies revealed that
PTIP is a strong inhibitor of the trans-activation
activities of Pax2A and Pax2B on the glucagon gene promoter, which was
chosen as a model because it is a target of the Pax2A and Pax2B
transcription factors. This effect is completely abolished by
co-transfection of p8 in glucagon-producing InRIG9 cells, indicating
that p8 binding to PTIP prevents inhibition of the glucagon gene
promoter. This was not observed in NIH3T3 fibroblasts that do not
express glucagon. Finally, expression of p8 enhances the effect of p300
on Pax2A and Pax2B trans-activation of the glucagon gene
promoter. These observations suggest that in glucagon-producing cells
p8 is a positive cofactor of the activation of the glucagon gene
promoter by Pax2A and Pax2B, both by recruiting the p300 cofactor to
increase the Pax2A and Pax2B activities and by binding the
Pax2-interacting protein PTIP to suppress its inhibition.
p8 was cloned because the strong induction of its expression in
pancreatic acinar cells during the acute phase of pancreatitis suggested that it was an important regulatory gene (1), and further
experiments have shown that p8 activation was not restricted to
pancreatic cells. In vivo, p8 mRNA expression is
activated in several tissues in response to systemic
lipopolysaccharide (2), and in vitro studies showed
that a variety of cell lines exhibited transient p8 mRNA expression
in response to several stress agents (1, 3, 4) through a
p38-dependent pathway (4). However, like other
pancreatitis-induced proteins p8 is also constitutively expressed in
several tissues (1, 3). Concomitant studies by another laboratory (5)
demonstrated that expression of the candidate of metastasis 1 (Com 1)
protein, which is identical to the human p8 (3), could mediate the
growth of tumor cells after metastatic establishment in a secondary
organ. This suggests that activated expression of p8 in metastatic
cells is required for tumor progression. This was recently confirmed by
showing that p8-expressing fibroblasts transduced with a retrovirus encoding both the RasV12 and the E1A oncogenes could
generate tumors in vivo, whereas p8-deficient fibroblasts
could not (6). Therefore, p8 is a stress-induced protein critical for
tumor development.
The deduced protein sequence revealed that p8 contains a canonical
bipartite signal for nuclear targeting, suggesting that p8 should be
located in the nucleus. Supporting this hypothesis, we detected p8
within the nucleus of COS-7 cells transfected with a p8 expression
plasmid, although it was also partly localized to the cytoplasm (3).
Furthermore, analysis of the p8 primary structure suggested that it was
a DNA-binding protein (1). More recently we performed biochemical and
biophysical studies showing that human recombinant p8 was in many
aspects very similar to the
HMG1-I/Y proteins, although
sharing with them only 35% amino acid sequence identity (7). Thus,
despite a weak sequence homology, p8 can be considered an HMG-I/Y-like
protein. In addition, we recently found that p8 acts as a
co-transcription factor since it is able to enhance the transcription
activity of the Smad proteins in response to TGF- This report describes first attempts to characterize partners of p8 in
gene regulation. We found that p8 binds to and is acetylated by p300,
and when looking for other partners of p8 by yeast two-hybrid screening
we observed strong interaction with the Pax2
trans-activation domain-interacting protein (PTIP). Finally,
we also demonstrated using the model of the glucagon gene promoter that
these interactions are functionally active.
Pull-down of p300 by p8--
The expression vector pQE-30
(Qiagen) containing the human p8 sequence cloned in its
BamHI-HindIII site was used to generate a fusion
protein with an amino-terminal histidine tag to the human p8 sequence.
The protein was produced and purified on nickel-agarose resin (Qiagen)
as previously reported (7). The recombinant protein was named
His6-hp8. An approximate 20-µl bed volume of nickel-agarose bound to His6-hp8 was incubated in 100 µl
of pull-down buffer (20 mM HEPES/KOH, pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.05% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.02% bovine serum albumin, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 10 µg/ml
aprotinin as protease inhibitors) together with 100 µg of HeLa cell
extract. After 3 h of incubation at 4 °C, the nickel-agarose
beads were washed five times with 1 ml phosphate-buffered saline before
elution with SDS-PAGE sample buffer. The eluted material was resolved
by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane, and p300 was
detected with a specific polyclonal antibody that does not cross-react
with cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB)-binding
protein (N-15, Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
Immunoprecipitation of p300 and p8 Acetylation Test--
For
immunoprecipitation about 5 × 106 COS-7 cells, seeded
into 15-cm dishes, were transfected with 5 µg of the pCMVbp300-CHA plasmid (9) using the FuGENE reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Cells were harvested 24 h later and lysed in 500 µl of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 10 µg/ml aprotinin on ice for 30 min. After
clearing the lysate containing the p300-CHA hybrid protein, one-half
was used for immunoprecipitation with 0.5 µg of anti-hemagglutinin
antibody (3F10, Roche Molecular Biochemicals) for 4 h at 4 °C
in the presence of a 50-µl bed volume of protein G preincubated in
cell lysates from non-transfected cells supplemented with 1% bovine
serum albumin. The remaining half of the lysate was used as a control
in which the anti-hemagglutinin antibody was omitted.
Immunoprecipitates were washed four times with 1 ml of lysis buffer and
once with 2× TBE buffer (89 mM Tris, pH 8.3, 89 mM sodium borate, 1 mM EDTA). One-tenth of the
material bound to the beads was eluted in SDS-loading buffer and
analyzed by Western blot using a specific antibody to p300 (N-15) and
the ECL detection system (Amersham Biosciences). Another tenth was used
to test its capacity to acetylate His6-hp8 in
vitro. The reaction was performed in TBE, 1 mM
dithiothreitol buffer, with 0.1 mg/ml protein substrate (as indicated
in each case) and 18 µM [1-14C]acetyl-CoA.
The standard assay was performed at 25 °C for 30 min and initiated
by adding the protein substrate to the mixture containing the
acetyltransferase and acetyl-CoA in the relevant buffer. Histone from
calf thymus (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) was used as a positive
control. Reaction products were separated by SDS-PAGE, and
14C-labeled proteins were visualized by autoradiography.
Yeast Two-hybrid Screen--
The Matchmaker two-hybrid system
(CLONTECH Laboratories) was used according to the
protocols provided by the manufacturer. Using polymerase chain
reaction-based strategies, we subcloned the complete coding sequence of
the human p8 (3) into the BamHI-SalI site of the
pGBT9 vector to generate a fusion protein with the GAL4 DNA binding
domain (BDhp8). That protein was used as bait to screen a HeLa cell
cDNA library constructed in the pACT2 vector to generate fusion
products with the GAL4 activation domain. This library was also
purchased from CLONTECH Laboratories. Yeast cells were initially selected for growth on In Vitro Binding of MBP-hPTIP to His6-hp8--
hPTIP
cDNA encoding residues 773-1056 was amplified by PCR and subcloned
into the SalI restriction site of the pMAL-c2 vector (New
England Biolabs), fusing the maltose-binding protein (MBP) with the
carboxyl-terminal region of the hPTIP. The fusion protein, named
MBP-hPTIP, was produced following the manufacturer's recommendations. To test the His6-hp8-hPTIP interaction in vitro,
we incubated 1 µg of the purified MBP-hPTIP or MBP (as a control) in
the presence of 2 µl (about 2 µg) of the His6-hp8 bound
to nickel beads or only free nickel beads (as a control) in 25 µl of
a binding buffer containing 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl, 0.25 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, and 1% Nonidet P-40 for 1 h at
room temperature. The nickel beads were recovered by centrifugation and
washed five times with the binding buffer and once with
phosphate-buffered saline prior to elution with SDS-PAGE sample buffer.
The eluted material was resolved on SDS-PAGE, transferred onto
nitrocellulose membrane, and MBP-hPTIP and MBP proteins were detected
by Western blotting with a specific anti-MBP antibody (New England Biolabs).
Trans-activation Assays--
Expression vectors containing Pax2A
and Pax2B (11), the hp8 expression vector (3), the reporter plasmid
p8 Interacts with the General Co-activator p300 in
Vitro--
Because p8 is a nuclear protein (3) with DNA binding
ability (7), which seems to act as a co-transcriptional factor since it
is structurally related to the HMG-I/Y (7) and its expression enhances
the Smad trans-acting activity (8), we began its functional
study by examining a relationship with the general co-activator of
transcription, p300. In fact, p300 is coupled to the basal
transcription machinery and acts as a general co-activator of several
transcription factors (13). In vitro pull-down analysis was
performed by adding His6-hp8 to HeLa extracts containing
p300 and monitoring formation of a p8-p300 complex. As shown in Fig.
1, a significant binding of p8 to p300
was indeed found.
p8 Is Acetylated by p300 in Vitro--
Because p8 is an
HMG-I/Y-related protein and HMG-I/Y is acetylated by p300 (14), we
examined whether p8 is also acetylated by p300. We therefore tested the
ability of p300 to incorporate radioactive acetate into
His6-hp8. Fig. 2 demonstrates
that the immunoprecipitated recombinant human p300 efficiently
acetylates His6-hp8. The acetylation is specific since
bovine serum albumin, which also has a high lysine content, was not
acetylated (data not shown). Nucleosomal histones served as positive
control. The labeling is enzyme-dependent since reaction
mixtures containing [1-14C]acetyl-CoA, but lacking
enzyme, failed to incorporate acetate into His6-hp8. We
conclude that p8 is specifically acetylated by p300 (Fig. 2).
p8 Binds the PTIP--
The previous suggestion that the p8 protein
is a general co-transcription factor was based on the biochemical and
biophysical similarities of p8 with HMG-I/Y proteins and its ability to
bind DNA in a sequence-independent manner. In that context, one should expect that protein factors bind p8 to confer some specificity to the
resulting transcription regulation complex. In order to identify such
protein factors, a HeLa cell cDNA library was screened with a yeast
two-hybrid system, using the complete coding sequence of human p8 as
bait. A cDNA fragment, encoding a protein that specifically
interacted with p8 in yeast, was isolated. Comparison of its sequence
with sequences in the GenBankTM revealed significant
similarities with a previously reported mouse cDNA corresponding to
PTIP, a BRCT domain-containing gene that interacts with the
transcription factor Pax2 (10). The 283-amino acid carboxyl-terminal
region of human PTIP showed 89% identity with the mouse counterpart
(Fig. 3).
The interaction between human PTIP and p8 observed in yeast was
confirmed by in vitro studies using a pull-down analysis
with the His6-hp8 and the MBP-hPTIP products (Fig.
4). As expected, His6-hp8
strongly interacted with recombinant MBP-hPTIP, but not with MBP
alone.
p8 Reverses the Inhibition by PTIP of the Glucagon Gene Promoter
Trans-activation by Pax2--
PTIP interacts with the Pax2
transcription factor, is expressed ubiquitously, and can bind active
chromatin (10). These observations strongly suggest that PTIP is a
cofactor of the regulation of transcription by Pax2. Following our
observation that PTIP interacts with the HMG-I/Y-related protein p8, we
formulated the hypothesis that the resulting PTIP-p8 complex could
regulate the trans-activation activity of Pax2. To check
that possibility, we transfected the glucagon-producing InRIG9 cells
with: (i) a vector harboring the region between nucleotides p300 Enhances the Effect of p8 on Glucagon Promoter
Trans-activation by Pax2A and Pax2B--
The results presented above
demonstrating association of p300 with p8 led us to test whether p300
could influence regulation by p8 of glucagon gene promoter
activity. This possibility was tested using the Pax2 responsive region
of the glucagon gene promoter as target of the Pax2A and Pax2B
transcription factors. Further transfection with vectors expressing
p300 and p8 allowed monitoring of the combined influence of these
proteins on the activity of the glucagon gene promoter. As expected
(12), Pax2A and Pax2B strongly trans-activated the glucagon
gene promoter (Fig. 6, A and
B). p300 enhanced Pax2 trans-activation activity
only weakly, but its co-transfection with p8 significantly increased
Pax2 capacity, whereas p8 alone had no significant effect. Similar
experiments conducted in non-glucagon-producing NIH3T3 fibroblasts
showed that expression of p300 also enhanced the Pax2A and Pax2B
trans-activation activities, but expression of the glucagon
promoter remained very low as compared with InRIG9 cells, and
co-expression with p8 only led to a small increase (Fig. 6,
C and D). Altogether, these observations strongly
suggest that in glucagon-producing cells p8 in association with p300 is
a co-activator of Pax2. In this context, p300 contributes to the
glucagon gene promoter activation (15).
Concluding Remarks--
We found that the HMG-I/Y-related protein
p8 interacts with the general co-activator p300 and that p300
acetylates p8. The relationship between the acetylation of p8 and its
transcriptional activity remains to be determined. Then, selection by
the two-hybrid system allowed us to identify PTIP, a Pax2-binding
protein, as another partner of p8. We could demonstrate that PTIP is a
strong inhibitor of the Pax2 trans-activation activity on
the glucagon gene promoter. We could also demonstrate that p8 binding
to the Pax2 inhibitor PTIP prevents inhibition of the glucagon gene
promoter. This was observed in glucagon-producing cells only. We
suggest that in glucagon-producing cells p8 recruits the p300 cofactor and binds the Pax2-interacting protein PTIP to suppress its inhibitory activity, resulting in Pax2 activation (Fig.
7). This is not the first evidence that
p8 can regulate the activity of a transcription factor. We reported
previously that p8 interacts with Smad proteins after activation by
TGF-
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(8). The mechanism
by which p8 could enhance the trans-activation of Smads
remains unclear, however.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
His plates. Of the
approximately 1 × 106 transformants screened, 23 grew
well on
His plates (colonies of >2 mm). Plasmid DNAs were isolated
from each one. To identify false positives and self activators, the
plasmids were reintroduced into the original yeast strain expressing no
BDhp8. Nine independent clones were obtained and sequenced. The
sequence corresponded to the human counterpart of the mouse PTIP
(10).
138GluCAT (12), and the pMYC-PTIP (10) were previously reported. The
pCMVbp300-CHA plasmid (9) was a gift from A. Hecht (Max Planck
Institute of Immunology, Freiburg, Germany). InRIG9 and NIH3T3 cells
were grown as described (1, 12). Cells were transfected with the FuGENE
reagent following recommendations of the supplier (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals). The pCMV/
gal plasmid encoding
-galactosidase was
added to monitor transfection efficiency. Cell extracts were prepared
48 h after transfection and analyzed for CAT and
-galactosidase activities as previously described (8). A minimum of three independent
transfections were performed; each of them was carried out in duplicate
or triplicate.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (53K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
In vitro interaction between p8
and p300. A pull-down assay was performed to determine the
interaction between p8 and p300. In A, His6-hp8
(His6hp8) bound to nickel-agarose was
incubated in pull-down buffer together with HeLa cell extract for
3 h at 4 °C. Binding reactions were extensively washed and
eluted with SDS-PAGE sample buffer. The eluted material was resolved on
SDS-PAGE gel, transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane, and p300
detected with a specific polyclonal antibody that does not cross-react
with CBP, whereas p8 was detected with an antihuman p8. In
B, the HeLa cellular extract was omitted, and in
C, it was incubated with nickel-agarose beads without bound
His6-hp8 as a control.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
COS-7 cells were transfected with the
pCMVbp300-CHA plasmid. Cell extract was prepared 24 h after
transfection. One-half was used for immunoprecipitation with
anti-hemagglutinin (3F10) antibody in the presence of protein G-agarose
beads, and in the remaining half antibody was omitted. One-tenth of the
material bound was eluted in SDS-loading buffer and analyzed by Western
blot using the anti-p300 (N-15) antibody and the ECL detection system
(lower panel). Another tenth was used to test its capacity
to acetylate the His6-hp8
(His6hp8) in vitro using
[1-14C]acetyl-CoA as a donor of the acetyl group
(top panel). Reaction products were separated on SDS-PAGE,
and 14C-labeled proteins were visualized by
autoradiography. The middle panel shows the recombinant
His6-hp8 (His6hp8)
protein stained with Coomassie Blue. The right panel shows
p300-CHA acetylated histone as a positive control.

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Sequence comparison of the carboxyl-terminal
regions of the human (hPTIP) and mouse (mPTIP) PTIP. Amino acid
identities are indicated in the consensus sequence shown in the middle,
and similarities are noted as (+). Amino acids of mPTIP were numbered
according to the GenbankTM sequence with accession number
AF104261, whereas hPTIP numbering was made according to the nucleotide
sequence obtained from the cDNA clone identified by the two-hybrid
system.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
In vitro interaction between PTIP
and p8. To test the His6-hp8-hPTIP interaction
in vitro, we incubated purified MBP-hPTIP in the presence of
His6-hp8 bound to nickel-agarose beads for 1 h at room
temperature. The nickel-agarose beads were recovered by centrifugation
and extensively washed prior to elution with SDS-PAGE sample buffer.
The eluted material was resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto
nitrocellulose membrane. MBP-hPTIP and MBP proteins were detected by
Western blotting with a specific anti-MBP antibody and p8 with an
antihuman p8 antibody. In A, MBP was incubated with
His6-hp8 bound to nickel-agarose beads as a control of
nonspecific interaction between MBP and His6-hp8. In
B, His6-hp8 was omitted. Only free
nickel-agarose beads were incubated with MBP. In C,
MBP-hPTIP was incubated with His6-hp8 bound to the
nickel-agarose beads. In D, His6-hp8 was
omitted. Only free nickel-agarose beads were incubated with MBP-hPTIP.
In E, and F, only purified hPTIP and MBP,
respectively, were loaded onto the gel.
138 and
+58 of the glucagon promoter, which contains the Pax2-responsive G1
element (12) driving the CAT reporter gene and (ii) the expression
vectors coding for Pax2A and Pax2B. Pax2A and Pax2B strongly
trans-activated the glucagon promoter in the
glucagon-producing cell line InRIG9 (Fig.
5, A and B) as well
as in the non-islet-derived cell line NIH-3T3 (Fig. 5, C and
D) as previously reported (12). Co-transfection of the PTIP
expression plasmid in InRIG9 cells inhibited
trans-activation of the reporter gene by Pax2A or Pax2B to
25 and 30% of the full activity, respectively (Fig. 5, A
and B), confirming that PTIP binds the transcription factor
Pax2 to inhibit its trans-activation capacity. A similar
observation was made in NIH3T3 fibroblasts (Fig. 5, C and
D). However, when either Pax2A or Pax2B was co-transfected with a p8 expression plasmid into InRIG9 cells the effect of PTIP was
completely abolished, indicating that p8 binding to PTIP prevents PTIP
inhibition of Pax2 activity (Fig. 5, A and B).
Interestingly, the effect of p8 was not observed in NIH3T3 fibroblasts
(Fig. 5, C and D), suggesting that p8-mediated
inhibition of PTIP activity is cell type-specific. These results
support the hypothesis that in some cell types p8 can activate
Pax2-dependent genes upon binding to the Pax2 inhibitor
PTIP.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
p8 expression reverses the effect of PTIP on
the trans-activation activity of Pax2 on the glucagon
gene promoter. InRIG9 (A and B) and
NIH3T3 (C and D) cells were transfected with
expression plasmids encoding Pax2A (A and C),
Pax2B (B and D), PTIP, and p8 using the FuGENE
reagent. To determine the trans-activation activity of Pax2,
we used the Pax2-responsive region of the glucagon gene promoter as
described under "Materials and Methods." The pCMV/
gal plasmid
encoding
-galactosidase was added to monitor transfection
efficiency. Cell extracts were prepared using the reporter lysis buffer
48 h after transfection and analyzed for CAT and
-galactosidase
activities. All experiments were performed with equal amounts of
plasmids. CAT activity was normalized for transfection efficiency by
expressing its activity relative to
-galactosidase activity. The
data represent means ± S.E.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Effect of the co-expression of p8 and p300 on
trans-activations by Pax2A and Pax2B.
InRIG9 cells were grown as described in the legend to Fig. 5. InRIG9
(A and B) and NIH3T3 (C and
D) cells were transfected with expression plasmids encoding
Pax2A (A and C), Pax2B (B and
D), p300, and/or p8 using the FuGENE reagent. To determine
the trans-activation activity of Pax2, we used the Pax2
responsive region of the glucagon gene promoter as described in the
legend to Fig. 5. The pCMV/
gal plasmid encoding
-galactosidase
was added to monitor transfection efficiency. Cell extracts were
prepared 48 h after transfection using the reporter lysis buffer
and analyzed for CAT and
-galactosidase expression. Results were
normalized to CAT activity. The data represent means ± S.E.
. In fact, fibroblasts derived from homozygous p8 knockouts are
partially defective in the Smad signaling of the TGF-
pathway, and
this defect is corrected by co-transfection with a p8 mammalian
expression vector (8). Interestingly, Smad activity is also, at least
in part, p300-dependent (16). Although the mechanism by
which p8 enhances the Smad trans-activation activity is not
elucidated; yet, we suggest that p8 contributes to the regulation of
the transcription of some genes by recruiting p300, which in turn may
act as an adapter protein linking activators to the basal transcription
machinery. In the particular case of glucagon-producing cells, the
p8-p300 complex would in addition relieve inhibition of transcription
by PTIP.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
An integrative view of the regulatory
mechanism of Pax2, PTIP, p8, and p300 on the glucagon gene
promoter. Pax2 activates glucagon gene transcription. PTIP acts
negatively on Pax2, and p8 acts negatively on PTIP, which relieves
Pax2. In addition, p8 recruits the positive factor p300 to the
transcription complex.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|---|
We thank Dr. R. Eckner for help and comments.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (to A. H. and H. B.), Humboldt Fundation (to S. V.), Program Ecos-Sud (to A. R., M. V., and J. I.), the French-Argentinean cooperation program (INSERM/CONICET) (to S. M. and J. I.), and the Antorchas Foundation (to S. M.). This work was also supported by the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ Both authors contributed equally to this work.
§§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Centre de Recherche INSERM, EMI 116, 163 avenue de Luminy, Campus de Luminy, BP 172, 13009 Marseille, France. Tel.: 33-491-827533; Fax: 33-491-826083; E-mail: iovanna@inserm-adr.univ-mrs.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 8, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201657200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: HMG, high mobility group; PTIP, Pax2 trans-activation domain-interacting protein; MBP, maltose-binding protein; h, human; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Mallo, G. V.,
Fiedler, F.,
Calvo, E. L.,
Ortiz, E. M.,
Vasseur, S.,
Keim, V.,
Morisset, J.,
and Iovanna, J. L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
32360-32369 |
| 2. | Jiang, Y. F., Vaccaro, M. I., Fiedler, F., Calvo, E. L., and Iovanna, J. L. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 260, 686-690[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Vasseur, S., Mallo, G. V., Fiedler, F., Bodeker, H., Canepa, E., Moreno, S., and Iovanna, J. L. (1999) Eur. J. Biochem. 259, 670-675[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Garcia-Montero, A., Vasseur, S., Mallo, G. V., Soubeyran, P., Dagorn, J. C., and Iovanna, J. L. (2001) Eur. J. Cell Biol. 80, 720-725[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. |
Ree, A. H.,
Tvermyr, M.,
Engebraaten, O.,
Rooman, M.,
Rosok, O.,
Hovig, E.,
Meza-Zepeda, L. A.,
Bruland, O. S.,
and Fodstad, O.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
4675-4680 |
| 6. | Vasseur, S., Hoffmeister, A., Garcia, S., Bagnis, C., Dagorn, J. C., and Iovanna, J. L. (2002) EMBO Rep. 3, 165-170[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Encinar, J. A.,
Mallo, G. V.,
Mizyrycki, C.,
Giono, L.,
Gonzalez-Ros, J. M.,
Rico, M.,
Canepa, E.,
Moreno, S.,
Neira, J. L.,
and Iovanna, J. L.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
2742-2751 |
| 8. | Garcia-Montero, A., Vasseur, S., Giono, L., Canepa, E., Moreno, S., Dagorn, J. C., and Iovanna, J. L. (2001) Biochem. J. 357, 249-253[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. |
Eckner, R.,
Ewen, M. E.,
Newsome, D.,
Gerdes, M.,
DeCaprio, J. A.,
Lawrence, J. B.,
and Livingston, D. M.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
869-884 |
| 10. |
Lechner, M. S.,
Levitan, I.,
and Dressler, G. R.
(2000)
Nucleic Acids Res.
28,
2741-2751 |
| 11. |
Lechner, M. S.,
and Dressler, G. R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
21088-21093 |
| 12. |
Ritz-Laser, B.,
Estreicher, A.,
Gauthier, B.,
and Philippe, J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
32708-32715 |
| 13. |
Vo, N.,
and Goodman, R. H.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
13505-13508 |
| 14. |
Munshi, N.,
Agalioti, T.,
Lomvardas, S.,
Merika, M.,
Chen, G.,
and Thanos, D.
(2001)
Science
293,
1054-1055 |
| 15. |
Hussain, M. A.,
and Habener, J. F.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
28950-28957 |
| 16. | Ghosh, A. K., Yuan, W., Mori, Y., and Varga, J. (2000) Oncogene 19, 3546-3555[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. M Clement, M. D Anway, M. Uzumcu, and M. K Skinner Regulation of the gonadal transcriptome during sex determination and testis morphogenesis: comparative candidate genes Reproduction, September 1, 2007; 134(3): 455 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Goruppi, R. D. Patten, T. Force, and J. M. Kyriakis Helix-Loop-Helix Protein p8, a Transcriptional Regulator Required for Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy and Cardiac Fibroblast Matrix Metalloprotease Induction Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2007; 27(3): 993 - 1006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Malicet, V. Giroux, S. Vasseur, J. C. Dagorn, J. L. Neira, and J. L. Iovanna Regulation of apoptosis by the p8/prothymosin {alpha} complex PNAS, February 21, 2006; 103(8): 2671 - 2676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. H. Kasper, T. Fukuyama, M. A. Biesen, F. Boussouar, C. Tong, A. de Pauw, P. J. Murray, J. M. A. van Deursen, and P. K. Brindle Conditional Knockout Mice Reveal Distinct Functions for the Global Transcriptional Coactivators CBP and p300 in T-Cell Development Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2006; 26(3): 789 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Grasberger, U. Ringkananont, P. LeFrancois, M. Abramowicz, G. Vassart, and S. Refetoff Thyroid Transcription Factor 1 Rescues PAX8/p300 Synergism Impaired by a Natural PAX8 Paired Domain Mutation with Dominant Negative Activity Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2005; 19(7): 1779 - 1791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Flock, X. Cao, and D. J. Drucker Pdx-1 Is Not Sufficient for Repression of Proglucagon Gene Transcription in Islet or Enteroendocrine Cells Endocrinology, January 1, 2005; 146(1): 441 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Mohammad, D. D. Seachrist, C. C. Quirk, and J. H. Nilson Reexpression of p8 Contributes to Tumorigenic Properties of Pituitary Cells and Appears in a Subset of Prolactinomas in Transgenic Mice that Hypersecrete Luteinizing Hormone Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2004; 18(10): 2583 - 2593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Goruppi and J. M. Kyriakis The Pro-hypertrophic Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Protein p8 Is Degraded by the Ubiquitin/Proteasome System in a Protein Kinase B/Akt- and Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3-dependent Manner, whereas Endothelin Induction of p8 mRNA and Renal Mesangial Cell Hypertrophy Require NFAT4 J. Biol. Chem., May 14, 2004; 279(20): 20950 - 20958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Vasseur, E. Folch-Puy, V. Hlouschek, S. Garcia, F. Fiedler, M. M. Lerch, J. C. Dagorn, D. Closa, and J. L. Iovanna p8 Improves Pancreatic Response to Acute Pancreatitis by Enhancing the Expression of the Anti-inflammatory Protein Pancreatitis-associated Protein I J. Biol. Chem., February 20, 2004; 279(8): 7199 - 7207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Cho, M. J. Prindle, and G. R. Dressler BRCT Domain-Containing Protein PTIP Is Essential for Progression through Mitosis Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2003; 23(5): 1666 - 1673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Quirk, D. D. Seachrist, and J. H. Nilson Embryonic Expression of the Luteinizing Hormone beta Gene Appears to Be Coupled to the Transient Appearance of p8, a High Mobility Group-related Transcription Factor J. Biol. Chem., January 10, 2003; 278(3): 1680 - 1685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Flock and D. J. Drucker Pax-2 Activates the Proglucagon Gene Promoter But Is Not Essential for Proglucagon Gene Expression or Development of Proglucagon-Producing Cell Lineages in the Murine Pancreas or Intestine Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2002; 16(10): 2349 - 2359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |