Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M202286200 on April 12, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 25, 22460-22468, June 21, 2002
Mutational Analysis of Human Thioredoxin Reductase 1
EFFECTS ON p53-MEDIATED GENE EXPRESSION AND INTERFERON AND
RETINOIC ACID-INDUCED CELL DEATH*
Xinrong
Ma
,
Junbo
Hu
§,
Daniel J.
Lindner¶, and
Dhananjaya V.
Kalvakolanu
From the Greenebaum Cancer Center, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of
Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 and the
¶ Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland,
OH 44195
Received for publication, March 8, 2002, and in revised form, April 10, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The interferon (IFN)-
and
all-trans-retinoic acid combination suppresses tumor growth
by inducing apoptosis in several tumor cell lines. A genetic
technique permitted the isolation of human thioredoxin reductase (TR)
as a critical regulator of IFN/all-trans-retinoic acid-induced cell death. Our recent studies have shown that
TR1:thioredoxin 1-regulated cell death is effected in part through the
activation of p53-dependent responses. To understand its
death regulatory function, we have performed a mutational analysis of
TR. Human TR1 has three major structural domains, the FAD binding
domain, the NADPH binding domain, and an interface domain (ID). Here, we show that the deletion of the C-terminal interface domain results in
a constitutive activation of TR-dependent death responses
and promotes p53-dependent gene expression. TR mutant
without the ID still retains its dependence on thioredoxin for
promoting these responses. Thus, our data suggest that TR-ID
acts as a regulatory domain.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Interferons (IFNs)1
exert antitumor effects by inducing the expression of a number of
cellular genes using the Janus tyrosine kinase-signal transducers and
activators of transcription (STAT) pathways (1, 2). A higher
susceptibility of IFN-
receptor
/
and
STAT1
/
mice to chemical carcinogenesis as compared with
their wild-type counterparts and a failure of syngeneic mice to reject
the IFN-
receptor
/
and STAT1
/
tumors
underscore the importance of IFNs in tumor growth control (3).
Similarly, two IFN-regulated transcription factors, IRF-1 and IRF-8
(IFN consensus sequence binding protein), act as tumor growth
suppressors (4, 5) because mutations in these genes cause leukemias (6,
7). In rodent cells, IFN-stimulated transcription factors of the p200
family control cell cycle progression (8, 9). IFNs also down-regulate
c-myc expression, activate tumor suppressor pRb, and inhibit
transcription factor E2F to inhibit cell cycle progression in
human cell lines (10-12). Although a great deal is known about IFN
signaling pathways and the transcription factors involved, very little
is known about the gene products that mediate the tumor-suppressive
pathways employed by IFNs. Additionally, despite their beneficial
therapeutic effects in certain leukemias, IFNs are marginally active in
the therapy of solid tumors (13, 14). Clinical and experimental models
have shown that the combination of IFNs with retinoids, a class of vitamin A derivatives, yields a highly effective growth-suppressive effect in several solid tumors (15-17). All-trans-retinoic
acid (RA), a vitamin metabolite, inhibits the growth of promyelocytic leukemias, and teratocarcinomas in vitro (18). Two
structurally similar but genetically distinct classes of transcription
factors, the retinoic acid receptor and the retinoid X receptor,
mediate retinoid-induced growth suppression (19). One such receptor, retinoic acid receptor
, appears to be a tumor suppressor (20, 21).
However, the identity of retinoid-regulated growth-inhibitory gene
products is unknown.
Our earlier studies showed that the combination of IFN-
and RA, but
not the single agents, causes cell death in vitro and suppresses tumor growth in vivo (17). Using a genetic
technique, we have recently identified several genes associated with
retinoid-IFN-induced mortality (22). Human thioredoxin reductase (TR)
1, a redox regulatory enzyme (23, 24), was identified as one of the
genes associated with retinoid-IFN-induced mortality (22). Subsequent studies have shown that TR and its substrate, Trx, activate cell death
by modulating the activity of caspase-8 and tumor suppressor p53
(25-27). To further understand the structure-function relationship of
TR to these processes, we have performed a mutational analysis. A
comparative analysis of the primary structure of this enzyme with other
redox enzymes led to the assignment of three major modules, the FAD,
NBD, and ID (23, 24). Whereas the FAD and NBD are critical for redox
function and are well conserved among the TRs from all sources, the ID
is unique to mammalian TR. ID has been suggested to act as a
dimerization surface to generate functional TR (23, 24). However, the
functional significance of ID has not been fully appreciated. Here we
show that removal of ID enhances death-stimulatory activity of TR and
p53-dependent gene expression.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Reagents--
Restriction and DNA-modifying enzymes (PerkinElmer
Life Sciences); G418 sulfate,
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside, and LipofectAMINE
PLUS (Invitrogen); nylon membranes, ECL reagents, and horseradish
peroxidase coupled to anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibodies (Amersham
Biosciences); human IFN-
ser (Berlex Inc.); and mouse
monoclonal antibodies against actin, FLAG epitope (Sigma), p53
(Oncogene Science Inc.), and myc-epitope (Zymed Laboratories Inc.) were employed in these studies. Rabbit polyclonal antibody against the C-terminal peptide of TR1 was described previously (22).
Fresh stocks of all-trans-retinoic acid (Sigma) were
prepared in ethanol and added to cultures under subdued light.
Cell Culture--
MCF-7 cells were cultured in phenol red-free
Eagle's minimal essential medium supplemented with 5%
charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum and 10
11
M estradiol during treatment with IFN-
and RA. MCF-7
cells stably transfected with wild-type and mutant forms of Trx have
been described previously (25). The mutant Trx bears serine residues in
the place of cysteines at positions 32 and 35 (28). MCF-7 cells stably transfected with mammalian expression vector pCMV-neo (MCF-7 neo) or
the same vector with the E6 gene of human papilloma virus type-16 (MCF-7 E6) were provided by A. J. Fornace Jr. (National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD) (29). The loss of p53 function in MCF-7 E6
cells has been demonstrated previously (29, 30). These cells were grown
in phenol red-free media 24 h before treatments were initiated.
DLD human carcinoma cells, which lack endogenous p53, were a gift from
Bert Vogelstein (Johns Hopkins University Oncology Center, Baltimore, MD).
Plasmids--
Mammalian expression vector pCMV-FLAG bears a FLAG
epitope sequence in its multiple cloning region. An in-frame insertion of any cDNA lacking the N-terminal methionine into this vector generates the protein with a FLAG epitope tag at the N terminus. Mammalian expression vector pCXN2-myc carries a C-terminal myc epitope
tag. Cloning of an insert without a "stop" codon between the 5'
EcoRI and 3' KpnI sites of this vector permits
the addition of a myc tag to the expressed protein. The p53-Luc
reporter carries eight copies of the p53 binding element cloned
upstream of the SV40 early promoter in the pGL3 basic vector (Promega)
was described earlier. Wild-type and mutant p53 (R175H) cloned in the
pCMV expression vector have been described elsewhere (31, 32). A
luciferase reporter driven by human Bax promoter, Bax-Luc, was provided
by Carol Prives (Columbia University, New York, NY) (33).
Generation of TR Mutants--
Gene-specific primers bearing
specific restriction enzyme-cutting sites (for facilitating subcloning)
and AmpliTaq gold enzyme (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) were
employed in PCR for generating TR mutants. All primers used in this
study are listed in Table I. Two separate
sets of primers were used to generate myc- and FLAG epitope-tagged
constructs. Construction of a myc-tagged full-length TR was described
in our earlier publication (26). At first, the myc-tagged mutants were
generated, which served as templates for generating FLAG-tagged
mutants. Twelve cycles of PCR were performed to avoid the emergence of
unwanted mutants due to polymerase errors. Mutants were sequenced to
verify their identity.
Mutant
-FAD was amplified using myc primers 2 and 3 with wild-type
TR cDNA as template.
-ID was generated using myc primers 1 and
4. To generate the
-NBD mutant, four primers were used. The myc
primer 1 and
-NBD primer 1 were used to amplify the FAD domain. The
myc primer 2 and
-NBD primer 2 were used to amplify the ID region.
Oligonucleotides used for amplification of the FAD and ID regions have
a BamHI site at their 3' and 5' ends, respectively. The myc
primers 1 and 2 bore EcoRI and KpnI sites. The
FAD product was digested with EcoRI and BamHI,
and the ID product was digested with BamHI and
KpnI and then purified. The products were combined with
pCXN2-myc vector predigested with EcoRI and KpnI
in a three-way ligation reaction. The final
-NBD construct has two
non-template-derived amino acids, a glycine and a serine, at the
junction of FAD and ID, due to a BamHI site present in the
amplifying primers. Constructs f-TR and f-
-NBD were generated using
FLAG primers 1 and 2, with the corresponding myc-tagged constructs as
templates. The f-
-ID and f-
-FAD mutants were generated using FLAG
primers 1 and 4 and FLAG primers 3 and 2, respectively. f-tagged
truncated mutants of
-ID were generated using the indicated reverse
primers and FLAG primer 1, with wild-type TR as template. Point mutants
were generated using
-ID80 as a template. For example, to generate
the T193A mutant, a reverse primer and a forward primer bearing the
same mutation were used in a three-step PCR. FLAG primer 1 and reverse
primer (mutagenic) were used in the first PCR reaction. Forward primer
(mutagenic) and
-ID80 R primer were used for the second PCR.
Purified PCR products from the first and second PCR were mixed,
denatured, and annealed. This mixture now served as template for FLAG
primer 1 and
-ID80 R primer to generate the final product. The final PCR product was digested with EcoRI and KpnI and
ligated to pCMV-FLAG. The other mutants were generated in a very
similar manner, using appropriate mutant primers.
Cell Growth Assay--
Cells (2000 cells/well) were seeded into
96-well plates. Drugs were added, and growth was monitored using a
colorimetric assay (34). Each group of treatments had eight replicates.
Cells were fixed with 10% trichloroacetic acid at the end of the
experiment and stained with 0.4% sulforhodamine B (Sigma). The bound
dye was eluted with 100 µl of Tris-HCl (pH 10.5), and absorbance was monitored at 570 nm. One plate was fixed with trichloroacetic acid, 10 h after plating. Absorbance obtained with this
plate was considered as 0% growth. Absorbance obtained with untreated cells was considered as 100% growth. An increase and decrease of
A570 values in the experimental wells relative
to the 0% value indicate cell growth and death, respectively.
Death Assays--
Cell death was determined using annexin-V
binding assays. After treatment with IFN/RA, cells were stained using a
commercially available kit (Trevigen Inc.) per the manufacturer's
recommendation. FITC-positive cells were considered apoptotic and
quantified using flow cytometry.
Gene Expression Analyses--
Transfection,
-galactosidase
and luciferase assays, SDS-PAGE, and electrophoretic mobility shift
analyses (EMSAs) were performed as described in our previous
publications (25-27). The total amount of transfected DNA (1.0 µg)
was kept constant by adding corresponding empty expression vector DNA,
where required. In general, 0.2 µg of luciferase and 0.2 µg of TR
mutant were co-transfected. CMV
-galactosidase reporter (0.1 µg)
was used as an internal control for normalizing variations in
transfection efficiency. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay with p53
oligonucleotides was performed as described previously (25-27).
Western Blot Analysis--
Equal quantities of cell extracts
were separated on 12% SDS-PAGE and Western blotted onto nylon
membranes. Specific first antibodies were incubated with the blots as
described in our previous publication (22). These blots were washed and
incubated with an appropriate second antibody tagged with horseradish
peroxidase. Protein bands were visualized using a commercially
available enhanced chemiluminescence kit (ECL; Amersham Biosciences).
 |
RESULTS |
Generation of TR Mutants--
We have shown previously that
overexpression of a catalytically inactive TR1 or a redox inactive Trx1
in human tumor cell lines imparts resistance to IFN/RA-induced cell
death (25, 26). In contrast, a wild-type TR1 and Trx1 promoted cell
death under the same conditions. However, the role of other TR domains
in cell growth control is unknown. To understand the relationship between structural domains of TR and cell death regulation, we have
generated new TR mutants. Using PCR we generated three mutants,
-FAD,
-NBD, and
-ID, which lacked the FAD binding domain, the NADPH binding domain, and the interface domain, respectively. Because
no domain-specific antibodies are available for TR1, we have cloned the
PCR products into mammalian expression vectors, pCMV-FLAG or pCXN2-myc.
Proteins expressed from pCMV-FLAG and pCXN2-myc will bear an N-terminal
FLAG- and a C-terminal myc epitope tag, respectively. Wild-type TR
produces a polypeptide with a theoretical molecular mass of 54.7 kDa. However, it migrates as a ~58-kDa protein on SDS-PAGE due to
posttranslational modifications. The
-FAD,
-NBD, and
-ID
constructs are expected to yield 40.1-, 33.2-, and 27.6-kDa peptides,
respectively. The mutants were transiently transfected into human
breast carcinoma cell line MCF-7 to check for the production of
proteins of proper size. Cell lysates were prepared and Western blotted
using either FLAG- or myc epitope-specific monoclonal antibodies.
Indeed, all mutants can be expressed to a comparable level upon
transfection (Fig. 1, B and
C). Both tags were used only to demonstrate that either
N-terminal or C-terminal tags have no effect on protein function.
Furthermore, pCXN2-myc has a G418 resistance marker
(G418r) for selecting stably transfected cells,
which is absent from pCMV-FLAG. The FLAG tag is shorter than the myc
tag by about 8 amino acids.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Expression of TR mutants. Mutants were
generated using PCR as described under "Materials and Methods."
A, diagrammatic representation of the structures of TR
mutants. B and C show the Western blot
(WB) analyses. MCF-7cells were transiently transfected with
the indicated plasmids (1 µg), and equal amounts of lysates were
separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE and Western blotted. The blots were probed
with indicated antibodies.
|
|
Removal of ID Enhances the Cell Death Effects of TR--
To test
the effect of TR mutants on cell growth, we first generated cell lines
that stably express them. Because the pCXN2-myc vector also carries a
G418r marker that permits the selection of stable
transfectants, we have used the myc-tagged constructs for this purpose.
As observed earlier, transfection of a wild-type TR resulted in the
formation of fewer colonies than the vector. The
-FAD construct gave
rise to marginally more colonies than the control vector-transfected cultures, indicating its inhibitory effect on cell death. The
-NBD
mutant and vector produced a comparable number of colonies. Interestingly, the
-ID mutant yielded 75% and 50% fewer
G418r colonies than the vector- and TR-transfected
cultures, respectively (Fig.
2A). The G418r
colonies in each group were pooled and used in the experiments described below to avoid a clonal bias. In the next experiment, the
effect of TR mutants on cell growth was determined using a colorimetric
assay (34), where cell growth was quantified on the basis of the amount
of sulforhodamine B dye bound to cells (Fig. 2B). This
method correlates well with Coulter counting and determination of cell
number. Whereas the
-FAD-expressing cells grew slightly faster than
the vector-transfected cultures, the TR and
-ID transfectants grew
relatively slower. Expression of
-ID caused significantly slower
growth compared with TR. Growth of
-NBD transfectants was comparable
to that of vector transfectants. These observations suggest that
removal of ID converts TR into a significantly more potent inhibitor of
cell growth. Similar results were obtained with f-tagged TR mutants
(data not shown).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effects of TR mutants on cell growth.
A, effect of TR mutants on G418r colony
formation. MCF-7 cells were transfected with equimolar amounts of
pCXN2-myc vector expressing various mutants After 3 weeks of selection
with G418 (1 mg/ml) in growth medium, surviving colonies were counted.
Each bar represents the mean ± S.E. of triplicates.
B, effects of TR mutants on cell growth. An equal number of
cells (2000 cells/well) stably transfected with various TR mutants were
plated, and cell growth was monitored after 5 days using the
sulforhodamine B binding assay (34). Each bar represents the
mean ± S.E. of eight replicates. Cell growth was monitored and
quantified by measuring the absorbance of bound dye at 575 nm.
C, expression of TR mutants after stable transfection in
MCF-7 cells. Total protein (65 µg) from the indicated cell lines was
Western blotted and probed with anti-myc antibody. This blot was
stripped and probed (bottom panel) with actin-specific
antibodies. D, cells treated with IFN/RA were stained with
annexin-V as described under "Materials and Methods." The
percentage of annexin-V-positive cells was quantified using
fluorescence-activated cell-sorting analysis. Each bar
represents the mean ± S.E. of triplicates.
|
|
To demonstrate that these differential effects on cell growth were due
to the expression of mutants in the stable transfectants, cell lysates
were examined for the expression of transgenes by Western blot analysis
with myc tag-specific antibodies (Fig. 2C). Although all
mutants were expressed in the transfectants, wild-type TR and
-ID
were expressed to a lesser extent. In fact, the expression of
-ID
was lost with further passages of the transfectants (data not shown),
indicating its strong anticellular effects. To demonstrate a functional
relationship between cell death and mutant expression, the stable
transfectants were exposed to the IFN/RA combination (IFN/RA) and then
stained with FITC-labeled annexin-V, a maker for apoptotic death (35).
A higher FITC-positive staining indicates higher apoptosis.
FITC-positive cells were quantified using flow cytometry (Fig.
2D). The TR and ID transfectants exhibited a significantly higher sensitivity to IFN/RA-induced cell death compared with the other
mutants. The
-ID-expressing cells became FITC-positive 2-2.5-fold
higher than TR-expressing ones. The FAD mutant acted as an
inhibitor of apoptosis because cells expressing it were less
FITC-positive than the vector-expressing ones. Together, these data
indicate that ID of TR attenuates its proapoptotic effects.
Expression of
-ID Has No Effect on Endogenous TR and
p53--
To rule out the possibility that the expression of TR or
-ID somehow altered the endogenous TR levels to mediate these
differential effects, we next determined the levels of endogenous TR
protein by Western blotting with antibodies specific for TR. Because
only
-ID exhibited hyper-death-stimulatory effects, we have selected it for additional studies and compared its effects to full-length TR.
As shown in Fig. 3A, neither
the
-ID nor wild-type TR had an effect on endogenous TR because its
level was comparable between the vector- and mutant-transfected cells.
In wild-type TR-transfected cells, a slow migrating band above the TR
band was detected. It corresponds to the TR protein derived from the
transgene and migrates slower because of the presence of an epitope
tag. This band is absent in the vector- or
-ID-expressing cells.
Because the TR antibody was directed against a peptide in the C
terminus,
-ID could not be detected.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Equal amounts of total cell lysate (85 µg) from the indicated cell lines were immunoblotted
and analyzed with specific antibodies. A, expression of
endogenous TR protein. Arrowhead indicates the position of
transgene-derived TR. This antibody does not recognize protein derived
from -ID. This blot was stripped and probed with anti-actin
antibodies (bottom panel of B). B,
expression of endogenous p53 protein. WB, Western
blot.
|
|
We have shown previously that the cell death effects of TR were due in
part to its ability to modulate tumor suppressor
p53-dependent responses (25-27). Therefore, we examined
the possibility that a rise in endogenous p53 levels of mutant
transfectants relative to vector-expressing cells occurred. Expression
of
-ID or wild-type TR did not significantly affect p53 levels as
revealed by a Western blot analysis with an antibody that specifically
detects a wild-type p53 protein (Fig. 3B).
Effect of the IFN/RA Combination on p53-regulated Gene
Expression--
We have reported previously that TR modulates
p53-dependent cell death via an up-regulation of gene
expression (27). To test the influence of TR mutants on p53-stimulated
gene expression, we have performed the following experiments. First, we
wanted to know whether
-ID induces the expression a reporter gene
driven by p53 response element. MCF-7 cells were transfected with a
p53RE-Luc reporter. Along with the reporter pCMV-FLAG, wild-type f-TR
or f-
-ID mutant was co-transfected (Fig.
4A). Because the FLAG tag is
shorter and yielded a slightly better expression in transient assays,
we used the FLAG-tagged mutants for the following studies. Nevertheless, the myc-tagged mutants exhibited properties similar to
those of the FLAG-tagged ones (data not shown). After transfection, cells were treated with IFN/RA, and luciferase activity was measured. IFN/RA induced luciferase expression in the vector transfectants. In TR
transfectants, basal luciferase activity was elevated, and it was
further strongly induced by IFN/RA.
-ID co-expression strongly
enhanced luciferase expression, and it was only slightly but
significantly stimulated further by IFN/RA.
-ID induced slightly higher luciferase expression than the IFN/RA-treated, TR co-expressed control. Previously, we have shown that Bax, a p53-responsive mRNA,
and its protein are induced in the presence of wild-type TR and
inhibited in the presence of a catalytically inactive mutant. Because
p53-Luc used in this experiment contained a synthetic promoter, we next
explored whether
-ID exerted a similar effect on a native promoter.
A luciferase reporter driven by human Bax has been shown to respond to
p53 (33, 36). Therefore, we have employed it in the next experiment.
Fig. 4B shows the data obtained.
-ID constitutively
activated this promoter in a manner similar to p53-Luc. TR, on the
other hand, required treatment with IFN/RA to exert a similar effect.
Thus, a synthetic and the native promoter respond similarly to
-ID.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of IFN/RA on p53-dependent
gene expression. A, MCF-7 cells were treated with IFN/RA
after transfection with p53-Luc, CMV- -galactosidase, and TR mutants.
Cell extracts were measured for luciferase and -galactosidase
activity. Luciferase activity was normalized to the -galactosidase
activity. Each bar represents the mean ± S.E. of
triplicates. + indicates treatment with IFN- (500 units/ml) and RA
(1 µM) for 16 h. B, effect of IFN/RA on
the Bax promoter. MCF-7 cells were transfected with Bax-Luc and
CMV- -galactosidase plasmids. + indicates cells that were stimulated
with IFN/RA. C, effect of TR mutants on p53 binding to DNA.
Cell extracts from IFN/RA-stimulated cells (24 h) were incubated with a
32P-labeled oligonucleotide bearing the consensus p53
binding site. and + indicate no treatment and IFN/RA
treatment, respectively. 50X cold indicates that the -ID
cell extract was incubated with an excess (50×) unlabeled
oligonucleotide before use in EMSA. Thirty µg of nuclear extract was
used in this experiment.
|
|
Previously, we have shown that in the presence of a wild-type TR,
IFN/RA treatment enhances the DNA binding of p53, and a catalytically
inactive TR blocks it. Therefore, we examined the DNA binding of p53 in
cells stably expressing vector, wild-type TR, and
-ID. Our previous
studies have shown that exposure of cells to IFN/RA for 24-28 h, a
time when significant apoptosis can be detected, is optimal for
detecting p53 binding by EMSA without causing a rise in p53 levels
(25-27). Whereas an IFN/RA-dependent induction of p53
binding occurred in the TR-expressing cells, a constitutive binding of
p53 to the response element was observed in cells expressing
-ID
(Fig. 4C). It was slightly enhanced by IFN/RA. This
observation is consistent with the luciferase expression data. This
band was competed out by a cold p53 binding element. We have shown
earlier that this band is not competed out by a mutant p53
oligonucleotide and that it is supershifted by a polyclonal antibody
against p53 (25-27).
p53 Is Necessary for a Hyperstimulating Effect of
-ID on Gene
Expression--
A critical role for p53 in TR-regulated cell death
effects was examined using DLD human colon carcinoma cells, which
lacked the endogenous p53 (37). Reintroduction of p53 causes the death of these cells (37). Introduction of a p53-Luc reporter along with an
empty vector did not cause an up-regulation of luciferase activity.
-ID alone had no effect on luciferase expression. In the wild-type
p53-transfected cells, luciferase expression was stimulated
3.5-4.0-fold over the vector-transfected cells. Luciferase expression
was induced further significantly in the presence of
-ID.
Furthermore, the same reporter was not induced in cells transfected
with a mutant p53, and co-transfection of
-ID had no effect (Fig.
5A). These data show that p53
is obligatory for an inductive effect of
-ID on the luciferase
reporter.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
p53 is required for the gene-stimulatory
effect of -ID. In A, the human
DLD colon carcinoma cell line (p53-null) was transfected with the
indicated plasmids along with p53-Luc and CMV- -galactosidase
reporters. + indicates the presence of the indicated plasmid in the
transfection mixture. In B, MCF-7 neo and MCF-7 E6 cells
were transfected with p53RE-luciferase in the presence of various
indicated plasmids. The total amount of DNA transfected into the cells
was kept constant (1.0 µg) by adding the pCMV-FLAG vector, where
required.
|
|
Human breast carcinoma cell line MCF-7 carries a wild-type p53 allele
(38). The endogenous p53 can be inactivated by targeting it to
ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis upon stable expression of the human papilloma virus E6 gene (29, 30). Such epigenetic down-regulation confers a p53-null property to the MCF-7 E6 cell line.
The control cell line MCF-7 neo carries an empty expression vector.
Both cell lines were transfected with a p53RE-Luc reporter along with
empty vector, TR, or
-ID construct. As shown in Fig. 5B,
transfection of wild-type TR caused an elevation of luciferase gene
expression in MCF-7 neo cells.
-ID also induced luciferase expression, which was significantly higher than the wild-type TR.
p53-dependent gene expression was induced by IFN/RA
treatment in the vector-transfected cells. In the presence of wild-type TR, IFN/RA further induced luciferase activity strongly. IFN/RA caused
only a marginal increase in luciferase expression in the
-ID-transfected cells. Thus, deletion of ID permits a constitutive activation of p53-dependent gene induction. The same
mutant, when introduced into MCF-7 E6 cells, failed to promote
luciferase expression. These results show that p53 is critical for
TR-mediated gene induction.
Trx Is Required for Hyperactivating p53-dependent Gene
Expression--
Because mammalian TR exhibits a wide substrate range
(23, 24), we next examined whether the hyperactivation of
p53-dependent responses by
-ID was a result of its shift
from the use of its native substrate Trx1. Therefore, we next
determined whether the
-ID mutant activates
p53-dependent gene expression in MCF-7 cells stably
expressing a mutant Trx, which lacks the critical cysteines (at
positions 32 and 35) for its redox function (25). For this purpose, we
have employed three MCF-7 cell lines stably expressing the vector (V),
wild-type Trx1 (W), or mutant Trx1 (M). Co-transfection of pCMV2-FLAG
with p53-Luc had no effect on luciferase activity in the V, W, and M
cell lines (Fig. 6). However,
co-transfection of wild-type TR elevated the basal expression of
p53-Luc in V cells, which was further stimulated in W cells. However,
TR failed to augment p53-dependent gene expression in M
cells. A similar pattern of gene regulation was obtained with
-ID
mutant in V, W, and M cells. The only major difference between the
-ID and TR is that
-ID enhanced the gene expression to a higher
level than TR. Thus, Trx is required for the stimulatory effect of
-ID on p53-inducible expression.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Trx1 is required for the hyperstimulation of
p53-dependent gene expression. MCF-7 cells stably
expressing control vector (V), wild-type (W), and
redox inactive Trx1 (M) were transfected with TR mutants
along with p53-Luc and CMV- -galactosidase reporters. Luciferase
activity was quantified as described in the Fig. 4 legend. + indicates
the presence of that specific plasmid in the transfection
mixture.
|
|
Minimal Region of TR Protein Required for Stimulating
p53-dependent Gene Expression--
Based on the above
results, we next determined the minimal region of
-ID required for
stimulating p53-dependent gene expression. Serial deletion
mutants, each lacking a specific number of amino acids from the C
terminus of
-ID, were generated using PCR. These mutants (
-ID80,
-ID70,
-ID60,
-ID50, and
-ID30, which lacked 34, 44, 54, 64, and 95 amino acids, respectively), were expressed as N-terminal
FLAG-tagged proteins using pCMV-FLAG. These mutants yielded 23.6, 22.6, 21.6, 20.6, and 17.1 peptides, respectively. A Western blot analysis of
transfected cell extracts with FLAG tag-specific antibodies showed the
expression of these mutants (Fig.
7A). All mutants were
expressed equivalently. We next determined the effect of these
mutants on p53-dependent gene expression (Fig. 7B). The
-ID80 mutant was better than
-ID70 at
augmenting the reporter gene expression constitutively, although
-ID70 still retained a significant amount of stimulatory effect. The
other mutants lost their stimulatory effects on
p53-dependent gene expression. Although a slight
stimulatory effect of IFN/RA was found on the
-ID80 mutant, it was
lost with
-ID70. These data suggest that a domain between
-ID80
and
-ID60 regulates the constitutive stimulatory effect on
p53-regulated gene expression.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Minimal region of
-ID required for its hyperstimulatory effects on
p53-responsive gene expression. A, expression of mutants in
MCF-7 cells. Cells in 6-well dishes were transfected with 0.5 µg of
indicated plasmids, and whole cell lysates were prepared. A comparable
quantity of protein (50 µg) from each sample was employed for Western
blot analysis using FLAG-specific antibodies. B, effect of
the mutants shown in A on p53-dependnent luciferase
reporter. The indicated plasmids were co-transfected with p53-Luc and
CMV- -galactosidase reporters, and luciferase expression was
analyzed. + indicates treatment with IFN- (500 units/ml) and RA (1 µM) for 16 h.
|
|
Residues Critical for the Stimulatory Effect on
p53-dependent Transcription--
In the next set of
experiments, we determined the residues critical for the
hyperstimulatory effect of
-ID on p53-dependent gene
expression. Based on the fact that
-ID80 exhibits a strong constitutive effect on p53-dependent gene expression (Fig.
7B), we engineered new point mutants that lack specific
residues. Because the
-ID70 mutant has a significant stimulatory
effect, we reasoned that residues might lie within it. Primary sequence
analysis of this region revealed a NADPH binding domain. There are
potential residues that can be phosphorylated in this region. These
include a serine at 199, a threonine at 193, and two tyrosine residues at 187 and 200. Two of these are present within the NADPH binding motif. While mutating tyrosine 187, we simultaneously converted the
adjacent cysteine residue at 189 into an alanine. We have thus
generated three new mutants: 1) Y187F/C189A, 2) T193A, and 3)
S199A/Y200F. These mutants were cloned into pCMV-FLAG, and their
expression was verified by Western blot analysis of the transfected
cell extracts (Fig. 8A). The
mutants were co-transfected with a p53-luciferase reporter and analyzed
for their stimulatory effect on the promoter. Mutants Y187F/C189A and
T193A completely lost their stimulatory effect on
p53-dependent gene expression. However, mutant S199A/Y200F
retained its stimulatory effect, comparable to that of
-ID80 (Fig.
8B). Lastly, single mutants of Y187F and C189A activated the
p53-dependent gene expression like
-ID,
indicating that both amino acids play a crucial in the regulation of
p53-dependent gene expression.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Residues required for the hyperstimulatory
effect of -ID on p53-mediated gene expression.
A shows the expression of the point mutants indicated above
it. This experiment is similar to that in Fig. 7A.
B shows the effect of point mutants on
p53-dependent gene expression. Transfection and reporter
gene analysis were similar to those in Fig. 7B.
C, EMSA for p53 activation. Stable cell lines expressing
FLAG-tagged TR mutants (indicated above the lanes) were treated with
IFN/RA for 30 h, and EMSA was performed. + indicates treatment
with IFN- (500 units/ml) and RA (1 µM). The location
of the p53 band is indicated.
|
|
The influence of point mutants on p53 activation was analyzed by EMSA.
Stable cells lines expressing FLAG-tagged mutants were generated (see
Fig. 9). Four cell lines that expressed
-ID, Y187F/C189A, T193A, or S199A/Y200F were utilized for EMSA (Fig.
8C). Whereas
-ID and the S199A/Y200F mutant caused an
elevation of p53 binding to the response element, the Y187F/C189A and
T193A mutants did not. IFN/RA did not cause an activation of p53 in
cells expressing the Y187F/C189A and T193A mutants. IFN/RA had a slight
stimulatory effect on the
-ID, and S199A/Y200F-induced DNA binding
of p53. These data are consistent with the luciferase expression
data.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Effect of IFN/RA on cells expressing TR
mutants. A, cells stably expressing FLAG-tagged TR mutants
were selected for 3 weeks with IFN- (500 units/ml) and RA (1 µM). Cells were then stained with sulforhodamine B to
visualize surviving cells. B and C, expression of
TR mutants in the stable transfectants. Extracts from the cells
transfected with the indicated plasmids (70 µg) were employed for
Western blot analysis using anti-FLAG antibodies.
|
|
To examine the role of these mutants in IFN/RA-induced cytotoxicity,
stable transfectants expressing the FLAG-tagged mutants were plated and
selected with IFN/RA and G418 (0.5 mg/ml) for 3 weeks. The Y187F/C189A
and T193A mutants resisted IFN/RA, unlike TR,
-ID, and S199A/Y200F,
which were killed by the combination (Fig. 9A). This
property is consistent with their respective p53-augmenting functions.
Expression of these mutants in the cells was confirmed by a Western
blot analysis with FLAG tag-specific antibodies (Fig. 9, B
and C). However, the expression of S199A/Y200F was lost over several passages, indicating its growth-inhibitory effect.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Trx, a ubiquitous redox protein, regulates a wide array of
cellular activities including growth, transcription, and immune responses (23). Its redox status is controlled by a cytosolic enzyme,
TR. In mammals, three different TR genes, TR1,
TR2, and TR3, which are expressed in an organelle- and
tissue-specific manner, have been identified to date (39, 40). The
founding member of this family, TR1, is expressed
ubiquitously (23). Physiologic roles of the new members of TR family
are unclear at present. Mammalian TR has broader substrate specificity
than its prokaryotic homologues (23). For example, it can reduce unrelated compounds such as selenite, alloxan,
5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitorbenzoic acid), vitamin K, selenocysteine,
selinodiglutathione, and S-nitrosoglutathione, in addition
to Trx. Because TR modifies its substrates extremely rapidly, and no
stable prosthetic groups are involved in this process (23), it has been
technically difficult to define its intracellular targets. Trx is also
implicated in maintaining the redox status of transcription factors,
AP1, PEBP2, nuclear factor
B, and HIF1
(28,
41-44).
Based on chemical inhibition and other correlative data, Trx1 is
implicated in cell growth promotion in some cell types (24). However,
it is not a universal phenomenon. Several studies showed that Trx and
TR participate in growth-inhibitory actions. The Trx homologue of
Drosophila, deadhead, is essential for female meiosis and early embryonic development (45) but not for DNA synthesis
in vivo (46). Deletion of TR1 in
Drosophila affects survival (47). It codes for a cytoplasmic
and a mitochondrial isoform, both of which are necessary for the
viability of the fly. Similarly, Trx1-null mouse embryos do not implant
at all (48). Thioredoxin inhibits DNA synthesis in the fertilized
Xenopus eggs (49). In yeast, deletion of Trx gene causes an
increase in the frequency of mitotic cell cycles (50). TR is necessary for p53-dependent growth suppression in fission and budding
yeasts (51, 52). Inhibition of Trx1 causes resistance to
IFN-
-induced apoptosis (53), and Trx-producing hepatomas grow slowly
(54). Using a genetic tool, we have previously shown that
TR1 is critical for the cell death controlled by the IFN/RA
combination (22, 55). We and others have shown that tumor suppressor
p53, caspase-8, and caspase-3 are also regulated by TR:Trx (25-27, 56,
57).
Tumor suppressor p53 inhibits cell growth either by aborting the
division cycle or by inducing death (58) and is a frequently inactivated gene in several human cancers. Its activity is
controlled by several posttranslational mechanisms such as
stability, phosphorylation by protein kinases, ubiquitination,
SUMOylation, acetylation, and redox factors (59). We have
reported previously that the IFN/RA combination promotes
p53-dependent gene expression and cell death using TR1 and
Trx1 (27) without elevating the levels of p53 protein. p53 has two
cysteines (residues 242 and 176), which, along with two histidines,
coordinate Zn2+ for DNA binding (60, 61). Oxidation of
these cysteines ablates its transcriptional activity (60, 62).
Wild-type human p53, but not a cysteine mutant, inhibits growth in
yeast (63, 64). Redox control of p53 activity is further substantiated
by studies that showed that tms1, a dehydrogenase,
suppresses p53-induced growth arrest (65). Lastly, studies using
chimeric p53 proteins in yeast have revealed that in addition to the
DNA binding site, the transactivation domain of p53 is also subject to
TR-dependent redox regulation (66). Retinoids are known to
activate oxidative stress through an increased synthesis of reactive
oxygen species (67-70). The presence of ROS is a signal for p53
activation (58). IFN/RA treatment induces TR and Trx in cells
undergoing apoptosis (22, 26). p53 is kept in a reduced form by redox
factor-1, a downstream effector of the TR:Trx system. Indeed, recent
studies have shown that redox factor-1 promotes
p53-dependent gene expression and cell death (33). Redox
factor-1 has been suggested to prevent the oxidation of cysteine
residues of p53. Trx1 augments redox factor-1-dependent
gene expression through p53 (57). More importantly, the failure of
-ID to promote gene expression in the absence of p53 (Fig. 5)
clearly indicates an obligatory role for p53 in this process. Because
-ID fails to induce the p53-responsive reporter in cells expressing
a mutant Trx, its effects are Trx-dependent (Fig. 5).
The present observations raise a question: what is the role of ID?
Mammalian TR is a dimeric selenoprotein. Mutational analyses have
revealed that the mammalian TR has two redox centers: one at the N
terminus in the FAD binding domain, and the other at its C terminus.
The phylogenetically well-conserved N-terminal redox center is
constituted by cysteines residues at positions 59 and 64. A
selenocysteine at the C terminus forms the C-terminal redox center. In
an unusual manner, one of the two in-frame stop codons at the 3' end of
the open reading frame in conjunction with a stem-loop structure formed
by a selenocystine incorporation sequence of the 3'-untranslated region
of TR mRNA is proposed to act as an acceptor for selenocysteinyl
tRNA, leading to a co-translational incorporation of selenocysteine
into the mature protein (24, 71). Recent studies showed that bovine and
rat TRs lacking this selenocysteine have an extremely reduced
kcat value in vitro (72, 73).
However, this enzyme did not completely lose its enzymatic activity.
Furthermore, depending on the substrate used for the assay, its
activity is normal as long as the N-terminal primary redox center is
retained (73). In fact, incubation of the mutant-derived protein with
selenocysteine restored the activity dramatically in vitro
(72). These data suggest that selenocysteine in trans can
restore the enzyme activity. However, a low occurrence of free
selenocysteine (74) suggests that such modulation is a less frequent
event in vivo. It is possible that stress conditions such as
apoptosis alter the physiologic availability of selenocysteine. Such
selenocysteine may be derived from apoptotic degradation of other
selenoproteins or its biosynthesis. At least 10-12 proteins that
contain selenocysteine (75) have been identified to date, and the
degradation of these proteins may provide free selenocysteine.
The observations that yeast TR, which lacks a selenocysteine (76, 77),
can promote p53-dependent cell growth arrest (51, 52) and
that a truncated human TR lacking its ID also promotes p53-dependent transcriptional response (this study) are
consistent with the proposition that TR-stimulated p53-mediated
responses are selenocysteine-independent. Similarly,
Drosophila and plant TRs do not require selenium for their
function (47, 78). In fact, plant TR behaves like a prokaryotic TR
(78). Furthermore, the prokaryotic TRs do not reduce other substrates,
like the mammalian TR. Recent crystallographic data on rat TR (79) have
shown that the enzyme forms a head-to-tail dimer, with the N-terminal
redox center buried inside. Reducing power is first transferred from NADPH to the N-terminal redox center. The C terminus of one subunit is
inserted into the charged cleft (N-terminal redox center) of the other
subunit to tap electrons from the active site to selenocysteine. The
reduced selenocysteine then donates electrons to Trx/other substrates
at the surface of TR dimer, after emerging from the catalytic cleft. In
this model, the ID extends like a robotic arm to transfer electrons
between the enzyme and its various substrates. In the case of
prokaryotic TR, which also acts as a dimer, after the receipt of
electrons at the redox center from NADPH, the NADPH binding domain
undergoes a 66° rotation to provide access to oxidized Trx to the
redox center (23, 24).
-ID may behave like prokaryotic, yeast, and
plant TRs with strict Trx-reductive properties. This would be
sufficient for activating p53. Thus, it would appear that a
selenocysteine at the C terminus has evolved to enhance catalysis and
broaden substrate range and is an optional accessory. Although an
augmentation of TR activity by selenium has been reported in mammalian
cells, these studies used a supranutritional concentration of selenium
and are not physiologically relevant. In fact, an inverse correlation
between selenium and TR activity has also been reported (80). Lastly,
selenium metabolites can activate cell cycle arrest in the absence of
p53 and DNA damage (80), indicating the existence of a separate
mechanism of action. In light of these data, we suggest that
selenium/selenocysteine plays a limited role in TR-mediated
growth-suppressive pathways in vivo but is required for
other redox reactions during normal growth.
Alternatively, TR bearing alkylated C-terminal selenocysteine and
cysteine residues exhibits 30-fold higher NADPH oxidase activity
compared with the wild-type enzyme and is capable of producing
superoxides (81). These superoxides can oxidize intracellular environment, thus tilting the balance toward p53 activation and cell death. Consistent with this suggestion, deletion of the NADPH binding domain (mutants
-ID60 and
-ID50) prevents the
stimulatory effects of TR on p53-dependent gene expression
(Fig. 7). It is interesting to note that the mutation of cysteine
residue at 189 depletes the p53-augmenting function of
-ID (Fig. 8).
This suggests that Trx transiently interacts with this site during
enzymatic modification because Trx1 is still necessary to promote
p53-dependent gene expression. The threonine and tyrosine
residues may undergo posttranslational modifications, which in turn
contribute to full activity of
-ID. Thus, ID, which is unique to
mammalian TR, appears to act as a regulatory switch in cell growth
control. Its presence attenuates the growth-inhibitory effect of TR,
and its removal promotes cell death. Because prokaryotic/unicellular
organisms do not undergo apoptosis, and the primary role of TR is only
to maintain the redox functions. Thus, these organisms have a
much simpler modular structure. Because TR and Trx can promote pro- and
anti-growth processes, depending on the physiologic status of cells,
and because mammalian TR has expanded physiologic roles, the evolution
of a regulatory switch (ID) is critical for preventing an inadvertent
operation of these divergent processes. Thus, ID may act as a decision
switch to mediate such "yin-yang" reactions in vivo. In
the meantime, one potential use for the
-ID mutant will be in gene
therapy along with wild-type p53 in p53-null tumors.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Peter Gutierrez for helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Cancer Institute Grants
CA 78282 and CA 71401 (to D. V. K.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
§
Present address: Dept. of Surgery, Tongji Medical Center, Wuhan,
People's Republic of China.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Greenebaum Cancer
Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 665 W. Baltimore St., BRB-9th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21201. Tel.:
410-328-1396; Fax: 410-328-1397; E-mail: dkalvako@umaryland.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 12, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M202286200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IFN, interferon;
RA, all-trans-retinoic acid;
STAT, signal transducers and
activators of transcription;
TR, thioredoxin reductase;
Trx, thioredoxin;
NBD, NADPH binding domain;
ID, interface domain;
CMV, cytomegalovirus;
Luc, luciferase;
FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift analysis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kalvakolanu, D. V.,
Choi, K.,
and Borden, E. C.
(2001)
in
The Molecular Basis of Cancer
(Mendelsohn, J.
, Howley, P. M.
, Israel, M. A.
, and Liotta, L. A., eds)
, pp. 503-534, W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia
|
| 2.
|
Stark, G. R.,
Kerr, I. M.,
Williams, B. R. G.,
Silverman, R. H.,
and Schreiber, R. D.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67,
227-264[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Kaplan, D. H.,
Shankaran, V.,
Dighe, A. S.,
Stockert, E.,
Aguet, M.,
Old, L. J.,
and Schreiber, R. D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
7556-7561[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Kroger, A.,
Koster, M.,
Schroeder, K.,
Hauser, H.,
and Mueller, P. P.
(2002)
J. Interferon Cytokine Res.
22,
5-14[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Tamura, T.,
and Ozato, K.
(2002)
J. Interferon Cytokine Res.
22,
145-152[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Willman, C. L.,
Sever, C. E.,
Pallavicini, M. G.,
Harada, H.,
Tanaka, N.,
Slovak, M. L.,
Yamamoto, H.,
Harada, K.,
Meeker, T. C.,
List, A. F.,
and Taniguchi, T.
(1993)
Science
259,
968-971[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
Holtschke, T.,
Lohler, J.,
Kanno, Y.,
Fehr, T.,
Giese, N.,
Rosenbauer, F.,
Lou, J.,
Knobeloch, K. P.,
Gabriele, L.,
Waring, J.,
Bachmann, M. F.,
Zinkernagel, R. M.,
Morse, H. C.,
Ozato, K.,
and Horak, I.
(1996)
Cell
87,
307-317[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Choubey, D., Li, S. J.,
Datta, B.,
Gutterman, J. U.,
and Lengyel, P.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
5668-5678[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Wen, Y.,
Yan, D. H.,
Wang, B.,
Spohn, B.,
Ding, Y.,
Shao, R.,
Zou, Y.,
Xie, K.,
and Hung, M. C.
(2001)
Cancer Res.
61,
7142-7147[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Kimchi, A.
(1992)
J. Cell. Biochem.
50,
1-9[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Resnitzky, D.,
Tiefenbrun, N.,
Berissi, H.,
and Kimchi, A.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
402-406[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Tiefenbrun, N.,
Melamed, D.,
Levy, N.,
Resnitzky, D.,
Hoffman, I.,
Reed, S. I.,
and Kimchi, A.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
3934-3944[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
Gutterman, J. U.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
1198-1205[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Lindner, D. J.,
Kalvakolanu, D. V.,
and Borden, E. C.
(1997)
Semin. Oncol.
24,
S9-99-S99-104[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Moore, D. M.,
Kalvakolanu, D. V.,
Lippman, S. M.,
Kavanagh, J. J.,
Hong, W. K.,
Borden, E. C.,
Paredes-Espinoza, M.,
and Krakoff, I. H.
(1994)
Semin. Hematol.
31,
31-37[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
DiPaola, R. S.,
Rafi, M. M.,
Vyas, V.,
Toppmeyer, D.,
Rubin, E.,
Patel, J.,
Goodin, S.,
Medina, M.,
Medina, P.,
Zamek, R.,
Zhang, C.,
White, E.,
Gupta, E.,
and Hait, W. N.
(1999)
J. Clin. Oncol.
17,
2213-2218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Lindner, D. J.,
Borden, E. C.,
and Kalvakolanu, D. V.
(1997)
Clin. Cancer Res.
3,
931-937[Abstract]
|
| 18.
|
Love, J. M.,
and Gudas, L. J.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
6,
825-831[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Mangelsdorf, D. J.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1995)
Cell
83,
841-850[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Faria, T. N.,
Mendelsohn, C.,
Chambon, P.,
and Gudas, L. J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
26783-26788[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Lin, B.,
Chen, G. Q.,
Xiao, D.,
Kolluri, S. K.,
Cao, X., Su, H.,
and Zhang, X. K.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
957-970[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Hofmann, E. R.,
Boyanapalli, M.,
Lindner, D. J.,
Weihua, X.,
Hassel, B. A.,
Jagus, R.,
Gutierrez, P. L.,
and Kalvakolanu, D. V.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
6493-6504[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Arner, E. S.,
and Holmgren, A.
(2000)
Eur. J. Biochem.
267,
6102-6109[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Mustacich, D.,
and Powis, G.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
346, Part 1,
1-8[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Ma, X.,
Karra, S.,
Lindner, D. J., Hu, J.,
Reddy, S. P.,
Kimchi, A.,
Yodoi, J.,
and Kalvakolanu, D. V.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
3703-3715[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Ma, X.,
Karra, S.,
Guo, W.,
Lindner, D. J., Hu, J.,
Angell, J. E.,
Hofmann, E. R.,
Reddy, S. P.,
and Kalvakolanu, D. V.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
24843-24854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Hu, J., Ma, X.,
Lindner, D. J.,
Karra, S.,
Hofmann, E. R.,
Reddy, S. P.,
and Kalvakolanu, D. V.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
4235-4248[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Hirota, K.,
Matsui, M.,
Iwata, S.,
Nishiyama, A.,
Mori, K.,
and Yodoi, J.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
3633-3638[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Fan, S.,
Smith, M. L.,
Rivet, D. J.,
Duba, D.,
Zhan, Q.,
Kohn, K. W.,
Fornace, A. J.,
and O'Connor, P. M.
(1995)
Cancer Res.
55,
1649-1654[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Potapova, O.,
Gorospe, M.,
Dougherty, R. H.,
Dean, N. M.,
Gaarde, W. A.,
and Holbrook, N. J.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
1713-1722[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Baker, S. J.,
Markowitz, S.,
Fearon, E. R.,
Willson, J. K.,
and Vogelstein, B.
(1990)
Science
249,
912-915[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Kern, S. E.,
Pietenpol, J. A.,
Thiagalingam, S.,
Seymour, A.,
Kinzler, K. W.,
and Vogelstein, B.
(1992)
Science
256,
827-830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Gaiddon, C.,
Moorthy, N. C.,
and Prives, C.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
5609-5621[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Skehan, P.,
Storeng, R.,
Scudiero, D.,
Monks, A.,
McMahon, J.,
Vistica, D.,
Warren, J. T.,
Bokesch, H.,
Kenney, S.,
and Boyd, M. R.
(1990)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
82,
1107-1112[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
van Engeland, M.,
Ramaekers, F. C.,
Schutte, B.,
and Reutelingsperger, C. P.
(1996)
Cytometry
24,
131-139[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Miyashita, T.,
and Reed, J. C.
(1995)
Cell
80,
293-299[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
|