![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 25, 22528-22533, June 21, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Program in Cardiovascular Gene Therapy, Cardiovascular
Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical
School, Boston, Massachusetts 02129
Received for publication, February 12, 2002, and in revised form, April 10, 2002
Akt activation reduces cardiomyocyte death and
induces cardiac hypertrophy. To help identify effector mechanisms, gene
expression profiles in hearts from transgenic mice with
cardiac-specific expression of activated Akt (myr-Akt) were compared
with littermate controls. 40 genes were identified as differentially
expressed. Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR confirmed
qualitative results of transcript profiling for 9 of 10 genes examined,
however, there were notable quantitative discrepancies between the
quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and microarray data sets.
Interestingly Akt induced significant up-regulation of insulin-like
growth factor-binding protein-5 (IGFBP-5), which could contribute to
its anti-apoptotic effects in the heart. In addition, Akt-mediated
down-regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)
The serine-threonine kinase Akt (or protein kinase B) has
well documented anti-apoptotic effects in many systems (1-3). We have
shown that expression of a constitutively active mutant of Akt
(myr-Akt) is sufficient to block apoptosis in hypoxic neonatal rat
cardiomyocytes in vitro (4) and in vivo prevents
cardiac injury while preserving heart function during
ischemia-reperfusion injury (5). The downstream targets of Akt that
mediate cell survival in the heart remain poorly characterized. Indeed
some Akt substrates (e.g. Bad, glycogen synthase kinase-3,
and Bcl-2) identified in other cell types appear to be either expressed
at very low levels or not phosphorylated by Akt in cardiomyocytes (5,
6). These data suggest that additional Akt-dependent phosphorylation, translation, and/or transcription events may be
required for Akt-mediated cytoprotection in the heart.
Translational effects of Akt involve the phosphorylation and activation
of the mammalian target of rapamycin
(mTOR)1 that in turn
phosphorylates 4E-BP1 and p70S6 kinase (7). The net effect of these
phosphorylation events is enhanced translation of specific mRNA
subset(s), which is bound by the initiation factor eIF-4F and/or the
ribosomal S6 subunit. In contrast, the transcriptional effects of Akt
are less well defined, although the importance of these events may be
greater than initially realized (8, 9). Akt-regulated gene
transcription has been described for Glut-1 (10), vascular endothelial
growth factor (11), and Bcl-2 (12), and a number of Akt-regulated
transcription factors have been identified. Akt directly phosphorylates
Forkhead box transcription factors, class O (FOXOs) (13-15) and may
also regulate, through direct and/or indirect mechanisms, AP-1,
cAMP-response element-binding protein, and NF- To examine the transcriptional effects of Akt in the heart we analyzed
the changes in global gene expression in transgenic mice with
cardiac-specific expression of myr-Akt using DNA microarrays. This
approach enabled the quantitation of the effects of Akt activation on
~11,000 genes. Results of interest were validated by quantitative RT-PCR (QRT-PCR). Here we identify genes differentially regulated by
chronic Akt activation in the heart and demonstrate that modulated transcripts represent a combination of primary and secondary effects. The importance of confirming microarray results of interest using additional, complimentary techniques is discussed.
Mice--
Generation and phenotypic characterization of myr-Akt
mice is described elsewhere in detail (20). In brief, the cDNA
encoding hemagglutinin-tagged Akt with a src myristoylation
(myr) signal (kindly provided by Dr. Thomas F. Franke, Columbia
University) was subcloned downstream of the 5.5-kb murine Preparation of cRNA for Microarray Analysis--
Total RNA was
extracted from F3, 6-week-old, 20 line male mouse hearts using TRIzol
(Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. RNA was
resuspended in diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated H2O and
further purified using the Qiagen (Chatsworth, CA) RNeasy total RNA
isolation kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA was
quantified, and samples (n = 2-5 hearts) were pooled
such that pooled RNA represented equal amounts (10 µg) of RNA from TG-positive or TG-negative mice within the litter. This was repeated in
three independent experiments. Pooled samples (10 µg) were used to
generate cDNA using the Superscript Choice system (Invitrogen) according to the Affymetrix protocol (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA).
Resulting cDNA was used to generate biotin-labeled cRNA using the
ENZO Bioarray High Yield transcript labeling kit (Affymetrix). cRNA (20 µg) was fragmented in fragmentation buffer (40 mM Tris (pH 8.1), 100 mM potassium acetate, 30 mM
magnesium acetate) for 35 min at 94 °C. The quality of the cRNA was
checked by hybridization to Test2 arrays (Affymetrix) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Subsequently samples were hybridized to
Affymetrix mU74A microarrays, and bound sequences were identified by
staining and scanning according to Affymetrix protocols.
Analysis of Microarray Data--
To enable comparison between
experiments expression data were globally scaled to an average
intensity of 1500 using the Affymetrix Microarray SuiteTM
software. A minimum value of 150 was assigned to all average differences (AvDiffs) with an intensity measurement below 150. Two
parameters, the AvDiff and the absolute call (present or absent), extracted from the Affymetrix data files, were used in the data analysis, which was performed using GenespringTM (Silicon
Genetics, CA). Results were sorted using a combination of high and low
stringency filtering criteria. High stringency filtering required that
a gene should have an absolute call of present in six of six samples
with a mean -fold change of QRT-PCR Analysis--
Total RNA was isolated and purified from
the hearts of F3, 6-week-old male mice from the 20 and 564 transgenic
lines as described above. Following purification RNA was quantified in
triplicate using Ribogreen (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) according to
the manufacturer's instructions. RNA (5 µg) was treated (10 min at 20 °C) with amplification grade DNase 1 (Invitrogen) following which
the DNase 1 was heat-inactivated (5 min at 75 °C). QRT-PCR was
performed in duplicate using the Brilliant One-Step QRT-PCR kit
(Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) containing SYBR Green I (1:30,000, Sigma), forward and reverse primers (50 nM each), and
sample RNA (90 ng). Primers were designed to be compatible with a
single QRT-PCR thermal profile (48 °C for 30 min, 95 °C for 10 min, and 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s and 60 °C for 1 min)
such that multiple transcripts could be analyzed simultaneously.
Accumulation of PCR product was monitored in real time (Mx4000,
Stratagene), and the crossing threshold (Ct) was determined using the
Mx4000 software. For each set of primers, a no template control and a
no reverse amplification control were included. Postamplification
dissociation curves were performed to verify the presence of a single
amplification product in the absence of DNA contamination. -Fold
changes in gene expression were determined using the Adenoviral Vectors (Ads)--
Ad·EGFP· In Vitro Studies of myr-Akt Expression--
Primary cultures of
neonatal rat ventricular cardiomyocytes (NRVMs) were prepared from the
cardiac ventricles of Sprague-Dawley neonates as described previously
(5). To study the effects of transient transgene expression, myocytes
were infected with adenoviral vectors at a multiplicity of infection of
100 for 24 h in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing
10% fetal bovine serum. Cells were subsequently serum-starved for
24 h prior to RNA extraction. RNA was extracted, purified, and
quantified as described above.
Immunoblotting--
Hearts from littermate control and
myr-Akt-expressing mice were removed from deeply anesthetized animals,
snap frozen, and crushed under liquid nitrogen before tissue was
homogenized in cold lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH7.6),
150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 µg/ml
leupeptin, 1 µg/ml aprotinin). Proteins from NRVMs were extracted by
scraping cells directly into cold lysis buffer as described previously
(4). Protein concentration was measured by the Bradford method
(Bio-Rad). Proteins (30 µg) were separated by SDS-PAGE on 12%
separation gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher
& Schuell) by semidry transfer. Blots were incubated with anti-Akt
(1:1000, Cell Signaling) overnight at 4 °C and subsequently
incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody
(1:5000, Dako). Immunoreactive bands were detected by enhanced
chemiluminescence (Cell Signaling).
Statistics--
Data are represented as mean ± S.E. Data
were compared by two-tailed Student's t test. The null
hypothesis was rejected for p < 0.05.
Effects of myr-Akt Expression on Gene Expression in the
Heart--
To identify genes differentially regulated by Akt in the
heart we examined the gene expression profiles of mice with
cardiac-specific expression of myr-Akt (20 line) compared with
TG-negative littermate controls. The
experiment was repeated three times to reduce erroneous data that can
arise when pooled RNA alone is used as a substitute for experimental
replication (25). Genes of interest were identified using the described
filtering protocols and examined for statistically significant
differences in expression. These analyses revealed that expression of
myr-Akt in the heart resulted in the differential regulation of 40 (21 up-regulated and 19 down-regulated) of the ~11,000 genes examined
(Tables I and II).
It is surprising to observe that the two genes with the greatest -fold
changes in expression are not usually expressed in the heart. Myosin
alkali light chain 1 fast/3 fast (MLC1F/3F, up-regulated 11.8-fold) is
predominantly expressed in skeletal muscle (26) and the ovary testis
transcribed (OTT, up-regulated 11.1-fold) gene is usually only
expressed in the ovary or the testis (27). Induction of insulin-like
growth factor-binding protein-5 (IGFBP-5) by insulin-like growth
factor-I (IGF-I) via phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and mTOR has
been observed previously (28), although a direct connection to Akt has
not been reported. Some genes of related function were coordinately
regulated by chronic Akt expression. For instance, the potent inhibitor
of angiogenesis pigment epithelium-derived factor was up-regulated 2.6-fold, while the angiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor was down-regulated 1.8-fold. In addition, transcripts for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor Validation of Microarray Data for myr-Akt-expressing Mice by
QRT-PCR--
The differential expression of six up-regulated and four
down-regulated genes, identified by microarray analysis, were validated by QRT-PCR. Relative transcript levels were determined in F3, 20 line
TG-positive males compared with TG-negative male littermate controls
(Fig. 1). QRT-PCR analysis confirmed 7 of
the 10 genes were statistically differentially regulated
(p < 0.05) in the 20 line. Cardiac ankyrin repeat
protein, pigment epithelium-derived factor, and IGF-II, although
differentially regulated in accordance with microarray data, did not
achieve statistical significance. Cardiac ankyrin repeat protein and
pigment epithelium-derived factor were subsequently confirmed as
differentially regulated (p < 0.05) in the 564 line.
Although the -fold change of some genes (IGFBP-5, pigment
epithelium-derived factor, PGC-1, PPAR, and vascular endothelial growth
factor), as determined by QRT-PCR analysis, correlated with the -fold
change reported by microarray analysis there were three major
discrepancies. The greatest discrepancy was observed in the expression
levels of OTT, which was reported as 11.1-fold up-regulated by
microarray analysis compared with 675-fold by QRT-PCR (Table I and
Figs. 1 and 2). The second major discrepancy was seen in the expression levels of growth differentiation factor-8 (GDF-8), which was reported as 5.1-fold up-regulated in
TG20-positive hearts by microarray analysis compared with 18.4-fold up-regulated by QRT-PCR. These discrepancies may be explained, in part,
by the greater dynamic range afforded by QRT-PCR analysis. However,
this explanation cannot account for the difference between microarray
and QRT-PCR data for MLC1F/3F expression. An 11.8-fold (p < 0.01) up-regulation of MLC1F/3F was recorded by
microarray analysis compared with a 1.7-fold (p < 0.05) up-regulation as determined by QRT-PCR. The relative expression
of MLC1F/3F was further examined by Northern blot analysis, which
revealed a modest increase in MLC1F/3F mRNA levels in TG-positive
hearts in accordance with the QRT-PCR data and in deference to the
microarray data (data not shown).
Comparison of Differential Gene Expression between Two myr-Akt TG
Lines--
To control for differences in transgene insertion,
expression, and activity, we determined the relative expression of the 10 genes examined by QRT-PCR in the 20 line in a second
myr-Akt-expressing line, the 564 line (Fig. 1). For all genes except
OTT, the pattern of differential expression observed in TG20 mice was
confirmed in TG564 mice, although the -fold change in expression was
significantly greater in the 564 line for GDF-8 and IGFBP-5 (64.9 versus 18.4, p < 0.01 and 6.0 versus 3.8, p < 0.05, respectively; Fig.
1A). Although OTT mRNA was detected in the TG564 hearts,
there was no difference in the low level of expression between
TG-positive and -negative littermates.
Effects of Transient myr-Akt Expression on IGFBP-5 and GDF-8
Transcript Levels in Vitro--
We next examined whether IGFBP-5
and/or GDF-8 were directly regulated by acute Akt activation in
cardiomyocytes using an in vitro system (4). NRVMs were
infected with Ad·EGFP, Ad·myr-Akt, or dominant-negative
Ad·Akt(AA). Ad·Akt(AA) served as a full-length control for the Akt
molecule, including the pleckstrin homology domain but lacking
catalytic activity. The effects of these constructs on IGFBP-5
and GDF-8 gene expression were determined by QRT-PCR (Fig.
3A). Expression of
Ad·myr-Akt, at levels comparable to those observed in the TG mice
(Fig. 3B), significantly up-regulated IGFBP-5 (7.2-fold,
p < 0.05) compared with Ad·Akt(AA). This finding corroborates a previous study in vascular smooth muscle cells that
demonstrated IGFBP-5 mRNA up-regulation by IGF-I in a
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mTOR-dependent manner
(28). In contrast, Ad·myr-Akt did not alter the expression level of
GDF-8 at 24 h and had no effect on GDF-8 expression at either
48 or 72 h (data not shown).
Akt protects the heart from ischemia-reperfusion injury (5, 29),
although it does not appear to phosphorylate many of its potential
downstream targets, including Bad, when expressed in neonatal or adult
cardiomyocytes (5). Thus, the mechanisms of Akt cardioprotection remain
incompletely defined and may include transcriptional effects. The
recent identification of Akt-dependent transcripts
(e.g. Glut-1, Bcl-2, and Fas ligand) (10-12)
and Akt-modulated transcription factors (e.g. FOXOs, AP-1,
and cAMP-response element-binding protein) (13-17), which are
expressed in the heart, supports this hypothesis. We characterized the
transcriptional effects of myr-Akt expression in the heart using DNA microarrays.
It has been suggested that DNA microarray experiments should be
repeated with at least three replicates (25) and that the resulting
data sets should be filtered and validated to minimize erroneous data.
Indeed, as much as one-third of the variation seen during an
experimental comparison may be attributable to variations intrinsic to
the arrays themselves (30). However, data filters should be used with
caution as they can increase the number of false negative results. Thus
changes in important, low copy transcripts, which are excluded from
analysis by virtue of their low AvDiffs and/or their increased
propensity to be called "absent," may be missed. We observed
significant changes in the expression of 40 (~0.4%) of the genes
examined in myr-Akt-expressing hearts (Tables I and II). Of note, the
two transcripts with the greatest -fold changes, OTT and GDF-8, were in
the group of genes identified using the "low stringency" filter.
This finding illustrates how potentially important data may be missed
if too stringent a filter is applied to microarray data sets.
We have demonstrated that Akt activation increases the transcription of
IGFBP-5 in the heart. IGFBP-5 may have direct and/or indirect
anti-apoptotic activity (31-34). Therefore, IGFBP-5 up-regulation, in
an Akt-dependent manner, may be of particular importance to the cardioprotective effects of Akt. In the light of previous studies,
Akt-dependent IGFBP-5 up-regulation in the heart is likely to be mediated through mTOR (28). It is therefore interesting to note
that rapamycin, an mTOR inhibitor, can dramatically attenuate the
protective effects of insulin, which activates Akt, in the heart (29).
In this study, we have also shown that Akt down-regulates PGC-1 and
PPAR- Confirmation of microarray data by a previously validated and
established technique should be performed for a selection of differentially regulated genes and in particular for genes of specific
interest. Of the 10 genes analyzed by QRT-PCR, nine were confirmed in
one or both of the transgenic lines as significantly differentially
expressed in keeping with the microarray data. However, the degree of
differential regulation of OTT, GDF-8, and MLC1F/3F determined by
QRT-PCR differed markedly from microarray results (Tables I and II and
Fig. 1). OTT mRNA has been described only in the testis and ovary
(27), and it was initially unclear why this gene should be up-regulated
by Akt activation in the heart. As the inheritance in the 20 line is
X-linked and OTT is encoded on the X chromosome (27), we hypothesize
that the up-regulation of OTT may be an insertional effect of the
transgene construct. Consistent with this hypothesis, OTT was not
differentially regulated in the 564 line in which the low level of
expression was similar to that seen in transgene-negative littermates
from both lines and wild-type controls (data not shown). The
possibility that the discrepancy between the two lines represents an
insertional effect on an autosome in the TG564 mice (for example in a
trans-acting element regulating OTT expression) appears less
likely but has not been formally excluded. As microarray
characterization of transgenic mice becomes more common and the murine
physical map better characterized, the hitherto latent frequency of
insertional events may become more apparent.
The disparity between microarray and QRT-PCR data for the expression
levels of GDF-8 and MLC1F/3F highlights two other important limitations
of microarray data: dynamic range and sequence specificity. The -fold
change in expression of GDF-8 in TG20 hearts, compared with littermate
controls, was reported as 5.1-fold up-regulated by microarray analysis.
In contrast, analysis of GDF-8 expression in the 20 line by QRT-PCR,
likely a more accurate means of quantifying mRNA levels, revealed
that GDF-8 was up-regulated by 18.4-fold. This underestimation of -fold
change was even greater for OTT, which was found to be 11.1-fold
up-regulated by microarray analysis compared with 675-fold by QRT-PCR
(Table I and Figs. 1 and 2). The problem of false positive results
reported by microarray analysis was illustrated by the MLC1F/3F data,
reported as 11.8-fold up-regulated by microarray analysis compared with
1.7-fold (20 line) and 1.4-fold (564 line) by QRT-PCR (Table I and Fig.
1). This false positive result could reflect an error in the sequences
on the microarray, the occurrence of which was dramatically
demonstrated when up to one-third of the sequences on one set of mouse
arrays were found to be wrong (37). Other possibilities for this type
of error include cross-hybridization by splice variants, related genes,
and/or pseudogenes.
The Akt/mTOR pathway has been identified as the crucial regulator of
skeletal muscle and pancreatic islet cell hypertrophy in
vivo (38, 39). In both our myr-Akt-expressing mouse lines cardiac
hypertrophy, with no evidence of decompensation, was observed at 6 weeks (20). Akt therefore promotes both skeletal and cardiac muscle
hypertrophy. As Akt promotes cardiac hypertrophy, we hypothesize that
the observed up-regulation of GDF-8, a negative regulator of muscle
growth, acts as part of a negative feedback loop limiting heart size.
The phenomenon of negative feedback and activation of adaptive
mechanisms is recognized but infrequently described in transgenic and
knockout mice (40, 41). GDF-8, also termed myostatin, is highly
conserved across species, and although first characterized in skeletal
muscle (42, 43) it has also been identified in the heart (44). The
hypothesis that GDF-8 up-regulation is a secondary event is supported
by our in vitro experiments where expression of myr-Akt, at
levels similar to those seen in TG mice (Fig. 3B), resulted
in the up-regulation of IGFBP-5 but not GDF-8 (Fig. 3A). It
remains unclear whether GDF-8 expression is related to myocyte size or
organ mass (24).
In summary, these data demonstrate that chronic Akt activation results
in the differential regulation of *
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grants HL-59521 and HL-61557 (to A. R.) and HL-04250 (to T. M.) and a grant from the Wellcome Trust (International Prize Traveling Fellowship (to S. A. C.)).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 15, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201462200
The abbreviations used are:
mTOR, mammalian
target of rapamycin;
FOXO, Forkhead box transcription factor, class O;
QRT-PCR, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR;
myr, myristoylated;
TG, transgenic;
AvDiff, average difference;
Ad, adenoviral vector;
EGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein;
NRVM, neonatal rat
ventricular cardiomyocyte;
MLC1F/3F, myosin alkali light chain 1 fast/3
fast;
OTT, ovary testis transcribed;
IGF, insulin-like growth factor;
IGFBP, IGF-binding protein;
PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptor;
PGC-1, PPAR-
Transcriptional Effects of Chronic Akt Activation in the
Heart*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
coactivator-1 (PGC-1) and PPAR-
may shift myocytes toward
glycolytic metabolism shown to preserve cardiomyocyte function and
survival during transient ischemia. IGFBP-5 transcripts also increased
after adenoviral gene transfer of myr-Akt to cultured cardiomyocytes,
suggesting that this represents a direct effect of Akt activation. In
contrast, substantial induction of growth differentiation factor-8
(GDF-8), a highly conserved inhibitor of skeletal muscle growth, was
observed in transgenic hearts but not after acute Akt activation
in vitro, suggesting that GDF-8 induction may represent a
secondary effect perhaps related to the cardiac hypertrophy seen in
these mice. Thus, microarray analysis reveals previously unappreciated
Akt regulation of genes that could contribute to the effects of Akt on
cardiomyocyte survival, metabolism, and growth.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B (16-19).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-myosin
heavy chain promoter (generously provided by Dr. Jeffrey Robbins,
Division of Molecular Cardiovascular Biology, Cincinnati Children's
Hospital Research Foundation) and used to generate transgenic mice
through oocyte injection. Positive founders were identified by Southern blotting and bred to wild-type C57BL6 mice for six generations. Two
transgenic (TG) lines were maintained; the 20 line exhibited X-linked
inheritance, whereas the 564 line exhibited autosomal inheritance.
TG-positive F3 mice were used for studies and compared with TG-negative
littermates. Both lines express myr-Akt specifically in the heart at
levels 5-7-fold higher than the endogenous molecule and exhibit a
substantial increase in Akt activation as measured by both in
vitro kinase assays and in vivo phosphorylation of known substrates (20).
±1.6. Low stringency filtering
required that the gene be called present in two of the three replicates
in the more highly expressing group with a mean AvDiff of
750 and
mean -fold change of
2. Mean -fold changes between groups were
calculated from the mean AvDiffs. Data passing these criteria were
combined and subjected to statistical analysis.
Ct method with
normalization to total RNA (21, 22).
-gal contains
cytomegalovirus-driven expression cassettes for
-galactosidase and enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) (5).
Ad·Akt(AA) utilizes a similar viral backbone but encodes a
dominant-negative Akt mutant and was kindly provided by Dr. Wataru
Ogawa, Kobe University, Japan (23). Ad·myr-Akt and Ad·EGFP mediate
expression of hemagglutinin-tagged constitutively active Akt or EGFP,
respectively, and have been described previously (5). Ads were
amplified in 293 cells, the particle count was estimated from
A260, and the titer was determined by
plaque assay. Wild-type adenovirus contamination was excluded by the
absence of PCR-detectable early region 1 (E1) sequences.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Genes significantly up-regulated in myr-Akt-expressing mice
Genes significantly down-regulated in myr-Akt-expressing mice
(PPAR-
) and
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
coactivator-1 (PGC-1),
both involved in fatty acid metabolism, were down-regulated.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Comparison of gene expression of sequences
identified as differentially regulated by microarray analysis in two
myr-Akt-expressing lines. 10 genes identified as differentially
regulated in 20 line transgenic hearts by microarray analysis were
examined in two myr-Akt-expressing lines (20 line and 564 line) by
QRT-PCR using gene-specific primers. Amplified products were detected
in real time using SYBR Green I, and product specificity was confirmed
by postamplification dissociation curve analysis. Gene expression
levels in TG20 and TG564 transgenic hearts were determined relative to
littermate controls (n = 3-4 in both groups).
A, up-regulated genes: relative expression levels of six
up-regulated genes in the 20 line and 564 line myr-Akt-expressing mice.
Data are expressed as mean ± S.E. (*, p < 0.05;
**, p < 0.01). B, down-regulated genes:
relative expression levels of four down-regulated genes in the 20 line
and 564 line myr-Akt-expressing mice. VEGF, vascular
endothelial growth factor; PEDF, pigment epithelium-derived
factor; CARP, cardiac ankyrin repeat protein.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Amplification curves and postamplification
dissociation curves for OTT in 20 line mice. Total RNA was
prepared from 20 line TG and littermate (LM) controls and
subjected to QRT-PCR analysis of OTT mRNA levels using
gene-specific primers and postamplification melt curve analysis. A no
template control (NTC) and a no amplification control
(NAC) were included to confirm accumulation of a single PCR
product of the predicted melting temperature in the absence of DNA
contamination. A, amplification: amplified product was
detected after an average of 18.7 cycles of PCR in TG hearts compared
with an average of 28.1 cycles in littermate control hearts
(n = 3 in both groups). Accumulation of nonspecific
product was observed in the no template control after 33 cycles. No
amplification was observed in the no amplification control confirming
the absence of DNA contamination. B, melting point analysis:
the first derivative of the postamplification dissociation curve
demonstrates that the accumulated product has a single melting point in
accordance with that predicted for the specific OTT amplicon. Minimal
nonspecific primer-dimer was observed in the no template control, and
no DNA-derived product was observed in the no amplification
control.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Transient expression of myr-Akt increases
mRNA encoding IGFBP-5 but not that of GDF-8. NRVMs were
infected with Ad·EGFP, Ad·myr-Akt, or Ad·Akt(AA) (multiplicity of
infection = 100 for all), and total RNA or protein was extracted
after 24 h in serum-free medium. A, expression of
IGFBP-5 and GDF-8 mRNA: relative expression levels of IGFBP-5 and
GDF-8 were determined by QRT-PCR using gene-specific primers.
Ad·myr-Akt increased the expression of IGFBP-5 by 7.2-fold relative
to Ad·EGFP, whereas Ad·Akt(AA) did not. In contrast, Ad·myr-Akt
had no effect on expression levels of GDF-8. Data are expressed as
mean ± S.E. (**, p < 0.01; n = 3 in all groups). B, immunoblots of myr-Akt expression
in vivo and in vitro: the expression levels of
myr-Akt and endogenous Akt were determined to validate the comparison
between in vivo and in vitro QRT-PCR data.
Proteins (30 µg) from hearts or cultured NRVMs were separated by
SDS-PAGE, and Akt expression was determined by immunoblotting.
Top panel, 20 line littermate controls (lanes 1 and 2) and TG positives (lanes 3 and
4). Middle panel, 564 line littermate controls
(lanes 1 and 2) and TG positives (lanes
3 and 4). Bottom panel, uninfected NRVMs
(lanes 1 and 2) and NRVMs infected with
Ad·myr-Akt (multiplicity of infection = 100) for 24 h
(lanes 3 and 4).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
in the heart. This may shift cardiomyocyte metabolism away
from fatty acid metabolism in favor of glycolysis, which has been shown
to protect cardiomyocytes during transient ischemia (35, 36).
40 genes in the heart. Several of
the observed changes generate intriguing hypotheses regarding the
effects of Akt in the heart and possible mechanisms underlying
Akt-mediated cardioprotection. Akt-dependent up-regulation of the anti-apoptotic molecule IGFBP-5 may be of particular
importance and could contribute to the observed cytoprotective effects
of Akt in the heart. Similarly Akt down-regulation of PGC-1 and
PPAR-
could shift myocytes toward glycolytic metabolism previously
shown to help preserve cardiomyocyte function and survival during
transient ischemia (35, 36). Chronic Akt activation in the heart was associated with the differential regulation of a subset of genes that
are dissimilar to those observed with acute Akt activation in other
cell types, emphasizing the tissue and temporal specificity of changes
in transcription profiles (9). In the myr-Akt mice, some changes
(e.g. IGFBP-5) appear to be direct consequences of Akt
activation and were recapitulated in cardiomyocytes in
vitro, while other transcripts (e.g. GDF-8) were not
induced by acute Akt activation in vitro and therefore
likely represent an indirect effect of the transgene. Given the role of
GDF-8 in limiting skeletal muscle growth, we hypothesize that the
dramatic up-regulation of GDF-8 observed in hypertrophied hearts may
represent a negative feedback mechanism. However, additional studies
will be necessary to demonstrate the functional relevance of the
observed alterations in transcript levels. Finally, while our
transcript profiling and QRT-PCR data were generally concordant, there
were some striking discrepancies in the quantitative assessment of
mRNA changes, underscoring the importance of validation of DNA
microarray results through additional independent techniques.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
An established investigator of the American Heart Association. To
whom correspondence should be addressed: Program in Cardiovascular Gene
Therapy, Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital-East, 114 16th St., Rm. 2600, Charlestown, MA 02129-2060. Tel.: 617-726-8286; Fax: 617-726-5806; E-mail:
Rosenzweig@helix.mgh.harvard.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
coactivator-1;
GDF-8, growth
differentiation factor-8.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Dudek, H.,
Datta, S. R.,
Franke, T. F.,
Birnbaum, M. J.,
Yao, R.,
Cooper, G. M.,
Segal, R. A.,
Kaplan, D. R.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1997)
Science
275,
661-665 2.
Franke, T. F.,
Kaplan, D. R.,
and Cantley, L. C.
(1997)
Cell
88,
435-437[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Songyang, Z.,
Baltimore, D.,
Cantley, L. C.,
Kaplan, D. R.,
and Franke, T. F.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
11345-11350 4.
Matsui, T., Li, L.,
del Monte, F.,
Fukui, Y.,
Franke, T. F.,
Hajjar, R. J.,
and Rosenzweig, A.
(1999)
Circulation
100,
2373-2379 5.
Matsui, T.,
Tao, J.,
del Monte, F.,
Lee, K. H., Li, L.,
Picard, M.,
Force, T. L.,
Franke, T. F.,
Hajjar, R. J.,
and Rosenzweig, A.
(2001)
Circulation
104,
330-335 6.
Cook, S. A.,
Sugden, P. H.,
and Clerk, A.
(1999)
Circ. Res.
85,
940-949 7.
Proud, C. G.,
and Denton, R. M.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
328,
329-341
8.
Brunet, A.,
Datta, S. R.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(2001)
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
11,
297-305[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Kuhn, I.,
Bartholdi, M. F.,
Salamon, H.,
Feldman, R. I.,
Roth, R. A.,
and Johnson, P. H.
(2001)
Physiol. Genomics
7,
105-114 10.
Barthel, A.,
Okino, S. T.,
Liao, J.,
Nakatani, K., Li, J.,
Whitlock, J. P., Jr.,
and Roth, R. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
20281-20286 11.
Jiang, B.-H.,
Zheng, J. Z.,
Aoki, M.,
and Vogt, P. K.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
1749-1753 12.
Pugazhenthi, S.,
Nesterova, A.,
Sable, C.,
Heidenreich, K. A.,
Boxer, L. M.,
Heasley, L. E.,
and Reusch, J. E.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
10761-10766 13.
Biggs, W. H., III,
Meisenhelder, J.,
Hunter, T.,
Cavenee, W. K.,
and Arden, K. C.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
7421-7426 14.
Brunet, A.,
Bonni, A.,
Zigmond, M. J.,
Lin, M. Z.,
Juo, P., Hu, L. S.,
Anderson, M. J.,
Arden, K. C.,
Blenis, J.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1999)
Cell
96,
857-868[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Tang, E. D.,
Nunez, G.,
Barr, F. G.,
and Guan, K. L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
16741-16746 16.
Kitaura, J.,
Asai, K.,
Maeda-Yamamoto, M.,
Kawakami, Y.,
Kikkawa, U.,
and Kawakami, T.
(2000)
J. Exp. Med.
192,
729-740 17.
Du, K.,
and Montminy, M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32377-32379 18.
Ozes, O. N.,
Mayo, L. D.,
Gustin, J. A.,
Pfeffer, S. R.,
Pfeffer, L. M.,
and Donner, D. B.
(1999)
Nature
401,
82-85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Romashkova, J. A.,
and Makarov, S. S.
(1999)
Nature
401,
86-90[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Matsui, T., Li, L., Wu, J. C., Cook, S. A., Nagoshi, T.,
Picard, M. H., Liao, R., and Rosenzweig, A. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, in press
21.
Bustin, S. A.
(2000)
J. Mol. Endocrinol.
25,
169-193[Abstract]
22.
Pfaffl, M. W.
(2001)
Nucleic Acids Res.
29,
2002-2007
23.
Kitamura, T.,
Ogawa, W.,
Sakaue, H.,
Hino, Y.,
Kuroda, S.,
Takata, M.,
Matsumoto, M.,
Maeda, T.,
Konishi, H.,
Kikkawa, U.,
and Kasuga, M.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
3708-3717 24.
Conlon, I.,
and Raff, M.
(1999)
Cell
96,
235-244[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Lee, M.-L. T.,
Kuo, F. C.,
Whitmore, G. A.,
and Sklar, J.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
9834-9839 26.
Neville, C.,
Gonzales, D.,
Houghton, L.,
McGrew, M. J.,
and Rosenthal, N.
(1996)
Dev. Genet.
19,
157-162[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Kerr, S. M.,
Taggart, M. H.,
Lee, M.,
and Cooke, H. J.
(1996)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
5,
1139-1148 28.
Duan, C.,
Liimatta, M. B.,
and Bottum, O. L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
37147-37153 29.
Jonassen, A. K.,
Sack, M. N.,
Mjos, O. D.,
and Yellon, D. M.
(2001)
Circ. Res.
89,
1191-1198 30.
Friddle, C. J.,
Koga, T.,
Rubin, E. M.,
and Bristow, J.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
6745-6750 31.
Clemmons, D. R.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
140,
19-24[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Perks, C. M.,
McCaig, C.,
and Holly, J. M.
(2000)
J. Cell. Biochem.
80,
248-258[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Roschier, M.,
Kuusisto, E.,
Suuronen, T.,
Korhonen, P.,
Kyrylenko, S.,
and Salminen, A.
(2001)
J. Neurochem.
76,
11-20[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
McCaig, C.,
Perks, C. M.,
and Holly, J. M.
(2002)
J. Cell. Biochem.
84,
784-794[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Apstein, C. S.,
Gravino, F. N.,
and Haudenschild, C. C.
(1983)
Circ. Res.
52,
515-526[Abstract]
36.
Malhotra, R.,
and Brosius, F. C., III
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
12567-12575 37.
Knight, J.
(2001)
Nature
410,
860-861[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Bernal-Mizrachi, E.,
Wen, W.,
Stahlhut, S.,
Welling, C. M.,
and Permutt, M. A.
(2001)
J. Clin. Investig.
108,
1631-1638[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Bodine, S. C.,
Stitt, T. N.,
Gonzalez, M.,
Kline, W. O.,
Stover, G. L.,
Bauerlein, R.,
Zlotchenko, E.,
Scrimgeour, A.,
Lawrence, J. C.,
Glass, D. J.,
and Yancopoulos, G. D.
(2001)
Nat. Cell Biol.
3,
1014-1019[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Godecke, A.,
and Schrader, J.
(2000)
Basic Res. Cardiol.
95,
492-498[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Fishman, G. I.
(1998)
Circ. Res.
82,
837-844 42.
McPherron, A. C.,
and Lee, S. J.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
12457-12461 43.
McPherron, A. C.,
Lawler, A. M.,
and Lee, S. J.
(1997)
Nature
387,
83-90[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
44.
Sharma, M.,
Kambadur, R.,
Matthews, K. G.,
Somers, W. G.,
Devlin, G. P.,
Conaglen, J. V.,
Fowke, P. J.,
and Bass, J. J.
(1999)
J. Cell. Physiol.
180,
1-9[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Hu, X. Xu, Y. Huang, J. Fassett, T. P. Flagg, Y. Zhang, C. G. Nichols, R. J. Bache, and Y. Chen Disruption of Sarcolemmal ATP-Sensitive Potassium Channel Activity Impairs the Cardiac Response to Systolic Overload Circ. Res., October 24, 2008; 103(9): 1009 - 1017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Kim, R. R. Roy, J. A. Kim, H. Zhong, F. Haddad, K. M. Baldwin, and V. R. Edgerton Gene expression during inactivity-induced muscle atrophy: effects of brief bouts of a forceful contraction countermeasure J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2008; 105(4): 1246 - 1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Rodgers and D. K. Garikipati Clinical, Agricultural, and Evolutionary Biology of Myostatin: A Comparative Review Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2008; 29(5): 513 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ventura-Clapier, A. Garnier, and V. Veksler Transcriptional control of mitochondrial biogenesis: the central role of PGC-1{alpha} Cardiovasc Res, July 15, 2008; 79(2): 208 - 217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. L. Holland and S. A. Summers Sphingolipids, Insulin Resistance, and Metabolic Disease: New Insights from in Vivo Manipulation of Sphingolipid Metabolism Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2008; 29(4): 381 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Y. Oudit, Z. Kassiri, J. Zhou, Q. C. Liu, P. P. Liu, P. H. Backx, F. Dawood, M. A. Crackower, J. W. Scholey, and J. M. Penninger Loss of PTEN attenuates the development of pathological hypertrophy and heart failure in response to biomechanical stress Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2008; 78(3): 505 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.-W. Wang, H. Chang, P. Kuan, and K.-G. Shyu Angiotensin II activates myostatin expression in cultured rat neonatal cardiomyocytes via p38 MAP kinase and myocyte enhance factor 2 pathway J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2008; 197(1): 85 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Pasha, Y. Wang, R. Sheikh, D. Zhang, T. Zhao, and M. Ashraf Preconditioning enhances cell survival and differentiation of stem cells during transplantation in infarcted myocardium Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2008; 77(1): 134 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N Artaza, S. Reisz-Porszasz, J. S Dow, R. A Kloner, J. Tsao, S. Bhasin, and N. F Gonzalez-Cadavid Alterations in myostatin expression are associated with changes in cardiac left ventricular mass but not ejection fraction in the mouse J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2007; 194(1): 63 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ahuja, P. Sdek, and W. R. MacLellan Cardiac Myocyte Cell Cycle Control in Development, Disease, and Regeneration Physiol Rev, April 1, 2007; 87(2): 521 - 544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Shiojima and K. Walsh Regulation of cardiac growth and coronary angiogenesis by the Akt/PKB signaling pathway Genes & Dev., December 15, 2006; 20(24): 3347 - 3365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Matsakas, C. Bozzo, N. Cacciani, F. Caliaro, C. Reggiani, F. Mascarello, and M. Patruno Effect of swimming on myostatin expression in white and red gastrocnemius muscle and in cardiac muscle of rats Exp Physiol, November 1, 2006; 91(6): 983 - 994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schiekofer, I. Shiojima, K. Sato, G. Galasso, Y. Oshima, and K. Walsh Microarray analysis of Akt1 activation in transgenic mouse hearts reveals transcript expression profiles associated with compensatory hypertrophy and failure Physiol Genomics, October 11, 2006; 27(2): 156 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Javadov, D. M. Purdham, A. Zeidan, and M. Karmazyn NHE-1 inhibition improves cardiac mitochondrial function through regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis during postinfarction remodeling Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2006; 291(4): H1722 - H1730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|