|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201603200 on April 17, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 25, 22553-22557, June 21, 2002
Retinol/Ethanol Drug Interaction during Acute Alcohol
Intoxication in Mice Involves Inhibition of Retinol Metabolism to
Retinoic Acid by Alcohol Dehydrogenase*
Andrei
Molotkov and
Gregg
Duester
From the Gene Regulation Program, Burnham Institute, La Jolla,
California 92037
Received for publication, February 15, 2002, and in revised form, April 4, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Substantial evidence indicates that one
consequence of alcohol intoxication is a reduction in retinoic acid
(RA) levels. Studies on the mechanism have shown that chronic ethanol
consumption induces P450 enzymes that increase RA degradation, thus
accounting for much but not all of the observed decrease in RA. A
reduction in RA synthesis may also be involved as ethanol competitively
inhibits retinol oxidation catalyzed by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH)
in vitro. This may be important during acute ethanol
intoxication and may contribute to adverse retinol/ethanol drug
interactions. Here we have examined mice for the effect of
either acute ethanol intoxication or Adh1 gene disruption
on RA synthesis and degradation. RA produced following a dose of
retinol (50 mg/kg) was reduced 87% by pretreatment with an
intoxicating dose of ethanol (3.5 g/kg). RA produced in
Adh1-null mutant mice following a 50-mg/kg dose of retinol
was reduced 82% relative to wild-type mice, thus similar to wild-type
mice pretreated with ethanol. Reduced RA production was associated with
increased retinol levels in both ethanol-treated wild-type mice and
Adh1-null mutant mice, indicating reduced clearance of the
retinol dose. RA degradation following a dose of RA (10 mg/kg) was
increased only 42% by ethanol pretreatment (3.5 g/kg) and only 26% in
Adh1-null mutant mice relative to wild-type mice. These
findings demonstrate that the reduced RA levels observed during acute
retinol/ethanol drug interaction are due primarily to a decrease in
ADH-catalyzed RA synthesis and secondarily to an increase in RA degradation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Vitamin A (retinol) is metabolized to retinoic acid
(RA),1 which serves as a
ligand for nuclear retinoid receptors essential for growth and
development of chordate animals (1, 2). Retinoid signaling influences
pattern formation during the development of several organs including
the central nervous system (3-5), limb buds (6-8), and eye (9). Also,
RA controls epithelial/mesenchymal inductive interactions during
organogenesis of the urinary and respiratory tracts (10-12), and RA is
needed in the adult to control epithelial cell differentiation (13) and
to provide some brain functions such as spatial learning and memory
(14, 15) and motor skills (16).
Retinoid activation is performed by enzymes that first oxidize retinol
to retinal followed by oxidation of retinal to RA. Many of the
retinoid-metabolizing enzymes identified in vitro are
members of the same families of alcohol- and aldehyde-metabolizing dehydrogenases that oxidize ethanol to acetaldehyde and acetaldehyde to
acetic acid (i.e. alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), respectively) (17). Deactivation of RA by
oxidation to more polar metabolites can be performed by various cytochrome P450 enzymes (18-20). Thus, the steady-state level of RA is
dependent upon the activities of both synthesizing and degrading enzymes.
It has been reported that chronic ethanol treatment of rats leads to a
reduction in RA levels in liver and serum and that this may contribute
to ethanol-induced liver carcinogenesis (21). Further studies on the
mechanism have indicated that much, but not all, of the decrease in RA
levels during chronic ethanol treatment can be attributed to an
increase in RA degradation by ethanol-inducible CYP2E1, a P450 that was
shown to metabolize RA to more polar metabolites (22). However, this
may not be the case for acute ethanol treatment as it takes days to
weeks for CYP2E1 activity to be induced by ethanol (23). Thus, the
mechanism whereby ethanol reduces RA levels may be different depending
on whether ethanol administration is acute or chronic.
It has been hypothesized that ethanol may reduce RA synthesis by acting
as a competitive inhibitor of ADH-catalyzed retinol oxidation (24, 25).
Mouse embryos treated acutely with ethanol have reduced levels of RA,
which may be a contributing factor in the pathogenesis of fetal alcohol
syndrome (26). Five classes of ADHs are known to exist in humans and
mice (27). Studies on purified human ADH1 and ADH4 have shown that
these enzymes are direct targets of ethanol action because ethanol can
competitively inhibit their abilities to catalyze retinol oxidation
with Ki values of ~0.04-3.8 mM for
ADH1 and 6-12 mM for ADH4 (28-30). These Ki values are well within the range of blood alcohol concentrations achieved by moderate or binge drinkers (31), and
alcoholics have much higher blood ethanol levels (32). Thus, ethanol
inhibition of ADH-catalyzed retinol oxidation may be of concern
medically as it could result in reduced RA synthesis leading to an
inhibition of retinoid signaling or reduced clearance of retinol
leading to toxicity.
Adverse interactions occur when vitamin A and ethanol are administered
simultaneously. This is particularly noticeable in alcoholics who were
administered retinol supplements to counter vitamin A deficiency where
it was found that retinol/ethanol drug interactions occurred that
increased hepatotoxicity and carcinogenicity (33). The mechanism of
such interactions is not well understood but may relate to the fact
that ADHs can utilize both retinol and ethanol as substrates. Genetic
studies have demonstrated that Adh1 / mice
have large deficiencies in the metabolism of both ethanol and retinol,
indicating that ADH1 can efficiently metabolize both substrates
in vivo (34). In addition to a decrease in metabolism of a
dose of retinol, Adh1 / mice display
increased retinol toxicity, indicating that clearance of retinol to RA
is protective against retinol toxicity (35). These studies have shown
that ADH1, expressed at high levels in liver, is the major enzyme
responsible for clearance of excess retinol or ethanol. Thus, analogous
to the observation that increased retinoid toxicity occurs in vitamin
A-treated Adh1 / mice, increased retinoid
toxicity associated with alcohol consumption may be rooted in the
ability of ethanol to inhibit ADH-catalyzed retinol oxidation.
Here we have examined RA synthesis and degradation in retinoid-treated
wild-type mice either with or without additional exposure to acute
ethanol intoxication. We have also compared these results with those
obtained from Adh1 / mice. Our results
indicate that acute ethanol treatment reduces ADH1-catalyzed metabolism
of a dose of retinol resulting in decreased RA synthesis, but in
addition there is also an increase in RA degradation that accounts for
some additional loss in RA.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Animals--
The wild-type and
Adh1 / -null mutant mice used here have been
described (34). Both strains are on the same genetic background: 50%
C57Bl/6, 25% Black Swiss, and 25% 129/SvJ. All mice examined were
matched for age, weight, and sex.
Acute Ethanol Treatment--
When used, ethanol was administered
intraperitoneally as one acute dose at 3.5 g/kg (18 µl of 25%
ethanol in physiological saline per gram of body weight) as previously
described (34). Control injections consisted of the same volume of
physiological saline. Injections were performed 30 min prior to retinol
or RA injection.
Retinol and RA Treatment--
Retinoids were administered orally
essentially as described (36). All-trans-retinol or
all-trans-RA (Sigma) were dissolved in acetone/Tween
20/water (0.25:5:4.75, v/v/v) and were administered by oral injection
at a dose of 50 mg/kg for retinol or 10 mg/kg for RA. At several time
points following retinoid injection, blood was collected and stored at
20 °C until HPLC analysis as described below.
Quantitation of Retinoic Acid and Retinol by HPLC--
Serum
(200 µl) was extracted with 2 ml of methanol/acetone (50:50, v/v).
After centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, the organic phase was evaporated under vacuum and the residue was dissolved in 200 µl of methanol/dimethyl sulfoxide (50:50, v/v).
Samples were analyzed by HPLC to quantitate retinoid levels using
standards for all-trans-RA and all-trans-retinol
(Sigma). Reversed-phase HPLC analysis was performed using a
MICROSORB-MVTM 100 C18 column (4.5 × 250 mm) (Varian)
at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Mobile phase consisted of 0.5 M
ammonium acetate/methanol/acetonitrile (25:65:10, v/v) (solvent A) and
acetonitrile (solvent B). The A/B (v/v) gradient composition was: 100:0
at the time of injection, 70:30 at 1 min, 65:35 at 14 min, 0:100 at 16 min. UV detection was carried out at 340 nm.
Data Analysis--
Quantitation of RA synthesis or degradation
over time was performed by determining the area under the curve (AUC).
Statistical significance was determined for raw data using the unpaired
Student's t test (Statistica version 5.0).
 |
RESULTS |
RA Synthesis during Acute Ethanol Treatment of Wild-type
Mice--
To examine RA synthesis, mice were treated orally with a
single dose of retinol (50 mg/kg), and metabolism to RA was followed over time by quantitation of RA in the serum. RA is normally present in
mouse serum at 4 ng/ml (37). Treatment of wild-type mice with retinol
resulted in a peak RA concentration of 1170 ng/ml (Fig.
1A).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Effect of acute ethanol treatment and
Adh1 / genotype on RA synthesis.
A, RA was quantitated in the serum of wild-type mice treated
with 50 mg/kg retinol (WT control) or in wild-type mice that
had also been pretreated with 3.5 g/kg ethanol 30 min prior to retinol
treatment (WT+ethanol). All values are mean ± S.E.
(n = 3). B, RA was quantitated in the serum
of wild-type (WT) mice or Adh1 /
mice treated with 50 mg/kg retinol. All values are mean ± S.E.
(n = 3). The WT data in A and B
are identical.
|
|
We have previously shown that treatment of mice with a single
intraperitoneal dose of ethanol (3.5 g/kg) results in a peak blood
ethanol concentration of ~90 mM at 30 min after the dose, with the concentration dropping to ~25 mM at 4-h
post-treatment (34). Mice exposed to acute ethanol intoxication in this
fashion were examined for RA synthesis as above. Pretreatment of
wild-type mice with 3.5 g/kg ethanol 30 min prior to retinol treatment
led to a large reduction in serum RA with the peak RA concentration reaching only 180 ng/ml (Fig. 1A). Comparison of AUC values
demonstrated that ethanol pretreatment resulted in an 87% reduction in
the level of serum RA (Table I).
Whether this is entirely due to a decrease in RA synthesis or whether
an increase in RA degradation may also occur during acute ethanol
exposure is examined below.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Area under curve (AUC) values for the effect of either ethanol or Adh1
gene disruption on all-trans-retinoic acid (RA) synthesis or
degradation
|
|
Comparison of RA Synthesis in Wild-type and Adh1 /
Mice--
Treatment of Adh1 / mice with 50 mg/kg retinol resulted in a peak serum RA concentration of only 270 ng/ml relative to wild-type mice that exhibited 1170 ng/ml (Fig.
1B). AUC values indicated that disruption of Adh1
resulted in an 82% reduction in the level of serum RA following a dose
of retinol (Table I). These findings suggest that ADH1 plays a large
role in the synthesis of RA from the administered retinol, but the
effect of a loss of ADH1 on RA degradation was also examined below.
Retinol Clearance--
The above mice were also examined for
concentration of serum retinol. Although wild-type mice exhibited 1.6 µg/ml serum retinol at 2 h following retinol treatment,
pretreatment with ethanol increased serum retinol to 2.5 µg/ml, and
Adh1 / mice exhibited 3.1 µg/ml (Fig.
2). Significant defects in serum retinol
clearance due to ethanol pretreatment or Adh1 disruption were also seen at 4 h following retinol treatment (Fig. 2).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of ethanol or
Adh1 / genotype on retinol
clearance. All-trans-retinol was quantitated in serum
of wild-type (WT) or Adh1 / mice
at 2 h or 4 h after a 50-mg/kg dose of retinol. The
WT+ethanol group was pretreated with 3.5 g/kg ethanol 30 min
prior to retinol treatment. All values are mean ± S.E.
(n = 3). *, p < 0.05 (significantly
different from the WT value).
|
|
RA Degradation During Acute Ethanol Treatment of Wild-type
Mice--
RA is efficiently metabolized to polar degradation products
(38) leading to a half-life in mouse serum of 0.5-1.0 h (39). Following treatment of wild-type mice with 10 mg/kg RA, serum RA was
quantified over time in order to examine the time course of clearance
(degradation). Treatment with this dose of RA resulted in a peak serum
RA concentration of 1550 ng/ml (comparable to the peak RA observed when
retinol was administered above) with almost complete RA clearance
observed at 6 h (Fig.
3A). Pretreatment of wild-type
mice with ethanol (3.5 g/kg) 30 min prior to RA treatment resulted in a
lower RA peak concentration of 1002 ng/ml (Fig. 3A). The AUC
values indicated that ethanol increased RA clearance (degradation) by
42% (Table I). Although significant, the effect on degradation is not
enough to account for the lower RA values observed in Fig.
1A when retinol was metabolized to RA in the presence of
ethanol.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of acute ethanol treatment and
Adh1 / genotype on RA degradation.
A, RA was quantitated in the serum of wild-type mice treated
with 10 mg/kg RA (WT control) or in wild-type mice that had
also been pretreated with 3.5 g/kg ethanol 30 min prior to RA treatment
(WT+ethanol). All values are mean ± S.E.
(n = 3). B, RA was quantitated in the serum
of wild-type (WT) mice or Adh1 /
mice treated with 10 mg/kg RA. All values are mean ± S.E.
(n = 3). The WT data in A and B
are identical.
|
|
Comparison of RA Degradation in Wild-type and Adh1 /
Mice--
Treatment of Adh1 / mice with 10 mg/kg RA resulted in a peak serum RA concentration of 1250 ng/ml
relative to wild-type mice, which exhibited 1550 ng/ml (Fig.
3B). A comparison of AUC values indicated that disruption of
Adh1 resulted in only a 26% increase in RA clearance (Table
I). Thus, the effect of Adh1 disruption on RA degradation is
low, indicating that the results in Fig. 1B are primarily
due to a decrease in RA synthesis from retinol.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The investigation described here indicates that acute alcohol
intoxication does in fact reduce metabolism of a dose of retinol and
has a negative effect on RA concentration. A single dose of ethanol was
shown to decrease RA synthesis and increase RA degradation, with the
effect on synthesis being larger. As the peak RA concentrations observed following either 50 mg/kg retinol (1170 ng/ml) or 10 mg/kg RA
(1550 ng/ml) are in the same order of magnitude, the studies performed
here with retinol treatment or RA treatment can be compared to estimate
the relative effect of ethanol on RA synthesis as opposed to
degradation. From the AUC calculations it is clear that ethanol
decreases the amount of RA measured following retinol treatment by
87%, from an AUC value of 2.93 to 0.37, while increasing RA
degradation following RA treatment by 42%. Thus, if one allows that
42% of the ethanol-induced loss of RA following retinol treatment may
be due to increased RA degradation, this would only reduce the AUC from
2.93 to 1.70, accounting for an AUC loss of 1.23. As we observed an AUC
of 0.37, this indicates that an ethanol-induced decrease in RA
synthesis must account for the remaining AUC loss of 1.33. Thus, the
effect of acute ethanol on RA synthesis is larger than the effect seen
on RA degradation, but both are significant.
Further evidence that ethanol inhibits RA synthesis was obtained by our
results indicating that the administered retinol was not cleared as
efficiently during acute ethanol intoxication. This suggests that
oxidation of retinol to retinal by ADH was reduced by ethanol, thus
producing less retinal for synthesis of RA. Our studies on
Adh1 / mice have confirmed that this is the
most plausible explanation. In the absence of ethanol,
Adh1 / mice demonstrated an 82% reduction in
RA concentration relative to wild-type mice. This is nearly the same
effect that was observed when wild-type mice were treated with ethanol.
Examination of the effect of Adh1 disruption on RA
degradation indicated that RA degradation was increased by only 26%.
Thus, for both Adh1 / mice and acute
ethanol-treated mice, the negative effect on RA synthesis is still
greater than the positive effect on RA degradation.
It is unclear why a loss of ADH1 or acute ethanol treatment would
increase RA degradation, but it is clear why these conditions would
decrease RA synthesis. ADH1 is the most abundant ADH in mouse liver
(40-42), and it is the most efficient ADH for ethanol metabolism
measured either by in vitro comparison of enzyme activities (40) or by in vivo comparison of ethanol clearance
capabilities in wild-type and ADH-deficient mice (34). ADH1 is also the
most efficient enzyme for metabolism of a dose of retinol to RA with ADH3 (expressed ubiquitously) playing a lesser but still significant role (43). Adh1 / mice do not have noticeable
developmental defects, but Adh3 / mice have
reduced survival and growth that is rescued by retinol supplementation
(43). Thus, ADH3 in contrast to ADH1 has been shown to be necessary for
metabolism of retinol to RA when retinol levels are low
(physiological). However, a large role for ADH1 in the clearance of
pharmacological doses of retinol to prevent toxicity has been
demonstrated (i.e. Adh1 / mice
have increased retinol toxicity as demonstrated by a 3-fold decrease in
the LD50 for retinol) (35).
As metabolism of retinol by ADH1 is competitively inhibited by
ethanol with a Ki of 0.04-3.8 mM (28,
29), the mechanism behind the effects we observed during acute ethanol treatment could involve ethanol inhibition of ADH1-catalyzed retinol metabolism. The dose of ethanol administered here (3.5 g/kg) has been
previously shown to result in a peak blood ethanol concentration of 90 mM after 30 min then falling to 20 mM over the
subsequent 4 h (34). Thus, during the 4 h when RA was
monitored after this ethanol treatment, there was clearly sufficient
ethanol to almost totally inhibit ADH1-catalyzed retinol oxidation. To
account for the lower AUC in ethanol-treated wild-type mice (0.37)
compared with Adh1 / mice (0.52), it is
possible that this is due to ethanol inhibition of ADH3 (43) or yet
other ADHs (27) that may play minor roles in clearance of excess
retinol. Alternatively, the difference may be accounted for by
increased RA degradation, because we demonstrated that ethanol-treated
mice appeared to show a larger increase in RA degradation than
Adh1 / mice.
Collectively, the above findings indicate that ADH1 plays a central
role in retinol/ethanol drug interactions, thus suggesting that the
primary defect leading to adverse interaction may be reduced clearance
of retinol to RA through the ADH metabolic pathway. ADH1 metabolism of
retinol evidently produces less toxicity than either accumulation of
retinol or metabolism through other pathways.
In addition, the observations reported here on acute ethanol
intoxication demonstrate that ethanol decreases RA synthesis from the
administered retinol, although it remains to be tested whether acute
treatment reduces endogenous RA levels in mice not treated with
retinol. Previous studies have demonstrated that chronic ethanol
intoxication does reduce endogenous RA levels in rats, and the
mechanism of RA deficiency is dependent to a large extent upon an
ethanol-induced increase of CYP2E1-dependent degradation of
RA to less active metabolites such as 4-oxo-RA (22). However, any
effect of ethanol on endogenous RA levels during acute ethanol
intoxication (i.e. binge drinking) should be different
because CYP2E1 induction requires several days to weeks of continuous
ethanol treatment (23). Also, as RA levels during chronic ethanol
intoxication were restored to only about 75% of control levels when RA
degradation was inhibited by co-administering chlormethiazole, a
specific CYP2E1 inhibitor (22), it is unknown what is responsible for
the remaining 25% reduction in RA concentration during chronic ethanol
intoxication. Our findings here combined with previous studies (43)
suggest that this may be due to ethanol inhibition of endogenous RA
synthesis catalyzed by one or more retinol-utilizing ADHs.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank G. Salvesen for providing access to
an HPLC system.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant AA09731 (to G. D.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Gene Regulation
Program, Burnham Inst., 10901 North Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92037. Tel.: 858-646-3138; Fax: 858-646-3195; E-mail:
duester@burnham.org.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 17, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201603200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
RA, all-trans-retinoic acid;
ADH, alcohol dehydrogenase;
Adh1, mouse class I ADH gene;
ALDH, aldehyde dehydrogenase;
HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography;
AUC, area under curve, WT,
wild-type.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kastner, P.,
Chambon, P.,
and Leid, M.
(1994)
in
Vitamin A in Health and Disease
(Blomhoff, R., ed)
, pp. 189-238, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York
|
| 2.
|
Mangelsdorf, D. J.,
Umesono, K.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1994)
in
The Retinoids: Biology, Chemistry, and Medicine
(Sporn, M. B.
, Roberts, A. B.
, and Goodman, D. S., eds), 2nd Ed.
, pp. 319-349, Raven Press, Ltd., New York
|
| 3.
|
Maden, M.,
Gale, E.,
Kostetskii, I.,
and Zile, M. H.
(1996)
Curr. Biol.
6,
417-426[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Niederreither, K.,
Vermot, J.,
Schuhbaur, B.,
Chambon, P.,
and Dollé, P.
(2000)
Development
127,
75-85[Abstract]
|
| 5.
|
Gavalas, A.,
and Krumlauf, R.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
10,
380-386[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Helms, J. A.,
Kim, C. H.,
Eichele, G.,
and Thaller, C.
(1996)
Development
122,
1385-1394[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
Stratford, T.,
Horton, C.,
and Maden, M.
(1996)
Curr. Biol.
6,
1124-1133[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Power, S. C.,
Lancman, J.,
and Smith, S. M.
(1999)
Dev. Dyn.
216,
469-480[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Wagner, E.,
McCaffery, P.,
and Dräger, U. C.
(2000)
Dev. Biol.
222,
460-470[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Mendelsohn, C.,
Lohnes, D.,
Décimo, D.,
Lufkin, T.,
LeMeur, M.,
Chambon, P.,
and Mark, M.
(1994)
Development
120,
2749-2771[Abstract]
|
| 11.
|
Malpel, S.,
Mendelsohn, C.,
and Cardoso, W. V.
(2000)
Development
127,
3057-3067[Abstract]
|
| 12.
|
Batourina, E.,
Gim, S.,
Bello, N.,
Shy, M.,
Clagett-Dame, M.,
Srinivas, S.,
Costantini, F.,
and Mendelsohn, C.
(2001)
Nat. Genet.
27,
74-78[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
De Luca, L. M.,
Kosa, K.,
and Andreola, F.
(1997)
J. Nutr. Biochem.
8,
426-437[CrossRef]
|
| 14.
|
Chiang, M. Y.,
Misner, D.,
Kempermann, G.,
Schikorski, T.,
Giguère, V.,
Sucov, H. M.,
Gage, F. H.,
Stevens, C. F.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1998)
Neuron
21,
1353-1361[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Misner, D. L.,
Jacobs, S.,
Shimizu, Y., De,
Urquiza, A. M.,
Solomin, L.,
Perlmann, T., De,
Luca, L. M.,
Stevens, C. F.,
and Evans, R. M.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
11714-11719[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Krezel, W.,
Ghyselinck, N.,
Samad, T. A.,
Dupé, V.,
Kastner, P.,
Borrelli, E.,
and Chambon, P.
(1998)
Science
279,
863-867[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Duester, G.
(2000)
Eur. J. Biochem.
267,
4315-4324[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Roberts, E. S.,
Vaz, A. D. N.,
and Coon, M. J.
(1992)
Mol. Pharmacol.
41,
427-433[Abstract]
|
| 19.
|
White, J. A.,
Guo, Y. D.,
Baetz, K.,
Beckett-Jones, B.,
Bonasoro, J.,
Hsu, K. E.,
Dilworth, F. J.,
Jones, G.,
and Petkovich, M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
29922-29927[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
McSorley, L. C.,
and Daly, A. K.
(2000)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
60,
517-526[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Wang, X. D.,
Liu, C.,
Chung, J. Y.,
Stickel, F.,
Seitz, H. K.,
and Russell, R. M.
(1998)
Hepatology
28,
744-750[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Liu, C.,
Russell, R. M.,
Seitz, H. K.,
and Wang, X. D.
(2001)
Gastroenterology
120,
179-189[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Lieber, C. S.
(1997)
Clin. Chim. Acta
257,
59-84[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Duester, G.,
Shean, M. L.,
McBride, M. S.,
and Stewart, M. J.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
1638-1646[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Duester, G.
(1991)
Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.
15,
568-572[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Deltour, L.,
Ang, H. L.,
and Duester, G.
(1996)
FASEB J.
10,
1050-1057[Abstract]
|
| 27.
|
Szalai, G.,
Duester, G.,
Friedman, R.,
Jia, H.,
Lin, S.,
Roe, B. A.,
and Felder, M. R.
(2002)
Eur. J. Biochem.
269,
224-232[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Han, C. L.,
Liao, C. S., Wu, C. W.,
Hwong, C. L.,
Lee, A. R.,
and Yin, S. J.
(1998)
Eur. J. Biochem.
254,
25-31[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Kedishvili, N. Y.,
Gough, W. H.,
Davis, W. I.,
Parsons, S., Li, T. K.,
and Bosron, W. F.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
249,
191-196[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Allali-Hassani, A.,
Peralba, J. M.,
Martras, S.,
Farrés, J.,
and Parés, X.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
426,
362-366[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Eckardt, M. J.,
File, S. E.,
Gessa, G. L.,
Grant, K. A.,
Guerri, C.,
Hoffman, P. L.,
Kalant, H.,
Koob, G. F., Li, T.-K.,
and Tabakoff, B.
(1998)
Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.
22,
998-1040[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Lindblad, B.,
and Olsson, R.
(1976)
J. Am. Med. Assoc.
236,
1600-1602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Leo, M. A.,
and Lieber, C. S.
(1999)
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
69,
1071-1085[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Deltour, L.,
Foglio, M. H.,
and Duester, G.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
16796-16801[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Molotkov, A.,
Deltour, L.,
Foglio, M. H.,
Cuenca, A. E.,
and Duester, G.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
13804-13811[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Collins, M. D.,
Eckhoff, C.,
Chahoud, I.,
Bochert, G.,
and Nau, H.
(1992)
Arch. Toxicol.
66,
652-659[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Satre, M. A.,
Ugen, K. E.,
and Kochhar, D. M.
(1992)
Biol. Reprod.
46,
802-810[Abstract]
|
| 38.
|
Frolik, C. A.
(1984)
in
The Retinoids, Vo. 2
(Sporn, M. B.
, Roberts, A. B.
, and Goodman, D. S., eds)
, pp. 177-208, Academic, Orlando
|
| 39.
|
Armstrong, R. B.,
Ashenfelter, K. O.,
Eckhoff, C.,
Levin, A. A.,
and Shapiro, S. S.
(1994)
in
The Retinoids: Biology, Chemistry, and Medicine
(Sporn, M. B.
, Roberts, A. B.
, and Goodman, D. S., eds), 2nd Ed.
, pp. 545-572, Raven Press, Ltd., New York
|
| 40.
|
Algar, E. M.,
Seeley, T.-L.,
and Holmes, R. S.
(1983)
Eur. J. Biochem.
137,
139-147[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Zgombic-Knight, M.,
Ang, H. L.,
Foglio, M. H.,
and Duester, G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
10868-10877[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Haselbeck, R. J.,
and Duester, G.
(1997)
Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.
21,
1484-1490[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Molotkov, A.,
Fan, X.,
Deltour, L.,
Foglio, M. H.,
Martras, S.,
Farrés, J.,
Parés, X.,
and Duester, G.
(2002)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
99,
5337-5342[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J A McCarroll, P A Phillips, N Santucci, R C Pirola, J S Wilson, and M V Apte
Vitamin A inhibits pancreatic stellate cell activation: implications for treatment of pancreatic fibrosis
Gut,
January 1, 2006;
55(1):
79 - 89.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Fatma, E. Kubo, L. T. Chylack Jr., T. Shinohara, Y. Akagi, and D. P. Singh
LEDGF regulation of alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases in lens epithelial cells: stimulation of retinoic acid production and protection from ethanol toxicity
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
August 1, 2004;
287(2):
C508 - C516.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Molotkov and G. Duester
Genetic Evidence That Retinaldehyde Dehydrogenase Raldh1 (Aldh1a1) Functions Downstream of Alcohol Dehydrogenase Adh1 in Metabolism of Retinol to Retinoic Acid
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 19, 2003;
278(38):
36085 - 36090.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X.-D. Wang
Retinoids and Alcohol-Related Carcinogenesis
J. Nutr.,
January 1, 2003;
133(1):
287S - 290.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|