Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M203037200 on April 17, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 25, 22605-22615, June 21, 2002
Escherichia coli Apurinic-Apyrimidinic Endonucleases
Enhance the Turnover of the Adenine Glycosylase MutY with G:A
Substrates*
Mary Ann
Pope
,
Silvia L.
Porello, and
Sheila S.
David§
From the Department of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake
City, Utah 84103
Received for publication, March 28, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The DNA repair enzyme MutY plays an important
role in the prevention of DNA mutations resulting from the presence of
the oxidatively damaged lesion 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine
(OG). MutY is a base excision repair (BER) glycosylase that removes
misincorporated adenine residues from OG:A mispairs, as well as G:A and
C:A mispairs. We have previously shown that, under conditions of low
MutY concentrations relative to an OG:A or G:A substrate, the time
course of the adenine glycosylase reaction exhibits biphasic kinetic
behavior due to slow release of the DNA product by MutY. The
dissociation of MutY from its product may require the recruitment of
other proteins from the BER pathway, such as an apurinic-apyrimidinic
(AP) endonuclease, as turnover-enhancing cofactors. The effect of the
AP endonucleases endonuclease IV (Endo IV), exonuclease III (Exo III),
and Ape1 on the reaction kinetics of MutY with G:A- and OG:A-containing substrates was investigated. The effect of the glycosylases UDG and
MutM and the DNA polymerase pol I was also characterized. Endo
IV and Exo III, unlike Ape1, UDG, and pol I, greatly enhance the rate
of product release with a G:A substrate, whereas the rate constant for
the adenine removal step remains unchanged. Furthermore, the turnover
rate with a truncated form of MutY, Stop 225, which lacks 125 amino
acids of the C terminus, is unaffected by the presence of Endo IV or
Exo III. These results constitute the first evidence of an interaction
between the MutY-product DNA complex and Endo IV or Exo III.
Furthermore, they suggest a role for the C-terminal domain of MutY in
mediating this interaction.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The base excision repair
(BER)1 pathway is the primary
cellular mechanism charged with the task of removing DNA bases modified via hydrolysis, oxidation, and alkylation (1). BER relies on the action
of damage-specific DNA glycosylases that recognize various types of
modified or inappropriate bases within the context of normal
Watson-Crick DNA (2). The repair process is initiated by hydrolytic
removal of the target base by the relevant DNA glycosylase and proceeds
by incision at the abasic site, generation of a gap, reparative DNA
synthesis, and ligation of the nicked DNA (1, 3). The BER pathway has
been reconstituted in vitro with cell-free extracts or
purified protein components, and these experiments have established the
minimal requirements for restoration of the damaged DNA (4-11). For
example, repair of uracil in DNA was achieved by use of five
Escherichia coli proteins: uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG),
endonuclease IV (an AP endonuclease), RecJ protein, DNA polymerase I,
and DNA ligase (7). Both "short patch" and "long patch" BER
pathways have been observed, which differ in the number of nucleotides
and the various protein components involved (12, 13). The type of BER
pathway utilized depends on the organism and the type of DNA damage;
however, minimally the BER pathway requires a damage-specific
glycosylase, an AP endonuclease, DNA polymerase, and DNA ligase.
The DNA glycosylases of BER may be classified into two distinct
classes: 1) monofunctional glycosylases, which catalyze the removal of
the damaged base to generate an apurinic or apyrimidinic (AP) site and
2) bifunctional glycosylase/AP-lyases, which catalyze base displacement
and an associated
-elimination reaction to provide strand scission
(2, 14). The AP site products of monofunctional glycosylases are
unstable and degrade autocatalytically to generate DNA strand breaks
(15). The presence of AP sites in DNA impedes DNA synthesis with many
DNA polymerases and may also be potentially mutagenic due to lack of
base coding information (16). The potent cytotoxicity of these sites
behooves the repair machinery to insert the appropriate base without
leaving the AP site exposed at any time. In keeping with this
imperative, many DNA glycosylases, including the human thymine DNA
glycosylase (hTDG), human uracil DNA glycosylase (hUDG), human OG
glycosylase (hOGG1), human MED1 protein, E. coli
double-stranded uracil DNA glycosylase (DUG), and the adenine
glycosylase MutY have been reported to bind very tightly to their
respective AP site products (17-25). Presumably, these glycosylases
remain bound to their AP site product until cellular components, which
will complete the repair process, are recruited.
The enzymes in charge of recognizing AP sites and catalyzing cleavage
of the DNA backbone are AP endonucleases. The ability of the human AP
endonuclease Ape1 (also called HAP1, APEX, REF1) to enhance release of
the DNA product in vitro from hUDG (19), hTDG (17), hOGG1
(20, 21), and murine MutY homolog (26) has been demonstrated recently.
This suggests a direct interaction between the AP endonuclease and the
BER glycosylase·AP site DNA product complex. In eukaryotes,
specific interactions between enzymes downstream of the glycosylase in
the BER pathway have also been uncovered. For example, Ape1 has been
found to make protein·protein contacts with polymerase
(27),
which, in turn, interacts directly with DNA ligase I (28). Some
interactions occur indirectly using a third protein as a mediator, as
is the case for polymerase
and ligase III, which are connected via the scaffolding protein XRCC1 (9). Structural studies of BER enzymes
and their substrate and product complexes have also suggested coordination between enzymes of the BER pathway (3, 29).
Two AP endonucleases, exonuclease III (Exo III) and endonuclease IV
(Endo IV), are well characterized in E. coli (2, 30). Both
enzymes nick the DNA strand on the 5' side of the AP site resulting in
5'-deoxyribose phosphate and 3'-deoxyribose-hydroxyl end products.
Despite their similar substrate specificity, the primary sequences of
these two enzymes are different. Exo III is the major AP endonuclease
in E. coli (31, 32) and is homologous to the human AP
endonuclease Ape1 (33-35). Exo III also possesses a potent 3'-5'
exonuclease activity. Endo IV belongs to a second group of AP
endonucleases that includes a variety of homologs thus far only
identified in bacteria and simple eukaryotic organisms such as APN-1 in
yeast (36, 37) and CeAPN-1 in the nematode Caenorhabditis
elegans (38). The in vitro reconstitution studies reported for the bacterial BER pathway utilized Endo IV as the AP
endonuclease, suggesting that this protein may be responsible for the
step following base removal by DNA glycosylases in vivo (7,
10). Indeed, APN-1 null yeast strains are strong mutators resulting in
a 60-fold increase in the rate of AT
CG transversions and a
hypersensitivity to AP site-generating species (39).
The prevention of mutations associated with formation of OG within
duplex DNA in E. coli relies on two BER glycosylases: MutY and MutM (also called Fpg) (40). MutM is an OG glycosylase specific for
removal of OG opposite C. The MutY enzyme prevents mutations caused by
OG by removing misincorporated adenine residues, thereby short-circuiting G:C
T:A transversion mutations (41). Homologs to
both MutY(42) and MutM (43-48) have been identified in
human cells (2). Indeed, the importance of the "GO" repair system in humans has recently been highlighted by the finding of a family with
colorectal tumors that have inherited variants of human MutY (hMYH)
(49).
MutY also exhibits adenine glycosylase activity toward G:A and C:A
mismatches (50-52). The adenine glycosylase MutY is composed of two
domains that are susceptible to separation upon partial proteolytic
digestion (53). The N-terminal domain (Met-1 to Lys-225) retains
catalytic activity (54) and exhibits a sequence (55) and structure (56)
that place MutY within the BER superfamily of DNA glycosylases (57).
The C-terminal domain has sequence (58) and structural homology to the
d(OG)TPase MutT (59), indicating a role in recognition of OG. Kinetic
experiments with substrates and binding assays with substrate analogs
are consistent with a role of the C-terminal domain in OG recognition
and nucleotide flipping (58, 60). However, it is possible that this
domain has additional functions. In studies of the kinetic properties of MutY reported previously by our laboratory (24, 60), the product
release step of the glycosylase reaction with G:A and OG:A substrates
was shown to be rate-limiting, suggesting a high affinity of MutY for
the AP site product. Though MutY binds tightly to the AP site product
produced from both OG:A and G:A substrates, this interaction is
particularly strong with the OG:AP site, such that the half-life
(t1/2) of the complex is approximately 3 h
(24). The strong interaction between MutY and OG:AP was also shown by
the ability to observe a distinct MutY "footprint" in
methidium-propyl EDTA-Fe(II) hydroxyl radical footprinting experiments
on the MutY·product complex (25). The tight binding of MutY to
the AP site may be important in vivo to avoid the adverse
effects of the abasic site lesion and the premature removal of OG by MutM.
It is conceivable that the in vivo turnover rate of MutY may
be higher than that observed in vitro. The dissociation of
MutY from its product may require the recruitment of other proteins from the BER pathway, such as an AP endonuclease, as turnover-enhancing cofactors. A study of the effect of the AP endonucleases Endo IV, Exo
III, and Ape1 on the kinetics of the reaction of MutY with G:A and OG:A
substrates is described herein. The effect of the glycosylases UDG and
MutM and the DNA polymerase pol I was also characterized. It was found
that Endo IV and Exo III, unlike Ape1, UDG, and polymerase I, greatly
enhance the rate of product release with a G:A substrate, whereas the
rate constant for the adenine removal step remained unchanged. However,
neither Endo IV nor Exo III enhanced turnover with an OG:A substrate.
Furthermore, the turnover rate for a truncated form of MutY, Stop 225, which lacks 125 amino acids on the C terminus, is not affected by the presence of Endo IV or Exo III. These results constitute the first evidence of an interaction between MutY and E. coli AP
endonucleases and suggest a role for the C-terminal domain in mediating
these interactions.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
General Methods, Materials, and Instrumentation--
The
plasmids pKKYEco, containing mutY, and pKKFapy2,
containing fpg, were kindly provided by M. Michaels and
J. H. Miller (UCLA). The plasmid containing endonuclease
IV (pET24 Eco Nfo) was provided by Dr. Richard
Cunningham (SUNY, Albany, NY). All common DNA manipulations were
performed using the standard protocols (61). All
-cyanoethyl
phosphoramidites were purchased from ABI, except the
7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine, and the tetrahydrofuran (dspacer) phosphoramidites, which were purchased from Glen
Research. All other reagents used were purchased from Fisher, Sigma
Chemical Co., or USB. 5'-End labeling was performed with T4
polynucleotide kinase (New England BioLabs) using
[
-32P]ATP (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.). Labeled
oligonucleotides were purified using ProbeQuant G-50 Micro columns
(Amersham Biosciences, Inc.). UV-visible spectroscopy was performed on
a Hewlett-Packard 8452A diode array spectrophotometer. Storage phosphor
autoradiography was performed using a Molecular Dynamics STORM 840 PhosphorImager. All data fitting was performed using GraFit v. 4. All
electrophoresis was performed using 1× or 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE)
buffer (pH 8.3), where 1× = 90 mM Tris, 90 mM
boric acid, 1 mM EDTA. Chromatography for MutY,
endonuclease IV, and MutM purification was conducted with a BioLogic
chromatography system (Bio-Rad) at 4 °C.
Enzymes--
The E. coli strain JM101
mutY::mini-tn10 harboring the pKKYS225
plasmid or pKKYEco plasmid were used in the production of Stop 225 and
WT MutY, respectively, as described previously by our laboratory (60).
Endonuclease IV was purified using pET 24-Eco Nfo plasmid in
BL21(DE3)pLysS cells. The purification of endonuclease IV was modified
from Haas et al. (62) by replacing dialysis steps with an
Amersham Biosciences, Inc. HiPrep 26/10 desalting column. E. coli MutM was purified as described previously (63). Purified Ape1
was a generous gift of Dr. David Wilson and Dr. Jan Erzberger (Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory). E. coli uracil-DNA
glycosylase (UDG) and pol I were purchased from Invitrogen. Exonuclease
III was purchased from New England BioLabs. It should be noted that,
for all of the enzymes except MutY and MutM (Fpg), the concentration is
listed as the Bradford concentration. MutY concentrations are reported
as the active site concentrations, and MutM concentrations are based on
the absorbance at 280 nm (
280 = 3.9 × 104 liters mol
1cm
1).
Oligonucleotides--
DNA oligonucleotides were synthesized by
standard phosphoramidite chemistry on an Applied Biosystems model 392 DNA/RNA synthesizer as per the manufacturer's protocol.
Oligonucleotides for enzyme assays and binding experiments were
purified by ion-exchange chromatography (Waters, Protein-Pak DEAE 8HR
column). The following DNA oligonucleotides were used:
d(5'-CGATCATGGAGCCACXAGCTCCCGTTACAG-3') where 30-G, X = 2'-deoxyguanosine (G) and 30-OG,
X = 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine (OG);
d(3'-GCTAGTACCTCGGTGYTCGAGGGCAATGTC-5') where 30-A,
Y = 2'-deoxyadenosine (A) and 30-THF, Y = tetrahydrofuran nucleotide (THF);
d(5'-CGATCATGGAGCCACGAGCTCCCGTTACAGTAGG-3'): 34-G;
d(3'-GGATGCTAGTACCTCGGTGATCGAGGGCAATGTC-5'): 34-A;
d(5'-CGAGAAGTTGACGGTCTGCAGCTGTAACGGGAGCTAGTGGCTCCATGATCGTCACGGTAAAGATCTACGG-3'): 70-A;
d(3'-GCTCTTCAACTGCCAGACGTCGACATTGCCCTCGA(OG)CACCGAGGTACTAGCAGTGCCATTTCTAGATGCC-5'): 70-OG.
Adenine Glycosylase Assays with MutY--
The adenine
glycosylase activity of MutY was monitored using a 30-bp
oligonucleotide duplex substrate with a centrally located G:A or OG:A
pair, as described previously by our laboratory (24, 60). The
A-containing strand was 32P-labeled on the 5'-end, and the
rate of adenine removal was monitored by treating the reaction mixture
with NaOH to promote strand cleavage at the abasic site. The substrate
DNA (30-nucleotide strand) and the product-derived oligonucleotide
(14-nucleotide) were separated in an 8 M urea-denaturing
polyacrylamide gel (15%) and then quantified via storage phosphor autoradiography.
The A-containing strand of the DNA duplexes used was
5'-32P-end-labeled using T4 polynucleotide kinase, and the
end-labeled A-containing strand was added to a final concentration of
2-5% to the unlabeled A-containing strand. The complementary strand was then added in slight excess (10%). The duplex formation was achieved by heating to 90 °C in an annealing buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 10 mM EDTA, and 150 mM NaCl) and then slow-cooling to room temperature over
3-4 h.
In all of the kinetic experiments, substrate DNA (20 nM
duplex) was equilibrated at 37 °C in reaction buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 10 mM EDTA, 30 mM NaCl, 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin). For
multiple-turnover experiments, the enzyme concentrations were adjusted
to afford a 10-20% product formation for the burst phase of the
reaction. Single-turnover experiments were performed in a manner
analogous to the multiple-turnover experiments, with a MutY protein
concentration of 60 nM. Enzyme concentrations for MutY are
the active enzyme concentration determined using an active-site titration method with an OG:A substrate (24).
Adenine Glycosylase Assays in the Presence of BER
Enzymes--
In experiments requiring Endo IV or Ape1, these enzymes
were added at concentrations ranging from 5 to 500 nM. In
experiments using Exo III, the Exo III concentration ranged from 38 to
760 nM. The adenine glycosylase activity was performed as
above with NaOH providing cleavage at the abasic site (not the AP
endonuclease). For experiments using Ape1, the buffer did not contain
EDTA and contained 2 mM Mg2+. Experiments were
performed in a similar manner with MutM, UDG, and pol I.
Gel Retardation Assays--
Gel retardation experiments (64)
were performed in a manner similar to that described previously for
MutY with substrate analog duplexes (25, 65). However, in these
experiments, the DNA duplex was prepared in a manner similar to that
for the kinetics experiments, i.e. 2-5% of the duplex was
32P-end-labeled and mixed with cold duplex at the
appropriate concentration. In addition, buffer conditions were slightly
different than previous experiments. Reactions containing 15 nM DNA duplex, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 22.5 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol were
incubated in the presence of freshly diluted Endo IV, Exo III, Ape-1,
or MutM in the presence or absence of 20 nM MutY. After
incubation at 37 °C for 15 min, the samples were electrophoresed on
a 6% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel (17 × 14 × 0.3 cm)
equilibrated with 0.5× TBE buffer at 4 °C. The dried gel was
exposed to a Molecular Dynamics storage phosphor screen for at least
10 h, and the autoradiogram was quantitated using ImageQuaNT
(Molecular Dynamics).
 |
RESULTS |
Endo IV Stimulates Release of MutY from the DNA Product with a G:A
Substrate--
Our laboratory has shown previously that, under
multiple-turnover conditions ([MutY] < [DNA]), the reaction of
MutY exhibits biphasic kinetics with both OG:A- and G:A-containing
substrates, consistent with rate-limiting product release (24). The
rate constant for the exponential phase is proportional to the rate constant of the steps involving chemistry (k2),
whereas the amplitude of the burst phase is proportional to the
concentration of active MutY. The linear steady-state portion of the
plots is dominated by the rate of product release
(k3). We have previously proposed a kinetic
scheme to analyze the kinetic properties of MutY (Scheme 1) and have described our analysis using
multiple- and single-turnover kinetics to determine the relevant rate
constants (24).
The effect of 5, 20, 50, and 100 nM Endo IV on the kinetics
of the reaction of 3 nM MutY with 20 nM DNA is
shown in Fig. 1A. The presence
of increasing concentrations of Endo IV causes a remarkable increase in
the steady-state rate of the glycosylase reaction but has a minimal
effect on the rate or amplitude of the burst. At sufficiently high Endo
IV concentration (~50 nM), product release is no longer
rate-limiting, and the observed plot is no longer biphasic. This
results in quantitative conversion to product after approximately 25 min at 100 nM Endo IV, whereas in the absence of Endo IV
only 25% product is formed after the same period of time. These data
suggest that Endo IV is able to displace MutY from the G:AP site in
DNA, thus facilitating the turnover of MutY.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Effect of endonuclease IV on the reaction of
MutY with a G:A substrate. A, a representative plot of
product formation at 37 °C as a function of time, under
multiple-turnover conditions, with MutY in the presence of increasing
amounts of Endo IV is shown. Conditions: substrate DNA, 20 nM; active MutY, 3 nM; Endo IV, 0 nM (closed circles), 5 nM
(open circles), 20 nM (open squares),
50 nM (open triangles), and 100 nM
(open diamonds). The steady-state rates
(kss) for this particular experiment: 0.04 ± 0.01, 0.06 ± 0.01, and 0.08 ± 0.02 min 1
with 0, 5, and 20 nM Endo IV, respectively. B,
representative plot of product formation as a function of time, under
single-turnover conditions, with MutY on a G:A-containing DNA duplex in
the presence and absence of Endo IV at 37 °C. Conditions: substrate
DNA (20 nM) and 60 nM MutY (active site
concentration) were reacted in the absence (closed circles)
or presence (open circles) of 480 nM Endo
IV.
|
|
The effect of Endo IV on the chemical events prior to product release
was investigated under single-turnover conditions (60 nM
MutY with 20 nM substrate DNA). Under these conditions, the observed rate constant remained unchanged (Fig. 1B). The
reactions in the presence of 0 or 480 nM Endo IV lead to
quantitative conversion of substrate to product with observed rate
constant values of (1.0 ± 0.2) and (1.1 ± 0.2)
min
1, respectively. The combined results indicate that
the presence of Endo IV does not affect the intrinsic chemical process
associated with the adenine removal and that the effect is limited to
the steps governing the steady-state rate (i.e. product release).
Exo III Stimulates the Product Release of MutY with a
G:A-containing DNA Substrate--
To prevent exonucleolytic
degradation of the DNA substrate by Exo III, a DNA duplex containing 3'
overhangs on both the G and the A strand was used, which has previously
been shown to inhibit the exonuclease activity of Exo III (66).
Unfortunately, at the high Exo III concentrations used in these
experiments (77-380 nM), the presence of the 3'
overhanging ends did not effectively inhibit the exonuclease activity;
however, reactions in which 10 mM EDTA was present in the
buffer completely inhibited the exonuclease activity while only
partially inhibiting the AP endonuclease activity. Thus, all Exo III
experiments were performed in buffer containing 10 mM EDTA
so that the analysis of the experiments would not be hampered by the
exonucleolytic degradation of the substrate.
Experiments in which increasing amounts of Exo III (0, 77, 160, and 380 nM) were added to reactions of 4 nM MutY with
20 nM G:A-containing substrate showed a stimulation of the
product release (k3) of MutY, until at high Exo
III concentrations (380 nM), the product formation plots no
longer retain biphasic character (Fig. 2A). These results are
qualitatively similar to those observed with Endo IV; however, a higher
concentration of Exo III is required under these conditions to produce
the same stimulation of the product release of MutY with G:A-containing
DNA by Endo IV.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of exonuclease III on the glycosylase
activity of MutY with a G:A substrate. A, a
representative plot of product formation as a function of time at
37 °C, under multiple-turnover conditions, with MutY in the presence
of increasing amounts of Exo III is shown. Conditions: DNA (34G:34A),
20 nM; active MutY, 4 nM; Exo III, 0 nM (closed circles), 77 nM
(open circles), 160 nM (open
squares), and 380 nM (open diamonds).
B, a representative plot of product formation as a function
of time at 37 °C, under single-turnover conditions, with MutY (30 nM), DNA (30G:30A, 20 nM), and Exo III, 0 nM (closed circles) and 380 nM
(open circles).
|
|
The effect of Exo III on the chemical events prior to product release
was investigated under single-turnover conditions (30 nM
MutY with 20 nM substrate DNA). The reactions in the
presence of 0 or 380 nM ExoIII lead to quantitative
conversion of substrate to product with observed rate constant values
of 1.4 ± 0.1 and 2.1 ± 0.1 min
1, respectively
(Fig. 2B). Under these conditions, the observed rate
constant is minimally changed; indeed, there appears to be a slight
increase in the observed rate constant in the presence of Exo III. The
combined results indicate that the presence of Exo III minimally
perturbs the intrinsic chemical process associated with the adenine
removal and that the effect is limited to the steps governing the
steady-state rate (i.e. product release).
Effect of Ape1 on the Reaction of MutY with a G:A
Substrate--
The effect of the ExoIII homolog human AP endonuclease
Ape1 on the reaction of 3 nM active MutY with 20 nM G:A-containing substrate DNA was also investigated. In
these reactions, EDTA was absent from the buffer to prevent removal of
the catalytic metal ions from Ape1. As shown in Fig.
3, increasing concentrations of Ape1, in
the range of 5-100 nM had no measurable effect on the
kinetics of the glycosylase reaction. Ape1 experiments performed in the
presence and absence of Mg2+ gave similar results (data not
shown). Because the AP site is the substrate for all of the AP
endonucleases, but an effect is seen only with Endo IV and Exo III,
there must be specific interactions between these E. coli
endonucleases and either the DNA and/or enzyme in the MutY·product
DNA complex. In short, the recognition of the AP site as a
substrate is not sufficient to displace MutY from the product-bound
complex.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Representative plot of product formation as a
function of time, under multiple-turnover conditions, with MutY on a
G:A-containing DNA in the presence of Ape1 at 37 °C.
Conditions: MgCl2, 2 mM; DNA (30-G:30-A), 20 nM; active MutY, 3 nM; Ape1, 0 nM
(closed circles), 5 nM (open
circles), 20 nM (open squares), 50 nM (open triangles), 100 nM
(open diamonds).
|
|
Endo IV Does Not Significantly Increase the Product Release of Stop
225 with G:A- and OG:A-containing DNA--
We (60) and others (58, 67)
have previously shown that removal of the C-terminal domain to form a
truncated enzyme (henceforth referred to as Stop 225) affects the
intrinsic rate for adenine removal. However, Stop 225 retains biphasic
kinetic behavior under conditions of substrate excess, indicating that
the rate of product release remains rate-limiting in a manner similar
to that observed with the WT enzyme (60). Indeed, the measured
k3 values for Stop 225 and WT MutY with a G:A
substrate are nearly identical (60). Thus, the effect of Endo IV on the
rate of the product release step with the truncated form of MutY was
studied under similar conditions. In these experiments, 20 nM G:A-containing oligonucleotide was incubated with 4 nM active Stop 225 in the presence of 0, 5, 20, 50, and 100 nM Endo IV (Fig. 4). The
calculated rate constant for the steady-state phase in the absence of
Endo IV was (0.015 ± 0.005) min
1 and remained
essentially unchanged by the presence of Endo IV at all concentrations.
This result indicates that the C-terminal domain of MutY, which has
been deleted in Stop 225, is at least partially responsible for the
enhancement of the steady-state rate by Endo IV on the native enzyme
reaction. Similar results were also obtained with an OG:A-containing
substrate.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Representative plot of product formation as a
function of time, under multiple-turnover conditions, with Stop 225 on
a G:A-containing DNA with increasing amounts of Endo IV at
37 °C. Substrate DNA (30-G:30-A, 20 nM) was reacted
for times ranging from 0.5 to 60 min with 4 nM Stop 225, in
the absence (closed circles) or presence (open
symbols) of 5 nM (circle), 20 nM (square), 50 nM
(triangle), and 100 nM (diamond) Endo
IV.
|
|
Exo III Does Not Significantly Increase the Product Release of Stop
225 with G:A- and OG:A-containing DNA--
Similar to what we observed
with Endo IV, Exo III did not significantly increase the product
release rate of Stop 225 with a G:A-containing DNA substrate. Under
conditions of 4 nM Stop 225 with 20 nM
G:A-containing duplex, the presence of 380 nM Exo III
resulted in a slight stimulation of the product release rate, k3 (Fig. 5).
However, this increase in k3 was very small and
fell within the experimental error of the reported
k3 of Stop 225 alone. When the concentration of
Exo III was increased to 1000 nM, there was still no
significant stimulation of the product release rate of Stop 225 with
G:A-containing DNA substrate. Similar results were also obtained with
an OG:A-containing substrate.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Representative plot of product formation as a
function of time, under multiple-turnover conditions, with Stop 225 on
a G:A-containing DNA (34-G:34-A) with increasing amounts of Exo III at
37 °C. Conditions: DNA, 20 nM; Stop 225, 4 nM; Exo III, 0 nM (closed circles)
and 380 nM (open circles).
|
|
Effect of UDG, DNA Polymerase I, and MutM on the Reaction of MutY
with G:A-containing Duplexes--
To determine the specificity of the
Endo IV and Exo III effect on the glycosylase activity of MutY, the
effect of other enzymes belonging to the BER pathway on the glycosylase
reaction of MutY with excess G:A-containing duplex oligonucleotide (20 nM) was examined. The MutY concentration used in these
experiments varied from 3 to 6 nM, and the UDG, pol I, and
MutM concentrations used ranged from 50 to 100 nM. No
alterations in the steady-state kinetic parameters of the glycosylase
reaction of MutY were detected upon addition of UDG or pol I to the
reaction mixture (data not shown). These enzymes have a high affinity
for non-target DNA and are thought to utilize a processive DNA-scanning
mechanism for damage recognition. The absence of an effect on the time
course of the MutY reaction in the presence of UDG and pol I suggests
that the ability of these enzymes to bind nonspecifically to DNA does
not compete with the specific binding of MutY. In contrast, as shown in
Fig. 6A, the presence of MutM
in the reaction mixture affects the course of the reaction of MutY in a
way that appears to be similar to that observed for Endo IV. However,
addition of increasing amounts of MutM (e.g. 480 nM) greatly inhibits the activity of MutY with a G:A
substrate under multiple-turnover conditions, probably due to
competition for the DNA double helix, whereas addition of 480 nM Endo IV does not appear to compete with MutY for the G:A
duplex (Fig. 6B). This result indicates that the mechanism by which MutM enhances turnover at low concentrations may be similar to
that of Endo IV and Exo III; however, at high concentrations the high
nonspecific binding of MutM to duplex DNA results in competition with
MutY, and this does not appear to be a feature of the Endo IV and Exo
III effects.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of MutM on the adenine glycosylase
activity of MutY. A, representative plot of product
formation as a function of time, under multiple-turnover conditions,
with MutY on G:A-containing DNA in the presence or absence of 50 nM MutM. Conditions: DNA (30G:30A), 20 nM;
active MutY, 4 nM; MutM, 0 nM (closed
circles), and 50 nM (open circles),
37 °C. B, representative plot of product formation as a
function of time, under multiple-turnover conditions, with MutY on a
G:A-containing DNA in the presence of 480 nM Endo IV or
MutM. Conditions: DNA, 20 nM; active MutY, 5 nM; MutY alone (closed circles), 480 nM MutM (open circles), 480 nM Endo
IV (open triangles), 37 °C. Note that MutM severely
inhibits the intrinsic rate of adenine removal, whereas similar
concentrations of Endo IV only affect turnover.
|
|
Effect of Endo IV on the Reaction of MutY with an OG:A
Substrate--
The effect of Endo IV on the reaction of MutY with an
OG:A-containing DNA duplex was also analyzed under multiple- and
single-turnover conditions. No change was observed on the steady-state
rate of the reaction of 20 nM OG:A-containing duplex DNA
and 3 nM MutY even at the highest concentration (480 nM) of Endo IV assayed (Fig.
7). This suggests that Endo IV is not
able to enhance the release of the OG:AP product from MutY.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of EndoIV on reaction of MutY with an
OG:A substrate. Representative plot of product formation as a
function of time, under multiple-turnover conditions, of MutY with an
OG:A-containing substrate in the presence of 480 nM Endo IV
at 37 °C. Substrate DNA, 20 nM, was reacted for times
ranging from 0.5 to 60 min with 3 nM MutY, in the absence
(closed circles) or in the presence (open
circles) of 480 nM Endo IV.
|
|
Because an OG:AP duplex has not yet been characterized as a substrate
for Endo IV, the ability of this enzyme to recognize and cleave a DNA
strand containing an AP site opposite to OG was tested. The AP site
analog tetrahydrofuran (THF) was used due to its increased stability
when compared with an abasic site. THF has been previously used in
biochemical studies of Endo IV, and it was shown to constitute a good
substrate for the enzyme (68). In this study, THF was incorporated into
a duplex DNA opposite G and OG, and the ability of Endo IV to cleave
the THF-containing DNA strand was determined. Analysis of the reaction
of Endo IV with G:THF- and OG:THF-containing oligonucleotides (data not
shown) demonstrated that OG:THF is comparable to G:THF as a substrate for Endo IV. This result is consistent with a previous report by
Erzberger et al. (68), where the recognition
elements for efficient AP endonuclease binding and subsequent activity
were analyzed. The authors concluded that the base opposite the AP site
is not an important recognition element for Endo IV. Thus, the
inability of Endo IV to enhance the OG:AP release from MutY must be a
consequence of unique properties of the MutY·OG:AP product complex.
This further highlights the differences in recognition and catalysis by
MutY of OG:A relative to G:A base pairs.
Displacement of MutY from the OG:AP site product may require
formation of a multiprotein complex of BER enzymes. Thus, we also
investigated the effect of various combinations of Endo IV, pol I, and
MutM on the product release rate (k3) in the
presence of MutY (data not shown). Essentially, all combinations of
these enzymes did not enhance the measured k3,
indicating that the presence of these enzymes under these conditions
was unable to enhance release of MutY from the OG:AP product. In
addition, we considered the possibility that the 30-bp duplex may be
too short to mediate interactions between these various BER enzymes and
MutY, and therefore, these experiments were also performed using a
70-bp duplex. Similar results were observed with the 70-bp duplex (data
not shown).
Exo III Does Not Increase the Release of MutY from the Product with
OG:A-containing DNA Substrate--
Similar to Endo IV, Exo III does
not increase the product release rate of MutY from OG:A-containing
substrate (Fig. 8). Under conditions of 4 nM MutY with 20 nM OG:A-containing DNA, the
presence of a relatively high Exo III concentration (380 nM) resulted in no measurable increase in the product
release rate (k3). However, unlike Endo IV,
under single-turnover conditions with the buffer conditions used in
previous experiments, Exo III processes OG:THF-containing DNA more
slowly than G:THF-containing DNA (Fig.
9). This slow processing of the
OG:THF-containing DNA may contribute to lack of stimulation of MutY by
Exo III with OG:A-containing substrate. However, at high concentrations
of Exo III, it is unlikely that the lack of stimulation is solely due
to the slow processing of the OG:AP-containing DNA.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effect of Exo III on the glycosylase activity
of MutY with OG:A-containing DNA substrate (30-OG:34A). Shown is a
representative plot of product formation as a function of time, under
multiple-turnover condition, with an OG:A-containing substrate (20 nM) with 4 nM MutY and Exo III, 0 nM (closed circles), 380 nM
(open circles) at 37 °C.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Representative plot of product formation as a
function of time illustrating the relative AP endonuclease cleavage
activity of Exo III with G:THF (closed squares)- and
OG:THF (open squares)-containing DNA under
single-turnover conditions at 37 °C. The DNA duplexes used,
30-THF:30-G and 30-THF:30-OG, did not contain overhanging ends.
Reactions were performed with 20 nM DNA and 22 nM Exo III.
|
|
We also investigated the effect of various combinations of Exo III, pol
I, and MutM on the product release rate (k3) in
the presence of MutY using the 70-bp OG:A-containing duplex substrates (data not shown). Essentially, all combinations of these enzymes did
not enhance the measured k3, indicating that the
presence of these enzymes under these conditions was unable to enhance release of MutY from the OG:AP product.
Displacement of MutY from the DNA Product by Endo IV--
The
enhancement of the rate of product release (k3)
of MutY by Endo IV suggested that Endo IV may interact with MutY to
displace MutY from the DNA, or, alternatively, both Endo IV and MutY
may remain bound to the DNA. Non-denaturing PAGE gel-retardation
experiments were performed to examine the interaction of Endo IV and
32P-end-labeled DNA duplexes containing OG:A, OG:THF, G:A,
or G:THF base pairs, in the presence and absence of MutY.
The PAGE analysis indicated that Endo IV was able to displace MutY when
a duplex containing a G:A or G:THF base pair was used (Fig.
10). Endo IV (Fig. 10, A and
B, lanes 2-4) or MutY (Fig. 10, A and
B, lane 5) with the duplex alone exhibit a band
with a distinct retarded mobility relative to the free duplex. The
mobility differences in the retarded bands are consistent with the
larger molecular mass of MutY (~39 kDa) relative to Endo IV (~32
kDa). In addition, in the case of MutY, the retarded band is likely due
to binding to the G:AP site product that would have formed during the
incubation period prior to loading on the gel. As Endo IV was added
with increasing concentrations to the MutY·DNA complex, a band with altered migration increased in intensity (Fig. 10, A and
B, lanes 6-8). This band comigrates with the
lanes for Endo IV with the DNA duplex, indicating that increasing
concentrations of Endo IV displaces MutY from the DNA duplex. Analogous
experiments with Ape1 instead of Endo IV in the presence and absence of
Mg2+ with the G:A and G:THF duplex (data not shown) did not
result in displacement of MutY from the DNA product or product analog by Ape1. Similar experiments were performed with OG:A- or
OG:THF-containing duplex (data not shown); however, no displacement of
MutY from the DNA duplexes in the presence of Endo IV was observed.
This result is consistent with the lack of an effect by Endo IV on the
glycosylase activity of MutY with OG:A substrates.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Storage phosphor autoradiogram of
non-denaturing gel resolution of DNA bound to MutY or Endo IV from the
free DNA duplex. Increasing amounts of Endo IV result in
displacement of MutY from A, G:A-containing duplex and
B, a G:THF-containing duplex. Conditions: substrate DNA, 15 nM; active MutY, 20 nM. Lane 1, DNA
only; lane 2, DNA and 50 nM Endo IV; lane
3, DNA and 100 nM Endo IV; lane 4, DNA and
200 nM Endo IV; lane 5, DNA and MutY; lane
6, DNA, MutY and 50 nM Endo IV; lane 7,
DNA, MutY, and 100 nM Endo IV; and lane 8, DNA,
MutY, and 200 nM Endo IV.
|
|
A Super-shifted Band Is Observed in Gel Retardation Assays of
MutY, Exo III, and G:A or OG:A-containing DNA--
The enhancement of
the rate of product release (k3) of MutY by Exo
III may also be due to the ability of Exo III to displace MutY from the
DNA duplex. Non-denaturing PAGE gel retardation experiments were
performed to examine the interaction of Exo III and
32P-end-labeled DNA duplexes containing OG:A, OG:THF, G:A,
or G:THF base pairs, in the presence and absence of MutY.
Gel retardation experiments were performed with increasing
concentrations of Exo III (0, 38, 77, 380 nM) with 15 nM OG:A-, G:A-, G:THF-, or OG:THF-containing DNA and 20 nM of active MutY. As shown in Fig.
11A, with the G:A substrate
DNA, increasing concentrations of Exo III in the absence of MutY (Fig.
11, lanes 1-4) did not produce a retarded band consistent
with an Exo III·DNA complex; this suggests that Exo III has a
relatively low affinity for DNA under the assay conditions. However,
increasing concentrations of Exo III in the presence of MutY resulted
in a super-shifted band with significantly retarded mobility relative
to MutY and DNA in the absence of Exo III (Fig. 11, lanes
5-8). Exo III has a molecular mass of 28 kDa whereas MutY
has a molecular mass of 39 kDa; therefore, Exo III bound to DNA is not
likely to produce a retarded band with slower migration than MutY.
Moreover, no retarded bands were observed with Exo III and DNA alone.
Thus, it is likely that the slow migrating band that is observed is due
to the DNA·MutY·Exo III complex. This indicates that Exo III may
interact directly with the MutY product·DNA complex. This interaction
appears to be strong enough to be observed in the gel retardation
experiments; however, this interaction must also mediate the
displacement of MutY from the G:AP product to enhance turnover of
MutY.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
Storage phosphor autoradiogram of
non-denaturing gel resolution of G:A- or OG:A- containing DNA, free, or
bound to MutY and ExoIII. The presence of increasing
concentrations of Exo III results in a super-shifted band
presumably due to the Exo III·MutY·DNA complex. Reactions were
performed with the blunt-ended duplex: A, 30G:30A and
B, 30OG:30A, at 25 °C. The concentrations used throughout
were: DNA duplex, 15 nM; MutY, 20 nM.
Lane 1, DNA only; lane 2, DNA and 38 nM Exo III; lane 3, DNA and 77 nM
Exo III; lane 4, DNA and 380 nM Exo III;
lane 5, DNA and MutY; lane 6, DNA, MutY, and 38 nM Exo III; lane 7, DNA, MutY, and 77 nM Exo III; lane 8, DNA, MutY, and 380 nM Exo III.
|
|
Similar results were seen with the DNA containing the THF
product analog (Fig. 12A).
Exo III appeared to not bind to DNA under these conditions in the
absence of MutY (Fig. 12A, lanes 1-4) even though G:THF-containing DNA is a substrate for Exo III. However, a
similar super-shifted band was observed as the Exo III concentration was increased in the presence of MutY (Fig. 12A, lanes
5-8). Interestingly, a super-shifted band with similar mobility
to that observed with the G:THF- and G:A-containing duplex was also
seen when an OG:THF-containing DNA duplex was used (Fig.
12B, lanes 5-8) or an OG:A-containing duplex
(Fig. 11B). This suggests that the DNA·MutY·Exo III
complex forms with both OG:AP- and G:AP-containing product duplexes
even though ExoIII only stimulates the release of MutY from
G:AP-product DNA.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 12.
Storage phosphor autoradiogram of
non-denaturing gel resolution of G:THF-containing or OG:THF-containing
DNA duplex free or bound to MutY and ExoIII. The presence of
increasing concentrations of Exo III results in a super-shifted band
presumably due to the Exo III·MutY·DNA complex. Reactions were
performed with the blunt-ended duplexes: A, 30-G:30-THF and
B, 30-OG:30-THF at 25 °C. Conditions: DNA, 15 nM; active MutY, 20 nM. Lane 1, DNA
only; lane 2, DNA and 38 nM Exo III; lane
3, DNA and 77 nM Exo III; lane 4, DNA and
380 nM Exo III; lane 5, DNA and MutY; lane
6, DNA, MutY, and 38 nM Exo III; lane 7,
DNA, MutY, and 77 nM Exo III; lane 8, DNA, MutY,
and 380 nM Exo III.
|
|
MutM Displaces MutY from G:A-containing DNA but Not OG:A-containing
DNA in Gel Retardation Assays--
Low concentrations of MutM have
also been shown to stimulate the turnover of MutY; however, as the
concentration of MutM was increased, inhibition of the adenine
glycosylase activity of MutY was observed. This suggests that the two
enzymes may compete for the DNA duplex. Gel retardation assays were
performed with increasing concentrations of MutM (0 to 200 nM) with 15 nM G:A-, G:THF-, OG:A-, and
OG:THF-containing DNA and 20 nM active MutY. In Fig. 13 the resulting autoradiogram from the
experiment with the G:A-containing DNA is shown. Similar results were
obtained with the G:THF duplex (data not shown). Increasing
concentrations of MutM in the absence of MutY (Fig. 13, lanes
1-4) resulted in a significant amount of retarded band due to the
MutM·DNA complex; thus, MutM has a high affinity for the DNA duplex
under these assay conditions. When the concentration of MutM increases
in the presence of MutY, the amount of DNA bound to MutY decreases as
the amount of DNA bound to MutM increases (Fig. 13, lanes
5-8). Analysis of samples used in the gel retardation assay by
denaturing PAGE (12%) indicates that all of the G:A-containing duplex
had been converted to product during the incubation time prior to
loading on the gel in the gel retardation experiment. Thus, these
experiments illustrate that MutM is able to displace MutY from the G:AP
site DNA product. However, displacement of MutY by MutM was not
observed when an OG:A- or OG:THF-containing DNA duplex was
used.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 13.
Storage phosphor autoradiogram of
non-denaturing gel resolution of DNA bound to MutY and free
G:A-containing DNA duplex (30G:30A). The presence of increasing
amounts of MutM results in displacement of MutY by MutM from
G:A-containing DNA substrate. Conditions: DNA, 15 nM;
active MutY, 20 nM. Lane 1, DNA only; lane
2, DNA and 50 nM MutM; lane 3, DNA and 100 nM MutM; lane 4, DNA and 200 nM
MutM; lane 5, DNA and MutY; lane 6, DNA, MutY,
and 50 nM MutM; lane 7, DNA, MutY, and 100 nM MutM; lane 8, DNA, MutY, and 200 nM MutM.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
During the past several years, considerable advances have been
made in the understanding of the structural and mechanistic details of
BER DNA glycosylases. Many studies on the substrate specificity and
kinetics have been performed, aimed at characterizing the behavior of
these important enzymes. In particular, pre-steady-state kinetics of
the reactions of E. coli MutY (24, 60), hTDG (17, 18), and
the human mismatch-specific glycosylase MED1 (22) have been thoroughly
investigated. In addition, analyses of the reactions of hUDG (19),
E. coli DUG (23), hOGG1 (20, 21), and mMYH (26) reveal a
similar type of kinetic behavior, and therefore a common theme for this
class of enzymes is emerging. In all of these cases, the overall rate
for the catalytic cycle is controlled by a step following base removal
as evidenced by characteristic burst kinetics for product formation.
This rate-limiting step is dominated by the rate of the release of the
enzyme from the DNA product. Our laboratory has used this
kinetic behavior to our advantage to determine the magnitude of rate
constants for both steps of mutant MutYs with various DNA substrates
(24, 60, 69-71).
The release of the product by these enzymes in vivo may
require the aid of cellular factors to protect the cell from the
deleterious effect of the AP site that remains after base removal. For
example, Ape1 has been shown to enhance the steady state of the
reaction of hTDG, hUDG, hOGG1, and mMYH (17, 19-21, 26). In addition, previous work with E. coli DUG (also called MUG) indicated
that the presence of the E. coli AP endonuclease Endo IV
enhances product release (23). In the case of the reaction of MutY with
a G:A substrate, a dramatic change in the steady-state rate of the
reaction was observed upon addition of Endo IV. The rate is
significantly enhanced to a degree that is dependent on the Endo IV
concentration. At the higher Endo IV concentrations tested, the product
release step is no longer rate-limiting and the product formation curve is no longer biphasic. Similar results were also obtained using the
E. coli AP endonuclease Exo III; however, the stimulation of
the turnover of MutY with Exo III required a significantly higher
concentration of protein. This may be due to the reduced activity of
Exo III or may suggest a weaker interaction of Exo III with the
MutY·DNA complex. Surprisingly, the human homolog to Exo III, Ape1,
did not stimulate turnover of MutY. This indicates that recognition of
the AP site alone is not responsible for the enhanced turnover and
suggests that there may be specific recognition of the E. coli MutY·product complex by the E. coli AP endonucleases.
Many enzymes of the BER pathway have significant affinity for undamaged
DNA and have been proposed to recognize their substrates through a
DNA-scanning process. To rule out nonspecific binding as a cause for
the Endo IV and Exo III effect, three other enzymes belonging to the
BER pathway have been assayed for potential effects on the glycosylase
activity of MutY. For two of them, UDG and DNA polymerase I, no effect
on the reaction of MutY with a G:A substrate was detected. At low
concentrations of MutM, on the other hand, enhancement of the turnover
of MutY in a fashion similar to Endo IV and Exo III was observed.
However, in contrast to the effect observed with the E. coli
AP endonucleases, the glycosylase reaction of MutY is inhibited at high
concentrations of MutM. Indeed, even the highest concentrations of Endo
IV or Exo III tested did not diminish the glycosylase activity of MutY.
This suggests that MutM and MutY compete for the DNA duplex and that this may be part of the mechanism by which MutM stimulates the turnover
of MutY. Because Endo IV and Exo III do not seem to inhibit the
glycosylase reaction at any concentration, this suggests that competition between Endo IV or Exo III and MutY for non-target DNA does
not contribute to the effect observed.
Endo IV, Exo III, and MutM are all able to enhance the turnover of MutY
with a G:A substrate; however, there are hints from the effects on the
glycosylase activity of MutY and the gel retardation experiments that
the exact mechanism of the enhanced turnover may be different for the
three enzymes. The fact that the presence of MutM inhibits the
glycosylase activity of MutY whereas Exo III and Endo IV do not
suggests that MutM may be able to more effectively compete with MutY
for the DNA duplex. Indeed, MutM binds to the G:A-containing duplex in
the absence of MutY. A distinct feature of Exo III, is that, unlike
Endo IV and MutM, it does not bind to the DNA duplex under the
conditions used; however, Exo III does bind to the MutY·DNA complex
to give a super-shifted band in the gel retardation assay. In contrast,
in the gel retardation assay, both Endo IV and MutM result in
displacement of MutY from the DNA duplex and formation of an Endo
IV·DNA or MutM·DNA complex. This is highly suggestive that Exo III
may be recognizing a specific structure of MutY bound to the product
DNA. Experiments are in progress to further explore both the
interaction of Endo IV and Exo IIII with MutY, and this may provide
additional insight into the features required for the enhanced turnover.
Specific recognition of the MutY-AP site DNA product by the E. coli AP endonucleases may be responsible for the enhanced turnover of MutY. In the three-dimensional structure of Endo IV bound to an AP
site-containing oligonucleotide, a major distortion of the DNA
structure was observed (72). Enzyme loops intercalate amino acid side
chains at the AP site, compress the phosphate backbone, and bend the
DNA by ~90°. This DNA distortion upon Endo IV binding could be one
of the factors reducing the affinity of MutY for the DNA and promoting
its dissociation from the duplex. Indeed, in a thorough analysis of the
structural characteristics of the enzymes in the human BER pathway,
Tainer et al. (29) showed that the extent of DNA bending
increases as the different enzymes in the pathway bind to the DNA. For
example, Ape1 has an extensive DNA binding surface and causes
considerable distortion of the bound DNA (73). The degree of kinking of
the DNA by Ape1 is considerably more than that observed by the
preceding glycosylase (such as hUDG). This has led Tainer and coworkers
(73) to suggest that these features of Ape1 recognition of AP site
substrate DNA allow for displacement of the glycosylase bound to its AP
site product. A similar mechanism would allow polymerase
to
displace Ape1 bound to its nicked AP site product, and therefore, this generic mechanism would ensure direct and sequential transfer of the
DNA duplex to the next enzyme in the pathway (74). Recognition and
repair of damaged DNA mediated by glycosylases in E. coli is
likely to involve coordinated action of various proteins in the BER
pathway as well. However, at present, there is less evidence than in
the mammalian counterparts for a coordinated repair effort.
Other elements may also be important for the effect of Endo IV and Exo
III on the adenine glycosylase activity of MutY. The lack of
enhancement in the turnover rate of Stop 225 by Endo IV or Exo III
indicates that the C-terminal domain of MutY plays an important role in
mediating the E. coli AP endonucleases effect on the product
release. It is possible that Endo IV/Exo III binds to the
MutY·G:AP·DNA complex by recognizing features of MutY, such as the
C-terminal domain, and the Watson-Crick portion of the DNA duplex to
promote MutY dissociation. Subsequent formation of the specific complex
between Endo IV or Exo III and its substrate, the AP site, leads to
strand cleavage catalysis. These results suggest that there may be a
direct interaction of the E. coli AP endonucleases and MutY,
possibly involving the C-terminal domain of MutY. A direct interaction
between the human homolog of MutY, hMYH, and Ape1 in vivo
has been demonstrated using immunoprecipitation and Western blotting
(75). It is also possible that the C-terminal domain of MutY may be
playing a more indirect role in mediating the effect with Endo IV or
Exo III. The presence of the C-terminal domain may be necessary to
provide the proper degree of DNA bending and/or distortion that is
needed for recognition of the MutY product complex by Endo IV and Exo
III. Indeed, recognition of the unusual structure of the AP site duplex
in the presence of MutY by an E. coli AP endonuclease may be
more important than recognition of MutY.
Surprisingly, an enhancement by Endo IV or Exo III of the glycosylase
reaction of MutY with an OG:A substrate was not detected. The reported
differences in the MutY reaction with G:A compared with OG:A substrates
suggest distinct properties for the recognition and catalysis by MutY
with these two base pairs (24). Indeed, the faster turnover of MutY
with the G:A substrate suggests that the affinity of the enzyme for the
G:AP site product is lower than for the OG:AP product (24). This has
also been reflected by smaller dissociation constants for OG:THF
compared with G:THF (60). Waters et al. (17) also observed
that Ape1 was able to enhance the turnover of hTDG more efficiently
with a C:U mismatch than a G:T mismatch. This observation also
corresponded to the weaker affinity of hTDG for the C:AP product
compared with the G:AP product such that steady-state turnover was much
faster with a C:U substrate. The different characteristics of MutY
complexed with its two products (G:AP and OG:AP) could also affect the
interaction with Endo IV and Exo III. Interestingly, in the gel
retardation experiments, a "super-shifted" band was observed in the
presence of Exo III, MutY, and OG:A or OG:THF duplex. This indicates
that Exo III recognizes the complex between MutY and the OG:THF duplex, even though this interaction does not lead to enhancement of turnover. Thus, stimulation of turnover of MutY with an OG:A substrate may require the participation of other proteins, in addition to Exo III or
Endo IV, that are not necessary with the G:A substrate. In contrast, in
experiments with the murine homolog of MutY with an OG:A substrate,
enhancement of turnover with Ape1 was observed (26). Thus, this further
underscores the unusual behavior of E. coli MutY with its
OG:AP product.
The endonuclease action of Endo IV or Exo III on OG:AP may be harmful,
because it would result in the formation of a strand break opposite the
damaged OG base producing an extremely unstable site in the DNA. This
type of site in DNA is a substrate for the OG glycosylase MutM, and
therefore, action of MutM may result in double-strand breaks that may
further promote loss of genetic information or cell death. As suggested
earlier, the observed enhancement of the turnover of MutY by MutM may
be the result of competition of the two enzymes for the non-target DNA.
Alternatively, it is possible that MutY and MutM interact in a
multiprotein complex to modulate each other's activity to some extent.
A multiprotein complex has been isolated from bovine testis that is
capable of repair of uracil in DNA (76), and this suggests that BER
enzymes may exist in a preformed "repairosome" that can carry out
repair in a concerted, rather than stepwise, manner. The formation of such a complex may be necessary for the activity of MutY with OG:A
substrates due to the unique properties of the OG:AP product, which
differs from the products of other BER glycosylases in that both
strands are "damaged." Indeed, the high affinity of MutY for the
OG:AP site may serve as a mechanism for blocking DNA replication or
transcription until the "OG" and "AP" sites have been fully repaired. Further investigation of the unusual properties of MutY with
its OG:AP site product will be required and will likely provide unique
insight into the coordination of repair events in the cell.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by grants from the National
Institutes of Health (CA 67985) and the Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
A National Institutes of Health predoctoral trainee (Grant GM08537).
§
An AP Sloan Fellow (1998-2002). To whom correspondence should be
addressed. Tel.: 801-585-9718; Fax: 801-587-9657; E-mail: david@
chemistry.chem.utah.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 17, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203037200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
BER, base excision
repair;
AP, apurinic-apyrimidinic;
Ape1, human AP endonuclease;
DUG, E. coli double-stranded uracil-DNA glycosylase;
Endo III, E. coli endonuclease III;
Endo IV, E. coli
endonuclease IV;
Exo III, E. coli exonuclease III;
hOGG1, human OG glycosylase;
hMYH, human MutY homolog;
hTDG, human thymine-DNA
glycosylase;
hUDG, human uracil-DNA glycosylase;
mMYH, murine MutY
homolog;
OG, 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine;
Stop 225, truncated
form of E. coli MutY (Met-1 to Lys-225);
THF, tetrahydrofuran nucleotide;
UDG, uracil-DNA glycosylase;
WT, wild
type.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Friedberg, E. C.,
Walker, G. C.,
and Siede, W.
(1995)
DNA Repair and Mutagenesis
, ASM Press, Washington, D. C.
|
| 2.
| David, S. S., and Williams, S. D. (1998) Chem.
Rev. 1221-1261
|
| 3.
|
Schärer, O. D.,
and Jiricny, J.
(2001)
Bioessays
23,
270-281[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Matsumoto, Y.,
and Bogenhagen, D. F.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
3750-3757[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Wang, Z., Wu, X.,
and Friedberg, E. C.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
1051-1058[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Dianov, G.,
Price, A.,
and Lindahl, T.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
1605-1612[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Dianov, G.,
and Lindahl, T.
(1994)
Curr. Biol.
4,
1069-1076[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Wiebauer, K.,
and Jiricny, J.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
5842-5845[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Kubota, Y.,
Nash, R. A.,
Klungland, A.,
Schar, P.,
Barnes, D.,
and Lindahl, T.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
6662-6670[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Harrison, L.,
Hatahet, Z.,
and Wallace, S. S.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
290,
667-684[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Sung, J.-S.,
Bennett, S. E.,
and Mosbaugh, D. W.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
2276-2285[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Frosina, G.,
Fortini, P.,
Rossi, O.,
Carrozzino, F.,
Raspaglio, G.,
Cox, L. S.,
Lane, D. P.,
Abbondandol, A.,
and Dogliotti, E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
9573-9578[Abstract/Fr |