Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201975200 on April 11, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 25, 22692-22698, June 21, 2002
ErbB-
-Catenin Complexes Are Associated with
Human Infiltrating Ductal Breast and Murine Mammary Tumor Virus
(MMTV)-Wnt-1 and MMTV-c-Neu Transgenic Carcinomas*
Joyce A.
Schroeder
,
Melissa C.
Adriance
,
Elizabeth J.
McConnell,
Melissa C.
Thompson,
Barbara
Pockaj, and
Sandra J.
Gendler§
From the Tumor Biology Program and Department of Biochemistry and
Molecular Biology, Mayo Medical/Graduate School, Mayo Clinic
Scottsdale, Scottsdale, Arizona 85259
Received for publication, February 27, 2002, and in revised form, April 3, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Simultaneous deregulation of both Wnt and
ErbB growth factors has previously been shown to result in the
cooperative induction of mammary gland tumors. Using the murine mammary
tumor virus (MMTV)-Wnt-1 transgenic model of mammary carcinoma, we have
identified an unvarying association between
-catenin and epidermal
growth factor receptor/c-Neu (ErbB1/ErbB2) heterodimers in mammary
gland tumors, indicating a requirement for ErbB signaling in
Wnt-mediated tumorigenesis. Expansion of these observations to a second
transgenic model, MMTV-c-Neu, demonstrated similar tumor-specific
interactions, including an ErbB1 ligand-inducible phosphorylation of
both
-catenin and c-Neu. Direct relevance of these findings to human
breast cancer was established upon examination of a set of human
infiltrating ductal breast adenocarcinoma and lymph node metastasis
tissues taken at surgery. These data revealed increased levels of
-catenin in tumors and metastases versus normal breast
as well as an association between
-catenin and c-Neu that measurably
occurs only in neoplasia, most strongly in metastatic lesions. These
studies have identified a seemingly indispensable interaction between
-catenin and epidermal growth factor receptor/c-Neu
heterodimers in Wnt-1-mediated breast tumorigenesis that may indicate a
fundamental signaling event in human metastatic progression.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The ErbB family of transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinases (ErbB1
or epidermal growth factor receptor
(EGFR),1 ErbB2 or Her2/c-Neu,
ErbB3, and ErbB4) and ligands (including EGF-like ligands and
neuregulin-like ligands) have been consistently implicated in mammary
gland tumorigenesis in both humans and rodents (1-3). The ErbB
receptors are activated by the binding of cognate ligands, resulting in
homo- and heterodimer receptor formation and subsequent phosphorylation
of a wide variety of cellular substrates (i.e.
mitogen-activated protein kinase, signal transducers and activators of
transcription, phospholipase C
, c-src, etc. (4)), most
often leading to increased cellular mitogenesis. The development of
transgenic lines targeting overexpression of either the ligands (3) or
the receptors (5, 6) to the mammary gland invariably results in
tumorigenesis and has been useful in elucidating the involvement of
other proteins in ErbB-related oncogenesis, such as c-Myc (7) and
cyclin D1 (8). One such study utilized insertional mutagenesis of the
WAP-transforming growth factor
(TGF
) model to identify
genes able to synergize with EGFR activation in tumor progression (9).
These studies resulted in the observation that Wnt-1 and Wnt-3 are
up-regulated in this model of ErbB-induced tumorigenesis, indicating
that these pathways may cooperate during transformation.
The Wnts are a family of secreted proteins whose overexpression results
in the accumulation of
-catenin, a protein involved in both cellular
adhesion (as a critical component of the E-cadherin-actin complex found
at adherens junctions) and oncogenesis (10, 11). Binding of the soluble
Wnt protein to the Frizzled receptor results in the inactivation of
glycogen synthase kinase-3
, which normally phosphorylates
excess
-catenin and causes its ubiquitination and degradation (10,
12). Wnt signaling-induced inactivation of glycogen synthase
kinase-3
results in the loss of this regulating mechanism, causing
an accumulation of
-catenin. This increased pool of
-catenin can
translocate to the nucleus, where it functions as a transcriptional
coactivator of LEF/TCF transcription factors, resulting in the
transcription of the protooncogenes c-myc and cyclin D1,
among others (13-15). Importantly, in vitro studies have
shown that the ErbB receptors can induce a tyrosine phosphorylation of
-catenin (16, 17), which can prevent the binding of
-catenin to
E-cadherin, potentially shifting
-catenin to the oncogenic pathway
(18). In fact, tyrosine phosphorylation of
-catenin can result in
enhanced invasion and metastasis in breast cancer and melanoma cell
lines (16, 17). These studies indicate that the ErbB receptor kinase
family and
-catenin may be cooperating in tumorigenesis.
The creation of MMTV-Wnt-1 (19, 20) and MMTV-
-catenin
N
(
-catenin with increased stability due to a lack of glycogen synthase kinase-3
phosphorylation residues) (21) transgenic mice
resulted in similar phenotypes, including the stochastic development of
unifocal, nonmetastatic mammary gland adenocarcinomas. Additionally,
MMTV-
-catenin
N transgenics display increased expression of
c-myc and cyclin D1 (21). These studies indicate that the mechanism of Wnt-induced mammary carcinoma is indeed through the accumulation of
-catenin. Recent evidence suggests that
-catenin may play a pivotal role in the development and diagnosis of human breast cancer (22). Translocation of
-catenin from the adherens junction to the cytoplasm and nucleus correlates significantly with
poor patient outcome (22). Interestingly, this shift in localization is
commonly observed in a number of human cell lines following tyrosine
phosphorylation of
-catenin (16, 17, 23, 24).
We have investigated the relationship between ErbB receptor kinases and
-catenin during mammary gland tumorigenesis utilizing human
adenocarcinoma samples as well as the MMTV-Wnt-1 (19) and MMTV-c-Neu
(5) transgenic models. We have identified an interaction between the
ErbB receptors and
-catenin that is specific to mammary gland tumors
in transgenic mice, and, importantly, we have found this interaction
reiterated in human breast cancer. These studies identify an important
interaction between
-catenin and the ErbB family of receptors in
breast tumorigenesis that may indicate a fundamental signaling event in
human metastatic progression.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Animals--
MMTV-Wnt-1 mice (FVB) were purchased from Jackson
Laboratories and bred with wild type FVB females (19). MMTV-c-Neu mice (line 202) were a kind gift from W. Muller (5). All animals were housed
at four mice per cage, and results were similar with virgin and
pregnant females.
Lysate Preparation--
Protein lysates from transgenic mice
were prepared as described previously (25). For human tissue
collection, primary breast tumors, axial lymph node tumors, and normal
breast samples were provided by the Mayo Clinic Hospital Pathology
Laboratory as discard from surgical lumpectomy or mastectomy (with
Institutional Review Board approval). Tissue pathology was
determined by Mayo Clinic Hospital pathologists and either fixed in
methacarn or homogenized in lysis buffer immediately (25).
Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting--
Immunoprecipitations
and immunoblotting was performed as described previously (25).
Immunoblot chemiluminescence was performed using Pierce Super Signal
substrate; West Pico chemiluminescent substrate (midpicogram range
detection) for ErbB,
-catenin, and exogenous phosphorylation; and
West Dura extended duration chemiluminescent substrate (femtogram range
detection) for endogenous phosphorylation detection. Antibodies used
for immunoprecipitation studies are as follows:
-catenin,
EGFR (1005), and c-Neu (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.,
Santa Cruz, CA). Antibodies used for immunoblotting are as follows:
anti-EGFR (1005, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-EGFR (ERCT,
H. S. Earp, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC);
-catenin (rabbit) and c-Neu (both from Santa Cruz Biotechnology);
and anti-phosphotyrosine (Transduction Laboratories (RC20-HRP) or
Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, NY, G410-HRP).
Immunofluorescence--
Sections were treated and analyzed as
previously described (25). The following antibodies were used: Alexa
anti-rabbit 488 and Alexa anti-mouse 546 (Molecular Probes, Inc.,
Eugene OR). Dilutions for the antibodies were as follows: EGFR (1005),
1:100; mouse-anti-
-catenin (Transduction Laboratories), 1:300; and
c-Neu (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, mouse tissues, 1:250 or Neomarkers Ab17, human tissues 1:200).
 |
RESULTS |
-Catenin Is Tyrosine-phosphorylated in MMTV-Wnt-1
Tumors--
EGFR-induced tumor formation in the mammary gland is
promoted by cooperative events with Wnt-mediated signaling, since both Wnt-1 and Wnt-3 were found to be up-regulated in tumor samples from
WAP-TGF
transgenic animals (9). To directly examine the role
of EGFR signaling in Wnt-1-mediated tumorigenesis, we utilized the
MMTV-Wnt-1 transgenic mouse (19). In this transgenic model, overexpression of the soluble Wnt-1 glycoprotein results in the accumulation of
-catenin in the mammary gland, leading to
hyperplasia and the stochastic formation of nonmetastatic, unifocal
adenocarcinoma (20). Separate studies have demonstrated that the
transforming event is probably due solely to this accumulation of
-catenin (21). Analysis of the
-catenin protein in the
hyperplastic mammary glands (all nontumor mammary glands in this model
are hyperplastic but will hereafter be referred to as normal) and corresponding tumors of MMTV-Wnt-1 mice revealed two species of
-catenin protein in the normal mammary gland lysates of ~95 and 97 kDa, respectively. Interestingly, mainly the larger form (with retarded
mobility in the SDS-PAGE) was observed in the tumors (Fig.
1A).

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
-Catenin is
tyrosine-phosphorylated in tumors from MMTV-Wnt-1 mammary glands.
A, protein lysates (1 mg) from both normal (N)
and mammary gland tumors (T) were immunoprecipitated
(IP) with goat anti- -catenin and immunoblotted
(IB) with rabbit-anti- -catenin. B,
immunoprecipitations were performed as described for A and
immunoblotted with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (RC20-HRP). Endogenous
phosphorylation was detected using West Dura extended duration
chemiluminescent substrate and exposed for 30 s. Normal mammary
glands and tumors from a single animal are bracketed, and
the two species of -catenin are indicated by arrows
(~97 kDa (closed arrow) and ~95 kDa
(open arrow)).
|
|
To determine the tyrosine phosphorylation status of
-catenin, we
analyzed a set of tumor and mammary gland lysates using an enhanced
anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (RC20-HRP; see "Materials and
Methods") and a highly sensitive chemiluminescent substrate (West
Dura extended duration; see "Materials and Methods"), capable of
detecting the low level of endogenous phosphorylation present in whole
tissue lysates. We detected a single phosphoprotein that comigrated
with the larger form of
-catenin in both the tumor and mammary gland
(Fig. 1B, closed arrow). Since the
major species identified in the tumors was the larger phosphorylated
form, this indicated that a kinase was preferentially associated with
-catenin in the tumors, as opposed to the normal gland.
Interestingly, we detected a phosphoprotein of ~180 kDa
coimmunoprecipitating with
-catenin (Fig. 1B,
arrowhead), which is the size range of the ErbB receptor kinases.
EGFR and c-neu Associate with
-Catenin in Tumors but Not Normal
Mammary Glands--
Previous studies have demonstrated a functional
relationship between
-catenin and EGFR in tumor progression (9, 16). We therefore analyzed our tumor and mammary gland samples to determine if the 180-kDa kinase we had detected immunoprecipitating with
-catenin (Fig. 1) was in fact EGFR. Upon analysis of more than 25 independent mammary gland tumors from MMTV-Wnt-1 transgenics, we found
that EGFR and
-catenin interacted in 100% of the tumors (Fig.
2). Conversely, we detected minimal
amounts of
-catenin coimmunoprecipitating with EGFR in the normal
mammary glands taken from the same animal as the tumor (Fig. 2).
Through analysis of the endogenous kinase activity of EGFR as
determined by EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation, we detected variable
phosphorylation of the EGFR in tumors where EGFR and
-catenin were
interacting (Fig. 2B, top panel). This
indicated that
-catenin phosphorylation (Fig. 1B) was not
due solely to EGFR kinase activity and may be the result of an
interaction with one or more of the other ErbB members. We investigated
the interaction between
-catenin and c-Neu (ErbB2/Her2) in
MMTV-Wnt-1 transgenics, since in vitro studies have shown
that c-Neu and
-catenin associate in stomach adenocarcinoma cell
lines (24, 26). Similar to that observed with EGFR, we found a complete concordance of c-Neu interacting with
-catenin in all tumors. In
contrast, c-Neu/
-catenin associations could not be detected in the
normal MMTV-Wnt-1 mammary glands (Fig.
3A). Importantly, almost no
c-Neu expression was detected in the normal glands, indicating a
dramatic up-regulation of c-Neu in the tumors.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
-Catenin associates with EGFR
in MMTV-Wnt-1 tumors. A, protein lysates (1 mg) from
both normal (N) and mammary gland tumors (T) were
immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-EGFR (1005) and
immunoblotted (IB) with either rabbit-anti- -catenin
(top panel) or anti-EGFR antibody (ERCT)
(bottom panel). B,
immunoprecipitations and immunoblots were performed as described for
A (middle and bottom
panels) and immunoblotted with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody
(RC20-HRP) (top panel). Endogenous
phosphorylation was detected using West Dura extended duration
chemiluminescent substrate and exposed for 30 s. Normal mammary
glands and tumors from a single animal are bracketed.
|
|

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
-Catenin-EGFR-c-Neu complex
formation in MMTV-Wnt-1 and MMTV-c-Neu tumors. A,
MMTV-Wnt-1 protein lysates (1 mg) from both normal (N) and
mammary gland tumors (T) were immunoprecipitated
(IP) with either anti-c-Neu antibody (top
three panels) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or
goat-anti- -catenin (bottom panel). Membranes
were immunoblotted (IB) with either rabbit anti- -catenin
(top and bottom panels), anti-c-Neu
antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) (middle top
panel), or anti-phosphotyrosine (RC20-HRP)
(middle bottom panel). B,
immunoprecipitations (1 mg) and immunoblotting for MMTV-c-Neu
transgenic animals were performed as described for A.
Endogenous phosphorylation was detected using West Dura extended
duration chemiluminescent substrate and exposed for 30 s and 1 min, respectively. Normal mammary glands and tumors from a single
animal are bracketed.
|
|
To determine whether the interaction between the ErbB receptors and
-catenin is a common mechanism or unique to the MMTV-Wnt-1 model, we
investigated a second established model of mammary carcinoma, MMTV-c-Neu (5). In this model, overexpression of unactivated rat
ErbB2/c-Neu protein results in the stochastic formation of metastatic
(pulmonary), unifocal mammary gland adenocarcinomas (5). Analysis of
this model revealed that while complex formation occurred between
phosphorylated c-Neu and phosphorylated
-catenin in MMTV-c-Neu
tumors, only ~50% of the samples displayed the interaction (5 of 11)
(Fig. 3B and data not shown). Therefore, whereas
Wnt-1/
-catenin-mediated tumorigenesis always appears to involve ErbB
receptors, ErbB-induced tumorigenesis apparently does not always
involve
-catenin. Interestingly, all five of the MMTV-c-Neu mice
displaying
-catenin-c-Neu complexes in the tumors also had pulmonary
metastases, while only two of six of the negative tumors did. This may
indicate a correlation between
-catenin-ErbB complex formation and metastasis.
We also detected interactions between ErbB3 and ErbB4 and
-catenin
in the MMTV-Wnt-1 mammary glands but only in those tumors where
exceptionally high levels of
-catenin were present, since overall
levels of both ErbB3 and ErbB4 were low in both the tumors and the
normal glands (data not shown). Perhaps the interaction between
-catenin and the ErbB receptors is hierarchical in nature, and the
preferred interaction is with EGFR/c-Neu heterodimers and next with
ErbB3 and ErbB4, as has been previously proposed regarding receptor
heterodimerization (27, 28).
EGFR/c-neu Heterodimers Induce
-Catenin Phosphorylation in
MMTV-Wnt-1 and MMTV-c-neu Mammary Tumors--
To verify that the
tyrosine phosphorylation of
-catenin was due to EGFR kinase
activity, we injected tumor-bearing mice with the following
EGFR-specific ligands: receptor grade epidermal growth factor (EGF),
TGF
, or amphiregulin. It has been previously shown that EGF
injection into mice induces EGFR kinase activation as well as
transphosphorylation of dimerizing ErbB partners and subsequent
phosphorylation of interacting proteins (25, 28). All three ligands
induced tyrosine phosphorylation of
-catenin in tumors from both
MMTV-Wnt-1 and MMTV-c-Neu transgenic animals (Fig.
4A). In contrast, only minimal
phosphorylation was observed in the normal gland during exogenous
ligand stimulation. It should be noted that the analysis of protein
phosphorylation from animals injected with EGFR ligands was performed
with West Pico chemiluminescent substrate (see "Materials and
Methods"), a detection method not sensitive enough to detect
endogenous phosphorylation (as it was utilized in these studies). This
dramatic induction of
-catenin phosphorylation detected in tumors
from both MMTV-Wnt-1 and MMTV-c-Neu transgenic animals provides further
evidence that the interaction between EGFR/c-Neu and
-catenin is
tumor-specific.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
-Catenin is phosphorylated by
EGFR-specific ligands in both MMTV-Wnt-1 and MMTV-c-Neu mammary gland
tumors. A, animals were injected with 0.8 µg/g body
weight TGF or amphiregulin, and normal (N) and mammary
gland tumors (T) were immunoprecipitated (IP) (1 mg) with anti- -catenin antibodies (goat). Immunoblotting
(IB) was performed using anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies
(RC20-HRP) (top panel) or rabbit anti- -catenin
(bottom panel). Exogenous phosphorylation was
detected using West Pico chemiluminescent substrate and exposed for 2 min. B, MMTV-Wnt-1 and MMTV-c-neu protein lysates (1 mg)
from both normal (N) and mammary gland tumors (T)
were immunoprecipitated with either anti-EGFR antibodies (1005)
(top panel) or anti-c-Neu antibodies
(bottom panel) and immunoblotted with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (RC20-HRP). Animals were injected with 1 µg/g body weight EGF. Exogenous phosphorylation was detected using
West Pico chemiluminescent substrate for 45 s. Normal mammary
glands and tumors from a single animal are bracketed.
|
|
To determine whether the phosphorylation of c-Neu and its association
with
-catenin was due to a heterodimer formation with EGFR, similar
transphosphorylation experiments were performed using EGF injections in
both MMTV-Wnt-1 and MMTV-c-Neu mice. Injection of the cognate ligand
for EGFR resulted in the phosphorylation of c-Neu in addition to EGFR,
indicating heterodimer formation between these two receptor kinases
(Fig. 4B). Note that treatment with EGF resulted in greatly
increased phosphorylation of both EGFR and c-Neu receptor compared with
endogenous phosphorylation of these receptors, since endogenous
phosphorylation was undetectable using the Pico chemiluminescent
substrate (see Figs. 1-3). Collectively, these data demonstrate that
an EGFR/c-Neu heterodimer induces
-catenin phosphorylation
specifically in tumors. Despite the fact that MMTV-Wnt-1 normal mammary
glands are hyperplastic, EGF-induced phosphorylation of
-catenin is
difficult to detect in those tissues, suggesting this signaling complex
is important primarily in carcinoma. Furthermore, these findings
indicate that EGFR and c-Neu are constitutive components of
Wnt-1-mediated tumorigenesis.
c-neu and
-Catenin Associate in Human Breast Cancer--
To
determine the frequency of these interactions in human breast cancer,
we analyzed normal breast, breast-infiltrating ductal adenocarcinomas,
and axillary lymph node metastases for overall
-catenin expression
and the frequency of interactions occurring between
-catenin and
members of the ErbB receptor family. Tissues were prepared directly
after surgery from surgical pathology samples obtained during
lumpectomy or mastectomy, and lysates were produced. Immunoblot
analysis revealed increasing amounts of
-catenin protein with
advancing levels of invasiveness, although in two of four samples
analyzed, levels were similar in both the tumor and metastasis (Fig.
5, A and B,
bottom panels). Our attempts to determine levels of
-catenin phosphorylation levels were unsuccessful, largely due to
nonspecific contamination that masked proteins around 97 kDa in size,
including
-catenin (although different anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies were attempted). Fortunately, we were able to detect tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins of ~180 kDa coimmunoprecipitating with
-catenin in the metastatic samples (Fig. 5B,
fourth panel, and data not shown). Analysis of
EGFR-
-catenin coimmunoprecipitation complexes revealed that
interactions between the two proteins occur in all samples, with
variable increases in the tumors and metastases (Fig. 5A,
and data not shown; total samples analyzed: metastases,
n = 4; tumors, n = 5; and normal,
n = 5). Since the expression of EGFR itself was highly
variable from patient to patient and was frequently highest in the
normal breast (data not shown), it is difficult to ascertain whether
interactions between
-catenin and EGFR were higher in one tissue
type over another.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
c-Neu is phosphorylated and associates
with -catenin in invasive human breast
cancer. A, protein lysates from normal breast
(N), primary breast adenocarcinoma (T), and
axillary lymph node metastasis (M) (2 mg) were
immunoprecipitated (IP) with either goat anti- -catenin
(bottom) or rabbit anti-EGFR (top) (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) and immunoblotted (IB) with rabbit
anti- -catenin. B and C, samples described for
A were immunoprecipitated with either rabbit-anti-c-neu
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or goat-anti- -catenin (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) antibodies and immunoblotted with
rabbit-anti- -catenin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology),
anti-phosphosphotyrosine (Transduction Laboratories), or mouse
anti-c-Neu (Neomarkers) antibodies. Human breast (HB) sample
numbers are denoted above the brackets
(brackets indicate one patient) and correspond to Table
I.
|
|
Upon examination of c-Neu protein, we commonly observed an increase in
expression in the primary and metastatic tumor versus the
normal breast (Fig. 5, B and C). Examination of
c-Neu immunoprecipitations revealed
-catenin association in the
primary tumor and metastasis, with the strongest interaction occurring
in the metastatic lesion (Fig. 5B, total samples analyzed:
metastases, n = 5; tumors, n = 8; and
normal, n = 10). This observation was true even in
patients where c-Neu and
-catenin expression levels were equal in
both tumor and lymph node (Fig. 5, B and C,
samples HB014 and HB006 and data not shown). These data indicate that
c-Neu is the ErbB kinase specifically complexed with
-catenin in
invasive human breast cancer. As the interaction between c-Neu and
-catenin in the MMTV-c-Neu mice occurs only in those animals with
pulmonary metastases (see above section), a compelling argument can be
made for these protein interactions correlating with invasive disease.
It is interesting to note also that the majority of our patient samples
(9 of 10) were graded pathologically as HER2/Neu-negative (Table
I). The primary tumors from each
patient were graded using the DAKO HercepTest and graded 0 or 1+ (only
2+ or 3+ is considered positive for HER2/Neu expression), whereas
immunoprecipitation of c-Neu and immunoblotting allowed for readily
detectable HER2/Neu protein expression in most (5 of 9) of these
samples (Fig. 5C and data not shown). Importantly, analysis
of endogenous phosphorylation of the c-Neu protein present in these
tumors demonstrated activated receptor, indicating that the protein
present is in fact functional (Fig. 5C, top
panel). Further, in each clinically HER2/Neu-negative case
with an associated lymph node metastasis (n = 4), the
c-Neu in the metastatic lesion is hyperphosphorylated compared with the
primary tumor, as can be ascertained by the increased retardation of
the phosphorylated species in the acrylamide gel (Fig. 5C, top panel, LN). This may indicate an
increased activity in the metastasis versus the primary
tumor. It is interesting to note that in our single HER2/Neu clinically
positive patient (HB014), both the primary tumor and the lymph node
metastasis were hyperphosphorylated.
EGFR and c-neu Colocalize with
-Catenin in Both Membrane and
Cytoplasmic Compartments of Breast Tumors---
Previous reports
suggest that cytoplasmic/nuclear
-catenin expression is an
"activated" phenotype and correlates with a poor patient prognosis
(22). To determine the site of
-catenin/ErbB interactions in our
patient samples, we used confocal microscopy to analyze both tumors and
normal glands. In human and MMTV-Wnt-1 breast tumors,
-catenin was
detected in the membrane and cytoplasm, indicating a similarity between
the transgenic model and human disease. Substantial colocalization of
the ErbB receptors with
-catenin was observed in human, MMTV-Wnt-1,
and MMTV-c-Neu primary tumors and human lymph node metastases.
Colocalization of both EGFR and c-Neu with
-catenin in the tumor
samples from MMTV-c-Neu appeared to occur in close proximity to the
membrane (Fig. 6, F and
H), whereas human and MMTV-Wnt-1 colocalization was present throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 6, A, B, and
D). In contrast, very limited colocalization was detected in
the normal mammary glands (Fig. 6, C and G), with
the exception of EGFR/
-catenin in MMTV-c-Neu, where colocalization
was observed in some of the normal glands (Fig. 6E). These
data demonstrate that interactions between
-catenin and EGFR and
c-Neu do occur in the cytoplasm, similar to where
-catenin is found
to be localized in the activated phenotype observed by other groups
(22).

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
ErbB receptors colocalize with
-catenin in human and mammary carcinomas.
A, immunohistochemical detection of c-Neu/ -catenin
complex with mouse-anti-c-Neu (Ab17)/Alexa anti-mouse 546 and
rabbit-anti- -catenin/Alexa anti-rabbit 488 (white denotes
colocalization; overlays depicted). B-F,
immunohistochemical detection of EGFR- -catenin complex with rabbit
anti-EGFR (1005)/Alexa anti-rabbit 488 and mouse anti- -catenin/Alexa
anti-mouse 546. G and H, immunohistochemical
detection of c-Neu- -catenin complex with rabbit anti-c-Neu (Santa
Cruz Biotechnology) and Alexa anti-rabbit 488 and mouse
anti- -catenin. A, human infiltrating ductal carcinoma
(HB001); B, human lymph node metastasis (HB001);
C and D, MMTV-Wnt-1; E-H, MMTV-c-Neu.
C, E, and G, normal mammary gland;
D, F, and H, tumors. Sections were
examined at ×400 magnification, except B, which was
×630.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have discovered a strikingly common association between
EGFR/c-Neu and
-catenin that is highly restricted to tumors of the
mouse mammary gland and results in the tumor-specific phosphorylation of
-catenin. Remarkably, these results correspond closely with human
breast cancer, since c-Neu and
-catenin form a complex in invasive
breast cancer. Numerous reports indicate that under certain growth
conditions, both a normal mammary gland cell line (29) and carcinoma
cell lines (16, 17, 23, 24) are able to respond to EGFR ligands by
tyrosine phosphorylation of
-catenin. This interaction can result in
a loss of adherens junction formation and an increase in cellular
invasion. This is the first report to demonstrate that these
interactions occur in vivo and are unique to the transformed
breast. Importantly, through analysis of these multiple models, we can
hypothesize a paradigm of ErbB-induced
-catenin phosphorylation that
results in
-catenin deregulation and progression to invasive breast cancer.
The MMTV-Wnt-1 transgenic model induces the overexpression/accumulation
of
-catenin in the mouse mammary gland, resulting in the formation
of unifocal, stochastic adenocarcinomas (19, 20). One primary reported
mechanism of
-catenin-induced tumorigenesis is translocation to the
nucleus wherein
-catenin functions as a transcriptional co-factor
and increases the production of such oncogenes as c-myc and
cyclin D1 (13-15). In the four patients and the MMTV-c-Neu transgenic
animals analyzed for
-catenin/c-Neu colocalization,
-catenin was
not observed in the nucleus. No colocalization of
-catenin with EGFR
or c-Neu was seen in the nucleus of the MMTV-Wnt-1 transgenics either
but instead was observed in the cytoplasm and at the cell membrane. One
previously reported result of the association of
-catenin with the
ErbB transmembrane kinases is to induce a separation of
-catenin
from E-cadherin (16). Analysis of the soluble fraction of tumor and
normal lysates demonstrated no disruption of
-catenin/E-cadherin
association in the MMTV-Wnt-1 transgenic tumors (data not shown).
Therefore, these interactions may be occurring in the presence of
intact
-catenin/E-cadherin binding, a phenomenon previously
demonstrated in inflammatory breast carcinoma wherein the invasive cell
line MARY-X has intact E-cadherin/
-catenin binding at the adherens junctions (30). Alternatively, the
-catenin-ErbB complex may include
other, as yet unidentified, proteins, which promote tumorigenesis through
-catenin relocalization and interaction. Preliminary data in
our laboratory indicate that at least one other protein may be involved
in the complex, the tumor antigen MUC1 (data not shown), and these
interactions are currently being pursued. In addition, the
actin-bundling protein fascin both is up-regulated by ErbB2 expression
and interacts with
-catenin at the cell membrane, since its
overexpression can result in the induction of cell motility (31-34).
Therefore, fascin may also be a potential candidate for interacting
with alternatively regulated
-catenin, and these possible
interactions are currently being investigated.
Interestingly, clinical analysis using the HercepTest has graded eight
of nine of the primary tumors in this study HER2/Neu-negative for the
purposes of adjuvant therapy (Table I; Dako HercepTest score of 0 or
1+). Conversely, immunoblot and immunofluorescent analysis
revealed readily detectable levels of HER2/Neu in most (five of nine)
of these same tumors, indicating that our methodology is more sensitive
than what is performed clinically. Anti-HER2/Neu therapy
(Trastuzumab and Herceptin, Genentech, San Francisco, CA) is focused on
treating those patients whose biopsies indicate HER2/Neu
overexpression. Our data may indicate that it is not merely the level
of HER2/Neu or EGFR expression that is pertinent to cancer
progression but also the appropriation of the function of proteins
responsible for cell adhesion, such as
-catenin. Whereas most of the
tumors in this study were clinically classified as Her2/Neu-negative,
the c-Neu receptor in these tumor samples is clearly expressed and
engaged in a potentially oncogenic activity through its heightened
phosphorylation and interaction with
-catenin. It is interesting to
note that treatment of a low c-Neu-expressing cell line (MCF-7) with
4D5 (the nonhumanized precursor to Trastuzumab) resulted in the
inhibition of motility and invasion, encouraging the authors to
speculate on a role for anti-c-Neu therapy in treatment of breast
cancer with low receptor expression (35, 36). Whereas ~20-30% of
patients with metastatic breast cancer clinically overexpress Her2/Neu
(37), the treatment group potentially benefited by Herceptin therapy
may be much larger. The targeting of c-Neu in those cancers where
expression is low (and regarded as negative by standard clinical
testing) could prevent ErbB-induced phosphorylation of
-catenin and
the subsequent signaling events that occur in invasive disease.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to H. S. Earp for the
EGFR antibody and Todd D. Camenisch for critical reading of the
manuscript. We thank Marvin H. Ruona for computer graphics, Jim
Tarara for confocal expertise, the Mayo Clinic Hospital Surgical
Pathologists for human tissue procurement, and Joyce Wisby and Carol
Williams for administrative assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants CA64389 (to S. J. G.), CA81703 (to J. A. S.), and CA90204 (to M. C. A.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
gendler.sandra@mayo.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 11, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201975200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
EGFR, epidermal
growth factor receptor;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
MMTV, mouse
mammary tumor virus;
TGF
, transforming growth factor
;
WAP, whey
acidic protein.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Slamon, D. J.,
Clark, D. M.,
Wong, S. G.,
Levin, W. J.,
Ullrich, A.,
and McGuire, W. L.
(1987)
Science
235,
177-182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Fox, S. B.,
Smith, K.,
Hollyer, J.,
Greenall, M.,
Hastrich, D.,
and Harris, A. L.
(1994)
Breast Cancer Res. Treat.
29,
41-49[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Schroeder, J. A.,
and Lee, D. C.
(1997)
J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia
2,
119-129[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Alroy, I.,
and Yarden, Y.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
410,
83-86[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Guy, C. T.,
Webster, M. A.,
Schaller, M.,
Parsons, T. J.,
Cardiff, R. D.,
and Muller, W. J.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
10578-10582[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Brandt, R.,
Eisenbrandt, R.,
Leenders, F.,
Zschiesche, W.,
Binas, B.,
Juergensen, C.,
and Theuring, F.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
2129-2137[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Amundadottir, L. T.,
Johnson, M. D.,
Merlino, G.,
Smith, G. H.,
and Dickson, R. B.
(1995)
Cell Growth Differ.
6,
737-748[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Sandgren, E. P.,
Schroeder, J. A.,
Qui, T. H.,
Palmiter, R. D.,
Brinster, R. L.,
and Lee, D. C.
(1995)
Cancer Res.
55,
3915-3927[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Schroeder, J. A.,
Troyer, K. L.,
and Lee, D. C.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
3193-3199[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Polakis, P.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
1837-1851[Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Ben-Ze'ev, A.,
Shtutman, M.,
and Zhurinsky, J.
(2000)
Exp. Cell Res.
261,
75-82[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Papkoff, J.,
Rubinfeld, B.,
Schryver, B.,
and Polakis, P.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
2128-2134[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
He, T. C.,
Sparks, A. B.,
Rago, C.,
Hermeking, H.,
Zawel, L.,
da Costa, L. T.,
Morin, P. J.,
Vogelstein, B.,
and Kinzler, K. W.
(1998)
Science
281,
1509-1512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Shtutman, M.,
Zhurinsky, J.,
Simcha, I.,
Albanese, C.,
D'Amico, M.,
Pestell, R.,
and Ben-Ze'ev, A.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
5522-5527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Tetsu, O.,
and McCormick, F.
(1999)
Nature
398,
422-426[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Hazan, R. B.,
and Norton, L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
9078-9084[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Shibata, T.,
Ochiai, A.,
Kanai, Y.,
Akimoto, S.,
Gotoh, M.,
Yasui, N.,
Machinami, R.,
and Hirohashi, S.
(1996)
Oncogene
13,
883-889[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Piedra, J.,
Martinez, D.,
Castano, J.,
Miravet, S.,
Dunach, M.,
and de Herreros, A. G.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
20436-20443[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Tsukamoto, A. S.,
Grosschedl, R.,
Guzman, R. C.,
Parslow, T.,
and Varmus, H. E.
(1988)
Cell
55,
619-625[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Li, Y.,
Hively, W. P.,
and Varmus, H. E.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
1002-1009[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Michaelson, J. S.,
and Leder, P.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
5093-5099[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Lin, S. Y.,
Xia, W.,
Wang, J. C.,
Kwong, K. Y.,
Spohn, B.,
Wen, Y.,
Pestell, R. G.,
and Hung, M. C.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
4262-4266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Shibamoto, S.,
Hayakawa, M.,
Takeuchi, K.,
Hori, T.,
Oku, N.,
Miyazawa, K.,
Kitamura, N.,
Takeichi, M.,
and Ito, F.
(1994)
Cell Adhes. Commun.
1,
295-305[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Bonvini, P., An, W. G.,
Rosolen, A.,
Nguyen, P.,
Trepel, J.,
Garcia de Herreros, A.,
Dunach, M.,
and Neckers, L. M.
(2001)
Cancer Res.
61,
1671-1677[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Schroeder, J. A.,
Thompson, M. C.,
Gardner, M. M.,
and Gendler, S. J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
13057-13064[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Kanai, Y.,
Ochiai, A.,
Shibata, T.,
Oyama, T.,
Ushijima, S.,
Akimoto, S.,
and Hirohashi, S.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
208,
1067-1072[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Graus-Porta, D.,
Beerli, R. R.,
Daly, J. M.,
and Hynes, N. E.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
1647-1655[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Schroeder, J. A.,
and Lee, D. C.
(1998)
Cell Growth Differ.
9,
451-464[Abstract]
|
| 29.
|
Takahashi, K.,
Suzuki, K.,
and Tsukatani, Y.
(1997)
Oncogene
15,
71-78[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Tomlinson, J. S.,
Alpaugh, M. L.,
and Barsky, S. H.
(2001)
Cancer Res.
61,
5231-5241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Yamashiro, S.,
Yamakita, Y.,
Ono, S.,
and Matsumura, F.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
993-1006[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Tao, Y. S.,
Edwards, R. A.,
Tubb, B.,
Wang, S.,
Bryan, J.,
and McCrea, P. D.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
134,
1271-1281[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Grothey, A.,
Hashizume, R., Ji, H.,
Tubb, B. E.,
Patrick, C. W., Jr., Yu, D.,
Mooney, E. E.,
and McCrea, P. D.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
4864-4875[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Grothey, A.,
Hashizume, R.,
Sahin, A. A.,
and McCrea, P. D.
(2000)
Br. J. Cancer
83,
870-873[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Adam, L.,
Vadlamudi, R.,
Kondapaka, S. B.,
Chernoff, J.,
Mendelsohn, J.,
and Kumar, R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
28238-28246[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Kumar, R.,
Mandal, M.,
and Vadlamudi, R.
(2000)
Semin. Oncol.
27,
84-100[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Simon, R.,
Nocito, A.,
Hubscher, T.,
Bucher, C.,
Torhorst, J.,
Schraml, P.,
Bubendorf, L.,
Mihatsch, M. M.,
Moch, H.,
Wilber, K.,
Schotzau, A.,
Kononen, J.,
and Sauter, G.
(2001)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
93,
1141-1146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Guha, R. Chaerkady, A. Marimuthu, A. S. Patterson, M. K. Kashyap, H. C. Harsha, M. Sato, J. S. Bader, A. E. Lash, J. D. Minna, et al.
Comparisons of tyrosine phosphorylated proteins in cells expressing lung cancer-specific alleles of EGFR and KRAS
PNAS,
September 16, 2008;
105(37):
14112 - 14117.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. K. Dearth, X. Cui, H.-J. Kim, I. Kuiatse, N. A. Lawrence, X. Zhang, J. Divisova, O. L. Britton, S. Mohsin, D. C. Allred, et al.
Mammary Tumorigenesis and Metastasis Caused by Overexpression of Insulin Receptor Substrate 1 (IRS-1) or IRS-2
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
December 15, 2006;
26(24):
9302 - 9314.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Wen, T. C. Caffrey, M. J. Wheelock, K. R. Johnson, and M. A. Hollingsworth
Nuclear Association of the Cytoplasmic Tail of MUC1 and {beta}-Catenin
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 26, 2003;
278(39):
38029 - 38039.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|