Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201469200 on April 19, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 25, 22781-22788, June 21, 2002
Bcl-2 Family Member Bfl-1/A1 Sequesters Truncated Bid to Inhibit
Its Collaboration with Pro-apoptotic Bak or Bax*
Arlette B.
Werner,
Evert
de Vries,
Stephen W. G.
Tait,
Ilja
Bontjer, and
Jannie
Borst
From the Division of Cellular Biochemistry, The Netherlands Cancer
Institute, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands
Received for publication, February 13, 2002, and in revised form, March 29, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Following caspase-8 mediated cleavage, a
carboxyl-terminal fragment of the BH3 domain-only Bcl-2 family member
Bid transmits the apoptotic signal from death receptors to
mitochondria. In a screen for possible regulators of Bid, we defined
Bfl-1/A1 as a potent Bid interacting protein. Bfl-1 is an
anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family member, whose preferential expression in
hematopoietic cells and endothelium is controlled by inflammatory
stimuli. Its mechanism of action is unknown. We find that Bfl-1
associates with both full-length Bid and truncated (t)Bid, via the Bid
BH3 domain. Cellular expression of Bfl-1 confers protection against CD95- and Trail receptor-induced cytochrome c release.
In vitro assays, using purified mitochondria and
recombinant proteins, demonstrate that Bfl-1 binds full-length Bid, but
does not interfere with its processing by caspase-8, or with its
mitochondrial association. Confocal microscopy supports that Bfl-1,
which at least in part constitutively localizes to mitochondria, does
not impede tBid translocation. However, Bfl-1 remains tightly and
selectively bound to tBid and blocks collaboration between tBid and Bax
or Bak in the plane of the mitochondrial membrane, thereby preventing mitochondrial apoptotic activation. Lack of demonstrable interaction between Bfl-1 and Bak or Bax in the mitochondrial membrane suggests that Bfl-1 generally prevents the formation of a pro-apoptotic complex
by sequestering BH3 domain-only proteins.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Whether induced by death receptors or by other stimuli, apoptosis
signaling generally involves cytochrome c (Cyt
c)1 release from
mitochondria. In the cytosol, Cyt c acts as cofactor in
formation of a multimeric complex between the Apaf-1 scaffold protein
and the initiator caspase-9. The ensuing proteolytic activation of
caspase-9 allows for effector caspase processing and apoptotic execution (1, 2). Death receptors, which are apoptosis-inducing members of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor family, recruit and
activate caspase-8 or -10. These enzymes process effector caspases, as
well as the Bcl-2 family member Bid. A carboxyl-terminal fragment of
Bid, termed truncated (t)Bid, subsequently translocates to mitochondria
to promote Cyt c release (3, 4). Mitochondrial permeability
also allows release of Smac/Diablo, which reverses caspase inhibition
(5, 6), and AIF, an effector of nuclear apoptosis (7). The Bcl-2
protein family regulates mitochondrial permeability, by a yet
incompletely resolved mechanism (8).
Bfl-1/A1 was first cloned from mouse bone marrow, as a granulocyte
macrophage-colony stimulating factor-inducible Bcl-2-related gene (9). Its human homologue was cloned by three independent approaches from fetal liver, activated endothelium, and a myeloid leukemia (10-13). In normal tissues, Bfl-1 mRNA is primarily
restricted to bone marrow, lymphoid organs, peripheral leukocytes, and
lung. It is found in myeloid and endothelial cells and strongly induced by inflammatory stimuli, such as TNF
and interleukin-1
(10-13). In lymphocytes, Bfl-1 is up-regulated in response to antigen receptor (14) and CD40 triggering (15, 16). Stimuli inducing Bfl-1 expression
share the capacity to activate NF-
B transcription factor complexes,
which regulate the bfl-1 gene (13, 14, 15, 17).
The Bcl-2 family of apoptotic regulators is characterized by the
presence of Bcl-2 homology (BH) domains and can be subdivided into
three groups: anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 type proteins, pro-apoptotic Bax
type proteins, and pro-apoptotic BH3 domain-only family members (18,
19). The BH3 domain is a motif of about 16 residues, which forms an
amphipathic helix that is necessary for death induction and
dimerization among Bcl-2 family members. The BH3 helix of one partner
can bind to a groove formed by BH1, BH2, and BH3 domain helices of the
other (18). Bfl-1 has conserved BH1 and BH2 domains and is functionally
defined as an inhibitory Bcl-2-type protein. Well documented is the
protection it provides to TNF-
-induced apoptosis in primary
endothelial cells and HeLa carcinoma cells (13, 20, 21). Furthermore,
Bfl-1 conferred protection to p53-induced apoptosis in baby rat kidney
cells (22, 23), and to apoptosis induced by the anti-cancer drug
etoposide in fibrosarcoma cells (17). It also inhibited apoptosis
initiated by B cell antigen receptor triggering (14, 16) and
interleukin-3 withdrawal (9). Systematic examination of Bfl-1 function
in primary cells has not been documented. Germ-line gene inactivation
is complicated by the presence of at least four a1 genes in
the murine genome. Disruption of the a1-a gene accelerated
spontaneous neutrophil apoptosis, but did not affect TNF-induced
apoptosis of these cells (24).
Human and mouse Bfl-1 share a BH1, BH2, and somewhat less
conserved BH3 domain, but the limited homology to a BH4 domain found in
human Bfl-1 is not present in the mouse. Protection by Bfl-1 impinges
on intact BH1 and BH2 domains (23, 25). Whereas it is undisputed that
Bfl-1 is a protective Bcl-2 type protein, its mechanism of action is
unknown. The prototype members of this subgroup localize constitutively
to membranes of mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, and nucleus, but
Bfl-1 does not have a well defined hydrophobic carboxyl-terminal
region, implicated in membrane anchoring. Whereas certain authors find
Bfl-1 in mitochondria (21), others find it in the cytoplasm of resting
cells and the nucleus of apoptotic cells (26).
A model for the mechanism of action of Bcl-2 family members, prominent
until recently, predicts that Bcl-2 type proteins autonomously inhibit
apoptosis. Heterodimerization with pro-apoptotic family members would
abrogate their protective function and thereby provoke apoptosis (19,
27). However, new findings indicate that death induction is independent
of Bcl-2-type proteins, but involves collaboration between Bax-type
proteins and BH3 domain-only family members. The BH3 domain-only group
has many members, which differ strikingly in their responsiveness to
stimuli and thereby in the pathways they regulate (19). For instance,
Noxa and Puma are regulated by p53 and implicated in DNA damage
pathways (28, 29), Bmf binds to the cytoskeleton and is activated upon
cell detachment (30), whereas Bid is processed and activated by
caspase-8, downstream from death receptors (3, 4). The Bax group
consists of three members, Bax, Bak, and Bok. The availability of Bax
and Bak knockout mice has recently allowed work that illuminates how pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members induce cell death. Cells lacking both Bax and Bak did not die upon expression of BH3 domain-only proteins, in contrast to cells expressing either one of these molecules. This provided the insight that BH3 domain-only proteins require at least one Bax-type partner to induce cell death (31, 32).
Both Bax and Bak undergo a conformational change in response to
apoptotic stimuli (33, 34, 35). Moreover, they assemble into
homomultimers with presumed channel forming properties in the
mitochondrial membrane (36, 37). The conformational change and
multimerization of Bak or Bax is inducible by Bid (34, 36) and
inhibitable by Bcl-2 (37, 38). The novel model emerging from these
findings is that Cyt c release depends on interaction between a BH3 domain-only protein and a Bax-type partner, which allows
formation of a Bax-type transmembrane pore.
We show here that Bfl-1 acts by inhibiting the collaboration between
the BH3 domain-only protein Bid and its pro-apoptotic partners Bax or
Bak in the induction of Cyt c release. Bfl-1 does so by
binding to full-length Bid via the Bid BH3 domain. It does not
interfere with proteolytic activation of Bid, nor with its mitochondrial insertion, but remains selectively complexed to tBid in
the mitochondrial membrane where it prevents the activity of a
pro-apoptotic complex.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Reagents--
Anti-human CD95 (APO-1/Fas) mAb 7C11 was purchased
from Immunotech (Marseille, France). Rabbit anti-Bak pAb was from
Sigma, rabbit anti-Bax (N-20) and anti-Bfl-1/A1 (FL-175) pAb were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Polyclonal rabbit anti-Bid serum was raised
in our laboratory against a fusion protein of glutathione S-transferase and full-length Bid. Anti-actin mAb C4 was
obtained from Roche Molecular Biochemicals, anti-Cyt c mAb
7H8.2C12 from PharMingen, anti-HA mAb 3F10 was from Roche
Molecular Biochemicals, and anti-HA mAb 12CA5 was isolated from
hybridoma supernatant. Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat
anti-rat Ig was from Rockland (Gilbertsville, PA). Texas Red-conjugated
rabbit anti-rat Ig, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse
Ig, or swine anti-rabbit Ig were from DAKO A/S (Glostrup, Denmark).
Etoposide was from Sigma. Soluble human recombinant Trail and enhancer
were from Alexis (Läufelfingen, Switzerland). Recombinant human
caspase-8 was obtained from PharMingen. Protein A- and G-Sepharose and
the ECL kit were from Amersham Biosciences.
Cell Culture--
The J16 clone was derived from the human
T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line Jurkat by limiting dilution
and selected for CD95 sensitivity (40, 41). J16 cells were cultured in Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium, HeLa, COS-7, and Phoenix-Ampho cells in Dulbecco's modified medium, both supplemented with 8% fetal
calf serum, 2 mM glutamine, and antibiotics. Prior to
stimulation, J16 cells were suspended in serum-free Yssel's medium
(49) and seeded at 1 × 106 per ml, 200 µl/well in
round-bottom 96-well plates for apoptosis assays, and at 5-10 × 106 per ml in 24-well culture plates for Cyt c
release assays. After addition of stimulus, cells were incubated for
the indicated time periods at 37 °C, 5% CO2.
Irradiation was performed using a 137Cs source (415 Ci; Von
Gahlen Nederland, B.V.). HeLa cells, plated on coverslips, were
preincubated with 10 µg/ml cycloheximide for 2 h at 37 °C,
5% CO2 and subsequently stimulated with 10 ng/ml human
recombinant TNF
(Sigma) in the continued presence of cycloheximide.
Plasmids--
Human Bcl-2 cDNA was cloned into the
retroviral vector LZRS-MS-IRES-Zeo/pBR, a derivative of LZRS-pBMN-lacZ,
which was provided by Dr. G. Nolan (Stanford University School of
Medicine, Stanford, CA). The retroviral vector pEYZ-FmA1 and the empty
equivalent pEYZ-MCS were kindly provided by Dr. I. Berberich (Institut
für Virologie und Immunbiologie, Universität
Würzburg, Germany). pET15b/Bid containing human full-length Bid
cDNA was a gift from Dr. X. Wang (Howard Hughes Medical
Institute, Dallas, TX). pMT2SM-Myc-Bid, pMD4-Bid, pEGFP-N1-Bid, and
pET15b-tBid (nucleotides 181-588) vectors were made by introducing
suitable restriction sites by PCR into this Bid cDNA. Modified pMT2
vectors with multiple cloning site and upstream Myc or HA tag sequence
were constructed in our laboratory by Dr. M. Gebbink. pEGFP-N1 is a
commercial vector (CLONTECH), which allows fusion
of eGFP at the carboxyl terminus of the cDNA product of interest.
Point mutations in the BH3 domain of tBid (pET15b/tBidM97A/D98A) as
described (50), were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis using the
QuikChange Site-directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene). pCR3.1-Bak
(mouse) was kindly provided by Dr. U. Armæ (Institute of
Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Finland) and
pcDNA3-HA-Bax (mouse) by Dr. H. Brady (National Institute for
Medical Research, London, UK). Human Bfl-1 cDNA was cloned from the
yeast expression vector pACT into pET15b (for in vitro transcription/translation) and pMT2SM-HA (for confocal microscopy) by
PCR. All sequences were verified by dideoxynucleotide sequencing.
Yeast Two-hybrid System--
For yeast two-hybrid protein
interaction screens (51), pMD4-Bid was used as bait to screen a
cDNA library of Epstein-Barr virus-transformed human B lymphocytes,
according to earlier described procedures (52).
cDNA Transfer into Mammalian Cells--
COS-7 cells were
transfected with combinations of pMT2SM-Myc-Bid, pMT2SM-HA-Bfl-1,
and/or empty vector by the standard DEAE-dextran transfection method,
using 2.5 µg of plasmid DNA per 106 cells. HeLa cells
(1 × 105) were grown overnight on a coverslip and
transfected with 0.4 µg of DNA using Effectene according to the
manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen). To produce retrovirus,
LZRS-Bcl-2-IRES-Zeo/pBR, pEYZ-FmA1/Bfl-1, or empty LZRS or pEYZ-MCS
vectors were transfected into the 293T human embryonic kidney
cell-derived packaging cell line Phoenix-Ampho (Ref. 53; provided by
Dr. G. P. Nolan), using FuGENE 6 transfection reagent according to
instructions of the manufacturer (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).
Transfected cells were selected with 1 µg/ml puromycin (CLONTECH). Virus-containing supernatant was
harvested after 48 h and stored at
80 °C until further use.
J16 cells were coated with RetroNectin (Takara) and transduced at a
density of 0.5 × 106/ml of virus-containing
supernatant. Supernatants were removed after overnight incubation, and
cells were cultured in fresh medium. Selection of transduced cells was
initiated after 48 h by the addition of 200 µg/ml Zeocin
(Invitrogen). The selection process was completed within 2 weeks.
Transduced cells were further cultured in the presence of 200 µg/ml Zeocin.
Apoptosis Assay--
To measure nuclear fragmentation, cells
were lysed in 0.1% sodium citrate, 0.1% Triton X-100, 50 µg/ml
propidium iodide (54) as described earlier (40, 41). Fluorescence
intensity of propidium iodide-stained DNA was determined on a FACScan
(Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) and data were analyzed using CellQuest software.
Production of Recombinant Proteins--
Full-length Bid, tBid,
Bfl-1, Bax, and Bak were in vitro transcribed and translated
in the presence of [35S]methionine/cysteine from the
appropriate cDNA vectors with the TNT Quick Coupled
Transcription/Translation for genes cloned downstream from the T7 RNA
polymerase promoter, according to instructions supplied by the
manufacturer (Promega).
Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting--
COS-7 cells were
lysed with 1% Brij-96 in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
iodoacetamide, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, and 2.5 µg/ml aprotonin at 48 h after transfection. Cell lysates were clarified by centrifugation for 10 min
at 14,000 rpm at 4 °C. Lysates were incubated for at least 2 h
at 4 °C with either 12CA5 mAb or polyclonal anti-Bid serum. Immune
complexes were incubated with protein A-Sepharose beads for an
additional 2 h. Precipitated proteins were subjected to 15%
SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose. Blots were blocked in PBS
containing 0.05% Tween 20 and 5% non-fat dry milk (Nutricia) and
subsequently incubated with the appropriate primary and secondary antibodies. Immunostained proteins were visualized by ECL.
Immunoblot Analysis for in Vivo Cyt c Release--
After
incubation with the appropriate stimuli, cells were washed twice with
ice-cold PBS and resuspended in 100 µl of extraction buffer (50 mM PIPES-KOH, pH 7.4, 220 mM mannitol, 68 mM sucrose, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol and
protease inhibitors) and allowed to swell on ice for 30 min (55). Cells were homogenized by passing the suspension through a 25-gauge needle
(10 strokes). Homogenates were centrifuged in a Beckman Airfuge at
100,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C and supernatants
were harvested and stored at
70 °C until analysis by gel
electrophoresis. Ten µg of cytosolic protein, as determined by the
Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad, München) were loaded per lane
onto 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Proteins were transferred to
nitrocellulose sheets, which were blocked for 1 h in PBS, 0.05%
Tween with 5% non-fat dry milk, and probed in PBS, 0.05% Tween with
anti-Cyt c mAb (1:1000) and anti-actin mAb (1:10,000), to
confirm equal loading. After incubation with a 1:7500 dilution of
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse Ig, immunostained
proteins were visualized by ECL.
Isolation of Mitochondria--
Mouse liver cells were lysed by
Dounce homogenization in mitochondrion incubation buffer (MIB): 250 mM mannitol, 0.5 mM EGTA, 5 mM
Hepes pH 7.2, 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride as described (56). Briefly, nuclei and debris were removed by a 5-min centrifugation at
600 × g at 4 °C, and a pellet containing
mitochondria was obtained by a spin at 10,000 × g for
10 min at 4 °C. The pellet was resuspended in MIB and layered on a
gradient consisting of four layers of 10, 18, 30, and 70% Percoll in
225 mM mannitol, 25 mM Hepes pH 7.2, 0.5 mM EGTA, and 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin. Purified mitochondria were collected at the 30/70% Percoll interface after centrifugation in a SW-41 rotor for 35 min at 13,500 × g at 4 °C. The harvested fraction was diluted in MIB, at
least 5-fold, and centrifuged for 10 min at 6,300 × g
at 4 °C. After two more washes in MIB, mitochondria were resuspended
in Wang-buffer B (20 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 220 mM
mannitol, 68 mM sucrose, 100 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM Na2EDTA,
1 mM Na2EGTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) (3) to a protein concentration of 5 mg/ml.
In Vitro Mitochondrion Assays--
For monitoring Cyt
c release, mitochondria (25 µg/sample) were incubated in
the presence or absence of the in vitro
transcription/translation mixture containing the indicated recombinant
proteins (0.5-2 µl of tBid, 1 µl of Bid, Bax, Bak, or Bfl-1) in a
final volume 30 µl of Wang-buffer B for 1 h at 30 °C, and
then centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000 × g at 4 °C.
Mitochondrial pellets, solubilized in SDS sample buffer at 12.5 µg/sample, and a corresponding volume of the supernatant fractions,
were separated by 13% SDS-PAGE. Cyt c immunoblotting was
performed as described above. Protein interaction studies were
performed with 250 µg of mitochondria and 10 µl of the in
vitro transcription/translation mixture in a final volume of 300 µl of Wang-buffer B. Proteins were targeted to the mitochondria by
incubation for 30 min at 30 °C and then centrifuged for 10 min at
10,000 × g at 4 °C. Mitochondrial pellets were
solubilized in 100 µl of RIPA buffer (10 mM
triethanolamine, pH 8.2, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40,
0.1% SDS, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 5 mM EDTA, and
protease inhibitors) followed by sonification. The solubilized proteins
present in the supernatant (diluted in Wang-buffer B with 2% CHAPS)
were precipitated with appropriate antibodies and Protein G-Sepharose
beads and subjected to SDS-PAGE.
Confocal Microscopy--
Where indicated, transfected HeLa cells
on coverslips were incubated in 150 nM Mitotracker Red
(Molecular Probes) for 30 min prior to fixation. Cells were washed once
in PBS and then fixed for 5 min with methanol kept at
20 °C. All
subsequent incubations were at room temperature. Cells were washed in
TBS (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 in PBS) and incubated for 30 min in TBS, 0.05% Tween 20, 1% bovine serum albumin to block
nonspecific binding. Cells were washed in TBS, 0.05% Tween 20, followed by incubation with anti-HA mAb 3F10 for 1 h. Cells were
washed 5 times in TBS, 0.05% Tween 20 and incubated with either Texas
Red- or fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-rat Ig for 30 min.
Cells were washed and incubated with 1 mM TOPRO-3
(Molecular Probes) in TBS, 0.05% Tween 20. Coverslips were mounted in
Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingham, CA) and viewed under a
Leica TCS NT confocal laser-scanning microscope (Leica Microsystems,
Germany). Confocal images were taken from a basal plane of the cells,
just above the basal membrane, unless indicated otherwise.
 |
RESULTS |
Bfl-1 Interacts with Full-length Bid--
To obtain more insight
into the regulation of Bid function, we searched for Bid-interacting
proteins using the yeast two-hybrid system. A cDNA library of
Epstein-Barr virus-transformed human B-lymphocytes was screened with
full-length Bid as bait. The screen revealed eight positive clones,
which all represented Bfl-1 (data not shown). To confirm the
interaction between Bid and Bfl-1, COS-7 cells were transiently
transfected with Myc-tagged full-length Bid and HA-tagged Bfl-1 alone,
or in combination. Bfl-1 protein expression was easily detectable in
the total lysate and in anti-HA immunoprecipitates (Fig.
1). Anti-HA probing of anti-Bid
immunoprecipitates showed that Bfl-1 and Bid interact specifically,
since absence of either Myc-Bid or HA-Bfl-1 in the lysates gave no
signal (Fig. 1). Thus, Bfl-1 interacts with full-length Bid, as shown
by coexpression in yeast and mammalian cells.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Bfl-1 interacts with Bid in mammalian
cells. Myc-tagged Bid, HA-tagged Bfl-1, and empty vector were
expressed in the indicated combinations in COS-7 cells by transient
transfection. Immunoprecipitates (IP) of Bid (pAb anti-Bid)
and Bfl-1 (anti-HA mAb 12CA5) and total lysates (TL) were
separated by 15% SDS-PAGE. Bfl-1 was detected by immunoblotting with
anti-HA mAb 12CA5.
|
|
Bfl-1 Inhibits CD95- and Trail Receptor-induced Apoptosis and Cyt c
Release in Jurkat Cells--
Given its interaction with Bid, we
expected Bfl-1 to impact on signaling by death receptors such as CD95
(APO-1/Fas), TNF receptor-1, and the Trail receptors. Previously, Bfl-1
was found to inhibit TNF-induced apoptosis in human microvascular
endothelial cells and HeLa cells, but its impact on CD95 and Trail
receptor signaling was unexplored. To examine the effect of Bfl-1 on
death receptor-mediated apoptosis, we used Jurkat T-leukemic cells, because they are defined as Type II cells, in which Bcl-2
overexpression inhibits apoptosis induced by CD95 (39). The J16 Jurkat
clone, used routinely in our studies (40, 41), was transduced with retroviral vectors containing Bcl-2 or Bfl-1 and stimulated with anti-CD95 mAb or recombinant Trail. In agreement with the definition of
Jurkat cells as Type II cells, Bcl-2 inhibited both CD95- and Trail
receptor-induced apoptosis, as read out by nuclear fragmentation. Bfl-1
was fully comparable with Bcl-2 in its inhibitory effect on both CD95
and Trail receptor-mediated apoptosis (Fig.
2). After long periods of stimulation and
at a high dose of stimulus, neither Bfl-1 nor Bcl-2 could fully inhibit
apoptosis, which can be explained by mitochondrion independent effector
caspase activation by CD95 and Trail receptor. Interestingly, in the
same cells tested for death receptor sensitivity, Bfl-1 also inhibited
apoptosis as induced by DNA damaging stimuli, i.e. the
anti-cancer drug etoposide and
-radiation, but was much less
effective than Bcl-2 in doing so (Fig. 2). This result suggests that
Bfl-1 is more selective for the death receptor pathway.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Bfl-1 inhibits CD95- and Trail
receptor-induced apoptosis in Jurkat cells. J16 Jurkat cells,
transduced with empty retroviral vector (white bars), vector
with Bfl-1 (gray bars), or Bcl-2 cDNAs (black
bars) were left untreated or stimulated with the indicated
concentrations of anti-CD95 mAb 7C11 for 4 h, with human
recombinant soluble Trail plus enhancer for 6 h, or with etoposide
or -radiation for 16 h. Propidium iodide-stained nuclei were
prepared and apoptosis was read out as subdiploid DNA content on
a FACScan. Data are representative of multiple independent
experiments.
|
|
To explore whether the inhibitory effect of Bfl-1 on CD95- and Trail
receptor-mediated apoptosis was consistent with an effect on Bid
function, we examined Cyt c release in Bfl-1-transduced cells. Fig. 3 shows that CD95 and Trail
receptor effectively induce Cyt c release in control J16
cells, transduced with empty vector. Kinetics of Trail receptor-induced
Cyt c release are consistently slower in these cells than
kinetics of CD95-induced Cyt c release, which is consistent
with a slower onset of nuclear fragmentation (Fig. 2). Cyt c
release in response to both stimuli was severely reduced in cells
expressing Bfl-1. In fact, Bfl-1 inhibited Cyt c release to
a similar extent as Bcl-2 (Fig. 3).

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Bfl-1 inhibits Cyt c release
in vivo. J16 Jurkat cells, transduced with empty
vector, vector with Bfl-1 or Bcl-2 cDNAs, were left untreated
(medium), or stimulated with anti-CD95 mAb 7C11 at 100 ng/ml, or recombinant Trail at 200 ng/ml plus enhancer at 2 µg/ml for
the indicated time periods. Cells were lysed, and mitochondria-free
cytosol was prepared as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Equal amounts of protein were loaded after quantification, and
immunoblotting was performed for Cyt c and actin (as a
loading control).
|
|
Bfl-1 Blocks tBid-induced Cyt c Release, But Allows Generation of
tBid and Its Association with Mitochondria--
In J16 cells, CD95-
and Trail receptor-induced Cyt c release is inhibited by a
Bid mutant, which lacks the caspase-8 cleavage site, proving that tBid
generated by caspase-8 is a crucial mediator in these
responses.2 However,
caspase-8-processed Bid is difficult to detect, possibly because of the
small pool of Bid molecules involved, or because of its rapid turnover.
Bid fragments can be detected a few hours after receptor stimulation,
but these are generated downstream from the mitochondria (results not
shown). To define the impact of Bfl-1 on Bid processing and function,
we therefore resorted to an in vitro system, in which mouse
liver mitochondria are incubated with recombinant regulators and
examined for Cyt c release.
In these assays, bacterially expressed, unlabeled caspase-8 was used,
whereas other proteins were made by in vitro
transcription/translation and concomitantly radiolabeled. Mitochondria
were incubated with recombinant proteins for 1 h at 30 °C.
Subsequently, mitochondrial and cytosolic protein fractions were
electrophoresed and immunoblotted for the presence of Cyt c.
Whereas full-length Bid or capase-8 alone did not affect mitochondrial
permeability, the combination allowed effective Cyt c
release, in line with the generation of active tBid (Fig.
4A). Similarly, the
recombinant tBid fragment induced Cyt c release. These
results show that the system faithfully mimicks the in vivo
situation. In both cases, Cyt c release was completely
blocked by simultaneous addition of Bfl-1.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Bfl-1 inhibits tBid-mediated Cyt c
release in vitro, but not generation of tBid, or
its association with the mitochondria. A, isolated
mouse liver mitochondria were incubated with in vitro
transcribed/translated full-length Bid (Bid), truncated Bid
(tBid), or Bfl-1 protein and/or non-radioactive, bacterially
expressed caspase-8 (Casp-8) for 1 h at 30 °C.
Mitochondrion (mito) and soluble fractions (sol)
were separated by centrifugation, and assayed for the presence of Cyt
c by immunoblotting. B, autoradiography of the
same blot as shown in A reveals the presence of
[35S]methionine- and cysteine-labeled recombinant
proteins in the mitochondrial pellets and soluble fractions. Caspase-8
is not visible, since it was not radiolabeled.
|
|
Autoradiography of the blots allowed us to examine the presence of
radiolabeled recombinant proteins in the mitochondrion and soluble
fractions (Fig. 4B). This revealed that recombinant caspase-8 had effectively generated tBid. In contrast to full-length Bid, which was found predominantly in the soluble fraction, tBid generated from full-length Bid by caspase-8, as well as recombinant tBid preferentially associated with the mitochondria. Note that recombinant tBid has a somewhat higher molecular mass than tBid processed from full-length Bid, because it has a His tag. In the presence of Bfl-1, proteolytic processing of full-length Bid by caspase-8 was not influenced at all. Moreover, tBid generated by
caspase-8, as well as recombinant tBid associated with the mitochondria
with exactly the same efficiency as in the absence of Bfl-1 (Fig.
4B). The proportion of Bfl-1 molecules associating with the
mitochondria in the absence of tBid was in the order of 50%, which was
not dramatically changed in the presence of tBid. Apparently, insertion
of tBid into the mitochondrial membrane is not the driving force for
association of Bfl-1 with these organelles.
In conclusion, Bfl-1 associates with full-length Bid, but does not
affect its processing by caspase-8, nor association of tBid with the
mitochondria. However, Bfl-1 dramatically inhibits tBid-mediated Cyt
c release.
In Intact Cells, Bfl-1 Localizes in Part to Mitochondria and Allows
Death Receptor-induced Translocation of Bid--
The in
vitro studies indicated that Bfl-1 has a capacity to associate
with mitochondria and does not interfere with the mitochondrial association of tBid. To examine the exact intracellular localization of
Bfl-1 and its impact on Bid translocation in response to stimulus, confocal microscopy was used. Bfl-1 and a full-length Bid molecule, tagged at its carboxyl terminus with green fluorescent protein (GFP),
were expressed in HeLa cells, which are adherent cells with a large
cytoplasm and therefore allow proper visualization of mitochondrial
translocation. The localization of Bfl-1 relative to mitochondria was
examined by immunostaining of Bfl-1, and labeling of mitochondria with
MitoTracker. In unstimulated HeLa cells, Bfl-1 was concentrated in the
perinuclear region, where it co-localized for a large part, but not
completely, with mitochondria. Outside the perinuclear region, Bfl-1
was detected at incidental mitochondria, but also in low intensity
diffusely throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 5A). Bfl-1 localization
relative to mitochondria did not alter significantly after TNF receptor
stimulation, which induces Cyt c release and apoptosis in
HeLa cells (Fig. 5A). Co-expression of Bfl-1 and Bid-GFP
revealed a diffuse, cytoplasmic localization of Bid-GFP in unstimulated
cells, whereas Bfl-1 was again concentrated in the perinuclear region
(Fig. 5B). At 2 h after TNF receptor stimulation,
Bid-GFP was concentrated in the perinuclear region, reflecting its
mitochondrial translocation (as corroborated with MitoTracker staining;
not shown). Apparently, Bfl-1 did not impede the mitochondrial
translocation of Bid-GFP. Overlay of Bid-GFP and Bfl-1 staining
revealed a significant degree of co-localization, consistent with the
simultaneous presence of tBid and Bfl-1 at the mitochondria after death
receptor stimulation (Fig. 5B).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Bfl-1 constitutively localizes in part to
mitochondria and allows death receptor-induced translocation of
Bid. A, HeLa cells were transfected with
HA-tagged Bfl-1 and cultured in medium or stimulated with TNF for
2 h. Mitochondria were stained with MitoTracker (red),
DNA with TOPRO-3 (blue), and Bfl-1 with anti-HA mAb and
secondary fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated antibody
(green). B, HeLa cells were transfected with
HA-tagged Bfl-1 and carboxyl-terminal GFP-tagged Bid and cultured in
medium or stimulated with TNF for 2 h. Bid-GFP was detected by
green fluorescence, DNA with TOPRO-3 (blue), and Bfl-1 with
Texas Red-conjugated secondary antibody (red). GFP expressed
from empty vector control was diffusely localized throughout the cell,
both before and after TNF receptor stimulation (data not shown).
|
|
Bfl-1 Abrogates Synergism between tBid and Bax or Bak in Bringing
about Cyt c Release--
tBid is proposed to bring about Cyt
c release by collaborating with Bax or Bak at the
mitochondrial outer membrane. Therefore, we examined how Bfl-1 impacts
on this collaboration. In isolated mouse liver mitochondria, endogenous
Bak, but not Bax protein could be detected (not shown). When they were
incubated with recombinant Bax or Bak alone, no Cyt c
release was observed (Fig. 6,
A and B, upper panels). Increasing
amounts of recombinant tBid were added, which in the absence of
recombinant Bak or Bax were not sufficient to bring about Cyt
c release. However, when a fixed amount of recombinant Bax
or Bak was added simultaneously with tBid, synergism between tBid and
Bax or Bak allowed for Cyt c release to occur (Fig. 6,
A and B, upper panels). In the
presence of Bfl-1, no Cyt c release took place, indicating
that the synergism between tBid and Bax or Bak was completely inhibited
(Fig. 6, A and B, upper panels).

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Bfl-1 abrogates synergism between tBid and
Bax or Bak in induction of Cyt c release.
A, isolated mouse liver mitochondria were incubated for 30 min at 30 °C with increasing concentrations of in vitro
transcribed/translated tBid alone, or together with Bax, or Bak and
Bfl-1. The upper panel shows Cyt c release, as
assayed by immunoblotting, the lower panel shows the
presence of 35S-radiolabeled recombinant proteins in
mitochondrial (mito) and soluble (sol) fractions,
as determined by autoradiography. B, the same type of
experiment as outlined for A, but using Bak instead of Bax.
The upper panel shows the result of anti-Cyt c
immunoblotting, the lower panel the result of
autoradiography.
|
|
Autoradiography of the blots revealed that association of recombinant
Bax with the mitochondria was inefficient and not enhanced by the
presence of tBid (Fig. 6A, lower panel).
Recombinant Bak on the other hand, preferentially localized to the
mitochondria, which was also independent of tBid (Fig. 6B,
lower panel). The amounts of recombinant tBid, Bax, Bak, and
Bfl-1 as visualized by autoradiography further serve as controls for
the Cyt c release assay (Fig. 6, A and
B, lower panels).
Bfl-1 Selectively Binds to tBid, Not Bax or Bak, via the Bid BH3
Domain--
Since Bfl-1 inhibited tBid-induced Cyt c
release, we examined whether it might do so by binding and sequestering
tBid after its insertion into the mitochondrial outer membrane.
Bringing together recombinant tBid, Bax, Bak, and Bfl-1 in
vitro in buffer, either in the presence or absence of various
detergents, did not allow efficient interaction between any of these
Bcl-2 family members. However, a completely different picture emerged
when the recombinant proteins were added together in the presence of mouse liver mitochondria. Detergent extraction of mitochondria, incubated with recombinant proteins, followed by immunoprecipitation with anti-Bid antiserum revealed that tBid very efficiently complexes with Bfl-1 when they are together in the mitochondrial membrane (Fig.
7A). Bfl-1 and tBid were
present in an anti-Bid immunoprecipitate at about equimolar levels. A
BH3 domain mutation in tBid (M97A/D98A), which had been described to
abrogate interaction between Bid and Bcl-2 (50), reduced the
efficiency of interaction between tBid and Bfl-1 at least 10-fold, as
determined by phosphorimaging of the blot (Fig. 7A). In the
same experiment, and others like it, only trace amounts of
tBid·Bax or tBid·Bak complexes could be detected, despite
the presence of mitochondria (Fig. 7A). This finding
suggests that the interaction between tBid and Bfl-1 is of another
nature than the interaction between tBid and Bax or Bak, which
is proposed to take place in the mitochondrial membrane. The observed,
low level of complex formation between tBid and Bak was affected
however, by the BH3 domain mutation in tBid (Fig. 7A).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Bfl-1 binds selectively to the BH3 domain of
tBid in the plane of the mitochondrial membrane. A,
isolated mouse liver mitochondria were incubated with in
vitro transcribed/translated Bfl-1, Bax, or Bak, in combination
with recombinant wild type tBid, or with tBid containing M97A/D98A BH3
domain mutations (tBidm) for 30 min at 30 °C.
Mitochondria were subsequently lysed with CHAPS detergent. The
upper panel shows the presence of
35S-radiolabeled recombinant proteins in the lysate. The
lower panel reveals which recombinant proteins are present
in anti-Bid immunoprecipitates derived from the mitochondrial lysates,
as determined by autoradiography. B, isolated mouse liver
mitochondria were incubated for 30 min at 30 °C with in
vitro transcribed/translated recombinant tBid and Bax or Bak, in
the presence or absence of Bfl-1. Mitochondria were lysed with CHAPS
and lysates, as well as anti-Bid and -Bax, and Bak immunoprecipitates
were examined for the presence of radiolabeled recombinant proteins by
autoradiography. To note, the band running at ~17 kDa in the
upper panel of B is most likely a degradation
product of recombinant Bak, since it is also precipitated with anti-Bak
serum.
|
|
Next, we examined whether Bfl-1 was selective in its interaction with
tBid, or also formed complexes with Bax or Bak in the presence of
mitochondria. tBid was included to simultaneously investigate impact of
Bfl-1 on complex formation between tBid and Bax or Bak. As for Fig.
7A, the level of complex formation between tBid and Bax or
Bak was very low, as revealed in Fig. 7B by
immunoprecipitation via Bid, Bax, or Bak. Therefore, no conclusions
could be drawn concerning a possible effect of Bfl-1 on this complex
formation (Fig. 7B). Immunoprecipitation with anti-Bid serum
again showed very efficient complex formation between Bfl-1 and tBid,
as in Fig. 7A. In contrast, neither anti-Bax nor anti-Bak
immunoprecipitates contained a significant amount of Bfl-1. Clearly,
Bfl-1 is highly selective between Bcl-2 family members and, in the
plane of the mitochondrial membrane, only efficiently associates with
tBid, not with Bax or Bak. Lack of demonstrable interaction between
Bfl-1 and Bax or Bak in the mitochondrial membrane suggests that Bfl-1
may generally prevent the formation of a pro-apoptotic complex by
interacting with BH3 domain-only proteins.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Bfl-1 has been grouped together with Bcl-2, Bcl-xL,
Bcl-w, Boo, and Mcl-1 in the inhibitory Bcl-2 subfamily. However, Bfl-1 lacks a bona fide hydrophobic anchor at the carboxyl terminus, which
targets prototype inhibitory family members to membranes of endoplasmic
reticulum, nucleus, and mitochondria (27). Three charged residues
interrupt the potential equivalent of this anchor in Bfl-1 (23),
raising the question whether Bfl-1 is freely distributed throughout the
cytosol, as opposed to its closest relatives. Reports on the
intracellular localization of Bfl-1 are partly conflicting. In
transfected baby rat kidney cells, Bfl-1 was present in the perinuclear
region, similar to Bcl-2 (22). In transduced endothelial cells, it was
found predominantly in the membrane fraction, including mitochondria,
but also in cytosol (21). Endogenous Bfl-1 was found in the cytosol of
live macrophages and in the nucleus once they were apoptotic (26). We
find that Bfl-1 has a propensity to associate with the mitochondrial membrane and constitutively localizes to mitochondria and other structures in the perinuclear region. Weak staining outside this region
suggests that Bfl-1 in part localizes to cytosol. The collective data
favor the interpretation that Bfl-1, like the prototype Bcl-2, primarily performs its inhibitory function at intracellular membranes, including those of mitochondria.
Whereas the anchor sequence is necessary for membrane localization of
Bcl-2, its anti-apoptotic activity does not consistently depend on it
(27). Deletion of the 24 carboxyl-terminal residues in Bfl-1 reduced
protection to p53-induced apoptosis (23). Whether it affected membrane
association was not reported. It will be interesting to examine whether
Bfl-1 requires localization to intracellular membranes to confer cell
survival. Its predominant interaction with tBid was only revealed in
the presence of mitochondria. This suggests that membrane localization
of both proteins, and/or the availability of other partners at the
mitochondrial membrane, promote complex formation between tBid and
Bfl-1 and thereby presumably the anti-apoptotic activity of Bfl-1.
Bfl-1 has previously been shown to protect from TNF-induced apoptosis
(13, 20, 21). TNF induces apoptosis via TNF receptor-1, a member of
death receptor family. We show here that Bfl-1 also affects apoptosis
signaling by the CD95 and Trail death receptors. Our finding that Bfl-1
prevents the pro-apoptotic activity of tBid explains its capacity to
regulate death receptor signaling in general. Importantly, Bfl-1
inhibits activation of the mitochondrial pathway downstream from death
receptors, which is not always necessary to bring about an apoptotic
response. In a number of cell types, death receptors can bypass
mitochondria to induce apoptosis, because of the capacity of caspase-8,
10 to directly process effector caspases (39). This may explain why
Bfl-1 severely delays TNF-induced apoptosis in microvascular
endothelial cells, but not in umbilical cord endothelial cells
(21).
Previously, Bfl-1 was found to inhibit mitochondrial Cyt c
release and dysfunction in response to TNF, in agreement with our findings. In that study, however, Bid processing appeared to be inhibited by Bfl-1 (21). Most likely, the Bid processing observed was
mediated by effector caspases, rather than by caspase-8 upstream from
the mitochondria. We have also found such secondary, Bcl-2 inhibitable,
Bid processing in Jurkat cells (results not shown).
The question is, whether the inhibitory activity of Bfl-1 in other
apoptosis pathways can also be attributed to its effect on Bid
function. Given the variety of pathways that are affected by Bfl-1, Bid
may not be its only target. Analysis of Bid-deficient mice has thus far
not provided evidence that Bid participates in death
receptor-independent pathways (42). For instance, etoposide-induced apoptosis in mouse embryo cells proceeded normally in the absence of
Bid (32). Recent evidence suggests that DNA damage pathways may use
Noxa and/or Puma, which are p53-inducible BH3 domain-only proteins (29,
43). Whereas Bfl-1 and Bcl-2 inhibited the death receptor pathways with
similar efficiency, we found Bfl-1 to be much less protective than
Bcl-2 in DNA damage pathways. Since a variety of BH3 domain-only
proteins can collaborate with Bax and Bak (44), a differential capacity
of Bfl-1 and Bcl-2 to inhibit certain pathways is best explained by a
differential capacity to sequester the BH3 domain-only partner of the
pro-apoptotic complex. It will be interesting to examine, therefore,
whether Bfl-1 and Bcl-2 have different selectivities in binding BH3
domain-only proteins in the mitochondrial membrane.
Unlike Bcl-2, Bfl-1 is not expressed constitutively, but induced by
stimuli that activate NF-
B (13-15, 17). NF-
B
transcription factor complexes can induce many other
anti-apoptotic gene products, such as Bcl-xL, Flip,
and IAPs (15, 45-47). Many members of the TNF receptor family can
activate NF-
B and therein promote cell survival. Intermediate in
this response is the Traf adapter protein. The up-regulation of Bfl-1
by Traf-linked TNF receptor family member CD40 is in line with this
general principle (15, 16). Death receptors can couple to the apoptotic
pathway via Fadd and caspase-8, whereas most of them can also promote
cell survival via Trafs. Whether a cell survives death receptor
signaling may well depend on the anti-apoptotic proteins that are in
place before the death signal is irrevocable.
A prevailing thought has been that death signaling involves
neutralization of the apoptosis inhibitory activity of Bcl-2-type proteins by their pro-apoptotic family members. However, it has recently become clear that the death signal depends on cooperation between a BH3 domain-only protein and a Bax/Bak-type protein (13, 32).
Bax and Bak have been found to change conformation and form
homomultimers in response to apoptotic stimuli or BH3 domain-only proteins (34). In a number of independent studies, Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL blocked the conformational change and/or
multimerization (32, 33, 37, 38). Apart from our work, one recent study provides evidence that inhibitory Bcl-2-type proteins may inhibit the
cooperation between BH3 domain-only proteins and Bax or Bak by
sequestering the BH3 domain-only partner of the complex: a Bcl-xL mutant that failed to bind Bim, Bad, or Bid, as well
as a Bcl-2 mutant that failed to bind Bid in vivo, could no
longer protect from apoptosis induced by overexpression of these BH3 domain-only proteins (44). Earlier work had indicated that
Bcl-xL mutants unable to bind Bax or Bak were still
protective (48). Future use of mutant Bcl-2 family members in
functional assays, combined with analysis of complex formation in
vivo should elucidate whether inhibitory Bcl-2 family members
generally function by sequestering the BH3 domain only partner of the
pro-apoptotic complex.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank G. van der Horst, E. Noteboom, A. Pfauth, L. Oomen, and L. Brocks for technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grant NKB 2000-2214 from the
Dutch Cancer Society.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of Cellular
Biochemistry, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: 31-20-5121972; Fax: 31-20-5121989;
E-mail: j.borst@nki.nl.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 19, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201469200
2
A. B. Werner et al.,
unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
Cyt c, cytochrome c;
BH, Bcl-2 homology;
GFP, green fluorescent
protein;
MIB, mitochondrion incubation buffer;
pAb, polyclonal
antibody;
TNF, tumor necrosis factor;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid;
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic
acid.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Li, P.,
Nijhawan, D.,
Budihardjo, I.,
Srinivasula, S. M.,
Ahmad, M.,
Alnemri, E. S.,
and Wang, X.
(1997)
Cell
91,
479-489[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Wang, X.
(2001)
Genes Dev.
15,
2922-2933[Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Luo, X.,
Budihardjo, I.,
Zou, H.,
Slaughter, C.,
and Wang, X.
(1998)
Cell
94,
481-490[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Li, H.,
Zhu, H., Xu, C. J.,
and Yuan, J.
(1998)
Cell
94,
491-501[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Du, C.,
Fang, M., Li, Y., Li, L.,
and Wang, X.
(2000)
Cell
102,
33-42[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Verhagen, A.,
Ekert, P. G.,
Silke, J.,
Conolly, L. M.,
Reid, G. E.,
Moritz, R. L.,
Simpson, R. J.,
and Vaux, D. L.
(2000)
Cell
102,
43-53[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Susin, S.,
Lorenzo, H. K.,
Zamzami, N.,
Marzo, I.,
Snow, B. E.,
Brothers, G. M.,
Mangion, J.,
Jacotot, E.,
Costantini, P.,
Loeffler, M.,
Larochette, N.,
Goodlett, D. R.,
Aebersold, R.,
Siderovski, D. P.,
Penninger, J. M.,
and Kroemer, G.
(1999)
Nature
397,
441-446[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Desagher, S.,
and Martinou, J.-C.
(2000)
Trends Cell Biol.
10,
369-377[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Lin, E. Y.,
Orlowsky, A.,
Berger, M. S.,
and Prystowsky, M. B.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
151,
1979-1988[Abstract]
|
| 10.
|
Choi, S. S.,
Park, I.-S.,
Yun, J. W.,
Sung, Y. C.,
Hong, S.-I.,
and Shin, H.-S.
(1995)
Oncogene
11,
1693-1698[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Karsan, A.,
Yee, E.,
Kaushansky, K.,
and Harlan, J. M.
(1996)
Blood
87,
3089-3096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Kenny, J. J.,
Knobloch, T. J.,
Augustus, M.,
Carter, K. C.,
Rosen, C. A.,
and Lang, J. C.
(1997)
Oncogene
14,
997-1001[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Zong, W.-X.,
Edelstein, L. C.,
Chen, C.,
Bash, J.,
and Gelinas, C.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
382-387[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Grumont, R. J.,
Rourke, I. J.,
and Gerondakis, S.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
400-411[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Lee, H. H.,
Dadgostar, H.,
Cheng, Q.,
Shu, J.,
and Cheng, G.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
9136-9141[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Kuss, A. W.,
Knodel, M.,
Berberich-Siebelt, F.,
Lindemann, D.,
Schimpl, A.,
and Berberich, I.
(1999)
Eur. J. Immunol.
29,
3077-3088[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Wang, C.-Y.,
Guttridge, D. C.,
Mayo, M. W.,
and Baldwin, A. S.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
5923-5929[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Adams, J. M.,
and Cory, S.
(2001)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
26,
61-66[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Huang, D. C. S.,
and Strasser, A.
(2000)
Cell
103,
839-842[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Karsan, A.,
Yee, E.,
and Harlan, J. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
27201-27204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Duriez, P. J.,
Wong, F.,
Dorovini-Zis, K.,
Shahidi, R.,
and Karsan, A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
18099-18107[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
D'Sa-Eipper, C.,
Subramanian, T.,
and Chinnadurai, G.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
3879-3882[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
D'Sa-Eipper, C.,
and Chinnandurai, G.
(1998)
Oncogene
16,
3105-3114[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Hamasaki, A.,
Sendo, F.,
Nakayama, K.,
Ishida, N.,
Negishi, I.,
Nakayama, K.,
and Hatakeyama, S.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
188,
1985-1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Zhang, H.,
Cowan-Jacob, S. W.,
Simonen, M.,
Greenhalf, W.,
Heim, J.,
and Meyhack, B.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
11092-11099[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Orlowsky, A.,
Somogyi, R. D.,
Weiss, L. M.,
and Prystowsky, M. B.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
163,
412-419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Kelekar, A.,
and Thompson, C. B.
(1998)
Trends Cell Biol.
8,
324-330[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Yu, J.,
Zhang, L.,
Hwang, P. M.,
Kinzel, K. W.,
and Vogelstein, B.
(2001)
Mol. Cell
7,
673-682[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Nakano, K.,
and Vousden, K. H.
(2001)
Mol. Cell
7,
683-694[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Puthalakath, H.,
Villunger, A.,
O'Reilley, L. A.,
Beaumont, J. G.,
Coultas, L.,
Cheney, R. E.,
Huang, D. C. S.,
and Strasser, A.
(2001)
Science
293,
1829-1832[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Zong, W.-X.,
Lindsten, T.,
Ross, A. J.,
MacGregor, G.,
and Thompson, C. B.
(2001)
Genes Dev.
15,
1481-1486[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Wei, M. C.,
Zong, W.-X.,
Cheng, E. H.-Y.,
Lindsten, T.,
Panoutsakopoulou, V.,
Ross, A. J.,
Roth, K. A.,
MacGregor, G. R.,
Thompson, C. B.,
and Korsmeyer, S. J.
(2001)
Science
292,
727-730[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Nechustan, A.,
Smith, C. L.,
Hsu, Y.-T.,
and Youle, R. J.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
2330-2341[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Desagher, S.,
Osen-Sand, A.,
Nichols, A.,
Eskes, R.,
Montessuit, S.,
Lauper, S.,
Maundrell, K.,
Antonsson, B.,
and Martinou, J.-C.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
891-901[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Griffiths, G. J.,
Dubrez, L.,
Morgan, C. P.,
Jones, N. A.,
Whitehouse, J.,
Corfe, B. M.,
Dive, C.,
and Hickman, J. A.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
903-914[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Wei, M. C.,
Lindsten, T.,
Mootha, V. K.,
Weiler, S.,
Gross, A.,
Ashiya, M.,
Thompson, C. B.,
and Korsmeyer, S. J.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
2060-2071[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Antonsson, B.,
Montessuit, S.,
Sanchez, B.,
and Martinou, J.-C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
11615-11623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Mikhailov, V.,
Mikhailova, M.,
Pulkrabek, D. J.,
Dong, Z.,
Venkatachalam, M. A.,
and Saikumar, P.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
18361-18374[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Scaffidi, C.,
Fulda, S.,
Srinivasan, A.,
Friesen, C., Li, F.,
Tomaselli, K. J.,
Debatin, K. M.,
Krammer, P. H.,
and Peter, M. E.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
1675-1687[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Tepper, A. D.,
de Vries, E.,
van Blitterswijk, W.,
and Borst, J.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
103,
971-978[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Tepper, A. D.,
Ruurs, P.,
Wiedmer, T.,
Sims, P. J.,
Borst, J.,
and van Blitterswijk, W. J.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
150,
155-164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Yin, X.-M.,
Wang, K.,
Gross, A.,
Zhao, Y.,
Zinkel, S.,
Klocke, B.,
Roth, K. A.,
and Korsmeyer, S. J.
(1999)
Nature
400,
886-891[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Oda, E.,
Ohki, R.,
Murasawa, H.,
Nemoto, J.,
Shibue, T.,
Yamashita, T.,
Tokino, T.,
Taniguchi, T.,
and Tanaka, N.
(2000)
Science
288,
1053-1058[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Cheng, E. H.-Y. A.,
Wei, M. C.,
Weiler, S.,
Flavell, R. A.,
Mak, T. W.,
Lindsten, T.,
and Korsmeyer, S. J.
(2001)
Mol. Cell
8,
705-711[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Chen, C.,
Edelstein, L. C.,
and Gelinas, C.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
2687-2695[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Micheau, O.,
Lens, S.,
Gaide, O.,
Alevizopoulos, K.,
and Tschopp, J.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
5299-5305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Stehlik, C.,
de Martin, R.,
Kumabashiri, I.,
Schmid, J. A.,
Binder, B. R.,
and Lipp, J.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
188,
211-216[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Cheng, E. H.,
Levine, B.,
Boise, L. H.,
Thompson, C. B.,
and Hardwick, J. M.
(1996)
Nature
379,
554-556[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Yssel, H.,
de Vries, J. E.,
Koken, M.,
van Blitterswijk, W.,
and Spits, H.
(1984)
J. Immunol. Methods
72,
219-227[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Wang, K.,
Yin, X.-M.,
Chao, D. T.,
Milliman, C. L.,
and Korsmeyer, S. J.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
2859-2869[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Fields, S.,
and Song, O.
(1989)
Nature
340,
245-246[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Smit, L.,
van der Horst, G.,
and Borst, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
8564-8569[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Kinsella, T. M.,
and Nolan, G. P.
(1996)
Hum. Gene Ther.
7,
1405-1413[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Nicoletti, I.,
Migliorati, G.,
Pagliacci, M. C.,
Grignani, F.,
and Riccardi, C.
(1991)
J. Immunol. Methods
139,
271-279[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Bossy-Wetzel, E.,
Newmeyer, D. D.,
and Green, D. R.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
37-49[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Petit, P. X.,
O'Connor, J. E.,
Grunwald, D.,
and Brown, S. C.
(1990)
Eur. J. Biochem.
194,
389-397[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea 