![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 25, 22889-22895, June 21, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) Group in
Matrix Dynamics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto,
Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E8, Canada
Received for publication, April 1, 2002
We examined mechanotranscriptional regulation of
the contractile gene, In fibroblasts (1), osteoblasts (2), and chondrocytes (3) the
expression of The regulation of SMA gene expression involves a complex interaction of
multiple positive and negative cis elements that act in a cell
type-specific fashion (4). Studies of the chicken, mouse, rat, and
human SMA genes have demonstrated the importance of cell context in the
characterization of promoter elements that function in transcriptional
regulation (5-8). The SMA promoter contains a number of highly
conserved regulatory elements. Some of the important elements include
CArG boxes, which have the general sequence motif
CC(A/T)6GG (9). The SMA promoter contains three CArG
elements, designated CArG A (at Force application can induce expression of fetal type genes such as SMA
(20), a process that could involve conserved CArG elements (8) or other
upstream domains. However, presently, these processes are not defined.
The CArG box-binding factor regulates the expression of SMA by binding
to the CArG box, which overlaps an ETS1 binding site in the SRE of the
SMA promoter (21). However, the force-induced activation of the SRE in
the SMA promoter in connective tissue cells such as osteoblasts may be
different from the mechanisms involved in c-Fos activation and
may also be cell type-specific. Notably, applied mechanical force can
regulate SMA gene expression by the p38 kinase pathway in cardiac
fibroblasts (22), a process that in turn may regulate the binding of
the serum response factor (SRF) to two critical CArG boxes in the SMA
promoter (23). Cognizant of this background we have examined the
responsiveness of the SMA promoter to applied forces in an in
vitro model system (24, 25). As SMA is expressed in osteoblasts during contractile force generation (2), we used ROS17/2.8 cells, a rat
osteoblastic cell line that exhibits phenotypic characteristics of
differentiated osteoblasts. The data show that the SMA promoter is
regulated by force-responsive elements associated with the CArG-B box.
Reagents--
Mouse monoclonal antibodies to SMA (clone no.
1A4), Cell Culture--
Rat osteosarcoma cells (ROS 17/2.8; hereafter
ROS cells) were incubated in complete Bead Preparations--
As described earlier (26, 27), 0.4 g
of magnetite beads (Sigma-Aldrich) were incubated for 1 h with 1 ml of an acidic bovine collagen solution (>95% type I collagen) at
37 °C and neutralized to pH 7.4 with 100 µl of 1 N
NaOH. Under these conditions collagen polymerizes and forms fibrils
around the beads within 30 min. The beads were sonicated to eliminate
clumps. BSA or poly-L-lysine beads were prepared in a
similar fashion by incubating beads in solutions of 1 mg/ml BSA or 1 mg/ml poly-L-lysine and then dispersed. Analysis of bead
size was performed by electronic particle counting (Coulter
Channelyzer, Coulter Electronics, Hialeah, FL). Particles tended to
exhibit a heterogeneous size distribution with a pronounced modal peak
at 5 µm, although there were many particles with smaller diameters.
Beads were rinsed in PBS, washed three times, and resuspended in
Ca2+- and Mg2+-free PBS.
Force Generation--
A ceramic permanent magnet (grade
8, 2.2 × 9.6 × 11 cm; Jobmaster, Mississauga, Ontario,
Canada) was used to generate perpendicular, tensile forces on beads
attached to the dorsal surface of cells. For all experiments the pole
face was parallel with and 2 cm from the cell culture dish surface. At
this distance the force on a single osteoblast with ~750
µm2 area of dorsal bead coverage was 480 piconewton/cell
or 0.64 piconewton/µm2. As the surface area of the magnet
was larger than the culture dishes, and as bead covering was relatively
uniform for all cells, the forces applied to cells across the width of
the culture dish were relatively uniform (27). A constant force of
varying duration was used for all experiments. Before incubating cells,
beads were rinsed in PBS, washed three times, resuspended in
calcium-free buffer and added to attached cells in full medium for 10 min. Cells were washed three times to remove unbound beads and exposed to force in PBS (pH 7.4) containing calcium and magnesium ions.
Immunofluorescence and Immunoblotting--
We assessed SMA
content in cells that were fixed, immunostained for SMA, and
counterstained with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat
anti-mouse IgG. Cells were examined in an epifluorescence microscope
and photographed. For immunoblotting, bead-associated proteins or cell
lysates prepared from cell cultures (60-mm dishes) that had been
subjected to an applied force for discrete time intervals were
analyzed. Cells were rinsed with PBS, lysed with 200 µl of SDS sample
buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol,
50 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1% w/v bromphenol blue), and
transferred to a Microfuge tube. The samples were kept on ice and
boiled for 5 min. Protein concentration was assessed by the BioRad
assay, and equal amounts of protein were loaded in each lane. Isolated
proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE (10% acrylamide) and transferred
to nitrocellulose membranes. SMA and Northern Analysis--
Total RNA was isolated from cells with
the Qiagen RNAeasy total RNA kit according to the manufacturer's
instructions and quantified by spectrophotometry (Ultrospec 3000;
Amersham Biosciences). RNA samples (10 µg) were separated in 1.2%
denaturing agarose gels containing 2.2 M formaldehyde in
MOPS running buffer, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Optitran;
Schleicher & Schuell), cross-linked by UV, and hybridized with
32P-labeled oligonucleotide probes. These probes were
designed from portions of the sequences of the rat Transient Transfections, Reporter Gene Assays, and DNA
Constructs--
ROS cells were grown and maintained in complete
The p547/ Preparation of Nuclear Extracts and Electrophoretic Mobility
Shift Assays (EMSAs)--
Nuclear extracts were prepared according to
a modified Digman's method (28). The oligonucleotides used for EMSAs
were synthesized and purified commercially (Invitrogen). The following
double-stranded oligonucleotides (with only the sense strands shown)
were used as probes: CArG-A, 5'-TTGCTCCTTGTTGGGGAAGC-3', CArG-B,
5'-GAGGTCCCTATAGGTTTGTG-3', and CArG-B mutation,
5'-GAGGTCCCTATATCATTGTG-3'. EMSA probes were generated by end labeling
single-stranded oligonucleotides (20 µM) with 150 µCi
of [32P]ATP (3000 Ci/mm; Mandel) using T4 polynucleotide
kinase. Labeled single-stranded oligonucleotides were annealed and
purified from unincorporated nucleotides using ProbeQuant TM G-50 Micro
columns (Amersham Biosciences). EMSAs were incubated for 30 min at room temperature in 1× binding buffer (10 mmol/liter Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mmol/liter KCl, 50 mmol/liter NaCl, 1 mmol/liter dithiothreitol, 1 mmol/liter EDTA, and 5% glycerol) and performed in a binding reaction
(20 µl) containing ~50 pg (50,000 cpm) of labeled probe, 10 µg of
nuclear extract, and 0.25 µg of poly(dA-dT) in 1× binding buffer (12 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM
MgCl2, 4 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.6 mM EDTA, 0.6 mM dithiothreitol, and 10%
glycerol). Samples were separated by electrophoresis on 4.5%
polyacrylamide gels at 150 V in 45 mM Tris borate and 1 mM EDTA. Serum response factor protein was produced
in vitro using the Promega rabbit reticulocyte system.
In Situ Statistical Analysis--
For all assays, three or more separate
experiments were performed. Means ± S.E. were calculated for
continuous variables, and when appropriate, comparisons between two
groups were analyzed by unpaired t-tests.
SMA Is Expressed in ROS17/2.8 Cells after Force
Application--
To determine whether force regulates SMA expression
in osteoblastic cells in vitro, we used collagen-coated
magnetite beads and permanent magnets to deliver precisely regulated
tensile forces to the actin cytoskeleton through integrins (27). ROS
cells are well differentiated osteoblastic cells that we have used to study regulation of smooth muscle actin promoter function by mechanical forces in vitro. Immunohistochemistry of ROS cells showed
positive staining for vimentin (Fig.
1A), an intermediate filament
protein that is a hallmark of connective tissue cells. Conversely,
cells were not stained for desmin (Fig. 1, B and
C), an intermediate filament protein marker that is
expressed by smooth muscle cells. ROS cells showed very weak staining
for SMA prior to force application (Fig. 1D). After only
4 h of force application, cells exhibited increased SMA staining
intensity that was notably less than cardiac myofibroblasts (Fig. 1,
E and F), cells which strongly express SMA
in vitro (22).
We examined whether ROS cells, following incubation with collagen, BSA,
or poly-L-lysine-coated beads, would exhibit variations of
SMA protein content after force application. After tensile force
application for 4 h, immunoblotting of whole cell lysates showed
that forces applied through collagen-coated beads increased SMA content
but did not affect
The increase of SMA protein content by applied force suggested that
force might affect selectively SMA mRNA content. Northern blotting
of SMA and SMA Promoter Activity Is Regulated by Force--
To determine
whether force regulates SMA promoter activity, we transfected ROS cells
with Force-mediated Activation of SMA Gene Expression Is Mediated by
Specific Promoter Domains--
As a first step in determining the
contributions of specific promoter regions to transcriptional
regulation by force, cells were transfected with constructs containing
specific domains of the SMA promoter (P547, P371, P208, P155, P92, and
P56; Fig. 4A). These
constructs were designed to include known regulatory domains of the SMA
promoter including the TATA, CArG-A, CArG-B, GArC (GGAAGAGACC), and E
boxes (9). The SMA constructs were made by PCR amplification using
P547/
The 122-bp core promoter of the chicken SMA gene in myoblasts and
fibroblasts has been identified previously (5). As the increased
promoter activity of the P155 construct after force application was
equivalent to that of longer promoter constructs, we considered that
the 122-bp core promoter contained within the P155 construct was
important for the SMA response to force. We also considered that the
P155 construct would provide a useful reagent for examining potential
cellular factors that regulate force-induced SMA promoter activity.
Accordingly, the first 155 bp of the SMA promoter was cloned into the
promoterless pEGFP-1 vector (CLONTECH) proximal to
the EGFP reporter gene. After cells were transfected with this
construct, the number of fluorescent cells and the total number of
cells in microscopic fields were counted (×25 objective), and the
proportion of EGFP to total cell counts was computed in each field. A
total of 1674 cells were counted in 50 fields. Analogous to the data
shown above for the P155 The CArG-B Box Is a Force-responsive Element--
Our data showed
that the proximal 155 bp of the SMA promoter mediated a high level of
transcriptional expression in ROS cells in response to force. Within
this region are two CArG boxes designated CArG-A and CArG-B. These
elements are 100% conserved between the four species in which the SMA
promoter has been cloned (9), suggesting that they may be important
regulators of SMA expression. Indeed, CArG box elements have been shown
to direct developmental and tissue-specific transcriptional expression
for both the skeletal and cardiac
Electrophoretic mobility studies have demonstrated that CArG elements
in the SMA promoter, like the SRE, bind the SRF (9) and that
muscle-derived cells express higher levels of SRF than non-muscle-derived cells (31). EMSA analyses were performed to confirm
that the CArG-B box is specifically involved in mediating force
responses. We compared CArG-A box, CArG-B, and CArG-B-mutation probes
in binding nuclear extracts from ROS cells subjected to force or no
force for 4 h. The CArG-A probe (Fig.
7, lanes 1-4) did not bind to
nuclear extracts with or without force application. The CArG-B probe
(Fig. 7, lanes 5-8) bound to the nuclear extract more
strongly after force application than without force. The CArG-B
mutation probe showed no binding (Fig. 7, lanes 9-12). The
gel shift produced by binding of the CArG-B probe to nuclear extracts
in force-treated cells was similar to the shift observed with an
SRF-specific probe. Competitor studies indicated that the force-induced
binding of CArG-B-labeled probes to nuclear extracts was progressively
inhibited by co-incubation with increasing concentrations of unlabeled
probes (Fig. 8). Collectively, these results indicated that force application through collagen-coated beads
stimulates SMA expression by binding to the CArG-B box in the SMA
promoter.
SMA is a prominent actin isoform that in vivo is
expressed by fibroblasts (1), osteoblasts (2), and chondrocytes (3) in
association with increased generation of contractile forces or during
wound contraction (32). In cultured connective tissue cells, SMA is a
phenotypic marker of contractile cells (1). Previous studies have
suggested that the actin cytoskeleton may also link transmission of
external applied forces to specific patterns of gene expression and
cellular organization (33, 34). The major novel findings of this study
are that contractile forces applied through integrins in osteoblastic
cells induce SMA expression, and that the CArG box in the SMA promoter
is a critical, force-sensitive element in this transcriptional
response. To assess regulation of SMA promoter function by mechanical
forces in vitro, the nature and the authenticity of the
in vitro model system are of critical importance.
ROS Cells as a Model for Studying Regulation of SMA by
Force--
We used ROS cells because they are well differentiated
osteoblastic cells that provide a culture model for the increased SMA that is seen in force-loaded osteoblasts in vivo (2). We
found that SMA is expressed at very low levels in untreated ROS cells but is increased significantly after force application, similar to what
is observed in vivo (2). Second, ROS cells abundantly express collagen receptors (35) that provide the attachment for
collagen-coated beads and the linkage to the actin cytoskeleton (22,
26). Indeed, compared with NIH-3T3 and Chinese hamster ovary cells, ROS
cells exhibited stronger binding to collagen beads and were not
dislodged from the culture dish after force application (data not
shown). Further, ROS cells showed specific responses of SMA to forces
applied through collagen but not BSA or
poly-L-lysine-coated beads, supporting the view that the
force effect was indeed mediated by specific collagen receptors
(i.e. Force-responsive Elements in the SMA Promoter--
Gene expression
induced by mechanical loading can be divided temporally into
immediate-early genes and late response genes, of which the SMA gene is
apparently an example. Immediate-early genes such as the transcription
factor c-Fos can couple trophic signals to changes in actin gene
expression (36), and c-Fos transcription is critical for the regulation
of actin expression both in vivo (37) and in
vitro (38). In turn, stretch-induced activation of the
c-Fos promoter is dependent on the serum response element and on
a signaling complex that includes a SRF and the p62TCF-ternary complex (30). Although there are regulatory
elements in the SMA promoter upstream of the conserved CArG elements
(8), previous studies of the chicken SMA gene demonstrated that the first 122 bp of the promoter were sufficient to confer a moderate to
high level of transcriptional activity in chicken smooth muscle cells,
skeletal myoblasts, and fibroblasts (5, 8). Consistent with these data,
our deletion analyses showed little difference in the force-induced
activation of the SMA promoter between constructs containing either 547 or 155 bp upstream of the translation start site. The force-induced
effect was surprisingly rapid because within 4 h of force after
force application there was a large increase of promoter activity in
experiments that used the 155-bp construct.
More detailed analyses using mutant constructs and EMSA showed that the
force effect was mediated by the CArG-B box, while the TATA and CArG-A
boxes were apparently not involved in the regulation of transcriptional
responses to force application. We suggest that tensile force induces
SRF to form complexes with as yet unidentified transcription factors.
This SRF complex may bind to the CArG-B box in the SMA promoter and
then stimulate SMA transcription. Although the identity of the proteins
in this putative force-sensitive complex is unknown, our data do show that the CArG-B box is a force-responsive element in the SMA promoter and are consistent with the general notion that actin isoforms are
subject to mechanotranscriptional regulation (17).
We thank G. K. Owens for the SMA constructs
and for valuable advice, Caroline Chu for assistance with preparation
of the manuscript, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and the
Canadian Institutes of Health Research for financial support.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 12, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203130200
The abbreviations used are:
SMA, smooth muscle
actin;
SRE, serum response element;
SRF, serum response factor;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
ROS, rat osteosarcoma cells;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid;
RSV, Rous sarcoma virus;
EGFP, enhanced green fluorescence protein;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
GFP, green fluorescence
protein.
Transcriptional Regulation of a Contractile Gene by
Mechanical Forces Applied through Integrins in Osteoblasts*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-smooth muscle actin (SMA), in osteoblastic
cells. Tensile forces were applied through collagen-coated magnetite beads to ROS17/2.8 cells. These cells were desmin
, vimentin+ and
expressed low levels of SMA. After force application (480 piconewton/cell), SMA protein and mRNA were increased but
-actin was unchanged. Beads coated with bovine serum albumin or
poly-L-lysine produced no change of SMA. In cells
transiently transfected with plasmids containing the SMA promoter fused
to
-galactosidase or green fluorescent protein coding sequences, SMA
promoter activity was increased by ~60% after 4 h of force,
whereas control (Rous sarcoma virus) promoter activity was unaffected.
Transfections with
-galactosidase or green fluorescent protein
reporter constructs showed that force-loaded cells exhibited higher
-galactosidase activity than cells without force. Cytochalasin D and
latrunculin B inhibited force-induced increases of SMA promoter
activity. Deletion analyses showed that SMA promoter activity was
increased ~70% after force with a minimal construct containing 155 bp upstream of the translation start site. The force effect on the SMA
promoter was abrogated in cells transfected with CArG-B box mutants.
Gel mobility shift analyses of nuclear extracts showed strong binding to the CArG-B motif after force. We conclude that the CArG-B box is a
force-responsive element in the SMA promoter.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-smooth muscle actin
(SMA)1 is associated with
increased generation of contractile forces. Currently, the mechanisms
by which applied forces regulate SMA expression are undefined. As SMA
is an important example of a contractile force protein in non-muscle
cells that is important in remodeling of extracellular matrices, a
detailed definition of the force-sensitive, promoter-regulatory
elements is important for a comprehensive understanding of how physical
signals regulate cytoskeletal gene expression.
62), CArG B (at
112), and an
intronic CArG (at +1001). These elements are completely conserved in
all species in which the promoter has been examined and are required
for generation of full promoter activity in cultured smooth muscle
cells (9, 10). The CArG box was first described as the core sequence of
the serum response element (SRE) in early response genes such as
c-fos (11). CArG elements can direct developmental
and tissue-specific expression of many muscle-specific genes (12-15)
and are required for the transient transcriptional responses of
immediate-early response genes such as c-fos,
-skeletal actin, and SMA following serum or growth factor stimulation (11, 16,
18, 19, 39).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-actin (clone no. AC-15), collagenase (C5138), rhodamine
phalloidin, BSA, fibronectin, and poly-L-lysine were
purchased from Sigma. Goat anti-mouse IgG2a and goat anti-mouse
IgG1 were purchased from Caltag (Burlingame, CA). Collagen was obtained
from Celltrix (Palo Alto, CA).
-MEM medium at 37 °C. The
medium contained 10% fetal bovine serum and a 1:10 dilution of an
antibiotic solution (0.17% w/v penicillin V, 0.1% gentamicin sulfate,
and 0.01 µg/ml amphotericin; Sigma). Cells were maintained in a
humidified incubator gassed with 95% O2-5%
CO2 and were passaged with 0.01% trypsin (Invitrogen).
-actin were identified by
immunoblotting. Blots were blocked for 1 h with 5% skim milk in
Tween-TBS and incubated with the indicated antibody (diluted 1:1000 in
0.5% Tween-TBS) for 1 h at room temperature. Blots were washed
with buffer for 10 min, incubated with appropriate second antibodies
for 1 h, washed 4× in Tween-TBS, and developed by
chemiluminescence (ECL; Amersham Biosciences). X-OMAT Kodak films were
exposed to the blots, and the density of the bands was analysis by IP
Lab Gel Scientific Image Processing (Signal Analytics Corporation,
Vienna, VA).
-SMA mRNA
5'-untranslated region:
(5'-GAAAAGAACTGAAGGCGCTGATCCACAAAACATTCACAGTTG-3') and from the rat
-actin mRNA 3'-untranslated region
(5'-CGCCTTCACCGTTCCAGTTTTTAAATCCTTGAGTCAAAAGCGCCA-3'). The
oligonucleotides were synthesized by the Biotechnology Service Centre
(Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario). Probes were labeled
with [32P]ATP (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) using 3' end
labeling. The blots were washed 4× with 0.5% SSC + 0.5% SDS at room
temperature for 10 min and twice for 40 min at 50 °C and exposed to
Kodak X-OMAT films at
70 °C.
-modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal calf serum. Prior to
transfection, ROS17/2.8 cells were plated at 1 × 104
cells/well in 6-well plates and incubated in complete
-Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium without antibiotics for 24 h. Cells were transiently transfected with reporter plasmids containing p547/LacZ constructs obtained from Dr. G. Owens in which the whole promoter is
present. Cells were co-transfected with a Rous sarcoma virus (RSV)
expression plasmid to normalize for equal loading using LipofectAMINE
2000 reagent according to the supplier's instructions (Invitrogen).
Following transfection (20 h), collagen beads were incubated with cells
and washed, and force was applied for 4 h. Cell extracts were
prepared after force application with a detergent lysis method.
-galactosidase reporter enzyme activity was measured with an enzyme
assay system (Roche).
-galactosidase activities were normalized to
RSV luciferase activity as a transfection control. The RSV (
124 to
+34)/luciferase construct was provided by H. P. Elsholtz
(University of Toronto) and was used as described earlier (24). RSV
luciferase assays were conducted using a luciferase assay system
(Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RSV luciferase
activity (reflecting promoter activity) was unaffected by all
treatments at all experimental time periods.
-galactosidase construct obtained from Dr. G. Owens
comprises the promoter region of the SMA gene fused to
-galactosidase coding sequences. Constructs P371, P155, P92, and P56
were made by PCR amplification using P547 as the template and the
following specific PCR primers: P371 = 5'-NNCCCAAGCTTTTAGCTAATGGACC-3', P155 = 5'-NNCCCAAGCTTTGGCCACCCAGATT-3', P92 = 5'-NNCCCAAGCTTCAGCTTCAGCCTGT-3', P56 = 5'-NNCCCAAGCTTGAGTGGGAGGGGATCAGACCAG-3', and reverse primer 5'-GGGGTACCCCTGATGGCGACTG-3'. Inserts of interest in the rat SMA promoter were excised with HindIII and KpnI, and
the inserts were religated into the pUC19/AUG
-galactosidase vector.
The CArG-B mutation in the rat SMA promoter (CCCTATATCA;
mutations underlined) was constructed by PCR amplification using the
p2600Int/Laz CArG-B mutation SMA promoter obtained from Dr. Owens as a
template (10). A SMA "core promoter" construct (p155GFP) was
made using the proximal 155 bp of the SMA promoter, which was inserted
into the promoterless pEGFP-1 vector (CLONTECH)
directly proximal to the EGFP reporter gene. P155EGFP promoter
constructs were synthesized by digesting the p547 plasmid with
HindIII and KpnI for 4 h at 37 °C. The
resultant promoter-containing restriction fragments were purified and
ligated into the HindIII/KpnI-digested pEGFP-1
vector. The ligated product was transformed into competent DH5-
'
cells (Stratagene), and individual colonies were cultured overnight in
5 ml of LB + kanamycin (30 µg/µl). Plasmid DNA was isolated
from these cultures (Qiagen), and the correct orientation of the insert
was verified through diagnostic restriction digests with
HindIII and KpnI. Subsequently, the authenticity
of the inserts was established by sequencing (Centre of Applied
Genomics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario).
-Galactosidase Staining of Transfected Cells--
To
monitor the efficiency of transfection after force application, we used
in situ staining for
-galactosidase. After transfection and force application, cells were washed with PBS (containing calcium
and magnesium), fixed with 2% formaldehyde and 0.05% glutaraldehyde for 5 min at room temperature, and washed with PBS. Cells were stained
(5 mM potassium ferricyanide, 5 mM
potassium ferrocyanide, 2 mM MgCl2 0.2%
5-bromo-4-chloro-3 indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal)), and plates were incubated overnight at room temperature prior
to rinsing and observation in an inverted microscope.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Characterization of ROS cells.
Immunohistochemical staining shows that ROS cells are vimentin+
(A) and desmin
(B). Same cells in B
are stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole to show nuclei
(C). SMA staining is weak in control ROS cells with collagen
beads alone (D) but is much stronger after force treatment
(4 h; E). Cardiac fibroblasts constitutively exhibit strong
SMA staining (F).
-actin content (Fig.
2A). In contrast, cultured
cardiac fibroblasts, which express very high basal levels of SMA,
showed reduced SMA after force application (Fig. 2B), an
effect that has been observed previously (22). The force-induced increase of SMA in ROS cells was apparently mediated through integrins because cells incubated with either BSA or poly-L-lysine
beads showed no increase of SMA content after force application (Fig. 2, C and D).

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
SMA expression after tensile force
application through magnetite beads. Immunoblots of SMA and
-actin in ROS cells (A) or cardiac fibroblasts
(B) incubated with collagen-coated beads show differential
effects of SMA content after force application in the two cell types.
In ROS cells, force strongly increases SMA expression. Following
application of force to ROS cells for 4 h, immunoblotting of whole
cell lysates showed no change of SMA in cells incubated with BSA-coated
(C) or poly-L-lysine-coated beads
(D). E, Northern blotting to measure mRNA
content of ROS cells or cardiac fibroblasts. Equivalent amounts of
total RNA (10 µg) were loaded on each lane and probed with
oligonucleotides specific for the rat SMA mRNA 5'-untranslated
region: (5'-GAAAAGAACTGAAGGCGCTGATCCACAAAACATTCACAGTTG-3') and from the
rat
-actin mRNA 3'-untranslated region:
(5'-CGCCTTCACCGTTCCAGTTTTTAAATCCTTGAGTCAAAAGCGCCA-3'). Probes were
labeled with [32P]ATP using 3' end labeling. SMA and
-actin mRNA content were measured after force application.
-actin mRNA was unchanged by force application, but SMA was
induced by force. Note that the basal level of SMA in control cells
(cardiac fibroblasts) was high. In F, the ratio of SMA to
-actin mRNA as determined by Northern blotting was increased
6-fold at 4 h after force (p < 0.05;
n = 3).
-actin mRNA content showed that compared with cardiac
fibroblasts, which express very high basal levels of SMA mRNA in
culture (22, 26), the basal SMA mRNA content of ROS cells was
virtually undetectable (Fig. 2E). After only 4 h of
force application, although
-actin mRNA content was unchanged, the ratio of SMA to
-actin mRNA was increased 6-fold
(p < 0.05; n = 3; Fig. 2F).
Thus ROS osteoblastic cells provide a convenient, rapidly responsive
model for studying how SMA gene expression is regulated by mechanical
forces in vitro.
-galactosidase SMA reporter constructs (P547/LacZ) in which the
whole SMA promoter (9) was present. As an internal transfection
control, ROS cells were co-transfected with a pEGFP-1 vector containing
an SV40 promoter that constitutively drives expression of the EGFP
reporter gene (Fig. 3). To directly examine SMA promoter function in response to force application, transfected ROS cells were stained for
-galactosidase in
situ. Cells transfected with a promoter-less construct (Fig.
3A) or transfected with the SMA construct but without force
showed minimal staining (Fig. 3B); but after force
application cells with bound beads exhibited much more intense staining
than cells without force (Fig. 3C). Fluorescence
attributable to EGFP driven by an SV-40 promoter in parallel cultures
of co-transfected cells was unaffected by force application (Fig. 3,
D-F). This experiment indicated that in combination with
force applied through collagen-coated beads, ROS cells provide a
sensitive and specific model for studying SMA promoter regulation by
mechanical forces in vitro.

View larger version (70K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Force effect on SMA promoter
activity. ROS cells transfected with
-galactosidase reporter
constructs driven by the SMA promoter (P547) in which the whole
promoter is present. Cells were co-transfected with a GFP construct in
which GFP expression is under the control of a SV-40 promoter as an
internal transfection control. After transfection, the proportion of
cells exhibiting
-galactosidase staining as a measure of SMA
promoter activity was increased in cells subjected to 4 h of force
compared with no force. A, promoterless
-galactosidase construct. B, no force in cells
transfected with SMA P547 construct and loaded with beads.
C, same as B but with force for 4 h. Arrows point to
-galactosidase-stained cells.
D-F, parallel cultures of ROS cells co-transfected with
EGFP construct under the control of an SV-40 promoter and the same
-galactosidase constructs as A-C show no change in
proportion of fluorescent cells after force application.
-galactosidase (9) as the template and PCR primers that
facilitated excision of the appropriate segment in the rat SMA
promoter. The inserts were ligated into the pUC19/AUG
-galactosidase vector. Cells were co-transfected with the RSV-luciferase construct as
a loading control. Transfection efficiencies for all experiments were
40-50%. The
-galactosidase activity normalized to RSV luciferase activity (Fig. 4B) gave an estimate of promoter activity
that compensated for variations of transfection efficiency. In cells transfected with P547, P371, and P155 constructs, the adjusted
-galactosidase activity was increased by ~60% after force
application compared with no force application (p < 0.05). In contrast, cells transfected with the P92 and P56 constructs
showed no significant change of
-galactosidase activity after force.
As SMA promoter activity was increased maximally with the P155
construct and not at all with the P92 or P56 constructs, it appeared
likely that the CArG-B box (but not the CArG-A box) is an important
force-responsive element in the SMA promoter.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
A, structure of rat SMA
promoter-
-galactosidase reporter constructs. Promoter sequences were
made by PCR amplification using P547 as the template and PCR primers
for P371, P155, P92, P56, and reverse primer described under
"Experimental Procedures." Appropriate segments in the rat SMA
promoter were excised with HindIII and KpnI. The
inserts were religated into the pUC19/AUG
-galactosidase vector.
B, cells were co-transfected with the SMA promoter
constructs and with RSV luciferase as loading control. Cells
transfected with P547, P371, and P155 showed >50% increase of
-galactosidase normalized to RSV luciferase (p < 0.05) after force application compared with no force. SMA promoter
activity was increased maximally after transfection with the P155
construct. The P547, P371, and P155 constructs all included the CArG-A
and CArG-B boxes, while the P92 and P56 constructs contain only the
CArG-A box. There was no significant force effect in cells transfected
with the P92 and P56 constructs.
-galactosidase construct, the proportion of
EGFP-expressing cells was increased 1.8-fold after force treatment
compared with the proportion of fluorescent cells without force (Fig.
5). Parallel cultures that were
transfected with the pEGFP construct under the control of the SV40
promoter showed no change of the proportion of EGFP fluorescent cells
after force application. As previous studies have indicated that actin
filaments are essential for mechanotranscriptional coupling of
cytoskeletal genes including filamin A (25), we determined if
force-mediated induction of SMA required intact actin filaments. Cells
were loaded with beads and treated with cytochalasin D (0.5 µm) or
latrunculin B (1 µm) to depolymerize actin filaments. Cells were then
subjected to force (or not), and the proportion of EGFP fluorescent
cells was computed. Although the proportion of untreated (baseline)
EGFP fluorescent cells was lower than untreated cells and was different between the two experiments in which latrunculin or cytochalasin were
used, both agents abrogated the force-induced increase of SMA promoter
activity above their respective baseline levels (Fig. 5).

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Requirement for actin filaments in
force-induced activation of SMA core promoter. Cultures
transfected with a pEGFP construct under the control of the SV40
promoter showed no change of the proportion of EGFP fluorescent cells
after force application. For studies of SMA promoter function, the
first 155 bp of the SMA promoter was purified and ligated into a
HindIII/KpnI-digested pEGFP-1 vector. Cultures
transfected with a promoterless construct showed virtually no
fluorescent cells. Transfections with the pEGFP-p155 construct
demonstrated a 1.8-fold increase of the proportions of fluorescent
cells after force application compared with no force controls
(p < 0.01). Cytochalasin D (0.5 µm) and latrunculin
B (1 µm) abrogated the force effect on SMA promoter activity. A total
of 1674 cells were counted in 50 fields for these experiments.
-actin genes (12, 15, 29). As the
P547, P371, and P155 constructs all include the CArG-B box, we
determined whether the CArG-B box is involved in the regulation of the
SMA promoter by force using a mutational approach (10). A two-point mutation was introduced in the CArG-B box in the P155 and P371 constructs, changes that were verified by sequencing. Cells transfected with either construct in which the CArG-B box mutants were present showed complete abrogation of the force effect compared with wild type
controls (Fig. 6). These data suggest
that the CArG-B box is an important regulatory domain for mediating
force-induced expression of SMA.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Effects of CArG-B box flanking mutations on
SMA promoter activity after force application. Two point mutations
were introduced (5'-CCCTATATGG-3' to 5'-CCCTATATCA-3') in the CArG-B
box. The mutation was confirmed by sequencing the P371 and P155
constructs. The SMA constructs and RSV-LUC were co-transfected into ROS
cells followed 20 h later by 4 h of force application.
-galactosidase activity was normalized to RSV-luciferase activity
(mean ± S.E.). Transfection with CArG-B box mutants (P155 and P
371) eliminated force-induced SMA promoter activity.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
EMSA analyses of nuclear extracts and CArG
boxes. A comparison of the binding of CArG-A box, CArG-B box, and
CArG-B box mutation probes to nuclear extracts (10 µg) from ROS cells
subjected to 4 h of tensile force is shown. CArG-A box, CArG-B
box, and CArG-B mutation probes were synthesized as described under
"Experimental Procedures." SRF protein was expressed in
vitro using the Promega rabbit reticulocyte system. The CArG-A
probe (lanes 1-4) did not bind to nuclear extracts with or
without force application. The CArG-B probe (lanes 5-8)
bound to nuclear extracts after force application, but the CArG-B
mutation (lanes 9-12) blocked binding. Purified SRF shifted
binding similar to the CArG-B probe. Lanes: 1, probe only; 2, no force;
3, force; 4, SRF; 5, probe; 6, no force; 7, force; 8, SRF; 9, probe;
10, no force; 11, force; 12, SRF.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Competition analysis of nuclear extracts for
CArG-B box binding. Nuclear extracts (10 µg) from ROS cells were
subjected to 4 h of tensile force. Radiolabeled wild type 20-bp
CArG-B oligonucleotide duplex was incubated with nuclear extracts.
Competition reactions were performed with unlabeled CArG-B
oligonucleotides. Competitor oligonucleotides were added at
100-400-fold molar excess relative to the radiolabeled DNA. Lanes: 1, labeled CArG-B DNA probe only; 2, radiolabeled wild type + force; 3, radiolabeled wild type + 100× unlabeled wild type + force; 4, radiolabeled wild type + 200× unlabeled wild type + force; 5, radiolabeled wild type + 400× unlabeled wild type + force; 6, radiolabeled wild type + no force; 7, radiolabeled wild type + 100×
unlabeled wild type + no force; 8, radiolabeled wild type + 200×
unlabeled wild type + no force; 9, radiolabeled wild type + 400×
unlabeled wild type + no force.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1,2,3
1 integrins).
Third, ROS cells were more easily transfected than other fibroblastic
and osteoblastic cell lines that were examined (e.g. NIH-3T3
cells; data not shown) and consistently exhibited higher transfection
efficiencies. Fourth, it was important to choose a cell line that would
exhibit force-induced increases of endogenous SMA as we found for ROS
cells. Notably, Owens and co-workers have demonstrated that the
regulatory elements responsible for transcriptional expression of the
SMA gene are highly dependent upon the cell type in which the promoter
is studied (9). They found that the P547 construct was
transcriptionally active in smooth muscle cells and skeletal myotubes
but was inactive in endothelial cells or skeletal myoblasts, cell types
that do not express SMA. In this context, ROS cells provide a
permissive model system in which force-induced expression of SMA is
induced from very low baseline levels. Finally, as cytochalasin D or
latrunculin B strongly inhibited the force-induced increase of SMA, the
model fulfills the concept that force mediates transcriptional
responses through intact actin filaments (24, 25).
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Rm. 244, Fitzgerald
Building, University of Toronto, 150 College St., Toronto, Ontario M5S
3E8, Canada. Tel.: 416-978-1258; Fax: 416-978-5956; E-mail:
christopher.mcculloch@utoronto.ca.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Hinz, B.,
Celetta, G.,
Tomasek, J. J.,
Gabbiani, G.,
and Chaponnier, C.
(2001)
Mol. Biol. Cell
12,
2730-2741 2.
Menard, C.,
Mitchell, S.,
and Spector, M.
(2000)
Biomaterials
18,
1867-1877
3.
Kinner, B.,
and Spector, M.
(2001)
J. Orthop. Res.
19,
233-241[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Mack, C. P.,
Thompson, M. M.,
Lawrenz-Smith, S.,
and Owens, G. K.
(2000)
Circ. Res.
86,
221-232 5.
Carroll, S. L.,
Bergsma, D. J.,
and Schwartz, R. J.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
241-250 6.
Min, B. H.,
Foster, D. N.,
and Strauch, A. R.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
16667-16675 7.
Nakano, Y.,
Nishihara, T.,
Sasayama, S.,
Miwa, T.,
Kamada, S.,
and Kakunaga, T.
(1991)
Gene
99,
285-289[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Blank, R. S.,
McQuinn, T. C.,
Yin, K. C.,
Thompson, M. M.,
Takeyasu, K.,
Schwartz, R. J.,
and Owens, G. K.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
984-989 9.
Shimizu, R. T.,
Blank, R. S.,
Jervis, R.,
Lawrenz-Smith, S. C.,
and Owens, G. K.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
7631-7643 10.
Mack, C. P.,
and Owens, G. K.
(1999)
Circ. Res.
84,
852-861 11.
Treisman, R.
(1992)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
17,
423-426[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Gustafson, T. A.,
Miwa, T.,
Boxer, L. M.,
and Kedes, L.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
4110-4119 13.
Chow, K. L.,
and Schwartz, R. J.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
528-538 14.
Papadopoulos, N.,
and Crow, M. T.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
6907-6918 15.
Mohun, T. J.,
Taylor, M. V.,
Garrett, N.,
and Gurdon, J. B.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
1153-1161[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Treisman, R.
(1990)
Semin. Cancer Biol.
1,
47-58[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Sadoshima, J.,
and Izumo, S.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
775-787[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Stoflet, E. S.,
Schmidt, L. J.,
Elder, P. K.,
Korf, G. M.,
Foster, D. N.,
Strauch, A. R.,
and Getz, M. J.
(1992)
Mol. Biol. Cell
3,
1073-1083[Abstract]
19.
Kim, J. H.,
Bushel, P. R.,
and Kumar, C. C.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
190,
1115-1121[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Komuro, I.
(2000)
Jpn. Heart J.
41,
117-129[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Kamada, S.,
and Miwa, T.
(1992)
Gene
119,
229-236[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Wang, J.,
Seth, A.,
and McCulloch, C. A.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
279,
H2776-H2785 23.
Garat, C.,
Van Putten, V.,
Refaat, Z. A.,
Dessev, C.,
Han, S. Y.,
and Nemenoff, R. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
22537-22543 24.
Lew, A. M,
Glogauer, M.,
and McCulloch, C. A.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
341,
647-653[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
D'Addario, M.,
Arora, P. D.,
Fan, J.,
Ganss, B.,
Ellen, R. P,
and McCulloch, C. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
31969-31977 26.
Wang, J.,
Lukse, E.,
Seth, A.,
and McCulloch, C. A.
(2001)
Tiss. Cell. Res.
33,
86-96
27.
Glogauer, M.,
and Ferrier, J.
(1998)
Pflugers Arch.
435,
320-327[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Ausubel, F. M,
Brent, R.,
Kingston, R. E.,
Moore, D. D.,
Seidman, J. G.,
Smith, J. A.,
and Struhl, K.
(2001)
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
, pp. 12.1.1-12.1.7, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
29.
Muscat, G. E.,
and Kedes, L.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
4089-4099 30.
Sadoshima, J.,
and Izumo, S.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
1681-1692[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Croissant, J. D.,
Kim, J. H.,
Eichele, G.,
Goering, L.,
Lough, J.,
Prywes, R.,
and Schwartz, R. J.
(1996)
Dev. Biol.
177,
250-264[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Dugina, V.,
Alexandrova, A.,
Chaponnier, C,.,
Vasiliev, J.,
and Gabbiani, G.
(1998)
Exp. Cell Res.
238,
481-490[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Grinnell, F.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
124,
401-404 34.
Arora, P. D.,
and McCulloch, C. A.
(1999)
Am. J. Pathol.
155,
2087-2099 35.
Gronowicz, G. A.,
and McCarthy, M. B.
(1995)
Endocrinology
136,
598-608[Abstract]
36.
Paradis, P.,
MacLellan, W. R.,
Belaguli, N. S,
Schwartz, R. J,
and Schneider, M. D.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
10827-10833 37.
Aoyagi, T.,
and Izumo, S.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
27176-27179 38.
Sadoshima, J.,
and Izumo, S.
(1993)
Circ. Res.
73,
424-438 39.
Hautmann, M. B.,
Madsen, C. S.,
Mack, C. P.,
and Owens, G. K.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
8398-8406
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Pho, W. Lee, D. R. Watt, C. Laschinger, C. A. Simmons, and C. A. McCulloch Cofilin is a marker of myofibroblast differentiation in cells from porcine aortic cardiac valves Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): H1767 - H1778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-H. Zhao, C. Laschinger, P. Arora, K. Szaszi, A. Kapus, and C. A. McCulloch Force activates smooth muscle {alpha}-actin promoter activity through the Rho signaling pathway J. Cell Sci., May 15, 2007; 120(10): 1801 - 1809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Meyer-ter-Vehn, S. Sieprath, B. Katzenberger, S. Gebhardt, F. Grehn, and G. Schlunck Contractility as a Prerequisite for TGF-{beta}-Induced Myofibroblast Transdifferentiation in Human Tenon Fibroblasts Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 4895 - 4904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wang, J. Fan, C. Laschinger, P. D. Arora, A. Kapus, A. Seth, and C. A. McCulloch Smooth Muscle Actin Determines Mechanical Force-induced p38 Activation J. Biol. Chem., February 25, 2005; 280(8): 7273 - 7284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D'Addario, P. D. Arora, R. P. Ellen, and C. A. G. McCulloch Regulation of Tension-induced Mechanotranscriptional Signals by the Microtubule Network in Fibroblasts J. Biol. Chem., December 26, 2003; 278(52): 53090 - 53097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wang, H. Chen, A. Seth, and C. A. McCulloch Mechanical force regulation of myofibroblast differentiation in cardiac fibroblasts Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2003; 285(5): H1871 - H1881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Rice and L. A. Leinwand Skeletal myosin heavy chain function in cultured lung myofibroblasts J. Cell Biol., October 13, 2003; 163(1): 119 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|