Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M200131200 on April 9, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 25, 22902-22908, June 21, 2002
Mechanisms of FOXC2- and FOXD1-mediated
Regulation of the RI
Subunit of cAMP-dependent
Protein Kinase Include Release of Transcriptional Repression and
Activation by Protein Kinase B
and cAMP*
Maria K.
Dahle
,
Line M.
Grønning
,
Anna
Cederberg§,
Heidi
Kiil
Blomhoff,
Naoyuki
Miura¶,
Sven
Enerbäck§,
Kristin A.
Taskén
, and
Kjetil
Taskén**
From the Department of Medical Biochemistry, Institute of Basic
Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, N-0317 Oslo,
§ Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Biochemistry,
Göteborg University, SE 405 30 Göteborg, and
¶ Department of Biochemistry, Hamamatsu University School of
Medicine, 1-20-1 Handa-yama, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan
Received for publication, January 5, 2002, and in revised form, March 8, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have reported recently that mice
overexpressing the forkhead/winged helix transcription factor
FOXC2 are lean and show increased responsiveness to insulin
due to sensitization of the
-adrenergic cAMP-PKA+
pathway and increased levels of the RI
subunit of
cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) (Cederberg,
A., Grønning, L. M., Ahren, B., Taskén, K., Carlsson,
P., and Enerbäck, S. (2001) Cell 106, 563-573). In this present study, we reveal that FOXC2 and
a related factor, FOXD1, specifically activate the 1b
promoter of the RI
gene in adipocytes and testicular
Sertoli cells, respectively. By deletional mapping, we discovered
two different mechanisms by which the Fox proteins activated expression
from the RI
1b promoter. In 3T3-L1 adipocytes, an upstream region
represses promoter activity under basal conditions. Bandshift
experiments indicate that overexpression of FOXC2 promotes
the release of a potential repressor from this region. In Sertoli
cells, sequences downstream of the transcription start sites mediate
the activating effect of FOXD1, and protein kinase
B
/Akt1 strongly induces this effect. Furthermore, we show that an
inactive FOXD1 mutant lowers the cAMP-mediated induction of
the RI
1b reporter construct. In summary, winged helix transcription
factors of the FOXC/FOXD families function as regulators of
the RI
subunit of PKA and may integrate hormonal signals acting
through protein kinase B and cAMP in a cell-specific manner.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The forkhead/winged helix family of transcription factors is
characterized by a highly conserved monomeric DNA-binding domain called
the winged helix (reviewed in Ref. 2). A number of forkhead and
forkhead-related genes have been isolated to date (3-7), and the
Fox1 nomenclature
(Forkhead box) has now been adopted for all
chordate forkhead genes (www.biology.pomona.edu/fox.html) (8).
Among these are several forkhead related
activators (FREACs) cloned from human (9-13) that all
share the minimum requirement for a 7-bp core binding motif (RTAAAYA).
One of these factors, FOXD1 (FREAC4, FKHL8), has expression
restricted to kidney, the central nervous system testis, and is
regulated by Ets-1 and p53 in kidney-derived cell lines (11, 14).
FOXC2 (FREAC11, FKHL14, MFH-1) (15, 16) is restricted to
adipocytes in adults (1), whereas the prenatal form is important for
development. Mice lacking Foxc2 die during embryogenesis or
perinatally and exhibit aortic arch and skeletal defects (17, 18).
Instead, overexpression of FOXC2 in adipose tissue has been
important in understanding its function in adult mice. FOXC2
transgenic mice develop a phenotype characterized by a high sensitivity
to insulin and partial resistance to diet-induced obesity (1). This
effect is partly due to up-regulation of
-adrenergic receptors and
PKA type I
that lower the threshold for activation of PKA by cAMP,
resulting in a hypersensitive
-adrenergic pathway.
Activation of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA)
proceeds by a concerted reaction in which binding of the intracellular second messenger cAMP to the regulatory subunit dimer (R2)
in a positive, cooperative fashion results in dissociation and
activation of two catalytic (C) subunits (reviewed in Ref. 19).
Targeted disruption of the RII
regulatory subunit gene in
mice leads to a lean phenotype with elevated levels of uncoupling
protein 1 and increased metabolic rate due to a shift in the PKA
composition from PKA II
(RII
2C2) to type
I
(RI
2C2) holoenzyme (20-22). The effect
of this regulatory subunit shift was shown to lower the threshold for
PKA activation by cAMP and to modulate lipolysis (23). The RII
knockout phenotype resembles that of the FOXC2 transgenic
mice (1) and supports the notion that regulation of PKA isozyme
composition, particularly RII
versus RI
, is important for hormonal responsiveness and cAMP sensitivity.
The RI
gene is controlled by several promoters, giving
rise to at least three mRNAs that differ in the first non-coding
exon (24-26). Two of these mRNAs (RI
1a and -1b) are expressed
in most tissues (25), and we have recently reported cAMP-mediated
post-transcriptional regulation of RI
1b in Sertoli cells (27). We
have shown that both FOXC2 and RI
are induced by cAMP in mouse
3T3-L1 adipocytes (28)2 and
that FOXD1 and RI
are induced by cAMP in Sertoli cell primary cultures3 (27). We have also
reported recently (28) that basal levels of Foxc2 mRNA
are down-regulated during differentiation of 3T3-L1 adipocytes, with a
simultaneous increase in Foxc2 responsiveness to insulin and
TNF
.
In this study, we examine the effect of FOXD1 and
FOXC2 on the RI
promoters, showing that the expression of
RI
1b but not RI
1a is induced. Deletional mapping reveals that
FOXC2 and FOXD1 regulate expression from the
RI
1b promoter through two different mechanisms, and EMSA and
co-transfection experiments showed that in 3T3-L1 adipocytes FOXC2
induces a release of transcriptional repression. In Sertoli cells,
PKB
strongly increases the effect of FOXD1, and a
truncated FOXD1 inhibits cAMP-mediated induction of the
RI
1b promoter, indicating that FOXD1 may function as a mediator of signaling by both cAMP and PKB in a cell-specific manner.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plasmids--
The RI
promoter constructs RI
1a+1b (
882 to
+77), RI
1a (
882 to
310), RI
1b (
406 to +77) (24), and the
RII
promoter construct (
4500 to
123) (29) were inserted into the
pCAT basic reporter vector (Promega, Madison, WI). Five deletion
constructs were made from the RI
1b promoter region: A+ (
307 to
+77), A (
307 to +4), B (
199 to +4), C (
92 to +4), and C+ (
92 to + 77) (27). Complementary DNAs encoding full-length forkhead genes were
inserted in pEVRFO (FOXD1) or pCB6+ (FOXC2)
expression vectors or C-terminal to the hemagglutinin epitope (HA) tag
of the pEF-BOS vector (30). A cDNA fragment encoding the forkhead
DNA binding domain (FOXD1-DBD, amino acids 127-221) was
cloned into pEVRFO. Expression vectors for HA-tagged wild type or
myristoylated PKB
/Akt1 were created in pCMV5 or pCMV6, respectively
(31). All these expression vectors contain cytomegalovirus (CMV)
promoters. In addition, the luciferase expression vector
pGL3Control (Promega) was used as internal control in
transfection experiments.
Cell Cultures--
Primary cultures of rat Sertoli cells were
prepared from testes of 19 days old Sprague-Dawley rats (B&K Universal
AS, Nittedal, Norway) according to the method of Dorrington et
al. (32) with some modifications (33). The cells were plated in
6-well plates (35-mm/well) for transfections or in 10-cm culture dishes
for preparation of nuclear extracts. Cells were grown in Eagle's
minimal essential medium (Invitrogen) with addition of streptomycin
(100 g/liter), penicillin (70 mg/liter), fungizone (0,25 mg/liter), L-glutamine (2 mM), and 10% fetal bovine serum
at 32 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. After
3 days, the cells were incubated further in serum-free modified
Eagle's minimal essential medium. After 2 days of culture in
serum-free medium, LipofectAMINE-mediated transfections were performed
as described elsewhere (34) using 2 µg of DNA (1.5 µg of CAT or
luciferase reporter and 0.5 µg of internal luciferase or CAT control)
with 5 µl of LipofectAMINE (Invitrogen) per 35-mm well for 3 h,
after which media were changed. Mouse 3T3 L1 cells (American Type
Culture Collection) were plated in 6-well plates for transfections or
in 10-cm culture dishes for preparation of nuclear or whole cell
extracts. Cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
(Invitrogen) with 4.5 g/liter glucose with addition of streptomycin
(100 mg/liter), penicillin (70 mg/liter), fungizone (0.25 mg/liter),
anti-PPLO agent, and 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C, and
transfected at ~80% confluency as described above.
Luciferase and CAT Assays--
All cells were harvested in
reporter lysis buffer 48 h after transfection and assayed for
luciferase activity (Promega, Madison, WI). CAT activities were
measured using an organic phase extraction method (35) and normalized
for expression of luciferase.
Immunoblotting--
Preconfluent 3T3-L1 cells
(10-cm2 culture dish) were washed in 5 ml of cold
phosphate-buffered saline and then scraped in 500 µl of a buffer
containing 10 mM potassium phosphate, pH 6.8, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM CHAPS (Sigma) and CompleteTM
protease inhibitor mix (1 tablet/10 ml) (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).
Cell suspensions were sonicated 3 times (Heat Systems Ultrasonics) and
centrifuged for 5 min at 12,000 × g. Supernatants were
stored at
70 °C until analysis. Protein samples were diluted in
SDS sample buffer and denatured for 5 min at 100 °C before loading
on a one-dimensional SDS-polyacrylamide gel (4.0% stacking gel, 10%
separating gel). 20 µg of total protein was loaded in each lane,
subjected to electrophoresis, and subsequently transferred to
polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA) by
electroblotting. The membranes were blocked in a solution containing 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween
20, 5% milk, followed by incubation with primary antibody for 1 h
in blocking solution. The antibodies used are monoclonal antibodies
against human RI
(1:500) (Transduction Laboratories) or human
FOXC2 (1:250) (16), chicken polyclonal antibody against
amino acids 1-12 in FOXD1 (1:200), or rabbit polyclonal
antibody against PKA catalytic subunit (C
, 1:250) (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology). Membranes were washed in a solution containing 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween
20. Immunoreactive proteins were visualized with enhanced
chemiluminescence reagents (ECL, Amersham Biosciences) using a
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:20.000)
(Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA) and
subjected to autoradiography. Films were scanned, and band densities
were quantitated using the Scion Image package
(www.scioncorp.com).
Preparation of Nuclear Extracts--
Sertoli cells or
preconfluent 3T3-L1 cells (10-cm2 culture dish) were
scraped in Hanks' balanced salts solution containing 0.1% fatty
acid-free bovine serum albumin, harvested by centrifugation at 320 × g for 5 min (4 °C), and washed once in cold
phosphate-buffered saline. Cell pellets were resuspended in 450 µl of
hypotonic buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 10 mM
NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2) and lysed by addition of 50 µl of 5% Nonidet P-40 in hypotonic buffer. The nuclei were pelleted
by centrifugation (130 × g, 5 min, 4 °C); pellets
were carefully washed in 1 ml of hypotonic buffer, centrifuged
(130 × g), and then resuspended in 100 µl of a
buffer containing 5 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 26% glycerol, 1.5 mM dithiothreitol, and the protease inhibitors
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (0.5 mM), CompleteTM protease inhibitor mix (1 tablet/10 ml), and calpain inhibitor I (50 µM) (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). High salt extraction was accomplished by addition of NaCl to a final concentration of 400 mM while mixing for 30 min at 4 °C. Extracts were
centrifuged (30,000 × g, 20 min, 4 °C), and the
supernatants were stored at
70 °C until analysis.
DNA-Protein Complex Analysis--
Electrophoretic mobility shift
assays (EMSAs) were performed using double-stranded
32P-end-labeled forkhead consensus oligonucleotide
(5'-GATCCCTTAAGTAAACAGCATGAGATC-3') (9) or a 100-bp region of RI
exon 1a (
407 to
306). For each reaction, 5000 cpm of labeled probe
were incubated with 2.5 (Fig. 3A) or 5 µg (Fig.
3B) of crude nuclear proteins from transfected 3T3-L1
preadipocytes and 0.5 (Fig. 3A) or 1 µg (Fig.
3B) of poly(dI·dC) in a buffer containing 5 mM
Hepes, pH 7.9, 26% glycerol, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 25 (Fig.
3B) or 100 mM KCl (Fig. 3A) at room
temperature for 15 min. Competition experiments were performed in the
presence of 250-fold molar excess of unlabeled probe or with a
nonspecific forkhead sequence
(5'-GATCCAGGCCGTAAACAGCATGAGATC-3') (9). In
addition, competitions were performed with oligonucleotides containing
the RI
exon 1a (
407 to
306) or exon 1b (+1 to +68) sequences. In
supershift experiments, a human monoclonal FOXC2 antibody
(16) was added followed by incubation for 1 h at room temperature.
Samples were run in 6% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels at 150 V in
Tris/glycine buffer (50 mM Tris pH 8.5, 380 mM glycine, 2 mM EDTA) at 4 °C. Subsequently, gels were
dried and subjected to autoradiography.
Immunofluorescence--
Primary Sertoli cells were grown on
polylysine-treated coverslips in 6-well plates and transfected with
pEF-BOS/FOXC2, pEF-BOS/FOXD1, pCMV/PKB
, or
pCMV/myristoylated PKB
(2 µg/well). Following incubation for
24 h, cells were washed twice in cold phosphate-buffered saline, and cells on coverslips were fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde,
permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, and proteins blocked with 2%
bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline, 0.01% Tween 20. Cells were then incubated with a mouse polyclonal antibody against the
HA tag (C-20, 1:250) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), followed by an
anti-mouse fluorescein (FITC)-conjugated secondary antibody (1:1000).
DNA was stained with 0.1 µg/ml Hoechst 33342. Observations were made and photographs taken as described previously (36).
 |
RESULTS |
FOXC2 Induces RI
Protein in 3T3-L1 Cells--
In order to
establish whether FOXC2 expression could induce RI
protein levels in 3T3-L1 cells as in the FOXC2 transgene, we
harvested cells transfected with human FOXC2 expression
vector or the corresponding empty vector and prepared whole cell
extracts after 6, 12, and 24 h. RI
, the PKA catalytic subunit,
C
, and FOXC2 protein levels were then examined by
immunoblotting (Fig. 1). Basal levels of
endogenous Foxc2 were observed in mouse 3T3-L1 cells, and a
stronger band (2-fold) was observed in extracts of 3T3-L1 cells
transfected for 6 h with the human FOXC2 construct. The
levels of FOXC2 protein were strongly increased after 12 and 24 h of expression (6-fold), and the mobility (~62 kDa with the appearance of a faster migrating band) was similar to that observed previously (16). RI
levels were ~2-fold induced in the presence of
FOXC2 at 6-24 h of expression as determined by
densitometric scanning. In contrast, FOXC2 had no effect on
the levels of C
.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Expression of FOXC2 elevates
levels of RI protein in 3T3-L1 cells.
Nuclear extracts from untransfected ( ) or
FOXC2-transfected (+) 3T3-L1 cells harvested after 6, 12, and 24 h were prepared and examined by immunoblotting using
antibodies to human FOXC2, RI , and C . Mobility of the
66-kDa band of Rainbow molecular weight marker (Amersham Biosciences)
is indicated. One representative of three experiments is shown.
|
|
FOXD1 and FOXC2 Induce Reporter Activity Driven by the RI
1b
Promoter in 3T3-L1 Cells--
To map the effect of FOXC2 on
RI
promoter activity in adipocytes, we cotransfected 3T3-L1 cells at
80% confluency with reporter constructs containing the RI
1a+1b
promoter, the 1a or 1b promoters alone, and a construct containing 4500 bp of the RII
promoter together with pCB6+/FOXC2 or the
empty expression vector (Fig. 2A). We simultaneously tested
whether FOXD1, which is not endogenously expressed in
adipocytes, had a similar effect on the RI
promoter (Fig.
2B). FOXC2 expression induced a 4-5-fold
increase in reporter activity directed from the RI
1a+1b and the
RI
1b promoter constructs, and in contrast, the RI
1a or RII
promoters were slightly down-regulated by the presence of
FOXC2. The same pattern of regulation was observed with
FOXD1. We next analyzed expression from five 3' and/or 5' deletion constructs of RI
1b in the pCAT basic reporter vector (Fig.
2C, left panel) (27). We observed a 7-fold induction of basal reporter expression when a 100-bp region in exon 1A was absent
(RI
1b A+). This deletion raised basal expression to the same levels
as in the presence of FOXC2 and thereby abolished the
induction by FOXC2 indicating that FOXC2
regulation may involve release of repression residing in this region.
In construct RI
1b B, however, basal levels were down to the level of
the longest construct (RI
1b), but the inductive effect of
FOXC2 was not reconstituted. Interestingly, the elevated
basal levels of the shortest constructs (RI
1b C and RI
1b C+) were
again higher, which indicates that repressive effects may reside in
RI
1b B as well, although not regulated by FOXC2.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
FOXC2 and FOXD1
induce expression from the 1b promoter of the RI
gene in 3T3-L1 cells. RI promoter constructs RI 1a + 1b
( 882 to +77), RI 1a ( 882 to 310), RI 1b ( 406 to +77), and
RII promoter construct ( 4500 to 123) inserted upstream of the
CAT reporter gene in the pCATbasic (pCATb) reporter vector were
transfected into preconfluent 3T3-L1 cells together with expression
vectors for FOXC2 or FOXD1. Cell cultures were
harvested after 48 h. Figure shows fold induction of reporter
activity directed by the promoter in the presence of FOXC2
(A) or FOXD1 (B), relative to activity
in the presence of the corresponding empty expression vectors.
C, 3' and 5' deletion constructs of the RI 1b promoter
(depicted to the left) upstream of the CAT reporter gene in
pCAT basic were transfected into 3T3-L1 cells together with expression
vectors for FOXC2 (filled bars) or the
corresponding empty vector (open bars). Data represent
reporter activities (CAT/Luc) relative to transfection with the RI 1b
promoter and empty expression vector that was assigned the value of 1. Data are normalized for expression of luciferase from a cotransfected
control vector (pGL3Control) and represent mean ± S.D. of three
separate transfections performed in triplicate. The main responsive
region is marked with a bold line below the
figure.
|
|
Specific Binding of a Protein to an Upstream Region of the RI
1b
Promoter Is Abolished in the Presence of FOXC2
Expression--
Specific binding of nuclear proteins from 3T3-L1 cells
transfected with FOXC2 expression vector or the
corresponding empty vector (basal) to a 32P-labeled
forkhead oligonucleotide or an oligonucleotide containing 100 bp of
RI
exon 1A were examined (Fig. 3).
Because FOXC1/FREAC3 and FOXC2 have identical DNA
binding domains, we used the forkhead-binding site characterized for
FOXC1 to detect FOXC2 by EMSA (9). Binding to the
labeled forkhead consensus site was induced in
FOXC2-transfected cells (Comp. I, lane 8 versus lane 2; Fig. 3A). However, this induction was not as profound as the increase in FOXC2
proteins levels observed by immunoblotting (Fig. 1), which can be
explained by the fact that the labeled FOXC1 consensus probe
is not specific for FOXC2 (9). An optimal DNA binding
sequence for FOXC2 has not been determined. Furthermore, in
extracts from FOXC2-transfected cells, we observed a small
shift in complex I to a faster mobility compared with basal extracts.
By supershift experiments using a human FOXC2 antibody, we
identified FOXC2 as the protein forming complex I
(lanes 7 and 13). Complex I binding to the
labeled DNA fragment could only be displaced by the homologous
unlabeled probe (lanes 3 and 9). Mutated oligos
(lanes 4 and 10) or oligos from the
FOXC2/FOXD1-responsive regions of the RI
1b
promoter containing 100 bp of RI
exon 1a (lanes 5 and
11) or 72 bp of RI
exon 1b (lanes 6 and
12) (see Figs. 2C and 4D for mapping
of regions) did not compete for binding. These observations indicate
that FOXC2 does not bind directly to the RI
1b promoter.
We next labeled oligos from the two responsive promoter regions located
in exon 1a (100 bp) and exon 1b (72 bp). Although no changes in
DNA-protein complex formation was observed with the
32P-labeled RI
exon 1b oligo (not shown), the exon 1a
probe that corresponds to the FOXC2-responsive region formed a specific
complex in 3T3-L1 nuclear extracts from untransfected cells (Fig.
3B, lane 2), which was strongly reduced by addition of the
homologous unlabeled probe (lane 3). This specific
DNA-protein complex was nearly abolished in extracts from 3T3-L1 cells
transfected with FOXC2 for 24 and 48 h (lanes
4 and 5), which may indicate that FOXC2 is implicated
in regulating release of a transcriptional repressor from the RI
promoter.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
A protein binding to the
RI 1b promoter is released following
FOXC2 expression. EMSA was performed with a
double-stranded forkhead oligonucleotide
(5'-GATCCCTTAAGTAAACAGCATGAGATC-3') as the
32P-labeled probe (A). Complex
(Comp.) formation was analyzed using 2.5 µg of nuclear
extracts from 3T3-L1 cells transfected with FOXC2 expression
vector (lanes 8-13) or empty vector (Basal,
lanes 2-7). Lane 1 shows probe in the absence of
nuclear extract. 250-Fold excess of homologous unlabeled probe
(+, lanes 3 and 9), a forkhead oligo
with altered flanking regions around the core sequence
(5'-GATCCAGGCCGTAAACAGCATGAGATC-3'
(mut, lanes 4 and 10), RI exon 1a
(lanes 5 and 11), and RI exon 1b (lanes
6 and 12) were added as competitors. Supershifts with
FOXC2 antibody (+, lanes 7 and
13) were obtained by incubation of antibody for 1 h at
room temperature. B, EMSA experiment with a
32P-labeled 100-bp oligonucleotide from RI exon 1a
incubated with 2.5 µg of nuclear extracts from 3T3-L1 cells
transfected with FOXC2 expression vector (lanes 4 and 5) or the empty vector (lanes 2 and
3). Lane 1 is probe in the absence of nuclear
extract. 250-Fold excess of homologous unlabeled probe was added as
competitor in lane 3. Results shown are representative of 3 observations using extracts made from separate cultures.
|
|
FOXD1 and FOXC2 Induce Reporter Activity Driven by the RI
1b
Promoter in Sertoli Cells--
We next wanted to investigate if
FOXD1, which is expressed in Sertoli cells of the
testis,3 regulated RI
levels through the same mechanism
as in adipocytes. The level of transfection is much lower in Sertoli
cell primary cultures (2-5% as opposed to 20-30% in 3T3-L1 cells),
and we detected ectopically expressed HA-tagged FOXC2 and
FOXD1 with FITC-conjugated anti-HA antibody (Fig.
4A), showing that expression
and localization is restricted to the nucleus in Sertoli cells. To
study the effect of FOXD1 on the RI
promoter region, we
co-transfected reporter constructs containing the RI
1a+1b promoter,
the 1a or 1b promoters alone, or a construct containing 4500 bp of the
RII
promoter into rat Sertoli cell primary cultures together with
expression vector for FOXD1 or the corresponding empty
vector (Fig 4B). We also tested if expression of
FOXC2 had the same effect on the RI
promoter (Fig.
4C). In Sertoli cell cultures, reporter activity from the
RI
1b promoter construct was increased 8-fold in the presence of
FOXD1 and 5-fold with FOXC2. The RI
1a+1b
construct was not similarly induced. The RI
and RII
constructs
were also induced to a smaller extent by the presence of
FOXD1 or FOXC2 (about 2-fold). Deletion of the
exon 1a region (RI
1b A+, Fig. 4D) elevated basal activity
2-fold, whereas a further 3' deletion of the region downstream of
transcription start (RI
1b A) again reduced basal activity. Some
activating effect of FOXD1 (3-fold) was restored in
constructs RI
1b A and C+ indicating that a downstream region of the
promoter mediated activation of RI
1b by FOXD1. The
presence of both upstream- and downstream-responsive regions appeared
to have the maximal effect on activity of the 1b promoter. In Sertoli
cells, the activation mediated by the downstream region appeared to be
more profound than the cis-acting repressor activity residing in the
upstream promoter region.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
FOXD1 and FOXC2
induce expression from the 1b promoter of the RI
gene in Sertoli cells. Sertoli cells were grown on
coverslips and transfected with 2 µg of expression vectors for
HA-tagged FOXD1 or FOXC2. Localization of the
ectopically expressed forkheads was visualized by immunofluorescence
using anti-HA primary antibody and FITC-conjugated secondary antibody
(Ab) (A). Deletion constructs of the RI
promoter and a construct from the RII promoter were transfected into
primary cultures of rat Sertoli cells together with expression vectors
for FOXD1 (B) and FOXC2 (C)
(filled bars) or the corresponding empty vector (open
bars). Cell cultures were harvested after 48 h. The figure
shows fold induction of reporter activity in the presence of the
FOXD1/FOXC2 expression relative to the presence
of corresponding empty expression vector. D, 3' and 5'
deletion constructs of the RI 1b promoter were inserted upstream of
the CAT reporter gene in pCAT basic and transfected into Sertoli cells
together with an expression vector for FOXD1 or the
corresponding empty vector. Data represent reporter activities
(CAT/Luc) relative to transfection with the RI 1b promoter and empty
vector that was assigned the value of 1. All data are normalized for
expression of luciferase from a cotransfected luciferase control vector
and represent mean ± S.D. of three separate transfections
performed in triplicate. The responsive regions are marked with
bold lines below the figure.
|
|
A Truncated FOXD1 Mutant Reduces cAMP-dependent
Induction of the RI
Gene in Sertoli Cells--
Observing that the
pattern of RI
regulation by FOXD1 in Sertoli cells mapped
to the same downstream region that was identified as responsible for
regulation by the cAMP pathway in our previous studies (27), we wished
to examine if FOXD1 was implicated in cAMP-dependent regulation of expression from RI
1b. We
expressed full-length FOXD1 as well as a FOXD1
mutant containing only the DNA-binding region and no transactivating
domains, which by overexpression would displace endogenous
FOXD1 by occupying Fox-binding sites (Fig.
5). The RI
1b reporter construct (1 µg/well) was transfected into primary rat Sertoli cells together with
empty expression vector, the full-length FOXD1 expression
vector, or the truncated FOXD1 vector (FOXD1-DBD)
(0.5 µg/well) and left untreated (open bars) or stimulated
by 8-(4-chlorophenyl)thio-cAMP (100 µM) for 28 h (filled bars). The induction of RI
by cAMP was
~6-fold in cells transfected with empty expression vector and 8-fold
in the presence of full-length FOXD1. In the presence of
FOXD1-DBD, however, cAMP-induced levels were reduced, which
may indicate that FOXD1 is implicated in cAMP-mediated
regulation of the RI
1b promoter.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Truncated FOXD1 abolishes
cAMP-dependent induction of the RI
gene. The RI 1b construct in the pCATbasic reporter vector
was transfected into primary cultures of rat Sertoli cells together
with expression vectors for the full-length FOXD1 vector
(FOXD1), a FOXD1 mutant (FOXD1-DBD),
or the corresponding empty vector (pEVRFO). The cell cultures were
either left untreated (open bars) or stimulated with
8-CPT-cAMP (100 µM) for 28 h (filled
bars). Data represent reporter activities (CAT/Luc) relative to
unstimulated Sertoli cells transfected with the RI 1b promoter and
empty vector that was assigned the value of 1. Data are normalized for
expression of luciferase from a cotransfected control vector (0.25 µg/culture dish) and represents mean ± S.D. of three separate
transfections performed in triplicate.
|
|
Protein Kinase B (PKB
) Induces the Effect of FOXD1 in Sertoli
Cells--
The insulin-activated serine/threonine kinase PKB/Akt
(reviewed in Ref. 37) has been reported to phosphorylate and negatively regulate forkhead/winged helix transcription factors of the
FOXO-family (AFX, FKHR, and FKHRL1) by inducing transport
out of the nucleus (38-42). Three highly homologous isoforms of PKB
have been characterized and termed PKB
/Akt1, PKB
/Akt2, and
PKB
/Akt3 (43-45). To test if PKB affected FOXD1 and
FOXC2 in our system, we transfected primary cultures of
Sertoli cells with pCMV expression vectors for wild type PKB
/Akt1
(0.5 µg/well) together with the FOXD1 expression vector
(0.5 µg/well) and pCAT reporter constructs containing the RI
1a or
RI
1b promoters (1.0 µg/well). We found that PKB
induced
expression from the RI
1b promoter 15-fold in the presence of
FOXD1 but had no significant effect when FOXD1
was absent (Fig 6A). No effect
was observed on the RI
1a promoter. In contrast, overexpression of
PKB
had no effect in the presence of FOXC2 or
FOXD1 in preconfluent or fully differentiated 3T3-L1
adipocytes (not shown). Furthermore, expression of PKB
did not
affect the level of FOXD1 as shown by immunoblotting. When we expressed
a constitutively active and membrane-bound myristoylated PKB
mutant (Fig. 6B, dark gray bars), we observed a reduced activation
of RI
1b compared with cells expressing wild type PKB
(black
bars). This might indicate that the activating mechanism of PKB
partly depends on detachment of PKB from the membrane.
Immunofluorescence data (Fig. 6C) show that HA-tagged wild
type PKB
is located throughout the cell, whereas myristoylated
PKB
mutant is restricted to the plasma membrane region as
expected.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
PKB strongly induces the effect of
FOXD1 on the RI 1b promoter,
whereas a membrane-bound PKB mutant is less effective.
A, constructs containing the RI 1a and RI 1b
promoters inserted in pCATbasic reporter vector and the corresponding
empty reporter vector (1 µg/well) were cotransfected with 0.5 µg of
expression vector for FOXD1 (hatched bars), 0.5 µg of expression vector for wild type (wt) protein kinase
B/PKB (gray bars), a combination of FOXD1/PKB
(black bars) or corresponding empty vectors (open
bars) in primary cultures of rat Sertoli cells. A pGL3 luciferase
reporter vector (0.25 µg) was transfected as internal control. Data
represent reporter activities (CAT/Luc) relative to transfection with
the RI 1b promoter and empty vector that was assigned the value of 1. Data are normalized for expression of luciferase from a cotransfected
control vector (pGL3Control) and represent mean ± S.D. of three
separate transfections performed in triplicate. A Western blot showing
FOXD1 expression in nuclear extracts from cells transfected
with expression vectors for FOXD1, FOXD1, in combination
with PKB , or the corresponding empty vector (pEVRFO)( ) is
incorporated in A. B, a reporter construct
containing the RI 1b promoter region was cotransfected with 0.5 µg
of FOXD1 expression vector (right 4 bars) or the
corresponding empty vector (pEVRFO, left 4 bars) together
with 0.5 µg of wild type PKB expression vector (black
bars), myristoylated (myr) PKB mutant (dark
gray bars), kinase dead PKB (light gray bars), or
the corresponding pCMV vector (open bars).
C, Sertoli cells were grown on coverslips and
transfected with 2 µg of expression vectors for HA-tagged wild type
PKB and myristoylated PKB . Localization of the ectopically
expressed proteins was visualized using anti-HA primary antibody and
FITC-conjugated secondary antibody (Ab).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the present work, we have performed detailed studies on
regulation of the RI
subunit of PKA by FOXC2 and
FOXD1 in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and Sertoli cell primary
cultures, and we found that both transcription factors induce
expression from the RI
1b promoter in both Sertoli cells and
adipocytes, whereas the RI
1a and RII
promoters were not similarly
affected. The reasons for differentially regulated promoters and
alternative splicing of leader exons in the RI
gene are
not known, but one possible explanation is that the relative levels of
RI
transcripts containing different 5'-UTRs create a fine-tuned
control mechanism for rapid translation of RI
protein as a response
to various signals. Sequences in the 5'-UTR may also affect subcellular localization.
Deletional mapping of the RI
1b promoter in 3T3-L1 cells indicate
that an upstream region of the 1b promoter (
400 to
300, part of
exon 1a) represses basal transcription, and EMSA experiments show that
FOXC2 mediates release of a factor from this region with
subsequent activation of RI
expression. The responsive part of
promoter 1b contains binding sites for the zinc finger transcriptional repressor Ikaros (IK1 and IK2) at positions
401,
392, and
315 (46, 47). We also found a binding site for GATA1 at position
382,
another zinc finger protein known to interact with CBP/p300. Recently,
an atypical GATA protein, TRPS1, was identified as a transcriptional
repressor (48). The IK2 and GATA1 sites in the RI
promoter are
thereby potential repressor binding elements.
In Sertoli cells, a region downstream of the transcription start site
is essential for the inductive effect of
FOXD1/FOXC2. We have reported recently (27) that
the RI
1b promoter is induced 8-fold by cAMP at the post-
transcriptional level, and the cAMP responsiveness is mapped to the
same downstream region. Here we suggest that FOXD1 may
partly and indirectly be involved in cAMP-mediated regulation through
this region, based on the observation that a truncated FOXD1
lacking the transactivating region and functioning as an inhibitor of
FOXD1 activity lowers cAMP-induced expression from the
RI
1b promoter. FOXD1 and FOXC2 both contain
putative PKA phosphorylation sites in the DNA binding domain,
identically positioned 5 amino acids downstream of the 15-amino acid
N-terminal forkhead signature. This indicates the possibility of a
direct regulation of FOXD1 by PKA in addition to induction
of the FOXD1 transcript.3 Another winged helix
transcription factor is also reported to be regulated by the FSH signal
in Sertoli cells (49).
In our study, we found that overexpression of the insulin-activated
kinase PKB
/Akt1 induced the FOXD1-mediated activation of
RI
1b in Sertoli cells but did not affect regulation by
FOXD1 or FOXC2 in preconfluent or fully
differentiated 3T3-L1 cells. There is a possibility that different PKB
isozymes mediate this effect in these cells. PKB
/Akt1 seems to
regulate spermatogenesis with no effect on glucose tolerance and
insulin sensitivity (50, 51), whereas PKB
/Akt2 was identified as the
PKB isoform required for insulin to maintain normal glucose homeostasis
(52, 53).
The FOXO family and several other transcription factors are regulated
by direct phosphorylation by PKB/Akt. However, no consensus phosphorylation sites for PKB were found in the FOXC2 or
FOXD1 sequences. Thus, we anticipate that a yet unknown
factor mediates the effect of PKB
on FOXD1 or that
FOXD1 and PKB
act in concert on downstream effectors that
regulate RI
. Studies on the dynamics of PKB following activation in
B-cells show that shortly after activation, PKB is distributed
throughout the cytosol and nucleus (54). We found that ectopically
expressed FOXD1 and FOXC2 are strictly localized
to the nucleus, and a direct interaction between PKB and
FOXD1 should thereby depend on the ability of PKB to
dissociate from the membrane and travel to the nucleus. This is
supported by the observation that a myristoylated, constitutively
membrane-bound PKB mutant has a reduced effect on
FOXD1-mediated induction of RI
1b.
The effects of insulin and PKB on translation is well accounted for
(55) and facilitates translational initiation of mRNAs containing
strong cap-proximal secondary structures (56). We have reported
recently (27) that the 5'-UTR of RI
1b mRNA, in contrast to
RI
1a mRNA, contains a strong stem-loop and is regulated at the
post-transcriptional level by cAMP in Sertoli cells, an effect that
appeared to be cell-specific. The observation that both PKA and PKB
appear to signal through FOXD1 and the RI
1b 5'-UTR in
regulation of RI
in Sertoli cells could indicate that a
post-transcriptional regulatory mechanism may be involved.
A PKA-independent, FSH/cAMP-mediated activation of PKB, mimicking the
insulin-like growth factor I response, has been reported in granulosa
cells (57). This activation was found to involve cAMP-regulated guanine
exchange factors that may activate phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase.
Other reports have suggested that PKA may activate PKB in a
phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase-independent manner (58). Our
observations that activation of the RI
1b promoter by FOXD2 is
significantly elevated in the presence of both PKB and cAMP may
implicate that cAMP activates PKB by PKA-dependent or
PKA-independent mechanisms. Both PKA-dependent and
PKA-independent cAMP-signaling pathways may stimulate proliferation in
several cell types (59).
Sertoli cells and adipocytes are both highly responsive to hormonal
stimuli and share many common features, such as glucose uptake, lipid
storage, as well as hormone-sensitive lipase activity. Whereas
adipocyte metabolism is regulated by catecholamines and sympatic tonus
through the
-adrenergic receptors, mature Sertoli cells support and
control spermatogenesis in response to the pituitary follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) testosterone, insulin, and insulin-like growth factors I/II (60, 61). Apparently, downstream pathways are parallel in the two cell types and involve cAMP, PKA, as
well as Fox family members. This in turn tunes cAMP sensitivity by
up-regulation of RI
levels (Fig.
7).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Tuning of cAMP sensitivity, metabolism, and
reproductive function by integration of signals in adipocytes and
Sertoli cells. Stimulation of the -adrenergic receptor
( -AR) by catecholamines (CAT) in adipocytes or
the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) by FSH in
Sertoli cells leads to increased levels of cAMP and activation of PKA.
In both cells, PKA phosphorylates and activates hormone-sensitive
lipase leading to enhanced lipolysis. In adipocytes, PKA signaling
up-regulates levels of uncoupling protein-1 (UCP1) that
contributes to increase energy expenditure. In Sertoli cells, PKA
activity is essential for expression of several factors vital for
spermatogenesis (e.g. androgen-binding protein,
ABP). Furthermore, cAMP induces levels of the RI
regulatory subunit of PKA in both cell types and of the winged helix
transcription factors Foxc2 in adipocytes and FoxD1 in Sertoli cells.
Conversely, Fox proteins increase RI levels by regulating the
RI 1b promoter. Insulin (Ins) and tumor necrosis factor
(TNF ) in adipocytes and various growth factors
(GrF) in Sertoli cells signal through corresponding
receptors (insulin receptor (IR), TNF receptor
(TNFR), growth factor receptor (GrFR)) and
phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase (PI3K) to activate PKB and
also to induce the levels of Foxc2 mRNA in adipocytes.
In Sertoli cells, PKB acts in concert with FoxD1 to further activate
RI levels, and possibly a similar function of PKB may be found in
adipocytes. In addition to this, stimulation of PKB activity by FSH has
also been reported in Sertoli cells. Taken together, similar mechanisms
regulate RI expression and thereby increase the sensitivity of PKA
to cAMP in both cell types (marked by bold arrow with
*).
|
|
In conclusion, FOXD1 and FOXC2 both induce the
RI
1b promoter to elevate RI
/PKAI levels. In adipocytes the effect
is mainly mediated through an upstream promoter region and the possible release of a repressor, whereas in Sertoli cells, FOXD1
primarily activates through a downstream region and mediates signals
from the cAMP/PKA and PKB signaling pathways.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We greatly appreciate the skillful technical
assistance of Gladys Josefsen and Guri Opsahl, and we thank Dr. Naheed
N. Ahmed for providing the PKB
/Akt1 expression vectors.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the Norwegian Cancer Society, the
Program for Advanced Studies in Medicine, the Norwegian Research Council, Anders Jahres Foundation, Novo Nordic Research Foundation Committee, the Swedish Medical Research Foundation, The Arne and IngaBritt Lundberg Foundation, the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation, the
Wallenberg Foundation, Amersham Biosciences, The Upjohn Co., and a
Junior Individual Grant from the Swedish Foundation for Strategic
Research (to S. E.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
Present address: Oslo Urological University Clinic, Aker
University Hospital, N-0514 Oslo, Norway.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Medical
Biochemistry, Inst. of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo,
P. O. Box 1112 Blindern, N-0317 Oslo, Norway. Tel.: 4722851454; Fax:
4722851497; E-mail: kjetil.tasken@basalmed.uio.no.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 9, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200131200
2
M. K. Dahle, L. M. Grønning, A. Cederberg, H. K. Blomhoff, N. Miura, S. Enerbäck, K. A. Taskén, and K. Taskén, unpublished data.
3
K. A. Taskén, S. Ernstsson, H. K. Knutsen, L. M. Grønning, K. Taskén, and S. Enerbäck, manuscript in preparation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
Fox, forkhead box;
C, catalytic subunit;
CMV, cytomegalovirus;
DBD, DNA binding domain;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
FITC, fluorescein
isothiocyanate;
FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone;
HA tag, hemagglutinin epitope tag;
IK, ikaros;
PKA, cAMP-dependent
protein kinase;
PKB, protein kinase B;
R, regulatory subunit;
TNF, tumor necrosis factor;
5'-UTR, 5'-untranslated region;
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid;
CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase;
Luc, luciferase;
oligo, oligonucleotide.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Cederberg, A.,
Grønning, L. M.,
Ahren, B.,
Taskén, K.,
Carlsson, P.,
and Enerbäck, S.
(2001)
Cell
106,
563-573[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Gajiwala, K. S.,
and Burley, S. K.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
10,
110-116[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Weigel, D.,
and Jackle, H.
(1990)
Cell
63,
455-456[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Lai, E.,
Clark, K. L.,
Burley, S. K.,
and Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
10421-10423[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Lai, E.,
Prezioso, V. R.,
Tao, W. F.,
Chen, W. S.,
and Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1991)
Genes Dev.
5,
416-427[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Dirksen, M. L.,
and Jamrich, M.
(1995)
Dev. Genet.
17,
107-116[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Kaestner, K. H.,
Lee, K. H.,
Schlondorff, J.,
Hiemisch, H.,
Monaghan, A. P.,
and Schutz, G.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
7628-7631[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Kaestner, K. H.,
Knochel, W.,
and Martinez, D. E.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
142-146[Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Pierrou, S.,
Hellqvist, M.,
Samuelsson, L.,
Enerbäck, S.,
and Carlsson, P.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
5002-5012[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Cederberg, A.,
Betz, R.,
Lagercrantz, S.,
Larsson, C.,
Hulander, M.,
Carlsson, P.,
and Enerbäck, S.
(1997)
Genomics
44,
344-346[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Ernstsson, S.,
Pierrou, S.,
Hulander, M.,
Cederberg, A.,
Hellqvist, M.,
Carlsson, P.,
and Enerbäck, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
21094-21099[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Ernstsson, S.,
Betz, R.,
Lagercrantz, S.,
Larsson, C.,
Ericksson, S.,
Cederberg, A.,
Carlsson, P.,
and Enerbäck, S.
(1997)
Genomics
46,
78-85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Larsson, C.,
Hellqvist, M.,
Pierrou, S.,
White, I.,
Enerbäck, S.,
and Carlsson, P.
(1995)
Genomics
30,
464-469[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Cederberg, A.,
Hulander, M.,
Carlsson, P.,
and Enerbäck, S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
165-169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
van Dongen, M. J.,
Cederberg, A.,
Carlsson, P.,
Enerbäck, S.,
and Wikstrom, M.
(2000)
J. Mol. Biol.
296,
351-359[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Miura, N.,
Iida, K.,
Kakinuma, H.,
Yang, X. L.,
and Sugiyama, T.
(1997)
Genomics
41,
489-492[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Yang, X. L.,
Matsuura, H., Fu, Y.,
Sugiyama, T.,
and Miura, N.
(2000)
FEBS Lett.
470,
29-34[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Iida, K.,
Koseki, H.,
Kakinuma, H.,
Kato, N.,
Mizutani-Koseki, Y.,
Ohuchi, H.,
Yoshioka, H.,
Noji, S.,
Kawamura, K.,
Kataoka, Y.,
Ueno, F.,
Taniguchi, M.,
Yoshida, N.,
Sugiyama, T.,
and Miura, N.
(1997)
Development
124,
4627-4638[Abstract]
|
| 19.
|
Taskén, K.,
Skålhegg, B. S.,
Taskén, K. A.,
Solberg, R.,
Knutsen, H. K.,
Levy, F. O.,
Sandberg, M.,
Ørstavik, S.,
Larsen, T.,
Johansen, A. K.,
Vang, T.,
Schrader, H. P.,
Reinton, N. T.,
Torgersen, K. M.,
Hansson, V.,
and Jahnsen, T.
(1997)
Adv. Second Messenger Phosphoprotein Res.
31,
191-204[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Cummings, D. E.,
Brandon, E. P.,
Planas, J. V.,
Motamed, K.,
Idzerda, R. L.,
and McKnight, G. S.
(1996)
Nature
382,
622-626[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Amieux, P. S.,
Cummings, D. E.,
Motamed, K.,
Brandon, E. P.,
Wailes, L. A., Le, K.,
Idzerda, R. L.,
and McKnight, G. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
3993-3998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
McKnight, G. S.,
Cummings, D. E.,
Amieux, P. S.,
Sikorski, M. A.,
Brandon, E. P.,
Planas, J. V.,
Motamed, K.,
and Idzerda, R. L.
(1998)
Recent Prog. Horm. Res.
53,
139-159[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Planas, J. V.,
Cummings, D. E.,
Idzerda, R. L.,
and McKnight, G. S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
36281-36287[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Solberg, R.,
Sandberg, M.,
Natarajan, V.,
Torjesen, P. A.,
Hansson, V.,
Jahnsen, T.,
and Taskén, K.
(1997)
Endocrinology
138,
169-181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Dahle, M. K.,
Reinton, N.,
Ørstavik, S.,
Taskén, K. A.,
and Taskén, K.
(2001)
Mol. Reprod. Dev.
59,
11-16[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Barradeau, S.,
Imaizumi-Scherrer, T.,
Weiss, M. C.,
and Faust, D. M.
(2000)
FEBS Lett.
476,
272-276[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Dahle, M. K.,
Knutsen, H. K.,
Taskén, K. A.,
Pilz, R.,
and Taskén, K.
(2001)
Eur. J. Biochem.
268,
5920-5929[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Grønning, L. M.,
Cederberg, A.,
Miura, N.,
Enerbäck, S.,
and Taskén, K.
(2002)
Mol. Endocrinol.
16,
873-883[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Knutsen, H. K.,
Taskén, K.,
Eskild, W.,
Richards, J. S.,
Kurten, R. C.,
Torjesen, P. A.,
Jahnsen, T.,
Hansson, V.,
Guerin, S.,
and Taskén, K. A.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
129,
101-114[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Mizushima, S.,
and Nagata, S.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
5322[Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Ahmed, N. N.,
Grimes, H. L.,
Bellacosa, A.,
Chan, T. O.,
and Tsichlis, P. N.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
3627-3632[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Dorrington, J. H.,
Roller, N. F.,
and Fritz, I. B.
(1975)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
3,
57-70[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Øyen, O.,
Frøysa, A.,
Sandberg, M.,
Eskild, W.,
Joseph, D.,
Hansson, V.,
and Jahnsen, T.
(1987)
Biol. Reprod.
37,
947-956[Abstract]
|
| 34.
|
Grønning, L. M.,
Knutsen, H. K.,
Eskild, W.,
Hansson, V.,
Taskén, K.,
and Taskén, K. A.
(1999)
Eur. J. Endocrinol.
141,
75-82[Abstract]
|
| 35.
|
Pothier, F.,
Ouellet, M.,
Julien, J. P.,
and Guerin, S. L.
(1992)
DNA Cell Biol.
11,
83-90[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Collas, P.,
Liang, M. R.,
Vincent, M.,
and Alestrom, P.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
1045-1054[Abstract]
|
| 37.
|
Chan, T. O.,
Rittenhouse, S. E.,
and Tsichlis, P. N.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
68,
965-1014[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Biggs, W. H., III,
Meisenhelder, J.,
Hunter, T.,
Cavenee, W. K.,
and Arden, K. C.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
7421-7426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Jackson, J. G.,
Kreisberg, J. I.,
Koterba, A. P.,
Yee, D.,
and Brattain, M. G.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
4574-4581[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
|