Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201695200 on April 9, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 25, 22915-22924, June 21, 2002
The Paired-like Homeodomain Protein, Arix, Mediates Protein
Kinase A-stimulated Dopamine
-Hydroxylase Gene Transcription through
Its Phosphorylation Status*
Megumi
Adachi and
Elaine J.
Lewis
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oregon
Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97201
Received for publication, February 19, 2002, and in revised form, March 27, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The homeodomain transcription factor Arix/Phox2a
plays a critical role in the specification of noradrenergic neurons by
inducing the expression of dopamine
-hydroxylase (DBH), the terminal
enzyme for noradrenaline biosynthesis. In reporter assays, Arix
together with activation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase
(PKA) potentiates DBH gene transcription. We have evaluated whether
post-translational modification of Arix regulates PKA-mediated DBH gene
transcription. We found that Arix is constitutively phosphorylated
in vivo at the basal level and that the
phosphorylation level is substantially decreased upon stimulation of
the PKA pathway. The change in the Arix phosphorylation state coincides
with DNA binding activity of Arix. Treatment of cells with
forskolin results in a robust enhancement of the DNA binding of Arix,
which is reversed by treatment with serine/threonine and tyrosine
phosphatase inhibitors. Consistent with the DNA binding activity of
Arix, treatment of cultured cells with phosphatase inhibitors
diminishes transcriptional activation with Arix plus forskolin. Amino
acid analysis demonstrates the presence of phosphoserine within Arix.
The results collectively suggest that dephosphorylation of Arix is a
necessary event to fully activate PKA-mediated DBH transcription. Thus,
the present study demonstrates that Arix can integrate extrinsic
signals through post-translational modification, regulating DBH gene
transcription in response to activation of the PKA pathway.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In the central and peripheral nervous systems, identity of
neurotransmitter is a pivotal attribute for proper function of a
neuron. Neurotransmitter phenotype is represented by the ability of a
neuron to synthesize, release, and uptake the neurotransmitter. Therefore, the expression of a biosynthetic enzyme and/or vesicular transporter in its given neuron defines a neurotransmitter identity. A
coordinated array of gene expression ultimately defines the phenotype
of any neuron. Indeed, many transcription factors have been shown to
play a key role in deciding the fate of a progenitor cell and in
linking the cell to a variety of extracellular stimuli during
development. Transcription factors of the homeodomain and basic-helix-loop-helix classes of proteins are frequently involved in
the determination of cell type specificity (1, 2).
Noradrenergic neurons are characterized by the coexpression of the
catecholamine biosynthetic enzymes, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)1 and DBH. TH, the
rate-limiting enzyme of catecholamine biosynthesis, catalyzes the
production of dihydroxyphenylalanine, which is in turn converted
to dopamine by amino acid decarboxylase. DBH is the terminal enzyme
that produces noradrenaline from dopamine; thus, the expression of DBH
is essential for determination of noradrenergic cells. For
specification of noradrenergic neurons, the paired-like homeodomain
transcription factors, Arix/Phox2a and NBPhox/Phox2b, appear to act in
concert to regulate noradrenergic traits in both the central and
peripheral nervous systems (3). Arix and NBPhox are closely related
homeodomain proteins that share significant amino acid sequence
homology, including 100% identity in the homeodomain and 50% identity
in the N terminus to the homeodomain. Coordinate action of Arix and
NBPhox is essential for the proper development of central and
peripheral noradrenergic cells. Targeted deletion analyses of Phox2a
(4-6) and Phox2b (7) demonstrate the necessity of these genes to
direct noradrenergic neuronal differentiation. Despite this
implication, forced expression of Phox2a is only able to induce the
expression of TH but not DBH in mammalian neural crest stem cell
cultures. Importantly, the expression of both TH and DBH is evoked by
Phox2a only together with bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) and
forskolin, which increases intracellular cAMP levels (8). In contrast,
in chicken and zebrafish, forced expression of Phox2a is sufficient to
promote the generation of ectopic noradrenergic neurons that express
TH, DBH, and pan-neuronal genes (4, 9, 10). These experimental findings in vivo and in ovo suggest that Phox2a
requires an additional factor and/or an environmental stimulus that is
present in the embryo in order to potentiate activation of target genes.
Phox2a expression is maintained in adult noradrenergic cells, where it
likely functions to sustain the expression of the genes necessary for
noradrenaline biosynthesis. The transcription of TH and DBH is
regulated postnatally by environmental stimuli, such as stress, which
trigger intracellular signaling pathways (11). The interaction between
Phox2a and signaling molecules is likely to extend beyond neuronal
development and function to modulate neurotransmitter biosynthesis in
the adult as well. In addition to its function in neurotransmitter
identity, Arix/Phox2a may also play a critical role in the development
of midbrain motor nuclei. A mutation in the N-terminal region of human
ARIX results in congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles type 2, believed to result from the maldevelopment of cranial nerve nuclei nII, nIV, and nVI (12).
In addition to the genetic manipulation studies, we and others (13-15)
have demonstrated a direct link between Phox2 transcription factors and
DBH gene expression by analyses of the 5'-upstream promoter of the DBH
gene. In previous studies, we found three homeodomain protein
recognition sites (HD1, -2, and -3) for Arix and NBPhox within the
proximal rat DBH promoter. Reporter assays using mutant promoters
showed that all three HD sites are integrated and interdependent in the
regulation of DBH transcription. Two of the homeodomain protein
recognition sites of the rat DBH promoter, HD1 and HD2, lie within a
genetic regulatory element, DB1, that mediates PKA responsiveness,
noradrenergic tissue specificity, and Arix-dependent
activation of DBH transcription (13, 16). Adjacent to sites HD1 and -2 on the DB1 enhancer is a cAMP-response element/activator protein 1 (CRE/AP1) site. Enhancement of DBH transcription by second messengers
occurs in catecholaminergic cell lines expressing endogenous DBH and is
mediated through the CRE/AP1 element on the DBH promoter (17). Binding
of AP1 family proteins, including c-Fos and c-Jun, to the CRE/AP1 site
is necessary to achieve transcriptional synergism of Arix with the PKA
pathway (17). In addition, recruitment of the coactivator, CRE-binding protein (CREB)-binding protein (CBP), appears to be involved in the DBH
promoter activation by Arix and PKA (18). CBP physically interacts with
the transactivation domain of Arix and augments Arix-mediated DBH
transcription in a PKA-dependent manner. However, it is
unknown how Arix acts through multiple HD sites to integrate the
activation of the PKA pathway. One plausible mechanism would involve
post-translational modification of Arix in response to PKA activation.
Protein phosphorylation is an important post-translational modification
to modulate the function of proteins in response to the extracellular
stimuli. In general, the phosphorylation state of a transcription
factor may influence its activity by modifying nuclear translocation,
DNA binding, or transactivation potential (19, 20). A few cases of
homeodomain proteins whose function is regulated by phosphorylation
have been reported. The Cut homeodomain transcription factor is
phosphorylated in vitro by casein kinase II and protein
kinase C in the Cut repeats, a DNA-binding motif in addition to the
homeodomain, causing a reduction in DNA binding and transcriptional
repression (21, 22). Casein kinase II is also known to phosphorylate
the homeodomain of Csx/Nkx2.5, increasing DNA binding (23). PKA can
directly phosphorylate the homeodomain of Oct-1 in vivo in a
mitosis-specific manner (24). Evidence of phosphorylation of
homeodomain proteins further extends to functional relevance in
vivo. Regulated phosphorylation of Drosophila
Antennapedia by casein kinase II plays an important role in the
appropriate development of thorax and abdomen during embryogenesis
(25). These developmental influences appear to result from the ability
of Antennapedia to bind DNA cooperatively with another homeodomain
protein, Extradenticle, upon phosphorylation of Antennapedia.
Natural target genes for most of the homeodomain proteins are unknown;
therefore, little is known about the transcriptional mechanisms that
achieve their functional specificity. In the present study, we took
advantage of the known in vivo target gene for Arix, and we
have characterized the molecular mechanism of Arix in the activation of
DBH gene transcription in coordination with activation of the PKA
pathway. We found that Arix is a constitutive phosphoprotein and that
the phosphorylation state of Arix is dramatically decreased in response
to activation of the PKA pathway. PKA activation leads to increased DNA
binding activity of Arix, which is abolished by pretreatment with
phosphatase inhibitors. Collectively, the present study suggests that a
dephosphorylated form of Arix is transcriptionally active and that the
regulated post-translational modification is a crucial event to
functionally activate Arix in response to an extracellular stimuli.
This is the first demonstration of functional regulation of a
paired-type homeodomain protein by phosphorylation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell Culture--
HepG2 cells were cultured in minimum Eagle's
medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone), 1%
non-essential amino acids, and 110 mg/liter sodium pyruvate. HEK293
cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with an
addition of 10% fetal bovine serum. CATH.a cells were cultured in RPMI
plus 8% horse and 4% fetal bovine sera. All cell lines were
maintained at 37 °C in an atmosphere of humidified air containing
5% CO2.
Plasmid Constructs--
The construction of DBH-Luc (
232/+10)
reporter plasmid containing the promoter and 5'-flanking sequence of
DBH gene was described previously (18). Briefly, this reporter
construct contains the proximal DBH promoter (
232/+10) including the
DB1 enhancer region, TATA-like sequence, and the transcription start
site, linked upstream of the coding sequence of firefly (Photinus
pyralis) luciferase. The RSV-PKA expression construct, containing
cDNA for the catalytic subunit of PKA
, was a generous gift from
Dr. Richard Maurer (Oregon Health Sciences University, previously
described by Maurer (26)). Hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged full-length
(HA-Arix) and truncated Arix (Ar·N, Ar·C, and HDAr) expression
plasmids were constructed as described by Adachi et al.
(14).
Transfections and Reporter Assays--
DNA used for
transfections was purified by equilibrium centrifugation in
CsCl2-ethidium bromide gradients. For HepG2 cell transfections, cells were plated at a density of 0.8 × 106 cells per well in a 6-well plate 1 day before
transfection and transiently transfected with DBH-Luc (750 ng), HA-Arix
(100 ng), and pRL-null (100 ng) by calcium phosphate precipitation as
described previously (16). Similarly, CATH.a cells were transfected
using Genefector (Venn Nova, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The total amounts of DNA were adjusted to 2 µg using
HA6.1, the backbone of an expression vector. Cells were harvested
24 h after transfection, and aliquots of cell extracts were
assayed for protein content and luciferase activity using Dual-Luciferase Assay System (Promega). For some experiments, cells
were stimulated with forskolin at a concentration of 20 µM for 7 h before harvest. Orthovanadate (1 mM final concentration) or okadaic acid (1 µM
or 50 nM final concentration) treatments were carried out
for 30 min prior to the forskolin stimulation. As an internal control
of transfection efficiency, all transfections contained a jellyfish
luciferase (Renilla) plasmid that lacks a promoter
(pRL-null). Values presented for reporter gene activity are
standardized to Renilla luciferase activity per extract.
In Vitro Kinase Assays--
For substrates, in vitro
translated and 35S-labeled Arix, truncated Arix constructs,
and NBPhox were produced using TNT-coupled wheat germ extract system
(Promega). Phosphorylation of substrates were carried out at 30 °C
for 30 min in an ATP-regenerating kinase buffer system. The kinase
buffer includes 0.5 µl of in vitro translated, 35S-labeled substrate, 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8), 2 mM MgCl2, 5 mM ATP, 10 mM phosphocreatine, 3.5 units/ml creatine kinase, 2.5 µM okadaic acid, 0.5 mM sodium orthovanadate,
and either 10 µg of cell nuclear extracts or 10 ng of purified and
recombinant catalytic subunit of PKA (rPKA) as a source of kinases. In
some kinase reactions, 5 µM of a PKA-specific inhibitor,
H-89, was included during incubation. In dephosphorylation experiments,
0.06 unit of potato acid phosphatase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) was
added in the kinase reaction mixture. The reaction products were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE, followed by autoradiography. For the in
vitro kinase assay using [
-32P]ATP, bacterially
produced and purified His-tagged Arix proteins (1 µg) (14) were
incubated at 30 °C for 5 min with 10 ng of rPKA in the kinase
reaction buffer containing 12.5 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8), 0.1 mM ATP, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mg/ml
bovine serum albumin, and 0.5 µCi [
-32P]ATP. The
reaction was stopped by adding EDTA at the final concentration of 80 mM on ice. As control reactions, wild-type and mutant CREB proteins (0.5 µg each) were used as substrates. The reaction products were separated on a SDS-PAGE gel and autoradiographed. rPKA and wild-type and mutant CREB proteins were generous gifts from Dr. Peter
Rotwein (Oregon Health Sciences University).
In Vivo Phosphorylation Studies--
3.5-4 × 106 of HEK293 cells were seeded on a 100-mm
polylysine-coated plate 1 day before transfection. 10 µg of DNA was
transfected using LipofectAMINE (Invitrogen) according to the
manufacturer's instruction. The total amount of DNA was adjusted with
HA6.1. The following day, cells were incubated in phosphate-free
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 500 µCi/ml of
[32P]orthophosphate for 4 h. Cells were harvested
and lysed in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% deoxycholate, 1%
Nonidet P-40, 0.1% SDS), and lysates were cleared by centrifugation. HA-tagged Arix was immunoprecipitated with HA antibody (3F10, Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) and resolved on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel,
followed by autoradiography. For quantitation of 32P
incorporation, a gel was exposed to a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics), and 32P signals were quantitatively analyzed.
Two-dimensional Phosphoamino Acid Mapping
Analyses--
32P-Labeled proteins were excised from
SDS-PAGE gels and ground in 1 ml of 50 mM ammonium
bicarbonate (pH 7.3) solution including 10 µl of 10% SDS and 50 µl
of
-mercaptoethanol. The samples were boiled for 5 min and eluted
with shaking at room temperature for 3 h twice. Eluted proteins
were precipitated by 250 µl of trichloroacetic acid on ice for 1 h with 40 µg of RNase A as a carrier protein and collected by
centrifugation. Resultant pellets were washed with ice-cold 100%
ethanol, air-dried and subjected to hydrolysis in 5.7 M HCl
for 1 h at 110 °C. After hydrolysis, samples were lyophilized
in a Speed-Vac and resuspended in 5-10 µl of pH 1.9 buffer (88%
formic acid, acetic acid, and deionized water at a ratio of 50:156:1794
(v/v)]), which contains phosphoamino acid standards. Samples were then
electrophoresed on a cellulose thin layer plate in the pH 1.9 buffer at
1.5 kV for 20 min as the first dimension, followed by the second
dimension electrophoresis in pH 3.5 buffer consisting of acetic acid,
pyridine, and deionized water (100:10:1890 (v/v)) at 1.3 kV for 16 min.
The plate was completely dried, sprayed with 0.25% ninhydrin solution
in acetone to visualize the standards, and autoradiographed.
In Vitro Protein-Protein Interaction Assay--
His pull-down
assays and micrococcal nuclease treatment were carried out as described
previously (14).
HEK293 Cell Extracts and Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays
(EMSA)--
To prepare cell extracts used for EMSA, HEK293 cells were
plated at a density of 3.5-4 × 106 cells in a 100-mm
polylysine-coated dish and transfected with the Arix expression
construct (10 µg) the next day using LipofectAMINE (Invitrogen)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. During transfection,
HEK293 cells were incubated in Opti-MEM (Invitrogen) with a lipid-DNA
mixture at a ratio of 3:1 for 5 h. The following day, cells were
treated with forskolin (20 µM at a final concentration) or vehicle for 1 h before harvest. Some of them were pretreated with okadaic acid (50 nM) or orthovanadate (1 mM) for 30 min prior to the forskolin stimulation.
Harvested cell pellets were resuspended in 80-100 µl of the RIPA
buffer and incubated for 20 min on ice. The cell extracts were
collected by centrifugation, and the protein concentration was assayed
by Bradford (Bio-Rad). To quantitate the amount of Arix in cell
extracts, 2.5 µg of cell extracts were separated on 10%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel and subjected to Western blot analyses using HA
antibody (3F10, Roche Molecular Biochemicals).
EMSA was carried out using 0.1 µg of HEK293 cell extracts as
described previously (14). For the quantitation of EMSA, relative proportions of bound probes were calculated using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).
 |
RESULTS |
Arix Is Post-translationally Modified in Vitro and in Vivo--
We
have demonstrated previously (13) that Arix can produce a modest
activation of transcription from the rat DBH promoter, and that the
transcriptional activity of Arix is greatly potentiated by stimulation
of the PKA pathway. In previous studies (17), we found that
PKA-dependent DBH transcription is associate with recruitment of Fos and Jun to the CRE/AP1 element on the DBH promoter. If binding of Fos and Jun to the DBH CRE/AP1 element is sufficient for
activation of transcription by PKA, we would anticipate that introduction of Fos and Jun into cells would mimic the effect of PKA on
DBH transcription. To analyze this hypothesis, Fos and Jun expression
constructs were cotransfected with the DBH promoter-reporter construct,
DBH-luc, plus an Arix expression construct. Consistent with our
previous observations (17, 18), Arix activated the DBH promoter by
3-fold (Fig. 1) in HepG2 hepatoma cells,
which lack the expression of endogenous Arix as well as DBH. When cells were treated with forskolin, an activator of adenylate cyclase, to
stimulate the PKA pathway, DBH promoter activity was elevated 2.6-fold,
whereas the combination of Arix plus forskolin resulted in a 14-fold
elevation of DBH transcription. Because the fold elevation of DBH
promoter activity with both Arix and forskolin is substantially greater
than that expected from the sum of each agent individually, these
two activators interact synergistically to potentiate
transcription from the DBH promoter. In contrast to the 14-fold
elevation of DBH transcription with forskolin and Arix, cotransfection
of Fos and Jun did not stimulate the DBH promoter. When Fos and Jun
were introduced together with Arix, transcription was induced only
4-fold, a value very similar to activation of transcription with Arix
alone. Transfection of Fos, Arix, and PKA expression plasmids together
resulted in elevation of luciferase activity to the same extent as
experiments containing only Arix and PKA (data not shown). These
experiments demonstrate that Fos plus Jun are not sufficient to
activate the DBH promoter in DBH-luc.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Fos and Jun are not sufficient to fully
activate DBH promoter by Arix under the PKA-stimulated condition.
DBH promoter activity was examined in HepG2 cells either with or
without the expression plasmids of Arix or Fos and Jun (200 ng each).
Values for firefly luciferase activity were normalized to those for the
Renilla luciferase activity and calculated relative to the
basal promoter activity in the absence of Arix, forskolin
(fsk), Fos, and Jun. Thus, the mean values of fold
luciferase activity for the basal control are equal to 1. Experiments
were done in triplicate and repeated three times with similar results.
Because the magnitude of responses was variable in each experiment, the
data from one representative experiment are shown, and bars
represent mean ± S.D.
|
|
Because the presence of Fos plus Jun was not sufficient to activate DBH
transcription, we hypothesized that a different mechanism, such as
post-translational modification of Arix, underlies PKA-stimulated DBH
transcription. To address the question, we first tested whether Arix is
phosphorylated in vitro (Fig.
2A). In vitro
kinase assays were performed, using in vitro translated
(IVT) and 35S-labeled proteins and PC12 cell nuclear
extracts as substrates and a source of kinases, respectively. In this
kinase assay, IVT-Arix and NBPhox were resolved on SDS-PAGE and
visualized by 35S signals. We then looked for the mobility
shifts that were eliminated by treatment of potato acid phosphatase as
evidence of phosphorylated products. Addition of PC12 cell nuclear
extracts resulted in multiple mobility shifts, which were sensitive to
potato acid phosphatase, from IVT-Arix as well as NBPhox, implicating
that both transcription factors can be phosphorylated by a kinase in
PC12 nuclear extract (Fig. 2A).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Arix is phosphorylated both in
vitro and in vivo. A,
35S-labeled IVT Arix (left panel) or NBPhox
(right panel) was subjected to the in vitro
kinase assay using PC12 nuclear extracts or rPKA as a source of
kinases. Some assays included 5 µM of H-89, a
PKA-specific inhibitor. Potato acid phosphatase (PAPase) was
added to dephosphorylate the phosphorylated products; therefore,
PAPase-sensitive mobility shifts are evidence of phosphorylation.
B, bacterially produced Arix, wild-type CREB
(WT), and mutant CREB (mt) were incubated in the
kinase reaction buffer with rPKA in the presence of
[ -32P]ATP. The amounts of Arix and CREB loaded in each
lane are approximately equal as examined by Coomassie Blue staining of
a gel (data not shown). C, DBH promoter activity was
examined in HEK293 cells either with or without the expression vectors
containing Arix or the PKA catalytic subunit (250 ng).
D, HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with 5 µg of HA-Arix plasmid either with or without 2.5 µg of the PKA
expression plasmid and metabolically labeled with
[32P]orthophosphate. HA-Arix was immunoprecipitated with
an HA antibody and resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE, followed by
autoradiography (middle panel as indicated by
32P). Immunoprecipitated Arix was also subjected to Western
blot and stained with HA antibody (bottom panel as indicated
by HA) to examine the amount of Arix. 32P
incorporation was quantitatively analyzed using a PhosphorImager.
Changes in 32P incorporation are expressed as a percentage
of Arix phosphorylation under the basal condition (top
panel). Bars represent mean values ± range from
two independent experiments.
|
|
To evaluate whether PKA was the kinase phosphorylating Arix in
vitro, the PKA-specific inhibitor, H-89, was added to the
reactions. However, H-89 did not eliminate mobility shifts created by
PC12 nuclear extracts in both Arix and NBPhox, nor did a direct
application of rPKA cause the appearance of mobility shifts. We also
tested for direct incorporation of [
-32P]ATP into
bacterially produced recombinant Arix by rPKA. rPKA efficiently
phosphorylated recombinant CREB protein as demonstrated by
32P incorporation but not a mutant form of CREB, which
lacks PKA phosphorylation sites at serine 133 residue (Fig.
2B). Recombinant Arix exhibited no significant
32P incorporation by rPKA. These results strongly suggest
that the phosphorylation of Arix and NBPhox is not a direct action of
PKA.
Next, we examined whether Arix is phosphorylated in vivo by
metabolically labeling cells with [32P]orthophosphate.
The Arix cDNA construct was tagged with hemagglutinin antigen (HA),
and HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with HA-Arix, followed by
immunoprecipitation with an HA antibody. HEK293 cells were chosen for
these experiments because they have a much higher transfection
efficiency (~80%) than HepG2 cells, which have only 2-3%
transfection efficiency.2
Furthermore, similar to HepG2 cells, HEK293 cells lack endogenous expression of Arix and demonstrate the activation of the DBH promoter by Arix and PKA; together Arix and the activation of PKA potentiated DBH transcription compared with Arix or PKA alone (Fig. 2C).
When HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with HA-Arix expression vector and metabolically labeled with
[32P]orthophosphate, 32P incorporation of
Arix was apparent. This result is evidence that Arix is a
constitutively phosphorylated protein (Fig. 2D). Importantly, cotransfection with PKA dramatically decreased
32P incorporation of Arix by 80%. Western blot analysis
demonstrated that the expression of Arix was equivalent between the
basal and PKA-stimulated conditions.
Protein-Protein Interactions of Arix and NBPhox Are Favored in
Dephosphorylated States--
Previously, we reported that Arix and
NBPhox have the ability to form homo- and heterodimers in
vitro (14) and in vivo (18). Protein-protein
interactions between Arix and NBPhox at the multiple homeodomain
recognition sites on the DBH promoter may be a mechanism to regulate
DBH transcription. To seek the functional relevance of the
phosphorylation event of Arix, we examined whether there is preference
in either the phosphorylation or dephosphorylation state of Arix and
NBPhox for protein-protein interactions. First, 35S-labeled
IVT proteins were subject to the kinase reaction with PC12 nuclear
extracts to generate phosphorylated proteins as described above (Fig.
3A). 35S-Labeled
IVT proteins containing phosphorylated products were then used for His
pull-down assays. In these assays, protein-protein interactions were
monitored by measuring the ability of 35S-labeled IVT
proteins to coprecipitate with His-Arix or His-NBPhox proteins
conjugated to nickel resin. His-Arix or His-NBPhox interacting proteins were resolved on SDS-PAGE and detected by 35S
signals. As shown in Fig. 3B, 35S-labeled IVT
products did not directly bind to the metal resin. His-Arix interacting
proteins were primarily the faster migrating proteins from both
IVT-Arix and NBPhox, presumably dephosphorylated proteins (Fig.
3B). In contrast, an analysis of an aliquot of supernatant
after the binding reaction demonstrated the presence of slower
migrating proteins, suggesting that unbound fractions are mostly
phosphorylated products. Consistently, in a reciprocal experiment using
His-NBPhox conjugated to nickel resin, His-NBPhox interacting
proteins were mostly in a dephosphorylated form of Arix and NBPhox. To
eliminate the possibility that these protein-protein interactions are
non-specifically mediated by association of DNA, the precipitates were
further treated with micrococcal nuclease to digest nonspecific DNA
prior to SDS-PAGE analyses (Fig. 3C). Even after the
micrococcal treatment, the protein-protein interactions were evident.
These protein-protein interaction studies imply that dephosphorylated
rather than phosphorylated Arix and NBPhox favorably undergo physical
interactions.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Dephosphorylated forms of Arix and NBPhox
interact preferably in vitro. A,
35S-IVT Arix or NBPhox was incubated with PC12 cell nuclear
extracts as a source of kinases. The reaction products were resolved on
SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. Potato acid phosphatase
(PAPase)-sensitive mobility shifts were observed as evidence
of phosphorylation. B, in vitro
protein-protein interaction assays were carried out in combination with
kinase assays to determine whether phosphorylated or dephosphorylated
forms of Arix and NBPhox preferably undergo protein-protein
interaction. Prior to protein-protein interaction assays,
35S-IVT proteins were treated with PC12 nuclear extracts in
kinase buffer as described under "Materials and Methods." All
reaction products in the kinase assay were then incubated with TALON
metal resin in the presence of recombinant His-Arix or His-NBPhox. In
the absence of His-Arix or His-NBPhox, IVT-proteins do not directly
bind to the resin. His-Arix or His NBPhox interacting proteins were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and detected by 35S signals.
Sup indicates unbound fractions collected from the
supernatant of the binding reaction before washing TALON metal affinity
resin, showing that phosphorylated 35S-IVT products were
abundant in the unbound fraction. C, after the above
in vitro binding assays, washed resin was further treated
with micrococcal nuclease prior to SDS-PAGE analyses to control for the
possibility that these protein-protein interactions are
non-specifically mediated by association with DNA. The binding assays
with and without micrococcal nuclease treatment were carried out in
parallel and examined by autoradiography with the same exposure
time.
|
|
PKA-dependent Dephosphorylation of Arix May Be a Key
Step to Activate DBH Transcription--
Within the DBH promoter,
there are three homeodomain recognition sites (HD1, -2, and
-3) (Fig. 4A). Recombinant
Arix and NBPhox can bind to the DBH promoter through the HD1-3 sites
(14), and all three sites are functionally required to regulate DBH
transcription (18). Based on our previous findings, we used
oligonucleotides containing these sites, named DB1 and HD3 probes (Fig.
4A), to examine whether the DNA binding activity of Arix is
altered upon activation of the PKA pathway. EMSAs were carried out
using cell extracts from HEK293 cells transiently transfected with the
HA-Arix expression vector (Fig. 4B). Some cells were
stimulated with forskolin to activate the PKA pathway and pretreated
with phosphatase inhibitors, okadaic acid, or orthovanadate, prior to
the preparation of the extracts. By using the HD3 probe,
Arix-containing extract exhibited a supershift with an HA antibody. The
formation of the supershift was robustly increased in the EMSA reaction
with the Arix-containing extract prepared from forskolin-treated cells.
The supershift formation was absent in the mutant probe, HD3m, where
the HD site is mutated, demonstrating that the supershift formation is
dependent on the HD sites. Similar to our observation, others (27) have also observed that the signal from the Arix-DNA-antibody complex is
stronger than that from the Arix-DNA complex. Thus, supershift formation is often used as a way to identify Arix-containing specific DNA-protein complexes and the extent of supershift formation reflects the DNA binding activity of Arix. Stimulation of the PKA pathway consistently results in a substantial increase in the DNA binding activity of Arix, from 2.5- to 3.5-fold between experiments, as quantitated by the intensity of the supershift.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
The DNA binding activity of Arix is enhanced
with PKA stimulation and reversed by phosphatase inhibitor
treatments. A, schematic diagram of the DBH promoter is
depicted with regulatory elements, CRE/AP1 site, and homeodomain
recognition sites, HD1-3. Wild-type and mutant oligonucleotides used
in the following EMSA are presented in detail with sequences.
B, by using HEK293 cell extracts transfected with HA-Arix,
EMSA was carried out with wild-type probes, HD3 and DB1, as well as
mutant probes, HD3m and 2HDm, which lack the HD sites. Some cells were
treated with phosphatase (PPase) inhibitors, 50 nM okadaic acid (OA), or 1 mM
orthovanadate (VO) for 30 min prior to forskolin
stimulation. As a competition assay of EMSA, 50 ng of an unlabeled
oligonucleotide was added in the binding reaction (cold). To
evaluate the DNA binding activity of Arix, 0.5 µg of HA antibody was
added in the EMSA reaction ( HA). The formation of a
supershift complex was observed from wild-type probes, HD3 and DB1, as
indicated by an open arrowhead. The supershift complexes
created by HD3 and DB1 probes were quantitated by using a
PhosphorImager. The graph depicts the quantitation of the supershifts
for the shown experiments using the wild-type probe. The intensity of a
supershift under the basal condition, where only Arix is included in
cell extracts with no treatments of forskolin, okadaic acid, and
orthovanadate, is calculated as 1. Thus, the fold intensity is relative
to the intensity of the basal state. The mobility shifts indicated by a
closed arrowhead in DB1 and 2HDm probes are nonspecific
DNA-protein complexes. C, under the same condition in
B, EMSA was carried out, using a probe extending from 80
to 14 ( 180/ 14). The supershift was eliminated by the
addition of mutant cold oligonucleotides, DB1m or HD3m, but not by
wild-type oligonucleotides, DB1 or HD3. D, the amounts of
Arix in HEK293 cell extracts used in the above EMSA were examined by a
Western blot.
|
|
Because Arix undergoes dephosphorylation upon PKA stimulation, as shown
by in vivo 32P labeling experiments (Fig.
2C), we asked whether phosphatase inhibitors can reverse the
effect of PKA activation on the DNA binding activity of Arix.
Arix-transfected cells were pretreated with okadaic acid or
orthovanadate as serine/threonine and tyrosine phosphatase inhibitors,
respectively, followed by stimulation of PKA activity by forskolin. In
these phosphatase inhibitor-treated cells, the formation of supershift
significantly decreased, demonstrating weakened DNA binding activity of
Arix (Fig. 4B). The extent of the supershift formation was
reversed close to the basal state of Arix.
We also examined the effect of PKA stimulation on the DNA binding
activity of Arix using the DB1 probe, which contains two HD sites.
Similar to the results from EMSA reactions using HD3 probe, the
Arix-containing extract from forskolin-treated cells demonstrated a
robust supershift formation, which was almost absent in
forskolin-untreated cells (Fig. 4B). The supershift was no longer present in the mutant probe, 2HDm, confirming the specificity of
the supershift formation through the HD sites. When the intensity of
supershift was quantitated, extracts from forskolin-treated cells
exhibited a 2-6-fold increase in supershift formation between experiments. The phosphatase inhibitor treatment using okadaic acid as
well as orthovanadate exhibited a reduction in the supershift formation, consistent to the EMSA reactions using the HD3 probe.
The specificity of the supershift appearing upon the addition of HA
antibody was further characterized using a probe (
180/
14) containing all three Arix-binding sites (HD1-3). The supershift was
specifically competed by either the DB1 or HD3 oligonucleotide, but not
by oligonucleotides containing mutations in the HD sites (Fig.
4C). These results confirm that the supershift formation is
specific to Arix-binding sites of the DBH promoter. Changes in the
intensity of supershift formation were not because of different contents of Arix in cell extracts as indicated by the Western blot
(Fig. 4D), suggesting that post-translational modification of Arix by the PKA pathway alters the DNA binding activity.
The results from EMSA analyses imply that the DNA binding activity of
Arix is enhanced by a dephosphorylation event resulting from
stimulation of the PKA pathway. To evaluate this model in cell culture,
the effect of phosphatase inhibitors on transcription from the DBH
promoter-reporter construct, DBH-Luc, was evaluated in CATH.a
cells, a catecholaminergic cell line, which expresses endogenous DBH
and Arix genes. Treatment of CATH.a cells with the tyrosine
phosphatase inhibitor, orthovanadate, resulted in a reduction in the
activation of the DBH promoter by forskolin, whereas treatment with the
serine/threonine-specific inhibitor, okadaic acid, completely
eliminated induction by PKA, without affecting basal activity (Fig.
5A). In either case, PKA
responsiveness was substantially reduced, to 1.1- and 1.5-fold for
okadaic acid and orthovanadate, respectively. To ask whether this
inhibitory effect of phosphatase inhibitors on DBH transcription as
well as PKA responsiveness is mediated through Arix, we evaluated the effects of inhibitors in HepG2 cells transfected with an Arix expression plasmid. PKA responsiveness in the presence of Arix was
decreased from 4.5- to 1.5- and 2-fold by okadaic acid and orthovanadate, respectively (Fig. 5C). These reductions were
similar to those observed in CATH.a cells. Okadaic acid and
orthovanadate also inhibited the PKA response of the DBH promoter in
the absence of Arix, demonstrating that there are multiple roles for
phosphorylation and dephosphorylation in the regulation of the DBH
promoter by PKA.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Inhibitors of serine/threonine and tyrosine
phosphatases reduce the PKA plus Arix response of the DBH
promoter. A, DBH promoter activity was examined in
CATH.a cells. One day after transfection, cells were treated with 1 µM okadaic acid (OA) or 1 mM
orthovanadate (VO) for 30 min, followed by addition of 0.2 mM 8-chlorophenylthio-cAMP. B, HepG2 cells
were transfected with DBH-Luc, HA-Arix, and pRL-null plasmid
constructs. Some of them were pretreated with 50 nM okadaic
acid or 1 mM of orthovanadate (VO) 30 min prior
to the forskolin (fsk) stimulation. Values for firefly
luciferase activity were normalized to those for the Renilla
luciferase activity and calculated relative to the basal promoter
activity in the absence of Arix and forskolin. Thus, the mean values of
fold luciferase activity for the basal control is equal to 1. Values
presented represent the mean ± S.D. from one representative
experiment. PKA responsiveness was expressed by a ratio of fold
luciferase activity under the basal condition to that under the
forskolin-stimulated condition. Experiments were repeated three times
with similar results.
|
|
These results suggest that inhibition of a dephosphorylation event,
likely on Arix, prevents augmentation of DBH transcription with PKA.
Together these results support the previous experiments by providing
further evidence that dephosphorylation of Arix is involved in the PKA
responsiveness of DBH transcription. Collectively from the results
described above, we hypothesize that constitutively phosphorylated Arix
in untreated cells undergoes dephosphorylation when PKA is activated,
gaining DNA binding activity and becoming transcriptionally active. The
appropriate post-translational modification of Arix through
phosphorylation/dephosphorylation may regulate the activation of DBH
gene transcription stimulated by PKA. Because inhibitors specific for
both tyrosine and serine/threonine kinases were effective in inhibiting
cAMP-mediated induction, the process may involve multiple kinase pathways.
Phosphorylation Sites Residing in Either or Both the Homeodomain
and the N Terminus of Arix May Participate in Regulation of the DBH
Gene Transcription--
To understand further the mechanism involved
in the PKA-regulated activity of Arix, we have begun to define the
phosphorylation sites on Arix responsible for the functional changes in
DNA binding. Analyses of the primary amino acid sequence of Arix for
consensus phosphorylation sites revealed that multiple phosphorylation
sites are present in the C terminus as well as in the homeodomain but none in the N terminus (Fig.
6A). These sites are potential
targets for tyrosine kinase, casein kinase II, protein kinase C, and
mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase. No PKA phosphorylation sites
were predicted, consistent with the results presented in Fig. 2,
A and B. To map the phosphorylation sites of
Arix, we first performed in vitro kinase assays using
truncated Arix constructs (Fig. 6A) as substrates and PC12
cell nuclear extracts as a source of kinases. Phosphatase-sensitive mobility shifts, indicative of phosphorylated form of proteins, were
observed from Ar·N and HDAr constructs, consistent with the prediction that phosphorylation sites reside in the homeodomain (Fig.
6B). However, the Ar·C construct did not exhibit
phosphatase-sensitive mobility shifts, even though the in
vitro kinase assay with the homeodomain alone resulted in mobility
shifts. It is possible that the C-terminal truncation caused a
structural change that masked the phosphorylation sites; therefore,
phosphatase-sensitive shifts were undetectable in this in
vitro kinase assay system.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Functional phosphorylation sites may reside
in the homeodomain and/or the N terminus of Arix.
A, schematic diagram of full-length and C-terminal
truncated Arix constructs either with or without a single amino acid
change in the homeodomain used in the following experiment is depicted.
The diagram also includes consensus phosphorylation sites, which were
predicted by using GeneWorks program (IntelliGenetics). For the
prediction of MAP kinase phosphorylation sites, a minimal consensus
sequence, (S/T)P, was used (42). All constructs were tagged with HA as
indicated by a black box. B, truncated Arix
constructs were in vitro translated with 35S and
subjected to the in vitro kinase assay using PC12 nuclear
extracts as a source of kinases. The reaction products were resolved on
10% SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. PAPase, potato
acid phosphatase. C, HEK293 cells were transiently
transfected with one of the Arix constructs and metabolically labeled
with [32P]orthophosphate. Arix was immunoprecipitated
with the HA antibody and resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE, followed by
autoradiography. 32P signals incorporated into Arix and
Ar·C proteins were indicated by a closed and open
arrowhead, respectively. D,
32P-labeled Arix and Ar·C proteins were extracted from
the gel shown in C and subjected to two-dimensional
phosphoamino acid mapping. The cross marks the origin of
samples. Standards for phosphoserine, threonine, and tyrosine were
visualized by ninhydrin reagent, circled, and indicated by
S, T, and Y, respectively.
|
|
Previous experiments (14) have demonstrated that truncation of the C
terminus does not reduce the transcriptional synergism between PKA and
Arix on the DBH promoter activity. Therefore, we examined the
phosphorylation state of the Ar·C construct by in vivo
32P labeling. In vivo phosphorylation of the
Ar·C construct was apparent (Fig. 6C) although
32P incorporation was reduced by 40-90% between two
experiments, compared with full-length Arix. The reduction in
32P incorporation of the Ar·C construct can be attributed
to the fact that multiple phosphorylation sites are present in the
C-terminal segment, whereas fewer phosphorylation sites are located in
the homeodomain and/or the N terminus of Arix.
To ascertain which amino acids are phosphorylated,
32P-labeled Arix proteins were extracted from the gel shown
in Fig. 6C and subjected to a phosphoamino acid mapping. In
this analysis, phosphoserine was evident from both the full-length and
C-terminal truncated Arix proteins (Fig 6D). This result
suggests that not only are there sites for serine kinases in the C
terminus, as predicted by consensus sequence analyses, but there are
additional phosphorylation sites on serine in the homeodomain and/or
the N terminus, not predicted by the sequence analyses. However, we
were not able to observe detectable signals for either phosphotyrosine
or phosphothreonine using either full-length Arix or Ar·C proteins.
Taken together, we conclude that there are multiple serine
phosphorylation sites in Arix, one or more of which plays a regulatory
role in Arix function.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Arix has been suggested to serve as an integrator that coordinates
multiple extracellular signals to mediate the expression of
characteristic terminal differentiation genes for noradrenergic neurons
in developing nervous systems (8, 18). The present study gives insight
into the molecular mechanisms underlying the transcriptional activity
of Arix in coordination with the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway in the
activation of DBH transcription. We demonstrate that Arix is
constitutively phosphorylated at multiple serine residues in cell
culture. Stimulation of the PKA pathway leads to a significant decrease
in the phosphorylation state of Arix, which coincides with increased
DNA binding activity of Arix to the multiple HD sites within the DBH
proximal promoter. The increase in DNA binding activity of Arix is
abolished by phosphatase inhibitor treatments. Consistently, the
phosphatase treatment reduces the PKA-stimulated DBH promoter activity
mediated by Arix. Taken together, the present findings imply that the
transcriptional activity of Arix is negatively regulated by
phosphorylation and that activation of the PKA pathway causes
dephosphorylation of Arix, converting it to a transcriptionally
competent form, and potentiating DBH gene transcription.
Possible Kinases and Phosphatases That Regulate Phosphorylation of
Arix--
The regulation of transcription from the rat DBH promoter by
Arix plus activation of the PKA pathway entails multiple events. Recruitment of AP1 proteins, Fos and Jun, to the CRE/AP1 site is a part
of the mechanism of PKA-stimulated DBH transcription (17), and the
transcriptional coactivator, CBP, a signal-dependent facilitator of PKA-stimulated DBH transcription (18) is also involved.
The present results further extend the molecular mechanism of DBH gene
transcription by demonstrating that the post-translational modification
of Arix is regulated by PKA and influences its DNA binding activity.
Consistent with the fact that phosphorylation of Arix is constitutive
under basal conditions, PKA does not directly phosphorylate Arix.
The kinase responsible for phosphorylation of Arix, as well as the
regulated phosphorylation site, remains to be determined. The
identification of the kinase and regulated phosphorylation site is
likely to be complicated, because the experiments herein suggest
multiple phosphoserine sites, and yet, using several search programs,
no consensus sites for phosphoserine were identified within the
appropriate region of the protein. The regulated phosphorylation site
should occur within the N-terminal or homeodomain regions of Arix,
because these domains are sufficient to interact synergistically with
PKA in the activation of DBH transcription (14). Nonetheless, there are
9 serine residues in the N-terminal segment of Arix and 1 in the
homeodomain (Fig 7A).
Candidate kinases may be one of the proline-directed kinases, such as
glycogen synthase kinase or MAP kinases, because the N-terminal section
of Arix, which contains the transcriptional activation domain, is
proline-rich, with serines embedded within the proline-rich segments.
Further suggestion of the involvement of MAP kinases as negative
regulators of DBH transcription arises from studies using leukemia
inhibitory factor and ciliary neurotrophic factor. These factors will
induce a neurotransmitter-phenotype switch in sympathetic neurons from noradrenergic to cholinergic (28). During the phenotype switch, leukemia inhibitory factor and ciliary neurotrophic factor cause down-regulation of DBH gene transcription, which can be blocked by a
MAP kinase inhibitor, PD98059 (29). This observation suggests that
activation of MAP kinase negatively regulates DBH transcription. It is
plausible that the growth factors present in the local environment of a
cell maintain a basal level of MAP kinase, which, in turn, phosphorylates Arix. When cells encounter another environmental cue
that activates the PKA pathway, phosphorylated Arix is converted to a
dephosphorylated form, gaining stronger transcriptional activity and
enhancing DBH transcription.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
A, the primary amino acid
sequences of Arix N terminus and homeodomain are presented. Serine
residues are marked with *. B, proposed model for the
transcriptional machinery involved in PKA-mediated DBH transcription is
depicted. When the noradrenergic tissue-specific transcription factor,
Arix, is expressed in a cell, the DBH promoter is competent to drive
basal transcription. In the basal state, Arix is likely to be
constitutively phosphorylated. However, its DNA binding activity is
minimal. Stimulation of the cAMP/PKA pathway leads to the recruitment
of a Fos/Jun complex at the CRE/AP1 site and to dephosphorylation of
Arix. Dephosphorylated Arix gains stronger DNA binding activity and
stabilizes the transcriptional machinery at the DBH promoter, leading
to enhancement of the DBH transcription.
|
|
The phosphatase that dephosphorylates Arix in response to PKA
stimulation is also not identified, although protein phosphatase 2A
(PP2A), a serine/threonine phosphatase, is an attractive candidate. A
primary target of okadaic acid is PP2A (30), and thus the ability of
low concentrations of okadaic acid to inhibit the DNA binding activity
of Arix and reduce PKA responsiveness suggests involvement of PP2A. The
regulatory B subunit of PP2A determines the substrate specificity of
the enzyme. In particular, B56
is highly expressed in brain and
concentrated in the nucleus as a phosphoprotein in vivo
(31). Furthermore, in vitro studies suggest that
phosphorylation of PP2A by PKA positively regulates its phosphatase activity (32). Increasing lines of evidence suggest that protein phosphatases play an important role in developmental processes (33,
34).
Partial inhibition of binding and transcriptional activation was also
observed with the phosphotyrosine phosphatase inhibitor orthovanadate.
Repeated phosphoamino acid analyses of phosphorylated Arix did not
reveal phosphotyrosine, suggesting that the effect of vanadate may be
indirect. A conserved tyrosine in the homeodomain (Tyr-25) was
altered to phenylalanine by mutagenesis but did not produce a
constitutively active transcription factor, as would be expected if it
were the regulated phosphoamino acid (data not shown). The effect of
vanadate suggests that PKA stimulates multiple phosphorylation/dephosphorylation cascades which affect Arix activity both by direct and indirect pathways.
Dephosphorylation of Arix Positively Regulates Its Transcriptional
Potential--
As demonstrated by EMSA (Fig 3), the DNA binding
activity of Arix is greatly enhanced by stimulation of the PKA pathway,
which appears to lead to dephosphorylation of Arix. In addition,
serine/threonine as well as tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor treatments
abrogated the enhanced DNA binding of Arix, suggesting that
phosphorylation at both serine/threonine and tyrosine residues play an
inhibitory role in DNA binding. In vitro studies suggest
that the homeodomain can be phosphorylated. In principle,
phosphorylation in the DNA binding domain introduces a negative charge,
which is unfavorable for DNA binding because the backbone of DNA is
negatively charged in character. If phosphorylation occurs within or
close to the homeodomain of Arix, removal of phosphorylation would be
an obligatory step to confer DNA binding activity of Arix. With regard
to the homeodomain proteins, Berry and Gehring (35) reported that the Drosophila Hox protein, Sex Combs Reduced (SCR),
which determines the identity of specific segments, is regulated by
phosphorylation. In vivo analyses using transgenic flies
revealed that a mutant form of SCR mimicking constitutive
phosphorylation in the N-terminal arm of the homeodomain is
functionally inactive. Dephosphorylation is apparently necessary to
switch SCR in an active state, possibly by PP2A, because a yeast
two-hybrid screen revealed the interaction between SCR and
PP2A.
The functional importance of the phosphorylation state of Arix is also
suggested by in vitro protein-protein interaction assays (Fig. 3). Homo- and heteromerization of Arix and NBPhox in
vitro occurs preferably in the dephosphorylated forms of these
proteins, rather than the phosphorylated forms. Whether binding of Arix to DNA requires protein dimerization is unknown at present. If this is
the case, phosphorylation at the dimerization interface may decrease
dimerization, thereby inhibiting DNA binding. Alternatively, because
the DBH proximal promoter carries multiple homeodomain recognition
sites, multimerization of Arix and NBPhox may confer cooperativity in
DNA binding. Upon stimulation of the PKA pathway, dephosphorylated Arix
may undergo multimer formation, stabilizing the transcriptional
machinery at the promoter, thereby enhancing DBH transcription.
Arix May Integrate Extracellular Signals through the cAMP/PKA
Pathway to Enhance DBH Gene Transcription during Noradrenergic
Differentiation and Environmental Stimuli--
During embryogenesis,
noradrenergic differentiation is believed to be triggered by BMPs,
secreted proteins of the transforming growth factor
superfamily.
Exposure to BMPs leads to the sequential induction of Mash1 and
Phox2a/Arix expression (8, 37). However, induction of TH and DBH
expression in mammalian neuronal crest stem cell culture requires the
activation of PKA, through the elevation of intracellular cAMP (8), and
cAMP potentiates the influence of BMPs in inducing TH expression in
avian neural crest cultures (38). In other developmental processes such
as renal branching morphogenesis (39) and chondrogenesis (40), BMP2 has
been demonstrated to increase PKA activity. Therefore, it is plausible
that BMP2/4, which have been shown to induce the expression of TH and
DBH in vivo (8, 41), can stimulate the cAMP/PKA pathway in
noradrenergic precursor cells.
Based on our results, the model for the regulation of DBH gene
transcription is outlined in Fig. 7B. Arix, the
noradrenergic tissue-specific transcription factor, is present in a
constitutively phosphorylated form under the basal condition, which is
a transcriptionally reduced state. Phosphorylated Arix has weak DNA
binding activity that contributes to the minimal activation of DBH
transcription. When cells encounter an environmental cue that activates
the cAMP/PKA pathway, specific protein phosphatases are activated,
which will dephosphorylate Arix at the homeodomain or the N terminus.
Dephosphorylated Arix is in an active state by acquiring strong DNA
binding activity. As a result, dephosphorylated Arix becomes competent
to fully activate DBH transcription. This mechanism may be active
during development or in mature noradrenergic cells. The present study demonstrates that the phosphorylation state of Arix shifts its functional activity through DNA binding and that Arix may serve as a
signal-dependent tissue-specific transcription factor that consolidates an extracellular cue, promoting a noradrenergic fate and
regulating noradrenaline biosynthesis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. Richard Maurer, Peter Rotwein,
and Paul Shapiro for providing us the plasmids and recombinant
proteins used in the present study. We are grateful to Drs. Thomas
Soderling and Debra Brickey for advice with phosphoamino acid mapping
analyses and Dr. Takuya Nakayama for critical reading of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant GM38696 (to E. J. L.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, L224,
Portland, OR 97201. Tel.: 503-494-5076; Fax: 503-494-8393; E-mail:
lewis@ohsu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 9, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201695200
2
M. Adachi and E. J. Lewis, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TH, tyrosine
hydroxylase;
DBH, dopamine
-hydroxylase;
PKA, cAMP-dependent protein kinase;
rPKA, recombinant PKA;
CREB, cAMP-response element-binding protein;
CBP, CREB-binding protein;
HA, hemagglutinin;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assays;
MAP, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
IVT, in vitro translated;
BMP, bone morphogenetic protein;
PP2A, phosphatase 2A;
SCR, Sex Combs
Reduced.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Goridis, C.,
and Brunet, J.-F.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
9,
47-53[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Marquardt, T.,
and Pfaff, S. L.
(2001)
Cell
106,
651-654[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Pattyn, A.,
Morin, X.,
Cremer, H.,
Goridis, C.,
and Brunet, J.-F.
(1997)
Development
124,
4065-4075[Abstract]
|
| 4.
|
Guo, S.,
Brush, J.,
Teraoka, H.,
Goddard, A.,
Wilson, S.,
Mullins, M.,
and Rosenthal, A.
(1999)
Neuron
24,
555-566[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Guo, S.,
Wilson, S. W.,
Cooke, S.,
Chitnis, A. B.,
Driever, W.,
and Rosenthal, A.
(1999)
Dev. Biol.
208,
473-487[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Morin, X.,
Cremer, H.,
Hirsch, M.,
Kapur, R.,
Goridis, C.,
and Brunet, J.
(1997)
Neuron
18,
411-423[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Pattyn, A.,
Morin, X.,
Cremer, H.,
Goridis, C.,
and Brunet, J.-F.
(1999)
Nature
399,
366-370[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Lo, L.,
Morin, X.,
Brunet, J. F.,
and Anderson, D. J.
(1999)
Neuron
22,
693-705[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Stanke, M.,
Junghans, D.,
Geissen, M.,
Goridis, C.,
Ernsberger, U.,
and Rohrer, H.
(1999)
Development
126,
4087-4094[Abstract]
|
| 10.
|
Patzke, H.,
Reissmann, E.,
Stanke, M.,
Bixby, J.,
and Ernsberger, U.
(2001)
Mech. Dev.
108,
149-159[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Sabban, E. L.,
and Kvetnansky, R.
(2001)
Trends Neurosci.
24,
91-98[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Nakano, M.,
Yamada, K.,
Fain, J.,
Sener, E.,
Selleck, C.,
Awad, A.,
Zwaan, J.,
Mullaney, P.,
Bosley, T.,
and Engle, E.
(2001)
Nat. Genet.
29,
315-320[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Swanson, D. J.,
Zellmer, E.,
and Lewis, E. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27382-27392[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Adachi, M.,
Browne, D.,
and Lewis, E. J.
(2000)
DNA Cell Biol.
19,
539-554[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Kim, H. S.,
Seo, H.,
Yang, C.,
Brunet, J. F.,
and Kim, K. S.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
8247-8260[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Shaskus, J.,
Greco, D.,
Asnani, L.,
and Lewis, E.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
18821-18830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Swanson, D. J.,
Zellmer, E.,
and Lewis, E. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
24065-24074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Swanson, D. J.,
Adachi, M.,
and Lewis, E. J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
2911-2923[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Whitmarsh, A. J.,
and Davis, R. J.
(2000)
Cell. Mol. Life Sci.
57,
1172-1183[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Hunter, T.,
and Karin, M.
(1992)
Cell
70,
375-387[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Coqueret, O.,
Berube, G.,
and Nepveu, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24862-24868[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Coqueret, O.,
Martin, N.,
Berube, G.,
Rabbat, M.,
Litchfield, D. W.,
and Nepveu, A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2561-2566[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Kasahara, H.,
and Izumo, S.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
526-536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Segil, N.,
Roberts, S. B.,
and Heintz, N.
(1991)
Science
254,
1814-1816[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Jaffe, L.,
Ryoo, H. D.,
and Mann, R. S.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
1327-1340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Maurer, R. A.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
6870-6873[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Yang, C.,
Kim, H. S.,
Seo, H.,
Kim, C. H.,
Brunet, J. F.,
and Kim, K. S.
(1998)
J. Neurochem.
71,
1813-1826[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Francis, N. J.,
and Landis, S. C.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Neurosci.
22,
541-566[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
| Dziennis, S., Hofmann, J., Lewis, E., and Habecker, B. (2001) in
Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting Society for
Neuroscience, San Diego, CA, November 10-15, 2001 (Abstr.
364.27), Society for Neuroscience, Washington D.C.
|
| 30.
|
Favre, B.,
Turowski, P.,
and Hemmings, B. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13856-13863[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
McCright, B.,
Rivers, A. M.,
Audlin, S.,
and Virshup, D. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
22081-22089[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Usui, H.,
Inoue, R.,
Tanabe, O.,
Nishito, Y.,
Shimizu, M.,
Hayashi, H.,
Kagamiyama, H.,
and Takeda, M.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
430,
312-316[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Janssens, V.,
and Goris, J.
(2001)
Biochem. J.
353,
417-439[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Stoker, A. W.
(2001)
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
11,
95-102[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Berry, M.,
and Gehring, W.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
2946-2957[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Flanagan, W. M.,
Corthesy, B.,
Bram, R. J.,
and Crabtree, G. R.
(1991)
Nature
352,
803-807[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Shah, N. M.,
Groves, A. K.,
and Anderson, D. J.
(1996)
Cell
85,
331-343[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via I |