JBC INTERFERin siRNA transfection reagent

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201917200 on April 15, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 25, 22925-22933, June 21, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/25/22925    most recent
M201917200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liedtke, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liedtke, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Protein Kinase Cepsilon -dependent Regulation of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Regulator Involves Binding to a Receptor for Activated C Kinase (RACK1) and RACK1 Binding to Na+/H+ Exchange Regulatory Factor*

Carole M. LiedtkeDagger §, C. H. Chris Yun, Nicole KyleDagger , and Dandan WangDagger

From the Dagger  Warren Alan Bernbaum, M.D. Center for Cystic Fibrosis Research, Departments of Pediatrics at Rainbow Babies and Children Hospital, and Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4948 and the  Department of Gastroenterology, Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322

Received for publication, February 26, 2002, and in revised form, April 12, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Protein kinase C (PKC) regulation of cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) chloride function has been demonstrated in several cell lines, including Calu-3 cells that express native, wild-type CFTR. We demonstrated previously that PKCepsilon was required for cAMP-dependent CFTR function. The goal of this study was to determine whether PKCepsilon interacts directly with CFTR. Using overlay assay, immunoprecipitation, pulldown and binding assays, we show that PKCepsilon does not bind to CFTR, but does bind to a receptor for activated C kinase (RACK1), a 37-kDa scaffold protein, and that RACK1 binds to Na+/H+ exchange regulatory factor (NHERF1), a binding partner of CFTR. In vitro binding assays demonstrate dose-dependent binding of PKCepsilon to RACK1 which is inhibited by an 8-amino acid peptide based on the sequence of the sixth Trp-Asp repeat in RACK1 or by an 8-amino acid sequence in the V1 region of PKCepsilon , epsilon V1-2. A 4-amino acid sequence INAL (70-73) expressed in CFTR shares 50% homology to the RACK1 inhibitory peptide, but it does not bind PKCepsilon . NHERF1 and RACK1 bind in a dose-dependent manner. Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy of RACK1 and CFTR revealed colocalization of the proteins to the apical and lateral regions of Calu-3 cells. The results indicate the RACK1 binds PKCepsilon and NHERF1, thus serving as a scaffold protein to anchor the enzyme in proximity to CFTR.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cystic fibrosis is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder caused by mutations in a gene encoding a protein called CFTR,1 cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (1). CFTR is a highly regulated chloride channel expressed in apical membranes of epithelia of the intestine, pancreas, sweat gland secretory coil, and conducting airways (2). In the airways, CFTR plays a major role in maintaining optimal humidity and electrolyte balance and in achieving efficient mucociliary clearance through the secretion of fluid and electrolytes. Functioning in concert with CFTR is a basolateral Na-K-2Cl cotransport protein, which mediates uptake of chloride for secretion. Although CFTR is regulated primarily by cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA), it is stimulated to a modest extent by protein kinase C (PKC). In addition, our laboratory and others reported that inhibition of PKC activity using a general PKC inhibitor chelerythrine prevented forskolin- or epinephrine-stimulated CFTR function (3-5). This laboratory established that activity of PKCepsilon is necessary for cAMP-dependent CFTR function. However, the intracellular signaling mechanism that accounts for PKCepsilon regulation of CFTR is not known. The goal of the present study is to elucidate this signaling mechanism.

Only a short term incubation with chelerythrine is necessary to modulate CFTR function, suggesting that PKCepsilon is proximal to and closely associated with CFTR. Alternatively, PKCepsilon could regulate CFTR indirectly through an interaction with CFTR-associated proteins. Mounting evidence suggests that active and inactive PKC isotypes are localized near their target substrates by binding to anchoring or scaffold proteins (6, 7). Because constitutive activity of PKCepsilon is necessary for modulation of CFTR function, we focused, in these studies, on proteins called RACKs, or receptors for activated C kinase. RACK1 was first cloned from a rat brain cDNA library and shown to be a homolog of the beta  subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins (8). RACK1 shares with Gbeta highly conserved repeating units, called WD repeats, which usually end in Trp-Asp (WD). RACK1 and Gbeta belong to an ancient regulatory protein family of WD repeat proteins (9). Although few WD repeat proteins are enzymes, several interact with other proteins through the WD repeat region to form complexes. The WD repeat regions of Gbeta and RACK1 form a rigid seven-blade beta  propeller structure, arranged in a ring, which is thought to function as an adaptor or scaffold motif (10, 11). RACK1 is thought to function in intracellular signaling by recruiting and anchoring multiple proteins, including enzymes, in the same signaling cascade thus tethering the proteins in the proper subcellular localization for their function. PKC was the first enzyme identified as a RACK1-binding partner (for review, see Refs. 6 and 7). It is now proposed that RACK1 binds PKC in an isotype-specific manner, which may also be cell type-specific (8, 12). A PKCepsilon -specific RACK has been identified by expression cloning and shown to bind activated PKCepsilon at a site in the amino-terminal variable region (V1) of PKCepsilon (13, 14). PKCbeta II also interacts with RACK1; however, binding involves two domains on PKCbeta II, a C2, or Ca2+ binding, domain (15) and a 5-amino acid motif in the V5 domain at the carboxyl terminus (16).

RACK1 also binds to other signaling molecules that are involved in intracellular signaling mechanisms. These interactions are often of high affinity, as with cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase PDE4D5 (17, 18), and are thought to connect various signal transduction components physically. Among recently recognized RACK1-binding partners are Src protein kinases (19), integrin beta  subunit (20), beta  chain of the interleukin-5/interleukin-3/granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor (21), PLCgamma (22), type 1 interferon receptor (23, 24), recombinant PH domains of beta -spectrin and dynamin (25), and gamma -aminobutyric acid type A receptor (26). Binding of PKC, Src or integrin beta  subunit to RACK1 is inducible by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate treatment, suggesting that, for PKC and Src, enzyme activation is necessary for binding. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate stimulation also induces tyrosine phosphorylation of RACK1 in NIH 3T3 cells expressing beta -platelet-derived growth factor (19).

In this study, we used a Calu-3 cell line to study the interaction of PKCepsilon with CFTR and other cellular proteins. The Calu-3 cell line is a serous cell line, which we have shown expresses CFTR and secretes chloride in response to elevations in cAMP (4, 27). CFTR activity is also modulated by an interaction with the Na+/H+ exchange regulatory factor (NHERF1), a 50-kDa protein that is also known as EBP50 (ezrin-radixin-moesin-binding phosphoprotein-50). NHERF1 is a regulatory factor involved in cAMP-dependent inhibition of NHE3 (28). The NHERF1 PDZ1 and PDZ2 domains bind to CFTR carboxyl-terminal sequence QDTRL and play a role in the regulation of channel gating in a Calu-3 cell line (29-31). NHERF1 is thought to link CFTR to the actin cytoskeleton through its interaction with ezrin and that ezrin serves as a PKA-anchoring protein (32, 33). Indeed, it has been proposed that the NHERF1-CFTR stoichiometry may modulate the magnitude of CFTR channel activity (29). In our previous studies, we demonstrated that down-regulation of PKCepsilon prevented cAMP-dependent CFTR function in Calu-3 cells but did not alter agonist-stimulated Na-K-2Cl cotransporter activity (27). In the current project, we examined the interaction of endogenous proteins involved in the signaling between PKCepsilon and CFTR. Protein-protein interactions were identified and characterized using coimmunoprecipitation, overlay assay, pulldown assay and direct binding assays. We report a new previously unidentified interaction between RACK1 and NHERF1. We also demonstrate that PKCepsilon binds to RACK1 and that the interaction involves specific sites on the endogenous proteins.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Isolation and Culture-- Calu-3 cells were grown in a submerged cell culture on 100-mm2 tissue culture plastic or on 0.4-µm pore size Transwell-Clear polyester filter inserts (Corning Costar, Cambridge, MA). For immunofluorescence, cells were seeded at a density of 3 × 105 cells/filter with a growth area of 1.0 cm2. Culture medium consisted of Earle's balanced salt solution supplemented with 2.4 mg of L-glutamine and 10% fetal bovine serum. Culture medium was changed at 48-72-h intervals until confluence was reached. Confluence was assessed by microscopic examination and by measurement of electrical resistance across the cell monolayers grown on filter inserts. Electrical resistance was quantitated using chopstick electrodes and EVOM (Epithelial Voltohmmeter, World Precision Instruments, New Haven, CT). Values were corrected for background resistance of filter alone bathed in medium.

Immunoprecipitation, Pulldown Analysis, and Immunoblot Analysis-- Cells were grown to confluence, serum deprived overnight, and washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). For immunoprecipitation of PKCepsilon , RACK1, and NHERF1, cells were lysed in 1 ml of lysis buffer consisting of 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaF, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 0.1 mM leupeptin, 1 mg/ml aprotinin, and 10 µM AEBSF. For CFTR, the lysis buffer contained the following detergents: 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS. Lysates were clarified by pretreatment with agarose beads and then incubated with antibody directed against the protein of interest. Immune complexes were recovered using protein A-agarose (CFTR, NHERF1), protein G-agarose (PKCepsilon ), or protein L-agarose (RACK1) beads. Immune complexes attached to beads were washed and resuspended in Laemmli buffer and either heated for 5 min in a boiling water bath (NHERF1, PKCepsilon , RACK1) or incubated for 30 min at room temperature (CFTR). Samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE on 6, 8, or 4-15% gradient slab gels. Protein bands were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane paper for immunoblot analysis. Protein bands immunoreactive to specific antibodies were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence.

Pulldown analysis was performed using rhRACK1 coupled to Talon beads or GST-NHERF1. Total cell lysates (TCL) were prepared and incubated at room temperature for 30 min with 1 or 2 µg of recombinant protein. Talon beads with attached proteins were centrifuged and washed extensively with PBS. Proteins bound to rhRACK1 were identified by immunoblot analysis for the protein of interest. To recover proteins bound to GST-NHERF1, the tagged protein was recovered by anti-GST antibody affinity chromatography. Complexed proteins were analyzed by immunoblot analysis.

Overlay and Binding Assays-- Proteins separated on SDS-PAGE were transferred to PVDF membrane paper and incubated with blocking buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 12 mM beta -mercaptoethanol, and 0.4% bovine serum albumin). Membrane strips were next incubated for 1 h in the presence or absence of 30 µg/ml phosphatidylserine (PtdSer), 2 µg/ml dioctanylglycerol, and 200 ng recombinant human PKCepsilon (rhPKCepsilon ) in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 12 mM beta -mercaptoethanol, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 1 µM KN93, 10 µM AEBSF, and protease inhibitors. Unbound material was removed by washing five times in wash buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 12 mM beta -mercaptoethanol). rhPKCepsilon bound to proteins immobilized on PVDF membrane strips was detected by immunoblot analysis using a polyclonal antibody to PKCepsilon and enhanced chemiluminescence.

Binding of proteins was studied using two methods, slot-blot binding assay or pulldown assay. To quantitate PKCepsilon binding to RACK1, 1 µg recombinant human RACK1 (rhRACK1) was immobilized on PVDF membrane paper in a slot-blot apparatus (Invitrogen), blocked, incubated with rhPKCepsilon in the absence or presence of activators, and washed extensively. rhPKCepsilon binding was detected by immunoblot analysis. Binding of NHERF1 and RACK1 was determined by immobilizing 2 µg of GST-NHERF1 onto PVDF membrane paper. Varying concentrations of rhRACK1 were added, and after an incubation of 45 min at room temperature, unbound material was removed by extensive washing. Bound rhRACK1 was detected by immunoblot analysis. In the second pulldown method, a solution binding assay was performed. rhPKCepsilon was incubated with PtdSer and dioctanylglycerol for 15 min at 30 °C to preactivate PKCepsilon . rhRACK1 coupled to Talon Metal Affinity Resin was added and the incubation continued for 30 min at room temperature. Protein complexes were recovered by centrifugation, washed five times to remove unbound material, and analyzed by immunoblot analysis for PKCepsilon .

Expression of Recombinant Proteins-- Sf9 cells (Invitrogen) were maintained at 27 °C in Grace's insect medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 10 µg/ml gentamicin. Viral stocks were kindly provided by Dr. Susan Brady-Kalnay and used to infect Sf9 cells and to express recombinant human RACK1, as described by Mourton et al. (34). The RACK1 construct consisted of a 1,800-bp fragment containing the full-length human RACK1 cDNA plus a polyhistidine tag, a PKA site, a thrombin cleavage site and an HA tag. Three days after infection, cells were lysed in ice-cold buffer consisting of 1% Triton X-100, 100 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 1 mM benzamidine, 1 mM sodium vanadate, and 20 mg/ml protease inhibitor mixture (Calbiochem) for 30 min on ice. The lysates were centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C to remove Triton-insoluble material. The supernatant was transferred to tubes containing washed Talon Metal Affinity Resin, incubated with rocking at room temperature for 30 min, and pelleted at 3,000 × g for 3 min at 4 °C. Talon beads were washed three times with ice-cold PBS and either used directly in experiments or treated with elution buffer (20 mM Tris, 200 mM imidazole, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl) to cleave HA-RACK1 from the resin. The resin was pelleted and discarded. The supernatant was added to a Millipore concentrator and centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 10-30 min at 4 °C until the volume was ~0.5-1.0 ml. Protein content was determined using a protein assay kit (Pierce) and bovine serum albumin as the standard. Isolation of fusion protein was monitored by immunoblot analysis using a monoclonal antibody to RACK1 (Fig. 1) or a polyclonal antibody to the HA tag (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 1, the final purified protein was immunoreactive with antibody to RACK1 and migrated as a single 50 kDa protein band. The molecular mass is consistent with the addition of the various tags.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Expression of rhRACK1 in Sf9 insect cells. rhRACK1 was expressed as described under "Experimental Procedures" and subjected to immunoblot analysis using a monoclonal antibody to RACK1. Endogenous RACK1 was detected in TCL prepared from Calu-3 cells as a 37 kDa protein band. A 50 kDa protein band in starting homogenate and purified protein was immunoreactive with the antibody to RACK1. WB, Western blot.

GST-NHERF1 in a pGEX4T-1 vector was expressed after addition of 100 µM isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside and a 6-h incubation at 37 °C. GST-NHERF1 fusion protein was purified using B-PER extraction as directed by the manufacturer (Pierce) followed by affinity chromatography with glutathione-Sepharose B beads. The fusion protein was evaluated by immunoblot analysis for the GST tag using a polyclonal antibody to GST.

Immunofluorescence and Confocal Microscopy-- Cell monolayers were washed three times with PBS and fixed in fresh 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature. Cells were washed three time with PBS and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in 10% normal goat serum in PBS. The fixed, permeabilized cells were stained for 1 h at room temperature with a monoclonal antibody directed to the carboxyl terminus of CFTR (1:100 dilution) or a monoclonal IgM antibody directed to RACK1 (1:200 dilution). Cell monolayers were washed three times with PBS. Secondary Oregon Green-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody for CFTR or Texas Red anti-mouse antibody for RACK1 was applied at 1:200 dilution for 1 h at room temperature. After three final washes with PBS, the polyester filters were carefully cut from their support inserts and mounted in Slow Fade mounting medium on glass microscope slides. Fluorescence was analyzed using a LSM410 confocal scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) equipped with an external argon-krypton laser. Optical sections of 512 × 512 pixels were digitally recorded in 16× line-averaging mode, and z-sectioning was done in 1-µm increments. Images were processed for reproduction using Photoshop software (Adobe Systems, Mountainview, CA).

Reverse Transcription-PCR-- Reverse transcription-PCR was performed with specific primers based on a sequence of RACK1 (GenBankTM Accession NM_006098). Two overlapping sets of sense and antisense oligonucleotides were used: 5'-GTGGCTTTCTCCTCTGACAA-3' and 5'-TTAGCGGGTACCAATAGTCA-3' encoding a 623-bp cDNA and 5'-CAGGAGAGGTTGTGGTGCTA-3' and 5'-GCCTTGCTGCTGGTACTGAT-3' encoding a 922-bp cDNA. Total RNA (1 µg) was reverse transcribed at 50 °C for 30 min, and PCR was performed using a One-Step reverse transcription-PCR kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. For cDNA synthesis, 1 µg of RNA was mixed with 2 µl of random hexamer primer (400 µM, each dNTP), 0.6 µM primer, enzyme mixture including Omniscript reverse polymerase, and diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated water to a final volume of 50 µl in a 0.5-ml Eppendorf tube and incubated at 50 °C for 30 min. The reaction mixture was heated to 95 °C for 15 min to activate HotStar Taq polymerase and inactivate reverse transcriptase. Single-stranded cDNA was amplified with a PTC-100 thermal cycler from MJ Research (Watertown, MA). PCRs were denatured at 95 °C for 2 min followed by 29 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 62 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 2 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels and stained with Syber Green I.

Sense and antisense strands of cloned PCR products were sequenced using the dideoxynucleotide chain termination methods. Automated sequencing reactions were performed with synthetic oligonucleotide primers and fluorescent dideoxynucleotide terminators on a DNA sequencer (model 377, Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA). Sequence data were analyzed using a BLAST (NIH) sequence similarity data base.

Materials-- Peptides encoding sequences from PKCepsilon , RACK1, and CFTR were synthesized by the Molecular Biotechnology Core Facility of the Cleveland Clinic Institute. Purity and structural integrity of the peptides were confirmed by high performance liquid chromatography, amino acid analysis, and mass spectrometry. Polyclonal antibodies to NHERF1 and to E3KARP and a GST-NHERF1 construct were supplied by C. H. C Yun (Emory University). Polyclonal anti-PKCepsilon and anti-GST antibodies, anti-GST-agarose beads, horseradish peroxidase-coupled secondary antibodies (anti-mouse IgM, anti-rabbit IgG, and anti-mouse IgG2A) and protein L-agarose were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Baculovirus-expressed recombinant PKCepsilon was obtained from Pan Vera (Madison, WI). Anti-human CFTR (carboxyl terminus-specific) monoclonal antibody was from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN), and anti-mouse RACK1 monoclonal antibody was from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY). Sepharose and agarose beads, PCR primers, and tissue culture supplies were purchased from Invitrogen. Chelerythrine chloride was purchased from Research Biochemicals International, (Natick, MA). Precast 4-15% SDS-polyacrylamide gels were obtained from Bio-Rad, and a One-Step reverse transcription-PCR kit was from Qiagen. An enhanced chemiluminescence reagent was purchased from Amersham Biosciences, and Transwell-Clear filter inserts were from Fisher Scientific. All other chemicals were reagent grade.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Overlay Assay for PKCepsilon -- To determine whether PKCepsilon interacts with airway epithelial cell proteins, we performed an overlay assay for PKCepsilon on Calu-3 cell proteins. Cell proteins were extracted with detergent buffer, separated by gel electrophoresis, and transferred to PVDF membrane paper. Endogenous PKCepsilon was detected as a 75 kDa protein band (Fig. 2A). The overlay assay using rhPKCepsilon revealed binding of exogenous PKCepsilon to at least six protein bands; one predominant band is a 37-kDa protein that corresponds in molecular mass to RACK1 (6, 7). We next performed overlay assays on immunoprecipitates of CFTR (Fig. 2B) and RACK1 (Fig. 2C) and found no specific binding of PKCepsilon to immunoprecipitated CFTR. Activated and inactive PKCepsilon bound to several protein bands in immunoprecipitates of RACK1; binding of activated PKCepsilon is favored (Fig. 2C, compare first and third lanes). Binding was prominent at 37 kDa, indicating PKCepsilon binding to endogenous RACK1. Immunoblot analysis of RACK1 immunoprecipitates for RACK1 demonstrated the presence of a RACK1 immunoreactive protein (Fig. 2C, right lane; see also Fig. 4B, center panel, right lane). We also detected a protein band at 75 kDa that was immunoreactive with antibody to PKCepsilon , suggesting coimmunoprecipitation of PKCepsilon . Sequence analysis of cDNA amplified from reverse transcribed total mRNA of Calu-3 cells with primers for human RACK1 demonstrated that the mRNA encoded RACK1, a member of a heterotrimeric Gbeta superfamily of proteins.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   PKCepsilon binding to Calu-3 cell proteins by overlay assay. Calu-3 cells were grown to confluence and serum deprived overnight. TCL were prepared and proteins separated on 4-15% gradient slab gels and transferred to PVDF membrane paper. For the overlay assay, 200 ng of rhPKCepsilon was inactive (-) or preactivated in the presence of 30 µg/ml PtdSer and 2 µg/ml dioctanylglycerol (+). Preactivated rhPKCepsilon was incubated with membrane paper for 60 min at room temperature. Membrane strips were washed extensively with blocking buffer and immunoblotted with polyclonal antibody to PKCepsilon . A, overlay assay on 25 µg of TCL reveals a protein that binds PKCepsilon and migrates to the same molecular mass as RACK1 in Fig. 1. Endogenous PKCepsilon is detected as a 75 kDa protein band. B, PKCepsilon binding is not detected in an overlay assay of immunoprecipitated (IP) CFTR. A positive control demonstrates the presence of CFTR in immunoprecipitates. C, PKCepsilon overlay assay of immunoprecipitated RACK1 shows binding at a predominant band at 37 kDa (compare first and third lanes). Endogenous PKCepsilon is in immunoprecipitates of RACK1 as a 75 kDa protein band. An inhibitory peptide, VI-RACK1, based on an 8-amino acid segment of the sixth WD repeat of RACK1, prevents binding of rhPKCepsilon to immunoprecipitated RACK1 (second lane). Immunoblot analysis of RACK1 in immune complexes that were not incubated with rhPKCepsilon and PKC activators shows the presence of RACK1 (far right lane). Results are representative of four separate experiments.

Coimmunoprecipitation of PKCepsilon , RACK1, and CFTR-- To characterize a potential interaction among PKCepsilon , RACK1, and CFTR, lysates from Calu-3 cells were immunoprecipitated with antibodies to PKCepsilon , RACK1, or CFTR and resolved on SDS-PAGE. Immunoblots of immunoprecipitates of CFTR and PKCepsilon were probed with antibodies to PKCepsilon and CFTR, respectively, are shown in Fig. 3A. CFTR was detected in immune complexes of PKCepsilon and, in a control for antibody selectivity, in TLC from T84 colonic cells. Likewise, PKCepsilon was detected in immunoprecipitates of CFTR. rhPKCepsilon was used as an antibody control for PKCepsilon in the immunoblot analysis. The results demonstrate coimmunoprecipitation of CFTR and PKCepsilon which might be related to PKCepsilon regulation of CFTR function. Because activity of PKCepsilon is necessary for its effect on CFTR, we next inhibited PKCepsilon using two different PKC inhibitors, chelerythrine and bisindolylmaleimide, and examined coimmunoprecipitation of PKCepsilon with CFTR. Fig. 3B illustrates the results. Inhibition of PKCepsilon with either PKC inhibitor did not prevent coimmunoprecipitation of PKCepsilon with CFTR.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   PKCepsilon coimmunoprecipitates with CFTR and vice versa. A, PKCepsilon and CFTR were immunoprecipitated from lysates of Calu-3 cells, subjected to electrophoresis on 8% (right two lanes) or 6% (left two lanes) SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and then to immunoblot analysis for CFTR and PKCepsilon , respectively. The left two lanes show that CFTR is detected in immune complexes of PKCepsilon (far left lane) and in TCL prepared from T84 cells (second lane). Because of abundant expression, T84 cells serve as a positive control for CFTR. The right two lanes show that PKCepsilon is detected in immunoprecipitates of CFTR (far right lane). rhPKCepsilon serves as a positive control for the primary antibody (second lane from right). B, cells were pretreated with buffer, 10 µM chelerythrine (CHE), or with 10 µM bisindolylmaleimide (BIS) for 15 min at 37 °C to inhibit PKC as described previously (4). CFTR was immunoprecipitated from lysates and subjected to electrophoresis on 4-15% SDS-gels. Western blot (WB) analysis for PKCepsilon showed that pretreatment with PKC inhibitors did not alter coimmunoprecipitation of PKCepsilon with CFTR, indicating that activity of PKCepsilon is not a prerequisite for coimmunoprecipitation with CFTR. The illustrated results are representative of four separate experiments. IgG, immunoglobulin G.

Immunoblots of PKCepsilon and RACK1 immunoprecipitates were probed with antibodies to RACK1 and PKCepsilon , respectively and are shown in Fig. 4, A and B. RACK1 was detected in immunoblots of PKCepsilon (Fig. 4A, left lane) and vice versa (Fig. 4B, left panel, left lane). Because RACK1 can potentially bind PKC isotypes in addition to PKCepsilon , we determined whether endogenous RACK1 associates with PKCdelta , a PKC isotype that is necessary for hormonal activation of Na-K-2Cl cotransporter (35). The right panel of Fig. 4B illustrates the results. PKCdelta was found in TCL but was not detected in RACK1 immunoprecipitates. As a measure of an association between CFTR and RACK1, we probed immunoblots of CFTR for RACK1 and vice versa. CFTR was not detected in RACK1 immunoprecipitates (Fig. 4C, second lane), and RACK1 was not detected in immunoprecipitates of CFTR (Fig. 4C, third lane). To confirm the lack of association of CFTR and RACK1, we used a pulldown technique with rhRACK1 bound to Talon beads to pull CFTR down from TCL of Calu-3 cells. CFTR was not detected in immunoblots of proteins associated with rhRACK1 (data not shown).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Interaction among PKCepsilon , RACK1, and CFTR. Proteins were immunoprecipitated from TCL, subjected to electrophoresis on 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gels or 4-15% gradient slab gels, and then to immunoblot analysis for indicated the proteins. A, RACK1 is detected in immunoprecipitates of PKCepsilon (left lane) and in TCL (right lane) as a 37 kDa protein band. B, PKCepsilon is detected in immunoprecipitates of RACK1 (left panel, left lane) and in TCL (left panel, right lane). In contrast, PKCdelta is not found in immunoprecipitates of RACK1 (right panel, left lane). Protein bands immunoreactive to monoclonal antibody to RACK1 were observed in immunoprecipitates of RACK1 (center panel, left lane) and TCL (center panel, right lane). C, coimmunoprecipitation of CFTR and RACK1. TCL were prepared in CFTR lysis buffer, and CFTR or RACK1 was immunoprecipitated using specific monoclonal antibodies, as described under "Experimental Procedures." Immunoprecipitates were subjected to 4-15% gradient slab gel electrophoresis and probed with monoclonal antibodies to CFTR or RACK1. CFTR was detected in immunoprecipitates of CFTR (far left lane) but not in immunoprecipitates of RACK1 (second lane). RACK1 was detected in immunoprecipitates of RACK1 (far right lane) but not in immunoprecipitates of CFTR (third lane). The illustrated results are representative of three separate experiments.

Binding of PKCepsilon to RACK1-- RACK1 has been shown to bind PKCepsilon in the presence of PtdSer and dioctanylglycerol in a dose-dependent manner (12). The binding properties of RACK1 and PKCepsilon were examined using recombinant proteins. Binding studies were performed in a slot-blot apparatus with immobilized rhRACK1 (Fig. 5A) or by solution assay with rhRACK1 attached to Talon Metal Affinity Resin (Fig. 5B).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   In vitro binding of rhPKCepsilon to rhRACK1. A, 1 µg of full-length rhRACK1 fusion protein was immobilized and blocked on PVDF membrane paper in a slot-blot apparatus. rhPKCepsilon was preactivated by incubation with mixed micelles (MM) of PKC activators, consisting of 30 µg/ml PtdSer and 2 µg/ml dioctanylglycerol, for 15 min at 30 °C. Preactivated rhPKCepsilon was incubated with RACK1 for 30 min at room temperature. Unbound material was removed by washing, and bound rhPKCepsilon was detected by immunoblot analysis. B, rhRACK1 complexed to 1 µg of Talon beads was mixed with increasing amounts of rhPKCepsilon in the presence of mixed micelles. Protein complexes were recovered by centrifugation, washed, and subjected to electrophoresis on 4-15% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Immunoblot analysis for PKCepsilon indicates dose-dependent binding of rhPKCepsilon . C, as a control for pulldown of rhRACK1, duplicate samples of immune complexes were immunoblotted using antibodies to the HA tag. Equal amounts of HA-tagged rhRACK1 were detected in pulldowns from the solution binding assay. LD, laser densitometry values.

We detected binding of rhPKCepsilon to rhRACK1 using both assay methods. PKCepsilon bound to rhRACK1 in a dose-dependent manner. Immunoblot analysis and laser densitometry for the HA tag on rhRACK1 indicated recovery of equal amounts of HA-tagged rhRACK1 from the solution binding assay (Fig. 5C). PtdSer and dioctanylglycerol were required for the binding. An EC50 (effective concentration) for PKCepsilon binding of 6 µM was calculated from Hill plots of binding data.

Peptides based on an 8-amino acid sequence in the sixth WD40 repeat of RACK1 (DIINALCF, designated VI-RACK) have been shown to bind PKCepsilon (8). BLAST comparison of the amino acid sequence of CFTR and RACK1 revealed homology in 4 amino acids, 70-73, of CFTR, INAL. We tested inhibition of the binding of the two recombinant proteins by VI-RACK and a 12-amino acid peptide based on CFTR amino acids 66-77 and embedding the INAL sequence. The results are illustrated in Fig. 6. We found that rhPKCepsilon binds to VI-RACK in a dose-dependent manner and that binding was dependent on the presence of PKC activators (Fig. 6A). Peak binding was found at 5 nM VI-RACK. rhPKCepsilon did not bind to a CFTR peptide with an embedded INAL sequence (Fig. 6B). These results demonstrate that PKCepsilon binds at a specific site on RACK1.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Binding of PKCepsilon to RACK1 inhibitory peptide. A, PKCepsilon was inactive (-) or preactivated (+) by incubation with 30 µg/ml PtdSer and 2 µg/ml dioctanylglycerol (DOG) for 15 min at 30 °C. rhPKCepsilon (25 ng/slot) was added to slots containing varying concentrations of a VI-RACK1 inhibitory peptide (DIINALCF) and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Unbound material was removed by washing, and bound PKCepsilon was detected by immunoblot analysis. B, inactive or preactivated PKCepsilon (50 ng/slot) was added to slots containing varying concentrations of inhibitory peptide based on the amino acid sequence of CFTR (NPKLINALRRCF) and incubated as described in A. Immunoblot analysis for PKCepsilon indicates that activated PKCepsilon preferentially binds to RACK1 inhibitory peptide but not to CFTR inhibitory peptide. Results are representative of three or four experiments. LD, laser densitometry units; WB, Western blot.

An 8-amino acid segment of the V1 region of PKCepsilon , denoted as epsilon V1-2, selectively inhibits PKCepsilon translocation function in intact myocytes (8) and prevents binding of PKCepsilon to rat beta '-coatomer protein (12). Therefore, we next investigated binding of RACK1 and PKCepsilon using epsilon V1-2 as an inhibitory peptide. If epsilon V1-2 encodes a specific binding site for interaction with RACK1, the inhibitory peptide should prevent binding of rhPKCepsilon and rhRACK1. We used a solution binding assay in which rhRACK1 coupled to Talon Metal Affinity Resin was incubated with preactivated rhPKCepsilon in the absence or presence of varying concentrations of epsilon V1-2. The results are illustrated in Fig. 7. epsilon V1-2 dose dependently blocked the interaction between rhPKCepsilon and rhRACK1 with an IC50 of 80.3 µM. We estimated the amount of rhPKCepsilon bound to rhRACK1 from laser densitometry units of experimental samples and of a 6.69-ng aliquot (3.26 µM) of rhPKCepsilon (Fig. 7, first lane). In the absence of inhibitory peptide, 4.08 ± 0.42 (n = 3) ng of rhPKCepsilon binds to 2 µg of rhRACK1.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Inhibition of PKCepsilon binding to RACK1 by epsilon VI-2, a PKCepsilon inhibitory peptide. Varying concentrations of epsilon VI-2 inhibitory peptide (EAVSLKPT) were mixed with rhRACK1 coupled to Talon beads, incubated at room temperature for 30 min, and then added to preactivated rhPKCepsilon . The mixture was incubated at 30 °C for 20 min, centrifuged to recover Talon beads, washed, and subjected to gel electrophoresis on 4-15% gradient slab gels. Immunoblot analysis for PKCepsilon indicates a dose-dependent inhibition of binding to rhRACK1 with increasing concentration of inhibitory peptide. Illustrated results are typical of three separate experiments. The asterisk (*) indicates that an aliquot of rhPKCepsilon was applied directly to the gel as a control for the primary antibody. LD, laser densitometry units.

Link between RACK1-PKCepsilon and CFTR Is NHERF1-- In the absence of direct binding of PKCepsilon or RACK1 to CFTR, we next explored a binding partner for RACK1 which is proximal to CFTR. Two closely related proteins that have been found to interact with CFTR are the PDZ domain proteins NHERF1, a 50-kDa phosphoprotein with two PDZ domains, and NHERF2, or E3KARP, a 50-kDa protein that shares ~52% amino acid identity with NHERF1 (31, 33, 36). NHERF1 was found in immune complexes of RACK1 as a 50 kDa protein band, and RACK1 was detected in immune complexes of NHERF1 as a 37 kDa protein band, suggesting that the two proteins retain an association in detergent lysis buffer (Fig. 8). Although readily detected in Calu-3 cell lysates, NHERF2 was not consistently detected in immunoprecipitates of RACK1 (data not shown). The polyclonal antibody used for immunoblot analysis of NHERF1 also detected lower molecular mass proteins. One at 25 kDa may be a light chain from IgG. A higher molecular mass band at ~100 kDa was also observed, but its identity is not clear. It could be the dimer form of NHERF1 or another protein closely related to NHERF1. A protein band immunoreactive to antibody to NHERF1 at 50 kDa was also seen in pulldown assays using His6-tagged rhRACK1 (Fig. 8B). Positive controls were also run to confirm the presence of RACK1 in pulldown assays. As seen Fig. 8B, rhRACK1 was observed in pulldowns as 50 kDa protein and endogenous RACK1 in TCL as a 37 kDa protein band. If NHERF1 and RACK1 are binding partners in Calu-3 cells, we predicted that RACK1 would be pulled down with NHERF1. This was examined using GST-tagged NHERF1. The tagged protein and associated proteins were recovered by anti-GST affinity chromatography. Immunoblot analysis of recovered proteins revealed the presence of RACK1 and, as a positive control, of NHERF1 (Fig. 8C). However, PKCepsilon was not detected in this pulldown assay using GST-NHERF1 and hence, we conclude, is not likely to be a binding partner of NHERF1. Our findings thus far indicate an association between RACK1 and NHERF1 but provide no evidence for direct binding. We performed slot-blot binding assays using GST-NHERF1 and rhRACK1 to examine the binding of the two proteins. As seen in Fig. 8D, RACK1 binds to NHERF1 in a dose-dependent manner. An EC50, calculated from the data of Fig. 8D, is 3.1 µg of RACK1, equivalent to a nominal concentration of 50.1 mM.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Interaction between RACK1 and NHERF1. A, coimmunoprecipitation of endogenous NHERF1 and RACK1. RACK1 or NHERF1 was immunoprecipitated (IP) from TCL and subjected to electrophoresis on 4-15% gradient slab gels and immunoblot analysis for NHERF1 and RACK1, respectively. NHERF1 was detected as a 50 kDa protein band and RACK1 as a 37 kDa protein band. As a positive control for each immunoprecipitated protein, immunoblots were stripped and reprobed. RACK1 and NHERF1 were detected in appropriate immunoprecipitates and TCL (data not shown). B, recovery of NHERF1 after pulldown (PD) of RACK1 using rhRACK1 coupled to Talon beads. 2 µg of rhRACK1 was mixed with 2.5 mg of TCL protein and incubated at 30 °C for 40 min. Talon beads were recovered by centrifugation, washed, and prepared for electrophoresis on 4-15% gradient slab gels. NHERF1 was detected by immunoblot analysis in TCL and in pulldowns with RACK1 as a 50 kDa protein band (upper panel). Antibody to RACK1 detected a 50 kDa protein band in pulldowns (lower panel, left lane) which corresponds in molecular mass to rhRACK1. Endogenous RACK1 is evident as a 37 kDa protein band in TCL (lower panel, right lane). C, recovery of RACK1 after pulldown using GST-NHERF1. The pulldown assay was run as described above except 1 µg of GST-NHERF1 was added/2.5 mg of lysate protein. Proteins bound to NHERF1 were recovered by anti-GST affinity chromatography. RACK1 is detected in pulldowns with NHERF1 (top panel, left lane) and, as a positive control, in TCL (top panel, right lane). Immunoblots were stripped and reprobed with antibody to NHERF1 (bottom panel) to confirm the presence of NHERF1 in pulldowns (left lane) and expression of NHERF1 in TCL (right lane). We consistently find NHERF1 in pulldowns using GST-NHERF1. Stripping immunoblots causes a loss in density of some cell proteins. This may explain the low density band in the left lane in this specific experiment. Results are representative of three or four experiments. D, in vitro binding of RACK1 and NHERF1. 2 µg of GST-NHERF1 was immobilized on PVDF paper in a slot-blot apparatus. Varying concentrations of rhRACK1 were added, as indicated. After incubation for 45 min at room temperature, unbound material was removed by washing and bound RACK1 detected by immunoblot analysis. The analysis revealed a dose-dependent binding to NHERF1 (upper panel). Binding was maximal at 5 µg of RACK1. Immunoblot analysis for NHERF1 served as a positive control for immobilized NHERF1 (lower panel). The results are representative of four experiments. WB, Western blot.

RACK1 Colocalizes with CFTR to the Apical Plasma Membrane-- The new findings on PKCepsilon -RACK1 interaction in Calu-3 cells imply that RACK1 and CFTR are colocalized in the same region of the cell. The intracellular localization of RACK1 relative to CFTR was determined using a double label immunofluorescence of confluent cell cultures grown on filter inserts. Shown in Fig. 9 are en face images of CFTR and RACK1 taken at three different intracellular locations. CFTR localized in an apical region, whereas RACK1 was localized predominantly in the plasma membrane of the apical and lateral domains. Merged images shows a color shift to orange-yellow, indicating colocalization of RACK1 with CFTR. Colocalization was seen predominantly in the apical region of Calu-3 cells, but it was also observed in the lateral plasma membrane. We were unable to investigate colocalization of PKCepsilon with RACK1 or with CFTR because of cross-reactivity between PCKepsilon primary antibody and fluorescent tagged-secondary antibodies to RACK1 and CFTR.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Localization of RACK1 and CFTR in Calu-3 cells. En face computer-generated images of apical, midsection, and basal planes through epithelial cell layer are shown. Serum-deprived Calu-3 cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized in 0.2% Triton X-100, and incubated with primary antibodies (anti-carboxyl terminus for CFTR and anti-RACK1) for 60 min before adding secondary antibody (Oregon Green-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody for RACK1 and Texas Red-conjugated anti-mouse antibody for CFTR) for 60 min. En face images of RACK1 (left images), CFTR (center images), and merged images (right images) were visualized by confocal microscopy. As reported by others, CFTR is localized predominantly in the apical region of Calu-3 cells. RACK1 is found in the apical and upper lateral regions of cells. Merged images show colocalization of RACK1 and CFTR. Cells incubated with secondary antibody alone displayed no image (data not shown).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

These studies were initiated to clarify the signaling mechanism that explained regulation of cAMP-dependent CFTR function by PKCepsilon in Calu-3 cells. An examination of the binding of activated PKCepsilon to cellular proteins by coimmunoprecipitation and overlay, pulldown and binding assays leads us to conclude that PKCepsilon binds directly to RACK1 and that RACK1 binds to NHERF1. This implies a new and unique role for the scaffold protein RACK1 in epithelial chloride channel function. Characterization of PKCepsilon binding by overlay assay provided evidence for the absence of direct binding to CFTR (Fig. 2) even though coimmunoprecipitation experiments suggest an interaction between CFTR and PKCepsilon (Fig. 3). Overlay assay also revealed that other Calu-3 cellular proteins bind PKCepsilon ; one is a 37-kDa protein that corresponds in molecular mass to RACK1. Lack of coimmunoprecipitation of RACK1 and CFTR indicates that the two proteins do not interact directly (Fig. 4) even though both proteins are colocalized in the apical region of Calu-3 cells (Fig. 9). Rather, we found that RACK1 and NHERF1, a scaffold protein that binds four carboxyl-terminal amino acids (DTRL) of CFTR through either of its PDZ (PDZ1 and PDZ2) domains (29, 31, 37, 38), coimmunoprecipitate from Calu-3 cells and are binding partners (Fig. 8). NHERF1 and CFTR bind with high affinity, apparently to regulate other transport proteins, such as the renal outer medullary potassium channel and epithelial sodium channels and NHE3 (39-41) and to function as a membrane retention signal (42). But, it is the potential dimerization of CFTR by bivalent NHERF1 which is postulated to regulate the full expression of CFTR channel function (29). NHERF1 may act as a scaffold protein to facilitate an interaction between CFTR and RACK1 or PKCepsilon to achieve optimal cAMP-dependent CFTR function.

These studies identify, for the first time, NHERF1 as a binding partner of RACK1 in airway epithelial cells, which express both proteins endogenously. RACK1 also binds PKCepsilon , suggesting that the association of RACK1 and NHERF1 brings activated PKCepsilon close to its site of action. RACK1 and its homolog, the Gbeta subunit of heterotrimeric proteins, share a unique rigid beta  propeller structure, formed by WD repeat regions. The WD repeats have been implicated in protein-protein interactions, the first being binding of activated PKC (8). It is thought that binding to RACK1 is necessary for translocation of activated PKC and to protect activated PKC from degradation. Our results indicate that airway epithelial RACK1 binds multiple proteins that are implicated directly in the regulation of CFTR function, thus acting as a scaffold. The mode of interaction between RACK1 and NHERF1 is not known. RACK1 lacks a PDZ binding motif at its carboxyl terminus. However, we could speculate that RACK1 might express an internal motif that binds to the PDZ domains of NHERF1. Alternatively, NHERF1 might interact with RACK1 through non-PDZ motifs, such as in its interaction with ezrin (43).

RACK1 is not phosphorylated by PKC (7), but our study provides convincing evidence for direct binding of PKCepsilon to RACK1 in Calu-3 cells. PKCepsilon bound to immunoprecipitates of endogenous RACK1 in an overlay assay (Fig. 2), and endogenous PKCepsilon and RACK1 coimmunoprecipitate (Fig. 4, A and B). Binding of PKCepsilon to RACK1 was concentration-dependent with a preference for activated enzyme (Fig. 5, A and B). Binding was blocked by inhibitory peptides derived from the amino acid sequences of predicted binding sites on PKCepsilon and RACK1 (8, 14). The inhibitory peptide epsilon V1-2, based on an 8-amino acid sequence in the V1 region of the amino terminus of PKCepsilon , prevented in vitro binding of RACK1 and PKCepsilon (Fig. 7). The V1, or variable, region encodes a 145-amino acid segment at the amino-terminal region of PKCepsilon which bears close resemblance to a C2 domain of conventional PKC isotypes (44). The C2 domain together with C1 domain of conventional PKC isotypes (alpha , beta , gamma ) is responsible for interaction with PKC activators. Dioctanylglycerol and phorbol esters and Ptd-Ser bind to C1 and Ca2+ binds to C2 domains to achieve proper PKC activation (45). The C2-like domain of novel PKC isotypes (delta , epsilon , eta , theta ) regulates kinase activity through binding of PtdSer, lacks acidic side chains necessary for Ca2+ binding, and also serves as a site of protein interactions (46). Other investigators and our current study demonstrate that C2 counterparts in PKCepsilon have sites of interaction with RACK1.

A second inhibitory peptide, based on an 8-amino acid peptide in the sixth WD repeat of RACK1 and designated VI-RACK, bound PKCepsilon in a dose-dependent manner and blocked the interaction between PKCepsilon and RACK1 (Fig. 6). We compared the sequence of VI-RACK with that of CFTR to determine whether an analogous binding site for PKCepsilon is expressed in CFTR. Amino acids 70-73 of CFTR shared 50% homology with VI-RACK. To test binding of PKCepsilon , a 12-amino acid peptide was designed to embed the 4-amino acid sequence INAL and still retain a CFTR signature. The CFTR-based peptide did not bind PKCepsilon , thus direct binding is not likely to account for PKCepsilon regulation of CFTR function. Instead, our data indicate that PKCepsilon interacts with the sixth WD repeat of RACK1. Binding to RACK1 can, however, be more complicated, involving more than one binding site on RACK1 or its binding partner. For example, binding of PKCbeta II to RACK1 involves two sites, one in the C2 domain, the other in the V5 domain (16, 47). We have yet to identify an additional site for the interaction of airway epithelial PKCepsilon with RACK1.

A direct target of activated PKCepsilon has yet to be defined. Only a short term incubation with the PKC inhibitor chelerythrine is necessary to inhibit cAMP stimulation of CFTR (3-5), suggesting acute regulation of CFTR function. In the Calu-3 cells, NHERF1, CFTR, and PKCepsilon are each phosphoproteins but may well represent only a small pool of potential PKCepsilon phosphorylation targets. Other proteins implicated in the regulation of CFTR include syntaxin 1A (48), which binds to CFTR at the amino terminus. The phosphorylation state of NHERF1 and Munc18, a binding partner of syntaxin 1A, are thought to be important determinants in the functional consequences of binding to CFTR.

How the interaction between PKCepsilon and RACK1 and between RACK1 and NHERF1 regulates CFTR function is not known. The activity state of PKCepsilon is often associated with its translocation. Selective activation of PKCepsilon or inhibition of PKCepsilon translocation has specific consequences in other cell types. Secretion of amyloid precursor protein (49), anionic amino acid transport (50), activation of cardiac L-type Ca2+ channels (13), and protection of cardiac myocytes by ischemic preconditioning (51, 52) are all regulated by PKCepsilon . RACK1 has been implicated in some of these effects of PKCepsilon ; however, the intracellular signaling mechanism still must be determined. Nevertheless, one model that emerges from these studies is that NHERF1 recruits a stable regulatory complex and that this is important for regulation of CFTR function. A protein complex of activated PKCepsilon bound to RACK1, which binds NHERF1, would support cAMP-dependent CFTR function. One can conjecture that inactivation of PKCepsilon would free the enzyme from RACK1, possibly to bind to another scaffold or anchor protein, with a subsequent loss of cAMP-dependent CFTR function. RACK1 might, as a consequence, dissociate from NHERF1 or alter NHERF1-CFTR interaction. Thus, PKCepsilon may shift between anchor proteins depending on its activity state. The activity of PKCepsilon may be an important determinant of its binding partner and phosphorylation state of its target protein as well as the functional status of CFTR.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We appreciate the assistance provided for this study from Dr. Susan Brady-Kalnay for the RACK1 baculovirus expression system, Dr. Doria Mochly-Rosen and Dr. Douglas Eaton for helpful discussions, and Robert Papay and Denise Hatalya for technical assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants HL58598, HL67190, and DK44484, Cystic Fibrosis Core Center Grant DK27651, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Grant LIEDTK00G0, and a research development program.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: BRB, Rm. 824, 2109 Adelbert Rd., Cleveland, OH 44106-4948. Tel.: 216-368-4629; Fax: 216-368-4223; E-mail: cxl7@po.cwru.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 15, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201917200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: CFTR, cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator; AEBSF, 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulfonyl fluoride; GST, glutathione S-transferase; HA, hemagglutinin; NHERF1, Na+/H+ exchange regulatory factor; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PDZ, PSD-95/Discs-large/ZO-1 homology; PKA, cAMP-dependent protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; PtdSer, phosphatidylserine; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride; RACK1, receptor for activated protein kinase C; rh, recombinant human; TCL, total cell lysates; WD repeat, repeating units ending in Trp-Asp.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Riordan, J. R., Rommens, J. M., Kerem, B. S., Alon, N., Rozmahel, R., Grzelczak, Z., Zielenski, J., Lok, S., Plavsic, N., Chou, J. L., Drumm, M. L, Iannuzzi, M. C., Collins, F. S., and Tsui, L. C. (1989) Science 245, 1066-1073
2. Sheppard, D. N., and Welsh, M. J. (1999) Physiol. Rev. 79, S23-S45
3. Jia, Y., Mathews, C. J., and Hanrahan, J. W. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 4978-4984
4. Liedtke, C. M., and Cole, T. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 275, C1357-C1364
5. Middleton, L. M., and Harvey, R. D. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 275, C293-C302
6. Jaken, S., and Parker, P. J. (2000) BioEssays 22, 245-254
7. Mochly-Rosen, D., and Gordon, A. S. (1998) FASEB J. 12, 35-42
8. Ron, D., Chen, C. H., Caldwell, J., Jamieson, L., Orr, E., and Mochly-Rosen, D. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 839-843
9. Neer, E. J., Schmidt, C. J., Nambudripad, R., and Smith, T. F. (1994) Nature 371, 297-300
10. Garcia-Higuera, I., Fenoglio, J., Li, Y., Leis, C., Panchenko, M. P., Reiner, O., Smith, T. F., and Neer, E. J. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 13985-13994
11. Lambright, D. G., Sondek, J., Bohm, A., Skiba, N. P., Hamm, H. E., and Sigler, N. B. (1996) Nature 379, 311-319
12. Csukai, M,., Chen, C.-H., De, Matteis, M. A., and Mochly-Rosen, D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 29200-29206
13. Hu, K., Mochly-Rosen, D., and Boutjdir, M. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. 279, H2658-H2664
14. Johnson, J. A., Gray, M. O., Chen, H.-H., and Mochly-Rosen, D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 24962-24966
15. Mochly-Rosen, D., Miller, K. G., Scheller, R. H., Khaner, H., Lopez, J., and Smith, B. L. (1992) Biochem. J. 31, 8120-8124
16. Stebbins, E. G., and Mochly-Rosen, D. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 29644-29650
17. Steele, M. R., McCahill, A., Thompson, D. S., MacKenzie, C., Isaacs, N. W., Houslay, M. D., and Bolger, G. B. (2001) Cell. Signal. 13, 505-513
18. Yarwood, S. J., Steele, M. R., Scotland, G., Houslay, M. D., and Bolger, G. B. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 14909-14917
19. Chang, B. Y., Chiang, M., and Cartwright, C. A. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 20346-20356
20. Liliental, J., and Chang, D. D. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 2379-2383
21. Geijsen, N., Spaargaren, M., Raaijmakers, J. A. M., Lammers, J.-W. J., Koenderman, L., and Coffer, P. J. (1999) Oncogene 18, 5126-5130
22. Disatnik, M.-H., Hernandez-Sotomayor, S. M. T., Jones, G., Carpenter, G., and Mochly-Rosen, D. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 559-563
23. Croze, E., Usacheva, A., Asarnow, D., Minshall, R. D., Perez, H. D., and Colamonici, O. (2000) J. Immunol. 165, 5127-5132
24. Usacheva, A., Smith, R., Minshall, R., Gaida, G., Seng, S., Croze, E., and Colamonici, O. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 22948-22953
25. Rodriguez, M. M., Ron, D., Touhara, K., Chen, C.-H., and Mochly-Rosen, D. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 13787-13794
26. Brandon, N. J., Uren, J. M., Kittler, J. T., Wang, H., Olsen, R., Parker, P. J., and Moss, S. J. (1999) J. Neurosci. 19, 9228-9234
27. Liedtke, C. M., Cody, D., and Cole, T. S. (2001) Am. J. Physiol. 280, L739-L747
28. Weinman, E. J., Steplock, D., Wang, Y., and Shenolikar, S. (1