Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201917200 on April 15, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 25, 22925-22933, June 21, 2002
Protein Kinase C
-dependent Regulation of Cystic
Fibrosis Transmembrane Regulator Involves Binding to a Receptor for
Activated C Kinase (RACK1) and RACK1 Binding to
Na+/H+ Exchange Regulatory Factor*
Carole M.
Liedtke
§,
C. H. Chris
Yun¶,
Nicole
Kyle
, and
Dandan
Wang
From the
Warren Alan Bernbaum, M.D. Center for Cystic
Fibrosis Research, Departments of Pediatrics at Rainbow Babies and
Children Hospital, and Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve
University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4948 and the ¶ Department of
Gastroenterology, Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of
Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322
Received for publication, February 26, 2002, and in revised form, April 12, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Protein kinase C (PKC) regulation of
cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) chloride function
has been demonstrated in several cell lines, including Calu-3 cells
that express native, wild-type CFTR. We demonstrated previously that
PKC
was required for cAMP-dependent CFTR function. The
goal of this study was to determine whether PKC
interacts directly
with CFTR. Using overlay assay, immunoprecipitation, pulldown and
binding assays, we show that PKC
does not bind to CFTR, but does
bind to a receptor for activated C kinase (RACK1), a 37-kDa scaffold
protein, and that RACK1 binds to Na+/H+
exchange regulatory factor (NHERF1), a binding partner of CFTR. In vitro binding assays demonstrate
dose-dependent binding of PKC
to RACK1 which is
inhibited by an 8-amino acid peptide based on the sequence of the sixth
Trp-Asp repeat in RACK1 or by an 8-amino acid sequence in the V1 region
of PKC
,
V1-2. A 4-amino acid sequence INAL (70-73) expressed in
CFTR shares 50% homology to the RACK1 inhibitory peptide, but it does
not bind PKC
. NHERF1 and RACK1 bind in a dose-dependent
manner. Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy of RACK1 and CFTR
revealed colocalization of the proteins to the apical and lateral
regions of Calu-3 cells. The results indicate the RACK1 binds PKC
and NHERF1, thus serving as a scaffold protein to anchor the enzyme in
proximity to CFTR.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Cystic fibrosis is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder caused
by mutations in a gene encoding a protein called
CFTR,1 cystic fibrosis
transmembrane regulator (1). CFTR is a highly regulated chloride
channel expressed in apical membranes of epithelia of the intestine,
pancreas, sweat gland secretory coil, and conducting airways (2). In
the airways, CFTR plays a major role in maintaining optimal humidity
and electrolyte balance and in achieving efficient mucociliary
clearance through the secretion of fluid and electrolytes. Functioning
in concert with CFTR is a basolateral Na-K-2Cl cotransport protein, which mediates uptake of chloride for secretion.
Although CFTR is regulated primarily by cAMP-dependent
protein kinase A (PKA), it is stimulated to a modest extent by protein
kinase C (PKC). In addition, our laboratory and others reported that
inhibition of PKC activity using a general PKC inhibitor chelerythrine
prevented forskolin- or epinephrine-stimulated CFTR function (3-5).
This laboratory established that activity of PKC
is necessary for cAMP-dependent CFTR function. However, the intracellular
signaling mechanism that accounts for PKC
regulation of CFTR is not
known. The goal of the present study is to elucidate this signaling mechanism.
Only a short term incubation with chelerythrine is necessary to
modulate CFTR function, suggesting that PKC
is proximal to and
closely associated with CFTR. Alternatively, PKC
could regulate CFTR
indirectly through an interaction with CFTR-associated proteins. Mounting evidence suggests that active and inactive PKC isotypes are
localized near their target substrates by binding to anchoring or
scaffold proteins (6, 7). Because constitutive activity of PKC
is
necessary for modulation of CFTR function, we focused, in these
studies, on proteins called RACKs, or receptors for activated C kinase.
RACK1 was first cloned from a rat brain cDNA library and shown to
be a homolog of the
subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins (8). RACK1
shares with G
highly conserved repeating units, called WD repeats,
which usually end in Trp-Asp (WD). RACK1 and G
belong to an ancient
regulatory protein family of WD repeat proteins (9). Although few WD
repeat proteins are enzymes, several interact with other proteins
through the WD repeat region to form complexes. The WD repeat regions
of G
and RACK1 form a rigid seven-blade
propeller structure,
arranged in a ring, which is thought to function as an adaptor or
scaffold motif (10, 11). RACK1 is thought to function in intracellular
signaling by recruiting and anchoring multiple proteins, including
enzymes, in the same signaling cascade thus tethering the proteins in
the proper subcellular localization for their function. PKC was the first enzyme identified as a RACK1-binding partner (for review, see
Refs. 6 and 7). It is now proposed that RACK1 binds PKC in an
isotype-specific manner, which may also be cell type-specific (8, 12).
A PKC
-specific RACK has been identified by expression cloning and
shown to bind activated PKC
at a site in the amino-terminal variable
region (V1) of PKC
(13, 14). PKC
II also interacts with RACK1;
however, binding involves two domains on PKC
II, a C2, or
Ca2+ binding, domain (15) and a 5-amino acid motif in the
V5 domain at the carboxyl terminus (16).
RACK1 also binds to other signaling molecules that are involved in
intracellular signaling mechanisms. These interactions are often of
high affinity, as with cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase PDE4D5 (17, 18),
and are thought to connect various signal transduction components
physically. Among recently recognized RACK1-binding partners are Src
protein kinases (19), integrin
subunit (20),
chain of the
interleukin-5/interleukin-3/granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating
factor receptor (21), PLC
(22), type 1 interferon receptor (23, 24),
recombinant PH domains of
-spectrin and dynamin (25), and
-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (26). Binding of PKC, Src or
integrin
subunit to RACK1 is inducible by phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate treatment, suggesting that, for PKC and Src, enzyme
activation is necessary for binding. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate
stimulation also induces tyrosine phosphorylation of RACK1 in NIH 3T3
cells expressing
-platelet-derived growth factor (19).
In this study, we used a Calu-3 cell line to study the interaction of
PKC
with CFTR and other cellular proteins. The Calu-3 cell line is a
serous cell line, which we have shown expresses CFTR and secretes
chloride in response to elevations in cAMP (4, 27). CFTR activity is
also modulated by an interaction with the
Na+/H+ exchange regulatory factor (NHERF1), a
50-kDa protein that is also known as EBP50
(ezrin-radixin-moesin-binding phosphoprotein-50). NHERF1 is a
regulatory factor involved in cAMP-dependent inhibition of
NHE3 (28). The NHERF1 PDZ1 and PDZ2 domains bind to CFTR carboxyl-terminal sequence QDTRL and play a role in the regulation of
channel gating in a Calu-3 cell line (29-31). NHERF1 is thought to
link CFTR to the actin cytoskeleton through its interaction with ezrin
and that ezrin serves as a PKA-anchoring protein (32, 33). Indeed, it
has been proposed that the NHERF1-CFTR stoichiometry may modulate the
magnitude of CFTR channel activity (29). In our previous studies, we
demonstrated that down-regulation of PKC
prevented
cAMP-dependent CFTR function in Calu-3 cells but did not
alter agonist-stimulated Na-K-2Cl cotransporter activity (27). In the
current project, we examined the interaction of endogenous proteins
involved in the signaling between PKC
and CFTR. Protein-protein
interactions were identified and characterized using
coimmunoprecipitation, overlay assay, pulldown assay and direct binding
assays. We report a new previously unidentified interaction between
RACK1 and NHERF1. We also demonstrate that PKC
binds to RACK1 and
that the interaction involves specific sites on the endogenous proteins.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Isolation and Culture--
Calu-3 cells were grown in a
submerged cell culture on 100-mm2 tissue culture plastic or
on 0.4-µm pore size Transwell-Clear polyester filter inserts (Corning
Costar, Cambridge, MA). For immunofluorescence, cells were seeded at a
density of 3 × 105 cells/filter with a growth area of
1.0 cm2. Culture medium consisted of Earle's balanced salt
solution supplemented with 2.4 mg of L-glutamine and 10%
fetal bovine serum. Culture medium was changed at 48-72-h intervals
until confluence was reached. Confluence was assessed by microscopic
examination and by measurement of electrical resistance across the cell
monolayers grown on filter inserts. Electrical resistance was
quantitated using chopstick electrodes and EVOM (Epithelial
Voltohmmeter, World Precision Instruments, New Haven, CT). Values were
corrected for background resistance of filter alone bathed in medium.
Immunoprecipitation, Pulldown Analysis, and Immunoblot
Analysis--
Cells were grown to confluence, serum deprived
overnight, and washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
For immunoprecipitation of PKC
, RACK1, and NHERF1, cells were lysed
in 1 ml of lysis buffer consisting of 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaF, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1% Nonidet
P-40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 0.1 mM leupeptin, 1 mg/ml aprotinin, and 10 µM
AEBSF. For CFTR, the lysis buffer contained the following detergents:
1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS. Lysates were
clarified by pretreatment with agarose beads and then incubated with
antibody directed against the protein of interest. Immune complexes
were recovered using protein A-agarose (CFTR, NHERF1), protein
G-agarose (PKC
), or protein L-agarose (RACK1) beads. Immune
complexes attached to beads were washed and resuspended in Laemmli
buffer and either heated for 5 min in a boiling water bath (NHERF1,
PKC
, RACK1) or incubated for 30 min at room temperature (CFTR).
Samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE on 6, 8, or 4-15% gradient slab
gels. Protein bands were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride
(PVDF) membrane paper for immunoblot analysis. Protein bands
immunoreactive to specific antibodies were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence.
Pulldown analysis was performed using rhRACK1 coupled to Talon
beads or GST-NHERF1. Total cell lysates (TCL) were prepared and
incubated at room temperature for 30 min with 1 or 2 µg of recombinant protein. Talon beads with attached proteins were
centrifuged and washed extensively with PBS. Proteins bound to rhRACK1
were identified by immunoblot analysis for the protein of interest. To
recover proteins bound to GST-NHERF1, the tagged protein was recovered
by anti-GST antibody affinity chromatography. Complexed proteins were
analyzed by immunoblot analysis.
Overlay and Binding Assays--
Proteins separated on SDS-PAGE
were transferred to PVDF membrane paper and incubated with blocking
buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 12 mM
-mercaptoethanol, and 0.4% bovine serum albumin).
Membrane strips were next incubated for 1 h in the presence or
absence of 30 µg/ml phosphatidylserine (PtdSer), 2 µg/ml
dioctanylglycerol, and 200 ng recombinant human PKC
(rhPKC
) in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 12 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 1 µM KN93, 10 µM AEBSF, and protease inhibitors. Unbound material was
removed by washing five times in wash buffer (50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 12 mM
-mercaptoethanol). rhPKC
bound to proteins immobilized on PVDF
membrane strips was detected by immunoblot analysis using a polyclonal
antibody to PKC
and enhanced chemiluminescence.
Binding of proteins was studied using two methods, slot-blot binding
assay or pulldown assay. To quantitate PKC
binding to RACK1, 1 µg
recombinant human RACK1 (rhRACK1) was immobilized on PVDF membrane
paper in a slot-blot apparatus (Invitrogen), blocked, incubated with
rhPKC
in the absence or presence of activators, and washed
extensively. rhPKC
binding was detected by immunoblot analysis.
Binding of NHERF1 and RACK1 was determined by immobilizing 2 µg of
GST-NHERF1 onto PVDF membrane paper. Varying concentrations of rhRACK1
were added, and after an incubation of 45 min at room temperature,
unbound material was removed by extensive washing. Bound rhRACK1 was
detected by immunoblot analysis. In the second pulldown method, a
solution binding assay was performed. rhPKC
was incubated with
PtdSer and dioctanylglycerol for 15 min at 30 °C to preactivate
PKC
. rhRACK1 coupled to Talon Metal Affinity Resin was added and the
incubation continued for 30 min at room temperature. Protein complexes
were recovered by centrifugation, washed five times to remove unbound
material, and analyzed by immunoblot analysis for PKC
.
Expression of Recombinant Proteins--
Sf9 cells
(Invitrogen) were maintained at 27 °C in Grace's insect medium
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 10 µg/ml gentamicin.
Viral stocks were kindly provided by Dr. Susan Brady-Kalnay and used to
infect Sf9 cells and to express recombinant human RACK1, as
described by Mourton et al. (34). The RACK1 construct consisted of a 1,800-bp fragment containing the full-length human RACK1
cDNA plus a polyhistidine tag, a PKA site, a thrombin cleavage site
and an HA tag. Three days after infection, cells were lysed in ice-cold
buffer consisting of 1% Triton X-100, 100 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 1 mM benzamidine, 1 mM sodium vanadate, and 20 mg/ml protease inhibitor mixture
(Calbiochem) for 30 min on ice. The lysates were centrifuged at
3,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C to remove
Triton-insoluble material. The supernatant was transferred to tubes
containing washed Talon Metal Affinity Resin, incubated with rocking at
room temperature for 30 min, and pelleted at 3,000 × g
for 3 min at 4 °C. Talon beads were washed three times with ice-cold
PBS and either used directly in experiments or treated with elution
buffer (20 mM Tris, 200 mM imidazole, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl) to cleave HA-RACK1 from the resin. The resin
was pelleted and discarded. The supernatant was added to a Millipore
concentrator and centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 10-30
min at 4 °C until the volume was ~0.5-1.0 ml. Protein content was
determined using a protein assay kit (Pierce) and bovine serum albumin
as the standard. Isolation of fusion protein was monitored by
immunoblot analysis using a monoclonal antibody to RACK1 (Fig.
1) or a polyclonal antibody to the HA tag
(data not shown). As shown in Fig. 1, the final purified protein was
immunoreactive with antibody to RACK1 and migrated as a single 50 kDa
protein band. The molecular mass is consistent with the addition of the
various tags.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Expression of rhRACK1 in Sf9 insect
cells. rhRACK1 was expressed as described under "Experimental
Procedures" and subjected to immunoblot analysis using a monoclonal
antibody to RACK1. Endogenous RACK1 was detected in TCL prepared from
Calu-3 cells as a 37 kDa protein band. A 50 kDa protein band in
starting homogenate and purified protein was immunoreactive with the
antibody to RACK1. WB, Western blot.
|
|
GST-NHERF1 in a pGEX4T-1 vector was expressed after addition of 100 µM isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside and
a 6-h incubation at 37 °C. GST-NHERF1 fusion protein was purified
using B-PER extraction as directed by the manufacturer (Pierce)
followed by affinity chromatography with glutathione-Sepharose B beads.
The fusion protein was evaluated by immunoblot analysis for the GST tag
using a polyclonal antibody to GST.
Immunofluorescence and Confocal Microscopy--
Cell monolayers
were washed three times with PBS and fixed in fresh 4%
paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature. Cells were washed
three time with PBS and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in 10%
normal goat serum in PBS. The fixed, permeabilized cells were stained
for 1 h at room temperature with a monoclonal antibody directed to
the carboxyl terminus of CFTR (1:100 dilution) or a monoclonal IgM
antibody directed to RACK1 (1:200 dilution). Cell monolayers were
washed three times with PBS. Secondary Oregon Green-conjugated
anti-rabbit antibody for CFTR or Texas Red anti-mouse antibody for
RACK1 was applied at 1:200 dilution for 1 h at room temperature.
After three final washes with PBS, the polyester filters were carefully
cut from their support inserts and mounted in Slow Fade mounting medium
on glass microscope slides. Fluorescence was analyzed using a LSM410
confocal scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) equipped with an
external argon-krypton laser. Optical sections of 512 × 512 pixels were digitally recorded in 16× line-averaging mode, and
z-sectioning was done in 1-µm increments. Images were processed for
reproduction using Photoshop software (Adobe Systems, Mountainview, CA).
Reverse Transcription-PCR--
Reverse transcription-PCR was
performed with specific primers based on a sequence of RACK1 (GenBankTM
Accession NM_006098). Two overlapping sets of sense and antisense
oligonucleotides were used: 5'-GTGGCTTTCTCCTCTGACAA-3' and
5'-TTAGCGGGTACCAATAGTCA-3' encoding a 623-bp cDNA and
5'-CAGGAGAGGTTGTGGTGCTA-3' and 5'-GCCTTGCTGCTGGTACTGAT-3' encoding a
922-bp cDNA. Total RNA (1 µg) was reverse transcribed at 50 °C
for 30 min, and PCR was performed using a One-Step reverse transcription-PCR kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. For cDNA synthesis, 1 µg of RNA was mixed with 2 µl of random hexamer primer (400 µM, each dNTP), 0.6 µM
primer, enzyme mixture including Omniscript reverse polymerase, and
diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated water to a final volume of 50 µl in a
0.5-ml Eppendorf tube and incubated at 50 °C for 30 min. The
reaction mixture was heated to 95 °C for 15 min to activate HotStar
Taq polymerase and inactivate reverse transcriptase.
Single-stranded cDNA was amplified with a PTC-100 thermal cycler
from MJ Research (Watertown, MA). PCRs were denatured at
95 °C for 2 min followed by 29 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min,
62 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 2 min, and a final extension at
72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on
1% agarose gels and stained with Syber Green I.
Sense and antisense strands of cloned PCR products were sequenced using
the dideoxynucleotide chain termination methods. Automated sequencing
reactions were performed with synthetic oligonucleotide primers and
fluorescent dideoxynucleotide terminators on a DNA sequencer (model
377, Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA). Sequence data were
analyzed using a BLAST (NIH) sequence similarity data base.
Materials--
Peptides encoding sequences from PKC
, RACK1,
and CFTR were synthesized by the Molecular Biotechnology Core Facility
of the Cleveland Clinic Institute. Purity and structural integrity of the peptides were confirmed by high performance liquid
chromatography, amino acid analysis, and mass spectrometry. Polyclonal
antibodies to NHERF1 and to E3KARP and a GST-NHERF1 construct were
supplied by C. H. C Yun (Emory University). Polyclonal anti-PKC
and anti-GST antibodies, anti-GST-agarose beads, horseradish
peroxidase-coupled secondary antibodies (anti-mouse IgM, anti-rabbit
IgG, and anti-mouse IgG2A) and protein L-agarose were
purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA).
Baculovirus-expressed recombinant PKC
was obtained from Pan Vera
(Madison, WI). Anti-human CFTR (carboxyl terminus-specific) monoclonal
antibody was from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN), and anti-mouse RACK1
monoclonal antibody was from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY).
Sepharose and agarose beads, PCR primers, and tissue culture supplies
were purchased from Invitrogen. Chelerythrine chloride was purchased
from Research Biochemicals International, (Natick, MA). Precast 4-15%
SDS-polyacrylamide gels were obtained from Bio-Rad, and a One-Step
reverse transcription-PCR kit was from Qiagen. An enhanced
chemiluminescence reagent was purchased from Amersham Biosciences, and
Transwell-Clear filter inserts were from Fisher Scientific. All other
chemicals were reagent grade.
 |
RESULTS |
Overlay Assay for PKC
--
To determine whether PKC
interacts with airway epithelial cell proteins, we performed an overlay
assay for PKC
on Calu-3 cell proteins. Cell proteins were extracted
with detergent buffer, separated by gel electrophoresis, and
transferred to PVDF membrane paper. Endogenous PKC
was detected as a
75 kDa protein band (Fig. 2A).
The overlay assay using rhPKC
revealed binding of exogenous PKC
to at least six protein bands; one predominant band is a 37-kDa protein
that corresponds in molecular mass to RACK1 (6, 7). We next performed
overlay assays on immunoprecipitates of CFTR (Fig. 2B) and
RACK1 (Fig. 2C) and found no specific binding of PKC
to
immunoprecipitated CFTR. Activated and inactive PKC
bound to several
protein bands in immunoprecipitates of RACK1; binding of activated
PKC
is favored (Fig. 2C, compare first and third lanes). Binding was prominent at 37 kDa,
indicating PKC
binding to endogenous RACK1. Immunoblot analysis of
RACK1 immunoprecipitates for RACK1 demonstrated the presence of a RACK1
immunoreactive protein (Fig. 2C, right lane; see
also Fig. 4B, center panel, right
lane). We also detected a protein band at 75 kDa that was immunoreactive with antibody to PKC
, suggesting
coimmunoprecipitation of PKC
. Sequence analysis of cDNA
amplified from reverse transcribed total mRNA of Calu-3 cells with
primers for human RACK1 demonstrated that the mRNA encoded RACK1, a
member of a heterotrimeric G
superfamily of proteins.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
PKC binding to
Calu-3 cell proteins by overlay assay. Calu-3 cells were grown to
confluence and serum deprived overnight. TCL were prepared and proteins
separated on 4-15% gradient slab gels and transferred to PVDF
membrane paper. For the overlay assay, 200 ng of rhPKC was inactive
( ) or preactivated in the presence of 30 µg/ml PtdSer and 2 µg/ml
dioctanylglycerol (+). Preactivated rhPKC was incubated
with membrane paper for 60 min at room temperature. Membrane strips
were washed extensively with blocking buffer and immunoblotted with
polyclonal antibody to PKC . A, overlay assay on 25 µg
of TCL reveals a protein that binds PKC and migrates to the same
molecular mass as RACK1 in Fig. 1. Endogenous PKC is detected as a
75 kDa protein band. B, PKC binding is not detected in an
overlay assay of immunoprecipitated (IP) CFTR. A positive
control demonstrates the presence of CFTR in immunoprecipitates.
C, PKC overlay assay of immunoprecipitated RACK1 shows
binding at a predominant band at 37 kDa (compare first and
third lanes). Endogenous PKC is in immunoprecipitates of
RACK1 as a 75 kDa protein band. An inhibitory peptide, VI-RACK1, based
on an 8-amino acid segment of the sixth WD repeat of RACK1, prevents
binding of rhPKC to immunoprecipitated RACK1 (second
lane). Immunoblot analysis of RACK1 in immune complexes that were
not incubated with rhPKC and PKC activators shows the presence of
RACK1 (far right lane). Results are representative of four
separate experiments.
|
|
Coimmunoprecipitation of PKC
, RACK1, and CFTR--
To
characterize a potential interaction among PKC
, RACK1, and CFTR,
lysates from Calu-3 cells were immunoprecipitated with antibodies to
PKC
, RACK1, or CFTR and resolved on SDS-PAGE. Immunoblots of
immunoprecipitates of CFTR and PKC
were probed with antibodies to
PKC
and CFTR, respectively, are shown in Fig.
3A. CFTR was detected in
immune complexes of PKC
and, in a control for antibody selectivity,
in TLC from T84 colonic cells. Likewise, PKC
was detected in
immunoprecipitates of CFTR. rhPKC
was used as an antibody control
for PKC
in the immunoblot analysis. The results demonstrate
coimmunoprecipitation of CFTR and PKC
which might be related to
PKC
regulation of CFTR function. Because activity of PKC
is
necessary for its effect on CFTR, we next inhibited PKC
using two
different PKC inhibitors, chelerythrine and bisindolylmaleimide, and
examined coimmunoprecipitation of PKC
with CFTR. Fig. 3B illustrates the results. Inhibition of PKC
with either PKC inhibitor did not prevent coimmunoprecipitation of PKC
with CFTR.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
PKC
coimmunoprecipitates with CFTR and vice versa.
A, PKC and CFTR were immunoprecipitated from lysates of
Calu-3 cells, subjected to electrophoresis on 8% (right two
lanes) or 6% (left two lanes)
SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and then to immunoblot analysis for CFTR and
PKC , respectively. The left two lanes show that CFTR is
detected in immune complexes of PKC (far left lane) and
in TCL prepared from T84 cells (second lane). Because of
abundant expression, T84 cells serve as a positive control for CFTR.
The right two lanes show that PKC is detected in
immunoprecipitates of CFTR (far right lane). rhPKC serves
as a positive control for the primary antibody (second lane
from right). B, cells were pretreated with
buffer, 10 µM chelerythrine (CHE), or with 10 µM bisindolylmaleimide (BIS) for 15 min at
37 °C to inhibit PKC as described previously (4). CFTR was
immunoprecipitated from lysates and subjected to electrophoresis on
4-15% SDS-gels. Western blot (WB) analysis for PKC
showed that pretreatment with PKC inhibitors did not alter
coimmunoprecipitation of PKC with CFTR, indicating that activity of
PKC is not a prerequisite for coimmunoprecipitation with CFTR.
The illustrated results are representative of four separate
experiments. IgG, immunoglobulin G.
|
|
Immunoblots of PKC
and RACK1 immunoprecipitates were probed with
antibodies to RACK1 and PKC
, respectively and are shown in Fig.
4, A and B. RACK1
was detected in immunoblots of PKC
(Fig. 4A, left
lane) and vice versa (Fig. 4B, left panel,
left lane). Because RACK1 can potentially bind PKC
isotypes in addition to PKC
, we determined whether endogenous RACK1
associates with PKC
, a PKC isotype that is necessary for hormonal
activation of Na-K-2Cl cotransporter (35). The right panel
of Fig. 4B illustrates the results. PKC
was found in TCL
but was not detected in RACK1 immunoprecipitates. As a measure of an
association between CFTR and RACK1, we probed immunoblots of CFTR for
RACK1 and vice versa. CFTR was not detected in RACK1 immunoprecipitates
(Fig. 4C, second lane), and RACK1 was not
detected in immunoprecipitates of CFTR (Fig. 4C, third
lane). To confirm the lack of association of CFTR and RACK1, we
used a pulldown technique with rhRACK1 bound to Talon beads to pull
CFTR down from TCL of Calu-3 cells. CFTR was not detected in
immunoblots of proteins associated with rhRACK1 (data not shown).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Interaction among
PKC , RACK1, and CFTR. Proteins were
immunoprecipitated from TCL, subjected to electrophoresis on 8%
SDS-polyacrylamide gels or 4-15% gradient slab gels, and then to
immunoblot analysis for indicated the proteins. A, RACK1 is
detected in immunoprecipitates of PKC (left lane)
and in TCL (right lane) as a 37 kDa protein band.
B, PKC is detected in immunoprecipitates of RACK1
(left panel, left lane) and in TCL (left
panel, right lane). In contrast, PKC is not found in
immunoprecipitates of RACK1 (right panel, left
lane). Protein bands immunoreactive to monoclonal antibody to
RACK1 were observed in immunoprecipitates of RACK1 (center
panel, left lane) and TCL (center panel,
right lane). C, coimmunoprecipitation of CFTR and
RACK1. TCL were prepared in CFTR lysis buffer, and CFTR or RACK1 was
immunoprecipitated using specific monoclonal antibodies, as described
under "Experimental Procedures." Immunoprecipitates were subjected
to 4-15% gradient slab gel electrophoresis and probed with monoclonal
antibodies to CFTR or RACK1. CFTR was detected in immunoprecipitates of
CFTR (far left lane) but not in immunoprecipitates of RACK1
(second lane). RACK1 was detected in immunoprecipitates of
RACK1 (far right lane) but not in immunoprecipitates of CFTR
(third lane). The illustrated results are representative of
three separate experiments.
|
|
Binding of PKC
to RACK1--
RACK1 has been shown to bind
PKC
in the presence of PtdSer and dioctanylglycerol in a
dose-dependent manner (12). The binding properties of RACK1
and PKC
were examined using recombinant proteins. Binding studies
were performed in a slot-blot apparatus with immobilized rhRACK1 (Fig.
5A) or by solution assay with
rhRACK1 attached to Talon Metal Affinity Resin (Fig.
5B).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
In vitro binding of
rhPKC to rhRACK1. A, 1 µg of
full-length rhRACK1 fusion protein was immobilized and blocked on PVDF
membrane paper in a slot-blot apparatus. rhPKC was preactivated by
incubation with mixed micelles (MM) of PKC activators,
consisting of 30 µg/ml PtdSer and 2 µg/ml dioctanylglycerol, for 15 min at 30 °C. Preactivated rhPKC was incubated with RACK1 for 30 min at room temperature. Unbound material was removed by washing, and
bound rhPKC was detected by immunoblot analysis. B,
rhRACK1 complexed to 1 µg of Talon beads was mixed with increasing
amounts of rhPKC in the presence of mixed micelles. Protein
complexes were recovered by centrifugation, washed, and subjected to
electrophoresis on 4-15% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Immunoblot analysis
for PKC indicates dose-dependent binding of rhPKC .
C, as a control for pulldown of rhRACK1, duplicate samples
of immune complexes were immunoblotted using antibodies to the HA tag.
Equal amounts of HA-tagged rhRACK1 were detected in pulldowns from the
solution binding assay. LD, laser densitometry values.
|
|
We detected binding of rhPKC
to rhRACK1 using both assay methods.
PKC
bound to rhRACK1 in a dose-dependent manner.
Immunoblot analysis and laser densitometry for the HA tag on rhRACK1
indicated recovery of equal amounts of HA-tagged rhRACK1 from the
solution binding assay (Fig. 5C). PtdSer and
dioctanylglycerol were required for the binding. An EC50
(effective concentration) for PKC
binding of 6 µM was
calculated from Hill plots of binding data.
Peptides based on an 8-amino acid sequence in the sixth WD40 repeat of
RACK1 (DIINALCF, designated VI-RACK) have been shown to bind PKC
(8). BLAST comparison of the amino acid sequence of CFTR and RACK1
revealed homology in 4 amino acids, 70-73, of CFTR, INAL. We tested
inhibition of the binding of the two recombinant proteins by VI-RACK
and a 12-amino acid peptide based on CFTR amino acids 66-77 and
embedding the INAL sequence. The results are illustrated in Fig.
6. We found that rhPKC
binds to
VI-RACK in a dose-dependent manner and that binding was
dependent on the presence of PKC activators (Fig. 6A). Peak
binding was found at 5 nM VI-RACK. rhPKC
did not bind to
a CFTR peptide with an embedded INAL sequence (Fig. 6B).
These results demonstrate that PKC
binds at a specific site on
RACK1.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Binding of PKC to
RACK1 inhibitory peptide. A, PKC was inactive ( )
or preactivated (+) by incubation with 30 µg/ml PtdSer and 2 µg/ml
dioctanylglycerol (DOG) for 15 min at 30 °C. rhPKC (25 ng/slot) was added to slots containing varying concentrations of a
VI-RACK1 inhibitory peptide (DIINALCF) and incubated for 30 min at room
temperature. Unbound material was removed by washing, and bound PKC
was detected by immunoblot analysis. B, inactive or
preactivated PKC (50 ng/slot) was added to slots containing varying
concentrations of inhibitory peptide based on the amino acid sequence
of CFTR (NPKLINALRRCF) and incubated as described in A.
Immunoblot analysis for PKC indicates that activated PKC
preferentially binds to RACK1 inhibitory peptide but not to CFTR
inhibitory peptide. Results are representative of three or four
experiments. LD, laser densitometry units; WB,
Western blot.
|
|
An 8-amino acid segment of the V1 region of PKC
, denoted as
V1-2,
selectively inhibits PKC
translocation function in intact myocytes
(8) and prevents binding of PKC
to rat
'-coatomer protein
(12). Therefore, we next investigated binding of RACK1 and PKC
using
V1-2 as an inhibitory peptide. If
V1-2 encodes a specific binding
site for interaction with RACK1, the inhibitory peptide should prevent
binding of rhPKC
and rhRACK1. We used a solution binding assay in
which rhRACK1 coupled to Talon Metal Affinity Resin was incubated with
preactivated rhPKC
in the absence or presence of varying
concentrations of
V1-2. The results are illustrated in Fig.
7.
V1-2 dose dependently blocked the
interaction between rhPKC
and rhRACK1 with an IC50 of
80.3 µM. We estimated the amount of rhPKC
bound to
rhRACK1 from laser densitometry units of experimental samples and of a
6.69-ng aliquot (3.26 µM) of rhPKC
(Fig. 7,
first lane). In the absence of inhibitory peptide, 4.08 ± 0.42 (n = 3) ng of rhPKC
binds to 2 µg of
rhRACK1.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Inhibition of PKC
binding to RACK1 by VI-2, a
PKC inhibitory peptide. Varying
concentrations of VI-2 inhibitory peptide (EAVSLKPT) were mixed with
rhRACK1 coupled to Talon beads, incubated at room temperature for 30 min, and then added to preactivated rhPKC . The mixture was incubated
at 30 °C for 20 min, centrifuged to recover Talon beads, washed, and
subjected to gel electrophoresis on 4-15% gradient slab gels.
Immunoblot analysis for PKC indicates a dose-dependent
inhibition of binding to rhRACK1 with increasing concentration of
inhibitory peptide. Illustrated results are typical of three separate
experiments. The asterisk (*) indicates that an aliquot of
rhPKC was applied directly to the gel as a control for the primary
antibody. LD, laser densitometry units.
|
|
Link between RACK1-PKC
and CFTR Is NHERF1--
In the absence
of direct binding of PKC
or RACK1 to CFTR, we next explored a
binding partner for RACK1 which is proximal to CFTR. Two closely
related proteins that have been found to interact with CFTR are the PDZ
domain proteins NHERF1, a 50-kDa phosphoprotein with two PDZ domains,
and NHERF2, or E3KARP, a 50-kDa protein that shares ~52% amino acid
identity with NHERF1 (31, 33, 36). NHERF1 was found in immune complexes
of RACK1 as a 50 kDa protein band, and RACK1 was detected in immune
complexes of NHERF1 as a 37 kDa protein band, suggesting that the two
proteins retain an association in detergent lysis buffer (Fig.
8). Although readily detected in Calu-3
cell lysates, NHERF2 was not consistently detected in
immunoprecipitates of RACK1 (data not shown). The polyclonal antibody
used for immunoblot analysis of NHERF1 also detected lower molecular
mass proteins. One at 25 kDa may be a light chain from IgG. A higher
molecular mass band at ~100 kDa was also observed, but its identity
is not clear. It could be the dimer form of NHERF1 or another protein
closely related to NHERF1. A protein band immunoreactive to antibody to
NHERF1 at 50 kDa was also seen in pulldown assays using
His6-tagged rhRACK1 (Fig. 8B). Positive controls
were also run to confirm the presence of RACK1 in pulldown assays. As
seen Fig. 8B, rhRACK1 was observed in pulldowns as 50 kDa
protein and endogenous RACK1 in TCL as a 37 kDa protein band. If NHERF1
and RACK1 are binding partners in Calu-3 cells, we predicted that RACK1
would be pulled down with NHERF1. This was examined using GST-tagged
NHERF1. The tagged protein and associated proteins were recovered by
anti-GST affinity chromatography. Immunoblot analysis of recovered
proteins revealed the presence of RACK1 and, as a positive control, of
NHERF1 (Fig. 8C). However, PKC
was not detected in this
pulldown assay using GST-NHERF1 and hence, we conclude, is not likely
to be a binding partner of NHERF1. Our findings thus far indicate an
association between RACK1 and NHERF1 but provide no evidence for direct
binding. We performed slot-blot binding assays using GST-NHERF1 and
rhRACK1 to examine the binding of the two proteins. As seen in Fig.
8D, RACK1 binds to NHERF1 in a dose-dependent
manner. An EC50, calculated from the data of Fig.
8D, is 3.1 µg of RACK1, equivalent to a nominal
concentration of 50.1 mM.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Interaction between RACK1 and NHERF1.
A, coimmunoprecipitation of endogenous NHERF1 and RACK1.
RACK1 or NHERF1 was immunoprecipitated (IP) from TCL and
subjected to electrophoresis on 4-15% gradient slab gels and
immunoblot analysis for NHERF1 and RACK1, respectively. NHERF1 was
detected as a 50 kDa protein band and RACK1 as a 37 kDa protein band.
As a positive control for each immunoprecipitated protein, immunoblots
were stripped and reprobed. RACK1 and NHERF1 were detected in
appropriate immunoprecipitates and TCL (data not shown). B,
recovery of NHERF1 after pulldown (PD) of RACK1 using
rhRACK1 coupled to Talon beads. 2 µg of rhRACK1 was mixed with 2.5 mg
of TCL protein and incubated at 30 °C for 40 min. Talon beads were
recovered by centrifugation, washed, and prepared for electrophoresis
on 4-15% gradient slab gels. NHERF1 was detected by immunoblot
analysis in TCL and in pulldowns with RACK1 as a 50 kDa protein band
(upper panel). Antibody to RACK1 detected a 50 kDa protein
band in pulldowns (lower panel, left lane) which
corresponds in molecular mass to rhRACK1. Endogenous RACK1 is evident
as a 37 kDa protein band in TCL (lower panel, right
lane). C, recovery of RACK1 after pulldown using
GST-NHERF1. The pulldown assay was run as described above except 1 µg
of GST-NHERF1 was added/2.5 mg of lysate protein. Proteins bound to
NHERF1 were recovered by anti-GST affinity chromatography. RACK1 is
detected in pulldowns with NHERF1 (top panel, left
lane) and, as a positive control, in TCL (top panel,
right lane). Immunoblots were stripped and reprobed with
antibody to NHERF1 (bottom panel) to confirm the presence of
NHERF1 in pulldowns (left lane) and expression of NHERF1 in
TCL (right lane). We consistently find NHERF1 in pulldowns
using GST-NHERF1. Stripping immunoblots causes a loss in density of
some cell proteins. This may explain the low density band in the
left lane in this specific experiment. Results are
representative of three or four experiments. D, in
vitro binding of RACK1 and NHERF1. 2 µg of GST-NHERF1 was
immobilized on PVDF paper in a slot-blot apparatus. Varying
concentrations of rhRACK1 were added, as indicated. After incubation
for 45 min at room temperature, unbound material was removed by washing
and bound RACK1 detected by immunoblot analysis. The analysis revealed
a dose-dependent binding to NHERF1 (upper
panel). Binding was maximal at 5 µg of RACK1. Immunoblot
analysis for NHERF1 served as a positive control for immobilized NHERF1
(lower panel). The results are representative of four
experiments. WB, Western blot.
|
|
RACK1 Colocalizes with CFTR to the Apical Plasma Membrane--
The
new findings on PKC
-RACK1 interaction in Calu-3 cells imply that
RACK1 and CFTR are colocalized in the same region of the cell. The
intracellular localization of RACK1 relative to CFTR was determined
using a double label immunofluorescence of confluent cell cultures
grown on filter inserts. Shown in Fig. 9
are en face images of CFTR and RACK1 taken at three
different intracellular locations. CFTR localized in an apical region,
whereas RACK1 was localized predominantly in the plasma membrane of the apical and lateral domains. Merged images shows a color shift to
orange-yellow, indicating colocalization of RACK1 with CFTR. Colocalization was seen predominantly in the apical region of Calu-3
cells, but it was also observed in the lateral plasma membrane. We were
unable to investigate colocalization of PKC
with RACK1 or with CFTR
because of cross-reactivity between PCK
primary antibody and
fluorescent tagged-secondary antibodies to RACK1 and CFTR.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Localization of RACK1 and CFTR in Calu-3
cells. En face computer-generated images of apical,
midsection, and basal planes through epithelial cell layer are shown.
Serum-deprived Calu-3 cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde,
permeabilized in 0.2% Triton X-100, and incubated with primary
antibodies (anti-carboxyl terminus for CFTR and anti-RACK1) for 60 min
before adding secondary antibody (Oregon Green-conjugated anti-rabbit
antibody for RACK1 and Texas Red-conjugated anti-mouse antibody for
CFTR) for 60 min. En face images of RACK1 (left
images), CFTR (center images), and merged images
(right images) were visualized by confocal microscopy. As
reported by others, CFTR is localized predominantly in the apical
region of Calu-3 cells. RACK1 is found in the apical and upper lateral
regions of cells. Merged images show colocalization of RACK1
and CFTR. Cells incubated with secondary antibody alone displayed no
image (data not shown).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
These studies were initiated to clarify the signaling mechanism
that explained regulation of cAMP-dependent CFTR function by PKC
in Calu-3 cells. An examination of the binding of activated PKC
to cellular proteins by coimmunoprecipitation and overlay, pulldown and binding assays leads us to conclude that PKC
binds directly to RACK1 and that RACK1 binds to NHERF1. This implies a new
and unique role for the scaffold protein RACK1 in epithelial chloride
channel function. Characterization of PKC
binding by overlay assay
provided evidence for the absence of direct binding to CFTR (Fig. 2)
even though coimmunoprecipitation experiments suggest an interaction
between CFTR and PKC
(Fig. 3). Overlay assay also revealed that
other Calu-3 cellular proteins bind PKC
; one is a 37-kDa protein
that corresponds in molecular mass to RACK1. Lack of
coimmunoprecipitation of RACK1 and CFTR indicates that the two proteins
do not interact directly (Fig. 4) even though both proteins are
colocalized in the apical region of Calu-3 cells (Fig. 9). Rather, we
found that RACK1 and NHERF1, a scaffold protein that binds four
carboxyl-terminal amino acids (DTRL) of CFTR through either of its PDZ
(PDZ1 and PDZ2) domains (29, 31, 37, 38), coimmunoprecipitate from
Calu-3 cells and are binding partners (Fig. 8). NHERF1 and CFTR bind
with high affinity, apparently to regulate other transport proteins,
such as the renal outer medullary potassium channel and epithelial
sodium channels and NHE3 (39-41) and to function as a membrane
retention signal (42). But, it is the potential dimerization of CFTR by
bivalent NHERF1 which is postulated to regulate the full expression of
CFTR channel function (29). NHERF1 may act as a scaffold protein to
facilitate an interaction between CFTR and RACK1 or PKC
to achieve
optimal cAMP-dependent CFTR function.
These studies identify, for the first time, NHERF1 as a binding partner
of RACK1 in airway epithelial cells, which express both proteins
endogenously. RACK1 also binds PKC
, suggesting that the association
of RACK1 and NHERF1 brings activated PKC
close to its site of
action. RACK1 and its homolog, the G
subunit of heterotrimeric
proteins, share a unique rigid
propeller structure, formed by WD
repeat regions. The WD repeats have been implicated in protein-protein
interactions, the first being binding of activated PKC (8). It is
thought that binding to RACK1 is necessary for translocation of
activated PKC and to protect activated PKC from degradation. Our
results indicate that airway epithelial RACK1 binds multiple proteins
that are implicated directly in the regulation of CFTR function, thus
acting as a scaffold. The mode of interaction between RACK1 and NHERF1
is not known. RACK1 lacks a PDZ binding motif at its carboxyl terminus.
However, we could speculate that RACK1 might express an internal motif
that binds to the PDZ domains of NHERF1. Alternatively, NHERF1 might
interact with RACK1 through non-PDZ motifs, such as in its interaction
with ezrin (43).
RACK1 is not phosphorylated by PKC (7), but our study provides
convincing evidence for direct binding of PKC
to RACK1 in Calu-3
cells. PKC
bound to immunoprecipitates of endogenous RACK1 in an
overlay assay (Fig. 2), and endogenous PKC
and RACK1 coimmunoprecipitate (Fig. 4, A and B). Binding of
PKC
to RACK1 was concentration-dependent with a
preference for activated enzyme (Fig. 5, A and
B). Binding was blocked by inhibitory peptides derived from
the amino acid sequences of predicted binding sites on PKC
and RACK1
(8, 14). The inhibitory peptide
V1-2, based on an 8-amino acid
sequence in the V1 region of the amino terminus of PKC
, prevented
in vitro binding of RACK1 and PKC
(Fig. 7). The V1, or
variable, region encodes a 145-amino acid segment at the amino-terminal
region of PKC
which bears close resemblance to a C2 domain of
conventional PKC isotypes (44). The C2 domain together with C1 domain
of conventional PKC isotypes (
,
,
) is responsible for
interaction with PKC activators. Dioctanylglycerol and phorbol esters
and Ptd-Ser bind to C1 and Ca2+ binds to C2 domains to
achieve proper PKC activation (45). The C2-like domain of novel PKC
isotypes (
,
,
,
) regulates kinase activity through binding
of PtdSer, lacks acidic side chains necessary for Ca2+
binding, and also serves as a site of protein interactions (46). Other
investigators and our current study demonstrate that C2 counterparts in
PKC
have sites of interaction with RACK1.
A second inhibitory peptide, based on an 8-amino acid peptide in the
sixth WD repeat of RACK1 and designated VI-RACK, bound PKC
in a
dose-dependent manner and blocked the interaction between PKC
and RACK1 (Fig. 6). We compared the sequence of VI-RACK with that of CFTR to determine whether an analogous binding site for PKC
is expressed in CFTR. Amino acids 70-73 of CFTR shared 50% homology
with VI-RACK. To test binding of PKC
, a 12-amino acid peptide was
designed to embed the 4-amino acid sequence INAL and still retain a
CFTR signature. The CFTR-based peptide did not bind PKC
, thus direct
binding is not likely to account for PKC
regulation of CFTR
function. Instead, our data indicate that PKC
interacts with the
sixth WD repeat of RACK1. Binding to RACK1 can, however, be more
complicated, involving more than one binding site on RACK1 or its
binding partner. For example, binding of PKC
II to RACK1 involves two
sites, one in the C2 domain, the other in the V5 domain (16, 47). We
have yet to identify an additional site for the interaction of airway
epithelial PKC
with RACK1.
A direct target of activated PKC
has yet to be defined. Only a short
term incubation with the PKC inhibitor chelerythrine is necessary to
inhibit cAMP stimulation of CFTR (3-5), suggesting acute regulation of
CFTR function. In the Calu-3 cells, NHERF1, CFTR, and PKC
are each
phosphoproteins but may well represent only a small pool of potential
PKC
phosphorylation targets. Other proteins implicated in the
regulation of CFTR include syntaxin 1A (48), which binds to CFTR at the
amino terminus. The phosphorylation state of NHERF1 and Munc18, a
binding partner of syntaxin 1A, are thought to be important
determinants in the functional consequences of binding to CFTR.
How the interaction between PKC
and RACK1 and between RACK1 and
NHERF1 regulates CFTR function is not known. The activity state of
PKC
is often associated with its translocation. Selective activation
of PKC
or inhibition of PKC
translocation has specific consequences in other cell types. Secretion of amyloid precursor protein (49), anionic amino acid transport (50), activation of cardiac
L-type Ca2+ channels (13), and protection of cardiac
myocytes by ischemic preconditioning (51, 52) are all regulated by
PKC
. RACK1 has been implicated in some of these effects of PKC
;
however, the intracellular signaling mechanism still must be
determined. Nevertheless, one model that emerges from these studies is
that NHERF1 recruits a stable regulatory complex and that this is
important for regulation of CFTR function. A protein complex of
activated PKC
bound to RACK1, which binds NHERF1, would support
cAMP-dependent CFTR function. One can conjecture that
inactivation of PKC
would free the enzyme from RACK1, possibly to
bind to another scaffold or anchor protein, with a subsequent loss of
cAMP-dependent CFTR function. RACK1 might, as a
consequence, dissociate from NHERF1 or alter NHERF1-CFTR interaction.
Thus, PKC
may shift between anchor proteins depending on its
activity state. The activity of PKC
may be an important determinant
of its binding partner and phosphorylation state of its target protein
as well as the functional status of CFTR.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We appreciate the assistance provided for
this study from Dr. Susan Brady-Kalnay for the RACK1 baculovirus
expression system, Dr. Doria Mochly-Rosen and Dr. Douglas Eaton for
helpful discussions, and Robert Papay and Denise Hatalya for
technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants HL58598, HL67190, and DK44484, Cystic Fibrosis Core Center Grant
DK27651, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Grant LIEDTK00G0, and a research
development program.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: BRB, Rm. 824, 2109 Adelbert Rd., Cleveland, OH 44106-4948. Tel.: 216-368-4629; Fax:
216-368-4223; E-mail: cxl7@po.cwru.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 15, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201917200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
CFTR, cystic
fibrosis transmembrane regulator;
AEBSF, 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulfonyl fluoride;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
HA, hemagglutinin;
NHERF1, Na+/H+ exchange regulatory factor;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PDZ, PSD-95/Discs-large/ZO-1 homology;
PKA, cAMP-dependent protein kinase A;
PKC, protein kinase C;
PtdSer, phosphatidylserine;
PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride;
RACK1, receptor for activated protein kinase C;
rh, recombinant human;
TCL, total cell lysates;
WD repeat, repeating units ending in Trp-Asp.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Riordan, J. R.,
Rommens, J. M.,
Kerem, B. S.,
Alon, N.,
Rozmahel, R.,
Grzelczak, Z.,
Zielenski, J.,
Lok, S.,
Plavsic, N.,
Chou, J. L.,
Drumm, M. L,
Iannuzzi, M. C.,
Collins, F. S.,
and Tsui, L. C.
(1989)
Science
245,
1066-1073
|
| 2.
|
Sheppard, D. N.,
and Welsh, M. J.
(1999)
Physiol. Rev.
79,
S23-S45
|
| 3.
|
Jia, Y.,
Mathews, C. J.,
and Hanrahan, J. W.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4978-4984
|
| 4.
|
Liedtke, C. M.,
and Cole, T.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
275,
C1357-C1364
|
| 5.
|
Middleton, L. M.,
and Harvey, R. D.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
275,
C293-C302
|
| 6.
|
Jaken, S.,
and Parker, P. J.
(2000)
BioEssays
22,
245-254
|
| 7.
|
Mochly-Rosen, D.,
and Gordon, A. S.
(1998)
FASEB J.
12,
35-42
|
| 8.
|
Ron, D.,
Chen, C. H.,
Caldwell, J.,
Jamieson, L.,
Orr, E.,
and Mochly-Rosen, D.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
839-843
|
| 9.
|
Neer, E. J.,
Schmidt, C. J.,
Nambudripad, R.,
and Smith, T. F.
(1994)
Nature
371,
297-300
|
| 10.
|
Garcia-Higuera, I.,
Fenoglio, J., Li, Y.,
Leis, C.,
Panchenko, M. P.,
Reiner, O.,
Smith, T. F.,
and Neer, E. J.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
13985-13994
|
| 11.
|
Lambright, D. G.,
Sondek, J.,
Bohm, A.,
Skiba, N. P.,
Hamm, H. E.,
and Sigler, N. B.
(1996)
Nature
379,
311-319
|
| 12.
|
Csukai, M,.,
Chen, C.-H., De,
Matteis, M. A.,
and Mochly-Rosen, D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
29200-29206
|
| 13.
|
Hu, K.,
Mochly-Rosen, D.,
and Boutjdir, M.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
279,
H2658-H2664
|
| 14.
|
Johnson, J. A.,
Gray, M. O.,
Chen, H.-H.,
and Mochly-Rosen, D.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24962-24966
|
| 15.
|
Mochly-Rosen, D.,
Miller, K. G.,
Scheller, R. H.,
Khaner, H.,
Lopez, J.,
and Smith, B. L.
(1992)
Biochem. J.
31,
8120-8124
|
| 16.
|
Stebbins, E. G.,
and Mochly-Rosen, D.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
29644-29650
|
| 17.
|
Steele, M. R.,
McCahill, A.,
Thompson, D. S.,
MacKenzie, C.,
Isaacs, N. W.,
Houslay, M. D.,
and Bolger, G. B.
(2001)
Cell. Signal.
13,
505-513
|
| 18.
|
Yarwood, S. J.,
Steele, M. R.,
Scotland, G.,
Houslay, M. D.,
and Bolger, G. B.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
14909-14917
|
| 19.
|
Chang, B. Y.,
Chiang, M.,
and Cartwright, C. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
20346-20356
|
| 20.
|
Liliental, J.,
and Chang, D. D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2379-2383
|
| 21.
|
Geijsen, N.,
Spaargaren, M.,
Raaijmakers, J. A. M.,
Lammers, J.-W. J.,
Koenderman, L.,
and Coffer, P. J.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
5126-5130
|
| 22.
|
Disatnik, M.-H.,
Hernandez-Sotomayor, S. M. T.,
Jones, G.,
Carpenter, G.,
and Mochly-Rosen, D.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
559-563
|
| 23.
|
Croze, E.,
Usacheva, A.,
Asarnow, D.,
Minshall, R. D.,
Perez, H. D.,
and Colamonici, O.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
165,
5127-5132
|
| 24.
|
Usacheva, A.,
Smith, R.,
Minshall, R.,
Gaida, G.,
Seng, S.,
Croze, E.,
and Colamonici, O.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
22948-22953
|
| 25.
|
Rodriguez, M. M.,
Ron, D.,
Touhara, K.,
Chen, C.-H.,
and Mochly-Rosen, D.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
13787-13794
|
| 26.
|
Brandon, N. J.,
Uren, J. M.,
Kittler, J. T.,
Wang, H.,
Olsen, R.,
Parker, P. J.,
and Moss, S. J.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
9228-9234
|
| 27.
|
Liedtke, C. M.,
Cody, D.,
and Cole, T. S.
(2001)
Am. J. Physiol.
280,
L739-L747
|
| 28.
|
Weinman, E. J.,
Steplock, D.,
Wang, Y.,
and Shenolikar, S.
(1 |