Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M203517200 on April 25, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 26, 23638-23644, June 28, 2002
Reconstitution of mRNA Editing in Yeast
Using a Gal4-ApoB-Gal80 Fusion Transcript as the Selectable
Marker*
Heinrich
Lellek
,
Sybille
Welker
,
Ines
Diehl,
Romy
Kirsten, and
Jobst
Greeve§
From the Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin, Kernklinik
und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
Received for publication, April 11, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
We describe a fusion transcript of Gal4
linked to its specific inhibitor protein Gal80 by 276 nucleotides of
apolipoprotein (apo) B sequence as a selectable marker for mRNA
editing. Editing of apoB mRNA is catalyzed by an editing enzyme
complex that introduces a stop codon by deamination of C to U. The
catalytic subunit APOBEC-1 is a cytidine deaminase and requires a
second essential component recently cloned and termed APOBEC-1
complementing factor (ACF) or APOBEC-1-stimulating protein (ASP). The
aim of this study was to demonstrate that APOBEC-1 plus ACF/ASP
comprise all that is required for editing of apoB mRNA in
vivo. Expression of APOBEC-1 and Gal4 fused to its inhibitor
Gal80 by an intervening unedited apoB sequence
(Gal4-apoBC-Gal80) did not result in the
Gal4-dependent expression of HIS3 and
-galactosidase in
the yeast strain CG1945. Co-expression of APOBEC-1 and ACF/ASP induced
editing of the apoB site in up to 13% of the
Gal4-apoBC-Gal80 transcripts and enabled selection of yeast
cells for robust expression of HIS3 and
-galactosidase. Additional
expression of the alternative splicing regulatory protein KSRP
increased the editing of the apoB site by APOBEC-1 and ACF/ASP to 21%.
Thus, APOBEC-1 and ACF/ASP represent the core apoB mRNA editing
enzyme in vivo. This study demonstrates for the
first time the successful use of a selectable marker for mRNA
editing. The Gal4-Gal80 system is analogous to the two-hybrid assay and may have broader applications for the study of other mRNA
processing reactions.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
mRNA editing is a genetic regulation that alters gene
expression by posttranscriptional nucleotide changes within the coding regions of transcripts. mRNA editing of nuclear-encoded genes consists of site-specific deamination reactions that convert A to I and
C to U. In most cases, these base changes result in important functional alterations of the edited gene products (1, 2). The A
to I editing described for glutamate receptors, serotonin 5-HT2C receptors, and the hepatitis delta virus RNA is
mediated by a family of adenosine deaminases known as adenosine
deaminases acting on RNAs (3, 4). These enzymes function as single peptides and contain both RNA binding and deaminase activity (3). C to
U editing has been described in plant mitochondria, in Physarum polycephalum, and also in mammals (2, 4).
The best characterized example of C to U editing occurs in the mRNA
of apolipoprotein (apo) B that creates a premature stop codon and leads
to the synthesis of the truncated apoB-48 (5, 6). The apoB
mRNA is extensively edited in the human small intestine but remains
unedited in the liver, which secretes apoB-100 containing very low
density lipoproteins as precursors for the atherogenic low density
lipoproteins (7, 8). Some animals, such as dog, horse, rat, and mouse,
do edit the apoB mRNA also in the liver and consequently have very
low plasma low density lipoproteins levels (7). Thus, editing of the
apoB mRNA is a decisive genetic regulation for the formation of
atherogenic lipoproteins (7).
The editing of apoB occurs coincident with splicing and polyadenylation
of the mRNA and is mediated by the apoB mRNA editing enzyme
complex (9-11). An 11-nucleotide "mooring" motif downstream of the
editing site from nucleotide position 6671-6681 is absolutely required
for the editing reaction (12). The catalytic component APOBEC-1 is a
cytidine deaminase that deaminates C to create U (13-16). APOBEC-1
requires other components for its editing activity (13-16).
Activation-induced deaminase, a close homologue of APOBEC-1 cloned from
antigen-stimulated germinal center B-lymphocytes, induces class switch
recombination, somatic hypermutation, and immunglobuline gene
conversion in developing B-lymphocytes (17-21). Activation-induced
deaminase is supposed to be an mRNA editing enzyme, although this
has not been proven so far (22).
In 2000, the cloning of the second essential component of the apoB
mRNA editing enzyme complex was reported by Driscoll and co-workers
(23) and simultaneously by our group (24). This protein, termed
APOBEC-1 complementing factor
(ACF)1 by Driscoll and
co-workers (23) and APOBEC-1-stimulating protein (ASP) by us,
represents a novel type of RNA-binding protein with three non-identical
binding domains for single-stranded RNA at the amino terminus and a
putative binding domain for double-stranded RNA at the carboxyl
terminus. Purified recombinant ACF/ASP and purified recombinant
APOBEC-1 reconstitute very strong apoB mRNA editing activity
in vitro (23, 24). Two variants of ASP/ACF differing by an
eight-amino acid insertion with identical activity and various
other splice variants have been described that are produced by
alternative splicing of the ACF/ASP pre-mRNA (24-26). In contrast to
the adenosine deaminases acting on RNAs that contain the RNA-binding
motifs and the catalytic domains in the same polypeptide, in C to U
editing, these modular elements for an editing enzyme appear to be
separated into APOBEC-1 and ASP/ACF (24).
In our protein purification that resulted in the cloning of ASP, the
KH-type splicing regulatory protein (KSRP) co-purified and demonstrated
stronger RNA binding to apoB mRNA than ASP, suggesting that KSRP
might also contribute to editing of apoB mRNA (24, 27). Three other
proteins have been recently isolated by two-hybrid selection in
yeast using APOBEC-1 as the bait; these proteins have also been
implicated in the editing of apoB mRNA (28-30). Earlier
biochemical studies already suggested that the apoB mRNA editing
enzyme complex may consist in high molecular weight complexes (24, 31).
Therefore, although several studies demonstrated that APOBEC-1 and
ASP/ACF exert strong apoB mRNA editing activity in
vitro, it is unknown whether APOBEC-1 and ASP/ACF are all that is
required for editing of apoB mRNA in vivo.
To demonstrate that APOBEC-1 and ASP/ACF represent the core of the apoB
mRNA editing enzyme complex that is fully competent to edit apoB
mRNA in vivo, we set out to establish an editing system
in yeast. This eukaryotic organism was chosen since it is genetically
most distant to mammalians in which this type of mRNA editing has
evolved (2, 4). A fusion transcript of the yeast transcription factor
Gal4 linked to its specific inhibitor protein Gal80 by an intervening
apoB fragment was used as a selectable marker. We demonstrate that the
apoB mRNA editing enzyme complex is reconstituted in yeast by
expression of APOBEC-1 and ASP/ACF. mRNA editing introduces a
stop codon in the Gal4-Gal80 fusion transcript and allows to
select for expression of active Gal4 protein. This is the first example
that mRNA editing is reconstituted in yeast, and the selection
system presented may have broader applications for the study of other
mRNA editing or processing reactions.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmids
pAS-GAL4-ApoB-GAL80--
ApoB cDNAs with a C or a T at
nucleotide position 6666, respectively, were amplified by PCR using
oligonucleotides L/NcoI (GCCATGGATATATACAAATTGCATTAGATGATG,
nucleotides 6591-6615 plus NcoI site) and L/BspH1rev
(GTCATGAATCCAAGATGCAGTACT ACT TCC, nucleotides 6867-6842 plus BspH1
site), cloned into pGEM-T Easy (Promega) and sequenced. The apoB
cDNA was excised from the vector by NcoI/BspH1 restriction enzyme digest and cloned into the unique
NcoI-site of construct pSB32-GAL4(1-841)-GAL80 kindly
provided by Dr. Stephen A. Johnston, University of Texas, Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, TX. The resulting construct GAL4-ApoB-GAL80 was
amplified by PCR using oligonucleotides Gal4-s
(CAAGCTTATGAAGCTACTGTCTTCTATCGAAC) and Gal80-rev
(GGATCCAGCAATCTCGATCGAATTAATGTCGC), cloned into pGEM T Easy, and
entirely sequenced to confirm the nucleotide sequence.
pAS-GAL4-ApoBC-GAL80 (pAS-Gal4C) and
pAS-GAL4-ApoBU-GAL80 (pAS-Gal4U), respectively, were
generated by tri-fragment ligation using (i) the
HindIII-BamHI fragment of pGEMT-GAL4-ApoB-GAL80 containing the GAL4-ApoB-GAL80 construct, (ii) the
HindIII-SacI fragment, and (iii) the
SacI-BamHI fragment of pAS2
(CLONTECH). The correct composition of the final
constructs was confirmed by DNA sequencing.
pLS317-Apobec-1--
Rat Apobec-1 cDNA was excised from
pSVL-Apobec-1 (32) with EcoRI and BamHI and
cloned into the EcoRI-BamHI site of pPGK2. The
PGK promoter along with the full-length Apobec-1 cDNA was excised
with XhoI and SalI and cloned into the
SalI site of pRS317 (obtained from ATCC) to generate
pLS317-Apobec-1.
pACT-APOBEC-1--
pACT-APOBEC-1 was constructed by tri-fragment
ligation using (i) an HindIII-SacI fragment
containing the open reading frame of rat APOBEC-1, (ii) the
HindIII-ScaI, and (iii) the
ScaI-SacI fragment of pACT2
(CLONTECH). In the resulting pACT-APOBEC-1, the
nuclear localization signal and the activation domain of GAL4 are
deleted, and APOBEC-1 is under the control of the ADH promoter and is
followed by the ADH termination signal (pACT
AD-APOBEC-1).
pACT-KSRP--
pACT-KSRP was constructed by cloning an
EcoRI-XhoI fragment containing the full-length
KSRP cDNA into the EcoRI-XhoI sites of
pACT-APOBEC-1, thereby replacing APOBEC-1 with KSRP.
pACT-ASP--
pGEM-T Easy containing the full-length cDNA of
ASP with the insertion of eight amino acids (24) was digested with
SacII and was treated with T4 DNA polymerase. After
phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation, the ASP
cDNA was excised by restriction enzyme digestion with
SalI. pACT-APOBEC-1 was digested with EcoRI and
treated with T4 DNA polymerase. After phenol/chloroform extraction and
ethanol precipitation, it was further digested with XhoI.
The full-length ASP cDNA was inserted into pACTII
AD by ligating
the SalI-XhoI sites and the blunted
EcoRI and SacII sites, respectively.
pBridge-GAL4-ApoB-GAL80--
The Gal4-ApoB-Gal80 cassettes of
pAS-Gal4-ApoBC-Gal80 and pAS-Gal4-ApoBU-Gal80,
respectively, were excised by restriction enzyme digestion with
XhoI and BamHI and inserted into the
XhoI and BamHI sites of pBridge to generate
pBridge-Gal4-ApoBC-Gal80 and
pBridge-Gal4-ApoBU-Gal80, respectively.
pBridge-Gal4-ApoBc-Gal80-ASP--
The full-length
cDNA of ASP was excised from pGEM-T Easy with NotI and
inserted into the unique NotI site of the multiple cloning
site II of pBridge-Gal4-ApoBC-Gal80 to generate
pBridge-GAL4-ApoBC-GAL80-ASP. The resulting construct was
sequenced to confirm the correct orientation of ASP.
pBridge-Gal4-ApoBc-Gal80-KSRP--
The
full-length cDNA of KSRP was excised from pGEM-T Easy by
restriction enzyme digest with NotI and inserted into the
unique NotI site of the multiple cloning site II of
pBridge-Gal4-ApoBC-Gal80 to generate
pBridge-Gal4-ApoBC-Gal80-KSRP.
Transformation and Growth Conditions of Yeast CG1945
The yeast expression plasmids were transformed into the yeast
strain CG-1945 (CLONTECH) by standard methods as
described previously (33). The genotype of CG1945 is MATa, ura3-52,
his 3-200, lys2-801, ase2-101, trp1-901, leu2-3, 112, Gal4-542,
Gal80-538, cyh-2,
Lys2::Gal1UAS-Gal1TATA-HIS3; URA3::GAL4 17mers(X3)-CyC1TATA-lacZ.
The LYS2 gene is non-functional. Yeasts were grown on
synthetic drop-out medium as described (33). Synthetic media lacking
histidine were supplemented with 5 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (3-AT) as a competitive inhibitor of the His3
protein to inhibit low levels of His3 protein expressed in a leaky
manner and thus to suppress background growth. Filter assays for
-galactosidase were performed using standard methods as described
(33).
Analysis of ApoB mRNA Editing in Yeast
Total RNA was prepared from yeast by acid phenol extraction. The
yeast were grown to late log phase on synthetic drop-out medium either
with or without histidine in the presence of 5 mM 3-AT. The
apoB cassette of the Gal4-ApoB-Gal80 transcript was amplified by RT-PCR
with oligonucleotides GAL4-1 sense (CTTTCACAACCAATTGCCTCCTCTAAC) and
apoB2 (CACGGATATGATA GTGCTCATCAAGAC) and analyzed for editing by primer
extension assay (7, 32). Primer extension products were quantitated as
described (7, 32).
 |
RESULTS |
Gal4-ApoB-Gal80 as a Selectable Marker for mRNA Editing in
Yeast--
The yeast transcription factor Gal4 is inhibited by complex
formation with its specific inhibitor Gal80. A fusion protein consisting of Gal4 and Gal80 is inactive and does not promote Gal4-dependent transcription. To establish a functional
assay system for apoB mRNA editing in vivo, we reasoned
that this Gal4-Gal80 fusion transcript might be a useful selectable
marker for mRNA editing in yeast. Therefore, we inserted 92 amino
acids of the apoB sequence that encompass the editing site at
C6666 in-frame between Gal4(1-841) and Gal80 to generate
Gal4-apoBC-Gal80 (Gal4-C). As a positive control, we
constructed Gal4-apoBU-Gal80 (Gal4-U), which contains the
edited version of the apoB sequence with the premature stop codon.
Gal4-C should not be able to promote
Gal4-dependent transcription because of complex
formation with its specific inhibitor Gal80, whereas the edited version
Gal4-U that contains only a tail of 25 amino acids of apoB sequence
should be active similar to wild-type Gal4 (Fig.
1).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Illustration of the
structure and function of the Gal4-ApoB-Gal80 fusion transcripts.
Gal4-C containing the unedited apoB sequence leads to a fusion
protein in which Gal4 is inhibited by complex formation with Gal80. In
contrast, Gal4-U gives rise to active Gal4 protein due to a premature
stop translation codon in the edited apoB sequence.
|
|
Gal4-C and Gal4-U were expressed in yeast CG1945 cells using the
expression plasmid pAS in the absence or presence of APOBEC-1 (Fig.
2A). The yeast strain CG1945
is commonly used for two-hybrid selection. It contains the lacZ
and the HIS3 gene under the transcriptional control
of Gal4. Expression of active Gal4 can be monitored by growth in the
absence of histidine and by detection of
-galactosidase activity.
After transformation of pAS2-Gal4-U and the empty vector pLS317, the
yeast cells grew well on medium lacking tryptophan, lysine, and
histidine and exhibited strong
-galactosidase activity (Fig.
2B). In contrast, yeast CG1945 cells transformed with
pAS2-Gal4-C and the control vector pLS317 did not grow on medium
without histidine and failed to express
-galactosidase (Fig.
2B). Even after co-transformation of pAS2-Gal4-C and
pLS317-APOBEC-1, the yeast cells did not grow without histidine and did
not express
-galactosidase activity (Fig. 2B). To analyze
the apoB editing site, the Gal4-C and Gal4-U transcripts were amplified
by RT-PCR and assayed for editing by primer extension analysis (Fig.
2C). The Gal4-U transcripts from yeast cells transformed
with pAS2-Gal4-U contained, as expected, only U at apoB position 6666, and the Gal4-C transcript from yeast transformed with pAS-Gal4-C and
pLS317 contained, as expected, only C at this position (Fig.
2C). The Gal4-C transcripts from yeast transformed with
pAS-Gal4-C and pLS317-APOBEC-1 did not differ and also did not
contain significant amounts of U residues at the editing site (Fig.
2C). These results confirmed the predictions that Gal4 is
active in yeast when expressed from the edited Gal4-U since the
stop codon prevents the translation of Gal80 but is inactive when
expressed from Gal4-C because of complex formation with Gal80.
Moreover, expression of only APOBEC-1 is not sufficient to induce
mRNA editing at the apoB site of Gal4-apoBC-Gal80.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Transformation of pAS-Gal4-C or pAS-Gal4-U
and pLS317-APOBEC-1 into yeast CG1945 cells. A,
illustration of the plasmids pAS and pLS317. In B,
transformed CG1945 yeast cells were streaked onto synthetic media
lacking either tryptophan and lysine or tryptophan, lysine, and
histidine in the presence of 5 mM 3-AT and were grown for
24 h at 30 °C (left panel). Nitrocellulose filter
lifts were taken, grown for another 12 h on the same synthetic
drop-out medium, and analyzed by -galactosidase ( -gal)
filter assay (right panel). In C, Gal4
transcripts were amplified by RT-PCR from total RNA of transformed
yeast CG1945 cells grown on synthetic drop-out medium lacking
tryptophan and lysine and analyzed for editing of the apoB sequence by
primer extension assay. The extension products for edited
(C) and unedited (U) apoB sequences are
indicated.
|
|
mRNA Editing in Yeast by Co-expression of APOBEC-1
and the APOBEC-1-stimulating Protein ASP--
We further investigated
whether co-expression of APOBEC-1 with ASP (ACF) or with KSRP would
lead to a functional editing enzyme complex in yeast that could induce
a stop codon at the editing site of Gal4-C and thereby enable the cells
to express active Gal4. For these experiments, Gal4-C and Gal4-U were
inserted into the yeast expression plasmid pBridge to generate
pB-Gal4-C or pB-Gal4-U, respectively. pBridge allows the
expression of a second gene from the MET25 promoter,
which is induced in the absence of methionine (Fig.
3A). Yeast CG1945 cells were
transformed with pLS317-APOBEC-1 and pB-Gal4-U, pB-Gal4-C,
pB-Gal4-C/ASP, or pB-Gal4-C/KSRP (Fig. 3A) and were grown on
medium lacking tryptophan, lysine, and methionine. The apoB cassettes
of the Gal4-C or Gal4-U mRNAs from the transformed yeast cells were
amplified by RT-PCR and analyzed for editing by primer extension assay
(Fig. 3B). The positive control Gal4-U contained only U,
whereas Gal4-C contained only C at the editing position (Fig.
3B). Approximately 12% of the C residues in the apoB
sequence of Gal4-C from yeast cells transformed with pB-Gal4-C/ASP were
found to be edited and were sequenced as Us (Fig. 3B). No Us
at this position of the apoB sequence could be detected in yeast cells
that were transformed with pB-Gal4-C/KSRP (Fig 3 B).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Transformation of pLS317-APOBEC-1 and
pBridge-Gal4-C/ASP into yeast CG1945 cells. A,
illustration of the plasmids pBridge and pLS318. In B, Gal4
transcripts were amplified by RT-PCR from total RNA of transformed
yeast CG1945 cells grown on medium lacking tryptophan, lysine, and
methionine and analyzed for editing of the apoB sequence by primer
extension assay. The extension products for edited (C) and
unedited (U) apoB sequences are indicated. In C,
transformed yeast CG1945 cells grown on synthetic medium without
tryptophan, lysine, and methionine were restreaked onto synthetic
medium lacking tryptophan, lysine, methionine, and histidine in the
presence of 5 mM 3-AT. After growth for 24 h at
30 °C, nitrocellulose filter lifts were taken, further grown for
another 12 h, and analyzed by -galactosidase
( -gal) filter assays.
|
|
These yeast cells that had been grown on medium lacking
tryptophan, lysine, and methionine to select for the presence of the two plasmids and to induce expression from the MET25
promoter were streaked onto nylon membranes and grown on medium lacking also histidine. As anticipated from the editing assay, only the yeast
cells transformed either with the positive control Gal4-U or with
Gal4-C/ASP grew on these media and exhibited activity of
-galactosidase (Fig. 3C). Therefore, in yeast, the apoB
site in Gal4-C is edited in the presence of APOBEC-1 and ASP. This mRNA editing leads to the expression of active Gal4 and thus
enables the cells to grow in the absence of histidine and to express
-galactosidase.
mRNA Editing in Yeast by Co-expression of APOBEC-1,
ASP, and the KH-type Splicing Regulatory Protein KSRP--
Next we
studied whether additional expression of KSRP would enhance the editing
efficiency achieved by APOBEC-1 and ASP alone. For this experiment, we
constructed a third yeast expression plasmid, pACT, that allows the
expression of ASP or KSRP separate from the expression of Gal4-C (Fig.
4A). Yeast CG1945 cells were
triple-transformed with pLS317-APOBEC-1, pAS-Gal4-C, or pAS-Gal4-U and
pACT-ASP, pACT-KSRP, or empty control pACT and were grown on medium
lacking tryptophan, lysine, and leucine. Editing of the apoB site in
Gal4-C was analyzed by primer extension assay of RT-PCR-amplified
Gal4-C mRNA (Fig. 4B). As before, the positive control
pAS-Gal4-U contained only U at the editing position, whereas no U
residue could be detected at this position in yeast transformed with
pLS317-APOBEC-1, pAS-Gal4-C, and pACT-KSRP or the empty vector control
pACT (Fig. 4B). In yeast cells transformed with pAS-Gal4-C,
pLS317-APOBEC-1, and pACT-ASP, however, ~8% of the C residues at the
apoB editing site demonstrated successful editing and were sequenced as
Us in the primer extension assay (Fig. 4B). This result
proved that expression of APOBEC-1 from pLS317 and of ASP from pACT is
sufficient to induce competent editing activity in yeast CG1945
cells.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Triple transformation of pLS317-APOBEC-1,
pAS-Gal4-C, and pACT-ASP in yeast CG1945 cells. A,
illustration of the plasmids pAS, pLS317, and pACT. In B,
Gal4 transcripts were amplified by RT-PCR from total RNA of transformed
yeast CG1945 cells grown on medium lacking tryptophan, lysine, and
leucine and analyzed for editing of the apoB sequence by primer
extension assay. The extension products for edited (C) and
unedited (U) apoB sequences are indicated.
|
|
In the next experiment, the three presumptive components of the apoB
mRNA editing enzyme complex were expressed in yeast CG1945 cells using the three yeast expression plasmids pB-Gal4-C,
pLS317-APOBEC-1, and pACT-ASP or KSRP (Fig.
5A). The apoB cassettes were
amplified by RT-PCR from yeast cells grown on medium lacking
tryptophan, lysine, leucine, and methionine and were analyzed for
editing by primer extension assay (Fig. 5B). Although the
positive control pBGal4-U contained only U at the editing position, no
U could be detected at this position in yeast cells transformed
with pLS317-APOBEC-1, with pB-Gal4-C, and with the empty control pACT
or pACT-KSRP (Fig. 5B). In yeast cells transformed with
pLS317-APOBEC-1, pB-Gal4-C, and pACT-ASP, ~13% of the C residues of
the apoB site were edited and analyzed as Us in the primer extension
assay (Fig. 5B). This amount of editing was further
increased to 21% in yeast cells that were transformed with pB-Gal4/ASP
and pACT-KSRP (Fig. 5B). The triple-transformed yeast cells
were restreaked onto synthetic medium lacking, in addition to
tryptophan, lysine, leucine, and methionine, also histidine. Only the
positive control with pB-Gal4-U and the yeast cells transformed with
pB-Gal4-C plus pACT-ASP or with pB-Gal4-C/ASP plus pACT-KSRP grew in
the absence of histidine and demonstrated robust
-galactosidase
activity (Fig. 5C).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Triple transformation of pLS317-APOBEC-1,
pAS-Gal4-C, and pACT-ASP in yeast CG1945 cells. A,
illustration of the plasmids pBridge-Gal4-C/ASP, pLS317-APOBEC-1, and
pACT-ASP or pACT-KSRP. B, Gal4 transcripts were amplified by
RT-PCR from total RNA of transformed yeast CG1945 cells grown on medium
lacking tryptophan, lysine, leucine, and methionine and analyzed for
editing of the apoB sequence by primer extension assay. The extension
products for edited (C) and unedited (U) apoB
sequences are indicated. C, transformed yeast CG1945 cells
grown on synthetic medium without tryptophan, lysine, leucine, and
methionine were restreaked onto synthetic medium lacking tryptophan,
lysine, leucine, methionine, and histidine in the presence of 5 mM 3-AT. After growth for 24 h at 30 °C,
nitrocellulose filter lifts were taken, further grown for another
12 h, and analyzed by -galactosidase ( -gal)
filter assays.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The results of this investigation allow two important conclusions.
First, it is demonstrated for the first time that coordinate expression
of the catalytic subunit APOBEC-1 and the APOBEC-1-stimulating protein
ASP/ACF is sufficient to create apoB mRNA editing in
vivo. These two proteins therefore represent the minimal core
components of the apoB mRNA editing enzyme complex in
vivo. These experiments were performed in yeast because this is
the eukaryotic organism most distant to mammalians in which this type
of mRNA editing has evolved to modulate lipoprotein metabolism. The
efficiency of apoB mRNA editing in yeast mediated by APOBEC-1 and
ASP (ACF) is limited and can be increased by the expression of the
alternative splicing factor KSRP. Second, a tripartite fusion of the
yeast transcription factor Gal4 with its specific inhibitor Gal80 and a
short intervening apoB sequence is demonstrated as a potent selectable
marker for the functional study of mRNA editing in vivo.
This approach of using the Gal4-Gal80 fusion transcript should be more
widely applicable and may be useful to study other forms of mRNA
editing or RNA processing as well. The system is based on the
two-hybrid assay and requires only little modifications of the
Gal4-Gal80 transcript depending on the special type of application.
The molecular identification of ASP/ACF by Driscoll and co-workers (23)
and simultaneously by our group (24) immediately led to the question as
to whether APOBEC-1 and ASP/ACF are sufficient for apoB mRNA
editing in vivo. APOBEC-1 together with ASP/ACF exert strong
apoB mRNA editing activity in vitro, but this does not
necessarily imply that these two proteins are all that is required for
editing in vivo. This investigation was designed to
address this question by reconstitution of apoB mRNA editing in
yeast. We assumed that this would be the most direct approach to this
issue. Even the generation of an ASP/ACF-deficient mouse model in which
editing would presumably be abolished could not rule out that other
proteins besides APOBEC-1 and ASP/ACF are required for editing in
vivo. Moreover, in our protein purification that led to the
molecular cloning of ASP, the alternative splicing factor KSRP
co-purified with ASP (24). Although no effect of KSRP on apoB mRNA
editing could be demonstrated in vitro, we were inclined to
assume that this co-purification might indicate that these two proteins
do interact functionally in vivo. The main objective of our
study was to demonstrate reconstitution of apoB mRNA editing
in vivo that was not only detectable by analysis of the
transcript per se but also exerted a physiological effect.
A short apoB fragment containing the editing site was inserted in-frame
between a Gal4-Gal80 fusion protein (kindly provided by Stephen A. Johnston, University of Texas, Dallas, TX) to create a selectable
marker for apoB mRNA editing in yeast. Gal4 is inhibited by Gal80
when both proteins are expressed on the same polypeptide. The nuclear
localization signal and the activation domain of Gal4 were deleted from
the pACT expression plasmid to allow a coordinate expression of ASP.
Gal4-C was a tight selectable marker that did not cause background
growth of the yeast cells without editing. Even when APOBEC-1 was
co-expressed, no editing of the apoB site was detectable, and Gal4 was
inactive. This result is in contradiction to another study that
demonstrated APOBEC-1-mediated mRNA editing in yeast without any
other additional exogenous component (34). The most likely explanation
for this discrepancy is the level of APOBEC-1 expression. We chose the
PGK promoter to avoid aberrant hyperediting by APOBEC-1 that has
been demonstrated in cell culture in vitro and in transgenic
animals in vivo (35, 36). High level expression of APOBEC-1
by the galactose-inducible GAL1 promoter and an exogenous SV40 nuclear
localization signal at the amino terminus apparently increases the
nuclear abundance of APOBEC-1 and leads to editing of apoB transcripts
even in the absence of ASP/ACF (34). This phenomenon was excluded in
our experiments by moderate constitutive expression of APOBEC-1
mediated by the PGK promoter. In addition, the absence of editing in
Gal4-C without APOBEC-1 and ASP/ACF does not favor the
endogenous yeast gene CDD1 as an editing enzyme as has been
previously proposed (37).
ApoB mRNA editing activity was reconstituted in yeast by the
expression of APOBEC-1 and ASP/ACF and induced the expression of active
Gal4 due to the introduction of a stop translation codon between Gal4
and Gal80. This was shown with two different expression plasmids. These
results provide proof that APOBEC-1 and ASP/ACF represent the core of
the apoB mRNA editing enzyme complex, which is missing in yeast.
The extent of editing at the apoB site in Gal4-C that was achieved in
yeast was limited to a maximum of 21%. This falls short from editing
of apoB mRNA in the intestine where in every message
C6666 is edited to U (5-7). Several reasons may explain
this limitation of editing in yeast. First, the Gal4-C transcripts
contain only 276 nucleotides of apoB sequence and may not be the ideal
substrate for APOBEC-1-mediated mRNA editing. Second, it may well
be that the optimum activity of the apoB mRNA editing enzyme
complex in vivo requires additional components besides
APOBEC-1 and ASP, which are missing in yeast.
The co-expression of KSRP increased editing from a level of 13%
achieved by APOBEC-1 and ASP alone to ~21%. This indicates that KSRP
can contribute to editing of apoB mRNA in vivo. Its precise function in the editing process, however, remains to be studied, but this was not the aim of the present investigation. Recently, three other proteins, GRY-RBP, CUGBP2, and ABBP-2,
have been identified by two-hybrid selection in yeast using APOBEC-1 as
the bait and have been suggested to be involved in the editing of apoB
mRNA (28-30). GRY-RBP is an RNA-binding protein with ~50% homology to ASP/ACF that itself cannot support APOBEC-1 to edit apoB
mRNA in vitro but that can inhibit the in
vitro editing reaction (28). CUGBP2 is an ubiquitously expressed
RNA-binding protein that can bind to apoB mRNA and to ACF/ASP and
that also has the potential to inhibit in vitro editing
(29). ABBP-2, a novel human Class II DnaJ homologue and member of the
human Hsp40 family, was demonstrated not only to interact with APOBEC-1
but also to be required for editing of apoB mRNA in
APOBEC-1-expressing BNLCL.2 cells (30). Taken together, these results
suggest that editing of every Gal4-C transcript may require more
components in addition to APOBEC-1 and ASP/ACF that comprise only the
essential core of the editing enzyme complex. The Gal4-C reporter
system will be an ideal tool to analyze the effects of GRY-RPB, CUGBP2,
or ABBP-2 on the editing efficiency of APOBEC-1 and ASP/ACF and may provide further proof for the necessity of any of these in the editing reaction.
This study is the first to demonstrate that transcriptional
regulation by Gal40-Gal80 can be used to reconstitute and select for
mRNA editing in yeast. Our system is based on the two-hybrid selection assay and uses the commercially available yeast strain CG1945, which is widely used for these studies. The nuclear
localization signal and the activation domain of GAL4 were deleted from
the commercially available yeast expression plasmid pACT, and the Gal4-binding domain in pAS and pBridge was replaced by the
Gal4-apoB-Gal80 fusion construct. The Gal4-apoB-Gal80 selection marker
does not produce background growth, and the synthesis of Gal4 is
entirely dependent on mRNA editing of the apoB site. We did not
observe breakthrough of the selection and demonstrated that the
Gal4-apoB-Gal80 transcripts were properly processed and not
cleaved prematurely as an obvious alternative to activate
Gal4.2 This system may
therefore be used to further study the apoB mRNA editing enzyme
complex in yeast by analyzing mutants of APOBEC-1 and ASP/ACF.
Moreover, by modifying the Gal4-Gal80 reporter, this system may be
adapted to investigate other mRNA processing reactions. Obvious
applications include the analysis of mRNA cleavage terminating the
transcript behind Gal4 and of alternative splicing that would remove
Gal80. Our work therefore extends the use of the Gal4 transcription factor to the analysis of mRNA editing and processing and may be
helpful to elucidate such processes.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
The construct pSB32-GAL4(1-841)-GAL80 was
kindly provided by Dr. Stephen A. Johnston, University of Texas,
Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, and is gratefully acknowledged.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft,
SFB 545, Teilprojekt A6, and by Bundesministerium für Bildung und
Forschung (BMBF), Förderkennzeichen 01KV95090.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
49-40-42803-2949; Fax: 49-40-418056; E-mail:
greeve@uke.uni-hamburg.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 25, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203517200
2
R. Kirsten, I. Diehl, and J. Greeve, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ACF, APOBEC-1
complementing factor;
ASP, APOBEC-1-stimulating protein;
PGK, phosphoglycerate kinase;
KSRP, KH-type splicing regulatory protein;
3-AT, 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole;
RT, reverse transcription;
Gal4-C, Gal4-apoBC-Gal80;
Gal4-U, Gal4-apoBU-Gal80.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bass, B. L.
(1997)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
22,
157-162[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Scott, J.
(1995)
Cell
81,
833-836[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Seeburg, P. H.,
Higuchi, M.,
and Sprengel, R.
(1998)
Brain Res. Rev.
26,
217-229[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Smith, H. C.,
Gott, J. M.,
and Hanson, M. R.
(1997)
RNA (N. Y.)
3,
1105-1123[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Chen, S. H.,
Habib, G.,
Yang, C. Y., Gu, Z. W.,
Lee, B. R.,
Weng, S. A.,
Silbermann, S. R.,
Cai, S. J.,
Deslypere, J. P.,
Rosseneu, M.,
Gotto, A. M., Li, W. H.,
and Chan, L.
(1987)
Science
238,
363-366[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Powell, L. M.,
Wallis, S. C.,
Pease, R. J.,
Edwards, Y. H.,
Knott, T. J.,
and Scott, J.
(1987)
Cell
50,
831-840[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Greeve, J.,
Altkemper, I.,
Dieterich, J.-D.,
Greten, H.,
and Windler, E.
(1993)
J. Lipid Res.
34,
1367-1384[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Brown, M. S,
and Goldstein, J. L.
(1986)
Science
232,
34-47[Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Lau, P. P.,
Xiong, W.,
Zhu, H.-J.,
Chen, S.-H.,
and Chan, L.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
20550-20554[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Greeve, J.,
Navaratnam, N.,
and Scott, J.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
3569-3576[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Smith, H. C.,
Kuo, S.-R.,
Backus, J. W.,
Harris, S. G.,
Sparks, C. E.,
and Sparks, J. D.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
1489-1493[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Shah, R. R.,
Knott, T. J.,
Legros, J. E.,
Navaratnam, N.,
Greeve, J.,
and Scott, J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
16301-16304[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Teng, B. B.,
Burand, C. F.,
and Davidson, N. O.
(1993)
Science
260,
1816-1819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Navaratnam, N.,
Morrison, J. R.,
Battacharya, S.,
Patel, D.,
Funahashi, T.,
Giannoni, F.,
Teng, B. B.,
Davidson, N. O.,
and Scott, J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
20709-20712[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Yamanaka, S.,
Poksay, K. S.,
Balestra, M. E.,
Zheng, G. Q.,
and Innerarity, T. L.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
21725-21734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Navaratnam, N.,
Battacharya, S.,
Fufino, T.,
Patel, D.,
Jarmuz, A. L.,
and Scott, J.
(1995)
Cell
81,
187-195[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Muramatsu, M.,
Sankaranand, V. S.,
Anant, S.,
Sugai, M.,
Kinshita, K.,
Davidson, N. O.,
and Honjo, T.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
18470-18476[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Muramatsu, M.,
Kinoshita, K.,
Fagarasan, S.,
Yamada, S.,
Shinkai, Y.,
and Honjo, T.
(2000)
Cell
102,
553-563[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Revy, P.,
Muto, T.,
Geissmann, F.,
Plebani, A.,
Sanal, O.,
Catalan, N.,
Forveille, M.,
Dufourcq-Lagelouse, R.,
Gennery, A.,
Teczan, I.,
Ersoy, F.,
Kayserili, H.,
Ugazio, A. G.,
Brousse, N.,
Muramatsu, M.,
Notarangelo, L. D.,
Kinoshita, K.,
Honjo, T.,
Fischer, A.,
and Durandy, A.
(2000)
Cell
102,
565-575[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Arakawa, H.,
Hasuchild, J.,
and Buerstedde, J.-M.
(2002)
Science
295,
1301-1306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Martin, A.,
Bardwell, P. D.,
Woo, C. J.,
Fan, M.,
Shulman, M. J.,
and Scharff, M. D.
(2002)
Nature
415,
802-806[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Tian, M.,
and Alt, F. W.
(2002)
Nature
407,
31-33[CrossRef]
|
| 23.
|
Mehta, A.,
Kinter, M. T.,
Sherman, N. E.,
and Driscoll, D. M.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
1846-1854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Lellek, H.,
Kirsten, R.,
Diehl, I.,
Apostel, F.,
Buck, F.,
and Greeve, J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
19848-19856[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Henderson, J. O.,
Blanc, V.,
and Davidson, N. O.
(2001)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1522,
22-30[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Dance, G. S.,
Sowden, M. P.,
Cartegni, L.,
Cooper, E.,
Krainer, A. R.,
and Smith, H. C.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
12703-12709[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Min, H.,
Turck, C. W.,
Nikolic, J. M.,
and Black, D. L.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
1023-103638[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Blanc, V.,
Navaratnam, N.,
Henderson, J. O.,
Anant, S.,
Kennedy, S.,
Jarmuz, A.,
Scoot, J.,
and Davidson, N. O.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
27,
10272-10283
|
| 29.
|
Anant, S.,
Henderson, J. O.,
Mukhopadhyay, D.,
Navaratnam, N.,
Kennedy, S.,
Min, J.,
and Davidson, N. O.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
47338-47351[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Lau, P. P.,
Villanueva, H.,
Kobayashi, K.,
Nakamuta, M.,
Chang, B. H.-J.,
and Chan, L.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
46445-46452[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Harris, S. G.,
Sabio, I.,
Mayer, E.,
Steinberg, M. F.,
Backus, J. W.,
Sparks, J. D.,
Sparks, C. E.,
and Smith, H. C.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
7382-7392[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Greeve, J.,
Jona, V. K.,
Chowdhury, N. R.,
Horwitz, M. S.,
and Chowdhury, J. R.
(1996)
J. Lipid Res.
37,
2001-2017[Abstract]
|
| 33.
|
Greeve, J.,
Lellek, H.,
Rautenberg, P.,
and Greten, H.
(1998)
Biol. Chem.
379,
1063-1073[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Dance, G. S. C.,
Sowden, M. P.,
Yang, Y.,
and Smith, H. C.
(2000)
Nucleic Acids Res.
28,
424-429[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Yamanaka, S.,
Poksay, K.,
Driscoll, D. M.,
and Innerarity, T. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
11506-11510[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Sowden, M.,
Hamm, J. K.,
and Smith, H. C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3011-3017[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Dance, G. S. C.,
Beemiller, P.,
Yang, Y.,
Van Mater, D.,
Mian, S.,
and Smith, H. C.
(2001)
Nucleic Acids Res.
29,
1772-1780[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. G. Conticello, C. J. F. Thomas, S. K. Petersen-Mahrt, and M. S. Neuberger
Evolution of the AID/APOBEC Family of Polynucleotide (Deoxy)cytidine Deaminases
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
February 1, 2005;
22(2):
367 - 377.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Greeve, A. Philipsen, K. Krause, W. Klapper, K. Heidorn, B. E. Castle, J. Janda, K. B. Marcu, and R. Parwaresch
Expression of activation-induced cytidine deaminase in human B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas
Blood,
May 1, 2003;
101(9):
3574 - 3580.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Blanc and N. O. Davidson
C-to-U RNA Editing: Mechanisms Leading to Genetic Diversity
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 10, 2003;
278(3):
1395 - 1398.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.