![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 27, 23973-23976, July 5, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§,
, and
From the
Department of Genetics and Microbiology,
University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy and the ¶ Department of
Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
30322
Amine oxidations are important in a number of
basic biological processes ranging from lysyl oxidation in the
cross-linking of collagen to the degradative metabolism of polyamines
and neurotransmitters. The oxidations of biogenic amines to the
corresponding imines are catalyzed by either the quinoprotein class of
enzymes (usually primary amines) (1) or by the flavin-containing amine
oxidases (primary, secondary, or tertiary amines) (2). In both cases, molecular oxygen is the usual electron acceptor with hydrogen peroxide
formed as reaction product. Flavin amine oxidases (2) catalyze the
oxidation of amines via an oxidative cleavage of the
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
INTRODUCTION
Crystal Structures of PAO...
Structural Comparisons between...
Proposed Mechanisms of Flavin-...
Conclusions
REFERENCES
-CH bond of the
substrate to form an imine product with the concomitant reduction of
the flavin cofactor (Fig. 1A). The imine product is then hydrolyzed (non-enzymatically in the cases
investigated) to the corresponding aldehyde and ammonia (or amine for
secondary or tertiary amine substrates). The reduced flavin coenzyme
reacts with oxygen to form hydrogen peroxide and the oxidized form of the flavin to complete the catalytic cycle.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Amine oxidation reactions catalyzed by PAO
and MAOs. A, scheme of the general reaction catalyzed
by PAO and MAO. B, structures of polyamine substrates of
PAO. C, structures of arylalkyl amines that can be oxidized
by MAOs.
The focus of this minireview is the structure and function of plant polyamine oxidase (PAO)1 and human monoamine oxidase (MAO), two thoroughly investigated members of the flavin-dependent class of amine oxidases. Both enzymes have been structurally characterized by x-ray crystallography (3, 4). Plant PAO is involved in the catabolism of polyamines (Fig. 1B) by catalyzing the oxidation of the secondary amino groups of spermine or spermidine and their acetyl derivatives (5). It is a soluble enzyme with a non-covalently bound FAD cofactor (6, 7). Very recently, the gene for human PAO has been identified (8), and the protein was investigated in preliminary work. Polyamines are essential for cell growth and differentiation (9), and their metabolism is the subject of extensive research to develop potential targets for antiproliferative drugs (10).
MAOs oxidize the primary amino groups of arylalkyl amines (Fig.
1C) and are widely distributed in higher eukaryotes.
In mammals, MAO is present as two isoforms (MAO A and MAO B),
which are separate gene products, that exhibit over 70% sequence
identity and distinct but overlapping substrate specificities in the
catabolism of neurotransmitters, such as dopamine and serotonin (11,
12). Both MAO A and MAO B are implicated in a large number of
neurological disorders and are a target for drugs against Parkinson's
disease and depression (13). Mammalian MAOs are bound to the outer
mitochondrial membrane and have a FAD molecule covalently bound to the
protein via an 8
-thioether linkage to a cysteinyl residue (14). They
are expressed in both a tissue-dependent and an
age-dependent manner and have been the subject of extensive
clinical and pharmacological studies with more than 15,000 papers
currently listed in the Medline index. A good deal of mechanistic
information is available for these two isozymes (see below).
| |
Crystal Structures of PAO and MAO |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The recent determination of the crystal structures of plant PAO and human MAO B have revealed valuable insights into the structure-function of the flavin-dependent amine oxidases. PAO (472 residues) and MAO B (520 residues) share ~20% amino acid sequence identity that is distributed throughout their respective polypeptide chains with the FAD-binding regions exhibiting the highest level of homology (3). Mammalian MAOs contain a 50-residue C-terminal segment that is not found in the PAO sequence. Truncation experiments as well as sequence analysis have demonstrated that this C-terminal segment of MAO A or MAO B is involved in anchoring them to the outer mitochondrial membrane (15). The crystallization of human MAO B was facilitated by the development of a high level expression system of the human gene in Pichia pastoris (16). Recombinant MAO B is tightly bound to the membrane fraction of the expression host. The maize PAO used in the structural experiments was isolated from natural sources. The elucidations of the respective three-dimensional structures of both plant PAO and human MAO B have permitted insights into several common features that provide a structural framework for a more definitive understanding of their respective mechanisms of amine oxidation.
The three-dimensional structure of maize PAO was solved at 1.9-Å
resolution (3). The overall fold has a two-domain topology (Fig.
2A), essentially identical to
that observed in the bacterial flavoenzyme p-hydroxybenzoate
hydroxylase (the so-called "PHBH" fold) (17). The interface of the
two domains defines a U-shaped catalytic tunnel (Fig. 2A),
which is about 30 Å in length, being optimally configured to bind the
linear polyamine substrates (Fig 1B). The openings at each
end of the tunnel are on the same side of the protein surface. One
opening is lined by several acidic amino acid residues, which may have
a role in steering the polycationic protonated amine substrate into the
substrate-binding site. The interior of the tunnel is embedded by a
number of aromatic residues, and its innermost section is located in
front of the flavin to form the catalytic site for amine oxidation.
|
Human MAO B is about 59 kDa with the FAD cofactor bound through the
flavin C8
-position to a cysteine side chain (Cys-397). The crystal
structure, which was solved to a resolution of 3.0 Å (4), reveals that
the enzyme crystallizes as a dimer in two different crystal forms,
which suggests that it may also occur as a dimer in its membrane
environment. The overall fold of each monomer (Fig. 2B)
resembles that of PAO (Fig. 2A). The main structural difference is related to the 50-residue C-terminal tail. This region
forms an extended segment that traverses the protein surface and then
folds into an
-helix. This helix protrudes from the basal face of
the structure to anchor the protein to the mitochondrial outer
membrane. Another prominent feature of the structure is the presence of
two adjacent cavities in the interior of the protein (Fig.
2B). The largest cavity (a flat hydrophobic entity of 420 Å3 in volume) is directly in front of the covalent flavin
ring and forms the substrate-binding site. For the substrate to enter
this cavity, it must first bind to an "entrance cavity" (also a
hydrophobic entity of 290 Å3 volume). This entrance
cavity is situated near the point where the protein surface intersects
with the surface of the outer mitochondrial membrane. The anionic
membrane surface may facilitate the electrostatic channeling of the
positively charged amine to this site for substrate admission in a
manner similar to the negatively charged entrance site to the substrate
tunnel in PAO. Both the entrance and substrate cavities are lined by
aromatic and aliphatic residues that create a highly apolar environment
for substrate binding. Whether such distinct cavities exist in the
human MAO A structure is not known. It is perhaps worthwhile to point
out that the amino acid residues separating the two cavities in MAO B
are different in MAO A. Site-directed mutagenesis work (18) suggests
Tyr-326 in MAO B (situated at the juncture of the two cavities) to
be important.
The current view for MAO is that the amine substrate is deprotonated to
the free base on entering the catalytic substrate binding site. Thus,
by extension, the deprotonated polyamine substrate also may be the form
that traverses the tunnel in PAO. The mechanism for substrate
deprotonation in this class of enzymes is not known.
| |
Structural Comparisons between PAO and MAO B Active Sites |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A striking feature emerging from the structural comparison is that, despite their overall structural folding similarity, PAO and MAO B differ substantially in the overall topology of their respective substrate-binding sites. In particular, the PAO U-shaped tunnel and the MAO B cavities follow entirely different pathways within the three-dimensional structures and are lined by residues that are not homologous in sequence. The only conserved features can be found in the sites for binding of the flavin and for recognition of the substrate amine group that undergoes oxidation.
In both PAO and MAO B, the normally planar flavin ring is highly bent
about the N5-N10 axis (about a 30° angle between the pyrimidine and
the dimethylbenzene rings) with the active sites situated on the
re side of the flavin ring. Hydrogen-bonding interactions of
the isoalloxazine ring of the cofactor with the protein are similar in
the two enzymes. In particular, Lys-300 of PAO is bridged to the N5
atom of the flavin through a water molecule. Binding studies with
inhibitors (19) have shown that this residue participates in catalysis
by compensating for the change in the flavin protonation state
(i.e. the addition of a hydrogen atom to the N5-position, which occurs on cofactor reduction). This interaction is strictly conserved also in MAO B where Lys-296 occupies a position identical to
that of Lys-300 in PAO (Fig. 3, A and
B). Recent 2.5-Å x-ray diffraction data on MAO B have shown a water molecule acting as a
bridge between Lys-296 and the flavin N5 atom. This structural feature
is not unique to these amine oxidases and has also been found in other
flavoenzyme oxidases (but is not a general structural feature of
flavoenzymes). In L-amino acid oxidase (20), Lys-326 is
structurally positioned with respect to the flavin as is Lys-300 in
PAO. In the structure of monomeric sarcosine oxidase (21) (an enzyme
that oxidizes N-methylglycine to glycine), Lys-265 is also
hydrogen-bonded to the flavin N5-position through a water molecule.
Taken together, these observations indicate the
"Lys-H2O-flavin N5" element as a structural motif
shared among flavin-dependent amine and amino acid
oxidases.
|
The PAO and MAO B substrate-binding sites, where the flavin-dependent amine oxidation takes place, display several conserved features. In both proteins, two aromatic amino acid side chains form an "aromatic sandwich" by facing each other in perpendicular orientations to the flavin on its re side. In PAO, residues Phe-403 and Tyr-439 are positioned parallel to each other and perpendicular to the flavin plane (Fig. 3A). Likewise, in MAO B, there is an aromatic pair formed by Tyr-398 and Tyr-435, whose aromatic rings are slightly turned toward the flavin (Fig. 3B). The distance between these aromatic side chains in each pair is about 8 Å (Table I). Furthermore, in both PAO and MAO B the aromatic pairs are sheltered by additional aromatic residues (Fig. 3, A and B). Trp-60 in PAO and Tyr-60 in MAO B are positioned at the top of the flavin ring, being coplanar to the respective pyrimidine rings of the flavin coenzymes whereas Tyr-298 of PAO and Phe-343 of MAO B are both located on the same side of the flavin, in proximity of the lysine that is hydrogen-bonded to the FAD.
|
On the basis of the structures of enzyme-inhibitor complexes (3, 19), models of the bound substrates in the active sites have been proposed with reference to spermine for PAO (Figs. 1B and 3A) and to benzylamine for MAO B (Figs. 1C and 3B). In these models, the amino groups are positioned between the side chains of the aromatic sandwiches of the two enzymes with distances between the amine nitrogen and each aromatic ring (Table I) within the range generally observed in amine-aromatic recognition sites (22). An additional element in binding the substrate amino group is the flavin ring, whose C4a atom is in van der Waals contact with the substrate nitrogen (Fig. 3C). The combination of the flavin and aromatic sandwich generates an "aromatic cage" that is suggested to recognize the deprotonated amine group of the substrate.
Binding of the substrate amino group through aromatic side chains is
also observed in bacterial trimethylamine dehydrogenase (a
6-S-cysteinyl- FMN-dependent dehydrogenase that
catalyzes the oxidative N-demethylation of trimethylamine to
dimethylamine and formaldehyde) (23 and references therein). The
three-dimensional structure of this protein reveals that the binding
site for the substrate amino group is in the form of an "aromatic
bowl." Thus, it appears that recognition of amine substrates via the
placement of the amine moiety in an aromatic cage may represent a
common feature among flavoenzymes catalyzing the oxidation of amines, which may have mechanistic implications.
| |
Proposed Mechanisms of Flavin-dependent Amine Oxidation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A number of mechanisms have been proposed to describe the chemical
events involved in flavin-dependent amine oxidations. One mechanism that has achieved considerable notoriety is the single electron transfer mechanism (also termed the aminium cation
radical or single electron transfer mechanism) that was suggested by
Silverman and colleagues (24) based on their work on the interaction of MAO B with N-cyclopropyl-N-benzylamine substrate
analogues as well as other analogues that serve as mechanism-based
inhibitors of the enzyme. This mechanism is shown in Fig
4A. A key feature of this
mechanism is that the flavin serves as a one-electron oxidant of the
amine to form the aminium cation radical as the first initial
reversible step in catalysis. The formation of such an intermediate
would render the
-proton sufficiently acidic as to allow a basic
amino acid residue at the active site to abstract the proton with
subsequent radical recombination occurring to form the imine product
and reduced flavin as products. Although chemically attractive and able
to account for the formation of ring-opened products observed, little
direct evidence from rapid reaction studies has been found to support
this scheme. Stopped flow studies show no evidence for any flavin
radical intermediates during catalysis (25, 26). No influence of
magnetic field on the reaction rate is observed as would be expected if
a radical pair (flavin radical and substrate radical) were formed as
transient intermediates (27). Thermodynamic consideration also suggests that the one-electron oxidation of a primary amine (E = +1.5 V) by the flavin moiety in MAO B (E = +0.04 V) is
unlikely (28).
|
Current structural data on MAO B or on PAO also show there to be no amino acid residue at the catalytic site that would be expected to function as an active site base for any proposed H+ abstraction mechanisms of catalysis. Mechanism-based inactivation studies of MAO B by cyclopropylbenzylamine analogues show inhibition of the enzyme to occur by modification of Cys-365, which was suggested to be the active site base in MAO B (29). However, the structural data on MAO B show this residue not to be at the active site on the enzyme but instead to be at the surface of the molecule some 20 Å in distance (4).
Although the structural data provide no evidence for a
proton-abstraction mechanism, recent quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) data on MAO A with a series of
para-substituted benzylamine analogues (26) provides
definitive evidence that
-CH bond cleavage indeed does occur by a
proton abstraction mechanism. The reconciliation of these apparently
disparate observations is shown by the mechanism suggested for MAO A
catalysis as shown in Fig. 4B. In this mechanism, the amine
functionality adds to the 4a-position of the flavin in a
nucleophilic manner, which activates the N5-position to function as a
strong active site base because the pKa of reduced
flavins approximates that of benzyl
protons.2 This
proposed mechanism would imply that the reaction is concerted; a
conclusion that remains to be experimentally verified. The mechanism shown in Fig. 4B would appear to be more consistent with
available mechanistic and structural data than the radical mechanism
shown in Fig. 4A.
The lysine-H2O-flavin N5 motif discussed above for the
amine oxidases poses an additional question with regard to the proposed mechanism is Fig 4B. Why should the flavin C4a adduct
abstract a proton from the substrate when it has a water molecule in
close proximity? Currently there is no answer to this question, and further work is required to provide an explanation.
| |
Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Flavin-dependent amine oxidases catalyze the oxidative
dehydrogenation of a -CH2-NH- group in a manner
mechanistically similar to the quinoprotein amine oxidases in that a
H+ abstraction mechanism is the initial C-H bond cleavage
event. These classes of enzymes differ in the substrate specificities observed and in the detailed mechanisms of catalysis. The flavin moiety
is central to both substrate dehydrogenation and to the reduction of
O2 to H2O2. The folding of the PAO
amino acid chain relative to that of MAO B is crucial in defining their
relative substrate binding sites, and these differences account for
their respective substrate diversities. Similarities in active site structures suggest a crucial role for an aromatic cage in the oxidation
of amines, which has yet to be mechanistically defined. The observed
Lys-H2O-flavin N5 hydrogen bonding motif appears to be a
consistent motif among several flavoenzyme oxidases, and the
mechanistic significance of this motif awaits further work. The
structural information available should allow for more detailed investigations, which should provide further insights into the catalytic mechanisms of flavin-dependent amine oxidations.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This minireview will be reprinted in the 2002 Minireview Compendium, which will be available in December, 2002.
§ To whom correspondence may be addressed: Dept. of Genetics and Microbiology, University of Pavia, via Abbiategrasso, 27100 Pavia, Italy. Tel.: 39-0382-505560; Fax: 39-0382-528496; E-mail: mattevi@ipvgen.unipv.it.
To whom correspondence may be addressed: Dept. of
Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, 1510 Clifton Rd.,
Atlanta, GA 30322. Tel.: 404-727-5972; Fax: 404-727-3452;
E-mail: dedmond@bimcore.emory.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 15, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.R200005200
2 S. Ghisla, personal communication.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: PAO, polyamine oxidase; MAO, monoamine oxidase.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Hartmann, C., and McIntire, W. S. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 280, 98-150[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Massey, V. (2000) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 28, 283-296[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Binda, C., Coda, A., Angelini, R., Federico, R., Ascenzi, P., and Mattevi, A. (1999) Structure Fold Des. 7, 265-276[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Binda, C., Newton-Vinson, P., Hubalek, F., Edmondson, D. E., and Mattevi, A. (2002) Nat. Struct. Biol. 9, 22-26[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Seiler, N. (1995) Prog. Brain Res. 106, 333-344[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Sebela, M., Radova, A., Angelini, R., Tavladoraki, P., Frebort, I. I., and Pec, P. (2001) Plant Sci. 160, 197-207[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Tavladoraki, P., Schinina, M. E., Cecconi, F., Di, Agostino, S., Manera, F., Rea, G., Mariottini, P., and Federico, R. (1998) FEBS Lett. 426, 62-66[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Wang, Y. L.,
Devereux, W.,
Woster, P. M.,
Stewart, T. M.,
Hacker, A.,
and Casero, R. A.
(2001)
Cancer Res.
61,
5370-5373 |
| 9. | Tabor, C. W., and Tabor, H. (1984) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 53, 749-790[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Casero, R. A., Jr., and Woster, P. M. (2001) J. Med. Chem. 44, 1-26[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Weyler, W., Hsu, Y. P., and Breakfield, X. (1990) Pharmacol. Ther. 47, 391-417[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Shih, J. C., Chen, K., and Ridd, M. J. (1999) Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 22, 197-217[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Cesura, A. M., and Pletscher, A. (1992) Prog. Drug Res. 38, 171-297[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Kearney, E. B., Salach, J. I., Walker, W. H., Seng, R. L., Kenney, W., Zeszotek, E., and Singer, T. P. (1971) Eur. J. Biochem. 24, 321-327[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Mitoma, J.,
and Ito, A.
(1992)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
111,
20-24 |
| 16. | Newton-Vinson, P., Hubalek, F., and Edmodson, D. E. (2000) Protein Expression Purif. 20, 334-345[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Fraaije, M. W., and Mattevi, A. (2000) Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 126-132[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Geha, R. M.,
Rebrini, I.,
Chen, K.,
and Shih, J. C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
9877-9882 |
| 19. | Binda, C., Angelini, R., Federico, R., Ascenzi, P., and Mattevi, A. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 2766-2776[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Pawelek, P. D., Cheah, J., Coulombe, R., Macheroux, P., Ghisla, S., and Vrielink, A. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 4204-4215[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Trickey, P., Wagner, M. A., Jorns, M. S., and Mathews, F. S. (1999) Structure Fold Des. 7, 331-345[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Levitt, M., and Perutz, M. F. (1988) J. Mol. Biol. 201, 751-754[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Trickey, P., Basran, J., Lian, L. Y., Chen, Z., Barton, J. D., Sutcliffe, M. J., Scrutton, N. S., and Mathews, F. S. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 7678-7688[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Silverman, R. B. (1995) Accts. Chem. Res. 28, 335-342[CrossRef] |
| 25. | Walker, M. C., and Edmondson, D. E. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 7088-7098[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Miller, J. R., and Edmondson, D. E. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 13670-13683[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Miller, J. R., Edmondson, D. E., and Grissom, C. B. (1995) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 7830-7831 |
| 28. | Newton-Vinson, P., and Edmondson, D. E. (2000) in Flavins and Flavoproteins (Ghisla, S. , Kroneck, P. , Macheroux, P. , and Sund, H., eds) , pp. 431-434, Agency for Scientific Research, Berlin |
| 29. | Zhong, B., and Silverman, R. B. (1997) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 6690-6691 |
| 30. | Kraulis, P. (1991) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 946-950[CrossRef] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Besson-Bard, C. Courtois, A. Gauthier, J. Dahan, G. Dobrowolska, S. Jeandroz, A. Pugin, and D. Wendehenne Nitric Oxide in Plants: Production and Cross-talk with Ca2+ Signaling Mol Plant, March 1, 2008; 1(2): 218 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Anand and R. Marmorstein Structure and Mechanism of Lysine-specific Demethylase Enzymes J. Biol. Chem., December 7, 2007; 282(49): 35425 - 35429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Winkler, T. M. Kutchan, and P. Macheroux 6-S-Cysteinylation of Bi-covalently Attached FAD in Berberine Bridge Enzyme Tunes the Redox Potential for Optimal Activity J. Biol. Chem., August 17, 2007; 282(33): 24437 - 24443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pandini, G. Mauri, A. Bordogna, and L. Bonati Detecting similarities among distant homologous proteins by comparison of domain flexibilities Protein Eng. Des. Sel., June 30, 2007; (2007) gzm021v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gordon, D. G. Holt, A. Panigrahi, B. T. Wilhelm, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, J. Bahler, and B. R. Cairns Genome-Wide Dynamics of SAPHIRE, an Essential Complex for Gene Activation and Chromatin Boundaries Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2007; 27(11): 4058 - 4069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Forneris, C. Binda, M. A. Vanoni, E. Battaglioli, and A. Mattevi Human Histone Demethylase LSD1 Reads the Histone Code J. Biol. Chem., December 16, 2005; 280(50): 41360 - 41365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. De Colibus, M. Li, C. Binda, A. Lustig, D. E. Edmondson, and A. Mattevi Three-dimensional structure of human monoamine oxidase A (MAO A): Relation to the structures of rat MAO A and human MAO B PNAS, September 6, 2005; 102(36): 12684 - 12689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Binda, M. Li, F. Hubalek, N. Restelli, D. E. Edmondson, and A. Mattevi Insights into the mode of inhibition of human mitochondrial monoamine oxidase B from high-resolution crystal structures PNAS, August 19, 2003; 100(17): 9750 - 9755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cervelli, F. Polticelli, R. Federico, and P. Mariottini Heterologous Expression and Characterization of Mouse Spermine Oxidase J. Biol. Chem., February 7, 2003; 278(7): 5271 - 5276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |