![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 27, 24039-24048, July 5, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, Minnesota 55912
Received for publication, October 12, 2001, and in revised form, April 8, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Bcl-2 family member Bad is a pro-apoptotic
protein, and phosphorylation of Bad by cytokines and growth factors
promotes cell survival in many cell types. Induction of apoptosis by UV radiation is well documented. However, little is known about UV activation of cell survival pathways. Here, we demonstrate that UVB
induces Bad phosphorylation at serine 112 in JNK1, RSK2, and MSK1-dependent pathways. Inhibition of mitogen-activated
protein (MAP) kinases including ERKs, JNKs, and p38 kinase by the use of their respective dominant negative mutant or a specific inhibitor for MEK1 or p38 kinase, PD98059 or SB202190, resulted in abrogation of
UVB-induced phosphorylation of Bad at serine 112. Incubation of active
MAP kinase members with Bad protein showed serine 112 phosphorylation
of Bad by JNK1 only. However, activated RSK2 and MSK1, downstream
kinases of ERKs and p38 kinase, respectively, also phosphorylated Bad
at serine 112 in vitro. Cells from a Coffin-Lowry syndrome
patient (deficient in RSK2) or expressing an N-terminal or C-terminal
kinase-dead mutant of MSK1 were defective for UVB-induced serine 112 phosphorylation of Bad. Furthermore, MAP kinase
pathway-dependent serine 112 phosphorylation was shown to
be required for dissociation of Bad from Bcl-XL. These data
illustrated that UVB-induced phosphorylation of Bad at serine 112 was
mediated through MAP kinase signaling pathways in which JNK1, RSK2, and
MSK1 served as direct mediators.
The development and maintenance of healthy tissues is critically
dependent on a balance between cell survival and cell death (apoptosis). Alterations of both pathways contribute to the clonal expansion of cancer cells. The Bcl-2 family of related proteins contains protein-protein interaction domains that facilitate homo- and
heterodimerization. Some members, Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, Mcl-1, and A1, promote cell survival, whereas others, Bad, Bid, Bax, and Bak,
promote cell death. A possible mechanism exists whereby the interactions resulting in homo- or heterodimerization of the various proteins define the fate of a cell (1, 2). Bad, for example, has been
shown to heterodimerize with Bcl-XL through interaction with its Bcl-2 homology 3 domain at the mitochondrial membrane (3, 4). The complex formation of Bad with Bcl-XL may cause Bcl-XL to release Apaf1 or regulate other
Bcl-XL activities resulting in a caspase 9-initiated
cascade of proteolysis and induction of apoptosis (5, 6). Survival
factors such as interleukin (IL)1-3 can inhibit the
apoptotic activity of Bad by activating intracellular signaling
pathways that result in the phosphorylation of Bad at two critical
sites, serine 112 and serine 136 (7). Akt has been shown to promote
cell survival through its ability to phosphorylate Bad specifically at
serine 136 (8, 9). Recent studies showed that RSK2 (p90 ribosomal S6
kinase 2), mitochondria-associated protein kinase A (PKA), and Ultraviolet (UV) radiation, especially in the UVB range (290-320 nm),
is an important environmental factor of inducible health hazards for
mankind, which include the induction of skin cancer (15), suppression
of the immune system (16), and chronic skin damage including premature
skin aging (17). Similar to chemical agents, UV has the ability to
activate various signal transduction pathways and to induce the
expression of specific genes (18-20). A great deal of progress has
been made recently in elucidating the mechanisms of the UV-induced
apoptotic signaling transduction pathways (21, 22). However, much less
is known about the UV-induced survival-signaling pathway, especially
during the immediate time following UV radiation.
One of the major UV responsive pathways is the Ras/mitogen-activated
protein (MAP) kinases cascade (23). MAP kinases belong to a large
family of serine/threonine protein kinases comprising three distinct
components: extracellular-signal-regulated protein kinases (ERKs),
c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs), and p38 kinase. Generally, JNKs and
p38 kinase are known to be activated by various forms of stress, such
as UV radiation, heat shock, and inflammation (24-26). Our studies and
those of others have shown that ERKs are critical for UV-induced signal
transduction (27-29). Although UVB radiation has been shown to induce
cytokine production (30-33) and to activate growth factor and cytokine
receptors (26), whether UVB radiation induces Bad phosphorylation and
the signaling pathways that are involved in the phosphorylation remains
largely unknown. MAP kinases have been implicated in both apoptosis and
survival signaling (34-37). Therefore, we investigated the possible
role of MAP kinase signaling pathways in the regulation of Bad
phosphorylation and its function following UVB radiation. In this
study, we demonstrated that UVB radiation induces Bad phosphorylation
at serine 112, but not serine 136. Using a dominant negative mutant of
ERK2, JNK1, p38 kinase, or an N-terminal or C-terminal kinase-dead
mutant of mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase 1 (MSK1),
RSK2-deficient cells, and a specific inhibitor of mitogen-activated
protein kinase kinase 1 (MEK1) or p38 kinase, we conclude that
UVB-induced phosphorylation of Bad at serine 112 is mediated through
MAP kinase signaling pathways in which JNK1, RSK2, and MSK1 have a
direct role in the regulation of Bad phosphorylation and its function.
Materials--
Dominant negative (DN) mutants of ERK2, JNK1, and
p38 kinase were generous gifts from Dr. Melanie H. Cobb (38), Dr. Roger J. Davis (39), and Dr. Mercedes Rincon (40), respectively; plasmids of
cytomegalovirus (CMV) 5 vector, N-terminal, or C-terminal kinase-dead
mutant of MSK1 were kindly provided by Dr. Dario R. Alessi (41); active
recombinant ERK1 (100 units/mg), JNK1 (85 units/mg), JNK2 (100 units/mg), p38 kinase (157 units/mg), RSK2 (350 units/mg), MSK1 (167 units/mg), mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinase 2 (MAPKAPK-2) (442 units/mg), Bad fusion proteins, polyclonal RSK2
antibody, and RSK2 immunoprecipitation kinase assay kit were from
Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, NY); and active recombinant
ERK2 (10,000 units/mg), phosphospecific Bad (Ser-112) and Bad (Ser-136)
antibodies, phosphoPlus p44/42 MAP kinase, JNK, and p38 kinase antibody
kits, p44/42 MAP kinase, JNK, and p38 kinase assay kits were purchased
from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Beverly, MA). The monoclonal Bad
antibody (B36420) was from PharMingen Laboratories (Los Angeles, CA);
the polyclonal Bcl-XL antibody was from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA); and the monoclonal UV Radiation--
UVB radiation was performed on serum-starved
monolayer cultures utilizing a transluminator emitting UVB (42). The
source of UVB was a bank of four Westinghouse F520 lamps (National
Biological, Twinsburg, OH) at 6 J/s/m light in the UVB range.
Approximately 10% of the remaining radiation from the F520 lamp is in
the UVA region (320 nm). Although almost no UVC leakage occurred, the UVB radiation was carried out in a UVB exposure chamber fitted with a
Kodak Kodacel K6808 filter that eliminates all wavelengths below 290 nm. This lamp is one of the most frequently used UVB sources for the
study of carcinogenesis. The International Agency for Research on
Cancer refers to this lamp as a source emitting mainly UVB radiation
for the study of cancer induction in animals. UVB radiation was
measured using the UVX radiometer from UVP (UVX-31).
Generation of Stable Cotransfectants--
JB6 Cl 41 cells were
transfected with CMV-neo or CMV5 vector with or without the plasmids of
dominant negative mutant of ERK2, JNK1, p38 kinase, or N-terminal or
C-terminal kinase-dead mutant of MSK1 by using LipofectAMINE following
the manufacturer's instructions. The stable transfectants were
obtained by selection for G418 resistance (400 µg/ml) and further
confirmed by assay of respective activity as described (27,
43-46).
Cell Culture--
The JB6 mouse epidermal cell line Cl 41 and
its stable transfectants, CMV-neo, DN-ERK2, DN-JNK1, DN-p38 kinase,
CMV5, N-MSK1, and C-MSK1 were cultured in monolayers at 37 °C and
5% CO2 using MEM containing 5% FBS, 2 mM
L-glutamine, and 25 µg/ml gentamicin (27, 43-46).
Lymphoblast cells that originated from a Coffin-Lowry syndrome (CLS)
patient (deficient in RSK2) and a clinically unaffected person (normal)
(Coriell Institute for Medical Research, Camden, NJ) were cultured in
RPMI 1640 medium with 15% FBS, 2 mM
L-glutamine, and 25 µg/ml gentamicin. The CLS patient was
an 8-year-old male. Clinically unaffected lymphoblasts were obtained
from an age- and race-matched male.
Immunoblotting and Immunoprecipitation--
Immunoblotting for
phosphorylated proteins of ERKs, JNKs, and p38 kinase was carried out
using phosphospecific antibodies against phosphorylated sites of ERKs,
JNKs, or p38 kinase, respectively (28, 45). To study the effect of UVB
radiation on the induction of Bad phosphorylation, the Bad protein was
first immunoprecipitated with a specific antibody. The immunocomplex
was then analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and
immunoblotted with the phosphospecific antibodies against Bad at serine
112 and serine 136. Briefly, cells were cultured in 100-mm dishes until
they reached 80-90% confluence. Then, the cells were starved by
culturing them in 0.1% FBS MEM or 0.5% RPMI 1640 medium for 24 h. The cells were exposed to UVB radiation to induce Bad
phosphorylation and then were disrupted on ice for 30 min in lysis
buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM Co-immunoprecipitation of Proteins--
To study the effect of
UVB radiation on the interaction of Bad with Bcl-XL
in vivo, cell lysates were first immunoprecipitated with an
antibody against Bad as described above. Immunoprecipitates of Bad were
immunoblotted with the antibodies against Bcl-XL.
RSK2 Immunoprecipitation Kinase Assay--
The assay of RSK2 was
carried out as described by the protocol of Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.
Briefly, cells were exposed to UVB (4 kJ/m2), and then the
cells were disrupted in 300 µl of the lysis buffer as described
above. The lysates were sonicated and centrifuged. The supernatant
fraction containing 500 µg of protein was incubated with 4 µg of
anti-RSK2 antibody for 6-10 h at 4 °C, followed by incubation with
protein A/G plus agarose for another 4 h. The enzyme immune
complex was washed three times with 0.5 ml of lysis buffer and once
with 100 µl of assay dilution buffer (20 mM MOPS, pH 7.2, 25 mM Phosphorylation of Bad by UVB-activated RSK2--
Cells were
exposed to UVB (4 kJ/m2) and cultured for an additional 30 min. Lysates were prepared from the cells, and the immunoprecipitation of RSK2 was described above. The enzyme immune complex was washed twice
with 500 µl of the lysis buffer and twice with 500 µl of kinase
buffer (25 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 5 mM Phosphorylation Assay of Bad Protein in
Vitro--
Phosphorylation of Bad by active recombinant ERK1, ERK2,
JNK1, JNK2, p38 kinase, RSK2, MSK1, or MAPKAPK-2 was carried out at
30 °C for 30 min in the presence of the kinase buffer with 200 µM ATP and 3 µg of Bad as substrate. The phosphorylated
Bad protein was detected by immunoblotting using a phosphospecific antibody.
Induction of Bad Phosphorylation at Serine 112, but Not Serine 136, by UVB Radiation--
Because the phosphorylation of serine 112 and
serine 136 is critical for Bad function (7), we first investigated
whether exposure of cells to UVB radiation results in phosphorylation of Bad at these sites. We used a specific antibody to detect Bad phosphorylation at serine 112 or serine 136 by Western blot analysis (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) (11). The specificity of the antibody
to Bad phosphorylation at serine 112 or serine 136 was confirmed
previously by showing its reactivity to recombinant Bad protein, which
was phosphorylated by PKA or RSK2, but not to unphosphorylated Bad, and
by its recognition of 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate- or forskolin-induced phosphorylated wild-type Bad, but not of a Bad
mutant with substitution of serine 112 or serine 136 with alanine that
was expressed in 293T cells (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) (11). As
shown in Fig. 1A,
phosphorylation of Bad at serine 112 occurred 15 min after cells were
exposed to UVB radiation and reached a maximum at 30 min. A
dose-response study indicated that 4 kJ/m2 was the optimal
dosage for induction of Bad phosphorylation at serine 112 (Fig.
1B). In contrast, phosphorylation of Bad at serine 136 was
not observed in either experiment (Fig. 1, A and
B). These results indicated that UVB radiation only induces
Bad phosphorylation at serine 112 in a time- and
dose-dependent manner.
UVB-induced Bad Phosphorylation at Serine 112 Is MAP
Kinase-dependent--
Our previous studies indicated that
in JB6 Cl 41 cells, UVB leads to activation of the MAP kinase
superfamily, composed of ERKs, JNKs, and p38 kinase, even at 15 min
after UVB radiation (28, 45-47). Therefore, we investigated the
possible role of the MAP kinase family in mediating the phosphorylation
of Bad at serine 112. To test this, we used two approaches to
inactivate MAP kinases. First, PD98059, a specific inhibitor of MEK1
that acts by inhibiting activation of ERKs (48), and SB202190, a specific inhibitor of p38 kinase (49), were tested for their effect on
UVB-induced serine 112 phosphorylation of Bad. Pretreatment with 12.5 µM PD98059 or 0.5 µM SB202190, which
specifically inhibited UVB-induced phosphorylation of ERKs (Fig.
2A) or p38 kinase (Fig. 2B), but not JNKs (Fig. 2C), markedly impaired
the phosphorylation of Bad at serine 112 (Fig. 2D). These
data suggested that both ERKs and p38 kinase may be involved in
UVB-induced serine 112 phosphorylation of Bad. The second strategy used
to inactivate MAP kinases was to use dominant negative mutants of ERK2,
JNK1, or p38 kinase. Previous studies have shown that overexpression of
DN-ERK2, DN-JNK1, or DN-p38 kinase specifically blocked UVB-induced activation of ERKs, JNKs, or p38 kinase, respectively (27, 28, 43-45,
47). Compared with Cl 41 cells expressing CMV-neo vector, the
expression of DN-ERK2, DN-JNK1, or DN-p38 kinase markedly suppressed
Bad phosphorylation at serine 112 after exposure of cells to UVB for up
to 60 min (Fig. 3, A-C).
These two experiments demonstrated that UVB-induced phosphorylation of
Bad at serine 112 is mediated through MAP kinases, including ERKs,
JNKs, and p38 kinase.
Phosphorylation of Bad at Serine 112 by Activated JNK1, RSK2, and
MSK1 in Vitro--
To test whether MAP kinases are direct mediators of
UVB-induced phosphorylation of Bad at serine 112, we incubated Bad
fusion protein with one of several pure and active recombinant MAP
kinase family members in the presence of ATP. The results showed that Bad at serine 112 was phosphorylated strongly by active JNK1, but not
by active JNK2, ERK1, ERK2, or p38 kinase (Fig.
4A). Although ERKs and p38
kinase could not directly phosphorylate Bad at serine 112, inactivated
ERKs and p38 kinase significantly inhibited serine 112 phosphorylation
in vivo (Figs. 2 and 3). This prompted us to test whether
downstream members of ERKs or p38 kinase, such as RSK2 (50), MSK1 (41,
51), or MAPKAPK-2 (52), catalyze the phosphorylation of Bad at serine
112. In JB6 Cl 41 cells, UVB induced RSK2 activity and reached a
maximum at 15-30 min (Fig. 4B). The activation of RSK2
induced by UVB was markedly inhibited by pretreatment with 12.5-25
µM PD98059 or using cells expressing DN-ERK2 (Fig.
4B), indicating that RSK2 is a downstream kinase of the
UVB-activated ERK signaling pathway. We performed an immune complex
phosphorylation assay of UVB-activated RSK2, which was immunoprecipitated from cells exposed to UVB, using a Bad fusion protein as the substrate. The result showed that UVB-activated RSK2
phosphorylated Bad at serine 112, whereas pretreatment with 12.5 µM PD98059 blocked the phosphorylation (Fig.
4C). In addition, phosphorylation of Bad at serine 112 was
further confirmed by using pure and active recombinant RSK2 (Fig.
4D). Very recently, we have shown that MSK1 was also
activated in JB6 Cl 41 cells at 5-30 min after UVB radiation and
inhibition of ERKs or p38 kinase markedly repressed UVB-induced MSK1
activities (45, 46). Therefore, we performed a phosphorylation assay of
Bad protein by active MSK1 in vitro and found that Bad could
also be phosphorylated at serine 112 by active MSK1, but not by active
MAPKAPK-2 (Fig. 4E), another downstream kinase of p38 kinase
(52). These results suggested that Bad at serine 112 phosphorylation is
mediated via JNK1, RSK2, and MSK1.
Inactivated RSK2 or MSK1 Abrogates UVB-induced Bad Phosphorylation
at Serine 112 in Vivo--
To further confirm that RSK2 and MSK1 have
specific roles in UVB-induced phosphorylation of Bad at serine 112, we
used RSK2-deficient lymphoblasts derived from a CLS patient or
established a stable transfectant with an N-terminal kinase-dead mutant
of MSK1 (N-MSK1) or a C-terminal kinase-dead mutant of MSK1 (C-MSK1).
Western blot analysis confirmed a complete loss of RSK2 protein in the
CLS patient (Fig. 5A).
Compared with the normal lymphoblasts, UVB-induced activation of RSK2
was totally blocked in CLS lymphoblasts (Fig. 5B). As a
result, the phosphorylation of Bad at serine 112 induced by UVB
radiation was shown to be profoundly suppressed in CLS lymphoblasts
(Fig. 5C). Overexpression of N-MSK1 or C-MSK1 markedly inhibited UVB-induced MSK1 activity as described previously (45, 46).
Using these stable transfectants, we found that both N-terminal mutant
MSK1 and C-terminal mutant MSK1 attenuated UVB-induced serine 112 phosphorylation of Bad, compared with a CMV5 vector in vivo
(Fig. 6). Together, these results
indicated that both RSK2 and MSK1 indeed mediate phosphorylation of Bad
at serine 112 in response to UVB radiation.
MAP Kinase Signaling-dependent Serine 112 Phosphorylation Dissociates Bad from Bcl-XL--
Having
established the role of MAP kinases and their downstream kinases in
mediating Bad phosphorylation at serine 112 following UVB radiation, we
determined whether MAP kinase pathway-dependent phosphorylation of serine 112 was important for disrupting
Bad-Bcl-XL heterodimerization. During apoptosis, Bad
heterodimerization may play a significant role in promoting death
signal by inactivating Bcl-XL (4, 7). Our results showed
that Bcl-XL was not co-precipitated with Bad at 30 min
after UVB radiation, consistent with serine 112 phosphorylation-induced
dissociation (Fig. 7A).
Inhibition of Bad phosphorylation at serine 112 by pretreatment with
PD98059 or SB202190 (Fig. 7A) or using cells expressing
DN-JNK1 (Fig. 7B), restored Bad-Bcl-XL
association. Phosphorylation of Bad at serine 136 has also been shown
to play an important role in disassociation of Bad from
Bcl-XL (7, 8). However, our previous study showed that
inhibition of ERKs or p38 kinase blocked UVB-induced activation of Akt
(45), which is responsible for serine 136 phosphorylation of Bad (8,
9). Furthermore, phosphorylation of Bad at serine 136 could not still
be induced by UVB radiation following inactivation of MAP kinases (Fig.
7, A and B). These data demonstrated that MAP
kinase pathway-dependent serine 112 phosphorylation of Bad is critical for the dissociation of Bad-Bcl-XL dimers in
the early response to UVB radiation.
The phosphorylation of Bad, a Bcl-2 family protein, may represent
an important bridge between survival signaling by growth factor
receptors and the prevention of apoptosis. Oncogenes involved in the
signal transduction of growth factor receptors may mediate the
requirement for extracellular stimuli to maintain protection from
apoptosis, in part by increasing Bad phosphorylation. Therefore, identifying the specific signaling pathways involved in the regulation of Bad is crucial in our understanding of oncogenesis. In this study,
we demonstrated that Bad is phosphorylated at serine 112, but not
serine 136, early after UVB radiation. Furthermore, we found that
UVB-induced serine 112 phosphorylation of Bad depends on MAP kinase
signaling pathways in which JNK1 directly mediates serine 112 phosphorylation, whereas RSK2 and MSK1 transduce ERKs and p38 kinase
signals by phosphorylating Bad.
Exposure of cells to UV radiation elicits a complex set of acute
cellular responses called "UV responses." The initial signal triggering the UV response is in large part independent of DNA damage,
but it instead appears to be mediated by a membrane-associated component of the Ras pathway and activation of MAP kinases (23). ERKs
are involved in survival signaling in response to a variety of growth
factors (10, 35, 53), whereas activation of JNKs or p38 kinase is
suggested to play decisive roles in the control of cell death (34). The
early activation of JNKs and p38 kinase by tumor necrosis factor- UV-induced Bad phosphorylation at a single residue, serine 112, and
activation of the PI3-K/Akt survival pathway have also recently been
observed in human skin cells by Wan et al. (58). They showed
that the UV-induced serine 112 phosphorylation of Bad occurred in a
PI3-K-dependent manner by using PI3-K inhibitors such as
LY294002 and wortmannin. However, Akt, a downstream kinase of PI3-K,
has been shown to catalyze the phosphorylation of Bad specifically at
serine 136, but not serine 112 (8, 9). Furthermore, previous studies
have demonstrated the inhibitory effect of both LY294002 and wortmannin
on ERK activation in several cell types after various modes of
stimulation (59-61). Our recent results also showed that pretreatment
with LY294002 or overexpression of a dominant negative mutant of PI3-K
subunit p85 blocks UVB-induced ERKs and MSK1 activation (45) as well as
activation of RSK2 (data not shown), indicating the requirement for
PI3-K upstream of ERKs following UVB radiation. The phosphorylation of
Bad at serine 112 induced by UVB was also confirmed to be partially
inhibited by pretreatment with 12.5-25 µM LY294002 in
our experiments (data not shown). However, in light of the above
findings and in context with our results here, inhibition of Bad serine
112 phosphorylation by LY294002 most likely occurs through inhibition
of the ERKs/RSK2 and ERKs/MSK1 pathways, but not Akt.
PKA has been shown to mediate IL-3-induced phosphorylation of Bad at
serine 112 in a cAMP-dependent manner, offering an
explanation for the survival-promoting effects of cAMP in some cell
types (12). However, recent studies have reported that the level of cAMP was not affected after stimulation with cytokines, suggesting that
PKA activation by cAMP is not the principle means for Bad phosphorylation at serine 112 (62, 63). Very recently, we showed that
PKA was not activated following UVB radiation (46). Therefore, we
conclude that PKA may not be involved in UVB-induced Bad
phosphorylation at serine 112.
Recently, A number of published works have suggested that serine 136 phosphorylation of Bad is physiologically important. Expression of a
mutant Bad in which serine 136 was changed to alanine potentiates apoptosis, arguing that the inability of Akt to phosphorylate this
altered residue promotes association with Bcl-XL, thus
leading to cell death (7, 8, 64). However, singly phosphorylated Bad at
serine 112 also proved incapable of binding to Bcl-XL (7). Our studies here with endogenous Bad argue that Bad-Bcl-XL
association is disrupted independently of serine 136 phosphorylation.
Rather, the dissociation is primarily dependent upon the
phosphorylation state of serine 112. The phosphorylation of Bad at
serine 136 could not be detected following UVB radiation (Fig. 1).
Furthermore, Bad was not shown to be phosphorylated at serine 136 by
active MAP kinases (data not shown) and inhibition of MAP kinases did not result in activation of other protein kinases such as Akt (45) to
phosphorylate Bad at serine 136 after UVB radiation (Fig. 7). On the
other hand, loss of serine 112 phosphorylation of Bad, through
inhibition of MAP kinases including ERKs, JNKs, and p38 kinase,
completely restores the association of Bad with Bcl-XL
(Fig. 7). Therefore, these results suggest that serine 136 may not
necessarily be phosphorylated for cell survival in response to UVB radiation.
In summary, our studies demonstrate that the phosphorylation of Bad at
serine 112 induced by UVB radiation is mediated by the signaling of MAP
kinases and their downstream kinases (Fig. 8). In addition to serine 112 phosphorylation of Bad by RSK2 as demonstrated previously (10, 11), our
results further identify JNK1 and MSK1 as novel and direct signal
mediators of serine 112 phosphorylation in response to UVB radiation.
The phosphorylation of Bad at serine 112 by MAP
kinase-dependent pathways may cooperate with the PI3-K/Akt
pathway (45) to balance UV-induced apoptotic signals, thereby
preventing widespread cell death. Conversely, activation of these
survival pathways by UV radiation may enhance inappropriate cell
survival leading to skin cancer, as has been found in several other
types of cancer (29, 65). Therefore, understanding the cascade of
molecular signals in the UV-induced survival pathway may be helpful in
designing therapeutic targets for prevention of skin cancer induced by
UV radiation.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
- or
-p21-activated protein kinase (PAK) can mediate cytokine or growth
factor-induced phosphorylation of Bad at serine 112 (10-12).
Phosphorylation of Bad at serine residues 112 and 136 leads to the
dissociation of Bad from pro-survival Bcl-XL protein (7).
Mutation of either of these residues to alanine potentiates cell death
following transient transfection with Bad, suggesting that both are
critical in the disruption of Bad-Bcl-XL heterodimers.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-actin
antibody was from Sigma. MEK1-specific inhibitor, PD98059, was
from BIOMOL Research Laboratories, Inc. (Plymouth Meeting,
PA); p38 kinase inhibitor, SB202190, was from Calbiochem; Eagle's
minimum essential medium (MEM) and RPMI 1640 medium were from
Invitrogen; and fetal bovine serum (FBS) was from BioWhittaker,
Inc. (Baltimore, MD).
-glycerol
phosphate, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mg/ml
leupeptin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min in a microcentrifuge. The lysates
containing 500 µg of protein were immunoprecipitated using a
monoclonal antibody against Bad and then protein A/G plus agarose to
capture the complex. The beads were washed extensively to eliminate nonspecific binding, and levels of phosphorylated proteins of Bad at
serine 112 and serine 136 and total Bad were selectively measured by
Western immunoblotting using a specific antibody and a
chemifluorescence detection system (ECF; Amersham Biosciences).
-glycerol phosphate, pH 7.0, 1 mM
sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM dithiothreitol). Then, the
enzyme immune complex was added to 10 µl of assay dilution buffer, 10 µl of 50 µM RSK2 substrate peptide, 10 µl of
inhibitor mixture, and 10 µCi of [
-32P]ATP. The
reaction was incubated for 10 min at 30 °C and centrifuged, and then
30 µl of the supernatant fraction was transferred onto P-81
phosphocellulose paper and allowed to bind for 30 s. The P-81
papers were washed four times in 0.75% phosphoric acid and then washed
once in acetone and
-32P incorporation was measured
by scintillation counting.
-glycerol
phosphate, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM
Na3VO4, and 10 mM
MgCl2). The kinase reactions were carried out in the
presence of 200 µM ATP at 30 °C for 30 min using 3 µg of Bad as substrate. The phosphorylated proteins were detected by
immunoblotting using phosphospecific antibodies.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (54K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
UVB radiation induces Bad phosphorylation at
serine 112, but not serine 136. JB6 Cl 41 cells were starved by
replacing the medium with 0.1% FBS MEM and culturing for 24 h.
The cells were exposed to UVB (4 kJ/m2) and then cultured
for the indicated times (A) or were treated with different
doses of UVB and then cultured for 30 min (B). Lysates were
prepared from the cells, and Bad was immunoprecipitated using
monoclonal Bad antibodies. The levels of phosphorylated Bad at serine
112 or serine 136 and total Bad were selectively measured as described
under "Experimental Procedures."

View larger version (74K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Inhibition of UVB-induced Bad phosphorylation
at serine 112 by MEK1 inhibitor, PD98059, and p38 kinase inhibitor,
SB202190. JB6 Cl 41 cells were starved by replacing the medium
with 0.1% FBS MEM and culturing for 24 h. The cells were then
pretreated with PD98059 or SB202190 at the indicated concentrations for
30 min. The cells were exposed to UVB (4 kJ/m2) and
subsequently cultured for 30 min. Lysates were prepared from the cells,
and one tenth of the lysates was used for immunoblotting with
phosphospecific or total antibodies against ERKs (A), p38
kinase (B), or JNKs (C). The rest of the lysates
were used for immunoprecipitation with monoclonal antibodies against
Bad. The levels of phosphorylated Bad at serine 112 and total Bad
(D) were assessed by immunoblotting.

View larger version (55K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Expression of a dominant negative mutant of
ERK2, JNK1, or p38 kinase impairs UVB-induced Bad phosphorylation at
serine 112. JB6 Cl 41 cell stable transfectants, CMV-neo, DN-ERK2
(A), DN-JNK1 (B), and DN-p38 kinase
(C) were starved by replacing the medium with 0.1% FBS MEM
and culturing for 24 h. The cells were exposed to UVB (4 kJ/m2) and subsequently cultured for the indicated times.
Lysates were prepared from the cells, and Bad was immunoprecipitated
using monoclonal Bad antibodies. The levels of phosphorylated Bad at
serine 112 and total Bad were assessed by immunoblotting.

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Bad is phosphorylated at serine 112 in
vitro by activated JNK1, RSK2, and MSK1. A,
Bad serine 112 is phosphorylated by active JNK1, but not by active
JNK2, ERK1/2, and p38 kinase. Phosphorylation of Bad at serine 112 by
active recombinant kinases was carried out at 30 °C for 30 min in
the presence of Bad fusion protein, kinase buffer, 200 µM
ATP, and one of the MAP kinase family. Phosphorylation was
immunodetected with antibodies against phosphorylation of Bad at serine
112. B, RSK2 is a downstream kinase of the UVB-activated ERK
signaling pathway. JB6 Cl 41 cells (B1) and their stable
transfectants, CMV-neo and DN-ERK2 (B2), were starved by
replacing the medium with 0.1% FBS MEM and culturing for 24 h.
The JB6 Cl 41 cells were either pretreated or not with PD98059 for 30 min at the indicated concentrations. The cells were exposed to UVB (4 kJ/m2) and subsequently cultured for the indicated times.
Lysates (500 µg of protein) were prepared from the cells, and RSK2
was immunoprecipitated using RSK2 antibodies. The activity of RSK2 was
determined as described under "Experimental Procedures." Data from
three independent experiments were averaged and are presented as
mean ± S.E. C and D, UVB-activated or
-active RSK2 phosphorylates Bad at serine 112. JB6 Cl 41 cells were
treated as in B and lysed. The immunoprecipitated
(IP) RSK2 was assayed for kinase activity by adding Bad
fusion protein as substrate (C). Phosphorylation of Bad at
serine 112 by active recombinant RSK2 was carried out as described in
A, except for using active RSK2 to replace the MAP kinases
in the reaction mixture (D). The levels of phosphorylated
Bad at serine 112 were assessed by immunoblotting. E, Bad
serine 112 is phosphorylated by active MSK1, but not by active
MAPKAPK-2. Phosphorylation of Bad at serine 112 by active recombinant
MSK1 or MAPKAPK-2 was carried out as described in A, except
for using active MSK1 or MAPKAPK-2 to replace the MAP kinases in the
reaction mixture.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
UVB-induced Bad phosphorylation at serine 112 is blocked in RSK2-deficient cells. A, RSK2 is
deficient in the lymphoblasts derived from a CLS patient. Extracts were
prepared from normal and CLS lymphoblasts. Expression of RSK2 was
immunodetected with RSK2 antibodies.
-Actin was used as an internal
control to monitor equal protein loading. B, in
vitro RSK2 assay. Normal and CLS lymphoblasts were starved by
replacing the medium with 0.5% FBS RPMI 1640 medium and culturing for
24 h. The lymphoblasts were exposed to UVB (4 kJ/m2)
and subsequently cultured for the indicated times. Lysates (500 µg of
protein) were prepared from the lymphoblasts, and RSK2 was
immunoprecipitated using RSK2 antibodies. The activity of RSK2 was
determined as described under "Experimental Procedures." Data from
three independent experiments were averaged and are presented as
mean ± S.E. C, CLS cells are defective in UVB-induced
Bad phosphorylation at serine 112. Normal and CLS lymphoblasts were
starved by replacing the medium with 0.5% FBS RPMI 1640 medium and
culturing for 24 h. The lymphoblasts were exposed to UVB (4 kJ/m2) and subsequently cultured for the indicated times.
Lysates were prepared from the lymphoblasts, and Bad was
immunoprecipitated using monoclonal Bad antibodies. The levels of
phosphorylated Bad at serine 112 and total Bad were assessed by
immunoblotting.

View larger version (61K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Blocking UVB-induced phosphorylation of Bad
at serine 112 by overexpression of N-terminal or C-terminal kinase-dead
mutant of MSK1. JB6 Cl 41 cell stable transfectants, CMV5, N-MSK1,
and C-MSK1 were starved by replacing the medium with 0.1% FBS MEM and
culturing for 24 h. The cells were exposed to UVB (4 kJ/m2) and subsequently cultured for the indicated times.
Lysates were prepared from the cells, and Bad was immunoprecipitated
using monoclonal Bad antibodies. The levels of phosphorylated Bad at
serine 112 and total Bad were assessed by immunoblotting.

View larger version (50K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
UVB-induced serine 112 phosphorylation
disrupts association of Bad with Bcl-XL. JB6 Cl 41 cells (A) and their stable transfectants, CMV-neo and
DN-JNK1 (B), were starved by replacing the medium with 0.1%
FBS MEM and culturing for 24 h. The JB6 Cl 41 cells were either
pretreated or not with PD98059 or SB202190 at the indicated
concentrations for 30 min. The cells were exposed to UVB (4 kJ/m2) and subsequently cultured for 30 min. Lysates were
prepared from the cells, and Bad was immunoprecipitated (IP)
using monoclonal Bad antibodies. The Bad immunoprecipitates were
immunoblotted with Bcl-XL, phospho-Bad (Ser136)
or total Bad antibodies.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and overexpression of MAP kinase kinase 6, an upstream kinase of p38
kinase, also have been reported to contribute to survival signaling
(36, 37). Our recent study demonstrates the requirement of JNK
activation for tumor necrosis factor-
-induced JB6 cell
transformation (44). Embryos with disruption of Jnk1 and
Jnk2 genes exhibit increased apoptosis in the development of
forebrain (54, 55). In addition, integrin-mediated survival signaling
has been shown to be mediated by the JNK pathway (56). However, little
direct evidence has been obtained to show that the MAP kinase family
regulates survival-signaling components in response to UV radiation.
Very recently, we reported that ERK- and p38
kinase-dependent MSK1 activation, in addition to the
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-K) pathway, is required for Akt
activation early after UVB radiation (45). In the present study, we
further found that MAP kinases mediate UVB-induced Bad phosphorylation
at serine 112. The results of our study indicated that JNK1 is a direct mediator of UVB-induced phosphorylation of Bad at serine 112 (Figs. 3B and 4A). Although ERKs and p38 kinase did not
directly phosphorylate Bad at serine 112, RSK2, a downstream kinase of
ERKs (Fig. 4B) (50), and MSK1, a downstream kinase of ERKs
and p38 kinase (41, 45, 46, 51), were shown to be responsible for the
phosphorylation in vitro and in vivo (Figs.
4-6). Furthermore, the MAP kinase-dependent phosphorylation of Bad at serine 112 was found to be required for Bad
dissociation from Bcl-XL (Fig. 7). Therefore, these data suggest a novel role for MAP kinases and their downstream kinases in
the regulation of survival signal transduction pathways immediately following UV radiation. However, the significance of the members of MAP
kinases being required for UVB-induced serine 112 phosphorylation of
Bad and regulation of its function is not presently known. Some
evidence indicates that cross-talk among ERKs, JNKs, and p38 kinase
signaling may play an important role in determining cell survival and
death (34, 57). Further study will be required to confirm this hypothesis.
- and
-PAK have also been shown to phosphorylate Bad at
serine 112 in vitro and in vivo (13, 14).
Activation of
-PAK was shown to be induced by IL-3 in FL5.12
lymphoid progenitor cells (13), but not by tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF-
) in BALB3T3 fibroblasts (14). These results indicate that
activation of
-PAK may depend on cell type differences or different
extracellular stimuli. Furthermore, whether
-PAK is involved in
IL-3-induced endogenous Bad phosphorylation at serine 112 has not been
determined (13). Overexpression of constitutively active
-PAK
stimulates cell survival of BALB3T3 fibroblasts in response to TNF-
,
growth factor withdrawal, and UVC radiation (14). The authors suggested that phosphorylation of Bad at serine 112 by
-PAK may be one of the
mechanisms for protection from cell death. However, whether UVC
radiation induction of endogenous Bad phosphorylation and
-PAK is
required for the phosphorylation has not yet been investigated. Interestingly, expression of active
-PAK increases the early activation of ERKs, JNKs, and p38 kinase induced by TNF-
(14). Currently, we are also identifying the upstream effectors of MAP kinases involved in UVB-induced phosphorylation of Bad at serine 112. Whether
-PAK is one of the candidate effectors will need to be determined.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Schematic diagram showing the involvement of
MAP kinases and their downstream kinases in the phosphorylation of Bad
at serine 112 induced by UVB radiation. UVB radiation induces
activation of ERKs, JNKs, p38 kinase, and their downstream kinases in
which JNK1, RSK2, and MSK1 are direct signal mediators of Bad
phosphorylation at serine 112. The arrows indicate
activation, and
indicates inhibition.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. Ann M. Bode for critical reading of the manuscript and Andria Hansen for secretarial assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by the Hormel Foundation and by National Institutes of Health Grant CA77646.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Hormel Inst.,
University of Minnesota, 801 16th Ave. N.E., Austin, MN
55912. Tel.: 507-437-9600; Fax: 507-437-9606; E-mail:
zgdong@hi.umn.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 30, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109907200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: IL, interleukin; CMV, cytomegalovirus; DN, dominant negative; CLS, Coffin-Lowry syndrome; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; MEK1, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1; RSK2, p90 ribosomal S6 kinase 2; MSK1, mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase 1; MAPKAPK-2, mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated protein kinase 2; PI3-K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PAK, p21-activated protein kinase; PKA, protein kinase A; MEM, Eagle's minimum essential medium; FBS, fetal bovine serum; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Oltvai, Z. N., and Korsmeyer, S. J. (1994) Cell 79, 189-192 |
| 2. | Reed, J. C. (1998) Oncogene 17, 3225-3236 |
| 3. | Zha, J., Harada, H., Osipov, K., Jockel, J., Waksman, G., and Korsmeyer, S. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24101-24104 |
| 4. | Kelekar, A., Chang, B. S., Harlan, J. E., Fesik, S. W., and Thompson, C. B. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 7040-7046 |
| 5. | Gross, A., McDonnell, J. M., and Korsmeyer, S. J. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 1899-1911 |
| 6. | Martin, S. J., and Green, D. R. (1995) Cell 82, 349-352 |
| 7. | Zha, J., Harada, H., Yang, E., Jockel, J., and Korsmeyer, S. J. (1996) Cell 87, 619-628 |
| 8. | Datta, S. R., Dudek, H., Tao, X., Masters, S., Fu, H., Gotoh, Y., and Greenberg, M. E. (1997) Cell 91, 231-241 |
| 9. | del Peso, L., Gonzalez-Garcia, M., Page, C., Herrera, R., and Nunez, G. (1997) Science 278, 687-689 |
| 10. | Bonni, A., Brunet, A., West, A. E., Datta, S. R., Takasu, M. A., and Greenberg, M. E. (1999) Science 286, 1358-1362 |
| 11. | Tan, Y., Ruan, H., Demeter, M. R., and Comb, M. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 34859-34867 |
| 12. | Harada, H., Becknell, B., Wilm, M., Mann, M., Huang, L. J., Taylor, SS, Scott, J. D., and Korsmeyer, S. J. (1999) Mol. Cell 3, 413-422 |
| 13. | Schurmann, A., Mooney, A. F., Sanders, L. C., Sells, M. A., Wang, H. G., Reed, J. C., and Bokoch, G. M. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 453-461 |
| 14. | Jakobi, R., Moertl, E., and Koeppel, M. A. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 16624-16634 |
| 15. | de Gruijl, F. R., Sterenborg, H. J., Forbes, P. D., Davies, R. E., Cole, C, Kelfkens, G., van Weelden, H., Slaper, H., and van der Leun, J. C. (1993) Cancer Res. 53, 53-60 |
| 16. | Beissert, S., and Schwarz, T. (1999) J. Invest. Dermatol. Symp. Proc. 4, 61-64 |
| 17. | Fisher, G. J., Datta, S. C., Talwar, H. S., Wang, Z. Q., Varani, J., Kang, S, and Voorhees, J. J. (1996) Nature 379, 335-339 |
| 18. | Herrlich, P., Ponta, H., and Rahmsdorf, H. J. (1992) Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 119, 187-223 |
| 19. | Herrlich, P., and Rahmsdorf, H. J. (1994) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6, 425-431 |
| 20. | Bender, K., Blattner, C., Knebel, A., Iordanov, M., Herrlich, P., and Rahmsdorf, H. J. (1997) J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 37, 1-17 |
| 21. | Tournier, C., Hess, P., Yang, D. D., Xu, J., Turner, T. K., Nimnual, A, Bar-Sagi, D., Jones, S. N., Flavell, R. A., and Davis, R. J. (2000) Science 288, 870-874 |
| 22. | Bulavin, D. V., Saito, S., Hollander, M. C., Sakaguchi, K., Anderson, CW, Appella, E., and Fornace, A. J., Jr. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 6845-6854 |
| 23. | Dhanasekaran, N., and Premkumar Reddy, E. (1998) Oncogene 17, 1447-1455 |
| 24. | Derijard, B., Hibi, M., Wu, I. H., Barrett, T., Su, B., Deng, T., Karin, M., and Davis, R. J. (1994) Cell 76, 1025-1037 |
| 25. | Han, J., Lee, J. D., Bibbs, L., and Ulevitch, R. J. (1994) Science 265, 808-811 |
| 26. | Rosette, C., and Karin, M. (1996) Science 274, 1194-1197 |
| 27. | Huang, C., Ma, W. Y., and Dong, Z. (1999) Oncogene 18, 2828-2835 |
| 28. | She, Q. B., Chen, N., and Dong, Z. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 20444-20449 |
| 29. | Merienne, K., Jacquot, S., Zeniou, M., Pannetier, S., Sassone-Corsi, P., and Hanauer, A. (2000) Oncogene 19, 4221-4229 |
| 30. | Kock, A., Schwarz, T., Kirnbauer, R., Urbanski, A., Perry, P., Ansel, J. C., and Luger, T. A. (1990) J. Exp. Med. 172, 1609-1614 |
| 31. | Ullrich, S. E. (1995) Photochem. Photobiol. 62, 389-401 |
| 32. | Leverkus, M., Yaar, M., Eller, M. S., Tang, E. H., and Gilchrest, B. A. (1998) J. Invest. Dermatol. 110, 353-357 |
| 33. | Kulms, D., Poppelmann, B., and Schwarz, T. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 15060-15066 |
| 34. | Xia, Z., Dickens, M., Raingeaud, J., Davis, R. J., and Greenberg, M. E. (1995) Science 270, 1326-1331 |
| 35. | Ip, Y. T., and Davis, R. J. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 205-219 |
| 36. | Roulston, A., Reinhard, C., Amiri, P., and Williams, L. T. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 10232-10239 |
| 37. | Zechner, D., Craig, R., Hanford, D. S., McDonough, P. M., Sabbadini, RA, and Glembotski, C. C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 8232-8239 |
| 38. | Frost, J. A., Geppert, T. D., Cobb, M. H., and Feramisco, J. R. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 3844-3848 |
| 39. | Chen, Y. R., Wang, X., Templeton, D., Davis, R. J., and Tan, T. H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 31929-31936 |
| 40. | Rincon, M., Enslen, H., Raingeaud, J., Recht, M., Zapton, T., Su, MS, Penix, L. A., Davis, R. J., and Flavell, R. A. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 2817-2829 |
| 41. | Deak, M., Clifton, A. D., Lucocq, L. M., and Alessi, D. R. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4426-4441 |
| 42. | Huang, C., Ma, W. Y., Ding, M., Bowden, G. T., and Dong, Z. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 27753-27757 |
| 43. | Huang, C., Ma, W. Y., Maxiner, A., Sun, Y., and Dong, Z. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 12229-12235 |
| 44. | Huang, C., Li, J. X., Ma, W. Y., and Dong, Z. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 29672-29676 |
| 45. | Nomura, M., Kaji, A, Ma, W. Y., Zhong, S., Liu, G., Bowden, G. T., Miyamoto, K., and Dong, Z. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 25558-25567 |
| 46. | Zhong, S. P., Jansen, C., She, Q. B., Goto, H., Inagaki, M., Bode, A. M., Ma, W. Y., and Dong, Z. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 33213-33219 |
| 47. | Zhong, S. P., Ma, W. Y., and Dong, Z. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 20980-20984 |
| 48. | Alessi, D. R., Cuenda, A., Cohen, P., Dudley, D. T., and Saltiel, A. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 27489-27494 |
| 49. | Hazzalin, C. A., Cano, E., Cuenda, A., Barratt, M. J., Cohen, P., and Mahadevan, L. C. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 1028-1031 |
| 50. | Frodin, M., and Gammeltoft, S. (1999) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 151, 65-77 |
| 51. | New, L., Zhao, M., Li, Y., Bassett, W. W., Feng, Y., Ludwig, S., Padova, F. D., Gram, H., and Han, J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 1026-1032 |
| 52. | Stokoe, D., Campbell, D. G., Nakielny, S., Hidaka, H., Leevers, S. J., Marshall, C., and Cohen, P. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 3985-3994 |
| 53. | Meier, P., and Evan, G. (1998) Cell 95, 295-298 |
| 54. | Kuan, C. Y., Yang, D. D., Samanta Roy, D. R., Davis, R. J., Rakic, P., and Flavell, R. A. (1999) Neuron 22, 667-676 |
| 55. | Sabapathy, K., Jochum, W., Hochedlinger, K., Chang, L., Karin, M., and Wagner, E. F. (1999) Mech. Dev. 89, 115-124 |
| 56. | Almeida, E. A., Ilic, D., Han, Q., Hauck, C. R., Jin, F., Kawakatsu, H, Schlaepfer, D. D., and Damsky, C. H. (2000) J. Cell Biol. 149, 741-754 |
| 57. | Canman, C. E., and Kastan, M. D. (1996) Nature 384, 213-214 |
| 58. | Wan, Y. S., Wang, Z. Q., Shao, Y., Voorhees, J. J., and Fisher, G. J. (2001) Int. J. Oncol. 18, 461-466 |
| 59. | Hawes, B. E., Luttrell, L. M., van Biesen, T., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 12133-12136 |
| 60. | Sutor, S. L., Vroman, B. T., Armstrong, E. A., Abraham, R. T., and Karnitz, L. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 7002-7010 |
| 61. | Wennstrom, S., and Downward, J. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 4279-4288 |
| 62. | Scheid, M. P., Foltz, I. N., Young, P. R., Schrader, J. W., and Duronio, V. (1999) Blood 93, 217-225 |
| 63. | Scheid, M. P., Schubert, K. M., and Duronio, V. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 31108-31113 |
| 64. | Blume-Jensen, P., Janknecht, R., and Hunter, T. (1998) Curr. Biol. 8, 779-782 |
| 65. | Altiok, S., Batt, D., Altiok, N., Papautsky, A., Downward, J., Roberts, T. M., and Avraham, H. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 32274-32278 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. G. Humphrey, C. Sonnenberg-Hirche, S. D. Smith, C. Hu, A. Barton, Y. Sadovsky, and D. M. Nelson Epidermal Growth Factor Abrogates Hypoxia-Induced Apoptosis in Cultured Human Trophoblasts through Phosphorylation of BAD Serine 112 Endocrinology, May 1, 2008; 149(5): 2131 - 2137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yao, Y.-Y. Cho, H. R. Bergen III, B. J. Madden, B. Y. Choi, W.-Y. Ma, A. M. Bode, and Z. Dong Nuclear Factor of Activated T3 Is a Negative Regulator of Ras-JNK1/2-AP-1 Induced Cell Transformation Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 67(18): 8725 - 8735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-M. Oh, F. Zhu, Y.-Y. Cho, K. W. Lee, B. S. Kang, H.-G. Kim, T. Zykova, A. M. Bode, and Z. Dong T-Lymphokine-Activated Killer Cell-Originated Protein Kinase Functions as a Positive Regulator of c-Jun-NH2-Kinase 1 Signaling and H-Ras-Induced Cell Transformation Cancer Res., June 1, 2007; 67(11): 5186 - 5194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. S. R. Sastry, Y. Karpova, and G. Kulik Epidermal Growth Factor Protects Prostate Cancer Cells from Apoptosis by Inducing BAD Phosphorylation via Redundant Signaling Pathways J. Biol. Chem., September 15, 2006; 281(37): 27367 - 27377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Cai, S. H. Chang, E. B. E. Becker, A. Bonni, and Z. Xia p38 MAP Kinase Mediates Apoptosis through Phosphorylation of BimEL at Ser-65 J. Biol. Chem., September 1, 2006; 281(35): 25215 - 25222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ohi, Y. Nishikawa, T. Tokairin, Y. Yamamoto, Y. Doi, Y. Omori, and K. Enomoto Maintenance of Bad Phosphorylation Prevents Apoptosis of Rat Hepatic Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells in Vitro and in Vivo Am. J. Pathol., April 1, 2006; 168(4): 1097 - 1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Sooranna, N. Engineer, J. A. Z. Loudon, V. Terzidou, P. R. Bennett, and M. R. Johnson The Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Dependent Expression of Prostaglandin H Synthase-2 and Interleukin-8 Messenger Ribonucleic Acid by Myometrial Cells: The Differential Effect of Stretch and Interleukin-1{beta} J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3517 - 3527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|