|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M200191200 on April 30, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 27, 24243-24251, July 5, 2002
Novel Mode of Interference with Nuclear Factor of Activated
T-cells Regulation in T-cells by the Bacterial Metabolite
n-Butyrate*
Christos
Diakos ,
Eva E.
Prieschl§,
Marcus
Säemann ,
Veronica
Novotny§,
Georg
Böhmig¶,
Robert
Csonga§,
Thomas
Baumruker§, and
Gerhard J.
Zlabinger
From the Institute of Immunology, University of
Vienna, Borschkegasse 8a, A-1090 Vienna, the § Department of
Allergic Diseases, Novartis Research Institute, Brunnerstrasse 53,
A-1235 Vienna, and the ¶ Department of Internal Medicine III,
Division of Nephrology, University of Vienna, Währinger
Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
Received for publication, January 8, 2002, and in revised form, April 8, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The transcription factor nuclear factor of
activated T-cells (NF-AT) plays an essential role in the activation of
many early immune response genes. A dynamic equilibrium between
calcineurin and cellular kinases controls its phosphorylation and thus
regulates its activity by determining its subcellular localization.
Here, we demonstrate that T-cell activation in the presence of the
bacterial metabolite n-butyrate, which leads to inhibition
of interleukin-2 transcription, is characterized by the maintenance of
the activity of counter-regulatory kinases glycogen synthase kinase 3 and protein kinase A as well as persistence of intracellular cAMP
levels, whereas calcium response and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation were indistinguishable from cells stimulated in the absence
of n-butyrate. Nuclear binding of NF-AT was decreased but
other transcription factors implicated in interleukin-2 expression such
as AP1 and nuclear factor B were unaffected. The effect on NF-AT
binding appeared to be the result of increased nuclear export because
the export inhibitor leptomycin B completely restored nuclear binding
of NF-AT. We, therefore, provide first evidence for interference with
NF-AT regulation alternative to the currently understood inhibition of
nuclear import. This mechanism might represent a bacterial strategy to
subvert host defense, which could be of particular clinical importance
in the gastrointestinal tract where high amounts of
n-butyrate are physiologically present.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
T-cell receptor (TCR)1
ligation and subsequent T-cell triggering initiate the coordinated
succession of two major activating signaling pathways, namely via
severally branched Ras/Rac-activated protein kinase cascades and
Ca2+-dependent signaling events. Successful
T-cell activation characteristically results in enhanced induction of
the growth factor IL-2, governing the expansion of antigen-specific
T-cells. Mechanistically, IL-2 expression is transcriptionally
regulated with the inducible transcription factors activating protein-1
(AP1), nuclear factor B (NF B), and nuclear factor of activated
T-cells (NF-AT) playing a critical role in this process. Currently,
in vivo footprinting data imply that the cooperative
occupancy of the binding sites of all three transcription factors at
the IL-2 promoter is required for the activation of this gene (1-4).
Consequently, functional inhibition of one of these factors is
sufficient to inhibit IL-2 production and therefore T-cell activation.
This has been demonstrated with the immunosuppressive drug FK506, which
selectively blocks the nuclear translocation of NF-AT family members
(5, 6).
Two such members of the NF-AT family, NF-AT1 and NF-AT2, control the
activation of most, if not all, lymphokine genes expressed by T-cells.
Upon TCR engagement they are activated via the
Ca2+/calcineurin phosphatase pathway, resulting in
dephosphorylation and unmasking of the nuclear localization motif and
the subsequent translocation to the nucleus (3, 7, 8). Considerably less is known about the regulation in the export of these factors and
thus termination of IL-2 synthesis. Several kinases have been reported
to act counter-regulatory to the phosphatase calcineurin with protein
kinase A (PKA) and glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3) being the best
characterized examples. PKA phosphorylation motifs reside within the
nuclear localization signal of NF-AT, and phosphorylation of this
transcription factor by PKA has been demonstrated in vitro. Phosphorylated NF-AT then appears "primed" for GSK-3, a
kinase that has been shown to promote export of NF-AT from the nucleus. It is noteworthy that both kinases are rapidly inactivated upon TCR
engagement; however, the in vivo relevance of this
down-regulation in the overall activation process remains unclear
(9-11). This is likely the result of the fact that no inhibitors of
the activation-dependent abrogation of GSK-3 and PKA are
available. As exemplified for the calcineurin inhibitors, which
facilitated the exploration of the association between NF-AT import and
calcineurin, such a substance would facilitate the elucidation of the
pathways connecting the kinases with NF-AT export in
vivo.
Several lines of evidence indicate that co-evolution of pathogen and
host has resulted in the development of microbial strategies to subvert
immune surveillance. In general, tactics like stealth, sabotage, or
exploitation are applied, which include, for example, usage of immune
receptors for infection or sequestration, inhibition of antigen
presentation or cytokine production, and induction of tolerance or
exploitation of lymphoid activation for spreading infection,
respectively (12). Although much progress has been made recently
regarding the recognition of the different ways of subversion, the
knowledge about the actual means of interference as well as the
molecular mode of action is still limited.
The short chain fatty acid n-butyrate is produced in
considerable amounts by bacterial fermentation in the human
gastrointestinal tract (13). In addition to its well known function as
an essential energy source for colonocytes, n-butyrate has
anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects in vitro and
in vivo (14-17), which might be exploited by the intestinal
microflora to evade host defense (18). Regarding T-cells, this
bacterial metabolite has been shown to inhibit their expansion in
response to (allo-) antigens and mitogens. Furthermore,
n-butyrate not only suppresses primary T-cell responses, it
also induces antigen-specific tolerance (19-21). Importantly, the
recently reported ability of n-butyrate to inhibit antigen-specific immune reactivity in vivo indicates a
potential clinical relevance (22, 23). A central feature of
n-butyrate-mediated inhibition of T-cell expansion is the
abrogation of IL-2 production (17, 24), which appears to be an
important determinant of anergy induction. To obtain a better
understanding of the mode of bacterial interference, we investigated
the molecular mechanisms underlying the inhibition of IL-2 production
by n-butyrate. Using Jurkat and human primary T-cells, we
demonstrate that n-butyrate selectively inhibits NF-AT
function in activated T-cells. In contrast to FK506 or other macrolide
undecapeptides, n-butyrate does not prevent the nuclear
import of NF-AT, but rather promotes its export leading to abrogation
of IL-2 synthesis. Such accelerated NF-AT export is accompanied by
sustained cAMP levels, as well as PKA and GSK-3 activity akin to that
observed in nonstimulated cells.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Isolation of T-cells from buffy coats, culturing conditions of
Jurkat T-cells and stimulations, reporter gene assays, depletion of
protein kinase C (PKC) by prolonged PMA treatment, IL-2 ELISA, Bradford
assay, Western blot analysis, preparation of total RNA, radiolabeled
probes, nuclear extracts, and electrophoretic mobility shift assays
(EMSAs) were performed as described (25-31).
Antibodies and Reagents--
Antibodies directed against
tyrosine kinase p56lck (Lck), linker for
activation of T-cells (LAT), GSK-3, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
(PI3K) were from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, NY),
antibodies against Zap70 were bought from Transduction Laboratories (Franklin Lakes, NJ), and anti-NF-AT1 and anti-NF-AT2 antibodies were
from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. and Alexis (San Diego, CA). The
p-JNK1/2 antibody was bought from Promega (Madison, WI). Antibodies directed against p-Erk1/2, Erk1/2, JNK1/2, p-p38, p38, p-pan-PKC, p-PKC , and p-GSK-3 were from New England Biolabs/Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA). CD3 mAb (OKT3) was from Ortho Diagnostics (Raritan, NJ),
CD28 mAb (Leu-28) from BD PharMingen. PMA and ionomycin were bought from Sigma, and (Rp)-8-Br-cAMP was from
Calbiochem.
RNase Protection Assay--
5 µg of total RNA were used in an
RNase protection assay, which was performed according to the protocol
provided by the manufacturer (Riboquant system, BD PharMingen).
Determination of Cytoplasmic Concentrations of Free
Calcium--
4 × 105 Jurkat T-cells were resuspended
in 150 µl of Tyrode/BSA buffer (1.5 mM CaCl2,
5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 130 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES, 0.1% (w/v)
D-glucose, 0.1% (w/v) BSA). Subsequently 250 µl of
loading solution (20 µM FLUO-3/AM (Molecular Probes, Leiden, The Netherlands), 0.0275% Pluronic F-127 (Molecular Probes)) were added and the cells incubated in a thermomixer (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) at 600 rpm at 26 °C for 45 min. After incubation, the cells were washed three times with Tyrode/BSA buffer. 5 × 104 cells were analyzed in a Fluoroscan (BMG Lab
Technologies, Offenburg, Germany) at an excitation wavelength of 485 nm
and an emission wavelength of 538 nm. After the addition of the
stimulus, values were recorded every 70 s for 7 min.
GSK-3 Immunoprecipitation and Kinase Assay--
For
immunoprecipitation 1 × 107 Jurkat T-cells were lysed
in 1 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM
trisodium orthovanadate, 0.1% (v/v) -mercaptoethanol, 1% Triton
X-100, 50 mM NaF, 5 mM tetrasodium
pyrophosphate, 10 mM -glycerophosphate, 0.1 mM PMSF, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin) at
4 °C for 1 h with constant rotation. For each sample 50 µl of
GammaBind G-Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences) were incubated with
5 µg of anti-GSK-3 antibody in lysis buffer at 4 °C for 1 h
with constant rotation. After washing the beads four times with lysis
buffer, the cell lysate was added and again incubated for 1 h at
4 °C with constant rotation. Finally, the immunoprecipitate was
washed another three times with lysis buffer and two times with GSK-3
kinase buffer (8 mM MOPS, 0.2 mM EDTA, 10 mM magnesium acetate, pH 7.3). 1 µg of glycogen
synthetase peptide (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.) and 10 µCi of
[ -32P]ATP (Amersham Biosciences) were added and the
reaction incubated at 30 °C for 30 min. Subsequently reducing sample
buffer was added and an aliquot subjected to SDS-PAGE (16% Tricine
gel; Novex, La Jolla, CA). The gel was fixed (10% acetic acid, 40%
methanol) for 1 h and dried before exposing to a Biomax-MR film
(Eastman Kodak Co.).
PKA Kinase Assay--
Cellular extracts were obtained and kinase
activity assayed using the PKA assay kit (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.)
according to the manufacturer's protocol. Upon completion, the
reaction was resolved on a 16% Tricine gel (Novex). The gel was fixed
(10% acetic acid, 40% methanol) for 1 h and dried before
exposing to a Biomax-MR film.
cAMP Assay--
Per sample, 1 × 107 Jurkat
T-cells were used. Cell lysis and intracellular cAMP measurements were
performed using an enzyme immunoassay (BIOTRAK, Amersham
Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Preparation of Rafts/Sucrose Gradient--
2 × 107 Jurkat T-cells were either left nonstimulated or
activated for 1 min before lysis (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 1 mM
trisodium orthovanadate, 30 mM sodium pyruvate, 10 mM glycerophosphate, 1 mM PMSF, 0.02 units/ml
aprotinin, 0.01% sodium azide, and 1% Nonidet P-40 on ice for 10 min). The lysate was mixed 1:1 with an 80% sucrose solution (sucrose
had been dissolved in 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 125 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA) before loading onto a
sucrose gradient. The gradient was generated with the stepwise addition
of 2 ml each of 80, 60, 40 (containing the cell lysate), 30, 20, and
10% sucrose. After centrifugation (SW40 rotor with 37,500 rpm for
18 h at 4 °C), 666-µl fractions were collected from the top
of the gradient. Protein content of the fractions was determined with a
Bradford assay (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Kinase Assay and Immunoprecipitation of Sucrose
Fractions--
For the in vitro kinase reaction, 20 and
40% sucrose fractions were pooled (10 µl of each fraction) and
diluted to 120 µl in kinase buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.3, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MnCl2). Then 10 µCi of [ -32P]ATP (Amersham Biosciences) was added
and the reaction incubated for 10 min at 30 °C. 20 µl of each
reaction were used for SDS-PAGE (4-20% Tris-glycine gel; Novex).
After electrophoresis, the gel was fixed (10% acetic acid, 40%
methanol) before drying. The gel was then subjected to autoradiography
as described above. For immunoprecipitation, 5 µg of rabbit anti-Lck
antibody were coupled to 50 µl of Sepharose G beads (Amersham
Biosciences). After washing the beads, they were resuspended in 1 ml of
buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM PMSF, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM trisodium orthovanadate, and 1 mM sodium
fluoride). 200 µl of a radiolabeled kinase reaction from the 20%
sucrose fraction (see above) was added and incubated with the beads for
1 h at 4 °C with constant rotation. The beads were subsequently
collected by centrifugation and washed four times with the
precipitation buffer. The beads were resuspended in SDS sample buffer
with subsequent PAGE. After electrophoresis, the gel was fixed and
subjected to autoradiography as described above.
 |
RESULTS |
Inhibition of IL-2 Production--
In the low millimolar
concentration range, n-butyrate is known to inhibit
alloantigen-stimulated T-cell expansion. Furthermore, it causes
antigen-specific hyporesponsiveness in restimulation assays (19-21,
23, 32). This phenomenon is accompanied by a strong suppression of
T-cell produced cytokines. To address the corresponding molecular
mechanism of n-butyrate, we have chosen the Jurkat T-cell
line as a model system. As a surrogate readout for the inhibitory
effects of this compound, anti-CD3/CD28-induced IL-2 production as
determined by ELISA was used (Fig.
1A). When n-butyrate (1 mM) was added at culture
initiation, TCR-driven IL-2 secretion was prevented. To crudely address
the level of inhibition (transcriptionally or post-transcriptionally),
an RNase protection assay was performed to measure IL-2 steady state
mRNA levels. Although upon TCR engagement IL-2 mRNA increased
compared with nonstimulated cells (no RNA detectable; see Fig.
1B, lanes 1 and 2),
n-butyrate totally blocked this induction (Fig.
1B, lanes 2 and 3). This
finding indicates that the generation of a stable IL-2 message was
prevented. To further demonstrate that IL-2 transcription is affected
by n-butyrate, induction of an IL-2 promoter-driven
luciferase reporter gene was evaluated. Again, in this setting
n-butyrate strongly reduced IL-2
promoter-dependent luciferase synthesis after stimulation
with CD3/CD28 mAb or PMA plus ionomycin (Fig. 1C). These
data confirm that Jurkat T-cells are a suitable model system to
investigate the molecular mechanisms responsible for
n-butyrate-mediated IL-2 inhibition, showing that the block
affects the assembly of the transcription factor machinery at the IL-2
promoter.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Inhibition of IL-2 production by
n-butyrate (n-but) in Jurkat
T-cells. Jurkat T-cells were stimulated for 6 h by CD3 and
CD28 mAb ( CD3/28) or PMA and ionomycin
(PMA/iono) in the presence or absence of
n-butyrate (1 mM). nst,
nonstimulated. A, supernatants were analyzed for IL-2
production by ELISA. B, RNA was isolated and ribonuclease
protection assays were performed. L32 indicates a
housekeeping gene used as a control for equal loading of lanes.
C, Jurkat T-cells stably transfected with the IL-2 promoter
(position 583 to +40) linked to a luciferase gene were used to assess
transcriptional interference.
|
|
Differential Modulation of Early Signaling
Events--
n-Butyrate is known to cause diminished
population doubling rates, altered morphology, decreased
anchorage-independent growth, and increased expression of colon
epithelial differentiation marker enzymes such as alkaline phosphatase
in colon carcinoma cells (33-35). The latter effects were attributed
to a decreased activity of p56lck (36), a
protein-tyrosine kinase that plays an essential role in TCR
stimulation. In activated Lck / T-cells, endogenous Fyn
predominantly substitutes for this kinase with one notable exception,
the activation of NF-AT and consequently IL-2 production (37). The
latter is reminiscent of the effects observed with
n-butyrate in our model system. It was therefore decided to
investigate the function of Lck in terms of its localization in (lipid)
rafts and its associated kinase activity in Jurkat T-cells stimulated
in the presence or absence of n-butyrate (1 mM).
As illustrated (Fig. 2A),
there is successful separation of rafts (20% sucrose fraction)
versus the bulk of the cytoplasmic proteins (40% sucrose
fraction) confirmed with Western blot analysis of marker proteins. As
described, LAT was clearly detected in both fractions (compare
lanes 1, 3, and 5,
corresponding to the rafts, with lanes 2,
4, and 6, corresponding to the cytosolic preparation). In addition, trace amounts of Lck (comparable with the
5.8% that were reported recently) were seen in the raft compartment (see especially lanes 3 and 5). In
contrast, PI3K and Zap70, which both comprise cytoplasmic proteins, are
exclusively present within the 40% fraction (Fig. 2A,
lanes 2, 4, and 6). To
normalize for protein content, a Bradford assay was performed showing
equal amounts of protein independent of the activation status of the cells (Fig. 2B). However, in an in vitro kinase
assay using the isolated rafts as source of kinase activity, increased
phosphorylation of a protein corresponding to the size of Lck (56 kDa)
was detected 1 min after an anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation (Fig.
2C, lanes 1 and 2). This
induction was blocked after drug treatment (Fig. 2C, lanes 2 and 3). The identity of this
activity/protein band was further revealed by immunoprecipitation
analysis as p56lck.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of n-butyrate on Lck
kinase activity and Lck localization in rafts of stimulated Jurkat
T-cells. A, Western blot analysis of the sucrose
gradient-separated fractions. Lanes 1,
3, and 5 show the detergent-resistant membranes
(20% sucrose fraction), and lanes 2,
4, and 6 show the bulk of the cytoplasmic
proteins (40% sucrose fraction), of either nonstimulated
(nst) or CD3 plus CD28 mAb ( CD3/28)-stimulated
cells in the presence or absence of n-butyrate
(n-but). The identity of the investigated proteins is
indicated to the right. B, the amount of protein
present in respective fractions was determined using a Bradford assay.
C, in vitro kinase assays using isolated rafts
(20% sucrose fraction) from unstimulated Jurkat T-cells (lane
1) or Jurkat T-cells stimulated with CD3 plus CD28 mAb in the
absence (lane 2) or presence of n-butyrate
(lane 3) as a source of kinase activity. The identity of
kinase activity/protein band was shown by immunoprecipitation
(IP) analysis (lanes 4 and
5). The bar graph in the
lower panel depicts quantitation of Lck
phosphorylation by densitometry. Phosphorylation levels are expressed
as percentage of intensity of stimulated cells (lanes
1 and 3 versus lane 2, lane
5 versus lane 4).
|
|
Substitution of Lck by Fyn in Lck / T-cells leads to an
indistinguishable activation of both major signaling pathways after TCR
stimulation. Ca2+ mobilization and the branched
Ras/Rac-activated protein kinase cascades with Erk and p38
mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) phosphorylation taken as
endpoints were essentially unaffected in these Lck /
cells (26). A similar result was observed in Jurkat T-cells stimulated
in the presence of 1 mM n-butyrate (Fig.
3, A and B). Such
treatment had no effect on Ca2+ mobilization during the
first 7 min after anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation (Fig. 3A).
Additionally Erk1/2 and p38 were phosphorylated/activated independent
of whether n-butyrate is applied, as illustrated in a time
kinetic analysis by Western blotting using phosphospecific antibodies
(Fig. 3B). Regarding JNK, constitutive phosphorylation was
observed, which was not influenced by n-butyrate (Fig.
3B). PKC, which comprise a parallel and/or alternative
activation pathway to the MAPK (38), also became fully activated as
visualized in a pan-phospho-PKC- and a phospho-PKC -specific Western
blot analysis in the presence of 1 mM n-butyrate
(Fig. 3C, lanes 2 and 3).
To rule out that any PKC isoform conveys a negative signal resulting in
the observed suppression of IL-2 transcription, Jurkat T-cells were
depleted of the classical and novel isoforms by a prolonged treatment
with PMA. However, in an IL-2 reporter gene assay, these cells were
still susceptible to n-butyrate-mediated inhibition (Fig.
3D). This strongly indicated that the suppressive effect
observed is not mediated by PKC activities.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
A, n-butyrate does not affect
intracellular calcium mobilization. For measurement of free
intracellular calcium levels, cells were loaded with the
membrane-permeable penta-acetoxymethylester FLUO3/AM. After stimulation
with CD3 and CD28 mAb ( CD3/28) in the presence ( ) or
absence ( ) of n-butyrate (n-but), measurements
were performed using a fluorimeter ( , unstimulated). B,
influence of n-butyrate (1 mM) upon the
activation of MAPK Erk, JNK, and p38. Western blot analysis was
performed, and both the constitutive form and the phosphorylated
(active) form of the enzymes were investigated at 5, 10, and 15 min
after CD3 and CD28 mAb ( CD3/28) stimulation. Phosphorylation of the
kinases was quantified by densitometry and was normalized to the
expression of the constitutive forms. C, PKC activation is
not influenced by n-butyrate. Pan-phospho-PKC- and a
phospho-PKC -specific Western blot analysis (lanes
2 and 3) were performed using extracts from
Jurkat T-cells stimulated with CD3 and CD28 mAb in the presence or
absence of n-butyrate. Phosphorylation of pan-PKC and PKC
was quantified by densitometry. norm, normal. D,
to exclude that any PKC isoform conveys a negative signal and
consequently mediates suppression of IL-2 transcription, Jurkat T-cells
were depleted of PKC by prolonged treatment with PMA. Then they were
further stimulated in the presence/absence of n-butyrate,
and IL-2 transcription was studied by reporter gene assays.
|
|
As the major activating pathways are unaffected by
n-butyrate, we started to explore cascades that are
abrogated in the course of T-cell activation and regarded to act
negatively. Li et al. (39) recently reported that
anti-CD3/CD28 triggering of Jurkat T-cells is accompanied by a decrease
in the intracellular concentration of cAMP. In contrast, it is well
known that increased cAMP levels negatively impact upon T-cell
activation including IL-2 production (8, 40). Our results with Jurkat
T-cells showing a reduction of ~50% in intracellular cAMP level 15 min after anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation are in line with these reports
(Fig. 4A). Importantly, pretreatment with n-butyrate for 30 min prevented this
effect, providing a situation identical to that observed in
nonstimulated cells.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
n-Butyrate restores cAMP levels in
activated Jurkat T-cells. Jurkat T-cells were stimulated by CD3
and CD28 mAb ( CD3/28) in the presence or absence of
n-butyrate (n-but). nst,
nonstimulated. A, intracellular cAMP levels were measured by
ELISA. B, n-butyrate restores the
stimulation-induced decrease in PKA activity in Jurkat T-cells. Using
extracts from Jurkat T-cells stimulated with CD3 and CD28 mAb in the
presence or absence of n-butyrate as a source of PKA, and a
mixture consisting of kemptide as substrate and cAMP as co-factor,
in vitro kinase assays were performed. C, the
cAMP antagonist (Rp)-8-Br-cAMP (Rp)
is able to revert the n-butyrate-mediated inhibition of IL-2
transcription as was shown in a reporter gene assay.
|
|
cAMP-dependent PKA reflects the concentration of its
co-factor (41). Using whole cell lysates and a PKA-specific peptide as
a substrate, we found that n-butyrate greatly preserves the kinase activity comparable with those of resting cells. Stimulated cells, in contrast, responded with a strong decrease in kinase activity
(Fig. 4B, lanes 1-3). To support
these findings functionally, the effect of the selective PKA inhibitor
(Rp)-8-Br-cAMP (42) on IL-2 transcription was
studied in an IL-2 reporter gene assay. 100 µM amount of
the analog reverses the inhibition of IL-2 transcription by
n-butyrate (Fig. 4C). This finding therefore
strongly implies that sustained PKA activity is causally involved in
the abrogation of IL-2 synthesis upon drug treatment.
In T-cells previous data imply that PKA and GSK-3 together negatively
influence cytoplasmic components of NF-AT, a major transcription factor
at the IL-2 promoter. In addition, retrovirus-mediated overexpression
of GSK-3 was recently shown to prevent T-cell proliferation and IL-2
synthesis (9, 11). In model organisms (Dictyostelium), this
usually constitutively active kinase is regulated by Wnt/Wg signaling
or alternatively by cAMP (43). This prompted us to investigate the
importance of this kinase in our butyrate model. Western blot analysis
(Fig. 5A) with extracts from
Jurkat T-cells using a phosphospecific anti-GSK-3 antibody directed
against the negative regulation site(s) serine 9/21 (GSK /GSK ) was
performed. Levels of phospho-GSK increase significantly after
anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation, a response that is prevented by
n-butyrate addition (Fig. 5A). This
posttranslational modification correlates with kinase activity (Fig.
5B). Immunoprecipitated GSK-3 from the same Jurkat cell
lysate was used in an in vitro kinase assay with a glycogen
synthase peptide as a substrate. Both nonstimulated and n-butyrate-treated Jurkat T-cells have high levels of GSK-3
activity (Fig. 5B, lanes 1 and
4). In contrast, stimulation with anti-CD3/CD28 that led to
a phosphorylation at Ser 9/21 correlates with markedly reduced kinase
activity (Fig. 5B, lane 2). Because
n-butyrate did not affect activity when added to extracts of
stimulated T-cells (Fig. 5B, lane 3), a direct
effect upon GSK-3 appears unlikely. To link these findings functionally
with the observed inhibition of IL-2 transcription, the effect of
lithium chloride (LiCl), a known inhibitor of GSK-3, was studied in a
reporter gene assay (11). Interestingly, concomitant application of
LiCl partially reverted the n-butyrate-mediated reduction of
IL-2 synthesis (Fig. 5C). Taken together, these data imply
that modulation of GSK-3 activity is indeed involved in mediating
the inhibitory effects of n-butyrate.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
A, n-butyrate causes
dephosphorylation of GSK-3 at serine 9/21, indicating an increase in
GSK-3 activity. Using Western blot analysis, we investigated the
ability of n-butyrate (n-but) to modify the
phosphorylation state of GSK-3. Cell extracts from Jurkat T-cells
(with/without n-butyrate), which have been stimulated for 5, 10, 15, and 20 min with CD3 plus CD28 mAb ( CD3/28) were
used. nst, nonstimulated. Phosphorylation of the kinase was
quantified by densitometry and was normalized to the expression of the
constitutive form (lower panel). B,
n-butyrate treatment prevents the activation-induced
decrease in GSK-3 activity. After immunoprecipitation GSK-3 from
nuclear extracts from Jurkat T-cells stimulated with CD3 and CD28 mAb
in the presence (c) or absence of n-butyrate was
employed in in vitro kinase assays using glycogen synthetase
peptide (GS peptide) as a substrate. A direct effect of
n-butyrate on GSK-3 was excluded by its addition to an
in vitro kinase assay using extract from Jurkat T-cells
stimulated with CD3 and CD28 mAb in the absence of
n-butyrate (a). C, lithium reverses
the n-butyrate-induced inhibition of IL-2 transcription.
Reporter gene assays were performed in transfected Jurkat T-cells
stimulated with CD3 and CD28 mAb in the presence or absence of
n-butyrate and under the influence of lithium chloride
(Li).
|
|
Selective Inhibition of NF-AT Nuclear Binding--
In addition to
its function as a glycogen synthase kinase, GSK-3 has been identified
as a member of the NF-AT kinase complex (9). In conjunction with other
kinases, it mediates the re-phosphorylation of this transcription
factor and thus its nuclear export. This study also provides evidence
that PKA might be an additional component acting as a priming kinase to
generate optimal conditions for GSK-3 activity. As IL-2 transcriptional
activation fully depends on the presence of a sufficient amount of
functional NF-AT in the nucleus, we speculated at this point that the
altered activities of PKA and GSK-3 after n-butyrate
treatment integrate at the level of this transcription factor.
Therefore, gel shift analyses were performed using nuclear extracts
from Jurkat T-cells stimulated with CD3/CD28 monoclonal antibodies in
the presence or absence of n-butyrate. As radiolabeled
probes binding sites of NF-AT but also of NF B and AP1 were used to
address the three major transcription factors implicated in the
regulation of IL-2 synthesis. Enhanced binding activity was observed
for all three transcription factors in extracts of anti-CD3/CD28
stimulated Jurkat cells (Fig. 6, lanes 2 and 3, 10 and
11, and 18 and 19). Strikingly,
n-butyrate treatment totally abolished the
activation-induced NF-AT binding (Fig. 6, lanes 3 and 4), whereas the binding of NF B and AP1 remained essentially unaffected (Fig. 6, lanes 11 and
12 as well as lanes 19 and
20). An SP1 gel shift analysis (lanes
25-32) served as a normalization control for the nuclear
extracts. The specificity of the observed binding was analyzed in
corresponding competition assays for each of the transcription factors
(lanes 5-8, 13-16, 21-24, and 29-32). These results clearly
indicate that only NF-AT function is altered in
n-butyrate-treated T-cells.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
n-Butyrate selectively inhibits
NF-AT nuclear binding. DNA binding activity of NF-AT, NF B, AP1,
and SP1 was analyzed by EMSA in nuclear extracts from Jurkat T-cells
stimulated with CD3 and CD28 mAb ( CD3/28) in the presence
or absence of n-butyrate (n-but). As a specific
competitor, a 40-fold excess of the unlabeled corresponding binding
site was used. As an unspecific competitor, an SP1 consensus
oligonucleotide was used in 40-fold excess for NF-AT, NF B, and AP1,
and an AP1 consensus oligonucleotide was used for SP1. f,
free probe. The binding ability of the nuclear factors NF B and AP1
remained essentially unaffected. The ubiquitously expressed SP1 protein
was used as control. nst, nonstimulated.
|
|
Impact of Nuclear Export on Decreased NF-AT Binding--
The
finding of a diminished NF-AT binding in a gel shift analysis, however,
does not allow the discrimination between a block of NF-AT import (as
after FK506 treatment) and enhanced export. To differentiate between
these two possibilities, gel shift analyses as well as Western blot
analyses were performed. Leptomycin B was used as a general inhibitor
of exportin (CRM1)-dependent export (44); additionally,
LiCl, which partially reverted the inhibition mediated by
n-butyrate in functional assays, was used with our standard
stimulation conditions. If applied in addition to
n-butyrate, both compounds were able to substantially
increase nuclear binding of NF-AT (Fig.
7A, compare lane
4 to lanes 5 and 6).
Applied alone, however, they had no effect (lanes
7 and 8), suggesting that the combination of
anti-CD3/CD28 activation and n-butyrate does not prevent the
import but accelerates the export of NF-AT. To further substantiate
this finding, the import inhibitor FK506 was applied to
anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated cells in the presence or absence of leptomycin
B (lanes 9 and 10). In both cases no
NF-AT binding is detectable, a picture that clearly differs from the
one after n-butyrate treatment. This indicates that the
block by n-butyrate occurs later in the process of T-cell
activation than the block mediated by a nuclear import inhibitor. To
show that not only the binding activity of NF-AT is lost after
n-butyrate treatment, but that this factor is no longer
detectable in the nuclear compartment, Western blot analysis of the
same nuclear extracts was performed using antibodies against NF-AT1
(Fig. 7B) and NF-AT2 (data not shown). Here, an observation
analogous to the gel shift analyses was made, proving that
n-butyrate leads to a complete physical elimination of NF-AT
from the nucleus in the process of T-cell activation. Furthermore, we
show that the selective PKA inhibitor (Rp)-8-Br-cAMP was able to counter the effect of
n-butyrate on NF-AT nuclear binding in EMSA as well as the
effect of n-butyrate on NF-AT subcellular localization in
Western blot analysis (Fig. 7, C and D,
respectively). These findings, together with the ability of the PKA
inhibitor (Rp)-8-Br-cAMP to revert the
n-butyrate-mediated inhibition of IL-2 transcription as
shown in reporter gene assays (Fig. 4C), strongly suggest
that sustained PKA activity in n-butyrate-treated cells is
indeed related to impaired NF-AT activation. In further experiments,
the effect of leptomycin B on IL-2 transcription was studied in an IL-2
reporter gene assay. 50 nM amount of the export inhibitor
to some extent reverses the inhibition of IL-2 transcription by
n-butyrate (Fig. 7E).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
n-Butyrate promotes NF-AT nuclear
export. A, DNA binding activity of NF-AT was analyzed
in nuclear extracts from Jurkat T-cells stimulated with CD3 and CD28
mAb ( CD3/28) and treated (simultaneously to the stimulus)
with/without 1 mM n-butyrate (n-but).
Leptomycin B (lept) (200 nM, pretreatment for 30 min) and lithium chloride (Li) (10 mM,
pretreatment for 30 min) were used to antagonize nuclear export of
NF-AT. f, free probe. B, Western blot analysis
was performed using the same nuclear extracts as above to show the
interference with NF-AT translocation at the protein level.
nst, nonstimulated. C, the selective PKA
inhibitor (Rp)-8-Br-cAMP (Rp, 100 µM) is able to revert the n-butyrate (1 mM)-mediated inhibition of NF-AT DNA binding as shown by
EMSA. D, the subcellular localization of NF-AT was
investigated by Western blot analysis upon n-butyrate (1 mM) and (Rp)-8-Br-cAMP
(Rp, 100 µM) treatment. E, reporter
gene assays were performed in transfected Jurkat T-cells stimulated
with CD3 and CD28 mAb in the presence or absence of
n-butyrate and under the influence of leptomycin B
(lept) (10 and 50 nM, pretreatment for 30 min).
|
|
Impact of n-Butyrate upon the Activation of Primary
T-cells--
To examine the validity of our observations in primary
T-cells, we first evaluated the effect of n-butyrate upon
IL-2 production in activated primary T-cells by ELISA. As shown in Fig.
8A, n-butyrate inhibited IL-2 production in activated primary T-cells. We further tested the effect of n-butyrate on NF-AT nuclear binding by
EMSA, as well as on the presence of NF-AT in the nuclear compartment of
activated T-cells. In complete agreement with our findings in Jurkat
T-cells, we demonstrate that n-butyrate inhibits NF-AT nuclear binding (Fig. 8B) as well as nuclear accumulation of
NF-AT in activated primary T-cells (Fig. 8C). Addition of
leptomycin B restored both the nuclear binding in EMSA (Fig.
8B, lane 4) as well as NF-AT levels in the
nucleus (Fig. 8C, lane 4). Taken together, our
results show that the mechanism employed by the short chain fatty acid
n-butyrate to inhibit NF-AT binding and consequently IL-2
production in Jurkat T-cells is also functional in primary T-cells.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Influence of
n-butyrate on the activity of primary T-cells.
A, inhibition of IL-2 production by n-butyrate
(n-but) in primary T-cells. Primary T-cells were stimulated
by CD3 and CD28 mAb ( CD3/28) in the presence (addition
simultaneous to the stimulus) or absence of n-butyrate (1 mM) for 24 h, and supernatants were analyzed for IL-2
production by ELISA. nst, nonstimulated. B, DNA
binding activity of NF-AT was analyzed in nuclear extracts from primary
T-cells stimulated with CD3 and CD28 mAb ( CD3/28) and
treated with/without 1 mM n-butyrate
(n-but). Leptomycin B (lept) was used (200 nM, pretreatment for 30 min) to antagonize the NF-AT
nuclear export. C, Western blot analysis was applied using
the same nuclear extracts as above to show the interference with NF-AT
translocation at the protein level. nst, nonstimulated;
norm, normalization.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The bacterial metabolite n-butyrate exerts strong
inhibitory effects on T-cells. A central aspect to the
n-butyrate-mediated inhibition of T-cell expansion is the
abrogation of IL-2 production by a yet unknown molecular mechanism.
Here we demonstrate that treatment with this short chain fatty acid at
concentrations capable of blocking IL-2 transcription completely
inhibited NF-AT nuclear binding. As underlying molecular mechanism, we
revealed an interference of n-butyrate with the nuclear
export machinery of this transcription factor. Given the essential role
of NF-AT in the regulation of immune cells, it is tempting to speculate
that bacteria employ this mechanism to escape immune surveillance. This
might be of particular relevance to the intestinal microflora, which
produce high amounts of this metabolite.
Binding of NF-AT to the IL-2 promoter is controlled by two major
mechanisms: the nuclear import of this transcription factor initiated
by T-cell activation and its nuclear export, which terminates T-cell
activation (8). Phosphorylation of NF-AT is considered to affect its
subcellular localization by modulating both its import and export
rates. It has been reported that, in both activated and resting
T-cells, the extent of NF-AT phosphorylation is determined by a dynamic
equilibrium between calcineurin and cellular kinases (45). Changes in
this equilibrium, either through calcineurin activation or kinase
inhibition, result in dephosphorylated NF-AT and nuclear import of the
transcription factor. Nuclear export of NF-AT is enabled by Ser/Thr
protein kinases, such as GSK-3, casein kinase I and II, and JNK. GSK-3
prefers to phosphorylate serines adjacent to serines, which were
phosphorylated previously by PKA (9). Binding of NF-AT to CRM1 via a
nuclear export signal sequence then mediates the nuclear export of the
transcription factor terminating transcriptional activation (46). The
persistence of GSK-3 and PKA activity after T-cell activation in the
presence of n-butyrate as observed in this study would be
compatible with a shift in the equilibrium of NF-AT phosphorylation.
Other kinases such as p38 and JNK might not contribute to the mechanism
engaged by n-butyrate, as they were unaffected by this short
chain fatty acid. Furthermore, blocking PKA activity by the selective
PKA inhibitor (Rp)-8-Br-cAMP or GSK-3 by LiCl in
activated and n-butyrate-treated T-cells was followed by
restored NF-AT nuclear binding and IL-2 transcription. Finally,
addition of the CRM1 inhibitor leptomycin B on top of
n-butyrate to stimulated cells led to the accumulation of
NF-AT in the nuclear compartment associated with increased nuclear
binding, whereas applying leptomycin B in unstimulated cells did not
bring about an increase in nuclear NF-AT. This indicated that
n-butyrate treatment had allowed nuclear import but
prematurely terminated nuclear binding by promoting the export of the
transcription factor.
High intracellular cAMP levels in T-cells induced by compounds like
forskolin or dibutyryl cAMP are well known to inhibit T-cell activation
and proliferation (39, 47). A clear correlation between high cAMP
levels to PKA activation via dominant negative mutants and,
furthermore, an inhibition of NF B binding to the IL-2 promotor at
the 225 site were demonstrated (48). In addition, PKA activation was
shown to alter PKC-induced transcriptional regulation of members of the
Jun and Fos (AP1) family (30). n-Butyrate treatment,
however, had no effect on either NF B or AP1 as observed in our gel
shift analyses, although it alters cAMP levels and PKA activity in
Jurkat T-cells. The functional relevance of these results was given, as
the selective PKA inhibitor was able to revert the
n-butyrate-induced inhibition of NF-AT nuclear binding and
IL-2 transcription. Rather than different model systems, externally
applied drugs versus real intracellular levels and treatment
schedules to explain such observed results, we favor the hypothesis
that the threshold of cAMP, most likely combined with exact timing, is
important for this difference. Externally applied phosphodiesterase
inhibitors elevate cAMP levels far beyond the ones found in
nonstimulated cells,2 leading
to unphysiological high levels. PKA translates cAMP levels into a
negative signal via two major negative regulatory pathways, p50csk as a key negative regulator of
p56lck and a direct Ser-43 phosphorylation of
Raf1 leading to its inactivation (49, 50). However, in our
n-butyrate-treated Jurkat T-cells, only the inhibition of
Lck is observed, whereas the MAPK pathway, exemplified by the Erk1/2
and p38 activation, is intact. This was further confirmed in Western
blot analyses using phosphospecific antibodies detecting Raf 1 deactivation by PKA as well as mitogen-activated protein
kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase 1/2 activation in
addition.3 The activation
status of both kinases was not changed upon n-butyrate application compared with stimulated Jurkat T-cells. This suggests that, in activated T-cells with a cAMP concentration comparable with
that of nonstimulated cells, only one of the two inhibitory pathways
(inhibition of Lck) is active, whereas further cAMP elevation would be
required to prevent the induction of the MAPK cascade.
In addition to its ability to suppress primary T-cell responses,
n-butyrate has been shown to induce a state of
antigen-specific hyporesponsiveness. The difference between the mode of
action of n-butyrate (hyporesponsiveness) and nuclear import
inhibitors such as FK506 (immunosuppression) is not fully understood.
This is shown functionally by applying nuclear import inhibitors in addition to n-butyrate treatment. In such experiments an
enhanced suppression of primary responses, but a prevention of the
generation of the alloantigen-specific hyporesponsiveness, is observed
(20). Ipso facto, this can be interpreted that too early an
abortion of T-cell triggering results in suppression. In contrast, as
soon as a certain checkpoint of activation is achieved (characterized by the appearance of the inducible transcription factors in the nucleus), the potential of a T-cell to react again to a restimulation is altered.
Consequently, one might imagine that distinct genes require different
concentrations or duration of nuclear NF-AT to become transcriptionally
activated. In such a setting, long term presence of NF-AT in the
nucleus would promote expression of all genes required for the
differentiation to an effector phenotype, whereas short, transient
NF-AT appearance and concomitant low concentrations would only allow
the transcription of a subset of genes resulting in tolerance. That the
nuclear half-life of NF-AT has a huge impact on the selection of
induced genes is known from T-cells of certain SCID patients. Here,
impaired and ultratransient translocation of NF-AT parallels a complete
failure to induce IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, and interferon- , but to a much
lesser extent the induction of MIP1 , granulocyte/macrophage
colony-stimulating factor, and IL-13 (51).
In conclusion, our results obtained in Jurkat and in primary T-cells
demonstrate that T-cell activation in the presence of n-butyrate is characterized by the maintenance of
counter-regulatory signaling events, finally leading to defective NF-AT
nuclear binding. Furthermore, they indicate that the mode of action of
this bacterial metabolite is completely different from the classical
calcineurin antagonists and instead involves interference with the
nuclear export of this transcription factor. Because of its abundant
concentrations in the gastrointestinal tract, the potential of
n-butyrate to interfere with T-cell signaling might be of
particular biological importance for the bacterial-host relationship.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank L. Machado for critical reading of
the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Austrian Research Fund Grant P
14874-PAT.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
43-1-4277-64971; Fax: 43-1-4277-64972; E-mail:
gerhard.zlabinger@univie.ac.at.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 30, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200191200
2
C. Diakos, unpublished results.
3
E. Prieschl, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TCR, T-cell
receptor;
AP1, activating protein-1;
CRM1, exportin;
GSK-3, glycogen
synthase kinase 3;
LAT, linker for activation of T-cells;
Lck, tyrosine
kinase p56lck;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein
kinase;
NF-AT, nuclear factor of activated T-cells;
NF B, nuclear
factor B;
PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase;
PKA, protein kinase
A;
PKC, protein kinase C;
8-Br-cAMP, 8-bromo-cyclic AMP;
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay;
PMA, phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate;
IL, interleukin;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid;
PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride;
JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase;
Erk, extracellular signal-regulated
kinase;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alberola-Ila, J.,
Takaki, S.,
Kerner, J. D.,
and Perlmutter, R. M.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
15,
125-154[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Cantrell, D.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
14,
259-274[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Crabtree, G. R.,
and Clipstone, N. A.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
63,
1045-1083[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Jain, J.,
Loh, C.,
and Rao, A.
(1995)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
7,
333-342[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Kiani, A.,
Rao, A.,
and Aramburu, J.
(2000)
Immunity
12,
359-372[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Schreiber, S. L.,
and Crabtree, G. R.
(1992)
Immunol. Today
13,
136-142[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Rao, A.,
Luo, C.,
and Hogan, P. G.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
15,
707-747[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Masuda, E. S.,
Imamura, R.,
Amasaki, Y.,
Arai, K.,
and Arai, N.
(1998)
Cell Signal.
10,
599-611[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Beals, C. R.,
Sheridan, C. M.,
Turck, C. W.,
Gardner, P.,
and Crabtree, G. R.
(1997)
Science
275,
1930-1934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Chow, C. W.,
and Davis, R. J.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
702-712[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Ohteki, T.,
Parsons, M.,
Zakarian, A.,
Jones, R. G.,
Nguyen, L. T.,
Woodgett, J. R.,
and Ohashi, P. S.
(2000)
J. Exp. Med.
192,
99-104[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Brodsky, F. M.
(1999)
Immunol. Rev.
168,
5-11[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Cummings, J. H.,
Pomare, E. W.,
Branch, W. J.,
Naylor, C. P.,
and MacFarlane, G. T.
(1987)
Gut
28,
1221-1227[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Velazquez, O. C.,
Lederer, H. M.,
and Rombeau, J. L.
(1997)
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
427,
123-134[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Andoh, A.,
Bamba, T.,
and Sasaki, M.
(1999)
J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr.
23,
70-73
|
| 16.
|
Inan, M. S.,
Rasoulpour, R. J.,
Yin, L.,
Hubbard, A. K.,
Rosenberg, D. W.,
and Giardina, C.
(2000)
Gastroenterology
118,
724-734[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Saemann, M. D.,
Bohmig, G. A.,
Osterreicher, C. H.,
Burtscher, H.,.,
Parolini, O.,
Diakos, C.,
Stockl, J.,
Horl, W. H.,
and Zlabinger, G. J.
(2000)
FASEB J.
14,
2380-2382[Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Chapman, M. A.
(2001)
Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl.
83,
75-80[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Bohmig, G. A.,
Csmarits, B.,
Cerwenka, A.,
Alaei, P.,
Kovarik, J.,
and Zlabinger, G. J.
(1995)
Transplantation
59,
1500-1503[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Bohmig, G. A.,
Wekerle, T.,
Saemann, M. D.,
Kovarik, J.,
and Zlabinger, G. J.
(1996)
Transplant. Int.
9 Suppl. 1,
318-322
|
| 21.
|
Gilbert, K. M.,
and Weigle, W. O.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
151,
1245-1254[Abstract]
|
| 22.
|
Bohmig, G. A.,
Krieger, P. M.,
Saemann, M. D.,
Ullrich, R.,
Karimi, H.,.,
Wekerle, T.,
Muhlbacher, F.,
and Zlabinger, G. J.
(1999)
Transplant. Immunol.
7,
221-227[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Gilbert, K. M.,
Wahid, R.,
Fecher, N. P.,
Freeman, J. P.,
and Fifer, E. K.
(2000)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
294,
1146-1153[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Le Gros, G. S.,
Herbert, A. G.,
and Watson, J. D.
(1985)
Lymphokine Res.
4,
221-227[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Saemann, M. D.,
Bohmig, G. A.,
Osterreicher, C. H.,
Staffler, G.,
Diakos, C.,
Krieger, P. M.,
Horl, W. H.,
Stockinger, H.,
and Zlabinger, G. J.
(2000)
Transplantation
70,
1215-1225[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
August, A.,
and Dupont, B.
(1995)
Tissue Antigens
46,
155-162[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Waclavicek, M.,
Majdic, O.,
Stulnig, T.,
Berger, M.,
Sunder-Plassmann, R.,
Zlabinger, G. J.,
Baumruker, T.,
Stockl, J.,
Ebner, C.,
Knapp, W.,
and Pickl, W. F.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
161,
4671-4678[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Hengel, H.,
Wagner, H.,
and Heeg, K.
(1991)
J. Immunol.
14,
1115-1120
|
| 29.
|
Stulnig, T. M.,
Berger, M.,
Sigmund, T.,
Raederstorff, D.,
Stockinger, H.,
and Waldhausl, W.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
143,
637-644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Tamir, A.,
and Isakov, N.
(1994)
J. Immunol.
152,
3391-3399[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Prieschl, E. E.,
Gouilleux-Gruart, V,
Walker, C.,
Harrer, N. E.,
and Baumruker, T.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
154,
6112-6119[Abstract]
|
| 32.
|
Suthanthiran, M.,
Rubin, A. L.,
Novogrodsky, A.,
and Stenzel, K. H.
(1982)
Transplantation
33,
534-540[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Archer, S.,
Meng, S., Wu, J.,
Johnson, J.,
Tang, R.,
and Hodin, R.
(1998)
Surgery
124,
248-253[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Coradini, D.,
Pellizzaro, C.,
Marimpietri, D.,
Abolafio, G.,
and Daidone, M. G.
(2000)
Cell Prolif.
33,
139-146[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Herz, F.,
and Halwer, M.
(1983)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
762,
289-294[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Foss, F. M.,
Veillette, A.,
Sartor, O.,
Rosen, N.,
and Bolen, J. B.
(1989)
Oncogene Res.
5,
13-23[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Denny, M. F.,
Patai, B.,
and Straus, D. B.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
1426-1435[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Berridge, M. J.
(1997)
Crit. Rev. Immunol.
17,
155-178[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Li, L.,
Yee, C.,
and Beavo, J. A.
(1999)
Science
283,
848-851[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Tsuruta, L.,
Lee, H. J.,
Masuda, E. S.,
Yokota, T.,
Arai, N.,
and Arai, K.
(1995)
J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.
96,
1126-1135[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Beebe, S. J.
(1994)
Semin. Cancer Biol.
5,
285-294[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Schwede, F.,
Maronde, E.,
Genieser, H.,
and Jastorff, B.
(2000)
Pharmacol. Ther.
87,
199-226[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Kim, L.,
and Kimmel, A. R.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
10,
508-514[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Kudo, N.,
Wolff, B.,
Sekimoto, T.,
Schreiner, E. P.,
Yoneda, Y.,
Yanagida, M.,
Horinouchi, S.,
and Yoshida, M.
(1998)
Exp. Cell Res.
242,
540-547[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Shibasaki, F.,
Price, E. R.,
Milan, D.,
and McKeon, F.
(1996)
Nature
38,
370-373
|
| 46.
|
Zhu, J.,
and McKeon, F.
(1999)
Nature
398,
256-260[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Paliogianni, F.,
Kincaid, R. L.,
and Boumpas, D. T.
(1993)
J. Exp. Med.
178,
1813-1817[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Chen, D.,
and Rothenberg, E. V.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
179,
931-942[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Ramstad, C.,
Sundvold, V.,
Johansen, H. K.,
and Lea, T.
(2000)
Cell Signal.
2,
557-563
|
| 50.
|
Vang, T.,
Torgersen, K. M.,
Sundvold, V.,
Saxena, M.,
Levy, F. O.,
Skalhegg, B. S.,
Hansson, V.,
Mustelin, T.,
and Tasken, K.
(2001)
J. Exp. Med.
193,
497-508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Feske, S.,
Draeger, R.,
Peter, H. H.,
Eichmann, K.,
and Rao, A.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
165,
297-305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Bosisio, M. Vulcano, A. Del Prete, M. Sironi, V. Salvi, L. Salogni, E. Riboldi, F. Leoni, C. A. Dinarello, G. Girolomoni, et al.
Blocking TH17-polarizing cytokines by histone deacetylase inhibitors in vitro and in vivo
J. Leukoc. Biol.,
December 1, 2008;
84(6):
1540 - 1548.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Nakamura, I. Matsushita, E. Kosaka, T. Kondo, and T. Kimura
Anti-arthritic effects of combined treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitor and low-intensity ultrasound in the presence of microbubbles in human rheumatoid synovial cells
Rheumatology,
April 1, 2008;
47(4):
418 - 424.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Nakamura, T. Kukita, T. Shobuike, K. Nagata, Z. Wu, K. Ogawa, T. Hotokebuchi, O. Kohashi, and A. Kukita
Inhibition of Histone Deacetylase Suppresses Osteoclastogenesis and Bone Destruction by Inducing IFN-{beta} Production
J. Immunol.,
November 1, 2005;
175(9):
5809 - 5816.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|