Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201107200 on May 1, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 27, 24609-24617, July 5, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/27/24609    most recent
M201107200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ebert, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Dermody, T. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ebert, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Dermody, T. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Cathepsin L and Cathepsin B Mediate Reovirus Disassembly in Murine Fibroblast Cells*

Daniel H. EbertDagger §, Jan Deussing||, Christoph Peters, and Terence S. DermodyDagger §**DaggerDagger

From the Departments of Dagger  Microbiology and Immunology and ** Pediatrics and § Elizabeth B. Lamb Center for Pediatric Research, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232 and  Institut für Molekulare Medizin und Zellforschung, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Federal Republic of Germany

Received for publication, February 2, 2002, and in revised form, April 25, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

After attachment to receptors, reovirus virions are internalized by endocytosis and exposed to acid-dependent proteases that catalyze viral disassembly. Previous studies using the cysteine protease inhibitor E64 and a mutant cell line that does not support reovirus disassembly suggest a requirement for specific endocytic proteases in reovirus entry. This study identifies the endocytic proteases that mediate reovirus disassembly in murine fibroblast cells. Infection of both L929 cells treated with the cathepsin L inhibitor Z-Phe-Tyr(t-Bu)-diazomethyl ketone and cathepsin L-deficient mouse embryo fibroblasts resulted in inefficient proteolytic disassembly of viral outer-capsid proteins and decreased viral yields. In contrast, both L929 cells treated with the cathepsin B inhibitor CA-074Me and cathepsin B-deficient mouse embryo fibroblasts support reovirus disassembly and growth. However, removal of both cathepsin B and cathepsin L activity completely abrogates disassembly and growth of reovirus. Concordantly, cathepsin L mediates reovirus disassembly more efficiently than cathepsin B in vitro. These results demonstrate that either cathepsin L or cathepsin B is required for reovirus entry into murine fibroblasts and indicate that cathepsin L is the primary mediator of reovirus disassembly. Moreover, these findings suggest that specific endocytic proteases can determine host cell susceptibility to infection by intracellular pathogens.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Endocytic proteases play important roles in propagating signals from the cell surface, processing molecules for distribution to appropriate intracellular organelles, and generation of antigen-specific immune responses. Endocytic proteases also act on internalized microorganisms, in some cases mediating their destruction, but in others, removing components that allow subsequent steps in the infectious cycle. Although endocytic proteases engage in nonspecific bulk hydrolysis within lysosomes, there are several examples of specific biologic functions mediated by individual endocytic proteases (1). For example, in epithelial cells of the thymic cortex, cathepsin L plays a key role in cleaving the CLIP peptide, allowing for antigen presentation in the context of MHC class II molecules. As a result, cathepsin L-deficient mice are immunodeficient due to a defect in positive selection of T cells (2). In addition, cathepsin L is required for regulation of hair growth, and cathepsin L-deficient mice are "furless" (3). Cathepsin B can modulate pathological trypsinogen activation (4) and apoptosis induced by tumor necrosis factor-alpha (5). To better understand the role and specificity of endocytic proteases in virus-host interactions, we studied the proteolytic disassembly of reovirus.

Mammalian reoviruses are nonenveloped viruses that contain a segmented, double-stranded RNA genome. In comparison to enveloped viruses, less is known about cell entry mechanisms of nonenveloped viruses, a group that includes several important human pathogens. Mammalian reoviruses are a useful experimental system to study cell entry of nonenveloped viruses, as discrete steps in the viral entry pathway have been defined. Reovirus particles consist of two concentric protein shells, the outer capsid and core. After engagement of cell-surface receptors including junctional adhesion molecule-1 (6) and sialic acid (7-13), reovirus virions enter cells by receptor-mediated endocytosis (14-16). Within the endocytic compartment, virions are exposed to acid-dependent proteases, which catalyze formation of infectious subvirion particles (ISVPs).1 Endocytic proteases degrade outer-capsid protein sigma 3 and cleave outer-capsid protein µ1/µ1C to form particle-associated fragments µ1delta /delta and phi  (for review, see Ref. 17). ISVPs are capable of penetrating membranes, thereby delivering transcriptionally active core particles into the cytoplasm (18-22).

Previous studies suggest that reovirus disassembly is dependent on specific endocytic proteases. Treatment of cells with the cysteine protease inhibitor E64 (23) blocks steps in reovirus disassembly required for generation of ISVPs (24-26). Treatment of reovirus virions with purified cathepsin L leads to formation of particles that have the biochemical and growth properties of ISVPs generated in vitro by treatment of virions with intestinal proteases (27). In contrast, treatment of cells with the aspartic protease inhibitor pepstatin A (28) does not alter reovirus entry and growth (29), and treatment of virions with cathepsin D does not result in generation of ISVPs (26, 29). These findings suggest that endocytic cysteine proteases but not aspartic proteases are required for reovirus disassembly.

Persistent reovirus infection of murine L929 (L) cells selects mutant (LX) cells that do not support viral disassembly within the endocytic pathway. Studies of mutant LX cells provide further evidence that reovirus entry is dependent on specific proteases. Infection of LX cells with virions does not result in viral growth, whereas infection with ISVPs does (30). These findings indicate that LX cells have a defect in viral entry steps leading to formation of ISVPs. Parental L cells and mutant LX cells do not differ in the capacity to internalize reovirus virions, acidify intracellular compartments, or deliver virions to acidified organelles. However, in contrast to parental L cells, the activity of two cysteine endocytic proteases, cathepsin B and cathepsin L (27),2 is absent in mutant LX cells. The activity of a third cysteine protease, cathepsin H, is equivalent in parental L cells and mutant LX cells. These findings provide further support for the idea that cysteine proteases mediate disassembly of reovirus virions.

To identify the specific endocytic proteases that uncoat reovirus virions in fibroblast cells, L cells were treated with specific inhibitors of cathepsin B and cathepsin L and tested for the capacity to support reovirus disassembly and growth. Similar assays were performed using mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from cathepsin B-deficient mice and cathepsin L-deficient mice. Finally, the in vitro disassembly of virions to ISVPs by purified cathepsin B and cathepsin L was compared. These studies indicate that cathepsin B and cathepsin L mediate reovirus disassembly in cellular endosomes. Moreover, these studies delineate a new, physiologically relevant substrate for cathepsin B and cathepsin L.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cells and Viruses-- Murine L929 (L) cells were grown in either suspension or monolayer cultures in Joklik's modified Eagle's minimal essential medium (Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (Intergen, Purchase, NY), 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 units of penicillin/ml, 100 µg of streptomycin/ml, and 0.25 µg of amphotericin/ml (Irvine). MEFs, derived from cathepsin L -/- and cathepsin L +/+ mice (3) or cathepsin B -/- and cathepsin B +/+ mice (31, 32), were grown in monolayer cultures in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 units of penicillin/ml, and 100 µg of streptomycin/ml. Reovirus strains type 1 Lang (T1L) and type 3 Dearing (T3D) are laboratory stocks. Purified virion preparations were made using second-passage L-cell lysate stocks of twice-plaque-purified reovirus as previously described (33). Purified virions containing 35S-labeled proteins were obtained by adding Easy Tag Express-35S protein labeling mix (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) to cell suspensions (~12.5 µCi/ml) at the initiation of infection. ISVPs were prepared by treating purified T1L virions with Nalpha -p-tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl ketone-treated bovine alpha -chymotrypsin (Sigma) as previously described (24).

Specificity of Protease Inhibitors-- The cathepsin B inhibitor CA-074Me (BI) (Peptides International, Louisville, KY), the cathepsin L inhibitor Z-Phe-Tyr(t-Bu)-diazomethyl ketone (LI) (Calbiochem-Novabiochem), the cathepsin B substrate Z-Arg-Arg-MCA (Peptides International), and the cathepsin L substrate (Z-Phe-Arg)2-R110 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) were dissolved in Me2SO to generate a 10 mM stock that was separated into aliquots, and frozen. CA-074Me specifically inhibits intracellular cathepsin B (34-36), whereas Z-Phe-Tyr(t-Bu)-diazomethyl ketone specifically inhibits cathepsin L (37).

Cathepsin B activity was measured by preincubating L cells (2 × 106) in 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tubes in 1 ml of medium supplemented to contain 0-10 µM BI or 0-10 µM LI at 37 °C for 1 h. Cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended in 100 µl of lysis buffer (100 mM sodium acetate (pH 5), 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Triton X-100). Insoluble material was sedimented in a microcentrifuge at 4 °C. In a black 96-well plate (Costar), 20 µl of cell lysate was mixed with 80 µl of reaction buffer (100 mM sodium acetate (pH 5), 1 mM EDTA, 4 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and 100 µl of substrate solution (100 µM Z-Arg-Arg-MCA diluted in 0.1% Brij 35 (Sigma)) (38). After incubation at room temperature for 30 min, fluorescence was measured using a FLUOstar 403 fluorometer (BMG LabTechnologies, Durham, NC) with an excitation of 390 nm and emission at 460 nm. Cathepsin L activity was measured by preincubating L cells (5 × 106) in 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tubes in 1 ml of medium supplemented to contain 0-10 µM BI or LI at 37 °C for 1 h. Cells were washed once with PBS and resuspended in PBS supplemented with 0-10 µM protease inhibitors and 50 µM (Z-Phe-Arg)2-R110. After incubation at 37 °C for 90 min, 200-µl aliquots were added to a black 96-well plate. Fluorescence was measured using a FLUOstar 403 fluorometer with an excitation of 485 nm and an emission at 510 nm.

Growth of Reovirus in Cells Treated with Protease Inhibitors-- Monolayers of L cells (4 × 105) in 24-well plates (Costar) were preincubated for 1 h in medium supplemented to contain 0-10 µM BI or 0-10 µM LI. The medium was removed, and cells were adsorbed with reovirus at a multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.) of 2 plaque-forming units (pfu)/cell in gel saline (39). After a 1-h incubation at 4 °C, cells were washed once with PBS, and 1 ml of fresh medium supplemented with 0-10 µM protease inhibitors was added. Alternatively, MEFs (2 × 105) in 24-well plates were preincubated with medium supplemented with 0-1 µM BI or 0-1 µM LI at 37 °C for 1 h. The medium was removed, and cells were adsorbed with reovirus at an m.o.i. of 2 pfu/cell. After incubation at room temperature for 30 min, cells were washed once with PBS, and 1 ml of fresh medium supplemented with 0-1 µM protease inhibitors was added. After incubation at 37 °C for 24 h, cells were frozen and thawed twice, and viral titers in cell lysates were determined by plaque assay (39). Independent experiments were performed using single wells of cells, which were titrated in triplicate.

Proteolysis of Reovirus Outer-capsid Proteins during Cell Entry-- Monolayers of L cells (1 × 107) in 100-mm dishes (Costar) were preincubated for 1 h in medium supplemented to contain 0-10 µM BI or 0-10 µM LI. The medium was removed, and cells were adsorbed with purified35S-labeled reovirus virions at an m.o.i. of 10,000 particles/cell. After incubation at 4 °C for 1 h, the inoculum was removed, cells were washed twice with PBS, and 5 ml of fresh medium supplemented with 0-10 µM protease inhibitors was added. Alternatively, MEFs (3 × 106) in 100-mm dishes were preincubated with 0-1 µM BI or 0-1 µM LI and infected as described for L cells. After incubation at 37 °C for 0-3 h, cells were suspended by scraping and collected by centrifugation at 528 × g for 5 min. Cells were resuspended in 0.5 ml of lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM benzamidine (Sigma), 100 mM leupeptin (Sigma), 2.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and placed on ice for 5 min, and 4.0 ml of homogenization buffer (250 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 0.067% 2-mercaptoethanol) was added. Samples were sonicated for 15 s, 2.5 ml of Freon (EM Science, Gibbstown, NJ) was added, and samples were again sonicated for 20 s. Samples were centrifuged at 9700 × g for 10 min, and the aqueous fraction was placed into 13 × 51-mm centrifuge tubes (Beckman Instruments). Virus particles were pelleted by centrifugation in an SW50.1 rotor (Beckman) at 210,000 × g for 1 h. Pelleted particles were resuspended in 30-50 µl of 1× sample buffer (125 mM Tris, 2% 2-mercaptoethanol, 1% SDS, 0.01% bromphenol blue) and frozen at -20 °C.

Transfection of Cathepsin L-deficient MEFs-- Monolayers of MEFs (2 × 105) in 24-well plates were transfected using LipofectAMINE Plus (Invitrogen) with 0.4 µg of the eukaryotic expression vector pSG5 (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) or pSG5 into which a cDNA encoding murine procathepsin L had been cloned (40). After a 24-h incubation, transfected cells were infected with virus at an m.o.i. of 2 pfu/cell.

Fluorescent Focus Assay of Viral Infectivity-- Virus inocula were adsorbed to confluent MEF monolayers (1 × 105 cells) in 24-well plates as for growth experiments. After incubation at 37 °C for 18 h to permit completion of a single round of viral replication, cell monolayers were fixed with 1 ml of methanol at -20 °C for a minimum of 30 min. Fixed monolayers were washed twice with PBS, blocked with 5% immunoglobin-free bovine serum albumin (Sigma) in PBS, and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min with protein A-affinity-purified polyclonal rabbit anti-reovirus serum at a 1:500 dilution in PBS, 0.5% Triton X-100. Monolayers were washed twice with PBS, 0.5% Triton X-100 and incubated with a 1:1000 dilution of anti-rabbit immunoglobulin serum conjugated with Alexa-488 (Molecular Probes). Monolayers were washed twice with PBS, 0.5% Triton X-100, and infected cells were visualized by indirect immunofluorescence. Infected cells were identified by the presence of intense cytoplasmic fluorescence that was excluded from the nucleus (41). Background staining in uninfected control monolayers was not detected.

SDS-PAGE of Reovirus Structural Proteins-- Discontinuous SDS-PAGE was performed as previously described (42). Viral particles were solubilized by incubation in sample buffer (125 mM Tris, 2% 2-mercaptoethanol, 1% SDS, 0.01% bromphenol blue) at 100 °C for 5 min. Samples were loaded into wells of 10% polyacrylamide gels and electrophoresed at a 200-V constant voltage for 1 h. After electrophoresis, gels were fixed, dried onto filter paper (Bio-Rad) under vacuum, and exposed to BioMax film (Eastman Kodak Co.).

Densitometric Analysis of Reovirus Outer-capsid Proteins-- Dried gels containing 35S-labeled reovirus virions were exposed to an imaging plate, and band intensities were quantitated by determining photostimulus luminescence units using a FLA-2000 fluorescent image analyzer (Fuji Medical Systems, Inc., Stamford, CT). For each lane, mean densities were determined for bands corresponding to the reovirus sigma 2 and sigma 3 proteins. Densities of bands corresponding to sigma 3 were divided by those corresponding to sigma 2 as a control for loading. Core protein sigma 2 is not degraded during protease treatment of virions to generate ISVPs (11, 14, 16, 43-45). To statistically compare sigma 3/sigma 2 ratios between two different conditions, one-tailed, two-sample t tests assuming unequal variance were calculated using Excel 97 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA).

Treatment of Reovirus Virions with Purified Cathepsins-- Purified 35S-labeled reovirus virions at a concentration of 1 × 1012 particles/ml in reaction buffer (50 mM sodium acetate (pH 5.0), 3 mM DTT) were treated with 0-4 µM purified recombinant human cathepsin L (46) or 0-4 µM purified bovine spleen cathepsin B (Calbiochem-Novabiochem) at 37 °C for 8 h. Alternatively, purified reovirus virions at a concentration of 1 × 1012 particles/ml in reaction buffer (50 mM sodium acetate (pH 5.0), 100 mM NaCl, 3 mM DTT) were treated with 1 µM cathepsin L at 37 °C for various intervals. A 25-µl aliquot of each reaction was mixed with 5 µl of 6× sample buffer (350 mM Tris (pH 6.8), 9.3% DTT, 10% SDS, 0.012% bromphenol blue) and incubated at 100 °C for 5 min. Samples were loaded into wells of 10% polyacrylamide gels and electrophoresed at a 200-V constant voltage. After electrophoresis, gels were fixed, dried onto filter paper under vacuum, and exposed to BioMax film (Kodak).

Identification of Cathepsin L Cleavage Sites in T1L-- Purified T1L virions at a concentration of 8 × 1012 particles/ml in reaction buffer (50 mM sodium acetate (pH 5.0), 100 mM NaCl, 3 mM DTT) were treated with 25 µg of cathepsin L/ml at 37 °C for 1 h. Samples were loaded into wells of 14% polyacrylamide gels and electrophoresed at 200 V. After electrophoresis, viral proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad) at 400 mA for 20 min. Membranes were stained with Coomassie Blue. The 13-kDa fragment was excised from the membrane, and the N terminus was sequenced using Edman degradation by the Vanderbilt Protein Chemistry Laboratory. Cathepsin L cleavage sites were modeled onto the sigma 3 structure (47) using Swiss PDB viewer 3.7 (Glaxo Wellcome) and POV-Ray (Persistence of Vision Development Team).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Specificity of Protease Inhibitors-- As a prelude to experiments to determine the effects of both an inhibitor of cathepsin L, Z-Phe-Tyr(t-Bu)-diazomethyl ketone (LI), and an inhibitor of cathepsin B, CA-074Me (BI), on reovirus disassembly and growth, we first tested the specificity of these protease inhibitors using fluorogenic protease substrates. De-esterification of the membrane-permeable proinhibitor CA-074Me inside cells generates the specific cathepsin B inhibitor CA-074 (36). Cathepsin B activity was measured by incubating cell lysates with the cathepsin B-specific substrate Z-Arg-Arg-MCA (38). Cathepsin L activity was measured by incubating intact cells with (Z-Phe-Arg)2-R110, which is cleaved 820 times more efficiently by cathepsin L than cathepsin B (48, 49). In L cells treated with 1 µM BI, cathepsin B activity was reduced to 1% of that in untreated cells (Fig. 1A), whereas cathepsin L activity was 87% that in untreated cells (Fig. 1B). In contrast, cathepsin B activity in L cells treated with 3.3 µM LI was 90% that in untreated cells, whereas cathepsin L activity was only 2.6% that in untreated cells. At 10 µM LI, cathepsin L activity was further reduced to 2% of untreated cells, whereas cathepsin B activity was reduced to 53% of untreated cells. Because cathepsin B is capable of cleaving the substrate (Z-Phe-Arg)2-R110, albeit with much less efficiency than cathepsin L (48), the residual fluorescence in cells treated with 10 µM LI may be due to cathepsin B as opposed to uninhibited cathepsin L. Thus, concentrations of BI and LI can be defined that selectively inhibit cathepsin B and cathepsin L, respectively.


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Effect of cathepsin B inhibitor CA-074Me (BI) and cathepsin L inhibitor Z-Phe-Tyr(t-Bu)-diazomethyl ketone (LI) on growth of reovirus strains T1L and T3D in L cells. A, cathepsin B activity in L cells treated with protease inhibitors. L cells were preincubated with either BI or LI for 1 h and lysed. Cathepsin B substrate Z-Arg-Arg-MCA was added to lysates, and after incubation at room temperature for 30 min, fluorescence was measured. Negative control (Neg) contained no cell lysate in the reaction. B, cathepsin L activity in L cells treated with protease inhibitors. After a 1-h preincubation with either BI or LI, cells were incubated with (Z-Phe-Arg)2-R110 in the presence of either BI or LI for 90 min, and fluorescence was measured. Negative control (Neg) contained no substrate in the reaction. The results are presented as mean fluorescence for three independent experiments. Error bars indicate S.D. C, monolayers of L cells (4 × 105) were preincubated for 1 h in medium supplemented with BI, LI, or both BI and LI at the concentrations shown in µM. The medium was removed, and cells were infected with each virus strain at an m.o.i. of 2 pfu/cell. After a 1-h adsorption period, the inoculum was removed, fresh medium with or without BI and LI was added, and cells were incubated for 24 h. Viral titers in cell lysates were determined by plaque assay. The results are presented as the mean viral yield, calculated by dividing titer at 24 h by titer at 0 h, for 3 independent experiments. Error bars indicate S.D. UT, untreated.

Viral Growth and Disassembly in L Cells Treated with Inhibitors of Cathepsin B and Cathepsin L-- To test whether cathepsin B or cathepsin L is required for productive reovirus entry into cells, viral growth and disassembly were assessed using L cells, a murine fibroblast line, treated with BI and LI. L cells pretreated with 0-10 µM BI or LI were infected with reovirus at an m.o.i. of 2 pfu/cell, and yields were determined after 24 h of viral growth in the presence of 0-10 µM BI or LI (Fig. 1C). Yields of T1L and T3D in L cells treated with 1 µM BI, which selectively inhibits cathepsin B, were approximately equivalent to yields in untreated L cells. In contrast, yields of T1L and T3D in L cells treated with 3.3 µM LI, which selectively inhibits cathepsin L, were 30 and 13%, respectively, of yields in untreated cells. At 10 µM LI, yields of T1L and T3D in L cells were 1.8 and 1.1%, respectively, of yields in untreated cells. Yields of T1L and T3D in L cells treated with 1 µM BI and 10 µM LI, which blocks the activity of both cathepsin B and cathepsin L, were 1.4- and 0.98-fold viral input, a 1300- and 2000-fold reduction in viral yield in comparison to untreated cells. These results indicate that inhibition of cathepsin B alone does not alter viral growth in L cells. However, inhibition of cathepsin L activity alone decreases growth of T1L from 3.3- to 56-fold and T3D from 7.6- to 91-fold. Moreover, these results demonstrate that viral growth is completely abolished in L cells when both cathepsin B and cathepsin L are inhibited.

To provide evidence that the observed inhibition of viral growth by treatment with BI and LI is due to inhibition of proteolytic disassembly of virions, cells were infected with ISVPs of strain T1L generated in vitro by chymotrypsin treatment of purified virions. ISVPs can grow in cells treated with inhibitors of virion-to-ISVP disassembly but not in cells treated with inhibitors of subsequent steps in the viral replication cycle (17). Viral yields after infection with ISVPs were equivalent in the presence and absence of BI and LI (Fig. 1C). These results suggest that the blockade of viral growth in L cells treated with inhibitors of cathepsin B and cathepsin L is due to blockade of virion-to-ISVP disassembly.

To demonstrate directly that differences in growth of virions in L cells treated with cathepsin B and cathepsin L inhibitors are linked to differences in viral disassembly, 35S-labeled virions of T1L were adsorbed to L cells that had been pretreated with 0-10 µM BI and LI. After 0 or 3 h of incubation in media supplemented with or without BI and LI, viral structural proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by autoradiography (Fig. 2A). Degradation of outer-capsid protein sigma 3 and cleavage of outer-capsid protein µ1C to delta , changes indicative of ISVP formation, were observed after 3 h of incubation in untreated cells. Degradation of sigma 3 and generation of delta  also occurred in cells treated with 1 µM BI. In contrast, degradation of sigma 3 and cleavage of µ1C occurred to a significantly lesser extent in cells treated with 3.3 µM LI than in untreated cells. Because viral core protein sigma 2 is not degraded during viral entry, band intensity of the sigma 2 protein was used to normalize for potential discrepancies in sample preparation and loading (Fig. 2B). Using a one-tailed, two-sample t test assuming unequal variance, the difference in the sigma 3/sigma 2 ratio after infection of cells treated with 3.3 µM LI and untreated cells was statistically significant (p < 0.002). Treatment of cells with 10 µM LI resulted in further inhibition of sigma 3 and µ1C cleavage, and the difference in the sigma 3/sigma 2 ratio after infection of cells treated with 10 µM LI and 3.3 µM LI was statistically significant (p < 0.0002). Treatment of cells with both 10 µM LI and 1 µM BI blocked all degradation of sigma 3 and cleavage of µ1C. The sigma 3/sigma 2 ratio in cells treated with 10 µM LI and 1 µM BI approximated that observed at 0 h and was significantly greater than that seen after infection of cells treated with 10 µM LI alone (p < .03). These results indicate that disassembly of reovirus virions in endosomes of murine L cells is dependent on either cathepsin B or cathepsin L. Moreover, these results suggest that cathepsin B activity is dispensable, whereas cathepsin L activity is not.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Proteolysis of reovirus outer-capsid proteins after internalization of virus into L cells treated with BI and LI. A, monolayers of L cells (1 × 107) were preincubated for 1 h in medium supplemented to contain 0-10 µM BI or LI. The medium was removed, and cells were adsorbed with purified 35S-labeled T1L virions at 10,000 particles/cell. After incubation at 4 °C for 1 h, the inoculum was removed, fresh medium with or without BI or LI was added, and cells were incubated at 37 °C for either 0 or 3 h. Viral particles in cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Concentrations of BI and LIM) are shown at the top. UT, untreated. Viral proteins are labeled on the right. B, quantitation of sigma 3 band intensity. The densities of bands corresponding to the sigma 2 and sigma 3 proteins were determined, and the results are expressed as the mean sigma 3/sigma 2 ratios for three independent experiments. Error bars indicate S.D.

Viral Growth and Disassembly in Cathepsin L-deficient MEFs-- Studies of L cells treated with LI indicate a critical role for cathepsin L in reovirus entry into murine fibroblasts. To further test this hypothesis, MEFs generated from either cathepsin L +/+ or cathepsin L -/- mice were transfected with either a cathepsin L-expressing vector or an empty vector (mock) and infected with reovirus virions at an m.o.i. of 2 pfu/cell. Viral growth was assessed by a fluorescent focus assay in which a polyclonal anti-reovirus serum is used to detect newly synthesized reovirus protein. Infection of mock-transfected wt MEFs resulted in a majority of cells staining positive for reovirus protein, indicating productive viral infection (Fig. 3A). In contrast, infection of mock-transfected cathepsin L-deficient MEFs resulted in few reovirus-positive cells. Transfection of cathepsin L-deficient MEFs with the cathepsin L-encoding vector resulted in numerous cells that stained positive, with an approximately equivalent percentage of cells staining for reovirus protein as seen after infection of wt MEFs transfected with the cathepsin L expression vector (Fig. 3A). These results suggest that the absence of cathepsin L renders MEFs significantly less permissive for reovirus infection and that this block to reovirus infection can be removed by complementing cathepsin L. 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Growth of reovirus virions in cathepsin L-deficient MEFs. A, monolayers of wt MEFs (cathepsin L +/+) and cathepsin L-deficient MEFs (cathepsin L -/-) (1 × 105) were transfected with either an empty expression vector (Mock) or with a vector expressing murine procathepsin L. After a 24-h incubation, transfected cells were adsorbed with T1L at an m.o.i. of 2 pfu/cell. After incubation at 37 °C for 18 h, viral proteins were detected by indirect immunofluorescence using polyclonal rabbit anti-reovirus serum raised against T1L and anti-rabbit-immunoglobulin conjugated to Alexa488. B, monolayers of MEFs (1 × 105) were preincubated for 1 h in medium supplemented with 0 or 1 µM BI. The medium was removed, and cells were adsorbed with T1L, T3D, or T1L ISVPs at an m.o.i. of 2 pfu/cell. After adsorption for 30 min, the inoculum was removed, fresh medium with or without BI was added, and cells were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Viral titers in cell lysates were determined by plaque assay. The results are presented as the mean viral yield, calculated by dividing titer at 24 h by titer at 0 h, for three independent experiments. Error bars indicate S.D. UT, untreated.

Infection of wt MEFs with either T1L or T3D results in robust viral growth, with viral yields of 47 and 435, respectively, after a single cycle of viral replication. In contrast, yields of T1L and T3D after infection of cathepsin L-deficient MEFs were 1.8- and 40-fold viral input, a reduction of 26- and 11-fold in comparison to yields after infection of wt MEFs. To test whether residual reovirus growth in cathepsin L-deficient MEFs is dependent on cathepsin B, MEFs were treated with BI before infection with reovirus. Treatment of wt MEFs with BI resulted in only a 2.9-fold decrease in yield of T3D in comparison to that after growth in untreated cells. However, treatment of cathepsin L-deficient MEFs with BI completely abolished viral growth. As a control, infection of MEFs treated with 0-1 µM BI with ISVPs resulted in essentially equivalent viral yields (Fig. 3B). These results indicate that genetic ablation of cathepsin L in conjunction with pharmacologic inhibition of cathepsin B renders MEFs incapable of supporting reovirus replication and suggest that the block to viral growth occurs before generation of ISVPs.

To determine whether cathepsin L is required for MEFs to support reovirus disassembly, wt MEFs and cathepsin L-deficient MEFs were adsorbed with 35S-labeled T1L virions, cells were lysed at various intervals, and viral proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE. After infection of wt MEFs, sigma 3 was rapidly degraded, and µ1C was cleaved to form delta . In contrast, infection of cathepsin L-deficient MEFs was associated with a significant delay of these cleavage events; sigma 3 was degraded at a slower rate, whereas traces of delta  generation were evident only at the latest time point (Fig. 4A). In concordance with these results, at each time point after viral adsorption of cathepsin L-deficient MEFs, the sigma 3/sigma 2 ratio was significantly greater than that after adsorption of wt MEFs (p < 0.0009 for 3 h, p < 0.02 for 6 h, p < 0.009 for 9 h) (Fig. 4B). These results indicate that efficient proteolytic processing of the reovirus outer capsid requires cathepsin L. 


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Proteolysis of reovirus outer-capsid proteins during viral disassembly in cathepsin L-deficient MEFs. A, monolayers of wt MEFs (cathepsin L +/+) and cathepsin L-deficient MEFs (cathepsin L -/-) (1.5 × 106) were adsorbed with 1 × 1011 purified 35S-labeled T1L virions. After incubation at room temperature for 30 min, the inoculum was removed, fresh medium with or without BI was added, and cells were incubated at 37 °C for 0, 3, 6, or 9 h. Viral particles in cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Viral proteins are labeled on the right. B, quantitation of sigma 3 band intensity. The densities of bands corresponding to the sigma 2 and sigma 3 proteins were determined, and the results are expressed as the mean sigma 3/sigma 2 ratios for three independent experiments. Error bars indicate S.D.

To test whether cathepsin B is responsible for the residual capacity of cathepsin L-deficient MEFs to support reovirus disassembly, MEFs were pretreated with BI and adsorbed with 35S-labeled T1L virions. Degradation of sigma 3 and cleavage of µ1C to delta  were only slightly diminished after infection of BI-treated wt MEFs in comparison to untreated MEFs (Fig. 5A). As anticipated, the sigma 3/sigma 2 ratio after infection of wt MEFs treated with BI was slightly higher than that after infection of untreated MEFs. However, after treatment of cathepsin L-deficient MEFs with BI, the modest degradation of sigma 3 and cleavage of µ1C to delta  observed 9 h after infection of untreated cells was not observed. At this late time point, delta  formation was not evident, and the sigma 3 band intensity and the sigma 3/sigma 2 ratio were equivalent to those at the 0-h time point in BI-treated cathepsin L-deficient MEFs (Fig. 5, A and B). Thus, inefficient proteolytic disassembly of reovirus virions in cathepsin L-deficient MEFs appears entirely dependent on cathepsin B. 


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Proteolysis of reovirus outer-capsid proteins during viral disassembly in cathepsin L-deficient MEFs treated with BI. A, monolayers of wt MEFs (cathepsin L +/+) and cathepsin L-deficient MEFs (cathepsin L -/-) (1.5 × 106) were preincubated for 1 h in medium supplemented to contain 0 or 1 µM BI. The medium was removed, and cells were adsorbed with 1 × 1011 purified 35S-labeled T1L virions. After incubation at room temperature for 30 min, the inoculum was removed, fresh medium with or without BI was added, and cells were incubated at 37 °C for 0 or 9 h. Viral particles in cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Viral proteins are labeled on the right. B, quantitation of sigma 3 band intensity. The densities of bands corresponding to the sigma 2 and sigma 3 proteins were determined, and the results are expressed as the mean sigma 3/sigma 2 ratios for three independent experiments. Error bars indicate S.D.

Viral Growth and Disassembly in Cathepsin B-deficient MEFs-- To more precisely define the role of cathepsin B in reovirus entry, cathepsin B-deficient MEFs were infected with reovirus virions, and viral yields were determined after 24 h of viral growth. Infection with either T1L or T3D resulted in approximately equivalent yields in wt MEFs and cathepsin B-deficient MEFs (Fig. 6). In concordance with studies using L cells treated with BI, these results indicate that the absence of cathepsin B does not alter the capacity of MEFs to support reovirus growth.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Growth of reovirus virions in cathepsin B-deficient MEFs. Monolayers of wt MEFs (cathepsin B +/+) and cathepsin B-deficient MEFs (cathepsin B-/-) (1 × 105) were preincubated for 1 h in medium supplemented to contain 0 or 1 µM LI. The medium was removed, and cells were adsorbed with T1L, T3D, or T1L ISVPs at an m.o.i. of 2 pfu/cell. After incubation at room temperature for 30 min, the inoculum was removed, fresh medium with or without LI was added, and cells were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Viral titers in cell lysates were determined by plaque assay. The results are presented as the mean viral yield, calculated by dividing titer at 24 h by titer at 0 h, for 3 independent experiments. Error bars indicate S.D.

Because previous experiments suggested a requirement for either cathepsin B or cathepsin L in reovirus entry, we tested the effect of LI on reovirus growth in cathepsin B-deficient MEFs. Treatment of wt MEFs with LI resulted in 4-5-fold reductions in yields of T1L and T3D in comparison to those in untreated wt MEFs. In contrast, treatment of cathepsin B-deficient MEFs with LI resulted in 55-600-fold lower viral yields in comparison to those after growth in untreated cathepsin B-deficient MEFs. In fact, viral yields in LI-treated cathepsin B-deficient MEFs were only 0.5-2-fold greater than viral input (Fig. 6). Thus, cathepsin B-deficient MEFs are much more sensitive than wt MEFs to the inhibitory effects of LI on viral growth. Moreover, growth of reovirus in cathepsin B-deficient MEFs can be completely abrogated by treatment with an inhibitor of cathepsin L.

To determine whether cathepsin B-deficient MEFs can support disassembly of reovirus virions, 35S-labeled T1L virions were adsorbed to cathepsin B-deficient MEFs, cells were lysed at different times, and viral proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 7A). In contrast to results obtained in experiments using cathepsin L-deficient MEFs, by 3 h after infection of cathepsin B-deficient MEFs, sigma 3 was substantially degraded, and noticeable quantities of delta  had accumulated. By 6 h after infection, more sigma 3 was degraded, and greater amounts of delta  were generated. However, in LI-treated cathepsin B-deficient MEFs, sigma 3 and µ1C remained intact, even at 6 h after adsorption. The sigma 3/sigma 2 ratio after infection of cathepsin B-deficient MEFs treated with LI approximated that observed at the 0-h time point and was significantly greater than the sigma 3/sigma 2 ratio after infection of wt MEFs at 6 h (p < 0.011) (Fig. 7B). These results indicate that cathepsin B-deficient MEFs are not altered in the capacity to disassemble reovirus virions and that inhibition of cathepsin L prevents virion disassembly in cathepsin B-deficient MEFs.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Proteolysis of reovirus outer-capsid proteins during viral disassembly in cathepsin B-deficient MEFs treated with LI. A, monolayers of cathepsin B-deficient MEFs (1.5 × 106) were preincubated for 1 h in medium supplemented to contain 0 or 1 µM LI. The medium was removed, and cells were adsorbed with 1 × 1011 purified 35S-labeled T1L virions. After incubation at room temperature for 30 min, the inoculum was removed, fresh medium with or without LI was added, and cells were incubated at 37 °C for 0, 3, or 6 h. Viral particles in cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Viral proteins are labeled on the right. B, quantitation of sigma 3 band intensity. The densities of bands corresponding to the sigma 2 and sigma 3 proteins were determined, and the results are expressed as the mean sigma 3/sigma 2 ratios for three independent experiments. Error bars indicate S.D.

Treatment of Reovirus Virions with Purified Endocytic Proteases-- Because reovirus disassembly in murine fibroblasts is dependent on cathepsin B and cathepsin L, with cathepsin L appearing to play a more important role in this process, we compared the relative capacities of purified cathepsin B and cathepsin L to mediate reovirus disassembly in vitro. Equivalent numbers of 35S-labeled virions of strain T1L were incubated with increasing concentrations of each enzyme. Outer-capsid protein sigma 3 was degraded with increasing concentrations of both cathepsin B (Fig. 8A) and cathepsin L (Fig. 8B). However, degradation of sigma 3 occurred with substantially lower concentrations of cathepsin L. At 1 µM enzyme, sigma 3 was completely degraded by cathepsin L but minimally cleaved by cathepsin B. Even after incubation with 4 µM cathepsin B, substantial amounts of sigma 3 remained. Generation of the delta  fragment was evident after incubation with 1 µM cathepsin L but not 1 µM cathepsin B. At 4 µM enzyme, cathepsin L treatment resulted in nearly complete cleavage of µ1C to delta , whereas cathepsin B treatment resulted in minimal µ1C cleavage. Thus, cathepsin L is substantially more efficient than cathepsin B in converting reovirus virions to ISVPs.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Treatment of reovirus virions with cathepsin B and cathepsin L. Purified 35S-labeled virions of strain T1L were treated with cathepsin B (A) or cathepsin L (B) at the concentrations shown for 8 h at 37 °C or with 1 µM cathepsin L for the times shown at 37 °C (C). Equal numbers of viral particles were loaded into wells of 10% polyacrylamide gels and electrophoresed. Magnified insets in A and C highlight sigma 3 doublet bands. Viral proteins are labeled on the right, and molecular mass standards (in kilodaltons) are indicated on the left.

During these experiments, we noted that cathepsin B cleavage of sigma 3 produced a doublet band as full-length sigma 3 was replaced by a fragment of slightly faster electrophoretic mobility (Fig. 8A). To determine whether cathepsin L degrades sigma 3 by a similar mechanism, virions of T1L were treated with 1 µM cathepsin L over a time course, and viral structural proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 8C). Degradation of sigma 3 by cathepsin L also resulted in a doublet band that preceded complete degradation of the protein. After incubation for 1 h, a faint band appeared that migrated slightly faster than full-length sigma 3. After incubation for 2-4 h, this lower band increased in intensity in direct proportion to the loss in intensity of the upper band. At times greater than 8 h, neither band was apparent (data not shown). After treatment of T1L virions with cathepsin L, the upper and lower bands were resolved by SDS-PAGE, excised from the gel, digested with trypsin, and analyzed by mass spectrometry. The tryptic fragments from the upper and lower bands had identical masses that matched predicted tryptic cleavage fragments of sigma 3 (data not shown). These results suggest that an initial cleavage event by either cathepsin B or cathepsin L occurs near a terminus of the sigma 3 protein.

Identification of Cathepsin L Cleavage Sites in T1L Virions-- Results presented thus far indicate that cathepsin L is the major mediator of reovirus disassembly in endosomes of murine fibroblasts. To identify sites in sigma 3 cleaved by cathepsin L, T1L virions were treated with purified cathepsin L, and the C-terminal sigma 3 cleavage fragment was subjected to peptide sequencing. Cathepsin L treatment of T1L sigma 3 results in ~13- and 29-kDa fragments after SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining, analogous to Staphylococcus aureus V8 protease treatment of T3D sigma 3 (50, 51). In studies using V8 protease, the smaller fragment corresponds to the C-terminal fragment. Based on this finding, the 13-kDa fragment generated by cathepsin L treatment of T1L virions was transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane and subjected to N-terminal peptide sequencing by Edman degradation. Two amino acid sequences were evident from this analysis (Fig. 9A). The predominant sequence was HFGLS, which matches sigma 3 amino acid residues 251-255. The minor sequence was TPARD, which corresponds to sigma 3 amino acid residues 244-248. Thus, sequence analysis of the 13-kDa sigma 3 cleavage fragments generated by cathepsin L treatment of T1L virions indicates that cathepsin L cleaves sigma 3 at two sites, between amino acids 250 and 251 and between amino acids 243 and 244. 


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Cathepsin L cleavage sites in T1L sigma 3. A, the primary amino acid sequence of sigma 3 from amino acids 241 to 255 is shown. The arrows point to identified cathepsin L cleavage sites. B, cathepsin L cleavage sites are highlighted in the crystal structure of sigma 3. A ribbon diagram of the crystal structure of T3D sigma 3 (47) is displayed. The cathepsin L cleavage sites in T1L are depicted in blue between amino acids 243 and 244 and between 250 and 251 and, within the surrounding amino acids from 241 to 253, in yellow. The C-terminal residues of sigma 3, from amino acids 340 to 365, are colored red. Amino acid 354, which is a site mutated in PI and D-EA viruses, is colored green. The virion-distal end of sigma 3 is at the top of the page, and the virion-proximal end and N terminus is at the bottom.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

After receptor-mediated endocytosis, the reovirus outer capsid is subject to proteolysis by endocytic proteases, resulting in generation of ISVPs. These particles are obligate intermediates in reovirus disassembly that interact directly with vacuolar membranes leading to delivery of transcriptionally active viral cores into the cytoplasm (for review, see Ref. 17). Previous studies suggest that specific endocytic proteases mediate disassembly of reovirus virions to ISVPs. Cysteine protease inhibitor E64 blocks reovirus disassembly (24-26), but aspartic protease inhibitor pepstatin A does not (29). Mutant cells selected during persistent reovirus infection do not support reovirus disassembly despite internalizing and transporting virions to acidified, perinuclear compartments. These mutant cells have defects in the activity of cysteine proteases cathepsin B and cathepsin L but not cysteine protease cathepsin H (27).2 This study sought to identify the specific endocytic proteases that act on reovirus virions in endosomes of murine fibroblasts to generate functional ISVPs.

Studies using L cells and genetically deficient MEFs indicate that either cathepsin B or cathepsin L is required for reovirus virion-to-ISVP disassembly. Removal of cathepsin L activity alone, whether by active-site inhibitors or by genetic modification, significantly decreases the capacity of cells to support reovirus disassembly. In contrast, removal of cathepsin B activity alone does not alter the capacity of cells to support either disassembly or growth. However, removal of both cathepsin B and cathepsin L activity completely abrogates disassembly and growth of reovirus. In concordance with these data, cathepsin L mediates reovirus disassembly more efficiently than cathepsin B in vitro. Particles generated by cathepsin L treatment of T1L virions have biological hallmarks of ISVPs in that these particles bypass blocks to inhibitors of viral entry, such as E64 and ammonium chloride, and can infect mutant cells selected during persistent infection (27). Thus, murine fibroblasts have a requirement for either cathepsin B or cathepsin L to support reovirus disassembly, although cathepsin L is the major mediator of this process.

Why reovirus has evolved so that only specific proteases can effect its disassembly within cellular endosomes is an interesting question. The answer may lie in the virion stability/disassembly fulcrum. There is selective pressure for a virus to be stable in the environment yet disassemble and activate its genetic program in the appropriate intracellular compartment. Requirement by a nonenveloped virus for specific endocytic proteases to mediate capsid removal would allow it to be stable in the environment where these proteases are either not present or present in inactive forms. Upon delivery to the appropriate endocytic organelle, the resident proteases contained therein, such as cathepsin B and cathepsin L, would catalyze viral disassembly and facilitate delivery of the virus into the cytoplasm.

Results presented here implicate the reovirus outer capsid as a physiologically relevant substrate for cathepsin B and cathepsin L. The outer capsid consists of sigma 3 and µ1 in 1:1 complexes, present at 600 copies/virion (52-54). The sigma 3 protein acts as a cap to protect µ1, which is the viral protein that mediates membrane penetration (20-22). Thus, removal of sigma 3 is essential to the disassembly process (16, 24). Reovirus sigma 3 is a bilobed protein with its N terminus in a virion-proximal smaller lobe bound to µ1 and its C terminus in a virion-distal larger lobe (47, 55, 56). Studies using S. aureus V8 protease suggest that sigma 3 is sensitive to proteolytic cleavage near amino acid 220 (50), which is approximately positioned between the two lobes (47).

We identified sites in T1L sigma 3 cleaved by cathepsin L to provide additional evidence that sigma 3 serves as a cathepsin L substrate and to gain insight into mechanisms of sigma 3 cleavage in the endocytic pathway. Two cleavage sites were identified in the smaller of two stable sigma 3 cleavage fragments produced after cathepsin L treatment. The more predominant species was produced after cleavage between amino acids 250 and 251, and a lower abundance product was produced after cleavage between amino acids 243 and 244. It is possible that cleavage at one site precedes cleavage at the other, or both sites may be used, albeit with different efficiencies. Cathepsin L prefers large hydrophobic residues at the P2 positions for efficient proteolysis (38). The cathepsin L cleavage sites in T1L sigma 3 determined here conform to this preference. At the cleavage site between amino acids 250 and 251, phenylalanine is present at the P2 position; at the cleavage site between amino acids 243 and 244, the P2 position is occupied by leucine.

The first observed cleavage event after treatment of reovirus virions with either cathepsin B or cathepsin L in vitro is a sigma 3 band of slightly faster electrophoretic mobility than full-length sigma 3. Mass spectrometric analysis of the faster migrating species generated by cathepsin L treatment of T1L virions confirmed that it is indeed formed from sigma 3. These findings suggest that an initial cleavage event occurs at a sigma 3 terminus. Previous studies from our laboratory show that PI viruses isolated from L-cell cultures persistently infected with reovirus strain T3D (24, 30) and D-EA mutant viruses isolated from serial passage of T3D in the presence of cysteine protease inhibitor E64 (26) are more sensitive to proteolytic cleavage by either chymotrypsin or cathepsin L than parental strain T3D. Furthermore, PI and D-EA viruses, unlike wt T3D, are capable of growth in cells treated with E64. For all tested PI and D-EA viruses, the sigma 3-encoding S4 gene is the primary genetic determinant of resistance to E64-mediated inhibition of viral growth. Remarkably, all PI and D-EA viruses subjected to genetic analysis have a tyrosine-to-histidine mutation at amino acid 354 in sigma 3. For one of the PI viruses and two of the D-EA viruses, histidine 354 is the only mutation in sigma 3. These findings suggest that the C terminus of sigma 3 plays an important role in determining susceptibility of the protein to proteolytic attack. In addition, strain-specific differences in sigma 3 susceptibility to proteolysis have been mapped to the C-terminal third of sigma 3 using chimeric sigma 3 molecules (57). Based on these studies and the analysis of the previously determined crystal structure of T3D sigma 3 (47), it seems most likely that the initial cleavage event in sigma 3 occurs near the C terminus in the vicinity of amino acid 354. Importantly, the C-terminal region of sigma 3 and the cathepsin L cleavage sites identified in this study are adjacent to each other in the T3D sigma 3 crystal structure (Fig. 9B). Although the cathepsin L cleavage sites were identified in T1L sigma 3, the deduced amino acid sequences of T1L and T3D differ at only 12 positions (58, 59), and thus, conclusions based on the structure of T3D sigma 3 are likely to be applicable to T1L sigma 3.

We hypothesize that the C-terminal region of sigma 3 acts as a safety latch, controlling access to the more internal cleavage sites in sigma 3 and subsequent conversion of virions to ISVPs. Because reovirus disassembly is an acid-dependent process, this latch might be primed for movement at acidic pH. The first sigma 3 cleavage event may remove this safety latch and allow access to the cleavage sites identified in this study at residues 243-244 and 250-251. In viruses with mutations in the C-terminal region of sigma 3, such as PI and D-EA viruses, the safety latch may be altered by structural rearrangements. Alterations in structure have been observed by cryoelectron microscopy and three-dimensional image analysis of viruses with the tyrosine-to-histidine mutation at residue 354 in sigma 3.3

Results presented in this report provide evidence that specific endocytic proteases play distinct roles in reovirus disassembly. To mediate virion-to-ISVP conversion, murine fibroblasts have a requirement for either cathepsin B or cathepsin L, with cathepsin L being the dominant enzyme in this reaction. These findings also indicate that cathepsin B and cathepsin L have specific functions in modulating susceptibility of cells to productive infection by intracellular pathogens. Moreover, these results raise the possibility that that cathepsin B and cathepsin L may influence tropism or virulence of reovirus after infection of host organisms.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We express our appreciation to Jim Chappell, Denise Wetzel, and Greg Wilson for careful review of the manuscript. We thank Bonnie Sloane for the kind gift of cathepsin B-deficient MEFs and John Mort for providing purified cathepsin L. We thank the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center for peptide sequencing and the Vanderbilt Diabetes Research and Training Center for reagents.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by NIGMS, National Institutes of Health (NIH) Public Health Service Grant T32 GM07347 for the Vanderbilt Medical Scientist Training Program (to D. H. E.), NIAID, NIH Public Health Service Grant R01 AI32539, and the Elizabeth B. Lamb Center for Pediatric Research.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

|| Present address: Max-Planck-Institut für Psychiatrie, Molekulare Neurogenetik, Kraepelinstrasse 2-10, 80804 München, FRG.

Dagger Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Lamb Center for Pediatric Research, D7235 MCN, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232. Tel.: 615-343-9943; Fax: 615-343-9723; E-mail: terry.dermody@mcmail.vanderbilt.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 1, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201107200

2 D. Ebert and T. Dermody, unpublished results.

3 G. Wilson, E. Nason, B. Prasad, and T. Dermody, unpublished results.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ISVP, infectious subvirion particle; MEF, mouse embryo fibroblast; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; DTT, dithiothreitol; m.o.i., multiplicity of infection; pfu, plaque-forming unit; wt, wild type.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Reinheckel, T., Deussing, J., Roth, W., and Peters, C. (2001) Biol. Chem. 382, 735-741[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Nakagawa, T., Roth, W., Wong, P., Nelson, A., Farr, A., Deussing, J., Villadangos, J. A., Ploegh, H., Peters, C., and Rudensky, A. Y. (1998) Science 280, 450-453[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Roth, W., Deussing, J., Botchkarev, V., Pauly-Evers, M., Saftig, P., Hafner, A., Schmidt, P., Schmahl, W., Scherer, J., Anton-Lamprechet, I., Von Figura, K., Paus, R., and Peters, C. (2000) FASEB J. 14, 2075-2086[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Halangk, W., Lerch, M., Brandt-Nedelev, B., Roth, W., Ruthenbuerger, M., Reinheckel, T., Domschke, W., Lippert, H., Peters, C., and Deussing, J. (2000) J. Clin. Invest. 106, 773-781[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Guicciardii, M. E., Deussing, J., Miyoshi, H., Bronk, S. F., Svingen, P. A., Peters, C., Kaufmann, S. H., and Gores, G. J. (2000) J. Clin. Invest. 106, 1127-1137[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Barton, E. S., Forrest, J. C., Connolly, J. L., Chappell, J. D., Liu, Y., Schnell, F., Nusrat, A., Parkos, C. A., and Dermody, T. S. (2001) Cell 104, 441-451[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Gentsch, J. R., and Pacitti, A. F. (1985) J. Virol. 56, 356-364[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Pacitti, A., and Gentsch, J. R. (1987) J. Virol. 61, 1407-1415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Paul, R. W., Choi, A. H., and Lee, P. W. K. (1989) Virology 172, 382-385[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Dermody, T. S., Nibert, M. L., Bassel-Duby, R., and Fields, B. N. (1990) J. Virol. 64, 5173-5176[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Nibert, M. L., Chappell, J. D., and Dermody, T. S. (1995) J. Virol. 69, 5057-5067[Abstract]
12. Chappell, J. D., Gunn, V. L., Wetzel, J. D., Baer, G. S., and Dermody, T. S. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 1834-1841[Abstract]
13. Chappell, J. D., Duong, J. L., Wright, B. W., and Dermody, T. S. (2000) J. Virol. 74, 8472-8479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Borsa, J., Sargent, M. D., Lievaart, P. A., and Copps, T. P. (1981) Virology 111, 191-200[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Rubin, D. H., Weiner, D. B., Dworkin, C., Greene, M. I., Maul, G. G., and Williams, W. V. (1992) Microb. Pathog. 12, 351-365[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Sturzenbecker, L. J., Nibert, M. L., Furlong, D. B., and Fields, B. N. (1987) J. Virol. 61, 2351-2361[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Nibert, M. L., and Schiff, L. A. (2001) in Fields Virology (Knipe, D. M. , and Howley, P. M., eds), 4th Ed. , pp. 1679-1728, Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia
18. Borsa, J., Morash, B. D., Sargent, M. D., Copps, T. P., Lievaart, P. A., and Szekely, J. G. (1979) J. Gen. Virol. 45, 161-170[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Hooper, J. W., and Fields, B. N. (1996) J. Virol. 70, 672-677[Abstract]
20. Hooper, J. W., and Fields, B. N. (1996) J. Virol. 70, 459-467[Abstract]
21. Lucia-Jandris, P., Hooper, J. W., and Fields, B. N. (1993) J. Virol. 67, 5339-5345[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Tosteson, M. T., Nibert, M. L., and Fields, B. N. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 10549-10552[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Barrett, A. J., Kembhavi, A. A., Brown, M. A., Kirschke, H., Knight, C. G., Tamai, M., and Hanada, K. (1982) Biochem. J. 201, 189-198[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Baer, G. S., and Dermody, T. S. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 4921-4928[Abstract]
25. Chandran, K., and Nibert, M. L. (1998) J. Virol. 762, 467-475
26. Ebert, D. H., Wetzel, J. D., Brumbaugh, D. E., Chance, S. R., Stobie, L. E., Baer, G. S., and Dermody, T. S. (2001) J. Virol. 75, 3197-3206[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Baer, G. S., Ebert, D. H., Chung, C. J., Erickson, A. H., and Dermody, T. S. (1999) J. Virol. 73, 9532-9543[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Dean, R. T., and Barrett, A. J. (1976) Essays Biochem. 12, 1-40[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Kothandaraman, S., Hebert, M. C., Raines, R. T., and Nibert, M. L. (1998) Virology 251, 264-272[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Dermody, T. S., Nibert, M. L., Wetzel, J. D., Tong, X., and Fields, B. N. (1993) J. Virol. 67, 2055-2063[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Moin, K., Demchik, L., Mai, J., Duessing, J., Peters, C., and Sloane, B. (2000) Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 477, 391-401[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Deussing, J., Roth, W., Saftig, P., Peters, C., Ploegh, H. L., and Villadangos, J. A. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 4516-4521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Furlong, D. B., Nibert, M. L., and Fields, B. N. (1988) J. Virol. 62, 246-256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Towatari, T., Nikawa, T., Murata, M., Yokoo, C., Tamai, M., Hanada, K., and Katunuma, N. (1991) FEBS Lett. 280, 311-315[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Murata, M., Miyashita, S., Yokoo, C., Tamai, M., Hanada, K., Hatayama, K., Towatari, T., Nikawa, T., and Katunuma, N. (1991) FEBS Lett. 280, 307-310[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Buttle, D., Murata, M., Knight, C. G., and Barrett, A. J. (1992) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 299, 377-380[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Shaw, E., Mohanty, S., Colic, A., Stoka, V., and Turk, V. (1993) FEBS Lett. 334, 340-342[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Barrett, A. J., and Kirschke, H. (1981) Methods Enzymol. 800, 535-561
39. Virgin, H. W., IV, Bassel-Duby, R., Fields, B. N., and Tyler, K. L. (1988) J. Virol. 62, 4594-4604[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Chapman, R. L., Kane, S. E., and Erickson, A. H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 8808-8816[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Barton, E. S., Connolly, J. L., Forrest, J. C., Chappell, J. D., and Dermody, T. S. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 2200-2211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Chang, C. T., and Zweerink, H. J. (1971) Virology 46, 544-555[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Silverstein, S. C., Astell, C., Levin, D. H., Schonberg, M., and Acs, G. (1972) Virology 47, 797-806[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Wetzel, J. D., Wilson, G. J., Baer, G. S., Dunnigan, L. R., Wright, J. P., Tang, D. S. H., and Dermody, T. S. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 1362-1369[Abstract]
46. Carmona, E., Dufour, É., Plouffe, C., Takebe, S., Mason, P., Mort, J. S., and Ménard, R. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 8149-8157[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Olland, A. M., Jané-Valbuena, J., Schiff, L. A., Nibert, M. L., and Harrison, S. C. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 979-989[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Assfalg-Machleidt, I., Rothe, G., Klingel, S., Banati, R., Mangel, W. F., Valet, G., and Machleidt, W. (1992) Biol. Chem. Hoppe Seyler 373, 433-440[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Rothe, G., Klingel, S., Assfalg-Machleidt, I., Machleidt, W., Zirkelbach, C., Banati, R., Mangel, W., and Valet, G. (1992) Biol. Chem. Hoppe Seyler 373, 547-554[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Schiff, L. A., Nibert, M. L., Co, M. S., Brown, E. G., and Fields, B. N. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 273-283[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Miller, J. E., and Samuel, C. E. (1992) J. Virol. 66, 5347-5356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Coombs, K. M. (1998) Virology 243, 218-228[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Jayasuriya, A. K., Nibert, M. L., and Fields, B. N. (1988) Virology 163, 591-602[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Lee, P. W. K., Hayes, E. C., and Joklik, W. K. (1981) Virology 108, 134-146[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Nason, E., Wetzel, J., Mukherjee, S., Barton, E., Prasad, B., and Dermody, T. (2001) J. Virol. 75, 6625-6634[Abstract/Free Full Text]
56. Liemann, S., Chandran, K., Baker, T. S., Nibert, M. L., and Harrison, S. C. (2002) Cell 108, 283-295[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Jané-Valbuena, J., Nibert, M. L., Spencer, S. M., Walker, S. B., Baker, T. S., Chen, Y., Centonze, V. E., and Schiff, L. A. (1999) J. Virol. 73, 2963-2973[Abstract/Free Full Text]
58. Kedl, R., Schmechel, S., and Schiff, L. (1995) J. Virol. 69, 552-559[Abstract]
59. Seliger, L. S., Giantini, M., and Shatkin, A. J. (1992) Virology 187, 202-210[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
L. Zhang, M. A. Agosto, T. Ivanovic, D. S. King, M. L. Nibert, and S. C. Harrison
Requirements for the Formation of Membrane Pores by the Reovirus Myristoylated {micro}1N Peptide
J. Virol., July 15, 2009; 83(14): 7004 - 7014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
T. Kobayashi, L. S. Ooms, J. D. Chappell, and T. S. Dermody
Identification of Functional Domains in Reovirus Replication Proteins {micro}NS and {micro}2
J. Virol., April 1, 2009; 83(7): 2892 - 2906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. Jiang, J. R. Abend, B. Tsai, and M. J. Imperiale
Early Events during BK Virus Entry and Disassembly
J. Virol., February 1, 2009; 83(3): 1350 - 1358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
V. Thomas, S. Samanta, and E. Fikrig
Anaplasma phagocytophilum Increases Cathepsin L Activity, Thereby Globally Influencing Neutrophil Function
Infect. Immun., November 1, 2008; 76(11): 4905 - 4912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. S. Maginnis, B. A. Mainou, A. Derdowski, E. M. Johnson, R. Zent, and T. S. Dermody
NPXY Motifs in the {beta}1 Integrin Cytoplasmic Tail Are Required for Functional Reovirus Entry
J. Virol., April 1, 2008; 82(7): 3181 - 3191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
E. K. Rainey-Barger, B. Magnuson, and B. Tsai
A Chaperone-Activated Nonenveloped Virus Perforates the Physiologically Relevant Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane
J. Virol., December 1, 2007; 81(23): 12996 - 13004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
P. Kumar, D. Nachagari, C. Fields, J. Franks, and L. M. Albritton
Host Cell Cathepsins Potentiate Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus Infection
J. Virol., October 1, 2007; 81(19): 10506 - 10514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
Y. Mori, T. Yamashita, Y. Tanaka, Y. Tsuda, T. Abe, K. Moriishi, and Y. Matsuura
Processing of Capsid Protein by Cathepsin L Plays a Crucial Role in Replication of Japanese Encephalitis Virus in Neural and Macrophage Cells
J. Virol., August 15, 2007; 81(16): 8477 - 8487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. Forzan, M. Marsh, and P. Roy
Bluetongue Virus Entry into Cells
J. Virol., May 1, 2007; 81(9): 4819 - 4827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
L. Zhang, K. Chandran, M. L. Nibert, and S. C. Harrison
Reovirus {micro}1 Structural Rearrangements That Mediate Membrane Penetration
J. Virol., December 15, 2006; 80(24): 12367 - 12376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
Z. Qiu, S. T. Hingley, G. Simmons, C. Yu, J. Das Sarma, P. Bates, and S. R. Weiss
Endosomal Proteolysis by Cathepsins Is Necessary for Murine Coronavirus Mouse Hepatitis Virus Type 2 Spike-Mediated Entry.
J. Virol., June 1, 2006; 80(12): 5768 - 5776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
K. Schornberg, S. Matsuyama, K. Kabsch, S. Delos, A. Bouton, and J. White
Role of endosomal cathepsins in entry mediated by the ebola virus glycoprotein.
J. Virol., April 1, 2006; 80(8): 4174 - 4178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. S. Maginnis, J. C. Forrest, S. A. Kopecky-Bromberg, S. K. Dickeson, S. A. Santoro, M. M. Zutter, G. R. Nemerow, J. M. Bergelson, and T. S. Dermody
{beta}1 Integrin Mediates Internalization of Mammalian Reovirus
J. Virol., March 15, 2006; 80(6): 2760 - 2770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
D. M. Tscherne, C. T. Jones, M. J. Evans, B. D. Lindenbach, J. A. McKeating, and C. M. Rice
Time- and Temperature-Dependent Activation of Hepatitis C Virus for Low-pH-Triggered Entry
J. Virol., February 15, 2006; 80(4): 1734 - 1741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I-C. Huang, B. J. Bosch, F. Li, W. Li, K. H. Lee, S. Ghiran, N. Vasilieva, T. S. Dermody, S. C. Harrison, P. R. Dormitzer, et al.
SARS Coronavirus, but Not Human Coronavirus NL63, Utilizes Cathepsin L to Infect ACE2-expressing Cells
J. Biol. Chem., February 10, 2006; 281(6): 3198 - 3203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
P. Danthi, M. W. Hansberger, J. A. Campbell, J. C. Forrest, and T. S. Dermody
JAM-A-Independent, Antibody-Mediated Uptake of Reovirus into Cells Leads to Apoptosis
J. Virol., February 1, 2006; 80(3): 1261 - 1270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. M. Richards, D. R. Lowy, J. T. Schiller, and P. M. Day
Cleavage of the papillomavirus minor capsid protein, L2, at a furin consensus site is necessary for infection
PNAS, January 31, 2006; 103(5): 1522 - 1527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
K. M. Clark, J. D. Wetzel, Y. Gu, D. H. Ebert, S. A. McAbee, E. K. Stoneman, G. S. Baer, Y. Zhu, G. J. Wilson, B. V. V. Prasad, et al.
Reovirus Variants Selected for Resistance to Ammonium Chloride Have Mutations in Viral Outer-Capsid Protein {sigma}3
J. Virol., January 15, 2006; 80(2): 671 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
C. T. Pager and R. E. Dutch
Cathepsin L Is Involved in Proteolytic Processing of the Hendra Virus Fusion Protein
J. Virol., October 15, 2005; 79(20): 12714 - 12720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Diederich, M. Moll, H.-D. Klenk, and A. Maisner
The Nipah Virus Fusion Protein Is Cleaved within the Endosomal Compartment
J. Biol. Chem., August 19, 2005; 280(33): 29899 - 29903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
E. Im, A. Venkatakrishnan, and A. Kazlauskas
Cathepsin B Regulates the Intrinsic Angiogenic Threshold of Endothelial Cells
Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2005; 16(8): 3488 - 3500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
K. Chandran, N. J. Sullivan, U. Felbor, S. P. Whelan, and J. M. Cunningham
Endosomal Proteolysis of the Ebola Virus Glycoprotein Is Necessary for Infection
Science, June 10, 2005; 308(5728): 1643 - 1645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
A. L. Odegard, K. Chandran, X. Zhang, J. S. L. Parker, T. S. Baker, and M. L. Nibert
Putative Autocleavage of Outer Capsid Protein {micro}1, Allowing Release of Myristoylated Peptide {micro}1N during Particle Uncoating, Is Critical for Cell Entry by Reovirus
J. Virol., August 15, 2004; 78(16): 8732 - 8745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
K. Hueffer, L. M. Palermo, and C. R. Parrish
Parvovirus Infection of Cells by Using Variants of the Feline Transferrin Receptor Altering Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis, Membrane Domain Localization, and Capsid-Binding Domains
J. Virol., June 1, 2004; 78(11): 5601 - 5611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. W. Golden, J. A. Bahe, W. T. Lucas, M. L. Nibert, and L. A. Schiff
Cathepsin S Supports Acid-independent Infection by Some Reoviruses
J. Biol. Chem., March 5, 2004; 279(10): 8547 - 8557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. H. Ebert, S. A. Kopecky-Bromberg, and T. S. Dermody
Cathepsin B Is Inhibited in Mutant Cells Selected during Persistent Reovirus Infection
J. Biol. Chem., January 30, 2004; 279(5): 3837 - 3851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
K. Chandran, J. S. L. Parker, M. Ehrlich, T. Kirchhausen, and M. L. Nibert
The {delta} Region of Outer-Capsid Protein {micro}1 Undergoes Conformational Change and Release from Reovirus Particles during Cell Entry
J. Virol., December 15, 2003; 77(24): 13361 - 13375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
S. Saha and P. N. Rangarajan
Common host genes are activated in mouse brain by Japanese encephalitis and rabies viruses
J. Gen. Virol., July 1, 2003; 84(7): 1729 - 1735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
G. J. Wilson, E. L. Nason, C. S. Hardy, D. H. Ebert, J. D. Wetzel, B. V. Venkataram Prasad, and T. S. Dermody
A Single Mutation in the Carboxy Terminus of Reovirus Outer-Capsid Protein {sigma}3 Confers Enhanced Kinetics of {sigma}3 Proteolysis, Resistance to Inhibitors of Viral Disassembly, and Alterations in {sigma}3 Structure
J. Virol., August 28, 2002; 76(19): 9832 - 9843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/27/24609    most recent
M201107200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ebert, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Dermody, T. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ebert, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Dermody, T. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement