![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 28, 24863-24869, July 12, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
Received for publication, March 1, 2002, and in revised form, April 1, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Streptococcus pneumoniae is a
naturally transformable bacterium that is able to incorporate DNA from
its environment into its own chromosome. This process, known as
transformational recombination, is dependent in part on the
mmsA gene, which encodes a protein having a sequence that
is 40% identical to that of the Escherichia coli RecG
protein, a junction-specific DNA helicase believed to be involved in
the branch migration of recombinational intermediates. We have
developed an expression system for the MmsA protein and have purified
the MmsA protein to more than 99% homogeneity. The MmsA protein has
DNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis and DNA junction-helicase activities that are similar to those of the E. coli RecG
protein. The effect of the MmsA protein on the S. pneumoniae RecA protein-promoted three-strand exchange reaction
was also investigated. In the standard direction (circular
single-stranded (ss) DNA + linear double-stranded (ds) DNA Streptococcus pneumoniae is a naturally
transformable bacterium that is able to take up DNA from its
environment (in the form of
ssDNA)1 and incorporate this
DNA into its chromosome (1, 2). It has been proposed that this process,
known as transformational recombination, has evolved as a general
mechanism that allows S. pneumoniae to change its genetic
composition in response to environmental changes and stresses (3). For
example, transformational recombination is believed to have contributed
to the recent emergence of penicillin-resistance in clinical
isolates of S. pneumoniae (4, 5).
Genetic studies have shown that transformational recombination is
dependent on the presence of the recA gene, which encodes a
DNA recombinase analogous to the RecA protein from Escherichia coli (2, 6). We recently developed an expression system and
purification protocol for the S. pneumoniae RecA protein
(7). The purified S. pneumoniae RecA protein (RecA(Sp)) has
an ATP-dependent three-strand exchange activity that is
generally similar to that of the E. coli RecA protein
(RecA(Ec)) (7). In the standard three-strand exchange reaction, a
circular ssDNA and a homologous linear dsDNA are recombined to form a
nicked circular dsDNA and a linear ssDNA. This reaction proceeds in
three phases. In the first phase, RecA protein polymerizes onto the
circular ssDNA (1 RecA monomer/3 nucleotides of ssDNA), forming a
helical nucleoprotein filament known as the presynaptic complex. In the
second phase, the presynaptic complex interacts with a homologous
linear dsDNA, and pairing between the circular ssDNA and the
complementary strand from the linear dsDNA is initiated. In the third
phase, the complementary linear strand is completely transferred to the
circular ssDNA by unidirectional branch migration (in the 5'-3'
direction relative to the circular ssDNA) to yield the nicked circular
dsDNA and displaced linear ssDNA products (8, 9).
The three-strand exchange activity of the RecA(Ec) protein is
stimulated by the E. coli SSB protein, a homotetrameric,
non-sequence-specific, single-stranded DNA-binding protein that is
involved in many aspects of DNA biochemistry (10). It is believed that
E. coli SSB protein (SSB(Ec)) stimulates strand exchange
both presynaptically (by facilitating the binding of RecA(Ec) protein
to the circular ssDNA substrate), and postsynaptically (by binding to
the displaced linear strand that is generated when the circular ssDNA
invades the linear dsDNA substrate) (8, 9). In our initial
characterization of the RecA(Sp) protein, we found that its
three-strand exchange activity was also strongly stimulated by SSB(Ec)
protein (7). More recently, we isolated the SSB protein from S. pneumoniae (SSB(Sp)) and showed that this protein stimulates the
RecA(Sp)-promoted three-strand exchange reaction in a manner
similar to that of the SSB(Ec) protein (11).
Genetic studies have shown that transformational recombination is also
dependent, at least in part, on the mmsA gene (12). The
mmsA gene encodes a protein of 671 amino acids (75,188 Da) having a sequence that is 40% identical to the E. coli RecG protein (693 amino acids, 76,438 Da), a protein
believed to be involved in the branch migration of recombinational
intermediates (12). On the basis of this similarity, it has been
proposed that the S. pneumoniae MmsA protein (MmsA(Sp)) may
be involved in the branch migration of three-stranded intermediates
formed by the RecA(Sp) protein during transformational recombination
(12). To directly evaluate its mechanistic role in transformational
recombination, we have developed an expression system and purification
protocol for the MmsA(Sp) protein. These procedures, the biochemical
properties of the purified MmsA(Sp) protein, and the effects of the
MmsA(Sp) protein on the RecA(Sp) protein-promoted three-strand exchange reaction are described in this report.
Materials--
S. pneumoniae RecA protein (7) and
S. pneumoniae SSB protein (11) were prepared as described.
ATP and [
The three-stranded DNA junction was prepared by annealing DNA I, DNA
II, and DNA III as described by Whitby and Lloyd (13). The fully paired
dsDNA was prepared by annealing DNA III and DNA IV, and the partially
paired dsDNA was prepared by annealing DNA I and DNA III. Linear Cloning the S. pneumoniae mmsA Gene--
The S. pneumoniae mmsA gene was amplified from 2 µl of a
saturated culture of R800 S. pneumoniae cells (generously
provided by Dr. Jean-Pierre Claverys, Université Paul Sabatier,
Toulouse Cedex, France) using in situ PCR and
Pfu DNA polymerase as described by the manufacturer
(Stratagene). The primers used
(5'-GGATGGGAGCATATGAATCTACATCAACC-3' and
5'-AAGGGATCCTTAGAGAAAGCTTAATCC-3')
corresponded to the 5' and 3' ends of the coding sequence (italics) of
the mmsA gene and also contained the recognition sequences
for the restriction enzymes NdeI and BamHI
(underlined).2 The DNA
product obtained from the polymerase chain reaction was digested with
NdeI and BamHI and ligated into pET-21a (Novagen) to give the final construct, pETmmsA(Sp). The insert was sequenced by
the Johns Hopkins University DNA Sequencing Facility and found to be
identical to the mmsA gene nucleotide sequence
(GenBankTM accession number Z49988) (12).
Expression of S. pneumoniae MmsA Protein--
The S. pneumoniae mmsA gene was expressed in E. coli strain
BL21(DE3)pLysS (Novagen). Competent BL21(DE3)pLysS cells were transformed with pETmmsA (Sp) and selected for growth on
LB/carbenicillin/chloramphenicol plates. A single
BL21(DE3)pLys/pETmmsA(Sp) colony was used to inoculate LB broth (5 ml)
containing carbenicillin (50 µg/ml) and chloramphenicol (34 µg/ml),
and the resulting culture was incubated overnight at 37 °C. A
portion of the culture (2 ml) was then used to inoculate 2 liters of LB
broth/carbenicillin (50 µg/ml)/chloramphenicol (34 µg/ml), and the
cells were grown at 37 °C to an A600 of 0.8. The cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in 2 liter
of LB broth/carbenicillin (50 µg/ml)/chloramphenicol (34 µg/ml).
Isopropyl-1- Purification of S. pneumoniae MmsA Protein--
All purification
steps were carried out at 4 °C. The frozen BL21(DE3)pLys/pETmmsA(Sp)
cell suspension (50 ml) was thawed on ice overnight; the cells lysed
upon thawing because of the constitutive expression of T7 lysozyme from
the pLysS plasmid (Novagen). The thawed suspension was then
centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 60 min. The pellet was
discarded, and 0.9 ml of Polymin-P (5%, pH 7.9) was added to the
supernatant (35 ml). The suspension was mixed for 15 min and then
centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 15 min. The supernatant
was discarded, and the pellet was suspended in 35 ml of R buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)/10% glycerol/7 mM
The concentration of the purified S. pneumoniae MmsA protein
was determined by UV absorbance at 280 nm using the extinction coefficient of 54,740 M Preparation of the S. pneumoniae MmsA Protein--
To develop a
purification procedure for the MmsA(Sp) protein, we first used the
polymerase chain reaction to amplify the mmsA gene from
wild-type R800 S. pneumoniae cells. The sequence of our
amplified gene was identical to that reported previously for the
S. pneumoniae mmsA gene (12). We then cloned the
mmsA gene into a pET21a expression vector and expressed the
protein in E. coli strain BL21(DE3)pLysS. With this
expression system, the MmsA(Sp) protein corresponded to ~5-10% of
the total protein in the crude cell extract, and we were able to obtain
2 mg of highly purified protein (more than 99% homogeneity) from
10 g of cells (Fig. 1). The mobility
of the purified MmsA(Sp) protein during polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis was consistent with a protein with a molecular mass of
~75,000 Da (Fig. 1). Mass spectrometric analysis of the purified
MmsA(Sp) protein yielded a molecular mass of ~75,100 Da, in excellent
agreement with the molecular mass of 75,188 Da predicted by the protein
sequence (12). Furthermore, there was no indication of a peak at the
position corresponding to the molecular mass of the E. coli
RecG protein (76,438 Da; Ref. 16), demonstrating that the MmsA(Sp)
protein preparation contained no detectable E. coli RecG
protein. Amino-terminal protein sequencing confirmed that the
preparation corresponded to the MmsA(Sp) protein.
MmsA(Sp) Protein-catalyzed DNA-dependent ATP
Hydrolysis--
The purified MmsA(Sp) protein was analyzed for
DNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis activity at pH 7.5 and
37 °C. The initial set of reactions was carried out at a fixed
concentration of MmsA(Sp) protein (0.3 µM) and ATP (4 mM), in the presence of a variety of oligomeric DNA
effectors (1-75 µM). The oligomers that were used to
construct these DNA effectors are described under "Experimental Procedures."
As shown in Fig. 2, the MmsA(Sp) protein
exhibited ATP hydrolysis activity in the presence of each of the DNA
effectors that was examined. The best effector was a partially paired
dsDNA, with a maximal rate of ATP hydrolysis of ~4500 mol ATP
hydrolyzed/min/mol MmsA protein being reached at DNA concentrations of
30 µM or higher (Fig. 2). The reaction was less efficient
when either a fully paired dsDNA or a ssDNA oligomer was provided as
the effector (Fig. 2). There was no detectable ATP hydrolysis by the
MmsA protein in the absence of DNA. The preference of the MmsA(Sp)
protein for the partially paired dsDNA effector is similar to the DNA specificity that has been reported for the E. coli RecG
protein (17), and suggests that the MmsA(Sp) protein may interact
favorably with ssDNA/dsDNA junctions.
The dependence of the MmsA(Sp) protein-catalyzed ATP hydrolysis
reaction on ATP concentration was determined at a fixed concentration of MmsA(Sp) protein (0.3 µM) and a saturating
concentration of the partially paired dsDNA effector (50 µM). The maximal rate of ATP hydrolysis under these
conditions was ~4500 mol ATP hydrolyzed/min/mol MmsA protein, and the
apparent Km for ATP was ~0.7 mM (Fig.
3).
MmsA(Sp) Protein-promoted Unwinding of a Three-stranded DNA
Junction--
The MmsA(Sp) protein was examined for DNA
junction-helicase activity at pH 7.5 and 37 °C, using an oligomeric
three-stranded DNA junction substrate that was used previously with the
E. coli RecG protein (13). In this three-stranded junction,
two noncomplementary single-stranded oligonucleotides are each paired
with a third single-stranded oligonucleotide; the 5'-half of the third
strand is complementary to one of the noncomplementary strands and the 3'-half is complementary to other noncomplementary strand. The central
12 nucleotides of the third strand are complementary to both
noncomplementary strands, thus allowing the three-stranded junction to
branch migrate through this region. The oligomers that were used to
construct the three-stranded junction are described under
"Experimental Procedures."
The reaction that occurred when MmsA(Sp) protein (0.5 nM)
was added to the three-stranded junction (500 nM) in the
presence of ATP (5 mM) is shown in Fig.
4. In this reaction, the central strand
of the three-stranded junction was 32P-end labeled. The
MmsA(Sp) protein was able to unwind the three-stranded junction to form
either of the two partially paired dsDNAs (32P-labeled) and
the corresponding displaced linear ssDNAs (unlabeled) as reaction
products. Neither the partially paired dsDNA nor a fully paired dsDNA
substrate of the same length was unwound under these conditions (gel
not shown), indicating that the unwinding activity of the MmsA(Sp)
protein was specific for the three-stranded junction. No unwinding of
the three-stranded junction occurred if ATP was omitted from the
reaction solution, indicating that the reaction was dependent on ATP
(gel not shown). The ATP-dependent three-stranded
junction-helicase activity of the MmsA(Sp) protein is similar to that
of the E. coli RecG protein (13).
Effect of MmsA(Sp) Protein on RecA(Sp) Protein-promoted
Three-strand Exchange (Standard Reaction)--
The effect of the
MmsA(Sp) protein on the strand exchange activity of the
RecA(Sp) protein was examined at pH 7.5 and 37 °C, using
the standard ATP-dependent three-strand exchange reaction (14). In this reaction, a circular
The three-strand exchange reaction that was promoted by the RecA(Sp)
protein in the absence of MmsA(Sp) protein is shown in Fig.
5A. In this reaction, the
formation of partially exchanged DNA intermediates was apparent within
5 min and the fully exchanged nicked circular dsDNA product could be
detected within 15 min. The nicked circular dsDNA product accumulated
to a maximal level after ~30 min. This reaction time course is
consistent with our previously reported results (11).
The three-strand exchange reaction that was promoted by the RecA(Sp)
protein in the presence of MmsA(Sp) protein is shown in Fig. 5,
B and C. When MmsA(Sp) protein was added to the
reaction after the partially exchanged intermediates had formed but
before they had been converted into the fully exchanged nicked circular dsDNA product (10 min), the intermediates disappeared rapidly and the
formation of the fully exchanged product was strongly inhibited (Fig.
5B). When MmsA(Sp) protein was added at the beginning of the
reaction, there was no detectable accumulation of intermediates and the
yield of the fully exchanged product was reduced further still (Fig.
5C). These results suggest that the partially exchanged intermediates that were formed by the RecA(Sp) protein were
branch-migrated by the MmsA(Sp) protein in the direction opposite of
the RecA protein-promoted strand exchange reaction (i.e. in
the 3'-5' direction relative to the circular ssDNA substrate),
resulting in the reformation of the circular ssDNA and linear dsDNA
substrates. A similar inhibitory effect has been reported for the
E. coli RecG protein on the RecA(Ec) protein-promoted
three-strand exchange reaction (13).
Effect of MmsA(Sp) Protein on RecA(Sp) Protein-promoted
Three-strand Exchange (Reverse Reaction)--
A consideration of the
results described above suggested that the effect of the MmsA(Sp)
protein on the three-strand exchange activity of the RecA(Sp) protein
might depend on the manner in which the strand exchange reaction is
carried out. In particular, we reasoned that if we carried out the
reaction in the direction opposite of that of the standard three-strand
exchange reaction (i.e. by starting with linear
The reverse three-strand exchange reaction that was promoted by the
RecA(Sp) protein in the absence of MmsA(Sp) protein is shown in Fig.
6A. In this reaction, the
formation of partially exchanged intermediates was apparent within 5 min and these intermediates accumulated to a maximum level after ~15
min. In contrast to the results obtained in the standard reaction,
however, the partially exchanged intermediates were not converted to
fully exchanged products in the presence of RecA(Sp) protein alone
(Fig. 6A). When MmsA(Sp) protein was added to the reaction
after the partially exchanged intermediates had formed (15 min),
however, the intermediates disappeared rapidly, and the formation of
the fully exchanged linear dsDNA product was apparent within 10 min
after MmsA(Sp) protein addition (Fig. 6B). When MmsA(Sp)
protein was added at the beginning of the reaction, there was no
detectable accumulation of intermediates, but the formation of linear
dsDNA was still detected (Fig. 6C). No strand exchange
products were formed in the presence of MmsA(Sp) protein if RecA(Sp)
protein was omitted from the reaction solution (gel not shown). These
results suggest that the partially exchanged intermediates that were
formed by the RecA(Sp) protein were branch-migrated by the MmsA(Sp)
protein in the direction opposite of the RecA protein-promoted strand exchange reaction (i.e. in the 3'-5' direction relative to
the linear ssDNA substrate) to form the linear dsDNA product.
The MmsA(Sp) protein has DNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis
and DNA junction-helicase activities that are similar to those of the RecG protein from E. coli. These findings provide
biochemical support for the previous proposal (based on sequence
similarity and genetic evidence) that the MmsA(Sp) protein is an
S. pneumoniae homolog of the E. coli RecG protein
(12). Recent studies suggest that the E. coli RecG protein
may be involved in the recombinational repair of stalled replication
forks (18), and it is possible that the MmsA(Sp) protein will be found
to play a similar role in S. pneumoniae, although
this has not yet been investigated. It has been shown, however, that a
null mutation in the mmsA gene leads to marked reduction in
transformational recombination in S. pneumoniae,
indicating that the MmsA(Sp) protein plays a direct role in this
process (12).
The first step in transformational recombination involves the binding
of exogenous dsDNA to one of the specific uptake sites on the surface
of a S. pneumoniae cell (19). The DNA is initially cleaved
into fragments (several kb in size) by a surface-bound nuclease.
One strand of the dsDNA fragment is then degraded further into smaller
oligonucleotides, whereas the complementary linear ssDNA is transported
through the cell wall and membrane into the cell cytosol (19). It is
presumed that the RecA(Sp) protein will then mediate the assimilation
of this ssDNA into a homologous region of the double-stranded
S. pneumoniae chromosome (20).
The means by which the MmsA(Sp) protein would facilitate the RecA(Sp)
protein-mediated transformational recombination reaction has not been
clear inasmuch as it has been reported that the E. coli RecG
protein inhibits the three-strand exchange activity of the RecA(Ec)
protein (12-13, 20). Although our results indicate that the MmsA(Sp)
protein can similarly inhibit the three-strand exchange activity of the
RecA(Sp) protein, this inhibitory effect was observed only when the
strand exchange reaction was carried out in the standard manner, with a
circular ssDNA and a linear dsDNA as the starting substrates (Fig.
7A). In this direction, the
circular ssDNA substrate can pair with the 3'-end of the complementary strand of the linear dsDNA substrate. The branch migration activity of
the RecA(Sp) protein can then extend this three-stranded junction in
the 5'-3' direction (relative to the circular ssDNA substrate) to form
the nicked circular dsDNA and linear ssDNA products (8, 9). When
MmsA(Sp) protein is included in the reaction, however, the initial
partially exchanged intermediates may be branch-migrated in the
direction opposite of the RecA(Sp) protein to regenerate the starting
circular ssDNA and linear dsDNA substrates (Fig. 7A). In
contrast, if the three-strand exchange reaction is carried out in the
reverse direction, with a linear ssDNA and a nicked circular dsDNA as
the starting substrates, a MmsA(Sp) protein-promoted branch migration
of the partially exchanged intermediates to form circular ssDNA and
linear dsDNA would have the effect of stimulating (rather than
inhibiting) the overall reaction (Fig. 7B).
linear
ssDNA + nicked circular dsDNA), the MmsA protein appears to promote the
branch migration of partially exchanged intermediates in a direction
opposite of the RecA protein, resulting in a nearly complete
inhibition of the overall strand exchange reaction. In the
reverse direction (linear ssDNA + nicked circular dsDNA
circular
ssDNA + linear dsDNA), however, the MmsA protein appears to facilitate
the conversion of partially exchanged intermediates into fully
exchanged products, leading to a pronounced stimulation of the
overall reaction. These results are discussed in terms of the molecular
mechanism of transformational recombination.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]ATP were from Amersham
Biosciences. Circular
X ssDNA (+ strand) and circular
X
dsDNA were from New England Biolabs. The ssDNA oligomers, DNA I
(5'-GACGCTGCCGAATTCTACCAGTGCCTTGCTAGGACATCTTTGCCCACCTGCAGGTTCACCC-3'), DNA II
(5'-CAACGGCATAAAGCTTGACGATTACATTGCTAGGACATGCTGTCTACAGGATCCGACTATCGA-3'), DNA III
(5'-TGGGTGAACCTGCAGGTGGGCAAAGATGTCCTAGCAATGTAATCGTCAAGCTTTATGCCGTT-3'), and DNA IV
(5'-CAACGGCATAAACGTGACGATTACATTGCTAGGACATCTTTGCCCACCTGCAGGTTCACCC-3'), were from Invitrogen.
X
dsDNA was prepared from circular
X dsDNA by PstI
digestion as described by Cox and Lehman (14). Linear
X ssDNA was
prepared from circular
X ssDNA by annealing a complementary DNA
oligomer (25 nucleotides) to the region corresponding to the PstI site and then digesting it with PstI. Nicked
circular
X dsDNA was generated by a RecA protein-mediated strand
exchange reaction between circular
X ssDNA and linear
X dsDNA
(using the conditions described in the legend to Fig. 5), and was then purified by agarose gel electrophoresis. Single- and
double-stranded DNA concentrations were determined by absorbance at 260 nm using the conversion factors 36 and 50 µg
ml
1A
-D-thiogalactopyranoside (1 mM)
was added to induce expression of the S. pneumoniae MmsA
protein, and the culture was incubated at 27 °C for 12 h. The
cells (10 g) were collected by centrifugation, suspended in 50 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)/20% sucrose/1 mM EDTA,
and frozen in liquid nitrogen. The cell suspension was stored at - 80 °C.
-mercaptoethanol)/1.0 M NaCl. The suspension was centrifuged as
described above. Ammonium sulfate (0.42 g/ml final concentration) was
added to the supernatant, and the mixture was stirred for 1 h. The
mixture was then centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 30 min.
The pellet was dissolved in 8 ml of R buffer, and the mixture was
dialyzed against 2 liters of R buffer/0.5 M NaCl. The dialyzed fraction
was diluted with R buffer to a final NaCl concentration of 0.1 M (40 ml final volume) and then loaded onto a
DEAE-Sepharose column (30 ml, Sigma) that had been equilibrated with R
buffer/0.1 M NaCl. The column was then washed with R buffer/0.1 M NaCl.
The protein-containing fractions (Bradford assay) were pooled and then
loaded onto an SP-Sepharose column (30 ml; Sigma) that had been
equilibrated with R buffer/0.1 M NaCl. The column was
washed with 3 column volumes of R buffer/0.1 M NaCl and then eluted
with a 100-ml linear gradient of R buffer/0.1-1.0 M NaCl. The
protein-containing fractions (centered at 0.4 M NaCl) were pooled and then loaded onto a Sephacryl S-300 HR column (200 ml; Sigma)
that had been equilibrated with R buffer/1 M NaCl. The fractions containing MmsA protein (identified by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis) were pooled and dialyzed against 2 liters of R
buffer/0.2 M NaCl. The dialyzed fraction was loaded onto a
Progel-TSK Heparin-5PW column (Supelco) that had been equilibrated with
R buffer/0.2 M NaCl, and it was then eluted with a linear gradient (30 ml) of R buffer/0.2-1.0 M NaCl. The fractions containing MmsA protein were pooled and dialyzed against 2 liters of R buffer (pH
8.5). The dialyzed fraction was loaded onto a MonoQ HR 5/5 FPLC column
(Amersham Biosciences) that had been equilibrated with R buffer (pH
8.5), and was then eluted with a linear gradient (30 ml) of R buffer(pH
8.5)/0-1.0 M NaCl. The fractions containing MmsA protein (centered at
0.4 M NaCl) were pooled and dialyzed against 2 liters of
storage buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)/20% glycerol/1
mM DTT/0.1 mM EDTA) to yield the final fraction
(2 mg) of highly purified S. pneumoniae MmsA protein (Fig.
1).
1cm
1,
which was calculated from the amino acid sequence (12) using the
formula of Gill and von Hippel (15). Amino-terminal protein sequencing
of the purified S. pneumoniae MmsA protein was carried out
by the Johns Hopkins Protein/Peptide Sequencing Facility. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometric analysis
was carried out by the Applied Biosynthesis Mass Spectrometry Facility
at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of
purified MmsA(Sp) protein. The gel lanes contained
purified MmsA(Sp) protein or molecular mass standards (M),
as indicated. The acrylamide concentration was 5% in the stacking gel
and 13% in the separating gel. The gel was stained in 0.1% Coomassie
Brilliant Blue R-250.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
DNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis by
the MmsA(Sp) protein. The reaction solutions contained 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2,
5% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 0.3 µM MmsA(Sp)
protein, 4 mM [
-32P]ATP, and the indicated
concentrations of linear ssDNA (DNA I, closed triangles),
fully paired dsDNA (DNA III·DNA IV, open circles), or
partially paired dsDNA (DNA I·DNA III, closed circles).
The reactions were carried out at 37 °C. ATP hydrolysis was measured
using a thin-layer chromatography method as described previously (25).
The points represent the initial rates of ATP hydrolysis
that were measured at the indicated concentrations of DNA.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Dependence of MmsA(Sp) protein-catalyzed
DNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis on ATP concentration. The
reaction solutions contained 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, 5% glycerol, 1 mM DTT,
0.3 µM MmsA(Sp) protein, 50 µM partially
paired dsDNA (DNA I·DNA III), and the indicated concentrations of
[
-32P]ATP. The reactions were carried out at 37 °C.
ATP hydrolysis was measured using a thin-layer chromatography method as
described previously (25). The points represent the initial
rates of ATP hydrolysis that were measured at the indicated
concentrations of ATP.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
MmsA(Sp) protein-promoted unwinding of a
three-stranded DNA junction. The reaction solutions contained 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2,
5% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 5 mM ATP, 500 nM three-stranded DNA junction substrate
(32P-end labeled on the central strand), and 0.5 nM MmsA(Sp) protein. The reaction was carried out at
37 °C. At the indicated times, an aliquot (20 µl) was removed from
the reaction solution and quenched with SDS (1% final concentration)
and EDTA (15 mM final concentration). The quenched aliquots
were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 12% polyacrylamide gel using a
Tris borate-EDTA buffer system. The substrates and products of the
reaction were visualized by autoradiography. The positions of the
three-stranded junction substrate and the partially paired dsDNA and
linear ssDNA products are indicated.
X ssDNA (5386 nucleotides) and a
homologous linear
X dsDNA (5386 base pairs) are recombined to form a
nicked circular
X dsDNA and a linear
X ssDNA; the substrates and
products of this reaction are readily monitored by agarose gel
electrophoresis (14). The reactions were carried out in the presence of
SSB(Sp) protein, which strongly stimulates the strand exchange activity
of the RecA(Sp) protein (11).

View larger version (83K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Effect of MmsA(Sp) protein on the RecA(Sp)
protein-promoted three-strand exchange reaction (standard
direction). The reaction solutions contained 25 mM
Tris acetate (pH 7.5), 10 mM
Mg(acetate)2, 5% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 5 µM circular
X ssDNA, 15 µM linear
X
dsDNA, 0.3 µM SSB(Sp) protein, 6 µM
RecA(Sp) protein, and either 0 or 1 µM MmsA(Sp) protein.
The reaction solutions also contained an ATP regeneration system
consisting of 10 units (Sigma)/ml creatine kinase, 12 mM
phosphocreatine, and 3 mM potassium glutamate. The
reactions were initiated by the addition of ATP and SSB(Sp) protein and
were carried out at 37 °C. At the indicated times following SSB(Sp)
addition, an aliquot (20 µl) was removed from each reaction solution
and quenched with SDS (1% final concentration) and EDTA (15 mM final concentration). The quenched aliquots were
analyzed by electrophoresis on a 0.8% agarose gel using a Tris
acetate-EDTA buffer system, and the substrates and products of the
reactions were visualized by ethidium bromide staining. A,
no MmsA(Sp) protein added; B, MmsA(Sp) protein (1 µM) added immediately following the 10 min time point;
C, MmsA(Sp) protein (1 µM) added at the 0 min
time point. LD, linear
X dsDNA; NC, nicked
circular
X dsDNA; SS,
X ssDNA; I, partially
exchanged DNA intermediates.
X ssDNA
and nicked circular
X dsDNA as our strand exchange substrates), then
a MmsA(Sp) protein-promoted branch migration of the partially exchanged
intermediates to form circular ssDNA and linear dsDNA would act to
stimulate (rather than inhibit) the overall strand exchange reaction.
To test this idea, we examined the RecA(Sp) protein-promoted
three-strand exchange reaction between a linear
X ssDNA and nicked
circular
X dsDNA in the presence and absence of MmsA(Sp) protein
(this reaction will be referred to below as the reverse three-strand
exchange reaction).

View larger version (84K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Effect of MmsA(Sp) protein on the RecA(Sp)
protein-promoted three-strand exchange reaction (reverse
direction). The reaction solutions contained 25 mM
Tris acetate (pH 7.5), 10 mM
Mg(acetate)2, 5% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 5 µM linear
X ssDNA, 15 µM nicked circular
X dsDNA, 0.3 µM SSB(Sp) protein, 6 µM
RecA(Sp) protein, and either 0 or 1 µM MmsA(Sp) protein.
The reaction solutions also contained an ATP regeneration system
consisting of 10 units (Sigma)/ml creatine kinase, 12 mM
phosphocreatine, and 3 mM potassium glutamate. The
reactions were initiated by the addition of ATP and SSB(Sp) protein and
were carried out at 37 °C. At the indicated times following SSB(Sp)
addition, an aliquot (20 µl) was removed from each reaction solution
and quenched with SDS (1% final concentration) and EDTA (15 mM final concentration). The quenched aliquots were
analyzed by electrophoresis on a 0.8% agarose gel using a Tris
acetate-EDTA buffer system, and the substrates and products of the
reactions were visualized by ethidium bromide staining. A,
no MmsA(Sp) protein added; B, MmsA(Sp) protein (1 µM) added immediately following the 15 min time point;
C, MmsA(Sp) protein (1 µM) added at the 0 min
time point. LD, linear
X dsDNA; NC, nicked
circular
X dsDNA; SS,
X ssDNA; I, partially
exchanged DNA intermediates.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (7K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Hypothetical representations of the standard
and reverse three-strand exchange reactions. A,
standard three-strand exchange reaction. A circular ssDNA and a
homologous linear dsDNA are initially paired by the RecA(Sp) protein
(via the 3'-end of the complementary strand of the linear dsDNA) to
form a three-stranded intermediate. The three-stranded intermediate can
then be branch-migrated in the 5'-3' direction (relative to the
circular ssDNA) by the RecA(Sp) protein to form the nicked circular
dsDNA and linear ssDNA products or in the 3'-5' direction by the
MmsA(Sp) protein to reform the circular ssDNA and linear dsDNA
substrates. B, reverse three-strand exchange reaction. A
linear ssDNA and a homologous nicked circular dsDNA are initially
paired by the RecA(Sp) protein (via the 3'-end of the linear ssDNA) to
form a three-stranded intermediate. The three-stranded intermediate can
then be branch-migrated in the 3'-5' direction (relative to the linear
ssDNA) by the MmsA(Sp) protein to form the circular ssDNA and linear
dsDNA products or in the 5'-3' direction by the RecA(Sp) protein to
reform the linear ssDNA and nicked circular dsDNA substrates.
It has been reported that the RecA(Ec) protein was unable to promote a strand exchange reaction between linear ssDNA and gapped circular dsDNA substrates that were similar to those used in our reverse strand exchange reactions (21). Our results are consistent with this earlier report in that they show that although the RecA(Sp) protein is able to form initial pairing intermediates between a linear ssDNA and nicked circular dsDNA, it is unable to readily extend these intermediates to form fully exchanged products. The incomplete reaction that was observed in the reverse direction may be due to the linear nature of the ssDNA substrate. Because RecA protein polymerizes on ssDNA in the 5'-3' direction and dissociates from the 5'-end of the RecA-ssDNA filament, the 3'-end of the linear ssDNA substrate will be preferentially covered with RecA protein and will therefore be more likely to invade the nicked circular dsDNA (8, 9). If the 3'-end of the linear ssDNA invades the dsDNA, however, the branch migration activity of the RecA protein (which is 5'-3' relative to the linear ssDNA) will be unable to extend this heteroduplex junction (Fig. 7B). When the MmsA(Sp) protein is included in the reaction, however, it appears to facilitate the branch migration of these junctions in the 3'-5' direction (relative to the linear ssDNA), leading to the formation of the fully exchanged linear dsDNA product (Fig. 7B).
Because transformational recombination is believed to involve the
recombination of a linear ssDNA into the double-stranded S. pneumoniae chromosome (19), the reverse three-strand exchange reaction may be more appropriate than the standard reaction as a model
reaction for this process. In fact, the sequential reaction that we
describe here, in which an initial RecA(Sp) protein-mediated invasion
of a linear ssDNA into a homologous dsDNA is followed by a MmsA(Sp)
protein-mediated branch migration of the three-stranded intermediate,
is consistent with a hypothetical model for transformational recombination that was envisioned by Claverys and colleagues (12, 20).
However, although our results suggest that the RecA(Sp) and
MmsA(Sp) protein can act together to carry out a complete strand
exchange reaction between a polymeric linear ssDNA and homologous
dsDNA, the efficiency of this coupled reaction is relatively low under
our present reaction conditions. In particular, a comparison of the
reaction time courses in Figs. 5 and 6 indicates that the yield of
initial pairing intermediates is lower in the reverse reaction than in
the standard reaction. This is likely due to an inefficient assembly of
RecA(Sp) protein on the linear ssDNA substrate. The three-strand
exchange activity of the RecA(Sp) protein is strongly stimulated by
SSB(Sp) protein (11) and SSB(Sp) protein was included in the
reactions shown in Figs. 5 and 6. The RecA(Sp) protein differs from the
RecA(Ec) protein, however, in that its ssDNA-dependent ATP
hydrolysis activity is completely inhibited by SSB(Sp) protein,
apparently because SSB(Sp) protein displaces
RecA(Sp) protein from ssDNA (22). These results indicate that
in contrast to the mechanism that has been established for the RecA(Ec)
protein, SSB(Sp) protein does not facilitate the formation of a
presynaptic complex between the RecA(Sp) protein and the ssDNA
substrate. Instead, the stimulatory effect of SSB(Sp) protein in the
RecA(Sp) protein-promoted strand exchange reaction may be due entirely
to the postsynaptic binding of the displaced single strand that is
generated when the ssDNA substrate invades the homologous linear dsDNA.
The competing displacement of RecA(Sp) protein from the ssDNA substrate
by SSB(Sp) protein, however, will reduce the efficiency of strand
invasion and intermediate formation (22). These findings suggest that
the efficient assembly of RecA(Sp) protein on the linear ssDNA
substrate may require additional recombination accessory proteins,
perhaps analogous to the E. coli RecO and RecR
proteins, which have been shown to facilitate the assembly of the
RecA(Ec) protein on SSB(Ec) protein-covered ssDNA (23, 24). A search
for these putative recombination accessory proteins as well as studies
aimed at more clearly defining the mechanistic nature of the
interaction between the RecA(Sp) and MmsA(Sp) proteins at the
three-stranded junction are in progress.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. Jean-Pierre Claverys (Université Paul Sabatier) for providing the R800 S. pneumoniae cells and The Institute for Genomic Research for providing S. pneumoniae genome sequence data prior to its publication.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Grant GM 36516 from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 410-955-3895;
Fax: 410-472-3378; E-mail: fbryant@jhsph.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 17, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M202041200
2 S. pneumoniae genome sequence data were obtained from the Institute for Genomic Research Web site at www.tigr.org.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
ssDNA, single-stranded DNA;
dsDNA, double-stranded DNA;
X, bacteriophage
X174;
SSB protein, single-stranded DNA-binding protein;
DTT, dithiothreitol.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Lacks, S. (1962) J. Mol. Biol. 5, 119-131[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Mortier-Barriere, I., de Saizieu, A., Claverys, J.-P., and Martin, B. (1998) Mol. Microbiol. 27, 159-170[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Claverys, J.-P., Prudhomme, M., Mortier-Barriere, and Martin, B. (2000) Mol. Microbiol. 35, 251-259[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Dowson, C. G., Coffey, T. J., and Spratt, B. G. (1994) Trends Microbiol. 2, 361-366[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Hakenbeck, R., Grebe, T., Zahner, D., and Stock, J. B. (1999) Mol. Microbiol. 33, 673-678[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Martin, B.,
Ruellan, J-M.,
Angulo, J.,
Devoret, R.,
and Claverys, J.-P.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
6412 |
| 7. | Steffen, S. E., and Bryant, F. R. (2000) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 382, 303-309[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Cox, M. M. (1999) Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. 63, 311-366[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Bianco, P. R., Tracy, R. B., and Kowalczykowski, S. C. (1998) Front. Biosci. 3, 570-603 |
| 10. | Lohman, T. M., and Ferrari, M. E. (1994) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63, 527-570[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Steffen, S. E., and Bryant, F. R. (2001) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 388, 165-170[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Martin, B., Sharples, G. J., Humbert, O., Lloyd, R. G., and Claverys, J. P. (1996) Mol. Microbiol. 19, 1035-1045[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Whitby, M. C., and Lloyd, R. G. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 3302-3310[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Cox, M. M.,
and Lehman, I. R.
(1981)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
78,
3433-3437 |
| 15. | Gill, S. C., and von Hippel, P. H. (1989) Anal. Biochem. 182, 319-326[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Lloyd, R. G.,
and Sharples, G. J.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
6837-6843 |
| 17. |
Whitby, M. C.,
and Lloyd, R. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
19729-19739 |
| 18. |
McGlynn, P.,
and Lloyd, R. G.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
8227-8234 |
| 19. | Dubnau, D. (1999) Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 53, 217-244[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Mortier-Barriere, I., Humbert, O., Martin, B., Prudhomme, M., and Claverys, J.-P. (1997) Microb. Drug Resist. 3, 233-242[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Roman, L. J., and Kowalczykowski, S. C. (1986) Biochemistry 25, 7375-7385[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. |
Steffen, S. E.,
Katz, F. S.,
and Bryant, F. R.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
14493-14500 |
| 23. |
Umezu, K.,
and Kolodner, R. D.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
30005-30013 |
| 24. | Bork, J. M., Cox, M. M., and Inman, R. B. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 7313-7322[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Weinstock, G. M.,
McEntee, K.,
and Lehman, I. R.
(1979)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
76,
126-130 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. E. Grove, S. Willcox, J. D. Griffith, and F. R. Bryant Differential Single-stranded DNA Binding Properties of the Paralogous SsbA and SsbB Proteins from Streptococcus pneumoniae J. Biol. Chem., March 25, 2005; 280(12): 11067 - 11073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Pericone, S. Park, J. A. Imlay, and J. N. Weiser Factors Contributing to Hydrogen Peroxide Resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae Include Pyruvate Oxidase (SpxB) and Avoidance of the Toxic Effects of the Fenton Reaction J. Bacteriol., December 1, 2003; 185(23): 6815 - 6825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |