|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201884200 on May 1, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 28, 25576-25582, July 12, 2002
The Human Papillomavirus Oncoprotein E7 Attenuates
NF- B Activation by Targeting the I B Kinase Complex*
Dimitry
Spitkovsky ,
Steffen P.
Hehner§,
Thomas G.
Hofmann¶,
Andreas
Möller§, and
M. Lienhard
Schmitz **
From the Institute for Vegetative Physiology,
University of Cologne, Robert-Koch-Strasse 39, D-50931 Cologne, Germany, the § German Cancer Research
Center, Division of Immunochemistry (G0200), Im Neuenheimer Feld
280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany, the ¶ Department of
General Virology, Heinrich-Pette-Institute for Experimental
Virology and Immunology, Martinistrasse 52, D-20251 Hamburg, Germany,
and the University of Bern, Department for Chemistry and
Biochemistry, Freiestr 3, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
Received for publication, February 25, 2002, and in revised form, April 18, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Infection with high-risk human papillomaviruses
(HPV) can lead to the development of cervical carcinomas. This
process critically depends on the virus-encoded E6 and E7
oncoproteins, which stimulate proliferation by manipulating the
function of a variety of host key regulatory proteins. Here we show
that both viral proteins dose-dependently interfere with
the transcriptional activity of NF- B. A variety of experimental
approaches revealed that a fraction of the E7 proteins is found in
association with the I B kinase complex and attenuates induced kinase
activity of I B kinase (IKK ) and IKK , thus resulting in
impaired I B phosphorylation and degradation. Indirect
immunofluorescence shows that E7 impairs TNF -induced nuclear
translocation of NF- B, thus preventing NF- B from binding to its
cognate DNA. While E7 obviates IKK activation in the cytoplasm, the E6
protein reduces NF- B p65-dependent transcriptional activity within the nucleus. We suggest that HPV oncogene-mediated suppression of NF- B activity contributes to HPV escape from the immune system.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
HPVs1 are small DNA
viruses, and specific high-risk types such as the HPV type 16 (HPV16)
or HPV18 are causative agents of some forms of anogenital and oral
cancers (1). HPV16 encodes six early proteins including the major
oncoproteins E6 and E7. Both proteins play a central role in the
induction of benign proliferation and malignant transformation (2), and
at least the persistence of E7 is necessary to maintain the transformed
phenotype (3). These two oncoproteins are selectively and continuously
expressed in HPV-induced tumors and manipulate cell proliferation upon
physical and functional interaction with several master cell cycle
regulators (4). E6 binds to p53 (5) and causes its
ubiquitin-dependent degradation (6), thereby interfering
with p53 functions in cell cycle control and apoptosis. In addition,
the E6 protein binds to the protein kinase PKN (7) and other regulators
including interferon regulatory factor 3 (8) and the proapoptotic
Bak protein (9). The E7 protein interacts with so-called
"pocket proteins" such as the retinoblastoma protein pRb, p107, and
p130 (10), resulting in their enhanced phosphorylation and degradation (11). pRb destruction results in the release of E2F family
transcription factors and subsequent activation of genes promoting cell
proliferation (12). But the stimulatory effects of E7 on cell
proliferation depends not only on its association with pRb (13, 14),
because E7 targets the function of a plethora of regulators including cyclin E (15), acid alpha-glucosidase (16), and M2 pyruvate kinase
(17). E7 also interferes with the activity of a variety of
transcription factors such as AP-1 (18), interferon regulatory factor-1
(19), fork head domain transcription factor MPP2 (20), and
TATA-box-binding protein (21). This multiplicity of interaction partners and additional levels of functional E7 regulation by phosphorylations (22), protein stability (23), and the oligomerization state (24) allow a highly complex and sophisticated manipulation of the
expression program by E7 oncoproteins (1, 25). Most of the
E6/E7-regulated genes allow the virus to interfere either with cell
proliferation and apoptosis or enable viral escape from the immune
system. Immunological tolerance is induced by various mechanisms
including transcriptional down-regulation of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I gene (26) and selected proinflammatory cytokines (4, 27).
Some E6/E7-regulated gene products are target genes of NF- B, a
dimeric transcription factor involved in the expression of proteins
necessary for innate immunity (28), apoptosis, and cell proliferation
(29). NF- B is typically a heterodimer between the p50 and p65 (RelA)
subunits and is mainly regulated by intracellular compartmentalization.
The inactive form of NF- B is kept in the cytoplasm upon association
with an inhibitory I B protein (30). Triggering cells with a variety
of stimuli including TNF , IL-1, or phorbol ester induces
phosphorylation of I B, which allows subsequent ubiquitinylation and
degradation of the inhibitor, thus leading to nuclear entry and DNA
binding of NF- B (31). The inducible phosphorylation of I B at
serines 32 and 36 is mediated by the I B kinase complex (IKC), which
contains the I B kinases IKK and IKK and the regulatory subunit
IKK /NEMO (30). The IKKs are activated by direct phosphorylation
mediated by upstream kinases. Alternatively, IKKs can be recruited to
intracellular domains of cell surface receptors that lead to an
increased local concentration of the IKKs and allow their auto- and
cross-phosphorylation (28).
Given the overlapping set of genes regulated by E6/E7 and NF- B, we
analyzed the effects of HPV E6 and E7 proteins on NF- B activity.
These experiments revealed a dose-dependent interference of
these HPV oncoproteins with NF- B functions.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture and Transfections--
Human U2OS and H1299 cells
were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10%
(v/v) fetal calf serum and 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin (all from
Invitrogen). These cell lines were transfected using
Superfect® reagent (Qiagen) according to the instructions
of the manufacturer. Primary kidney epithelial cells stably transfected
with the E6 or E7 gene under the control of the
mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter (32) were grown in the
presence of 1 µM dexamethasone.
Plasmids and Antibodies--
The reporter plasmids ( B)3-luc
(33) and (Gal4)2-Luc (34) as well as the expression vectors encoding E6
and E7 (35), E1A12S (36), Gal4-VP16, Gal4-p65 and Gal4 (34),
GST-I B -(1-54), HA-IKK / , Myc-IKK / , and NIK
(33) were described. The vector encoding the FLAG-tagged E7
protein was constructed upon insertion of an appropriate PCR fragment
into the vector pEF-BOS (37). The following antibodies were obtained
from the indicated suppliers: FLAG (M2), Sigma; HA (12CA5), Roche
Molecular Biochemicals; IKK (B7.1), BD PharMingen; p65
(sc-372X) and I B , Santa Cruz Biotechnology;
phospho-I B , New England Biolabs.
Luciferase Assays--
Luciferase activity in cell extracts was
measured in a luminometer (Duo Lumat LB 9507, Berthold) by
automatically injecting 50 µl of assay buffer and measuring light
emission for 10 s after injection according to the instructions of
the manufacturer (Promega). To ensure comparable transfection
efficiencies, results were normalized to -galactosidase produced by
a cotransfected RSV- -galactosidase expression vector.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSAs)--
Cells stably
transfected with MMTV-E6/E7 were washed twice with phosphate-buffered
saline. Nuclear extracts were prepared by resuspending the cell pellet
in 200 µl of cold buffer A (10 mM Hepes/KOH (pH 7.9), 10 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). After incubation for 10 min on ice, 5 µl of 10% (v/v) Nonidet P-40 was added, and cells were lysed by
vortexing. Cell nuclei were isolated by short centrifugation and
dissolved in 30 µl of buffer C (20 mM Hepes/KOH (pH 7.9),
0.4 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, and (10 µg/ml) aprotinin). After incubation on ice, the
extract was centrifuged for 5 min in a microcentrifuge at 4 °C, and
the supernatant was used for EMSAs essentially as described (33). The
supershift experiments were performed by preincubating the nuclear
extracts with 2 µg of p65 antibodies for 15 min at 4 °C.
Immunofluorescence--
H1299 cells were grown on cover slips
and analyzed 1 day post-transfection by immunofluorescence. 20 min
after TNF stimulation, cells were fixed with 3.5% (w/v)
paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature. After permeabilization
with 0.02% (v/v) Nonidet P-40 in phosphate-buffered saline for 1 min,
cells were incubated for 2 h with 10% (v/v) goat serum in
phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.2% (v/v) Triton X-100. The
primary antibodies were diluted to 1 µg/ml and added for 1 h at
22 °C. After further washing steps, the following secondary
antibodies were added: Alexa-488-coupled goat -rabbit (Molecular
Probes) and Cy3-coupled goat -mouse (Dianova). Chromosomal DNA was
visualized by 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), and stained cells
were mounted on glass slides and examined using a Zeiss Axiophot
microscope. The stained cells were further analyzed using
Axiovision software.
Co-precipitation Experiments and Immunoblotting--
Cells were
washed with phosphate-buffered saline, and pellets were resuspended on
ice for 15 min in 250 µl of Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 mM NaF,
0.5 mM sodium vanadate, leupeptin (10 µg/ml), aprotinin
(10 µg/ml), 1% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, and 10% (v/v) glycerol). Cell
debris was pelleted upon centrifugation, and extracts were precleared
with protein A/G-Sepharose. Equal amounts of protein contained in the
supernatants were mixed with 1-2 µg of antibodies and 25 µl of
protein A/G-Sepharose and rotated for 4 h on a spinning wheel at
4 °C. The immunoprecipitates were washed five times in Nonidet P-40
lysis buffer and then boiled in 1× SDS sample buffer prior to SDS-PAGE
and further analysis by semidry Western blotting.
I B Kinase Assays--
Cells were transfected and lysed in
Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer. An aliquot of the cell extract was directly
analyzed by immunoblotting. The tagged IKK proteins contained in the
remaining cell lysate were immunoprecipitated using HA antibodies.
The precipitate was washed three times in lysis buffer and two times in
kinase buffer (20 mM Hepes/KOH (pH 7,4), 25 mM
-glycerophosphate, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 20 mM MgCl2). The kinase assay was performed in a
final volume of 20 µl of kinase buffer containing 2 µg of bacterially expressed GST-I B- -(1-54), 20 µM ATP,
and 5 µCi of [ -32P]ATP. After incubation for 20 min
at 30 °C, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 5× SDS sample
buffer. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, and the fixed gel was
dried and quantified using a phosphorimager.
 |
RESULTS |
HPV E6 and E7 Interfere with Transcriptional Activity of
NF- B--
To investigate the impact of HPV E6 and E7 proteins on
NF- B activity, human U2OS cells were transfected with a
NF- B-dependent luciferase reporter gene and various
combinations of expression vectors encoding the two HPV oncoproteins
and the adenovirus-encoded control protein E1A 12S. TNF -induced
NF- B activity was only mildly impaired by E6, whereas the inhibitory
effect of E7 on NF- B was more pronounced (Fig.
1A). Maximal NF- B
inhibition was achieved with intermediate amounts of expression vector,
whereas NF- B inhibition was diminished upon expression of higher
levels of viral proteins. Also, E6 and E7 encoded by the HPV high-risk strain 18 were negatively interfering with NF- B activity (data not
shown), revealing that the inhibitory activity is not restricted to
HPV16. To test whether E7 also inhibits NF- B that is activated by
further stimuli, we determined the effects of E6/E7 expression on
NF- B-dependent reporter gene activity that is induced by
IL-1 or phorbol ester. The HPV oncoproteins inhibited NF- B
activity in response to both stimuli (Fig. 1B), indicating
that the viral proteins interfere with one or more common steps during
NF- B activation rather than with a single event that is specific for an individual stimulus. Accordingly, E7 also inhibited NF- B activity that was induced by expression of MEKK1 (data not shown). The inhibitory effect occurred also in other human and murine cell lines
(data not shown), excluding cell type-specific effects.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Impact of E6 and E7 proteins on
NF- B-dependent transcription.
A, U2OS cells were transfected with a NF- B luciferase
reporter construct together with increasing amounts (1-5 µg) of
eukaryotic expression vectors for E6 and E7 or E1A 12S at the indicated
combinations. One day later, cells were stimulated for 10 h with
TNF , and luciferase activity was determined. Results shown are
averages of three independent experiments, bars indicate
S.D. B, U2OS cells were transfected with a
NF- B-dependent reporter gene and E6/E7 expression
vectors as shown. Cells were stimulated for 10 h either with
IL-1 (1 ng/ml) or 25 ng/ml phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride phorbol
12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), and luciferase activity was determined.
Maximal luciferase activity was arbitrarily set as 100%. Mean values
from two independent experiments and S.D. are displayed.
|
|
E6 Interferes with NF- B-dependent Transactivation,
whereas E7 Impairs Induced DNA Binding--
The step within the
NF- B activation cascade affected by HPV E6/E7 expression was further
analyzed by testing the impact of both proteins on TNF -induced DNA
binding of NF- B. Primary cells stably transfected with the
E6 or E7 gene under the control of the
glucocorticoid-inducible MMTV promoter were cultured in the absence or
presence of the synthetic steroid dexamethasone. Because of the lack of
E6/E7-recognizing antibodies, the hormone-inducible production of both
oncoproteins was confirmed by cell proliferation assays (data not
shown). TNF stimulation induced DNA binding of nuclear NF- B, as
determined by EMSAs. Supershift assays showed that the NF- B/DNA
complex contained the transactivating p65 subunit. Whereas
dexamethasone-triggered expression of E6 failed to interfere with DNA
binding of NF- B (Fig. 2A),
the E7 protein strongly reduced DNA binding of NF- B (Fig.
2B). The E6 protein interferes with NF- B-dependent transcription without changing induced
DNA binding, raising the possibility that E6 affects
NF- B-dependent transactivation. To test this hypothesis,
a nuclear fusion protein between the transactivating NF- B p65
subunit and the Gal4 DNA-binding domain was tested for its activity in
the presence of HPV E6 and E7 proteins. Gal4-p65-induced transcription
of a Gal4-dependent luciferase reporter gene was slightly
but significantly impaired by E6, whereas E7 had no impact (Fig.
2C). In a control experiment, E6 expression did not
interfere with transcription induced either by the DNA-binding domain
of Gal4 alone or by the Gal4-VP16 fusion protein (Fig. 2C).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of E6 and E7 proteins on
NF- B DNA binding and transactivation.
A, rat cells stably transfected with MMTV-E6 were cultured
in the presence of dexamethasone (proliferating) or for
48 h in the absence of hormone (arrested). At various
time points after the dexamethasone-induced expression of E6, TNF
(1000 units/ml) was added for 15 min to the cells as shown. Equal
amounts of protein contained in nuclear extracts were tested for DNA
binding activity of NF- B by EMSAs. An autoradiogram is displayed.
The arrow points to the complexes supershifted by p65
antibodies. The filled arrowhead indicates the location of
the DNA/NF- B complex. The circle indicates the position
of a constitutively DNA-binding protein, and the triangle
highlights the position of the unbound oligonucleotide. B,
the experiment was performed as in A with the exception that
cells containing MMTV-E7 were used. C, U2OS cells were
transfected with a Gal4-dependent luciferase reporter gene
and Gal4, Gal4-p65, or Gal4-VP16 expression constructs. Gene expression
was determined in the absence or presence of co-expressed E6 and E7
proteins. To facilitate comparison, maximal gene expression was
arbitrarily set as 100%. Bars indicate S.D.
|
|
E7 Partially Co-localizes with NF- B p65 and Prevents Its
TNF -induced Nuclear Translocation--
To test whether impaired DNA
binding of NF- B in the presence of E7 may be caused by the effects
on nuclear import of NF- B, H1299 cells were transfected with an
expression vector encoding FLAG-tagged E7 or the empty expression
vector as a control. The next day, cells were either left untreated or
stimulated with TNF . Double staining with p65 and FLAG
antibodies was used to identify transfected cells by immunofluorescent
staining (Fig. 3A). In
unstimulated cells, the p65 subunit was found in the cytoplasm. In
agreement with previous reports (38, 39), the E7 protein occurred in
the nucleus and the cytoplasm. Double staining for NF- B p65 and E7
revealed areas of overlapping localization in the cytoplasm, which are
shown in yellow. In the absence of E7, TNF treatment
induced complete nuclear localization of p65, whereas expression of
this viral oncogene strongly interfered with nuclear uptake of p65
(Fig. 3B).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
HPV E7 interferes with
TNF -induced nuclear translocation of
NF- B. H1299 cells were transiently
transfected with an expression vector encoding FLAG-tagged E7 and were
either left untreated (A) or stimulated for 20 min with
TNF (B). Intracellular localization of p65 was
investigated by indirect immunofluorescence using p65 antibodies.
The E7 protein was detected with FLAG antibodies. NF- B p65
(green) and E7 (red) localization is shown. An
overlay of both stains reveals areas of co-localization in
yellow. Nuclear DNA was visualized with DAPI
(4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole).
|
|
E7 Is Constitutively Associated with the I B Kinase
Complex--
The overlapping subcellular localization of E7 and
NF- B p65 raises the possibility of a physical association between
this viral protein and the IKC, which was experimentally tested by co-immunoprecipitation experiments. In the absence of antibodies immunoprecipitating the endogenous E7 protein, a FLAG-tagged E7 protein
was expressed in U2OS cells. Cells were lysed, and the viral protein
was immunoprecipitated from the cell extracts with FLAG antibodies.
Subsequent immunoblotting revealed the occurrence of endogenous IKK
in E7 immunoprecipitates (Fig.
4A), showing an association
between the endogenous IKC and the E7 protein. The association between
the IKC and E7 was not modulated after TNF stimulation (data not
shown). This interaction was further characterized upon transfection of
cells with Myc-tagged versions of IKK and IKK either alone or
together with a FLAG-E7 encoding vector. The E7 protein was
immunoprecipitated from an aliquot of the cell lysates, and Western
blotting showed its association with IKK and IKK (Fig.
4B). In a complementary experimental approach, the IKKs were
immunoprecipitated from another aliquot of the cell lysate followed by
the detection of associated E7 proteins by Western blotting. These
experiments confirmed the E7-IKK interaction by an independent
experimental approach. Of note, these biochemical experiments and the
co-localization studies revealed only a fraction of the total cellular
E7 proteins in association with the IKC.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
E7 is constitutively associated with the
IKC. A, U2OS cells were transfected with either empty
expression vector or an expression vector for FLAG-tagged E7. One day
later cells were lysed, and the E7 protein was immunoprecipitated
(IP) from an aliquot of the lysates with FLAG antibodies.
The co-precipitating IKK protein was detected by immunoblotting
using IKK antibodies (upper). Aliquots of the whole
cell extract (WCE) were tested by immunoblotting for the
expression of IKK and E7 (lower). The position of
molecular mass markers is indicated at the left.
B, expression vectors for Myc-tagged IKK and IKK and
FLAG-tagged E7 were transfected into U2OS cells at the indicated
combinations. One day later cells were lysed, and an aliquot of the
lysate was used to immunoprecipitate the E7 protein with FLAG
antibodies. The co-precipitating IKK proteins were detected by
immunoblotting using Myc antibodies. In a complementary experiment,
another aliquot of the cell lysate was used to immunoprecipitate the
IKKs with Myc antibodies followed by detection of co-precipitating
E7 protein with FLAG antibodies (middle). Five percent of
the WCE was analyzed by immunoblotting for the correct expression of
the ectopically expressed proteins (lower). Representative
results are shown.
|
|
E7 Interferes with Induced I B Phosphorylation and IKK Kinase
Activity--
To test whether the IKK association of E7 has any
consequences for induced I B phosphorylation and degradation, U2OS
cells were transfected at high efficiency with an E7 expression vector or empty control vector. Cells were either left untreated or stimulated with TNF , and extracts were tested by immunoblotting for the occurrence of I B . Expression of E7 impaired TNF -induced
degradation of I B (Fig.
5A). The incomplete protection
of TNF -induced I B proteolysis by E7 can be attributed to the
limited transfection efficiency of cells. In parallel, determination of
I B phosphorylation by Western blotting using phosphospecific
antibodies revealed an impaired TNF -triggered phosphorylation of
I B in the presence of E7. To directly test the consequences of E7
expression on IKK activity, cells were transfected to express moderate
amounts of HA-tagged IKK , which allows their incorporation into
functional cytokine-responsive high molecular weight IKCs (40, 41)
together with vectors encoding the IKK activator NIK and increasing
amounts of E7. The tagged IKK protein was immunoprecipitated, and
its activity was examined by measuring the phosphorylation of the exogenously added substrate protein (GST-I B- (1-54)) in immune complex kinase assays (Fig. 5B). NIK-induced kinase activity
of IKK was dose-dependently impaired upon coexpression
of E7. The impact of E7 on IKK activity was assayed by an analogous
experimental approach by ectopically expressing IKK instead of
IKK . As already seen for IKK , the expression of E7 also inhibited
NIK-activated IKK activity (Fig. 5C), showing that the
viral protein can directly interfere with induced kinase activity.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Expression of E7 impairs IKK activity and
I B
phosphorylation. A, U2OS cells transfected to
express E7 were either left untreated or stimulated for 5 min with
TNF . Cell extracts were analyzed by immunoblotting for the abundance
of I B (upper). In parallel, the extract was tested by
Western blotting for the phosphorylation of I B as detected by
phosphospecific antibodies (lower). The position of a
nonspecific (ns) band is shown. B, HA-tagged
IKK was expressed either alone or in combination with NIK and
increasing amounts of E7 in U2OS cells as shown. 24 h
post-transfection, cell lysates were prepared, and IKK was
immunoprecipitated. Kinase activity was determined by immune complex
kinase assays (KA) using purified GST-I B (1-54) as
substrate. An autoradiogram from a reducing SDS gel shows IKK
phosphorylation (upper) and phosphorylation of the
recombinant substrate protein and a quantitative evaluation obtained by
phosphorimaging (middle). A fraction of the cell lysate was
analyzed by Western blotting (WB) for expression of IKK ,
NIK, and E7 (lower). C, the experiment was done
and analyzed as in (B) with the exception that an expression
vector encoding IKK instead of IKK was used. Representative
experiments are shown.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Given the important contribution of NF- B to central biological
processes, this transcription factor and its activation pathways are
frequently targeted by viruses. Early evidence for viral appropriation of the NF- B pathway came from the finding that the turkey retrovirus REV-T encodes the v-rel protein, an oncogenic homologue to the NF- B
DNA-binding subunits (42). It is frequently observed that products of a
variety of viruses induce NF- B activity in order to ensure
NF- B-dependent expression of viral genes (43). On the
other hand, the relevance of NF- B for innate immunity and the
induction of apoptosis forced some viruses to evolve strategies to
counteract NF- B activation. For example, the African swine fever virus encodes a functional and stable I B protein, which is
able to inhibit NF- B activity by replacement of the
proteasome-degraded endogenous I B protein (44).
The repressive effect of NF- B on HPV transcription via binding to
the long control region (45) raises the need to interfere with the
inhibitory activity of this transcription factor. Since HPV
transcription is prevented by some proinflammatory NF- B target proteins including TNF and IL-1 (46, 47), it is reasonable to assume
that it is beneficial for the virus to disturb NF- B activity.
Consistent with our data showing an inhibitory effect of HPV
oncoproteins on NF- B-dependent transcription, expression of the bona fide NF- B target gene IL-6 occurs
only in stromal cells surrounding cervical carcinomas but not in the
tumor itself (48). Therefore, the inhibitory effect of HPV oncoproteins
on NF- B may contribute to virus evasion from the host immune system. Interestingly, papillomavirus-encoded proteins might also inhibit NF- B by an additional mechanism. Nuclear extracts from human papillomavirus type 6- and 11-infected laryngeal papilloma tissues contain elevated levels of NF- B p50 homodimers (49), which act as
repressors of NF- B-dependent transcription (50). The E6
protein encoded by HPV type 16 negatively interferes with NF- B activity in the human ovarian cancer cell line A2780, thus sensitizing these cells to TNF -induced cytotoxicity (51).
Biological evidence shows that HPV infection down-regulates only a
subset of NF- B target genes (4). This might be explained by the fact
that many cytokines are not solely regulated by NF- B and critically
depend on the concerted activity of NF- B together with various other
transcription factors, which themselves are potentially affected by
E6/E7 proteins. The dose dependence of E7 and E6 activity raises the
possibility that the amount of viral proteins or the quantity of
IKC-associated E7 proteins determines the impact on NF- B function.
The mechanistic basis for reduced NF- B inhibition in the presence of
high amounts of E6/E7 is not clear. Possibly, elevated concentrations
of viral protein favor the formation of E6 and E7 multimers (52), thus
leading to decreased interactions between E7 and the IKC. This might
also explain why retrovirus mediated very strong overexpression of E6
from HPV16 induces transcription of some NF- B target genes (25).
Since the IKC serves as an intracellular point of convergence for
distinct NF- B activation signals (53), and IKK is required for
activation of the immune response in response to viral infections (54),
this kinase complex is frequently usurped by a variety of viral
proteins (43). Interference of E7 with IKK activity may be
mechanistically explained by mutual binding and steric effects on the
spatial conformation of the IKC.
Our data indicate that E6 does not prevent induced DNA binding activity
of NF- B, but it does impair NF- B-dependent
transactivation. Since the zinc finger domain of the nuclear E6 protein
interacts with the coactivator CBP/p300, the negative effect of E6 on
p65 function may also involve competition for this commonly used
coactivator. This inhibitory activity on p65 activity may add to the
negative effect of E6 on p53 within the nucleus, since p53-induced
apoptosis is prevented upon inhibition of NF- B (55). Interestingly,
NF- B activity is never completely switched off by E6/E7 proteins.
This may be biologically meaningful, because residual NF- B activity could be necessary for proliferation of virus-infected cells.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We are grateful to Dr. Susanne Bacher for
helpful comments about the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grants (Schm 1417/3-1) from the
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Fonds der chemischen Industrie, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds, Schweizerische Krebsliga (Oncosuisse), and the Association for International Cancer Research.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 41-31631-4315;
Fax: 41-31631-4887; E-mail: Lienhard.Schmitz@ibc.unibe.ch.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 1, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201884200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HPV, human
papillomavirus;
IKK, I B kinase;
TNF, tumor necrosis factor;
IKC, I B kinase complex;
MMTV, mouse mammary tumor virus;
EMSAs, electrophoretic mobility shift assays;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
IL, interleukin;
MEKK, mitogen-activated
protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase kinase;
HA, hemagglutinin;
NIK, NF- B inducing kinase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
zur Hausen, H.
(1999)
Eur. J. Cancer
35,
1878-1885[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Hawley-Nelson, P.,
Vousden, K. H.,
Hubbert, N. L.,
Lowy, D. R.,
and Schiller, J. T.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
3905-3910[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
von Knebel Doeberitz, M.,
Rittmuller, C.,
Aengeneyndt, F.,
Jansen-Durr, P.,
and Spitkovsky, D.
(1994)
J. Virol.
68,
2811-2821[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
zur Hausen, H.
(2000)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
92,
690-698[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Werness, B. A.,
Levine, A. J.,
and Howley, P. M.
(1990)
Science
248,
76-79[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Scheffner, M.,
Huibregtse, J. M.,
Vierstra, R. D.,
and Howley, P. M.
(1993)
Cell
75,
495-505[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Gao, Q.,
Kumar, A.,
Srinivasan, S.,
Singh, L.,
Mukai, H.,
Ono, Y.,
Wazer, D. E.,
and Band, V.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
14824-14830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Ronco, L. V.,
Karpova, A. Y.,
Vidal, M.,
and Howley, P. M.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2061-2072[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Thomas, M.,
and Banks, L.
(1998)
Oncogene
17,
2943-2954[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Dyson, N.,
Howley, P. M.,
Munger, K.,
and Harlow, E.
(1989)
Science
243,
934-937[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Boyer, S. N.,
Wazer, D. E.,
and Band, V.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
4620-4624[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Nevins, J. R.
(2001)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
10,
699-703[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Caldeira, S.,
de Villiers, E. M.,
and Tommasino, M.
(2000)
Oncogene
10,
821-826
|
| 14.
|
Dick, F. A.,
Sailhamer, E.,
and Dyson, N. J.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
3715-3727[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
McIntyre, M. C.,
Ruesch, M. N.,
and Laimins, L. A.
(1996)
Virology
215,
73-82[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Zwerschke, W.,
Mannhardt, B.,
Massimi, P.,
Nauenburg, S.,
Pim, D.,
Nickel, W.,
Banks, L.,
Reuser, A. J.,
and Jansen-Durr, P.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
9534-9541[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Zwerschke, W.,
Mazurek, S.,
Massimi, P.,
Banks, L.,
Eigenbrodt, E.,
and Jansen-Durr, P.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
1291-1296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Antinore, M. J.,
Birrer, M. J.,
Patel, D.,
Nader, L.,
and McCance, D. J.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
1950-1960[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Park, J. S.,
Kim, E. J.,
Kwon, H. J.,
Hwang, E. S.,
Namkoong, S. E.,
and Um, S. J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
6764-6769[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Luscher-Firzlaff, J. M.,
Westendorf, J. M.,
Zwicker, J.,
Burkhardt, H.,
Henriksson, M.,
Muller, R.,
Pirollet, F.,
and Luscher, B.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
5620-5630[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Massimi, P.,
Pim, D.,
and Banks, L.
(1997)
J. Gen. Virol.
78,
2607-2613[Abstract]
|
| 22.
|
Chien, W. M.,
Parker, J. N.,
Schmidt-Grimminger, D. C.,
Broker, T. R.,
and Chow, L. T.
(2000)
Cell Growth & Differ.
11,
425-435[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Wang, J.,
Sampath, A.,
Raychaudhuri, P.,
and Bagchi, S.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
4740-4749[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Clements, A.,
Johnston, K.,
Mazzarelli, J. M.,
Ricciardi, R. P.,
and Marmorstein, R.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
16033-16045[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Nees, M.,
Geoghegan, J. M.,
Hyman, T.,
Frank, S.,
Miller, L.,
and Woodworth, C. D.
(2001)
J. Virol.
75,
4283-4296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Georgopoulos, N. T,
Proffitt, J. L.,
and Blair, G. E.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
4930-4935[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Tindle, R. W.
(2002)
Nature Reviews Cancer
2,
59-64[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Silverman, N.,
and Maniatis, T.
(2001)
Genes Dev.
15,
2321-2342[Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Joyce, D.,
Albanese, C.,
Steer, J., Fu, M.,
Bouzahzah, B.,
and Pestell, R. G.
(2001)
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev.
12,
73-90[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Karin, M.,
and Ben-Neriah, Y.
(2000)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
18,
621-663[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Ghosh, S.
(1999)
Immunol. Res.
19,
183-189[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Crook, T.,
Morgenstern, J. P.,
Crawford, L.,
and Banks, L.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
513-519[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Hehner, S. P.,
Hofmann, T. G.,
Ushmorov, A.,
Dienz, O.,
Wing-Lan Leung, I.,
Lassam, N.,
Scheidereit, C.,
Droge, W.,
and Schmitz, M. L.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
2556-2568[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
De Bosscher, K.,
Schmitz, M. L.,
Vanden Berghe, W.,
Plaisance, S.,
Fiers, W.,
and Haegeman, G.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
13504-13509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Spitkovsky, D.,
Aengeyndt, F.,
Braspenning, J.,
and Knebel Doeberitz, M.
(1996)
Oncogene
13,
1027-1035[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Schmitz, M. L.,
Indorf, A.,
Limbourg, F. P.,
Stadtler, H.,
Traenckner, E. B.,
and Baeuerle, P. A.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
4052-4063[Abstract]
|
| 37.
|
Mizushima, S.,
and Nagata, S.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
5322[Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Mannhardt, B.,
Weinzimer, S. A.,
Wagner, M.,
Fiedler, M.,
Cohen, P.,
Jansen-Durr, P.,
and Zwerschke, W.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
6483-6495[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Smith-McCune, K.,
Kalman, D.,
Robbins, C.,
Shivakumar, S.,
Yuschenkoff, L.,
and Bishop, J. M.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
6999-7004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Karin, M.,
and Delhase, M.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
9067-9069[Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Lee, F. S.,
Peters, R. T.,
Dang, L. C.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
9319-9324[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Gilmore, T. D.
(1992)
Cancer Surv.
15,
69-87[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Hiscott, J.,
Kwon, H.,
and Genin, P.
(2001)
J. Clin. Invest.
107,
143-151[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Tait, S. W.,
Reid, E. B.,
Greaves, D. R,
Wileman, T. E.,
and Powell, P. P.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
34656-34664[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Fontaine, V.,
van der Meijden, E.,
de Graaf, J.,
ter Schegget, J.,
and Struyk, L.
(2000)
Virology
272,
40-49[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Kyo, S.,
Inoue, M.,
Hayasaka, N.,
Inoue, T.,
Yutsudo, M.,
Tanizawa, O.,
and Hakura, A.
(1994)
Virology
200,
130-139[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Malejczyk, J.,
Malejczyk, M.,
Majewski, S.,
Breitburd, F.,
Luger, T. A.,
Jablonska, S.,
and Orth, G.
(1994)
Int. J. Cancer
56,
593-598[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Tartour, E.,
Gey, A.,
Sastre-Garau, X.,
Pannetier, C.,
Mosseri, V.,
Kourilsky, P.,
and Fridman, W. H.
(1994)
Cancer Res.
54,
6243-6248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Vancurova, I., Wu, R.,
Miskolci, V.,
and Sun, S.
(2002)
J. Virol.
76,
1533-1536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Schmitz, M. L.,
and Baeuerle, P. A.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
3805-3817[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Vikhanskaya, F.,
Falugi, C.,
Valente, P.,
and Russo, P.
(2002)
Int. J. Cancer
97,
732-739[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Chinami, M.,
Sasaki, S.,
Hachiya, N.,
Yuge, K.,
Ohsugi, T.,
Maeda, H.,
and Shingu, M.
(1994)
J. Gen. Virol.
75,
277-281[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Israel, A.
(2000)
Trends Cell Biol.
10,
129-133[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Chu, W. M.,
Ostertag, D., Li, Z. W.,
Chang, L.,
Chen, Y., Hu, Y.,
Williams, B.,
Perrault, J.,
and Karin, M.
(1999)
Immunity
11,
721-731[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Ryan, K. M.,
Ernst, M. K.,
Rice, N. R.,
and Vousden, K. H.
(2000)
Nature
404,
892-897[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Holloway, T. T. Truong, and B. S. Coulson
Rotavirus Antagonizes Cellular Antiviral Responses by Inhibiting the Nuclear Accumulation of STAT1, STAT2, and NF-{kappa}B
J. Virol.,
May 15, 2009;
83(10):
4942 - 4951.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E. Randall and S. Goodbourn
Interferons and viruses: an interplay between induction, signalling, antiviral responses and virus countermeasures
J. Gen. Virol.,
January 1, 2008;
89(1):
1 - 47.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. R. Chin and M. S. Horwitz
Mechanism for Removal of Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 from the Cell Surface by the Adenovirus RID{alpha}/{beta} Complex
J. Virol.,
November 1, 2005;
79(21):
13606 - 13617.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Routes, K. Morris, M. C. Ellison, and S. Ryan
Macrophages Kill Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E6-Expressing Tumor Cells by Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha- and Nitric Oxide-Dependent Mechanisms
J. Virol.,
January 1, 2005;
79(1):
116 - 123.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. C. Pingle, J. F. Sanchez, D. M. Hallam, A. L. Williamson, S. B. Maggirwar, and V. Ramkumar
Hypertonicity Inhibits Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression in Smooth Muscle Cells by Inhibiting Nuclear Factor {kappa}B
Mol. Pharmacol.,
June 1, 2003;
63(6):
1238 - 1247.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Basile, A. Eichten, V. Zacny, and K. Munger
NF-{kappa}B-Mediated Induction of p21Cip1/Waf1 by Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha} Induces Growth Arrest and Cytoprotection in Normal Human Keratinocytes
Mol. Cancer Res.,
February 1, 2003;
1(4):
262 - 270.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|