|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M202791200 on May 6, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 28, 25715-25721, July 12, 2002
Relationships between Rap1b, Affinity Modulation of
Integrin IIb 3, and the Actin
Cytoskeleton*
Alessandra
Bertoni ,
Seiji
Tadokoro ,
Koji
Eto ,
Nisar
Pampori ,
Leslie V.
Parise§,
Gilbert C.
White¶, and
Sanford J.
Shattil **
From the Departments of Cell Biology and
Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research
Institute, La Jolla, California 92037 and the Departments of
§ Pharmacology and ¶ Medicine, University of North
Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
Received for publication, March 22, 2002, and in revised form, April 29, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The affinity of integrin
IIb 3 for fibrinogen is
controlled by inside-out signals that are triggered by agonists like
thrombin. Agonist treatment of platelets also activates Rap1b, a small
GTPase known to promote integrin-dependent adhesion of other
cells. Therefore, we investigated the role of Rap1b in
IIb 3 function by viral transduction of
GFP-Rap1 chimeras into murine megakaryocytes, which exhibit inside-out
signaling similar to platelets. Expression of constitutively active
GFP-Rap1b (V12) had no effect on unstimulated megakaryocytes, but it
greatly augmented fibrinogen binding to IIb 3 induced by a PAR4 thrombin receptor
agonist (p < 0.01). The Rap1b effect was
cell-autonomous and was prevented by pre-treating cells with
cytochalasin D or latrunculin A to inhibit actin polymerization. Rap1b-dependent fibrinogen binding to megakaryocytes was
blocked by POW-2, a novel monovalent antibody Fab fragment specific for high affinity murine IIb 3. In contrast to
GFP-Rap1b (V12), expression of GFP-Rap1GAP, which deactivates
endogenous Rap1, inhibited agonist-induced fibrinogen binding
(p < 0.01), as did dominant-negative GFP-Rap1b (N17)
(p < 0.05). None of these treatments affected surface
expression of IIb 3. These studies
establish that Rap1b can augment agonist-induced ligand binding to
IIb 3 through effects on integrin
affinity, possibly by modulating IIb 3
interactions with the actin cytoskeleton.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The IIb 3 integrin is a receptor for
adhesive ligands such as fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor, and
ligand binding to IIb 3 is required for
platelet aggregation and spreading in hemostasis. Ligand binding is
regulated by positive and negative "inside-out" signals that
converge on IIb 3 to control the integrin
activation state through modulation of receptor affinity or avidity
(1). Affinity modulation, the dominant mode of regulation in platelets, implies a change in the conformation of the
IIb 3 heterodimer to increase access of
ligand binding sites, while avidity modulation implies lateral
movements of heterodimers in the plane of the plasma membrane,
culminating in integrin clustering (2-4). Positive inside-out signals
can be initiated by agonist occupancy of several different classes of
excitatory receptors that couple to heterotrimeric G proteins and
tyrosine kinases (5-10). IIb 3 activation
can be negatively regulated by prostacyclin or nitric oxide, whose effects are mediated through cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP, respectively (5).
The signaling molecules directly responsible for regulation of
IIb 3 downstream of excitatory receptors
are incompletely characterized. Nonetheless, isoforms of protein kinase
C and PI1 3-kinase as well as
cytoplasmic free Ca2+ have been identified as key signaling
intermediates (1, 5). In addition, IIb 3
function in platelets appears to be regulated in some way by the actin
cytoskeleton because inhibition of actin polymerization by low
micromolar concentrations of cytochalasin D or latrunculin A increases
agonist-dependent fibrinogen binding, whereas higher
concentrations of these agents partially inhibit fibrinogen binding
(11). Therefore, protein kinase C, PI 3-kinase, and Ca2+
may introduce post-translational modifications in
signaling/cytoskeletal proteins that associate with and regulate
IIb 3 (1, 12). However, major gaps remain
in the identification and characterization of integrin regulatory
proteins in platelets.
The Ras family GTPase, Rap1b, may be one such integrin regulatory
protein. Like other Ras family members, it cycles from an inactive,
GDP-bound form to an active, GTP-bound form, with cycling regulated by
one or more guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), guanine
nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs), and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) (13). Rap1b is highly expressed in platelets, is
rapidly activated in response to agonists such as thrombin, ADP, or
epinephrine and partitions along with
IIb 3 to the Triton-insoluble core actin
cytoskeleton of aggregated platelets (14-16). Rap1b activation in
response to thrombin depends initially on Ca2+ fluxes into
the platelet cytoplasm and subsequently on protein kinase C (17).
Although the function of Rap1b in platelets is unknown, it has been
implicated in promoting 1 and 2
integrin-dependent adhesion of fibroblastic and
hematopoietic cell lines and murine thymocytes (18-22). The evidence
for this is based largely on overexpression of constitutively active
and dominant-negative forms of Rap1, but additional support for Rap1
involvement comes from studies of mouse embryonic fibroblasts deficient
in the Rap1 GEF, C3G, which exhibit defective
integrin-dependent adhesion that is correctable by
expression of a constitutively active Rap1 mutant (23). Because, cell
adhesion by integrins is dependent on a combination of factors, including inside-out signaling, ligand binding, and post-ligand binding
events, the precise mechanism(s) whereby Rap1 promotes adhesion may
vary with the integrin and the cell type.
Based on these considerations, the present study was carried out to
determine whether Rap1b is an effector of inside-out signaling to
IIb 3. Because platelets are not amenable
to genetic manipulation, we used Sindbis virus vectors to express
specific GFP-tagged chimeric proteins in primary, mature murine
megakaryocytes. Megakaryocytes are nucleated cells that function
primarily to produce platelets, and like platelets they exhibit an
inside-out signaling pathway from excitatory receptors to
IIb 3 (24-26). The results establish that
Rap1b, in concert with platelet agonists, can promote fibrinogen binding to IIb 3. Furthermore, they
indicate that Rap1b functions to modulate
IIb 3 affinity, possibly through effects
on the actin cytoskeleton.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Construction of Sindbis Virus Vectors--
Enhanced green
fluorescent protein (GFP) was amplified by PCR using pEGFP-C1 as a
template (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) and cloned into
the MluI/SphI sites of the Sindbis expression
vector, pSinRep5 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Full-length human Rap1b
(V12) or Rap1b (N17) cDNAs in pGBT9 and pCGN, respectively, were
PCR-amplified to generate XbaI/SphI fragments and
directionally cloned into pSinRep5. Then a
XbaI/XbaI GFP cassette was subcloned in-frame into this plasmid to create GFP-Rap1b (V12) or GFP-Rap1b (N17) fusions.
GFP-Rap1GAP in pSinRep5 was generated by cloning PCR-amplified human
Rap1GAP (a generous gift from Alan Hall, London) as a
MluI/MluI fragment, followed by a 5' in-frame
insertion of the GFP cassette. Insert orientations were verified by
colony PCR, and all coding sequences were verified in the Sindbis
vectors by automated DNA sequencing.
To produce Sindbis viruses encoding mRNA for the GFP chimeras, the
pSinRep5 plasmids and a helper plasmid (DH26S) were linearized and used
as a template to synthesize in vitro capped and
polyadenylated mRNA using an SP6 RNA-polymerase kit (Ambion,
Austin, TX). Expression and helper mRNAs were then co-transfected
in a 1:1 molar ratio by electroporation into BHK cells, which were
cultured for 24 h to allow virion production. Supernatants
containing virions were collected, centrifuged at 2000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, and stored in liquid nitrogen in
1-ml aliquots. Viral titers were evaluated by transducing BHK cells and
assessing GFP expression 18 h later by flow cytometry. Only viral
preparations capable of inducing GFP expression in more then 50% of
BHK cells at a 1:3000 dilution of viral supernatant were used for
subsequent megakaryocyte experiments.
Characterization of GFP-tagged Proteins--
GFP, GFP-Rap1b, and
GFP-Rap1GAP proteins were characterized by incubating NIH 3T3 cells
with a 1:3 dilution of recombinant virus in 1% Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium/fetal calf serum for 1 h at 37 °C. After
10-fold dilution in the same medium without virus, cells were cultured
another 6 h, and expression of recombinant proteins was assessed
in Nonidet P-40 detergent-solublized cell lysates by Western blotting
(26). Blots were probed with a monoclonal antibody to GFP (1:500
dilution; CLONTECH) and an horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (1:3000 dilution; Bio-Rad Laboratories). Immunoreactive bands were detected by
enhanced chemiluminescence using SuperSignal WestPico reagent (Pierce).
GTP loading of Rap1b was detected by a pull-down assay (14). NIH 3T3
cells were lysed at 4 °C in RIPA buffer containing 75 mM
NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1% deoxycholic acid, 0.2% sodium dodecyl
sulfate, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM sodium
orthovanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride, 2 µM leupeptin, 2 µM aprotinin, and 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4. After clarification, 500 µg of
protein in 500 µl were incubated with 30 µl of a 50% slurry of
glutathione-Sepharose beads precoupled to either GST or the GST-Rap
binding domain of RalGDS. After three washes with RIPA buffer, the
presence of GFP or GFP-Rap1b proteins in the pellets, and the amounts
of recombinant or endogenous Rap1 in the starting material were
examined by Western blotting with an antibody to either GFP or Rap1
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA).
Transduction of GFP-tagged Proteins into
Megakaryocytes--
Bone marrow cells were harvested from 6 to
8-week-old BALB/c mice and cultured in the presence of thrombopoietin,
IL-6, and IL-11 as described (26). After 5 days, mature, polyploid
megakaryocytes were enriched by gravity sedimentation for 60 min at
37° in a 50-ml conical polypropylene tube and then applied to a
discontinuous density gradient of 1-2-3% bovine serum albumin in
phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4. After gravity sedimentation for 30 min at 37°, cells were resuspended in complete Iscove's Modified
Dulbecco's medium to 2 × 105/ml, and 0.5-ml aliquots
were added to 100-mm dishes previously blocked with 1% bovine serum
albumin in phosphate-buffered saline. Cells were infected with 2 ml of
a 1:1 dilution of recombinant Sindbis virus for 1 h at 37° and
then diluted with 5 ml of complete medium and incubated for 6 h in
a CO2 incubator.
Analysis of Fibrinogen Binding to Megakaryocytes--
After
viral infection, megakaryocytes were collected in 50-ml polypropylene
tubes and sedimented by gravity for 60 min at 37°. Cells were gently
resuspended in modified Tyrode's buffer (137 mM NaCl, 2.9 mM KCl, 12 mM NaHCO3, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM MgCl2, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 0.1% glucose, 5 mM HEPES, pH
7.4), and incubated for 20 min at room temperature in a final volume of
50 µl in the presence of 200 µg/ml biotin-fibrinogen, 0.5 or 1 mM PAR4 thrombin receptor-activating peptide (AYPGFK) (27), and 10 µg/ml phycoerythrin-streptavidin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). To assess nonspecific binding, parallel samples were incubated with either 10 mM EDTA or 20 µg/ml 1B5, a
function-blocking antibody specific for murine
IIb 3 (a gift from Barry Coller, New York) (28). In some cases, cells were pre-incubated for 10 min with either 10 µM cytochalasin D, latrunculin A or an equivalent volume of Me2SO vehicle before addition of fibrinogen and agonist.
Fibrinogen binding to large megakaryocytes was quantified by flow
cytometry (26). Surface expression of
IIb 3 was determined by flow cytometry after incubating cells with 10 µg/ml biotinylated anti-murine IIb antibody or an isotype-matched control IgG (BD
PharMingen, San Diego, CA).
Development of a Recombinant Antibody Fab Fragment Specific for
High Affinity Murine IIb 3--
PAC-1 Fab
is a recombinant IgG1, RGD-containing antibody Fab fragment
specific for high affinity human IIb 3
(29). To determine whether Rap1b modulates
IIb 3 affinity in mouse megakaryocytes, PAC-1 was re-engineered to recognize high affinity murine
IIb 3. Specifically, PAC-1 Fab heavy chain
cDNA was subjected to splice-overlap extension PCR such that an
11-amino acid stretch of H-CDR-3 (PSYYRGDGAGP) was replaced with a
13-amino acid stretch from kistrin (CRIPRGDMPDDRC), an integrin-binding
snake venom peptide (30). When expressed as a secreted heavy chain
along with the PAC-1 light chain in Drosophila S2 cells
(31), the resulting Fab fragment, named POW-2, was found to be
selective for high affinity murine IIb 3 (see "Results"). Serum-free S2 culture supernatant containing POW-2
Fab was concentrated 10-fold and dialyzed extensively against phosphate-buffered saline. Preliminary studies showed that the Fab in
this preparation was monomeric by size exclusion chromatography on a
Sephadex G-200 column (29). Furthermore, forced oligomerization of
IIb 3 in a Chinese hamster ovary cell
model system did not promote POW-2 Fab binding, indicating that POW-2
was not sensitive to changes in IIb 3
avidity (3). POW-2 Fab interaction with mouse platelets and
megakaryocytes was analyzed by flow cytometry (29). For platelets,
POW-2 binding was assessed with a secondary goat anti-mouse Ig (H+L)
antibody (Fab')2 conjugated with Alexa-488 (31). For
megakaryocytes, POW-2 was used to compete for biotin-fibrinogen binding.
 |
RESULTS |
Expression of GFP-Rap1 Chimeric Proteins--
The purpose of this
investigation was to determine the role of Rap1b in
IIb 3 function. Toward this end, RNA
Sindbis virus vectors encoding either GFP, constitutively active
GFP-Rap1b (V12), dominant-negative GFP-Rap1b (N17), or GFP-Rap1GAP were
introduced into murine megakaryocytes, and fibrinogen binding to
IIb 3 was examined. GFP was fused to the N
termini of these constructs to facilitate flow cytometric
identification of transduced cells. Prior to megakaryocyte studies,
recombinant protein expression was verified by transducing murine NIH
3T3 cells and examining Western blots of cell lysates with an antibody
to GFP. In each case, a single immunoreactive band with the appropriate
electrophoretic mobility was observed (Fig.
1A). To determine whether
GFP-Rap1b (V12) was active in the sense that it was loaded with GTP,
lysates from virally infected cells were incubated with
glutathione-Sepharose beads coated with the GST-Rap1 binding domain of
RalGDS, a Rap1b effector (20). GFP-Rap1b (V12) bound to these beads,
whereas GFP-Rap1b (N17) and GFP did not (Fig. 1B). Binding
of GFP-Rap1b (V12) was specific because it failed to bind to beads
coated with GST (not shown). GFP-Rap1GAP was functional in that it
eliminated GTP-loading of endogenous Rap1 (Fig. 1C). On the
basis of these results, these viral vectors were used to introduce the
GFP-tagged chimeras into megakaryocytes.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Expression of GFP-Rap1 proteins in murine
cells. As described under "Experimental Procedures," NIH 3T3
cells were incubated for 6 h with Sindbis viruses encoding either
GFP, GFP-Rap1b (V12), GFP-Rap1b (N17), or GFP-Rap1GAP. In panel
A, cells were lysed in Nonidet P-40 buffer and subjected to sodium
dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blotting
using anti-GFP antibody as a probe. In panel B, cells were
incubated with viruses encoding GFP, GFP-Rap1b (V12), or GFP-Rap1b
(N17), lysed in RIPA buffer, and then subjected to a pull-down assay
using glutathione-Sepharose beads coated with GST-Rap1 binding domain
of RalGDS. After washing, GFP-tagged proteins retained on the beads
(e.g. GTP-Rap1b) were analyzed on a Western blot
using an anti-GFP antibody. In parallel, the amount of recombinant GFP
proteins in 10 µg of each cell lysate (e.g. total
GFP) was assessed using an antibody to GFP. In panel C,
infection of cells with viruses encoding GFP or GFP-Rap1GAP was carried
out in the presence of 10% fetal calf serum, the latter added to
stimulate endogenous Rap1. After cell lysis, GTP-Rap1 retained on the
beads and total Rap1 in 10 µg of cell lysate were assessed by Western
blotting using an antibody to Rap1.
|
|
Rap1b and Inside-out IIb 3 Signaling
in Megakaryocytes--
Large, mature megakaryocytes derived from bone
marrow cultures were incubated for 6 h with Sindbis viruses
encoding the GFP-tagged chimeras, and fibrinogen binding was then
examined by flow cytometry (26). The light scattering mode of the flow
cytometer was used to identify large megakaryocytes, the FL1
fluorescence channel to identify virally transduced, GFP-positive
cells, the FL2 channel to quantify the binding of biotin-fibrinogen
(using phycoerythrin-streptavidin), and the FL3 channel to exclude
propidium iodide-positive, dead cells. After viral infection, the
percentage of large megakaryocytes that expressed the recombinant GFP
proteins ranged from 10 to 50% from experiment to experiment. Fig.
2 shows the fibrinogen binding data for a
single experiment in the form of dot plots, where cells expressing the
recombinant protein are above the horizontal lines and cells not
expressing the recombinant protein are below the horizontal lines. Note
that megakaryocytes that had been incubated with the control Sindbis
virus encoding GFP (Fig. 2, panels A and D) bound
little or no fibrinogen unless the cells were stimulated during the
fibrinogen binding step with a PAR4 thrombin receptor-activating peptide (AYPGKF) (27). Both GFP-positive and GFP-negative cells appeared to respond in a similar fashion. Unstimulated megakaryocytes expressing either GFP-Rap1b (V12), which is constitutively active, or
GFP-Rap1GAP, which inactivates endogenous Rap1 (18), also bound little
fibrinogen (Fig. 2, panels B and C). In contrast, when stimulated with AYPGKF, megakaryocytes expressing GFP-Rap1b (V12)
appeared to bind relatively more fibrinogen than non-expressing cells
(Fig. 2, panel E), while megakaryocytes expressing
GFP-Rap1GAP appeared to bind relatively less fibrinogen than
non-expressing cells (Fig. 2, panel F).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of Rap1b on fibrinogen binding to
megakaryocytes. Megakaryocytes were incubated for 6 h with
Sindbis viruses encoding either GFP (panels A and
D), GFP-Rap1b (V12) (panels B and E)
or GFP-Rap1GAP (panels C and F). Cells were then
incubated for 20 min with 200 µg/ml biotin-fibrinogen in the presence
or absence of 1 mM PAR4 receptor-activating peptide
(AYPGKF), and fibrinogen binding was assessed by flow cytometry using
phycoerythrin-strepavidin as the fluorophore. Each panel is
a dot plot representing 10,000 large megakaryocytes. Blue
dots below the horizontal lines represent cells not expressing the
recombinant protein, and red dots above the horizontal lines
are cells expressing the protein. The number in each dot plot
represents the percentage of all GFP-positive events present in the
upper right hand quadrant.
|
|
To validate the conclusions drawn from this single experiment, the
results of five such experiments are summarized in Fig. 3, which depicts specific fibrinogen
binding, defined as binding inhibited by 10 mM EDTA.
Neither GFP-Rap1b (V12) nor GFP-Rap1GAP significantly influenced basal
fibrinogen binding to unstimulated megakaryocytes (Fig. 3A).
However, compared with megakaryocytes expressing GFP, those expressing
GFP-Rap1b (V12) bound significantly more fibrinogen in response to
AYPGKF (p < 0.01), whether a subsaturating (0.5 mM) or a saturating (1 mM) concentration of the
agonist was employed (Fig. 3A). Identical results were
obtained if 20 µg/ml 1B5, a function-blocking
anti- IIb 3 antibody, was used instead of
EDTA to determine specific fibrinogen binding (not shown). In contrast
to the results with GFP-Rap1b (V12), cells expressing GFP-Rap1GAP bound
46% less fibrinogen than GFP-expressing cells in response to 1 mM AYPGKF (p < 0.01). These effects of
GFP-Rap1b (V12) or GFP-Rap1GAP were confined to the subpopulation of
megakaryocytes in each sample that had been successfully transduced
(compare Fig. 3, A versus B). In addition, in three
independent experiments, transduction of megakaryocytes with GFP-Rap1b
(N17), which acts in a dominant-negative fashion by binding to some
Rap1 GEFs (32), inhibited fibrinogen binding induced by 1 mM AYPGKF by 27 ± 8% (p < 0.05).
Taken together, these results establish that Rap1b promotes
agonist-induced fibrinogen binding to
IIb 3, and this effect is
cell-autonomous.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of Rap1b on specific fibrinogen
binding to megakaryocytes. Data for five independent experiments
of the kind illustrated in the legend to Fig. 2 are summarized.
Specific fibrinogen binding was defined as that inhibited by 10 mM EDTA. It was expressed relative to the binding observed
with agonist-stimulated megakaryocytes incubated with the Sindbis/GFP
virus, which was arbitrarily set at 100%. Data are the means ± S.E. Asterisks represent significant differences from the
GFP sample, determined by Student's t test
(p < 0.01).
|
|
The observed effects of Rap1b and Rap1GAP expression on fibrinogen
binding to megakaryocytes suggest that Rap1b modulates IIb 3 affinity and/or avidity. However,
similar results might be obtained if Rap1b were to modify expression
levels of IIb 3 or if Sindbis virus
infection, per se, were to somehow alter the responsiveness
of the megakaryocytes to agonists. Therefore these potential
confounding variables were investigated. The levels of
IIb 3 expressed on the surface of
megakaryocytes were measured with an antibody to the IIb
subunit. None of the Sindbis virus constructs affected
IIb 3 expression, either before or after stimulation with AYPGKF (Fig.
4A). Furthermore, transduction
of megakaryocytes with Sindbis virus encoding GFP did not affect agonist-induced fibrinogen binding when the responses of GFP-positive cells were compared with GFP-negative cells (Fig. 4B), or
when cells exposed to virus were compared with mock-transfected cells (not shown). We conclude that Rap1b modulates fibrinogen binding to
IIb 3 by an effect on integrin affinity
and/or avidity.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of Sindbis virus infection on
IIb 3
expression and function in megakaryocytes. In panel A,
megakaryocytes were incubated for 6 h with the indicated Sindbis
viruses, and surface expression of IIb 3
was determined by flow cytometry, using an antibody specific for the
IIb subunit. Where indicated, cells were stimulated with
1 mM PAR4 receptor-activating peptide (AYPGKF) during the
binding assay. Data are presented as specific binding of the
anti- IIb antibody and expressed relative to the binding
observed with unstimulated, non-transduced (GFP-negative)
megakaryocytes that had been incubated with the Sindbis/GFP virus. In
panel B, megakaryocytes were incubated with Sindbis virus
encoding GFP. Biotin-fibrinogen binding was then assessed in the
presence or absence of AYPGKF and 10 mM EDTA, as indicated.
Binding is expressed as mean fluorescence intensity in arbitrary units.
Data represent the means ± S.E. of 3-7 experiments.
|
|
Mechanistic Aspects of Rap1b Function in Inside-out
Signaling--
To begin to investigate the mechanism by which Rap1b
modulates fibrinogen binding to megakaryocytes, we developed a novel reagent capable of reporting on changes in the affinity of murine IIb 3. PAC-1 is a murine IgM monoclonal
antibody specific for activated human
IIb 3 (33). Because it is multimeric,
PAC-1 IgM is sensitive to changes in both
IIb 3 affinity and avidity. In contrast,
and as might be predicted, a recombinant, monomeric, and monovalent Fab
fragment of PAC-1 is sensitive only to changes in
IIb 3 affinity (3, 29). Because PAC-1 Fab
is specific for human IIb 3, we
re-engineered it to recognize high affinity murine
IIb 3. By removing an 11-amino acid
segment from the H-CDR3 of PAC-1 Fab and replacing it with a 13-amino
acid RGD-containing segment from the disintegrin, kistrin, a new
recombinant Fab fragment called POW-2 was created (Fig.
5A). Recombinant POW-2 bound
to IIb 3 on agonist-activated mouse (or
human) platelets. Binding was specific for high affinity
IIb 3 because minimal binding was observed
to unstimulated platelets, to stimulated platelets incubated with EDTA,
kistrin or antibody 1B5 to block fibrinogen binding to
IIb 3 or to stimulated platelets incubated
with dibutyryl cyclic AMP to inhibit platelet activation (Fig.
5B). Although kistrin recognizes
V 3 and 5 1
in addition to IIb 3, POW-2 only
recognized IIb 3 in murine cells (not
shown).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Characterization of POW-2 Fab and its effect
on fibrinogen binding to megakaryocytes. Panel A shows the
amino acid sequences within the H-CDR3 regions of PAC-1 and POW-2 Fabs.
The bold letters represent the swapped sequences that
converted PAC-1 Fab into POW-2 Fab. Panel B validates the
binding specificity of POW-2 Fab for IIb 3
using murine platelets and flow cytometry, as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Incubation of platelets with 130 µg/ml
POW-2 Fab was carried out for 30 min in the presence of an agonist and
inhibitors, as indicated. The agonist was 1 mM AYPGKF, EDTA
was used at 10 mM, kistrin at 5 µM, 1B5 at 20 µg/ml, and dibutyryl cyclic AMP (db-cAMP) at 1 mM. Panel C shows the effect of 130 µg/ml
POW-2 Fab on the specific binding of 50 µg/ml biotin-fibrinogen to
megakaryocytes. Where indicated, 0.5 mg/ml of unlabeled fibrinogen was
used instead of POW-2 Fab as a competitor. Data represent the
means ± S.E. of three experiments.
|
|
Therefore, POW-2 Fab was used to compete with biotin-fibrinogen for
binding to AYPGKF-stimulated mouse megakaryocytes, with the rationale
that it would compete successfully only for binding to high affinity
IIb 3. POW-2 Fab was used at 130 µg/ml,
a concentration that in preliminary studies inhibited the specific
binding of 50 µg/ml biotin-fibrinogen to AYPGKF-stimulated mouse
platelets by >95%. As shown in Fig. 5C, POW-2 Fab
inhibited agonist-dependent fibrinogen binding to
GFP-expressing megakaryocytes by 75% and to GFP-Rap1b (V12)-expressing
megakaryocytes by 82%. In fact, POW-2 was almost as good a competitor
of biotin-fibrinogen as was an excess of unlabeled fibrinogen (Fig.
5C). This substantial blockade of fibrinogen binding by
POW-2 Fab suggests that AYPGKF and Rap1b (V12) modulate the affinity of
IIb 3.
Because IIb 3 interacts with and may be
regulated by components of the platelet actin cytoskeleton (11, 34), we
examined whether inhibition of actin polymerization affected Rap1b
(V12)-dependent fibrinogen binding to stimulated
megakaryocytes. Pre-incubation of GFP-expressing megakaryocytes with 10 µM cytochalasin D blocked fibrinogen binding induced by
AYPGKF by 40%, consistent with previous studies of this concentration
of cytochalasins in platelets (11, 35, 36). More importantly,
cytochalasin D completely blocked the increment in fibrinogen binding
caused by GFP-Rap1b (V12) (Fig. 6).
Similar results were obtained if actin polymerization was blocked with
10 µM latrunculin A instead of cytochalasin D (not
shown). Thus, Rap1b may regulate IIb 3
affinity and fibrinogen binding through effects on the actin
cytoskeleton.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of cytochalasin D on specific
fibrinogen binding to megakaryocytes. Megakaryocytes were
transduced with Sindbis/GFP or Sindbis/GFP-Rap1b (V12) viruses. Cells
were then incubated for 10 min with 10 µM cytochalasin D
(CD) or Me2SO vehicle as a control, and
fibrinogen binding was determined by flow cytometry. The data represent
specific fibrinogen binding to transduced megakaryocytes and is
expressed relative to binding observed with agonist-stimulated cells
transduced with the Sindbis/GFP virus. Data are the means ± S.E.
of three experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, recombinant human Rap1b constructs were expressed
in primary murine megakaryocytes to assess the potential role of this
GTPase in inside-out IIb 3 signaling.
Megakaryocytes were chosen because they respond to platelet agonists by
engaging fibrinogen via IIb 3, but unlike
their anucleate platelet progeny, they are amenable to genetic
manipulation (25, 26, 37). The major new findings are the following. 1)
Expression of constitutively active Rap1b (V12) augments fibrinogen
binding to IIb 3 when megakaryocytes are
stimulated through the PAR4 thrombin receptor. In contrast, expression
of Rap1GAP, which inactivates endogenous Rap1, or expression of Rap1b
(N17), a dominant-negative construct, has the opposite effect. 2)
Modulation of fibrinogen binding by Rap1b appears to be due primarily
to effects on IIb 3 affinity. 3)
Regulation of IIb 3 activation state by
Rap1b may depend on the actin cytoskeleton, because no Rap1b effect was
observed if actin polymerization was blocked by cytochalasin D or
latrunculin A. These results establish a role for Rap1b in affinity
modulation of IIb 3, and they raise
important new questions about the identities and mechanisms of action
of the relevant Rap1b regulators and effectors in megakaryocytes and platelets.
GFP-Rap1b and GFP-Rap1GAP constructs were introduced into mature, bone
marrow-derived mouse megakaryocytes using Sindbis viruses. In this
system, the recombinant proteins were expressed rapidly, and cell
integrity was preserved long enough for functional studies of
IIb 3 to be carried out. Indeed, viral
transduction, per se, had no detrimental effect on
IIb 3 surface expression or on
agonist-induced fibrinogen binding (Fig. 4). In addition, N-terminal
fusion of GFP to these constructs did not adversely affect their
function, as exemplified by the ability of Rap1b (V12) to bind GTP and
the ability of GFP-Rap1GAP to reduce GTP loading of endogenous Rap1 (Fig. 1). Because expression of GFP alone did not interfere with agonist-induced fibrinogen binding to megakaryocytes, the opposing effects on fibrinogen binding of GFP-Rap1b (V12) and GFP-Rap1GAP provide strong evidence that IIb 3
activation can be modulated by Rap1b (Figs. 2 and 3). Furthermore,
although the recombinant proteins used here were human in origin, the
high degree of sequence conservation between human and murine Rap1b
(e.g. 85% overall amino acid identity; 95% in the switch
regions)2 indicates that our
results are unlikely to be complicated by species differences.
One caveat in overexpression work with Rap1b (V12) and Rap1b (N17) is
that the results obtained may not necessarily reflect the function of
endogenous Rap1b. For example, dominant-negative Rap1b (N17) may exert
functions in addition to the expected one of titrating Rap1 GEFs, and
it may not titrate all Rap1 GEFs (32). Indeed, this may explain why
GFP-Rap1GAP was a better inhibitor of agonist-induced fibrinogen
binding to megakaryocytes than GFP-Rap1b (N17) (e.g. 46%
versus 27%). Nonetheless, the present study demonstrates unambiguously that Rap1b can promote inside-out signaling to
IIb 3 in primary megakaryocytes, thus
providing a strong rationale to further evaluate the functional
relationships between Rap1b and IIb 3 in
platelets. The rapid activation of Rap1b in platelets stimulated with
thrombin, ADP, or epinephrine is consistent with a role in inside-out
signaling (14-17). Rap1b is a substrate for protein kinase A in
platelets (38). While the significance of phosphorylation to Rap1b
function is unclear, the phosphorylation of one or more proteins by
protein kinase A inhibits agonist-induced ligand-binding to
IIb 3 in platelets (39). Perhaps Rap1b is one of the relevant protein kinase A substrates in this context.
This work provides new insights into the role of Rap1b in integrin
function. Previous studies in fibroblasts, various hematopoietic cell
lines and murine thymocytes have demonstrated that overexpression of
Rap1 or its GEFs and GAPs affects cell adhesion, aggregation, and
phagocytosis dependent on 1 or 2
integrins (18-22, 40). Because all of these responses involve integrin
ligation as well as post-ligand binding events, these observed effects
of Rap1 do not necessarily pinpoint which phase is targeted by the
GTPase. However, in one study employing a B lymphocyte cell line, Rap1 (V12) increased the expression of an activation epitope on
L 2 and the binding of a soluble
ICAM-1/IgG fusion protein to the cells, consistent with affinity
modulation of L 2 by Rap1 (19). On the
other hand, work in transgenic thymocytes concluded that Rap1 was
sufficient to modulate the clustering and avidity, rather than the
affinity, of 1 and 2 integrins (22).
In megakaryocytes, Rap1b increased fibrinogen binding to
IIb 3, but only when the cells were
stimulated with an agonist (Figs. 2 and 3). This suggests that signals
from Rap1b are not sufficient to activate
IIb 3, but rather they may be required to
achieve maximal IIb 3 activation in
response to agonist-triggered signals. Furthermore, the results with
POW-2, a monomeric and monovalent ligand-mimetic Fab specific for high
affinity murine IIb 3, establish that
Rap1b functions, in large part, by modulating
IIb 3 affinity in megakaryocytes (Fig. 5).
Overall, these results indicate that Rap1 is capable of regulating the
activation state of 1, 2, and
3 integrins. However, the precise mechanism of
regulation, e.g. affinity versus avidity
modulation, appears to depend on the integrin and the cell type. Future
studies should consider the possibility that Rap1 may also influence
post-ligand binding events, such as changes in cell shape or polarity
(13).
How is Rap1b activated in megakaryocytes and platelets, and which Rap1b
effector(s) modulate IIb 3 affinity?
Addressing these questions is made complicated by the plethora of Rap1
GEFs and GAPs in various cells and tissues, some of which are not
specific for Rap1 (13, 41-43). Furthermore, the effector functions of many of the known proteins that bind selectively to GTP-Rap1 have yet
to be completely characterized (13, 44). Most importantly, relatively
little information is available about the repertoire of Rap1 regulators
and effectors in platelets and megakaryocytes. Because Rap1b (V12)
augmented the fibrinogen binding response to a PAR4 thrombin receptor
agonist, the relevant Rap1 GEFs or GAPs may themselves be regulated by
signaling molecules activated downstream of one or more heterotrimeric
G proteins. In this context, the products of phospholipase C-mediated
phospholipid hydrolysis, Ca2+ and diacylglycerol, have been
implicated in agonist-dependent Rap1b activation in
platelets (17). Indeed, platelets and megakaryocytes contain a Rap1 GEF
(CalDAG-GEFI) likely to be activated by Ca2+ and
diacylglycerol (41, 45).3
Potential Rap1 effectors identified in platelets include RalGDS, p110
PI 3-kinase, and Raf-1 (13, 46-48).
Integrins are coupled to actin filaments through actin-binding
proteins, such as -actinin, filamin, and talin (12). Consequently, a
conceptual link is often made between changes in the actin cytoskeleton and changes in integrin clustering or avidity (4, 22, 49). We found
that inhibition of actin polymerization by 10 µM
latrunculin A or cytochalasin D blocked Rap1b-dependent
fibrinogen binding to megakaryocytes (Fig. 6). Because fibrinogen
binding is controlled primarily by changes in
IIb 3 affinity (Fig. 5) (3), we propose that Rap1b may regulate IIb 3 affinity
through an effect on actin dynamics or organization. A causal link
between changes in actin and changes integrin affinity has not been
established unambiguously. However, this idea is consistent with the
recent observation that relatively low concentrations of cytochalasin D
or latrunculin A, which may release integrins from cytoskeletal
constraints, increase agonist-dependent fibrinogen binding
to platelets (11). In this regard, at least two Rap1b effectors in
platelets, RalGDS and p110 PI 3-kinase, have been proposed to influence
actin filament organization (46, 47, 50). Studies in cell lines have
demonstrated that Ras family members in addition to Rap1, such as H-Ras
and R-Ras, can influence ligand binding to integrins, although the net
effects vary considerably among cell types (51-53). Given the suitability of primary megakaryocytes for the molecular analysis of
IIb 3 signaling, the experimental system
employed here should prove useful for identifying the physiological
regulators and effectors of Rap1b responsible for modulating
IIb 3 affinity and for determining the
roles of other Ras family members in IIb 3 function.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Barry Coller, Alan Hall, and Mark
Larson for reagents, and Mark Ginsberg and Martin Schwartz for critical
review of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
These studies were supported by research grants from the
National Institutes of Health (to L. V. P., G. C. W., and
S. J. S.) and by a postdoctoral fellowship from the American Heart
Association (to K. E.). This work was presented in part at the Annual
Meeting of the American Society of Hematology, December, 2002, Orlando, FL and published in abstract form (Bertoni, A., Tadokoro, S., Eto, K., Pampori, N., Parise, L., White, G. C., and Shattil, S. J. (2001) Blood 98, 752a).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: The Dept. of Cell
Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Rd.,
VB-5, La Jolla, CA 92037. Tel.: 858-784-7148; Fax: 858-784-7422;
E-mail: shattil@scripps.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 6, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M202791200
2
G. C. White, unpublished observations.
3
R. Murphy, K. Eto, S. Kerrigan, A. Bertoni, S. Shattil, and A. Leavitt, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PI, phosphatidylinositol;
GFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein;
RIPA, radioimmune precipitation assay buffer;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
IL, interleukin;
GEF, guanine nucleotide
exchange factors;
GAP, GTPase-activating proteins.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Shattil, S. J.,
Kashiwagi, H.,
and Pampori, N.
(1998)
Blood
91,
2645-2657[Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Xiong, J. P.,
Stehle, T.,
Diefenbach, B.,
Zhang, R.,
Dunker, R.,
Scott, D. L.,
Joachimiak, A.,
Goodman, S. L.,
and Arnaout, M. A.
(2001)
Science
294,
339-345[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Hato, T.,
Pampori, N.,
and Shattil, S. J.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
141,
1685-1695[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Kucik, D. F.,
O'Toole, T. E.,
Zheleznyak, A.,
Busettini, D. K.,
and Brown, E. J.
(2001)
Mol. Biol. Cell
12,
1509-1518[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Brass, L. F.
(2000)
in
Hematology. Basic Principles and Practice
(Hoffman, R.
, Benz, E.
, Shattil, S.
, Furie, B.
, Cohen, H.
, Silberstein, L.
, and McGlave, P., eds), 3rd Ed.
, pp. 1753-1782, Churchill-Livingstone, New York
|
| 6.
|
Andrews, R. K.,
Shen, Y.,
Gardiner, E. E.,
Dong, J. F.,
Lopez, J. A.,
and Berndt, M. C.
(1999)
Thromb. Haemost.
82,
357-364[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Clemetson, K. J.,
and Clemetson, J. M.
(2001)
Thromb. Haemost.
86,
189-197[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Watson, S. P.,
Asazuma, N.,
Atkinson, B.,
Berlanga, O.,
Best, D.,
Bobe, R.,
Jarvis, G.,
Marshall, S.,
Snell, D.,
Stafford, M.,
Tulasne, D.,
Wilde, J.,
Wonerow, P.,
and Frampton, J.
(2001)
Thromb. Haemost.
86,
276-288[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Suzuki-Inoue, K.,
Ozaki, Y.,
Kainoh, M.,
Shin, Y., Wu, Y.,
Yatomi, Y.,
Ohmori, T.,
Tanaka, T.,
Satoh, K.,
and Morita, T.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
1643-1652[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Phillips, D. R.,
Prasad, K. S.,
Manganello, J.,
Bao, M.,
and Nannizzi-Alaimo, L.
(2001)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
13,
546-554[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Bennett, J. S.,
Zigmond, S.,
Vilaire, G.,
Cunningham, M.,
and Bednar, B.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
25301-25307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Calderwood, D. A.,
Zent, R.,
Grant, R.,
Rees, D. J. G.,
Hynes, R. O.,
and Ginsberg, M. H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
28071-28074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Bos, J. L.,
de Rooij, J.,
and Reedquist, K. A.
(2001)
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.
2,
369-377[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Franke, B.,
Akkerman, J. W. N.,
and Bos, J. L.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
252-259[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
White, G. C., II,
Fischer, T. H.,
and Duffy, C. M.
(1998)
Thromb. Haemost.
79,
832-836[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Lova, P.,
Paganini, S.,
Sinigaglia, F.,
Balduini, C.,
and Torti, M.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
12009-12015[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Franke, B.,
Van Triest, M., De,
Bruijn, K. M. T.,
Van Willligen, G.,
Nieuwenhuis, H. K.,
Negrier, C.,
Akkerman, J. W. N.,
and Bos, J. L.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
779-785[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Caron, E.,
Self, A. J.,
and Hall, A.
(2000)
Curr. Biol.
10,
974-978[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Katagiri, K.,
Hattori, M.,
Minato, N.,
Irie, S.,
Takatsu, K.,
and Kinashi, T.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
1956-1969[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Reedquist, K. A.,
Ross, E.,
Koop, E. A.,
Wolthuis, R. M. F.,
Zwartkruis, F. J. T.,
Van Kooyk, Y.,
Salmon, M.,
Buckley, C. D.,
and Bos, J. L.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
148,
1151-1158[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Suga, K.,
Katagiri, K.,
Kinashi, T.,
Harazaki, M.,
Iizuka, T.,
Hattori, M.,
and Minato, N.
(2001)
FEBS Lett.
489,
249-253[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Sebzda, E.,
Bracke, M.,
Tugal, T.,
Hogg, N.,
and Cantrell, D. A.
(2002)
Nat. Immunol.
3,
251-258[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Ohba, Y.,
Ikuta, K.,
Ogura, A.,
Matsuda, J.,
Mochizuki, N.,
Nagashima, K.,
Kurokawa, K.,
Mayer, B. J.,
Maki, K.,
Miyazaki, J.,
and Matsuda, M.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
3333-3341[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Zauli, G.,
Bassini, A.,
Vitale, M.,
Gibellini, D.,
Celeghini, C.,
Caramelli, E.,
Pierpaoli, S.,
Guidotti, L.,
and Capitani, S.
(1997)
Blood
89,
883-895[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Faraday, N.,
Rade, J. J.,
Johns, D. C.,
Khetawat, G.,
Noga, S. J.,
DiPersio, J. F.,
Jin, Y.,
Nichol, J. L.,
Haug, J. S.,
and Bray, P. F.
(1999)
Blood
94,
4084-4092[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Shiraga, M.,
Ritchie, A.,
Aidoudi, S.,
Baron, V.,
Wilcox, D.,
White, G.,
Ybarrondo, B.,
Murphy, G.,
Leavitt, A.,
and Shattil, S.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
147,
1419-1430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Faruqi, T. R.,
Weiss, E. J.,
Shapiro, M. J.,
Huang, W.,
and Coughlin, S. R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
19728-19734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Lengweiler, S.,
Smyth, S. S.,
Jirouskova, M.,
Scudder, L. E.,
Park, H.,
Moran, T.,
and Coller, B. S.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
262,
167-173[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Abrams, C.,
Deng, J.,
Steiner, B.,
and Shattil, S. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
18781-18788[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Adler, M.,
Lazarus, R. A.,
Dennis, M. S.,
and Wagner, G.
(1991)
Science
253,
445-448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Pampori, N.,
Hato, T.,
Stupack, D. G.,
Aidoudi, S.,
Cheresh, D. A.,
Nemerow, G. R.,
and Shattil, S. J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
21609-21616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
van den Berghe, N.,
Cool, R. H.,
Horn, G.,
and Wittinghofer, A.
(1997)
Oncogene
15,
845-850[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Shattil, S. J.,
Hoxie, J. A.,
Cunningham, M.,
and Brass, L. F.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
11107-11114[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Calderwood, D. A.,
Shattil, S. J.,
and Ginsberg, M. H.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
22607-22610[Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Peerschke, E. I. B.,
and Wainer, J. A.
(1985)
Am. J. Physiol.
248,
C466-C472[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Fox, J.,
Shattil, S. J.,
Kinlough-Rathbone, R.,
Richardson, M.,
Packham, M. A.,
and Sanan, D. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
7004-7011[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Wilcox, D. A.,
Olsen, J. C.,
Ishizawa, L.,
Bray, P. F.,
French, D. L.,
Steeber, D. A.,
Bell, W. R.,
Griffith, M.,
and White, G. C.
(2000)
Blood
95,
3645-3651[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Fischer, T. H.,
Gatling, M. N.,
Lacal, J.-C.,
and White, G. C.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
19405-19408[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Walter, U.,
Eigenthaler, M.,
Geiger, J.,
and Reinhard, M.
(1993)
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
344,
237-249[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Arai, A.,
Nosaka, Y.,
Kanda, E.,
Yamamoto, K.,
Miyasaka, N.,
and Miura, O.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
10453-10462[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Kawasaki, H.,
Springett, G. M.,
Toki, S.,
Canales, J. J.,
Harlan, P.,
Blumenstiel, J. P.,
Chen, E. J.,
Bany, I. A.,
Mochizuki, N.,
Ashbacher, A.,
Matsuda, M.,
Housman, D. E.,
and Graybiel, A. M.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
13278-13283[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Reuther, G. W.,
and Der, C. J.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
12,
157-165[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Self, A. J.,
Caron, E.,
Paterson, H. F.,
and Hall, A.
(2001)
J. Cell Sci.
114,
1357-1366[Abstract]
|
| 44.
|
Jin, T.-J.,
Satoh, T.,
Liao, Y.,
Song, C.,
Gao, X.,
Kariya, K., Hu, C.,
and Kataoka, T.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
30301-30307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Dupuy, A. J.,
Morgan, K.,
von Lintig, F. C.,
Shen, H.,
Acar, H.,
Hasz, D. E.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
Copeland, N. G.,
Boss, G. R.,
and Largaespada, D. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
11804-11811[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Wolthuis, R. M. F.,
Franke, B.,
Van Triest, M.,
Bauer, B.,
Cool, R. H.,
Camonis, J. H.,
Akkerman, J. W. N.,
and Bos, J. L.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
2486-2491[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Ohta, Y.,
Suzuki, N.,
Nakamura, S.,
Hartwig, J. H.,
and Stossel, T. P.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
2122-2128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Ezumi, Y.,
Uchiyama, T.,
and Takayama, H.
(1998)
Eur. J. Biochem.
258,
976-985[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Bazzoni, G.,
and Hemler, M. E.
(1998)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
23,
30-34[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Rittenhouse, S. E.
(1996)
Blood
88,
4401-4414[Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Zhang, Z.,
Vuori, K.,
Wang, H.-G.,
Reed, J. C.,
and Ruoshlati, E.
(1996)
Cell
85,
61-69[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Shibayama, H.,
Anzai, N.,
Braun, S. E.,
Fukuda, S.,
Mantel, C.,
and Broxmeyer, H. E.
(1999)
Blood
93,
1540-1548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Sethi, T.,
Ginsberg, M. H.,
Downward, J.,
and Hughes, P. E.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
1799-1809[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. S. Smyth, D. S. Woulfe, J. I. Weitz, C. Gachet, P. B. Conley, S. G. Goodman, M. T. Roe, A. Kuliopulos, D. J. Moliterno, P. A. French, et al.
G-Protein-Coupled Receptors as Signaling Targets for Antiplatelet Therapy
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
April 1, 2009;
29(4):
449 - 457.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-S. Lee, C. J. Lim, W. Puzon-McLaughlin, S. J. Shattil, and M. H. Ginsberg
RIAM Activates Integrins by Linking Talin to Ras GTPase Membrane-targeting Sequences
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 20, 2009;
284(8):
5119 - 5127.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Carmona, S. Gottig, A. Orlandi, J. Scheele, T. Bauerle, M. Jugold, F. Kiessling, R. Henschler, A. M. Zeiher, S. Dimmeler, et al.
Role of the small GTPase Rap1 for integrin activity regulation in endothelial cells and angiogenesis
Blood,
January 8, 2009;
113(2):
488 - 497.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Huang, D. Wu, H. Jin, D. Stupack, and J. Y.J. Wang
Induction of cell retraction by the combined actions of Abl-CrkII and Rho-ROCK1 signaling
J. Cell Biol.,
November 17, 2008;
183(4):
711 - 723.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. F. Guidetti, P. Lova, B. Bernardi, F. Campus, G. Baldanzi, A. Graziani, C. Balduini, and M. Torti
The Gi-coupled P2Y12 Receptor Regulates Diacylglycerol-mediated Signaling in Human Platelets
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 24, 2008;
283(43):
28795 - 28805.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Chu, A. Awasthi, G. C. White II, M. Chrzanowska-Wodnicka, and S. Malarkannan
Rap1b Regulates B Cell Development, Homing, and T Cell-Dependent Humoral Immunity
J. Immunol.,
September 1, 2008;
181(5):
3373 - 3383.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. G. Dupuy and E. Caron
Integrin-dependent phagocytosis - spreading from microadhesion to new concepts
J. Cell Sci.,
June 1, 2008;
121(11):
1773 - 1783.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. B. Reddy, D. M. Smith, and E. F. Plow
Analysis of Fyn function in hemostasis and {alpha}IIb{beta}3-integrin signaling
J. Cell Sci.,
May 15, 2008;
121(10):
1641 - 1648.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. A. Karim, W. Choi, and S. W. Whiteheart
Primary Platelet Signaling Cascades and Integrin-mediated Signaling Control ADP-ribosylation Factor (Arf) 6-GTP Levels during Platelet Activation and Aggregation
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 2, 2008;
283(18):
11995 - 12003.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K. Boudreaux, S. M. Schmutz, and P. S. French
Calcium Diacylglycerol Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor I (CalDAG-GEFI) Gene Mutations in a Thrombopathic Simmental Calf
Vet. Pathol.,
November 1, 2007;
44(6):
932 - 935.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Schoenwaelder, A. Ono, S. Sturgeon, S. M. Chan, P. Mangin, M. J. Maxwell, S. Turnbull, M. Mulchandani, K. Anderson, G. Kauffenstein, et al.
Identification of a Unique Co-operative Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Signaling Mechanism Regulating Integrin {alpha}IIbbeta3 Adhesive Function in Platelets
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 28, 2007;
282(39):
28648 - 28658.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Pasvolsky, S. W. Feigelson, S. S. Kilic, A. J. Simon, G. Tal-Lapidot, V. Grabovsky, J. R. Crittenden, N. Amariglio, M. Safran, A. M. Graybiel, et al.
A LAD-III syndrome is associated with defective expression of the Rap-1 activator CalDAG-GEFI in lymphocytes, neutrophils, and platelets
J. Exp. Med.,
July 9, 2007;
204(7):
1571 - 1582.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Itoh, C. M. Nelson, C. A. Myers, and M. J. Bissell
Rap1 Integrates Tissue Polarity, Lumen Formation, and Tumorigenic Potential in Human Breast Epithelial Cells
Cancer Res.,
May 15, 2007;
67(10):
4759 - 4766.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Lorenowicz, M. Fernandez-Borja, and P. L. Hordijk
cAMP Signaling in Leukocyte Transendothelial Migration
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
May 1, 2007;
27(5):
1014 - 1022.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kasirer-Friede, B. Moran, J. Nagrampa-Orje, K. Swanson, Z. M. Ruggeri, B. Schraven, B. G. Neel, G. Koretzky, and S. J. Shattil
ADAP is required for normal {alpha}IIb{beta}3 activation by VWF/GP Ib-IX-V and other agonists
Blood,
February 1, 2007;
109(3):
1018 - 1025.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Offermanns
Activation of Platelet Function Through G Protein-Coupled Receptors
Circ. Res.,
December 8, 2006;
99(12):
1293 - 1304.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Shankar, B. N. Kahner, J. Prabhakar, P. Lakhani, S. Kim, and S. P. Kunapuli
G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium channels regulate ADP-induced cPLA2 activity in platelets through Src family kinases
Blood,
November 1, 2006;
108(9):
3027 - 3034.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Holinstat, B. Voss, M. L. Bilodeau, J. N. McLaughlin, J. Cleator, and H. E. Hamm
PAR4, but Not PAR1, Signals Human Platelet Aggregation via Ca2+ Mobilization and Synergistic P2Y12 Receptor Activation
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 8, 2006;
281(36):
26665 - 26674.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Choi, Z. A. Karim, and S. W. Whiteheart
Arf6 plays an early role in platelet activation by collagen and convulxin
Blood,
April 15, 2006;
107(8):
3145 - 3152.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Bernardi, G. F. Guidetti, F. Campus, J. R. Crittenden, A. M. Graybiel, C. Balduini, and M. Torti
The small GTPase Rap1b regulates the cross talk between platelet integrin {alpha}2beta1 and integrin {alpha}IIbbeta3
Blood,
April 1, 2006;
107(7):
2728 - 2735.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Yuan, T. M. Leisner, A. W. McFadden, Z. Wang, M. K. Larson, S. Clark, C. Boudignon-Proudhon, S. C.-T. Lam, and L. V. Parise
CIB1 is an endogenous inhibitor of agonist-induced integrin {alpha}IIb{beta}3 activation
J. Cell Biol.,
January 17, 2006;
172(2):
169 - 175.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. S. Stork and T. J. Dillon
Multiple roles of Rap1 in hematopoietic cells: complementary versus antagonistic functions
Blood,
November 1, 2005;
106(9):
2952 - 2961.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Li, R. J. Greenwald, E. M. Lafuente, D. Tzachanis, A. Berezovskaya, G. J. Freeman, A. H. Sharpe, and V. A. Boussiotis
Rap1-GTP Is a Negative Regulator of Th Cell Function and Promotes the Generation of CD4+CD103+ Regulatory T Cells In Vivo
J. Immunol.,
September 1, 2005;
175(5):
3133 - 3139.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Prevost, D. S. Woulfe, H. Jiang, T. J. Stalker, P. Marchese, Z. M. Ruggeri, and L. F. Brass
Eph kinases and ephrins support thrombus growth and stability by regulating integrin outside-in signaling in platelets
PNAS,
July 12, 2005;
102(28):
9820 - 9825.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Campus, P. Lova, A. Bertoni, F. Sinigaglia, C. Balduini, and M. Torti
Thrombopoietin Complements Gi- but Not Gq-dependent Pathways for Integrin {alpha}IIb{beta}3 Activation and Platelet Aggregation
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 1, 2005;
280(26):
24386 - 24395.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Schultess, O. Danielewski, and A. P. Smolenski
Rap1GAP2 is a new GTPase-activating protein of Rap1 expressed in human platelets
Blood,
April 15, 2005;
105(8):
3185 - 3192.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. T. Dorsam, S. Kim, S. Murugappan, S. Rachoor, H. Shankar, J. Jin, and S. P. Kunapuli
Differential requirements for calcium and Src family kinases in platelet GPIIb/IIIa activation and thromboxane generation downstream of different G-protein pathways
Blood,
April 1, 2005;
105(7):
2749 - 2756.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Shattil and P. J. Newman
Integrins: dynamic scaffolds for adhesion and signaling in platelets
Blood,
September 15, 2004;
104(6):
1606 - 1615.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Shankar, S. Murugappan, S. Kim, J. Jin, Z. Ding, K. Wickman, and S. P. Kunapuli
Role of G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium channels in P2Y12 receptor-mediated platelet functional responses
Blood,
September 1, 2004;
104(5):
1335 - 1343.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. S. Price, A. Hajdo-Milasinovic, J. Zhao, F. J. T. Zwartkruis, J. G. Collard, and J. L. Bos
Rap1 Regulates E-cadherin-mediated Cell-Cell Adhesion
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 20, 2004;
279(34):
35127 - 35132.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Lova, F. Campus, R. Lombardi, M. Cattaneo, F. Sinigaglia, C. Balduini, and M. Torti
Contribution of Protease-activated Receptors 1 and 4 and Glycoprotein Ib-IX-V in the Gi-independent Activation of Platelet Rap1B by Thrombin
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 11, 2004;
279(24):
25299 - 25306.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Baron, G. R. Bolduc, M. B. Goldberg, T. C. Auperin, and L. C. Madoff
Alpha C Protein of Group B Streptococcus Binds Host Cell Surface Glycosaminoglycan and Enters Cells by an Actin-dependent Mechanism
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 4, 2004;
279(23):
24714 - 24723.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Caloca, J. L. Zugaza, M. Vicente-Manzanares, F. Sanchez-Madrid, and X. R. Bustelo
F-actin-dependent Translocation of the Rap1 GDP/GTP Exchange Factor RasGRP2
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 7, 2004;
279(19):
20435 - 20446.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kasirer-Friede, M. R. Cozzi, M. Mazzucato, L. De Marco, Z. M. Ruggeri, and S. J. Shattil
Signaling through GP Ib-IX-V activates {alpha}IIb{beta}3 independently of other receptors
Blood,
May 1, 2004;
103(9):
3403 - 3411.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Prevost, D. S. Woulfe, M. Tognolini, T. Tanaka, W. Jian, R. R. Fortna, H. Jiang, and L. F. Brass
Signaling by ephrinB1 and Eph kinases in platelets promotes Rap1 activation, platelet adhesion, and aggregation via effector pathways that do not require phosphorylation of ephrinB1
Blood,
February 15, 2004;
103(4):
1348 - 1355.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kinashi, M. Aker, M. Sokolovsky-Eisenberg, V. Grabovsky, C. Tanaka, R. Shamri, S. Feigelson, A. Etzioni, and R. Alon
LAD-III, a leukocyte adhesion deficiency syndrome associated with defective Rap1 activation and impaired stabilization of integrin bonds
Blood,
February 1, 2004;
103(3):
1033 - 1036.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G.A. Stouffer and S.S. Smyth
Effects of Thrombin on Interactions Between {beta}3-Integrins and Extracellular Matrix in Platelets and Vascular Cells
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
November 1, 2003;
23(11):
1971 - 1978.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. B. Riggins, L. A. Quilliam, and A. H. Bouton
Synergistic Promotion of c-Src Activation and Cell Migration by Cas and AND-34/BCAR3
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 18, 2003;
278(30):
28264 - 28273.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T.-T. Fujimoto, S. Katsutani, T. Shimomura, and K. Fujimura
Thrombospondin-bound Integrin-associated Protein (CD47) Physically and Functionally Modifies Integrin {alpha}IIb{beta}3 by Its Extracellular Domain
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 11, 2003;
278(29):
26655 - 26665.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Rehmann, A. Rueppel, J. L. Bos, and A. Wittinghofer
Communication between the Regulatory and the Catalytic Region of the cAMP-responsive Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Epac
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 20, 2003;
278(26):
23508 - 23514.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. T. de Bruyn, F. J. T. Zwartkruis, J. de Rooij, J.-W. N. Akkerman, and J. L. Bos
The Small GTPase Rap1 Is Activated by Turbulence and Is Involved in Integrin {alpha}IIb{beta}3-mediated Cell Adhesion in Human Megakaryocytes
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 13, 2003;
278(25):
22412 - 22417.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Newman and D. K. Newman
Signal Transduction Pathways Mediated by PECAM-1: New Roles for an Old Molecule in Platelet and Vascular Cell Biology
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
June 1, 2003;
23(6):
953 - 964.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. L. Delehanty, M. Mogass, S. L. Gonias, F. K. Racke, B. Johnstone, and A. N. Goldfarb
Stromal inhibition of megakaryocytic differentiation is associated with blockade of sustained Rap1 activation
Blood,
March 1, 2003;
101(5):
1744 - 1751.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Rangarajan, J. M. Enserink, H. B. Kuiperij, J. de Rooij, L. S. Price, F. Schwede, and J. L. Bos
Cyclic AMP induces integrin-mediated cell adhesion through Epac and Rap1 upon stimulation of the {beta}2-adrenergic receptor
J. Cell Biol.,
February 18, 2003;
160(4):
487 - 493.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K. Larson, H. Chen, M. L. Kahn, A. M. Taylor, J.-E. Fabre, R. M. Mortensen, P. B. Conley, and L. V. Parise
Identification of P2Y12-dependent and -independent mechanisms of glycoprotein VI-mediated Rap1 activation in platelets
Blood,
February 15, 2003;
101(4):
1409 - 1415.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Caron
Cellular functions of the Rap1 GTP-binding protein: a pattern emerges
J. Cell Sci.,
February 1, 2003;
116(3):
435 - 440.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Lova, S. Paganini, E. Hirsch, L. Barberis, M. Wymann, F. Sinigaglia, C. Balduini, and M. Torti
A Selective Role for Phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-Trisphosphate in the Gi-dependent Activation of Platelet Rap1B
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 3, 2003;
278(1):
131 - 138.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. C. Austin, J. E. B. Fox, G. H. Werstuck, A. R. Stafford, D. E. Bulman, G. Y. Dally, C. A. Ackerley, J. I. Weitz, and P. N. Ray
Identification of Dp71 Isoforms in the Platelet Membrane Cytoskeleton. POTENTIAL ROLE IN THROMBIN-MEDIATED PLATELET ADHESION
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 27, 2002;
277(49):
47106 - 47113.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Yang, J. Wu, H. Jiang, R. Mortensen, S. Austin, D. R. Manning, D. Woulfe, and L. F. Brass
Signaling through Gi Family Members in Platelets. REDUNDANCY AND SPECIFICITY IN THE REGULATION OF ADENYLYL CYCLASE AND OTHER EFFECTORS
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 22, 2002;
277(48):
46035 - 46042.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Eto, R. Murphy, S. W. Kerrigan, A. Bertoni, H. Stuhlmann, T. Nakano, A. D. Leavitt, and S. J. Shattil
Megakaryocytes derived from embryonic stem cells implicate CalDAG-GEFI in integrin signaling
PNAS,
October 1, 2002;
99(20):
12819 - 12824.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. T. de Bruyn, S. Rangarajan, K. A. Reedquist, C. G. Figdor, and J. L. Bos
The Small GTPase Rap1 Is Required for Mn2+- and Antibody-induced LFA-1- and VLA-4-mediated Cell Adhesion
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 9, 2002;
277(33):
29468 - 29476.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|