Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M200301200 on April 25, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 28, 25783-25790, July 12, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/28/25783    most recent
M200301200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Samuni, U.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Samuni, U.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Spectroscopically and Kinetically Distinct Conformational Populations of Sol-Gel-encapsulated Carbonmonoxy Myoglobin

A COMPARISON WITH HEMOGLOBIN*

Uri Samuni, David Dantsker, Imran Khan, Adam J. Friedman, Eric PetersonDagger, and Joel M. Friedman§

From the Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461

Received for publication, January 10, 2002, and in revised form, April 25, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have used sol-gel encapsulation protocols to trap kinetically and spectroscopically distinct conformational populations of native horse carbonmonoxy myoglobin. The method allows for direct comparison of functional and spectroscopic properties of equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations under the same temperature and viscosity conditions. The results implicate tertiary structure changes that include the proximal heme environment in the mechanism for population-specific differences in the observed rebinding kinetics. Differences in the resonance Raman frequency of nu (Fe-His), the iron-proximal histidine stretching mode, are attributed to differences in the positioning of the F helix. For myoglobin, the degree of separation between the F helix and the heme is assigned as the conformational coordinate that modulates both this frequency and the innermost barrier controlling CO rebinding. A comparison with the behavior of encapsulated derivatives of human adult hemoglobin indicates that these CO binding-induced conformational changes are qualitatively similar to the tertiary changes that occur within both the R and T quaternary states. Protein-specific differences in the time scale for the proposed F helix relaxation are attributed to variations in the intra-helical hydrogen bonding patterns that help stabilize the position of the F helix.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Myoglobin (Mb)1 continues to be used as a model protein system for investigations into how structure, dynamics, and reactivity interconnect to give rise to functionality. Recently there has been a renewed interest in myoglobin based on several new developments. From a functional point of view there are indications and suggestions that, apart from its physiological importance in facilitating oxygen diffusion, myoglobin has functions arising from its ability to participate in catalytic multisubstrate reactions involving such molecules as NO, O2, and H2O2 (1-3). In addition the presence of apolar intra-protein substrate docking sites (the so-called Xe cavities) (4, 5) have recently been linked both to these newly proposed functions and to the kinetic patterns associated with geminate and bimolecular ligand binding (3, 6-13).

These new developments highlight fundamental biophysical issues that have not been fully addressed despite the extensive research effort that has been directed toward myoglobin. The issue that we address in this work relates to ligand reactivity as a function of conformation. Several studies show that myoglobin can adopt different tertiary conformations. In particular there is evidence that the equilibrium distribution of tertiary conformations is different for the deoxy (ferrous five coordinate) and CO derivatives of Mb. X-ray crystallographic studies show that there is a small clam shell-like rotation of the E and F helices in going from deoxy to COMb (14) as well as adjustments in the positioning of residues in the distal heme pocket (8-10, 15, 16) that may or may not be related to the clam shell motion. Recent time-resolved x-ray crystallographic studies of photodissociated COMb (17) indicate that these motions can occur on the subnanosecond time scale. Raman (18-23) and absorption studies (24-30), in which the equilibrium deoxy derivative is compared with the non-equilibrium deoxy derivative derived from the photodissociation of COMb under conditions where there is either no or slowed relaxation of the photoproduct, indicate that the proximal heme environment is different in the two cases. How and through what mechanism these different tertiary conformations impact ligand reactivity are uncertain.

A complication in addressing the role of conformational relaxation arises from the difficulty in trapping COMb derivatives having different tertiary structure distributions at the same temperature under ambient conditions. In this study, we describe the use of sol-gel encapsulation as a method of trapping different tertiary conformations of COMb that allows for both spectroscopic and functional characterization at the same ambient conditions.

Relatively inert and transparent amorphous sol-gel matrices, composed of a porous network of silica-oxygen-silica bonds have been prepared under conditions that allow for the non-destructive encapsulation of proteins (31-33). In most instances the trapped protein molecules are isolated and immobile, preventing any possible complications due to aggregation. Advantageously, the porous matrix does allow water and small molecules to diffuse in and out. Thus, when the matrix is placed in a bathing buffer, the encapsulated proteins are solvated and their function can be examined and compared with solution phase work. Studies have revealed that the encapsulated proteins remain intact and functional. For example encapsulated hemeproteins undergo ligand binding and dissociation as well as redox reactions (32, 34). Many encapsulated enzymes have been shown to retain enzymatic activity within the sol-gel matrix (35). The sol-gel matrix also seems to confer enhanced structural stability (36-38).

Most significantly, with respect to the present project, sol-gel encapsulation has been shown to limit conformational change in hemoglobin. Oxygen binding (39-42), kinetic (43, 44), and spectroscopic (45, 46) studies all indicate that the sol-gel can be used to stabilize the quaternary state conformation of the initially encapsulated derivative to the extent that subsequent addition or removal of ligand does not induce the usual quaternary state transition that occurs in solution. As a result non-equilibrium species associated with the liganded T state and the deoxy R state can be generated and studied. Furthermore, the sol-gel-induced slowing of the conformational dynamics is dramatically dependent on temperature (40, 45, 46). The tertiary and quaternary relaxation times can be tuned from essentially days or weeks at 4 °C to hours and minutes as the temperature is progressively raised (46).

Potentially, this sol-gel property opens the way to overcome the "diffusional barrier" that exists in rapid mix experiments, where the diffusion time of ligands/reactants is often longer than the time it takes for conformational relaxation. Encapsulation can extend the relaxation time beyond the diffusion time for small substrate molecules. Thus, encapsulation of proteins in sol-gel may become a new method both for trapping non-equilibrium species and for studying the evolution of short-lived non-equilibrium structures. In this work we show that the sol-gel-based approach of "locking in" of the quaternary structure of Hb can be applied to the much smaller amplitude motions associated with the ligation-dependent tertiary structure of myoglobin. As a result we are able to expose the ligation-induced conformational and functional changes in myoglobin at a temperature well above the glass transition. The Soret band-enhanced resonance Raman spectrum is used to characterize the proximal environment of the 8-ns photoproduct as a function of trapped conformation (47, 48), whereas the geminate and solvent phase rebinding of CO is used to expose the functional consequences of conformation (11, 12).

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Buffered solutions of filtered horse Mb (Sigma Chemical Co.) were prepared in either BisTris acetate, pH 6.5, or the same with 25% or 50% glycerol by volume. All chemicals were from Aldrich. To improve the degree of locking in, the original sol-gel preparation protocol (32) was modified as previously described (43) by avoiding sonication and by changing the buffer to 50 mM BisTris acetate, pH 6.5, diluted 3:1 with glycerol to yield 25% glycerol by volume. The gels were cast as thin films in 10-mm NMR tubes. Equal volumes of tetramethylorthosilicate, buffer, and Mb were combined and added to the NMR tubes (New Era and Willmad). The tubes were then spun using a high speed spinner (Princeton Photonics Inc., Princeton, NJ) to generate the thin film that eventually gelled after approximately 1 h of spinning. The samples were flushed and covered with buffer and then allowed to age a minimum of 1 day at 4 °C. The final concentration of Mb was 0.5 mM. DeoxyMb samples were prepared from nitrogen-purged solutions of metMb to which a slight excess of sodium dithionite (solution) was added. All solutions and gels were prepared in and stored under anaerobic conditions. The spinner was contained and operated within a nitrogen-purged glove box.

The preparations for both visible resonance Raman and transient absorption were as described earlier (38). In addition to the visible resonance Raman measurements described below, absorption, front-face fluorescence, and UV resonance Raman measurements on samples of Mb encapsulated using this protocol all indicate that the native structure is maintained.

Scheme 1 shows the two types of encapsulated samples that were prepared. In one case COMb is directly encapsulated in sol-gel. This protocol or sample type is denoted [COMb]. For the other protocol, deoxyMb is encapsulated in the sol-gel, and is denoted as [deoxyMb]. The Mb encapsulated in sol-gels was found to be intact and functional by exhibiting the unperturbed absorption spectra of the corresponding solution phase samples (not shown). The samples were aged at ~4 °C, to allow the evolving gel to "template" around the equilibrium structure of the encapsulated Mb derivative to maximize the likelihood of locking in the initial distribution of conformations. After the encapsulated deoxyMb sample was allowed to age (1-5 days) and its spectra were recorded it was then exposed to CO. Rapid (within 5 min or less) ligation with CO occurred as determined by the characteristic changes in the visible absorption spectrum. Such samples are denoted [deoxyMb]+CO to indicate that the CO is added after encapsulation. A similar two-protocol approach was used to prepare the COHbA locked in either the R or the T quaternary state (43).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Scheme 1.  


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Visible Resonance Raman Spectra, A Comparison of Sol-Gel-encapsulated Samples-- Fig. 1 contains segments of Soret-enhanced resonance Raman spectra for both myoglobin and hemoglobin samples. The resonance Raman spectra from the sol-gel-encapsulated samples are very similar to those of the corresponding solution phase samples (as shown in the inset of Fig. 1) indicating that the protein conformation is not altered by the sol-gel matrix to any significant degree. Nonetheless, for some of the sol-gel-encapsulated samples there are differences in the frequency of the iron-proximal histidine mode, nu (Fe-His). Table I contains a summary of the relevant peak frequencies for nu (Fe-His). Fig. 1 displays a section of the visible resonance Raman spectrum, comparing the Raman band arising from nu (Fe-His) for [deoxyMb] (A), the 8-ns photoproduct of [deoxyMb]+CO (B), and the 8-ns photoproduct of [COMb] (C). Also shown are the solution phase spectra for deoxyMb (D) and the 8-ns photoproduct of COMb (E). The absolute peak positions are accurate to ~0.5 cm-1 based on repeated spectral acquisitions. Peak position differences for nu (Fe-His) obtained when comparing spectra from different samples are accurate to within 0.2 cm-1 on average when the spectra are generated under similar conditions on the same day.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Visible (Soret-enhanced) resonance Raman spectra of deoxy derivatives and of the 8-ns photoproduct of CO-liganded derivatives of solution and sol-gel-encapsulated Mb and HbA. The Raman spectra of the region showing the nu (Fe-His) band for: A, [deoxyMb] (blue trace); B, [deoxyMb]+CO (red trace); C, [COMb] (green trace); D, deoxyMb (blue trace); E, COMb (green trace); F, [deoxyMb]+CO+100% glycerol stored for 1 year (red trace); G, [COMb]+100% glycerol stored for 1 year (green trace); H, [deoxyHbA] (blue trace); I, [deoxyHbA]+CO (red trace); J, [COHbA] (green trace). The inset shows a larger Raman shift range for: a, [COMb] (green trace); b, [deoxyMb]+CO (blue trace); c, [COHbA] (green trace); d, [deoxyHbA]+CO (blue trace). The traces were baseline-corrected and normalized to the nu (Fe-His) band (to nu 7 for the traces in the inset). All solutions were 50 mM BisTris acetate, pH 6.5; all sol-gels were bathed in a 50 mM BisTris acetate, pH 6.5, buffer with 25% glycerol (except for traces F and G, which are bathed in 100% CO-saturated glycerol). Throughout this report, bracketed specie names signify the state of the protein at the time of encapsulation; whereas, the plus sign is followed by the chemicals added to the sample after the sol-gel has undergone aging for at least 24 h.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
nu (Fe-His) frequency for Mb and Hb generated from either equilibrium deoxy derivatives or the 8-ns photoproduct of the CO-saturated derivative
Samples are: in solution, in a buffer-bathed sol-gel (indicated by brackets), or in glycerol-bathed sol-gel (indicated by brackets and "+gly").

The frequency of nu (Fe-His) for [deoxyMb] is very close to that of the corresponding solution phase sample. Whereas in solution, the frequency of nu (Fe-His) for the 8-ns photoproduct of COMb is only a fraction of a cm-1 higher than for the equilibrium deoxyMb sample as previously reported (23, 49, 50), in the sol-gel it is higher by ~2 cm-1. This increase is also seen for COMb samples in highly viscous media (23) and for the unrelaxed picosecond photoproduct of COMb in solution (51). The frequency of nu (Fe-His) for the 8-ns photoproduct of [deoxyMb]+CO is slightly higher than for the [deoxyMb] sample but is still clearly lower than for [COMb]. Traces F and G illustrate the consequence of replacing the bathing buffer with 100% CO-saturated glycerol for the 8-ns photoproduct Raman spectrum of [deoxyMb]+CO and [COMb], respectively. The added glycerol has the effect of increasing the frequency of nu (Fe-His) for both samples (see Table I); nevertheless, the frequency difference between the two photoproduct populations is still maintained. It is noted that traces F and G are for samples that have been kept for about a year in a cold room, after CO exposure, demonstrating that trapping of non-equilibrium structures for extended periods of time can be achieved.

Fig. 1 also shows the Fe-His bands of sol-gel-encapsulated HbA, prepared using similar protocols ([deoxyHbA] (H); [deoxyHbA]+CO (I); and [COHbA] (J)). Based on the kinetics and UV resonance Raman spectra from such samples (43, 45, 46), we have unambiguously established that, in the first two samples, HbA is locked in the T quaternary structure and in the last it is locked in the R quaternary structure. The spectra from the two equilibrium forms, [deoxyHbA] and the 8-ns photoproduct of [COHbA], are both identical to the corresponding spectra obtained in solution (see inset in Fig. 1 and Table I). It can be seen that the frequency of nu (Fe-His) for the photoproduct of the liganded T state derivative, [deoxyHbA]+CO, is clearly higher than that of the deoxy T state but substantially lower than that of the R state photoproduct. This frequency is similar to what has been reported for either mutant Hbs stabilized in the T state even when fully liganded (52) and for the early time photoproduct of T state NOHbA+IHP (53). Not shown is the spectrum obtained from a sample of [oxyHbA], which had been deoxygenated through the addition of dithionite after gelation and aging. In this case the frequency of nu (Fe-His) is ~223 cm-1, a value much lower than that of the R state photoproduct but at a value in the frequency range for mutant or modified ferrous Hbs and transient forms that are in the R state despite being ligand free (54-58).

Geminate and Solvent Phase Rebinding Kinetics-- The question now arises as to whether the spectroscopically distinct encapsulated COMb samples are also functionally distinct. For Hb such a correlation exists. Earlier work on encapsulated HbA clearly shows a progression in the geminate recombination that parallels the changes in the quaternary state (43, 44). The geminate yield for T state COHbA is substantially lower than that of R state COHbA. The kinetics for the solvent phase rebinding associated with the encapsulated CO derivatives of HbA show a direct correspondence to kinetic phases that are observed in solution (70). Whereas in solution both the slow T state and fast R state solvent phases are observed, for the encapsulated HbA samples only one solvent phase is seen. The encapsulated T state COHbA derivative, [deoxyHbA]+CO, and the encapsulated R state COHbA derivative, [COHbA], exhibit the slow T state and fast R state solvent phase recombination phases, respectively.

Fig. 2 shows a comparison of the kinetic traces of CO rebinding to photodissociated COMb under different conditions. In the top panel, there is a comparison of the kinetics at 3.5 °C for COMb in solution (trace a), [deoxyMb]+CO bathed in buffer (trace b), and [COMb] bathed in buffer (trace c) where the CO saturated buffer in all three cases contains 25% glycerol. It can be seen that the geminate yield increases in going from solution, to [deoxyMb]+CO, to [COMb]. It can also be seen that the solvent phase kinetics for the encapsulated samples are different both from each other and from the solution sample. The near vertical decay seen for the solution sample is characteristic of the expected exponential kinetics. Both encapsulated samples exhibit solvent phase kinetic traces that show a sloping decay suggestive of a distribution of rates. The distribution for [COMb] clearly consists of a faster rebinding kinetic population compared with that of [deoxyMb]. Again the pattern is similar to what is seen for the comparison of kinetics from [COHbA] and [deoxyHbA]+CO, but the magnitude of the protocol-specific differences is smaller for the Mb samples as might be anticipated from the Raman results. The Mb kinetic differences are similar in magnitude to the variation in the kinetic pattern within a given quaternary state of encapsulated Hb due to such factors such as the presence or absence of allosteric effectors or chemical modification (e.g. modification of beta 93-SH) (44).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   The recombination kinetics of CO to photodissociated COMb in sol-gel and solution environments subsequent to an 8-ns, 532-nm laser pulse. The kinetics values are displayed on a log-log plot of normalized absorbance versus time. The top panel shows the kinetics at 3.5 °C from COMb in solution (trace a), [deoxyMb]+CO (trace b), and [COMb] (trace c) with the bathing buffer containing 25% by volume glycerol. The middle panel shows the kinetics at 3.5 °C from COMb in solution (trace d), [deoxyMb]+CO (trace e), and [COMb] (trace f) with the bathing buffer containing 50% by volume glycerol. The bottom panel shows the kinetics at -15 °C from [deoxyMb]+CO (trace g), and [COMb] (trace h) with the bathing buffer consisting of CO-saturated pure glycerol. Traces g and h were obtained from glycerol bathed sol-gel samples stored at 4 °C for a period of several months. In the top two panels the bathing buffer used for the sol-gel samples in each panel was also the solvent used to prepare the solution phase sample whose kinetics are displayed in the corresponding panel.

The second panel in Fig. 2 depicts the kinetic traces at 3.5 °C for the same three types of samples as above, but in each case the buffer used both for the solution phase sample and for the bathing solvent for the two sol-gel samples contains 50% glycerol. The pattern observed in the upper panel is further enhanced in this comparison. The geminate yield increases in going from solution (trace d) to [deoxyMb]+CO (trace e) to [COMb] (trace f). The geminate yield for both of the encapsulated samples is enhanced over that of the corresponding samples bathed in buffer containing 25% glycerol, but the protocol-specific difference remains. It is also apparent that the solvent phase rebinding is again faster for the [COMb] sample.

In the bottom panel a kinetic comparison is shown for the two encapsulated samples, but in this case the bathing solvent is CO-saturated glycerol and the temperature is reduced to -15 °C to further increase the viscosity. The addition of 100% glycerol and the further cooling is used both to eliminate possible differences due to conformational relaxation and to further enhance the geminate rebinding phase (23, 28, 59-64). The results obtained from kinetic studies of [COHbA] in the presence of glycerol clearly indicate that the glycerol diffuses into the sol-gel and imparts substantially enhanced local viscosity to the encapsulated protein (43). An earlier study on a COMb sample in 90% glycerol at ~270 K showed that relaxation of the photoproduct does not occur at least out to 10 µs and that the geminate yield is greatly enhanced (25). In a recent study (65) of the rebinding kinetics of COMb and COMb mutants in a trehalose glass, the different kinetic phases seen in the third panel were assigned to geminate rebinding arising from CO localized in different cavities within the protein (see below). Rebinding directly from the distal heme pocket gives rise to the fastest phase, and progressively slower phases derive from progressively more distant xenon cavities (e.g. Xe4 and Xe1).

The two kinetic traces shown in the bottom panel of Fig. 2 are from samples of [deoxyMb]+CO (trace g) and [COMb] (trace h), which had been stored at 4 °C for a period of several months. The kinetic traces of [deoxyMb]+CO and [COMb] exhibit a clear difference. The kinetic traces show that the amplitudes for the faster geminate phases are larger for the [COMb] sample. This observation indicates that the dissociated ligand has a greater probability of rebinding from the more distant cavities for the conformation(s) associated with the [deoxyMb]+CO sample.

The sample-specific difference seen in the bottom panel is observed to very slowly decrease with time. A comparison with the kinetic traces obtained shortly after the samples were bathed with glycerol reveals a larger difference due to the kinetics from the [deoxyMb]+CO sample having an even lower amplitude for the faster geminate phases. The change in kinetics over time indicates that there is a small amount of relaxation associated with the non-equilibrium [deoxyMb]+CO sample over a period of many months. This relaxation is in the direction of the [deoxyMb]+CO sample evolving toward a population similar to that of the [COMb] sample. In the absence of added glycerol, the kinetic difference between the two sol-gel samples exhibits substantial decay over a period of days to weeks.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Fe-His Stretching Frequency-- To assess the significance of the nu (Fe-His) frequency differences seen for the Mb samples requires an understanding of the conformational factors effecting this frequency. The following description is a framework for evaluating these shifts. This description is derived from a syntheses of the many experimental and theoretical contributions that have focused either on the behavior of nu (Fe-His) or elements of structure, which are directly related to the positioning of the iron and the proximal histidine (47, 48, 50, 51, 53, 54, 66-77).

Determinants of the Equilibrium Frequency of nu (Fe-His)-- There are two major conformational factors that contribute significantly to the frequency differences among equilibrium deoxy derivatives of myoglobins and hemoglobins. These two factors are the relative orientation of the proximal histidine with respect to the heme and the packing or positioning of the F helix above the heme.

The orientation of the histidine determines the magnitude of the repulsive interaction between the imidazole and the heme. Orientations of the imidazole that have increased repulsive interactions (e.g. the tilted histidine for the alpha  heme in T state deoxyHbA) favor a configuration of the heme that has the iron with a greater displacement out of the heme plane. An increase in the displacement of the iron is associated with a decrease in the frequency of nu (Fe-His) (66, 77).

The positioning of the F helix can be expected to modulate the orientation effects of the proximal histidine with respect to the frequency of nu (Fe-His). It is likely that the strong repulsive interactions between the imidazole and the heme dictate the displacement of the iron above the heme plane. For a given displacement, there is an optimal iron-imidazole bond length that would be achieved for the protein-free imidazole derivative. If, through intra-protein interactions, the F-helix is highly constrained at a fixed position above the heme, the iron-imidazole bond length may be either compressed or expanded relative to the optimal length that would occur either in a model system or in a protein where the positioning of the F-helix is fully responsive to the iron displacement. Compression and expansion of the bond will increase and decrease the frequency of nu (Fe-His), respectively.

In addition to the above two conformational factors, there are an additional two physical properties that can modify the frequency of nu (Fe-His): the hydration status of the heme environment and the strength of the hydrogen bond associated with the Ndelta of the proximal histidine. For deoxyMb, the loss of water from the heme environment, either through osmotic effects (23) or the replacement of distal residues with more hydrophobic residues (72), results in a maximum 2-cm-1 decrease in the frequency of nu (Fe-His). Enhancing and weakening of the hydrogen bond associated with the Ndelta of the proximal histidine have been shown to increase and decrease the frequency of nu (Fe-His), respectively (69, 78), although these effects are not likely to be a factor for Mb and Hb.

Determinants of the Frequency of nu (Fe-His) for the Early Time Photoproduct-- The spectra of the photoproduct of COMb and COHb are determined by the initial events occurring subsequent to photodissociation. It has been shown that the displacement of the iron out of the heme plane upon photodissociation occurs within a fraction of a picosecond (79, 80). Under most circumstances this seemingly ballistic motion will precede any relaxation involving movements in the alpha  helices that have been triggered by the dissociation. Thus, in general, there is an adiabatic type partitioning of the early events in that, within the first picosecond, the iron has undergone a displacement out of the heme plane and the overall tertiary structure remains that of the initial liganded species. At some later time, the tertiary structure begins to respond. Whereas the time scale for the protein relaxation is highly dependent on solution conditions to the extent that they can be greatly slowed by enhancing the solution viscosity, the rapid motion of the iron appears insensitive to environmental factors. There is Raman evidence that the iron displacement can be inhibited only at liquid helium temperatures (18, 20, 21, 48).

Under the experimental conditions employed in the present study, the photoproduct frequency of nu (Fe-His) will reflect a species (or population) where the iron has undergone displacement and the key variable in determining frequency differences will be the extent to which the protein tertiary structure has evolved. Under conditions where the encapsulated samples are bathed with 100% glycerol, the expectation is that the photoproduct spectra will reflect a population that has the iron out of the heme plane but with the tertiary structure still largely reflective of the distribution of conformations associated with the initial liganded derivative.

Encapsulated Mb: Conformational Consequences-- The spectra of deoxyMb in solution and in the sol-gel (with buffer as the bathing medium) are essentially the same. In particular there is no obvious frequency shift in nu (Fe-His). This result indicates that the encapsulation protocol does not perturb the equilibrium conformational distribution of deoxyMb and does not exert any undue osmotic stress on the heme environment. The addition of high concentrations of glycerol to the encapsulated deoxyMb sample does induce a reduction in the frequency2 that is seen in solution (23).

The photoproduct spectrum of [COMb] resembles the spectra obtained from COMb in solutions that contain significant amounts of viscosity-enhancing reagents such as 75% or higher glycerol (by volume) (23). It is also similar to the unrelaxed spectrum of the COMb photoproduct occurring within several picoseconds after photodissociation (51). Thus the sol-gel clearly creates an environment that slows or stops the subnanosecond relaxation, which occurs in low viscosity solutions. The addition of pure glycerol as the bathing buffer further increases the frequency of nu (Fe-His) over the increase achieved through encapsulation. This "upper limit" frequency is the same as that which we obtain from samples of COMb embedded in an ultra high viscosity glass matrix derived from trehalose. Earlier studies show that increasing the viscosity slows and eventually stops the tertiary relaxation of photodissociated COMb (23, 25, 28, 59, 60, 62, 64, 81-86). These findings all indicate that the distribution of photoproduct conformations being probed for the [COMb] +100% glycerol sample is reflective of the initial liganded protein but with the iron displaced out of the heme plane (and the heme geometry appropriately modified).

Both static and time-resolved x-ray crystallographic studies of Mb (14, 17) implicate the shifting of the F helix as a major contributor to the relaxation dependence of nu (Fe-His). It appears that there is a clam-shell type rotation of the E and F helices upon switching from the deoxy to CO derivative. For the CO derivative the F helix is more tightly packed over the heme. Relaxation of the F helix away from the heme upon photodissociation of COMb in a crystal has been observed to occur within nanoseconds of photodissociation (17). Picosecond IR absorption studies on photodissociated COMb also indicate that substantial relaxation of the F helix occurs on the picosecond time scale (87). Based on these findings, we attribute the high frequency end point for the 8-ns photoproduct nu (Fe-His) ([COMb]+100% glycerol, COMb in trehalose glass) as arising from a situation where the F helix has not yet shifted from its COMb position. As a consequence, the Fe-His bond is compressed yielding an increased frequency for nu (Fe-His). In solution the F helix shifts on a subnanosecond time scale accounting for the rapid picosecond decrease in the frequency of nu (Fe-His) subsequent to photodissociation of COMb (51) and the minimal frequency difference seen between deoxyMb and the 8-ns photoproduct of COMb (23, 49, 50). This rapid shifting is likely to account for at least some of the rapid picosecond relaxation observed (88) for Band III, a near IR charge transfer band sensitive to both proximal and distal effects (18, 72, 89-91).

The frequency of nu (Fe-His) for the 8-ns photoproduct of the [COMb] sample bathed with buffer containing 25% glycerol is lower than that of the [COMb]+100% glycerol sample yet higher than that of COMb in just the buffer (also containing 25% glycerol). In the context of the above discussion, it would appear that the sol-gel allows some relaxation of the initial conformation within the 8-ns time period but clearly not to the extent seen in solution. The question now arises as to whether the sol-gel is merely slowing the full relaxation process that occurs within solution or is imposing limitations as to the extent of relaxation, i.e. whether the sol-gel actually traps a conformational population that has a bounded range of accessible nu (Fe-His) frequencies.

Evidence That the Sol-Gel Traps Conformational Populations of Mb-- If the sol-gel merely slows relaxation, then the end point spectra for [COMb] and [deoxyMb]+CO should eventually be the same both for the buffer-bathed and glycerol-bathed samples. The results clearly show that the spectra from the two samples are not the same. Although both samples exhibit a frequency increase for nu (Fe-His) upon addition of the 100% glycerol, the frequency for the [COMb] sample is always higher. This result is consistent with the sol-gel biasing the encapsulated population toward that of the initially encapsulated Mb derivative. Thus the range of accessible frequencies for nu (Fe-His) for the [deoxyMb]+CO sample is bounded by the constraints of the overall deoxyMb tertiary structure, whereas for [COMb] the bounded range is determined by the tertiary conformation of COMb. The glycerol-bathed samples yield different upper frequency limits for the 8-ns photoproduct, reflecting a different upper limit for each of the initially trapped populations.

Comparison between [COHbA] and [COMb]-- That the sol-gel imposes protocol-specific limits on accessible proximal conformations for the encapsulated Mb populations is very suggestive (but on a smaller scale) of the behavior observed in hemoglobins. For hemoglobins there is a bounded range of accessible tertiary proximal hemepocket conformations that are distinctly different for the T and R quaternary states. As with Mb, the low frequency limit for the frequency of nu (Fe-His) is achieved for the deoxy derivatives, but the T state has a lower limit (~214 cm-1) than the R state (~ 220 cm-1). Similarly the upper limit for the range of accessible values for this frequency is achieved for the unrelaxed photoproduct of fully liganded derivatives, with the unrelaxed R state species having a higher upper limit (230 cm-1) than the unrelaxed T state species (~222 cm-1). A comparison of the behavior of Mb and Hb with respect to ligand binding-induced tertiary conformational changes as reflected in the proximal heme pocket indicates a similar trend for both proteins.

Within either the T or the R state quaternary structure, ligand binding induces tertiary structure changes that result in an increase in the frequency of nu (Fe-His). As suggested from x-ray crystallographic data (92-97), it appears that the quaternary structure sets boundaries for a range of accessible ligation state-dependent tertiary conformations. The pattern observed for Mb is very similar to that seen for Hb within either quaternary state. Ligand binding induces tertiary structure changes that increase the frequency of nu (Fe-His). This similarity is consistent with the proposed E-F helix clam-shell type rotational motions for both Mb (14) and HbA (58, 98). It is also interesting that both the high and low frequency end point values for Mb and Hb are not the same. The higher frequency for the R state photoproduct (230 vis à vis 223 cm-1) has been attributed to the quaternary enhancement effect due to a quaternary structure-induced compaction of the Fe-His bond (69, 98); whereas, the lower deoxy T state value (~205 cm-1 for the T state deoxy alpha  subunit vis à vis 220 cm-1 for deoxyMb) is due to a quaternary constraint that induces a proximal strain on the alpha  subunit through a tilting of the proximal imidazole (47, 48, 52, 54, 55, 99).

Although the 8-ns photoproduct frequency of nu (Fe-His) for [COHbA] is identical to the solution phase value, the value is higher for [COMb]. This difference in the behavior of the two proteins is readily explained based on their respective relaxation properties. Both proteins undergo a substantial slowing in the tertiary relaxation of the photoproduct with increasing viscosity (23, 25, 62, 64, 83-85, 88, 100). In the case of aqueous COMb, the relaxation is largely complete within tens of picoseconds but with some residual components persisting well beyond 10 ns (23, 28, 48, 50, 51, 62, 64, 82, 88, 101-103). In dramatic contrast, for COHbA, the tertiary relaxation does not begin until several nanoseconds subsequent to photodissociation (48, 57, 58, 103-106). Consequently, slowing down the relaxation will, in the case of Mb, eventually allow the unrelaxed photoproduct to persist to beyond nanoseconds, whereas for HbA, the photoproduct already persists beyond nanoseconds. This assessment is consistent with our observation that, for COHbA, there is no change in the 8-ns photoproduct frequency of nu (Fe-His) in going from aqueous buffer to either a solution with added glycerol (100) or to an ultra high viscosity trehalose glass matrix (107). In contrast, the addition of glycerol to the solution or the use of a trehalose glass results in an increase in the frequency for the 8-ns photoproduct of COMb.

An obvious question arises: Why is the tertiary relaxation in myoglobin so much faster than in hemoglobin even though both tertiary relaxations are purported to be a similar clam shell type rotation of the E-F helices? A likely explanation is that for hemoglobin there is an extensive series of hydrogen bonds and salt bridges functioning as scaffolding that maintains the spacing between pairs of alpha  helices (71, 98, 108, 109). By damping rapid change in inter-helical spacing, the scaffolding will slow the response time of the E-F helices to the sudden local changes associated with ligand dissociation/association. Enhancement of this scaffolding has been invoked to account for dramatic slowing in tertiary relaxation seen in the mutant hemoglobin, Hb(Ypsilanti) (98).

Thus, in R state HbA, we attribute the increase in the frequency of nu (Fe-His) in going from the deoxy R derivative to the 8-ns photoproduct to a compression of the Fe-His bond for the photoproduct due to the intra-protein damping of the F helix motion away from the heme. In contrast, for COMb the increase in the frequency for the 8-ns photoproduct is apparent only when the external viscosity damps the rapid motion of the F helix that leads to the subnanosecond decompression of the Fe-His bond that is seen in solution.

Functional Consequences-- The sol-gel kinetic results parallel the Raman results. There is a consistent difference in the kinetics between the [deoxyMb]+CO and [COMb] samples independent of the bathing buffer. For both samples, the geminate yield (GY) increases when the bathing buffer contains increasing amounts of glycerol (25 to 50%); nonetheless, the GY is always higher for the [COMb] sample. Similarly, the distribution of rates for the solvent phase rebinding is skewed toward faster values for the [COMb] sample. When the bathing solvent is 100% glycerol (CO-saturated), the kinetic trace consists of several geminate phases that have been attributed to rebinding arising from the CO localized in different xenon cavities (65). Under this high viscosity limit it can be seen that the GY for the faster phases is greater for the [COMb] sample. These results are consistent with the sol-gel trapping populations that are not only spectroscopically distinct but also functionally distinct.

The protocol dependence of the Raman suggests a possible basis for the difference in the kinetics. The frequency of nu (Fe-His) has been related to proximal strain that is a measure of the protein-related amount of extra work needed to move the iron into the heme plane upon ligand binding (47, 48, 52-54, 99, 110-112). The lower the frequency, the greater is the energetic cost of creating a stable six-coordinate ferrous heme derivative. To the extent that the kinetic barrier is determined in part by a transition state that has the iron at least partially moved toward the heme plane, as is believed to be the case for the CO ligand (47, 113, 114), the binding rate will be responsive to proximal strain. This assessment is consistent with pressure studies on Mb in which increased pressure both increases the frequency of nu (Fe-His) and increases the geminate yield (115). In the case of the Mb samples, the difference in the kinetics arising from proximal effects would stem from the positioning of the F helix. In the case of the photodissociated glycerol-bathed [COMb] sample, the F helix is already at the equilibrium COMb position and consequently there is no extra "proximal" work associated with moving the iron back into the heme plane upon CO rebinding. For samples whose photoproduct spectra exhibit frequencies for nu (Fe-His) that are less than the upper limit, the rebinding of CO requires the extra work of moving the F helix. In the absence of any modification of the heme-histidine stereochemistry (e.g. tilting or rotation), which alters the steric interactions between the heme and the proximal imidazole, the range of accessible values of nu (Fe-His) is an indication of the dynamic range for the positioning of the F helix above the heme.

Conclusions-- A new sol-gel encapsulation protocol is shown to successfully maintain (lock) both equilibrium and non-equilibrium conformational distributions of myoglobin. It is not clear how the sol-gel locks the conformational populations of Mb. A pure viscosity effect seems unlikely given the ease with which ligands can enter and escape from the protein. A likely possibility, based on the templating behavior of the gel around encapsulated proteins (34, 37), is that the cavity surrounding the encapsulated protein preferentially limits only certain categories of conformational changes. Transitions between protein conformations that require a transition state that has an enhanced volume with a change in the hydration pattern as in hemoglobin (116) may be especially vulnerable to being damped. This vulnerability could arise from both spatial constraints of the sol-gel matrix and possible solvent shell stabilization effects by the Si-O groups lining the templated cavity surrounding the hydrated protein. The dramatic slowing in the relaxation properties of encapsulated Hb below 10 °C (46) is suggestive of a mechanism involving the immobilization of hydration shell water molecules.

Spectroscopically distinct encapsulated populations are seen to have different ligand rebinding kinetics. The spectroscopic differences implicate differences in the proximal heme environment as contributing to the observed functional differences. The retention of kinetic differences when the two populations are exposed to the osmotic stress of 100% glycerol argues against variation in water occupancy within the distal pocket as a source of the kinetic differences. Recent findings3 on sol-gel-encapsulated distal heme pocket mutants of Mb indicate that the reported effects are not due to the different conformational substates associated with the distal histidine.

A comparison between sol-gel-encapsulated Mb and HbA derivatives reveals a similar pattern of tertiary structure change upon ligand binding. For sol-gel-trapped forms of both the R and T quaternary states of HbA, ligand binding induces tertiary structure changes that increase the frequency of nu (Fe-His). Although the pattern of ligand-induced change is similar to that of Mb, both the magnitude of frequency change and the range of accessible frequencies for HbA are a function of the quaternary state.

This general approach for locking in of equilibrium and non-equilibrium conformational populations allows for spectroscopic and kinetic comparisons under identical environmental conditions. The results pave the way for the isolation and the eventual full characterization of the pure conformational contribution to the inverse temperature effect in which the kinetics slow instead of accelerate with increasing temperature.

The approaches described herein for Mb are anticipated to be of general applicability for comparing the conformational and functional properties of substrate-binding proteins by maintaining the substrate-bound and substrate-free equilibrium conformations when substrate is subsequently removed or added, respectively. The general usefulness of this approach is further enhanced by the observations that the combination of the new encapsulation protocol with the addition of glycerol as the bathing material for the sol-gel greatly extends the lifetime of non-equilibrium populations.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants RO1 HL65188, PO1 GM58890, and RO1 HL58247 and by the W. M. Keck Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Present address: Dept. of Chemistry, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME 04011.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Physiology and Biophysics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, NY 10461. Tel.: 718-430-3591; Fax: 718-430-8819; E-mail: jfriedma@aecom.yu.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 25, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200301200

2 T. Das and J. M. Friedman, unpublished result.

3 U. Samuni, D. Dantsker, and J. M. Friedman, unpublished results.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: Mb, myoglobin; COMb, carbonmonoxy myoglobin; BisTris, 2-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-2-(hydroxymethyl)- propane-1,3-diol; GY, geminate yield.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Brunori, M. (2001) Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 21-23[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Flogel, U., Merx, M. W., Godecke, A., Decking, U. K. M., and Schrader, J. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 735-740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Frauenfelder, H., McMahon, B. H., Austin, R. H., Chu, K., and Groves, J. T. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 2370-2374[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Schoenborn, B. P., Watson, H. C., and Kendrew, J. C. (1965) Nature 207, 28-30[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Tilton, R. F. J., Kuntz, I. D., Jr., and Petsko, G. A. (1984) Biochemistry 23, 2849-2857[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Brunori, M., Vallone, B., Cutruzzola, F., Travaglini-Allocatelli, C., Berendzen, J., Chu, K., Sweet, R. M., and Schlichting, I. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 2058-2063[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Brunori, M. (2000) Biophys. Chem. 86, 221-230[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Chu, K., Vojtchovsky, J., McMahon, B. H., Sweet, R. M., Berendzen, J., and Schlichting, I. (2000) Nature 403, 921-923[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Ostermann, A., Waschipky, R., Parak, F. G., and Nienhaus, G. U. (2000) Nature 404, 205-208[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Schlichting, I., and Chu, K. (2000) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10, 744-752[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Scott, E. E., and Gibson, Q. H. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 11909-11917[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Scott, E. E., Gibson, Q. H., and Olson, J. S. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 5177-5188[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Brunori, M., and Gibson, Q. H. (2001) EMBO Rep. 2, 674-679[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Kachalova, G. S., Popov, A. N., and Bartnik, H. D. (1999) Science 284, 473-476[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Brunori, M., Cutruzzola, F., Savino, C., Travaglini-Allocatelli, C., Vallone, B., and Gibson, Q. H. (1999) Biophys. J. 76, 1259-1269[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Vojtechovsky, J., Chu, K., Berendzen, J., Sweet, R. M., and Schlichting, I. (1999) Biophys. J. 77, 2153-2174[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Srajer, V., Ren, Z., Teng, T. Y., Schmidt, M., Ursby, T., Bourgeois, D., Pradervand, C., Schildkamp, W., Wulff, M., and Moffat, K. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 13802-13815[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Ahmed, A., Campbell, B., Caruso, D., Chance, M., Chavez, M., Courtney, S., Friedman, J., Iben, I., Ondrias, M., and Yang, M. (1991) Chem. Phys. 158, 329-351[CrossRef]
19. Campbell, B. F., Chance, M. R., and Friedman, J. M. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 14885-14890[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Powers, L., Chance, B., Chance, M., Campbell, B., Friedman, J., Khalid, S., Kumar, C., Naqui, A., Reddy, K. S., and Zhou, Y. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 4785-4796[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Sassaroli, M., Dasgupta, S., and Rousseau, D. L. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 13704-13713[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Rousseau, D. L., and Argade, P. V. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 1310-1314[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Sage, J. T., Schomacker, K. T., and Champion, P. M. (1995) J. Phys. Chem. 99, 3394-3405[CrossRef]
24. Iizuka, T., Yamamoto, H., Kotani, M., and Yonetani, T. (1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 371, 126-139[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Huang, J., Ridsdale, A., Wang, J., and Friedman, J. M. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 14353-14365[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Frauenfelder, H., Sligar, S. G., and Wolynes, P. G. (1991) Science 254, 1598-1603[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Nienhaus, G. U., Mourant, J. R., and Frauenfelder, H. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 2902-2906[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Ansari, A., Jones, C. M., Henry, E. R., Hofrichter, J., and Eaton, W. A. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 5128-5145[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Steinbach, P. J., Ansari, A., Berendzen, J., Braunstein, D., Chu, K., Cowen, B. R., Ehrenstein, D., Frauenfelder, H., Johnson, J. B., and Lamb, D. C. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 3988-4001[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Ansari, A., Berendzen, J., Bowne, S. F., Frauenfelder, H., Iben, I. E., Sauke, T. B., Shyamsunder, E., and Young, R. D. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 5000-5004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Avnir, D., Braun, S., Lev, O., and Ottolenghi, M. (1994) Chem. Mater. 6, 1605-1614[CrossRef]
32. Ellerby, L. M., Nishida, C. R., Nishida, F., Yamanaka, S. A., Dunn, B., Valentine, J. S., and Zink, J. I. (1992) Science 255, 1113-1115[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Braun, S., Shtelzer, S., Avnir, D., and Ottolenghi, M. (1992) J. Non-Cryst. Solids 148, 739-743[CrossRef]
34. Dave, B. C., Miller, J. M., Dunn, B., Valentine, J. S., and Zink, J. I. (1997) J. Sol Gel Sci. Technol. 8, 629-634
35. Gill, I., and Ballesteros, A. (2000) TIBTECH 18, 282-296
36. Das, T. K., Khan, I., Rousseau, D. L., and Friedman, J. M. (1998) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 10268-10269[CrossRef]
37. Eggers, D. K., and Valentine, J. S. (2001) Protein Sci. 10, 250-261[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Samuni, U., Navati, M. S., Juszczak, L. J., Dantsker, D., Yang, M., and Friedman, J. M. (2000) J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 10802-10813
39. Shibayama, N., and Saigo, S. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 251, 203-209[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Shibayama, N. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 285, 1383-1388[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Bettati, S., and Mozarrelli, A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 32050-32055[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Bruno, S., Bonaccio, M., Bettati, S., Rivetti, C., Viappiani, C., Abbruzzetti, S., and Mozzarelli, A. (2001) Protein Sci. 10, 2401-2407[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Khan, I., Shannon, C. F., Dantsker, D., Friedman, A. J., Perez-Gonzalez-de-Apodaca, J., and Friedman, J. M. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 16099-16109[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Khan, I., Dantsker, D., Samuni, U., Friedman, A. J., Bonaventura, C., Manjula, B., Acharya, S. A., and Friedman, J. M. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 7581-7592[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Juszczak, L., and Friedman, J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 30357-30360[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Das, T., Khan, I., Rousseau, D., and Friedman, J. (1999) Biospectroscopy 5, S64-S70[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Friedman, J. M. (1994) Methods Enzymol. 232, 205-231[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Rousseau, D. L., and Friedman, J. M. (1988) in Biological Applications of Raman Spectroscopy (Spiro, T. G., ed), Vol. III , pp. 133-215, John Wiley & Sons, New York
49. Findsen, E., Scott, T., Chance, M., Friedman, J., and Ondrias, M. (1985) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107, 3355-3357[CrossRef]
50. Peterson, E., Chien, E., Sligar, S., and Friedman, J. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 12301-12319[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Mizutani, Y., and Kitagawa, T. (2001) J. Phys. Chem. 105, 10992-10999
52. Friedman, J. M., Rousseau, D. L., Ondrias, M. R., and Stepnoski, R. A. (1982) Science 218, 1244-1246[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Friedman, J. M., Scott, T. W., Stepnoski, R. A., Ikeda-Saito, M., and Yonetani, T. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 10564-10572[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54. Kitagawa, T. (1988) in Biological Application of Raman Spectroscopy (Spiro, T. G., ed), Vol. III , pp. 97-131, Wiley & Sons, New York
55. Ondrias, M. R., Rousseau, D. L., Kitagawa, T., Ikeda-Saito, M., Inubushi, T., and Yonetani, T. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 8766-8770[Free Full Text]
56. Ondrias, M. R., Rousseau, D. L., Shelnutt, J. A., and Simon, S. R. (1982) Biochemistry 21, 3428-3437[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Scott, T. W., and Friedman, J. M. (1984) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 5677-5687[CrossRef]
58. Jayaraman, V., Rodgers, K. R., Mukerji, I., and Spiro, T. G. (1995) Science 269, 1843-1848[Abstract/Free Full Text]
59. Beece, D., Eisenstein, L., Frauenfelder, H., Good, D., Marden, M. C., Reinisch, L., Reynolds, A. H., Sorensen, L. B., and Yue, K. T. (1980) Biochemistry 19, 5147-5157[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
60. Doster, W., Kleinert, T., Post, F., and Settles, M. (1993) in Protein-Solvent Interactions (Gregory, R. B., ed) , pp. 375-385, Marcel Dekker, New York
61. Kleinert, T., Doster, W., Leyser, H., Petry, W., Schwarz, V., and Settles, M. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 717-733[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
62. Lambright, D. G., Balasubramanian, S., and Boxer, S. G. (1991) Chem. Phys. 158, 249-260[CrossRef]
63. Tian, W. D., Sage, J. T., Srajer, V. V., and Champion, P. M. (1992) Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 408-411[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
64. Hagen, S. J., and Eaton, W. A. (1996) J. Chem. Phys. 104, 3395-3398[CrossRef]
65. Dantsker, D., Samuni, U., Friedman, A. J., Yang, M., Ray, A., and Friedman, J. M. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 315, 257-269
66. Stavrov, S. S. (1993) Biophys. J. 65, 1942-1950[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
67. Wells, A. V., Sage, J. T., Morikis, D., Champion, P. M., Chiu, M. L., and Sligar, S. G. (1991) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 9655-9660[CrossRef]
68. Spiro, T. G., and Czernuszewicz, R. S. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 246, 416-460[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
69. Spiro, T. G., Smulevich, G., and Su, C. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 4497-4508[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
70. Dasgupta, S., and Spiro, T. G. (1986) Biochemistry 25, 5941-5948[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
71. Hu, X. H., Rodgers, K. R., Mukerji, I., and Spiro, T. G. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 3462-3467[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
72. Christian, J. F., Unno, M., Sage, J. T., Champion, P. M., Chien, E., and Sligar, S. G. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 11198-11204[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
73. Gilch, H., Schweitzer-Stenner, R., and Dreybrodt, W. (1993) Biophys. J. 65, 1470-1485[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
74. Gilch, H., Dreybrodt, W., and Schweitzer-Stenner, R. (1995) Biophys. J. 69, 214-227[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
75. Bangcharoenpaurpong, O., Schomaker, K. T., and Champion, P. M. (1984) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 5688-5698[CrossRef]
76. Argade, P., Sassaroli, M., Rousseau, D., Inubushi, T., Ikeda-Saito, M., and Lapidot, A. (1984) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 6593-6596[CrossRef]
77. Bitler, A., and Stavrov, S. S. (1999) Biophys. J. 77, 2764-2776[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
78. Smulevich, G., Mauro, J. M., Fishel, L. A., English, A. M., Kraut, J., and Spiro, T. G. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 5477-5485[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
79. Franzen, S., Bohn, B., Poyart, C., and Martin, J. L. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 1224-1237[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
80. Franzen, S., Bohn, B., Poyart, C., DePillis, G., Boxer, S. G., and Martin, J. L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1718-1720[Abstract/Free Full Text]
81. Balasubramanian, S., Lambright, D. G., Marden, M. C., and Boxer, S. G. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 2202-2212[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
82. Lambright, D. G., Balasubramanian, S., and Boxer, S. G. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 10116-10124[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
83. Ansari, A., Jones, C. M., Henry, E. R., Hofrichter, J., and Eaton, W. A. (1992) Science 256, 1796-1798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
84. Hagen, S. J., Hofrichter, J., and Eaton, W. A. (1996) J. Phys. Chem. 100, 12008-12021[CrossRef]
85. Sastry, G. M., and Agmon, N. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 7097-7108[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
86. Shreve, A. P., Franzen, S., Simpson, M. C., and Dyer, R. B. (1999) J. Phys. Chem. 103, 7969-7975
87. Causgrove, T. P., and Dyer, R. B. (1996) J. Phys. Chem. 100, 3273-3277[CrossRef]
88. Lim, M., Jackson, T. A., and Anfinrud, P. A. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 5801-5804[Abstract/Free Full Text]
89. Agmon, N. (1991) in Proceedings of the Emil Warburg Symposium World Scientific, Singapore (Blumen, A. , Klafter, J. , and Haarer, D., eds) , pp. 333-347, World Scientific, Singapore
90. Kiger, L., Stetzkowsky-Marden, F., Poyart, C., and Marden, M. C. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 228, 665-668[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
91. Stavrov, S. S. (2001) Chem. Phys. 271, 145-154[CrossRef]
92. Liddington, R., Derewenda, Z., Dodson, G., and Harris, D. (1988) Nature 331, 725-728[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
93. Liddington, R., Derewenda, Z., Dodson, E., Hubbard, R., and Dodson, G. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 228, 551-579[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
94. Liddington, R. (1994) Methods Enzymol. 232, 15-26[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
95. Luisi, B., and Shibayama, N. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 206, 723-736[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
96. Luisi, B., Liddington, B., Fermi, G., and Shibayama, N. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 214, 7-14[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
97. Mueser, T. C., Rogers, P. H., and Arnone, A. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 15353-15364[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
98. Huang, J., Juszczak, L. J., Peterson, E. S., Shannon, C. F., Yang, M., Huang, S., Vidugiris, G. V., and Friedman, J. M. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 4514-4525[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
99. Friedman, J. M. (1985) Science 228, 1273-1280[Abstract/Free Full Text]
100. Findsen, E. W., Friedman, J. M., and Ondrias, M. R. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 8719-8724[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
101. Esquerra, R. M., Goldbeck, R. A., Kim-Shapiro, D. B., and Kligar, D. S. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 17527-17536[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
102. Findsen, E., Friedman, J., Ondrias, M., and Simon, S. (1985) Science 229, 661-665[Abstract/Free Full Text]
103. Sassaroli, M., and Rousseau, D. L. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 3092-3098[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
104. Lyons, K. B., Friedman, J. M., and Fleury, P. A. (1978) Nature 275, 565-566[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
105. Goldbeck, R. A., Paquette, S. J., Bjorling, S. C., and Kliger, D. S. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 8628-8639[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
106. Bjorling, S. C., Goldbeck, R. A., Paquette, S. J., Milder, S. J., and Kliger, D. S. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 8619-8627[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
107. Gottfried, D., Peterson, E., Sheikh, A., Yang, M., Wang, J., and Friedman, J. (1996) J. Phys. Chem. 100, 12034-12042[CrossRef]
108. Dick, L. A., Heibel, G., Moore, E. G., and Spiro, T. G. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 6406-6410[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
109. Wang, D., and Spiro, T. G. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 9940-9951[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
110. Friedman, J. M., Scott, T. W., Fisanick, G. J., Simon, S. R., Findsen, E. W., Ondrias, M. R., and Macdonald, V. W. (1985) Science 229, 187-190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
111. Peterson, E. S., and Friedman, J. M. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 4346-4357[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
112. Kitagawa, T. (1992) Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 58, 1-18[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
113. Szabo, A., and Karplus, M. (1973) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 70, 673-674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
114. Szabo, A. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 75, 2108-2111[Abstract/Free Full Text]
115. Galkin, O., Buchter, S., Tabirian, A., and Schulte, A. (1997) Biophys. J. 73, 2752-2763[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
116. Goldbeck, R. A., Paquette, S. J., and Kliger, D. S. (2001) Biophys. J. 81, 2919-2934[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. H. Ouellet, R. Daigle, P. Lague, D. Dantsker, M. Milani, M. Bolognesi, J. M. Friedman, and M. Guertin
Ligand Binding to Truncated Hemoglobin N from Mycobacterium tuberculosis Is Strongly Modulated by the Interplay between the Distal Heme Pocket Residues and Internal Water
J. Biol. Chem., October 3, 2008; 283(40): 27270 - 27278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. J. Roche, F. Guo, and J. M. Friedman
Molecular Level Probing of Preferential Hydration and Its Modulation by Osmolytes through the Use of Pyranine Complexed to Hemoglobin
J. Biol. Chem., December 15, 2006; 281(50): 38757 - 38768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. J. Roche, D. Dantsker, U. Samuni, and J. M. Friedman
Nitrite Reductase Activity of Sol-Gel-encapsulated Deoxyhemoglobin: INFLUENCE OF QUATERNARY AND TERTIARY STRUCTURE
J. Biol. Chem., December 1, 2006; 281(48): 36874 - 36882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Dantsker, C. Roche, U. Samuni, G. Blouin, J. S. Olson, and J. M. Friedman
The Position 68(E11) Side Chain in Myoglobin Regulates Ligand Capture, Bond Formation with Heme Iron, and Internal Movement into the Xenon Cavities
J. Biol. Chem., November 18, 2005; 280(46): 38740 - 38755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Tsuneshige, K. Kanaori, U. Samuni, D. Danstker, J. M. Friedman, S. Neya, L. Giangiacomo, and T. Yonetani
Semihemoglobins, High Oxygen Affinity Dimeric Forms of Human Hemoglobin Respond Efficiently to Allosteric Effectors without Forming Tetramers
J. Biol. Chem., November 19, 2004; 279(47): 48959 - 48967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Dantsker, U. Samuni, Y. Ouellet, B. A. Wittenberg, J. B. Wittenberg, M. Milani, M. Bolognesi, M. Guertin, and J. M. Friedman
Viscosity-dependent Relaxation Significantly Modulates the Kinetics of CO Recombination in the Truncated Hemoglobin TrHbN from Mycobacterium tuberculosis
J. Biol. Chem., September 10, 2004; 279(37): 38844 - 38853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. K. Das, U. Samuni, Y. Lin, D. E. Goldberg, D. L. Rousseau, and J. M. Friedman
Distal Heme Pocket Conformers of Carbonmonoxy Derivatives of Ascaris Hemoglobin: EVIDENCE OF CONFORMATIONAL TRAPPING IN POROUS SOL-GEL MATRICES
J. Biol. Chem., March 12, 2004; 279(11): 10433 - 10441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
U. Samuni, D. Dantsker, A. Ray, J. B. Wittenberg, B. A. Wittenberg, S. Dewilde, L. Moens, Y. Ouellet, M. Guertin, and J. M. Friedman
Kinetic Modulation in Carbonmonoxy Derivatives of Truncated Hemoglobins: THE ROLE OF DISTAL HEME POCKET RESIDUES AND EXTENDED APOLAR TUNNEL
J. Biol. Chem., July 11, 2003; 278(29): 27241 - 27250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. S. Navati, U. Samuni, P. Aisen, and J. M. Friedman
Bioinorganic Chemistry Special Feature: Binding and release of iron by gel-encapsulated human transferrin: Evidence for a conformational search
PNAS, April 1, 2003; 100(7): 3832 - 3837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/28/25783    most recent
M200301200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Samuni, U.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Samuni, U.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement