![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 29, 26136-26142, July 19, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331
Received for publication, January 11, 2002, and in revised form, May 8, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mammalian mismatch repair (MMR) systems respond
to broad ranges of DNA mismatches and lesions. Kinetic analyses of MMR
processing in vitro have focused on base mismatches in a
few sequence contexts, because of a lack of general and quantitative
MMR assays and because of the difficulty of constructing a multiplicity
of MMR substrates, particularly those with DNA lesions. We describe
here simple and efficient construction of 11 different MMR substrates,
by ligating synthetic oligomers into gapped plasmids generated using
sequence-specific N.BstNBI nicking endonuclease, then using
sequence-specific nicking endonuclease N.AlwI to introduce
single nicks for initiation of 3' to 5' or 5' to 3' excision. To
quantitatively assay MMR excision gaps in base-mispaired substrates,
generated in human nuclear extracts lacking exogenous dNTPs, we used
position- and strand-specific oligomer probes. Mispair-provoked
excision along the shorter path from the pre-existing nick toward the
mismatch, either 3' to 5' or 5' to 3', predominated over longer path
excision by roughly 10:1 to 20:1. MMR excision was complete within 7 min, was highly specific (90:1) for the nicked strand, and was strongly
mispair-dependent (at least 40:1). Nonspecific
(mismatch-independent) 5' to 3' excision was considerably greater than
nonspecific 3' to 5' excision, especially at pre-existing gaps, but was
not processive. These techniques can be used to construct and analyze
MMR substrates with DNA mismatches or lesions in any sequence context.
Mismatch repair (MMR)1
protein systems were originally defined by studies that elucidated
roles of MutS-homolog (MSH) and MutL-homolog (MLH/PMS) proteins
in DNA replication and recombination fidelity (1-3). Both prokaryotic
MutS and eukaryotic MSH2·MSH6 (MutS Error correction end-products have typically been assayed as restored
restriction endonuclease recognition sites or reverted mutations in
reporter genes (19, 20). Such assays have not generally been possible
with base mismatches in other sequence contexts, or with DNA lesion
substrates, except in one special case where the lesion itself was
removed by MMR (21), which is not necessarily the biologically relevant
response. It is difficult to prepare, in high yield and purity, a
multiplicity of MMR substrates, particularly those with a single
specific lesion in one strand and a defined single nick for initiation
of excision in the other. Here we describe a simple procedure for
preparation of MMR substrates and a general but precise MMR excision
assay. We quantitatively analyzed the time courses of generation of
excision gaps at specific positions in these MMR substrates in human
nuclear extracts lacking exogenous dNTPs. Because of the low levels of
adventitious nicks in these substrates, MMR excision was highly
specific for mispaired versus homoduplex DNA, nicked
versus continuous strands, and shorter versus
longer nick-mispair paths.
We generated a variety of MMR substrates in high yield, by a new
method: direct production of defined gaps in high copy number plasmids
using a sequence-specific nicking enzyme, ligation of mismatch-creating
synthetic oligomers into these gaps, and introduction of a defined nick
using a second such enzyme. We used base-mismatched substrates and
analyzed the end-products by restriction endonuclease assay as well, so
that excision and error correction endpoints could be compared.
However, the MMR excision assay procedures are applicable to DNA
mismatches or lesions in any sequence context.
Materials--
All oligonucleotides were synthesized by MWG
Biotech (High Point, NC). T4 polynucleotide kinase was purchased from
Invitrogen. [ Construction of Plasmids--
Plasmid pUC19X was previously
derived from pUC19 by removal of all GAGTC sequences (endonuclease
N.BstNBI site, see Table I from Ref. 22). The base
pair corresponding to the first C:G base pair in the EarI
site at position 2488 of the original pUC19 sequence is designated base
pair 1 in pUC19X and in its derivative vectors described here (see
Table I and Fig. 1 below). Nucleotides (nt) in the sense strands are
designated 1, 2, ... , and the complementary antisense strand
nucleotides are designated 1', 2', ... (sense and antisense
strands are defined by the pUC19 bla gene). Plasmid pUC19X
was further modified, by PCR-mediated site-specific mutagenesis employing Pfu DNA polymerase, so as to remove all GGATC
sequences (endonuclease N.AlwI sites), changing those at nt
699, 769', 785, 866', 883, 1347, 1646', and 1668 to GGACC, GCATC,
GAATC, GGATG, GCATC, GGACC, GAATC, and GGACC, respectively. In the
product plasmid pUC19Y, we replaced DNA between the unique
AatII and SapI sites by a staggered heteroduplex
with a single mismatch (in boldface) made by annealing antisense strand
oligomer 1 (5'-CATCGAGTCCGATGCGGATATTAATGTGACGGTAGCGAGTCGCTCTTCC) to sense strand oligomer 2 (5'-AGCGGAAGAGCGACTCGCTACCGTCACATTGATATCCGCATCGGACTCGATGACGT). Two new plasmids, each with only two GAGTC sites
(underlined), separated by 32 nt on the antisense strand, were
created by subsequent segregation of the strands during plasmid
replication. The plasmid with an endonuclease AseI
recognition site in the inserted sequence was designated pUC19AseI; the
other was designated pUC19AseIC to indicate the T:A to C:G base change
in the AseI recognition sequence AT(T Preparation of Gapped Plasmid DNA and Construction of Nicked DNA
Substrates--
Plasmids pUC19CPD, pUC19CPDC, and pUC19CPDRev were
transferred into Escherichia coli strain SCS110
(dam Mismatch Repair Reactions in HeLa Nuclear Extracts--
Nuclear
extracts were prepared from HeLaS3 cells (purchased from the
National Cell Culture Center, Minneapolis, MN) as previously described
(22). Standard MMR mixtures (15 µl) contained 75 fmol (100 ng) of
sCPDC(g/t)n or sCPDRev(a/c)n substrate, 100 µg of nuclear extract,
and 750 ng of bovine serum albumin, plus the following components at
the indicated concentrations: 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6; 1.5 mM ATP; 1 mM glutathione; 0.1 mM
for each of four dNTPs; 5 mM MgCl2; and 110 mM KCl. Mixtures were incubated at 37 °C for 15 min
unless otherwise indicated. Reactions were terminated by the addition
of 30 µl of Stop solution (25 mM EDTA, 0.67% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and 90 µg/ml proteinase K). After further incubation of mixture at 37 °C for 15 min, DNA was extracted twice with an equal volume of phenol and precipitated with ethanol. DNA was resuspended in H2O and digested with 4 units of
AseI endonuclease and 1 µg of RNase A at 37 °C for
2 h in 15 µl of AseI digestion buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9; 100 mM NaCl; 10 mM MgCl2; and 1 mM dithiothreitol
(DTT)). The digested products were separated by electrophoresis in 1%
agarose gel in 1× TAE buffer (40 mM Tris acetate, 2 mM EDTA). Correction of (G/T) or (A/C) mismatches to (A/T)
restores a second site for AseI endonuclease, which thus cuts the products into 0.8- and 1.2-kb fragments. DNA bands were visualized by staining with ethidium bromide then imaged with UVP
ImageStore7500 and analyzed using ImageQuaNT software. The repair
yield equals the ratio of the summed intensities of the 0.8- and 1.2-kb
fragments to the total of this sum plus the intensity of the 2.0-kb
band corresponding to singly cut (uncorrected) DNA.
Analysis of Excision Gaps--
To freeze excision gaps generated
during MMR, exogenous dNTPs were omitted from a standard reaction
mixture containing nicked mismatched DNA substrate or various control
substrates. Incubation was at 37 °C for 7 min, unless otherwise
indicated. DNA was extracted and precipitated as described under "MMR
Reactions in HeLa Nuclear Extracts" and digested at 37 °C for
2 h with 4 units of AhdI endonuclease plus 1 µg of
RNase A in 15 µl of AhdI digestion buffer (20 mM Tris acetate, pH 7.9; 50 mM potassium
acetate; 10 mM magnesium acetate, and 1 mM
DTT). After 0.5 pmol of a particular 32P-labeled oligomer
probe (Table III) was added, the mixture was incubated at 85 °C for
5 min then slowly cooled down to room temperature. Annealed products
were separated from free oligomers by electrophoresis in 1% agarose
gels in 1× TAE buffer. After DNA bands from agarose gels were measured
quantitatively, as described under "MMR Reactions in HeLa Nuclear
Extracts," the gels were dried and the radioactivity in each sample
was measured by phosphorimaging. Measurements of DNA bands from
agarose gels were used to normalize radioactivity measurements for any
variations in DNA recovery and loading.
To test their ability to be converted into corrected products, putative
gapped intermediates were generated and purified as above (before
treatment with RNase A and AhdI endonuclease) and incubated
with 2 units of DNA pol I Klenow fragment (Invitrogen) plus
all four dNTPs (17 µM each) in 15 µl of AseI
digestion buffer (see above) for 20 min at room temperature. The
gap-filling reaction was terminated by heating at 85 °C for 20 min;
after cooling, 4 units of AseI endonuclease and 1 µg of
RNase A were added to the mixture and the incubation continued at
37 °C for 2 h. Digestion products were separated by 1% agarose
gel electrophoresis and analyzed as described under "MMR Reactions in
HeLa Nuclear Extracts"; product yields were compared with those
obtained from identical HeLa extract MMR reactions using standard
reaction conditions.
Preparation of Mismatched DNA Substrates and Comparison of Error
Correction and Excision Time Courses--
Plasmids pUC19CPD,
pUC19CPDC, and pUC19CPDRev (Table I),
which all contain two tandem sites for the sequence-specific nicking endonuclease N.BstNBI, separated by 32 nt on the antisense
strand, were used to produce gaps into which mismatch-creating
oligomers were ligated (Tables I and II).
Nicking at respective sites for a recently described second such
enzyme, endonuclease N.AlwI (25), provides points for
initiation of 5' to 3' or 3' to 5' MMR excision along the shorter paths
toward the mismatches (Table I and Fig. 1). Beginning with 400 µg of plasmid
DNA, we routinely obtain 200 µg of gapped plasmid. Typically,
ligation of 50 µg of gapped plasmid with excess oligomer yields
20-25 µg of purified product. In substrate sCPDC(g/t)n, 3' to 5'
excision of the sense strand along the shorter nick-mispair path
removes the guanine nucleotide at nt 178, and DNA resynthesis restores
a recognition site for endonuclease AseI. In substrate
sCPDRev(a/c)n, 5' to 3' excision of the antisense strand removes the
cytosine at nt 179, and resynthesis again restores the AseI
site.
We compared time courses of MMR error correction and excision in HeLa
extracts, with or without exogenous dNTPs. The substrate sCPDC(g/t)n
contains a G/T mispair at bp 178/178', and a nick 3' to the G, at nt 23 (Table I). In repeated experiments, yields of corrected product, now
cleavable by AseI endonuclease at both bp 178 and 1381, reached plateau levels of 30-45% of input substrates after 8-10 min
(Fig. 2, A and D,
open circles). Product yields remained constant for up to 30 min (data not shown). MMR excision, assayed as the appearance of
single-strand DNA bound by radiolabeled probe A and
collinear with the nicked strand at nt 170-201 (Table III and Fig. 1),
preceded error correction by 50 s at half-maximal yields, reaching
a plateau after ~6 min (Fig. 2, B-D, filled
squares). Supercoiled DNA substrate sCPDC(g/t) showed no
detectable restoration of the AseI site at bp 178 (<3% of
input plasmid, data not shown) and only low background levels of
excision of either strand at bp 170-201 under gap generation
conditions (Table III).
To calibrate excision yields against corrected-product yields, we
incubated substrate sCPDC(g/t)n for 7 min in extracts lacking exogenous
dNTPs and isolated the DNA, which was insensitive to cleavage by
AseI endonuclease at bp 178 (Fig.
3, lane 2). Thus, yields of
corrected product in the absence of exogenous dNTPs were <0.05 of
those obtained in their presence, in contrast with previous reports of
as much as 0.40 of normal yields (26). Incubation of this putative
gapped intermediate DNA with DNA polymerase I Klenow fragment and dNTPs
produced corrected products in 38% yield (Fig. 3, lane 3),
in good agreement with the 40% yield in the standard reaction (Fig. 3,
lane 1). Thus, excision in the absence of dNTPs produces
competent MMR intermediates, and plateau levels of both corrected
products and excision intermediates correspond to the same yields,
~40%.
To determine whether these plateaus reflected rapid exhaustion of one
or more rate-limiting components, we measured corrected product after
15-min incubation of substrates at concentrations of 2.5 to 15 nM (inputs of 37.5, 75, 150, and 225 fmol). Product yields
(13.9, 29.7, 63.0, and 91.5 fmol) were ~40% in each case. In a
similar experiment with substrate sCPDRev(a/c)n, in which a nick at nt
30' is 5' to an A/C mispair that disrupts an AseI endonuclease recognition site at bp 179/179' (Table I), the same amounts of input substrates resulted in product yields of 14.5, 28.8, 59.5, and 82.1 fmol, again directly proportional to substrates. Fang
and Modrich (26), noting rapid conversion of nicked into full-length
strands during MMR incubations, suggested that competing ligation
limited product yields. In confirmation, we found that almost all
(initially nicked) DNA migrated as closed circles after 15-min
MMR incubation, that incubation of recovered DNA with fresh extract for
another 15 min only negligibly increased product yields, and that even
20-min incubation on ice sealed roughly one-third of the nicked
substrate, reducing the product yield in a subsequent 37 °C
incubation by one-third (data not shown).
To illustrate the utility of these substrate preparation and excision
assay techniques, we prepared nine additional MMR substrates, incorporating the other seven base mispairs and two extrahelical nucleotide (loop) substrates in virtually the same sequence context as
the G/T in sCPD(g/t)n. This was achieved by using nine different oligomers but with a single preparation of gapped pUC19CPDC. We assayed
3' to 5' excision initiated at a nick ~155 nt away (Table II) using a
30-mer radiolabeled probe immediately 3' to the guanine in the G/T
mispair. Excision signals, which presumably reflect efficiencies of
excision initiation versus competing ligation, ranged from
0.42 to 1.14 of G/T values, in general, but not complete, agreement
with previous studies (19, 20, 26-28).
Specificity of MMR Excision--
We used different oligomer probes
to compare plateau (7-min) signals for excision of nicked and
continuous strands, at various positions inside and outside the shorter
nick-mispair paths in 3'-(G/T) and 5'-(A/C) substrates and in
homoduplex substrates (Figs. 1 and 4 and
Table III). Specific radioactivities of the respective probes were
closely similar, and probes were designed to have similar duplex
thermal stabilities and thus similar annealing efficiencies. For the
nicked substrates sCPDC(g/t)n and sCPDRev(a/c)n, plateau signals for
shorter path excision of nicked strands at positions most proximal to
the nicks (Fig. 1 and Table III, probes C and J,
respectively) were assigned relative values of 1.0 and equated with
plateau error correction yields for the same substrates (~40 and
35%, respectively), based on the two-stage gap-filling experiments
described above (Fig. 3 and data not shown). To estimate background
signals that might arise from annealing of probes to gaps generated by
excision initiated at adventitious nicks, we measured excision 1 kb
away from the nick mispair region, at nt 953-986 (probe E).
These very low background signals, 0.04 and 0.02, respectively, for
sCPDC(g/t)n and sCPD(a/t)n, contrast with previous reports of
incorporation of one-fifth as much as [
The signal for (G/T)-provoked shorter path excision of the continuous
strand of sCPDC(g/t)n is 0.03, already near the background level of
0.02. Comparison with background-corrected signals for nicked strand
excision (0.87-0.97, see above), yields a minimum nicked:continuous
strand specificity of roughly 90:1.
To compare (G/T) mispair-provoked excision along the shorter (3' to 5')
versus the longer (5' to 3') nick-mispair path, it is
necessary to estimate the contribution of nonspecific 5' to 3' excision
to the high gap signal 45 nt from the nick along the longer (5' to 3')
path in sCPDC(g/t)n (probe F, Fig. 4 and Table III). Some of
this signal of 1.25 presumably corresponds to nonspecific nick-initiated 5' to 3' excision, which in homoduplex DNA yields a
(probe F) signal of 0.40. Much of the remainder of 5' to 3' excision of sCPDC(g/t)n might be accounted for if it were stimulated by
gaps, in this case generated by mispair-provoked 3' to 5' excision in
the opposite direction. Indeed, almost all (0.96) of (non-nicked) substrate sCPDgap molecules initiate 5' to 3' excision at the single
pre-existing gap (probe H, Table III). Thus, for 0.96 of the
(40% of total) sCPDC(g/t)n substrates showing a mispair-provoked 3' to
5' excision signal of 1.00, concomitant gap-initiated nonspecific 5' to
3' would generate a signal of 0.96. In the remaining 60% of
sCPDC(g/t)n substrate, nick-initiated nonspecific 5' to 3' excision
would generate a signal of 0.24 (60% of 0.40). The sum of 1.20 accounts for all but 0.05 of the probe F signal for
sCPDC(g/t)n, suggesting a ratio of roughly 20 (that is, 1.00/0.05) for
shorter path (3' to 5')-specific versus longer path (5' to
3')-specific mispair-provoked excision. Whatever the source, even the
relatively potent longer path 5' to 3' excision appears to be
non-processive (compare probe E versus
probe F signals for sCPDC(g/t)n in Table III). For substrate
sCPDRev(a/c)n, in which the shorter nick-mispair path lies 5' to 3',
similar correction of the apparent longer path 3' to 5' excision
(probe K, Table III) for nonspecific nick- and gap-initiated
3' to 5' excision, yields a shorter versus longer path
specificity of roughly 10:1.
We describe here a simple and general technique to obtain, in high
yield and purity, a wide variety of DNA substrates for analysis of MMR
processing. Key elements are production of gapped plasmids using a
commercially available sequence-specific nicking enzyme, covalent
incorporation of short synthetic DNA oligomers, and subsequent nicking
of the purified ligation product using a second such enzyme.
Previously, a 22-nt gap/oligomer was used successfully; here we have
illustrated the use of 32-nt gaps/oligomers to construct 11 different
substrates with different mismatches in almost identical sequence
contexts. Where correction of mismatches was assayable as restoration
of restriction endonuclease sites, the nicks directed correction of
30-45% of input substrates, within the range of previous reports (7),
and correction in the absence of the specific nick was essentially
undetectable. The plasmids used to generate these substrates are
genetically much more amenable to modification than bacteriophage
genomes; thus it is simple to change the sequence context of a mismatch
or DNA lesion target for MMR processing, to move the nick site from one
strand to the other, or to vary its distance from the mismatch. Duckett
et al. (21) previously prepared gapped circular DNA by
annealing circular single-stranded phage DNA to linear double-stranded
phage DNA lacking 51 bp at one end, then non-covalently incorporated a
lesion-containing 51-mer, such that both 5' to 3' and 3' to 5' excision
might initiate from the nearby flanking nicks.
We have assayed MMR excision of specific strands at specific points,
using oligomeric probes that bind to gaps generated in the absence of
exogenous dNTPs and electrophoresce in association with the
respective substrates. Using this assay, which does not depend on
restoration of restriction endonuclease sites or reporter gene
sequences, it is now possible to kinetically analyze MMR responses to a
wide range of mismatches or DNA lesions, inserted into virtually any
sequence context via the new substrate construction technique. Because
essentially all excised intermediates could be converted to final
(corrected) products, excision and error correction time courses could
be quantitatively compared here.
MMR excision measured by this assay showed high specificity. The
preference for nicked versus the continuous strand along the
shorter path of a 3'-(G/T) substrate was roughly 90:1, considerably higher than previous reports (19, 26), and the specificity for this
mispair-provoked excision versus that for a nicked
homoduplex, a parameter not quantitatively determined previously, was
~40:1. The high strand specificity may reflect lower levels of
adventitious nicks in these substrates, which are one-third the size of
the phage DNA molecules typically used previously and are not subjected to extensive manipulation during preparation.
After correcting the respective apparent 5' to 3' and 3' to 5' longer
path excision signals in mispaired substrates sCPDC(g/t)n and
sCPDRev(a/c)n, for both nonspecific nick-initiated excision and
nonspecific gap-initiated excision concomitant with mispair-provoked shorter path excision, the preferences of MMR excision for the shorter
nick-mispair paths were estimated to be 20:1 or 10:1. These analyses
are consistent with previous mapping of MMR excision gaps: in
substrates where the shorter nick-(G/T) path was 3' to 5', a broad
range of endpoints for the 3' termini of the gaps, spanning several
hundred nucleotides from the nick position, were detected by indirect
end labeling. However, in substrates where the shorter path was 5' to
3', the range of endpoints at the 5' termini of the gaps was much
narrower (26), indicating much less 3' to 5' than 5' to 3' nonspecific
excision. Previous mapping of excision tracts during E. coli
MMR also showed shorter path excision to be favored over longer path
(29).
The potent nonspecific 5' to 3' exonuclease activity seems not to
generally result in MMR-independent mispair correction. Our analyses
here and in the accompanying paper (30) show shorter path 3' to 5' and
5' to 3' excision provoked by G/T or A/C mispairs to be equally
efficient, despite the large disparity in the respective nonspecific
excision efficiencies. Also, other workers previously showed that
extracts deficient in hMSH2, hMSH6, or hMLH1 proteins showed no
correction of (G/T) or other mispairs, i.e. there was little
or no nonspecific 5' to 3' excision initiated at a nick 128 nt away to
remove the mismatches (7, 31, 32). However, for substrates with poorly
recognized mispairs or DNA lesions, especially close to nicks,
nonspecific shorter path 5' to 3' excision might be relatively
significant, so nick-mismatch (lesion) distances should be as long as
practical if a 5'-nicked substrate is used.
The high specificity of the excision assay warrants quantitative
comparison of the plateau excision signals generated by a series of
mismatches in closely similar sequence contexts (Table II). Six of the
eight possible base mispairs and an extrahelical thymine stimulate
excision with roughly the same efficiencies (1 ± 0.13). The C/C
and A/G mispairs are less than half as efficient in this context, even
less than a 4-extrahelical nucleotide substrate, whose repair
presumably involves recognition by hMSH2·hMSH3. Comparisons with
other studies (19, 20, 26-28), which show somewhat different substrate
specificities, suggest that MMR efficiency can be strongly influenced
by sequence contexts, as proposed previously (33).
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
) proteins were shown to
recognize base mispairs in short linear synthetic DNA oligoduplexes,
but binding to a variety of lesions, including UV light photoproducts
(4, 5), O6-methylguanine residues (6, 7),
8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8), and some base adducts (9-12), by
mammalian and yeast (8) MutS
proteins has also been reported.
Mammalian cells lacking either MSH2·MSH6 or MLH1·PMS2 heterodimer
proteins are resistant to agents that generate some of these lesions
(7, 13-16). The elevated UV mutagenesis seen in MMR-deficient
bacterial (17) and rodent cells (18) suggests that MMR processing might
correct photoproduct/base mispairs. Beyond such binding experiments,
exogenous circular DNA substrates containing specific base mismatches
and defined nicks for initiation of excision have been used to analyze MMR error corrections in mammalian cell-free extract (19, 20). These
studies have yielded important mechanistic findings, including roles for MutL-homolog proteins, and for other MMR accessory proteins such as proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and demonstration of MMR
excision specificity.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]ATP was from PerkinElmer Life
Sciences, and Pfu DNA polymerase was from
CLONTECH. Endonucleases AseI,
AhdI, and N.BstNBI were purchased from New
England BioLabs, from whom N.AlwI endonuclease was a
generous gift.
C)AAT. Next, the blunt-end homoduplex formed by annealing
antisense strand oligomer 3 (5'-CTCGAGCACTCGATCCAAGCTT) to sense strand
oligomer 4 (5'-AAGCTTGGATCGAGTGCTCGAG) was inserted into
the unique SspI sites of pUC19AseI and pUC19AseIC to create a unique endonuclease N.AlwI site (underlined) on the sense
strand, yielding plasmids pUC19CPD and pUC19CPDC, respectively. Plasmid pUC19CPDRev was constructed by inserting a blunt-end homoduplex, formed
by annealing antisense strand oligomer 5 (5'-CTCGAGGATCTCGTGCACAGCTT) to sense strand oligomer 6 (5'-AAGCTGTGCACGAGATCCTCGAG) into the SspI site of
pUC19AseI, again providing a unique N.AlwI site (underlined) but instead on the antisense strand. All modified sequences were confirmed by direct sequencing, and by restriction digestion where one
or more diagnostic sites were available.
, endA
), which
was obtained from CLONTECH. Each plasmid was
prepared from 3 liters of overnight LB broth by alkaline lysis and
purified by at least two rounds of isopycnic sedimentation in cesium
chloride plus ethidium bromide (23). Gapped plasmids were generated
from the purified plasmids as previously described (24): nicking at the
closely spaced N.BstNBI sites, removal of the
oligonucleotides, and purification of gapped product by chromatography
on benzoylated and napthoylated DEAE-cellulose. Previously, the yield
of plasmid with 22-nt gaps was 30% of input DNA (24). The yield here
of plasmids with 32-nt gaps was 50%, presumably because of improved binding to benzoylated and napthoylated DEAE-cellulose by the larger
gap. To construct substrates for MMR studies, we annealed a 10-fold
excess of oligomer 7, 5'-GCGGATATTAATGTGACGGTAGCGAGTCGCTC, to 50 µg of gapped pUC19CPDC or pUC19CPD plasmid DNA, then purified the ligated product by isopycnic centrifugation in CsCl plus ethidium bromide as previously described (24). The boldface thymine (nt 178')
thus created a G/T mismatch (substrate sCPDC(g/t)) or an A/T pair
(substrate sCPD(a/t)). Similarly, a 10-fold excess of oligomer 8, 5'-GCGGATATCAATGTGACGGTAGCGAGTCGCTC, was ligated to gapped
pUC19CPDRev, so the boldface cytosine (nt 179') created an A/C mismatch
(substrate sCPDRev(a/c)). Endonuclease N.AlwI (25), which
nicks one strand of double-strand DNA 4 nt 3' to its recognition
sequence of (GGATCNNNN
, unmethylated adenines only) was used to
introduce site-specific nicks into the respective plasmids, yielding
substrates sCPD(a/t)n, sCPDC(g/t)n, and sCPDRev(a/c)n (see Table I and
Fig. 1). We constructed nine other substrates using oligomers similar
to oligomer 7 but with one or two changes (the 5th through 17th base
pairs are shown in Table II (lines 2-10; see
footnote), which were ligated into gapped pUC19CPDC and
processed as described above.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Plasmids and derived DNA substrates
Excision analyses of mismatched-DNA substrates

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Substrates and probes for MMR studies.
Construction of these and other DNA substrates and plasmids is
described under "Experimental Procedures," and the relevant
properties are summarized in Table I. Coordinates 1 and
1' designate respective nucleotides in sense (3' to 5') and
antisense (5' to 3') strands relative to the bla gene at the
first base pair in the EarI endonuclease site in pUC19 and
its derivatives. Numbering is clockwise as shown.
Approximate sites of restriction endonucleases cleaving both DNA
strands (AseI, AhdI, and EarI), or
only the strand indicated (N.AlwI, N.BstNBI), are
indicated. Heavy bars indicate positions and strand
collinearity of probes (italicized) (see Table I).
A, substrates sCPDC(g/t)n and sCPD(a/t)n. Position of nick
generated by N.AlwI endonuclease at coordinate 23 for
initiation of 3' to 5' excision toward the mispair region is indicated.
Letters [(T), (G or A)] in regions covered by
probes D and A refer to antisense-strand thymine
and sense-strand guanine or adenine, respectively, creating a T/G
mispair or a T/A homopair at coordinate 178. B,
substrate sCPDRev(a/c)n. Position of nick generated by endonuclease
N.AlwI at coordinate 30' for initiation of 5' to
3' excision toward the mispair is indicated. Non-italicized
letters [(C), (A)] in the region covered by probe I
refer to C/A mispair at coordinate 179'.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Time course of MMR error correction and
excision. A, standard MMR error correction. Lane
1 corresponds to reaction terminated at time zero without 37 °C
incubation, and lanes 2-14 correspond to reactions
terminated at 40 and 80 s, and at the times indicated in Fig.
2D (open circles). B-D, excision
assay. Incubation of 900 fmol of DNA substrate sCPDC(g/t)n with 1200 µg of nuclear extract in 180 µl of standard MMR mixture lacking
exogenous dNTPs at 37 °C, removal of 15-µl aliquots at indicated
time points, digestion with proteinase K, DNA extraction, digestion
with AhdI endonuclease, annealing to 32P-labeled
probe A, analysis by gel electrophoresis, and
autoradiography, as described under "Experimental
Procedures." B, agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide;
C, autoradiography of dried agarose gel. Lane 1,
aliquot before 37 °C incubation; lanes 2-11, removal of
aliquots after incubation at 37 °C with extract for times indicated
in D (filled squares): 40, 80, 120, 160, 200, 240, 280, 320, 360, and 400 s, respectively. D, amounts
of corrected product relative to yields at 10 min (
) and
phosphorimaged excision-probe signals relative to plateau value
at 360 s (
).
Relative excision signals and estimated yield of excised intermediate

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Treatment of gapped DNA intermediate with DNA
polymerase. Incubation of 75 fmol of substrate sCPDC(g/t)n with
100 µg of nuclear extract at 37 °C in 15 µl of complete MMR
reaction or in mixtures lacking exogenous dNTPs, extraction of DNA,
subsequent gap-filling DNA synthesis with pol I Klenow
fragment as indicated, digestion with AseI endonuclease, and
electrophoresis, as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Lane 1, standard 15-min MMR incubation with
added exogenous dNTPs and AseI endonuclease digestion of
extracted DNA. Lane 2, 7-min incubation without exogenous
dNTPs, and AseI endonuclease digestion of extracted DNA.
Lane 3, 7-min incubation without exogenous dNTPs, then
treatment of extracted DNA with polymerase I Klenow with four dNTPs at
17 µM final concentration, before AseI
endonuclease digestion and electrophoresis.
-32P]dTTP
outside the shorter nick-mispair path as within (19). For substrate
sCPDC(g/t)n, plateau excision signals slightly decreased along the
shorter (3' to 5') path from the nick toward the mismatch (Table III,
probes C, B, and A), whereas signals
for excision along the 5' to 3' nick-mispair path in substrate
sCPDRev(a/c)n were nearly the same (probes J and
I). This may reflect limited DNA synthesis near the 3' to 5'
excision end point, using residual dNTPs in the extracts. To assess the
specificity of 3' to 5' excision for mispaired DNA, we compared shorter
path excision signals (probes A, B, and
C) for substrate sCPDC(g/t)n versus sCPD(a/t)n,
respectively, 0.90 to 1.00 and 0.04 to 0.05. If the excision signals
are each corrected for adventitious background (probes
A, B, and C versus probe E), the final values, 0.87 to 0.97 for sCPDC(g/t)n and
0.02 to 0.03 for sCPD(a/t)n, correspond to a mismatch:homoduplex DNA specificity of roughly 40:1.

View larger version (46K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Analysis of MMR excision gap formation at
different positions. Incubation of 450 fmol of DNA substrates
indicated below with 600 µg of nuclear extract in 90-µl mixtures
with standard MMR components but without exogenous dNTPs, for 7 min at
37 °C, extraction of DNA, treatment with AhdI
endonuclease in 75 µl AhdI Digestion Buffer, annealing of
15-µl of the digested DNA to 0.5 pmole of one of the indicated
probes, and electrophoresis and autoradiography, as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Data are summarized in Table III. Nearly
identical values were obtained from another set of independent
experiments.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|---|
We thank Dr. Andrew Buermeyer for critical reading of the manuscript and helpful suggestions.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant ES09848 (to J. B. H.). This is contribution 11907 from the Oregon Agricultural Experimental Station.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, ALS 1007, Corvallis, OR 97331. Tel.: 541-737-1777; Fax: 541-737-0497; E-mail: haysj@bcc.orst.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 10, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200357200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
MMR, mismatch
repair;
hMutS
, MSH2·MSH6 heterodimer;
nt, nucleotide(s);
DTT, dithiothreitol.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Buermeyer, A. B., Deschenes, S. M., Baker, S. M., and Liskay, R. M. (1999) Annu. Rev. Genet. 33, 533-564[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Kolodner, R. D., and Marsischky, G. T. (1999) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9, 89-96[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Jiricny, J., and Nystrom-Lahti, M. (2000) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10, 157-161[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Mu, D., Tursun, M., Duckett, D. R., Drummond, J. T., Modrich, P., and Sancar, A. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 760-769[Abstract] |
| 5. |
Wang, H.,
Lawrence, C. W., Li, G.-M.,
and Hays, J. B.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
16894-16900 |
| 6. |
Duckett, D. R.,
Drummond, J. T.,
Murchie, A. I. H.,
Reardon, J.,
Sancar, A.,
Lilley, D. M. J.,
and Modrich, P.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
6443-6447 |
| 7. |
Kat, A.,
Thilly, W. G.,
Fang, W.-H.,
Longley, M. J., Li, G.-M.,
and Modrich, P.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
6424-6428 |
| 8. | Ni, T. T., Marsischky, G. T., and Kolodner, R. D. (1999) Mol. Cell 4, 439-444[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Mello, J. A., Acharya, S., Fishel, R., and Essigmann, J. M. (1996) Chem. Biol. 3, 579-589[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Drummond, J. T.,
Anthony, A.,
Brown, R.,
and Modrich, P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19645-19648 |
| 11. |
Li, G.-M.,
Wang, H.,
and Romano, L. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24084-24088 |
| 12. | Swann, P., Waters, T. R., Moulton, D. C., Xu, Y.-Z., Zheng, Q., Edwards, M., and Mace, R. (1996) Science 273, 1109-1111[Abstract] |
| 13. | Branch, P., Aquilina, G., Bignami, M., and Karran, P. (1993) Nature 362, 652-654[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Wu, J., Gu, L.,
Wang, H.,
Geacintov, N.,
and Li, G.-M.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
8292-8301 |
| 15. |
Fritzell, J. A.,
Narayanan, L.,
Baker, S. M.,
Bronner, C. E.,
Andrew, S. E.,
Prolla, T. A.,
Bradley, A.,
Jirik, F. R.,
Liskay, R. M.,
and Glazer, P. M.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
5143-5147 |
| 16. |
Fink, D.,
Zheng, H.,
Nebel, S.,
Norris, P. S.,
Aebi, S.,
Lin, T. P.,
Nehme, A.,
Christen, R. D.,
Haas, M.,
MacLeod, C. L.,
and Howell, S. B.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
1841-1845 |
| 17. |
Liu, H.,
Hewitt, S.,
and Hays, J. B.
(2000)
Genetics
154,
503-512 |
| 18. |
Nara, K.-i.,
Nagashima, F.,
and Yasui, A.
(2001)
Cancer Res.
61,
50-52 |
| 19. |
Holmes, J.,
Clark, S.,
and Modrich, P.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
5837-5841 |
| 20. |
Thomas, D. C.,
Roberts, J. D.,
and Kunkel, T. A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
3744-3751 |
| 21. |
Duckett, D. R.,
Bronstein, S. M.,
Taya, Y.,
and Modrich, P.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
12384-12388 |
| 22. | Wang, H., and Hays, J. B. (2000) Mol. Biotechnol. 15, 97-104[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Helig, J. S., Elbing, K. L., and Brent, R. (1998) in Current Protocol in Molecular Biology (Ausubel, F. M. , Brent, R. , Kingston, R. E. , Moore, D. D. , Seidman, J. G. , Smith, J. A. , and Struhl, K., eds) , pp. 1.76-1.78, John Wiley & Sons, New York |
| 24. | Wang, H., and Hays, J. B. (2001) Mol. Biotechnol. 19, 133-140[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Xu, Y.,
Lunnen, K. D.,
and Kong, H.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
12990-12995 |
| 26. |
Fang, W.-h.,
and Modrich, P.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
11838-11844 |
| 27. |
Genschel, J.,
Littman, S. J.,
Drummond, J. T.,
and Modrich, P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
19895-19901 |
| 28. |
Gradia, S.,
Acharya, S.,
and Fishel, R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
3922-3930 |
| 29. |
Grilley, M.,
Griffith, J.,
and Modrich, P.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
11830-11837 |
| 30. |
Wang, H.,
and Hays, J. B.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
26143-26148 |
| 31. |
Drummond, J., Li, G.-M.,
Longley, M. J.,
and Modrich, P.
(1995)
Science
268,
1909-1912 |
| 32. |
Li, G.-M.,
and Modrich, P.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
1950-1954 |
| 33. |
Jones, M.,
Wagner, R.,
and Radman, M.
(1987)
Genetics
115,
605-610 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Wang and J. B. Hays Human DNA mismatch repair: coupling of mismatch recognition to strand-specific excision Nucleic Acids Res., November 29, 2007; 35(20): 6727 - 6739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. W. Hou, R. Prasad, K. Asagoshi, A. Masaoka, and S. H. Wilson Comparative assessment of plasmid and oligonucleotide DNA substrates in measurement of in vitro base excision repair activity Nucleic Acids Res., September 27, 2007; 35(17): e112 - e112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-Y. Xu, Z. Zhu, P. Zhang, S.-H. Chan, J. C. Samuelson, J. Xiao, D. Ingalls, and G. G. Wilson Discovery of natural nicking endonucleases Nb.BsrDI and Nb.BtsI and engineering of top-strand nicking variants from BsrDI and BtsI Nucleic Acids Res., July 9, 2007; 35(14): 4608 - 4618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Plotz, C. Welsch, L. Giron-Monzon, P. Friedhoff, M. Albrecht, A. Piiper, R. M. Biondi, T. Lengauer, S. Zeuzem, and J. Raedle Mutations in the MutS{alpha} interaction interface of MLH1 can abolish DNA mismatch repair Nucleic Acids Res., December 2, 2006; 34(22): 6574 - 6586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Modrich Mechanisms in Eukaryotic Mismatch Repair J. Biol. Chem., October 13, 2006; 281(41): 30305 - 30309. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. York and P. Modrich Mismatch Repair-dependent Iterative Excision at Irreparable O6-Methylguanine Lesions in Human Nuclear Extracts J. Biol. Chem., August 11, 2006; 281(32): 22674 - 22683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Karnitz, K. S. Flatten, J. M. Wagner, D. Loegering, J. S. Hackbarth, S. J. H. Arlander, B. T. Vroman, M. B. Thomas, Y.-U. Baek, K. M. Hopkins, et al. Gemcitabine-Induced Activation of Checkpoint Signaling Pathways That Affect Tumor Cell Survival Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2005; 68(6): 1636 - 1644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yang, L. E. Sass, C. Du, P. Hsieh, and D. A. Erie Determination of protein-DNA binding constants and specificities from statistical analyses of single molecules: MutS-DNA interactions Nucleic Acids Res., August 1, 2005; 33(13): 4322 - 4334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kang, S. Huang, and M. J. Blaser Structural and Functional Divergence of MutS2 from Bacterial MutS1 and Eukaryotic MSH4-MSH5 Homologs J. Bacteriol., May 15, 2005; 187(10): 3528 - 3537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-M. Huang, S.-U. Chen, S. D. Goodman, S.-H. Wu, J.-T. Kao, C.-N. Lee, W.-C. Cheng, K.-S. Tsai, and W.-h. Fang Interaction of Nick-directed DNA Mismatch Repair and Loop Repair in Human Cells J. Biol. Chem., July 16, 2004; 279(29): 30228 - 30235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Martik, C. Baitinger, and P. Modrich Differential Specificities and Simultaneous Occupancy of Human MutS{alpha} Nucleotide Binding Sites J. Biol. Chem., July 2, 2004; 279(27): 28402 - 28410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wang and J. B. Hays Mismatch Repair in Human Nuclear Extracts: EFFECTS OF INTERNAL DNA-HAIRPIN STRUCTURES BETWEEN MISMATCHES AND EXCISION-INITIATION NICKS ON MISMATCH CORRECTION AND MISMATCH-PROVOKED EXCISION J. Biol. Chem., August 1, 2003; 278(31): 28686 - 28693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wang and J. B. Hays Mismatch Repair in Human Nuclear Extracts. TIME COURSES AND ATP REQUIREMENTS FOR KINETICALLY DISTINGUISHABLE STEPS LEADING TO TIGHTLY CONTROLLED 5' TO 3' AND APHIDICOLIN-SENSITIVE 3' TO 5' MISPAIR-PROVOKED EXCISION J. Biol. Chem., July 12, 2002; 277(29): 26143 - 26148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||