|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201834200 on May 1, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 29, 26327-26334, July 19, 2002
The Effects of the Fanconi Anemia Zinc Finger
(FAZF) on Cell Cycle, Apoptosis, and Proliferation Are
Differentiation Stage-specific*
Mu-Shui
Dai §¶,
Nathalie
Chevallier ,
Stacie
Stone ,
Michael C.
Heinrich** ,
Melanie
McConnell ,
Tanja
Reuter ,
Hal E.
Broxmeyer§,
Jonathan D.
Licht ,
Li
Lu§, and
Maureen E.
Hoatlin §§
From the Division of Molecular Medicine, Oregon
Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97201, § Department of Microbiology/Immunology and the
Walther Oncology Center, Indiana University School of Medicine and the
Walther Cancer Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, Derald H. Ruttenberg Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, The Mount Sinai
School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, and ** Division
of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine and
the Portland Veterans Administration Medical
Center, Portland, Oregon 97201
Received for publication, February 23, 2002, and in revised form, April 30, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
FAZF, a member of the BTB/POZ family of
transcriptional repressor proteins, has been shown to bind to FANCC,
the protein defective in patients with the bone marrow failure syndrome
Fanconi anemia complementation group C. Because bone marrow failure in
Fanconi anemia has been attributed to a failure of the hematopoietic
stem cell population to produce sufficient progeny, we documented the expression of FAZF in human CD34+ hematopoietic
progenitor cells. FAZF was expressed at high levels in early stages of
differentiation but declined during subsequent differentiation into
erythroid and myeloid lineages. Consistent with its presumed role as a
transcriptional repressor, FAZF was found in the nuclear compartment,
where it resides in distinct nuclear speckles at or near sites of DNA
replication. Using a FAZF-inducible myeloid cell line, we found that
enforced expression of FAZF was accompanied by accumulation in the
G1 phase of the cell cycle followed later by apoptosis.
These results suggest an essential role for FAZF during the
proliferative stages of primitive hematopoietic progenitors, possibly
acting in concert with (a subset of) the Fanconi anemia proteins.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
FAZF1 (also known as
TZFP (1) and murine homologs ROG (2) and Tzfp (3)), a new member of the
BTB/POZ (pox virus and zinc finger) protein family, was identified
based on its ability to interact with the Fanconi anemia (FA)
complementation group C protein, FANCC (4). FA is a genomic instability
disorder characterized by progressive pancytopenia, diverse congenital anomalies, and predisposition to cancer, particularly acute myeloid leukemia and squamous cell carcinoma (for review, see Ref. 5). Congenital malformations in FA are a striking feature of the disease. The most common are defects in the thumbs (e.g. absent,
bifid, or hypoplastic thumb) (6), although abnormalities are variable and may involve any major organ system. The range and type of developmental defects observed suggest that FA genes are involved in
morphogenesis. Cells from FA patients are hypersensitive to DNA
cross-linking agents such as mitomycin C. In addition, FA cells have an
abnormal cell cycle profile, and this abnormality is exacerbated by
treatment with mitomycin C (7). CD34+ cells isolated from
FA-C patients fail to thrive in vitro (8, 9), and treating
normal CD34+ cells with antisense oligodinucleotides
directed against the FANCC gene recapitulates the defective
phenotype (10). These results suggest that FA genes are involved in
ensuring the proper growth and differentiation of primitive
hematopoietic cells. Despite efforts to discover the function of the
FANCC protein and the function of the proteins encoded by the other
more recently cloned FA genes (FANCA, FANCD2,
FANCE, FANCF, and FANCG), the basic
defect is still unknown (11). There is strong evidence that several FA
proteins functionally interact within a large protein complex, and
recent experiments demonstrated that the Fanconi anemia protein FANCD2
is coupled to a DNA damage response pathway involving BRCA1 (12).
We reported previously that FAZF is a transcriptional repressor
belonging to the BTB/POZ family of proteins and is similar to the PLZF
protein (4). PLZF is involved in reciprocal chromosomal translocations
with the retinoic acid receptor leading to a form of acute
promyelocytic leukemia (for review, see Melnick and Licht (13)). PLZF
is a sequence-specific transcriptional repressor that functions by
interacting with co-repressor complexes including HDAC1. Enforced
expression of PLZF in the murine hematopoietic cell line 32Dcl3 blocks
cells in G1/S phase, inhibits cell growth and
differentiation, and leads to apoptosis (14). Experiments with PLZF
nullizygous mice showed that it is essential for axial skeleton
patterning and normal limb development (15).
There are many unanswered questions regarding the function of FAZF in
hematopoiesis and its relationship to the pathogenesis of FA, including
its expression profile and its effects on growth and differentiation in
hematopoietic cells. In the present study, we show that FAZF mRNA
and protein are expressed in primary hematopoietic CD34+
progenitor cells, increase during early proliferation, and are then
down-regulated during terminal differentiation in both erythroid and
myeloid lineages. The pattern is similar but not identical with that of
PLZF. Further analysis using a FAZF-inducible hematopoietic cell line
demonstrated that enforced expression of FAZF triggers a G1
phase cell cycle arrest followed by increased apoptosis. Thus, our
data suggest that FAZF influences hematopoietic cell fate, and its
effects are conditional, depending on the proliferation/differentiation status of the cell.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plasmids, Antibodies, Cytokines, Viruses, and Chemicals--
The
pFLAG-FAZF expression plasmid and 293-EBNA/FLAG-FAZF cell line have
been described (4). FAZF-specific antibodies were prepared using a
FAZF-glutathione S-transferase fusion protein as an antigen,
essentially as described previously (16). The glutathione
S-transferase-FAZF expression plasmid was constructed by
inserting an internal XhoI-BamHI fragment from
FAZF cDNA, encoding amino acid residues 114-295 of the FAZF
protein, into an XhoI-BamHI-cut pGEX-5x-2 vector
(Amersham Biosciences). U937T/FAZF cells, a line of U937 cells stably
expressing FAZF and the autoregulatory tet-VP16 under the control of
the tet-operator promoter (17), were routinely maintained in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal bovine serum, 0.5 µg/ml puromycin, and 0.1 µg/ml
tetracycline in 5% CO2. Recombinant human Epo was
purchased from Amgen Corp. (Thousand Oaks, CA) and used at 1 unit/ml.
Recombinant human SLF and granulocyte-CSF were purchased from R & D
Systems Inc. (Minneapolis, MN) and used at 50 and 10 ng/ml,
respectively. Recombinant human GM-CSF and IL-3 were gifts from Immunex
Corp. (Seattle, WA) and used at 200 units/ml each. Monoclonal mouse
anti-PLZF antibody was purchased from Oncogene Research Products
(Cambridge, MA). All other antibodies and chemicals were
obtained from Sigma unless otherwise indicated.
Construction of Inducible Cell Lines--
Tetracycline-inducible
FLAG-tagged FAZF cell lines were produced using the Tet-off system
(18). Briefly, an EcoRI/BglII fragment containing
FAZF cDNA was obtained from pSG5-FAZF (4) and cloned into pUHD10-3
cut with EcoRI and BamHI (18). For each
transfection 2 × 107 U937T cells were washed once and
resuspended in 400 µl of additive-free RPMI 1640. Ten micrograms of
pUHD:FAZF and 1 µg of pIND (Invitrogen), as a neomycin selection
marker, were linearized and co-transfected by electroporation at 960 microfarads and 0.17 kV using a Bio-Rad electroporator. After
24 h cells were plated into methylcellulose containing 10% fetal
bovine serum, 0.1 µg/ml tetracycline, and 0.5 µg/ml puromycin with
1 mg/ml G418. Resistant clones were isolated and analyzed for FAZF
expression. Growth of triplicate cultures of U937 cells was measured by
the metabolic conversion of tetrazolium to formazan (CellTiter 96 Proliferation Assay, Promega).
Separation and Culture of CD34+
Cells--
Mononuclear cells were obtained using Ficoll-Hypaque
centrifugation from normal human umbilical cord blood.
CD34+ cells were isolated with magnetic-activated cell
separation beads (Miltenyi Biotech Inc., Auburn, CA) according to the
instructions of the manufacturer. The purification method routinely
gave CD34+ cells that were more than 80-95% pure, as
previously described (19, 20). CD34+ cells were cultured
either in suspension culture or semi-solid culture for differentiation
as previously described (19-22). Briefly, 200 cells/ml were seeded in
semisolid cultures contained Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium
(Invitrogen), 1% methylcellulose, 30% fetal calf serum, 0.1 mmol/liter hemin (Eastman Kodak Co.), 2 mmol/liter
L-glutamine (Invitrogen), 0.1 mmol/liter
-mercaptoethanol, 200 units/ml granulocyte-macrophage-CSF, 200 units/ml IL-3, 50 ng/ml SLF, 1 units/ml Epo, 10 µg/ml vitamin
B12, 15 µg/ml folic acid, 10 µg/ml insulin. For
erythroid differentiation in suspension culture, CD34+
cells were seeded at 2 × 104 cells/ml in Iscove's
modified Dulbecco's medium containing 15% fetal calf serum in the
presence of IL-3, granulocyte-macrophage-CSF, SLF, and Epo. For myeloid
differentiation, CD34+ cells were cultured either in
suspension or methylcellulose culture for CFU-granulocyte macrophage as
for erythroid cultures except with the addition of 10 ng/ml
granulocyte-CSF in lieu of Epo.
Reverse Transcriptase-PCR Analysis--
Total RNA was isolated
from freshly separated CD34+ cells (d0) or differentiated
cells in both erythroid and myeloid lineages at different time courses
(d3-d14) by Qiagen RNeasy mini kits (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) as suggested
by the manufacturer. Total RNA was treated with DNase I for 15 min at
room temperature followed by heating at 95 °C for 10 min before
reverse transcription to eliminate any contamination of remaining
genomic DNA. PCR was performed by a thermal cycler (PerkinElmer Life
Sciences). The sequences of primers are as follows: FAZF, 5'-GAG ATG
TTG CAC AAG CAC TCG C-3', 5'-CAA CTG GTT CTG GCT CCA GAG C-3'; PLZF,
5'-GAA GCA TTC CAG CGA GGA GA-3', 5'-GGA GTA GAT GGC CAG ATG CT-3'. The primers for -actin was described previously (20). The PCR profile used was denaturation at 94 °C for 45 s, annealing at
52-55 °C for 45 s, and polymerization at 72 °C for 2 min
for 35 cycles. Ten µl of amplification reaction was electrophoresed,
transferred to membrane, and hybridized with [32P]dCTP
(Amersham Biosciences)-labeled FAZF, PLZF, or -actin gene fragment
as a probe. Hybridization was performed overnight at 42 °C, filters
were washed with 0.1 × SSC (1× SSC = 0.15 M
NaCl and 0.015 M sodium citrate), 0.1% SDS at
55 °C for 60 min, dried, and exposed to x-ray at 70 °C.
Immunoblotting--
Whole cell lysates were prepared by
suspending cells at a concentration of 2 × 107
cells/ml in cell lysis buffer (50 mmol/liter Tris, pH 7.4, 0.25 mmol/liter NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% SDS, 1 mmol/liter
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml
aprotinin, 100 mmol/liter NaF). Protein in the clear lysate was
quantitated using the Bio-Rad protein assay kit and separated by 10%
sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proteins
were electroblotted onto Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore Corp.,
Bedford, MA) and incubated with mouse or rabbit antibodies specific for
PLZF, FAZF, FLAG M2, or actin, as noted in text, followed by incubation
with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or goat
anti-mouse secondary antibodies. Proteins were detected with the
ECL-Western blotting system (Amersham Biosciences).
Cell Cycle Analysis--
Cells were seeded at a density of
5 × 104 cells/ml in RPMI 1640 plus 1% fetal calf
serum and incubated for 1-7 days in 5% CO2 at 37 °C.
Cells were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed in 70%
cold ethanol at 20 °C, washed twice in PBS, and incubated in 50 µg/ml RNase A and 20 µg/ml propidium iodide for 30 min at 37 °C.
The cell cycle status was detected by fluorescence-activated cell
sorter flow cytometry and analyzed using CellFit software (BD PharMingen).
Apoptosis Assays--
Apoptosis was determined using annexin V
staining. Briefly, cells were incubated with annexin V-fluorescein
isothiocyanate in binding buffer (10 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 140 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2) for 15 min
at room temperature, then suspended in binding buffer containing 50 µg/ml propidium iodide followed by flow cytometry analysis.
Immunofluorescence Microscopy--
For FAZF expression in 293 EBNA cells (Invitrogen), cells were seeded on chamber slides and
transfected using LipofectAMINE as directed by the manufacturer
(Invitrogen). Plasmids encoding epitope-tagged FAZF or the parental
vectors as negative controls for antibody specificity were used as
indicated in text. Cells were processed as described previously (4)
using monoclonal anti-HA 12CA5 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and/or
rabbit polyclonal anti-FLAG (Zymed Laboratories Inc.,
South San Francisco, CA) and Oregon Green-conjugated goat anti-mouse
and/or Texas Red-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (Molecular Probes, Eugene,
OR) as secondary antibodies. For analysis of CD34+ cells,
cells were placed on chamber slides pretreated with poly-lysine. Sites
of DNA synthesis were determined by a 2-bromo-2'-deoxy-uridine (BrdUrd)-labeling kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Briefly, cells were incubated in the presence of 10 µM BrdUrd for
4.5 h, permeabilized, and fixed with 70% ethanol in a 50 mM glycine buffer, pH 2.0. Cells were incubated with rabbit
FAZF-specific antisera followed by Texas Red-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit (Molecular Probes). BrdUrd incorporation was visualized
with an anti-BrdUrd mouse monoclonal antibody followed by a
fluorescein-labeled secondary antibody. Image collection and
manipulation for overlapping signals were performed as described
previously (4).
 |
RESULTS |
FAZF Localizes in Foci in Human Hematopoietic Progenitor
Cells--
To determine the subcellular localization of FAZF we
generated FAZF-specific antibodies using a glutathione
S-transferase-FAZF fusion protein as an antigen. An internal
domain of FAZF with only 14% identity to PLZF was selected to reduce
potential cross-reactivity with PLZF and other BTB/POZ proteins. To
demonstrate that the antibody recognizes FAZF, we examined lysates from
293 EBNA cells transiently transfected with a plasmid encoding
FLAG-tagged FAZF (293/Fl-FAZF) or the parental plasmid (control) by
immunoblot. As shown in Fig
1A, the antibody recognizes
FAZF, and no signal was observed in negative control lysates. Reprobing
the blot with anti-FLAG detected a band overlapping with that
recognized by anti-FAZF (Fig 1B). In immunofluorescence
assays using 293/Fl-FAZF cells, preimmune serum lacked specific
staining (Fig 1C), whereas FAZF-specific antiserum
demonstrated that FAZF is localized in the nucleus of 293/Fl-FAZF cells
in speckles in a range of sizes from micropunctate to large foci (Fig
1D). The staining is indistinguishable from that using an
anti-FLAG antibody that recognizes the epitope-tagged FAZF (4). We
conclude that our antibody recognizes FAZF in both immunoblot and
immunofluorescence assays.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
FAZF-specific antibody. The lysates from
293 cells expressing FLAG-tagged FAZF (FAZF/pCEP-FLAG)- and
pCEP-FLAG-transfected cells as mock controls were subjected to SDS-PAGE
electrophoresis and probed with anti-FAZF 4509 antibody (A)
or anti-FLAG (B). An equatorial confocal image of 293 EBNA
cells expressing FLAG-FAZF was obtained by incubating the cells with
anti-FAZF (D) followed by detection with an anti-rabbit
antibody conjugated to Oregon Green compared with incubation with
normal rabbit serum (C) as a control. The staining in
panel D was identical to that using anti-FLAG (4).
|
|
To determine the expression pattern of endogenously expressed FAZF,
CD34+ cells were isolated from human cord blood
and grown in the presence of growth factors as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The cells were fixed and stained with
anti-FAZF and examined by immunofluorescence. As shown in Fig
2, FAZF is expressed in the nucleus in a
speckled pattern, consistent with the pattern observed in 293 cells
overexpressing the FLAG epitope-tagged FAZF (4). The speckled pattern
is similar to that observed for other BTB/POZ-containing proteins
including the related proteins, PLZF (23) and BCL6 (also known as LAZ3)
(24, 25).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
FAZF localizes in foci in human hematopoietic
progenitor cells. CD34+ cells were fixed,
permeabilized, and then stained with a rabbit polyclonal antibody
specific for FAZF or preimmune normal rabbit serum followed by staining
with a fluorescent-conjugated secondary antibody (Texas Red, Molecular
Probes). Immunofluorescence was examined by laser confocal microscopy
(Deltavision, Applied Precision Inc.) using a 100× oil lens.
Panel A, control cells were negative. Panel B,
representative cell stained with anti-FAZF exhibit a micro-punctate
nuclear pattern, similar to that of PLZF.
|
|
Endogenous FAZF Associates with Replication Foci in Primary
Cells--
The significance of the nuclear speckled pattern observed
for certain BTB/POZ-containing proteins is unknown. However, recent experiments with BCL6 by Albagli et al. (25) demonstrate a
close association of BCL6 and replication foci, suggesting that BCL6 may have a positioning or assembly role in replication. To test the
possibility that FAZF associates with sites of DNA synthesis, we
examined CD34+ cells that were grown in the presence of
erythroid factors for 5 days by pulse-labeling the sites of DNA
synthesis with BrdUrd. Stained cells were examined by confocal
microscopy. Fig 3 shows that FAZF and
BrdUrd labeling occur in foci and that these foci are often adjacent or
overlapping, suggesting that FAZF is localized near sites of DNA
replication.

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
FAZF associates with sites of DNA synthesis
in human hematopoietic progenitors. The first two rows show
representative CD34+ cells (1 and 2)
grown for 3 days in the presence of erythroid growth factors and
stained with a nuclear marker (DAPI), anti-BrdUrd (BrdU),
and anti-FAZF. 1a, DAPI; 1b, anti-BrdUrd;
1c, anti-FAZF; 1d, merged image of anti-BrdUrd
and anti-FAZF; 2a, DAPI; 2b, anti- BrdUrd;
2c, anti-FAZF; 2d, overlap of anti-BrdUrd and
anti-FAZF; 3, cells stained with DAPI and preimmune rabbit serum; 4, cells stained with anti-BrdUrd and DAPI; 5, cells stained
with anti-FAZF and DAPI.
|
|
FAZF Is Expressed during Erythroid and Myeloid Differentiation of
Human Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells--
To begin to define the role
of FAZF in hematopoiesis, we determined the expression of FAZF during
early proliferation and terminal differentiation stages of
CD34+ progenitor cells directed to either erythroid or
myeloid lineages by the presence of SLF, IL-3, granulocyte,
macrophage-CSF, plus Epo (for erythroid) or granulocyte-CSF (for
myeloid). The day-7-14 BFU-E (burst-forming unit-erythrocyte)-derived
cells were described (19), and CFU-granulocyte macrophage-derived cells
expressed myeloid lineage markers such as CD11b/CD14 by flow cytometry
analysis (data not shown). The day-3 and -5 suspension culture-derived cells for both erythroid and myeloid lineages can form secondary CFU-erythrocyte and CFU-granulocyte macrophage colonies (data not
shown), indicating that the cells differentiate to specific erythroid
or myeloid lineages under these culture conditions. The expression of
FAZF was compared with that of PLZF, the closest hematopoietic
counterpart to FAZF. Cell samples collected at days 0, 3, 5, 7, 10, and
14 were assayed for FAZF or PLZF protein by immunoblot using anti-actin
as a control for protein loading. Transcripts from corresponding
samples were also analyzed by reverse transcriptase-PCR. As shown in
Fig. 4A, PLZF mRNA was
expressed in CD34+ progenitor cells at a high level,
consistent with previous reports (14, 23). PLZF was expressed during
both early proliferation (before day 7) and terminal differentiation
(after day 7) stages in both erythroid and myeloid lineages. No
differences in expression were observed between lineages. In contrast,
FAZF was expressed in CD34+ progenitor cells at a lower
level relative to PLZF, which remained at high levels during early
proliferation but was down-regulated during terminal differentiation in
both lineages. As shown in Fig. 4B, the expression of both
FAZF and PLZF proteins is high before day 7 and decreases during
terminal differentiation stages, suggesting that PLZF but not FAZF is
regulated at the post-transcriptional level during hematopoiesis
in vitro. These results suggest that down-regulation of both
PLZF and FAZF is required for the proper differentiation of both
erythroid and myeloid lineages.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
FAZF is expressed during erythroid and
myeloid differentiation of human CD34+ cells. Protein
or RNA was prepared from freshly separated CD34+ cells (day
0), from suspension cultures of CD34+ cells grown for 3 and
5 days, and from colonies grown in 1% methyl cellulose cultures for 7, 10, 12, and 14 days in the presence of SLF, IL-3, granulocyte,
macrophage-CSF, and with Epo (for erythroid differentiation) or
granulocyte-CSF (for myeloid differentiation). Panel A,
reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR amplification was performed
on total RNA prepared from the time points as indicated. Panel
B, cell lysates were subjected to SDS/PAGE, and immunoblots were
performed by using anti-FAZF or anti-PLZF antibodies. An actin
immunoblot was used as a protein loading control.
|
|
Generation of FAZF-inducible Cell Lines--
We anticipated
difficulty in directly assessing the biological function of FAZF by
expressing the protein in cells because FAZF is similar to other
proteins that negatively regulate growth. Thus, to complement the
results obtained in primary cells and to examine the possible growth
inhibitory and pro-apoptotic effects of FAZF in hematopoietic cells, we
used a tetracycline-regulated expression system. A parental U937T cell
line constructed to constitutively express the tetracycline repressor
(17) was transfected with a FAZF construct under the control of the TET
operator, and individual clones were isolated. Expression of FAZF upon
tetracycline withdrawal was assessed in each independent clone by
immunoblot with an anti-FAZF polyclonal antibody followed by a
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. We selected two clones with
tight regulation and high expression levels termed U937T/FAZF-6 and
-30, respectively (Fig 5A). A cell line that was
neomycin-resistant but did not produce FAZF as detected by immunoblot
(U937T/NEO) was used as a negative control in all experiments. The
growth rate, viability, and cell cycle profile before and after
tetracycline withdrawal of the control U937T/NEO cell line was
indistinguishable from the parental line U937T. In contrast, cultures
of U937T/FAZF cell clones were significantly growth-suppressed upon
withdrawal of tetracycline as shown in Fig 5B.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Characteristics of FAZF-inducible cell lines.
A, U937T/FAZF cell clones were grown in the presence or
absence of tetracycline for 1 and 4 days. Cell lysates were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblot with anti-FAZF. B,
expression of FAZF has a growth-suppressive effect. Control U937T
parental cells and FAZF-expressing clones 6 and 30 were seeded in the
presence and absence of tetracycline. Proliferation assays on cultured
cells were performed daily.
|
|
Enforced FAZF Expression Induces Apoptosis--
BCL6 and PLZF,
related BTB/POZ-containing proteins, can mediate apoptosis (14,
24). To determine whether FAZF triggers apoptosis, we tested the
U937T/FAZF-inducible cell lines before and after FAZF expression.
Apoptosis was demonstrated by an annexin V staining assay, which is a
sensitive method for detection of cells in pre-apoptosis. We measured
annexin V staining and propidium iodide staining over time in control
cells and in cells induced to express FAZF. Annexin V staining labels
cells that are undergoing apoptosis, whereas propidium iodide staining
labels cells that have undergone sufficient programmed cell death that
they become permeable to this nucleic acid stain. Thus, apoptotic cells
bind annexin V and later become stained with propidium iodide. In cells where FAZF is not expressed, the population of annexin V-positive cells
ranged from 3.7 to 6.1% over a 5-day period, and propidium iodide
staining cells increased over this time period from 1.7 to 3.3% of the
population (Fig 6). In contrast, cells
with induced FAZF expression exhibit a significant increase in annexin
V-positive cells during this time, and at day 7 post-induction, 32.8%
of the population was stained in this representative experiment. A
concomitant increase in cells stained by propidium iodide was observed,
reaching 13% at day 7. We conclude that enforced FAZF expression in
U937T/FAZF cells induces apoptosis.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Enforced FAZF expression induces
apoptosis. The U937/FAZF-inducible cell line was assayed for
annexin V and propidium iodide staining with and without induction of
FAZF expression at days 3, 5, and 7 post-induction. The lower
panel shows annexin V staining (apoptosis) over the course of
induction. tet, tetracycline.
|
|
Enforced FAZF Expression Results in G1 Arrest--
The
combination of growth suppression and apoptosis led us to examine the
cell cycle profiles in FAZF-expressing cells. U937/FAZF clones 6 and 30 were followed for 7 days after induction of FAZF expression. In the
parental control cells and in FAZF clones in the presence of
tetracycline (no FAZF expression), the cell cycle profile included
~60% of cells in G1 and ~20% in each of the S and
G2/M phases. In contrast, in FAZF-expressing clones 3 days post-induction, 90% of cells accumulated in G1, and cells
in S and G2/M phase decreased (Fig
7). We conclude that enforced FAZF expression in these cells causes accumulation in the G1
phase of the cell cycle.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Enforced FAZF expression results in
G1 arrest in U937 cells. Control U937T clone and two
FAZF-expressing clones were grown in the presence or absence of
tetracycline (Tet). Cell cycle analysis was performed daily
over a 7-day period.
|
|
As shown in Fig 4, both PLZF and FAZF are highly expressed in
CD34+ cells and in proliferating derivatives up to 7 days
of culture in vitro, and then much lower levels of FAZF and
PLZF proteins are detected thereafter. At this time cells in the
population are predominantly in S phase and G1 (70%, 29%,
respectively) (19). Thus, physiologic expression of FAZF or PLZF is
compatible with proliferation and differentiation in this context, at
least up to about day 7. We infer from these data that appropriate
expression of FAZF is required in the early stages of hematopoietic
differentiation, and FAZF-dependent accumulation of cells
in G1 is conditional, depending on cell type and
differentiation status.
 |
DISCUSSION |
FAZF was identified as an interacting partner of the Fanconi
anemia protein FANCC by a yeast two-hybrid assay, subcellular colocalization, and coimmunoprecipitation (4). FAZF also interacts with
another FA protein, FANCG, in yeast two-hybrid and in
coimmunoprecipitation experiments, reinforcing the notion that FAZF
might be part of the FA protein complex (26).
Because so little is known about the function(s) of FAZF or of the FA
proteins, the current work is focused on the basic biology of FAZF,
emphasizing early hematopoiesis. We chose to examine hematopoietic
progenitor cells because this compartment is a likely intersection
between FAZF and FANCC function, based on the structural similarity of
FAZF to PLZF and on the pancytopenia observed in FA. To analyze role of
FAZF in early hematopoiesis, we determined expression at the mRNA
and protein levels, determined subcellular localization, and measured
the effects of its enforced expression. A unique aspect of our work is
that these experiments were performed in primary cells as well as with
a FAZF-inducible cell line. As a result, we had the opportunity to
observe that the effects of FAZF protein expression depended on the
differentiation stage of the cells. Our results support the hypothesis
that FAZF and PLZF have similar but non-overlapping characteristics and
that FAZF plays a role in cell fate decisions during normal hematopoiesis.
We found that expression of FAZF protein in quiescent CD34+
cells was reproducibly lower than that in proliferating derivatives, whereas PLZF was highly expressed in both quiescent and proliferating stages of CD34+ cells. Both FAZF and PLZF are expressed at
high levels between days 3 and 7 and then decline. As protein
expression begins to decrease for PLZF in both erythroid and myeloid
lineages, PLZF mRNA is still abundant. Thus, our data suggest that
unlike FAZF, PLZF is post-transcriptionally regulated in both myeloid
and erythroid lineages as CD34+ cells proliferate and
express their commitment to differentiate. The overlapping expression
pattern during early proliferation and late differentiation stages of
primary CD34+ cells between FAZF and PLZF suggests that
FAZF expression must decrease to allow for the normal differentiation
program. These conclusions are in agreement with those made previously
for PLZF using a PLZF-inducible cell line (14, 27).
Like PLZF, FAZF is localized in discrete nuclear foci of various sizes
in an asynchronous population of hematopoietic progenitors. BCL6,
another BTB/POZ protein, which is involved in translocations frequently
found in non-Hodgkin lymphomas (28, 29), is also located in distinct
nuclear foci in osteosarcoma cells (24). BCL6 and PLZF proteins
function by interacting with co-repressor complexes including histone
deacetylase. Recent evidence suggests that BCL6 foci coincide or are
nearby DNA replication foci, suggesting that this structurally related
transcriptional repressor is involved in some processes related to DNA
synthesis (25). The functional significance of the foci is unknown,
although BCL6 derivatives lacking the BTB/POZ domain fail to form foci,
do not associate with ongoing DNA synthesis, and also fail to function
as transcriptional repressors (24). Because FAZF can associate with
sites of DNA synthesis, FAZF may have a role in initiation or
progression of synthesis. Alternatively, with regard to its interaction
with FANCC, FAZF could have a role in DNA repair processes that occur during replication. In this regard, the recent work by Garcia-Higuera et al. (12) demonstrating the DNA damage-induced
co-localization of FANCD2 and BRCA1 in nuclear foci is especially
intriguing. BRCA1, a protein with multiple functions involved in the
maintenance of genomic stability, has been shown to associate with
components of the histone deacetylase complex (30). Further
underscoring the possible connection between FA proteins and chromatin
remodeling, recent work by Otsuki et al. (31) demonstrate
that FANCA interacts with the BRG1 gene product, a subunit of the
SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex.
The strong homology between FAZF and PLZF and our initial work
demonstrating an overlap in transcriptional repression activity suggested that the function of FAZF and PLZF were related. Based on
previous experiments with PLZF, we hypothesized that enforced expression of FAZF would have a profound effect on cell cycle progression, differentiation/proliferation, and apoptosis (14, 27).
When expression was induced in the cell lines, FAZF acted as an
effective negative regulator of cell growth. Cell cycle analysis of the
U937T/FAZF cell lines 3 days after FAZF induction demonstrated that the
cells accumulated in the G1 phase of the cell cycle in
significant numbers. Moreover, the accumulation in G1
presaged a shift to apoptosis, with apoptotic cells beginning to rise
at day 4 post-induction to 32.8% of the cell population at day 7 post-induction.
One major conclusion that can be drawn from our studies comparing
FAZF-inducible cell lines and physiologic expression of FAZF in
CD34+ cells is that the high physiologic expression of FAZF
(and PLZF) in CD34+ (days 3-7) cells is compatible with
rapid growth in these cells. In contrast, FAZF expression in U937T/FAZF
cells has the effect of rapidly causing G1 accumulation
followed by apoptosis. One might have concluded from enforced
(inducible) expression that PLZF and FAZF have negative growth effects,
as reported earlier for PLZF and BCL-6 (14, 24). However, because our
studies show that the expression of FAZF and PLZF is abundant in
rapidly proliferating derivatives of CD34+ cells, this
effect apparently depends on the cell type where FAZF and PLZF are
expressed. A possible mechanism for these different effects is that
repression of critical target genes required for growth suppression
might not occur in the CD34+ cells because certain
differentiation stage-specific co-repressors are absent. Alternatively,
the action of certain specific corepressors could be consistent with
survival and proliferation of CD34+ cells. Specific
co-repressors for BTB/POZ-containing proteins are possible in addition
to the HDAC1-containing corepressor complex that interacts with (among
others) PLZF and BCL6. Indeed, a specific co-repressor has been
identified for BCL6 (32). It remains to be seen if FAZF has unique
interaction partners that can act as co-repressors or for other
functional roles. In this regard, it is interesting to speculate on the
contribution of one of the FAZF specific interacting partners, FANCC.
FANCC mRNA is expressed in CD34+ cells (33, 34) and is
evidently necessary for survival (10). Experiments with
CD34+ cells from FA patients as well as evidence from
Fancc / mouse models reinforces the idea that FANCC is
critical for early hematopoietic cell development (7, 35-38). Thus, as
an early step in defining the functions of FAZF and FANCC, it will be
important to determine whether FAZF is a member of the FA protein core
complex, particularly in early hematopoietic cells. Specifically, it
will be of interest to determine whether FAZF, like PLZF, is a
component of a high molecular weight complex with Cdc2 (39). Evidence
from co-immunoprecipitation studies suggest that binding of FANCC and
Cdc2 is required to relieve the cell cycle defect observed in FA cells
(40), and other work has led to the hypothesis that FANCC is involved
in a cross-link damage avoidance pathway that signals through Cdc2 (41), Recent work by Qiao et al. (42) demonstrates that
Fanconi anemia proteins are associated with chromatin and the nuclear matrix in wild-type cells and in FA complementation group D cells but
not in cells from FA patients belonging to other complementation groups. This is consistent with the idea that the FA protein complex may have a role in chromatin changes during replication and DNA damage
repair. Further studies will focus on the role of FAZF in this process.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants from the Fanconi Anemia
Research Fund and National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant HL56045 (to
M. E. H.), American Chemical Society Grant DHP 160, and NIH Grant CA59936 (to J. D. L.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Current address: Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97201.

Recipient of a Veterans Affair Merit Review Grant.
§§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Div. of Molecular
Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 S. W. Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR 97201. Tel.: 503-494-1123; Fax: 503-494-7368; E-mail: hoatlinm@OHSU.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 1, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201834200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
FAZF, FA zinc
finger;
FA, Fanconi anemia;
PLZF, promyelocytic zinc finger;
SLF, stem
cell factor;
CSF, colony-stimulating factor;
IL-3, interleukin-3;
CFU, colony-forming unit;
BrdUrd, bromodeoxyuridine;
Epo, erythropoietin;
DAPI, 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Lin, W.,
Lai, C. H.,
Tang, C. J.,
Huang, C. J.,
and Tang, T. K.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
264,
789-795[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Miaw, S. C.,
Choi, A., Yu, E.,
Kishikawa, H.,
and Ho, I. C.
(2000)
Immunity
12,
323-333[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Tang, C. J.,
Chuang, C. K., Hu, H. M.,
and Tang, T. K.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
19631-19639[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Hoatlin, M. E.,
Zhi, Y.,
Ball, H.,
Silvey, K.,
Melnick, A.,
Stone, S.,
Arai, S.,
Hawe, N.,
Owen, G.,
Zelent, A.,
and Licht, J. D.
(1999)
Blood
94,
3737-3747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Joenje, H.,
and Patel, K. J.
(2001)
Nat. Rev. Genet.
2,
446-457[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
De Kerviler, E.,
Guermazi, A.,
Zagdanski, A. M.,
Gluckman, E.,
and Frija, J.
(2000)
Clin. Radiol.
55,
340-345[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Haneline, L. S.,
Broxmeyer, H. E.,
Cooper, S.,
Hangoc, G.,
Carreau, M.,
Buchwald, M.,
and Clapp, D. W.
(1998)
Blood
91,
4092-4098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Walsh, C. E.,
Nienhuis, A. W.,
Samulski, R. J.,
Brown, M. G.,
Miller, J. L.,
Young, N. S.,
and Liu, J. M.
(1994)
J. Clin. Invest.
94,
1440-1448[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Walsh, C. E.,
Grompe, M.,
Vanin, E.,
Buchwald, M.,
Young, N. S.,
Nienhuis, A. W.,
and Liu, J. M.
(1994)
Blood
84,
453-459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Segal, G. M.,
Magenis, R. E.,
Brown, M.,
Keeble, W.,
Smith, T. D.,
Heinrich, M. C.,
and Bagby, G. C., Jr.
(1994)
J. Clin. Invest.
94,
846-852[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Timmers, C.,
Taniguchi, T.,
Hejna, J.,
Reifsteck, C.,
Lucas, L.,
Bruun, D.,
Thayer, M.,
Cox, B.,
Olson, S.,
D'Andrea, A. D.,
Moses, R.,
and Grompe, M.
(2001)
Mol Cell
7,
241-248[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Garcia-Higuera, I.,
Taniguchi, T.,
Ganesan, S.,
Meyn, M. S.,
Timmers, C.,
Hejna, J.,
Grompe, M.,
and D'Andrea, A. D.
(2001)
Mol. Cell
7,
249-262[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Melnick, A.,
and Licht, J.
(1999)
Blood
93,
3167-3215[Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Shaknovich, R.,
Yeyati, P. L.,
Ivins, S.,
Melnick, A.,
Lempert, C.,
Waxman, S.,
Zelent, A.,
and Licht, J. D.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
5533-5545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Barna, M.,
Hawe, N.,
Niswander, L.,
and Pandolfi, P. P.
(2000)
Nat. Genet.
25,
166-172[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Hoatlin, M. E.,
Kew, O. M.,
and Renz, M. E.
(1987)
J. Virol.
61,
1442-1447[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Boer, J.,
Bonten-Surtel, J.,
and Grosveld, G.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
1236-1247[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Gossen, M.,
and Bujard, H.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
5547-5551[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Dai, M. S.,
Mantel, C. R.,
Xia, Z. B.,
Broxmeyer, H. E.,
and Lu, L.
(2000)
Blood
96,
3985-3987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Lu, L.,
Heinrich, M. C.,
Wang, L. S.,
Dai, M. S.,
Zigler, A. J.,
Chai, L.,
and Broxmeyer, H. E.
(1999)
Blood
94,
2319-2332[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Lu, L., Ge, Y., Li, Z. H.,
Keeble, W.,
Kabat, D.,
Bagby, G. C.,
Broxmeyer, H. E.,
and Hoatlin, M. E.
(1996)
Blood
87,
525-534[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Oda, A.,
Sawada, K.,
Druker, B. J.,
Ozaki, K.,
Takano, H.,
Koizumi, K.,
Fukada, Y.,
Handa, M.,
Koike, T.,
and Ikeda, Y.
(1998)
Blood
92,
443-451[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Reid, A.,
Gould, A.,
Brand, N.,
Cook, M.,
Strutt, P., Li, J.,
Licht, J.,
Waxman, S.,
Krumlauf, R.,
and Zelent, A.
(1995)
Blood
86,
4544-4552[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Albagli, O.,
Lantoine, D.,
Quief, S.,
Quignon, F.,
Englert, C.,
Kerckaert, J. P.,
Montarras, D.,
Pinset, C.,
and Lindon, C.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
5063-5075[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Albagli, O.,
Lindon, C.,
Lantoine, D.,
Quief, S.,
Puvion, E.,
Pinset, C.,
and Puvion-Dutilleul, F.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
8560-8570[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Matkovic, M. E.,
Folias, A. F.,
Ward, A. M.,
Hejna, J. A.,
and Moses, R. E.
(2001)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
69 (suppl.),
355 (Abstr. 1011)
|
| 27.
|
Yeyati, P. L.,
Shaknovich, R.,
Boterashvili, S., Li, J.,
Ball, H. J.,
Waxman, S.,
Nason-Burchenal, K.,
Dmitrovsky, E.,
Zelent, A.,
and Licht, J. D.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
925-934[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Kerckaert, J. P.,
Deweindt, C.,
Tilly, H.,
Quief, S.,
Lecocq, G.,
and Bastard, C.
(1993)
Nat. Genet.
5,
66-70[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Ye, B. H.,
Lista, F., Lo,
Coco, F.,
Knowles, D. M.,
Offit, K.,
Chaganti, R. S.,
and Dalla-Favera, R.
(1993)
Science
262,
747-750[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Yarden, R. I.,
and Brody, L. C.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
4983-4988[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Otsuki, T.,
Furukawa, Y.,
Ikeda, K.,
Endo, H.,
Yamashita, T.,
Shinohara, A.,
Iwamatsu, A.,
Ozawa, K.,
and Liu, J. M.
(2001)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
10,
2651-2660[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Huynh, K. D.,
Fischle, W.,
Verdin, E.,
and Bardwell, V. J.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
1810-1823[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Brady, G.,
Billia, F.,
Knox, J.,
Hoang, T.,
Kirsch, I. R.,
Voura, E. B.,
Hawley, R. G.,
Cumming, R.,
Buchwald, M.,
and Siminovitch, K.
(1995)
Curr. Biol.
5,
909-922[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Tower, P. A.,
Christianson, T. A.,
Peters, S. T.,
Ostroski, M. L.,
Hoatlin, M. E.,
Zigler, A. J.,
Heinrich, M. C.,
Rathbun, R. K.,
Keeble, W.,
Faulkner, G. R.,
and Bagby, G. C., Jr.
(1998)
Exp. Hematol.
26,
19-26[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Carreau, M.,
Gan, O. I.,
Liu, L.,
Doedens, M.,
Dick, J. E.,
and Buchwald, M.
(1999)
Exp. Hematol.
27,
1667-1674[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Bagby, G. C.,
Heinrich, M. C.,
Magenis, E.,
Brown, M.,
Keeble, W.,
Smith, T. D.,
and Segal, G. M.
(1993)
Blood
82,
183 (Abstr. 718)
|
| 37.
|
Haneline, L. S.,
Gobbett, T. A.,
Ramani, R.,
Carreau, M.,
Buchwald, M.,
Yoder, M. C.,
and Clapp, D. W.
(1999)
Blood
94,
1-8[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Liu, J. M.,
Young, N. S.,
Walsh, C. E.,
Cottler-Fox, M.,
Carter, C.,
Dunbar, C.,
Barrett, A. J.,
and Emmons, R.
(1997)
Hum. Gene Ther.
8,
1715-1730[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Ball, H. J.,
Melnick, A.,
Shaknovich, R.,
Kohanski, R. A.,
and Licht, J. D.
(1999)
Nucleic Acids Res.
27,
4106-4113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Kupfer, G. M.,
and D'Andrea, A. D.
(1996)
Blood
88,
1019-1025[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Kruyt, F. A.,
Dijkmans, L. M.,
Arwert, F.,
and Joenje, H.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
2244-2251[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Qiao, F.,
Moss, A.,
and Kupfer, G. M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
23391-23396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Weber, Y. Xu, L. Zhang, A. Patocs, L. Shen, P. Platzer, and C. Eng
Microenvironmental Genomic Alterations and Clinicopathological Behavior in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
JAMA,
January 10, 2007;
297(2):
187 - 195.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Piazza, J. A. Costoya, T. Merghoub, R. M. Hobbs, and P. P. Pandolfi
Disruption of PLZP in Mice Leads to Increased T-Lymphocyte Proliferation, Cytokine Production, and Altered Hematopoietic Stem Cell Homeostasis
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
December 1, 2004;
24(23):
10456 - 10469.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-C. Miaw, B. Y. Kang, I. A. White, and I-C. Ho
A Repressor of GATA-Mediated Negative Feedback Mechanism of T Cell Activation
J. Immunol.,
January 1, 2004;
172(1):
170 - 177.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. McConnell, N. Chevallier, W. Berkofsky-Fessler, J. M. Giltnane, R. B. Malani, L. M. Staudt, and J. D. Licht
Growth Suppression by Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia-Associated Protein PLZF Is Mediated by Repression of c-myc Expression
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
December 15, 2003;
23(24):
9375 - 9388.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Bogliolo, O. Cabre, E. Callen, V. Castillo, A. Creus, R. Marcos, and J. Surralles
The Fanconi anaemia genome stability and tumour suppressor network
Mutagenesis,
November 1, 2002;
17(6):
529 - 538.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|