|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201244200 on May 1, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 29, 26412-26421, July 19, 2002
Identification and Characterization of A Novel Rat
Ov-Serpin Family Member, Trespin*
Jerry E.
Chipuk §¶ ,
LaMonica V.
Stewart ** ,
Annalisa
Ranieri**§§,
Kyung
Song §, and
David
Danielpour §¶¶
From the Ireland Cancer Center Research Laboratories
and § Department of Pharmacology, Case Western Reserve
University/University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio 44106 and
the ** Laboratory of Cell Regulation and Carcinogenesis, NCI,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Received for publication, February 6, 2002, and in revised form, April 18, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Serpins are responsible for
regulating a variety of proteolytic processes through a unique
irreversible suicide substrate mechanism. To discover novel genes
regulated by transforming growth factor- 1 (TGF- 1), we performed
differential display reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis of NRP-152 rat
prostatic epithelial cells and cloned a novel rat serpin that is
transcriptionally down-regulated by TGF- and hence named
trespin (TGF- -repressible serine proteinase inhibitor
(trespin). Trespin is a 397-amino acid member of the ov-serpin clade
with a calculated molecular mass of 45.2 kDa and 72% amino acid
sequence homology to human bomapin; however, trespin exhibits different
tissue expression, cellular localization, and proteinase specificity
compared with bomapin. Trespin mRNA is expressed in many tissues,
including brain, heart, kidney, liver, lung, prostate, skin, spleen,
and stomach. FLAG-trespin expressed in HEK293 cells is localized
predominantly in the cytoplasm and is not constitutively secreted. The
presence of an arginine at the P1 position of trespin's reactive site
loop suggests that trespin inhibits trypsin-like proteinases.
Accordingly, in vitro transcribed and translated trespin
forms detergent-stable and thermostable complexes with plasmin and
elastase but not subtilisin A, trypsin, chymotrypsin, thrombin, or
papain. Trespin interacts with plasmin at a near 1:1 stoichiometry, and
immunopurified mammal-expressed trespin inhibits plasmin in a
dose-dependent manner. These data suggest that trespin is a
novel and functional member of the rat ov-serpin family.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The serpins are an expanding superfamily of proteins
present in the genomes of viruses, plants, and metazoans (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). Serpins are identified by their unique conformation (3,
4), namely a conserved secondary structure containing three -sheets
(designated A, B, and C), -helices (usually nine), and a reactive
site loop (RSL),1 which
confers specificity to proteinase recognition. The RSL is composed of
~17 amino acids, which form a flexible region capable of distorting a
target proteinase upon entry into the enzyme's active site. Inhibition
occurs after the target proteinase cleaves the serpin RSL (5-8),
generating a covalent acyl-enzyme intermediate, which parallels a
suicide substrate mechanism (9-11).
The serpin superfamily is divided into 16 different clades based on
phylogenic relationships (1). Clade B members, the ov-serpins, were
originally identified by their significant sequence homology to chicken
ovalbumin (12). They are competitive inhibitors of serine or cysteine
proteinases and can target more than one proteinase through the use of
several P1 residues (13, 14). Ov-serpins also share several properties:
1) the absence of an N-terminal signal sequence, 2) the beginning of
their amino acid sequences relative to 1-antitrypsin at
amino acid position ~23, and 3) the lack of a carboxyl-terminal
extension. Human ov-serpins are further characterized by gene
structure, namely an exon encoding a polypeptide loop between helices C and D (i.e. CD loop). The CD loop confers unique
characteristics to serpins, such as nuclear localization, and provides
a binding motif for ancillary proteins (15-18).
The physiological functions of ov-serpins are not well understood;
however, evidence suggests that their roles are diverse. MENT is a
nuclear ov-serpin containing a lamin-like chromatin binding domain that
induces higher order chromatin assembly when overexpressed (19). Other
ov-serpins such as plasminogen inhibitor-9 (PI-9) can inhibit cells
from undergoing granzyme B-mediated apoptosis and may regulate host
defense against microbial or viral proteinases (20, 21). Bomapin
(proteinase inhibitor-10) as well as plasminogen activator inhibitor-2
(PAI-2) confers apoptotic resistance to tumor necrosis factor in
several cell lines (22-24). Maspin (protease inhibitor-5) has been
identified as an inhibitor of cell motility and metastasis along with
demonstrating anti-angiogenesis properties (25-28). The variety of
physiological roles serpins regulate foreshadows their potential as
novel therapeutic targets for many disease states.
To identify genes whose products may serve as downstream mediators or
regulators of transforming growth factor- 1 signal transduction (reviewed in Refs. 29 and 30), we performed differential display reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction using NRP-152 rat
prostatic cells treated with or without TGF- 1, either alone or in
the presence of insulin, which blocks several of TGF- 1's effects.2 NRP-152 is a unique
androgen receptor-positive basal prostatic epithelial cell line highly
sensitive to TGF- 1 (31-34). From these differential display
analyses, we have identified and characterized a widely expressed novel
rat ov-serpin, trespin, which directly binds and inhibits plasmin with
a stoichiometry of 1:1.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell Culture--
The NRP-152 rat prostatic epithelial cell line
(31) was maintained in GM2 culture medium (Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12 supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, 5 µg/ml insulin, 10 ng/ml cholera toxin, 20 ng/ml epidermal growth
factor, and 0.1 µM dexamethasone) in Nunc
80-cm2 tissue culture flasks. The cells were kept at
37 °C in a 95% air, 5% CO2 environment and at
subconfluence (every 3-4 days) passaged 1:40. All experiments were
performed under low serum conditions, where NRP-152 cells were cultured
in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12 medium supplemented
with 15 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 1% calf serum, 50 units/ml
penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, and 0.1 µM
dexamethasone. HEK293, a human embryonic kidney cell line, was grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12 with 10% fetal bovine
serum. THP-1, a human monocytic leukemia cell line, was grown in RPMI
supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 0.05 mM -mercaptoethanol, and 500 µg/ml gentamycin. RBL-1,
a rat basophilic leukemia cell line, was grown in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium/F-12 supplemented with 10% calf serum and 400 µg/ml gentamycin.
Differential Display--
Following the method of Zhao et
al. (35), differential display RT-PCR was performed using total
RNA prepared from either untreated NRP-152 cells (control) or cells
treated with TGF- 1 (10 ng/ml) for 24 h in the absence or
presence of insulin (5 µg/ml). The RNA for differential display was
isolated by a modified RNeasy method (36). The
[33P]dATP-labeled PCR products were then resolved through
a denaturing polyacrylamide gel, and the selected bands were
reamplified and cloned into pCR-TRAP (GenHunter).
Northern Blot Analysis--
Total RNA was extracted from cells
using an RNeasy Total RNA kit (Qiagen) and resolved through a 1%
agarose, 0.66 M formaldehyde gel. Equal loading of the gel
was confirmed through ethidium bromide staining of 28 S ribosomal RNA.
The RNA was then transferred to a Nytran membrane (Schleicher & Schuell). Nytran membranes were cross-linked using ultraviolet
radiation and prehybridized, hybridized, and washed following the
Church and Gilbert method (37). The presence of indicated
mRNAs was detected with [32P]dCTP random
primer-labeled cDNA probes.
5'-Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (5'-RACE) PCR--
The
RACE system (Invitrogen) was used to amplify TRG-13 cDNA
from NRP-152 cells. Two separate 5'-RACE RT-PCRs were performed using
the following pairs of reverse primers: set 1, primers TRG B2
(5'-TTAGGGGGAGTAGAATCTTCCA-3') and TRG B1
(5'-AAATAGAATGGTATTGGTTACGTT-3'); set 2, primers TRG B4
(5'-TTTTCCAATCCTAATATGAATTTTG-3') and TRG B3
(5'-GATGTTTGTTTTGTCTATATGAAGT-3'). The eLONGase Amplification System
(Invitrogen) was used in the PCRs to enhance the fidelity of the PCR
amplification. Gel-eluted 5'-RACE PCR products were cloned into the
pcDNA3 mammalian expression vector and sequenced by the University
of North Carolina-Chapel Hill Automated DNA Sequencing Facility.
Protein analyses were performed using GCG Wisconsin Sequence Package
Analysis, ClustalW 1.8, ESPript 2.0, and other ExPASy biology server programs.
Nuclear Run-on Assay--
A modification of the protocol by
Srivastava et al. (38) was performed. NRP-152 cells were
plated in 150-mm culture dishes (6 × 106 cells/dish)
in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12 supplemented with
1% calf serum, 15 mM HEPES, 0.1 µM
dexamethasone, 50 units/ml penicillin, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin,
with four dishes used for each treatment. After the cells attached for
24 h, a subset of cells was treated with TGF- 1 (10 ng/ml) for
24 h (or vehicle, 4 mM HCl, and 1 mg/ml bovine
serum albumin). The cells were trypsinized, washed in cold PBS, and
resuspended in 4 ml of HB buffer (0.3 M sucrose, 2 mM magnesium acetate, 3 mM CaCl2, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.8, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1% Triton X-100) and
Dounce-homogenized (pestle A, 10 strokes). The homogenate was diluted
1:1 with PB buffer (25% glycerol, 5 mM magnesium acetate,
10 mM HEPES, pH 7.8, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 5 mM DTT)
and centrifuged 15 min at 1500 rpm. The nuclei were resuspended in 200 µl of NSB buffer (25% glycerol, 5 mM magnesium acetate,
5 mM HEPES, pH 7.8, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 0.5 mM DTT) per 108 cells.
For each nuclear run-on reaction, 3-5 × 107 nuclei
were resuspended in wash buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 5 mM MgCl2, 40% glycerol, and 2.5 mM
DTT) to a final volume of 200 µl, combined with 200 µl of 2×
reaction buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 5 mM
MgCl2, 200 mM KCl, 200 units/ml RNasin, 1 mM CTP, 1 mM GTP, 2 mM ATP, 2 µM UTP, and 5 mM DTT), 20 µl of
[ -32P]UTP (3000 Ci/mmol) and incubated for 1 h at
26 °C. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 400 µl of
RNAzol and 160 µl of phenol/chloroform and incubated on ice for 5 min. After centrifuging (12,000 × g for 5 min), the
aqueous layer was combined with an equal volume of isopropyl alcohol.
RNA was pelleted at 16,000 × g, resuspended in TE
buffer containing 0.1% SDS, and reprecipitated with 100% ethanol. The
RNA was dissolved in TE buffer and passed through a Quick Spin G-25
Sephadex column (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The labeled RNA,
diluted to 1 × 106 cpm/ml in
prehybridization/hybridization buffer (3× SSC, 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.3, 0.02% polyvinyl pyrrolidone, 0.02% Ficoll, 0.1% SDS, and 100 µg/ml yeast tRNA), was incubated at 60 °C
overnight with Nytran membranes slot-blotted with 1 µg each of
cDNA and prehybridized for 4 h at 60 °C. The membranes were
then washed (2× SSC, 0.1% SDS, 30 min at room temperature; 2× SSC,
0.1% SDS, 30 min at 60 °C; 0.5× SSC, 0.1% SDS, 60 min at
60 °C; 0.1× SSC, 0.1% SDS, 30 min at 60 °C) and exposed to a
phosphor screen. ImageQuant was used to quantitate differences in
mRNA expression.
Nytran membranes used contained cDNA probes for trespin and
-actin. The 1.17-kb trespin cDNA probe was designed to hybridize to bases 79-1251 of trespin mRNA, whereas the 0.35-kb -actin probe was complementary to exons 2 and 3 of the rat -actin gene. A
1.4-kb fragment of the pcDNA3 expression vector, prepared by digestion with AvaII, was also loaded for nonspecific DNA binding.
RT-PCR--
Reverse transcription was performed using murine
leukemia virus reverse transcriptase and random hexamer primers
(GeneAmp; PerkinElmer Life Sciences) with 0.2 µg of total RNA from
each tissue. The cDNA was then PCR-amplified (40 cycles of 94 °C
for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 60 s) using
AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (GeneAmp). The sense
(5'-ACCCTCACTGCAAAAATCCTC-3') and antisense (5'-CTGACTGGAGGTCATAACTCTCC-3') primers used in these reactions were
designed to synthesize a 629-bp product. The resulting products were
resolved through a 1.2% agarose gel containing 0.72 µg/ml ethidium bromide.
Development of pcDNA3-FLAG-trespin, pCEP4-FLAG-trespin, and
pcDNA3-FLAG-bomapin Vectors--
The hemagglutinin tag and
translational start site was excised from hemagglutinin-pcDNA3 by
digestion with HindIII and BamHI and replaced
with 5'-HindIII-Kozak-FLAG-BamHI-3' cDNA made
by annealing complementary oligonucleotides (Integrated DNA
Technologies, Inc.). Trespin (codons 2 to stop) were amplified
with primers containing BamHI and EcoRI ends and
ligated to BamHI- and EcoRI-digested pcDNA3-FLAG
to generate pcDNA3-FLAG-trespin. pCEP4-FLAG-trespin was generated by
excision of FLAG-trespin from pcDNA3-FLAG-trespin using complete
NotI digestion, followed by limited digestion with HindIII and ligation to HindIII- and
NotI-digested pCEP4. The bomapin coding sequence (codons 2 to stop) was PCR-amplified from THP-1 total RNA with primers
containing BamHI and ClaI ends and ligated into
BamHI and ClaI-digested pcDNA-FLAG to generate
pcDNA3-FLAG-bomapin. Constructs were sequenced for confirmation.
Proteinase Binding
Assays--
35S-Labeled trespin and bomapin were
generated using a T7-coupled in vitro
transcription/translation TnT® kit (Promega) with pcDNA3-FLAG-trespin
(or pcDNA3-FLAG-bomapin) as template. 1 µl of in vitro
transcribed/translated (IVTT) reaction was combined with the indicated
nanogram amounts of proteinases (plasmin, elastase, subtilisin A,
papain, and thrombin from Sigma;
1-chloro-3-tosylamido-7-amino-2-heptanone-treated chymotrypsin and
L-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone-treated trypsin from Worthington) in Tris-buffered saline (pH 7.4) in a
total volume of 15 µl. Samples were incubated at 37 °C for 15 min
and then heated to 100 °C for 10 min in the presence of 2% SDS and
100 mM DTT. Complexes were resolved in 4-12% NuPAGE
gradient gels (Invitrogen) using 1× MOPS buffer (Invitrogen) and
transferred to nitrocellulose before exposing to a phosphor screen for
48 h. Images were generated by an Amersham Biosciences
PhosphorImager and ImageQuant Software.
Purification of FLAG-trespin--
HEK293 cells (2.0 × 106/100-mm plate) were transfected with 10 µg of
amino-terminal FLAG-tagged trespin in pCEP4 (Invitrogen) (pCEP4-FLAG-trespin) or pCEP4 control using a standard calcium phosphate co-precipitate method, and stable clones were selected with
300 µg/ml hygromycin (Invitrogen). A pool of stable clones expressing
FLAG-trespin (or pCEP4 control) were grown to subconfluence in 10%
fetal bovine serum/Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12 in
15 × 150-mm2 plates. Cells were lysed in NETT (150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris, pH
7.4, 1% Triton X-100) containing protease inhibitors (Complete tablets
without EDTA; Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and the lysates were
centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min before immunoprecipitation with
anti-FLAG M2-agarose (Sigma) overnight at 4 °C. Immune
complexes were washed twice with each NETT and Tris-buffered saline, pH
7.4. FLAG-trespin was eluted at 4 °C from the resin with five 2-ml
washes (30 min each) of 100 µg/ml FLAG peptide (Sigma) in
Tris-buffered saline, concentrated to 1 ml with a YM-10 Centricon
(Amresco) and dialyzed (10-14-kDa cut-off membrane) against 5 mM HEPES for 48 h (buffer changed every 16 h).
Purified FLAG-trespin was quantified by a microtiter BCA protein assay
(Pierce) and Coomassie Blue staining of a 4-12% NuPAGE gel, using
bovine serum albumin standards.
Subcellular Fractionation and Conditioned Medium--
One 150-mm
dish of stable transfected pCEP4-FLAG-trespin HEK293 cells were
trypsinized, resuspended, and quantified. 25% of the cell suspension
was used for whole lysate, and 75% was used for nuclear extract. For
preparation of nuclear extract, cells were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for
10 min and resuspended in 2 ml of lysis buffer (10 mM
HEPES, pH 7.5, 2 mM EDTA, 5 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 µg/ml each leupeptin, aprotinin,
antipain, and 4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonyl fluoride). Cells were
incubated on ice for 20 min, homogenized with 10 passes through a
25-gauge needle, and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The
pellet was washed twice with 1 ml of lysis buffer and resuspended with
300 µl of lysis buffer. Samples were incubated for 1 h at
80 °C, thawed, and centrifuged at 14,500 rpm for 30 min at
4 °C; supernatant is the nuclear extract. For whole cell lysate,
cells were harvested, resuspended in lysis buffer, and immediately
incubated at 80 °C for 1 h. The thawed lysate was then
centrifuged at 14,500 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C; supernatant is the
whole cell lysate. The same volume of nuclear extract and whole cell
lysate (equal number of nuclei and whole cells per ml) was subjected to
Western blot analysis, and FLAG-trespin was detected as mentioned
above. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression (clone NA03,
1:250; Oncogene Research) was used as loading control.
The secretion of trespin from HEK293-FLAG-trespin cells was compared
with the content of total cellular FLAG-trespin as follows. Conditioned
medium (treated with 1% Triton X-100 and protease inhibitor mixture)
and whole cell lysate (treated similarly) from 107 cells
were each mixed overnight with 50 µl of anti-FLAG-agarose. Resin was
then washed extensively with PBS plus 1% Triton-X-100 and eluted with
a total of 0.2 ml of 0.1 mg/ml FLAG peptide, as described by the
manufacturer. Equal volumes of each eluted fraction were analyzed by
Western blot.
Thermostability of Trespin--
0.5 µg of purified
FLAG-trespin was suspended in 20 µl of PBS and heated to the
indicated temperatures for 5 min (39). Samples were then centrifuged at
14,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was combined with SDS
loading buffer and resolved in a 4-12% NuPAGE gel with 1× MOPS
buffer, transferred to nitrocellulose, and subjected to Western blot
analysis with anti-FLAG (clone M1; Sigma) as described (40).
Binding Stoichiometry--
Active plasmin concentration was
determined by titrating the plasmin substrate
D-Val-Leu-Lys-pNA (VLK-pNA; Sigma) to
measure the turnover rate, using a spectrophotometric method similar to Chase and Shaw (41). Plasmin (100 nM) was incubated with
the indicated concentrations of FLAG-trespin (0-88.4 nM)
in PBS for 30 min at 37 °C. Residual plasmin activity was measured
(A405 with a Tecan Spectra Mini microplate
reader and WinSelect 3.0 software) after a 20-min incubation with
VLK-pNA (1 mM final concentration) at 37 °C.
The stoichiometry of inhibition was determined by plotting the
fractional activity (velocity of inhibited reaction divided by velocity
of control reaction, Vi/Vo)
against the ratio of FLAG-trespin to plasmin
([I]0/[E]0). Linear
regression analysis was performed by GraphPad Prism 3.0 to extrapolate
the inhibitor and enzyme ratio resulting in 100% inhibition.
Proteinase Inhibition Studies--
Under pseudo-first order
conditions, plasmin (100 nM), VLK-pNA (1 mM final concentration), and the indicated nanomolar
concentrations of FLAG-trespin (0-88.4 nM) were combined
simultaneously in PBS (total reaction volume was 100 µl). Plasmin
activity proceeded at 37 °C, and the rate of product formation was
recorded (A405) as described above.
 |
RESULTS |
Cloning of Trespin--
Differential display RT-PCR was used to
identify and isolate genes regulated by TGF- 1 in NRP-152 cells. This
was done with RNA isolated from NRP-152 cells treated with or without
10 ng/ml TGF- 1 for 24 h either alone or in the presence of 5 µg/ml insulin, which blocks several effects of TGF- 1.2
Following differential display screening with 20 primer sets, we
identified the 3'-end of a novel gene, which we initially named TGF- -regulated gene 13 (TRG-13). Expression of TRG-13 is decreased by TGF- 1 in a manner that is blocked in the presence of insulin (Fig. 1A, doublet is observed
due to denaturing electrophoresis of double-stranded DNA). We confirmed
these results by Northern blot analysis of total RNA from NRP-152
cells, using a [32P]dCTP-labeled cDNA probe prepared
by reamplification of the original 300-bp fragment eluted from the
differential display gel. TRG-13 migrates as a single 1.4-kb transcript
and is down-regulated as early as 5 h after TGF- 1 exposure
(Fig. 1B).

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Cloning of TRG-13, a novel rat gene
transcriptionally down-regulated by TGF- 1 in a
manner inhibited by insulin. A, differential display
RT-PCR detection of TRG-13. Differential display RT-PCR was performed
using total RNA prepared from either untreated NRP-152 cells (control)
or cells treated with TGF- 1 (10 ng/ml) in the absence or presence of
insulin (5 µg/ml). The 300-bp TRG-13 cDNA fragment shown above
was amplified in reactions using the E2AP13
sense and ET12MA anchor antisense primers. Each treatment
was done in duplicate. B, Northern blot analysis confirms
that TGF- 1 decreases TRG-13 gene expression. TGF- 1 (10 ng/ml) was
added at different time periods to NRP-152 cells grown under low serum
conditions. For cultures treated with insulin, insulin (5 µg/ml) was
added to the cells 24 h before the addition of TGF- 1. Each blot
is representative of three independent experiments. C,
nuclear run-on analysis of nuclei isolated from untreated NRP-152 cells
(control) or NRP-152 cells treated with 10 ng/ml TGF- 1 for 24 h. [32P]dUTP-labeled trespin and -actin mRNAs were
extracted from nuclei and allowed to hybridize to blots containing
their respective cDNA and pcDNA3 DNA control. Message levels
were quantified by a phosphorimager and expressed as the ratio of
trespin mRNA/ -actin mRNA with respect to control. The
trespin/ -actin ratio for the control group has been set at 1.0. The
error bar represents the S.D. of three
independent experiments.
|
|
To obtain full-length TRG-13 cDNA, we performed 5'-RACE RT-PCR
using oligonucleotide primers complementary to the 300-bp differential display product. From these reactions, we amplified a PCR product that
contains the entire coding region of TRG-13. This product, totaling
1345 nucleotides, has 1.2 kb of coding region with 78 and 73 bp of 5'-
and 3'-flanking untranslated regions, respectively. Analysis of this
sequence with a nucleotide BLAST search revealed that TRG-13 shares
high sequence similarity with serpins, with greatest similarity to the
human bone marrow serpin bomapin (~80%) (42). cDNA alignment of
TRG-13 to bomapin allowed us to identify the open reading frame and the
ATG codon representing the translation start site (43). Although TRG-13
shares significant nucleotide and amino acid sequence similarity with
other serpins, it is down-regulated by TGF- 1, which contrasts with
the dogmatic view of TGF- influence on proteolysis (44, 45).
TGF- 1 has been shown to regulate mRNA expression through both
transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms. To determine whether the decrease in trespin mRNA produced by TGF- 1 occurred through loss of gene transcription, we measured trespin mRNA
production in NRP-152 cells by nuclear run-on assay. The amount of
trespin mRNA produced in NRP-152 cells treated with 10 ng/ml
TGF- 1 for 24 h was ~20% that of untreated control cells
(Fig. 1C), demonstrating that TGF- 1 lowers trespin
mRNA levels by decreasing transcription of the trespin gene. For
this reason, we have renamed this serpin trespin (for
TGF- -repressible serine
proteinase inhibitor.
Trespin Sequence Analysis--
Based on its deduced sequence,
trespin consists of 397 amino acids (Fig.
2A) with a predicted molecular
mass of 45.2 kDa. Whereas trespin protein has 72% sequence identity
with human bomapin, it also shows about 40% identity with other
serpins, including human PAI-2 (46), chicken MENT (19), and human PI-9
(47, 48) (Fig. 2B). Amino acids are shaded according to
similarities (red and yellow are most homologous
to trespin) by ESPript 2.0. Trespin's predicted fold (Fig.
3) is based on the alignment of structures with Protein Data Bank identification numbers 1BY7 (human
PAI-2), 1JRR (human PAI-2 complexed with RSL peptide), 1HLE (equine
leukocyte elastase inhibitor), and 1OVA (chicken ovalbumin). The two
most divergent regions are 1) reactive loop 350-364, which is built
based on secondary structure prediction (Swiss model) and steric
considerations, and 2) loop 64-75, which cannot be built without
experimental data. However, loop 64-75 is modeled after a similar 1OVA
loop where possible. Even so, the in silico structure
determination suggests that trespin exhibits a classical serpin fold
with nine helices, three sheets, and an exposed RSL.

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Trespin amino acid sequence and homology to
other ov-serpin members. A, deduced amino acid sequence
of trespin. The arrow indicates the putative P1-P1'
scissile bond. B, comparison of trespin amino acid sequence
with serpins: human bomapin, human PAI-2, chicken MENT, and human PI-9.
The canonical reactive site loops and scissile bond are
designated.
|
|

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
In silico trespin structure
prediction. Trespin's predicted fold based on the structural
alignment of the Protein Data Bank identification numbers 1BY7, 1JRR,
1HLE, and 1OVA using ClustalW 1.8, Swiss Model, and steric
considerations. Loop 64-75, which cannot be built without experimental
data, is modeled after 1OVA where possible. Amino acids 361-363 (Phe,
Arg, and Ile) within the RSL are indicated for reference.
|
|
Expression of Trespin in Rat Tissues and Cellular
Localization--
Consistent with its expression in the NRP-152
prostatic epithelial cell line, we found trespin to be expressed in rat
ventral prostate, dorso-lateral prostate, and seminal vesicle as shown by RT-PCR of total RNA (Fig.
4A). RT-PCR analysis also
showed expression of trespin mRNA in several other rat tissues,
with highest levels in the lung (Fig. 4B). PCR without
reverse transcriptase, which was done in parallel for all samples,
failed to amplify any product (data not shown).

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Trespin expression in adult rat tissues.
A and B, RT-PCR was performed on 0.2 µg of
total RNA extracted from each tissue. The resulting products were
resolved through a 1.2% agarose gel. The predicted size of the PCR
product is 629 bp. Analyses are representative of three independent
experiments. SV, seminal vesicle; Skel. mus.,
skeletal muscle; Sm. intest., small intestine. C,
rat and human lung poly(A)+ RNA (2 µg/lane) Northern
blots were probed for trespin (left panel) and bomapin
(right panel) mRNA expression, respectively.
D, Northern blot analysis of leukemia cell lines RBL-1 and
THP-1 for trespin and bomapin expression, respectively. -Actin
mRNA expression is shown as loading control in C and
D.
|
|
The above RT-PCR results indicated lung, skin, and stomach tissues have
the greatest trespin expression. Since lung has the highest trespin
mRNA expression, we probed rat (Fig. 4C, left panel) and human (Fig. 4C, right panel) lung
poly(A)+ RNA (2 µg/lane) Northern blots to compare
trespin and bomapin expression in this tissue. Similar to Fig.
4B, trespin is expressed in rat lung, whereas the human lung
blot was negative for bomapin expression, consistent with previously
published results (42). As control for the bomapin probe and
hybridization conditions, we performed Northern blot analysis of two
leukemic cells lines of rat basophilic and human monocytic origin,
RBL-1 and THP-1, respectively (Fig. 4D). THP-1 demonstrated
high bomapin expression, as suggested by Riewald et al.
(49), and trespin expression was present in RBL-1 (Fig. 4C).
Evidence suggests that bomapin is not expressed in nonmonocytic
leukocytes (such as basophils), and trespin's expression in RBL-1
provides further support that it is not the rat homologue of bomapin.
Ov-serpins have unique cellular localization, and many are secreted
into the extracellular matrix. The nuclear versus
cytoplasmic distribution of trespin was determined by fractionation of
HEK293 cells stably expressing FLAG-trespin, followed by Western blot analysis using an anti-FLAG M1 antibody. Expression of FLAG-trespin in
duplicate cultures was assayed (Fig.
5A, upper panel) in
a nuclear fraction compared with whole cell extracts. The same number of nuclei and whole cells were analyzed to allow for direct comparison; the Western blot detection of proliferating cell nuclear antigen is
shown as loading control (Fig. 5A, lower panel).
These analyses indicated that FLAG-trespin is primarily localized to
the cytoplasm, with only a minor species in the nucleus, which greatly
contrasts with bomapin, a predominantly nuclear protein.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Trespin is primarily localized to the cytosol
and is not secreted. A, intracellular and extracellular
distribution of trespin was determined by fractionation of HEK293 cells
stably expressing FLAG-trespin, followed by Western blot analysis.
Expression of FLAG-trespin (upper panel) in duplicate
cultures was assayed in both nuclear and whole cell lysate. An equal
number of nuclei and whole cells were loaded per lane, and
proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is shown as
loading control (lower panel). B, to measure if
trespin was secreted, total conditioned medium and whole cell lysate
from a confluent 150-mm dish of stable HEK293-FLAG-trespin cells were
each purified with immobilized anti-FLAG M2, and an equal volume of
each eluted fraction was analyzed by Western blot using anti-FLAG M1
antibody. Total cell lysate is shown as control (+ control).
Analyses are representative of three independent experiments.
|
|
To measure if trespin was secreted, the total conditioned medium (Fig.
5B) and whole cell lysate from a confluent 150-mm dish of
HEK293-FLAG-trespin cells were each purified with immobilized anti-FLAG
M2, and an equal volume of each eluted fraction was analyzed by Western
blot. No FLAG-trespin was detectable in the conditioned medium from the
HEK293-FLAG-trespin clones, suggesting that trespin is not
constitutively secreted.
Survey for Target Proteinases--
Serpins normally form complexes
with target proteinases that are resistant to reducing agents,
SDS and heat (50, 51). The presence of an arginine at the
reactive center (Fig. 2A) suggests that trespin inhibits
trypsin-like proteinases. To discover targets that trespin binds and
potentially regulates, we screened a panel of serine proteinases
(subtilisin A, trypsin, chymotrypsin, thrombin, papain, elastase, and
plasmin) for the ability to form SDS-stable, DTT-stable, and
thermostable complexes with trespin. Trespin (45.2 kDa) was in
vitro transcribed/translated (trespinIVTT) and
combined with the indicated proteinases in Tris-buffered saline. The
samples were heated to 100 °C in the presence of SDS and DTT (2%
and 100 mM final concentrations, respectively) before SDS-PAGE analysis, transfer to nitrocellulose, and exposure to a
phosphorscreen. Elastase (32 kDa) and plasmin (34 kDa) formed SDS-stable, DTT-stable, and thermostable complexes with
trespinIVTT with the expected bands at 76 and 77 kDa,
respectively (Fig. 6A).

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Trespin forms SDS-stable, DTT-stable, and
thermostable proteinase complexes with different specificity than
bomapin. A and B, full-length FLAG-tagged
trespin (A and B) or FLAG-tagged bomapin
(B) was in vitro transcribed and translated from
pcDNA3-FLAG-trespin using a coupled TnT® kit with T7 RNA
polymerase. 20 pmol of indicated proteinase, IVTT product, and
Tris-buffered saline (volume to 15 µl) were incubated at 37 °C for
15 min. In vitro translation from pcDNA3 empty vector
was used as a control (controlIVTT). Samples were
heated to 100 °C for 5 min in the presence of 2% SDS and 100 mM DTT. Proteins were resolved in a 4-12% NuPAGE gel with
1× MOPS buffer and transferred to nitrocellulose. Nitrocellulose was
exposed to a phosphorscreen for 72 h. complex1
and complex2, trespin and bomapin complexes,
respectively. Analyses are representative of three independent
experiments.
|
|
Although the tissue expression patterns and cellular localization of
trespin and bomapin are different, we wanted to compare the proteinase
specificity of these serpins to further substantiate that these
proteins are not homologues. As mentioned above, trespin forms
complexes with elastase and plasmin; data from Riewald and Schleef (42)
show that bomapin complexes with thrombin and weakly with trypsin. To
confirm the reported bomapin results and directly compare the
proteinase specificity of trespin with bomapin, we performed a parallel
proteinase binding survey. Bomapin formed SDS-stable, DTT-stable, and
thermostable complexes with thrombin and trypsin, as expected, with no
detectable binding to elastase and plasmin, unlike trespin (Fig.
6B). These results support the notion that bomapin and
trespin are functionally different proteins.
We next characterized the dose dependence of the trespin interactions.
Plasmin demonstrated a classical dose-response profile with
complex formation (Fig. 7A)
detectable at 1 pmol of plasmin, increasing linearly (data not shown)
up to 100 pmol of plasmin. At the highest mass of plasmin (100 pmol),
~100% of trespinIVTT was complexed at near 1:1
stoichiometry. Also, it appears that trespinIVTT may
serve as a plasmin cleavage substrate in the presence of high plasmin
activity, which may occur before or after complex formation. In
contrast, elastase did not exhibit a classical dose-response inhibition
profile (Fig 7B), with the majority of complex formation detectable at 20 pmol of elastase and little to zero detectable complex
formation at <20 pmol elastase. Even so, the majority of
trespinIVTT was cleaved at 100 pmol of elastase (with
minimal complex observed), suggesting that it preferentially serves as
an elastase substrate.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Dose-dependent effects of plasmin
and elastase on trespin complex formation. Full-length FLAG-tagged
trespin was in vitro transcribed and translated using a
coupled TnT® kit with T7 RNA polymerase. The indicated amounts (pmol)
of plasmin or elastase, FLAG-trespinIVTT, and Tris-buffered
saline (volume to 20 µl) were incubated at 37 °C for 15 min.
Samples were heated to 100 °C for 5 min in the presence of 2% SDS
and 100 mM DTT. Proteins were resolved in a 4-12% NuPAGE
gel with 1× MOPS buffer and transferred to nitrocellulose.
Nitrocellulose was exposed to a phosphor screen for 72 h. These
analyses are representative of three independent experiments.
|
|
Trespin Inhibits Plasmin Activity in a Dose-dependent
Manner--
Due to the classical dose-response profile between plasmin
and trespin, we wanted to observe if purified trespin could inhibit plasmin activity in vitro. We developed a stable mammalian
expression system (pCEP4-FLAG-trespin) in HEK293 cells and purified
FLAG-trespin from these cells by large scale immunoprecipitation with
anti-FLAG-agarose and gentle elution with 100 µg/ml competitor FLAG
peptide. The eluted FLAG-trespin was highly pure (~95%) with minimal
nonspecific bands detectable by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining
(Fig. 8A). Also, no other
proteins in the eluted material were recognized by the FLAG antibody
(Fig. 8B), as demonstrated by the control immunoprecipitation lacking FLAG immunoreactive bands. To ensure that
the purified FLAG-trespin was in its active conformation, we obtained a
thermal denaturation profile. Native serpins, due to their metastable
conformation, undergo a temperature-induced transition (i.e.
precipitate out of solution) with a melting temperature of
Tm = ~60-70 °C and no other detectable
transition up to 125 °C (1, 52). Cleaved or latent forms exhibit a
sharp, highly cooperative unfolding transition at a much higher
temperature of Tm = 124 °C. Fig. 8C
shows that FLAG-trespin rapidly precipitates at ~60-70 °C,
suggesting that it is properly folded and in the appropriate
conformation for further analyses.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Purity and thermal denaturation analyses of
purified FLAG-trespin. A, immunopurified FLAG-trespin
(1 µg) was subjected to SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining.
Lanes 1 and 2 are molecular weight
standards and purified FLAG-trespin, respectively. B, eluted
material (400 ng of total protein) from HEK293 cells expressing
pCEP4-FLAG-trespin or pCEP4 control (pCEP4 control immunoprecipitation
(IP)) was subjected to Western blot analysis and detected
with an anti-FLAG M1 antibody. Total lysate from HEK293-FLAG-trespin
cells is shown as a positive control (lane 3).
C, thermal denaturation of 0.5 µg of FLAG-trespin in PBS
was performed at the indicated temperatures. Samples were then
centrifuged at 4 °C, and supernatants containing soluble
FLAG-trespin were detected by Western blot analysis using anti-FLAG M1
antibody. These analyses are representative of two independent
experiments.
|
|
Classical serpins exhibit a stoichiometry of inhibition (SI) of 1:1
with their target proteinase. The SI ((ks + ki)/ki)) determines whether the
serpin-proteinase complex partitions down the pathway leading to the
formation of a covalent inhibitory complex (ki) or
if parallel substrate pathways (ks) predominate
(53). A SI of 1 suggests that the formation of inhibitory complexes
predominates, whereas a SI of >1 indicates the substrate pathway
exceeds the ki. To determine the SI for trespin and
plasmin, the indicated concentrations of FLAG-trespin (0-168.8 nM) were combined with 100 nM plasmin in PBS
and incubated for 20 min at 37 °C. Following the addition of plasmin
substrate, D-Val-Leu-Lys-pNA (final
concentration 1 mM), residual plasmin activity was recorded
using a microplate reader (A405) after a 20-min
incubation at 37 °C. The fractional activity
(A405 of inhibited reaction
(Vi)/A405 control reaction
(Vo)) was plotted against the ratio of
FLAG-trespin ([I]0) to plasmin
([E]0). Linear regression analysis was
performed to extrapolate the inhibitor and enzyme ratio resulting in
100% inhibition (x intercept), and we obtained an SI of
0.85 (Fig. 9A), similar to the
expected SI of 1:1. The inset (same x and
y axes) contains data points from above and includes
[I]0/[E]0 ratios of >1. Data
points with [I]0/[E]0 ratios of
>1 are on the x axis (due to 100% inhibition) and bias the
linear regression analysis; therefore, they were omitted in determining
the stoichiometry of inhibition.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Trespin inhibits plasmin in a
dose-dependent manner. A, the stoichiometry
of inhibition for FLAG-trespin with plasmin was determined by
preincubating 100 nM plasmin with the indicated
concentrations of FLAG-trespin (0-88.4 nM) for 37 min at
37 °C. VLK-pNA (1 mM final concentration) was
added, and the reaction was incubated for 20 min at 37 °C. Residual
plasmin activity was recorded using a microplate reader
(A405). The fractional activity was the product
formation of the inhibited reaction (Vi) divided by
the control reaction (Vo). Linear regression
analysis was performed to extrapolate the inhibitor and enzyme ratio,
resulting in 100% inhibition. The inset (same x
and y axes) contains data points from above and includes
[I]0/[E]0 ratios of >1. Data
points with [I]0/[E]0 ratios of
>1 are plotted on the x axis (due to 100% inhibition) and
bias the linear regression analysis; therefore, they are omitted in
determining the stoichiometry of inhibition. B, a progress
curve method analysis was used to demonstrate that FLAG-trespin
inhibits plasmin in a dose-dependent manner. 100 nM plasmin was simultaneously combined with
VLK-pNA (1 mM final substrate) and FLAG-trespin
(0 nM ( ), 4.42 nM ( ), 8.84 nM
( ), 17.68 nM ( ), 26.52 ( ), 35.36 nM
( ), 44.2 ( ), and 88.4 nM ( )) in the presence of
PBS. Plasmin activity (A405) was recorded using
a microplate reader for the indicated times and plotted against time
(s). These analyses are representative of three independent
experiments.
|
|
To further substantiate that trespin inhibits plasmin through
irreversible inactivation, we performed a progress curve method analysis (54, 55). 100 nM plasmin was simultaneously
combined with VLK-pNA (1 mM final substrate) and
the indicated concentrations of FLAG-trespin (0-84.4 nM)
in PBS. Plasmin activity (A405) was recorded
using a microplate reader and plotted against time (s). Fig.
9B demonstrates that FLAG-trespin inhibits plasmin activity in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, the initial
inactivation (<300 s) proceeds at a linear rate; however, the
inactivation pathway (i.e. plasmin inhibition by trespin)
predominates as the rate of product formation is followed. These
results demonstrate that trespin inhibits plasmin by directly binding
to plasmin's active site, resulting in functional inactivation, and
not through an allosteric mechanism.
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this report, we have identified a novel member of the rat
ov-serpin family that is down-regulated by TGF- 1 using differential display RT-PCR. Trespin is expressed in a variety of tissue types and
forms SDS-stable, DTT-stable, and thermostable complexes with elastase
and plasmin. FLAG-trespin exhibits a classical dose-response inhibition
profile with plasmin (Fig. 9B), and complex formation between FLAG-trespin and plasmin is detectable at 1 pmol (Fig. 7A).
Three-dimensional structure prediction by a Swiss Model Protein Data
Bank homology screen (Fig. 3) and steric considerations demonstrated
that trespin has a classical serpin fold with nine -helices, three
-sheets, and canonical carboxyl-terminal RSL. Trespin lacks an
amino-terminal signal sequence, suggesting that it is not part of the
secretory pathway, and Fig. 5B further suggests that
trespin is not normally secreted. However, analysis of the amino acid
sequence revealed the presence of potential N-linked glycosylation sites (NX(T/S)) at Asn177,
Asn201, Asn209, Asn321,
Asn324, and Asn383 that may allow trespin, like
PAI-2 (29, 30), to be secreted under certain conditions. The stimuli
that promote potential cellular relocalization and/or secretion of
trespin are under investigation.
Protein motif analysis indicated that trespin shares an identical
nuclear targeting sequence (KKRK) with bomapin (16) at amino acids
74-77. However, analysis of the trespin sequence by PSORT (56)
predicted trespin to be primarily cytoplasmic with minor percentages
targeted to nuclear and mitochondrial compartments; in contrast, PSORT
prediction and data suggest that bomapin is localized to the
nucleus (16). Cellular fractionation experiments (Fig. 5A)
in our laboratory demonstrate that FLAG-trespin is predominantly cytoplasmic in HEK293 cells, consistent with PSORT predictions and
preliminary data with endogenous trespin in NRP-152 cells (data not shown).
It is important to note that although functional domains between
serpins are highly conserved, this similarity does not indicate similar
function or homologous genes and is not a useful method to predict
homologous serpins. Several human serpins within the ovalbumin and heat
shock 47 clades exhibit high degrees of RSL homology, such as the
squamous cell carcinoma antigen serpins 1 and 2 (65% homologous RSLs)
and SERPINH1 and SERPINH2 (100% homologous
RSLs); furthermore, trespin and bomapin have 67% RSL homology, which
does not suggest that these proteins are homologues. Accordingly,
interspecies homologues of the same serpin, such as PAI-2, usually
demonstrate 100% RSL conservation, whereas the structural backbone may
vary by 25%. Serpins evolved through gene duplication, which results
in highly homologous proteins with specificity not necessarily
conferred through sequence but rather by tissue-specific expression and
regulation. A recent review by Silverman et al. (1) notes
that a linear relationship between human and murine (and assumed other
species) is not likely and that once all human serpins have been
identified, proper nomenclature of nonhuman serpins (i.e.
following the established rules of serpin nomenclature by the Second
International Symposium on the Structure and Biology of Serpins and the
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee), including rat trespin, will ensue.
Each member of the ov-serpin family has a unique and sometimes limited
tissue expression. Trespin is likely to function in multiple tissues as
indicated by its expression pattern, in contrast to human bomapin,
which has been detected only in the bone marrow by multiple tissue
Northern blot analyses and RT-PCR screens (49). Results suggest that
primary cells and established cell lines from monocytic lineage have
significant bomapin expression (49), with elevations in patients with
acute monocytic leukemia and no detectable expression in the peripheral
blood. On the contrary, we detected trespin expression in RBL-1, a
basophilic cell line, which is representative of one cell type in
peripheral blood, and in other tissues (prostate, lung, etc.). This
result, in conjunction with proteinase specificity (Fig. 6B)
and other mentioned differences, strongly suggests that
trespin is not the rat homolog of bomapin but instead is a novel rat serpin.
Alignment of the trespin amino acid sequence with bomapin and other
serpins (PAI-2, PI-9, and MENT) indicated a unique reactive center of
trespin between amino acids 346 (P17) and 367 (P5'). Within the
reactive site loop, the amino acid sequence of the hinge region
(P17-P8) is highly conserved among serpins shown to inhibit serine
proteinase activity (57-59). Trespin is identical to the consensus
sequence for the hinge region at every residue except for the P9
position, suggesting that it functions as an inhibitory serpin. Of the
amino acids present in the reactive site, the P1 residue is most
critical in determining the proteinase specificity of an inhibitory
serpin (2, 60). Trespin, like bomapin and PAI-2, contains arginine at
its P1 position, suggesting that it interacts with trypsin-like serine
proteinases. We analyzed a variety of trypsin-like serine proteinases
and determined that elastase and plasmin formed stable complexes with
trespin (Fig. 6A). Although elastase formed a stable complex
with trespin, the profile obtained (Fig. 7B) did not
indicate a dose-dependent inhibitory response. This may be
the result of trespin binding to a region of elastase other than the
active site or proteolytic degradation of trespin by elastase, which
generates trespin fragments with altered conformation(s) or affinities
for elastase. The dose-dependent degradation of
FLAG-trespin by elastase is obvious in Fig. 7B, which
suggests that trespin may be a potential elastase substrate.
Most serpins characterized inhibit proteinases through a suicide
substrate-like mechanism with the exception of maspin (61). From a
screen to find target proteinases that trespin binds, only plasmin
exhibited dose-dependent complex formation (Fig.
7A). Serpins usually exhibit a 1:1 stoichiometry with their
target proteinase, and deviations from this ratio are often observed by
altering the length of the RSL (62). Enzyme catalysis studies demonstrate trespin neutralizes plasmin with a stoichiometry of inhibition of 0.85 (Fig. 9A). The 15% deviation from the
ideal 1:1 ratio may be due to the inherent error of the assays used to
determine the concentration of immunopurified FLAG-trespin or active
plasmin. Further support for the possibility that FLAG-trespin inhibits
plasmin was obtained by a progress curve method analysis. This analysis
demonstrates that FLAG-trespin inhibits plasmin in a
dose-dependent manner (Fig. 9B) and that the
FLAG-trespin inactivation pathway predominates as catalysis proceeds.
We have not yet determined whether trespin is expressed in peripheral
blood (except for the basophilic cell line, RBL-1; Fig. 4D)
or in other tissues where plasmin activity is evident. However, our
data indicating that trespin inhibits plasmin provide fresh insight to
the active site(s) of proteinases which trespin may regulate. Due to
the significant degree of amino acid homology to bomapin, we were
interested in determining whether trespin exhibited similar functional
characteristics to bomapin, in light of the differences in tissue
expression and cellular localization. Bomapin has been shown to form
stable complexes with thrombin and trypsin (42); however, we cannot
detect the formation of any trespin complex with these proteinases
(Fig. 6, A and B). Also, the only physiological
role of bomapin described is resistance to tumor necrosis factor
-induced apoptosis (22) in HeLa cells, a cell line that does not
express endogenous bomapin. Even so, we investigated a similar role for
trespin and found no protection from tumor necrosis factor -induced
apoptosis in HeLa cells by both transient transfection and stable clone
assays (data not shown), further substantiating that bomapin and
trespin have distinct physiological roles.
In multiple tumor types through genetic and epigenetic mechanisms, the
TGF- pathway is susceptible to loss or mutation of either TGF-
receptors or Smad proteins (63). The consequence of these alterations
is the escape from the tumor-suppressive effects of TGF- , namely
cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and perhaps increased tumor burden
induced by local immune suppression, enhanced metastatic
potential, or angiogenesis (64, 65). In the nontumorigenic basal
prostatic epithelial cell line, NRP-152, our laboratory in
collaboration with Dr. Lalage Wakefield's group has demonstrated a
potential tumor suppressor role for the TGF- 1 type II receptor (66).
NRP-152 cells respond to TGF- with classical effects: extracellular
matrix secretion, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis (32). Other unique
and well characterized properties of these cells make them an ideal
model for prostatic carcinogenesis and to explore novel pathways
regulated by TGF- .
The literature describes few cases of serpin regulation by TGF- 1,
such as PAI-1, a direct transcriptional target of TGF- 1 (44, 45,
67), and PAI-2 (68, 69). PAI-1 deposition into the extracellular matrix
is increased by TGF- 1, along with a down-regulation of the PAI-1
targets: urokinase-type and tissue-type plasminogen activators (45).
The protein level of PAI-2 can be regulated by TGF- 1, but data
suggest that this effect may be cell type-dependent and
occurs through nontranscriptional mechanisms (68, 69). The overall
effect of the above TGF- 1 responses is a dramatic decrease in
extracellular proteolytic activity. On the contrary, trespin is
transcriptionally down-regulated by TGF- 1 (Fig. 1C) and
is found to be only intracellular (Fig. 4C). Trespin may
protect against cellular injury induced by a variety of stimuli such as
leakage of potent proapoptotic enzymes like granzyme B or cathepsin G
in the cytoplasm or mispackaged lysosomal or secretory granule enzymes.
Trespin's ability to complex with elastase and plasmin, along with its
expression in RBL-1, suggests a potential role in fibrinolysis or
similar cascades. Of interest to our laboratory is the impact trespin
will have on the biology of TGF- signal transduction and responses.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Vivien Yee (in
silico structure determination and related insights); Dr. Tony
Berdis (discussions on inhibition studies and critical review of the
manuscript); Drs. Anita Roberts and Seong-Jin Kim (discussions on
TGF- ); Drs. Shin-Geon Choi, Youngsuk Yi, and Yong-Seok Kim
(synthetic oligonucleotides); Dr. Bingcheng Wang
(hemagglutinin-pcDNA3); Dr. George Dubyak (RBL-1); Dr. Maria
Bamberger (THP-1); and Andrew Hsing and Nicole Pultz (technical assistance).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This study was supported by Cancer Center Grant P30CA43703,
American Cancer Society Research Grant RG-91-022-06, and NCI, National
Institutes of Health (NIH), Grant 1R01 CA3069-01 and by NIH intramural
funds from the Laboratory of Cell Regulation and Carcinogenesis.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AY075037.
¶
Supported by a Research Oncology Training Grant predoctoral
award to the Cancer Center from NCI, NIH.
These authors contributed equally to this work.

Supported by an intramural NIGMS, NIH, Pharmacology Research
Associate postdoctoral fellowship. Present address: Dept. of Molecular
and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030.
§§
Supported by an intramural guest researcher-training award from
the NIH visiting program. Present address: Dept. of Oncology and
Neuroscience, University of Medicine, Chieti 66013, Italy.
¶¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Ireland
Cancer Center Research Laboratories, Samuel Gerber Bldg., Suite 200, Lab 3, 11001 Cedar Rd., Cleveland, OH 44106. Tel.: 216-844-6959;
E-mail: dxd49@po.cwru.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 1, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201244200
2
D. Danielpour, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
RSL, reactive site
loop;
TGF- , transforming growth factor- ;
RT, reverse
transcription;
IVTT, in vitro translation/transcription;
MENT, myeloid and erythroid nuclear termination stage-specific protein;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PAI-1 and -2, plasminogen activator
inhibitor-1 and -2, respectively;
PI-9, proteinase inhibitor 9;
TRG, TGF- -regulated gene;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
VLK-pNA, D-Val-Leu-Lys-para-nitroanilide;
RACE, rapid
amplification of cDNA ends;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid;
SI, stoichiometry of inhibition.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Silverman, G. A.,
Bird, P. I.,
Carrell, R. W.,
Church, F. C.,
Coughlin, P. B.,
Gettins, P. G.,
Irving, J. A.,
Lomas, D. A.,
Luke, C. J.,
Moyer, R. W.,
Pemberton, P. A.,
Remold-O'Donnell, E.,
Salvesen, G. S.,
Travis, J.,
and Whisstock, J. C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
33293-33296[Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Potempa, J.,
Korzus, E.,
and Travis, J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
15957-15960[Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Huber, R.,
and Carrell, R. W.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
8951-8966[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Crowther, D. C.,
Evans, D. L.,
and Carrell, R. W.
(1992)
Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.
3,
399-407[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Baumann, U.,
Bode, W.,
Huber, R.,
Travis, J.,
and Potempa, J.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
226,
1207-1218[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Baumann, U.,
Huber, R.,
Bode, W.,
Grosse, D.,
Lesjak, M.,
and Laurell, C. B.
(1991)
J. Mol. Biol.
218,
595-606[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Mourey, L.,
Samama, J. P.,
Delarue, M.,
Choay, J.,
Lormeau, J. C.,
Petitou, M.,
and Moras, D.
(1990)
Biochimie (Paris)
72,
599-608
|
| 8.
|
Loebermann, H.,
Tokuoka, R.,
Deisenhofer, J.,
and Huber, R.
(1984)
J. Mol. Biol.
177,
531-557[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Huntington, J. A.,
Read, R. J.,
and Carrell, R. W.
(2000)
Nature
407,
923-926[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Gettins, P.,
Patston, P. A.,
and Schapira, M.
(1992)
Hematol. Oncol. Clin. N. Am.
6,
1393-1408[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Gettins, P.,
Patston, P. A.,
and Schapira, M.
(1993)
Bioessays
15,
461-467[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Remold-O'Donnell, E.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
315,
105-108[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Riewald, M.,
and Schleef, R. R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
14526-14532[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Potempa, J.,
Shieh, B. H.,
and Travis, J.
(1988)
Science
241,
699-700[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Ye, R. D.,
Ahern, S. M., Le,
Beau, M. M.,
Lebo, R. V.,
and Sadler, J. E.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
5495-5502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Chuang, T. L.,
and Schleef, R. R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
11194-11198[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Jensen, P. H.,
Jensen, T. G.,
Laug, W. E.,
Hager, H.,
Gliemann, J.,
and Pepinsky, B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
26892-26899[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Jensen, P. H.,
Schuler, E.,
Woodrow, G.,
Richardson, M.,
Goss, N.,
Hojrup, P.,
Petersen, T. E.,
and Rasmussen, L. K.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
15394-15398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Grigoryev, S. A.,
Bednar, J.,
and Woodcock, C. L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
5626-5636[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Bird, C. H.,
Sutton, V. R.,
Sun, J.,
Hirst, C. E.,
Novak, A.,
Kumar, S.,
Trapani, J. A.,
and Bird, P. I.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
6387-6398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Buzza, M. S.,
Hirst, C. E.,
Bird, C. H.,
Hosking, P.,
McKendrick, J.,
and Bird, P. I.
(2001)
Cell. Immunol.
210,
21-29[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Schleef, R. R.,
and Chuang, T. L.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
26385-26389[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Kumar, S.,
and Baglioni, C.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
20960-20964[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Dickinson, J. L.,
Bates, E. J.,
Ferrante, A.,
and Antalis, T. M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27894-27904[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Zhang, M.,
Volpert, O.,
Shi, Y. H.,
and Bouck, N.
(2000)
Nat. Med.
6,
196-199[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Sheng, S.,
Carey, J.,
Seftor, E. A.,
Dias, L.,
Hendrix, M. J.,
and Sager, R.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
11669-11674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Maass, N.,
Hojo, T.,
Zhang, M.,
Sager, R.,
Jonat, W.,
and Nagasaki, K.
(2000)
Acta Oncol.
39,
931-934[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Sager, R.,
Sheng, S.,
Pemberton, P.,
and Hendrix, M. J.
(1996)
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
213,
51-64[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Massague, J.,
and Wotton, D.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
1745-1754[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Massague, J.,
and Chen, Y. G.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
627-644[Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Danielpour, D.,
Kadomatsu, K.,
Anzano, M. A.,
Smith, J. M.,
and Sporn, M. B.
(1994)
Cancer Res.
54,
3413-3421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Hsing, A. Y.,
Kadomatsu, K.,
Bonham, M. J.,
and Danielpour, D.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
5146-5149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Lucia, M. S.,
Sporn, M. B.,
Roberts, A. B.,
Stewart, L. V.,
and Danielpour, D.
(1998)
J. Cell. Physiol.
175,
184-192[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Danielpour, D.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
169-179[Abstract]
|
| 35.
|
Zhao, S.,
Ooi, S. L.,
and Pardee, A. B.
(1995)
BioTechniques
18,
842-850[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Bonham, M. J.,
and Danielpour, D.
(1996)
BioTechniques
21,
57-60[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Church, G. M.,
and Gilbert, W.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
1991-1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Srivastva, K. K.,
Cable, E. E.,
and Bonkovsky, H. L.
(1993)
BioTechniques
15,
226-227[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Askew, Y. S.,
Pak, S. C.,
Luke, C. J.,
Askew, D. J.,
Cataltepe, S.,
Mills, D. R.,
Kato, H.,
Lehoczky, J.,
Dewar, K.,
Birren, B.,
and Silverman, G. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
49320-49330[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Chipuk, J. E.,
Bhat, M.,
Hsing, A. Y., Ma, J.,
and Danielpour, D.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
26614-26621[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Chase, T., Jr.,
and Shaw, E.
(1969)
Biochemistry
8,
2212-2224[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Riewald, M.,
and Schleef, R. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
26754-26757[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Kozak, M.
(1986)
Cell
44,
283-292[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Laiho, M.,
Saksela, O.,
and Keski-Oja, J.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
17467-17474[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Lund, L. R.,
Riccio, A.,
Andreasen, P. A.,
Nielsen, L. S.,
Kristensen, P.,
Laiho, M.,
Saksela, O.,
Blasi, F.,
and Dano, K.
(1987)
EMBO J.
6,
1281-1286[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Kruithof, E. K.
(1988)
Enzyme
40,
113-121[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Sprecher, C. A.,
Morgenstern, K. A.,
Mathewes, S.,
Dahlen, J. R.,
Schrader, S. K.,
Foster, D. C.,
and Kisiel, W.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
29854-29861[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Sun, J.,
Bird, C. H.,
Sutton, V.,
McDonald, L.,
Coughlin, P. B., De,
Jong, T. A.,
Trapani, J. A.,
and Bird, P. I.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
27802-27809[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Riewald, M.,
Chuang, T.,
Neubauer, A.,
Riess, H.,
and Schleef, R. R.
(1998)
Blood
91,
1256-1262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Cohen, A. B.,
Geczy, D.,
and James, H. L.
(1978)
Biochemistry
17,
392-400[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Longas, M. O.,
and Finlay, T. H.
(1980)
Biochem. J.
189,
481-489[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Kaslik, G.,
Kardos, J.,
Szabo, E.,
Szilagyi, L.,
Zavodszky, P.,
Westler, W. M.,
Markley, J. L.,
and Graf, L.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
5455-5464[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Travis, J.,
and Salvesen, G. S.
(1983)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
52,
655-709[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Morrison, J. F.,
and Walsh, C. T.
(1988)
Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol.
61,
201-301[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Wimalasena, K.,
and Haines, D. C.
(1996)
Anal. Biochem.
234,
175-182[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Nakai, K.,
and Kanehisa, M.
(1992)
Genomics
14,
897-911[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Hopkins, P. C.,
and Stone, S. R.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
15872-15879[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 58.
|
Hopkins, P. C.,
Pike, R. N.,
and Stone, S. R.
(2000)
J. Mol. Evol.
51,
507-515[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 59.
|
Hopkins, P. C.,
Carrell, R. W.,
and Stone, S. R.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
7650-7657[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
Travis, J.,
Matheson, N. R.,
George, P. M.,
and Carrell, R. W.
(1986)
Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler
367,
853-859[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 61.
|
Pemberton, P. A.,
Wong, D. T.,
Gibson, H. L.,
Kiefer, M. C.,
Fitzpatrick, P. A.,
Sager, R.,
and Barr, P. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
15832-15837[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 62.
|
Zhou, A.,
Carrell, R. W.,
and Huntington, J. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
27541-27547[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 63.
|
Derynck, R.,
Akhurst, R. J.,
and Balmain, A.
(2001)
Nat. Genet.
29,
117-129[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 64.
|
Akhurst, R. J.,
and Balmain, A.
(1999)
J. Pathol.
187,
82-90[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 65.
|
Akhurst, R. J.,
and Derynck, R.
(2001)
Trends Cell Biol.
11 (suppl.),
44-51
|
| 66.
|
Tang, B.,
de Castro, K.,
Barnes, H. E.,
Parks, W. T.,
Stewart, L.,
Bottinger, E. P.,
Danielpour, D.,
and Wakefield, L. M.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
4834-4842[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 67.
|
Chen, Y. Q.,
Sloan-Lancaster, J.,
Berg, D. T.,
Richardson, M. A.,
Grinnell, B.,
and Tseng-Crank, J.
(2001)
Thromb. Haemostasis
86,
1563-1572[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 68.
|
Hayashida-Hibino, S.,
Watanabe, H.,
Nishida, K.,
Tsujikawa, M.,
Tanaka, T.,
Hori, Y.,
Saishin, Y.,
and Tano, Y.
(2001)
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
42,
1691-1697[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 69.
|
Falk, P., Ma, C.,
Chegini, N.,
and Holmdahl, L.
(2000)
Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest.
60,
439-447[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Wang, K. Song, T. L. Sponseller, and D. Danielpour
Novel Function of Androgen Receptor-associated Protein 55/Hic-5 as a Negative Regulator of Smad3 Signaling
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 18, 2005;
280(7):
5154 - 5162.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. S. Puente and C. Lopez-Otin
A Genomic Analysis of Rat Proteases and Protease Inhibitors
Genome Res.,
April 1, 2004;
14(4):
609 - 622.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|