|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M203832200 on May 22, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 29, 26540-26546, July 19, 2002
Detection of Circulating and Endothelial Cell Polymers
of Z and Wild Type 1-Antitrypsin by a Monoclonal Antibody*
Sabina
Janciauskiene §,
Ruta
Dominaitiene ,
Nils H.
Sternby¶,
Eva
Piitulainen , and
Sten
Eriksson
From the Departments of Internal Medicine,
¶ Pathology, and Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital,
Malmö, 20502 Malmö, Sweden
Received for publication, April 19, 2002, and in revised form, May 21, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Globular inclusions of abnormal 1-antitrypsin
(AAT) in the endoplasmic reticulum of hepatocytes are a characteristic
feature of AAT deficiency of the PiZZ phenotype. Monoclonal
antibodies, which contain constant specificity and affinity, are often
used for the identification of Z-mutation carriers. A mouse
monoclonal antibody (ATZ11) raised against PiZZ hepatocytic AAT was
successfully used in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and in
identification of Z-related AAT globular inclusions by
immunohistochemical techniques. Using electrophoresis, Western
blotting, and ELISA procedures, we have shown in the present study that
this monoclonal antibody specifically detects a
conformation-dependent neoepitope on both polymerized and
elastase-complexed molecular forms of AAT. The antibody has no apparent
affinity for native, latent, or cleaved forms of AAT. The antibody
ATZ11 illustrates the structural resemblance between the polymerized
form of AAT and its complex with elastase and provides evidence that
Z-homozygotes beyond the native form may have at least one more
circulating molecular form of AAT, i.e. its polymerized
form. In addition, staining of endothelial cells with ATZ11 antibody in
both M- and Z-AAT individuals shows that AAT attached to endothelial
cells is in a polymerized form. The antibody can be a powerful
tool for the study of the molecular profile of AAT, not only in
Z-deficiency cases but also in other (patho)physiological conditions.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The capacity to undergo conformational changes is crucial for the
physiological function of many proteins; the serine proteinase inhibitors (serpins)1 are a
clear case for such changes having been exploited during evolution as a
means of modulating inhibitory activity (1). Serpins possess two
structural elements that are conformationally labile and are essential
for efficient proteinase inhibition: a reactive center loop and a
-sheet ( -sheet A) that is able to open and accommodate the
reactive center loop after its cleavage by the attacking proteases
(2-5). The x-ray crystal structures of native, cleaved, cleaved in
complex with protease, and polymerized forms of serpins have confirmed
the abilities of these proteins to undergo profound conformational
changes under certain environmental conditions (6-8). The crystal
structure of the 1-antitrypsin-trypsin complex showed complete
insertion of the reactive site loop, which substantially increases
thermal and conformational stability of the serpin and results in the
irreversible inhibition and then the structural destruction of the
proteinase (9).
The conformational changes that occur in the serpin molecule during the
formation of the enzyme-serpin complexes, interaction with other
molecules, polymerization, cleavage, and oxidation lead to the
generation of conformation-dependent neoepitopes (10). Immunochemical analysis by means of monoclonal antibodies is a useful
approach for study of the formation of new epitopes that occur as a
result of the conformational polymorphism of serpins (11, 12). For
example, the suggestion that the whole reactive site loop is
incorporated as an additional strand into the -sheet A upon complex
formation is supported by immunological evidence obtained using
antithrombin in which unique epitopes were exposed through binding to
proteases and cleavage of the reactive side bond (13). These epitopes
were also present in the cleaved serpin, where crystallographic data
have revealed full loop insertion. For another serpin, the C1
inhibitor, it was shown that neoepitopes are induced upon interaction
with target and non-target proteases, illustrating the structural
similarities between its complexed and cleaved forms. (14).
Molecular mobility confers on serpins not only the capacity to bind and
entrap their target proteinases in highly stable complexes but also a
concomitant propensity to form dysfunctional molecules (15). A change
of a single amino acid in certain domains of the serpin molecule can
block changes in the structure necessary for normal inhibitory activity
and folding and can lead to the polymerization of mutant serpin into
intracellular aggregates (16). Our understanding of the lost and
altered activities of dysfunctional serpins has been greatly advanced
by correlating studies on molecular structure with analysis of the
mechanisms of serpins and their target proteinases and of their
physical properties (17-19).
1-Antitrypsin is the major serpin in the human circulation. It is
produced predominantly by hepatocytes but also by blood monocytes,
macrophages, pulmonary alveolar cells, and intestinal epithelial cells
(20, 21). The biological activity of AAT can be affected by point
mutations modifying its structure and/or secretion. Several genetic
variants of AAT are associated with low plasma AAT levels (22). Severe
AAT deficiency of the homozygous PiZ phenotype, which differs from the
normal M variant in the substitution of Glu342 with Lys,
was first recognized as a new hereditary condition predisposing to
disease on the basis of low plasma levels (10% normal) of the protein
that arise not from the lack of AAT synthesis but from a blockage of
its secretion (23, 24). Molecules of the Z variant of AAT are retained
in the endoplasmic reticulum of hepatocytes as inclusion bodies that
can be recognized by periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining (25).
PAS-positive intracellular inclusions are the end result of AAT
polymerization due to a sequential insertion of the reactive loop from
one AAT molecule into a -sheet of another (26, 27). The retained
Z-AAT polymers are cytotoxic for the hepatocytes and can cause liver
damage with a variable clinical presentation, from neonatal hepatitis
to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in adults (28).
Individuals with AAT deficiency are also at an increased risk of
developing emphysema, which is the most frequent complication of AAT
deficiency and is believed to occur because of the decrease in elastase
inhibitory capacity normally provided by AAT. However, AAT polymers
also occur in the lungs of patients with AAT deficiency (29,
30). Moreover, an association has been shown between Z-AAT
deficiency and immunomediated diseases, particularly C-ANCA positive
vasculitic disorders (31).
A monoclonal antibody raised against the PiZZ type of AAT purified from
the liver of Z-homozygotes was widely used for the recognition of AAT
deficiency in ELISA procedures (32). The antibody was shown to
recognize specifically the Z type of AAT, and the linear epitope was
thought to be located at the mutation site (Lys342 Glu)
in the AAT molecule. This idea was challenged by later studies showing
the ability of a single amino acid substitution in a protein molecule
to change the shape of the molecule and result in the opening and/or
creation of new, conformation-dependent epitopes (11, 13,
34, 35). Typically, the pronounced structural change that occurs during
the formation of the enzyme-serpin complex leads to the generation of
new epitopes (36). To date, monoclonal antibodies have been described
that recognize a conformation-dependent neoepitope in both
the activated protein C-protein C inhibitor complex and the cleaved,
loop-inserted inhibitor but lack affinity for the native form of
inhibitor (10). Such antibodies provide evidence that identical
neoepitopes can be present in two different molecular forms of
proteolytically modified inhibitor and that they are conformationally dependent.
We hypothesize that the change in protein folding of Z-AAT could cause
formation of the multidomain, conformational epitopes but need not
necessarily involve the mutation site. Here we have shown that a mouse
monoclonal antibody, ATZ11, which has been produced against Z-AAT,
recognizes a conformational neoepitope including both polymerized and
elastase-complexed forms of AAT but lacks affinity to native,
latent, or cleaved AAT.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Specific Reagents--
Native, purified human AAT was a gift
from the Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital, Malmo,
Sweden. Human plasma AAT (purity >95% and inhibitory
activity >75%) was obtained from Calbiochem. Porcine pancreatic
elastase (EC 3.4.21.36) was obtained from Sigma. Monospecific antisera
against AAT and neutrophil elastase, negative control mouse IgG2b, and
all secondary peroxidase-labeled antibodies were obtained from DAKO
(Dako, Denmark). The monoclonal antibody ATZ11 raised against Z-AAT
isolated from liver tissue was described earlier (32) and is available
in our laboratory. Monoclonal antibody specific to native AAT (3C5, IgG1) was a gift from Dr. A. Zvirbliene, Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania. Synthetic peptide (99% purity) of 10 amino acids
(H-Leu-Thr-Ile-Asp-Lys-Lys-Gly-Thr-Glu-Ala-OH) containing the mutation
PiZZ site 342 (Glu Lys) was produced by SAVEEN Biotech AB (Malmo, Sweden).
Patients--
After informed consent, plasma samples were
collected from 12 PiZZ individuals in the Swedish AAT Registry, at the
University Hospital, Malmo. PiZZ phenotypes were identified by
isoelectric focusing at the Department of Clinical Chemistry,
University Hospital, Malmo. Eight of the patients had pulmonary
emphysema, one had asthma, one had pulmonary fibrosis, and two were
asymptomatic. None of them had clinical signs of liver disease or
vasculitis. Plasma samples from 12 normal PiM individuals were used as
controls. Z-AAT plasma samples were analyzed immediately after
collection and again 2 weeks later.
Preparation of Cleaved AAT and AAT-Elastase Complexes--
A
stock solution of AAT was prepared in sterile Tris-buffered saline
(0.015 M Tris, 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.4) at a
concentration of 18 mg/ml. Cleaved AAT was prepared as
previously described (37). Briefly, native AAT was incubated with
porcine pancreatic elastase at a molar ratio of 1:5 for 15 min at
37 °C. The cleaved AAT was separated from the elastase using a
centrifugal microconcentrator (Centricon-30, Millipore Corp.,
Bedford, MA). AAT-elastase complexes were produced by
incubating AAT with porcine pancreatic elastase at a molar ratio of
1.2:1 for 15 min at 37 °C temperature. All preparations of AAT were
analyzed by 7.5, 10, or 12% PAGE and SDS-PAGE gels followed by
staining with Coomassie Blue.
Preparation of AAT Polymers and Latent AAT--
AAT polymers
were prepared according to Dafforn et al. (38) by incubating
AAT (final concentration 1.2 mg/ml) at 56 °C for 3 h with
gentle shaking. Polymer formation was confirmed by non-denaturing 7.5%
PAGE and a concomitant loss of inhibitory activity against pancreatic elastase.
The latent AAT was prepared as described previously (39) by incubating
protein (final concentration 1.2 mg/ml) in 0.7 M citrate
buffer at 65 °C for 24 h. The citrate was removed by dialysis against 20 mM Tris, pH 8.6, at 4 °C. The latent AAT
preparations were then heated at 56 °C for 3 h to convert any
residual active AAT to polymers. Latent AAT was assessed by 10 or 12%
SDS and non-denaturing PAGE.
Electrophoresis and Western Blotting--
PAGE was
performed in a Mini-PROTEAN II electrophoresis cell (Bio-Rad) on 7.5, 10, or 12% homogeneous gels.
Electrophoretically separated samples were transferred to a
polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (ImmobilonTM-P, Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) in transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, 190 mM glycine, 20% methanol) using a semidry blot
electrophoretic transfer system (Trans-Blot S.D., Bio-Rad). After the
transfer, the membranes were blocked overnight with 5% nonfat dried
milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 at 4 °C.
Blots were developed for 2 h using primary polyclonal rabbit
antibodies against human AAT (1:800) or mouse monoclonal antibodies
against human Z-AAT (ATZ11) (1:250). In some experiments ATZ11
antibodies were preincubated with the mutation site peptide for 24 h at 4 °C prior to use. The protein bands were visualized by
incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody
against rabbit or mouse immunoglobulins (1:800), respectively. DAB
(3,3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride, Sigma) was used as a
peroxidase substrate.
Sandwich ELISA Assay--
Nunc-Immuno plates (Nalge Nunc
International, Denmark) were routinely coated with 100 µl of plasma
samples diluted 1:100 in coating buffer (0.05 M
NaCO3, pH 9.6) or different molecular forms of purified AAT
(2.5 µg/ml) and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The plates were
washed with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.01% Tween, and
nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 100 µl of 1% bovine
serum albumin for 1 h at room temperature. The wells were washed,
and 100 µl of ATZ11 antibodies were added at different dilutions
alone or preincubated with various molecular forms of AAT for 24 h
at 4 °C prior to use. After incubation for 2 h on a shaker at
room temperature, the washing procedure was repeated, and horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG antibody (1:1000) was added
for 2 h. Finally, the wells were washed as before, and 200 µl of
2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium
(Sigma) substrate was added. The absorbance was estimated after 15 min
at 405 nm in an ELISA reader (Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland). All
samples were analyzed in six replicates. For the control, monoclonal
antibody was replaced by washing buffer.
Double Sandwich ELISA--
The plates were coated by exposure
overnight to 100 µl of polyclonal anti-human AAT antibody diluted
1:2000 in coating buffer at 4 °C. The wells were next washed with
washing buffer and blocked by adding 100 µl of 1% bovine serum
albumin in phosphate-buffered saline for 1 h at room temperature.
The wells were washed, and various dilutions of purified native,
cleaved, complexed, or polymerized forms of AAT or plasma samples were
incubated for 2 h at room temperature. After incubation, the
washing procedure was repeated, and 100 µl of monoclonal antibody to
Z-AAT (ATZ11), diluted 1:300, was added and incubated for 2 h on a
shaker at room temperature. After washing as described above, 100 µl
of peroxidase-conjugated rabbit antibody to mouse immunoglobulins,
diluted 1:1000, was added for 2 h at room temperature. Finally,
the wells were washed as before, and 200 µl of
2,2-azino-di-[3-ethylbenzthiazoline sulfonate] (ABTS) substrate was
added. The absorbance was estimated after 15 min at 405 nm in an
ELISA reader. All samples were analyzed in triplicate. For the control,
washing buffer was substituted for the monoclonal antibody.
Immunohistochemistry--
Specimens of temporal artery and aorta
were obtained by biopsy and autopsy, respectively. The specimens were
fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. After
cutting, sections were deparaffinized and developed in the
immunostaining system, TechMateTM 500 Plus (Dako). Blocking antibody
was applied for 20 min at room temperature. The primary antibody ATZ11
(1:100), polyclonal anti-AAT (1:1000), and polyclonal anti-neutrophil
elastase (1:1000) were added and allowed to react for 90 min at room
temperature. Control slides were incubated with the buffer or
non-immunized mouse IgG (1:1000, negative control). The second
peroxidase-labeled antibody was applied and incubated for 30 min at
room temperature. After washing, the sections were stained with DAB.
The samples were analyzed by microscopy, using an Olympus B×41
(Olympus Optical Co., Hamburg, Germany). Images were taken with an
Olympus camera DP50 (Olympus Optical Co.) at a magnification of
×100.
Statistical Analysis--
The difference of the means in the
experimental results was analyzed for statistical significance by
Student's two-sample two-sided t test and/or one-way
analysis of variance combined with a multiple comparison procedure
(Scheffe multiple-range test), with an overall significance level of
= 0.05.
 |
RESULTS |
Detection of Various Molecular Forms of AAT by the Monoclonal
Antibody ATZ11--
Different molecular forms of AAT, such as native,
proteolytically cleaved, polymerized, complexed with elastase, and
latent were subjected to 7.5 or 10% non-denaturing and SDS-PAGE,
respectively, and immunoblotted with monoclonal antibody ATZ11. First,
to investigate the specificity of ATZ11 antibody while conserving
protein conformation, non-denaturing (native) PAGE immunoblotting
analysis was used. We found that ATZ11 reacts equally well with
AAT-elastase complex and with polymerized AAT (Fig.
1) but shows no interaction with native
AAT or with elastase alone (Fig. 1, A and B). The
absence of a reaction against native AAT clearly confirms that the
ATZ11 antibody does not interact with the inhibitory active, so-called "stressed" conformation of this protein. Analysis of the latent, cleaved, and AAT-complexed with elastase forms by 10% native PAGE followed by Western blotting confirmed that the ATZ11 antibody reacts
strongly only with AAT-elastase complex (Fig.
2) but does not recognize non-inhibitory
latent and cleaved forms of AAT. These data show that reactive site
loop insertion during the formation of the AAT-enzyme complex and AAT
polymerization induces an immunologically similar conformation, which
is detectable by the ATZ11 antibody. Analysis of the same samples by
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting showed no interaction between ATZ11 and
any molecular form of AAT (Fig. 3). This
implies that the epitope recognized by ATZ11 is not determined by the
AAT sequence, i.e. is non-linear. Furthermore, preincubation
of ATZ11 with the peptide carrying the Z mutation failed to inhibit
ATZ11 interaction with AAT polymers and AAT-elastase complex (data not
shown). Thus, these experiments further supported the specificity of
ATZ11 for a conformational but non-linear epitope.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Native, polymerized, and elastase-complexed
AAT analyzed on Native 7. 5% PAGE gel followed by Western
blotting is visualized with ATZ11 antibody. Electrophoretic analysis
(A) followed by Western blotting (B): lane
1, molecular markers; lane 2, native AAT; lane
3, AAT-elastase complex. Electrophoretic analysis (C)
followed by Western blotting (D): lane 1,
molecular markers; lane 2, elastase; lane 3,
polymerized AAT.
|
|

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Various molecular forms of AAT analyzed by
native 10% PAGE followed by Western blotting. Blots visualized
with ATZ11 antibody. Electrophoresis (A) and Western
blotting (B): lane 1, elastase; lane
2, AAT-elastase complex; lane 3, cleaved AAT;
lane 4, latent AAT.
|
|

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Various molecular forms of AAT analyzed by
7.5% SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting. Electrophoresis
(A) and Western blotting (B): lane 1,
molecular markers; lane 2, native AAT; lane 3,
AAT-elastase complex; lane 4, elastase; lane 5,
cleaved AAT; lane 6, polymerized AAT.
|
|
Specificity of the Monoclonal Antibody Studied by the ELISA
Method--
The specific ability of polymerized and elastase-complexed
AAT, but not native or cleaved AAT, to inhibit binding of the
monoclonal antibody to immobilized antigen was demonstrated by
competitive ELISA experiments. Microtiter plates were coated with Z-AAT
plasma (1:200) with polymerized or AAT-elastase complexes (2.5 µg/ml). A constant dilution of monoclonal antibody ATZ11 (1:300) was
mixed with serial dilutions of antigen, namely, native polymerized, AAT
complexed with elastase, or Z patient plasma and incubated overnight at
room temperature. As illustrated in Figs.
4 and 5, ATZ11 antibody alone binds strongly to immobilized Z-AAT plasma, polymerized AAT, and the AAT-elastase complex. Preincubation of ATZ11
with Z-AAT plasma samples in dilutions from 1:2 to 1:32 inhibits ATZ11
binding to immobilized antigen in a concentration-dependent manner from 91 to 30% (p < 0.01). Similarly,
preincubation of ATZ11 with various concentrations of either
polymerized AAT or AAT-elastase complex showed an effective competition
for binding of ATZ11 to immobilized antigen. In contrast, native,
cleaved, and latent forms of AAT showed no ability at all to compete
with the ATZ11 antibody binding to immobilized antigens (data not
shown). These experiments demonstrate that both polymerized and
complexed AAT are effective competitors for ATZ11 binding to
immobilized Z-AAT plasma and vice versa. Similar experiments
were performed using a double sandwich ELISA, which also demonstrated
that Z plasma as well as polymerized AAT and AAT-elastase complex
inhibits ATZ11 binding to antigens (data not shown).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Competitive ELISA assays illustrating the
binding (expressed as A405) of monoclonal
antibody ATZ11 to immobilized antigen. Z plasma (A) and
polymerized AAT (B) alone and in the presence of different
dilutions of polymerized AAT or Z-AAT patient plasma. Each point
represents a mean of eight repeats (p < 0.01). The
experiments were carried out by mixing a fixed dilution (1:300) of
antibody ATZ11 with a dilution series of polymerized AAT or ZZ plasma.
After overnight incubation, the mixtures were added to antigen-coated
microtiter plates. ELISA assay was performed as described under
"Experimental Procedures."
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
ELISA assay illustrating monoclonal antibody
ATZ11 specificity to immobilized antigen. AAT-elastase complex
(A) and Z plasma (B), alone and in the presence
of different dilutions of the AAT-elastase complex or Z plasma. Each
point represents a mean of eight repeats (p < 0.01).
The experiment was carried out by mixing a fixed dilution (1:300) of
antibody ATZ11 with a dilution series of AAT-elastase complex or Z
plasma. After overnight incubation, the mixtures were added to
antigen-coated microtiter plates. ELISA assay was performed as
described under "Experimental Procedures."
|
|
Immunohistochemistry--
Temporal artery and aortic specimens
taken from non-Z individuals were immunostained for AAT with polyclonal
anti-AAT, polyclonal anti-neutrophil elastase, monoclonal ATZ11
antibodies, and with non-immunized mouse IgG (negative control) (Fig
6, a-d).

View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Localization of AAT in temporal artery.
Specimens stained with polyclonal anti-human AAT (1:1000) show
immunoreactivity on the endothelial lining and in the smooth muscle
cells (a). Monoclonal antibody ATZ11 (1:100) shows AAT
immunoreactivity only in the endothelium layer (indicated by
arrow) (c). The endothelial layer is not
stained by anti-elastase antibody (1:500) (b) or by
non-immunized mouse IgG antibody (1:500) used as a negative control
(d) (original magnification ×100).
|
|
Endothelial cell lining stained intensely positive for AAT in all
specimens using monoclonal ATZ11 antibody (Fig. 6, c). The polyclonal AAT antibody showed a nearly identical staining pattern of
endothelial cell layers compared with the monoclonal ATZ11 antibody
(Fig. 6, a), but in addition polyclonal anti-AAT showed AAT
immunoreactivity in the smooth muscle cell layer. The polyclonal antibody to elastase as well as control mouse IgG showed no endothelial staining at all (Fig. 6, b and d).
Identification of the Molecular Profile of AAT in Plasma Samples
from Z-homozygotes--
Plasma samples from PiMM (n = 12) and PiZZ (n = 12) homozygotes were analyzed by
7.5% non-denaturing PAGE electrophoresis followed by Western blotting.
The blots were performed using monoclonal antibody, ATZ11, and
commercial polyclonal anti-AAT antibody. Plasma samples were freshly
obtained and analyzed at once. Immunoblots that were developed using
polyclonal anti-AAT antibodies showed similar AAT profiles in both Z
and M plasma. In contrast, the fact that the same immunoblots developed
by using ATZ11 antibodies shows that Z, but not M, plasma samples
contain a remarkable amount of polymerized forms of AAT (Fig.
7A). AAT profiles in the
analyzed samples were compared with those obtained from the purified,
AAT-elastase complex and polymerized AAT (Fig. 7A,
lanes 6 and 7; Fig. 7B, lanes
1 and 2). Z-AAT plasma samples, kept at 20 °C and
analyzed after 2 weeks, showed an identical polymer profile (data not
shown), suggesting that the formation and disintegration of plasma AAT polymers are not very sensitive with regard to sample manipulation. Moreover, as shown in Fig. 7A, one of the Z plasma samples,
in addition to the polymeric AAT, showed a protein band occurring at
the same position as the AAT-elastase complex prepared in
vitro (Fig 7A, lanes 5 and 7).
Because Z-AAT molecules are known to have a lesser ability to maintain
a stable complex with elastase (27), it is reasonable to believe that
storage of the Z plasma samples, as well as multiple refreezing, might
result in the dissociation of AAT-elastase complexes. Further studies
are needed to confirm that Z-homozygotes, except polymerized AAT, also
contain circulating AAT-elastase complexes. Plasma from M samples
showed no polymerized and/or complexed AAT as determined by the ATZ11
antibody (Fig. 7A, lanes 1 and 2).

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
7.5% Native PAGE electrophoretic analysis of
plasma samples from normal (controls) and PiZ homozygotes followed by
Western blotting. The blots were developed using monoclonal
antibody ATZ11 (A) and polyclonal anti-AAT antibody (DAKO)
(B). A, lanes 1 and 2,
M-AAT plasma; lanes 3-5, deficiency Z-AAT plasma from
patients with emphysema; lane 6, polymerized native AAT;
lane 7, AAT-elastase complex. B, lane
1, AAT-elastase complex; lane 2, polymerized AAT;
lanes 3-5, Z-AAT plasma; lanes 6 and
7, M-AAT plasma.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
A monoclonal antibody, ATZ11, has been prepared after immunization
of mice with globular AAT inclusions purified from a ZZ liver (32).
Screening of a large number of plasma samples with ATZ11 using a double
sandwich ELISA procedure allowed rapid and easy identification of
individuals with homozygous PiZ or intermediate PiMZ, SZ, and FZ AAT
deficiency. There was no overlapping observed between plasma from
subjects lacking the Z allele and those that were PiZ homozygotes or
heterozygous. No false positive plasma samples have been found
(40-42). The antibody was also utilized for the identification of PiZ
gene carriers in liver tissue sections (43). Together these studies
have suggested that the ATZ11 antibody is of great value for the
identification of PiZ gene carriers at both plasma and tissue levels.
Recently, however, Fischer et al. (44) have shown that the
ATZ11 antibody reacts with endothelial cells of portal capillaries and
larger blood vessels from both PiM and PiZ individuals. They have
suggested that this is due to a cross-reaction of the antibody with an
epitope on endothelial cells. We have confirmed these findings by
showing that various non-Z specimens of vessel endothelium stain
intensely positive for AAT with monoclonal ATZ11. The observation that
ATZ11 antibody is unable to distinguish between the normal and the
deficiency variant of AAT on endothelial cells led us to predict that
the ATZ11 antibody recognizes a conformation-dependent, presumably non-linear, epitope of the AAT molecules, not necessarily involving the Z mutation per se. Because a mouse monoclonal
antibody ATZ11 was developed against hepatic inclusion bodies isolated from a Z-homozygote, one can assume that the AAT protein used as an
antigen was in a polymerized form. In both the native PAGE immunoblot
analysis and ELISA systems, polymers prepared in vitro from
purified M-AAT clearly showed that the ATZ11 antibody recognizes a
polymeric form of AAT. We also found that, in addition to AAT polymers,
the antibody reacts with AAT-elastase complex but shows no reaction
with the native, inhibitory form of AAT or its non-inhibitory forms,
viz. cleaved or latent. A synthetic peptide covering the Z mutation of
AAT (Glu342 Lys) failed to inhibit the antibody
reaction with polymerized and complexed AAT, providing further evidence
that a neoepitope recognized by the ATZ11 antibody does not involve the
mutation site of the Z-AAT molecule.
An interaction between AAT and its target enzyme results in a
conformational transition of AAT that allows the opening of -sheet A
and insertion of the cleaved reactive site loop (45). The insertion of
the reactive site strand into -sheet A can also be induced under
mild denaturation conditions and during intermolecular polymerization
of AAT (46). The structural transitions associated with loop insertion
expose epitopes that can stimulate antibody production. Recently a
monoclonal antibody has been identified that recognizes a neoepitope
covering both complexed and cleaved forms of the protein C inhibitor
but shows no affinity for the native form of the serpin (10). It is
generally assumed that small conformational differences between the
cleaved serpin complexed with an enzyme and cleaved serpin without
complex formation limit the possibilities to produce an antibody that
recognizes only one of these inactive forms (12). However, for the C1
inhibitor at least one antibody has been described which recognizes a
neoepitope exclusively exposed on the cleaved inhibitor and not on the
complexed form of the protein (14).
To date no antibody has been described covering a neoepitope on both
AAT complexed with enzyme and polymerized AAT. The finding that ATZ11
antibody reacts specifically with two non-inhibitory forms of AAT,
polymerized and complexed with elastase but not with cleaved or latent
forms, implies that the dislocations of structural elements in the AAT
molecule caused by the insertion of the active site strand into the
-sheet during polymerization and complex formation are distinct from
those occurring in the latent and proteolytically cleaved forms of AAT.
The structures of intact, latent, cleaved, and polymerized serpins and
serpins complexed with enzyme confirm the polymorphic character of the reactive site strand, which to varying extents can undergo an insertion
into -sheet A (5, 47-49). The ATZ11 antibody that can discriminate
conformational states associated with reactive site insertion into
-sheet A may provide great help in elucidating the structural
features of AAT as well as in detecting molecular forms of AAT in
vivo.
In the classic form of AAT deficiency, phenotype PiZ, the mutant Z-AAT
molecules are retained within the endoplasmic reticulum of the liver
cells due to an aberrant protein polymerization (50, 51). We have
demonstrated here that plasma freshly obtained from patients with
homozygous Z deficiency also contains a significant amount of AAT
polymers. This observation provides good evidence that Z-AAT
polymerization occurs not only within hepatocytes but also in the
circulation. Non-Z carriers were found to have very low levels or a
total lack of plasma AAT polymers, which is also consistent with the
high sensitivity and specificity of the ATZ11-based ELISA system used
for the detection of Z carriers in earlier studies (40, 41).
Considering the potential cytotoxicity of Z-AAT polymers to hepatocytes
and their occurrence in the circulation, it is relevant to discuss the
potential pathogenic role of these polymers in extrahepatic clinical
manifestations of AAT deficiency, such as emphysema and vasculitic
disorders. The accompanying plasma deficiency predisposes the
Z-homozygote to early onset emphysema, particularly in cigarette
smokers (52-54). Emphysema is thought to be caused by uninhibited
proteolysis in the lung tissue (23, 55), although Z-AAT polymers have
also been identified in the lungs of Z-AAT homozygotes with emphysema
(56). However, at present we can only speculate about the putative role
of AAT polymers in the pathogenesis of emphysema. The polymers of Z-AAT
molecules, either locally formed de novo or deriving from
the circulation, may favor proteolytical events but also provide as yet
unknown biological activities.
The intrinsic property of the wild type AAT to undergo loop-sheet
polymerization is much less pronounced than for mutant Z-AAT. To date,
in vivo, wild type AAT polymers have been described only in
human bile, where AAT interaction with the hydrophobic microenvironment is supposed to enhance polymer formation (57). The observed reaction of
ATZ11 antibody with vascular endothelial cells from non-Z AAT
individuals clearly demonstrates that endothelial-bound AAT is in a
polymerized form. Neutrophil elastase staining of endothelial cells
turned out to be negative, arguing against any significant contribution
of AAT-elastase complexes to the observed staining pattern.
Expression of AAT in human islet, microvascular endothelial cells has
been demonstrated (58), and endothelial binding of AAT and
1-antichymotrypsin derived from plasma has been identified (59). It
has been suggested that the loss of endothelial serpins predisposes to
vascular injury (60, 61). The mode of biosynthesis and/or uptake
mechanisms of AAT in endothelial cells, however, needs further
investigation. Moreover, our findings highlight the need for the
elucidation of the putative role of AAT in large vessel diseases and
also in small vessel disorders, particularly Wegener's granulomatosis,
a characteristic C-ANCA entity. Many recent studies have shown a
firm relationship between the presence of a Z allele and
anti-proteinase-3-positive systemic vasculitis (31, 33).
Taken together, our data describe a mouse monoclonal antibody that
recognizes a conformation-dependent neoepitope in
polymerized AAT and in the AAT-elastase complex but that has no
affinity for the native form of inhibitor or for the non-inhibitory
cleaved or latent forms. We have also shown that a fraction of plasma AAT in Z-homozygotes exists in a polymerized form and that a polymeric wild type AAT is an endothelial cell marker. The ATZ11 antibody can be
a valuable tool for further conformational studies of AAT and for
various clinical applications.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Elise Nilsson for expert technical
assistance with the immunostaining experiments.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was funded in part by the Swedish Medical Research
Council (K01-72X), the Medical Faculty of Lund University, and the Tore
Nilsson and Alfred Österlund Foundations.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Medicine,
Wallenberg Laboratory, Ing. 46, UMAS, S-20502, Malmö, Sweden. Tel.: 46-40-33-14-14; Fax: 46-40-33-40-71; E-mail:
sabina.janciauskiene@medforsk.mas.lu.se.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 22, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203832200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
serpin, serine
proteinase inhibitor;
AAT, 1-antitrypsin;
Z-AAT, deficiency ZZ
variant of AAT;
AAT-M, normal MM variant of ATT;
s ATZ11, mouse
monoclonal antibody against ZZ deficiency hepatocytic ATT;
DAB, 3,3-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride;
ELISA, enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay;
PiZ, the abnormal heterozygous phenotype of AAT;
PiZZ, the abnormal homozygous phenotype of AAT;
PiM, normal phenotype
of AAT;
C-ANCA, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Silverman, G. A.,
Bird, P. I.,
Carrell, R. W.,
Church, F. C.,
Coughlin, P. B.,
Gettins, P. G.,
Irving, J. A.,
Lomas, D. A.,
Luke, C. J.,
and Whisstock, J. C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
33293-33296[Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Sun, J.,
Rose, J. B.,
and Bird, P. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
16089-16096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Macen, J. L.,
Upton, C.,
Nation, N.,
and McFadden, G.
(1993)
Virology
195,
348-363[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Zhou, A.,
Carrell, R. W.,
and Huntington, J. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
27541-27547[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Lawrence, D. A.,
Olson, S. T.,
Muhammad, S.,
Day, D. E.,
Kvassman, J. O.,
Ginsburg, D.,
and Shore, J. D.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
5839-5844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Ye, S.,
and Goldsmith, E. J.
(2001)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
11,
740-745[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Skinner, R.,
Abrahams, J. P.,
Whisstock, J. C.,
Lesk, A. M.,
Carrell, R. W.,
and Wardell, M. R.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
266,
601-609[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Stein, P. E.,
and Carrell, R. W.
(1995)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
2,
96-113[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Huntington, J. A.,
Read, R. J.,
and Carrell, R. W.
(2000)
Nature
407,
923-926[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Strandberg, K.,
Kjellberg, M.,
Erb, E. M.,
Persson, U.,
Mosher, D. F.,
Villoutreix, B. O.,
and Stenflo, J.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
15713-15720[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Saunders, D. N.,
Buttigieg, K. M.,
Gould, A.,
McPhun, V.,
and Baker, M. S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
10965-10971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Abbink, J. J.,
Kamp, A. M.,
Swaak, A. J.,
and Hack, C. E.
(1991)
J. Immunol. Methods
143,
197-208[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Picard, V.,
Marque, P. E.,
Paolucci, F.,
Aiach, M.,
and Le Bonniec, B. F.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
4586-4593[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Nuijens, J. H.,
Huijbregts, C. C.,
van Mierlo, G. M.,
and Hack, C. E.
(1987)
Immunology
61,
387-389[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Kopito, R. R.,
and Ron, D.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Bio.
2,
207-209[CrossRef]
|
| 16.
|
Elliott, P. R.,
Pei, X. Y.,
Dafforn, T. R.,
and Lomas, D. A.
(2000)
Protein Sci.
9,
1274-1281[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Carrell, R. W.,
Whisstock, J.,
and Lomas, D. A.
(1994)
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
150,
S171-175[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Carrell, R. W.,
and Lomas, D. A.
(2002)
N. Engl. J. Med.
346,
45-53[Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Janciauskiene, S.
(2001)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1535,
221-235[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Travis, J.,
Shieh, B. H.,
and Potempa, J.
(1988)
Tokai. J. Exp. Clin. Med.
13,
313-320[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Molmenti, E. P.,
Perlmutter, D. H.,
and Rubin, D. C.
(1993)
J. Clin. Invest.
92,
2022-2034[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Carrell, R. W.,
Lomas, D. A.,
Sidhar, S.,
and Foreman, R.
(1996)
Chest
110,
243S-247S[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Eriksson, S.
(1999)
J. Hepatol.
30,
34-39[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Kalsheker, N.,
and Morgan, K.
(1990)
Thorax
45,
759-764[Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Bolmer, S.,
and Kleinerman, J.
(1986)
Am. J. Pathol.
123,
377-389[Abstract]
|
| 26.
|
Lomas, D. A.
(2000)
Respir. Med.
94,
S3-6
|
| 27.
|
Lomas, D. A.,
Evans, D. L.,
Stone, S. R.,
Chang, W. S.,
and Carrell, R. W.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
500-508[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Teckman, J. H., Qu, D.,
and Perlmutter, D. H.
(1996)
Hepatology
24,
1504-1516[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Reid, P. T.,
and Sallenave, J. M.
(2001)
Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs
2,
59-67[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Mahadeva, R.,
and Lomas, D. A.
(1998)
Thorax
53,
501-505[Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Esnault, V. L.,
Audrain, M. A.,
and Sesboue, R.
(1997)
Exp. Clin. Immunogenet.
14,
206-213[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Wallmark, A.,
Alm, R.,
and Eriksson, S.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
5690-5693[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Borgmann, S.,
Endisch, G.,
Urban, S.,
Sitter, T.,
and Fricke, H.
(2001)
Clin. Immunol.
98,
244-248[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Eldering, E.,
Nuijens, J. H.,
and Hack, C. E.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
11776-11779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Bjork, I.,
Nordling, K.,
and Olson, S. T.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
6501-6505[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Patston, P. A.,
and Gettins, P. G.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
383,
87-92[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Moraga, F.,
Lindgren, S.,
and Janciaskiene, S.
(2001)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
386,
221-226[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Dafforn, T. R.,
Mahadeva, R.,
Elliott, P. R.,
Sivasothy, P.,
and Lomas, D. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
9548-9555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Lomas, D. A.,
Elliott, P. R.,
Chang, W. S.,
Wardell, M. R.,
and Carrell, R. W.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
5282-5288[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Carlson, J.,
and Eriksson, S.
(1985)
Scand. J. Gastroenterol.
20,
835-842[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Elzouki, A. N.,
Segelmark, M.,
Wieslander, J.,
and Eriksson, S.
(1994)
J. Intern. Med.
236,
543-548[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Elzouki, A. N.,
Verbaan, H.,
Lindgren, S.,
Widell, A.,
Carlson, J.,
and Eriksson, S.
(1997)
J. Hepatol.
27,
42-48[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Callea, F.,
Brisigotti, M.,
Faa, G.,
Lucini, L.,
and Eriksson, S.
(1991)
J. Hepatol.
12,
372-376[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Fischer, H. P.,
Ortiz-Pallardo, M. E., Ko, Y.,
Esch, C.,
and Zhou, H.
(2000)
J. Hepatol.
33,
883-892[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Seo, E. J., Im, H.,
Maeng, J. S.,
Kim, K. E.,
and Yu, M. H.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
16904-16909[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Koloczek, H.,
Banbula, A.,
Salvesen, G. S.,
and Potempa, J.
(1996)
Protein Sci.
5,
2226-2235[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Schulze, A. J.,
Huber, R.,
and Bode, W.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
344,
117-124[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Munch, M.,
Heegaard, C.,
Jensen, P. H.,
and Andreasen, P. A.
(1991)
FEBS Lett.
295,
102-106[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Gooptu, B.,
Hazes, B.,
Chang, W. S.,
Dafforn, T. R.,
Carrell, R. W.,
Read, R. J.,
and Lomas, D. A.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
67-72[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Teckman, J. H.,
and Perlmutter, D. H.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.
279,
G961-974[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Carrell, R. W.,
and Lomas, D. A.
(1997)
Lancet
350,
134-138[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Campbell, I. C.
(2000)
Respir. Med.
94,
18-21[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Perlmutter, D. H.
(1998)
Semin. Liver Dis.
18,
217-225[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Eriksson, S.
(1996)
Chest
110,
237S-242S[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Perlmutter, D. H.
(2000)
Clin. Liver Dis.
4,
387-408[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Elliott, P. R.,
Bilton, D.,
and Lomas, D. A.
(1998)
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
18,
670-674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 57.
|
Janciauskiene, S.,
Toth, E.,
Sahlin, S.,
and Eriksson, S.
(1996)
Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest.
56,
597-608[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 58.
|
Lou, J.,
Triponez, F.,
Oberholzer, J.,
Wang, H., Yu, D.,
Buhler, L.,
Cretin, N.,
Mentha, G.,
Wollheim, C. B.,
and Morel, P.
(1999)
Diabetes
48,
1773-1778[Abstract]
|
| 59.
|
Forsyth, K. D.,
Talbot, V.,
and Beckman, I.
(1994)
Clin. Exp. Immunol.
95,
277-282[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
Smedly, L. A.,
Tonnesen, M. G.,
Sandhaus, R. A.,
Haslett, C.,
Guthrie, L. A.,
Johnston, R. B.,
Henson, P. M.,
and Worthen, G. S.
(1986)
J. Clin. Invest.
77,
1233-1243[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 61.
|
Nakatani, K.,
Takeshita, S.,
Tsujimoto, H.,
Kawamura, Y.,
and Sekine, I.
(2001)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
69,
241-247[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-P. Chang, R. Mahadeva, W.-S. W. Chang, A. Shukla, T. R. Dafforn, and Y.-H. Chu
Identification of a 4-mer Peptide Inhibitor that Effectively Blocks the Polymerization of Pathogenic Z {alpha}1-Antitrypsin
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.,
November 1, 2006;
35(5):
540 - 548.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Persson, D. Subramaniyam, T. Stevens, and S. Janciauskiene
Do Native and Polymeric α1-Antitrypsin Activate Human Neutrophils In Vitro?
Chest,
June 1, 2006;
129(6):
1683 - 1692.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Onda, D. Belorgey, L. K. Sharp, and D. A. Lomas
Latent S49P Neuroserpin Forms Polymers in the Dementia Familial Encephalopathy with Neuroserpin Inclusion Bodies
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 8, 2005;
280(14):
13735 - 13741.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Mahadeva, C. Atkinson, Z. Li, S. Stewart, S. Janciauskiene, D. G. Kelley, J. Parmar, R. Pitman, S. D. Shapiro, and D. A. Lomas
Polymers of Z {alpha}1-Antitrypsin Co-Localize with Neutrophils in Emphysematous Alveoli and Are Chemotactic in Vivo
Am. J. Pathol.,
February 1, 2005;
166(2):
377 - 386.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Gershagen and S. Janciauskiene
ELISA for Specific Detection of PiZ-Related {alpha}1-Antitrypsin Deficiency
Clin. Chem.,
December 1, 2004;
50(12):
2407 - 2410.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D A Lomas and H Parfrey
{alpha}1-Antitrypsin deficiency * 4: Molecular pathophysiology
Thorax,
June 1, 2004;
59(6):
529 - 535.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. T. Mulgrew, C. C. Taggart, M. W. Lawless, C. M. Greene, M. L. Brantly, S. J. O'Neill, and N. G. McElvaney
Z {alpha}1-Antitrypsin Polymerizes in the Lung and Acts as a Neutrophil Chemoattractant
Chest,
May 1, 2004;
125(5):
1952 - 1957.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Parfrey, R. Mahadeva, N. A. Ravenhill, A. Zhou, T. R. Dafforn, R. C. Foreman, and D. A. Lomas
Targeting a Surface Cavity of {alpha}1-Antitrypsin to Prevent Conformational Disease
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 29, 2003;
278(35):
33060 - 33066.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Picard, M.-D. Dautzenberg, B. O. Villoutreix, G. Orliaguet, M. Alhenc-Gelas, and M. Aiach
Antithrombin Phe229Leu: a new homozygous variant leading to spontaneous antithrombin polymerization in vivo associated with severe childhood thrombosis
Blood,
August 1, 2003;
102(3):
919 - 925.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|