![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 30, 26815-26820, July 26, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
,
,
,
, and
**
From the
Department of Physiology, University of
Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas 75390, the
§ Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry, Baylor
College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, and the ¶ University of
South Dakota School of Medicine, Division of Basic Biomedical Sciences,
Vermillion, South Dakota 57069
Received for publication, February 21, 2002, and in revised form, April 10, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PA700, the 19 S regulatory complex of the 26 S
proteasome, plays a central role in the recognition and efficient
degradation of misfolded proteins. PA700 promotes degradation by
recruiting proteasomal substrates utilizing polyubiquitin chains and
chaperone-like binding activities and by opening the access to the core
of the 20 S proteasome to promote degradation. Here we provide evidence that PA700 in addition to binding misfolded protein substrates also
acts to remodel their conformation prior to proteolysis. Scrambled
RNase A (scRNase A), a misfolded protein, only slowly refolds
spontaneously into an active form because of the rate-limiting unfolding of misfolded disulfide isomers. Notably, PA700 accelerates the rate of reactivation of scRNase A, consistent with its ability to
increase the exposure of these disulfide bonds to the solvent. In this
regard, PA700 also exposes otherwise buried sites to digestion by
exogenous chymotrypsin in a polyubiquitinated enzymatically active
substrate, pentaubiquitinated dihydrofolate reductase, Ub5DHFR. The dihydrofolate reductase ligand
methotrexate counters the ability of PA700 to promote digestion by
chymotrypsin. Together, these results indicate that in addition to
increasing substrate affinity and opening the access channel to the
catalytic sites, PA700 activates proteasomal degradation by remodeling
the conformation of protein substrates.
Damaged proteins are produced by genetic alterations and thermal
or oxidative stresses. Unless degraded, these damaged proteins tend to
aggregate. An accumulation of protein aggregates is tightly linked to
neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and
Huntington's diseases (1-3). An increased turnover of damaged protein
is associated with cystic fibrosis, maple syrup urine disease, and
cancer (4). In cells, molecular chaperones retard the aggregation
process and present the aberrant proteins for proteolysis (5), the bulk
of which is mediated by the proteasome.
The 20 S proteasome consists of two seven-member rings of The multifunctional PA700 complex can be disassociated into two
subcomplexes, the so-called "lid" and "base" (12). Although the
function of most PA700 subunits is obscure, several activities have
been defined by genetic and biochemical studies. First, the six
AAA1 ATPase subunits of PA700
base compose a ring, which associates with both ends of the 20 S
proteasome when the 26 S proteasome is formed, thereby opening
the narrow pore of the 20 S core (13, 14). Second, the lid complex
contains polyubiquitin chain binding activity. The S5a subunit of PA700
specifically binds polyubiquitin-tagged proteins in vitro
(15). However in vivo studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and plants show that the ubiquitin chain binding site in S5a is not required for the degradation of all polyubiquitinated proteins (16, 17), suggesting that additional sites are involved. Third, an isopeptidase activity (18, 19) is present in the lid. A
37-kDa subunit, P37, catalyzes the cleavage of the polyubiquitin chains
into ubiquitin monomers, which are then presumably recycled, whereas
the targeted substrates are degraded. Fourth, a misfolded protein
binding activity has been identified in the base. Both mammalian PA700
(20) and yeast proteasome regulatory complex (21) interact with several
misfolding proteins and repress their aggregation. The base alone,
which contains the six AAA ATPases and two other proteins, can mediate
this activity. Finally, PA700 is presumed to be an unfoldase (22, 23).
The constricted annulus of even the dilated 20 S proteasome is thought
to permit access of only denatured proteins to the catalytic sites
within the chamber. By analogy, the AAA ATPase regulators of the
prokaryotic Clp protease family, ClpA and ClpX, have been demonstrated
to unfold the substrate prior to degradation (24-26). An unfoldase
activity was also demonstrated for the recently described
archaebacterial proteasome-activating nucleotidase in addition to its
anti-aggregation and refolding activities (27). To test the hypothesis
that proteasomal substrates are unfolded and/or remodeled by PA700, a
misfolded protein, scrambled bovine pancreatic ribonuclease A (scRNase
A) and a polyubiquitinated substrate pentaubiquitin-tagged
dihydrofolate reductase (Ub5DHFR) was selected as model
substrates. Our results suggest that PA700 promotes the exposure of
otherwise buried sites in these two substrates, highlighting additional
parallels between the 26 S proteasome and the Clp proteases.
Materials--
PA700 and latent 20 S proteasome were purified
from bovine red blood cells as described previously (8, 28).
Recombinant PA28 Reactivation of scRNase A--
scRNase A stock solution was
prepared in 0.1% acetic acid. PA700, PDI, and other proteins were
preincubated in refolding buffer A (20 mM Tris-HCl, 20 mM NaCl, 0.3 mM EDTA, 0.65 mM DTT,
pH 7.6) for 10 min at 30 °C, and then scRNase A was added to a final
concentration of 6 µM. At each time point, 30 µl of the
solution was removed, and the RNase activity was measured
spectrophotometrically at room temperature with a cytidine 2',3'-cyclic
monophosphate (cCMP) substrate (33). The reaction mixture contained 1.2 µM incubated scRNase A, 4 mM cCMP in 20 mM Tris-HCl, 20 mM NaCl buffer, pH 7.35. The
hydrolysis of cCMP, reflecting the reactivation of RNase A, was
monitored continuously as an increase in absorbance at 296 nm. The
noncatalyzed reactivation of scRNase A under the same conditions was
subtracted as background. The activity of an equivalent amount of
native RNase A in this assay was taken as 100%.
Alternatively, scRNase A activation was determined using RNA as a
substrate. 3 µg of polymerized nucleic acid was incubated with 50 nM scRNase A in the presence or absence of 60 nM PDI, PA700, and other proteins in refolding buffer A for
15 min at 30 °C. The reaction was stopped by adding 5% perchloric
acid. The degree of reactivation was monitored by separating RNA on a
2% agarose gel and visualizing the remaining RNA with ethidium bromide
fluorescence. In glycerol gradient co-sediment experiments, 15 mg of
PA700 was resolved on a 2-ml 10-35% glycerol gradient and centrifuged
at 55,000 × g for 3 h. The fractions were
collected (100 µl) and assayed (10 µl) for their ability to promote
the reactivation of 73 nM scRNase A using 2 µg of RNA
substrate. The fractions were also assessed (20 µl) for their ability
to stimulate the proteolytic activity of the 20 S proteasome using a
suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin fluorogenic peptide
substrate as described previously (35). The modification of
PA700 and PDI by N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) was performed
according to the protocol "conjugation with thiol-reactive probes"
offered by Molecular Probes. Approximately, 3 µM PDI or
PA700 was incubated with 1 mM NEM in 20 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 20 mM NaCl, I mM EDTA, 10%
(v/v) glycerol, and the mixture was kept at 4 °C for 6 h under
dark. Excess NEM was removed by dialysis extensively at 4 °C against
the same reaction buffer.
Oxidative Refolding NRCSQGSC (dansyl-K) N-peptide--
The
peptide was synthesized at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute
facility at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center using a
Rainin Symphony multiplex peptide synthesizer using Fmoc
(N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl) chemistry and purified by high performance liquid chromatography (>95%). The identity was confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectral
analysis. The peptide concentration was calculated based on the
molecular mass of 1329 Da. The redox folding of the peptide (50 µM) was carried out in McIlvaine buffer (0.2 M dibasic sodium phosphate, 0.1 M citric acid,
5 mM reduced glutathione, 1 mM oxidized glutathione, pH 6.5) with appropriate concentrations of DsbA, PA700,
and BSA as shown in Fig. 3B (34). Reduced and
oxidized peptides were separated by reverse phase high performance
liquid chromatography on a 0.46 × 150-cm ultrasphere C18 column
(Beckman). The peptides were eluted (1 ml/min) using a 1%/min gradient
of 90% buffer A (0.1% trifluoroacetic acid:H2O), 10%
buffer B (0.085% trifluoroacetic acid:acetonitrile) to 70% buffer A,
30% buffer B. The peptide was detected using the absorbance of
the dansyl-lysine group at 340 nm. The oxidized and reduced peptides
were eluted at 19% and 20% buffer B, respectively and were well
resolved (data not shown).
Digestion of Ub5DHFR--
Ub5DHFR (80 nM) was incubated with chymotrypsin (2 nM) with
or without PA700 (20 nM), GroEL (20 nM)·GroES
(40 nM) complex, Hsc70 (20 nM), and/or MTX (200 µM) in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, 20 mM NaCl, 20 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA for
the indicated time at 37 °C. The reactions were stopped by adding
5× SDS sample buffer. The samples were heated at 95 °C for 5 min
and then subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to Immobilon-NC
transfer membranes (Millipore). Ub5DHFR was detected using
a monoclonal anti-hemagglutinin antibody (BAbCo, Richmond, CA) against
the hemagglutinin tag at the C terminus of Ub5DHFR
(21).
Degradation of scRNase A by 20 S and 26 S Proteasome--
26 S
proteasome was assembled in vitro in refolding buffer A as
described previously (35) from 20 S proteasome (50 nM) and PA700 (200 nM). The proteasome-specific inhibitor
PA700-dependent Reactivation of a Misfolded Protein,
Scrambled RNase A--
The native bovine pancreatic RNase A structure
required for enzymatic activity contains a specific set of disulfide
bonds, Cys26-Cys84,
Cys40-Cys95,
Cys58-Cys105, and
Cys65-Cys72. Any mismatched cysteinyl
disulfide results in misfolding, RNase A with one or more inappropriate
disulfides is classically denoted as scrambled RNase A (36). The
reactivation of this misfolded protein is slow unless the disulfide
exchange reaction is enzymatically catalyzed, or the exposure of these
mismatched bonds to the solvents is increased (33, 37). Both eukaryotic
PDI and prokaryotic DsbA, a periplasmic thiol disulfide oxidoreductase,
catalyze the formation and/or isomerization of disulfide bonds in
vitro (33, 37). Isomerization by PDI utilizes the reduced form of
its Cys-X-X-Cys active sites to attack
disulfide bonds of misfolded proteins and directly promote their
exchange (38). To assess whether PA700 could also promote the
reactivation of scRNase A, the formation of native enzymatically active
RNase was assayed by the RNase-dependent digestion of RNA.
Fig. 1A shows that like PDI
and DsbA, PA700 can promote the reactivation of scRNase A. At a 1:1.2
molar ratio of scRNase A to enzymes, their relative scRNase A
reactivation abilities are PDI > PA700 > DsbA. As shown in
Fig. 1B, neither of the other proteins such as PA28
The kinetics of scRNase A reactivation were assessed in the presence of
PDI, DsbA, PA700, PA28 Mechanism of Reactivation PA700 Does Not Share the Same
Isomerization Mechanism as PDI--
PDI utilizes reduced Cys residues
in the Cys-X-X-Cys active sites to catalyze the
oxidoreduction steps. NEM, a sulfydryl-specific modifying reagent,
blocks the catalytic cysteines in PDI, which results in the loss of
activity (Fig. 3A). NEM
treatment also effectively inhibits the ATPase activity of PA700 (14)
but not its chaperone-like activity (21). In this regard, the
NEM-modified reactivation activity of PA700 is unaltered (Fig.
3A), consistent with the lack of ATP dependence in our RNA
digestion assay. The results suggest that PA700 does not require ATPase
activity for reactivation and that PA700 does not utilize exposed
catalytic cysteines for accelerating the exchange of the misfolded
disulfide pairs in scRNase A.
The thiol disulfide exchange reaction can be executed by PDI and DsbA
on a wide range of substrates including proteins, peptides, and low
molecular weight thiols and disulfides (31). Both PDI and DsbA catalyze
the formation of an intramolecular disulfide bond in a small largely
unstructured decapeptide, NRCSQGSCWN (34). To assess whether PA700
could also promote the formation of a disulfide bond, we synthesized an
analogue (NRCSQGSC (dansyl-K)N) of this peptide, replacing the
tryptophan residue with a dansyl-modified lysine. As shown in Fig.
3B, the catalytic amounts of DsbA catalyzed the oxidation of
the peptide, whereas PA700 and BSA did not promote the formation of the
disulfide bond, consistent with their inability to directly catalyze
the oxidation step and a lack of an effect on already exposed bonds.
Together, these results strongly suggest that PA700 does not directly
catalyze the oxidoreduction step of the reactivation reaction, but
rather the mechanism for promoting reactivation here is probably the
remodeling of scRNase A by PA700 to increase and/or prolong the
exposure of the substrate disulfides to the solvent.
PA700 Exposes Buried Chymotryptic Sites in a Polyubiquitinated
Substrate--
To further assess whether PA700 can expose otherwise
inaccessible sites, Ub5DHFR was examined as a substrate.
Ub5DHFR is degraded by the 26 S proteasome (22). The rate
of degradation suggests that in light of the high affinity binding of
Ub5DHFR (Km = 35 nM) by
PA700, substrate unfolding may be the rate-limiting step (22). To
directly test whether PA700 could remodel this substrate, we examined
the ability of PA700 to present otherwise buried sites in
Ub5DHFR to chymotrypsin in trans. As shown in Fig. 4, at the present concentration of
chymotrypsin, Ub5DHFR is resistant to chymotryptic
digestion (lane 1). The isopeptidase activity (18) of PA700
catalyzes removal of ubiquitin from the Ub5DHFR substrate
(lane 4). After eliminating the contribution because of
the deubiquitination of Ub5DHFR, the degradation of Ub5DHFR by chymotrypsin was accelerated ~5-fold by PA700
(lane 5). No obvious acceleration was mediated by the
lid subcomplex, which contains the polyubiquitination chain
binding subunit S5a and the isopeptidase activity. Significantly, PA700
does not promote the chymotryptic digestion of nonubquitinated DHFR
(data not shown). Moreover, Fig. 4 shows that the chymotryptic
degradation was inhibited by saturating concentrations of methotrexate
(MTX), a ligand that stabilizes the folded conformation of DHFR (40,
41). The ability of two chaperones to promote the exposure of
chymotryptic sites in Ub5DHFR was also assessed. Hsc70, a
chaperone known to be involved in substrate presentation to the
proteasome (42), has no effect on the chymotryptic digestion of
Ub5DHFR in the presence or absence of Mg-ATP (data not
shown), suggesting that simple differential binding of the substrate
cannot account for the further increased exposure of the chymotryptic
sites. By contrast, the GroEL·GroES complex, a chaperonin with known
unfoldase activity (43, 44), also increased the exposure of the sites
in Ub5DHFR (data not shown). These results are consistent
with a PA700-dependent increase in exposure of otherwise
occluded or buried sites and suggest that PA700 alone is unable to
efficiently act on hyperstable conformations such as MTX-stabilized
Ub5DHFR.
Effect of PA700 on Proteasomal Degradation of scRNase A--
The
degradation of scRNase A is stimulated when PA700 associates with the
20 S proteasome to form the 26 S proteasome. 20 S proteasome degrades
nonubiquitinated proteins, such as mildly oxidized proteins (45-48),
and the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21WAF1/CIP1 (49). The molecular basis for the recognition
of these substrates by the 20 S proteasome is not yet well understood,
although it has been suggested that hydrophobic interactions may play a
role (50-52). We assessed the possibility that scRNase A is also a
substrate for the proteasome. As shown in Fig.
5, A and C, the
latent bovine red cell 20 S proteasome is capable of degrading
nonubiquitinated scRNase A. This activity is enhanced when PA700
associates with the 20 S proteasome to form the 26 S proteasome (Fig.
5A). The degradation of the misfolded protein was inhibited
by the addition of
The scrambled disulfides in scRNase A can be reduced under mild
reducing conditions (0.2-1.0 mM DTT) (51). Therefore, we assessed whether the 20 S proteasomal degradation of scRNase A requires the disruption of the mismatched disulfide bridges by DTT.
This is not the case as DTT in the reaction buffer actually retarded
the degradation (data not shown). This effect is probably the result of
accelerated spontaneous reactivation of scRNase A into the proteasomal
resistant native RNase A. Thus, the degradation of scRNase A by the
latent 20 S proteasome does not require the reduction of the scrambled
disulfides by DTT.
Proteasomal Degradation of scRNase A Is Inhibited by Pretreatment
with PA700--
PA700 catalyzes the reactivation of scRNase A to
native RNase A. Because native RNase is resistant to 20 S proteasomal
degradation, it was reasonable to expect that PA700 could rescue
misfolded scRNase A from proteasomal degradation by promoting its
reactivation and refolding. As shown in Fig. 5D, the
preincubation of PA700 with scRNase A and DTT prior to the addition of
the 20 S proteasome protects this substrate from degradation.
Protection correlates well with the degree of reactivation (Fig.
2A), suggesting that it is the gain of native structure
during the preincubation that is protective rather than the formation
of some more proteasome-resistant structure (i.e.
aggregates). These results raise the possibilities that PA700 preforms
multiple roles in vitro, promoting the degradation of a
misfolded protein when it is associated with the 20 S proteasome and
reactivating the misfolded substrate when it is not bound to the 20 S
proteasome. Both abilities would require the remodeling of the
substrates as shown here.
In this work, we have shown that PA700, the 19 S regulatory
complex of the 26 S proteasome, catalyzes the reactivation of scRNase A
and promotes exposure of buried chymotryptic sites in a folded
functionally active proteasomal substrate, Ub5DHFR. This ability is probably a critical component of a concerted action of PA700
by which it binds the substrate using ubiquitin binding and
chaperone-like sites, opens the annulus of the 20 S proteasome, and
alters the conformation of the substrate itself. By contrast to the
thiol oxidoreductases, PA700 promotes isomerization of the misfolded
disulfides by increasing their exposure and does not exhibit the
ability to promote the formation of disulfides. Not surprisingly, this
reactivation activity is not observed for the proteasomal regulatory
complex PA28 The molecular chaperone-like activity of PA700 requires interaction
site(s) that recognize misfolded proteins in the base subcomplex (20,
21). Thus, this nonnative state recognition site may reside in the ring
formed by the six AAA ATPases. In addition, a proteasome-activating
nucleotidase from archaebacteria (27, 54), homologous to these six AAA
ATPases in PA700, mediates anti-aggregation, refolding, and unfoldase
activities to promote proteasomal degradation. In analogy to cellular
chaperones such as the GroEL·GroES complex and Hsc70, a hydrophobic
interaction site(s) on PA700 would be expected to bind the misfolded
proteins including scRNase A. The observation that Hsc70 is ineffective in remodeling these substrates suggests that a more extensive hydrophobic surface, such as that found on GroEL (55, 56), may be
required. Such a hydrophobic surface on PA700 has been detected by
8-anilino-1-naphthalene-sulfonic acid binding (data not shown).
Interaction with this site could stabilize and trap the more open forms
of the misfolded substrates in preparation for translocation into the
annulus of 20 S and subsequent proteolysis. Consistent with this model,
the ability to promote the reactivation of scRNase A reported here is
ATPase-independent. These open states are visited only rarely in
MTX-stabilized Ub5DHFR and thus they can not be efficiently
trapped by PA700 (as shown in Fig. 4). In this regard, the accelerated
reactivation of scRNase A catalyzed by PA700 could be explained by a
prolonged exposure of mismatched disulfides to solvent while bound to
this site. Again, the stabilization of these remodeled open states of
the substrate could promote their translocation through the narrow
channel of the 20 S core particle to the catalytic sites.
The preferential translocation of open conformers to the proteolytic
sites probably accounts for the ATPase dependence of the proteolytic
process. This model predicts that substrate conformational remodeling
by PA700 is coupled to translocation. As such, a more efficient
remodeling of proteasome substrates (active unfolding) would require an
intact translocation reaction in addition to stabilization of the open
conformers. In prokaryotes, the regulatory complexes of Clp protease,
ClpA and ClpX, have been shown to unfold green fluorescence protein, a
very stable protein (24-26). The unfolding process is facilitated when
these complexes are associated with ClpP to form the proteolytic
complexes ClpAP and ClpXP (25, 26). Lee et al. (57)
suggested that both the Clp protease and the proteasome catalyze
unfolding by processively unraveling their substrates from the
attachment point of the degradation signals and that the ability of a
protein to be degraded depends on the stability of the local structure
adjacent to the degradation signal. In these cases, degradation
requires the associated regulatory complexes for both Clp protease and
proteasome to recognize the substrates. However, as we reported here,
the latent 20 S proteasome alone degrades scRNase A but not native
RNase A. This observation suggests that the substrate itself may
regulate the gating of the latent 20 S proteasome to promote degradation.
The ability of PA700 to either promote proteasomal degradation when
forming the 26 S proteasome complex (Fig. 5A) or the
refolding of the misfolded protein into a proteasome-resistant form in
the absence of 20 S (Fig. 5D) raises an interesting
question. Does PA700 catalyze the refolding of misfolded proteins
in vivo? To date, there exists no firm evidence for PA700
sans 20 S in a cell other than during the assembly of 26 S. Therefore, The ability of PA700 to promote refolding and suppress
aggregation in vitro may simply reflect partial reactions of
its normal function in proteasomal activation. However, it is
interesting to consider the alternative possibility that the balance
between degradation and refolding could be adjusted depending upon the
conditions facing the cell by controlling the association of PA700 with
20 S proteasome.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-subunits
containing the active sites flanked by two seven-member rings of
noncatalytic
-subunits (6, 7). Either end of the 20 S proteasome can
interact with two proteasomal regulatory complexes, PA700 (also called
the 19 S regulatory complex) and PA28 (also called 11 S regulatory
complex). PA700 contains ATPase sites, polyubiquitin, and misfolded
protein binding sites. Together with the 20 S core, PA700 forms
the 26 S proteasome responsible for the degradation of large
polyubiquitinated and/or damaged proteins (8, 9). The PA28·20 S
proteasome complex degrades smaller polypeptides, producing peptides
for presentation as class I major histocompatibility complex
antigens (9-11).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, a potent proteasomal activator of peptide
hydrolysis, was purified by standard methods (29). Hsc70 was purified
from bovine brain as reported previously (30). Ub5DHFR was
a kind gift from Dr. C. M. Pickart (Johns Hopkins University).
Purified Escherichia coli GroEL and GroES were a gift
from Dr. D. Chuang (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center).
scRNase A was made as described previously (31). Protein disulfide
isomerase (PDI) was purified from rat liver (32). DsbA was purchased
from Stress Gene. Polyribonucleic acid was from Calbiochem. Purified
PA700, 20 S proteasome, and PA28
concentration were calculated based
on their molecular masses of 700, 700, and 210 kDa,
respectively. Purified scRNase A, PDI, and DsbA concentrations were
determined spectrophotometrically using
280 = 9300, 43,000, 11,900 cm
1 M
1, respectively.
-lactone (100 µM) was added after 15 min of assembly.
scRNase A stock solution (2.5 µg) was added to 30 µl of either 20 S
or 26 S proteasome. To access the influence of DTT on degradation, 2.5 µg of scRNase A was incubated in buffer A with or without DTT for 10 min, and then 75 nM 20 S proteasome was added to start the
reaction. To detect the influence of PA700 on the degradation rate, 2.0 µg of scRNase A in buffer A was preincubated for 30 or 150 min with or without 0.75 µM PA700, and then 75 nM 20 S
proteasome was added to the substrate for another hour. All of the
reactions were carried out at 30 °C. 5× SDS sample buffer was added
to stop the reactions. The samples were heated at 95 °C for 5 min
prior to 10% SDS-PAGE and visualization by Coomassie Blue staining.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
nor
BSA has any obvious ability to accelerate the reactivation of
scRNase A. This indicates that the ability of reactivation of scRNase A
is not a common property of proteasomal activators like PA28
or a
"sticky" protein, BSA. The data in Fig. 1C demonstrate
that the peak of the reactivation of scRNase A activity co-sediments
with PA700 protein (data not shown) and proteasome activation activity
on a glycerol density gradient (10-35%) centrifugation. This result
argues that the catalyzed reactivation of scRNase A is because of PA700
and not the contamination of a trace amount of known disulfide
isomerase.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Effect of PA700 on reactivation of a
misfolded protein, scRNase A. Reactivation of 50 nM
scRNase A in the presence of 60 nM PA700, 60 nM
PDI, and 60 nM DsbA (A) and in the presence of
60 nM PA700, PA28
, and BSA (B) was determined
by assessing RNA hydrolysis (see "Experimental Procedures").
C, co-purification of PA700 with activities for stimulation
of the 20 S proteasome and for reactivation of scRNase A. The
fraction numbers between the gel and proteasome activity
assay are aligned with the exception of the far left lane,
which is a control for hydrolysis of RNA by scRNase A without PA700
treatment.
, and BSA by detecting the RNase
A-dependent hydrolysis of cCMP (33). The spontaneous
reactivation of scRNase A among different preparations of scRNase A
during the 3-h incubation in buffer A varied between 9 and 16%. The
reactivation observed in the presence of PA700 is consistently above
this background. PDI-dependent reactivation reached a
maximum of ~40% by 1.5 h, consistent with previous reports
(39). PA700 and DsbA, respectively, produced 12 and 6% reactivation
above the spontaneous level after the 3-h incubation. PA28
and BSA
did not catalyze significant reactivation over the same time course
(Fig. 2A). The data in Fig.
2B show that PA700 exhibits an initial rate of reactivation of scRNase A linearly proportional to its concentration, suggesting a
first-order process with a kcat ~0.08%
reactivation/h/nM PA700. The results demonstrate that PA700
accelerates the reactivation of scRNase A, a misfolded protein. PA700
contains six AAA ATPases (14). To assess whether ATP binding or
hydrolysis could play a role in the reactivation ability, we carried
out the RNA digestion assay for PA700 in the presence of ATP, but no
obvious inhibition or promotion effect was observed.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
PA700-dependent reactivation of a
misfolded protein, scRNase A. A, representative time
course of reactivation of 6 µM scRNase A determined
spectrophotometrically (see "Experimental Procedures") in the
presence of 0.75 µM PDI (
), PA700 (
), DsbA (
),
PA28
(
), and BSA (
), respectively. The spontaneous
reactivation of scRNase A was subtracted as the background.
B, initial rate of reactivation of scRNase A by the
indicated concentrations of PA700.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
NEM sensitivity and disulfide exchange
activity. A, the influence of NEM-modified PDI and
PA700 on reactivation of scRNase A. The data presented are the average
of three independent spectrophotometrical assays. B, the
rate of oxidation of the NRCSQGSC (dansyl-K) N peptide in the presence
of DsbA, PA700, and BSA. Oxidation of 50 µM peptide in
McIlvaine's buffer alone (
) and in the presence of 3.0 µM DsbA (
), 1.5 µM DsbA (
), 0.75 µM DsbA (
), 1.5 µM PA700 (
), 1.5 µM PA700 with 200 µM ATP, 5 mM
MgCl2 (
), 3 µM BSA (
). The data are the
average of three independent experiments. The mean ± S.D. is
<9%.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
PA700-dependent exposure of
buried chymotryptic sites in Ub5DHFR. Degradation of
Ub5DHFR (80 nM) by chymotrypsin (2 nM) in the presence of PA700 (20 nM) and a DHFR
ligand, methotrexate (200 µM). Ub5DHFR was
detected by Western blotting with an antibody against a C-terminal
hemagglutinin tag.
-lactone, a specific proteasome inhibitor. In
contrast, as shown in Fig. 5B, native RNase A is resistant
to degradation by either the 20 S or 26 S proteasome, consistent with
earlier reports (48, 53).

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Sensitivity of scRNase A, reactivated RNase
A, and native RNase A to proteasomal degradation. A,
time course of degradation of 2.5 µg of scRNase A by 50 nM 20 S and 26 S proteasomes in the absence and presence of
100 µM
-lactone. B, time course of
degradation of 2.5 µg of native RNase A by 50 nM 20 S and
26 S proteasomes. C, densitometric analysis of three
independent scRNase A degradation experiments for the 20 S proteasome
(
and
) and the 26 S proteasome (
and
). Open
symbols indicate the presence of 100 µM
-lactone
inhibitor. D, preincubation of scRNase A in buffer A with
PA700 can protect proteasomal degradation (the top schematic
shows the procedure of the experimental protocol), the left
panel shows SDS-PAGE of 75 nM 20 S degradation of 2.0 µg of scRNase A preincubated 30 and 150 min in the presence or
absence of 0.75 µM PA700. The right panel
shows the percentage of loss of proteasome susceptibility
versus PA700-dependent reactivation ability
derived from the data of Fig. 2A.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(Figs. 1 and 2). PA700 also accelerates the exposure of
buried chymotryptic sites in the DHFR moiety of Ub5DHFR.
Notably, this effect is unlikely to be simply attributed to
preferential binding and stabilization of an open conformation, because
Hsc70 does not exhibit this activity. By contrast, GroEL or
GroEL·GroES complex, a chaperone molecule with known unfoldase
activity (43, 44), exhibits a similar ability to accelerate
chymotryptic digestion of Ub5DHFR. This property of both
PA700 and GroEL·GroES is inhibited by ligand-dependent stabilization of DHFR by MTX. Taken together, these data suggest that
PA700 remodels the conformation of proteasomal substrates in addition
to its well established activities, such as, polyubiquitin binding
(15), ubiquitin isopeptidase (18, 19), 20 S proteasome activation (13,
14), and the recently characterized "chaperone-like" activity
(20, 21).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. C. Pickart for the generous gift of Ub5DHFR substrate, Dr. D. Chuang for offering the GroEL protein, Dr. D. Agard for insightful comments, Dr. C. Wigley for critical review of this paper, and members of our laboratories for helpful comments.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by American Heart Association Grant 9740033N and National Institutes of Health Grants DK49835 (to P. J. T.) and DK46818 (to G. N. D.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence may be addressed: Dept. of
Physiology, UT Southwestern, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX
75390-9040. Tel.: 214-648-3308; Fax: 214-648-4771; E-mail:
gdemar@mednet.swmed.edu.
** To whom correspondence may be addressed: Dept. of Physiology, UT Southwestern, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9040. Tel.: 214-648-8723; Fax: 214-648-9268; E-mail: philip.thomas@UTSouthwestern.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 14, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201782200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: AAA, ATPases-associated cellular-activities; scRNase A, scrambled bovine pancreatic ribonuclease A; PDI, protein disulfide isomerase; dansyl, 5-dimethylaminonaphthalene-1-sulfonyl; Ub5DHFR, pentaubiquitinated dihydrofolate reductase; cCMP, cytidine 2',3'-cyclic monophosphate; DTT, dithiothreitol; suc, succinyl; NEM, N-ethylmaleimide; BSA, bovine serum albumin; MTX, methotrexate.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Harris, D. A. (2000) Nutrition 16, 554-556[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Tan, S. Y., and Pepys, M. B. (1994) Histopathology 25, 403-414[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Dobson, C. M. (1999) Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 329-332[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Thomas, P. J., Qu, B. H., and Pedersen, P. L. (1995) Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 456-459[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. |
Wickner, S.,
Maurizi, M. R.,
and Gottesman, S.
(1999)
Science
286,
1888-1893 |
| 6. | Groll, M., Ditzel, L., Lowe, J., Stock, D., Bochtler, M., Bartunik, H. D., and Huber, R. (1997) Nature 386, 463-471[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Lowe, J.,
Stock, D.,
Jap, B.,
Zwickl, P.,
Baumeister, W.,
and Huber, R.
(1995)
Science
268,
533-539 |
| 8. |
DeMartino, G. N.,
Proske, R. J.,
Moomaw, C. R.,
Strong, A. A.,
Song, X.,
Hisamatsu, H.,
Tanaka, K.,
and Slaughter, C. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3112-3118 |
| 9. | Baumeister, W., Walz, J., Zuhl, F., and Seemuller, E. (1998) Cell 92, 367-380[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Ma, C. P.,
Slaughter, C. A.,
and DeMartino, G. N.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
10515-10523 |
| 11. | Rechsteiner, M., Realini, C., and Ustrell, V. (2000) Biochem. J. 345, 1-15[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Glickman, M. H., Rubin, D. M., Coux, O., Wefes, I., Pfeifer, G., Cjeka, Z., Baumeister, W., Fried, V. A., and Finley, D. (1998) Cell 94, 615-623[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Glickman, M. H.,
Rubin, D. M.,
Fried, V. A.,
and Finley, D.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
3149-3162 |
| 14. |
DeMartino, G. N.,
Moomaw, C. R.,
Zagnitko, O. P.,
Proske, R. J.,
Chu-Ping, M.,
Afendis, S. J.,
Swaffield, J. C.,
and Slaughter, C. A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
20878-20884 |
| 15. |
Deveraux, Q.,
Ustrell, V.,
Pickart, C.,
and Rechsteiner, M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
7059-7061 |
| 16. | van Nocker, S., Sadis, S., Rubin, D. M., Glickman, M., Fu, H., Coux, O., Wefes, I., Finley, D., and Vierstra, R. D. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6020-6028[Abstract] |
| 17. |
Fu, H.,
Sadis, S.,
Rubin, D. M.,
Glickman, M.,
van Nocker, S.,
Finley, D.,
and Vierstra, R. D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
1970-1981 |
| 18. | Lam, Y. A., Xu, W., DeMartino, G. N., and Cohen, R. E. (1997) Nature 385, 737-740[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | Hochstrasser, M. (1996) Annu. Rev. Genet. 30, 405-439[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Strickland, E.,
Hakala, K.,
Thomas, P. J.,
and DeMartino, G. N.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
5565-5572 |
| 21. | Braun, B. C., Glickman, M., Kraft, R., Dahlmann, B., Kloetzel, P. M., Finley, D., and Schmidt, M. (1999) Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 221-226[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Thrower, J. S., Hoffman, L., Rechsteiner, M., and Pickart, C. M. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 94-102[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Johnston, J. A.,
Johnson, E. S.,
Waller, P. R.,
and Varshavsky, A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
8172-8178 |
| 24. | Weber-Ban, E. U., Reid, B. G., Miranker, A. D., and Horwich, A. L. (1999) Nature 401, 90-93[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Kim, Y. I., Burton, R. E., Burton, B. M., Sauer, R. T., and Baker, T. A. (2000) Mol. Cell 5, 639-648[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Singh, S. K.,
Grimaud, R.,
Hoskins, J. R.,
Wickner, S.,
and Maurizi, M. R.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
8898-8903 |
| 27. | Benaroudj, N., and Goldberg, A. L. (2000) Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 833-839[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | McGuire, M. J., McCullough, M. L., Croall, D. E., and DeMartino, G. N. (1989) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 995, 181-186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
Song, X.,
von Kampen, J.,
Slaughter, C. A.,
and DeMartino, G. N.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27994-28000 |
| 30. |
Strickland, E., Qu, B. H.,
Millen, L.,
and Thomas, P. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
25421-25424 |
| 31. | Hillson, D. A., Lambert, N., and Freedman, R. B. (1984) Methods Enzymol. 107, 281-294[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Noiva, R.,
Kimura, H.,
Roos, J.,
and Lennarz, W. J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
19645-19649 |
| 33. | Lyles, M. M., and Gilbert, H. F. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 613-619[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Ruddock, L. W., Hirst, T. R., and Freedman, R. B. (1996) Biochem. J. 315, 1001-1005[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. |
Ma, C. P., Vu, J. H.,
Proske, R. J.,
Slaughter, C. A.,
and DeMartino, G. N.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
3539-3547 |
| 36. |
Sela, M.,
White, F. H., Jr.,
and Anfinsen, C. B.
(1957)
Science
125,
691-692 |
| 37. |
Yu, J.,
McLaughlin, S.,
Freedman, R. B.,
and Hirst, T. R.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
4326-4330 |
| 38. | Lambert, N., and Freedman, R. B. (1983) Biochem. J. 213, 235-243[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. | Walker, K. W., Lyles, M. M., and Gilbert, H. F. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 1972-1980[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. |
Matthews, D. A.,
Bolin, J. T.,
Burridge, J. M.,
Filman, D. J.,
Volz, K. W.,
and Kraut, J.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
392-399 |
| 41. | Eilers, M., and Schatz, G. (1988) Cell 52, 481-483[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. |
Bercovich, B.,
Stancovski, I.,
Mayer, A.,
Blumenfeld, N.,
Laszlo, A.,
Schwartz, A. L.,
and Ciechanover, A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
9002-9010 |
| 43. | Zahn, R., Perrett, S., Stenberg, G., and Fersht, A. R. (1996) Science 271, 642-645[Abstract] |
| 44. |
Shtilerman, M.,
Lorimer, G. H.,
and Englander, S. W.
(1999)
Science
284,
822-825 |
| 45. |
Ferrington, D. A.,
Sun, H.,
Murray, K. K.,
Costa, J.,
Williams, T. D.,
Bigelow, D. J.,
and Squier, T. C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
937-943 |
| 46. | Merker, K., and Grune, T. (2000) Exp. Gerontol. 35, 779-786[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 47. | Wang, R., Chait, B. T., Wolf, I., Kohanski, R. A., and Cardozo, C. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 14573-14581[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 48. |
Lasch, P.,
Petras, T.,
Ullrich, O.,
Backmann, J.,
Naumann, D.,
and Grune, T.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
9492-9502 |
| 49. | Touitou, R., Richardson, J., Bose, S., Nakanishi, M., Rivett, J., and Allday, M. J. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 2367-2375[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 50. |
Chao, C. C., Ma, Y. S.,
and Stadtman, E. R.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2969-2974 |
| 51. |
Pacifici, R. E.,
Kono, Y.,
and Davies, K. J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
15405-15411 |
| 52. | Davies, K. J. (2001) Biochimie (Paris) 83, 301-310 |
| 53. |
Dunten, R. L.,
and Cohen, R. E.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
16739-16747 |
| 54. | Navon, A., and Goldberg, A. L. (2001) Mol. Cell 8, 1339-1349[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 55. | Bukau, B., and Horwich, A. L. (1998) Cell 92, 351-366[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 56. | Xu, Z., Horwich, A. L., and Sigler, P. B. (1997) Nature 388, 741-750[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 57. | Lee, C., Schwartz, M. P., Prakash, S., Iwakura, M., and Matouschek, A. (2001) Mol. Cell 7, 627-637[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Wojcik and M. Di Napoli Ubiquitin-Proteasome System and Proteasome Inhibition: New Strategies in Stroke Therapy Stroke, June 1, 2004; 35(6): 1506 - 1518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wojcik, M. Yano, and G. N. DeMartino RNA interference of valosin-containing protein (VCP/p97) reveals multiple cellular roles linked to ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent proteolysis J. Cell Sci., January 15, 2004; 117(2): 281 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-W. Liu, M. J. Corboy, G. N. DeMartino, and P. J. Thomas Endoproteolytic Activity of the Proteasome Science, January 17, 2003; 299(5605): 408 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||