Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M203421200 on May 20, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 30, 27120-27129, July 26, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/30/27120    most recent
M203421200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coste, H.
Right arrow Articles by Rodríguez, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coste, H.
Right arrow Articles by Rodríguez, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Orphan Nuclear Hormone Receptor Rev-erbalpha Regulates the Human Apolipoprotein CIII Promoter*

Hervé CosteDagger and Joan C. Rodríguez§

From GlaxoSmithKline, 25 avenue du Québec, 91951 Les Ulis cedex, France

Received for publication, April 9, 2002, and in revised form, May 17, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Apolipoprotein CIII (apoCIII) plays an important role in plasma triglyceride and remnant lipoprotein metabolism. Because hypertriglyceridemia is an independent risk factor in coronary artery disease and the presence in plasma of triglyceride-rich remnant lipoproteins is correlated with atherosclerosis, considerable research efforts have been focused on the identification of factors regulating apoCIII gene expression to decrease its production. Here we report that the orphan nuclear hormone receptor Rev-erbalpha regulates the human apoCIII gene promoter. In apoCIII expressing human hepatic HepG2 cells, transfection of Rev-erbalpha specifically repressed apoCIII gene promoter activity. We determined by deletion and site-directed mutagenesis experiments that Rev-erbalpha dependent repression is mainly due to an element present in the proximal promoter of the apoCIII gene. In contrast, we found no functional Rev-erbalpha response elements in the convergently transcribed human apoAI gene or the common regulatory enhancer. The identified Rev-erbalpha response element coincides with a RORalpha 1 element, and in the present study we provide evidence that functional cross-talk between these orphan receptors modulates the apoCIII promoter. In vitro binding analysis showed that monomers of Rev-erbalpha bound this element but not another upstream RORalpha 1 response element. In addition, we showed that the closely related nuclear orphan receptor RVR also specifically repressed the human apoCIII gene. These studies underscore a novel physiological role for members of the Rev-erb family of nuclear receptors in the regulation of genes involved in triglyceride metabolism and the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Recent large scale clinical trials indicate that hypertriglyceridemia is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease (1-4). In addition, triglyceride-rich remnant lipoproteins are positively correlated to the progression of atherosclerosis, which remains one of the leading causes of death in the Western world (5, 6).

Apolipoprotein CIII (apoCIII)1 is a key protein in plasma triglyceride metabolism. It is well established that the plasma concentration and synthesis rate of apoCIII are positively correlated with plasma triglycerides, both in normal and hypertriglyceridemic subjects (7-9). In fact, apoCIII deficiency in humans results in increased catabolism of very low density lipoprotein particles (10), whereas increased apoCIII synthesis is associated with hypertriglyceridemia (11). Overexpression of human apoCIII in mice results in severe hypertriglyceridemia (12), whereas disruption of the endogenous apoCIII gene protects the mice from postprandial hypertriglyceridemia (13). apoCIII has been shown to delay the catabolism of triglyceride-rich particles by several mechanisms (14-17), including inhibition of lipoprotein binding to the cell surface glycosaminoglycan matrix (17) and lipolysis by lipoprotein lipase (10, 18). Moreover, studies with retinoids, fibrates, and other pharmacological agents show evidence that the modulation of apoCIII expression has an important role in hypertriglyceridemia (19-23). Therefore, the identification of factors capable of decreasing plasma apoCIII concentrations by down-regulation of its expression is of major importance for the treatment of dyslipidemia.

In humans, apoCIII is synthesized in the liver and, to a much lesser extent, in the intestine. The expression of apoCIII is strongly regulated at the transcriptional level, and the regulatory sequences responsible for the tissue-specific expression pattern of the apoCIII gene and for its modulation by signal transduction pathways have been extensively described (reviewed in Ref. 24). The 5'-flanking region of the human apoCIII gene contains a proximal promoter and a distal regulatory enhancer (25). The gene for apoCIII resides in an apolipoprotein gene cluster on chromosome 11q23 between the apoAI and apoAIV genes (26, 27). The product of the convergently transcribed apoAI gene is the major protein component of high density lipoproteins. Plasma levels of apoAI and high density lipoprotein cholesterol correlate with each other, and both correlate inversely with the incidence of coronary heart disease (28, 29). Importantly, the distal regulatory region of apoCIII acts as a common enhancer for the three genes of the cluster (24, 30-32).

The orphan nuclear receptor Rev-erb (NR1D) group contains two members in mammals: Rev-erbalpha (33-35) and RVR (also known as Rev-erbbeta and BD73) (36-39). Rev-erb receptors are widely expressed (33, 37) and have been described as negative transcriptional regulators of the Rev-erbalpha gene itself (40) as well as N-myc (41), enoyl-CoA hydratase/3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase bifunctional enzyme (42), alpha -fetoprotein (43), and rat apoAI (44) genes. Rev-erbalpha mRNA is induced dramatically during adipogenesis (45), and a role has also been proposed for both Rev-erbalpha and RVR in myogenesis (46). However, the specific biological functions of these receptors in adipogenesis or in other physiological processes are still unknown.

Monomers of Rev-erbalpha and RVR bind to the six-nucleotide core motif PuGGTCA preceded by a 6-bp AT-rich region (36-39, 47, 48). In addition, homodimers of Rev-erbalpha and RVR bind to a direct repeat of the core sequence separated by two nucleotides with an AT-rich 5' extension (Rev-DR2) (40, 48). Although the core binding site is recognized by the P-box/first helix of the DNA-binding domain, the precise recognition of the sequences 5' to the core binding site is determined by the C-terminal extension of the zinc finger domains (49). Rev-erbalpha and RVR share a high degree of sequence similarity with the C-terminal extension/third helix of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) (NR1C) and retinoic acid-related orphan receptors (RORs, also termed RZRs) (NR1F). As a consequence, Rev-erbalpha binds to the PPAR response elements of CYP4A6 and the hydratase/dehydrogenase bifunctional enzyme genes and interferes with the PPAR-dependent transactivation of the former gene (42, 49). Conversely, the Rev-DR2 site described in the promoter of the human Rev-erbalpha gene is also a PPAR response element (50). It should be noted that although the sequence determinants required for Rev-erbalpha and PPAR bindings are similar, they are not identical as evidenced by the incapacity of Rev-erbalpha to bind to the fatty acyl-CoA oxidase PPAR response element (42, 49). The gene for N-myc, as well as the rat alpha -fetoprotein and apoAI genes, have been shown to contain elements that bind and are regulated by members of both Rev-erb and RORalpha groups (41, 43, 44). The sequence requirements for RORalpha , Rev-erbalpha , and RVR are closely related (37). Nevertheless, they are not identical (49), so the putative cross-talk between those nuclear receptors should be analyzed in terms of case-by-case studies.

We have learnt from Staels and co-workers (51) that RORalpha 1 regulates apoCIII gene transcription through binding sites located in its proximal promoter. The importance of RORalpha in apoCIII expression was underscored by studies with the staggerer mice, which carry a natural deletion in the RORalpha gene (52). These mice show decreased plasma triglyceride and apoCIII levels compared with wild type mice (51).

In this report, we demonstrate that Rev-erbalpha regulates the human apoCIII gene promoter. Rev-erbalpha represses transcription through one of the functional RORalpha 1 response elements present in the apoCIII gene proximal promoter. Our results suggest a novel role for Rev-erbalpha in regulating triglyceride metabolism.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Plasmids-- The 5'-flanking region of human apoCIII gene (nt -1408 to +24, relative to the transcription start site) was obtained by PCR using human genomic DNA as a template (CLONTECH). Forward primer contained nt -1408 to -1383 and was tailed with a NheI restriction site. Reverse primer contained nt +24 to +2 and was tailed with a HindIII site. The PCR product was digested with NheI and HindIII and cloned into the corresponding sites of the promoter-less firefly (Photinus pyralis) luciferase reporter plasmid pGL3-basic (Promega), generating p-1408/+24hC3LUC (also designated wild type). For the construction of p-108/+24hC3LUC, a DNA fragment was generated by PCR using p-1408/+24hC3LUC as a template and a NheI site tailed forward primer containing nt -108 to -86, with the reverse primer used for the former construction. The amplified promoter fragment was digested with NheI/HindIII enzymes and cloned into pGL3-basic vector. The 5' region of human apoAI gene (nt -1170 to +235, relative to the transcription start site) was obtained by PCR using human genomic DNA as a template, a BglII site tailed forward primer containing nt -1170 to -1152 and a HindIII site tailed reverse primer containing nt +235 to +215. After digestion with BglII and HindIII, it was cloned into pGL3-basic vector to produce p-1170/+235hAILUC. The 5'-flanking region of rat apoAI gene (nt -823 to +31, relative to the transcription start site) was obtained by PCR using Sprague-Dawley rat genomic DNA as a template (CLONTECH), a NheI site tailed forward primer containing nt -823 to -804 and a HindIII site tailed reverse primer containing nt +31 to +10. The resulting fragment was cut with NheI and HindIII and then cloned in the corresponding sites of pGL3-basic vector to generate p-823/+31rAILUC. Site-directed mutagenesis of the construct p-1408/+24hC3LUC was accomplished using the QuikChangeTM site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) according to the recommendations of the manufacturer and two pairs of 34-mer oligonucleotides containing mutations corresponding, respectively, to nt -21(G right-arrow A)/-22(G right-arrow C) and to nt -78(G right-arrow C)/-79(G right-arrow A) of human apoCIII promoter. The vector pGL3-TK contains a fragment corresponding to nt -109 to +20 of the TK gene promoter of herpes simplex virus (53) subcloned into the BglII/HindIII sites of pGL3-basic vector. The reporter plasmid pREVDR2-TKLUC was generated by insertion of a double-stranded oligonucleotide containing the Rev-DR2 response element of the human Rev-erbalpha gene promoter (5'-GATCCGGAAAAGTGTGTCACTGGGGCACA-3') (40) into the BglII site of pGL3-TK. Similarly, three copies of a double-stranded oligonucleotide containing wild type (5'-GATCCGATATAAAACAGGTCAGAACCCTA-3') or mutant (5'-GATCCGATATAAAACACATCAGAACCCTA-3') sequences spanning nt -33 to -11 and wild type (5'-GATCCTCAGCAGGTGACCTTTGCCCAGCA-3') or mutant (5'-GATCCTCAGCAGGTGATGTTTGCCCAGCA-3') sequences corresponding to nt -90 to -68 of human apoCIII gene promoter were inserted into the BglII site of pGL3-TK to generate, respectively, p(wtC3RE1)3-TKLUC, p(mutC3RE1)3-TKLUC, p(wtC3RE2)3-TKLUC, and p(mutC3RE2)3-TKLUC. Plasmids expressing human cDNAs for Rev-erbalpha , RORalpha 1, and RVR were provided by J. A. Holt and J. T. Moore (GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC). The backbone of those plasmids was the mammalian expression vector pSG5 with a modified polylinker. Plasmid DNA was prepared using the Qiagen endotoxin-free Maxipreparation method and quantitated spectrophotometrically. The integrities of all of the plasmids were verified by DNA sequencing.

Cell Transfection and Reporter Assays-- Human hepatoblastoma HepG2 cells were cultured in basal Eagle medium supplemented with nonessential amino acids and 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum. On day 0, the cells were seeded on 24-well plates at a density of 3.5 × 105 cells/well. On day 1, the cells were transfected with FuGENE 6 reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Typically, each well of a 24-well plate received 100 ng of firefly luciferase reporter plasmid and, when indicated, 0-400 ng of plasmids expressing human Rev-erbalpha , RORalpha 1, or RVR. Effector plasmid dosage was kept constant by the addition of appropriate amounts of the empty expression vector pSG5. 10 ng/well of a sea pansy (Renilla reniformis) luciferase plasmid pRL-SV40 (Promega) was included in all transfections as an internal control for transfection efficiency. On day 3, the cell lysates were prepared by shaking the cells in 200 µl of 1× Promega lysis buffer for 10 min at room temperature. Firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were measured using a Dual-Luciferase® Reporter Assay System (Promega) and a Lumistar luminometer (BMG Lab Technologies). Firefly luciferase activity values were divided by Renilla luciferase activity values to obtain normalized luciferase activities. To facilitate comparisons within a given experiment, the activity data were presented as relative luciferase activities. All of the transfection experiments were performed at least three times, with each experimental point done in triplicate. The data are expressed as the means ± S.D.

In Vitro Transcription/Translation and Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Analysis-- Human Rev-erbalpha and human RORalpha 1 proteins were synthesized in vitro from the corresponding expression plasmids in rabbit reticulocyte lysate by using TNT® Quick Coupled transcription/translation system (Promega) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. To obtain an unprogrammed lysate as a negative control for electrophoretic mobility shift analysis, a reaction was performed with the empty vector pSG5. Protein-DNA binding assays were performed as described (54). Double-stranded oligonucleotides corresponding to the Rev-DR2 response element of human Rev-erbalpha gene promoter (RevDR2), wild type nt -33 to -11 (wtC3RE1), wild type nt -90 to -68 (wtC3RE2) of human apoCIII gene promoter (described under "Plasmids"), and a consensus sequence for the binding of monomers of Rev-erbalpha (47, 48) (consensus sequence) were radiolabeled by fill in with the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I. For the competition experiments, 10-, 50-, or 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled probes were included during a 10-min preincubation on ice. mtC3RE1 is a double-stranded oligonucleotide corresponding to a mutant sequence spanning nt -33 to -11 of human apoCIII promoter (described under "Plasmids"). The samples were electrophoresed at 4 °C on a 4.5% polyacrylamide gel in 0.5× TBE buffer (45 mM Tris, 45 mM boric acid, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). The gels were dried and analyzed using a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager STORM 860 and ImageQuant software (Amersham Biosciences).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Orphan Nuclear Receptor Rev-erbalpha Represses the Activity of the Human apoCIII Gene Promoter-- To find factors capable of down-regulating the expression of the human apoCIII gene without affecting apoAI or other human lipid-related genes, we cloned their promoters in front of the firefly luciferase reporter gene and performed cotransfection experiments in the human hepatoblastoma cell line HepG2, which synthesizes apoCIII. Cotransfection of the human orphan nuclear receptor Rev-erbalpha expression plasmid resulted in a reduction of firefly luciferase activity driven by the 5'-flanking sequence of the human apoCIII gene (nt -1408 to +24) (Fig. 1A). The repression by Rev-erbalpha was promoter-dependent because it was not observed with the promoter-less pGL3-basic vector (Fig. 1A) or with constructs containing the promoter of human apoAI (see below) or other lipid-related genes (not shown). Furthermore, increasing amounts of the expression plasmid for Rev-erbalpha resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of firefly luciferase activity (Fig. 1B). As shown in Fig. 1B, the repression by Rev-erbalpha was already appreciable at low doses.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Rev-erbalpha represses the activity of the human apoCIII gene promoter. A, HepG2 cells were transiently transfected with a plasmid containing a luciferase reporter gene driven by the 5'-flanking region (-1408/+24) of the human apoCIII gene or the empty pGL3-basic vector along with a plasmid expressing human Rev-erbalpha (200 ng) or the empty expression vector as control (pSG5). B, the reporter plasmid containing the -1408/+24 region of human apoCIII cloned in front of the luciferase gene was cotransfected with increasing amounts of a Rev-erbalpha expression plasmid into HepG2 cells. Plasmid dosage was kept constant by the addition of empty expression vector. Luciferase activities were measured and expressed as described under "Experimental Procedures." The fold change relative to control level is shown for each construct.

Rev-erbalpha Antagonizes Transactivation by RORalpha 1 from Human apoCIII Gene Promoter-- Transcription of human apoCIII gene is regulated by the orphan nuclear receptor RORalpha 1 (51). Cross-talk between Rev-erbalpha and RORalpha 1 has been reported in the rat alpha -fetoprotein far upstream enhancer (43) and the rat apoAI promoter (44). Both receptors are expressed in HepG2 cells (37, 43, 50). To investigate whether Rev-erbalpha could repress RORalpha 1-induced transcriptional activity on human apoCIII, we carried out transfection assays using the luciferase reporter plasmid containing the -1408/+24 region of apoCIII along with expression plasmids for human Rev-erbalpha and RORalpha 1 in HepG2. Cotransfection of human RORalpha 1 led to a 2.5-fold induction over basal levels (Fig. 2). We found that increasing amounts of Rev-erbalpha expression plasmid with constant levels of RORalpha 1 efficiently decreased transactivation by RORalpha 1 (Fig. 2). These results suggest that the net transcriptional response from apoCIII promoter is influenced by the relative levels of Rev-erbalpha and RORalpha 1 in the cells.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Rev-erbalpha antagonizes RORalpha 1-induced activation of the human apoCIII gene promoter. HepG2 cells were transfected with a plasmid containing a luciferase reporter gene driven by the 5'-flanking region (-1408/+24) of the human apoCIII gene together with the empty expression vector pSG5 or a constant amount of the expression plasmid encoding human RORalpha 1 (100 ng) and increasing amounts (0, 25, 50, and 100 ng) of the Rev-erbalpha expression plasmid. Plasmid dosage was kept constant by the addition of empty expression vector. The luciferase activities were measured and expressed as described under "Experimental Procedures."

The Elements Required for Rev-erbalpha -mediated Repression Are Located in the Proximal Promoter of apoCIII Gene-- The 5'-flanking region of human apoCIII gene contains two RORalpha 1 response elements (ROREs), both located in the proximal promoter (51). As expected, the 5' deletion of 1.3 kilobase pairs led to a notable reduction in basal activity because of the lack of the strong distal regulatory enhancer (Fig. 3). However, the fragment containing the first 108 bp of the apoCIII promoter, which harbors the functional ROREs, is still repressed by Rev-erbalpha (Fig. 3).


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Rev-erbalpha selectively represses the human apoCIII proximal promoter but not the human apoAI promoter. HepG2 cells were transfected with reporter plasmids containing the firefly luciferase gene driven by nt -1408/+24 or -108/+24 of the 5'-flanking region of the human apoCIII gene, the human apoAI (-1170/+235), or rat apoAI (-823/+31) genes or with the empty pGL3-basic vector as a negative control, along with expression plasmids encoding human RORalpha 1 or human Rev-erbalpha (200 ng) or the empty pSG5 expression vector as control. The luciferase activities were measured and expressed as described under "Experimental Procedures." The fold change by Rev-erbalpha relative to control level is shown for each construct. Enhancer, distal regulatory enhancer; LUC, luciferase.

The sequences immediately 5' to the start of transcription of both apoCIII and apoAI genes are significantly similar (55), and the distal regulatory region of human apoCIII acts as an enhancer for the hepatic and intestinal expression of human apoAI gene expression (30-32). So we investigated whether Rev-erbalpha could somehow repress human apoAI gene. First, Vu-Dac and colleagues (44) have shown that Rev-erbalpha is able to repress the rat apoAI promoter but not the first 256 bp of the human apoAI promoter. We confirmed those results by using a reporter construct that contains a longer sequence of the human apoAI gene 5'-flanking region (Fig. 3). We observed that, in contrast to rat apoAI or human apoCIII, neither Rev-erbalpha nor RORalpha 1 have significant influence on the -1170/+235 human apoAI promoter activity (Fig. 3). Second, we next examined whether, in addition to the proximal promoter, any other Rev-erbalpha response element could be present in the distal regulatory enhancer of human apoCIII gene. For this purpose, we mutated by site-directed mutagenesis the two 6-bp core motifs AGGTCA present in the proximal promoter, which coincide with the half-sites of ROREs, in the context of the -1408/+24 region of apoCIII gene (Fig. 4A). We found that upon mutation of both half-sites (nt -21(G right-arrow A)/-22(G right-arrow C) and nt -78(G right-arrow C)/-79(G right-arrow A)), repression by Rev-erbalpha was lost (compare the 0.3-fold variation of the wild type construct with the 1.2-fold variation of the double mutant in Fig. 4B). These results demonstrate that there is no other Rev-erbalpha response element in the distal enhancer.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Functional effects of mutations in ROREs on the response of the human apoCIII promoter to Rev-erbalpha . A, human apoCIII gene promoter sequence surrounding the ROREs. The gray boxes denote the RORE1 and RORE2 sequences. The AGGTCA half-sites are indicated by horizontal arrows. The wild type nucleotides that were modified by site-directed mutagenesis are underlined. The corresponding -21(G right-arrow A)/-22(G right-arrow C) and -78(G right-arrow C)/-79(G right-arrow A) mutated nucleotides are shown below the vertical arrows and within the gray squares. B, HepG2 cells were transfected with a plasmid expressing human Rev-erbalpha (200 ng) or the empty pSG5 vector as control together with reporter constructs containing the wild type or site-directed mutated 5'-flanking regions (-1408/+24) of the human apoCIII gene or the empty pGL3-basic vector as negative control. The luciferase activities were measured and expressed as described under "Experimental Procedures." The fold change by Rev-erbalpha relative to control level is shown for each construct. Crosses indicate the presence of site-directed mutations in a specific RORE. Enhancer, distal regulatory enhancer; LUC, luciferase.

Evaluation of the Contribution of Each RORE Present in apoCIII Promoter to Repression by Rev-erbalpha -- The data shown in Fig. 4B indicate that each RORE present in apoCIII promoter contributes differently to the Rev-erbalpha -mediated repression. When the -1408/+24 region of apoCIII gene was mutated at the half-site of the RORE located at position -82/-71 (RORE2), therefore leaving an intact RORE site at -29/-18 (RORE1), the repression by Rev-erbalpha was still clearly observed. In contrast, mutation of only the half-site present in RORE1 almost completely abrogated Rev-erbalpha responsiveness, even with an intact RORE2 site (Fig. 4B). These results indicate that the response to Rev-erbalpha is mainly mediated by the RORE site at -29/-18 (hereafter designated C3RE1) and that the contribution of the RORE site at -82/-71 (hereafter designated C3RE2), if any, is minimal.

Specificity of Rev-erbalpha Binding-- Electrophoretic mobility shift analyses were performed to determine whether Rev-erbalpha could directly interact to the C3RE1 and C3RE2 sites. Incubation of a labeled double-stranded oligonucleotide containing the -29/-18 site (C3RE1) with in vitro translated human Rev-erbalpha resulted in a retarded complex (Fig. 5B, lane 2). The binding was specifically competed by the addition of either the cold C3RE1 probe (Fig. 5B, lanes 3-5) or a cold probe representing a consensus sequence for the binding of Rev-erbalpha (Fig. 5B, lanes 9-11). In contrast, a cold double-stranded oligonucleotide (mtC3RE1) that is equivalent to C3RE1 but harbors point mutations in the half-site (nt -21(G right-arrow A)/-22(G right-arrow C) in Fig. 4A) could not compete (Fig. 5B, lanes 6-8). Interestingly, this binding was not displaced by a cold probe containing the wild type site -82/-71 (C3RE2) (Fig. 5A, lanes 12-14). The apparent incapacity of C3RE2 to bind Rev-erbalpha was further assessed by gel mobility shift assays using labeled C3RE2 probe. As shown on Fig. 5A, incubation of the C3R2 probe with RORalpha 1 resulted in the formation of a visible retarded complex of C3R2 probe and RORalpha 1 (Fig. 5B, lane 2). In contrast, no retarded complexes were clearly detected from the incubation with Rev-erbalpha (Fig. 5B, lane 3).


View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Rev-erbalpha can specifically bind to the C3RE1 site of the human apoCIII promoter. Electrophoretic mobility shift analyses were performed using in vitro transcribed/translated human Rev-erbalpha (10 µl), human RORalpha 1 (5 µl) or unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate (-), when indicated, and labeled double-stranded oligonucleotides corresponding to nt -90/-68 (C3RE2) (A) and nt -33/-11 (C3RE1) (B) of the human apoCIII gene promoter as described under "Experimental Procedures." The lysate volumes were kept constant by the addition of unprogrammed lysate. The competition experiments for binding of human Rev-erbalpha were performed by adding 10-, 50-, and 100-fold molar excess of the indicated unlabeled double-stranded oligonucleotides, whose identities are described under "Experimental Procedures." mtC3RE1 is identical to wtC3RE1 but with point mutations in the half-site (-21(G right-arrow A), -22(G right-arrow C)). CONS, consensus sequence for the binding of Rev-erbalpha ; wt, wild type.

Rev-erbalpha Binds to apoCIII C3RE1 as a Monomer-- Rev-erbalpha is capable of binding DNA as a monomer (47) or as a homodimer (40, 48). To elucidate the binding mode of Rev-erbalpha to the human apoCIII gene promoter, we performed electrophoretic mobility shift analysis with: 1) labeled C3RE1 and C3RE2, 2) a labeled probe that binds in vitro to both monomers and dimers (RevDR2), and 3) a labeled probe that only binds monomers of Rev-erbalpha (consensus sequence). As shown in Fig. 6, Rev-erbalpha binds as a monomer to C3RE1. Again, no retarded complexes between C3RE2 and Rev-erbalpha were clearly detected (Fig. 6, lane 7).


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Rev-erbalpha binds to the C3RE1 site of human apoCIII as a monomer. Electrophoretic mobility shift analyses were performed using in vitro transcribed/translated human Rev-erbalpha (10 µl), human RORalpha 1 (2.5 µl), or unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate (-), when indicated, and labeled double stranded nucleotides containing the Rev-DR2 response element of the human Rev-erbalpha gene promoter (RevDR2), nt -33/-11 (C3RE1), and nt -90/-68 (C3RE2) of the human apoCIII gene promoter and a consensus sequence for the binding of monomers of Rev-erbalpha (CONS) as described under "Experimental Procedures." The lysate volumes were kept constant by the addition of unprogrammed lysate. Note that the shifted bands of probe C3RE2 (lanes 6 and 7) are unspecific. The mobilities of complexes containing dimers (D) and monomers (M) are indicated.

apoCIII C3RE1, but Not C3RE2, Confers Rev-erbalpha Responsiveness to Heterologous Promoters-- To study whether either of these two sites could confer Rev-erbalpha responsiveness to an heterologous promoter, we linked three copies of the human apoCIII C3RE1 and C3RE2 sites upstream of the TK promoter and the luciferase gene. These reporter constructs along with human RORalpha 1 and Rev-erbalpha expression vectors were then tested by cotransfection in HepG2 cells (Fig. 7). A construct containing the Rev-DR2 element was used as a positive control. As expected, transfection of the RORalpha 1 expression vector resulted in activation of both the wtC3RE1- and wtC3RE2-driven TK promoter constructs. However, reporter constructs with the TK promoter alone or driven by three copies of mutC3RE1 were not induced, which is in agreement with previous observations (51). As demonstrated in Fig. 7, wild type CR3RE1was able to confer Rev-erbalpha -mediated repression to TK promoter, unlike the mutated CR3RE1 or wild type CR3R2. These data also show that the human apoCIII C3RE1 site was able to mediate functional cross-talk between RORalpha 1 and Rev-erbalpha in HepG2 cells.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   The Rev-erbalpha response element present in the proximal promoter of the human apoCIII gene (C3RE1) confers Rev-erbalpha responsiveness to heterologous promoters. HepG2 cells were transiently transfected with plasmids expressing human RORalpha 1 and/or human Rev-erbalpha or the empty pSG5 vector as control, together with reporter constructs containing three copies of the wild type (wtC3RE1) or mutant (mutC3RE1) sequence corresponding to nt -33/-11 or the wild type sequence of nt -90/-68 (wtC3RE2) of the human apoCIII gene promoter cloned in front of a heterologous TK promoter-driven luciferase. The Rev-DR2 response element of the human Rev-erbalpha gene promoter (RevDR2) in front of TK-luciferase was used as positive control. The empty pGL3-TK reporter vector was used as negative control. The plasmid dosage was kept constant by the addition of empty expression vector. The luciferase activities were measured and expressed as described under "Experimental Procedures."

The Nuclear Orphan Receptor RVR Also Represses the Activity of Human apoCIII Gene Promoter-- We were interested in determining whether RVR, a nuclear orphan receptor closely related to Rev-erbalpha that is also expressed in human liver and HepG2 cells (36), could modulate the human apoCIII promoter activity. Cotransfection of a human RVR expression plasmid resulted in a significant reduction of firefly luciferase activity under the control of both the 5'-flanking sequence of human apoCIII gene (nt -1408 to +24) and the apoCIII promoter site C3RE1-driven TK promoter (Fig. 8), as well as the RevDR2-TK. The repression by RVR was specific because it was not observed on the promoter-less pGL3-basic vector or on the TK promoter alone. These results also show that the Rev-erbalpha response element of human apoCIII gene promoter confers RVR responsiveness to heterologous promoters (Fig. 8).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   RVR also represses the activity of human apoCIII gene promoter. The Rev-erbalpha response element in the apoCIII promoter confers RVR responsiveness to heterologous promoters. HepG2 cells were transfected with expression plasmids encoding human Rev-erbalpha or human RVR (200 ng) or the empty pSG5 vector as control, along with a plasmid containing a luciferase reporter gene driven by the 5'-flanking region (-1408/+24) of human apoCIII gene or the empty pGL3-basic (pGL3) vector as control. As well as a reporter construct containing three copies of the sequence corresponding to nt -33/-11 of human apoCIII gene promoter (C3RE1) cloned in front of a heterologous TK promoter-driven luciferase or the empty reporter vector pGL3-TK as a negative control. A reporter construct containing the Rev-DR2 response element of human Rev-erbalpha gene promoter (RevDR2) in front of TK-luciferase was used as positive control. The luciferase activities were measured and expressed as described under "Experimental Procedures."


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

It is well established that the expression of human apoCIII plays a key role in hypertriglyceridemia (10-12, 19-23), whereas the concentration of the convergently transcribed apoAI, the major protein constituent of high density lipoproteins, contributes to the prevention of atherosclerosis (28, 56, 57). Looking for factors capable of reducing the expression of apoCIII without having negative effects on human apoAI or other lipid-related genes, we found that human apoCIII is a selective target gene for orphan nuclear receptor Rev-erbalpha . Here we show that this transcription factor specifically represses apoCIII through an element present in the promoter, which coincides with one of the two functional RORalpha 1 response elements described previously (51). Our results identify cross-talk between human Rev-erbalpha and RORalpha 1 that is restricted to apoCIII proximal promoter and is not present in the distal common regulatory enhancer or in the promoter of human apoAI. Interestingly, this Rev-erbalpha response element (nt -29/-18) overlaps the TATA box of apoCIII promoter (Fig. 4A). It remains as an interesting question for future research to determine whether modulation of transcription by Rev-erbalpha could also involve cross-talk with the TATA-binding protein in this promoter. However, the contribution of this putative cross-talk to the net repression should not play an important part because we have demonstrated that this element can confer Rev-erbalpha responsiveness when cloned in front of the TK promoter. Strikingly, the Rev-erbalpha response element of the rat apoAI promoter (nt -32/-21) also overlaps the TATA box. This phenomenon gives further insight into the understanding of the process of the evolution of the apoAI and apoCIII genes from a common ancestor (58).

Importantly, our findings are in accord with data showing an increase in the hepatic apoCIII mRNA levels in Rev-erbalpha -deficient mice (59). Based on the similarity between the sequence of the Rev-erbalpha -responsive element of the mouse apoCIII gene promoter and its human counterpart (55), these results in vivo can most likely be extended to the human apoCIII gene. On the other hand, although we have found that RVR also represses the apoCIII gene promoter, the Rev-erbalpha knockout mice data would indicate that RVR has no complete overlapping function compared with Rev-erbalpha . Even so, it remains to be determined whether mice carrying at the same time disruptions of both Rev-erbalpha and RVR genes could have even higher levels of apoCIII expression.

Luciferase reporter assays made in the context of the natural promoter suggest that the other functional RORE, located in nt -82/-71, might have a slight contribution to Rev-erbalpha -mediated repression of human apoCIII gene. However, in contrast to the site at -29/-18, it does not confer Rev-erbalpha responsiveness to a heterologous promoter. In addition, gel shift assays show that the binding of Rev-erbalpha , if any, should be very weak. Conversely, we and others have shown that it confers a weak RORalpha 1 responsiveness to the TK promoter and is capable of binding RORalpha 1 in vitro (51). This site discrimination underlines a somewhat different affinity of binding to DNA and suggests the hypothesis that functional ROREs in other promoters could be unresponsive to Rev-erbalpha .

Our data and those reported previously demonstrate that the Rev-erb subfamily functions as dominant transcriptional repressors (40, 41, 44). Some crystallography studies suggest that Rev-erbalpha is de facto an orphan receptor because of the small size or absence of a ligand pocket (60). Furthermore, in contrast to most ligand-activated factors, RORalpha receptors, which also still remain as orphan, and Rev-erb have arthropod homologues. Thus, it has been suggested that such orphans may represent ancestral receptors, before the evolution of ligands and/or ligand binding (61). The lack of ligand have hampered further assessment on the biological role of both receptors. Nevertheless, the convergence of the opposite transcriptional effects played by Rev-erb and RORalpha on a same gene suggests the existence of an orphan receptor-based signaling pathway. This mechanism should provide a fine tuning required for expression in response to a particular environmental or physiological cue. Because both subfamilies of receptors are expressed in human liver, the expression of apoCIII could be dictated, in part, by the ratio between the Rev-erb and RORalpha hepatic expression levels. In addition, the regulation of those signals could presumably come from the cellular status of some coregulators that interplay with the orphans (62).

Regulation of Rev-erbalpha expression has been achieved by treatment with fibrates (44, 50) and glucocorticoids (63). Because fibrates increase the hepatic expression of Rev-erbalpha through a PPARalpha -mediated activation of the Rev-erbalpha gene promoter, it has been pointed out that Rev-erbalpha could play a functional role in the transcriptional repression of rat apoAI by fibrates (44). As we have demonstrated, apoCIII promoter is repressed by Rev-erbalpha . Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that Rev-erbalpha is involved in the previously reported repression of apoCIII gene by fibrates. Studies with PPARalpha knockout mice have clearly demonstrated that PPARalpha is required in the negative regulation of apoCIII gene expression by fibrates (64). In contrast, the involvement of other factors in the transcriptional repression by these agents is still unclear. The hepatocyte nuclear factor-4 (HNF-4) (NR2A1) is a receptor required for the hepatic expression of apoCIII (24, 65). This liver-enriched transcription factor strongly activates the human apoCIII promoter activity through its binding to the previously described proximal element CIIIB (nt -92/-67) and thereby mediates transactivation by the transforming growth factor-beta signal transduction pathway (24, 25). Hertz et al. (23) showed that the transcriptional suppression of apoCIII exerted by fibrates is due to direct and indirect complementary modes of actions: 1) displacement of HNF-4 from the element CIIIB in the apoCIII promoter mediated by nonproductive PPAR-RXR binding (Fig. 9) and 2) transcriptional suppression of HNF-4 levels. The former mechanism, however, needs further analysis because Vu-Dac et al. (44) could not confirm any significant regulation of HNF-4 gene expression in livers of animals treated with fibrates. Here we propose an alternative or an additional mechanism for PPARalpha -mediated negative regulation of apoCIII promoter by fibrates, namely, repression by an increase in PPARalpha -induced Rev-erbalpha levels (Fig. 9). Despite exhaustive efforts we have not been able to demonstrate a direct implication of Rev-erbalpha in the repression by fibrates. Although studies in animals show a clear suppression of hepatic expression of apoCIII by treatment with fibrates, we, as well as others (66, 67), could not observe these effects in cultured hepatocytes, most likely because the response to fibrates is dependent on the serum used in the culture medium (68). This paradox suggests that other factors, in addition to PPARalpha and Rev-erbalpha , should be involved in the negative regulation by fibrates. On the other hand, treatment of rats with dexamethasone results in a decrease of hepatic Rev-erbalpha mRNA levels. Interestingly, consistent with this observation, dexamethasone increases hepatic apoCIII mRNA in mice (69) and elevates plasma triglycerides in humans (70). It will be of interest to determine whether glucocorticoids also increase human apoCIII expression and to investigate a putative involvement of Rev-erbalpha .


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Model for negative regulation of apoCIII gene transcription by fibrates in human hepatocytes. Upon activation by fibrates, PPARalpha could repress apoCIII promoter by two modes of action. In a direct mechanism (A), nonproductive binding of PPAR-RXR heterodimers displaces HNF-4 from the element CIIIB (23) and thereby inhibits transactivation by transforming growth factor-beta signal transduction (24). Alternatively, in a multi-step process, PPAR-RXR could bind a Rev-DR2 element in Rev-erbalpha gene promoter (B), and increase its expression (50). Then monomers of Rev-erbalpha antagonize activation by RORalpha 1 and repress the activity of human apoCIII promoter (C). Moreover, upon activation of PPARalpha , the negative autoregulation of Rev-erbalpha (40) could be diminished because of a competition between PPAR-RXR and homodimers of Rev-erbalpha (50).

In conclusion, our results have shown that Rev-erbalpha specifically inhibits human apoCIII promoter gene activity. These data underscore a physiological role for Rev-erbalpha in the regulation of genes involved in triglyceride metabolism and, therefore, identify Rev-erbalpha as a potential pharmacological target for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank J. Kirilovsky and M. Walker for encouragement of this work, V. I. Zannis (Boston University, MA), T. Grand-Perret, S. Huet, and D. Grillot for scientific discussions, S. Demaria-Magny for technical assistance, and M. Sierra for critical reading of the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by a Marie Curie Fellowship of the European Community Program Quality of Life under contract number QLK5-CT-2000-60009.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 33-1-69-29-60-72; Fax: 33-1-69-07-48-92; E-mail: hjcc6201@gsk.com.

§ To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 33-1-69-29-61-22; Fax: 33-1-69-07-48-92; E-mail: jcr0226@gsk.com.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 20, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203421200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: apoAI, apoAIV, and apoCIII, apolipoprotein AI, AIV and CIII, respectively; HNF-4, hepatocyte nuclear factor-4; nt, nucleotide(s); PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; ROR, retinoic acid-related orphan receptor; RORE, retinoic acid-related orphan receptor response element; RXR, retinoid X receptor; TK, thymidine kinase.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Jeppesen, J., Hein, H. O., Suadicani, P., and Gyntelberg, F. (1998) Circulation 97, 1029-1036[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Miller, M., Seidler, A., Moalemi, A., and Pearson, T. A. (1998) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 31, 1252-1257[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Assmann, G., Schulte, H., and von Eckardstein, A. (1996) Am. J. Cardiol. 77, 1179-1184[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Stampfer, M. J., Krauss, R. M., Ma, J., Blanche, P. J., Holl, L. G., Sacks, F. M., and Hennekens, C. H. (1996) J. Am. Med. Assoc. 276, 882-888[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Krauss, R. M. (1998) Am. J. Cardiol. 81, 13B-17B[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Hodis, H. N. (1999) Circulation 99, 2852-2854[Free Full Text]
7. Shachter, N. S. (2001) Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 12, 297-304[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Marcoux, C., Tremblay, M., Fredenrich, A., Davignon, J., and Cohn, J. S. (2001) Metabolism 50, 112-119[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Stocks, J., Holdsworth, G., and Galton, D. (1979) Lancet 2, 667-671[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Ginsberg, H. N., Le, N. A., Goldberg, I. J., Gibson, J. C., Rubinstein, A., Wang-Iverson, P., Norum, R., and Brown, W. V. (1986) J. Clin. Invest. 78, 1287-1295[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Esterbauer, H., Hell, E., Krempler, F., and Patsch, W. (1999) Clin. Chem. 45, 331-339[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Ito, Y., Azrolan, N., O'Connell, A., Walsh, A., and Breslow, J. L. (1990) Science 249, 790-793[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Maeda, N., Li, H., Lee, D., Oliver, P., Quarfordt, S. H., and Osada, J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 23610-23616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Aalto-Setälä, K., Fisher, E. A., Chen, X., Chajek-Shaul, T., Hayek, T., Zechner, R., Walsh, A., Ramakrishnan, R., Ginsberg, H. N., and Breslow, J. L. (1992) J. Clin. Invest. 90, 1889-1900[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. de Silva, H. V., Lauer, S. J., Wang, J., Simonet, W. S., Weisgraber, K. H., Mahley, R. W., and Taylor, J. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 2324-2335[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Aalto-Setälä, K., Weinstock, P. H., Bisgaier, C. L., Wu, L., Smith, J. D., and Breslow, J. L. (1996) J. Lipid Res. 37, 1802-1811[Abstract]
17. Ebara, T., Ramakrishnan, R., Steiner, G., and Shachter, N. S. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 99, 2672-2681[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Wang, C. S., McConathy, W. J., Kloer, H. U., and Alaupovic, P. (1985) J. Clin. Invest. 75, 384-390[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Vu-Dac, N., Gervois, P., Torra, I. P., Fruchart, J. C., Kosykh, V., Kooistra, T., Princen, H. M., Dallongeville, J., and Staels, B. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 102, 625-632[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Haubenwallner, S., Essenburg, A. D., Barnett, B. C., Pape, M. E., DeMattos, R. B., Krause, B. R., Minton, L. L., Auerbach, B. J., Newton, R. S., Leff, T., and Bisgaier, C. L. (1995) J. Lipid Res. 36, 2541-2551[Abstract]
21. Staels, B., Vu-, Dac, N., Kosykh, V. A., Saladin, R., Fruchart, J. C., Dallongeville, J., and Auwerx, J. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 95, 705-712[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Winegar, D. A., Brown, P. J., Wilkison, W. O., Lewis, M. C., Ott, R. J., Tong, W. Q., Brown, H. R., Lehmann, J. M., Kliewer, S. A., Plunket, K. D., Way, J. M., Bodkin, N. L., and Hansen, B. C. (2001) J. Lipid Res. 42, 1543-1551[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Hertz, R., Bishara-Shieban, J., and Bar-Tana, J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13470-13475[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Zannis, V. I., Kan, H. Y., Kritis, A., Zanni, E. E., and Kardassis, D. (2001) Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 12, 181-207[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Ogami, K., Hadzopoulou-Cladaras, M., Cladaras, C., and Zannis, V. I. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 9808-9815[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Karathanasis, S. K., McPherson, J., Zannis, V. I., and Breslow, J. L. (1983) Nature 304, 371-373[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Karathanasis, S. K. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 6374-6378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Miller, N. E. (1987) Am. Heart J. 113, 589-597[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Castelli, W. P., Garrison, R. J., Wilson, P. W., Abbott, R. D., Kalousdian, S., and Kannel, W. B. (1986) J. Am. Med. Assoc. 256, 2835-2838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Kan, H. Y., Georgopoulos, S., and Zannis, V. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 30423-30431[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Georgopoulos, S., Kan, H. Y., Reardon-Alulis, C., and Zannis, V. (2000) Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 4919-4929[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Walsh, A., Azrolan, N., Wang, K., Marcigliano, A., O'Connell, A., and Breslow, J. L. (1993) J. Lipid Res. 34, 617-623[Abstract]
33. Lazar, M. A., Hodin, R. A., Darling, D. S., and Chin, W. W. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 1128-1136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Miyajima, N., Horiuchi, R., Shibuya, Y., Fukushige, S., Matsubara, K., Toyoshima, K., and Yamamoto, T. (1989) Cell 57, 31-39[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Lazar, M. A., Jones, K. E., and Chin, W. W. (1990) DNA Cell Biol. 9, 77-83[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Dumas, B., Harding, H. P., Choi, H. S., Lehmann, K. A., Chung, M., Lazar, M. A., and Moore, D. D. (1994) Mol. Endocrinol. 8, 996-1005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Forman, B. M., Chen, J., Blumberg, B., Kliewer, S. A., Henshaw, R., Ong, E. S., and Evans, R. M. (1994) Mol. Endocrinol. 8, 1253-1261[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Retnakaran, R., Flock, G., and Giguère, V. (1994) Mol. Endocrinol. 8, 1234-1244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Bonnelye, E., Vanacker, J. M., Desbiens, X., Begue, A., Stehelin, D., and Laudet, V. (1994) Cell Growth Differ. 5, 1357-1365[Abstract]
40. Adelmant, G., Bègue, A., Stéhelin, D., and Laudet, V. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 3553-3558[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Dussault, I., and Giguère, V. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 1860-1867[Abstract]
42. Kassam, A., Capone, J. P., and Rachubinski, R. A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 22895-22900[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Bois-Joyeux, B., Chauvet, C., Nacer-Chérif, H., Bergeret, W., Mazure, N., Giguère, V., Laudet, V., and Danan, J. L. (2000) DNA Cell Biol. 19, 589-599[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Vu-Dac, N., Chopin-Delannoy, S., Gervois, P., Bonnelye, E., Martin, G., Fruchart, J. C., Laudet, V., and Staels, B. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 25713-25720[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Chawla, A., and Lazar, M. A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 16265-16269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Burke, L., Downes, M., Carozzi, A., Giguère, V., and Muscat, G. E. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 3481-3489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Harding, H. P., and Lazar, M. A. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 3113-3121[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Harding, H. P., and Lazar, M. A. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 4791-4802[Abstract]
49. Hsu, M. H., Palmer, C. N., Song, W., Griffin, K. J., and Johnson, E. F. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 27988-27997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Gervois, P, Chopin-Delannoy, S., Fadel, A., Dubois, G., Kosykh, V., Fruchart, J. C., Najib, J., Laudet, V., and Staels, B. (1999) Mol. Endocrinol. 13, 400-409[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Raspé, E., Duez, H., Gervois, P., Fiévet, C., Fruchart, J. C., Besnard, S., Mariani, J., Tedgui, A., and Staels, B. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 2865-2871[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Hamilton, B. A., Frankel, W. N., Kerrebrock, A. W., Hawkins, T. L., FitzHugh, W., Kusumi, K., Russell, L. B., Mueller, K. L., van Berkel, V., Birren, B. W., Kruglyak, L., and Lander, E. S. (1996) Nature 379, 736-739[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. McKnight, S. L. (1982) Cell 31, 355-365[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Rodríguez, J. C., Gil-Gómez, G., Hegardt, F. G., and Haro, D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 18767-18772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Januzzi, J. L., Azrolan, N., O'Connell, A., Aalto-Setälä, K., and Breslow, J. L. (1992) Genomics 14, 1081-1088[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
56. Paszty, C., Maeda, N., Verstuyft, J., and Rubin, E. M. (1994) J. Clin. Invest. 94, 899-903[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Forte, T. M., and McCall, M. R. (1994) Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 5, 354-364[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. Haddad, I. A., Ordovas, J. M., Fitzpatrick, T., and Karathanasis, S. K. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 13268-13277[Abstract/Free Full Text]
59. Duez, H. M., Mansén, A., Fruchart, J. C., Vennström, B., Fiévet, C., and Staels, B. (1998) Circulation 98, I449-I450
60. Renaud, J. P., Harris, J. M., Downes, M., Burke, L. J., and Muscat, G. E. (2000) Mol. Endocrinol. 14, 700-717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
61. Escriva, H., Safi, R., Hänni, C., Langlois, M. C., Saumitou-Laprade, P., Stehelin, D., Capron, A., Pierce, R., and Laudet, V. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 6803-6808[Abstract/Free Full Text]
62. Sauvé, F., McBroom, L. D., Gallant, J., Moraitis, A. N., Labrie, F., and Giguère, V. (2001) Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 343-353[Abstract/Free Full Text]
63. Torra, I. P., Tsibulsky, V., Delaunay, F., Saladin, R., Laudet, V., Fruchart, J. C., Kosykh, V., and Staels, B. (2000) Endocrinology 141, 3799-3806[Abstract/Free Full Text]
64. Peters, J. M., Hennuyer, N., Staels, B., Fruchart, J. C., Fievet, C., Gonzalez, F. J., and Auwerx, J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 27307-27312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
65. Hayhurst, G. P., Lee, Y. H., Lambert, G., Ward, J. M., and Gonzalez, F. J. (2001) Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 1393-1403[Abstract/Free Full Text]
66. Hsu, M. H., Savas, U., Griffin, K. J., and Johnson, E. F. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 27950-27958[Abstract/Free Full Text]
67. Guo, Q., Wang, P. R., Milot, D. P., Ippolito, M. C., Hernandez, M., Burton, C. A., Wright, S. D., and Chao, Y. (2001) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1533, 220-232[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
68. Clavey, V., Copin, C., Mariotte, M. C., Baugé, E., Chinetti, G., Fruchart, J., Fruchart, J. C., Dallongeville, J., and Staels, B. (1999) Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 9, 139-149[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
69. Lawrence, J. W., Wollenberg, G. K., Frank, J. D., and DeLuca, J. G. (2001) Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 170, 113-123[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
70. Stone, N. J. (1994) Med. Clin. North Am. 78, 117-141[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
C. Fontaine, E. Rigamonti, B. Pourcet, H. Duez, C. Duhem, J.-C. Fruchart, G. Chinetti-Gbaguidi, and B. Staels
The Nuclear Receptor Rev-erb{alpha} Is a Liver X Receptor (LXR) Target Gene Driving a Negative Feedback Loop on Select LXR-Induced Pathways in Human Macrophages
Mol. Endocrinol., August 1, 2008; 22(8): 1797 - 1811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
T. Kakizawa, S.-i. Nishio, G. Triqueneaux, S. Bertrand, J. Rambaud, and V. Laudet
Two differentially active alternative promoters control the expression of the zebrafish orphan nuclear receptor gene Rev-erb{alpha}
J. Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2007; 38(5): 555 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
G. Benoit, A. Cooney, V. Giguere, H. Ingraham, M. Lazar, G. Muscat, T. Perlmann, J.-P. Renaud, J. Schwabe, F. Sladek, et al.
International Union of Pharmacology. LXVI. Orphan Nuclear Receptors
Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2006; 58(4): 798 - 836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
A. Anzulovich, A. Mir, M. Brewer, G. Ferreyra, C. Vinson, and R. Baler
Elovl3: a model gene to dissect homeostatic links between the circadian clock and nutritional status
J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2006; 47(12): 2690 - 2700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Wang, L. Yin, and M. A. Lazar
The Orphan Nuclear Receptor Rev-erb{alpha} Regulates Circadian Expression of Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor Type 1
J. Biol. Chem., November 10, 2006; 281(45): 33842 - 33848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
E. A. Ruiz-Narvaez, Y. Yang, Y. Nakanishi, J. Kirchdorfer, and H. Campos
APOC3/A5 haplotypes, lipid levels, and risk of myocardial infarction in the Central Valley of Costa Rica
J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 2605 - 2613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X. Prieur, T. Huby, H. Coste, F. G. Schaap, M. J. Chapman, and J. C. Rodriguez
Thyroid Hormone Regulates the Hypotriglyceridemic Gene APOA5
J. Biol. Chem., July 29, 2005; 280(30): 27533 - 27543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
L. Yin and M. A. Lazar
The Orphan Nuclear Receptor Rev-erb{alpha} Recruits the N-CoR/Histone Deacetylase 3 Corepressor to Regulate the Circadian Bmal1 Gene
Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2005; 19(6): 1452 - 1459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. N. Ramakrishnan, P. Lau, L. J. Burke, and G. E. O. Muscat
Rev-erb{beta} Regulates the Expression of Genes Involved in Lipid Absorption in Skeletal Muscle Cells: EVIDENCE FOR CROSS-TALK BETWEEN ORPHAN NUCLEAR RECEPTORS AND MYOKINES
J. Biol. Chem., March 11, 2005; 280(10): 8651 - 8659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
H. Cheng, H. Khanna, E. C.T. Oh, D. Hicks, K. P. Mitton, and A. Swaroop
Photoreceptor-specific nuclear receptor NR2E3 functions as a transcriptional activator in rod photoreceptors
Hum. Mol. Genet., August 1, 2004; 13(15): 1563 - 1575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X. Prieur, H. Coste, and J. C. Rodriguez
The Human Apolipoprotein AV Gene Is Regulated by Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor-{alpha} and Contains a Novel Farnesoid X-activated Receptor Response Element
J. Biol. Chem., July 3, 2003; 278(28): 25468 - 25480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Vu-Dac, P. Gervois, H. Jakel, M. Nowak, E. Bauge, H. Dehondt, B. Staels, L. A. Pennacchio, E. M. Rubin, J. Fruchart-Najib, et al.
Apolipoprotein A5, a Crucial Determinant of Plasma Triglyceride Levels, Is Highly Responsive to Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor alpha Activators
J. Biol. Chem., May 9, 2003; 278(20): 17982 - 17985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
E. Raspe, H. Duez, A. Mansen, C. Fontaine, C. Fievet, J.-C. Fruchart, B. Vennstrom, and B. Staels
Identification of Rev-erb{alpha} as a physiological repressor of apoC-III gene transcription
J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2002; 43(12): 2172 - 2179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/30/27120    most recent
M203421200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coste, H.
Right arrow Articles by Rodríguez, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coste, H.
Right arrow Articles by Rodríguez, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement