|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M203421200 on May 20, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 30, 27120-27129, July 26, 2002
Orphan Nuclear Hormone Receptor Rev-erb Regulates
the Human Apolipoprotein CIII Promoter*
Hervé
Coste and
Joan C.
Rodríguez§
From GlaxoSmithKline, 25 avenue du Québec,
91951 Les Ulis cedex, France
Received for publication, April 9, 2002, and in revised form, May 17, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Apolipoprotein CIII (apoCIII) plays an
important role in plasma triglyceride and remnant lipoprotein
metabolism. Because hypertriglyceridemia is an independent risk factor
in coronary artery disease and the presence in plasma of
triglyceride-rich remnant lipoproteins is correlated with
atherosclerosis, considerable research efforts have been focused on the
identification of factors regulating apoCIII gene expression to
decrease its production. Here we report that the orphan nuclear hormone
receptor Rev-erb regulates the human apoCIII gene promoter. In
apoCIII expressing human hepatic HepG2 cells, transfection of
Rev-erb specifically repressed apoCIII gene promoter activity. We
determined by deletion and site-directed mutagenesis experiments that
Rev-erb dependent repression is mainly due to an element present in
the proximal promoter of the apoCIII gene. In contrast, we found no
functional Rev-erb response elements in the convergently transcribed
human apoAI gene or the common regulatory enhancer. The identified
Rev-erb response element coincides with a ROR 1 element, and in
the present study we provide evidence that functional cross-talk
between these orphan receptors modulates the apoCIII promoter. In
vitro binding analysis showed that monomers of Rev-erb bound
this element but not another upstream ROR 1 response element. In
addition, we showed that the closely related nuclear orphan receptor
RVR also specifically repressed the human apoCIII gene. These
studies underscore a novel physiological role for members of the
Rev-erb family of nuclear receptors in the regulation of genes involved
in triglyceride metabolism and the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Recent large scale clinical trials indicate that
hypertriglyceridemia is an independent risk factor for coronary artery
disease (1-4). In addition, triglyceride-rich remnant lipoproteins are positively correlated to the progression of atherosclerosis, which remains one of the leading causes of death in the Western world (5,
6).
Apolipoprotein CIII
(apoCIII)1 is a key protein
in plasma triglyceride metabolism. It is well established that the
plasma concentration and synthesis rate of apoCIII are positively
correlated with plasma triglycerides, both in normal and
hypertriglyceridemic subjects (7-9). In fact, apoCIII deficiency in
humans results in increased catabolism of very low density lipoprotein
particles (10), whereas increased apoCIII synthesis is associated with
hypertriglyceridemia (11). Overexpression of human apoCIII in mice
results in severe hypertriglyceridemia (12), whereas disruption of the
endogenous apoCIII gene protects the mice from postprandial
hypertriglyceridemia (13). apoCIII has been shown to delay the
catabolism of triglyceride-rich particles by several mechanisms
(14-17), including inhibition of lipoprotein binding to the cell
surface glycosaminoglycan matrix (17) and lipolysis by lipoprotein
lipase (10, 18). Moreover, studies with retinoids, fibrates, and other
pharmacological agents show evidence that the modulation of apoCIII
expression has an important role in hypertriglyceridemia (19-23).
Therefore, the identification of factors capable of decreasing plasma
apoCIII concentrations by down-regulation of its expression is of major importance for the treatment of dyslipidemia.
In humans, apoCIII is synthesized in the liver and, to a much lesser
extent, in the intestine. The expression of apoCIII is strongly
regulated at the transcriptional level, and the regulatory sequences
responsible for the tissue-specific expression pattern of the apoCIII
gene and for its modulation by signal transduction pathways have been
extensively described (reviewed in Ref. 24). The 5'-flanking region of
the human apoCIII gene contains a proximal promoter and a distal
regulatory enhancer (25). The gene for apoCIII resides in an
apolipoprotein gene cluster on chromosome 11q23 between the apoAI and
apoAIV genes (26, 27). The product of the convergently transcribed
apoAI gene is the major protein component of high density lipoproteins.
Plasma levels of apoAI and high density lipoprotein cholesterol
correlate with each other, and both correlate inversely with the
incidence of coronary heart disease (28, 29). Importantly, the distal
regulatory region of apoCIII acts as a common enhancer for the three
genes of the cluster (24, 30-32).
The orphan nuclear receptor Rev-erb (NR1D) group contains two
members in mammals: Rev-erb (33-35) and RVR (also known as
Rev-erb and BD73) (36-39). Rev-erb receptors are widely expressed
(33, 37) and have been described as negative transcriptional regulators of the Rev-erb gene itself (40) as well as N-myc (41),
enoyl-CoA hydratase/3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase bifunctional enzyme (42), -fetoprotein (43), and rat apoAI (44) genes. Rev-erb mRNA is induced dramatically during adipogenesis (45), and a role
has also been proposed for both Rev-erb and RVR in myogenesis (46).
However, the specific biological functions of these receptors in
adipogenesis or in other physiological processes are still unknown.
Monomers of Rev-erb and RVR bind to the six-nucleotide core motif
PuGGTCA preceded by a 6-bp AT-rich region (36-39, 47, 48). In
addition, homodimers of Rev-erb and RVR bind to a direct repeat of
the core sequence separated by two nucleotides with an AT-rich 5'
extension (Rev-DR2) (40, 48). Although the core binding site is
recognized by the P-box/first helix of the DNA-binding domain, the
precise recognition of the sequences 5' to the core binding site is
determined by the C-terminal extension of the zinc finger domains (49).
Rev-erb and RVR share a high degree of sequence similarity with the
C-terminal extension/third helix of peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptors (PPARs) (NR1C) and retinoic acid-related orphan receptors
(RORs, also termed RZRs) (NR1F). As a consequence, Rev-erb binds to
the PPAR response elements of CYP4A6 and the hydratase/dehydrogenase
bifunctional enzyme genes and interferes with the
PPAR-dependent transactivation of the former gene (42, 49).
Conversely, the Rev-DR2 site described in the promoter of the human
Rev-erb gene is also a PPAR response element (50). It should be
noted that although the sequence determinants required for Rev-erb
and PPAR bindings are similar, they are not identical as evidenced by
the incapacity of Rev-erb to bind to the fatty acyl-CoA oxidase PPAR
response element (42, 49). The gene for N-myc, as well as
the rat -fetoprotein and apoAI genes, have been shown to contain
elements that bind and are regulated by members of both Rev-erb and
ROR groups (41, 43, 44). The sequence requirements for ROR ,
Rev-erb , and RVR are closely related (37). Nevertheless, they are
not identical (49), so the putative cross-talk between those nuclear
receptors should be analyzed in terms of case-by-case studies.
We have learnt from Staels and co-workers (51) that ROR 1 regulates
apoCIII gene transcription through binding sites located in its
proximal promoter. The importance of ROR in apoCIII expression was
underscored by studies with the staggerer mice, which
carry a natural deletion in the ROR gene (52). These mice show
decreased plasma triglyceride and apoCIII levels compared with wild
type mice (51).
In this report, we demonstrate that Rev-erb regulates the human
apoCIII gene promoter. Rev-erb represses transcription through one
of the functional ROR 1 response elements present in the apoCIII gene
proximal promoter. Our results suggest a novel role for Rev-erb in
regulating triglyceride metabolism.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plasmids--
The 5'-flanking region of human apoCIII gene (nt
1408 to +24, relative to the transcription start site) was obtained
by PCR using human genomic DNA as a template
(CLONTECH). Forward primer contained nt 1408 to
1383 and was tailed with a NheI restriction site. Reverse
primer contained nt +24 to +2 and was tailed with a HindIII
site. The PCR product was digested with NheI and
HindIII and cloned into the corresponding sites of the
promoter-less firefly (Photinus pyralis) luciferase reporter
plasmid pGL3-basic (Promega), generating p 1408/+24hC3LUC (also
designated wild type). For the construction of p 108/+24hC3LUC,
a DNA fragment was generated by PCR using p 1408/+24hC3LUC as a
template and a NheI site tailed forward primer containing nt
108 to 86, with the reverse primer used for the former
construction. The amplified promoter fragment was digested with
NheI/HindIII enzymes and cloned into pGL3-basic vector. The 5' region of human apoAI gene (nt 1170 to +235, relative to the transcription start site) was obtained by PCR using human genomic DNA as a template, a BglII site tailed forward
primer containing nt 1170 to 1152 and a HindIII site
tailed reverse primer containing nt +235 to +215. After digestion with
BglII and HindIII, it was cloned into pGL3-basic
vector to produce p 1170/+235hAILUC. The 5'-flanking region of rat
apoAI gene (nt 823 to +31, relative to the transcription start site)
was obtained by PCR using Sprague-Dawley rat genomic DNA as a template
(CLONTECH), a NheI site tailed forward primer containing nt 823 to 804 and a HindIII site
tailed reverse primer containing nt +31 to +10. The resulting fragment
was cut with NheI and HindIII and then cloned in
the corresponding sites of pGL3-basic vector to generate
p 823/+31rAILUC. Site-directed mutagenesis of the construct
p 1408/+24hC3LUC was accomplished using the QuikChangeTM
site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) according to the
recommendations of the manufacturer and two pairs of 34-mer
oligonucleotides containing mutations corresponding, respectively, to
nt 21(G A)/ 22(G C) and to nt 78(G C)/ 79(G A) of
human apoCIII promoter. The vector pGL3-TK contains a fragment
corresponding to nt 109 to +20 of the TK gene promoter of herpes
simplex virus (53) subcloned into the
BglII/HindIII sites of pGL3-basic vector. The reporter plasmid pREVDR2-TKLUC was generated by insertion of a double-stranded oligonucleotide containing the Rev-DR2 response element
of the human Rev-erb gene promoter
(5'-GATCCGGAAAAGTGTGTCACTGGGGCACA-3') (40) into the BglII
site of pGL3-TK. Similarly, three copies of a double-stranded
oligonucleotide containing wild type
(5'-GATCCGATATAAAACAGGTCAGAACCCTA-3') or mutant
(5'-GATCCGATATAAAACACATCAGAACCCTA-3') sequences spanning nt 33 to
11 and wild type (5'-GATCCTCAGCAGGTGACCTTTGCCCAGCA-3') or mutant
(5'-GATCCTCAGCAGGTGATGTTTGCCCAGCA-3') sequences corresponding to
nt 90 to 68 of human apoCIII gene promoter were inserted into the
BglII site of pGL3-TK to generate, respectively,
p(wtC3RE1)3-TKLUC, p(mutC3RE1)3-TKLUC,
p(wtC3RE2)3-TKLUC, and p(mutC3RE2)3-TKLUC. Plasmids expressing human cDNAs for Rev-erb , ROR 1, and RVR
were provided by J. A. Holt and J. T. Moore (GlaxoSmithKline,
Research Triangle Park, NC). The backbone of those plasmids was the
mammalian expression vector pSG5 with a modified polylinker. Plasmid
DNA was prepared using the Qiagen endotoxin-free Maxipreparation method and quantitated spectrophotometrically. The integrities of all of
the plasmids were verified by DNA sequencing.
Cell Transfection and Reporter Assays--
Human hepatoblastoma
HepG2 cells were cultured in basal Eagle medium supplemented with
nonessential amino acids and 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum. On day 0, the
cells were seeded on 24-well plates at a density of 3.5 × 105 cells/well. On day 1, the cells were transfected with
FuGENE 6 reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Typically, each well of a 24-well plate
received 100 ng of firefly luciferase reporter plasmid and, when
indicated, 0-400 ng of plasmids expressing human Rev-erb , ROR 1,
or RVR. Effector plasmid dosage was kept constant by the addition of
appropriate amounts of the empty expression vector pSG5. 10 ng/well of
a sea pansy (Renilla reniformis) luciferase plasmid pRL-SV40
(Promega) was included in all transfections as an internal control for
transfection efficiency. On day 3, the cell lysates were prepared by
shaking the cells in 200 µl of 1× Promega lysis buffer for 10 min at
room temperature. Firefly and Renilla luciferase activities
were measured using a Dual-Luciferase® Reporter Assay
System (Promega) and a Lumistar luminometer (BMG Lab
Technologies). Firefly luciferase activity values were divided by Renilla luciferase activity values to obtain normalized
luciferase activities. To facilitate comparisons within a given
experiment, the activity data were presented as relative luciferase
activities. All of the transfection experiments were performed at least
three times, with each experimental point done in triplicate. The data are expressed as the means ± S.D.
In Vitro Transcription/Translation and Electrophoretic Mobility
Shift Analysis--
Human Rev-erb and human ROR 1 proteins were
synthesized in vitro from the corresponding expression
plasmids in rabbit reticulocyte lysate by using TNT® Quick
Coupled transcription/translation system (Promega) according to the
instructions of the manufacturer. To obtain an unprogrammed lysate as a
negative control for electrophoretic mobility shift analysis, a
reaction was performed with the empty vector pSG5. Protein-DNA binding
assays were performed as described (54). Double-stranded
oligonucleotides corresponding to the Rev-DR2 response element of human
Rev-erb gene promoter (RevDR2), wild type nt 33 to 11 (wtC3RE1),
wild type nt 90 to 68 (wtC3RE2) of human apoCIII gene promoter
(described under "Plasmids"), and a consensus sequence for the
binding of monomers of Rev-erb (47, 48) (consensus sequence)
were radiolabeled by fill in with the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase
I. For the competition experiments, 10-, 50-, or 100-fold molar excess
of unlabeled probes were included during a 10-min preincubation on ice.
mtC3RE1 is a double-stranded oligonucleotide corresponding to a mutant
sequence spanning nt 33 to 11 of human apoCIII promoter (described
under "Plasmids"). The samples were electrophoresed at 4 °C on a
4.5% polyacrylamide gel in 0.5× TBE buffer (45 mM
Tris, 45 mM boric acid, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). The
gels were dried and analyzed using a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager
STORM 860 and ImageQuant software (Amersham Biosciences).
 |
RESULTS |
The Orphan Nuclear Receptor Rev-erb Represses the Activity of
the Human apoCIII Gene Promoter--
To find factors capable of
down-regulating the expression of the human apoCIII gene without
affecting apoAI or other human lipid-related genes, we cloned their
promoters in front of the firefly luciferase reporter gene and
performed cotransfection experiments in the human hepatoblastoma cell
line HepG2, which synthesizes apoCIII. Cotransfection of the human
orphan nuclear receptor Rev-erb expression plasmid resulted in a
reduction of firefly luciferase activity driven by the 5'-flanking
sequence of the human apoCIII gene (nt 1408 to +24) (Fig.
1A). The repression by
Rev-erb was promoter-dependent because it was not
observed with the promoter-less pGL3-basic vector (Fig. 1A)
or with constructs containing the promoter of human apoAI (see below)
or other lipid-related genes (not shown). Furthermore, increasing
amounts of the expression plasmid for Rev-erb resulted in a
dose-dependent inhibition of firefly luciferase activity
(Fig. 1B). As shown in Fig. 1B, the repression by
Rev-erb was already appreciable at low doses.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Rev-erb represses
the activity of the human apoCIII gene promoter. A,
HepG2 cells were transiently transfected with a plasmid containing a
luciferase reporter gene driven by the 5'-flanking region ( 1408/+24)
of the human apoCIII gene or the empty pGL3-basic vector along with a
plasmid expressing human Rev-erb (200 ng) or the empty expression
vector as control (pSG5). B, the reporter plasmid containing
the 1408/+24 region of human apoCIII cloned in front of the
luciferase gene was cotransfected with increasing amounts of a
Rev-erb expression plasmid into HepG2 cells. Plasmid dosage was kept
constant by the addition of empty expression vector. Luciferase
activities were measured and expressed as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The fold change relative to control
level is shown for each construct.
|
|
Rev-erb Antagonizes Transactivation by ROR 1 from
Human apoCIII Gene Promoter--
Transcription of human apoCIII
gene is regulated by the orphan nuclear receptor ROR 1 (51).
Cross-talk between Rev-erb and ROR 1 has been reported in the rat
-fetoprotein far upstream enhancer (43) and the rat apoAI promoter
(44). Both receptors are expressed in HepG2 cells (37, 43, 50). To
investigate whether Rev-erb could repress ROR 1-induced
transcriptional activity on human apoCIII, we carried out transfection
assays using the luciferase reporter plasmid containing the 1408/+24
region of apoCIII along with expression plasmids for human Rev-erb
and ROR 1 in HepG2. Cotransfection of human ROR 1 led to a 2.5-fold induction over basal levels (Fig. 2). We
found that increasing amounts of Rev-erb expression plasmid with
constant levels of ROR 1 efficiently decreased transactivation by
ROR 1 (Fig. 2). These results suggest that the net transcriptional
response from apoCIII promoter is influenced by the relative levels of
Rev-erb and ROR 1 in the cells.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Rev-erb antagonizes
ROR 1-induced activation of the human apoCIII gene promoter.
HepG2 cells were transfected with a plasmid containing a luciferase
reporter gene driven by the 5'-flanking region ( 1408/+24) of the
human apoCIII gene together with the empty expression vector pSG5 or a
constant amount of the expression plasmid encoding human ROR 1 (100 ng) and increasing amounts (0, 25, 50, and 100 ng) of the Rev-erb
expression plasmid. Plasmid dosage was kept constant by the addition of
empty expression vector. The luciferase activities were measured and
expressed as described under "Experimental Procedures."
|
|
The Elements Required for Rev-erb -mediated Repression Are
Located in the Proximal Promoter of apoCIII Gene--
The 5'-flanking
region of human apoCIII gene contains two ROR 1 response elements
(ROREs), both located in the proximal promoter (51). As expected, the
5' deletion of 1.3 kilobase pairs led to a notable reduction in basal
activity because of the lack of the strong distal regulatory enhancer
(Fig. 3). However, the fragment containing the first 108 bp of the apoCIII promoter, which harbors the
functional ROREs, is still repressed by Rev-erb (Fig. 3).

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Rev-erb selectively
represses the human apoCIII proximal promoter but not the human apoAI
promoter. HepG2 cells were transfected with reporter plasmids
containing the firefly luciferase gene driven by nt 1408/+24 or
108/+24 of the 5'-flanking region of the human apoCIII gene, the
human apoAI ( 1170/+235), or rat apoAI ( 823/+31) genes or with the
empty pGL3-basic vector as a negative control, along with expression
plasmids encoding human ROR 1 or human Rev-erb (200 ng) or the
empty pSG5 expression vector as control. The luciferase activities were
measured and expressed as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The fold change by Rev-erb relative to control level
is shown for each construct. Enhancer, distal regulatory
enhancer; LUC, luciferase.
|
|
The sequences immediately 5' to the start of transcription of both
apoCIII and apoAI genes are significantly similar (55), and the distal
regulatory region of human apoCIII acts as an enhancer for the hepatic
and intestinal expression of human apoAI gene expression (30-32). So
we investigated whether Rev-erb could somehow repress human apoAI
gene. First, Vu-Dac and colleagues (44) have shown that Rev-erb is
able to repress the rat apoAI promoter but not the first 256 bp of the
human apoAI promoter. We confirmed those results by using a reporter
construct that contains a longer sequence of the human apoAI gene
5'-flanking region (Fig. 3). We observed that, in contrast to rat apoAI
or human apoCIII, neither Rev-erb nor ROR 1 have significant
influence on the 1170/+235 human apoAI promoter activity (Fig. 3).
Second, we next examined whether, in addition to the proximal promoter,
any other Rev-erb response element could be present in the distal
regulatory enhancer of human apoCIII gene. For this purpose, we mutated
by site-directed mutagenesis the two 6-bp core motifs AGGTCA present in
the proximal promoter, which coincide with the half-sites of ROREs, in
the context of the 1408/+24 region of apoCIII gene (Fig.
4A). We found that upon
mutation of both half-sites (nt 21(G A)/ 22(G C) and nt
78(G C)/ 79(G A)), repression by Rev-erb was lost
(compare the 0.3-fold variation of the wild type construct with the
1.2-fold variation of the double mutant in Fig. 4B). These
results demonstrate that there is no other Rev-erb response element
in the distal enhancer.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Functional effects of mutations in ROREs on
the response of the human apoCIII promoter to Rev-erb .
A, human apoCIII gene promoter sequence surrounding the
ROREs. The gray boxes denote the RORE1 and RORE2 sequences.
The AGGTCA half-sites are indicated by horizontal arrows.
The wild type nucleotides that were modified by site-directed
mutagenesis are underlined. The corresponding 21(G A)/ 22(G C) and 78(G C)/ 79(G A) mutated nucleotides
are shown below the vertical arrows and within
the gray squares. B, HepG2 cells were transfected
with a plasmid expressing human Rev-erb (200 ng) or the empty pSG5
vector as control together with reporter constructs containing the wild
type or site-directed mutated 5'-flanking regions ( 1408/+24) of the
human apoCIII gene or the empty pGL3-basic vector as negative control.
The luciferase activities were measured and expressed as described
under "Experimental Procedures." The fold change by Rev-erb
relative to control level is shown for each construct.
Crosses indicate the presence of site-directed mutations in
a specific RORE. Enhancer, distal regulatory enhancer;
LUC, luciferase.
|
|
Evaluation of the Contribution of Each RORE Present in apoCIII
Promoter to Repression by Rev-erb --
The data shown in Fig.
4B indicate that each RORE present in apoCIII promoter
contributes differently to the Rev-erb -mediated repression. When the
1408/+24 region of apoCIII gene was mutated at the half-site of the
RORE located at position 82/ 71 (RORE2), therefore leaving an intact
RORE site at 29/ 18 (RORE1), the repression by Rev-erb was still
clearly observed. In contrast, mutation of only the half-site present
in RORE1 almost completely abrogated Rev-erb responsiveness, even
with an intact RORE2 site (Fig. 4B). These results indicate
that the response to Rev-erb is mainly mediated by the RORE site at
29/ 18 (hereafter designated C3RE1) and that the contribution of the
RORE site at 82/ 71 (hereafter designated C3RE2), if any, is minimal.
Specificity of Rev-erb Binding--
Electrophoretic mobility
shift analyses were performed to determine whether Rev-erb could
directly interact to the C3RE1 and C3RE2 sites. Incubation of a labeled
double-stranded oligonucleotide containing the 29/ 18 site (C3RE1)
with in vitro translated human Rev-erb resulted in a
retarded complex (Fig. 5B,
lane 2). The binding was specifically competed by the
addition of either the cold C3RE1 probe (Fig. 5B,
lanes 3-5) or a cold probe representing a consensus
sequence for the binding of Rev-erb (Fig. 5B, lanes 9-11). In contrast, a cold double-stranded oligonucleotide
(mtC3RE1) that is equivalent to C3RE1 but harbors point mutations in
the half-site (nt 21(G A)/ 22(G C) in Fig. 4A)
could not compete (Fig. 5B, lanes 6-8).
Interestingly, this binding was not displaced by a cold probe
containing the wild type site 82/ 71 (C3RE2) (Fig. 5A,
lanes 12-14). The apparent incapacity of C3RE2 to bind Rev-erb was further assessed by gel mobility shift assays using labeled C3RE2 probe. As shown on Fig. 5A, incubation of the
C3R2 probe with ROR 1 resulted in the formation of a visible retarded complex of C3R2 probe and ROR 1 (Fig. 5B, lane
2). In contrast, no retarded complexes were clearly detected from
the incubation with Rev-erb (Fig. 5B, lane
3).

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Rev-erb can
specifically bind to the C3RE1 site of the human apoCIII promoter.
Electrophoretic mobility shift analyses were performed using in
vitro transcribed/translated human Rev-erb (10 µl), human
ROR 1 (5 µl) or unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate ( ), when
indicated, and labeled double-stranded oligonucleotides corresponding
to nt 90/ 68 (C3RE2) (A) and nt 33/ 11 (C3RE1)
(B) of the human apoCIII gene promoter as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The lysate volumes were kept constant by
the addition of unprogrammed lysate. The competition experiments for
binding of human Rev-erb were performed by adding 10-, 50-, and
100-fold molar excess of the indicated unlabeled double-stranded
oligonucleotides, whose identities are described under "Experimental
Procedures." mtC3RE1 is identical to wtC3RE1
but with point mutations in the half-site ( 21(G A), 22(G C)). CONS, consensus sequence for the binding of Rev-erb ;
wt, wild type.
|
|
Rev-erb Binds to apoCIII C3RE1 as a Monomer--
Rev-erb is
capable of binding DNA as a monomer (47) or as a homodimer (40, 48). To
elucidate the binding mode of Rev-erb to the human apoCIII gene
promoter, we performed electrophoretic mobility shift analysis with: 1)
labeled C3RE1 and C3RE2, 2) a labeled probe that binds in
vitro to both monomers and dimers (RevDR2), and 3) a labeled probe
that only binds monomers of Rev-erb (consensus sequence). As shown
in Fig. 6, Rev-erb binds as a monomer
to C3RE1. Again, no retarded complexes between C3RE2 and Rev-erb
were clearly detected (Fig. 6, lane 7).

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Rev-erb binds to the
C3RE1 site of human apoCIII as a monomer. Electrophoretic mobility
shift analyses were performed using in vitro
transcribed/translated human Rev-erb (10 µl), human ROR 1 (2.5 µl), or unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate ( ), when indicated, and
labeled double stranded nucleotides containing the Rev-DR2 response
element of the human Rev-erb gene promoter (RevDR2), nt
33/ 11 (C3RE1), and nt 90/ 68 (C3RE2) of
the human apoCIII gene promoter and a consensus sequence for the
binding of monomers of Rev-erb (CONS) as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The lysate volumes were kept constant by
the addition of unprogrammed lysate. Note that the shifted bands of
probe C3RE2 (lanes 6 and 7) are unspecific. The
mobilities of complexes containing dimers (D) and monomers
(M) are indicated.
|
|
apoCIII C3RE1, but Not C3RE2, Confers Rev-erb Responsiveness to
Heterologous Promoters--
To study whether either of these two sites
could confer Rev-erb responsiveness to an heterologous promoter, we
linked three copies of the human apoCIII C3RE1 and C3RE2 sites upstream
of the TK promoter and the luciferase gene. These reporter constructs along with human ROR 1 and Rev-erb expression vectors were then tested by cotransfection in HepG2 cells (Fig.
7). A construct containing the Rev-DR2
element was used as a positive control. As expected, transfection of
the ROR 1 expression vector resulted in activation of both the
wtC3RE1- and wtC3RE2-driven TK promoter constructs. However, reporter
constructs with the TK promoter alone or driven by three copies of
mutC3RE1 were not induced, which is in agreement with previous
observations (51). As demonstrated in Fig. 7, wild type CR3RE1was able
to confer Rev-erb -mediated repression to TK promoter, unlike the
mutated CR3RE1 or wild type CR3R2. These data also show that the human
apoCIII C3RE1 site was able to mediate functional cross-talk between
ROR 1 and Rev-erb in HepG2 cells.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
The Rev-erb response
element present in the proximal promoter of the human apoCIII gene
(C3RE1) confers Rev-erb responsiveness to
heterologous promoters. HepG2 cells were transiently transfected
with plasmids expressing human ROR 1 and/or human Rev-erb or the
empty pSG5 vector as control, together with reporter constructs
containing three copies of the wild type (wtC3RE1) or mutant
(mutC3RE1) sequence corresponding to nt 33/ 11 or the
wild type sequence of nt 90/ 68 (wtC3RE2) of the human
apoCIII gene promoter cloned in front of a heterologous TK
promoter-driven luciferase. The Rev-DR2 response element of the human
Rev-erb gene promoter (RevDR2) in front of TK-luciferase
was used as positive control. The empty pGL3-TK reporter vector was
used as negative control. The plasmid dosage was kept constant by the
addition of empty expression vector. The luciferase activities were
measured and expressed as described under "Experimental
Procedures."
|
|
The Nuclear Orphan Receptor RVR Also Represses the Activity of
Human apoCIII Gene Promoter--
We were interested in determining
whether RVR, a nuclear orphan receptor closely related to Rev-erb
that is also expressed in human liver and HepG2 cells (36), could
modulate the human apoCIII promoter activity. Cotransfection of a human
RVR expression plasmid resulted in a significant reduction of firefly
luciferase activity under the control of both the 5'-flanking sequence
of human apoCIII gene (nt 1408 to +24) and the apoCIII promoter site
C3RE1-driven TK promoter (Fig. 8), as
well as the RevDR2-TK. The repression by RVR was specific because it
was not observed on the promoter-less pGL3-basic vector or on the
TK promoter alone. These results also show that the Rev-erb response
element of human apoCIII gene promoter confers RVR responsiveness to
heterologous promoters (Fig. 8).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
RVR also represses the activity of human
apoCIII gene promoter. The Rev-erb response element in the
apoCIII promoter confers RVR responsiveness to heterologous promoters.
HepG2 cells were transfected with expression plasmids encoding human
Rev-erb or human RVR (200 ng) or the empty pSG5 vector as control,
along with a plasmid containing a luciferase reporter gene driven by
the 5'-flanking region ( 1408/+24) of human apoCIII gene or the empty
pGL3-basic (pGL3) vector as control. As well as a reporter
construct containing three copies of the sequence corresponding to nt
33/ 11 of human apoCIII gene promoter (C3RE1) cloned in
front of a heterologous TK promoter-driven luciferase or the empty
reporter vector pGL3-TK as a negative control. A reporter construct
containing the Rev-DR2 response element of human Rev-erb gene
promoter (RevDR2) in front of TK-luciferase was used as
positive control. The luciferase activities were measured and expressed
as described under "Experimental Procedures."
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
It is well established that the expression of human apoCIII plays
a key role in hypertriglyceridemia (10-12, 19-23), whereas the
concentration of the convergently transcribed apoAI, the major protein
constituent of high density lipoproteins, contributes to the prevention
of atherosclerosis (28, 56, 57). Looking for factors capable of
reducing the expression of apoCIII without having negative effects on
human apoAI or other lipid-related genes, we found that human apoCIII
is a selective target gene for orphan nuclear receptor Rev-erb . Here
we show that this transcription factor specifically represses apoCIII
through an element present in the promoter, which coincides with one of
the two functional ROR 1 response elements described previously (51).
Our results identify cross-talk between human Rev-erb and ROR 1
that is restricted to apoCIII proximal promoter and is not present in
the distal common regulatory enhancer or in the promoter of human
apoAI. Interestingly, this Rev-erb response element (nt 29/ 18)
overlaps the TATA box of apoCIII promoter (Fig. 4A). It
remains as an interesting question for future research to determine
whether modulation of transcription by Rev-erb could also involve
cross-talk with the TATA-binding protein in this promoter. However, the
contribution of this putative cross-talk to the net repression should
not play an important part because we have demonstrated that this
element can confer Rev-erb responsiveness when cloned in front of
the TK promoter. Strikingly, the Rev-erb response element of the rat
apoAI promoter (nt 32/ 21) also overlaps the TATA box. This phenomenon gives further insight into the understanding of the process
of the evolution of the apoAI and apoCIII genes from a common ancestor
(58).
Importantly, our findings are in accord with data showing an increase
in the hepatic apoCIII mRNA levels in Rev-erb -deficient mice
(59). Based on the similarity between the sequence of the Rev-erb -responsive element of the mouse apoCIII gene promoter and
its human counterpart (55), these results in vivo can most likely be extended to the human apoCIII gene. On the other hand, although we have found that RVR also represses the apoCIII gene promoter, the Rev-erb knockout mice data would indicate that RVR has
no complete overlapping function compared with Rev-erb . Even so, it
remains to be determined whether mice carrying at the same time
disruptions of both Rev-erb and RVR genes could have even higher
levels of apoCIII expression.
Luciferase reporter assays made in the context of the natural promoter
suggest that the other functional RORE, located in nt 82/ 71, might
have a slight contribution to Rev-erb -mediated repression of human
apoCIII gene. However, in contrast to the site at 29/ 18, it does
not confer Rev-erb responsiveness to a heterologous promoter. In
addition, gel shift assays show that the binding of Rev-erb , if any,
should be very weak. Conversely, we and others have shown that it
confers a weak ROR 1 responsiveness to the TK promoter and is capable
of binding ROR 1 in vitro (51). This site discrimination
underlines a somewhat different affinity of binding to DNA and suggests
the hypothesis that functional ROREs in other promoters could be
unresponsive to Rev-erb .
Our data and those reported previously demonstrate that the Rev-erb
subfamily functions as dominant transcriptional repressors (40, 41,
44). Some crystallography studies suggest that Rev-erb is de facto
an orphan receptor because of the small size or absence of a ligand
pocket (60). Furthermore, in contrast to most ligand-activated factors,
ROR receptors, which also still remain as orphan, and Rev-erb have
arthropod homologues. Thus, it has been suggested that such orphans may
represent ancestral receptors, before the evolution of ligands and/or
ligand binding (61). The lack of ligand have hampered further
assessment on the biological role of both receptors. Nevertheless, the
convergence of the opposite transcriptional effects played by Rev-erb
and ROR on a same gene suggests the existence of an orphan
receptor-based signaling pathway. This mechanism should provide a fine
tuning required for expression in response to a particular
environmental or physiological cue. Because both subfamilies of
receptors are expressed in human liver, the expression of apoCIII could
be dictated, in part, by the ratio between the Rev-erb and ROR
hepatic expression levels. In addition, the regulation of those signals
could presumably come from the cellular status of some coregulators
that interplay with the orphans (62).
Regulation of Rev-erb expression has been achieved by treatment with
fibrates (44, 50) and glucocorticoids (63). Because fibrates increase
the hepatic expression of Rev-erb through a PPAR -mediated
activation of the Rev-erb gene promoter, it has been pointed out
that Rev-erb could play a functional role in the transcriptional
repression of rat apoAI by fibrates (44). As we have demonstrated,
apoCIII promoter is repressed by Rev-erb . Therefore, it is tempting
to speculate that Rev-erb is involved in the previously reported
repression of apoCIII gene by fibrates. Studies with PPAR knockout
mice have clearly demonstrated that PPAR is required in the negative
regulation of apoCIII gene expression by fibrates (64). In contrast,
the involvement of other factors in the transcriptional repression by
these agents is still unclear. The hepatocyte nuclear factor-4 (HNF-4)
(NR2A1) is a receptor required for the hepatic expression of apoCIII
(24, 65). This liver-enriched transcription factor strongly activates
the human apoCIII promoter activity through its binding to the
previously described proximal element CIIIB (nt 92/ 67) and thereby
mediates transactivation by the transforming growth factor- signal
transduction pathway (24, 25). Hertz et al. (23) showed that
the transcriptional suppression of apoCIII exerted by fibrates is due
to direct and indirect complementary modes of actions: 1) displacement
of HNF-4 from the element CIIIB in the apoCIII promoter mediated by
nonproductive PPAR-RXR binding (Fig. 9)
and 2) transcriptional suppression of HNF-4 levels. The former
mechanism, however, needs further analysis because Vu-Dac et
al. (44) could not confirm any significant regulation of HNF-4
gene expression in livers of animals treated with fibrates. Here we
propose an alternative or an additional mechanism for PPAR -mediated
negative regulation of apoCIII promoter by fibrates, namely, repression
by an increase in PPAR -induced Rev-erb levels (Fig. 9). Despite
exhaustive efforts we have not been able to demonstrate a direct
implication of Rev-erb in the repression by fibrates. Although
studies in animals show a clear suppression of hepatic expression of
apoCIII by treatment with fibrates, we, as well as others (66, 67),
could not observe these effects in cultured hepatocytes, most likely
because the response to fibrates is dependent on the serum used in the
culture medium (68). This paradox suggests that other factors, in
addition to PPAR and Rev-erb , should be involved in the negative
regulation by fibrates. On the other hand, treatment of rats with
dexamethasone results in a decrease of hepatic Rev-erb mRNA
levels. Interestingly, consistent with this observation, dexamethasone
increases hepatic apoCIII mRNA in mice (69) and elevates plasma
triglycerides in humans (70). It will be of interest to determine
whether glucocorticoids also increase human apoCIII expression and to investigate a putative involvement of Rev-erb .

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Model for negative regulation of apoCIII gene
transcription by fibrates in human hepatocytes. Upon activation by
fibrates, PPAR could repress apoCIII promoter by two modes of
action. In a direct mechanism (A), nonproductive binding of
PPAR-RXR heterodimers displaces HNF-4 from the element CIIIB (23) and
thereby inhibits transactivation by transforming growth factor-
signal transduction (24). Alternatively, in a multi-step process,
PPAR-RXR could bind a Rev-DR2 element in Rev-erb gene promoter
(B), and increase its expression (50). Then monomers of
Rev-erb antagonize activation by ROR 1 and repress the activity of
human apoCIII promoter (C). Moreover, upon activation of
PPAR , the negative autoregulation of Rev-erb (40) could be
diminished because of a competition between PPAR-RXR and homodimers of
Rev-erb (50).
|
|
In conclusion, our results have shown that Rev-erb specifically
inhibits human apoCIII promoter gene activity. These data underscore a
physiological role for Rev-erb in the regulation of genes involved
in triglyceride metabolism and, therefore, identify Rev-erb as a
potential pharmacological target for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank J. Kirilovsky and M. Walker for
encouragement of this work, V. I. Zannis (Boston University, MA),
T. Grand-Perret, S. Huet, and D. Grillot for scientific discussions, S. Demaria-Magny for technical assistance, and M. Sierra for critical
reading of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by a Marie Curie Fellowship of the
European Community Program Quality of Life under contract number QLK5-CT-2000-60009.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.:
33-1-69-29-60-72; Fax: 33-1-69-07-48-92; E-mail: hjcc6201@gsk.com.
§
To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 33-1-69-29-61-22;
Fax: 33-1-69-07-48-92; E-mail: jcr0226@gsk.com.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 20, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203421200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
apoAI, apoAIV, and
apoCIII, apolipoprotein AI, AIV and CIII, respectively;
HNF-4, hepatocyte nuclear factor-4;
nt, nucleotide(s);
PPAR, peroxisome
proliferator-activated receptor;
ROR, retinoic acid-related orphan
receptor;
RORE, retinoic acid-related orphan receptor response element;
RXR, retinoid X receptor;
TK, thymidine kinase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Jeppesen, J.,
Hein, H. O.,
Suadicani, P.,
and Gyntelberg, F.
(1998)
Circulation
97,
1029-1036[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Miller, M.,
Seidler, A.,
Moalemi, A.,
and Pearson, T. A.
(1998)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.
31,
1252-1257[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Assmann, G.,
Schulte, H.,
and von Eckardstein, A.
(1996)
Am. J. Cardiol.
77,
1179-1184[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Stampfer, M. J.,
Krauss, R. M., Ma, J.,
Blanche, P. J.,
Holl, L. G.,
Sacks, F. M.,
and Hennekens, C. H.
(1996)
J. Am. Med. Assoc.
276,
882-888[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Krauss, R. M.
(1998)
Am. J. Cardiol.
81,
13B-17B[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Hodis, H. N.
(1999)
Circulation
99,
2852-2854[Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Shachter, N. S.
(2001)
Curr. Opin. Lipidol.
12,
297-304[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Marcoux, C.,
Tremblay, M.,
Fredenrich, A.,
Davignon, J.,
and Cohn, J. S.
(2001)
Metabolism
50,
112-119[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Stocks, J.,
Holdsworth, G.,
and Galton, D.
(1979)
Lancet
2,
667-671[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Ginsberg, H. N., Le, N. A.,
Goldberg, I. J.,
Gibson, J. C.,
Rubinstein, A.,
Wang-Iverson, P.,
Norum, R.,
and Brown, W. V.
(1986)
J. Clin. Invest.
78,
1287-1295[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Esterbauer, H.,
Hell, E.,
Krempler, F.,
and Patsch, W.
(1999)
Clin. Chem.
45,
331-339[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Ito, Y.,
Azrolan, N.,
O'Connell, A.,
Walsh, A.,
and Breslow, J. L.
(1990)
Science
249,
790-793[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Maeda, N., Li, H.,
Lee, D.,
Oliver, P.,
Quarfordt, S. H.,
and Osada, J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
23610-23616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Aalto-Setälä, K.,
Fisher, E. A.,
Chen, X.,
Chajek-Shaul, T.,
Hayek, T.,
Zechner, R.,
Walsh, A.,
Ramakrishnan, R.,
Ginsberg, H. N.,
and Breslow, J. L.
(1992)
J. Clin. Invest.
90,
1889-1900[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
de Silva, H. V.,
Lauer, S. J.,
Wang, J.,
Simonet, W. S.,
Weisgraber, K. H.,
Mahley, R. W.,
and Taylor, J. M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
2324-2335[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Aalto-Setälä, K.,
Weinstock, P. H.,
Bisgaier, C. L., Wu, L.,
Smith, J. D.,
and Breslow, J. L.
(1996)
J. Lipid Res.
37,
1802-1811[Abstract]
|
| 17.
|
Ebara, T.,
Ramakrishnan, R.,
Steiner, G.,
and Shachter, N. S.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
99,
2672-2681[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Wang, C. S.,
McConathy, W. J.,
Kloer, H. U.,
and Alaupovic, P.
(1985)
J. Clin. Invest.
75,
384-390[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Vu-Dac, N.,
Gervois, P.,
Torra, I. P.,
Fruchart, J. C.,
Kosykh, V.,
Kooistra, T.,
Princen, H. M.,
Dallongeville, J.,
and Staels, B.
(1998)
J. Clin. Invest.
102,
625-632[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Haubenwallner, S.,
Essenburg, A. D.,
Barnett, B. C.,
Pape, M. E.,
DeMattos, R. B.,
Krause, B. R.,
Minton, L. L.,
Auerbach, B. J.,
Newton, R. S.,
Leff, T.,
and Bisgaier, C. L.
(1995)
J. Lipid Res.
36,
2541-2551[Abstract]
|
| 21.
|
Staels, B., Vu-,
Dac, N.,
Kosykh, V. A.,
Saladin, R.,
Fruchart, J. C.,
Dallongeville, J.,
and Auwerx, J.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
95,
705-712[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Winegar, D. A.,
Brown, P. J.,
Wilkison, W. O.,
Lewis, M. C.,
Ott, R. J.,
Tong, W. Q.,
Brown, H. R.,
Lehmann, J. M.,
Kliewer, S. A.,
Plunket, K. D.,
Way, J. M.,
Bodkin, N. L.,
and Hansen, B. C.
(2001)
J. Lipid Res.
42,
1543-1551[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Hertz, R.,
Bishara-Shieban, J.,
and Bar-Tana, J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13470-13475[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Zannis, V. I.,
Kan, H. Y.,
Kritis, A.,
Zanni, E. E.,
and Kardassis, D.
(2001)
Curr. Opin. Lipidol.
12,
181-207[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Ogami, K.,
Hadzopoulou-Cladaras, M.,
Cladaras, C.,
and Zannis, V. I.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
9808-9815[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Karathanasis, S. K.,
McPherson, J.,
Zannis, V. I.,
and Breslow, J. L.
(1983)
Nature
304,
371-373[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Karathanasis, S. K.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
6374-6378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Miller, N. E.
(1987)
Am. Heart J.
113,
589-597[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Castelli, W. P.,
Garrison, R. J.,
Wilson, P. W.,
Abbott, R. D.,
Kalousdian, S.,
and Kannel, W. B.
(1986)
J. Am. Med. Assoc.
256,
2835-2838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Kan, H. Y.,
Georgopoulos, S.,
and Zannis, V.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
30423-30431[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Georgopoulos, S.,
Kan, H. Y.,
Reardon-Alulis, C.,
and Zannis, V.
(2000)
Nucleic Acids Res.
28,
4919-4929[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Walsh, A.,
Azrolan, N.,
Wang, K.,
Marcigliano, A.,
O'Connell, A.,
and Breslow, J. L.
(1993)
J. Lipid Res.
34,
617-623[Abstract]
|
| 33.
|
Lazar, M. A.,
Hodin, R. A.,
Darling, D. S.,
and Chin, W. W.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
1128-1136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Miyajima, N.,
Horiuchi, R.,
Shibuya, Y.,
Fukushige, S.,
Matsubara, K.,
Toyoshima, K.,
and Yamamoto, T.
(1989)
Cell
57,
31-39[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Lazar, M. A.,
Jones, K. E.,
and Chin, W. W.
(1990)
DNA Cell Biol.
9,
77-83[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Dumas, B.,
Harding, H. P.,
Choi, H. S.,
Lehmann, K. A.,
Chung, M.,
Lazar, M. A.,
and Moore, D. D.
(1994)
Mol. Endocrinol.
8,
996-1005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Forman, B. M.,
Chen, J.,
Blumberg, B.,
Kliewer, S. A.,
Henshaw, R.,
Ong, E. S.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1994)
Mol. Endocrinol.
8,
1253-1261[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Retnakaran, R.,
Flock, G.,
and Giguère, V.
(1994)
Mol. Endocrinol.
8,
1234-1244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Bonnelye, E.,
Vanacker, J. M.,
Desbiens, X.,
Begue, A.,
Stehelin, D.,
and Laudet, V.
(1994)
Cell Growth Differ.
5,
1357-1365[Abstract]
|
| 40.
|
Adelmant, G.,
Bègue, A.,
Stéhelin, D.,
and Laudet, V.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
3553-3558[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Dussault, I.,
and Giguère, V.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
1860-1867[Abstract]
|
| 42.
|
Kassam, A.,
Capone, J. P.,
and Rachubinski, R. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
22895-22900[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Bois-Joyeux, B.,
Chauvet, C.,
Nacer-Chérif, H.,
Bergeret, W.,
Mazure, N.,
Giguère, V.,
Laudet, V.,
and Danan, J. L.
(2000)
DNA Cell Biol.
19,
589-599[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Vu-Dac, N.,
Chopin-Delannoy, S.,
Gervois, P.,
Bonnelye, E.,
Martin, G.,
Fruchart, J. C.,
Laudet, V.,
and Staels, B.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
25713-25720[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Chawla, A.,
and Lazar, M. A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
16265-16269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Burke, L.,
Downes, M.,
Carozzi, A.,
Giguère, V.,
and Muscat, G. E.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
3481-3489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Harding, H. P.,
and Lazar, M. A.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
3113-3121[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Harding, H. P.,
and Lazar, M. A.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
4791-4802[Abstract]
|
| 49.
|
Hsu, M. H.,
Palmer, C. N.,
Song, W.,
Griffin, K. J.,
and Johnson, E. F.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27988-27997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Gervois, P,
Chopin-Delannoy, S.,
Fadel, A.,
Dubois, G.,
Kosykh, V.,
Fruchart, J. C.,
Najib, J.,
Laudet, V.,
and Staels, B.
(1999)
Mol. Endocrinol.
13,
400-409[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Raspé, E.,
Duez, H.,
Gervois, P.,
Fiévet, C.,
Fruchart, J. C.,
Besnard, S.,
Mariani, J.,
Tedgui, A.,
and Staels, B.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
2865-2871[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Hamilton, B. A.,
Frankel, W. N.,
Kerrebrock, A. W.,
Hawkins, T. L.,
FitzHugh, W.,
Kusumi, K.,
Russell, L. B.,
Mueller, K. L.,
van Berkel, V.,
Birren, B. W.,
Kruglyak, L.,
and Lander, E. S.
(1996)
Nature
379,
736-739[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
McKnight, S. L.
(1982)
Cell
31,
355-365[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Rodríguez, J. C.,
Gil-Gómez, G.,
Hegardt, F. G.,
and Haro, D.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
18767-18772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Januzzi, J. L.,
Azrolan, N.,
O'Connell, A.,
Aalto-Setälä, K.,
and Breslow, J. L.
(1992)
Genomics
14,
1081-1088[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Paszty, C.,
Maeda, N.,
Verstuyft, J.,
and Rubin, E. M.
(1994)
J. Clin. Invest.
94,
899-903[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Forte, T. M.,
and McCall, M. R.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Lipidol.
5,
354-364[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 58.
|
Haddad, I. A.,
Ordovas, J. M.,
Fitzpatrick, T.,
and Karathanasis, S. K.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
13268-13277[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
|
Duez, H. M.,
Mansén, A.,
Fruchart, J. C.,
Vennström, B.,
Fiévet, C.,
and Staels, B.
(1998)
Circulation
98,
I449-I450
|
| 60.
|
Renaud, J. P.,
Harris, J. M.,
Downes, M.,
Burke, L. J.,
and Muscat, G. E.
(2000)
Mol. Endocrinol.
14,
700-717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 61.
|
Escriva, H.,
Safi, R.,
Hänni, C.,
Langlois, M. C.,
Saumitou-Laprade, P.,
Stehelin, D.,
Capron, A.,
Pierce, R.,
and Laudet, V.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
6803-6808[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 62.
|
Sauvé, F.,
McBroom, L. D.,
Gallant, J.,
Moraitis, A. N.,
Labrie, F.,
and Giguère, V.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
343-353[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 63.
|
Torra, I. P.,
Tsibulsky, V.,
Delaunay, F.,
Saladin, R.,
Laudet, V.,
Fruchart, J. C.,
Kosykh, V.,
and Staels, B.
(2000)
Endocrinology
141,
3799-3806[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 64.
|
Peters, J. M.,
Hennuyer, N.,
Staels, B.,
Fruchart, J. C.,
Fievet, C.,
Gonzalez, F. J.,
and Auwerx, J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27307-27312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 65.
|
Hayhurst, G. P.,
Lee, Y. H.,
Lambert, G.,
Ward, J. M.,
and Gonzalez, F. J.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
1393-1403[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 66.
|
Hsu, M. H.,
Savas, U.,
Griffin, K. J.,
and Johnson, E. F.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
27950-27958[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 67.
|
Guo, Q.,
Wang, P. R.,
Milot, D. P.,
Ippolito, M. C.,
Hernandez, M.,
Burton, C. A.,
Wright, S. D.,
and Chao, Y.
(2001)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1533,
220-232[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 68.
|
Clavey, V.,
Copin, C.,
Mariotte, M. C.,
Baugé, E.,
Chinetti, G.,
Fruchart, J.,
Fruchart, J. C.,
Dallongeville, J.,
and Staels, B.
(1999)
Cell. Physiol. Biochem.
9,
139-149[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 69.
|
Lawrence, J. W.,
Wollenberg, G. K.,
Frank, J. D.,
and DeLuca, J. G.
(2001)
Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
170,
113-123[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 70.
|
Stone, N. J.
(1994)
Med. Clin. North Am.
78,
117-141[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Fontaine, E. Rigamonti, B. Pourcet, H. Duez, C. Duhem, J.-C. Fruchart, G. Chinetti-Gbaguidi, and B. Staels
The Nuclear Receptor Rev-erb{alpha} Is a Liver X Receptor (LXR) Target Gene Driving a Negative Feedback Loop on Select LXR-Induced Pathways in Human Macrophages
Mol. Endocrinol.,
August 1, 2008;
22(8):
1797 - 1811.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kakizawa, S.-i. Nishio, G. Triqueneaux, S. Bertrand, J. Rambaud, and V. Laudet
Two differentially active alternative promoters control the expression of the zebrafish orphan nuclear receptor gene Rev-erb{alpha}
J. Mol. Endocrinol.,
May 1, 2007;
38(5):
555 - 568.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Benoit, A. Cooney, V. Giguere, H. Ingraham, M. Lazar, G. Muscat, T. Perlmann, J.-P. Renaud, J. Schwabe, F. Sladek, et al.
International Union of Pharmacology. LXVI. Orphan Nuclear Receptors
Pharmacol. Rev.,
December 1, 2006;
58(4):
798 - 836.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Anzulovich, A. Mir, M. Brewer, G. Ferreyra, C. Vinson, and R. Baler
Elovl3: a model gene to dissect homeostatic links between the circadian clock and nutritional status
J. Lipid Res.,
December 1, 2006;
47(12):
2690 - 2700.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Wang, L. Yin, and M. A. Lazar
The Orphan Nuclear Receptor Rev-erb{alpha} Regulates Circadian Expression of Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor Type 1
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 10, 2006;
281(45):
33842 - 33848.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. A. Ruiz-Narvaez, Y. Yang, Y. Nakanishi, J. Kirchdorfer, and H. Campos
APOC3/A5 haplotypes, lipid levels, and risk of myocardial infarction in the Central Valley of Costa Rica
J. Lipid Res.,
December 1, 2005;
46(12):
2605 - 2613.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Prieur, T. Huby, H. Coste, F. G. Schaap, M. J. Chapman, and J. C. Rodriguez
Thyroid Hormone Regulates the Hypotriglyceridemic Gene APOA5
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 29, 2005;
280(30):
27533 - 27543.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Yin and M. A. Lazar
The Orphan Nuclear Receptor Rev-erb{alpha} Recruits the N-CoR/Histone Deacetylase 3 Corepressor to Regulate the Circadian Bmal1 Gene
Mol. Endocrinol.,
June 1, 2005;
19(6):
1452 - 1459.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. N. Ramakrishnan, P. Lau, L. J. Burke, and G. E. O. Muscat
Rev-erb{beta} Regulates the Expression of Genes Involved in Lipid Absorption in Skeletal Muscle Cells: EVIDENCE FOR CROSS-TALK BETWEEN ORPHAN NUCLEAR RECEPTORS AND MYOKINES
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 11, 2005;
280(10):
8651 - 8659.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Cheng, H. Khanna, E. C.T. Oh, D. Hicks, K. P. Mitton, and A. Swaroop
Photoreceptor-specific nuclear receptor NR2E3 functions as a transcriptional activator in rod photoreceptors
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
August 1, 2004;
13(15):
1563 - 1575.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Prieur, H. Coste, and J. C. Rodriguez
The Human Apolipoprotein AV Gene Is Regulated by Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor-{alpha} and Contains a Novel Farnesoid X-activated Receptor Response Element
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 3, 2003;
278(28):
25468 - 25480.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Vu-Dac, P. Gervois, H. Jakel, M. Nowak, E. Bauge, H. Dehondt, B. Staels, L. A. Pennacchio, E. M. Rubin, J. Fruchart-Najib, et al.
Apolipoprotein A5, a Crucial Determinant of Plasma Triglyceride Levels, Is Highly Responsive to Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor alpha Activators
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 9, 2003;
278(20):
17982 - 17985.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Raspe, H. Duez, A. Mansen, C. Fontaine, C. Fievet, J.-C. Fruchart, B. Vennstrom, and B. Staels
Identification of Rev-erb{alpha} as a physiological repressor of apoC-III gene transcription
J. Lipid Res.,
December 1, 2002;
43(12):
2172 - 2179.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|