|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M203415200 on May 14, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 30, 27232-27239, July 26, 2002
Low Molecular Weight Peptides Restore the Procoagulant
Activity of Factor VIII in the Presence of the Potent Inhibitor
Antibody ESH8*
Sylvie
Villard,
Dominique
Piquer,
Sanjee
Raut ,
Jean-Paul
Léonetti,
Jean-Marie
Saint-Remy§, and
Claude
Granier¶
From the Unité Mixte de Recherche, CNRS 5094, Faculté
de Pharmacie, BP 14491, 34093 Montpellier, France,
the Division of Haematology, National Institute for
Biological Standards and Control, Blanche Lane, South Mimms, Potters
Bar, Hertfordshire EN6 3QG, United Kingdom, and the § Center
for Molecular and Vascular Biology, University of Leuven,
3000 Leuven, Belgium
Received for publication, April 9, 2002, and in revised form, May 14, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Following repeated administration of factor VIII
(FVIII), a significant number of hemophilia A patients develop
antibodies (Abs), inhibiting the procoagulant activity of infused
FVIII. We have designed an approach based on the blocking of the
deleterious activity of these Abs by peptide decoys mimicking the
anti-FVIII Ab epitopes. Here, the well characterized inhibitory
monoclonal Ab ESH8 served as a model. Several phage peptide
libraries were screened for specific binding to ESH8. Seven constrained
dodecapeptide sequences were obtained. Six sequences carried the
consensus motif, hydrophobic-(Y/F)GKTXL. This motif
showed a certain similarity with the
2231QVDFQKTMKV2240 sequence of the
C2 domain. In the seventh sequence, YCNPSIGDKNCR, the
residues GDKN are similar to the sequence
2267DGHQ2270. Upon inspection of the
C2 domain crystallographic structure, the two stretches
QVDFQKTMKV and DGHQ appeared close together in space and might
constitute a discontinuous epitope. Corresponding synthetic peptides
were able to inhibit the binding of ESH8 to FVIII in a specific and
dose-dependent manner. Moreover, the ability of the
selected peptides to neutralize the inhibitory activity of ESH8 was
demonstrated in functional tests as well as in vivo in a murine model of hemophilia A. This study demonstrates the potential of this approach to neutralize the activity of potent inhibitory Abs.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Coagulation defects attributed to the absence or dysfunction of
blood coagulation factor VIII
(FVIII)1 are observed in
0.01-0.02% of the male population (1). This recessive
X-linked bleeding disorder is known as hemophilia A. The
adequate treatment of this disease relies on infusions of human FVIII
concentrates. However, a serious treatment complication is the
development of a humoral immune response to FVIII in ~25% of
patients with hemophilia A. These antibodies (Abs), also called inhibitors, block the FVIII procoagulant activity and complicate seriously the medical care of the patients by precluding further FVIII
injections (2). This immune response is not only polyclonal but also
heterogeneous in its specificity (3). Nevertheless, epitope mapping
studies have shown that inhibitors recognize restricted binding sites,
predominantly on the A2, C2, and A3
domains on the FVIII molecule (4). The incidence of inhibitor
occurrence in hemophilia A patients is difficult to estimate and can
vary from 18 to 28% (5). This variation can be the result of a number of parameters, which needs to be considered, including quantitative criteria of inhibitor dosages, the elapsed time from the first apparition, the origin, the viral inactivation procedure applied, the
purity of the administered product, and, of course, the patient.
A number of different therapeutic approaches have been developed to
circumvent complications arising from inhibitors, such as the
administration of porcine FVIII, which is less antigenic than its human
counterpart (6), the administration of activated human FVII to bypass
the intrinsic pathway (7), and the activation of the coagulation
cascade by using prothrombin complex concentrates (8). Although these
treatments have greatly improved the medical management of the disease,
the ultimate goal for therapy, the specific neutralization of the
immune response to FVIII, has not yet been achieved. As this
complication of hemophilia A is largely antibody-mediated, we have
applied a novel approach based on blocking the deleterious activity of
these Abs by low molecular weight peptide decoys mimicking epitopes
recognized by anti-FVIII Abs with a view to restore a normal
procoagulant activity.
For the selection of peptide decoys, an approach based on phage peptide
display was adopted (9). This technology has already been successfully
applied in the area of thrombosis and hemostasis (10). In particular, a
number of researchers have used phages displaying single chain variable
fragment to study the molecular properties and functional
characteristics of human anti-FVIII Abs (11). Nord et al.
(12) used phages displaying ligands, which were able to bind to human
FVIII to isolate them by affinity chromatography. However, to our
knowledge, the phage peptide display technique has never been used to
isolate peptides that are able to neutralize the inhibitory activity of
anti-FVIII Abs. This methodology based on the display of random
peptides fused to the minor (pIII) or major (pVIII) coat proteins of
filamentous phages allows the identification of new molecules that
influence protein-protein interactions as, for example, the
antigen-antibody interaction. Such libraries allow to isolate
mimotopes, i.e. peptides mimicking the binding properties of
the natural antigen but with no apparent sequence homology with
the antigen (13). The mimicking potential of the peptides is broad as
mimotopes of linear, conformational, and even non-proteinaceous
epitopes have been reported (14).
To evaluate the possibility of disrupting the interaction between the
FVIII molecule and its inhibitors by peptide decoys to restore the
procoagulant activity of FVIII, a model system was investigated,
namely, the well characterized murine inhibitor mAb ESH8 (15). We used
this mAb to screen four different libraries displaying foreign peptides
at the surface of the major coat protein, pVIII. We present here
evidence both in vitro and in vivo that mimotopes
of the C2 domain can efficiently neutralize the inhibitory activity of mAb ESH8 and as such could represent an efficient method
for the treatment of hemophilia A patients with inhibitory antibodies.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Screening the Phage Library with mAb ESH8--
The different M13
phage libraries used expressing 15-mer (X15),
30-mer (X30), 17-mer including a fixed cysteine
residue (XCX15), and 12-mer peptides
including two fixed cysteine residues
(XCX8CX,) were all
described by Bonnycastle et al. (16) and were obtained from
Dr. J. Scott (Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada). MAb ESH8 was obtained from American Diagnostica Inc. (Greenwich, CT) and has been characterized previously (15). Pannings were performed as described by Smith (9). mAb ESH8 was coated
onto a polystyrene Petri dish (10 × 1.5 cm, Falcon 1029)
overnight at 4 °C at a concentration of 5 µg/ml for the first two
pannings and a concentration of 0.5 µg/ml for the last panning in 100 mM NaHCO3, pH 8.6, on a shaking platform. For
the first panning, 5 × 1012 transducting units of
each library were incubated with the adsorbed mAb. After incubation,
unbound phages were washed, and bound phages were removed by acidic
elution. Eluted phages were then used to infect Escherichia
coli K91 cells. After three rounds of enrichment, individual phage
clones were isolated and further analyzed (17).
Phage Binding Analysis by ELISA--
ELISA microtiter plates
were coated with 0.5 µg/ml ESH8 or control mAbs in 100 mM
NaHCO3, pH 8.6, overnight at 4 °C. Plates were washed
with PBS, 0.1% Tween 20 (v/v) and then blocked with PBS, 0.1% Tween
20, 2% nonfat dried milk (w/v) for 1 h at 37 °C. A mixture of
50 µl of a phage dilution and 50 µl of blocking buffer then was
added to each well. Phage particles were incubated for 2 h at
37 °C. Binding was detected using a peroxidase-conjugated anti-M13
antibody (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) diluted 1:3000 in blocking
buffer. After 1 h at 37 °C and washing, color was developed by
adding the peroxidase substrate. The resulting absorbance was measured
at 450 nm with an automated microtiter plate reader (Dynatech MR 5000).
Competitive ELISA with Phages--
The buffers used were the
same as those described above. ELISA plates were coated with 0.5 µg/ml ESH8 overnight at 4 °C and then washed and blocked for
1 h at 37 °C. Phages at 1012 transducting units/ml
and FVIII at increasing concentrations were incubated together for
2 h at 37 °C. For the control, the phages were incubated with
an irrelevant protein, bovine serum albumin. The binding of the phages
was detected by a peroxidase-conjugated anti-M13 antibody incubated
1 h at 37 °C. The resulting absorbance was measured at 450 nm
as described above.
Sequence Identification--
For each phage, ~9 µg of
single-stranded DNA was purified using the QIA prep Spin M13 protocol
(Qiagen). Sequencing reactions were done by the dideoxy chain
termination method (18) using the Abi Prism kit (PE Applied Biosystems)
with ABI PRISM 377 (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). The primer 5'-TCGGCAAGC
TCTTTTAGG-3' was used for annealing.
Synthesis and Immunoassay of Cellulose-bound Peptides--
The
different phage sequences as well as overlapping peptides of 15 and 25 amino acids frameshifted by one residue representing the C2
domain of FVIII were prepared by the Spot technique. The general
protocol has been described previously (19). The membranes were
obtained from Intavis (Bergish Gladbach, Germany). Fmoc amino acids and N-hydroxybenzotriazole were obtained from
Novabiochem. An ASP222 robot (Abimed) was used for the coupling steps.
All of the peptides were acetylated at their N terminus. After the peptide sequences had been assembled, the side-chain protecting groups
were removed by trifluoroacetic acid treatment. The set of
membrane-bound peptides was probed by incubation with ESH8 (5 µg/ml).
Its binding to peptides was detected by using an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-mouse antibody (Sigma) diluted 1:1000 with
its substrate, BCIP-MTT (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, Sigma),
which gives a blue precipitate on peptide spots recognized by ESH8. A
plot of spot intensities was obtained with the Scion Image software
after scanning the membrane. The membrane was further treated to
remove precipitated dye and bound antibodies and was reused (19).
Synthesis of Soluble Peptides--
All of the soluble peptides
were synthesized on an Abimed AMS422 synthesizer by Fmoc chemistry
(20). Peptides were deprotected and released from the resin by
trifluoroacetic acid treatment in the presence of appropriate
scavengers. Peptides were lyophilized, and their purity assessed by
reverse phase high pressure liquid chromatography and mass
spectrometry. When necessary, peptides were purified by high pressure
liquid chromatography to reach a purity greater than 90%.
Competitive ELISA Assay with Synthetic Peptides Derived from
Phages--
ESH8 (0.05 µg/ml) was preincubated in PBS-0.1% Tween
20, 2% nonfat dried milk (w/v) with synthetic peptides at
increasing concentrations overnight at 4 °C. ELISA plates
were coated with 1 µg/ml recombinant FVIII overnight at 4 °C in
PBS. Plates were washed and blocked for 1 h at 37 °C. The
mixture of ESH8 and synthetic peptides was incubated 2 h at
37 °C. mAb binding was revealed by adding a peroxidase-conjugated
anti-mouse IgG antibody (Sigma) diluted 1:3000 for 1 h at
37 °C. The resulting absorbance was measured at 490 nm after the
addition of 50 µl of 4 N H2SO4.
The reference absorbance was obtained with the incubation of ESH8 alone.
Modified Bethesda Assay--
This assay was based on the
Bethesda assay (21) with the Nijmegen modification. ESH8 at a fixed
concentration giving 50% FVIII activity inhibition was incubated
overnight at 4 °C with the different peptides at various
concentrations diluted with 0.05 M imidazole buffer, pH
7.3. Equal volumes (250 µl) of this sample and normal plasma buffered
with 0.1 M imidazole, pH 7.4, were mixed together and
incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. One-stage FVIII potency assays were
then carried out. The inhibitory activity was read in Bethesda
unit/ml from a semilogarithmic plot representing the correlation
between residual FVIII activity (logarithmic) and inhibitor activity
(linear). A minimum of three dilutions was made for each condition.
Thrombin Generation Test--
This assay is a modification of
that carried out by Pitney and Dacie (22). Normal platelet-poor plasma
was used as substrate. 375 µl of this normal platelet-poor plasma
substrate was added to a 100-µl preincubated solution of ESH8 (175 nM) mixed with either Tris borate saline buffer (control)
or with a 1000 molar excess of the different peptides. This mixture was
incubated at 37 °C for 20 min prior to the addition of 80 µl of
FIXa (14 nM) and further incubated for 1.5 min at 37 °C.
To this mixture, 400 µl of phospholipid (3.1 µg/ml) and 400 µl of
CaCl2 (7.8 mM) were then added to start the
reaction. At different time intervals, 50-µl aliquots were then
removed and placed in 200 µl of fibrinogen in cups on a Deca
coagulometer (Diagnostic Grifols S.A., Barcelona, Spain). The clotting
times were then converted into thrombin units by use of a -thrombin
standard curve. The peak thrombin level and the time taken to reach
half-maximal (t1/2max) coagulation were
deduced from the thrombin generation curves.
Peptide Stability--
The peptides were incubated for 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 24 h at 37 °C at 300 µM in cell
culture medium containing 10% fetal calf serum. Following
incubation, the samples (150 µl) were centrifuged for 8 min at 11,000 rpm through an ultrafiltration membrane (10 kDa, Amicon Microcon) to
remove serum proteins. 100 µl aliquots of the filtrate were then
analyzed by reverse phase-high pressure liquid chromatography and quantified.
In Vivo Experiments--
The FVIII knock-out mice used
here were as described previously (23-25). All of the mice were used
in groups of three individuals. 0.5 IU of human FVIII (Kogenate, Bayer
Inc., Berkeley, CA) diluted to 100 µl in physiological medium was
injected in the tail vein. A blood sample obtained by cardiac puncture
after 15 min was taken, and the concentration of FVIII was evaluated in
a chromogenic assay (Dade Behring). A group of mice was injected in the
tail with 0.25 µg of ESH8 followed 30 min later by an injection of 0.5 IU of FVIII. Preliminary experiments had demonstrated that this
amount of ESH8 was sufficient to inhibit 80% FVIII activity. Lastly,
ESH8 was preincubated overnight at 4 °C with 1 mg of peptide 46 or
an irrelevant peptide before injection in the tail vein, and the
residual FVIII activity was determined as described above.
 |
RESULTS |
Selection of Phages Displaying Peptides Recognized by mAb
ESH8--
To identify peptide binding to mAb ESH8, we screened four
different phage libraries, two of which expressed linear peptides of
either 15 (X15) or 30 amino acids
(X30), whereas the other two phage libraries
displayed peptides including either one or two fixed cysteines and
whose sizes were 17 (XCX15) or 12 amino acids (XCX8CX).
These random peptides are fused to the pVIII coat protein of
filamentous phage. A significant enrichment for phage binding to the
target Ab was obtained after three rounds of panning on the immobilized
mAb ESH8. Three hundred phage clones were randomly picked from the
third round of selection and were checked by ELISA for their ability to
bind mAb ESH8. The specificity of the signal was tested by evaluating
their reactivity on mAb ESH4 (15), another anti-C2 mAb, or
an anti-Troponin I mAb of the same isotype, mAb 11E12 (26). Thirty
positive clones giving ELISA signals at least four times higher than
background were further characterized. All of them bound to mAb ESH8 in
a dose-dependent manner and in a specific way, because none
of them cross-reacted with each of the control mAbs. The results
obtained with the most reactive phage clone are shown in Fig.
1A. This phage was further
used in a competition experiment with FVIII (Fig. 1B). FVIII
competed with the phage for mAb ESH8 binding in a
dose-dependent manner with a IC50 of 4 µg/ml
at 1011 phages/ml. Reciprocally, the clone was able to
inhibit FVIII binding to mAb ESH8. However, because of limitation in
the available quantity of phages, no complete inhibition curve could be
obtained (data not shown). Taken together, these results show that
phage peptides specifically recognizing mAb ESH8 have been
obtained.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Binding and specificity of the most reactive
phage clone selected on mAb ESH8. A, the target mAb
ESH8 and two control mAbs, ESH4, another anti-C2 domain
mAb, and 11E12, an irrelevant Ab of the same isotype, were coated onto
microtitration plates. The binding of the phage clone on ESH8 ( ), on
ESH4 ( ), and on 11E12 ( ) was detected by an anti-M13 antibody.
B, mAb ESH8 was coated onto microtitration plates. The
binding of the most reactive phage to mAb ESH8 was inhibited by
increasing concentrations of FVIII ( ) or an irrelevant protein,
bovine serum albumin (BSA) ( ). Phage binding was detected
as described above.
|
|
Sequence Determination and Comparison--
The phage DNA coding
for foreign peptide was sequenced. The deduced peptide sequences are
shown in Table I. A sequence
analysis revealed striking features. Despite exhaustive screening of
four phage peptide libraries, all of the selected peptides originated only from the dodecapeptide cysteine-constrained library
(XCX8CX), suggesting that
both the primary sequence and the conformational context in which the
sequence is presented are critical for binding. From the thirty
selected clones, only seven distinct sequences were obtained with six
peptides sharing the consensus motif GKTXL. These
four invariant amino acids suggested that they might be important for
binding either by providing residues contacting mAb ESH8 or by
participating in the appropriate peptide folding. A closer inspection
of the six related sequences revealed that the second position in the
loop was exclusively occupied by a hydrophobic residue, a valine (3 times), a threonine (2 times), or a leucine (1 time). The third
position in the loop corresponded to two aromatic residues, tyrosine or
phenylalanine. Consequently, the final consensus motif could be the
following:
XCX(V/T/L)(Y/F)GKTXLCX with
X being any amino acids. The seventh sequence (YCNPSIGDKNCR, peptide 73) is totally distinct from the others. To assess whether the
selected peptides could still be recognized by mAb ESH8 out of phage
context, they were synthesized on a cellulose membrane by the Spot
technique. All of the sequences were recognized by mAb ESH8, suggesting
that the binding activity was an intrinsic property of the peptide
(Fig. 2A). In this format, the
unique sequence, YCNPSIGDKNCR (peptide 73), as well as the sequences ECIVYGKTALCT (peptide 46) and QCQTFGKTMLCT (peptide 47) were the most
reactive.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Sequences of peptides isolated after screening of phage libraries
The two cysteine residues involved in the disulfide bridge are shown in
italics and the consensus motif is shown in boldface.
|
|

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Reactivity of ESH8 with the selected peptides
presented out of the phage. A, peptides
synthesized by the Spot method were probed for reactivity with ESH8.
The spot numbers correspond to the peptide sequences mentioned in Table
I. B, substitution study of each residue of the peptide 46 was also evaluated. Each residue was changed into each one of the 19 amino acids, and these peptides were tested for reactivity with ESH8.
Black boxes, 80-100% of the parent peptide reactivity;
gray boxes, 50-79% of the parent peptide reactivity;
white boxes, <50% of the parent peptide reactivity;
ND, not determined.
|
|
Localization of Mimotopes within the C2 Domain
Sequence--
To identify peptide residues critical for binding to mAb
ESH8, a mutational analysis based on the Spot technique was performed. A set of peptides was generated in which each residue of the lead sequence was replaced in turn by each one of the other nineteen naturally occurring amino acids. Fig. 2B shows the results
on the analysis conducted on peptide 46, ECIVYGKTALCT. The four
conserved residues, Gly, Lys, Thr, and Leu, of the consensus
motif appeared important functionally and/or structurally as any
substitution totally abrogated the binding. Similarly, the substitution
of the two cysteines by two alanines or serines resulted in a complete loss of reactivity, underlying the possible importance of the disulfide
bridge for binding. With regards to the second position, only the amino
acid with hydrophobic properties (Ile, Leu, Val, Met, Trp, Tyr, and
Thr) was tolerated, and a phenyl functionality at the third position
was crucial because no substitution even by tryptophan was allowed. The
same reactivity profile was obtained with the five other related
sequences (data not shown). However, the same study conducted on the
sequence YCNPSIGDKNCR (peptide 73) showed that the critical amino acids
were isoleucine, glycine, aspartic acid, lysine, and the last
asparagine residue as well as the two cysteines (data not shown). The
sequence alignment between the C2 domain of FVIII and the
consensus motif indicated a putative three residue homology
(2234FKT2237) in the sequence QVDFQKTMKV
(residues 2231-2240) of the C2 domain (Table I). By
inspecting the three-dimensional structure of the C2 domain
(27), these three residues appeared to belong to an exposed loop, which
faces residues 2267DGHQ2270 (Fig.
3A). On the other hand,
although peptide 73 presented no apparent homology with the FVIII
sequence, we observed possible similarities between its sequence,
YCNPSIGDKNCR, and the sequence 2267DGHQ2270 of
the C2 domain. The aspartic acid and the glycine residues were present in both of them. His2269 can be replaced by
conservative substitution with lysine and Gln2270 with
asparagine. Therefore, it is possible that peptide 73 functionally mimicked the region 2267DGHQ2270 of FVIII, a
region that is close to residues 2234FKT2237 in
the three-dimensional structure of the C2 domain (Fig.
3B). We postulate that the mAb ESH8 epitope is discontinuous
and made up of two antigenic determinants represented by the two
selected sequences (Fig. 3B). Another observation
strengthens this hypothesis. Epitope mapping studies using overlapping
15-mer peptides covering the whole sequence of the C2
domain gave no positive result, suggesting that mAb ESH8 recognized a
conformational epitope (data not shown). However, when 25-mer peptides
were used instead, an epitope with two components was uncovered,
i.e. EFLISSSQDGHQWTLFFQNGK (residues 2259-2279) and KEWLQVDFQKTMKVT (residues 2227-2241)
(Fig. 3A). Each one of these components contained the
regions (underlined) we postulated as constituting the mAb ESH8
epitope.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Localization of the mAb ESH8
epitope on the C2 domain. Representation of the
2259EFLISSSQDGHQWTLFFQNGK2279 sequence,
the epitope identified by Scandella et al. (15)
(yellow), and the two component epitopes deduced
from phage display, 2267DGHQ2270 and
2231QVDFQKTMKV2240 (red).
|
|
Inhibition of the Interaction between mAb ESH8 and FVIII in Vitro
and in Functional Assays--
The seven sequences were chemically
synthesized in a soluble form and tested for their ability to inhibit
the interaction of mAb ESH8 with FVIII in ELISA. To this end, the
binding of mAb ESH8 to FVIII was examined in the presence of increasing
amounts of specific or unrelated peptides. As shown in Fig.
4A, the different peptides
derived from the phage display selection efficiently inhibited the
binding of mAb ESH8 to FVIII in a dose-dependent manner,
which was not the case for an irrelevant peptide. At a concentration of
~10 µM, all of the six peptides were able to inhibit
50% mAb ESH8 binding, and complete inhibition was obtained at a
concentration higher than 100 µM. Therefore, these
results suggest that the different peptides derived from the phage
display selection mimicked the C2 domain for its binding
properties to mAb ESH8.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Capacity of the peptides to neutralize the
inhibitory activity of ESH8. A, inhibition of
the binding of ESH8 to FVIII by increasing concentrations of peptides
in ELISA. FVIII was coated onto microtitration plates, and the binding
of ESH8 was inhibited by increasing concentrations of either specific
peptides (45, 46, 47, 48, 72, and 73) or an irrelevant one.
B, neutralization of the inhibitory activity of ESH8 by
increasing concentrations of peptides in Bethesda test. The
concentration of ESH8 was that giving 50% FVIII activity
inhibition.
|
|
The capacity of peptides to neutralize the inhibitory activity of mAb
ESH8 was measured in two different functional tests. First, in a
modified Bethesda assay (21) in which mAb ESH8 was used at a
concentration resulting in 50% inhibition of FVIII cofactor activity,
the peptides were all able to neutralize mAb ESH8 inhibitory activity
in a dose-dependent manner with complete neutralization achieved by peptides 46 and 47 when used in a 106 molar
excess, corresponding to a final concentration of 200 µM, over mAb ESH8 (Fig. 4B). The neutralization was specific,
because an irrelevant peptide had no measurable activity in the same
range of concentrations (Fig. 4B). The peptides by
themselves had a minimal effect in the assay (data not shown).
Interestingly, when the test was repeated with a concentration of mAb
ESH8 giving 70% inhibition of FVIII activity, complete neutralization
was still reached by using a 106 molar excess of peptides
46 and 47.
These peptide properties were confirmed in a second functional assay
based on thrombin generation (TG). Fig. 5
shows the TG profiles of normal platelet-poor plasma in the absence and
presence of mAb ESH8. A lag phase was observed in the presence of mAb
ESH8, although the peak thrombin produced remained very similar to the profile obtained in absence of mAb ESH8. The inhibition of FVIII by mAb
ESH8 gave a t1/2max value of 220 s
compared with the t1/2max value of
116 s for normal plasma alone (Fig. 5). When this test was
repeated with mAb ESH8 that had been preincubated with the various
peptides, the inhibition of the TG profile was corrected by all of the
peptides with the exception of the control peptide, which showed only a
slight correction of the lag phase. This finding suggests that
neutralization of the inhibitory activity of mAb ESH8 by peptides 45, 46, 47, and 48 is indeed of physiological relevance.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Efficiency of the peptides in a thrombin
generation assay. A, comparison of thrombin generation
profiles of normal platelet-poor plasma (NPPP) in the
presence of buffer ( ), ESH8 alone ( ), ESH8 pre-incubated with
peptide 47 ( ), or with a control peptide ( ). B,
summary of the neutralizing effects of the different peptides on ESH8
inhibition of FVIII expressed as TG parameters,
t1/2max (seconds), and peak
thrombin (IU/ml).
|
|
Efficiency of the Peptide in Vivo--
Based on these in
vitro experiments, a potential application of such peptides for
neutralizing FVIII inhibitor Abs in vivo was considered. We
first assessed the stability of peptides 46 and 73 upon incubation in
10% fetal calf serum at 37 °C for various lengths of time using
high pressure liquid chromatography. No degradation was observed for
either peptide after 2 h of incubation, in contrast with the fate
of a linear peptide that was already 50% degraded (data not shown).
Over a longer period of time (24 h), peptide 73 was shown to be
particularly resistant with only 50% degradation, whereas 84% peptide
46 was degraded. Under the same experimental conditions, the linear
peptide was fully degraded.
These results encouraged us to examine whether or not such peptides
could neutralize the FVIII inhibitory activity of mAb ESH8 in an
in vivo model. We used FVIII-deficient mice obtained by
targeted disruption of exon 16 of the FVIII gene (23,
24). An injection of 0.5 IU of human FVIII in the tail vein resulted in
a FVIII level of 0.3 IU/ml after 10 min as measured by a chromogenic assay. 2 groups of 3 mice were pretreated with either 0.25 µg of mAb
ESH8 or a mixture of 0.25 µg of mAb ESH8 with 1 mg of peptide 46 or
control peptide preincubated overnight at 4 °C (this represents a
2 × 105 molar excess of the peptide). Thirty minutes
later, all of the mice were reconstituted with 0.5 IU of human FVIII.
From Fig. 6, it can be seen that
pretreatment with mAb ESH8 alone reduces FVIII activity by 88%,
whereas mice treated with the mAb ESH8-peptide mixture had only a 58%
reduction, indicating that peptide 46 exerted some neutralizing
activity on mAb ESH8-mediated FVIII inhibition. Such neutralization was
specific for peptide 46, because a control peptide was unable to
restore FVIII activity.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Capacity of the peptide 46 to neutralize the
inhibitory activity of ESH8 in a murine model of hemophilia A. Human FVIII was injected in the tail vein of mice to obtain a
detectable level by chromogenic assay. This circulating level was
evaluated in the absence or in the presence of ESH8, administered
alone, or preincubated with peptide 46 or control peptide.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
A significant proportion of hemophilia A patients develops
inhibitor Abs following repeated FVIII administration (28). Such Abs
inhibit the procoagulant activity of FVIII and present a serious clinical complication in that they preclude FVIII replacement therapy.
Several treatments have been attempted to overcome this problem, but
these are therapeutically or economically not suitable, emphasizing the
need to evaluate new approaches. One such attempt could be to prevent
FVIII binding to the inhibitor Abs using epitope-mimicking peptides. By
combining to the variable parts of these Abs, such peptides would
neutralize the inhibitory capacity of anti-FVIII Abs. In an attempt to
evaluate the feasibility of this approach, we chose an
anti-C2 antibody, mAb ESH8, which was used to identify peptides that were able to divert mAb ESH8 from FVIII. The choice for
mAb ESH8 was motivated by several criteria. First, this mAb is well
characterized (15, 29, 30) and is used as reference inhibitor Ab by a
number of research teams. Second, its epitope is mapped to residues
2248-2285 on the C2 domain of FVIII, a domain frequently
recognized by human anti-FVIII Abs (31). Third, it is an effective high
titer inhibitor Ab (6300 Bethesda unit/mg) (15). Finally, as
monoclonal and human Abs that map to C2 epitope 2218-2307,
its inhibition mechanism is based on the slow release of
thrombin-cleaved FVIII from von Willebrand factor, which reduces FVIII binding to phospholipids (29). The peptides binding to mAb ESH8
were selected by the phage display technology, a method allowing the
identification of peptides with significant mimicry potential for a
broad spectrum of applications (14). We have identified from a mixture
of several library peptides, two that are able to functionally mimic
mAb ESH8 epitope. By combining the information obtained from the
consensus motifs of the two sequences with that derived from the
three-dimensional structure of the C2 domain (27), we were
able to identify two distinct regions of the C2 domain
likely to be involved in the interaction with mAb ESH8. The two ligand
peptides are postulated to mimic non-consecutive solvent-exposed
stretches brought together in the three-dimensional structure of the
C2 domain and constituting a discontinuous epitope for mAb
ESH8. One of the two components (2267DGHQ2270)
belongs to a region that had already been described by Scandella et al. (15). They performed an epitope mapping
using truncated forms of recombinant C2 domain and
identified a region encompassing residues 2248-2285 as the putative
mAb ESH8 epitope. The second epitopic component (residues belonging to
the fragment 2227-2241) was identified in this study. mAb ESH8 was
found to have some affinity for each individual peptide sequence. The
two unrelated and separated peptides were each able to block in an
efficient and specific manner the in vitro binding of mAb
ESH8 to FVIII. The simultaneous addition of the two peptides improved
the inhibition (data not shown). An inspection of the crystallographic
structure of the C2 domain (27) indicates that the two
parts of the epitope are in fact spatially close together (7.3 Å) and
may form a coherent epitope. Our data indicate that the two
contributing parts are equally involved in mAb ESH8 recognition.
Scandella et al. (15) carried out the analysis using the
N-terminal truncated C2 domain in which the second
antigenic part could not be identified. Therefore, our results do not
stand in contradiction with this previous report. Consistent with these
epitope-mimicking properties, the peptides identified here also exert
functional properties in vitro. In the Bethesda test, the
peptides completely neutralized the inhibitory activity of mAb ESH8,
thereby restoring full FVIII cofactor activity. This neutralizing
effect was also observed in the inhibition of the thrombin generation
test in which peptides representative of the two epitopes were able to
neutralize the mAb ESH8-dependent inhibition of thrombin
generation. In both cases, 200 µM of peptides were
required to completely neutralize the inhibitory activity of mAb ESH8.
This is probably related to the fact that each peptide represents only
a part of the epitope to which mAb ESH8 binds. This is in line with the
findings of Reineke et al. (32) in a study on the
reconstruction of a discontinuous binding site on interleukin 10. These
authors (32) demonstrate that each of the peptides mimicking either one
of the two parts of the binding site was only slightly efficient when
used alone. However, combining these peptides representative of the two
binding sites by a linker molecule resulted in a biological activity
within the nanomolar range. The capacity to prevent the binding of
antibodies to FVIII by specific epitope-like peptides has also been
shown with another anti-FVIII mAb, mAb
F7b4.2 In such a case,
full neutralization of the FVIII inhibitory activity was obtained with
only a 50-fold molar excess (14 µM). Whether or not the
combination of peptides would be required for improved neutralization,
our data already demonstrate the feasibility of the approach, because
peptides can efficiently neutralize in vitro the inhibitory
activity of an anti-FVIII even when they mimic only part of the epitope.
An in vivo experiment using single peptides was carried out
to establish the basis of a possible therapeutic application. Because
mAb ESH8 does not inhibit the cofactor activity of mouse FVIII,3 we used the
model of hemophilia A mice reconstituted by human recombinant FVIII
(25). The inhibition of FVIII as measured in a chromogenic assay was
compared using either ESH8 alone or in a combination with one of the
peptide. A significant yet limited neutralization of the inhibitory
capacity of ESH8 was observed. The efficacy of a peptide in
vivo depends on a number of parameters and, in particular, on its
stability. For example, it is commonly accepted that L-peptides are
rapidly degraded in serum (33). Preliminary data had shown that peptide
46 exhibited an unusual resistance to protease degradation upon
incubation in serum, which was deemed to be dependent on the presence
of a disulfide bridge between Cys-2 and Cys-11, and to the
derivatization of both peptide ends, acetylation of the N-terminal end,
and amidation of the C-terminal end (34). These characteristics
prompted us to use the peptide as such with no attempt to further
increase its stability. However, this could be achieved by the
replacement of L-amino acids by D-derivatives
or by the addition of unnatural ones and/or modification of the peptide
bond itself. In addition, the dosing regimens used for the in
vivo bioassays were based on an extrapolation from in
vitro results, which might not be optimal for animal administration.
The efficiency of a molecular decoy approach similar to the one
described in this paper has already been studied in two models of human
pathology, diabetes mellitus (35) and myasthenia gravis (36). In both
cases, short RNA sequences were selected from a large random RNA
library on the basis of their ability to specifically bind to a mAb
representative of human autoantibodies. The authors (35, 36)
demonstrated that the selected decoys were able to inhibit the binding
of a few human sera to their target antigen, insulin, and acetylcholine
receptor, respectively. However, the efficacy of such RNA decoys had
not yet been validated in an animal model. Provided that technical
improvements would increase peptide stability and capacity to
neutralize inhibitory Abs, a number of clinical applications can
already be envisioned. Moderate and mild hemophilia A patients with
inhibitor could be more prone to benefit from peptide-based therapy
insofar, because the anti-FVIII immune response of such patients
appears to involve only a limited number of B cell clones, the
specificity of which is directed essentially against the epitope
corresponding to the region containing the FVIII mutation. In severe
hemophilia A cases, although the immune response is usually more
heterogeneous, the B cell epitopes cluster to only a limited number of
regions, i.e. residues Arg484-Ile508
on the A2 domain (37), residues
Glu2181-Val2243 and
His2315-Asp2332 on the C2 domain
(30, 38), and finally residues Gln1778-Met1823
(39). The present approach will now be repeated using Abs of human
origin of both monoclonal and polyclonal origins. The optimal combination of peptides will be determined to obtain a "universal" decoy or a mixture of decoys that is able to inhibit a majority of
anti-FVIII Abs. If full neutralization of inhibitor Abs cannot be
obtained, we can expect that it will significantly help reduce significantly the antibody titers of the patients.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Sharon Lynn Salhi for the
editorial revision of this paper. We also thank Sabrina Grailly for
carrying out the in vivo experiments.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was partly supported by a grant from Wyeth.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: UMR CNRS 5094, Faculté de Pharmacie, BP 14491, 15 Ave. Charles Flahault, 34093 Montpellier Cedex 5, France. Tel.: 33-4-67-54-86-02; Fax:
33-4-67-54-86-10; E-mail:
claude.granier@ibph.pharma.univ-montp1.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 14, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203415200
2
S. Raut, S. Villard, S. Grailly, J.-G.
Grilles, C. Granier, J. M. Saint-Remy, and T. Barrowdi, submitted for publication.
3
J. M. Saint-Remy, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
FVIII, factor VIII;
Abs, antibodies;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
Fmoc, N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl;
TG, thrombin
generation.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Hoyer, L. W.
(1987)
Hum. Pathol.
18,
153-161[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Lusher, J. M.,
Blatt, P. M.,
Penner, J. A.,
Aledort, L. M.,
Levine, P. H.,
White, G. C.,
Warrier, A. I.,
and Whitehurst, D. A.
(1983)
Blood
62,
1135-1138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Gilles, J. G.,
Arnout, J.,
Vermylen, J.,
and Saint-Remy, J. M.
(1993)
Blood
82,
2452-2461[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Scandella, D.
(1999)
Vox Sang.
77 Suppl. 1,
17-20[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Kreuz, W.,
Escuriola-Ettingshausen, C.,
Martinez-Saguer, I.,
Gungor, T.,
and Kornhuber, B.
(1996)
Vox Sang.
70,
2-8
|
| 6.
|
Hay, C. R.,
and Laurian, Y.
(1996)
Vox Sang.
70,
68-69
|
| 7.
|
Hedner, U.,
Glazer, S.,
and Falch, J.
(1993)
Transfus. Med. Rev.
7,
78-83[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Lusher, J. M.,
Arkin, S.,
Abildgaard, C. F.,
and Schwartz, R. S.
(1993)
N. Engl. J. Med.
328,
453-459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Smith, G. P.
(1985)
Science
228,
1315-1317[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Arza, B.,
and Felez, J.
(1998)
Thromb. Haemostasis
80,
354-365[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Voorberg, J.,
and van den Brink, E. N.
(2000)
Semin. Thromb. Hemostasis
26,
143-150[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Nord, K.,
Nord, O.,
Uhlen, M.,
Kelley, B.,
Ljungqvist, C.,
and Nygren, P.
(2001)
Eur. J. Biochem.
268,
4269-4277[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Geysen, H. M.,
Rodda, S. J.,
and Mason, T. J.
(1986)
Mol. Immunol.
23,
709-715[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Smith, G. P.,
and Petrenko, V. A.
(1997)
Chem. Rev.
97,
391-410[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Scandella, D.,
Gilbert, G. E.,
Shima, M.,
Nakai, H.,
Eagleson, C.,
Felch, M.,
Prescott, R.,
Rajalakshmi, K. J.,
Hoyer, L. W.,
and Saenko, E.
(1995)
Blood
86,
1811-1819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Bonnycastle, L. L.,
Mehroke, J. S.,
Rashed, M.,
Gong, X.,
and Scott, J. K.
(1996)
J. Mol. Biol.
258,
747-762[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Ferrieres, G.,
Villard, S.,
Pugniere, M.,
Mani, J. C.,
Navarro-Teulon, I.,
Rharbaoui, F.,
Laune, D.,
Loret, E.,
Pau, B.,
and Granier, C.
(2000)
Eur. J. Biochem.
267,
1819-1829[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Sanger, F.,
Nicklen, S.,
and Coulson, A. R.
(1977)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
74,
5463-5467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Molina, F.,
Laune, D.,
Gougat, C.,
Pau, B.,
and Granier, C.
(1996)
Pept. Res.
9,
151-155[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Gausepohl, H.,
Boulin, C.,
Kraft, M.,
and Frank, R. W.
(1992)
Pept. Res.
5,
315-320[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Kasper, C. K.,
and Pool, J. G.
(1975)
Thromb. Diath. Haemorrh.
34,
875-876[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Pitney, W. R.,
and Dacie, J. V.
(1953)
J. Clin. Pathol. (Lond.)
6,
9-14
|
| 23.
|
Bi, L.,
Lawler, A. M.,
Antonarakis, S. E.,
High, K. A.,
Gearhart, J. D.,
and Kazazian, H. H., Jr.
(1995)
Nat. Genet.
10,
119-121[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Bi, L.,
Sarkar, R.,
Naas, T.,
Lawler, A. M.,
Pain, J.,
Shumaker, S. L.,
Bedian, V.,
and Kazazian, H. H., Jr.
(1996)
Blood
88,
3446-3450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Singh, I.,
Smith, A.,
Vanzieleghem, B.,
Collen, D.,
Burnand, K.,
Saint-Remy, J.,
and Jacquemin, M.
(2002)
Blood
99,
3235-3240[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Larue, C.,
Defacque-Lacquement, H.,
Calzolari, C., Le,
Nguyen, D.,
and Pau, B.
(1992)
Mol. Immunol.
29,
271-278[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Pratt, K. P.,
Shen, B. W.,
Takeshima, K.,
Davie, E. W.,
Fujikawa, K.,
and Stoddard, B. L.
(1999)
Nature
402,
439-442[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Briet, E.,
Rosendaal, F. R.,
Kreuz, W.,
Rasi, V.,
Peerlinck, K.,
Vermylen, J.,
Ljung, R.,
Rocino, A.,
Addiego, J.,
Lorenzo, J. I.,
et al..
(1994)
Thromb. Haemostasis
72,
162-164[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Saenko, E. L.,
Shima, M.,
Gilbert, G. E.,
and Scandella, D.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
71,
27424-27431
|
| 30.
|
Nogami, K.,
Shima, M.,
Nakai, H.,
Tanaka, I.,
Suzuki, H.,
Morichika, S.,
Shibata, M.,
Saenko, E. L.,
Scandella, D.,
Giddingsm, J. C.,
and Yoshioka, A.
(1999)
Br. J. Haematol.
107,
196-203[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Prescott, R.,
Nakai, H.,
Saenko, E. L.,
Scharrer, I.,
Nilsson, I. M.,
Humphries, J. E.,
Hurst, D.,
Bray, G.,
and Scandella, D.
(1997)
Blood
89,
3663-3671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Reineke, U.,
Sabat, R.,
Misselwitz, R.,
Welfle, H.,
Volk, H. D.,
and Schneider-Mergener, J.
(1999)
Nature Biotechnol.
17,
271-275[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Lamont, A. G.,
Powell, M. F.,
Colon, S. M.,
Miles, C.,
Grey, H. M.,
and Sette, A.
(1990)
J. Immunol.
144,
2493-2498[Abstract]
|
| 34.
|
Tamamura, H.,
Omagari, A.,
Hiramatsu, K.,
Gotoh, K.,
Kanamoto, T., Xu, Y.,
Kodama, E.,
Matsuoka, M.,
Hattori, T.,
Yamamoto, N.,
Nakashima, H.,
Otaka, A.,
and Fujii, N.
(2001)
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
11,
1897-1902[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Doudna, J. A.,
Cech, T. R.,
and Sullenger, B. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
2355-2359[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Lee, S. W.,
and Sullenger, B. A.
(1997)
Nature Biotechnol.
15,
41-45[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Healey, J. F.,
Lubin, I. M.,
Nakai, H.,
Saenko, E. L.,
Hoyer, L. W.,
Scandella, D.,
and Lollar, P.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
14505-14509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Healey, J. F.,
Barrow, R. T.,
Tamim, H. M.,
Lubin, I. M.,
Shima, M.,
Scandella, D.,
and Lollar, P.
(1998)
Blood
92,
3701-3709[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Fijnvandraat, K.,
Celie, P. H.,
Turenhout, E. A.,
ten Cate, J. W.,
van Mourik, J. A.,
Mertens, K.,
Peters, M.,
and Voorberg, J.
(1998)
Blood
91,
2347-2352[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Planque, M. A. Escobar, K. C. Smith, H. Taguchi, Y. Nishiyama, E. Donnachie, K. P. Pratt, and S. Paul
Covalent Inactivation of Factor VIII Antibodies from Hemophilia A Patients by an Electrophilic FVIII Analog
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 2, 2008;
283(18):
11876 - 11886.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Lacroix-Desmazes, B. Wootla, S. Dasgupta, S. Delignat, J. Bayry, J. Reinbolt, J. Hoebeke, E. Saenko, M. D. Kazatchkine, A. Friboulet, et al.
Catalytic IgG from Patients with Hemophilia A Inactivate Therapeutic Factor VIII
J. Immunol.,
July 15, 2006;
177(2):
1355 - 1363.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. C. Lei and D. W. Scott
Induction of tolerance to factor VIII inhibitors by gene therapy with immunodominant A2 and C2 domains presented by B cells as Ig fusion proteins
Blood,
June 15, 2005;
105(12):
4865 - 4870.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Vanhoorelbeke, H. Depraetere, R. A. P. Romijn, E. G. Huizinga, M. De Maeyer, and H. Deckmyn
A Consensus Tetrapeptide Selected by Phage Display Adopts the Conformation of a Dominant Discontinuous Epitope of a Monoclonal Anti-VWF Antibody That Inhibits the von Willebrand Factor-Collagen Interaction
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 26, 2003;
278(39):
37815 - 37821.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|