|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M204183200 on May 20, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 31, 27772-27781, August 2, 2002
Purple Acid Phosphatases of Arabidopsis thaliana
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND DIFFERENTIAL REGULATION BY PHOSPHATE
DEPRIVATION*
Dongping
Li ,
Huifen
Zhu ,
Kunfan
Liu ,
Xin
Liu ,
Georg
Leggewie§,
Michael
Udvardi§, and
Daowen
Wang ¶
From the Institute of Genetics and
Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China and the § Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant
Physiology, 14424 Potsdam, Germany
Received for publication, April 30, 2002, and in revised form, May 20, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Purple acid phosphatases
(PAPs) are members of the metallo-phosphoesterase family. They are
characterized by the presence of seven conserved amino acid residues
involved in coordinating the dimetal nuclear center in their reactive
site. We compared the 29 PAPs predicted for Arabidopsis
thaliana in their varieties of potential metal-ligating residues.
Although 24 members possessed sets of metal-ligating residues typical
of known PAPs, 1 member lacked four of the seven residues. For the
remaining four members, potential metal-ligating residues were
generally more similar to those in metal-dependent
exonucleases and related proteins. Evidence was obtained for the
expression of the majority of the 29 PAPs. To facilitate future
investigations, a scheme for naming Arabidopsis PAPs and a
system for classifying the 29 PAPs are proposed. The cDNA sequences
and the responses to phosphate deprivation of seven
Arabidopsis PAPs (AtPAP7-AtPAP13) were characterized. For
some AtPAPs analyzed, there were fully processed transcripts as well as
splice variants. The splice variants of AtPAP10 were found to associate
with polyribosomes and may be translated into a
NH2-terminal truncated protein. Phylogenetic investigations showed that AtPAPs 7 and 8, together with similar enzymes from other
plant species, formed the low molecular weight plant PAP group. Members
of this group were more closely related to PAPs from mammalian cells.
AtPAPs 9-13, together with kidney bean PAP, formed the high molecular
weight PAP group. In phosphate deprivation experiments, gene
transcription of AtPAP11 and AtPAP12 was induced and increased,
respectively, whereas that of the remaining five AtPAPs was not
affected by phosphate deprivation. The present work demonstrates that
structure variation and expression regulation of plant PAPs are more
complex than previously described and provides a framework for
comprehensive molecular genetic and biochemical studies of all
Arabidopsis PAPs in the future.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In recent years, there has been considerable interest in purple
acid phosphatases (PAPs).1
Comparative analysis of the structure of PAPs from higher plants and
mammals has allowed the identification of conserved sequence and
structural motifs in this type of enzymes from many eukaryotic species
(1-4). The definition of the conserved sequence motifs has also aided
identification of potential PAP coding sequences from bacterial species
(4, 5). However, reports on structural, biochemical, and/or functional
properties of the bacterial PAPs have not yet appeared. Evolutionarily,
PAPs belong to the metallo-phosphoesterase family of proteins, members
of which also include phosphoprotein phosphatases, diadenosine
tetraphosphatases, exonucleases, 5'-nucleotidases, and other types of
phosphomonoesterases (1, 6-12). The structure motif conserved in
metallo-phosphoesterases is the - - - - fold (1, 13-16).
The amino acid residues involved in coordinating the dimetal nuclear
center (Fe(III)-M(II)) are located at the carboxyl ends of the parallel
-strands of the - - - - fold. The complement of amino
acid residues involved in metal ligation in different types of
metallo-phosphoesterases has recently been investigated based on the
alignment of conserved sequence motifs. For PAPs, a comparison of
multiple sequences from both eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms has
delineated seven invariant residues contained in five blocks of
conserved amino acid sequences being the ones required for metal
coordination (4, 5)
(DXG/GDXXY/GNH(D/E)/VXXH/GHXH; bold letters represent metal-ligating residues). For exonucleases and
structurally related proteins, there are also seven potential metal-ligating residues that distribute in five blocks of conserved amino acid sequences
(DXH/GDXXX/GNH(D/E)/XX(G/A)H/(G/A)HXH) (1). For phosphoprotein phosphatases and structurally related proteins,
there are only six metal-coordinating residues
(DXH/GDXXX/GNH(D/E)/XXXH/XXXH) (1). It is clear that different metallo-phosphoesterases share similarities in both the number and composition of their metal-ligating residues. The purple color in the purified proteins of known PAPs is
caused by a charge transfer transition at 560 nm from the metal-coordinating tyrosine residue to the metal ligand Fe(III).
Despite the presence of conserved structural and sequence motifs, PAPs
from different, or even the same, species can differ from each other in
the composition of their dimetal nuclear center and their overall
structures. The composition of the dimetal nuclear center in mammalian
PAPs is Fe(III)-Fe(II), whereas in plants it is either Fe(III)-Zn(II)
(as in KBPAP and PAP from soybean) or Fe(III)-Mn(II) (as in one of the
PAPs from sweet potato) (17-20). Structurally, the high molecular
weight (HMW) plant PAPs (typified by KBPAP) possess two domains (1, 3).
The NH2-domain does not have catalytic function. It is
composed of two sandwiched -sheets. By homology modeling, the
structure formed by the two sandwiched -sheets is later found to
resemble the fibronectin type III domain commonly seen in animal
proteins (21). The COOH-domain has the metal center and is the
catalytic domain of the enzyme. It consists of two sandwiched mixed
-sheets that include two - - - - motifs. In contrast,
mammalian PAPs (typified by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase
and uteroferrin) have only one domain in their structure with an
overall fold similar to that of the catalytic domain of KBPAP (13, 22,
23). The low molecular weight (LMW) plant PAPs have been described only
recently, and are substantially smaller in size compared with HMW plant
PAPs (4). Homology modeling shows that LMW plant PAPs lack the
equivalent of the NH2-domain of KBPAP and are hence
structurally similar to mammalian PAPs (4).
Biochemically, HMW plant PAPs function as homodimeric proteins with a
molecular mass of ~55 kDa/monomer, whereas mammalian PAPs are
typically monomeric proteins with a molecular mass of ~35 kDa (1-4,
13, 23). Many PAPs are glycoproteins that are targeted to the secretary
pathway (4). One PAP from Spirodela oligorrhiza has been
found to be glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchored in the cell (24).
Another PAP from Lupinus albus may contain a third domain
(with a structure resembling that of sterol desaturases) at the
carboxyl terminus (25, 26). It is not known how common the latter two
forms of posttranslational modification are in PAPs from other species.
In in vitro reactions, PAPs have been shown to catalyze the
hydrolysis of activated phosphoric acid esters and anhydrides at a pH
range of 4-7 (1). However, the in vivo function of PAPs
remains largely unknown. Mammalian PAPs may play a variety of
physiological roles, including resorption of bone and cartilage breakdown, iron transport, and generation of reactive oxygen species in
a Fenton-like reaction (27-29). In higher plants, PAPs have mostly
been studied for their potential involvement in phosphorus nutrition
because their hydrolytic activity may aid the release of inorganic P
(Pi) from organic P that is not readily available to plant
cells. Two PAPs (secreted PAP, membrane PAP) from L. albus have been shown to be highly inducible by phosphate
deprivation (25, 26). The induction and secretion of secreted PAP are specific to proteoid roots, a structure that is specifically formed in
L. albus as one of the adaptations to phosphorus deficiency, indicating that, at least in this species, PAPs may play an important part in phosphorus nutrition (26, 30). AtACP5, a PAP from Arabidopsis thaliana, is induced by both phosphate
deprivation and oxidative stress (31). This enzyme may be involved in
phosphate mobilization as well as the metabolism of reactive oxygen
species in stressed or senescent plant tissues (31). The promoter of a
separate Arabidopsis PAP gene has also been shown to be
inducible by phosphate deprivation, although in this case the
corresponding PAP enzyme has not been characterized (32). In addition,
several Arabidopsis PAPs may possess phytase activity
because their proteins show high levels of homology to a phytase
recently reported from soybean (33). Given the structural and
biochemical diversities described above, it is likely that PAPs from
higher plants may have yet undiscovered functions, the elucidation of
which may contribute significantly to the understanding of important
aspects of plant biology.
Genetically, higher plant species often contain multiple genes coding
for different PAPs. In sweet potato four PAPs have been described (4,
18, 19, 34). In Arabidopsis, the AGI project has annotated
16 different PAP genes searchable at the Institute for Genomic Research
(TIGR) Arabidopsis data base. The existence of multiple PAPs
in the same species may hinder functional investigations because of
potential genetic and functional redundancies. Additionally, studies on
PAP may be complicated by the presence in higher plants of other types
of acid phosphatases, which often react to environmental stimuli in
ways similar to PAPs. For example, the LePS2 acid phosphatase is
strongly induced by phosphate deprivation (35). However, molecular
investigations show that LePS2 is related to a new class of
phosphohydrolases rather than to PAPs (35). To study the function of
PAPs in plant biology systematically, it is desirable to employ a plant
species for which genetic knowledge on PAPs as well as other types of
acid phosphatases is already available.
We have selected the model plant species A. thaliana in our
studies on higher plant PAPs. A search of the annotated genome data
base of Arabidopsis reveals that, in addition to PAP genes, this species also contains genes encoding several other types of
phosphatases that may share some similarities with PAPs in reacting to
physiological and environmental cues. These enzymes include histidine
acid phosphatase (1 gene), vegetative storage protein type of acid
phosphatases (10 genes), and phosphatidic acid phosphatase (4 genes).
However, PAPs form by far the largest group of acid phosphatases in
Arabidopsis with 16 different members in the TIGR data base.
In this paper we report the finding of more Arabidopsis PAP
members from data base searching, comparative analysis of conserved
metal-ligating amino acid residues in 29 PAPs, and propose schemes for
naming and classifying these PAPs. We also describe cDNA cloning
and amino acid sequence analysis for seven PAPs encoded by chromosome
2. The patterns of primary structure variation in both LMW and HMW
Arabidopsis PAPs are also reported. As an entry point to
functional dissection, the response of the seven PAPs to phosphate
deprivation in suspension cells is examined. Based on the work
presented here, effective strategies for further studies of
Arabidopsis PAPs are discussed.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Data Base Search, Nomenclature, and Clustering Analysis of
Arabidopsis PAPs--
Initially, a search using the phrase "purple
acid phosphatase" was conducted at the TIGR web site
(www.tigr.org/tdb/e2k1/ath1/GeneNameSearch.shtml). This search resulted
in the retrieval of the predicted amino acid sequences of 16 different
PAPs. In the second stage, the predicted protein sequences were each
used as query sequences for Blastp searches at the TAIR A. thaliana genomic blast web page (arabidopsis.org/Blast/index.html) using the default setting. Identification of additional predicted PAPs
in the Blastp search was based on two criteria: at least 20% identical
to the query sequence and the possession of amino acid sequence
elements that could be related to the conserved sequence motifs
(DXG/GDXXY/GNH(E/D)/VX2H/GHXH) defined previously for PAPs. Thirteen additional predicted PAPs were
found in this step. In the third stage, the predicted protein sequences
of the newly retrieved 13 PAPs were each used as query sequences for
another round of Blastp search at the TAIR web site. However, no more
predicted PAPs were found, suggesting that the total number of
predicted PAPs in the Arabidopsis genome was likely to be
29. To identify expressed sequence tags and/or cDNA sequences for
the 29 PAPs, several nucleic acid and protein data bases, including the
TIGR Arabidopsis Gene Index (www.tigr.org/tdb/agi/, this
site also contains full-length cDNA sequences for 5000 Arabidopsis genes), MIPS
(mips.gsf.de/proj/thal/db/index.html), and
GenBankTM (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), were searched. For
naming the 29 Arabidopsis PAPs according to their positions
on the different chromosomes, the prefix "AtPAP" (for A. thaliana PAP) was used.
To establish a classification scheme for Arabidopsis PAPs,
clustering analysis of amino acid sequences was conducted. It is known
from previous work and from our study (see "Results") that the
predicted protein sequences of some Arabidopsis genes
contained localized errors because of imprecise prediction of intron
and exon boundaries during the annotation process. To improve the accuracy of the clustering analysis, two measures were taken. First,
for the seven PAPs (AtPAP7-AtPAP13; Table III) investigated in this
study and the three PAPs (AtPAP3, AtPAP17, AtPAP18; Table III) studied
by previous researchers, amino acid sequences derived from cDNAs
were used. Consequently, in only 19 of the 29 Arabidopsis PAPs, the predicted amino acid sequences were employed for the clustering analysis. Second, during the analysis, the "complete deletion option" was chosen with respect to sites involved in alignment gaps. The incorrectly predicted amino acid sites would cause
gaps in multiple alignment of sequences. The adoption of the complete
deletion option may minimize the impact of the prediction errors on the
clustering analysis (37). The protein sequences of 29 PAPs were aligned
using the program ClustalW 1.8 (searchlauncher.bcm.tmc.edu/multi-align/multi-align.html) (36). The
alignment result was converted to MEGA format, which was then subject
to clustering analysis using several different programs (neighbor
joining, minimum evolution, and parsimony) at the MEGA 2 web site
(www.megasoftware.net/) (37).
Plant Materials, Phosphate Deprivation Treatment, and Detection
of AtPAP cDNAs--
The Col-1 ecotype of A. thaliana
was used throughout this study. General conditions for plant growth and
initiation and maintenance of suspension cell cultures were the same as
those described previously (38, 39). For phosphate deprivation of
suspension cells, cells grown in phosphate-sufficient liquid medium (1 mM Pi, in the form of
NaH2PO4) were collected by vacuum, washed three
times using sterile distilled water, and dispersed into the low
phosphate liquid medium (0.01 mM Pi). A cell
sample was immediately taken as the day 0 control. Further samples were
collected at 1, 3, and 5 days later. Control cell samples were also
taken at identical points from suspension cells grown in the
phosphate-sufficient medium. For phosphate deprivation of
Arabidopsis seedlings, the method described by Haran
et al. (32) was adopted. All cell and tissue samples were
stored at 70 °C prior to RNA extraction.
Total RNA was extracted from cell and tissue samples using the RNeasy
Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). RNA concentrations were determined with the
aid of a spectrophotometer (BioPhotometer, Eppendorf AG). Using
nucleotide sequence information of the predicted PAPs, PCR primers were
synthesized for amplifying cDNAs corresponding to the coding
regions of 20 of the 29 predicted PAPs. A complete list of the PCR
primers used in this study is available at the web site
www.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/udvardi/(under section "Supplementary Materials
for Publications"). The primers used for amplifying coding region
cDNAs of the seven PAPs encoded by chromosome 2 are listed in Table
I. In each reverse transcription reaction using the Moloney murine
leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and random
hexamers (New England Biolabs), 10 µg of total RNA was used. For
amplifying cDNAs of individual PAPs, varying amounts of the reverse
transcription mix (1-3 µl) were used in 50-µl PCR reactions
containing PAP-specific primers and the high fidelity Taq
polymerase ExTaq (TaKaRa). The annealing temperature (48-55 °C) and
the extension time (1-3 min) were adjusted to suit the amplification
of the coding region of individual PAPs. After 35 cycles of
amplification, the PCR products were examined by agarose gel
electrophoresis with ethidium bromide staining. The PCR fragments of
expected size were purified from the gel, followed by cloning into the
plasmid vector pGEMT-easy (Promega). The inserts in selected positive
clones were sequenced commercially (TaKaRa). The resulting cDNA
sequences were compared with the predicted ORFs and previously reported
cDNAs of Arabidopsis PAPs using various programs at the
NCBI network (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).
Analysis of Splice Variants--
For each of the seven PAPs
(AtPAP7-AtPAP13) that were analyzed in more detail in this study,
cDNA sequences were determined using several clones, some of which
contained inserts of different sizes. This led to the identification of
splice variants (based on the presence of incompletely removed intron
sequences in the cDNAs) for two of the seven PAPs (AtPAP10 and
AtPAP13). To investigate whether the splice variant of AtPAP10 was
present in the cytoplasm and could access cellular translation
apparatus, polyribosomes were prepared from suspension cells grown in
either phosphate-sufficient or phosphate-limiting medium (with 1 mM and 0.01 mM Pi, respectively) using sucrose density gradient centrifugation detailed in published protocols (40, 41). In total, 12 fractions were collected from each
sucrose gradient. Total RNA was extracted from each fraction and was
further treated with RNase-free DNase (TaKaRa) to eliminate potential
contamination by genomic DNA. In analogy to the study by Petracek
et al. (41), monoribosomes were associated with fractions 4 and 5, whereas polyribosomes were contained in fractions 6-11. To
detect the distribution of wild type transcript and the splice variant
of AtPAP10 in fractions 4-11 by RT-PCR, 5 µg of total RNA from each
fraction was reverse-transcribed as described above. The resultant
cDNA mixtures were used for PCR amplification of wild type
transcripts (using the primers WTF and 16430R; Table I, Fig.
3A) and splice variants (using the primers SVF and 16430R;
Table I, Fig. 3A). The amplified products were checked by
agarose gel electrophoresis with ethidium bromide staining.
Phylogenetic Investigations and Primary Structure
Comparisons--
Using amino acid sequences deduced from cDNA
clones, phylogenetic relationships of AtPAP7-AtPAP13 to PAPs isolated
from other eukaryotic organisms were investigated. PAPs from bacterial
species were not included in this investigation because of some
uncertainties in potential metal-ligating residues (4). Multiple
sequence alignment was carried out using ClustalW 1.8. Phylogenetic
trees were constructed using several tree building methods (neighbor joining, minimum evolution, parsimony) available at the MEGA 2 web site
(37). For comparisons of primary structure, the amino acid sequences of
LMW PAPs (AtPAP7, AtPAP8) were compared with that of uteroferrin (as
the representative of known LMW PAPs), whereas the amino acid sequences
of HMW PAPs (AtPAP9-AtPAP13) were compared with that of KBPAP (as the
representative of known HMW PAPs).
Evaluation of Transcriptional Responses of AtPAPs to Phosphate
Deprivation Treatment using Semiquantitative RT-PCR--
The
transcriptional responses of AtPAP7-AtPAP13 to phosphate deprivation
treatment were evaluated using suspension cells. During the
experiments, suspension cells were subject to phosphate deprivation as
described above, followed by the extraction of total RNA from both
treated and control samples. For all samples to be compared, the same
amount of total RNA (10 µg) was used in reverse transcription
reactions. Prior to PCR amplification of Arabidopsis PAPs,
the cDNA content of all reverse transcription reactions was
normalized by amplifying the transcript of tubulin using primers TuF
and TuR (Table I). In amplifying the
transcripts of AtPAP7-AtPAP12 using normalized cDNA samples, the
same set of cycling parameters (annealing temperature, 52 °C;
extension time, 2 min; number of amplification cycles; Ref. 28) was
employed. In amplifying the transcripts of AtPAP13 using the same batch of normalized cDNA samples (and with annealing temperature of 52 °C and extension time of 2 min), the number of amplification cycles had to be increased to 32 to obtain consistent results. The
kinetics of the PCR amplifications was checked by amplifying tubulin
transcripts using the same annealing temperature and extension time but
with different numbers of amplification cycles (24, 28, 32) (Fig. 6).
For comparing the levels of AtPAP transcripts across the samples, the
same amount of reaction mixture was taken from all PCR amplifications,
followed by agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining.
The results were imaged using the gel documentation system AlphaImager
2200 (Alpha Innotech Corp.).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
A list of PCR primers
The underlined nucleotides form BamHI (GGATCC),
KpnI (GGTACC), NdeI (CATATG), or SalI
(GTCGAC) restriction site.
|
|
 |
RESULTS |
Comparative Analysis of Potential Metal-ligating Residues in
Arabidopsis PAPs--
Repeated Blastp searches of the protein data
base of Arabidopsis led to the finding of 29 potential PAPs
(Table II). In 24 Arabidopsis
PAPs, the complete set of seven invariant amino acid residues involved
in the ligation of the dimetal nuclear center in known PAPs was found
(Table II). However, in 5 of the 29 PAPs (Table II, shaded
lines), the varieties of potential metal-ligating residues
differed from those in typical PAPs. In At2g32770 (AtPAP13 in Table
III), the lack of four of the seven
invariant residues was caused by drastic changes of amino acid
compositions in three of the five sequence elements (Table II), which
were deduced to hold positions for metal ligation residues by amino
acid sequence comparisons. In At2g46880, At3g10150, At5g57140, and
At5g63140 (AtPAP14, AtPAP16, AtPAP28, and AtPAP29, respectively, in
Table III), the varieties of potential metal-ligating residues were
generally more similar to those found in several other types of
metallo-phosphoesterases from yeast, bacterium, and human (Table II,
Fig. 1) (1), some of which had been found
to possess exonuclease or phosphodiesterase activities (42-44).
However, they were still considered as potential PAPs because their
overall amino acid sequences exhibited significant levels of homology
to known PAPs. As shown in Fig. 1, proteins homologous to At2g46880,
At3g10150, At5g57140, and At5g63140 had also been found in two other
plant species (chickpea and rice).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Conserved sequence motifs containing potential metal-ligating residues
in Arabidopsis PAPs
The symbols plus (+) and minus ( ) in this table indicate positive and
negative scores, respectively. EST, expressed sequence tag.
|
|

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Comparison of potential metal-ligating
residues in At2g46880, At3g10150, At5g57140, and At5g63140 and related
proteins from plant, yeast, bacterium, and human. The nucleotides
conserved in all sequences are boxed. The potential
metal-ligating residues are marked by asterisks. The number
at the beginning of each sequence indicates amino acid position; the
number in between the sequence elements represents the sum of residues
separating two adjacent blocks. Accession numbers for related proteins
from plant, yeast, bacterium, and human are AJ276267 (CaPAP,
putative PTS protein of Cicer arietinum), AP004031
(OsPAP, hypothetical protein of Oryza sativa),
NC_001144 (YLR361c, probable membrane protein of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae), AL023518 (SPCC1020.05,
hypothetical protein of Schizosaccharomyces pombe), P13457
(EcSBCD, exonuclease SBCD of Escherichia coli),
NC_003030 (CaPase1, predicted Icc-like phosphohydrolase of
Clostridium acetobutylicum), D16557 (EsIcc, cAMP
phosphodiesterase of E. coli), and P17405 (Asm,
sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase of Homo sapiens).
|
|
Evidence for Expression, Nomenclature, and Classification of
Arabidopsis PAPs--
The above data base search results raised the
question of whether the multiple Arabidopsis PAPs were
expressed. Several lines of evidence presented in Table III indicated
that the transcripts for the majority of the 29 PAPs were present in
Arabidopsis cells. First, in various expressed sequence tag
projects, expressed sequence tags were discovered for 13 PAPs (Table
III). Second, in public data bases, full-length cDNA clones were
isolated and sequenced for five PAP genes (Table III). Third, in our
study, we had detected the cDNAs for 20 PAPs (Table III). From
Table III, it could also be seen that previous investigators had
tentatively named Arabidopsis PAPs in different manners.
Based on the finding that the great majority of the 29 predicted PAPs
were expressed, and the need in future to carry out more systematic
studies on individual PAPs, a system for naming
Arabidopsis PAPs is presented in Table III. This
nomenclature is consistent with the current system for naming members
of multigene families in A. thaliana.
Using amino acid sequences of 19 predicted PAPs and those of 10 PAPs
(AtPAP3, AtPAP7-AtPAP13, AtPAP17, AtPAP18) derived from cDNA
analysis, clustering analysis was conducted with the aim to establish a
classification scheme for Arabidopsis PAPs. The patterns in
the clustering of the 29 PAPs using different methods were essentially
similar. The result obtained with the minimum evolution method (Fig.
2) was adopted as the basis for a
classification scheme of Arabidopsis PAPs. The 29 PAPs could
be classified into three major groups (groups I, II, and III), each
with more than 95% bootstrap support (Fig. 2). A further division of
the three major groups yielded eight subgroups (Ia-1, Ia-2, Ib-1, Ib-2, IIa, IIb, IIIa, and IIIb; Fig. 2). Except for Ia-2, statistical support
for all other subgroups was equal or greater than 95% (Fig. 2). There
was a general correlation between the classification of the groups and
the number of amino acid residues in the 29 PAPs (Fig. 2). Thus, most
of proteins in group I contain more than 400 amino acid residues, all
proteins in group II are composed of more than 500 residues, and all
proteins in group III comprise fewer than 400 residues (Fig. 2).
AtPAP13, for which four of the seven potential metal-ligating residues
could not be identified, clustered with AtPAP15 and AtPAP23,
creating the subgroup Ib-1 (Fig. 2). AtPAPs 14, 16, 28, and 29 formed
the subgroup IIIa (Fig. 2). Proteins in the remaining subgroups all
contained the seven invariant amino acid residues typical of known
PAPs.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
A classification scheme for
Arabidopsis PAPs based on clustering analysis of amino
acid sequences. The clustering analysis used amino acid sequences
of 19 predicted PAPs and those of 10 PAPs (AtPAP3, AtPAP7-AtPAP13,
AtPAP17, AtPAP18) derived from cDNA analysis. The analysis, from
which the classification scheme was derived, was conducted using the
minimum evolution method (with PC distance and complete deletion
options). Bootstrap values are percentages of 500 replications. The
main groups (groups I, II, and III) are further divided to yield the
eight subgroups (second column). The bootstrap
values for the three main groups are boxed, whereas those
for the eight subgroups are indicated by arrows. The ranges
of amino acid residues in the predicted proteins of the different
subgroups are listed in the third column.
|
|
Characterization of Coding Region and Amino Acid Sequences of
AtPAP7-AtPAP13--
In our long term effort to address the function
of PAPs in the biology of Arabidopsis, we focused initially
on seven PAPs (AtPAP7-AtPAP13) encoded by PAP genes on chromosome 2. With four members in group I, one member in group II, and two members
in group III, the seven PAPs represent many of the structural and functional diversities in Arabidopsis PAPs. In RT-PCR
experiments, the cDNAs for AtPAP7, AtPAP8, AtPAP9, AtPAP10,
AtPAP12, and AtPAP13 were readily amplified using total RNA samples
prepared from Arabidopsis cells or tissues grown under four
different conditions
(www.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/udvardi/zusaetzlich/index-e.html). In contrast,
the cDNA for AtPAP11 was only obtained from using RNA samples
extracted from phosphate-deprived cells or root tissues, suggesting
that the expression of this PAP was regulated by phosphate availability. In cDNA sequencing experiments, clones containing fully processed, wild type ORFs were identified for each of the seven
PAPs. In addition, cDNA clones harboring variant ORFs retaining one
or more introns sequences were also obtained for AtPAP10 and AtPAP13
(see below).
Comparisons of the coding sequences and derived amino acid sequences
obtained for AtPAP7-AtPAP13 in this study with those predicted by AGI
and those deposited in public data bases by previous investigators on
PAP cDNAs isolated from Col-1 ecotype gave the following results.
First, for AtPAPs 9-13, the coding sequences and derived amino acid
sequences from our study were identical to those predicted by AGI. The
coding sequence and derived amino acid sequence of AtPAP12 from this
study differed from those by Cheuk and colleagues
(GenBankTM accession no. AY065067) for the same PAP by a
single nucleotide and amino acid change, respectively. This minor
difference may have been caused by PCR or sequencing error. Second, for
AtPAPs 7 and 8, the coding sequences determined by us and those
predicted by AGI differed substantially. Comparisons among the coding
sequences determined from cDNA analysis, the predicted coding
sequences and their corresponding genomic sequences showed that the
difference between predicted and cDNA-derived coding regions may
have been caused by error in predicting intron-exon boundaries in
genomic sequences (data not shown). The cDNA-derived coding
sequence of AtPAP8 also varied from the one by Yamada and colleagues
(GenBankTM accession no. AY065434) and the one by
Schenk et al. (4) for the same PAP
(www.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/udvardi/zusaetzlich/index-e.html). Schenk
et al. (4) determined the cDNA sequence for an
Arabidopsis PAP named as SmAth. In nucleotide
sequence comparison, the first 780 nucleotides of SmAth
coding sequence were identical to those of the AtPAP8 coding region
determined by us. Intriguingly, however, at the 3' end of the coding
region sequence, SmAth differed in multiple ways
(deletions involving single or more nucleotides, and insertions
involving single nucleotides) from AtPAP8 coding region determined by
us or Yamada and colleagues.
Association of Splice Variants of AtPAP10 with
Polyribosomes--
The intron-containing, variant ORF of AtPAP10 and
AtPAP13 was analyzed in more detail in terms of nucleotide sequence and structure. The genomic DNA sequence encoding AtPAP10 consisted of eight
exons and seven introns (Fig.
3A). The complete sequence of
the variant ORF of AtPAP10 showed that the second intron was retained
in the cDNA (Fig. 3A). In contrast, all intron sequences were removed from the cDNA containing the fully processed, wild type ORF of AtPAP10 (Fig. 3A). Similar analysis revealed
that the variant cDNA of AtPAP13 was also caused by the presence of intron sequences. In this case, two intact introns (the first and fifth
intron) and the 5' half of the third intron were retained in the
cDNA (Fig. 3B). Conceptual translation of the variant
ORF of AtPAP10 yielded a hypothetical protein of 348 amino acids. The
amino acid sequence of this hypothetical protein was completely homologous to that of the catalytic domain of the putative wild type
AtPAP10 protein, but lacked the amino-terminal 120 amino acid residues
of the wild type protein. An attempted translation of the variant ORF
of AtPAP13 produced a hypothetical protein of 428 amino acids. It
differed from the putative wild type AtPAP13 protein by one deletion
(of 81 amino acid residues) at the amino-terminal region, one deletion
(of 37 amino acid residues) at the carboxyl-terminal region, and one
insertion (29 amino acid residues) approximately in the middle region
of the protein.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Analysis of splice variants of AtPAP10 and
AtPAP13. A, a diagram illustrating the structure of the
genomic sequence of AtPAP10 ORF, the cDNA sequence of AtPAP10
variant ORF, and the cDNA sequence of AtPAP10 wild type
(WT) ORF. Introns are represented by boxes, exons
by filled horizontal lines. The
dashed lines indicate the removal of intron
sequences. ATG is start codon, TGA the stop
codon. The primer combination of WTF and 16430R was used for
detecting wild type transcript, whereas that of SVF and 16430R was used
for detecting splice variant. Diagrams are not drawn to scale.
B, a diagram illustrating the structure of the genomic
sequence of AtPAP13 ORF, the cDNA sequence of AtPAP13 variant ORF,
and the cDNA sequence of AtPAP13 wild type ORF. The representation
of different sequence elements was the same as described in
A. C, association of wild type transcripts and
splice variants of AtPAP10 with polyribosomes present in the different
fractions of a sucrose gradient. The polyribosomes were prepared from
suspension cells grown in phosphate-sufficient (top
panel) or phosphate-limiting (bottom
panel) medium.
|
|
The above results indicated that the transcription of the genes coding
for AtPAP10 and AtPAP13 can produce wild type (fully processed)
transcripts as well as splice variants in which intronic sequences were
not completely removed. The splice variants may be resided in either
nucleus or cytoplasm. If nuclear in origin, the splice variants may
have been intermediates of the splice reaction. If cytoplasmic, the
splice variants may serve important functions. To distinguish the two
possibilities, experiments were undertaken to determine whether splice
variants were associated with polyribosomes located in the cytoplasm.
Following well established protocols that entailed the separation of
polyribosomes from monoribosomes through the use of sucrose density
gradient centrifugation (40, 41), polyribosome fractions were prepared
from suspension cells grown in either phosphate-sufficient or
phosphate-limiting medium. The distribution of wild type transcripts
and splice variants of AtPAP10 in the different fractions of the
sucrose gradients was detected by RT-PCR. The oligonucleotide primers
for the PCR had been designed for selective amplification of either
wild type transcripts or splice variants (Fig. 3A). The wild
type transcripts were associated exclusively with polyribosome
fractions in the cells grown with either phosphate-sufficient or
phosphate-limiting medium (Fig. 3C). There was a clear, but
limited, association of the splice variant with polyribosomes in the
cells grown with sufficient phosphate supply (Fig. 3C).
However, in the cells cultured with limited phosphate supply, the
association of the splice variants with polyribosomes became more
extensive (Fig. 3C). During this experiment, it was
interesting to note the pattern for the association of the wild type
transcripts with polyribosomes was also affected by phosphate
deprivation (Fig. 3C).
Phylogenetic and Structural Relationships of Arabidopsis PAPs to
Homologous Proteins from Other Eukaryotes--
The availability of
amino acid sequences of AtPAP7-AtPAP13 derived from cDNA analysis
permitted a more reliable assessment of phylogenetic relationships of
Arabidopsis PAPs to homologous proteins from other
eukaryotes. In the phylogenetic tree constructed by the neighbor
joining method, there were three clades (LMW PAPs, fungal PAPs, and HMW
PAPs), each with more than 95% bootstrap support (Fig.
4). AtPAP9-AtPAP13 clustered with KBPAP,
forming the HMW PAP clade (Fig. 4). In contrast, AtPAP7 and AtPAP8
clustered with LMW PAPs from other plant species, forming one of two
groups in the LMW PAP clade (Fig. 4). In parallel with the LMW plant PAP group was the group comprising PAPs from mammalian species. This
suggested that LMW PAPs from plants and mammals might have shared a
common ancestral gene in their evolutionary history.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Phylogenetic relationships of AtPAP7-AtPAP13
to homologous proteins from eukaryotic organisms. The phylogenetic
tree presented was constructed using the neighbor joining method (with
PC distance and pairwise deletion options). Bootstrap values are
percentages of 500 replications. The rate of amino acid substitution is
shown below the phylogenetic tree. The GenBankTM
accession nos. for the homologous proteins are AF236107
(IbPAP-LMW), AF236109 (KBPAP-LMW), Q05117
(PAP-mouse), P29288 (PAP-rat), P13686
(PAP-human), P09889 (PAP-pig, uteroferrin),
U18553 (PAP-Ani), Z79750 (PAP-Anid), and P80366
(KBPAP).
|
|
The amino acid sequences of AtPAP7 and AtPAP8 could be aligned with
that of uteroferrin without the need to introduce frequent and major
gaps (Fig. 5A). Furthermore,
strong conservations were observed in the amino acid sequence elements
containing the seven invariant metal-ligating residues (Fig.
5A, boxed sequence elements), and in the
asparagine residue that may undergo posttranslational glycosylation
modification (Fig. 5A, indicated by empty
triangle). However, the three residues implicated in
substrate catalysis in mammalian PAPs were not strictly conserved in
AtPAP7 and AtPAP8 (Fig. 5A, marked by asterisks).
In contrast, extensive gaps were seen in the alignment of the amino
acid sequences of AtPAP9-AtPAP13 to that of KBPAP (Fig.
5B). Substantial variation was found in the sequence
elements containing the potential metal-ligating residues (Fig.
5B, boxed sequence elements), and, most
obviously, four of the seven potential metal-ligating residues could
not be recognized at the anticipated positions of the amino acid
sequence of AtPAP13 (Fig. 5B). In addition, strict
conservation was not found for the asparagine residues (Fig.
5B, indicated by empty triangles)
previously identified as sites of glycosylation in KBPAP, the cysteine
residue (Fig. 5B, indicated by filled
triangle) that had been involved in the formation of the
disulfide bridge required for the dimerization of KBPAP, and the three
residues participating in substrate catalysis by KBPAP (Fig.
5B, marked by asterisks). In a previous
investigation, Tsyguelnaia and Doolittle (21) found that the
NH2-domain of KBPAP shared seven conserved residues with
the fibronectin type III domain of human fibronectin. A complete
preservation of the seven residues was seen only in two of the five
Arabidopsis PAPs (AtPAP10 and AtPAP12; Fig. 5B, underlined residues).

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Comparison of the primary structure of
Arabidopsis PAPs with that of uteroferrin and
KBPAP. A, comparison among AtPAP7, AtPAP8, and
uteroferrin (UF). B, comparison among AtPAP9,
AtPAP10, AtPAP11, AtPAP12, AtPAP13, and KBPAP. The conserved sequence
motifs are boxed, and the metal-ligating residues are
represented by bold letters. Asterisks
indicate residues participating in substrate catalysis in uteroferrin
or KBPAP. The empty triangle marks the site of
glycosylation in uteroferrin or KBPAP. The filled
triangle indicates the cysteine residue involved in
disulfide bond formation in KBPAP. The underlined residues
in B represent residues conserved between the
NH2-domain of KBPAP and the fibronectin type III domain of
human fibronectin.
|
|
Differential Transcriptional Responses of Arabidopsis PAPs to
Phosphate Deprivation--
Because suspension cultures of different
plant species had been employed in past studies on the regulation of
many types of genes by phosphate deprivation treatment (31, 45-53),
the transcriptional responses of AtPAP7-AtPAP13 to phosphate
deprivation treatment were investigated using Arabidopsis
suspension cells. Total RNA was prepared from both control and
phosphate-deprived cell samples. After reverse transcription, the
cDNA content of different samples was normalized (as described
under "Experimental Procedures"). Care was also taken to ensure
that amplification of the different AtPAPs entered, but did not exceed,
the exponential phase of the PCR, and to maintain equal loading for all
PCR samples to be checked on agarose gels. With these optimizations,
three patterns of transcriptional responses were found for
AtPAP7-AtPAP13 (Fig. 6) in relation to phosphate deprivation treatment. For AtPAP7, AtPAP8, AtPAP9, AtPAP10, and AtPAP13, their transcript levels were not obviously affected by low
phosphate treatment (Fig. 6). The transcript level of AtPAP12 increased
upon low phosphate treatment (Fig. 6). In stark contrast, a dramatic
de novo induction of transcription was observed for AtPAP11
in response to phosphate deprivation (Fig. 6).

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Differential transcriptional responses of
AtPAP7-AtPAP13 to phosphate deprivation treatment in suspension cells
as assessed by semiquantitative RT-PCR. Samples were taken from
phosphate-deprived (P ) as well as the control,
phosphate-sufficient (P+) suspension cultures at
selected time points. Semiquantitative PCR assay was conducted as
described under "Experimental Procedures." The transcript level of
AtPAPs 7-10 and 13 was not significantly affected, whereas that of
AtPAP11 and AtPAP12 was induced and increased, respectively, by
phosphate deprivation treatment. In these experiments, the
amplification of tubulin transcripts was used to normalize the cDNA
content of different reverse transcription reactions, and to monitor
the kinetics of PCR (bottom panel).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Considerable insights have been gained in past x-ray
crystallography studies on the structure of PAPs (1, 3, 13, 23). However, the progress in structural studies has so far not been matched
by improved understanding of the biological functions of PAPs. To
advance investigations into higher plant PAPs, we have performed
comparative analysis of multiple PAPs from A. thaliana.
Blastp searches of Arabidopsis protein data base identified
29 PAPs encoded by this species, 24 of which possessed the seven invariant amino acid residues involved in the coordination of the
dimetal nuclear center of known PAPs. Transcripts for the great
majority of the 24 PAPs were found in Arabidopsis cells (Table III). Furthermore, AtPAP17 (AtACP5, Table III), 1 of the 24 AtPAPs, has been previously shown to resemble PAPs from mammalian cells
in primary structure and biochemical properties, and to be involved in
phosphate mobilization and the metabolism of reactive oxygen species
in vivo (31). On the basis of these results, we suggest that
the 24 Arabidopsis PAPs are all likely to be active metallo-phosphoesterases, although they may differ from each other in
aspects of their in vivo function.
In contrast to the above situation, AtPAP13 did not contain the whole
complement of the seven invariant metal-ligating residues typical of
known PAPs, nor did it possess varieties of potential metal-ligating
residues resembling those of other types of metallo-phosphoesterases. This indicates that AtPAP13 may not be a biochemically active PAP.
However, an alternative physiological function for AtPAP13 in
Arabidopsis cells may still exist because its coding gene
was transcribed. In AtPAPs 14, 16, 28, and 29, the varieties of
potential metal-ligating residues resembled those of exonucleases and
phosphodiesterases (1, 42-44). In the light of this finding, it will
be interesting to study further the structure and biochemical
properties of the four unusual AtPAPs to reveal their differences to
typical PAPs. It is also worthwhile to note that proteins homologous to
AtPAPs 14, 16, 28, and 29 are present in both eukaryotic and
prokaryotic organisms and that the six plant PAPs listed in Fig. 1
appear to be more similar to their counterparts from bacterial cells in
the size (and probably primary structure as well) of their polypeptide
chains. This suggests that the bacterial and plant PAPs of this type
may have evolved with similar structural constraints and, consequently,
may share similarities in properties.
Based on clustering analysis, the 29 AtPAPs could be classified into
three main groups, a further division of which yielded eight subgroups
(Fig. 2). Although detailed studies have yet to be performed for the
majority of the 29 AtPAPs, the following lines of evidence indicate
that the classification scheme we proposed may reflect structural and
biochemical differences as well as phylogenetic relationships among the
compared enzymes. First, although the classification scheme we proposed
was derived essentially from alignment of amino acid sequence elements
conserved in 29 Arabidopsis PAPs (because of the employment
of the complete deletion option during the clustering analysis), there
was a general correlation between the division of the groups and the
size of the predicted proteins of AtPAPs (Fig. 2). This indicates that
our classification scheme may reflect structure differences among the
different types of AtPAPs. Second, at the subgroup level, there was a
clustering of AtPAPs that were likely to have similar biochemical
properties. For example, most members in subgroups Ib-1 and Ib-2 have
been shown to exhibit high percentages of identity to a phytase
purified from soybean seedlings. Third, in our phylogenetic analysis
using the amino acid sequences derived from cDNA analysis of
AtPAP7-AtPAP13, it was found that the seven PAPs partitioned in both
the HMW and LMW PAP groups (Fig. 4). AtPAP9-AtPAP13, which belonged to
the HMW PAP group (Fig. 4), were located in groups I and II of our classification scheme. In contrast, AtPAPs 7 and 8, which were phylogenetically close to LMW PAPs (Fig. 4), resided in group III. This
suggests that our classification of Arabidopsis PAPs was in
accord with their evolutionary differences. It is interesting to note
that group II AtPAPs in our classification system (Fig. 2) are proteins
the size of which is generally larger than that of group I members.
However, based on the clustering of AtPAP9 (a representative of group
II) with AtPAP10-AtPAP12 and KBPAP in phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 4),
we propose that group II AtPAPs may still be related to the HMW PAPs in phylogeny.
Because of phylogenetic relatedness (Fig. 4), the primary structure of
AtPAPs 7 and 8 was compared with that of uteroferrin (as the
representative of LMW PAPs), and the primary structure of
AtPAP9-AtPAP13 compared with that of KBPAP (as the representative of
HMW PAPs). These comparisons were conducted with the aim to find out
the patterns in the conservation (or variation) of the primary
structure among PAPs functioning in plant or animal cells. Despite the
fact that plants and animals diverged approximately one billion years
ago, AtPAPs 7 and 8 and uteroferrin were remarkably similar in terms of
protein size, variety of metal-ligating residues, residue for
glycosylation, and some of the residues involved in substrate
catalysis. In contrast, there was extensive variation in the primary
structure among AtPAP9-AtPAP13 and in between the five AtPAPs and
KBPAP. This variation included changes in the size of the protein (as
already noted in Fig. 2), the variety of potential metal-ligating
residues, potential site for glycosylation or disulfide bond formation,
the residues involved substrate catalysis, and the residues that may
play a role in the structure formation of the NH2-terminal
domain. Clearly, less variation was seen in the LMW type of AtPAPs (as
represented by AtPAPs 7 and 8) when compared with the HMW type of
AtPAPs (as represented by AtPAPs 9-13) in terms of protein size and
variety of potential metal-ligating residues. This would imply that the
LMW and HMW type of AtPAPs may have evolved in different manners,
although the underlying reasons are presently not known. From a more
practical point of view, the identification of the conservation (or
variation) pattern through primary structure comparisons may yield
information on biochemical, catalytic and/or functional properties of
the AtPAPs under investigation, e.g. from the alignment
shown in Fig. 5B, it may be predicted that AtPAPs 10 and 12 would resemble KBPAP in many aspects of their enzymatic properties.
While characterizing the cDNAs of AtPAP7-AtPAP13, a surprising
finding was that the genes encoding AtPAP10 and AtPAP13 produced both
wild type, fully processed transcripts and splice variants. The splice
variants of AtPAP10 were found to associate with polyribosomes, and the
extent of this association could be increased by phosphate deprivation
(Fig. 3C). The putative product of AtPAP10 splice variant
may be translated and be enzymatically active, and if it is, it may
behave more like a LMW plant PAPs because of the lack of the
amino-terminal domain that would be present in the wild type enzyme.
The putative product of AtPAP13 splice variant was also smaller because
of deletions in both amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions, and like the
wild type protein, did not possess the whole complement of the seven
invariant metal-ligating residues typical of PAPs. In animal cells, the
production and function of NH2-terminal splice variants
have been demonstrated for a number of genes (54-59). Our results
indicate that the function of some plant genes may also involve more
than one form of a protein translated from either wild type transcripts
or NH2-terminal splice variants. Further experiments are
needed to investigate the biochemical, catalytic, and functional
properties of the two putative forms of AtPAP10 in
Arabidopsis cells. In contrast to AtPAP10, functional
investigations in AtPAP13 may be complicated by the fact that both
forms of putative proteins (wild type protein and the product of the
splice variant) did not contain the whole complement of metal-ligating residues.
Because of their phosphoesterase activity, it is understandable that
past studies have found evidence for the involvement of PAPs in
phosphorus nutrition of plant cells. However, previous investigators
have focused mainly on PAPs inducible by phosphate deprivation. In our
study on AtPAP7-AtPAP13, it was found that there were three different
patterns of transcriptional responses of PAPs in relation to phosphate
deprivation treatment in suspension cells. The transcript level of five
AtPAPs (AtPAPs 7-10 and 13) was not affected, whereas that of
AtPAP11 and AtPAP12 was induced and increased, respectively (Fig. 6).
These results suggest that transcriptional responses of PAPs to
phosphate deprivation are more complex than previously reported. From
the comparison of primary structure shown in Fig. 5B, it
could be seen that one of the differences among AtPAP10, AtPAP11, and
AtPAP12 (three AtPAPs possessing the three different patterns of
transcriptional responses to phosphate deprivation treatment) was that
the cysteine residue involved in dimerization of KBPAP was conserved in
AtPAP10 and AtPAP12, but not in AtPAP11 (Fig. 5B). Further
research is needed to study whether or not the biochemical function of
AtPAP11 involves the formation of homodimers. Although phosphate
deprivation did not appear to change the transcript levels of AtPAPs
7-10, and 13, it affected the association of AtPAP10 transcripts with polyribosomes (Fig. 3C) and caused an increased level of
AtPAP10 splice variants that have the potential to direct the
production of an enzyme with potentially new properties. This indicates
that, in future studies on the function of PAPs in phosphorus nutrition of plant cells, attention ought to be given to both inducibly and
constitutively expressed members of these enzymes.
Judging from the comparative analysis presented, there appear to be
high levels of variations in the structure, transcription regulation,
and responses to phosphate deprivation in Arabidopsis PAPs.
Consequently, functional dissection for 29 AtPAPs will be a complex
task, which will require the implementation of multiple strategies in
research. The use of a mutant for functional investigation of an acid
phosphatase in Arabidopsis has been reported, although it is
not known whether the affected acid phosphatase is actually a PAP (60).
As the number of knockout mutants for Arabidopsis genes
increases in various functional genomics projects, mutants missing one
or more PAPs will become important tools for functional studies.
Another important strategy will be to identify regulatory loci
affecting the expression of multiple PAPs. A MYB transcription factor
required for the increased expression of several genes under phosphate
deprivation conditions has been identified (61), one of which is that
for AtACP5 (AtPAP17, Table II) (31, 61). However, the transcription of
other AtPAPs was not reported in that work. Recently, a pho3
locus was reported to cause a 30% reduction of root acid phosphatase
activity in Arabidopsis (62). It will be interesting to test
if the reduction of root acid phosphatase activity by pho3
involves reduced expression of any of the 29 AtPAPs. Finally, in
addition to the above genetic strategies, a biochemical approach aimed
at comparing the biochemical properties of different AtPAPs using
in vitro expressed proteins would also generate information
useful in the interpretation of the results from the genetic
experiments. Only by combining the different research strategies
discussed above may a more complete understanding of the function of
PAPs in Arabidopsis biology be attainable.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Jiayang Li for helpful
discussions on our Arabidopsis research and Dr. Hongqing
Ling for critical comments on the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grant J99-A-035 from the Ministry
of Science and Technology of China and in part by a grant from the Max
Planck Society of Germany.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AF492659 (AtPAP7), AF492660 (AtPAP8), AF492661 (AtPAP9), AF492662 (AtPAP10), AF492663 (AtPAP11), AF492664 (AtPAP12), AF492665
(AtPAP13), AY090893 (AtPAP10 splice variant), and AY090894 (AtPAP13
splice variant).
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
8610-64889380; Fax: 8610-64854467; E-mail:
dwwang@genetics.ac.cn or daowenwang{at}hotmail.com.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 20, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M204183200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PAP, purple acid
phosphatase;
AGI, Arabidopsis genome initiative;
AtPAP, Arabidopsis purple acid phosphatase;
HMW, high molecular
weight;
KBPAP, kidney bean purple acid phosphatase;
LMW, low molecular
weight;
RT, reverse transcription;
ORF, open reading frame;
TIGR, the
Institute for Genomic Research.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Klabunde, T.,
Strater, N.,
Frohlich, R.,
Witzel, H.,
and Krebs, B.
(1996)
J. Mol. Biol.
259,
737-748[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Klabunde, T.,
Strater, N.,
Krebs, B.,
and Witzel, H.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
367,
56-60[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Strater, N.,
Klabunde, T.,
Tucker, P.,
Witzel, H.,
and Krebs, B.
(1995)
Science
268,
1489-1492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Schenk, G.,
Guddat, L. W., Ge, Y.,
Carrington, L. E.,
Hume, D. A.,
Hamilton, S.,
and de Jersey, J.
(2000)
Gene (Amst.)
250,
117-125[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Schenk, G.,
Korsinczky, M. L.,
Hume, D. A.,
Hamilton, S.,
and de Jersey, J.
(2000)
Gene (Amst.)
255,
419-424[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Goldberg, J.,
Huang, H. B.,
Kwon, Y. G.,
Greengard, P.,
Nairn, A. C.,
and Kuriyan, J.
(1995)
Nature
376,
745-753[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Kissinger, C. R.,
Parge, H. E.,
Knighton, D. R.,
Lewis, C. T.,
Pelletier, L. A.,
Tempczyk, A.,
Kalish, V. J.,
Tucker, K. D.,
Showalter, R. E.,
Moomaw, E. W.,
Gastinel, L. N.,
Habuka, N.,
Chen, X.,
Maldonado, F.,
Baker, J. E.,
Bacquet, R.,
and Villafranca, J. E.
(1995)
Nature
378,
641-644[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Griffith, J. P.,
Kim, J. L.,
Kim, E. E.,
Sintchak, M. D.,
Thomson, J. A.,
Fitzgibbon, M. J.,
Fleming, M. A.,
Caron, P. R.,
Hsiao, K.,
and Navia, M. A.
(1995)
Cell
82,
507-522[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Koonin, E. V.
(1994)
Protein Sci.
3,
356-358[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Zhuo, S.,
Clemens, J. C.,
Stone, R. L.,
and Dixon, J. E.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
26234-26238[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Lohse, D. L.,
Denu, J. M.,
and Dixon, J. E.
(1995)
Structure
3,
987-990[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Vincent, J. B.,
and Averill, B. A.
(1990)
FEBS Lett.
263,
265-268[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Uppenberg, J.,
Lindqvist, F.,
Svensson, C., Ek-,
Rylander, B.,
and Andersson, G.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
290,
201-211[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Zhang, J.,
Zhang, Z.,
Brew, K.,
and Lee, E. Y.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
6276-6282[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Huang, H. B.,
Horiuchi, A.,
Goldberg, J.,
Greengard, P.,
and Nairn, A. C.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
3530-3535[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Mertz, P., Yu, L.,
Sikkink, R.,
and Rusnak, F.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21296-21302[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Klabunde, T.,
and Krebs, B.
(1997)
Bond
89,
177-198
|
| 18.
|
Schenk, G.,
Carrington, L. E.,
Hamilton, S. E.,
de Jersey, J.,
and Guddat, L. W.
(1999)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
55,
2051-2052[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Durmus, A.,
Eicken, C.,
Sift, B. H.,
Kratel, A.,
Kappl, R.,
Huttermann, J.,
and Krebs, B.
(1999)
Eur. J. Biochem.
260,
709-716[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Beck, J. L.,
McConaghie, L. A.,
Summors, A. C.,
Arnold, N. W.,
de Jersey, J.,
and Zerner, B.
(1986)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
869,
61-68
|
| 21.
|
Tsyguelnaia, I.,
and Doolittle, R. F.
(1998)
J. Mol. Evol.
46,
612-614[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Lindqvist, Y.,
Johansson, E.,
Kaija, H.,
Vihko, P.,
and Schneider, G.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
291,
135-147[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Guddat, L. W.,
McAlpine, A. S.,
Hume, D.,
Hamilton, S.,
de Jersey, J.,
and Martin, J. L.
(1999)
Struct. Fold. Des.
7,
757-767[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Nakazato, H.,
Okamoto, T.,
Nishikoori, M.,
Washio, K.,
Morita, N.,
Haraguchi, K.,
Thompson, G. A., Jr.,
and Okuyama, H.
(1998)
Plant Physiol.
118,
1015-1020[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Wasaki, J.,
Omura, M.,
Osaki, M.,
Ito, H.,
Matsui, H.,
Shinano, T.,
and Tadano, T.
(1999)
Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.
45,
439-449
|
| 26.
|
Miller, S. S.,
Liu, J.,
Allan, D. L.,
Menzhuber, C. J.,
Fedorova, M.,
and Vance, C. P.
(2001)
Plant Physiol.
127,
594-606[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Hayman, A. R.,
Jones, S. J.,
Boyde, A.,
Foster, D.,
Colledge, W. H.,
Carlton, M. B.,
Evans, M. J.,
and Cox, T. M.
(1996)
Development
122,
3151-3162[Abstract]
|
| 28.
|
Nuttleman, P. R.,
and Roberts, R. M.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
12192-12199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Sibille, J. C.,
Doi, K.,
and Aisen, P.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
59-62[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Johnson, J. F.,
Vance, C. P.,
and Allan, D. L.
(1996)
Plant Physiol.
112,
31-41[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
del Pozo, J. C.,
Allona, I.,
Rubio, V.,
Leyva, A.,
de la Pena, A.,
Aragoncillo, C.,
and Paz-Ares, J.
(1999)
Plant J.
19,
579-589[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Haran, S.,
Logendra, S.,
Seskar, M.,
Bratanova, M.,
and Raskin, I.
(2000)
Plant Physiol.
124,
615-626[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Hegeman, C. E.,
and Grabau, E. A.
(2001)
Plant Physiol.
126,
1598-1608[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Durmus, A.,
Eicken, C.,
Spener, F.,
and Krebs, B.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1434,
202-209[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Baldwin, J. C.,
Karthikeyan, A. S.,
and Raghothama, K. G.
(2001)
Plant Physiol.
125,
728-737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Thompson, J. D.,
Higgins, D. G.,
and Gibson, T. J.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
4673-4680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Nei, N.,
and Kumar, S.
(2000)
Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics
, Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom
|
| 38.
|
Hu, Y.,
Bao, F.,
and Li, J.
(2000)
Plant J.
24,
693-701[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Mou, Z., He, Y.,
Dai, Y.,
Liu, X.,
and Li, J.
(2000)
Plant Cell
12,
405-418[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Davies, E.,
and Abe, S.
(1995)
in
Methods in Cell Biology
(Galbraith, D. W.
, Bourque, D. P.
, and Bohnert, H. J., eds)
, pp. 209-222, Academic Press, San Diego, CA
|
| 41.
|
Petracek, M. E.,
Dickey, L. F.,
Huber, S. C.,
and Thompson, W. F.
(1997)
Plant Cell
9,
2291-2300[Abstract]
|
| 42.
|
Takahashi, T.,
Suchi, M.,
Desnick, R. J.,
Takada, G.,
and Schuchman, E. H.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
12552-12558[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Imamura, R.,
Yamanaka, K.,
Ogura, T.,
Hiraga, S.,
Fujita, N.,
Ishihama, A.,
and Niki, H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
25423-25429[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Schuchman, E. H.,
Suchi, M.,
Takahashi, T.,
Sandhoff, K.,
and Desnick, R. J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
8531-8539[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Abel, S.,
Nurnberger, T.,
Ahnert, V.,
Krauss, G. J.,
and Glund, K.
(2000)
Plant Physiol.
122,
543-552[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Jost, W.,
Bak, H.,
Glund, K.,
Terpstra, P.,
and Beintema, J. J.
(1991)
Eur. J. Biochem.
198,
1-6[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Kock, M.,
Loffler, A.,
Abel, S.,
and Glund, K.
(1995)
Plant Mol. Biol.
27,
477-485[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Loffler, A.,
Glund, K.,
and Irie, M.
(1993)
Eur. J. Biochem.
214,
627-633[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Burleigh, S. M.,
and Harrison, M. J.
(1998)
Gene (Amst.)
216,
47-53[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Duff, S. M.,
Plaxton, W. C.,
and Lefebvre, D. D.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
9538-9542[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Malboobi, M. A.,
and Lefebvre, D. D.
(1995)
Plant Mol. Biol.
28,
859-870[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Palma, D. A.,
Blumwald, E.,
and Plaxton, W. C.
(2000)
FEBS Lett.
486,
155-158[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Theodorou, M. E.,
Cornel, F. A.,
Duff, S. M.,
and Plaxton, W. C.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
21901-21905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Bamberger, C.,
and Schmale, H.
(2001)
FEBS Lett.
501,
121-126[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Chraibi, A.,
Verdumo, C.,
Merillat, A. M.,
Rossier, B. C.,
Horisberger, J. D.,
and Hummler, E.
(2001)
Cell Physiol. Biochem.
11,
115-122[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Kone, B. C.,
and Higham, S. C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2543-2552[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 57.
|
Nakajima, T.,
Ichii, S.,
Furuyama, J.,
Tamaoki, T.,
and Hashimoto, T.
(1996)
Life Sci.
58,
761-768[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 58.
|
Schumacher, M. A.,
Moff, I.,
Sudanagunta, S. P.,
and Levine, J. D.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
2756-2762[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
|
Sunada, Y.,
Bernier, S. M.,
Utani, A.,
Yamada, Y.,
and Campbell, K. P.
(1995)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
4,
1055-1061[Free Full Text]
|
| 60.
|
Trull, M. C.,
and Deikman, J.
(1998)
Planta
206,
544-550[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 61.
|
Rubio, V.,
Linhares, F.,
Solano, R.,
Martin, A. C.,
Iglesias, J.,
Leyva, A.,
and Paz-Ares, J.
(2001)
Genes Dev.
15,
2122-2133[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 62.
|
Zakhleniuk, O. V.,
Raines, C. A.,
and Lloyd, J. C.
(2001)
Planta
212,
529-534[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Zhang, H. A. Gruszewski, B. I. Chevone, and C. L. Nessler
An Arabidopsis Purple Acid Phosphatase with Phytase Activity Increases Foliar Ascorbate
Plant Physiology,
February 1, 2008;
146(2):
431 - 440.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Hammond and P. J. White
Sucrose transport in the phloem: integrating root responses to phosphorus starvation
J. Exp. Bot.,
January 1, 2008;
59(1):
93 - 109.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. N. Devaiah, A. S. Karthikeyan, and K. G. Raghothama
WRKY75 Transcription Factor Is a Modulator of Phosphate Acquisition and Root Development in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology,
April 1, 2007;
143(4):
1789 - 1801.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Veljanovski, B. Vanderbeld, V. L. Knowles, W. A. Snedden, and W. C. Plaxton
Biochemical and Molecular Characterization of AtPAP26, a Vacuolar Purple Acid Phosphatase Up-Regulated in Phosphate-Deprived Arabidopsis Suspension Cells and Seedlings
Plant Physiology,
November 1, 2006;
142(3):
1282 - 1293.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Li, R. Welti, and X. Wang
Quantitative Profiling of Arabidopsis Polar Glycerolipids in Response to Phosphorus Starvation. Roles of Phospholipases D{zeta}1 and D{zeta}2 in Phosphatidylcholine Hydrolysis and Digalactosyldiacylglycerol Accumulation in Phosphorus-Starved Plants
Plant Physiology,
October 1, 2006;
142(2):
750 - 761.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Yoneyama, M. Shiozawa, M. Nakamura, T. Suzuki, Y. Sagane, Y. Katoh, T. Watanabe, and T. Ohyama
Characterization of a Novel Acid Phosphatase from Embryonic Axes of Kidney Bean Exhibiting Vanadate-dependent Chloroperoxidase Activity
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 3, 2004;
279(36):
37477 - 37484.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. HAMMOND, M. R. BROADLEY, and P. J. WHITE
Genetic Responses to Phosphorus Deficiency
Ann. Bot.,
September 1, 2004;
94(3):
323 - 332.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Tomscha, M. C. Trull, J. Deikman, J. P. Lynch, and M. J. Guiltinan
Phosphatase Under-Producer Mutants Have Altered Phosphorus Relations
Plant Physiology,
May 1, 2004;
135(1):
334 - 345.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Franco-Zorrilla, E. Gonzalez, R. Bustos, F. Linhares, A. Leyva, and J. Paz-Ares
The transcriptional control of plant responses to phosphate limitation
J. Exp. Bot.,
February 1, 2004;
55(396):
285 - 293.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Li, K. Liu, S. A. Baldwin, and D. Wang
Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporters of Arabidopsis thaliana: cDNA CLONING, EXPRESSION PATTERN, AND ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 12, 2003;
278(37):
35732 - 35742.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|