Dual Role of Insulin in Transcriptional Regulation of the Acute
Phase Reactant Ceruloplasmin*
Vasudevan
Seshadri
,
Paul L.
Fox
§, and
Chinmay K.
Mukhopadhyay
¶
From the
Department of Cell Biology, Lerner Research
Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195 and the
¶ Special Centre for Molecular Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru
University, New Delhi 110 067, India
Received for publication, April 15, 2002, and in revised form, May 22, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Insulin is a potent negative regulator of the
response of hepatic cells to pro-inflammatory cytokines, particularly,
interleukin (IL)-6. The action of insulin is target-selective because
it inhibits transcription of most but not all acute phase genes. We
here show that ceruloplasmin (Cp), an acute phase reactant with
important functions in iron homeostasis, is subject to a unique dual
regulation by insulin. IL-6 increased Cp mRNA expression in HepG2
cells by ~5-fold. Simultaneous treatment with insulin reduced this
stimulation by half. Surprisingly, insulin by itself caused a 2-4-fold
induction in Cp mRNA expression. The mechanism of induction by
insulin was studied by transfecting into HepG2 cells chimeric
constructs of the Cp 5'-flanking region driving luciferase.
The activity of a 4800-bp segment of the Cp 5'-flanking
region was increased 3-fold by insulin. Deletion and mutation analyses
showed the requirement for a single hypoxia-responsive element in a
96-bp segment ~3600 bp upstream of the initiation site. The domains
required for the two activities of insulin were distinct: The distal,
hypoxia-responsive element-containing site was sufficient for Cp
transactivation by insulin; in contrast, an 848-bp region adjacent to
the initiation site was sufficient for IL-6 transactivation of Cp and
for the inhibitory activity of insulin. The role of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 in the induction of Cp by insulin was shown by electrophoretic mobility shift assays and by the absence of insulin-stimulated Cp
promoter activation in mouse Hepa c4 cells deficient in
hypoxia-inducible factor-1 activity. Taken together these results show
that insulin functions as a bidirectional,
condition-dependent regulator of hepatic cell Cp
expression. The unique regulation of Cp may reflect its dual roles in
inflammation and iron homeostasis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Vertebrates respond to tissue damage and other inflammatory
stimuli by implementing a coordinated series of processes known as the
acute phase reaction. A characteristic of this response, and the basis
of common clinical tests, is the increase in the plasma concentration
of a limited group of proteins, e.g. C-reactive protein. The
major function of the acute phase response is almost certainly to
protect the host against injury, trauma, infection, and other
inflammatory events (1, 2). The response is initiated by surveying
leukocytes that respond to these events by secretion of inflammatory
mediators. These mediators have been broadly classified into two
groups: (i) cytokines, such as interleukin
(IL)1-6, IL-1,
interferon-
, and tumor necrosis factor-
, which are the primary
regulators of acute phase gene expression; and (ii) insulin (and other
growth factors) and glucocorticoids, which function as modulators of
cytokine action (1, 2). Among the pro-inflammatory mediators, IL-6 is
considered to be the major physiological regulator of acute phase gene
expression (2, 3). The liver is a principal target of inflammatory
mediators, and the specific actions of these mediators with respect to
the pattern of acute phase gene expression have been defined in detail in hepatocarcinoma cell lines (2). Insulin is a highly effective negative regulator of the cytokine-stimulated acute phase response in vitro (4-8) and in vivo (9, 10). Insulin
inhibits IL-6-mediated induction of haptoglobin, thiostatin, complement
C3, and C-reactive protein in hepatocytes and HepG2 cells (6, 11). The
extent of the inhibition depends on the target protein, and insulin
does not alter IL-6-induced expression of several acute phase proteins including
1-antichymotrypsin and
1-acid
glycoprotein (6, 11).
Ceruloplasmin (Cp) is a 132-kDa, copper-containing acute phase protein
of mainly hepatic origin. Its plasma concentration during inflammation
in humans increases by ~50-100%, much less than the 100-1000-fold
increases for C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A (12). The function
of Cp during inflammation is unclear. Several groups have reported an
antioxidant activity of Cp that protects lipids and DNA against free
radical-mediated injury (13). In contrast, we and others have shown
that Cp copper can cause oxidative modification of lipoproteins
(14-16). In addition to its participation in free radical reactions,
Cp is an important regulator of iron homeostasis. It is the major
ferroxidase in plasma, catalyzing the conversion of Fe2+ to
Fe3+ for binding by apo-transferrin (17). The key role of
Cp in iron homeostasis is supported by recent reports of iron overload in patients with hereditary Cp deficiency (18), and in mice with
targeted disruption of the Cp gene (19). These findings, together with early organ culture and animal studies (20, 21), suggest
that Cp is required for efficient release of iron from cells and
tissues. In contrast, Cp has been shown to mediate inward iron flux as
well in some cell culture systems. Cp increases iron uptake by
iron-deficient cells of hepatic and erythroid origin (22, 23), and by
glioblastoma cells (24, 25); the Cp homologue fet3p has a similar role
in high affinity iron uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
(26, 27).
The spectrum of agents that increases plasma Cp concentration in
vivo, and hepatic cell synthesis of Cp in vitro, is
consistent with its involvement in both inflammation as well as iron
homeostasis. Plasma levels of Cp increase in animal models of
inflammation, including after injection of tumor necrosis factor-
,
turpentine, IL-6, and endotoxin (28-30). Cp secretion is increased in
human hepatoma cells exposed to IL-6 (31, 32), but the underlying molecular mechanism has not been investigated in detail; a recent report suggests that regulation may be post-transcriptional (33). We
have shown recently that iron depletion increases hepatic cell transcription of Cp via activation of hypoxia-inducible
factor (HIF)-1, which binds to a hypoxia-responsive element (HRE) in the 5'-flanking region of Cp (22, 34). HIF-1 is a
heterodimer containing HIF-1
and HIF-1
/aryl hydrocarbon receptor
nuclear translocator (ARNT) subunits, two basic
helix-loop-helix/Per-ARNT-Sim proteins (35). Upon cell activation,
HIF-1
is induced and it translocates to the nucleus where it forms
dimers with HIF-1
; these dimers bind to HREs in multiple genes to
induce transcription. HIF-1 is activated by iron deficiency, hypoxia,
and CoCl2, and recent evidence shows activation of HIF-1 by
insulin and insulin-like growth factor (36, 37). Thus, HIF-1 activation
may provide a common mechanism for induction of multiple genes by
hypoxia and insulin, e.g. erythropoietin, vascular
endothelial growth factor, and the glucose transporter Glut1 (36,
38).
The known transcriptional responses of Cp present a potential paradox
regarding the effect of insulin on Cp gene expression. As a
negative regulator of the acute phase response, insulin would be
expected to diminish transcriptional activation of Cp, particularly by
IL-6. In contrast, as a HIF-1-responsive protein, insulin may increase
Cp expression. To investigate this paradox, we have studied the effect
of insulin (and IL-6) on the transcriptional response of Cp in HepG2
cells. Like multiple other acute phase proteins, the IL-6-mediated
induction of Cp is inhibited by insulin. However, our results indicate
that Cp is unique among acute phase proteins in that transcription is
induced by insulin, in the absence of IL-6, through HIF-1 activation.
This unusual dual response of Cp to insulin may be the result of its
unique metabolic positioning at the intersection of inflammation and
iron metabolism.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Reagents--
Human Cp was purchased from Calbiochem and bovine
insulin from Invitrogen. Rabbit polyclonal anti-human Cp IgG and
peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG were obtained from Accurate
Chemical (Westbury, NY) and Roche Molecular Biochemicals, respectively.
Other reagents were from Sigma.
Cell Lines and Culture Conditions--
Human hepatocarcinoma
HepG2 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection and
cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Sigma) supplemented
with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin,
100 mg/ml streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine
(Invitrogen). Mouse hepatoma cell lines Hepa-1c1c7 and Hepa c4 were
kind gifts of Oliver Hankinson and were cultured in modified Eagle's
medium with the same supplements used for HepG2 cells. Cells at
50-60% confluence were used in all experiments. Cells were maintained
in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37 °C.
For experiments in which cells were exposed to hypoxia, oxygen tension
in the chamber (Billups-Rothenberg, San Diego, CA) was set at either
1% O2 for hypoxia or 20% O2 for normoxia.
Immunoblot Analysis of Cp--
Conditioned medium from
serum-deprived HepG2 cells was subjected to 7% SDS-PAGE using Protogel
(National Diagnostics, Atlanta, GA) and transferred by a semi-dry
method to an Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA). The
membrane was incubated with anti-human Cp IgG (1:10,000) as primary
antibody, and then with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody
(1:5000). Cp was detected by chemiluminescence using ECL
(Amersham Biosciences). The blot was subsequently incubated with
Coomassie Blue dye to verify uniform loading of all samples.
RNA Blot Analysis of Cp and Other Transcripts--
RNA was
isolated from HepG2 cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). Total RNA
(20 µg) was denatured in formamide/formaldehyde, electrophoresed
through a 1% agarose gel containing 6% formaldehyde, and then blotted
onto nylon membranes (Schleicher & Schuell). After cross-linking by
ultraviolet irradiation (Stratalinker, Stratagene), the filters were
hybridized to a 646-base pair (bp) BstXI/BamHI
restriction fragment (positions 984-1629 of the open reading frame) of
a human Cp cDNA labeled by random priming with [
-32P]dCTP. For Northern blot analyses of other genes,
blots were hybridized with radiolabeled probes consisting of a 1.5-kb
EcoRI fragment of human C-reactive protein cDNA (pCRP1,
ATCC 59496), a 1.6-kb PstI fragment of human transferrin
cDNA (TfR27A, ATCC 53106), a 525-bp fragment of human serum albumin
generated by reverse transcription-PCR, and 0.65-bp EcoRI
fragment of VEGF (provided by Bela Anand-Apte).
Construction of Vectors Containing Cp Promoter and Enhancer
Segments--
Cp promoter/enhancer constructs, engineered to contain
SacI and XhoI restriction sites, were made by PCR
amplification using Pfu polymerase (Stratagene), primers
containing these restriction sites, and a 4774-bp fragment of the
5'-flanking region of the human Cp gene as template
(pGEM-Cp). pGEM-Cp was obtained by a PCR-based
screen of a human genomic library in the bacterial artificial chromosome vector pBeloBAC11 (Research Genetics, Huntsville, AL) as
described (34). A proximal construct was made from
848 to
1 (the
nucleotide upstream of the translation-initiation site, which is here
defined as +1) and ligated into SacI and XhoI
sites of pGL3basic vector (Promega). For the long constructs inserted into pGL3basic, the PCR products from two separate amplification reactions were ligated to form a single construct. In brief, a proximal
construct was made from
2389 (just upstream of an EcoRI site) to
1. Several distal constructs were PCR-amplified from 5'-termini at
4774,
3639, and
3576 to the 3'-terminus at
2325. The proximal and distal products were ligated at the EcoRI
site and then into the 5'-SacI and 3'-XhoI sites
upstream of luciferase in pGL3basic. An upstream Cp enhancer
construct was made by PCR amplification of pGEM-Cp between
3639 and
3544 and was ligated into the SacI and
XhoI sites of the pGL3prom vector (Promega) upstream of the
SV40 promoter and luciferase. Site-directed mutagenesis of the Cp HRE
in this construct (from CGT to AAA) was done by the megaprimer method
(39). All constructs were verified by sequencing.
Transient Transfection of Cells and Reporter Gene Assays--
To
measure transcriptional efficiency of chimeric Cp
promoter/enhancer constructs, HepG2 cells at ~50% confluence in
six-well plates were transiently transfected for 16 h with a
reporter plasmid (2 µg) using Lipofectin (Invitrogen). To monitor
transfection efficiency, a reporter gene construct (0.25 µg)
containing
-galactosidase behind an SV40 promoter was
co-transfected. Transfected cells were allowed to recover for 6 h
in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum
and then incubated with insulin or subjected to 1% O2 in
serum-free medium for 18 h. Luciferase (Promega) and
-galactosidase (Tropix, Bedford, MA) activities in cell extracts
were determined by chemiluminescence.
Preparation of Nuclear Extracts--
Nuclear extracts were
prepared from HepG2, Hepa-1c1c7, and Hepa c4 cells as described (40).
Briefly, 1 × 108 cells were washed with ice-cold
phosphate-buffered saline and then with a solution containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 1.5 mM MgCl2,
and 10 mM KCl, supplemented with a protease inhibitor
mixture containing 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.4 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 2 µg/ml each of
leupeptin, pepstatin, and aprotinin (Sigma). After incubation on ice
for 10 min, the cells were lysed by 10 strokes with a Dounce
homogenizer and the nuclei were pelleted. The pellet was resuspended in
a solution containing 420 mM KCl, 20 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 1.5 mM MgCl2, and 20%
glycerol, supplemented with the protease mixture described above, and
incubated at 4 °C with gentle agitation. The nuclear extract was
centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min, and the
supernatant was dialyzed twice against a solution of 20 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 100 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, and
20% glycerol. Protein concentration was determined using the Bio-Rad
reagent with bovine serum albumin as standard.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)--
Sequences of
the sense strands of the oligonucleotide probes used for EMSA were as
follows: 5'-TCT GTA CGT GAC CAC ACT CAC CTC-3' (Cp HRE), 5'-TCT GTA AAA
GAC CAC ACT CAC CTC-3' (mutated Cp HRE), and 5'-GCC CTA CGT GCT GTC TCA
CAC AGC-3' (erythropoietin HRE). The sense and antisense strands were
annealed, gel-purified, and end-labeled with [
-32P]ATP
(PerkinElmer Life Sciences) using T4-polynucleotide kinase (Promega). Unincorporated nucleotide was removed by gel filtration using G-25 Sephadex columns (Quick SpinTM TE, Roche
Molecular Biochemicals). To measure DNA-protein interaction, 1 × 105 cpm of oligonucleotide probe was incubated with 5 µg
of nuclear extract and 0.5 µg of sonicated, denatured salmon sperm
DNA (Invitrogen) in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM dithiothreitol, and 5% glycerol,
for 20 min at 4 °C in a total volume of 20 µl. The reaction
mixture was subjected to electrophoresis (200 V in 0.3× Tris-buffered
EDTA solution at 4 °C) using 5% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels.
Dried gels were subjected to autoradiography up to 24 h. For
competition experiments, a 10-300-fold molar excess of unlabeled,
annealed oligonucleotide was pre-mixed with radiolabeled probe before
addition to the binding reaction. For gel supershift analysis, 1 µl
of rabbit monoclonal antibody against HIF-1
or rabbit polyclonal
antibody against ARNT/HIF-1
(both from Novus Biologicals, Littleton,
CO) was added after the initial 20-min incubation, and the solution was
further incubated for 30 min at 4 °C before electrophoresis.
Statistical Analysis--
All experiments have been performed at
least three times with similar results, and representative experiments
are shown. Densitometric results are normalized with respect to
internal controls and are expressed relative to the results in
untreated control wells. Results from reporter experiments are
expressed as mean values ± standard error of the mean
(n = 3 replicate wells).
 |
RESULTS |
Induction of Cp Expression by Insulin--
We first determined
whether insulin blocked the IL-6-mediated induction of Cp
gene expression. Northern blot analysis of HepG2 cells showed that IL-6
increased the steady state level of both major Cp mRNA transcripts
by more than 4-fold (Fig. 1A).
The induction by IL-6 was substantially reduced by approximately half
by insulin, to a level that was still 2-fold higher than untreated
control cells. Surprisingly, Cp mRNA expression was increased by
~2-fold by insulin itself. A dose-response experiment was done to
determine whether the inhibitory activity was observed at physiological concentrations of insulin (between 0.1 and 5 nM). Marked
inhibition of IL-6-mediated Cp expression was observed at 0.3 nM insulin and maximal inhibition at ~1 nM
(Fig. 1B). The average serum insulin concentration in
fasting adults is ~0.1 nM, but insulin concentrations from 0.3 to 0.9 nM are transiently reached after meals (in
normal adults and obese adults with impaired glucose tolerance,
respectively), and levels of 1 nM and higher are seen after
insulin administration and in patients with insulinomas (41, 42). The
concentration of IL-6 used in this experiment, 2.5 ng/ml, is typical of
the serum concentration in patients with acute inflammatory syndromes including bacteremia or meningitis (43). Thus, insulin has a dual
activity with respect to Cp expression; it is a negative regulator of
Cp under inflammatory conditions characterized by elevated IL-6, but it
is a positive regulator under non-inflammatory conditions.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Positive and negative regulation of Cp
expression by insulin. A, subconfluent HepG2 cells were
incubated with medium alone (Cont.), IL-6 (25 ng/ml),
insulin (Ins., 100 nM), or both for 18 h.
Total RNA was isolated and Cp mRNA expression determined by
Northern blot analysis using a radiolabeled, 646-bp Cp cDNA
fragment as probe (upper panel). The 28 S
ribosomal subunit was detected by ultraviolet irradiation and served as
a loading control (middle panel). Cp mRNA
expression was quantitated densitometrically, normalized by the 28 S
subunit, and expressed with respect to untreated control cells
(lower panel). B, HepG2 cells were
incubated with IL-6 (2.5 ng/ml) in the presence of insulin at
concentrations up to 100 nM for 18 h. Cp mRNA
expression (upper panel), 28 S ribosomal subunit
loading control (middle panel), and normalized Cp
mRNA expression (lower panel) were determined
as in A.
|
|
Northern blot analysis of HepG2 treated with increasing amounts of
insulin showed that half-maximal stimulation of steady-state level of
Cp mRNA occurred at ~1 nM insulin, and a maximal
4-fold increase was observed at 10 nM. (Fig.
2A). In multiple repetition of
this experiment, the maximal stimulation of Cp mRNA expression by
insulin was between 2- and 4-fold compared with untreated controls. Analysis of secreted Cp, by immunoblot analysis of conditioned medium,
showed that the increase in synthesis and secretion of the protein
nearly paralleled the induction of the transcript (Fig. 2B).
Half-maximal induction was observed between 0.3 and 1 nM,
and maximal stimulation was seen at 3-10 nM insulin. Cp was secreted entirely in the intact, 132-kDa form required for several
of its biological activities (44, 45). The specificity of the induction
of Cp was shown by Northern analysis of other secreted hepatic
proteins. Insulin did not alter HepG2 cell mRNA expression of
C-reactive protein, a positive acute phase protein, or albumin and
transferrin, two negative acute phase proteins (Fig. 2C). In
a positive control experiment, we measured the induction of VEGF gene
expression as described previously for insulin (36) and insulin-like
growth factor-1 (37); comparable inductions of VEGF and Cp mRNA
were observed (Fig. 2C). A time-course experiment showed
only marginal stimulation of Cp mRNA expression after 8 h, and
essentially maximal expression by 16 h (Fig.
3A). A time course of protein
secretion, as expected, showed delayed stimulation of Cp by insulin
(Fig. 3B). Very little stimulation was seen after 16 h,
but substantial stimulation by 24 h.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Induction of Cp synthesis in HepG2 cells in
response to insulin. A, subconfluent HepG2 cells were
incubated for 18 h with insulin at concentrations up to 100 nM. Cp mRNA expression (upper
panel), 28 S ribosomal subunit loading control
(middle panel), and normalized Cp mRNA
expression (lower panel) were determined as in
Fig. 1A. B, HepG2 cells were incubated with
insulin at concentrations up to 100 nM for 18 h.
Aliquots of conditioned medium were subjected to 7% SDS-PAGE followed
by immunoblot analysis using polyclonal rabbit anti-human Cp IgG
(top panel). The Coomassie Blue-stained gel was
used as a loading control (middle panel). Cp
secretion was quantitated densitometrically, normalized by the major,
~180-kDa band, and expressed compared with untreated control cells
(lower panel). C, to determine
specificity of the effect of insulin on Cp, the expression of several
acute phase and other genes was determined. HepG2 cells were treated
with insulin (100 nM) for 18 h and total RNA isolated.
The expression of Cp, C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin,
transferrin, and VEGF mRNA was determined by Northern blot analysis
using gene-specific radiolabeled cDNA probes. Ultraviolet
visualization of the 28 S ribosomal RNA subunit served as a
control.
|
|

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Time-course Cp induction in response to
insulin. A, HepG2 cells were incubated with 30 or 100 nM insulin for up to 24 h. RNA was isolated and
subjected to Northern blot analysis. Cp mRNA expression
(upper panel), 28 S ribosomal subunit as loading
control (middle panel), and normalized Cp
mRNA expression (lower panel) were determined
as in Fig. 1A. B, aliquots of conditioned media
were subjected to 7% SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis using polyclonal
rabbit anti-human Cp IgG (top panel). The amount
of Cp was quantitated densitometrically and expressed as relative units
(lower panel).
|
|
Transcriptional Activation of Cp by Insulin: Requirement for a HRE
in the Cp 5'-Flanking Region--
We have previously reported that the
Cp gene contains a functional HRE activated by both iron
deficiency and hypoxia (34). This finding, coupled with recent reports
that insulin induces multiple genes through activation of HIF-1
(36-38), led us to examine the possible role of HIF-1 in
insulin-inducible Cp expression. We first compared the magnitude of the
inductions in response to insulin and hypoxia. Exposure of cells to
hypoxic conditions, i.e. 1% O2, induced an
~10-fold increase in Cp mRNA compared with normoxic control cells
(range was between 6- and 19-fold in multiple experiments), an
induction substantially greater than that by a maximal dose of insulin
(2.6-fold in this experiment) (Fig. 4A). Exposure of cells to both
hypoxia and insulin did not increase Cp expression beyond that induced
by hypoxia alone, indicating the absence of a synergistic effect.
Because the induction of HRE-containing genes by hypoxia requires new
protein synthesis, we tested whether protein synthesis was also
required for Cp induction by insulin. Cycloheximide completely blocked
the induction of Cp, indicating a common dependence on new protein
synthesis for both agonists (Fig. 4B).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Comparison of Cp mRNA induction by
insulin and hypoxia. A, subconfluent HepG2 cells were
incubated with insulin (100 nM), or subjected to 1%
O2 in a hypoxia chamber, or both, for 16 h. Cp
mRNA expression (upper panel), 28 S ribosomal
subunit loading control (middle panel), and
normalized Cp mRNA expression (lower panel)
were determined as in Fig. 1A. B, subconfluent
HepG2 cells were pretreated with cycloheximide (CHX, 10 µg/ml) for 45 min and then with insulin (100 nM) for
16 h. Cp mRNA expression (upper panel),
28 S ribosomal subunit loading control (middle
panel), and normalized Cp mRNA expression
(lower panel) were determined as in Fig.
1A.
|
|
To investigate the molecular mechanism of insulin-stimulated
Cp gene expression, we prepared chimeric constructs of the
Cp gene 5'-flanking regulatory region ligated with
luciferase as a heterologous reporter. The human Cp
5'-flanking region contains six consensus HIF-1 binding sites,
i.e. (G/A)CGTG (35), arranged in three adjacent pairs
between positions
4535 and
2447 (Fig. 5A). A series of
promoter/enhancer fragments was constructed with progressively larger
5'-deletions, and the fragments were ligated upstream of luciferase in
the promoterless reporter gene pGL3-basic. Subconfluent HepG2 cells
were transiently transfected with these constructs and then incubated
for 18 h with insulin or under hypoxic conditions. Transactivation
of the entire 4774-bp construct
(Cp
4774,
1-Luc) was increased
~3-fold by insulin (Fig. 5A). Hypoxia also transactivated this construct; the -fold stimulation was approximately twice that for
insulin, consistent with their relative increases in Cp mRNA
expression. Insulin and hypoxia similarly transactivated a chimeric
construct (Cp
3639,
1-Luc) lacking
the upstream-most pair of consensus HIF-1 binding sites. However, activation by insulin and hypoxia was completely abrogated in a
promoter/enhancer construct lacking the three distal consensus HIF-1
binding sites (Cp
3576,
1-Luc).
Basal activity was similar for all Cp promoter/enhancer
constructs. These results suggest that a single HRE located between
positions
3639 and
3577 is required for Cp transactivation by
insulin and hypoxia.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Determination of insulin-responsive element
by deletion and mutation analysis of Cp gene
5'-flanking region. A, mapping of Cp gene
insulin-responsive element by deletion analysis. Chimeric pGL3-basic
vectors were constructed to contain the proximal 4774, 3639, or 3576 bp
of the Cp gene 5'-flanking region (upstream of the
translation initiation site) driving luciferase. Consensus HIF-1
binding sites in the linear maps are indicated by open
rectangles, and labeled with the 5'-positions of the 5-bp
G/ACGTG cores. The constructs were transiently transfected into
subconfluent HepG2 cells (with a plasmid containing -galactosidase
to correct for transfection efficiency) using Lipofectin. After
recovery, the transfected cells were incubated with insulin (100 nM, black bars) for 18 h, or
were subjected to hypoxic condition of 1% O2 for 18 h
(striped bars), or were left untreated
(open bars). Luciferase activity in cell extracts
was measured and normalized for -galactosidase activity.
B, analysis of HRE activity by site-directed mutation
analysis. A segment of the Cp 5'-flanking region containing
the putative HRE was ligated upstream of the SV40 promoter driving
luciferase in pGL3-prom
(Cp 3639, 3544-SV40-Luc). A second
construct contained the same segment but with the core of the HIF-1
binding site mutated from CGT to AAA. The HIF-1 site is indicated by an
open rectangle; the HIF-1 mutation is indicated
by an X and by an underline below the
mutated nucleotides. The constructs were transiently transfected (with
a -galactosidase plasmid) into HepG2 cells as in A. After
recovery the cells were incubated for 18 h with insulin (100 nM, black bars), or with 1%
O2 (striped bars), or were left
untreated (open bars). Luciferase activity in
cell extracts was measured and normalized for -galactosidase
activity.
|
|
To test whether this single HRE was sufficient for Cp transactivation
by insulin, a mutagenesis strategy was used. A 96-bp segment containing
this HRE was subcloned upstream of the SV40 promoter driving luciferase
in the pGL3prom vector
(Cp
3639,
3544-SV40-Luc). After
transient transfection into HepG2 cells, insulin stimulated reporter
gene expression by almost 3-fold (Fig. 5B). As before, the
stimulation by hypoxia was approximately twice that by insulin. To show
that the HRE in this enhancer region was responsible for the observed
activation, the core 5'-ACGTG-3' sequence was mutated to 5'-AAAAG-3'.
This construct was completely inactive with respect to transactivation
by insulin or by hypoxia (Fig. 5B). These results suggest
that a single HRE present in the Cp enhancer is necessary and sufficient for transactivation by insulin.
Relationship between Cp Promoter/Enhancer Sites Required for
Stimulatory and Inhibitory Activities of Insulin--
We investigated
the relationship between the cis-acting site at which insulin
transactivates Cp and the site required for the inhibition of
IL-6-mediated Cp transactivation. HepG2 cells were transfected with the
full-length promoter/enhancer construct (Cp
4774,
1-Luc) and then were
treated with IL-6, insulin, or both, and luciferase activity was
measured. IL-6 induced reporter gene expression by almost 5-fold.
Insulin reduced IL-6-mediated induction to the level seen with insulin
alone, between 2- and 3-fold (Fig.
6A). Thus, both the positive
and negative regulatory activities of insulin are reconstituted using
the full-length Cp promoter/reporter construct. To determine whether
the two activities of insulin utilize the same site, fragments of the
5'-flanking region were tested. The vector containing the 96-bp segment
containing the active Cp HRE
(Cp
3639,
3544-SV40-Luc) was
transfected into HepG2 cells and treated with insulin and IL-6. As
expected, insulin induced luciferase expression by ~2.5-fold;
however, there was essentially no induction by IL-6 (Fig.
6B). The inability of insulin to inhibit the induction by
IL-6 suggested that the inhibitory site was not in the region
containing the HRE. Cells were then transfected with a construct
containing the presumptive basal Cp promoter
(Cp
848,
1-Luc), previously shown to drive constitutive, but not hypoxia-stimulated, reporter gene expression (34). As expected, insulin did not increase luciferase expression, but IL-6 increased expression by ~5-fold (Fig.
6C). The stimulatory activity of IL-6 was completely
abrogated by insulin, indicating the presence of the site of negative
regulation in this proximal construct. Together these results show that
distinct cis-acting sites in the Cp gene 5'-flanking region
are required for the stimulatory and inhibitory activities of insulin.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Determination of domains of Cp
gene 5'-flanking region responsible for the stimulatory and
inhibitory actions of insulin. A, subconfluent HepG2
cell cultures were transiently transfected with a chimeric construct
containing the proximal 4774 bp of the Cp gene 5'-flanking
driving luciferase in pGL3-basic vector
(Cp 4774, 1-Luc). The active HIF-1
binding site is indicated by an open rectangle
and inactive sites indicated by X-marked
rectangles. B, cells were transiently transfected
a segment of the Cp 5'-flanking region containing the active HRE
upstream of the SV40 promoter driving luciferase in pGL3-prom
(Cp 3639, 3544-SV40-Luc).
C, cells were transfected with a construct containing the
proximal 848 bp of the Cp gene 5'-flanking driving
luciferase in pGL3-basic vector
(Cp 848, 1-Luc). All cells were
co-transfected with a plasmid containing -galactosidase to correct
for transfection efficiency. After recovery, the transfected cells were
incubated for 18 h with insulin (100 nM), IL-6 (25 ng/ml), with both together, or with media alone. Luciferase activity in
cell extracts was measured by chemiluminescence and normalized for
-galactosidase activity.
|
|
Role of Hypoxia-inducible Factor-1 in Transcriptional Activation of
Cp by Insulin--
To identify the transcription factor(s) involved in
insulin-stimulated induction of Cp, EMSAs were done using a
radiolabeled 24-bp Cp HRE probe. HepG2 cells were treated with insulin
or hypoxia, and nuclear extracts were incubated with the Cp HRE probe.
Treatment with insulin led to the formation of a single radiolabeled
complex (Fig. 7A). The
mobility of the complex induced by insulin was the same as that induced
by hypoxia, and the same as that bound to an erythropoietin HRE probe,
suggesting that a similar HIF-1-containing complex may be induced by
both hypoxia and insulin. Competition experiments were done to show
specificity of binding of the complex to the Cp HRE probe. The binding
of radiolabeled Cp HRE probe was partially competed by a 10-fold molar
excess of unlabeled Cp HRE and almost completely competed by a 100-fold
molar excess (Fig. 7B). Binding was similarly blocked by an
excess of unlabeled erythropoietin HRE probe, whereas a mutated Cp HRE
probe showed only partial competition even at 300-fold molar
excess.

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Specific binding of an insulin-stimulated
transcription factor complex to the Cp HRE. A, EMSAs
were done to determine Cp HRE-binding complexes. HepG2 cells were
treated for 8 h with insulin (Ins., 100 nM)
or with 1% O2 (Hpx.). Nuclear extracts were
mixed with a 32P-labeled, double-stranded 24-mer probe
containing either the Cp HRE or the erythropoietin (Epo)
HRE. Probe-bound complexes were resolved by 5% nondenaturing PAGE and
visualized by autoradiography. Cont., control. The
positions of the putative HIF-1 and constitutive (Const.)
complexes are indicated by arrows. B, competitor
binding to show specificity of binding of a complex to the Cp HRE.
HepG2 cells were treated with insulin (100 nM) for 16 h and nuclear extracts prepared. Radiolabeled probe was pre-mixed with
unlabeled, annealed, 24-mer oligonucleotide competitor at 10-, 100-, or
300-fold molar excess (increasing concentration is indicated by
upward slope of triangle) before
addition to the nuclear extracts. The competitor probes were wild-type
(wt) Cp HRE, mutant (mut) Cp HRE containing a
CGT-to-AAA mutation (underlined), and erythropoietin
(Epo) HRE. The extracts were mixed with a
32P-labeled probe containing the Cp HRE, and probe-bound
complexes identified as in A.
|
|
Gel supershift studies were done to confirm the presence of HIF-1 in
the insulin-induced complex that binds the Cp HRE. Rabbit monoclonal
anti-HIF-1
shifted the complex formed in insulin-treated cells (Fig.
8A). Furthermore, a polyclonal
antibody against ARNT/HIF-1
(and a mixture of both antibodies)
completely blocked the formation of the complex. To further confirm the
requirement for HIF-1 in the formation of insulin-stimulated, Cp
HRE-binding complexes, we took advantage of the Hepa c4 mouse hepatoma
cell line, which is deficient in ARNT/HIF-1
(46). These cells,
derived from the parental Hepa-1c1c7 cell line, have been used to show
the requirement for HIF-1 in gene transactivation by hypoxia (40), and
more recently by insulin (36). Both cell lines were transfected with
the chimeric reporter gene
Cp
3639,
3544-SV40-Luc. Treatment
of the wild-type Hepa-1c1c7 cells with insulin increased luciferase
expression by almost 2-fold, whereas the stimulation by hypoxia was
~3-fold (Fig. 8B). Neither treatment increased Cp enhancer
activity in the HIF-1-
-deficient cell line. The mouse cell lines
were also used to establish HIF-1 binding by electrophoretic mobility
shift assay. Hepa-1c1c7 and c4 cells were treated with insulin or with
CoCl2, and the binding of the HIF-1 complex to the Cp HRE
probe was determined; we previously showed that CoCl2, like
hypoxia, activated HIF-1 and Cp transcription in these cells (34). Inducible binding was observed in nuclear extracts of wild-type
Hepa-1c1c7 cells treated with either agonist, whereas essentially no
HIF-1 binding was seen in the ARNT/HIF-1
-deficient Hepa c4 cells
(Fig. 8C). Together, these studies clearly demonstrate the
requirement for HIF-1 in activation of Cp transcription by insulin.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Role of HIF-1 in insulin-stimulated
activation of the Cp promoter/enhancer. A,
identification of HIF-1 by supershift analysis. HepG2 cells were
incubated in the absence (Cont.) or presence of insulin (100 nM) for 8 h and nuclear extracts prepared. The
extracts were incubated with a 32P-labeled, 24-mer Cp HRE
probe in the presence of 1 µl of anti-HIF-1 , anti-HIF-1 , or
both for 20 min. The extracts were subjected to 5% nondenaturing PAGE
and autoradiography. The positions of the HIF-1 and constitutive
(Const.) complexes are indicated by arrows. The
supershifted complex is indicated by an open
arrow. B, Cp enhancer activity in
HIF-1 /ARNT-deficient cells. The chimeric reporter gene
Cp 3639, 3544-SV40-Luc was
transiently transfected (with a -galactosidase plasmid) into
wild-type Hepa-1c1c7 and HIF-1 /ARNT-deficient Hepa c4 cells. After
recovery the cells were incubated for 18 h with insulin (100 nM, black bars) or with 1%
O2 (striped bars), or were left
untreated (open bars). Luciferase activity in
cell extracts was measured and normalized for -galactosidase
activity. C, analysis of transcription factor complex
formation in HIF-1 /ARNT-deficient cells. Mouse wild-type Hepa-1c1c7
and HIF-1 /ARNT-deficient Hepa c4 cells were incubated with insulin
(100 nM, Ins.) or CoCl2 (0.1 mM) for 10 h. Nuclear extracts were incubated with a
32P-labeled, 24-mer Cp HRE probe and HRE-bound complexes
detected by nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and
autoradiography as in A.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have found that the effect of insulin on hepatic cell
transcription of Cp depends on the inflammatory state of the
cell. In the absence of a pro-inflammatory stimulus, i.e.
treatment with IL-6, insulin enhances Cp gene expression and
protein production in HepG2 cells. This induction requires activation
of HIF-1 and binding to an HRE in the distal 5'-flanking region of
Cp. In contrast, in the presence of IL-6, insulin markedly
represses Cp gene expression in these cells. Thus, insulin
functions as a bidirectional, condition-dependent regulator
of hepatic cell Cp expression.
Negative Regulation of Cp Transcription by Insulin--
We have
confirmed previous reports of induction of Cp in hepatoma cells by IL-6
(31, 32). Our finding that IL-6 increases the steady-state level of Cp
mRNA and activates a chimeric Cp promoter-Luc
reporter shows that regulation is at the level of transcription.
Although these results are consistent with the mechanism of
IL-6-mediated induction of other acute phase genes, transcriptional
regulation of Cp by IL-6 has not been previously shown. We cannot
account for the difference between our results and an earlier report
that Cp induction by IL-6 is primarily post-transcriptional, but a
variance in culture conditions is a possible explanation (33).
Elucidation of the mechanism of transcriptional activation of acute
phase genes by IL-6 is an area of intense investigation. An important
role for C/EBP
in IL-6-stimulated transactivation of multiple acute
phase genes has been shown by up-regulation of C/EBP
expression, and
by its binding to specific sequences in the 5'-flanking regions of
these genes (47-49). More recently, the IL-6-activated "acute phase
response factor" has been shown to be STAT3, which binds to
palindromic, TT(N)5AA motifs (termed acute phase response
elements) in the promoters of multiple (but not all (Ref. 50)) acute
phase genes (51-54). The essential role of STAT3 in the acute phase
response in vivo has been shown in mice with an inducible
STAT3 gene deletion (55). The molecular mechanism of
Cp transactivation by IL-6 has not been investigated in
detail. Binding of C/EBP
to the rat Cp promoter has been
shown, but agonist-induced responses have not been examined (56).
Likewise, the role of STAT3 in basal or agonist-induced Cp
transcription has not been reported; however, the presence of three
near-consensus STAT3-binding sites in the proximal Cp
promoter between nucleotide positions
848 and
1 merits further analysis.
Our results show that insulin suppresses the IL-6-mediated increase in
Cp mRNA level to nearly the same level as that seen with insulin
alone. The experiments with a chimeric reporter gene (Cp
848,
1-Luc) confirm that IL-6
transcriptional activity is completely blocked by insulin. Thus, Cp
joins a family of insulin-inhibited acute phase genes including
haptoglobin, thiostatin, complement C3, and C-reactive protein (6, 11). The negative regulation by insulin may be mediated by at least three
pathways. Insulin reduces IL-6-induced STAT-3 activity as measured by
gene transcription, mRNA accumulation, protein concentration, and
DNA binding activity (7). Insulin also reduces the expression of the
IL-6 receptor
-subunit and IL-6 receptor binding (7). Finally,
insulin suppresses transactivation by C/EBP
(8). The presence of an
active C/EBP
-binding site in the rat Cp promoter (56) and the
consensus STAT3-binding sites suggest that either or both of these
pathways may be involved. Our results indicate that the direction and
magnitude of the response of the Cp promoter to insulin is
condition-dependent; under normal physiological conditions,
insulin increases Cp transcription, whereas, during the systemic acute
phase response or localized inflammation, insulin reduces Cp
transcription. We are not aware of other acute phase reactants that are
transcriptionally activated by insulin; thus, the response of Cp may be
unique. The dual response of Cp to insulin may reflect its pleiotropic
nature, with possibly distinct functions in inflammation and iron
homeostasis. Suppressive activities of insulin have been reported in
other enzyme systems, e.g. it inhibits transcriptional
activation of fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase by dexamethasone in rat
hepatoma FTO-2B cells (57). Insulin by itself causes transcriptional
activation of this enzyme in hepatic FAO-1 (58). Thus, the function of
insulin may be bidirectional in this system as well; however, a direct
demonstration using a single type of cell has not been demonstrated.
Activation of Cp Transcription by Insulin--
We observed a
2-5-fold insulin-stimulated increase in Cp transcription, in Cp
mRNA level, and in the rate of Cp secretion in HepG2 cells. We also
found that the stimulation of Cp gene expression by a
maximal concentration of insulin was much lower than that seen upon
treatment with 1% O2. Our observations are comparable with
a previous report of 2- and 4-fold induction of aldolase A
transcription in HepG2 cells by insulin and hypoxia, respectively (36).
The differential expression may reflect the 2-fold higher level of
HIF-1
in cells treated with hypoxia compared with cells treated with
insulin (59); however, these results were obtained in embryonic kidney
293 cells, and cell type-specific differences in HIF-1
activation by
insulin have been observed (36). The mechanism(s) of HIF-1
induction
by hypoxia and by insulin is not clearly understood. Hypoxia increases
the amount of HIF-1
by stabilization of the protein (60). Under
normoxic conditions, rapid, ubiquitin-dependent degradation
of HIF-1
occurs, whereas hypoxic stress inhibits this process (61).
There is evidence that insulin utilizes a similar mechanism for
stabilization of HIF-1
(36). Recent reports suggest that HIF-1
activation by both hypoxia and insulin utilize the phosphatidylinositol
3-kinase pathway (62, 63).
Role of Insulin in Regulating Cp Levels in Vivo--
Our results
may help to clarify contradictory studies on Cp expression in diabetic
patients and in animal models of diabetes. Elevated plasma Cp levels
have been reported in non-insulin-dependent diabetes
mellitus (NIDDM, type II diabetes) (64-66), but normal Cp levels have
been reported as well (67, 68). The reports on
insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM, type I diabetes) are similarly inconclusive, with one report indicating decreased plasma
Cp (69), whereas others indicate increased Cp (70). The lack of a
consistent response of serum Cp to diabetes has been ascribed to
variability in the acute phase response (64), diabetic vascular
complications (71), oxidative stress (70), extent of hyperglycemia
(66), serum nitric oxide (72), and to methodological differences
(70).
Our in vitro results suggest that the circulating level of
insulin may be a critical regulator of hepatic Cp synthesis, and consequently, plasma Cp level. In this case, part of the variation in
Cp levels in NIDDM patients may be a result of the large range in
plasma insulin values from normal to very high (e.g. in
early phases of the disease and in diabetes related to obesity), and possibly of the oscillatory nature of insulin levels in NIDDM. IDDM
patients require insulin for survival, and thus the method and extent
of diabetic control may influence Cp status. Animal models of diabetes
provide additional insights. In both alloxan- and
streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats, the decrease in insulin level is
accompanied by substantial reductions in plasma Cp (73-75), and
treatment of diabetic rats with insulin restores plasma Cp to normal
levels (75). Similarly, treatment of rats with streptozotocin decreases
Cp synthesis by the isolated perfused liver, but is restored to normal
after treatment of the rats with insulin (76). Taken together, these
data suggest a possible regulatory activity of insulin on hepatic Cp
synthesis and Cp plasma concentration in vivo. Our results
suggest that the relationship between plasma Cp and diabetes is likely
to be a complex function including dependences on both insulin levels
and the extent of inflammation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Oliver Hankinson for the
generous gift of mouse hepatoma Hepa-1c1c7 and the variant Hepa c4
cells and to Bela Anand-Apte for a VEGF cDNA probe.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by a fellowship from the American
Heart Association of Northeast Ohio (to C. K. M.) and by
National Institutes of Health Grants HL29582 and HL67725 (to P. L. F.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Cell Biology,
Lerner Research Inst., Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave.,
Cleveland, OH 44195. Tel.: 216-444-8053; Fax: 216-444-9404; E-mail: foxp@ccf.org.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 23, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203610200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IL, interleukin;
ARNT, aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator;
C/EBP, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein;
Cp, ceruloplasmin;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
HIF, hypoxia-inducible factor;
HRE, hypoxia-responsive element;
IDDM, insulin-dependent
diabetes mellitus;
Luc, luciferase;
NIDDM, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus;
STAT, signal
transducers and activators of transcription;
VEGF, vascular endothelial
growth factor.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Gabay, C.,
and Kushner, I.
(1999)
N. Engl. J. Med.
340,
448-454[Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Baumann, H.,
and Gauldie, J.
(1994)
Immunol. Today
15,
74-80[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Heinrich, P. C.,
Castell, J. V.,
and Andus, T.
(1990)
Biochem. J.
265,
621-636[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Thompson, D.,
Harrison, S. P.,
Evans, S. W.,
and Whicher, J. T.
(1991)
Cytokine
3,
619-626[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Campos, S. P.,
and Baumann, H.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
1789-1797[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
O'Riordain, M. G.,
Ross, J. A.,
Fearon, K. C.,
Maingay, J.,
Farouk, M.,
Garden, O. J.,
and Carter, D. C.
(1995)
Am. J. Physiol.
269,
E323-E330[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Campos, S. P.,
Wang, Y.,
and Baumann, H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24418-24424[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Guo, S.,
Cichy, S. B., He, X.,
Yang, Q.,
Ragland, M.,
Ghosh, A. K.,
Johnson, P. F.,
and Unterman, T. G.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
8516-8523[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
De Feo, P.,
Volpi, E.,
Lucidi, P.,
Cruciani, G.,
Reboldi, G.,
Siepi, D.,
Mannarino, E.,
Santeusanio, F.,
Brunetti, P.,
and Bolli, G. B.
(1993)
Diabetes
42,
995-1002[Abstract]
|
| 10.
|
Yudkin, J. S.,
Panahloo, A.,
Stehouwer, C.,
Emeis, J. J.,
Bulmer, K.,
Mohamed-Ali, V.,
and Denver, A. E.
(2000)
Diabetologia
43,
1099-1106[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Campos, S. P.,
Wang, Y.,
Koj, A.,
and Baumann, H.
(1994)
Cytokine
6,
485-492[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Kushner, I.
(1988)
Methods Enzymol.
163,
373-383[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Samokyszyn, V. M.,
Miller, D. M.,
Reif, D. W.,
and Aust, S. D.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
21-26[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Mukhopadhyay, C. K.,
Mazumder, B.,
Lindley, P. F.,
and Fox, P. L.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
11546-11551[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Lamb, D. J.,
and Leake, D. S.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
338,
122-126[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Van Lenten, B. J.,
Hama, S. Y., De,
Beer, F. C.,
Stafforini, D. M.,
McIntyre, T. M.,
Prescott, S. M., La Du, B. N.,
Fogelman, A. M.,
and Navab, M.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
96,
2758-2767[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Osaki, S.
(1966)
J. Biol. Chem.
241,
5053-5059[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Miyajima, H.,
Nishimura, Y.,
Mizoguchi, K.,
Sakamoto, M.,
Shimizu, T.,
and Honda, N.
(1987)
Neurology
37,
761-767[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Harris, Z. L.,
Durley, A. P.,
Man, T. K.,
and Gitlin, J. D.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
10812-10817[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Osaki, S.,
and Johnson, D. A.
(1969)
J. Biol. Chem.
244,
5757-5765[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Ragan, H. A.,
Nacht, S.,
Lee, G. R.,
Bishop, C. R.,
and Cartwright, G. E.
(1969)
Am. J. Physiol.
217,
1320-1323[Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Mukhopadhyay, C. K.,
Attieh, Z. K.,
and Fox, P. L.
(1998)
Science
279,
714-717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Attieh, Z. K.,
Mukhopadhyay, C. K.,
Seshadri, V.,
Tripoulas, N. A.,
and Fox, P. L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
1116-1123[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Xie, J. X.,
Tsoi, Y. K.,
Chang, Y. Z., Ke, Y.,
and Qian, Z. M.
(2002)
Mol. Brain Res.
99,
12-16[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Qian, Z. M.,
Tsoi, Y. K., Ke, Y.,
and Wong, M. S.
(2001)
Exp. Brain Res.
140,
369-374[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Askwith, C.,
Eide, D.,
Van Ho, A.,
Bernard, P. S., Li, L.,
Davis-Kaplan, S.,
Sipe, D. M.,
and Kaplan, J.
(1994)
Cell
76,
403-410[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Stearman, R.,
Yuan, D. S.,
Yamaguchi-Iwai, Y.,
Klausner, R. D.,
and Dancis, A.
(1996)
Science
271,
1552-1557[Abstract]
|
| 28.
|
Ryffel, B.,
Car, B. D.,
Woerly, G.,
Weber, M.,
DiPadova, F.,
Kammuller, M.,
Klug, S.,
Neubert, R.,
and Neubert, D.
(1994)
Blood
83,
2093-2102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Gitlin, J. D.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
6281-6287[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Beaumier, D. L.,
Caldwell, M. A.,
and Holbein, B. E.
(1984)
Infect. Immun.
46,
489-494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Mackiewicz, A.,
and Kushner, I.
(1989)
Scand. J. Immunol.
29,
265-271[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Ramadori, G.,
Van Damme, J.,
Rieder, H.,
and Meyer zum Büschenfelde, K.-H.
(1988)
Eur. J. Immunol.
18,
1259-1264[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Daffada, A. A.,
and Young, S. P.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
457,
214-218[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Mukhopadhyay, C. K.,
Mazumder, B.,
and Fox, P. L.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
21048-21054[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Semenza, G. L.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
15,
551-578[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Zelzer, E.,
Levy, Y.,
Kahana, C.,
Shilo, B. Z.,
Rubinstein, M.,
and Cohen, B.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
5085-5094[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Zundel, W.,
Schindler, C.,
Haas-Kogan, D.,
Koong, A.,
Kaper, F.,
Chen, E.,
Gottschalk, A. R.,
Ryan, H. E.,
Johnson, R. S.,
Jefferson, A. B.,
Stokoe, D.,
and Giaccia, A. J.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
391-396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Masuda, S.,
Chikuma, M.,
and Sasaki, R.
(1997)
Brain Res.
746,
63-70[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Barik, S.
(1993)
Methods Mol. Biol.
15,
277-286
|
| 40.
|
Rolfs, A.,
Kvietikova, I.,
Gassmann, M.,
and Wenger, R. H.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20055-20062[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Service, F. J.,
O'Brien, P. C.,
McMahon, M. M.,
and Kao, P. C.
(1993)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
76,
655-659[Abstract]
|
| 42.
|
Reaven, G. M.,
Chen, Y. D.,
Hollenbeck, C. B.,
Sheu, W. H.,
Ostrega, D.,
and Polonsky, K. S.
(1993)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
76,
44-48[Abstract]
|
| 43.
|
Waage, A.,
Brandtzaeg, P.,
Halstensen, A.,
Kierulf, P.,
and Espevik, T.
(1989)
J. Exp. Med.
169,
333-338[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Ehrenwald, E.,
Chisolm, G. M.,
and Fox, P. L.
(1994)
J. Clin. Invest.
93,
1493-1501[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Van Eden, M. E.,
and Aust, S. D.
(2000)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
381,
119-126[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Wood, S. M.,
Gleadle, J. M.,
Pugh, C. W.,
Hankinson, O.,
and Ratcliffe, P. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
15117-15123[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Poli, V.,
Mancini, F. P.,
and Cortese, R.
(1990)
Cell
63,
643-653[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Baumann, H.,
Morella, K. K.,
Campos, S. P.,
Cao, Z.,
and Jahreis, G. P.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
19744-19751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Agrawal, A.,
Cha-Molstad, H.,
Samols, D.,
and Kushner, I.
(2001)
J. Immunol.
166,
2378-2384[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Niehof, M.,
Streetz, K.,
Rakemann, T.,
Bischoff, S. C.,
Manns, M. P.,
Horn, F.,
and Trautwein, C.
(2001 |