Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M202712200 on May 13, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 31, 28167-28175, August 2, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/31/28167    most recent
M202712200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joo, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wine, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Joo, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wine, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Mucus Secretion from Single Submucosal Glands of Pig

STIMULATION BY CARBACHOL AND VASOACTIVE INTESTINAL PEPTIDE*

Nam Soo Joo, Yamil SaenzDagger , Mauri E. Krouse, and Jeffrey J. Wine§

From the Cystic Fibrosis Research Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2130 and Dagger  Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., Stanford, California 94305

Received for publication, March 20, 2002, and in revised form, April 29, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Secretion rates of >700 individual glands in isolated tracheal mucosa from 56 adult pigs were monitored optically. "Basal" secretion of 0.7 ± 0.1 nl·min-1 gland-1 was observed 1-9 h post-harvest but was near zero on day 2. Secretion to carbachol (10 µM) peaked at 2-3 min and then declined to a sustained phase. Peak secretion was 12.4 ± 1.1 nl·min-1 gland-1; sustained secretion was approximately one-third of peak secretion. Thapsigargin (1 µM) increased secretion from 0.1 ± 0.05 to 0.7 ± 0.2 nl·min-1 gland-1; thapsigargin did not cause contraction of the trachealis muscles. Isoproterenol and phenylephrine (10 µM each) were ineffective, but vasoactive intestinal peptide (1 µM) and forskolin (10 µM) each produced sustained secretion of 1.0 ± 0.5 and 1.7 ± 0.2 nl·min-1 gland-1, respectively. The density of actively secreting glands was 1.3/mm2. Secretion to either carbachol or forskolin was inhibited (~50%) by either bumetanide or HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> removal and inhibited ~90% by the combined treatments. Mucus secreted in response to carbachol or forskolin was acidic by ~0.2 pH units relative to the bath and remained acidic by ~0.1 pH units after bumetanide. The strong secretory response to vasoactive intestinal peptide, the acidity of [cAMP]i-stimulated mucus, and its inhibition by bumetanide were unexpected.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Submucosal glands play an important role in defending the upper airways from inhaled pathogens and irritants. The glands are under autonomic control and can be induced to secrete by stimulating various reflex pathways or by local mediators (1-13) (for review, see Ref. 14). The resulting mucus secretion can be copious, transiently increasing the depth of mucus on the airway surface to almost 80 µm (15). Mucus binds pathogens and inhibits their growth, and if all goes well, mucociliary transport carries the mucus and the trapped pathogens out of the airways.

All does not go well in diseases such as asthma, chronic bronchitis, the ciliary dyskinesias, and cystic fibrosis (CF).1 For different reasons in each disease, mucociliary clearance is inefficient or lost, and the airways become susceptible to mucus plugging and infection (16). In the ciliary dyskinesias, the mucus is normal, but ciliary beating is ineffective. Individuals so affected have a chronic, productive cough that helps clear secretions but are still susceptible to chronic bacterial infections that can in some cases destroy the lung (17). Thus, mucus stasis alone can permit chronic infection of the airways.

In cystic fibrosis, the cilia are normal, but mucus clearance is abnormal (18). Mucus plugging is characteristic of CF organs as diverse as sinuses, intestines, and gallbladder. In CF airways, normally benign bacteria and molds can be found in high densities within static mucous plugs but not attached to the surface of the conducting airway epithelia (19) nor usually in the alveoli nor systemically. These features indicate a defect in primary mucosal defenses of the conducting airways. Although long controversial, abnormally viscous primary mucus has now been shown to emanate from single submucosal glands in the bronchi of CF subjects but not in disease controls (20). Although it is certain that CF disease is caused by the loss of functional CFTR, an ion channel that conducts Cl- and HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>, the mechanism by which lost CFTR function increases mucus viscosity and the relation of increased mucus viscosity to CF lung disease has not been established. The uncertainties arise, in part, from our poor understanding of how submucosal glands work.

To help dissect the physiology of gland function, we have developed methods for assessing secretion rates and composition of single submucosal glands in sheep (21) and humans (20). In the present studies, we extend these methods to pigs, which have been shown by Ballard and colleagues (22-30) to be excellent models for studying human conducting airways. Our results complement their work with whole airways and show that single glands respond to both ACh and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) or forskolin but with markedly different response profiles. Unexpectedly, the pH of mucus produced by these different agonists is equivalent, and they respond equally to inhibitors of Cl- and HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> transport.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Animal tracheas were harvested less than 1 h postmortem from adult Yorkshire female pigs that had been killed with pentobarbital injection after acute experiments unrelated to the present studies. Tracheas were maintained until use in ice-cold Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate (KRB) buffer bubbled with 95% O2-5% CO2. The KRB buffer composition was (in mM): 115 NaCl, 2.4 K2HPO4, 0.4 KH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, 1.2 MgCl2, 1.2 CaCl2, and 10 glucose (pH 7.4). Osmolarity was measured on a Westcor vapor pressure osmometer and adjusted to ~290 mosM. To minimize tissue exposure to endogenously generated prostaglandins during tissue preparation and mounting, 1.0 µM indomethacin was present in the bath throughout the experiment unless otherwise indicated.

For each experiment, a tracheal ring of about 1.5 cm was cut off, opened up along the dorsal (posterior) fold in ice-cold, oxygenated KRB buffer, and pinned mucosal-side up on a pliable silicone surface. Only the cartilaginous portion of trachea was used for optical monitoring of gland secretion. The mucosa with underlying glands was dissected free and mounted mucosal-side up at the gas/liquid interface of a 35-mm, Sylgard-lined plastic Petri dish containing 2 ml of KRB buffer. The tissue surface was blotted, dried with a gentle stream of 95% O2-5% CO2 gas, and then partly covered with water-saturated mineral oil. The tissue was warmed to 37 °C at a rate of ~1.5 °C min-1 (TC-102, Medical Systems Corp., Greenvale, NY) and superfused with warmed, humidified 95% O2-5% CO2. For bicarbonate-free experiments, all 25 mM of the HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> in the Krebs buffer was replaced with 1 mM HEPES plus 24 mM NaCl that had been pregassed with humidified 100% O2. The HEPES maintained the bath pH at 7.4 after gassing with O2.

All pharmacological agents were diluted to final concentration with prewarmed, appropriately gassed bath solution immediately before adding to the serosal bath via complete bath replacement. For washout, the bath was replaced completely at least five times. During periods without stimulation, the bath was replaced at 10-15 min intervals with fresh 37 °C KRB solution that had been constantly gassed with 95% O2-5% CO2. No changes in secretion rate were associated with bath changes.

Optical Measures-- The experimental setup was described previously (21). In brief, tissues covered with water-saturated oil were obliquely illuminated to visualize the spherical droplets of secreted mucus within the oil. Most digital images were captured at 1-5 min intervals with a CCD sensor mounted on a microscope to give a resolution of ~49,000 pixels per mm2 for an area of ~6 mm2. In a smaller number of experiments, images of an area of ~1.5-2 cm2 were obtained directly with the macro lens of a Nikon 3-megapixel digital camera. Such experiments gave information on an area of ~25-fold larger but with resolution reduced to ~15,000 pixels per mm2. Images were stored on disk for subsequent analysis with volume calculated according to the formula for a sphere. Non-spherical droplets and merged droplets were excluded from analysis. In this method, apparently spherical droplet volumes may be overestimated to the extent that counted droplets wet the surface, but this effect is minor (21).

Potential Difference and pH Measurements-- Microelectrodes with resistances of ~10 megohms when filled with pH solution (see below) were placed within the secreted mucus droplets to measure the electrical potential difference (PD) of the proximal gland lumen relative to a Ag/AgCl electrode in the bath. The electrode was connected to a microelectrode amplifier (Getting Instruments) having an input impedance of >1012 ohms. In this circumstance, the PD should result primarily from the epithelium of the ciliated and collecting ducts because the contact between the surface epithelium and the mucus is minimized by the oil layer.

To measure pH, appropriate ion-selective electrodes were constructed (31) with slight modifications. LA16 glass capillaries (Dagan) were used for pH electrodes. After pulling, the tips of the ion-sensing electrodes were broken back to an opening of 10-15 µm, and the interiors were silanized with N, N-dimethyltrimethylsilylamine (Fluka). Each electrode tip was heated to >150 °C for at least 5 min to cure the silanizing agent. The silanized electrodes were filled with electrolyte solution (31), and then the pH resin was drawn into the pipette under suction to a depth of ~1 mm. The resulting electrodes have resistances of ~400 megohms and can be used with any conventional microelectrode amplifier. When the ion-selective resin in the pH electrodes contacted the oil layer, it lost its ion selectivity. To circumvent this problem, we fabricated electrodes in which the pH-sensitive resin was recessed slightly in the tip, which was then filled with a tiny amount of electrolyte solution. These worked but were difficult to fabricate and were often unstable. Therefore, most pH measurements were made without oil in chambers sealed except for a slight opening for the electrode. The chambers were superfused with water-saturated gas consisting of 95% O2-5% CO2. Equivalent results were obtained with the two methods.

Reagents-- All compounds were obtained from Sigma unless otherwise indicated and were maintained as stock concentrations. Stock solutions in deionized water were made for carbachol, isoproterenol, phentolamine, phenylephrine, and propranolol (all at 10 mM) and VIP (0.1 mM). Bumetanide (0.1 M) was dissolved in an alkaline solution. Other stock solutions were indomethacin (10 mM) in ethanol and forskolin, atropine (10 mM), and thapsigargin (1 mM) in dimethyl sulfoxide. To fabricate pH-sensitive electrodes, we used Hydrogen Ionophore II Mixture II (Fluka).

Statistics-- Data are means ± S.E. unless otherwise indicated. Student's t test for paired or unpaired data was used to compare the means of different treatment groups. The difference between the two means was considered to be significant when p < 0.05.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Our results are based on sampling >700 single glands from 54 pigs. We monitored on average 5 glands (range 1-11) per small format experiment (~300 glands) and ~100 glands per large format experiment (~400 glands).

Pig Glands Secrete Basally-- Basal secretion was measured at 1-9 h post-harvest for 182 glands from 18 pigs (Fig. 1). The mean basal secretion rate averaged over a 20-min period for each gland was 0.7 ± 0.1 nl·min-1 gland-1, and this rate was consistent over the 9-h time period. Secretion rates varied considerably among individual glands. Within a contiguous 6.25-mm2 area of tracheal tissue containing nine basally secreting glands, the fastest gland secretion rate was 38 times the slowest rate, i.e. 2.3 and 0.06 nl·min-1 gland-1 (Fig. 1a). Intergland differences greatly exceeded differences in average basal secretion rates among pigs, which varied only about 6-fold, from 0.25 ± 0.06 (10 glands) to 1.55 ± 0.28 (7 glands) nl·min-1 gland-1. Basal secretion was not inhibited by 1 µM indomethacin, 0.1 µM tetrodotoxin, 10 µM atropine, or 10 µM propranolol.


View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Basal gland and surface cell secretion. a, distribution of basal secretion rates for 154 glands from 16 pigs, measured from 1-9 h post-harvest. In b, each symbol denotes the mean basal secretion rate over a 20-60 min period for 1-11 glands (gl) from separate tissue preparations from 23 pigs. In c and d, surface cell secretion was observed in ~20% of our preparations and was easily distinguished from gland cell secretion. c, after a 30-min forskolin stimulation; d, after a 2-min carbachol stimulation. Arrows indicate selected surface cell secretions.

The mean basal secretion rate in each preparation declined over time post-harvest (Fig. 1b). When compared with tissues tested from 1 to 9 h post-harvest, basal secretion rates measured 18-31 h post-harvest had declined to ~38% of the initial values (0.27 ± 0.05. nl·min-1 gland-1, 129 glands in 16 pigs, p < 0.001). The number of basally secreting glands declined slightly over the same time period from 4.7 to 3.9 glands per experiment (not significant). The cause of basal secretion might be a response to a combination of trauma from the dissection, mechanical stimulation from the tissue preparation, or temperature fluctuations as reported previously (26).

Gland secretion was easily distinguished from surface cell secretion (Fig. 1, c and d). When compared with glands, surface cells produced fluid droplets that were smaller and more closely spaced. Surface cell secretion was observed variably, both among pigs and in different regions of the same trachea. It did not appear to respond to carbachol or forskolin (Fig. 1d) and did not decline in magnitude with time after harvest, as did spontaneous gland secretion. Surface cell secretion is an active process and is not leakage through a damaged epithelium because there is no hydrostatic pressure to move fluid into the oil layer (the fluid layer is ~1 mm below the surface layer of the epithelium). Consistent with that, blue dextran placed in the bath did not appear in these droplets, nor did fluid accumulate in the oil when small holes were deliberately made in the epithelium. Surface secretions were not observed when the preparation was kept cold. We hypothesize that surface secretion originates from goblet cells but have not yet investigated this type of secretion further.

Carbachol Stimulated Gland Secretion-- Glands secreted copiously after bath application of the cholinergic agonist carbachol (10 µM). A dose-response relation was not determined, but in a small number of experiments, we determined that 1 µM was clearly submaximal, whereas increasing the dose from 100 µM did not further increase the response. Single gland secretion to carbachol included a short latency, transient peak followed by sustained secretion that was approximately one-third of the peak response (Fig. 2, a and b). As shown, differences were observed in the temporal patterns of secretion among glands.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Responses to carbachol. a, volume accumulation for three glands from a representative experiment. Each point is the average ± S.E. of independent measurements by four observers. b, secretion rates plotted at 1-min intervals for individual glands (gland with intermediate rate omitted for clarity). Carbachol (10 µM) was present from the 20-min time point. c, distribution of latencies to peak response to carbachol. Mean = 2.8 min, data from 194 glands in 29 pigs. d, peak responses to carbachol as a function of time since harvest. Each point is the mean peak secretion rates of 2-10 glands (gl) from a single experiment in 23 pigs. e, sustained responses to carbachol as a function of time since harvest. Data are mean ± S.E. from 9 to 33 glands in 3 to 9 pigs.

The mean peak secretion rate to carbachol was 12.4 ± 1.1 nl·min-1 gland-1 (194 glands, 29 pigs) when measured at 1-min intervals. Rates of carbachol-stimulated peak secretion varied ~10-fold among adjacent glands in the same preparation, i.e. from 55.8 to 5.2 nl·min-1 gland-1 in one tissue preparation containing five glands in an area of 6.25 mm2, but the mean peak secretory response to carbachol across pigs varied only 3.7-fold. The mean latency to peak was 2.8 ± 0.1 min when measured at 1-min intervals (194 glands, 29 pigs, Fig. 2c).

Following the transient peak response, secretion declined to a smaller value that was sustained for as long as we were able to follow it. For 54 glands in 12 pigs, sustained secretion to carbachol, defined as secretion for at least a 5-min period occurring 15-60 min post-stimulation, was 2.4 ± 0.2 nl·min-1 gland-1, versus a mean peak value of 7.8 ± 0.7 nl·min-1 gland-1 in those same glands. Sustained secretion was measured for fewer glands because mucous bubbles from adjacent glands often merged within minutes after stimulation with carbachol and thus could not be followed further.

Responses to carbachol were observed for 100% of basally secreting glands. In addition, carbachol stimulated secretion from glands for which no basal secretion had been observed in at least a 20-min observation period prior to stimulation, suggesting that most glands probably respond to carbachol. In contrast with the gradual decline in basal secretion on the second day after harvest, the responses stimulated by carbachol, both peak and sustained, were unchanged during a period of at least 47 h post-harvest (Fig. 2, d and e).

Thapsigargin Stimulated Small but Sustained Secretion-- Thapsigargin inhibits Ca2+ uptake by the endoplasmic reticulum and elevates cytosolic Ca2+ unaccompanied by rises in other intracellular signals typically involved in Ca2+-mediated responses (32). When applied to the bath at high concentrations (1 µM), thapsigargin produced modest but sustained secretion in ~50% of glands after a variable latency of 10-50 min (Fig. 3). In 25 responding glands in 4 pigs, thapsigargin increased the mean sustained secretion rate 7-fold from 0.1 ± 0.05 to 0.7 ± 0.2 nl·min-1 gland-1. Subsequent addition of forskolin caused an increased rate of secretion similar to that seen with forskolin alone (1.9 ± 0.5, nl·min-1 gland-1, 17 glands, 2 pigs). Subsequent addition of carbachol caused typical large and fast secretory responses. Exposure to 1 µM thapsigargin neither stimulated airway smooth muscle nor prevented the contraction induced by carbachol (Fig. 4). The small and variable responses to thapsigargin suggest that this agent will be of limited use in the analysis of gland function and the comparison of glands in control and disease states. Although thapsigargin has the highly specific molecular effect of inhibiting sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase, the consequences of such inhibition are complex within even single cells and even more so within a complex system such as the one we are studying (for example, see Ref. 33).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Gland secretion to thapsigargin (tg). In this preparation, 1 µM thapsigargin stimulated secretion in only two of eight glands, all but one of which subsequently responded to 10 µM forskolin (Fsk).


View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Response of airway smooth muscle to thapsigargin and carbachol. a, unstimulated segment of posterior (dorsal) trachea that contains the trachealis muscles. In these figures, the anterior-posterior axis of the tissues is oriented horizontally. In b, no contraction observed following a 60-min exposure to 1 µM thapsigargin. c, contraction produced by a subsequent 5-min exposure to 10 µM carbachol. The grid consists of 0.5-mm squares.

Adrenergic Agonists Were Ineffective-- The alpha - and beta -adrenergic agonists phenylephrine and isoproterenol (10 µM) had, at best, weak, inconsistent, and transient effects on secretion. For 30 glands in 4 pigs, only 9 glands (30%) showed increased responses after isoproterenol with peak gland secretion of 1.0 ± 0.4 nl·min-1 gland-1, and this response was transient, returning to baseline within 10-20 min after the treatment. As we reported previously (21), pigs and sheep, in contrast with cats, have only small responses to phenylephrine: for 33 glands in 6 pigs, the mean peak response for 13 (39%) responding glands was 1.3 ± 0.3 nl·min-1 gland-1, and this response was also transient.

VIP and Forskolin Stimulated Sustained Secretion-- Submucosal glands are innervated by peptidergic nerves, and Calu-3 cells, a serous cell model, contain functional VIP receptors (34). In addition, prior work showed good secretory response to forskolin from bronchial segments of pigs (30). Therefore, we looked for response to both these agents, which elevate [cAMP]i. In contrast with the transient responses to isoproterenol, pig glands showed sustained secretion to VIP and forskolin. The response profiles to these agents, which elevate [cAMP]i, differed distinctly from the responses to carbachol. They lacked a sharp, early peak, requiring 10-15 min to reach a maximum rate that was then sustained for at least 1 h.

Secretion rates for eight glands in response to VIP are plotted in Fig. 5. At 20 h post-harvest, VIP (1 µM) increased the secretion rate in three basally secreting glands and initiated secretion in five other glands. Secretion peaked for all glands at the 10-min time point and remained elevated for at least 45 min in all but one gland. The mean peak and sustained secretion rates to VIP were 1.15 ± 0.17 and 1.04 ± 0.51 nl·min-1 gland-1, respectively, and the mean latency to peak was 12 ± 4.5 (S.D.) min (35 glands in 5 pigs). These figures exclude one trachea with a wet appearance in which responses to VIP and carbachol were both unusually small. Response rates and profiles to forskolin (10 µM, Fig. 6) were similar but somewhat larger than were those to VIP. The mean peak and sustained responses for 231 glands measured in 26 pigs was 2.29 ± 0.37 and 1.69 ± 0.22 nl·min-1 gland-1, respectively, but the distribution showed marked kurtosis and was positively skewed. The mean latency to peak was 17.8 ± 9.6 (S.D.) min for 43 glands from 6 pigs, but this figure is skewed by occasional late peaks that were only slightly higher than the rates reached at 10-15 min.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Gland secretion to VIP. a, cumulative volume secreted in each of eight glands following stimulation with 1 µM VIP. b, corresponding secretion rates for the glands shown in panel a. VIP (1 µM) was present from the 20-min time point.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Gland secretion to forskolin. a and b, segments of a large format view 0 and 50 min after stimulation with 10 µM forskolin. c, volume increases in three glands from a different experiment as a function of time after forskolin stimulation. d, magnitude of the secretory response to forskolin as a function of time post-harvest. Each symbol represents the average of sustained secretion rate over a 5-105-min period from a separate tissue preparation from 231 glands (gl) from 26 pigs. e, correlation between carbachol and forskolin (Fsk) secretion rates for individual glands. Each symbol plots the peak secretion rate to carbachol on the y axis and the peak secretion rate to forskolin on the x axis for an individual gland. Correlation coefficient = 0.81.

All basally secreting glands increased their rate of secretion in response to VIP or forskolin, and some inactive glands were recruited. Responses to forskolin (Fig. 6d) and VIP (data not shown) did not decline for at least 24 h post-harvest. When VIP was added after forskolin, it did not cause additional secretion. When forskolin was added after VIP, it increased secretion in 4 of 11 glands in which it was possible to follow the response. The larger response to forskolin may simply mean that 1 µM VIP was not maximal; we did not try larger amounts because of cost. The magnitude of responses in glands that responded to both carbachol and forskolin were positively correlated (Fig. 6e) with the transient peak responses to carbachol being ~6-fold greater than the maximal response (which was approx  sustained response) to forskolin. As expected from the above relationship and the much faster latency of the response to carbachol, we observed a small proportion of glands that responded to carbachol but not to forskolin.

Secretion Was Inhibited by Bumetanide andHCO<UP><SUB><UP>3</UP></SUB><SUP><UP>−</UP></SUP></UP> Replacement-- We used bumetanide to block the Na+-K+-2Cl- cotransporter NKCC1 in an attempt to reduce or eliminate Cl--mediated fluid transport. We replaced HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> with HEPES and gassed with air to eliminate HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>-mediated fluid transport. Carbachol-stimulated secretion was inhibited by ~50% by each inhibitor and reduced by 90% when they were used in combination (Fig. 7a). Forskolin-stimulated secretion showed a similar pattern (Fig. 7b).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Inhibition of agonist-stimulated gland secretion by bumetanide (Bm, 0.1 mM) and HCO<UP><SUB><B>3</B></SUB><SUP><B>−</B></SUP></UP> replacement. a, secretion stimulated by carbachol. b, secretion stimulated by forskolin. Each bar shows the percentage of residual secretion after inhibition by each agent alone and in combination. Data are means ± S.E. from 29 to 41 glands from 5 to 8 pigs. * and **, significantly different from control, p < 0.05 and 0.005, respectively. The combined treatment also differed significantly from either agent alone, but the differences between bumetanide or HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> replacement were not significant.

Density of Active Glands-- The numbers of secreting glands were counted in six large format experiments from four pigs (e.g. Fig. 8), giving the values shown in Table I. The overall average was 1.3 secreting glands/mm2. This figure is similar to figures based on anatomical methods (35, 36). The method will always underestimate the number of glands because it misses refractory glands, but it can overestimate density because the epithelium retracts


View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Density and distribution of actively secreting glands. An example of a preparation used to determine gland density. This method undercounts glands because slowly secreting glands are missed at early intervals, and secretions merge at later intervals. However the tissue retracts when removed from the cartilage, and this causes an overestimation of gland density.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Density of active glands in pig trachea
For each of the conditions shown, an area of trachea from ~14 to 79 mm2 was imaged at 10-min intervals, and the number of mucus bubbles emerging under the oil was counted.

PD and pH Measurements-- As described under "Materials and Methods," the PD across the epithelium of the gland can be measured by placing an electrode in the mucus bubble under oil and a reference electrode in the bath. With repeated measures of this kind, for secretions stimulated by forskolin or carbachol, the PD did not differ significantly from zero. We also failed to measure a PD when recording without oil. The lack of a PD is consistent with an earlier report that gland secretion might be electrically silent (37) but is inconsistent with a report that epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC) subunits are expressed in the ducts of submucosal glands (38, 39), where they would be expected to participate in electrogenic absorption of Na+. An insignificant PD could also mean that the duct is normally electrically leaky or was shunted by epithelial damage.

Measurement of pH with ion-sensitive microelectrodes revealed that mucus pH was acidic relative to the bath under all conditions tested (Fig. 9). For basal secretion, the mean pH was more acidic by 0.15 ± 0.07 pH units (27 glands, 5 pigs) for carbachol-stimulated secretion, the mean pH was more acidic than the bath by 0.20 ± 0.03 pH units (22 glands, 5 pigs), and for forskolin-stimulated secretion, the mean pH was more acidic than the bath by 0.17 ± 0.03 pH units, 40 glands, 7 pigs. Mucus secretion stimulated by forskolin from glands pretreated with bumetanide was also more acidic than the bath by 0.08 ± 0.02 pH units, but this value was significantly more alkaline than forskolin alone. These figures compare with a relative acidity of 0.4 pH units measured with the pH indicator BCECF (2',7'-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-5(6)-carboxyfluorescein) in normal and CF human mucus stimulated with carbachol (20). This could represent a species difference or could arise from the different methods used. Regardless, the significant finding was the near identical pH of mucus produced by the Ca2+-elevating agent carbachol and the [cAMP]i-elevating forskolin. The identical pH produced by these different agonists is as unexpected as the identical pH values found for mucus from control and cystic fibrosis and leads us to speculate that the final pH of the mucus is being homeostatically controlled by postsecretion processes (see "Discussion").


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Mucous pH. Each bar shows the mean pH for secretions produced by the indicated conditions. All were acidic relative to the bath, which was measured before and after each measure of secretion, averaged, and normalized to 7.4. The number of pigs and glands measured is shown in each bar. *, significantly different from the other three measures, p < 0.05.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The present studies apply improved optical methods for studying the dynamics of mucus secretion from single submucosal glands of pigs. The main advance of this work over our prior studies of sheep (21) and humans (20) is a description of the properties of VIP- and forskolin-mediated secretion. Rates of sustained secretion to these [cAMP]i elevating agents were 50-80% of the sustained response to carbachol; the figures are in good agreement with a prior study of forskolin-stimulated mucus secretion from pig airway segments (30). VIP and forskolin did not cause muscle contractions (40) and lacked the short latency peak response seen with carbachol.

Prior Studies of VIP Effects on Gland Secretion-- Vigorous, sustained secretion to VIP was not predictable from prior studies of the effects of VIP on submucosal gland secretion, which provide differing views of effects. In humans, in vitro release of mucus and lysozyme by explants of human bronchial mucosa and mucous and serous cells of the submucosal glands was slightly inhibited by VIP (41), and it was concluded that VIP has little effect on gland secretion (42). In ferrets, release of 35S-labeled macromolecules from tracheal explants was increased by VIP with a k1/2 of ~10 nM and a maximal response at ~1 µM. Because no changes were observed in electrical properties of tissues in Ussing chambers, it was concluded that VIP stimulates release of sulfated macromolecules from the submucosal glands without stimulating ion transport (43). Subsequent studies in ferrets confirmed a significant (180% increase) in 35S-labeled macromolecules by VIP and showed that VIP led to degranulation of serous cells (44). In isolated submucosal glands from cats, VIP produced a dose-dependent increase in [3H]glycoconjugate release of up to 300% of controls (maximal at 1 µM) without increasing tension in the gland myoepithelial cells (40). Our findings contradict some of the conclusions of these prior studies but not necessarily the results. Instead, we conclude that measurements of macromolecular secretion and Isc measurements are poor predictors of bulk fluid flow from glands.

Comparison with Results from Studies of Calu-3 cells-- The Calu-3 cell line shares a large set of biochemical features with gland serous cells (45) and is presently the best available model for them (46-48). In Isc experiments, Calu-3 cells secrete both Cl- and HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>. Secretion produced by elevated [cAMP]i is HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>-rich, as indicated by its resistance to bumetanide and the lack of a net flux of Cl-. Of more relevance, when stimulated with forskolin in open circuit, Calu-3 cells generate an apical pH of ~7.8 (49). Stimulation with agents that elevate Ca2+ activates basolateral K+ channels, hyperpolarizes the cell, and increases the driving force for Cl- secretion (49). Thus, Ca2+-dependent secretion is strongly inhibited (~80%) by bumetanide (48, 50), and Ca2+ stimulation secretions will have a reduced HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>:Cl- ratio. They may also contain an absolutely smaller amount of HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> because hyperpolarization creates a less favorable gradient for the transport of HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> through the electrogenic, basolateral Na+-HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> cotransporter with the magnitude of this effect depending upon the stoichiometry of the transporter (49). In summary, in Calu-3 cells, secretion stimulated by increased [cAMP]i has a basic pH, is resistant to bumetanide, and is strongly inhibited by HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> replacement, whereas secretion stimulated by increased [Ca2+]i is strongly inhibited by bumetanide and is predicted to have a less basic pH and to be inhibited less by HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> replacement.

Our findings with intact glands differ in all these respects from expectations based on Calu-3 cells. In glands, secretion stimulated by increased [cAMP]i has an acidic pH and is inhibited equally by bumetanide and HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> replacement, whereas secretion stimulated by increased [Ca2+]i has the same acidic pH and responds equivalently to inhibitors. Even in the presence of bumetanide, forskolin-stimulated gland secretion is acidic, although less so than without bumetanide.

The most likely explanation for the differences between Calu-3 and gland secretions is that gland serous cell secretions are only one component of gland secretions and are modified before we collect them. Glands are complex organs, and most glands operate by a two-stage mechanism in which the primary secretion is subsequently modified. The finding that the final pH values are identical for the two kinds of stimulus, as well as for normal and cystic fibrosis glands, leads us to speculate that ductal modification is homeostatic and reaches a final common pH regardless of the composition of the primary secretion.

A schematic of submucosal gland function (Fig. 10) can help frame hypotheses about gland function. The schematic, based on anatomical studies, divides submucosal glands into four compartments based on gross structure and cell types (51, 52). The location of CFTR in serous cells is based on immunohistochemistry (53) and physiological studies of primary serous and mucous cells (54-57), and the location of VIP receptors on serous cells is based on degranulation studies (44). In this model, gland mucous secretion is the joint product of serous and mucous cells. Serous cells secrete a Cl-/HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP>-rich fluid by a CFTR-dependent mechanism in response to both cholinergic and VIP pathways. They also secrete a host of proteins and peptides including MUC7 (58) lysozyme, secretory IgA, serum leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI), surfactant protein-A (SP-A), and lactoferrin.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Schematic of submucosal gland. Four functional compartments are proposed based on prior anatomical data with CFTR located primarily in serous cells (see "Results" and "Discussion").

Little is known about transport mechanisms of mucous cells. We propose that mucous cells secrete the bulk of the mucin (MUC5B) molecules (58). We hypothesize that the accompanying water and ion secretions from these tubules occur via non-CFTR-dependent mechanisms because mucus secretion is partially preserved in CF glands (20). The secretions from both types of cell are mixed and conditioned in the collecting duct and ciliated ducts. No direct evidence is available on the nature of the processes occurring in these regions of the gland, but the ciliated duct may be similar to surface epithelium, i.e. primarily absorptive and able to acidify secretions via H+, K+, and ATPase (59). On the basis of pH and [Na+] measurements (20), we infer that HCO<UP><SUB>3</SUB><SUP>−</SUP></UP> is either absorbed or converted to CO2 and water, that Na+ is also absorbed, and that either an osmolyte is added or the solution is able to remain hypotonic. This model can account for most existing results and makes specific predictions about differences between normal and CF glands. We and others are presently developing the methods needed to support or eliminate these and related hypotheses of submucosal gland function.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Jin V. Wu for expert assistance in the development of the optical methods used in this research and Rahul S. Dhillon, Christina Y. Tseng and Tracy Hsu for data analysis. Toshiya Irokawa, Drew Hotson, and Rabin Tirouvanziam provided helpful suggestions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grants DK51817 and HL60288 from the National Institutes of Health and by grants from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Cystic Fibrosis Research Laboratory, Bldg. 420, Sierra Mall, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2130; Tel.: 650-725-2462; Fax: 650-725-5699; E-mail: wine@stanford.edu. Web: www.stanford.edu/~wine.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 13, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M202712200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: CF, cystic fibrosis; CFTR, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator; ACh, acetylcholine; VIP, vasoactive intestinal peptide; KRB, Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate; PD, potential difference.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Davis, B., Roberts, A. M., Coleridge, H. M., and Coleridge, J. C. (1982) J. Appl. Physiol. 53, 985-991
2. Davis, B., Chinn, R., Gold, J., Popovac, D., Widdicombe, J. G., and Nadel, J. A. (1982) J. Appl. Physiol. 52, 1416-1419
3. German, V. F., Corrales, R., Ueki, I. F., and Nadel, J. A. (1982) J. Appl. Physiol. 52, 1153-1155
4. Nadel, J. A. (1983) Eur. J. Respir. Dis. Suppl. 128, 322-326
5. Schultz, H. D., Roberts, A. M., Bratcher, C., Coleridge, H. M., Coleridge, J. C., and Davis, B. (1985) J. Appl. Physiol. 58, 907-910
6. Yu, J., Schultz, H. D., Goodman, J., Coleridge, J. C., Coleridge, H. M., and Davis, B. (1989) J. Appl. Physiol. 67, 682-687
7. Haxhiu, M. A., Haxhiu-Poskurica, B., Moracic, V., Carlo, W. A., and Martin, R. J. (1990) Respir Physiol. 82, 267-277
8. Haxhiu, M. A., Van Lunteren, E., and Cherniack, N. S. (1991) J. Appl. Physiol. 71, 1663-1668
9. Haxhiu, M. A., Cherniack, N. S., and Strohl, K. P. (1991) J. Appl. Physiol. 71, 1669-1673
10. Hejal, R., Strohl, K. P., Erokwu, B., Cherniack, N. S., and Haxhiu, M. A. (1993) J. Appl. Physiol. 75, 2347-2352
11. Haxhiu, M. A., Chavez, J. C., Pichiule, P., Erokwu, B., and Dreshaj, I. A. (2000) Brain Res. 883, 77-86
12. Johnson, H. G., Chinn, R. A., Chow, A. W., Bach, M. K., and Nadel, J. A. (1983) Int. J. Immunopharmacol. 5, 391-396
13. Nadel, J. A. (1991) Respiration 58 Suppl. 1, 3-5
14. Widdicombe, J. G. (1996) Clin. Exp. Allergy 26 Suppl. 3, 32-35
15. Wu, D. X., Lee, C. Y., Uyekubo, S. N., Choi, H. K., Bastacky, S. J., and Widdicombe, J. H. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 274, L388-L395
16. Wanner, A. (1986) Clin. Chest Med. 7, 247-258
17. Pedersen, M., and Stafanger, G. (1983) Eur. J. Respir Dis. Suppl. 127, 118-128
18. Knowles, M. R., and Boucher, R. C. (2002) J. Clin. Invest. 109, 571-577
19. Worlitzsch, D., Tarran, R., Ulrich, M., Schwab, U., Cekici, A., Meyer, K. C., Birrer, P., Bellon, G., Berger, J., Weiss, T., Botzenhart, K., Yankaskas, J. R., Randell, S., Boucher, R. C., and Doring, G. (2002) J. Clin. Invest. 109, 317-325
20. Jayaraman, S., Joo, N. S., Reitz, B., Wine, J. J., and Verkman, A. S. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 8119-8123
21. Joo, N. S., Wu, J. V., Krouse, M. E., Saenz, Y., and Wine, J. J. (2001) Am. J. Physiol. 281, L458-L468
22. Ballard, S. T., Fountain, J. D., Inglis, S. K., Corboz, M. R., and Taylor, A. E. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 268, L526-L531
23. Inglis, S. K., Corboz, M. R., Taylor, A. E., and Ballard, S. T. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, L372-L377
24. Inglis, S. K., Corboz, M. R., Taylor, A. E., and Ballard, S. T. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, L203-L210
25. Trout, L., King, M., Feng, W., Inglis, S. K., and Ballard, S. T. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 274, L258-L263
26. Trout, L., Gatzy, J. T., and Ballard, S. T. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 275, L1095-L1099
27. Inglis, S. K., Corboz, M. R., and Ballard, S. T. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 274, L762-L766
28. Ballard, S. T., Trout, L., Bebok, Z., Sorscher, E. J., and Crews, A. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 277, L694-L699
29. Crews, A., Taylor, A. E., and Ballard, S. T. (2001) J. Appl. Physiol. 91, 797-802
30. Trout, L., Corboz, M. R., and Ballard, S. T. (2001) Am. J. Physiol. 281, L639-L645
31. Chao, P., Ammann, D., Oesch, U., Simon, W., and Lang, F. (1988) Pfluegers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 411, 216-219
32. Thastrup, O., Cullen, P. J., Drobak, B. K., Hanley, M. R., and Dawson, A. P. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 2466-2470
33. Takahashi, N., Aizawa, H., Fukuyama, S., Inoue, H., Nishima, S., and Hara, N. (2000) Eur. J. Pharmacol 410, 61-68
34. Linden, A., Yoshihara, S., Cardell, L. O., Kaneko, T., Stjarne, P., and Nadel, J. A. (1997) Peptides (Elmsford) 18, 843-846
35. Choi, H. K., Finkbeiner, W. E., and Widdicombe, J. H. (2000) J. Anat. 197, 361-372
36. Widdicombe, J. H., Chen, L. L., Sporer, H., Choi, H. K., Pecson, I. S., and Bastacky, S. J. (2001) J. Anat. 198, 207-221
37. Boucher, R. C., and Gatzy, J. T. (1982) J. Appl. Physiol. 52, 893-901
38. Burch, L. H., Talbot, C. R., Knowles, M. R., Canessa, C. M., Rossier, B. C., and Boucher, R. C. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 269, C511-C518
39. Gaillard, D., Hinnrasky, J., Coscoy, S., Hofman, P., Matthay, M. A., Puchelle, E., and Barbry, P. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. 278, L177-L184
40. Shimura, S., Sasaki, T., Ikeda, K., Sasaki, H., and Takishima, T. (1988) J. Appl. Physiol. 65, 2537-2544
41. Coles, S. J., Said, S. I., and Reid, L. M. (1981) Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 124, 531-536
42. Coles, S. J., Bhaskar, K. R., DD, O. S., Neill, K. H., and Reid, L. M. (1984) CIBA Found. Symp. 109, 40-60
43. Peatfield, A. C., Barnes, P. J., Bratcher, C., Nadel, J. A., and Davis, B. (1983) Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 128, 89-93
44. Gashi, A. A., Borson, D. B., Finkbeiner, W. E., Nadel, J. A., and Basbaum, C. B. (1986) Am. J. Physiol. 251, C223-C229
45. Finkbeiner, W. E., Carrier, S. D., and Teresi, C. E. (1993) Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 9, 547-556
46. Haws, C., Finkbeiner, W. E., Widdicombe, J. H., and Wine, J. J. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 266, L502-L512
47. Shen, B. Q., Finkbeiner, W. E., Wine, J. J., Mrsny, R. J., and Widdicombe, J. H. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 266, L493-L501
48. Moon, S., Singh, M., Krouse, M. E., and Wine, J. J. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 273, L1208-L1219
49. Devor, D. C., Singh, A. K., Lambert, L. C., DeLuca, A., Frizzell, R. A., and Bridges, R. J. (1999) J. Gen. Physiol. 113, 743-760
50. Singh, M., Krouse, M., Moon, S., and Wine, J. J. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, L690-L698
51. Meyrick, B., Sturgess, J. M., and Reid, L. (1969) Thorax 24, 729-736
52. Meyrick, B., and Reid, L. (1970) J. Anat 107, 281-299
53. Engelhardt, J. F., Yankaskas, J. R., Ernst, S. A., Yang, Y., Marino, C. R., Boucher, R. C., Cohn, J. A., and Wilson, J. M. (1992) Nat. Genet. 2, 240-248
54. Becq, F., Merten, M. D., Voelckel, M. A., Gola, M., and Figarella, C. (1993) FEBS Lett. 321, 73-78
55. Finkbeiner, W. E., Shen, B. Q., and Widdicombe, J. H. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 267, L206-L210
56. Yamaya, M., Finkbeiner, W. E., and Widdicombe, J. H. (1991) Am. J. Physiol. 261, L491-L494
57. Jiang, C., Finkbeiner, W. E., Widdicombe, J. H., and Miller, S. S. (1997) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 501, 637-647
58. Sharma, P., Dudus, L., Nielsen, P. A., Clausen, H., Yankaskas, J. R., Hollingsworth, M. A., and Engelhardt, J. F. (1998) Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 19, 30-37
59. Coakley, R. D., and Boucher, R. C. (2001) J. Pancreas 2 Suppl. 4, 294-300


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
N. S. Joo, J. J. Wine, and A. W. Cuthbert
Lubiprostone stimulates secretion from tracheal submucosal glands of sheep, pigs, and humans
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 2009; 296(5): L811 - L824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
R. J. Lee, J. M. Harlow, M. P. Limberis, J. M. Wilson, and J. K. Foskett
HCO3- Secretion by Murine Nasal Submucosal Gland Serous Acinar Cells during Ca2+-stimulated Fluid Secretion
J. Gen. Physiol., July 1, 2008; 132(1): 161 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
D. Wang, Y. Sun, W. Zhang, and P. Huang
Apical adenosine regulates basolateral Ca2+-activated potassium channels in human airway Calu-3 epithelial cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): C1443 - C1453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
R. J. Lee, M. P. Limberis, M. F. Hennessy, J. M. Wilson, and J. K. Foskett
Optical imaging of Ca2+-evoked fluid secretion by murine nasal submucosal gland serous acinar cells
J. Physiol., August 1, 2007; 582(3): 1099 - 1124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. P. Ianowski, J. Y. Choi, J. J. Wine, and J. W. Hanrahan
Mucus secretion by single tracheal submucosal glands from normal and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator knockout mice
J. Physiol., April 1, 2007; 580(1): 301 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
J. V. Wu, M. E. Krouse, and J. J. Wine
Acinar origin of CFTR-dependent airway submucosal gland fluid secretion
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): L304 - L311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. S. Joo, T. Irokawa, R. C. Robbins, and J. J. Wine
Hyposecretion, Not Hyperabsorption, Is the Basic Defect of Cystic Fibrosis Airway Glands
J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2006; 281(11): 7392 - 7398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
Y. Song, D. Salinas, D. W. Nielson, and A. S. Verkman
Hyperacidity of secreted fluid from submucosal glands in early cystic fibrosis
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): C741 - C749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
S. T. Ballard, L. Trout, J. Garrison, and S. K. Inglis
Ionic mechanism of forskolin-induced liquid secretion by porcine bronchi
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, January 1, 2006; 290(1): L97 - L104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. M. Rowe, S. Miller, and E. J. Sorscher
Cystic Fibrosis
N. Engl. J. Med., May 12, 2005; 352(19): 1992 - 2001.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
M. E. Krouse, J. F. Talbott, M. M. Lee, N. S. Joo, and J. J. Wine
Acid and base secretion in the Calu-3 model of human serous cells
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): L1274 - L1283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
T. Irokawa, M. E. Krouse, N. S. Joo, J. V. Wu, and J. J. Wine
A "virtual gland" method for quantifying epithelial fluid secretion
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, October 1, 2004; 287(4): L784 - L793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. S. Joo, D. J. Lee, K. M. Winges, A. Rustagi, and J. J. Wine
Regulation of Antiprotease and Antimicrobial Protein Secretion by Airway Submucosal Gland Serous Cells
J. Biol. Chem., September 10, 2004; 279(37): 38854 - 38860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
S. T. Ballard and S. K. Inglis
Liquid secretion properties of airway submucosal glands
J. Physiol., April 1, 2004; 556(1): 1 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
J. J. Wine and N. S. Joo
Submucosal Glands and Airway Defense
Proceedings of the ATS, January 1, 2004; 1(1): 47 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
L. Trout, M. I Townsley, A. L Bowden, and S. T Ballard
Disruptive effects of anion secretion inhibitors on airway mucus morphology in isolated perfused pig lung
J. Physiol., June 15, 2003; 549(3): 845 - 853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
S. K. Inglis, S. M. Wilson, and R. E. Olver
Secretion of acid and base equivalents by intact distal airways
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 2003; 284(5): L855 - L862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
A. S. Verkman, Y. Song, and J. R. Thiagarajah
Role of airway surface liquid and submucosal glands in cystic fibrosis lung disease
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, January 1, 2003; 284(1): C2 - C15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. S. Joo, T. Irokawa, J. V. Wu, R. C. Robbins, R. I. Whyte, and J. J. Wine
Absent Secretion to Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide in Cystic Fibrosis Airway Glands
J. Biol. Chem., December 20, 2002; 277(52): 50710 - 50715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/31/28167    most recent
M202712200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joo, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wine, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Joo, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wine, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement