|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201261200 on June 3, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 32, 28431-28438, August 9, 2002
Somatostatin, Acting at Receptor Subtype 1, Inhibits Rho
Activity, the Assembly of Actin Stress Fibers, and Cell Migration*
Alison M. J.
Buchan §,
Chin-Yu
Lin¶,
Jimmy
Choi¶, and
Diane L.
Barber¶
From the Department of Physiology, University of
British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z3, Canada and the
¶ Department of Stomatology, University of California,
San Francisco, California 94143-0512
Received for publication, February 7, 2002, and in revised form, May 16, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Somatostatin regulates multiple biological
functions by acting through a family of five G protein-coupled
receptors, somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) 1-5. Although all five
receptor subtypes inhibit adenylate cyclase activity and decrease
intracellular cAMP levels, specific receptor subtypes also couple to
additional signaling pathways. In CCL39 fibroblasts expressing either
human SSTR1 or SSTR2, we demonstrate that activation of SSTR1 (but not
SSTR2) attenuated both thrombin- and integrin-stimulated Rho-GTP
complex formation. The reduction in Rho-GTP formation in the presence of somatostatin was associated with decreased translocation of Rho and
LIM kinase to the plasma membrane and fewer focal contacts. Activation
of Rho resulted in the formation of intracellular actin stress fibers
and cell migration. In CCL39-R1 cells, somatostatin treatment prevented
actin stress fiber assembly and attenuated thrombin-stimulated cell
migration through Transwell membranes to basal levels. To show that
native SSTR1 shares the ability to inhibit Rho activation, we
demonstrated that somatostatin treatment of human umbilical vein
endothelial cells attenuated thrombin-stimulated Rho-GTP accumulation.
These data show for the first time that a G protein-coupled receptor,
SSTR1, inhibits the activation of Rho, the assembly of focal adhesions
and actin stress fibers, and cell migration.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The low molecular mass GTPase Rho plays a central role in
regulating organization of the actin-based cytoskeleton in mammalian cells. Activated, GTP-bound Rho promotes the formation of contractile actin filaments into stress fibers and the assembly of cell adhesion complexes (1, 2). Through its coordinate regulation of actin filaments,
contractility, and cell adhesion, Rho also plays a critical role in
cell migration (3, 4) and in tumor invasion (5, 6). Rho is activated by
transmembrane receptors, including the integrin family of adhesion
receptors (7) and a subset of heptahelical G protein-coupled receptors
(GPCRs)1 (8). Although the
signaling pathway linking integrin receptors to Rho has not been
determined, GPCRs, including those for lysophosphatidic acid (9-11)
and thrombin (11-13), activate Rho through the heterotrimeric GTPases
G12 and G13. However, GPCRs linked to the
inhibition of Rho and downstream cytoskeletal reorganization have not
been identified.
We now report that somatostatin (SST), acting at the GPCR subtype
SSTR1, inhibits Rho activity, attenuates the assembly of actin stress
fibers and focal adhesions, and inhibits cell migration. Five distinct
SSTR subtypes that are activated by SST have been identified, and these
receptors generally have potent inhibitory effects on diverse cell
functions such as hormone secretion, neurotransmitter release, smooth
muscle contractility, and cell proliferation (14, 15). Effector
pathways regulated by SSTRs, including inhibition of adenylate cyclase
and Ca2+ channel activity and stimulation of K+
channel and phosphatase activity, are mediated by pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive mechanisms, most likely involving GTPases of the G i family (15-17).
The rationale for studying SST effects on Rho and the cytoskeleton was
based on our previous studies with the Na+-H+
exchanger NHE1. NHE1 acts downstream of Rho to play a critical role in
regulating cytoskeletal organization (18). NHE1 is phosphorylated directly by the Rho-associated kinase ROCK (19), and activation of NHE1
by GPCRs, such as those for lysophosphatidic acid and thrombin, and by
integrin receptors is mediated by Rho and ROCK (19, 20). Moreover,
through its direct association with the ERM
(ezrin/radixin/moesin) family of
actin-binding proteins, NHE1 acts as a plasma membrane anchor for actin
filaments to control the assembly of cortical stress fibers and focal
adhesions (21). In contrast to lysophosphatidic acid and thrombin,
which stimulate Rho and NHE1, SST, acting at the SSTR1 (but not SSTR2)
subtype, inhibits NHE1 activity (16). We reasoned that inhibition of NHE1 by SSTR1 might be associated with an inhibition of Rho.
Consistent with this rationale, the findings from this study indicate
that SSTR1 (but not SSTR2) stably expressed in fibroblasts inhibits Rho
activation, cytoskeletal reorganization, and cell migration by
thrombin. We previously reported that in human umbilical vein
endothelial cells (HUVECs), which express endogenous SSTR1, but not
SSTR2, SST attenuates stress fiber assembly by serum (22), and we have
now determined that this attenuation is associated with a decrease in
activated, GTP-bound Rho. Moreover, in contrast to most effects of
SSTRs that are abolished by PTX, SSTR1 inhibition of NHE1 (16)
and, as we now report, Rho activity is PTX-insensitive.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture--
CCL39 hamster lung fibroblasts were maintained
in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 5% fetal
bovine serum (FBS). Human SSTR1 and SSTR2 were stably expressed in
CCL39 cells using the inducible mammalian expression vector pCMV (16).
Cells were cotransfected with pRSV-neo using calcium phosphate
precipitation, and G418-resistant clones were selected and examined for
their ability to bind [125I-Tyr11]SST-14 and
to mediate SST inhibition of cAMP accumulation, as previously described
(16). To determine sensitivity to PTX, cells were pretreated with the
toxin (List Biologicals) at 100 ng/ml for 18 h. Primary
HUVECs (Clonetics, Walkersville, MD) were cultured in endothelial cell
basal medium supplemented with 5% FBS, 0.1% human endothelial growth
factor, 0.1% gentamycin/amphotericin B, and 0.4% bovine brain extract (Clonetics).
Affinity Precipitation of Rho-GTP and Rac-GTP--
The abundance
of activated, GTP-bound Rho was determined by a modification of
previously described methods (7, 9) using affinity adsorption with a
GST fusion protein of the Rho-binding domain of the Rho-associated
kinase ROCK (amino acids 934-1015 of p160ROCK, kindly
provided by S. Narumiya). The BL21 bacterial strain was transformed
with this construct, and expression of the fusion protein was induced
by 0.5 mM
isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside for 3 h at
37 °C. Bacteria were lysed in buffer containing 50 mM
Tris (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 1% Triton
X-100. Bacterial lysates were sonicated with four 15-s pulses and then
cleared by centrifugation at 21,000 × g for 30 min,
after which the fusion protein was recovered by addition of glutathione
beads to the supernatant.
Fibroblast cells and HUVECs (plated at a density of 1 × 106 in 100-mm plates) were maintained in medium containing
5% FBS for 24 h, washed, and then maintained for an additional
24 h in medium containing 0.5% FBS. Cells were treated with 30 nM thrombin (Enzyme Research Labs) in the absence or
presence of 100 nM SST (Bachem) for the indicated times.
The effect of c-Src activity was determined in cells pretreated for 10 min with the c-Src inhibitor PP2 (25 µg/ml
4-amino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine; Sigma). To determine the response to integrin activation, quiescent cells were trypsinized, diluted with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing trypsin inhibitor (50 µg/ml; Sigma), collected by
centrifugation, and resuspended in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
in the absence of FBS. Cells were then plated in the absence or
presence of SST for 60 min in 100-mm plates coated with
poly-L-lysine (10 µg/ml; Sigma) or fibronectin (20 µg/ml; Sigma). After washing three times with ice-cold
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 1 mM
orthovanadate, cells from each 100-mm plate were lysed in 400 µl of
lysis buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 500 mM NaCl,
10 mM MgCl2, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium
deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 mM
orthovanadate). The lysates from three plates were pooled, aspirated
three times through a 26-gauge needle, and cleared by centrifugation at
13,000 × g for 3 min at 4 °C. A 40-µl aliquot of
the supernatant was collected for determination of total cellular Rho.
The remaining supernatant was added to 75 µg of GST fusion
protein-coated beads and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C on a
rotator. The beads were washed four times with wash buffer (Tris with
1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM
MgCl2, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), and proteins were
separated by 12% SDS-PAGE. GTP-bound Rho and total cellular Rho were
detected by Western blotting using a monoclonal antibody to RhoA (Santa
Cruz Biotechnology) at a dilution of 1:250. Densitometry analysis was
performed with NIH Image, and the amount of GTP-bound Rho is expressed
as a percentage of total cellular Rho.
The abundance of activated, GTP-bound Rac was determined by a
modification of previously described methods (23) using affinity adsorption with a GST fusion protein of the GTPase-binding domain of
PAK1 (cytoskeleton). CCL39-R1 cells (plated at a density of 1 × 106 in 100-mm plates) were maintained in medium containing
5% FBS for 24 h, washed, and then maintained for an additional
24 h in medium containing 0.5% FBS. Cells were treated with SST
(100 nM) or platelet-derived growth factor-BB (25 ng/ml;
Roche Molecular Biochemicals) for the indicated times. After washing
three times with PBS containing 1 mM orthovanadate, cells
from each 100-mm plate were lysed in 400 µl of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 2% Nonidet P-40, 10% glycerol, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 mM orthovanadate). The
lysates from two plates were pooled, aspirated three times through a
26-gauge needle, and cleared by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 3 min at 4 °C. A 40-µl aliquot of the supernatant
was collected for determination of total cellular Rac. The remaining
supernatant was added to 50 µg of GST fusion protein-coated beads and
incubated for 1 h at 4 °C on a rotator. The beads were washed
four times with wash buffer (Tris with 1% Nonidet P-40, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 µg/ml
leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), and proteins were separated by 12%
SDS-PAGE. GTP-bound Rac and total cellular Rac were detected by Western
blotting using a monoclonal antibody to Rac (Transduction Laboratories)
and quantified as described for determining the percentage of GTP-bound Rho.
Immunocytochemistry--
Cells grown on 22-mm glass coverslips
were maintained for 24 h in 0.5% FBS and then treated with 30 nM thrombin in the absence or presence of 100 nM SST for 20 min. They were washed briefly with phosphate
buffer and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 10 min. After thorough washing with PBS to remove excess fixative, the
cells were permeabilized for 10 min in 0.1% Triton X-100; immersed in
5% normal calf serum; and incubated with primary antibodies, including
those against paxillin (1:200 for 1 h at 23 °C;
Zymed Laboratories Inc.), RhoA (1:250 for 48 h at
4 °C; Transduction Laboratories), and LIMK (1:200 for 18 h at
4 °C; Transduction Laboratories). The bound antibodies were detected
using the relevant fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary
antibody (either goat anti-rabbit IgG or donkey anti-mouse IgG, Jackson
ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.) at a dilution of 1:500 for 1 h
at room temperature. The coverslips were mounted on glass slides with
Vectashield anti-fade mounting medium (Vector Labs, Inc.) and screened
using a Zeiss Axiophot microscope (magnification ×1000).
Representative images were collected using a Spot2 camera (Diagnostic
Instruments, Inc.) and imported into Adobe Photoshop.
Rho and LIMK Translocation--
The subcellular localization of
Rho and LIMK was determined by immunostaining and immunoblotting. For
immunoblotting, cells plated on 100-mm plates were maintained for
24 h in 0.5% FBS and then treated with thrombin (30 nM) in the absence or presence of SST (100 nM)
for 20 min. Cells were washed twice with PBS; collected by scraping in
buffer containing 50 mM Hepes, 135 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, and 3 mM EDTA (pH 7.5); and lysed by
sonication. Post-nuclear supernatants were obtained by centrifugation
and separated into S100 and P100 fractions by centrifugation at
100,000 × g for 20 min. Proteins were separated by
SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and probed with
antibodies to Rho (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and LIMK.
Cell Migration Assay--
Migration of CCL39-R1 and CCL39-R2
cells was assessed using Transwell membranes (8-µm pore size and
6.5-mm diameter) in 24-well plates (Corning Costar Corp.). The cells
were detached from the culture plates, and 200 µl of cell suspension
at a density of 1 × 106/ml in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium was added to the top chamber. Thrombin (30 nM final concentration) was added to the top chamber in the
absence or presence of 100 nM SST, and migration of cells
through the Transwell membrane was compared with untreated cells. The
plates were incubated at 37 °C for 8 h, with agonists reapplied
at 4 h. After 8 h, 2% paraformaldehyde was added to the top
and bottom wells, and cells were fixed overnight. After washing with
PBS, the cells in the upper well were removed by aspiration, and the
nuclei of cells that had migrated through to the bottom surface
of the filter were stained with 1 µg/ml 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
for 15 min at room temperature. To count migrated cells, the filter was
cut out of the holder and placed bottom side up on a glass slide. Five
fields at magnification ×40 were captured using a Spot2 camera, and
the number of cells was counted using NIH Image. The results are
expressed as means ± S.E., and statistical significance was
assessed by Student's unpaired t test, with
p < 0.05 considered significant. After removal of the
Transwell, the individual wells were checked to determine whether cells
had migrated through the filter, detached, and subsequently attached to
the base of the 24-well plate.
Regulation of Tyrosine-phosphorylated
p190RhoGAP and c-Src--
Tyrosine phosphorylation
of p190RhoGAP was determined in cell preparations similar
to those described for detecting Rho-GTP. Following fibronectin plating
or addition of secretagogues to adherent cells, cells were washed with
PBS containing 1 mM orthovanadate, lysed with a 500 µM concentration of a modified radioimmune precipitation assay buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM
NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% deoxycholate,
0.1% SDS, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM orthovanadate, and 1 mM NaF), and centrifuged at 1000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was precleared by incubation with
protein G-Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences) for 1 h at 4 °C and
then incubated with anti-p190RhoGAP antibody (3 µg;
Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.) for 60 min, followed by protein
G-Sepharose for 60 min. Immunoprecipitated proteins were recovered by
centrifugation at 1000 × g for 5 min, washed three
times, separated by 5% SDS-PAGE, and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Membranes were immunoblotted with antibody 4G10
(1:1000; Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.) to determine tyrosine phosphorylation and reprobed with anti-p190RhoGAP antibody
(1:500) to determine total p190RhoGAP in the immune
complex. Tyrosine phosphorylation of c-Src was determined by
immunoblotting total cell lysates with antibodies to
tyrosine-phosphorylated c-Src (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.) and total
c-Src (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
 |
RESULTS |
SSTR1 (but Not SSTR2) Inhibits Actin Stress Fiber Assembly and Rho
Activation by Thrombin--
Our initial studies investigated whether
SST regulates stress fiber assembly in CCL39 fibroblasts stably
expressing human SSTR1 or SSTR2. Receptor expression was determined by
membrane binding to [125I-Tyr11]SST-14, and
receptor function was confirmed by the ability of both receptor
subtypes to mediate a PTX-sensitive inhibition of cAMP accumulation by
SST (Fig. 1A).

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
SST inhibits cAMP accumulation and actin
stress fiber assembly. A, cAMP accumulation was
determined in wild-type CCL39 cells and in CCL39 cells stably
expressing human SSTR1 (CCL39-R1) and human SSTR2 (CCL39-R2). Data are
expressed as a percentage of forskolin (10 µM)
stimulation. Also included are data of cAMP accumulation by forskolin
(10 µM) plus SST (100 nM) with and without
pretreatment with PTX (100 ng/ml) for 18 h. Forskolin-induced
increases in cAMP accumulation were not significantly different in the
absence or presence of PTX (data not shown). Expression of SSTR1 and
SSTR2 was determined by radioligand binding of cell membranes with
[125I-Tyr11]SST-14 and are expressed as
fmol/mg of protein. Data represent the means ± S.E. of three
separate cell preparations for cAMP accumulation, and the means of four
separate membrane preparations for radioligand binding. B,
shown are the results from phalloidin labeling of actin filaments in
quiescent cells (Control) and in cells treated with thrombin
in the absence and presence of SST. Images are representative of >80%
of the total population of cells in four separate preparations.
|
|
Treating quiescent CCL39 cells with thrombin (30 nM) for 20 min resulted in the assembly of long parallel arrays of actin stress
fibers that extended throughout the cell (Fig. 1B), although the morphology of the cells was not markedly altered. In the presence of SST (100 nM), thrombin-induced stress fiber formation
was unchanged in wild-type CCL39 cells and in CCL39 cells expressing
SSTR2 (CCL39-R2), but was strikingly inhibited in CCL39 cells
expressing SSTR1 (CCL39-R1) (Fig. 1B). Actin stress fibers
were absent in the cell body, and their abundance and size were
markedly decreased in the cortex.
To determine whether SSTR1 attenuation of stress fiber assembly is
associated with an inhibition of Rho activity, we measured the
abundance of GTP-bound Rho complexed to a GST fusion protein of the
Rho-binding domain of its effector, ROCK. Thrombin (30 nM)
increased the abundance of Rho-GTP, with maximal stimulation occurring
at 10-20 min. Activation decreased between 30 and 60 min, but remained
higher than in control cells (data not shown). In the presence of SST
(100 nM), maximal Rho activation by thrombin at 20 min was
inhibited by 75% in CCL39-R1 cells, but was unchanged in wild-type
CCL39 cells and CCL39-R2 cells (Fig.
2A). In the absence of
thrombin, SST had no effect on the abundance of Rho-GTP in all three
cell types (data not shown), indicating that SSTR1 inhibits stimulated
(but not basal) Rho activity.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
SST inhibits activation of Rho by
thrombin. The abundance of GTP-bound Rho complexed with the
Rho-binding domain of ROCK and total Rho in post-nuclear supernatants
was determined by immunoblotting, and the abundance of Rho-GTP is
expressed as a percentage of total Rho immunoreactivity. A,
the abundance of Rho-GTP and immunoblots of Rho-GTP and total Rho
acquired from wild-type CCL39 cells and CCL39-R1 and CCL39-R2 cells.
Data were obtained from quiescent cells (Control) and cells
treated with thrombin (30 nM) for 20 min in the absence and
presence of SST (100 nM) and are representative of five
separate cell preparations. B, the abundance of Rho-GTP and
immunoblots of Rho-GTP and total Rho obtained from control and
ligand-treated CCL39-R1 cells pretreated with PTX (100 ng/ml) for
18 h. Data are representative of three separate cell preparations.
C, the abundance of Rho-GTP and immunoblots of Rho-GTP and
total Rho acquired from quiescent (Control) HUVECs and
HUVECs treated with thrombin (30 nM) for 20 min in the
absence or presence of SST (100 nM). Data are
representative of three separate cell preparations.
|
|
Although most effector actions of SST are abolished by PTX, SST
inhibition of NHE1 is PTX-insensitive (16, 24). Consistent with this
finding, the inhibition of Rho activity and stress fiber assembly by
SST was not blocked by preincubation with PTX (Fig. 2B),
although the inhibition of cAMP accumulation was completely reversed
(Fig. 1A). In PTX-treated cells, however, basal and
thrombin-stimulated Rho-GTP levels were consistently less than in
untreated cells, suggesting that PTX attenuates or blunts the
activation of Rho.
To confirm that SSTR1 inhibition of Rho activity is not an artifact of
receptor overexpression, we examined this response in HUVECs, which
express endogenous SSTR1, but not SSTR2. In HUVECs, the activation of
Rho by thrombin (30 nM) for 20 min was inhibited by 80% in
the presence of SST (Fig. 2C).
Because activation of Rho is associated with its translocation from the
cytoplasm to the plasma membrane, we determined whether changes in Rho
translocation are associated with the SSTR1-mediated decrease in
Rho-GTP. Immunoblotting for Rho indicated that thrombin increased the
abundance of Rho in the P100 fraction by 2-fold in CCL39-R1 cells
compared with quiescent (control) cells (Fig. 3A). In the presence of SST,
this increase was inhibited by 92%. The serine/threonine kinase LIMK
is activated downstream of Rho and ROCK, and this activation promotes
the translocation of LIMK from the cytosol to the plasma membrane.
Consistent with this redistribution by activated Rho, we found that
thrombin and SST regulated the abundance of membrane-associated LIMK.
Compared with quiescent CCL39-R1 cells, thrombin induced a 1.5-fold
increase in the abundance of LIMK in the P100 fraction (Fig.
3B). In the presence of SST, the abundance of LIMK in the
P100 fraction was 60% less than that of quiescent cells and 90% less
that that in the presence of the thrombin. Because SST did not reduce
the level of Rho-GTP below that observed in quiescent cells, additional Rho-independent signaling mechanisms likely contribute to SST inhibition of membrane-associated LIMK in control cells.

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
SST inhibits the membrane-associated
abundance of Rho and LIMK immunoreactivity in response to
thrombin. A and B, immunoblots of Rho and
LIMK abundance, respectively, in post-nuclear supernatants
(pNs) and in S100 and P100 fractions obtained from control
CCL39-R1 cells and CCL39-R1 cells treated with thrombin (30 nM) in the absence and presence of SST (100 nM). Data represent one-tenth of the total post-nuclear
supernatants, one-fourth of the S100 fraction, and one-half of the P100
fraction and were similar in three separate cell preparations.
C and D, immunostaining for Rho and LIMK,
respectively, in control CCL39-R1 cells and CCL39-R1 cells treated with
thrombin (30 nM) in the absence and presence of SST (100 nM). Images are representative of >80% of the cells in
three separate cell preparations.
|
|
The caveat of using subcellular fractionation to determine protein
localization is that the P100 fraction does not reveal which membranes
are involved. We therefore used immunostaining to determine whether
changes in the abundance of Rho and LIMK in the P100 fraction reflected
changes in their localization at the plasma membrane. In
thrombin-treated CCL39 and CCL39-R1 cells, the distribution of Rho
immunoreactivity shifted from a predominant intracellular localization
seen in quiescent cells to more marked staining at the cell membrane
(Fig. 3C). Pretreatment with SST blocked this redistribution
of Rho immunoreactivity in CCL39-R1 cells, but not in wild-type CCL39
cells, indicating that SSTR1 inhibition of Rho-GTP is also associated
with an inhibition of its translocation to the plasma membrane. The
distribution of LIMK immunoreactivity in quiescent CCL39-R1 cells
revealed a perinuclear and diffuse cytoplasmic localization (Fig.
3D). In the presence of thrombin, there was no detectable
perinuclear immunoreactivity, but instead diffuse cytoplasmic staining
and punctate accumulations in plasma membrane protrusions. These
findings suggest that LIMK immunoreactivity in the P100 fraction of
immunoblots from quiescent cells primarily reflects association with
intracellular membranes, but that in thrombin-treated cells, it
reflects, in part, association with the plasma membrane. In the
presence of SST, LIMK staining was predominantly perinuclear, with no
detectable immunoreactivity at the plasma membrane.
SSTR1 Inhibits Rho Activity and Focal Adhesion Assembly by
Integrins--
In addition to its central role in mediating GPCR
regulation of cytoskeletal reorganization, Rho is also activated by
integrin receptors, and it regulates integrin-induced assembly of focal adhesions. CCL39 cells express 5 1
integrins, which can be activated by plating the cells on fibronectin
to promote the assembly of actin stress fibers and paxillin-rich focal
adhesions (20). To determine whether SSTR1 also inhibits activation of
Rho by integrins, we determined the effects of SST in CCL39-R1 and
CCL39-R2 cells plated on fibronectin. Compared with control cells
plated on poly-L-lysine, plating on fibronectin for 60 min
induced an increase in Rho activity in both cell types. Although
preincubating cells with SST for 5 min prior to plating had no effect
on cell attachment (data not shown), it inhibited Rho activation by
fibronectin in CCL39-R1 cells, but not in CCL39-R2 cells (Fig.
4A). Moreover, SST treatment
had a dramatic effect on the assembly of focal adhesions and stress
fibers by fibronectin in CCL39-R1 cells. In the absence of SST,
immunostaining showed that the focal adhesion-associated protein
paxillin was localized in densely packed bundles within peripheral
focal adhesions, and phalloidin staining revealed densely packed actin
filaments predominantly at the cortex (Fig. 4B). With SST
treatment, however, paxillin immunostaining revealed smaller, punctate
focal complexes, indicating impaired assembly of focal adhesions (Fig.
4B). Additionally, in the presence of SST,
fibronectin-induced stress fiber formation was dramatically inhibited
in both the cell body and cortex (Fig. 4B). Hence, SSTR1 inhibits the activation of Rho and cytoskeletal reorganization in
response to both GPCR- and integrin-mediated signals.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
SST inhibits activation of Rho and the
assembly of focal adhesion in response to integrin activation.
A, the abundance of GTP-bound Rho complexed with the
Rho-binding domain of ROCK and total Rho in CCL39-R1 and
CCL39-R2 cells was determined by immunoblotting, and the
abundance of Rho-GTP is expressed as a percentage of total Rho
immunoreactivity. Data were obtained from cells plated for 60 min on
poly-L-lysine (PLL) (control) or fibronectin
(FN) in the absence or presence of SST and are
representative of three separate cell preparations. B, the
abundance of actin filaments, determined by phalloidin labeling, and
the abundance of focal adhesions, determined by paxillin staining, are
shown for CCL39-R1 cells plated for 60 min on fibronectin in the
absence and presence of SST. Images are representative of >85% of the
cells observed in four separate preparations.
|
|
SSTR1 Inhibits Migration by Thrombin Receptor Activation--
In
addition to the stimulation of Rho and accumulation of stress fibers,
activation of thrombin receptors is known to stimulate the migration of
fibroblasts. To investigate the possibility that SST treatment inhibits
thrombin-stimulated cell migration, a single-cell suspension of CCL39
and CCL39-R1 cells was added to the upper well of a Transwell chamber.
Addition of thrombin (30 nM) to the upper well resulted in
a significant increase in the number of both cell types migrating
through the pores of the Transwell membranes (Fig.
5). Although the migration of control
cells was less in CCL39 cells compared with CCL39-R1 cells, the percent
increase with thrombin in both cell types was similar (50% increase in CCL39 cells and 46% increase in CCL39-R1 cells). Co-treating the cells
with SST (100 nM) and thrombin had no effect on the
movement of wild-type CCL39 cells through to the lower surface
of the membrane, but it abolished thrombin-stimulated migration of
CCL39-R1 cells (p < 0.05; n = 4) (Fig.
5).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
SST inhibits cell migration in response to
thrombin. In wild-type CCL39 cells and CCL39-R1 cells, thrombin
(30 nM) added to the upper well stimulated migration of
cells through to the lower surface of the Transwell membrane.
Co-addition of SST (100 nM) to the upper well failed to
affect the thrombin-induced migration of CCL39 cells, but reversed the
migratory effect and reduced the number of cells on the lower membrane
surface to below basal levels. Data represent the means ± S.E. of
three separate cell preparations.
|
|
SSTR1 Inhibits Rho Activity Independently of Rac and Src
Activity--
Because GPCRs coupled to the inhibition of Rho have not
previously been identified, the signaling mechanism mediating this action remains undetermined. In fibroblasts, Rho activity is
down-regulated by increased Rac activity, and a reciprocal balance
between Rac and Rho activity is a major determinant of cellular
morphology and motility (25). We found, however, that in CCL39-R1
cells, the abundance of Rac-GTP was not regulated by SST, although it was markedly increased by platelet-derived growth factor (Fig. 6A). Moreover, SST had no
effect on the increased Rac-GTP abundance by platelet-derived growth
factor (data not shown). SSTR1 could attenuate GTP-bound Rho by
stimulating a Rho-dependent GTPase-activating protein
(GAP), and Arthur et al. (26) recently reported that in fibroblasts, a Src-dependent activation of
p190RhoGAP transiently inhibits Rho activity by integrin
engagement. Because SST analogs activate c-Src (27), inhibition of Rho
activity by SSTR1 might be mediated by a Src-dependent
activation of p190RhoGAP. Using conditions similar to those
for activating integrins, by plating CCL39-R1 cells on fibronectin, we
determined tyrosine phosphorylation of immunoprecipitated
p190RhoGAP. We observed a transient increase in
tyrosine-phosphorylated p190RhoGAP in cells plated on
fibronectin for 20 min compared with control cells plated on
poly-L-lysine; and by 60 min, tyrosine phosphorylation on
fibronectin had returned to control levels (Fig. 6B). In the presence of SST, however, the level of tyrosine phosphorylation in
response to fibronectin at both 20 and 60 min was not different (Fig.
6B). We also found no change in tyrosine phosphorylation of
p190RhoGAP in 48-h adherent CCL39-R1 cells treated with
thrombin in the absence and presence of SST for 20 min (Fig.
1C). At earlier time points of 5 and 10 min, there was also
no effect of thrombin or SST on tyrosine phosphorylation of
p190RhoGAP (data not shown). In neutrophils, however,
activation of p190RhoGAP by 2 integrin has
been shown to occur through an increased association of
p190RhoGAP and p120RasGAP, independent of
changes in tyrosine phosphorylation (28). Considering that SSTR1 might
regulate p190RhoGAP activity independently of
phosphorylation, we investigated upstream regulation by determining the
effect of Src activity. In CCL39 cells, however, SST attenuation of
Rho-GTP levels with thrombin was not different in the absence (68%
decrease) or presence (72% decrease) of the Src inhibitor protein
phosphatase-2 (Fig. 6D). To confirm that protein
phosphatase-2 was effectively inhibiting Src activity, we determined
that it completely abolished the increase in tyrosine phosphorylation
of Src in response to serum (10%, 10 min) (Fig. 6E).
Together, these data suggest that coupling of SSTR1 to the inhibition
of Rho activity is not mediated by the activation of Rac or Src or
by increased tyrosine phosphorylation of
p190RhoGAP.

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
SSTR1 does not regulate GTP binding to Rac or
tyrosine phosphorylation of p190RhoGAP. A,
the abundance of GTP-bound Rac complexed with the GTPase-binding domain
of PAK1 and total Rac in post-nuclear supernatants was determined in
CCL39-R1 cells by immunoblotting. Data were obtained from quiescent
cells (control (C)) and cells treated with SST
(S; 100 nM) or platelet-derived growth factor-BB
(P; 25 ng/ml) for the indicated times and are representative
of duplicate cell preparations. B and C, the
abundance of tyrosine-phosphorylated p190RhoGAP was
determined in CCL39-R1 cells plated for the indicated times on
poly-L-lysine (PL) or fibronectin
(FN) in the absence or presence of SST or plated for 48 h and treated with thrombin (T; 30 nM) for 20 min in the absence or presence of SST (S).
p190RhoGAP was immunoprecipitated, and immune complexes
were separated by 5% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted (IB) with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (4G10) and p190RhoGAP
antibody (total p190RhoGAP). Data are representative of
three separate cell preparations. D, GTP-bound Rho complexed
with the Rho-binding domain of ROCK was determined in CCL39-R1 cells in
the absence or presence of the c-Src inhibitor protein phosphatase-2
(PP2; 25 µg/ml; 10-min pretreatment). Data are shown for
quiescent cells and cells treated with thrombin (30 nM) for
20 min in the absence and presence of SST (100 nM). Data
are representative of duplicate cell preparations. E, total
cell lysates were prepared from quiescent CCL39-R1 cells and CCL39-R1
cells treated with FBS (10%) for 10 min in the absence and presence of
protein phosphatase-2 (25 µg/ml). Tyrosine-phosphorylated c-Src
(PY-Src) and total c-Src were determined by
immunoblotting.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
This study demonstrates for the first time that a GPCR,
viz. SSTR1, inhibits activation of Rho and that this effect
is correlated with a decrease in actin stress fiber assembly and cell
migration. This effect was not shared by SSTR2, which is a member of a
second subgroup of SSTRs. SSTRs have been subdivided based on sequence homology into two subgroups: SSTR1 and SSTR4; and SSTR2, SSTR3, and
SSTR5. The major functions of the latter group are well known because
they have higher affinities for most commonly available SST analogs,
including octreotide, which is widely used in a number of clinical
settings (29, 30). The functions of SSTR1 and SSTR4 remain unclear
because, until recently (31-33), there were no receptor-specific
analogs for members of this subgroup.
The SSTR family has widespread and overlapping cellular expression
patterns, with many cell lineages expressing two or more subtypes. Most cells express SSTR2 and/or SSTR5 as well as SSTR1 and/or
SSTR4, making it difficult to discriminate precisely which receptor is
responsible for a given biological function without the aid of
receptor-specific analogs. The consequence of multiple receptor subtype
expression becomes particularly problematical when the formation of
heterodimers between different SSTRs is taken into consideration (34,
35). To circumvent this problem we investigated receptor-specific
signaling using CCL39 hamster lung fibroblasts stably expressing either
human SSTR1 or SSTR2.
In CCL39 fibroblasts stimulated by thrombin, parallel arrays of actin
stress fibers were seen throughout the cytoplasm, as noted previously
in fibroblasts (11, 36) and endothelial cells (37, 38) and consistent
with the activation of Rho (1). Although thrombin-stimulated
endothelial cells undergo rounding (38), no change in the overall shape
of the CCL39 cells was noted in the present experiments. Treatment of
thrombin-stimulated cells with SST attenuated stress fiber formation in
CCL39-R1 fibroblasts, but not in wild-type CCL39 or CCL39-R2
fibroblasts. This is consistent with our previous finding that SST
decreases the abundance and size of actin stress fibers in HUVECs
expressing endogenous SSTR1 (22).
The signaling mechanism whereby SSTR1 inhibits Rho activity remains to
be determined. Down-regulation of Rho activity has been shown to occur
in response to activation of Rac (25); however, in CCL39-R1 cells, Rac
activity was not regulated by SST, although it was markedly increased
by platelet-derived growth factor (Fig. 6A). SSTR1 could
attenuate Rho activity by stimulating a Rho-dependent GAP
or by inhibiting a Rho-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor
(GEF). In fibroblasts, a Src-dependent activation of
p190RhoGAP transiently inhibits Rho activity by integrin
engagement (26). Although we confirmed that a transient increase in
tyrosine phosphorylation of p190RhoGAP occurs in response
to integrin activation, we found no effect of SSTR1 activation.
Moreover, although the Src inhibitor protein phosphatase-2 effectively
blocked tyrosine phosphorylation of Src in response to serum, it had no
effect on SST attenuation of Rho-GTP activity. Hence, if SSTR1 couples
to the inhibition of Rho by activating a GAP, our findings suggest that
this is independent of p190RhoGAP and Src.
An alternative mechanism mediating SSTR1 attenuation of Rho-GTP could
be inhibition of a Rho-specific GEF. Rho can be activated by
p115RhoGEF, which acts downstream of trimeric G proteins
G12 and G13. Although p115RhoGEF
binds to both G12 and G13, its activation of
Rho is stimulated by G13, but not G12; and
activation of G12 inhibits G13 stimulation of
p115RhoGEF (39). Hence, one possible mechanism whereby
SSTR1 inhibits Rho is through G12 blocking the
G13-p115RhoGEF-Rho signal. Consistent with this
possibility, we previously determined that G12 is the only
trimeric G protein -subunit shown to inhibit NHE1, which is
regulated downstream of Rho (40). SSTR1 inhibition of Rho is likely not
mediated by members of the Gi family of trimeric G proteins
because PTX failed to prevent this effect or by members of the
Gq family, which couple to the activation of Rho.
SSTR1 might also regulate a Rho guanine nucleotide dissociation
inhibitor to decrease GTP binding and plasma membrane translocation of
Rho. Two CAAX domains in Rho are thought to mediate lipid
anchoring; and in the GDP-bound conformation, these domains may be
masked, preventing the association of Rho with the plasma membrane
(41). Immunocytochemical studies in resting and SST-treated CCL39-R1 cells indicated that, although some Rho immunoreactivity is present as
a diffuse stain in the cytoplasm, a proportion is associated with small
vesicular structures scattered throughout the cell, with little
evidence of plasma membrane, Golgi, or nuclear staining. Overexpression
of green fluorescent protein-tagged RhoA and RhoB in COS-1 and
Madin-Darby canine kidney cells demonstrated that in quiescent cells,
RhoA is predominantly present as a diffuse cytoplasmic fluorescence
with no discernible plasma membrane staining, whereas RhoB is localized
to the plasma membrane and Golgi stack (41). The staining we obtained
with CCL39-R1 cells is consistent with the localization of RhoA in the
Madin-Darby canine kidney and COS-1 cells.
In addition to its central role in mediating GPCR regulation of
cytoskeletal reorganization, Rho is stimulated by plating cells on a
fibronectin substrate and activation of integrin receptors (7). In the
present study, the ability of SSTR1 to inhibit Rho activation was not
limited to GPCR-activated pathways because integrin-stimulated Rho was
attenuated by SST treatment. Again, this was specific to CCL39 cells
expressing SSTR1; no effect of SST treatment was observed in CCL39-R2
cells. We previously reported that CCL39 cells express
5 1 integrins, which can be activated by
plating the cells on fibronectin to promote the assembly of actin
stress fibers and paxillin-rich focal adhesions (20, 21). In
CCL39-R1 cells plated on fibronectin in the presence of SST, the
number and size of the stress fibers and focal adhesions was reduced,
consistent with the inhibition of Rho.
In COS cells transfected with a kinase-inactive LIMK-2, a similar
reduction in focal adhesion assembly was observed (42). LIMK-2 acts
downstream of Rho and ROCK to regulate the formation of stress fibers,
in part by regulating the phosphorylation and actin-severing activity
of cofilin. In control CCL39-R1 cells, LIMK immunoreactivity is
localized to the cytosol and perinuclear region with a distribution
similar to that reported in COS cells overexpressing LIMK-2 (42). The
increased abundance of LIMK immunoreactivity at the plasma membrane in
response to thrombin is markedly inhibited by SST, suggesting that this
pool of the kinase is involved in the formation and stabilization of
intracellular stress fibers and focal adhesions.
The clinical use of SST analogs has focused mainly on the
treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumors. The majority of these
tumors express the SSTR1 and SSTR2 subtypes, and SST can be used both
to locate the tumor and to inhibit secretion (23, 43). However, there
has been increasing interest in the possibility that SST might also
inhibit tumor growth by impairing angiogenesis through the inhibition
of endothelial cell migration (44, 45). Species and vascular bed
differences in the expression of SSTRs has made it difficult to
determine the receptor subtype responsible for this effect (22, 46,
47). In many cell types, including endothelial cells, the ability of
thrombin to stimulate cell migration is dependent on Rho activation
(37, 38, 48). In the present study, activation of SSTR1 resulted in an
inhibition of thrombin-stimulated migration in addition to the
inhibition of Rho activation, strongly implicating this receptor in the
anti-angiogenic effects of SST.
In summary, our data show for the first time that activation of a GPCR,
SSTR1, inhibits the GTP binding of Rho and its translocation to the
plasma membrane. The decrease in activated Rho correlates with a
decreased assembly of actin stress fibers and focal adhesions and
impaired cell migration.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dusko Iliac for help in determining
activation of Src and p190RhoGAP and members of the Barber
laboratory for comments and suggestions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants from the Canadian
Institutes of Health Research (to A. M. J. B.) and National
Institutes of Health Grants DK40259 and GM58642 (to D. L. B.) and
Grant T32DE07204 (to C.-Y. L.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 604-822-2083;
Fax: 604-822-6048; E-mail: ambuchan@interchange.ubc.ca.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
415-381-4862; Fax: 415-502-7338; E-mail: barber@itsa.ucsf.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 3, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201261200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GPCRs, G
protein-coupled receptors;
SST, somatostatin;
SSTR, somatostatin
receptor;
PTX, pertussis toxin;
HUVECs, human umbilical vein
endothelial cells;
FBS, fetal bovine serum;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PAK1, p21-activated kinase-1;
LIMK, LIM kinase;
GAP, GTPase-activating
protein;
GEF, guanine nucleotide exchange factor.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ridley, A. J.,
and Hall, A.
(1992)
Cell
70,
389-399[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Bishop, A. L.,
and Hall, A.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
348,
241-255[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Ridley, A.
(1999)
Curr. Biol.
9,
R156[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Nobes, C. D.,
and Hall, A.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
1235-1244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Yoshioka, K.,
Matsumura, F.,
Akedo, H.,
and Itoh, K.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
5146-5154[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Itoh, K.,
Yoshioka, K.,
Akedo, H.,
Uehata, M.,
Ishizaki, T.,
and Narumiya, S.
(1999)
Nat. Med.
5,
221-225[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Ren, X. D.,
Kiosses, W. B.,
and Schwartz, M. A.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
578-585[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Sah, V. P.,
Seasholtz, T. M.,
Sagi, S. A.,
and Brown, J. H.
(2000)
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
40,
459-489[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Kranenburg, O.,
Poland, M.,
van Horck, F. P.,
Drechsel, D.,
Hall, A.,
and Moolenaar, W. H.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
1851-1857[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Gohla, A.,
Harhammer, R.,
and Schultz, G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
4653-4659[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Gohla, A.,
Offermanns, S.,
Wilkie, T. M.,
and Schultz, G.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
17901-17907[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Majumdar, M.,
Seasholtz, T. M.,
Buckmaster, C.,
Toksoz, D.,
and Brown, J. H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
26815-26821[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Klages, B.,
Brandt, U.,
Simon, M. I.,
Schultz, G.,
and Offermanns, S.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
745-754[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Csaba, Z.,
and Dournaud, P.
(2001)
Neuropeptides
35,
1-23[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Patel, Y. C.
(1999)
Front. Neuroendocrinol.
20,
157-198[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Hou, C.,
Gilbert, R. L.,
and Barber, D. L.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
10357-10362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Bruns, C.,
Weckbecker, G.,
Raulf, F.,
Lubbert, H.,
and Hoyer, D.
(1995)
CIBA Found. Symp.
190,
89-101[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]; discussion 101-10
|
| 18.
|
Vexler, Z.,
Symons, M.,
and Barber, D. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
22281-22284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Tominaga, T.,
Narumiya, S.,
and Barber, D.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
4712-4722[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Tominaga, T.,
and Barber, D.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
2287-2303[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Denker, S. P.,
Huang, D. C.,
Orlowski, J.,
Furthmayr, H.,
and Barber, D. L.
(2000)
Mol. Cell
6,
1425-1436[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Curtis, S. B.,
Hewitt, J.,
Yakubovitz, S.,
Anzarut, A.,
Hsiang, Y. N.,
and Buchan, A. M.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
278,
H1815-H1822
|
| 23.
|
Bernard, V.,
Bohl, B. P.,
and Bokoch, G. M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
13198-13204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Barber, D. L.,
McGuire, M. E.,
and Ganz, M. B.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
21038-21042[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Sander, E. E.,
ten Klooster, J. P.,
van Delft, S.,
van der Kammen, R. A.,
and Collard, J. G.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
147,
1009-1022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Arthur, W. T.,
Petch, L. A.,
and Burridge, K.
(2000)
Curr. Biol.
10,
719-722[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Stetak, A.,
Csermely, P.,
Ullrich, A.,
and Keri, G.
(2001)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
288,
564-572[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Dib, K.,
Melander, F.,
and Anderson, T.
(2001)
J. Immunol.
166,
6311-6322[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Arnold, R.,
Simon, B.,
and Wied, M.
(2000)
Digestion
62 Suppl. 1,
84-91[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Jenkins, S. A.,
Kynaston, H. G.,
Davies, N. D.,
Baxter, J. N.,
and Nott, D. M.
(2001)
Chemotherapy
47 Suppl. 2,
162-196[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Rivier, J. E.,
Hoeger, C.,
Erchegyi, J.,
Gulyas, J.,
DeBoard, R.,
Craig, A. G.,
Koerber, S. C.,
Wenger, S.,
Waser, B.,
Schaer, J. C.,
and Reubi, J. C.
(2001)
J. Med. Chem.
44,
2238-2246[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Rohrer, S. P.,
and Schaeffer, J. M.
(2000)
J. Physiol. (Paris)
94,
211-215[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Chen, L.,
Hoeger, C.,
Rivier, J.,
Fitzpatrick, V. D.,
Vandlen, R. L.,
and Tashjian, A. H., Jr.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
258,
689-694[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Rocheville, M.,
Lange, D. C.,
Kumar, U.,
Sasi, R.,
Patel, R. C.,
and Patel, Y. C.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
7862-7869[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Pfeiffer, M.,
Koch, T.,
Schroder, H.,
Klutzny, M.,
Kirscht, S.,
Kreienkamp, H. J.,
Hollt, V.,
and Schulz, S.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
14027-14036[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Ha, K. S.,
and Exton, J. H.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
1789-1796[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Vouret-Craviari, V.,
Boquet, P.,
Pouyssegur, J.,
and Van Obberghen-Schilling, E.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
2639-2653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
van Nieuw Amerongen, G. P.,
van Delft, S.,
Vermeer, M. A.,
Collard, J. G.,
and van Hinsbergh, V. W.
(2000)
Circ. Res.
87,
335-340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Hart, M. J.,
Jiang, X.,
Kozasa, T.,
Roscoe, W.,
Singer, W. D.,
Gilman, A. G.,
Sternweis, P. C.,
and Bollag, G.
(1998)
Science
280,
2074-2075[Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Lin, X.,
Voyno-Yasenetskaya, T.,
Hooley, R.,
Lin, C.-Y.,
Orlowski, J.,
and Barber, D. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
22604-22610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Michaelson, D.,
Silletti, J.,
Murphy, G.,
D'Eustachio, P.,
Rush, M.,
and Philips, M. R.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
152,
111-126[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Sumi, T.,
Matsumoto, K.,
Takai, Y.,
and Nakamura, T.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
147,
1519-1532[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Behr, T. M.,
Gotthardt, M.,
Barth, A.,
and Behe, M.
(2001)
Q. J. Nucl. Med.
45,
189-200[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Bruns, C.,
Shi, V.,
Hoyer, D.,
Schuurman, H.,
and Weckbecker, G.
(2000)
Eur. J. Endocrinol.
143 Suppl. 1,
S3-S7[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Albini, A.,
Florio, T.,
Giunciuglio, D.,
Masiello, L.,
Carlone, S.,
Corsaro, A.,
Thellung, S.,
Cai, T.,
Noonan, D. M.,
and Schettini, G.
(1999)
FASEB J.
13,
647-655[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Averbukh, E.,
Halpert, M.,
Yanko, R.,
Yanko, L.,
Peer, J.,
Levinger, S.,
Flyvbjerg, A.,
and Raz, I.
(2000)
Int. J. Exp. Diabetes Res.
1,
39-47[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Suich, D. J.,
Mousa, S. A.,
Singh, G.,
Liapakis, G.,
Reisine, T.,
and DeGrado, W. F.
(2000)
Bioorg. Med. Chem.
8,
2229-2241[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Seasholtz, T. M.,
Majumdar, M.,
Kaplan, D. D.,
and Brown, J. H.
(1999)
Circ. Res.
84,
1186-1193[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Hata, K. Hori, J. Murata, and S. Takahashi
Remodeling of Actin Cytoskeleton in Lupeol-Induced B16 2F2 Cell Differentiation
J. Biochem.,
October 1, 2005;
138(4):
467 - 472.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Dutt, A. B. Jaffe, K. D. Merdek, A. Hall, and D. Toksoz
G{alpha}z Inhibits Serum Response Factor-Dependent Transcription by Inhibiting Rho Signaling
Mol. Pharmacol.,
December 1, 2004;
66(6):
1508 - 1516.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. S. Conlin, S. B. Curtis, Y. Zhao, E. D. W. Moore, V. C. Smith, R. M. Meloche, B. B. Finlay, and A. M. J. Buchan
Helicobacter pylori Infection Targets Adherens Junction Regulatory Proteins and Results in Increased Rates of Migration in Human Gastric Epithelial Cells
Infect. Immun.,
September 1, 2004;
72(9):
5181 - 5192.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H Reynaert, K Rombouts, A Vandermonde, D Urbain, U Kumar, P Bioulac-Sage, M Pinzani, J Rosenbaum, and A Geerts
Expression of somatostatin receptors in normal and cirrhotic human liver and in hepatocellular carcinoma
Gut,
August 1, 2004;
53(8):
1180 - 1189.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|