Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201261200 on June 3, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 32, 28431-28438, August 9, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/32/28431    most recent
M201261200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buchan, A. M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barber, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buchan, A. M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barber, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Somatostatin, Acting at Receptor Subtype 1, Inhibits Rho Activity, the Assembly of Actin Stress Fibers, and Cell Migration*

Alison M. J. BuchanDagger §, Chin-Yu Lin, Jimmy Choi, and Diane L. Barber||

From the Dagger  Department of Physiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z3, Canada and the  Department of Stomatology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0512

Received for publication, February 7, 2002, and in revised form, May 16, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Somatostatin regulates multiple biological functions by acting through a family of five G protein-coupled receptors, somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) 1-5. Although all five receptor subtypes inhibit adenylate cyclase activity and decrease intracellular cAMP levels, specific receptor subtypes also couple to additional signaling pathways. In CCL39 fibroblasts expressing either human SSTR1 or SSTR2, we demonstrate that activation of SSTR1 (but not SSTR2) attenuated both thrombin- and integrin-stimulated Rho-GTP complex formation. The reduction in Rho-GTP formation in the presence of somatostatin was associated with decreased translocation of Rho and LIM kinase to the plasma membrane and fewer focal contacts. Activation of Rho resulted in the formation of intracellular actin stress fibers and cell migration. In CCL39-R1 cells, somatostatin treatment prevented actin stress fiber assembly and attenuated thrombin-stimulated cell migration through Transwell membranes to basal levels. To show that native SSTR1 shares the ability to inhibit Rho activation, we demonstrated that somatostatin treatment of human umbilical vein endothelial cells attenuated thrombin-stimulated Rho-GTP accumulation. These data show for the first time that a G protein-coupled receptor, SSTR1, inhibits the activation of Rho, the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers, and cell migration.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The low molecular mass GTPase Rho plays a central role in regulating organization of the actin-based cytoskeleton in mammalian cells. Activated, GTP-bound Rho promotes the formation of contractile actin filaments into stress fibers and the assembly of cell adhesion complexes (1, 2). Through its coordinate regulation of actin filaments, contractility, and cell adhesion, Rho also plays a critical role in cell migration (3, 4) and in tumor invasion (5, 6). Rho is activated by transmembrane receptors, including the integrin family of adhesion receptors (7) and a subset of heptahelical G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)1 (8). Although the signaling pathway linking integrin receptors to Rho has not been determined, GPCRs, including those for lysophosphatidic acid (9-11) and thrombin (11-13), activate Rho through the heterotrimeric GTPases G12 and G13. However, GPCRs linked to the inhibition of Rho and downstream cytoskeletal reorganization have not been identified.

We now report that somatostatin (SST), acting at the GPCR subtype SSTR1, inhibits Rho activity, attenuates the assembly of actin stress fibers and focal adhesions, and inhibits cell migration. Five distinct SSTR subtypes that are activated by SST have been identified, and these receptors generally have potent inhibitory effects on diverse cell functions such as hormone secretion, neurotransmitter release, smooth muscle contractility, and cell proliferation (14, 15). Effector pathways regulated by SSTRs, including inhibition of adenylate cyclase and Ca2+ channel activity and stimulation of K+ channel and phosphatase activity, are mediated by pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive mechanisms, most likely involving GTPases of the Galpha i family (15-17).

The rationale for studying SST effects on Rho and the cytoskeleton was based on our previous studies with the Na+-H+ exchanger NHE1. NHE1 acts downstream of Rho to play a critical role in regulating cytoskeletal organization (18). NHE1 is phosphorylated directly by the Rho-associated kinase ROCK (19), and activation of NHE1 by GPCRs, such as those for lysophosphatidic acid and thrombin, and by integrin receptors is mediated by Rho and ROCK (19, 20). Moreover, through its direct association with the ERM (ezrin/radixin/moesin) family of actin-binding proteins, NHE1 acts as a plasma membrane anchor for actin filaments to control the assembly of cortical stress fibers and focal adhesions (21). In contrast to lysophosphatidic acid and thrombin, which stimulate Rho and NHE1, SST, acting at the SSTR1 (but not SSTR2) subtype, inhibits NHE1 activity (16). We reasoned that inhibition of NHE1 by SSTR1 might be associated with an inhibition of Rho.

Consistent with this rationale, the findings from this study indicate that SSTR1 (but not SSTR2) stably expressed in fibroblasts inhibits Rho activation, cytoskeletal reorganization, and cell migration by thrombin. We previously reported that in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), which express endogenous SSTR1, but not SSTR2, SST attenuates stress fiber assembly by serum (22), and we have now determined that this attenuation is associated with a decrease in activated, GTP-bound Rho. Moreover, in contrast to most effects of SSTRs that are abolished by PTX, SSTR1 inhibition of NHE1 (16) and, as we now report, Rho activity is PTX-insensitive.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Culture-- CCL39 hamster lung fibroblasts were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Human SSTR1 and SSTR2 were stably expressed in CCL39 cells using the inducible mammalian expression vector pCMV (16). Cells were cotransfected with pRSV-neo using calcium phosphate precipitation, and G418-resistant clones were selected and examined for their ability to bind [125I-Tyr11]SST-14 and to mediate SST inhibition of cAMP accumulation, as previously described (16). To determine sensitivity to PTX, cells were pretreated with the toxin (List Biologicals) at 100 ng/ml for 18 h. Primary HUVECs (Clonetics, Walkersville, MD) were cultured in endothelial cell basal medium supplemented with 5% FBS, 0.1% human endothelial growth factor, 0.1% gentamycin/amphotericin B, and 0.4% bovine brain extract (Clonetics).

Affinity Precipitation of Rho-GTP and Rac-GTP-- The abundance of activated, GTP-bound Rho was determined by a modification of previously described methods (7, 9) using affinity adsorption with a GST fusion protein of the Rho-binding domain of the Rho-associated kinase ROCK (amino acids 934-1015 of p160ROCK, kindly provided by S. Narumiya). The BL21 bacterial strain was transformed with this construct, and expression of the fusion protein was induced by 0.5 mM isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside for 3 h at 37 °C. Bacteria were lysed in buffer containing 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 1% Triton X-100. Bacterial lysates were sonicated with four 15-s pulses and then cleared by centrifugation at 21,000 × g for 30 min, after which the fusion protein was recovered by addition of glutathione beads to the supernatant.

Fibroblast cells and HUVECs (plated at a density of 1 × 106 in 100-mm plates) were maintained in medium containing 5% FBS for 24 h, washed, and then maintained for an additional 24 h in medium containing 0.5% FBS. Cells were treated with 30 nM thrombin (Enzyme Research Labs) in the absence or presence of 100 nM SST (Bachem) for the indicated times. The effect of c-Src activity was determined in cells pretreated for 10 min with the c-Src inhibitor PP2 (25 µg/ml 4-amino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine; Sigma). To determine the response to integrin activation, quiescent cells were trypsinized, diluted with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing trypsin inhibitor (50 µg/ml; Sigma), collected by centrifugation, and resuspended in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium in the absence of FBS. Cells were then plated in the absence or presence of SST for 60 min in 100-mm plates coated with poly-L-lysine (10 µg/ml; Sigma) or fibronectin (20 µg/ml; Sigma). After washing three times with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 1 mM orthovanadate, cells from each 100-mm plate were lysed in 400 µl of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 mM orthovanadate). The lysates from three plates were pooled, aspirated three times through a 26-gauge needle, and cleared by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 3 min at 4 °C. A 40-µl aliquot of the supernatant was collected for determination of total cellular Rho. The remaining supernatant was added to 75 µg of GST fusion protein-coated beads and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C on a rotator. The beads were washed four times with wash buffer (Tris with 1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), and proteins were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE. GTP-bound Rho and total cellular Rho were detected by Western blotting using a monoclonal antibody to RhoA (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at a dilution of 1:250. Densitometry analysis was performed with NIH Image, and the amount of GTP-bound Rho is expressed as a percentage of total cellular Rho.

The abundance of activated, GTP-bound Rac was determined by a modification of previously described methods (23) using affinity adsorption with a GST fusion protein of the GTPase-binding domain of PAK1 (cytoskeleton). CCL39-R1 cells (plated at a density of 1 × 106 in 100-mm plates) were maintained in medium containing 5% FBS for 24 h, washed, and then maintained for an additional 24 h in medium containing 0.5% FBS. Cells were treated with SST (100 nM) or platelet-derived growth factor-BB (25 ng/ml; Roche Molecular Biochemicals) for the indicated times. After washing three times with PBS containing 1 mM orthovanadate, cells from each 100-mm plate were lysed in 400 µl of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 2% Nonidet P-40, 10% glycerol, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 mM orthovanadate). The lysates from two plates were pooled, aspirated three times through a 26-gauge needle, and cleared by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 3 min at 4 °C. A 40-µl aliquot of the supernatant was collected for determination of total cellular Rac. The remaining supernatant was added to 50 µg of GST fusion protein-coated beads and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C on a rotator. The beads were washed four times with wash buffer (Tris with 1% Nonidet P-40, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), and proteins were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE. GTP-bound Rac and total cellular Rac were detected by Western blotting using a monoclonal antibody to Rac (Transduction Laboratories) and quantified as described for determining the percentage of GTP-bound Rho.

Immunocytochemistry-- Cells grown on 22-mm glass coverslips were maintained for 24 h in 0.5% FBS and then treated with 30 nM thrombin in the absence or presence of 100 nM SST for 20 min. They were washed briefly with phosphate buffer and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 10 min. After thorough washing with PBS to remove excess fixative, the cells were permeabilized for 10 min in 0.1% Triton X-100; immersed in 5% normal calf serum; and incubated with primary antibodies, including those against paxillin (1:200 for 1 h at 23 °C; Zymed Laboratories Inc.), RhoA (1:250 for 48 h at 4 °C; Transduction Laboratories), and LIMK (1:200 for 18 h at 4 °C; Transduction Laboratories). The bound antibodies were detected using the relevant fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody (either goat anti-rabbit IgG or donkey anti-mouse IgG, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.) at a dilution of 1:500 for 1 h at room temperature. The coverslips were mounted on glass slides with Vectashield anti-fade mounting medium (Vector Labs, Inc.) and screened using a Zeiss Axiophot microscope (magnification ×1000). Representative images were collected using a Spot2 camera (Diagnostic Instruments, Inc.) and imported into Adobe Photoshop.

Rho and LIMK Translocation-- The subcellular localization of Rho and LIMK was determined by immunostaining and immunoblotting. For immunoblotting, cells plated on 100-mm plates were maintained for 24 h in 0.5% FBS and then treated with thrombin (30 nM) in the absence or presence of SST (100 nM) for 20 min. Cells were washed twice with PBS; collected by scraping in buffer containing 50 mM Hepes, 135 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, and 3 mM EDTA (pH 7.5); and lysed by sonication. Post-nuclear supernatants were obtained by centrifugation and separated into S100 and P100 fractions by centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 20 min. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and probed with antibodies to Rho (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and LIMK.

Cell Migration Assay-- Migration of CCL39-R1 and CCL39-R2 cells was assessed using Transwell membranes (8-µm pore size and 6.5-mm diameter) in 24-well plates (Corning Costar Corp.). The cells were detached from the culture plates, and 200 µl of cell suspension at a density of 1 × 106/ml in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium was added to the top chamber. Thrombin (30 nM final concentration) was added to the top chamber in the absence or presence of 100 nM SST, and migration of cells through the Transwell membrane was compared with untreated cells. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 8 h, with agonists reapplied at 4 h. After 8 h, 2% paraformaldehyde was added to the top and bottom wells, and cells were fixed overnight. After washing with PBS, the cells in the upper well were removed by aspiration, and the nuclei of cells that had migrated through to the bottom surface of the filter were stained with 1 µg/ml 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole for 15 min at room temperature. To count migrated cells, the filter was cut out of the holder and placed bottom side up on a glass slide. Five fields at magnification ×40 were captured using a Spot2 camera, and the number of cells was counted using NIH Image. The results are expressed as means ± S.E., and statistical significance was assessed by Student's unpaired t test, with p < 0.05 considered significant. After removal of the Transwell, the individual wells were checked to determine whether cells had migrated through the filter, detached, and subsequently attached to the base of the 24-well plate.

Regulation of Tyrosine-phosphorylated p190RhoGAP and c-Src-- Tyrosine phosphorylation of p190RhoGAP was determined in cell preparations similar to those described for detecting Rho-GTP. Following fibronectin plating or addition of secretagogues to adherent cells, cells were washed with PBS containing 1 mM orthovanadate, lysed with a 500 µM concentration of a modified radioimmune precipitation assay buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM orthovanadate, and 1 mM NaF), and centrifuged at 1000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was precleared by incubation with protein G-Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences) for 1 h at 4 °C and then incubated with anti-p190RhoGAP antibody (3 µg; Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.) for 60 min, followed by protein G-Sepharose for 60 min. Immunoprecipitated proteins were recovered by centrifugation at 1000 × g for 5 min, washed three times, separated by 5% SDS-PAGE, and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Membranes were immunoblotted with antibody 4G10 (1:1000; Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.) to determine tyrosine phosphorylation and reprobed with anti-p190RhoGAP antibody (1:500) to determine total p190RhoGAP in the immune complex. Tyrosine phosphorylation of c-Src was determined by immunoblotting total cell lysates with antibodies to tyrosine-phosphorylated c-Src (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.) and total c-Src (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

SSTR1 (but Not SSTR2) Inhibits Actin Stress Fiber Assembly and Rho Activation by Thrombin-- Our initial studies investigated whether SST regulates stress fiber assembly in CCL39 fibroblasts stably expressing human SSTR1 or SSTR2. Receptor expression was determined by membrane binding to [125I-Tyr11]SST-14, and receptor function was confirmed by the ability of both receptor subtypes to mediate a PTX-sensitive inhibition of cAMP accumulation by SST (Fig. 1A).


View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   SST inhibits cAMP accumulation and actin stress fiber assembly. A, cAMP accumulation was determined in wild-type CCL39 cells and in CCL39 cells stably expressing human SSTR1 (CCL39-R1) and human SSTR2 (CCL39-R2). Data are expressed as a percentage of forskolin (10 µM) stimulation. Also included are data of cAMP accumulation by forskolin (10 µM) plus SST (100 nM) with and without pretreatment with PTX (100 ng/ml) for 18 h. Forskolin-induced increases in cAMP accumulation were not significantly different in the absence or presence of PTX (data not shown). Expression of SSTR1 and SSTR2 was determined by radioligand binding of cell membranes with [125I-Tyr11]SST-14 and are expressed as fmol/mg of protein. Data represent the means ± S.E. of three separate cell preparations for cAMP accumulation, and the means of four separate membrane preparations for radioligand binding. B, shown are the results from phalloidin labeling of actin filaments in quiescent cells (Control) and in cells treated with thrombin in the absence and presence of SST. Images are representative of >80% of the total population of cells in four separate preparations.

Treating quiescent CCL39 cells with thrombin (30 nM) for 20 min resulted in the assembly of long parallel arrays of actin stress fibers that extended throughout the cell (Fig. 1B), although the morphology of the cells was not markedly altered. In the presence of SST (100 nM), thrombin-induced stress fiber formation was unchanged in wild-type CCL39 cells and in CCL39 cells expressing SSTR2 (CCL39-R2), but was strikingly inhibited in CCL39 cells expressing SSTR1 (CCL39-R1) (Fig. 1B). Actin stress fibers were absent in the cell body, and their abundance and size were markedly decreased in the cortex.

To determine whether SSTR1 attenuation of stress fiber assembly is associated with an inhibition of Rho activity, we measured the abundance of GTP-bound Rho complexed to a GST fusion protein of the Rho-binding domain of its effector, ROCK. Thrombin (30 nM) increased the abundance of Rho-GTP, with maximal stimulation occurring at 10-20 min. Activation decreased between 30 and 60 min, but remained higher than in control cells (data not shown). In the presence of SST (100 nM), maximal Rho activation by thrombin at 20 min was inhibited by 75% in CCL39-R1 cells, but was unchanged in wild-type CCL39 cells and CCL39-R2 cells (Fig. 2A). In the absence of thrombin, SST had no effect on the abundance of Rho-GTP in all three cell types (data not shown), indicating that SSTR1 inhibits stimulated (but not basal) Rho activity.


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   SST inhibits activation of Rho by thrombin. The abundance of GTP-bound Rho complexed with the Rho-binding domain of ROCK and total Rho in post-nuclear supernatants was determined by immunoblotting, and the abundance of Rho-GTP is expressed as a percentage of total Rho immunoreactivity. A, the abundance of Rho-GTP and immunoblots of Rho-GTP and total Rho acquired from wild-type CCL39 cells and CCL39-R1 and CCL39-R2 cells. Data were obtained from quiescent cells (Control) and cells treated with thrombin (30 nM) for 20 min in the absence and presence of SST (100 nM) and are representative of five separate cell preparations. B, the abundance of Rho-GTP and immunoblots of Rho-GTP and total Rho obtained from control and ligand-treated CCL39-R1 cells pretreated with PTX (100 ng/ml) for 18 h. Data are representative of three separate cell preparations. C, the abundance of Rho-GTP and immunoblots of Rho-GTP and total Rho acquired from quiescent (Control) HUVECs and HUVECs treated with thrombin (30 nM) for 20 min in the absence or presence of SST (100 nM). Data are representative of three separate cell preparations.

Although most effector actions of SST are abolished by PTX, SST inhibition of NHE1 is PTX-insensitive (16, 24). Consistent with this finding, the inhibition of Rho activity and stress fiber assembly by SST was not blocked by preincubation with PTX (Fig. 2B), although the inhibition of cAMP accumulation was completely reversed (Fig. 1A). In PTX-treated cells, however, basal and thrombin-stimulated Rho-GTP levels were consistently less than in untreated cells, suggesting that PTX attenuates or blunts the activation of Rho.

To confirm that SSTR1 inhibition of Rho activity is not an artifact of receptor overexpression, we examined this response in HUVECs, which express endogenous SSTR1, but not SSTR2. In HUVECs, the activation of Rho by thrombin (30 nM) for 20 min was inhibited by 80% in the presence of SST (Fig. 2C).

Because activation of Rho is associated with its translocation from the cytoplasm to the plasma membrane, we determined whether changes in Rho translocation are associated with the SSTR1-mediated decrease in Rho-GTP. Immunoblotting for Rho indicated that thrombin increased the abundance of Rho in the P100 fraction by 2-fold in CCL39-R1 cells compared with quiescent (control) cells (Fig. 3A). In the presence of SST, this increase was inhibited by 92%. The serine/threonine kinase LIMK is activated downstream of Rho and ROCK, and this activation promotes the translocation of LIMK from the cytosol to the plasma membrane. Consistent with this redistribution by activated Rho, we found that thrombin and SST regulated the abundance of membrane-associated LIMK. Compared with quiescent CCL39-R1 cells, thrombin induced a 1.5-fold increase in the abundance of LIMK in the P100 fraction (Fig. 3B). In the presence of SST, the abundance of LIMK in the P100 fraction was 60% less than that of quiescent cells and 90% less that that in the presence of the thrombin. Because SST did not reduce the level of Rho-GTP below that observed in quiescent cells, additional Rho-independent signaling mechanisms likely contribute to SST inhibition of membrane-associated LIMK in control cells.


View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   SST inhibits the membrane-associated abundance of Rho and LIMK immunoreactivity in response to thrombin. A and B, immunoblots of Rho and LIMK abundance, respectively, in post-nuclear supernatants (pNs) and in S100 and P100 fractions obtained from control CCL39-R1 cells and CCL39-R1 cells treated with thrombin (30 nM) in the absence and presence of SST (100 nM). Data represent one-tenth of the total post-nuclear supernatants, one-fourth of the S100 fraction, and one-half of the P100 fraction and were similar in three separate cell preparations. C and D, immunostaining for Rho and LIMK, respectively, in control CCL39-R1 cells and CCL39-R1 cells treated with thrombin (30 nM) in the absence and presence of SST (100 nM). Images are representative of >80% of the cells in three separate cell preparations.

The caveat of using subcellular fractionation to determine protein localization is that the P100 fraction does not reveal which membranes are involved. We therefore used immunostaining to determine whether changes in the abundance of Rho and LIMK in the P100 fraction reflected changes in their localization at the plasma membrane. In thrombin-treated CCL39 and CCL39-R1 cells, the distribution of Rho immunoreactivity shifted from a predominant intracellular localization seen in quiescent cells to more marked staining at the cell membrane (Fig. 3C). Pretreatment with SST blocked this redistribution of Rho immunoreactivity in CCL39-R1 cells, but not in wild-type CCL39 cells, indicating that SSTR1 inhibition of Rho-GTP is also associated with an inhibition of its translocation to the plasma membrane. The distribution of LIMK immunoreactivity in quiescent CCL39-R1 cells revealed a perinuclear and diffuse cytoplasmic localization (Fig. 3D). In the presence of thrombin, there was no detectable perinuclear immunoreactivity, but instead diffuse cytoplasmic staining and punctate accumulations in plasma membrane protrusions. These findings suggest that LIMK immunoreactivity in the P100 fraction of immunoblots from quiescent cells primarily reflects association with intracellular membranes, but that in thrombin-treated cells, it reflects, in part, association with the plasma membrane. In the presence of SST, LIMK staining was predominantly perinuclear, with no detectable immunoreactivity at the plasma membrane.

SSTR1 Inhibits Rho Activity and Focal Adhesion Assembly by Integrins-- In addition to its central role in mediating GPCR regulation of cytoskeletal reorganization, Rho is also activated by integrin receptors, and it regulates integrin-induced assembly of focal adhesions. CCL39 cells express alpha 5beta 1 integrins, which can be activated by plating the cells on fibronectin to promote the assembly of actin stress fibers and paxillin-rich focal adhesions (20). To determine whether SSTR1 also inhibits activation of Rho by integrins, we determined the effects of SST in CCL39-R1 and CCL39-R2 cells plated on fibronectin. Compared with control cells plated on poly-L-lysine, plating on fibronectin for 60 min induced an increase in Rho activity in both cell types. Although preincubating cells with SST for 5 min prior to plating had no effect on cell attachment (data not shown), it inhibited Rho activation by fibronectin in CCL39-R1 cells, but not in CCL39-R2 cells (Fig. 4A). Moreover, SST treatment had a dramatic effect on the assembly of focal adhesions and stress fibers by fibronectin in CCL39-R1 cells. In the absence of SST, immunostaining showed that the focal adhesion-associated protein paxillin was localized in densely packed bundles within peripheral focal adhesions, and phalloidin staining revealed densely packed actin filaments predominantly at the cortex (Fig. 4B). With SST treatment, however, paxillin immunostaining revealed smaller, punctate focal complexes, indicating impaired assembly of focal adhesions (Fig. 4B). Additionally, in the presence of SST, fibronectin-induced stress fiber formation was dramatically inhibited in both the cell body and cortex (Fig. 4B). Hence, SSTR1 inhibits the activation of Rho and cytoskeletal reorganization in response to both GPCR- and integrin-mediated signals.


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   SST inhibits activation of Rho and the assembly of focal adhesion in response to integrin activation. A, the abundance of GTP-bound Rho complexed with the Rho-binding domain of ROCK and total Rho in CCL39-R1 and CCL39-R2 cells was determined by immunoblotting, and the abundance of Rho-GTP is expressed as a percentage of total Rho immunoreactivity. Data were obtained from cells plated for 60 min on poly-L-lysine (PLL) (control) or fibronectin (FN) in the absence or presence of SST and are representative of three separate cell preparations. B, the abundance of actin filaments, determined by phalloidin labeling, and the abundance of focal adhesions, determined by paxillin staining, are shown for CCL39-R1 cells plated for 60 min on fibronectin in the absence and presence of SST. Images are representative of >85% of the cells observed in four separate preparations.

SSTR1 Inhibits Migration by Thrombin Receptor Activation-- In addition to the stimulation of Rho and accumulation of stress fibers, activation of thrombin receptors is known to stimulate the migration of fibroblasts. To investigate the possibility that SST treatment inhibits thrombin-stimulated cell migration, a single-cell suspension of CCL39 and CCL39-R1 cells was added to the upper well of a Transwell chamber. Addition of thrombin (30 nM) to the upper well resulted in a significant increase in the number of both cell types migrating through the pores of the Transwell membranes (Fig. 5). Although the migration of control cells was less in CCL39 cells compared with CCL39-R1 cells, the percent increase with thrombin in both cell types was similar (50% increase in CCL39 cells and 46% increase in CCL39-R1 cells). Co-treating the cells with SST (100 nM) and thrombin had no effect on the movement of wild-type CCL39 cells through to the lower surface of the membrane, but it abolished thrombin-stimulated migration of CCL39-R1 cells (p < 0.05; n = 4) (Fig. 5).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   SST inhibits cell migration in response to thrombin. In wild-type CCL39 cells and CCL39-R1 cells, thrombin (30 nM) added to the upper well stimulated migration of cells through to the lower surface of the Transwell membrane. Co-addition of SST (100 nM) to the upper well failed to affect the thrombin-induced migration of CCL39 cells, but reversed the migratory effect and reduced the number of cells on the lower membrane surface to below basal levels. Data represent the means ± S.E. of three separate cell preparations.

SSTR1 Inhibits Rho Activity Independently of Rac and Src Activity-- Because GPCRs coupled to the inhibition of Rho have not previously been identified, the signaling mechanism mediating this action remains undetermined. In fibroblasts, Rho activity is down-regulated by increased Rac activity, and a reciprocal balance between Rac and Rho activity is a major determinant of cellular morphology and motility (25). We found, however, that in CCL39-R1 cells, the abundance of Rac-GTP was not regulated by SST, although it was markedly increased by platelet-derived growth factor (Fig. 6A). Moreover, SST had no effect on the increased Rac-GTP abundance by platelet-derived growth factor (data not shown). SSTR1 could attenuate GTP-bound Rho by stimulating a Rho-dependent GTPase-activating protein (GAP), and Arthur et al. (26) recently reported that in fibroblasts, a Src-dependent activation of p190RhoGAP transiently inhibits Rho activity by integrin engagement. Because SST analogs activate c-Src (27), inhibition of Rho activity by SSTR1 might be mediated by a Src-dependent activation of p190RhoGAP. Using conditions similar to those for activating integrins, by plating CCL39-R1 cells on fibronectin, we determined tyrosine phosphorylation of immunoprecipitated p190RhoGAP. We observed a transient increase in tyrosine-phosphorylated p190RhoGAP in cells plated on fibronectin for 20 min compared with control cells plated on poly-L-lysine; and by 60 min, tyrosine phosphorylation on fibronectin had returned to control levels (Fig. 6B). In the presence of SST, however, the level of tyrosine phosphorylation in response to fibronectin at both 20 and 60 min was not different (Fig. 6B). We also found no change in tyrosine phosphorylation of p190RhoGAP in 48-h adherent CCL39-R1 cells treated with thrombin in the absence and presence of SST for 20 min (Fig. 1C). At earlier time points of 5 and 10 min, there was also no effect of thrombin or SST on tyrosine phosphorylation of p190RhoGAP (data not shown). In neutrophils, however, activation of p190RhoGAP by beta 2 integrin has been shown to occur through an increased association of p190RhoGAP and p120RasGAP, independent of changes in tyrosine phosphorylation (28). Considering that SSTR1 might regulate p190RhoGAP activity independently of phosphorylation, we investigated upstream regulation by determining the effect of Src activity. In CCL39 cells, however, SST attenuation of Rho-GTP levels with thrombin was not different in the absence (68% decrease) or presence (72% decrease) of the Src inhibitor protein phosphatase-2 (Fig. 6D). To confirm that protein phosphatase-2 was effectively inhibiting Src activity, we determined that it completely abolished the increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of Src in response to serum (10%, 10 min) (Fig. 6E). Together, these data suggest that coupling of SSTR1 to the inhibition of Rho activity is not mediated by the activation of Rac or Src or by increased tyrosine phosphorylation of p190RhoGAP.


View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   SSTR1 does not regulate GTP binding to Rac or tyrosine phosphorylation of p190RhoGAP. A, the abundance of GTP-bound Rac complexed with the GTPase-binding domain of PAK1 and total Rac in post-nuclear supernatants was determined in CCL39-R1 cells by immunoblotting. Data were obtained from quiescent cells (control (C)) and cells treated with SST (S; 100 nM) or platelet-derived growth factor-BB (P; 25 ng/ml) for the indicated times and are representative of duplicate cell preparations. B and C, the abundance of tyrosine-phosphorylated p190RhoGAP was determined in CCL39-R1 cells plated for the indicated times on poly-L-lysine (PL) or fibronectin (FN) in the absence or presence of SST or plated for 48 h and treated with thrombin (T; 30 nM) for 20 min in the absence or presence of SST (S). p190RhoGAP was immunoprecipitated, and immune complexes were separated by 5% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted (IB) with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (4G10) and p190RhoGAP antibody (total p190RhoGAP). Data are representative of three separate cell preparations. D, GTP-bound Rho complexed with the Rho-binding domain of ROCK was determined in CCL39-R1 cells in the absence or presence of the c-Src inhibitor protein phosphatase-2 (PP2; 25 µg/ml; 10-min pretreatment). Data are shown for quiescent cells and cells treated with thrombin (30 nM) for 20 min in the absence and presence of SST (100 nM). Data are representative of duplicate cell preparations. E, total cell lysates were prepared from quiescent CCL39-R1 cells and CCL39-R1 cells treated with FBS (10%) for 10 min in the absence and presence of protein phosphatase-2 (25 µg/ml). Tyrosine-phosphorylated c-Src (PY-Src) and total c-Src were determined by immunoblotting.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

This study demonstrates for the first time that a GPCR, viz. SSTR1, inhibits activation of Rho and that this effect is correlated with a decrease in actin stress fiber assembly and cell migration. This effect was not shared by SSTR2, which is a member of a second subgroup of SSTRs. SSTRs have been subdivided based on sequence homology into two subgroups: SSTR1 and SSTR4; and SSTR2, SSTR3, and SSTR5. The major functions of the latter group are well known because they have higher affinities for most commonly available SST analogs, including octreotide, which is widely used in a number of clinical settings (29, 30). The functions of SSTR1 and SSTR4 remain unclear because, until recently (31-33), there were no receptor-specific analogs for members of this subgroup.

The SSTR family has widespread and overlapping cellular expression patterns, with many cell lineages expressing two or more subtypes. Most cells express SSTR2 and/or SSTR5 as well as SSTR1 and/or SSTR4, making it difficult to discriminate precisely which receptor is responsible for a given biological function without the aid of receptor-specific analogs. The consequence of multiple receptor subtype expression becomes particularly problematical when the formation of heterodimers between different SSTRs is taken into consideration (34, 35). To circumvent this problem we investigated receptor-specific signaling using CCL39 hamster lung fibroblasts stably expressing either human SSTR1 or SSTR2.

In CCL39 fibroblasts stimulated by thrombin, parallel arrays of actin stress fibers were seen throughout the cytoplasm, as noted previously in fibroblasts (11, 36) and endothelial cells (37, 38) and consistent with the activation of Rho (1). Although thrombin-stimulated endothelial cells undergo rounding (38), no change in the overall shape of the CCL39 cells was noted in the present experiments. Treatment of thrombin-stimulated cells with SST attenuated stress fiber formation in CCL39-R1 fibroblasts, but not in wild-type CCL39 or CCL39-R2 fibroblasts. This is consistent with our previous finding that SST decreases the abundance and size of actin stress fibers in HUVECs expressing endogenous SSTR1 (22).

The signaling mechanism whereby SSTR1 inhibits Rho activity remains to be determined. Down-regulation of Rho activity has been shown to occur in response to activation of Rac (25); however, in CCL39-R1 cells, Rac activity was not regulated by SST, although it was markedly increased by platelet-derived growth factor (Fig. 6A). SSTR1 could attenuate Rho activity by stimulating a Rho-dependent GAP or by inhibiting a Rho-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF). In fibroblasts, a Src-dependent activation of p190RhoGAP transiently inhibits Rho activity by integrin engagement (26). Although we confirmed that a transient increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of p190RhoGAP occurs in response to integrin activation, we found no effect of SSTR1 activation. Moreover, although the Src inhibitor protein phosphatase-2 effectively blocked tyrosine phosphorylation of Src in response to serum, it had no effect on SST attenuation of Rho-GTP activity. Hence, if SSTR1 couples to the inhibition of Rho by activating a GAP, our findings suggest that this is independent of p190RhoGAP and Src.

An alternative mechanism mediating SSTR1 attenuation of Rho-GTP could be inhibition of a Rho-specific GEF. Rho can be activated by p115RhoGEF, which acts downstream of trimeric G proteins G12 and G13. Although p115RhoGEF binds to both G12 and G13, its activation of Rho is stimulated by G13, but not G12; and activation of G12 inhibits G13 stimulation of p115RhoGEF (39). Hence, one possible mechanism whereby SSTR1 inhibits Rho is through G12 blocking the G13-p115RhoGEF-Rho signal. Consistent with this possibility, we previously determined that G12 is the only trimeric G protein alpha -subunit shown to inhibit NHE1, which is regulated downstream of Rho (40). SSTR1 inhibition of Rho is likely not mediated by members of the Gi family of trimeric G proteins because PTX failed to prevent this effect or by members of the Gq family, which couple to the activation of Rho.

SSTR1 might also regulate a Rho guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor to decrease GTP binding and plasma membrane translocation of Rho. Two CAAX domains in Rho are thought to mediate lipid anchoring; and in the GDP-bound conformation, these domains may be masked, preventing the association of Rho with the plasma membrane (41). Immunocytochemical studies in resting and SST-treated CCL39-R1 cells indicated that, although some Rho immunoreactivity is present as a diffuse stain in the cytoplasm, a proportion is associated with small vesicular structures scattered throughout the cell, with little evidence of plasma membrane, Golgi, or nuclear staining. Overexpression of green fluorescent protein-tagged RhoA and RhoB in COS-1 and Madin-Darby canine kidney cells demonstrated that in quiescent cells, RhoA is predominantly present as a diffuse cytoplasmic fluorescence with no discernible plasma membrane staining, whereas RhoB is localized to the plasma membrane and Golgi stack (41). The staining we obtained with CCL39-R1 cells is consistent with the localization of RhoA in the Madin-Darby canine kidney and COS-1 cells.

In addition to its central role in mediating GPCR regulation of cytoskeletal reorganization, Rho is stimulated by plating cells on a fibronectin substrate and activation of integrin receptors (7). In the present study, the ability of SSTR1 to inhibit Rho activation was not limited to GPCR-activated pathways because integrin-stimulated Rho was attenuated by SST treatment. Again, this was specific to CCL39 cells expressing SSTR1; no effect of SST treatment was observed in CCL39-R2 cells. We previously reported that CCL39 cells express alpha 5beta 1 integrins, which can be activated by plating the cells on fibronectin to promote the assembly of actin stress fibers and paxillin-rich focal adhesions (20, 21). In CCL39-R1 cells plated on fibronectin in the presence of SST, the number and size of the stress fibers and focal adhesions was reduced, consistent with the inhibition of Rho.

In COS cells transfected with a kinase-inactive LIMK-2, a similar reduction in focal adhesion assembly was observed (42). LIMK-2 acts downstream of Rho and ROCK to regulate the formation of stress fibers, in part by regulating the phosphorylation and actin-severing activity of cofilin. In control CCL39-R1 cells, LIMK immunoreactivity is localized to the cytosol and perinuclear region with a distribution similar to that reported in COS cells overexpressing LIMK-2 (42). The increased abundance of LIMK immunoreactivity at the plasma membrane in response to thrombin is markedly inhibited by SST, suggesting that this pool of the kinase is involved in the formation and stabilization of intracellular stress fibers and focal adhesions.

The clinical use of SST analogs has focused mainly on the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumors. The majority of these tumors express the SSTR1 and SSTR2 subtypes, and SST can be used both to locate the tumor and to inhibit secretion (23, 43). However, there has been increasing interest in the possibility that SST might also inhibit tumor growth by impairing angiogenesis through the inhibition of endothelial cell migration (44, 45). Species and vascular bed differences in the expression of SSTRs has made it difficult to determine the receptor subtype responsible for this effect (22, 46, 47). In many cell types, including endothelial cells, the ability of thrombin to stimulate cell migration is dependent on Rho activation (37, 38, 48). In the present study, activation of SSTR1 resulted in an inhibition of thrombin-stimulated migration in addition to the inhibition of Rho activation, strongly implicating this receptor in the anti-angiogenic effects of SST.

In summary, our data show for the first time that activation of a GPCR, SSTR1, inhibits the GTP binding of Rho and its translocation to the plasma membrane. The decrease in activated Rho correlates with a decreased assembly of actin stress fibers and focal adhesions and impaired cell migration.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dusko Iliac for help in determining activation of Src and p190RhoGAP and members of the Barber laboratory for comments and suggestions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (to A. M. J. B.) and National Institutes of Health Grants DK40259 and GM58642 (to D. L. B.) and Grant T32DE07204 (to C.-Y. L.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 604-822-2083; Fax: 604-822-6048; E-mail: ambuchan@interchange.ubc.ca.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 415-381-4862; Fax: 415-502-7338; E-mail: barber@itsa.ucsf.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 3, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201261200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: GPCRs, G protein-coupled receptors; SST, somatostatin; SSTR, somatostatin receptor; PTX, pertussis toxin; HUVECs, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; FBS, fetal bovine serum; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PAK1, p21-activated kinase-1; LIMK, LIM kinase; GAP, GTPase-activating protein; GEF, guanine nucleotide exchange factor.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Ridley, A. J., and Hall, A. (1992) Cell 70, 389-399[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Bishop, A. L., and Hall, A. (2000) Biochem. J. 348, 241-255[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Ridley, A. (1999) Curr. Biol. 9, R156[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Nobes, C. D., and Hall, A. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 144, 1235-1244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Yoshioka, K., Matsumura, F., Akedo, H., and Itoh, K. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 5146-5154[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Itoh, K., Yoshioka, K., Akedo, H., Uehata, M., Ishizaki, T., and Narumiya, S. (1999) Nat. Med. 5, 221-225[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Ren, X. D., Kiosses, W. B., and Schwartz, M. A. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 578-585[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Sah, V. P., Seasholtz, T. M., Sagi, S. A., and Brown, J. H. (2000) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 40, 459-489[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Kranenburg, O., Poland, M., van Horck, F. P., Drechsel, D., Hall, A., and Moolenaar, W. H. (1999) Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 1851-1857[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Gohla, A., Harhammer, R., and Schultz, G. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 4653-4659[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Gohla, A., Offermanns, S., Wilkie, T. M., and Schultz, G. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 17901-17907[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Majumdar, M., Seasholtz, T. M., Buckmaster, C., Toksoz, D., and Brown, J. H. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 26815-26821[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Klages, B., Brandt, U., Simon, M. I., Schultz, G., and Offermanns, S. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 144, 745-754[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Csaba, Z., and Dournaud, P. (2001) Neuropeptides 35, 1-23[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Patel, Y. C. (1999) Front. Neuroendocrinol. 20, 157-198[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Hou, C., Gilbert, R. L., and Barber, D. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 10357-10362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Bruns, C., Weckbecker, G., Raulf, F., Lubbert, H., and Hoyer, D. (1995) CIBA Found. Symp. 190, 89-101[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]; discussion 101-10
18. Vexler, Z., Symons, M., and Barber, D. L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 22281-22284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Tominaga, T., Narumiya, S., and Barber, D. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4712-4722[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Tominaga, T., and Barber, D. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 2287-2303[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Denker, S. P., Huang, D. C., Orlowski, J., Furthmayr, H., and Barber, D. L. (2000) Mol. Cell 6, 1425-1436[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Curtis, S. B., Hewitt, J., Yakubovitz, S., Anzarut, A., Hsiang, Y. N., and Buchan, A. M. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. 278, H1815-H1822
23. Bernard, V., Bohl, B. P., and Bokoch, G. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 13198-13204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Barber, D. L., McGuire, M. E., and Ganz, M. B. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 21038-21042[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Sander, E. E., ten Klooster, J. P., van Delft, S., van der Kammen, R. A., and Collard, J. G. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 147, 1009-1022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Arthur, W. T., Petch, L. A., and Burridge, K. (2000) Curr. Biol. 10, 719-722[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Stetak, A., Csermely, P., Ullrich, A., and Keri, G. (2001) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 288, 564-572[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Dib, K., Melander, F., and Anderson, T. (2001) J. Immunol. 166, 6311-6322[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Arnold, R., Simon, B., and Wied, M. (2000) Digestion 62 Suppl. 1, 84-91[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Jenkins, S. A., Kynaston, H. G., Davies, N. D., Baxter, J. N., and Nott, D. M. (2001) Chemotherapy 47 Suppl. 2, 162-196[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Rivier, J. E., Hoeger, C., Erchegyi, J., Gulyas, J., DeBoard, R., Craig, A. G., Koerber, S. C., Wenger, S., Waser, B., Schaer, J. C., and Reubi, J. C. (2001) J. Med. Chem. 44, 2238-2246[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Rohrer, S. P., and Schaeffer, J. M. (2000) J. Physiol. (Paris) 94, 211-215[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Chen, L., Hoeger, C., Rivier, J., Fitzpatrick, V. D., Vandlen, R. L., and Tashjian, A. H., Jr. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 258, 689-694[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Rocheville, M., Lange, D. C., Kumar, U., Sasi, R., Patel, R. C., and Patel, Y. C. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 7862-7869[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Pfeiffer, M., Koch, T., Schroder, H., Klutzny, M., Kirscht, S., Kreienkamp, H. J., Hollt, V., and Schulz, S. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 14027-14036[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Ha, K. S., and Exton, J. H. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 123, 1789-1796[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Vouret-Craviari, V., Boquet, P., Pouyssegur, J., and Van Obberghen-Schilling, E. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 2639-2653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. van Nieuw Amerongen, G. P., van Delft, S., Vermeer, M. A., Collard, J. G., and van Hinsbergh, V. W. (2000) Circ. Res. 87, 335-340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Hart, M. J., Jiang, X., Kozasa, T., Roscoe, W., Singer, W. D., Gilman, A. G., Sternweis, P. C., and Bollag, G. (1998) Science 280, 2074-2075[Free Full Text]
40. Lin, X., Voyno-Yasenetskaya, T., Hooley, R., Lin, C.-Y., Orlowski, J., and Barber, D. L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 22604-22610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Michaelson, D., Silletti, J., Murphy, G., D'Eustachio, P., Rush, M., and Philips, M. R. (2001) J. Cell Biol. 152, 111-126[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Sumi, T., Matsumoto, K., Takai, Y., and Nakamura, T. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 147, 1519-1532[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Behr, T. M., Gotthardt, M., Barth, A., and Behe, M. (2001) Q. J. Nucl. Med. 45, 189-200[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Bruns, C., Shi, V., Hoyer, D., Schuurman, H., and Weckbecker, G. (2000) Eur. J. Endocrinol. 143 Suppl. 1, S3-S7[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Albini, A., Florio, T., Giunciuglio, D., Masiello, L., Carlone, S., Corsaro, A., Thellung, S., Cai, T., Noonan, D. M., and Schettini, G. (1999) FASEB J. 13, 647-655[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Averbukh, E., Halpert, M., Yanko, R., Yanko, L., Peer, J., Levinger, S., Flyvbjerg, A., and Raz, I. (2000) Int. J. Exp. Diabetes Res. 1, 39-47[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Suich, D. J., Mousa, S. A., Singh, G., Liapakis, G., Reisine, T., and DeGrado, W. F. (2000) Bioorg. Med. Chem. 8, 2229-2241[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Seasholtz, T. M., Majumdar, M., Kaplan, D. D., and Brown, J. H. (1999) Circ. Res. 84, 1186-1193[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J BiochemHome page
K. Hata, K. Hori, J. Murata, and S. Takahashi
Remodeling of Actin Cytoskeleton in Lupeol-Induced B16 2F2 Cell Differentiation
J. Biochem., October 1, 2005; 138(4): 467 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
P. Dutt, A. B. Jaffe, K. D. Merdek, A. Hall, and D. Toksoz
G{alpha}z Inhibits Serum Response Factor-Dependent Transcription by Inhibiting Rho Signaling
Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2004; 66(6): 1508 - 1516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
V. S. Conlin, S. B. Curtis, Y. Zhao, E. D. W. Moore, V. C. Smith, R. M. Meloche, B. B. Finlay, and A. M. J. Buchan
Helicobacter pylori Infection Targets Adherens Junction Regulatory Proteins and Results in Increased Rates of Migration in Human Gastric Epithelial Cells
Infect. Immun., September 1, 2004; 72(9): 5181 - 5192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
H Reynaert, K Rombouts, A Vandermonde, D Urbain, U Kumar, P Bioulac-Sage, M Pinzani, J Rosenbaum, and A Geerts
Expression of somatostatin receptors in normal and cirrhotic human liver and in hepatocellular carcinoma
Gut, August 1, 2004; 53(8): 1180 - 1189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/32/28431    most recent
M201261200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buchan, A. M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barber, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buchan, A. M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barber, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement