Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M203618200 on May 28, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 32, 28601-28608, August 9, 2002
Transcriptional Regulation of the Membrane-associated
Prostaglandin E2 Synthase Gene
ESSENTIAL ROLE OF THE TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR Egr-1*
Hiroaki
Naraba
,
Chieko
Yokoyama
,
Naomi
Tago
,
Makoto
Murakami§,
Ichiro
Kudo§,
Mai
Fueki¶,
Sachiko
Oh-ishi¶
, and
Tadashi
Tanabe
**
From the
Department of Pharmacology, National
Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, 5-7-1 Fujishiro-dai,
Suita, Osaka 565-8565, Japan, the § Department of Health
Chemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Showa University,
1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8555, Japan, and the
¶ Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
Kitasato University, Shirokane 5-9-1, Minato-ku,
Tokyo 108-8641, Japan
Received for publication, April 15, 2002, and in revised form, May 23, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Membrane-associated prostaglandin (PG)
E2 synthase (mPGES) is an inducible terminal enzyme
in the biosynthetic pathway for prostaglandin E2, which
participates in many biological processes. In this study, we
investigated the molecular mechanism controlling the inducible
expression of mPGES. The mouse mPGES gene consisted of
three exons, and its 5'-proximal promoter contained consensus motifs
for the binding of several transcription factors. Transgenic expression
in mice of the mouse mPGES promoter flanked by a reporter gene resulted in stimulus-dependent induction of the
reporter in tissues where mPGES was intrinsically induced. Deletion and site-specific mutation analyses of the 5'-flanking region demonstrated that stimulus-inducible expression of mouse and human mPGES required tandem GC boxes adjacent to the initiation site. The stimulus-induced GC box binding activity was present in nuclear extracts of cells, in
which the proximal GC box was essential for binding. An 80-kDa stimulus-inducible nuclear protein that bound to this GC box was identified as the transcription factor Egr-1 (for early
growth response-1). These results suggest that
Egr-1 is a key transcription factor in regulating the inducible
expression of mPGES.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Prostaglandin E2
(PGE2)1 is an
important mediator that plays a variety of roles in biological events,
such as fever, pain, tumorigenesis, gastrointestinal protection,
osteogenesis, and inflammation (1-5). PGE2 production from
arachidonic acid, which is released by phospholipase A2
from membrane glycerophospholipids (6), is controlled by two
rate-limiting steps. The first step is catalyzed by cyclooxygenase
(COX), which converts arachidonic acid to the intermediate prostanoid
PGH2. Two isoforms of the COX enzyme have been identified:
cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), which is a constitutive enzyme, and
cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), which is induced by various stimuli,
including cytokines, growth factors, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and
tumor promoters such as 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) (7). The second step is the terminal conversion reaction of
PGH2 to PGE2, which is catalyzed by
PGE2 synthase (PGES). At least two forms of PGES have
recently been identified (8-13). Cytosolic PGES, which is identical to
the heat shock protein 90-associated protein p23, is expressed
ubiquitously in a wide variety of cells and tissues and promotes
COX-1-mediated immediate PGE2 production (8).
Membrane-associated PGES (mPGES), which was originally designated
MGST1-L1 (for membrane-bound
GST1-like-1), is an inducible enzyme, which is
coordinately induced with COX-2 on the perinuclear membrane and is
functionally coupled with COX-2 in marked preference to COX-1
(9-13).
It is important to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the
inducible expression of both the COX-2 and mPGES
genes. A number of studies have reported the transcriptional regulation of COX-2 expression, in which several consensus sites in the
COX-2 promoter, such as NF-
B, NF-interleukin 6, CRE, and E-box, have been identified as regulatory sequences for COX-2
induction in response to various stimuli (14-18). Although the
structure of the human mPGES gene, including a 632-bp
5'-flanking region, has been reported (19), transcription factors or
cis elements required for gene expression of
mPGES remain elusive.
In the present study, we have isolated the mouse mPGES gene
with its promoter region and analyzed the regulatory mechanisms for
inducible expression of the mPGES gene in mouse MC3T3-E1 or RAW264.7 cells. Our results indicate that the tandem GC box sequences in the mPGES promoter play a major role in regulating its
inducible transcription. Furthermore, we demonstrate that Egr-1, an
inducible zinc finger protein that recognizes the GC-rich consensus DNA sequence 5'-GCG(T/G)GGGCG-3' (20-23), binds to the proximal GC box in
the mPGES promoter region and facilitates inducible
transcription of the mPGES gene.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Genomic Cloning--
A mouse 129SvJ genomic library in
-FixII
was kindly provided by Drs. Nobuya Sasaki and Makoto Taketo (Kyoto
University, Kyoto, Japan). The primary genomic library was screened at
2 × 105 plaque-forming units/145-mm plate. The
-FixII library was screened with an oligonucleotide complementary
from +1 to +817 of the mouse mPGES cDNA that was labeled
with [
-32P]dCTP by random priming (Amersham
Biosciences). The phages were transferred to Hybond-N membranes
(Amersham Biosciences), which were then prehybridized at 60 °C and
hybridized with the labeled oligonucleotide in 50% formamide, 5×
Denhardt's, and 0.5% SDS at 42 °C for 18 h. Membranes were
washed in 2× SSC (300 mM NaCl, 30 mM sodium
citrate) and 0.1% SDS at 65 °C for 30 min, washed in 0.1× SSC and
0.1% SDS at 65 °C for 30 min, dried, and then exposed to Bio-Max MS
film (Eastman Kodak) overnight at
80 °C. After the first screening
of ~1 × 106 plaques, positive phages were subjected
to two additional rounds of screening. Of the multiple clones isolated,
three of them, which contained different sizes of the insert, were
purified (Qiagen) and characterized in detail. Pure positive phages
were stored in 0.1 M NaCl, 8 mM
MgSO4, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and 0.01% (w/v) gelatin with chloroform. PCR analysis using pfu Turbo DNA
polymerase (Stratagene) and a combination of vector primers and
mPGES cDNA-based primers revealed the complete structure
of the mouse mPGES gene. All primers and oligonucleotides
used here and in subsequent experiments were obtained from Amersham Biosciences.
Plasmid Constructs--
The genomic DNA fragment of the mouse
mPGES gene was amplified by PCR using a
-genomic clone as
a template and Expand High Fidelity DNA/polymerase mixture (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals). By subcloning and sequencing, an ~1.8-kb
fragment upstream of the translation start site was isolated (DDBJ
accession number AB083340). Human mPGES genomic DNA
was also amplified by PCR using genomic DNA from human leukocytes as a
template and specific primers designed on the basis of the reported
genomic sequence of human mPGES (9). The chimeric constructs
for transfection experiments were prepared by ligating different
lengths of the 5'-flanking region (FL) plus the 33-bp untranslated
region of the mouse mPGES gene with the
luciferase gene (luc) into the pGL3-basic vector
(Promega) at the XhoI and HindIII sites as
follows:
1814/+33/luc (1814-bp 5'-FL, 33-bp untranslated
region and luc),
1530/+33/luc,
1198/+33/luc,
930/+33/luc,
700/+33/luc,
655/+33/luc,
360/+33/luc,
150/+33/luc, and
70/+33/luc. The chimeric 5'-deletion constructs of the
human mPGES promoter and luc were
650/luc,
329/luc,
312/luc,
158/luc,
99/luc, where the numbers represent
5'-upstream sites in the promoter region considering the translation
initiation site as +1. Mutations were introduced into the GC
box-related sequences at
70/
77 (GC box-2, 5'-GGGCGGGG-3') and
81/
88 (GC box-1, 5'-GGGCGGGG-3') of the mouse 5'-FL, and at
101/
108 (GC box-2, 5'-GGGCGGGG-3') and
112/
119 (GC box-1,
5'-CGTGGGCGGTG-3') of the human 5'-FL by using the manufacturer's
protocol, as described previously (10). The pGL3/150GC box-2 mutant
(mt) (GC box-2 in the mouse mPGES 5'-FL was mutated to
5'-GTTCGGGG-3'), pGL3/150GC box-1-mt (GC box-1 in the mouse
mPGES 5'-FL was mutated to 5'-GTTCGGGG-3'), pGL3/150GC box-1 and 2-mt (both GC boxes in the mouse mPGES
5'-FL were mutated to
5'-GTTCGGGGAGTGTTCGGGG-3'), pGL3/158GC box 2-mt (GC box-2 in the human mPGES 5'-FL was mutated to
5'GTTCGGGG-3'), pGL3/158GC box-1-mt (GC box-1 in the human
mPGES 5'-FL was mutated to 5'-GTTCGGTG-3'), and
pGL3/158GC box-1 and 2-mt (both GC boxes in the human mPGES
5'-FL were mutated to
5'-GTTCGGGGCGTGTTCGGTG-3'), in which
mutated sites are underlined. The PCR primers were designed on the
basis of the sequences of the 5'-FL of the mouse and human mPGES genes, and all inserts derived from PCR amplification
were cloned into the pGL3-basic vector and were sequenced on both
strands. For preparation of the LacZ promoter gene
construct, pGL3/1814/+33/luc was digested at the
XhoI and HindIII sites, and the 1891-bp promoter fragment was subcloned into the XhoI/HindIII
sites in the p
gal-basic vector (CLONTECH) to
generate p
gal/1891.
Development of Transgenic Mice--
A 6658-bp insert containing
the chimeric mPGES promoter and the lacZ gene,
which was cut off from p
gal/1891 by digestion with SacI
and XmnI, was gel-purified with the Microspin column (Qiagen). Microinjection of the DNA and generation of chimeric mice
were performed in the transgenic mouse facilities at the Central
Laboratories for Experimental Animals (Kawasaki, Japan). Transgenic
mice were identified by Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA from tail
biopsies after hybridization with a lacZ gene probe. Transgenic mice were bred to C57BL/6 mice to generate F1 progeny. The
copy number of the integrated transgene was estimated as three to six
copies.
-Galactosidase reporter gene activity in various tissues of
F1 mice before or after intraperitoneal injection of 5 mg/kg
lipopolysaccharide (LPS, Escherichia coli O111: B4,
Sigma) was assessed by using the luminescent
-galactosidase
galactosidase detection kit II (CLONTECH). Tissue
homogenate was prepared by sonication in a lysis solution containing
100 mM KHPO4, 0.2% (v/v) Triton X-100, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 5 µg/ml leupeptin. After
centrifugation for 10 min, 25 µl of the supernatant was assayed by
incubation with 200 µl of the reaction buffer at room temperature for
60 min, and luminescence was measured with a luminometer according to
the manufacturer's instructions. Luminescence was normalized to
protein concentration in each sample.
Cell Culture--
Mouse MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells and mouse
RAW264.7 macrophage-like cells were obtained from the RIKEN Cell Bank
(Tsukuba Science City, Japan) and maintained in
-minimal essential
medium and Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, respectively.
Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells were purchased from Dainippon
Pharmaceutical Co. and maintained in RPMI 1640. All media used
in this study was from Invitrogen and supplemented with 10%
fetal bovine serum (Atlanta Biologics), penicillin G, and streptomycin
(Nacalai Tesque). The cells were cultured in a humidified 5%
CO2 and 95% air incubator at 37 °C.
Transfection and Luciferase Assay--
Transient transfection
was performed with SuperFect reagent (Qiagen) according to the
manufacturer's protocol for adherent cells, as described previously
(10). MC3T3-E1 cells (3 × 105 cells/dish), RAW264.7
cells (4 × 105 cells/dish), and HEK293 cells (2 × 105 cells/dish) were plated on 35-mm plastic dishes with
2 ml of culture medium 1 day before transfection. The cells were
transfected with 1 µg of several firefly luciferase reporter vectors
and 0.1 µg of the Renilla luciferase control reporter
vector (pRL-TK, Promega) with the use of 10 µl of the SuperFect
reagent. 1 day after transfection, the cells were incubated for 16 h with or without 100 nM TPA (Sigma), 5 ng/ml
interleukin-1
(Genzyme) plus tumor necrosis factor
(Genzyme) or
100 ng/ml LPS. The luciferase assay was performed with the dual
luciferase assay kit (Promega) and a luminometer according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Lysates (10-µl aliquots) were assayed
first for firefly luciferase and then for Renilla luciferase
activities. The activity of firefly luciferase was normalized to that
of Renilla luciferase. Data represent the average ± S.E. of four independent experiments, each of which was done in triplicate.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)--
The MC3T3-E1
and RAW264.7 cell nuclear extracts were prepared as previously
described (24). EMSA was performed as described previously (24).
Briefly, double-stranded oligonucleotides were radiolabeled with
[
-32P]dCTP at their 3'-ends with Klenow fragment
(Takara) and then purified with MicroSpin columns (Amersham
Biosciences). The sense sequences of synthesized
oligonucleotides used were as follows: 5'-GGTGGGCGGGGAGTGGGCGGGG-3' for
native GC boxes in the mouse mPGES 5'-FL,
5'-GGTGTTCGGGGAGTGGGCGGGG-3' for mutation in the GC box-2
(mutated sites underlined), 5'-GGTGGGCGGGGAGTGTTCGGGG-3' for mutation in the GC box-1, and
5'-GGTGTTCGGGGAGTGTTCGGGG-3' for mutation
in both GC boxes.
MC3T3-E1 cells (1 × 105 cells/dish) and RAW264.7
cells (2 × 105 cells/dish) were plated on 35-mm
plastic dishes with 2 ml of culture medium, and after 3 days of culture
the supernatant was replaced with 2 ml of fresh medium containing 0.1%
fetal bovine serum. After 2 h, cells were incubated with or
without TPA for various periods. The cells were suspended in 200 µl
of ice-cold buffer A (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 10 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml pepstatin, and 2 µg/ml aprotinin) and
incubated for 10 min on ice. Nonidet P-40 was added to the suspension
at a final concentration of 0.4% (v/v) and the mixtures were mixed vigorously for 10 s. After centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 1 min, the resulting pellets were suspended in 30 µl
of buffer C (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 0.4 M NaCl,
0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT,
0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml pepstatin, and 2 µg/ml aprotinin) by vigorous mixing for 5 min and the resulting supernatants were used as the nuclear extracts.
The nuclear extracts were incubated with 1 ng of
32P-labeled oligonucleotide in a binding buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 0.5 mM
EDTA, 5 mM DTT, 0.7 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml pepstatin, 2 µg/ml
aprotinin, 10% (v/v) glycerol, and 1 µg/ml poly(dI-dC)-poly(dI-dC))
for 30 min at 25 °C. For competition assay, a 100-fold excess of
unlabeled oligonucleotide was added to the binding reaction prior to
the addition of the radiolabeled probe. For supershift analysis, 1 µg
of each antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was added to the nuclear
extracts prior to the addition of the radiolabeled probe. These
incubation mixtures were then electrophoresed in a 6% (w/v) native
polyacrylamide gel in Tris borate-EDTA buffer. The gels were dried and
analyzed with an image analyzer BAS2500 (Fuji Photo Film).
Northern Blotting--
Approximately equal amounts (30 µg) of
the total RNA obtained from the various tissues were applied to
separate lanes of 1.2% (w/v) formaldehyde-agarose gels,
electrophoresed, and transferred to Hybond-N membranes. The resulting
blots were then probed with mPGES cDNA probes that had
been labeled with [
-32P]dCTP by random priming.
Prehybridization and hybridization were carried out as described
previously (25).
Southwestern Blotting--
MC3T3-E1 cells were stimulated with
100 nM TPA for 1 h, and then extracts of nuclear
proteins were prepared as described above. The nuclear extracts and
prestained molecular mass standards (Bio-Rad) were separated by
SDS-PAGE on 10% (w/v) gels under reducing conditions and
electroblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore). The membrane-immobilized nuclear proteins were denatured in buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 3 mM
MgCl2, 5 mM DTT) containing 6 M
guanidine hydrochloride for 1 h at 4 °C and then slowly
renatured. The renaturation process involved successive dilutions and
incubations for 30 min at 4 °C in the same buffer, in which the
concentrations of guanidine hydrochloride were reduced to 4, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, and 0.065 M and finally to zero. Following
renaturation, the membranes were incubated for 16 h at 4 °C in
the same buffer containing 5% (w/v) nonfat dried milk, and then
incubated overnight at 4 °C in the buffer containing 4 µg of
poly(dI-dC)-poly(dI-dC) and the 32P-labeled native GC box
oligonucleotide. The membrane was then washed with six changes of the
buffer, and signals were analyzed with BAS2500.
Western Blotting--
The membrane used for Southwestern blot
analysis mentioned above was washed in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.4, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT to remove the associated radioactivity. Then, the membrane was blocked for 2 h in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.4, containing 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 (TBS-T),
and 5% (w/v) skim milk. After washing the membrane with TBS-T, an
antibody against Egr-1 was added at a 1:5,000 dilution in TBS-T
containing 0.01% (w/v) bovine serum albumin and incubated for 1.5 h. After washing the membranes three times with TBS-T, horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Zymed
Laboratories Inc. was added at a 1:10,000 dilution in TBS-T
containing 0.01% bovine serum albumin and incubated for 1 h.
After six washes with TBS-T, protein bands were visualized with
enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting detection reagents (Amersham Biosciences) as described previously (25).
 |
RESULTS |
Structure of the Mouse mPGES Gene--
A Sv129J mouse genomic
library was screened with a mouse mPGES cDNA probe.
Three positive clones were isolated, each with inserts of different
sizes and overlapped sequences. The structure of the mPGES
gene was determined by combining the sequences of these three clones
(Fig. 1A). The distances
between exons were determined by long-PCR using exon-specific primers,
and the numbers and sizes of exons and the positions of the exon-intron
junctions were determined by comparing the sequence of the obtained
genomic sequence with that of mPGES cDNA. The mouse
mPGES gene was split into three exons (174, 80, and 567 bp)
by two introns (2.3 and 6.5 kb) and spans a region of about 10 kb (Fig.
1A). The initiation and termination codons reside in exons 1 and 3, respectively. Overall, the organization of the mouse
mPGES gene was similar to that of the human mPGES
gene (19).

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Genomic structure and promoter sequence of
the mouse mPGES. A, the organization
of the mouse mPGES gene. Exons are shown by
boxes. Rectangle in the bottom
represents the full-length protein. B, sequence of the mouse
mPGES promoter region between 1814 and +54, considering
the transcription start site as +1 (arrow), which was
determined by 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends using mouse
peritoneal macrophage cDNA. Consensus binding sites for
transcription factors are indicated by underlines. The
initiation codon ATG is shown in boldface.
|
|
The nucleotide sequence of the 5'-flanking region (~1.85 kb upstream
of exon 1) was determined by oligonucleotide walking (Fig.
1B). Although no typical TATA box was found throughout the sequence, two tandem GC boxes were present in a region ~70 bp upstream of the transcription initiation site, which was often the case
with the TATA-less genes. Moreover, the sequence around the
transcription initiation site shows close similarity to the pyrimidine-rich initiator element, which encompasses the transcription initiation sites for a number of developmentally regulated genes with
TATA-less promoters. In particular, the sequence
8CTCACTCT
1 in the mPGES gene
matches exactly the initiator consensus sequence CTCANTCT, which was
found in several other TATA-less genes (26, 27). Data base search for
potential transcription factor-binding sites using the Transcription
Element String Search (www.cbil.l.upenn.edu/tess), a web-based
search engine, revealed the presence of several consensus cis-acting elements within 1.8 kb upstream of the initiator
consensus sequence, including elements for C/EBP
, AP-1, C/EBP
,
and CACCC-binding factors as well as putative glucocorticoid or
progesterone response elements (Fig. 1B).
Generation of Transgenic Mice with the mPGES
Promoter/LacZ Construct and Its Response to LPS in
Vivo--
The expression of mPGES was increased markedly in various
tissues of rats after administration of LPS (10, 12). To test whether
the mPGES promoter obtained above could mimic
tissue-specific and LPS-inducible expression of mPGES in
vivo, we prepared a construct containing the mPGES
promoter flanked by the lacZ gene and created mPGES promoter/LacZ transgenic mice that
overexpressed
-galactosidase in tissues under the control of the
mPGES promoter region. F1 mice bearing the transgene were
injected intraperitoneally with 5 mg/kg LPS or buffer as control, and
mPGES expression and
-galactosidase activity in various tissues were
examined 16 h after treatment. The
-galactosidase activity was
increased markedly in several tissues such as thymus, lung, stomach,
kidney, and spleen in LPS-treated mice (Fig.
2B), which occurred in
parallel with the intrinsic LPS-dependent induction of
mPGES mRNA (Fig. 2A). These results imply that critical
elements that dictate tissue-specific and stimulus-inducible expression
of mPGES were present in the 1814-bp 5'-flanking region of the mouse
mPGES gene.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
LPS-induced expression in mice of the
transgene containing the mPGES
promoter/LacZ reporter. A,
expression of mPGES mRNA in various tissues of mice after injection
of LPS or buffer ( LPS) was assessed by RNA blotting.
B, extracts prepared from F1 transgenic mice tissue after
injection of LPS or buffer were assayed for -galactosidase activity
as described under "Experimental Procedures." A representative
result of three independent experiments is shown.
|
|
Promoter Activity of the 5'-Flanking Region of the Mouse mPGES
Gene--
To assess which portions of the mPGES 5'-flanking
region were involved in the regulation of inducible expression of
mPGES, a series of chimeric 5'-deleted promoter-luciferase
reporter constructs was developed. The structures and sizes of the
chimeric constructs as well as the locations of the consensus sequences
for various transcription factors found within the mPGES
promoter region (Fig. 1B), are depicted in Fig.
3A. The resulting plasmids
were then transfected into MC3T3-E1 cells (Fig. 3B) or
RAW264.7 cells (Fig. 3C). After 24 h of transfection,
the cells were stimulated with appropriate stimulants for 16 h,
and relative luciferase activities were assessed. Whereas all
constructs exhibited low basal luciferase activities, stimulation with
TPA, cytokines (IL-1 plus TNF), or LPS greatly increased the luciferase
activity in both cell types transfected with the full-length construct
(
1814). These stimulus-sensitive luciferase activities were unchanged
when the 5'-end of the promoter region was deleted to positions
1530,
1198,
930, and
700, and further truncation up to
150 tended to
increase the activity progressively. Thus, elements for several
transcription factors including AP-1 and C/EBP
and -
, located
between
1814 and
700 (Fig. 1B), were dispensable for
inducible mPGES transcription, and there may be negative regulatory
elements in a region between
700 and
150. Notably, the shortest
construct, pGL3/70, which harbored only a 70-bp 5'-flanking sequence,
showed no inducibility of luciferase activity even in the presence of
stimuli, as in the case of the promoter-null control vector pGL3/basic.
The plasmid pGL3/150rev, in which the 150-bp 5'-flanking sequence was
inserted in an inverse orientation, showed minimal luciferase activity and did not respond to TPA stimulation in MC3T3-E1 cells (data not
shown). These results suggest that the promoter region
150 to
70
contains positive regulatory elements essential for stimulus-induced mouse mPGES transcription in MC3T3-E1 and RAW264.7 cells.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
The mouse mPGES
promoter/luc reporter assay in MC3T3-E1 and
RAW264.7 cells. A, structures of various 5'-deletion
constructs of the mouse mPGES promoter fused to the
luc reporter gene are shown. The consensus binding sites for
transcription factors are shown by boxes. Luciferase
activities in MC3T3-E1 (B) or RAW264.7 (C) cells
transfected with these constructs were determined 16 h after
treatment with or without stimulants. To calibrate the transfection
efficiency, the cells were co-transfected with pRL-TK, and the
luciferase activity associated with each construct was normalized to
the activity of Renilla luciferase, as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Results are the mean ± S.E. of
four independent experiments.
|
|
As shown in Fig. 1B, two GC box-related sequences were
tandemly present between
150 and
70 in the mPGES
promoter region, suggesting that one or both of them may be involved in
regulating the transcription of the mPGES gene. To determine
their potential roles, we prepared a series of additional promoter
constructs with site-specific mutations, as illustrated in Fig.
4A. MC3T3-E1 cells transfected
with the chimeric plasmid containing either the distal GC box (GC
box-1) or proximal GC box (GC box-2) mutant, respectively, in which two
critical guanine residues were replaced with thymine residues, showed
lower (albeit significant) luciferase activity in response to TPA or
cytokines than did replicate cells transfected with the plasmid
containing the two native GC boxes (Fig. 4B). Moreover,
simultaneous mutations in both GC boxes further reduced luciferase
expression, indicating complete loss of promoter activity.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effects of GC box mutations on the mouse
mPGES promoter activity. A, mutations
were introduced into the GC box-related sequences at 70/ 77 (GC
box-1) and/or 81/ 88 (GC box-2) regions of the mouse
mPGES promoter. B, each plasmid was
co-transfected with pRL-TK into MC3T3-E1 cells, and luciferase
activities were determined 16 h after stimulation with or without
stimulants as described under "Experimental Procedures." The
activity associated with each construct was normalized relative to
Renilla luciferase activity. Results are the mean ± S.E. of four independent experiments.
|
|
Specific DNA-Protein Interactions within the GC Box Sequences of
mPGES--
The reporter gene assay suggested that both GC boxes play a
significant role in transcription of the mPGES gene. To
determine whether these elements could bind nuclear proteins, we
synthesized a 22-bp double-stranded oligonucleotide containing the
tandem GC boxes. MC3T3-E1 or RAW264.7 cells were stimulated with TPA, and the nuclear extracts were analyzed by EMSA for binding to the
32P-labeled oligonucleotide probe. Two distinct bands, I
and III, appeared after incubation of the probe with nuclear extracts
derived from unstimulated MC3T3-E1 (Fig.
5A) or RAW264.7 (Fig.
5B) cells. When these cells were stimulated with TPA for
0.5 h, a novel band II became detectable between DNA-protein
complexes I and III. The band II peaked at 1 h and declined
gradually thereafter in MC3T3-E1 cells (Fig. 5A), whereas it
reached a maximal level and a plateau after 1 h in RAW264.7 cells
(Fig. 5B). This inducible expression of DNA-protein complex
II depended on the concentrations of TPA in MC3T3-E1 (Fig.
5C) and RAW264.7 (Fig. 5D) cells.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
EMSA analysis of the GC boxes in the mouse
mPGES promoter. MC3T3-E1 (A and
C) or RAW264.7 (B and D) cells were
stimulated for the indicated periods with or without 100 nM
TPA (A and B) or for 1 h with various
concentrations of TPA (C and D), and then
extracts of nuclear proteins were prepared as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The extracts were incubated with a
32P-labeled DNA fragment containing the two GC box
sequences, and protein/DNA interactions were tested by EMSA. Binding
reactions were resolved by 6% acrylamide gel electrophoresis using
0.25× TBE (22 mM Tris base, 22 mM boric acid,
0.5 mM EDTA) as a buffer. Arrows indicate the
three protein-DNA complexes (I, II, and
III). A representative result of three independent
experiments is shown.
|
|
To test whether the tandem GC boxes were required for binding of the
nuclear proteins, we performed EMSA with oligonucleotide probes
containing mutations in either or both of the two GC box sequences.
Mutation in the GC box-2 alone or both GC boxes completely abolished
all three bands in TPA-stimulated MC3T3-E1 (Fig.
6A) and RAW264.7 cells (Fig.
6B), whereas mutation in the GC box-1 alone had no effect.
Moreover, the formation of these DNA-protein complexes was prevented by
addition of a 100-fold molar excess of an unlabeled oligonucleotide
harboring the GC box-1 alone or the two intact GC boxes, but not by an
oligonucleotide harboring the GC box-2 mutation alone or mutation in
both GC boxes (Fig. 6, A and B). These results
suggest that the formation of these DNA-protein complexes was
sequence-specific and that the proximal GC box-2 was essential.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
EMSA analysis of sequence-specific
DNA-protein interactions in the GC boxes. MC3T3-E1 (A
and C) or RAW264.7 (B and D) cells
were incubated with or without 100 nM TPA for 1 h, and
then the nuclear proteins were extracted. A and
B, the extracts were incubated with 32P-labeled
DNA fragments containing two intact GC boxes, GC box-1 mutant, GC box-2
mutant, or both GC box mutants as described under "Experimental
Procedures." C and D, the extracts were
incubated with a 32P-labeled DNA fragment containing the
two intact GC boxes with or without a 100-fold molar excess of
unlabeled competitor DNA. EMSA was performed under the same conditions
as described for Fig. 5. Arrows indicate the three
protein-DNA complexes (I, II, and
III). A representative result of three independent
experiments is shown.
|
|
Identification of a GC Box-binding Protein--
To determine the
molecular sizes of the factor(s) that interacts with the GC box-2, the
nuclear extract from MC3T3-E1 cells was examined for binding to the GC
box oligonucleotide probe by Southwestern blot analysis. The nuclear
extracts prepared from the cells incubated with or without TPA were
resolved on SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidene
difluoride membranes. The proteins were then renatured and incubated
with a 32P-labeled GC box oligonucleotide probe. As shown
in Fig. 7, several bands were detected
with similar intensity in crude nuclear extracts of both unstimulated
and TPA-stimulated cells, except for an 80-kDa band that was evident
only after TPA treatment.

View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Identification of a GC box-binding
protein. A, Southwestern blotting. MC3T3-E1 cells were
incubated with or without 100 nM TPA for 1 h, and the
nuclear extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to
polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, renatured, and probed with a
32P-labeled DNA fragment containing the two GC boxes. The
arrow indicates a 80-kDa GC box-binding protein.
B, supershift analysis. The nuclear extracts were incubated
with the 32P-labeled DNA fragment containing the two GC
boxes in the presence or absence of the indicated antibodies.
Arrows indicate the three protein-DNA complexes
(I, II, and III). S
indicates a supershifted band (lane 3). C,
Western blotting. The membrane used for the Southwestern blot analysis
(A) was reprobed with an antibody against Egr-1. A
representative result of three independent experiments is shown.
|
|
The Sp1 and Egr families are known to bind to GC-rich sequences (28,
29). To identify the factor(s) that binds to the GC box in the
mPGES promoter, supershift analysis was carried out using
polyclonal antibodies that specifically recognize Egr-1, Egr-2, Egr-3,
Sp1, or Sp3. As shown in Fig. 7B, the inducible DNA-protein
complex band II was retarded to the position of band S only
by an anti-Egr-1 antibody, whereas none of the other antibodies induced
such a supershift (Fig. 7B). It is notable that the
molecular mass of Egr-1 was 80-kDa (20), which was similar to the size of the inducible protein detected by Southwestern blot analysis (Fig.
7A). Indeed, when the membrane used for the Southwestern blot analysis was reprobed with anti-Egr-1 antibody by Western blotting, an 80-kDa Egr-1 protein was detected in TPA-treated cells
(Fig. 7C). These data suggest that the inducible GC
box-binding protein in TPA-stimulated MC3T3-E1 cells was the nuclear
transcription factor Egr-1.
Promoter Activity of the 5'-Flanking Region of the Human mPGES
Gene--
The tandem GC box sequences were highly conserved in both
the human and mouse mPGES gene promoters (Fig.
8A). To test whether the GC
boxes also play a significant role in transcription of the human
mPGES gene, a similar reporter gene assay, in which the
human mPGES promoter was flanked by the
luciferase reporter gene, was performed in human HEK293
cells. A 650-bp human mPGES promoter fragment was amplified
by PCR with human genomic DNA as a template. The locations of the
consensus sequences for transcription factors in the amplified product
that contains the tandem GC boxes and upstream GATA-2- and
N-myc-binding sites (Fig. 8B) and those in the
5'-end deleted mutants are depicted in Fig. 8C. The
resulting promoter-luciferase reporter plasmids were each
transfected into HEK293 cells, and the cells were then stimulated with
TPA for 16 h. As shown in Fig. 8D, the promoter
activities of pGL3/650, pGL3/392, pGL3/312, and pGL3/158 were elevated
by TPA stimulation, whereas pGL3/99, which contained no GC box
sequence, showed low basal and TPA-inducible luciferase activity.
Moreover, HEK293 cells transfected with plasmids containing either GC
box-1 or -2 mutants showed low luciferase activity in response to TPA, and mutations in both GC boxes further reduced the induction level compared with the plasmid containing the native GC box sequences (Fig.
8E). These results were compatible with the results from the
analyses of the mouse mPGES promoter, implying that the GC boxes play a significant role in the transcription of both human and
mouse mPGES genes.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
The human mPGES
promoter/luc reporter assay in HEK293
cells. A, comparison of the GC box sequences in the
mouse and human mPGES gene promoters. B,
structures of various 5'-deletion constructs of the human
mPGES promoter fused to the luc reporter gene are
shown. The consensus binding sites for transcription factors are
indicated by boxes. C, mutations were introduced
into the GC boxes at 101/ 108 (GC box-1) and/or 112/ 119 (GC
box-2) in the human mPGES promoter. D and
E, each plasmid was co-transfected with pRL-TK into HEK293
cells, and luciferase activity was determined 16 h after treatment
with or without 100 nM TPA. The activity associated with
each construct was normalized relative to Renilla luciferase
activity. Results are the mean ± S.E. of four independent
experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Evidence is emerging that mPGES is an inducible enzyme, the
expression of which is markedly increased in various cells and tissues
following proinflammatory stimuli (9, 10, 30-33). Inducible genes
contain particular nucleotide elements within their promoter regions
that are responsible for regulated transcription. The aim of this study
was to characterize the cis-acting regulatory elements and
trans-acting nuclear factors that regulate inducible expression of the mPGES gene. We found that the binding of
Egr-1, an inducible transcription factor, to the proximal GC box is an essential event that directs the regulatory expression of mPGES.
Transgenic expression of the chimeric mouse mPGES gene
(5'-untranslated fragment up to 1858 bp upstream of the initiating ATG)
flanked by the LacZ reporter gene in mice resulted in
LPS-stimulated expression of
-galactosidase in tissues in which
mPGES was intrinsically induced, implying that the regulatory elements
for stimulus-induced mPGES expression reside within this promoter
region. On the basis of results from the promoter/reporter assay in
mouse osteoblastic and macrophage-like cells, we identified the core
promoter region controlling reporter expression to be situated between
70 and
150, in which two GC boxes were located tandemly. Moreover,
mouse mPGES promoter activity was significantly increased
when the promoter region was deleted at
150 to
655, indicating that
this region adjacent to the GC boxes contains negative transcriptional
regulatory elements. In this region, there are two consensus regulatory
elements for glucocorticoids that have been shown to down-regulate
mPGES expression in several cell types (10, 12, 33, 34). Although the
mouse mPGES promoter region contains several other consensus binding sites for transcription factors involved in the expression of
proinflammatory genes, such as C/EBP
and -
, AP-1, and the CACCC-binding factor, these sites may be nonessential for
mPGES promoter activation under the conditions employed
here. There are no binding sites for NF-
B, CRE, and E-box that have
been implicated in COX-2 induction (14-18), in the mPGES
promoter region, implying that the mechanisms for inducible expression
of COX-2 and mPGES are distinct. Indeed, even though both enzymes are
stimulus-inducible and function sequentially in the same
PGE2-biosynthetic pathway, the kinetics of induction of
these two enzymes are not entirely identical in several systems (30,
33, 34).
Further studies using mutation constructs and EMSA
confirmed that the two GC box sequences located between
70 and
150
are essential for the activation of the mouse mPGES gene in
response to stimuli. Increase in reporter gene expression was reduced
by mutating either of the two GC boxes, whereas TPA-stimulated
DNA/protein binding activity was completely abolished only by mutation
of the GC box-2, but not the GC box-1. These results suggest that even
though the nuclear GC box-binding protein (Egr-1) binds only to the
proximal GC box-2, both GC boxes are required for full promoter
activity. Although the role of the distal GC box-1 is unclear, it may
contribute to full promoter activity through association with
coactivators or transcription initiation complex, which may act in
synergy with Egr-1. Our EMSA experiments indicated that two other
proteins, designated as I and III, also interacted with the GC box-2
even in unstimulated cells. It is possible that Egr-1 and the two other
GC box-binding proteins share an overlapping site, although it is
currently unclear whether these interactions are mutually exclusive or
act in concert. The molecular identities of the proteins responsible
for bands I and III detected in the EMSA analysis are under investigation.
It has been reported that tandem GC box sequences exist in several gene
promoters, such as prostacyclin synthase (35), thromboxane receptor
(36), hemopoietic cell kinase (37),
N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor 1 (38), and
thrombomodulin (39, 40). These tandem GC boxes represent binding sites
for members of the Sp1 transcription factor family (41) that play an
important role in the control of transcription of the aforementioned
genes. However, our EMSA studies using specific antibodies showed that
the GC box in the mPGES promoter region does not bind Sp1 or
Sp3. Instead, the transcription factor Egr-1 was found to bind the
proximal GC box sequence in the nuclear extract of TPA-stimulated
cells. Egr-1 (also known as Krox-24), which was first identified as an
immediate-early gene induced by mitogenic stimulation (23), contains
three zinc finger motifs that regulate transcription through binding to
the GC-rich consensus sequence 5'-GCG(T/G)GGGCG-3' (20). The
Egr-1 gene is rapidly and transiently induced by a variety
of stimuli or cellular stresses, including serum, TPA, and other growth
factors (21, 22). Egr-1-binding sites have been identified in the promoters of cyclin D1 (42), platelet-derived growth factor (43), and
p53 (44), where this inducible transcription factor is proposed to
mediate the activation of downstream genes that play crucial roles in
cellular proliferation and differentiation. We have previously shown
that sustained production of PGE2 by HEK293 cells stably
co-transfected with COX-2 and mPGES is associated with aggressive cell
growth and morphological change (9). Furthermore, the present study
provides unequivocal evidence that Egr-1 binds to the GC box in the
mPGES promoter region and regulates inducible transcription
of the mPGES gene. Thus, transcriptional regulation of mPGES
expression by Egr-1 appears to be closely correlated with cellular
proliferation and carcinogenesis. We speculate that Egr-1 may regulate
cellular proliferation and differentiation at least in part through
up-regulation of mPGES gene transcription, particularly in
tissues and cells where PGE2 plays a regulatory role in
these events. The functional link between Egr-1 and mPGES expression is
further supported by recent observations that cytokine-induced expression of mPGES is suppressed by a p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor (45) and that Egr-1 induction is mediated by the p38
mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway (46). Indeed, pharmacological
inhibition of p38 attenuates Egr-1-mediated mPGES expression in our
preliminary reporter
assay.2
Although the sequences of the mouse and human mPGES
promoters (
1 to
640) were only 48% homologous, the homology
between them around the tandem GC boxes (
70 to
124) is relatively
high (78%). Of importance, our studies revealed that the tandem GC boxes were also critical for transcriptional activation of the human
mPGES gene. Moreover, a similar regulatory mechanism is common to several distinct cell types (osteoblasts, macrophages, and
kidney cells) following various stimuli (TPA, cytokines, and LPS). It
is therefore likely that Egr-1-mediated regulation of the
mPGES gene represents the common regulatory machinery in
various situations.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Drs. Nobuya Sasaki and
Makoto Taketo (Kyoto University, Kyoto) for helpful advice
with the initial genomic cloning experiments.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of
Health, Welfare and Labor, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, and the Promotion of Fundamental Studies in Health Science of the Organization for Pharmaceutical Safety
and Research (OPSR) of Japan.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the DDBJ/GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AB083340.
Present address: Kitasato Institute, Tokyo 108-8642, Japan.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-6-6833-5012;
Fax: 81-6-6872-8090; E-mail: tanabe@ri.ncvc.go.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 28, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203618200
2
H. Naraba, C. Yokoyama, N. Tago, and T. Tanabe, unpublished observation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PGE2, prostaglandin E2;
mPGES, membrane-bound prostaglandin
E2 synthase;
COX, cyclooxygenase;
Egr, early growth
response;
Sp, specificity protein;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift
assay;
TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate;
LPS, lipopolysaccharide;
TNF, tumor necrosis factor;
HEK, human embryonic
kidney;
FL, flanking region;
luc, luciferase;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
CRE, cAMP-response element-binding protein;
mt, mutant;
PGES, prostaglandin E2 synthase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Harris, S. G.,
Padilla, J.,
Koumas, L.,
Ray, D.,
and Phipps, R. P.
(2002)
Trends Immunol.
23,
144-150[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Funk, C. D.
(2001)
Science
294,
1871-1875[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Ueno, A.,
Matsumoto, H.,
Naraba, H.,
Ikeda, Y.,
Ushikubi, F.,
Matsuoka, T.,
Narumiya, S.,
Sugimoto, Y.,
Ichikawa, A.,
and Oh-ishi, S.
(2001)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
62,
157-160[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Norrdin, R. W.,
Jee, W. S.,
and High, W. B.
(1990)
Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids
41,
139-149[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Matsumoto, H.,
Naraba, H.,
Ueno, A.,
Fujiyoshi, T.,
Murakami, M.,
Kudo, I.,
and Oh-ishi, S.
(1998)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
352,
47-52[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Murakami, M.,
Nakatani, Y.,
Atsumi, G.,
Inoue, K.,
and Kudo, I.
(1997)
Crit. Rev. Immunol.
17,
225-283[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Smith, W. L.,
and Langenbach, R.
(2001)
J. Clin. Invest.
107,
1491-1495[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Tanioka, T.,
Nakatani, Y.,
Semmyo, N.,
Murakami, M.,
and Kudo, I.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
32775-32782[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Jakobsson, P. J.,
Thoren, S.,
Morgenstern, R.,
and Samuelsson, B.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
7220-7225[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Murakami, M.,
Naraba, H.,
Tanioka, T.,
Semmyo, N.,
Nakatani, Y.,
Kojima, F.,
Ikeda, T.,
Fueki, M.,
Ueno, A.,
Oh-ishi, S.,
and Kudo, I.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
32783-32792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Satoh, K.,
Nagano, Y.,
Shimomura, C.,
Suzuki, N.,
Saeki, Y.,
and Yokota, H.
(2000)
Neurosci. Lett.
283,
221-223[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Mancini, J. A.,
Blood, K.,
Guay, J.,
Gordon, R.,
Claveau, D.,
Chan, C. C.,
and Riendeau, D.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
4469-4475[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Filion, F.,
Bouchard, N.,
Goff, A. K.,
Lussier, J. G.,
and Sirois, J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
34323-34330[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Schmedtje, J. F., Jr., Ji, Y. S.,
Liu, W. L.,
DuBois, R. N.,
and Runge, M. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
601-608[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Inoue, H.,
and Tanabe, T.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
244,
143-148[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Kim, Y.,
and Fischer, S. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27686-27694[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
von Knethen, A.,
Callsen, D.,
and Brune, B.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
361-372[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Yamamoto, K.,
Arakawa, T.,
Ueda, N.,
and Yamamoto, S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
31315-31320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Forsberg, L.,
Leeb, L.,
Thoren, S.,
Morgenstern, R.,
and Jakobsson, P.
(2000)
FEBS Lett.
471,
78-82[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Christy, B. A.,
Lau, L. F.,
and Nathans, D.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
7857-7861[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Silverman, E. S.,
Khachigian, L. M.,
Lindner, V.,
Williams, A. J.,
and Collins, T.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
273,
H1415-H1426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Lemaire, P.,
Revelant, O.,
Bravo, R.,
and Charnay, P.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
4691-4695[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Milbrandt, J.
(1987)
Science
238,
797-799[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Naraba, H.,
Ueno, A.,
Kosugi, Y.,
Yoshimura, M.,
Murakami, M.,
Kudo, I.,
and Oh-ishi, S.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
435,
96-100[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Naraba, H.,
Murakami, M.,
Matsumoto, H.,
Shimbara, S.,
Ueno, A.,
Kudo, I.,
and Oh-ishi, S.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
160,
2974-2982[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Smale, S. T.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1989)
Cell
57,
103-113[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Hatzinikolas, G.,
and Gibson, M. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
29309-29314[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
McMahon, S. B.,
and Monroe, J. G.
(1996)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
60,
159-166[Abstract]
|
| 29.
|
Black, A. R.,
Black, J. D.,
and Azizkhan-Clifford, J.
(2001)
J. Cell. Physiol.
188,
143-160[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
| Kojima, F., Naraba, H., Sasaki, Y., Okamoto, R., Koshino, T., and
Kawai, S. (2002) J. Rheumatol., in press
|
| 31.
|
Soler, M.,
Camacho, M.,
Escudero, J. R.,
Iniguez, M. A.,
and Vila, L.
(2000)
Circ. Res.
87,
504-507[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Yamagata, K.,
Matsumura, K.,
Inoue, W.,
Shiraki, T.,
Suzuki, K.,
Yasuda, S.,
Sugiura, H.,
Cao, C.,
Watanabe, Y.,
and Kobayashi, S.
(2001)
J. Neurosci.
21,
2669-2677[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Stichtenoth, D. O.,
Thoren, S.,
Bian, H.,
Peters-Golden, M.,
Jakobsson, P. J.,
and Crofford, L.
(2001)
J. Immunol.
167,
469-474[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Thoren, S.,
and Jakobsson, P. J.
(2000)
Eur. J. Biochem.
267,
6428-6434[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Ohkawara, S.,
Shimonishi, M.,
Tanabe, T.,
and Yokoyama, C.
(2000)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1494,
155-161[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Sugawara, A.,
Uruno, A.,
Kudo, M.,
Ikeda, Y.,
Sato, K.,
Taniyama, Y.,
Ito, S.,
and Takeuchi, K.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
9676-9683[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Hauses, M.,
Tonjes, R. R.,
and Grez, M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
31844-31852[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Bai, G.,
and Kusiak, J. W.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
7737-7744[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Tazawa, R.,
Hirosawa, S.,
Suzuki, K.,
Hirokawa, K.,
and Aoki, N.
(1993)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
113,
600-606[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Horie, S.,
Ishii, H.,
Matsumoto, F.,
Kusano, M.,
Kizaki, K.,
Matsuda, J.,
and Kazama, M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
2440-2450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Suske, G.
(1999)
Gene (Amst.)
238,
291-300[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Yan, Y. X.,
Nakagawa, H.,
Lee, M. H.,
and Rustgi, A. K.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
33181-33190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Maehara, K., Oh-,
Hashi, K.,
and Isobe, K. I.
(2001)
FASEB J.
15,
2025-2026[Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Ahmed, M. M.,
Sells, S. F.,
Venkatasubbarao, K.,
Fruitwala, S. M.,
Muthukkumar, S.,
Harp, C.,
Mohiuddin, M.,
and Rangnekar, V. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
33056-33061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Han, R.,
Tsui, S.,
and Smith, T. J.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
16355-16364[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Rolli, M.,
Kotlyarov, A.,
Sakamoto, K. M.,
Gaestel, M.,
and Neininger, A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
19559-19564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?