Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M202856200 on May 28, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 32, 29101-29107, August 9, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/32/29101    most recent
M202856200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Troyer, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Wightman, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Troyer, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Wightman, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Temporal Separation of Vesicle Release from Vesicle Fusion during Exocytosis*

Kevin P. Troyer and R. Mark WightmanDagger

From the Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599

Received for publication, March 25, 2002, and in revised form, May 22, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

During exocytosis, vesicles in secretory cells fuse with the cellular membrane and release their contents in a Ca2+-dependent process. Release occurs initially through a fusion pore, and its rate is limited by the dissociation of the matrix-associated contents. To determine whether this dissociation is promoted by osmotic forces, we have examined the effects of elevated osmotic pressure on release and extrusion from vesicles at mast and chromaffin cells. The identity of the molecules released and the time course of extrusion were measured with fast scan cyclic voltammetry at carbon fiber microelectrodes. In external solutions of high osmolarity, release events following entry of divalent ions (Ba2+ or Ca2+) were less frequent. However, the vesicles appeared to be fused to the membrane without extruding their contents, since the maximal observed concentrations of events were less than 7% of those evoked in isotonic media. Such an isolated, intermediate fusion state, which we term "kiss-and-hold," was confirmed by immunohistochemistry at chromaffin cells. Transient exposure of cells in the kiss and hold state to isotonic solutions evoked massive release. These results demonstrate that an osmotic gradient across the fusion pore is an important driving force for exocytotic extrusion of granule contents from secretory cells following fusion pore formation.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Vesicles in secretory cells perform two different functions: they are a storage depot for small molecules and they release these molecules during exocytosis. Storage in dense core vesicles requires stable packaging for an extended period of time. This is accomplished by association of the vesicular contents. On the other hand, release requires dissociation of this storage matrix on a relatively fast time scale so the contents can be extruded (1, 2).

In mast cells, histamine and 5-HT are associated with a negatively charged heparin matrix in the vesicles through a cation exchange type of interaction (3). These vesicles contain 150 mM histamine, which alone with its associated anion would lead to a free osmolality of ~550 mosM (4). However, the vesicles are iso-osmotic with the 300-mosM cytoplasm because of the association of the molecules within the granule matrix (5). Similarly, a single chromaffin cell vesicle contains 550 mM catecholamine along with 122 mM ATP, 17-30 mM Ca2+, 5 mM Mg2+, 22 mM ascorbate, and the acidic protein chromogranin A, leading to a total soluble concentration of 750 mM (6). Again, molecular associations lead to a state (7, 8) that is iso-osmotic with the cytoplasm (6). These close associations have been documented by nuclear magnetic resonance in vesicles from both cell types (9, 10).

Upon cell stimulation, the vesicle contacts the plasma membrane and forms a fusion pore, the dynamics and control of which have been reviewed recently (11, 12). Capacitance and amperometry techniques have indicated that a portion of the vesicular contents can be released through this fusion pore (13, 14). Furthermore, at both mast and chromaffin cells, patch-amperometry measurements reveal that the fusion pore can exist for several milliseconds prior to full extrusion of vesicle contents (15, 16). Following secretory vesicle-cell membrane fusion in mast cells vesicular swelling occurs (17), which has been attributed to the displacement of associated cations in the granule with hydrated cations such as Na+ from the external solution (18). This ion exchange mechanism, with its associated hydration effects (19), has been hypothesized and experimentally supported at several cell types as reviewed by Artalejo et al. (20).

Theoretical considerations of this process have likened the extrusion and swelling to a controlled explosion that drives full release of the vesicular contents and dissociation of the vesicular matrix (18). Amperometric recordings revealed that the time course of release is longer than that expected for free diffusion (1), having a duration of several milliseconds at chromaffin cells (21, 22), and even longer at mast cells (23), consistent with a rate-limiting dissociation. The time course of extrusion can be decreased by perturbing any of the physical and chemical gradients that exist between the vesicle interior and the extracellular environment. These include osmolarity, pH, and cation concentration (24-26). For example, increasing the osmotic gradient by lowering the extracellular solution osmolarity decreases the release time course and increases the amount released, whereas high extracellular osmolarity has the opposite effect (27). In the present work, the effects of high osmolarity (using elevated NaCl) on secretory cells were evaluated in an attempt to freeze exocytotic events at the step between fusion pore formation and extrusion of vesicle contents. The results reported are consistent with such a state and reveal that extrusion of the vesicular contents is a distinct step in the sequence of events termed exocytosis.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Culture-- Bovine adrenal medullary cells, enriched in either epinephrine or norepinephrine using a Renografin gradient, were cultured as previously described and plated at a density of 3 × 105 cells/plate (28). Cells were used on days 3-7 after culture. Murine peritoneal mast cells were cultured as described previously (29). Cells were plated on 25-mm glass coverslips (Carolina Biological Supply, Burlington, NC) contained in 35-mm diameter tissue culture plates (Falcon; Fisher Scientific).

Electrochemistry-- Carbon fiber microelectrodes for the detection of released molecules were prepared as described (30). Electrodes were backfilled with a 4 M potassium acetate, 150 mM KCl solution and calibrated using 4 µM epinephrine, norepinephrine, and histamine and 1 µM serotonin. FSCV1 was performed using locally written Labview software (National Instruments, Austin, TX) with an EI-400 potentiostat (Cypress Systems, Lawrence, KS) (31). Potentials were scanned from -200 mV to +1600 mV and back for catecholamines and from +100 to +1400 mV and back for histamine and serotonin (potentials versus a Ag/AgCl reference electrode, Bioanalytical Systems, Lafayette, IN). A scan rate of 2000 V/s was used with a 60-Hz repetition rate. Spike detection and analysis at the peak oxidation potentials for the molecules of interest were performed (32), and the resulting current spike amplitudes were converted to concentration based on electrode calibrations.

Cell Experiments-- Individual cells were stimulated to release by pressure ejection (Picospritzer; General Valve Corp., Fairfield, NJ) of 5 mM BaCl2 or 60 mM KCl (chromaffin cells), 0.5 µM A23187 (mast cells), or transient isotonic buffer solution (chromaffin and mast cells) from a micropipette placed 30 µm from the cell. The carbon fiber microelectrode was placed 1 µm from the cell membrane using a piezoelectric manipulator (PCS-1000, Burleigh Instruments, Fishers, NY) on the stage of an inverted microscope (Axiovert 35; Zeiss, Thornwood, NY). Cells were rinsed with isotonic Tris-HCl buffer at room temperature prior to experiment. For experiments in which bathing buffer osmolarity was changed, glass coverslips containing the cells were placed in a perfusion chamber positioned on the microscope.

Confocal Microscopy-- Dbeta H labeling was used to visualize events associated with exocytosis at chromaffin cells. To measure surface-bound Dbeta H, a measure of cell membrane-vesicle fusion, cells were exposed to 5 mM Ba2+ for 2 min in Tris-HCl buffer (no added Ca2+) in iso- or hypertonic buffer. Control cells were incubated without Ba2+. The cells were then fixed with a non-permeant protocol by quickly removing the bathing solutions and replacing them with identical buffers containing 4% p-formaldehyde at 4 °C for 20 min (33). The cells were then rinsed twice with buffer, incubated with 0.2% bovine serum albumin for 10 min, rinsed two more times, and incubated with mouse anti-Dbeta H monoclonal antibody (1:300; Chemicon, Temecula, CA) for 45 min at 4 °C. To monitor Dbeta H retention on the surface, an identical procedure was followed except the cells were incubated in iso- or hypertonic buffer for 20 min following Ba2+ but before fixation. To monitor vesicle recycling, the procedure was again identical except the anti-Dbeta H antibody was present during the exposure to Ba2+. These cells were fixed and permeabilized with ethanol to allow visualization of endocytosed Dbeta H.

After rinsing, Dbeta H was visualized by incubating the cells with Alexa-Fluor 568 goat anti-mouse IgG conjugate (1:1000, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). The coverslips containing the cells were washed and mounted on microscope slides with Vectashield (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA). Images were acquired using a 100× oil immersion objective on a Leica-LCS confocal microscope (Leica Instruments, Exton, PA). Analysis of images was performed using Scion Image software (Frederick, MD).

Mast Cell Optical Imaging-- Visualization of release from mast cells was enhanced with 50 µg/ml ruthenium red (29). Individual cells in both iso-osmotic and elevated osmolarity buffers were stimulated to release and monitored using a CCD camera (Sensys, Photometrics, Tucson, AZ) through the microscope.

Reagents and Solutions-- All chemicals were obtained from Sigma and used as received. A23187 was prepared by 1000-fold dilution of a stock solution in Me2SO. Iso-osmotic buffer contained 12.5 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 4 mM KCl, 1.2 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM glucose). Hypertonic buffers were prepared by elevating the NaCl concentration to 520 mM for chromaffin cells and 350 mM for mast cells. All solutions were prepared using doubly distilled deionized water and adjusted to pH 7.4 by addition of NaOH.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mast Cells-- Following transient exposure (5 s) to the Ca2+ ionophore A23187 in isotonic buffer (150 mM NaCl), mast cells exhibited frequent exocytotic release events that were detected by cyclic voltammetry (Table I), consistent with previous reports. Every exocytotic event resulted in the simultaneous release of 5-HT and histamine (Fig. 1) that each gave a distinct voltammetric peak (29). Each event was characterized by a simultaneous increase in the concentrations of 5-HT and histamine followed by a more gradual returned to base line. Occasionally the exocytotic spikes were preceded by a foot-like event (29) in which a transient, steady-state, low concentration of the amine was present (data not shown). Such events have been shown to be due to secretion through the fusion pore (13).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Effects of elevated osmolarity buffer on release from peritoneal mast cells.
Cmax is the maximal concentration of histamine measured from each current spike. ISO, ISO buffer contained 150 mM NaCl.


View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Cyclic voltammetric monitoring of exocytosis at a mast cell in isotonic solution (150 mM NaCl) and hypertonic solution (350 mM NaCl). Left panel, typical release from a mast cell exposed to A23187 in isotonic solution. A different cell, in hypertonic solution, was exposed to A23187 for 5 s during the first dashed box (middle panel) and then exposed to isotonic solution for 10 s during the second dashed box (right panel). Color plots: release events were monitored with background subtracted, FSCV that allows a simultaneous view of serotonin and histamine (29). The potential applied to the carbon fiber microelectrode is plotted on the y axis (from +0.1 to +1.4 and back to +0.1 V versus a Ag/AgCl reference), while the x axis is time. The current intensity is encoded in color as indicated by the scale bar (note change in scale bars). For serotonin, the oxidation is maximal at +0.7 V, and for histamine oxidation is maximal at +1.3 V. Middle trace, current arising from oxidation of histamine. Upper trace, fura-2 monitoring of intracellular divalent ion concentration at a different cell.

Mast cells displayed greater sensitivity to elevations in osmolarity than chromaffin cells. Application of external solution with NaCl concentrations of 520 mM, as used with chromaffin cells (see below), caused either complete inhibition of Ca2+-evoked release events or rapid, spontaneous degranulation. At a lower NaCl concentration (350 mM NaCl), only a few cells degranulated spontaneously. However, for intact cells, release was quite dramatically altered. Exposure to A23187 in hypertonic medium containing Ca2+ still evoked spikes, but their maximal concentration was ~1% of that evoked in isotonic solution. Indeed, they resemble feet unaccompanied by spikes. The frequency of spikes was also reduced (Table I). Spikes with large concentrations could be obtained if the cells were subsequently exposed to an isotonic puff for a transient (5 s) period 3 min after the initial A23187 exposure (an example is shown in Fig. 1). After the exposure to isotonic buffer, the spikes continued for as long as 5 min at a frequency similar to that in isotonic buffer (Table I).

Since the average diameter of mast cell vesicles is 700 nm (29), the degranulation that occurs during exocytosis can be observed with light microscopy. In hypertonic medium, the mast cells shrank and degranulation was not apparent upon application of A23187 (Fig. 2b). This was the case despite the fact that the voltammetric results showed spikes of histamine and 5-HT (Fig. 1), albeit small ones. However, degranulation was readily observed immediately after transient application of isotonic buffer, and it continued for the time scale of the release detected with voltammetry (Fig. 2, c and d).


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Optical micrographs of a mast cell during degranulation. a, initial view of the cell in hypertonic solution (350 mM NaCl). b, cell following exposure to A23187. c, same cell following subsequent exposure (10 s) to isotonic solution (150 mM NaCl). d, five minutes after c.

The lack of visual degranulation is not due to failure of Ca2+ to enter the cell. Ca2+ entry was immediate upon exposure to A23187 in hypertonic buffer as revealed by fluorescence from fura-2, the ratiometric divalent ion indicator (34). Furthermore, upon exposure to isotonic buffer, the larger spikes, with their accompanying visual degranulation, were not accompanied by a further influx of Ca2+ (Fig. 1, upper trace). Thus, in hypertonic solution, it appears that Ca2+ entry evokes vesicle-cell membrane fusion, but extrusion of vesicular contents is suppressed unless isotonic conditions are restored for a transient period.

Chromaffin Cells-- In isotonic solution without Ca2+, transient exposure of chromaffin cells to Ba2+ (5 mM, 5 s) causes exocytotic release of catecholamines (Fig. 3) (24). In isotonic solution containing Ca2+, transient exposure of chromaffin cells to elevated KCl (60 mM, 5 s) also causes exocytotic release of catecholamines (Fig. 4) (35). Cyclic voltammetry can be used to monitor the release and can distinguish cells that secrete norepinephrine from those that secrete epinephrine (36). Cyclic voltammograms (37) also reveal that the foot present for many exocytotic events is comprised of catecholamines (data not shown). Release evoked by the two secretagogues is quite similar (24) (Table II).


View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Cyclic voltammetric monitoring of exocytosis at a chromaffin cell in isotonic (150 mM NaCl) and hypertonic solution (520 mM NaCl). Left panel, release from a cell in isotonic solution upon exposure to Ba2+. The cell in hypertonic solution (middle panel) was exposed to Ba2+ for 5 s during the first dashed box and then exposed to isotonic solution for 15 s during the second dashed box (right panel). Color plots: release events were monitored with FSCV. The potential applied to the carbon fiber microelectrode is plotted on the y axis, while the x axis is time. The current intensity is encoded in color as indicated by the scale bar (note change in scale bars). For epinephrine, oxidation of the catechol to its o-quinone occurs at +0.75 V with a second peak at +1.5 V from the oxidation of the secondary amine as described previously (36). Middle trace, current arising from oxidation of epinephrine at +0.75 V. Upper trace, fura-2 monitoring of intracellular divalent ion concentration at a different cell.


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Cyclic voltammetric monitoring of exocytosis at a chromaffin cell in isotonic (150 mM NaCl) and hypertonic solution (520 mM NaCl). Left panel, release from a cell exposed to 60 mM K+ in isotonic solution. The cell in hypertonic solution was exposed to K+ for 5 s during the first dashed box (middle panel) and then exposed to isotonic solution for 15 s during the second dashed box (right panel). Color plots: release events were monitored with FSCV. The current intensity is encoded in color as indicated by the scale bar (note change in scale bars). Middle trace, current arising from oxidation of epinephrine at +0.75 V. The experimental parameters are the same as those in Fig. 3. Upper trace, fura-2 monitoring of intracellular divalent ion concentration at a different cell.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Effects of elevated osmolarity buffer on release from chromaffin cells stimulated with 5 mM Ba2+ or 60 mM K+.
Cmax values are measured from catecholamine oxidative peak. ISO, ISO buffer contained 150 mM NaCl.

In hyperosmotic solutions (520 mM NaCl) without Ca2+, transient exposure to 5 mM Ba2+ also results in exocytotic spikes from chromaffin cells (Fig. 3), but they are less frequent and much smaller in amplitude (Table II). Similar results are obtained for K+-induced release in hypertonic solutions (Fig. 4, Table II). The maximal concentration of spikes in hypertonic medium with Ba2+ is only 7% and with K+ is only 10% of that seen in isotonic medium. In all cases the cyclic voltammograms revealed that the small, foot-like events were the same catecholamine that the cell normally secreted. Thus, the results at chromaffin cells are quite similar to those at mast cells: in hyperosmotic solutions, release events of small amplitude can be evoked, but their concentration and frequency is lower than in isotonic solution.

Transient application of an isotonic solution to chromaffin cells for 15 s at 2 min after exposure to either secretagogue in hypertonic medium induced massive release (Table II, Figs. 3 and 4). In 27% of the chromaffin cells pretreated with 60 mM KCl and 36% of the cells pretreated with Ba2+, this release consisted of one to two spikes with maximal concentrations greater than 40 µM that appeared to be compound exocytotic events. In the remainder of cells, spikes were observed shortly after exposure to isotonic buffer with a delay time of ~4 s to the first spike. The isotonic buffer caused cell swelling on a similar time scale. The large spikes diminished immediately following cessation of transient exposure to isotonic buffer. When cells were completely restored to isotonic conditions, exposure to either secretagogue evoked spikes with a normal frequency and maximal concentrations (data not shown).

Fura-2 was used to monitor either intracellular Ba2+ or Ca2+ in these experiments. It is well established in isotonic solutions that both secretagogues cause an immediate increase in intracellular divalent ions (34), and this was replicated in this work (data not shown). In hypertonic solutions, pressure ejection of Ba2+ or K+ similarly caused an elevation in intracellular divalent ion concentrations. In the case of Ba2+, the signal remained elevated for greater than 3 min (Fig. 3) because intracellular Ca2+ stores do not effectively sequester it (38). Following K+ in hypertonic solution, the divalent ion signal returned to base-line levels ~10 s after its application. Thus, the observed, divalent ion entry accompanies the small release events obtained in hypertonic solutions.

Fura-2 measurements were also made during reintroduction of isotonic solution after exposure to secretagogues. The accompanying cell swelling and dye dilution complicates interpretation of the changes in divalent ions. There was no observable change in the bound to free ratio at cells that had been exposed to Ba2+; however, results in cells that had been exposed to K+ were equivocal.

Confocal Microscopy-- To provide evidence that vesicles fused with the plasma membrane in hypertonic solution, a fluorescently labeled antibody to Dbeta H was employed. Dbeta H is a vesicular enzyme that appears on the surface of chromaffin cells following exocytosis (39). Exposure to Ba2+ for 2 min in either isotonic (Fig. 5a) or hypertonic solutions (Fig. 5b) causes Dbeta H localization on the cell perimeter. The fluorescence at the cell surface, which is eight times more intense in cells stimulated in isotonic solution, indicates vesicle-cell membrane fusion has occurred under both conditions, exposing the vesicle interior to the external solution. In both solutions, unstimulated cells showed no fluorescence (data not shown).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Confocal images of chromaffin cells stimulated to release under different conditions and stained with Dbeta H antibody. a, c, and e, results obtained in isotonic solution. b, d, and f, results obtained in hypertonic (520 mM NaCl) solution. a and b, cell was fixed after 2-min exposure to 5 mM Ba2+ followed by Dbeta H antibody staining. c and d, cells were exposed to Ba2+ as in a and rinsed for 20 min without Ba2+ before fixation and staining. e and f, cells were stimulated as in a but in the presence of anti-Dbeta H antibody to reveal endocytosis.

A similar experiment was used to test vesicle lifetime at the cell surface. With the same treatment as in Fig. 5a, but with a 20-min incubation in buffer before the addition of Dbeta H antibody, Dbeta H was not found on cell surfaces when stimulated in isotonic medium (Fig. 5c). This is consistent with vesicle endocytosis that occurs on a time scale much shorter than 20 min in isotonic solutions (40). Supporting this conclusion, fluorescence was found within cells that were stimulated to release in isotonic solutions in the presence of Dbeta H antibody (Fig. 5e). In contrast, Dbeta H antibody was present on cell surfaces stimulated in hypertonic medium under all conditions, but was not seen to incorporate within the cell (Fig. 5, d and f). The rate of endocytosis is known to be lower in hypertonic solutions, consistent with this finding (41).

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In high osmolarity solutions, secretion from both mast and chromaffin cells is dramatically altered. The results presented here show that vesicle-cell membrane fusion can still occur under these conditions, but that full extrusion of the vesicle contents does not occur. Indeed, the fused vesicles in hypertonic solution appear to be frozen at the cell surface, and only release after swelling of the vesicle matrix is allowed to occur. Previous studies have demonstrated that both chromaffin and mast cell vesicles contract in response to hypertonic stress without disruption of their stored contents (5). Indeed, the chromaffin vesicle has been termed an ideal osmometer between 300 and 1000 mosM (6). The new finding of this work is that high osmolarity solutions prevent full extrusion of vesicle contents and allow temporal isolation of an intermediate state in the sequence of events that occur during exocytosis, a state we refer to as "kiss-and-hold."

Hypertonic solutions clearly lower the rate of exocytosis at both mast and chromaffin cells. This could arise from an increase in actin filaments at the cell membrane as found in neutrophils in hyperosmotic solutions (42), because the rate of exocytosis in chromaffin cells depends on the degree of association of actin filaments (43). However, previous visual studies in high osmolarity solutions have shown that vesicle-cell membrane fusion is not prevented at chromaffin or mast cells (17, 44, 45), nor in sea urchin eggs (46). In this work, vesicle-cell membrane fusion is established in chromaffin cells by the presence of Dbeta H on the cell surface in both isotonic and hypertonic medium. Dbeta H labeling is lowered in hypertonic solutions, correlating well with the decreased frequency of electrochemically detected spikes. At mast cells, visual evidence for vesicle-cell membrane fusion was not obtained in hypertonic medium, although secretion was clearly evident by the cyclic voltammetry. The secretory events that are seen are so small that they resemble the feet that precede some exocytotic events in iso-osmolar solutions at both types of cells in hypertonic media. This is the expected outcome if vesicle fusion occurred in hypertonic solutions with only minor extrusion of the contents. Despite their small size, the cyclic voltammograms establish that the substances detected are those stored in the vesicles.

All of the evidence from both cell types indicates that the small size of the spikes obtained in hypertonic medium is a consequence of inhibition of vesicle-matrix dissociation. The association of the vesicle contents in chromaffin cells has been characterized as a "dynamic viscous solution that is stabilized by ternary complex formation" (10) and is also well documented in mast cells (47). Upon exposure to the extracellular solution through the fusion pore, at the initial "kiss," exchange between the vesicular interior and the extracellular fluid begins. Normally the matrix dissociation and extrusion of its contents relies on hydration, with its accompanying matrix swelling, that is driven by a physical or chemical gradient across the fusion pore. By removing the osmotic gradient in hypertonic solutions, one of the driving forces for dissociation and extrusion is dissipated. The small amount of secretion that does occur could arise from components originally in an unassociated state or a small amount of matrix dissociation that occurs at the fusion pore, but which is unable to propagate into the remainder of the vesicle. Because rates of endocytosis are lowered in hypertonic solutions, the fused, intact vesicle "holds" at the cell surface for an extended period of time.

The frozen, fused vesicle state established in hypertonic medium is destroyed once the osmotic gradient is re-established. This occurs with the transient isotonic exposure that evokes multiple spikes on the time scale of cellular swelling. In mast cells, the maximal concentration of these spikes is consistent with extrusion of contents from previously fused vesicles. At chromaffin cells, the maximal concentration and time course of some observed spikes are larger than under normal exocytotic conditions, consistent with multiple, simultaneous secretory events. For cells stimulated with K+, the original stimulus is no longer present upon isotonic solution exposure, and yet secretion is still observed. This strongly suggests that the observed spikes arise from previously fused vesicles. With Ba2+ at chromaffin cells and with mast cells, the isotonic-evoked spikes are unaccompanied by an increase in intracellular divalent ions. Thus, it is clear that the discrete processes of vesicle fusion and vesicle extrusion have been temporally separated. Concentration and pH gradients between the vesicle matrix and the external solution may exert similar effects (24, 25). Indeed, chromaffin cells previously stimulated with Ba2+ in hypertonic solutions did not release when exposed to isotonic buffer at pH 5.5 (data not shown). Thus, re-establishing an osmotic gradient is not sufficient to unravel the kiss and hold state; the pH gradient is necessary as well.

All of these results are consistent with recent mathematical models for the swelling of secretory granules after fusion pore formation and its role in extrusion of granule contents (18, 48). These models indicate that the hydration and swelling of the vesicle matrix cause an enlargement of the fusion pore leading to its destabilization. Thus, normally in mast and chromaffin cells the pore expansion of the vesicle occurs rapidly, driven by the irreversible swelling of the matrix, and results in full incorporation of the vesicle membrane and extrusion of vesicular contents as illustrated in the sequence of steps in Fig. 6. By removing the driving force for swelling, we were able to isolate the intermediate kiss-and-hold state. The mathematical models predict that "kiss-and-run" events, events where fusion pore formation allows escape of some transmitter followed by vesicular retreat from the cellular membrane without fully fusing, are unlikely under normal conditions at cells with large vesicles. Consistent with these models, all fusion pore events in mast cells are followed by complete fusion of the vesicle with the cellular membrane and subsequent release (15). Patch-amperometry studies on chromaffin cells reveal only 10% of the observed fusion events are kiss-and-run (16), but these occurrences are increased with elevated external Ca2+ concentrations (49). In the absence of endocytosis caused by elevated osmolarity, one would expect these events to be restricted to the cell membrane, as shown in this work, until acted upon by external forces. For small vesicles, the force of matrix expansion is insufficient to destabilize the fusion pore, and kiss-and-run is more likely. This has also been observed for small clear vesicles at hippocampal synapses (50).


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Model for separation of vesicle fusion and subsequent extrusion of contents. When stimulated in hypertonic solution, vesicles dock with the plasma membrane and unassociated contents can diffuse through the fusion pore (upper). Subsequent exposure to isotonic solution causes expansion of the vesicle matrix and extrusion of contents (lower).

The hypertonically constructed kiss-and-hold configuration inhibits the dissociation of matrix constituents following vesicle fusion with the cell membrane. This provides access to the vesicle interior while maintaining the viability of the cell, which may allow for a more complete understanding of the complex interaction of molecules within the vesicle matrix in their natural environment as well as a glimpse of their dissociation during exocytosis. Under normal physiological conditions, full fusion and extrusion of vesicular contents is predominant at both mast and chromaffin cells, relying on the destabilization of the granule matrix through swelling to rapidly pass through the kiss-and-hold state.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 919-962-1472; Fax: 919-962-2388; E-mail: rmw@unc.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 28, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M202856200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: FSCV, fast scan cyclic voltammetry; Dbeta H, dopamine-beta -hydroxylase; 5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Schroeder, T. J., Borges, R., Finnegan, J. M., Pihel, K., Amatore, C., and Wightman, R. M. (1996) Biophys. J. 70, 1061-1068[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Marszalek, P. E., Farrell, B., Verdugo, P., and Fernandez, J. M. (1997) Biophys. J. 73, 1169-1183[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Uvnas, B., and Aborg, C. H. (1984) Acta Physiol. Scand. 120, 99-107[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Fernandez, J. M., Villalon, M., and Verdugo, P. (1991) Biophys. J. 59, 1022-1027[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Brodwick, M. S., Curran, M., and Edwards, C. (1992) J. Membr. Biol. 126, 159-169[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Holz, R. W. (1986) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 48, 175-189[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Helle, K. B., Reed, R. K., Pihl, K. E., and Serck-Hanssen, G. (1985) Acta Physiol. Scand. 123, 21-33[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Yoo, S. H., and Lewis, M. S. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 11236-11241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Rabenstein, D. L., Ludowyke, R., and Lagunoff, D. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 6923-6926[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Daniels, A. J., Williams, R. J., and Wright, P. E. (1978) Neuroscience 3, 573-585[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Zimmerberg, J., and Chernomordik, L. V. (1999) Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 38, 197-205[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Oheim, M., and Stuhmer, W. (2000) Eur. Biophys. J. 29, 67-89[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Breckenridge, L. J., and Almers, W. (1987) Nature 328, 814-817[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Neher, E. (1993) Nature 363, 497-498[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Alvarez, d. T., Fernandez-Chacon, R., and Fernandez, J. M. (1993) Nature 363, 554-558[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Albillos, A., Dernick, G., Horstmann, H., Almers, W., Alvarez, d. T., and Lindau, M. (1997) Nature 389, 509-512[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Zimmerberg, J., Curran, M., Cohen, F. S., and Brodwick, M. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 1585-1589[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Amatore, C., Bouret, Y., Travis, E. R., and Wightman, R. M. (2000) Biochimie (Paris) 82, 481-496[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Verdugo, P. (1991) Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 144, S33-S37[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Artalejo, C. R., Elhamdani, A., and Palfrey, H. C. (1998) Curr. Biol. 8, R62-R65[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Walker, A., Glavinovic, M. I., and Trifaro, J. M. (1996) Pfluegers Arch. 431, 729-735[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Wightman, R. M., Jankowski, J. A., Kennedy, R. T., Kawagoe, K. T., Schroeder, T. J., Leszczyszyn, D. J., Near, J. A., Diliberto, E. J., Jr., and Viveros, O. H. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 10754-10758[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Marszalek, P. E., Farrell, B., Verdugo, P., and Fernandez, J. M. (1997) Biophys. J. 73, 1160-1168[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Jankowski, J. A., Finnegan, J. M., and Wightman, R. M. (1994) J. Neurochem. 63, 1739-1747[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Jankowski, J. A., Schroeder, T. J., Ciolkowski, E. L., and Wightman, R. M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 14694-14700[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Pihel, K., Travis, E. R., Borges, R., and Wightman, R. M. (1996) Biophys. J. 71, 1633-1640[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Borges, R., Travis, E. R., Hochstetler, S. E., and Wightman, R. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 8325-8331[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Leszczyszyn, D. J., Jankowski, J. A., Viveros, O. H., Diliberto, E. J., Jr., Near, J. A., and Wightman, R. M. (1991) J. Neurochem. 56, 1855-1863[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Travis, E. R., Wang, Y. M., Michael, D. J., Caron, M. G., and Wightman, R. M. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 162-167[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Kawagoe, K. T., Zimmerman, J. B., and Wightman, R. M. (1993) J. Neurosci. Methods 48, 225-240[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Michael, D. J., Joseph, J. D., Kilpatrick, M. R., Travis, E. R., and Wightman, R. M. (1999) Anal. Chem. 71, 3941-3947[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Segura, F., Brioso, M. A., Gomez, J. F., Machado, J. D., and Borges, R. (2000) J. Neurosci. Methods 103, 151-156[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Cuchillo-Ibanez, I., Michelena, P., Albillos, A., and Garcia, A. G. (1999) FEBS Lett. 459, 22-26[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Neher, E. (1995) Neuropharmacology 34, 1423-1442[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Finnegan, J. M., and Wightman, R. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 5353-5359[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Pihel, K., Schroeder, T. J., and Wightman, R. M. (1994) Anal. Chem. 66, 4532-4537[CrossRef]
37. Wightman, R. M., Schroeder, T. J., Finnegan, J. M., Ciolkowski, E. L., and Pihel, K. (1995) Biophys. J. 68, 383-390[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. von Ruden, L., Garcia, A. G., and Lopez, M. G. (1993) FEBS Lett. 336, 48-52[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Wick, P. F., Trenkle, J. M., and Holz, R. W. (1997) Neuroscience 80, 847-860[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Palfrey, H. C., and Artalejo, C. R. (1998) Neuroscience 83, 969-989[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. von Grafenstein, H., Roberts, C. S., and Baker, P. F. (1986) J. Cell Biol. 103, 2343-2352[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Rizoli, S. B., Rotstein, O. D., Parodo, J., Phillips, M. J., and Kapus, A. (2000) Am. J. Physiol. 279, C619-C633[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Vitale, M. L., Seward, E. P., and Trifaro, J. M. (1995) Neuron 14, 353-363[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Breckenridge, L. J., and Almers, W. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 1945-1949[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Holz, R. W., and Senter, R. A. (1986) J. Neurochem. 46, 1835-1842[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Whitaker, M., and Zimmerberg, J. (1987) J. Physiol. 389, 527-539[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Uvnas, B. (1991) J. Physiol Pharmacol. 42, 211-219[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Chizmadzhev, Y. A., Kuzmin, P. I., Kumenko, D. A., Zimmerberg, J., and Cohen, F. S. (2000) Biophys. J. 78, 2241-2256[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Ales, E., Tabares, L., Poyato, J. M., Valero, V., Lindau, M., and Alvarez, d. T. (1999) Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 40-44[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Stevens, C. F., and Williams, J. H. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 12828-12833[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
C. V. Harper, J. A. Cummerson, M. R. H. White, S. J. Publicover, and P. M. Johnson
Dynamic resolution of acrosomal exocytosis in human sperm
J. Cell Sci., July 1, 2008; 121(13): 2130 - 2135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. M. Wightman
Detection technologies. Probing cellular chemistry in biological systems with microelectrodes.
Science, March 17, 2006; 311(5767): 1570 - 1574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. C. Ashton and Y. A. Ushkaryov
Properties of Synaptic Vesicle Pools in Mature Central Nerve Terminals
J. Biol. Chem., November 4, 2005; 280(44): 37278 - 37288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Chattopadhyay, P. Sun, P. Wang, B. Abonyo, N. L. Cross, and L. Liu
Fusion of Lamellar Body with Plasma Membrane Is Driven by the Dual Action of Annexin II Tetramer and Arachidonic Acid
J. Biol. Chem., October 10, 2003; 278(41): 39675 - 39683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/32/29101    most recent
M202856200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Troyer, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Wightman, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Troyer, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Wightman, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement