|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201489200 on May 31, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 32, 29125-29131, August 9, 2002
A cis-Acting Sequence Homologous to the
Yeast Filamentation and Invasion Response Element Regulates
Expression of a Pectinase Gene from the Bean Pathogen
Colletotrichum lindemuthianum*
Corentin
Herbert,
Christophe
Jacquet,
Charlotte
Borel,
Marie-Thérèse
Esquerré-Tugayé, and
Bernard
Dumas
From the UMR 5546 CNRS-Université Paul Sabatier, Pôle
de Biotechnologie Végétale, 24 Chemin de Borde Rouge,
BP17 Auzeville, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France
Received for publication, February 13, 2002, and in revised form, April 19, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Phytopathogenic fungi secrete hydrolytic enzymes
that degrade plant cell walls, notably pectinases. The signaling
pathway(s) that control pectinase gene expression are currently unknown
in filamentous fungi. Recently, the green fluorescent protein coding sequence was used as a reporter gene to study the expression of CLPG2, a gene encoding an endopolygalacturonase of the bean
pathogen Colletotrichum lindemuthianum. CLPG2
is transcriptionally induced by pectin in the axenic culture of the
fungus and during formation of the appressorium, an infection structure
specialized in plant tissue penetration. In the present study, promoter
deletion and mutagenesis, as well as gel shift mobility assays, allowed
for the first time identification of cis-acting
elements that bind protein factors and are essential for the regulation
of a pectinase gene. We found that two different adjacent DNA motifs
are combined to form an active element that shows a strong sequence
homology with the yeast filamentation and invasion response element.
The same element is required for the transcriptional activation of CLPG2 by pectin and during appressorium development. This
study strongly suggests that the control of virulence genes of fungal plant pathogens, such as pectinases, involves the formation of a
complex of transcriptional activators similar to those regulating the
invasive growth in yeast.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Saprophytic and phytopathogenic filamentous fungi secrete
extracellular enzymes that degrade plant cell wall polymers. Among them, pectinases are the subject of intense research, because pectin
degradation contributes to fungal pathogenicity in several host-pathogen systems (1-4) and is of considerable interest for various biotechnological processes. Pectinase gene expression is
regulated at the transcriptional level by environmental conditions such
as the pH of the medium (5, 6) and by carbon sources, being induced by
pectin and pectic components (polygalacturonic acid, galacturonic acid,
arabinose, and rhamnose) and repressed by glucose (6-8). Whereas the
regulatory pathways that control pectinase gene expression are well
documented in phytopathogenic bacteria (9), little is known about the
regulation of fungal pectinases. Recently, ccSNF1, a gene
encoding a protein homologous to the yeast protein kinase SNF1 required
for expression of glucose-repressed genes, was isolated from the maize
pathogen Cochliobolus carbonum (10). Mutants disrupted in
this gene showed a reduced pathogenicity, and genes coding for
hydrolytic enzymes were down-regulated.
Colletotrichum lindemuthianum is a pathogenic fungus that is
the causal agent of bean anthracnose. Conidia germinate on the surface
of the aerial part of the plant and differentiate a specialized cell
called appressorium, which allows the parasite to penetrate plant
tissues (11). During the first stages of infection, C. lindemuthianum establishes a biotrophic interaction with the host plant. 3-4 days post-inoculation, the parasite develops secondary hyphae and becomes necrotrophic, causing tissue necrosis. In a previous
work, we characterized two endoPG genes, CLPG1 and
CLPG2, from C. lindemuthianum (12, 13).
CLPG1 encodes the major endoPG isoform that is produced
during axenic culture of the fungus on pectin and during the
necrotrophic stage of infection. CLPG2 is early and only
transiently expressed at the onset of plant infection and on pectin.
Recently we developed the use of
GFP1 as a reporter gene to
study the transcriptional regulation of CLPG2 (14). The
promoter of CLPG2 allowed expression of the reporter gene
during the germination of conidia on pectin medium and during
appressorium formation both on a glass slide and during pathogenesis,
which indicates that diverse signals can induce endoPG gene
transcription. The main goal of the present study was to look for
cis-acting elements in the promoter of CLPG2
involved in the induction of this gene under various situations.
Deletions of the promoter delineated a 27-bp fragment required for
CLPG2 induction on pectin and during appressorium formation.
It is shown that this DNA fragment binds protein factors and contains
two essential elements that are highly homologous to the yeast
filamentation and invasion response element (FRE).
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Fungal Culture and Protoplast Transformation--
C.
lindemuthianum race was maintained on synthetic agar
medium as described (15) or grown on 9-cm cellophane disks laid down
onto the surface of 20 ml of solid ANM medium (2% malt extract, 0.1%
bactopeptone, 2% D(+)-glucose, 2% agar) in Petri dishes. After inoculation with 105 conidia/dish, the mycelium was
allowed to develop for 48 h at 24 °C before being transferred
for 10 h on solid medium supplemented with apple pectin (16) or for
24 h on bean cotyledonary leaves in a highly humid atmosphere.
Transformation of C. lindemuthianum was done according to
Ref. 17 except that the protoplasts were purified by the flotation
method (18). Transformants were regenerated on a medium containing
hygromycin at a final concentration of 50 µg·ml 1.
Mapping of Transcription Start Site--
The 5' end of the
CLPG2 mRNA was determined by 5' rapid amplification of
cDNA ends. Total RNA from pectin-induced C. lindemuthianum mycelium was prepared and submitted to first strand
cDNA synthesis using a gene-specific reverse primer pg2+1207 (Table
I) and SuperScriptTM II
(Invitrogen). The original mRNA template was removed by treatment with RNase H. cDNA was purified with GlassMAX® Spin Cartridge, and a homopolymeric tail was added to the 3' end using terminal transferase and dCTP. PCR amplification was accomplished using Taq DNA polymerase, the nested gene-specific reverse primer
pg2+178 (Table I), and a C-tailing annealing primer. 5' rapid
amplification of cDNA ends products were cloned in pGEM®-T vector
(Promega) and sequenced.
Promoter Fusion, Deletions, and Subcloning in GFP Vector--
To
fuse the CLPG2 promoter to the coding sequence of the GFP,
NcoI and BamHI restriction sites were introduced,
respectively, in the 5' and 3' ends of the promoter fragment by PCR.
The construct PG2-490 (see Fig. 1A) was obtained
by PCR amplification using the CLPG2 genomic clone (13) as a
template and pg2-490 and pg2+178 (Table I) as 5' and 3' primers,
respectively. The PCR product was digested by BamHI and
NcoI and cloned in the blue SGFP-TYG-nos SK plasmid (19)
restricted with BamHI and NcoI, resulting in a
translational fusion of the CLPG2 promoter with the GFP
gene, which included six codons of the CLPG2 coding
sequence. Constructs PG2-90, PG2-63, and
PG2-90:TLE were obtained through the same strategy using,
respectively, pg2-90, pg2-63, and pg2-90:TLE as 5' end primers (Table
I). Deletion PG2-490 27 was generated by the
GenEditorTM in vitro site-directed mutagenesis
system (Promega) using the 5'-phosphorylated primer pg2-490 27
according to the recommendations of the supplier.
To constitutively express GFP, the GFP coding sequence was fused to a
405-bp fragment of the GPDA promoter from Aspergillus nidulans, which was obtained by amplification with primers gpd-S and gpd-R (Table I) and pAN7-1 vector (20) as template. The construct
containing 3×TLE-90 was prepared by annealing primers 3×TLE-90-S and
3×TLE-90-R. The resulting DNA fragment, which contained the
5'-SstII and 3'-BamHI restriction sites, was
cloned in front of the 405-bp GPDA promoter of the
constitutive GFP-expressing vector restricted with SstII and
BamHI.
Fluorescence Microscopy--
Wells of enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay microplates were filled with 100 µl of liquid
medium supplemented with D(+)-glucose or apple pectin as
above, inoculated with 103 conidia, and incubated for
24 h at 24 °C in the dark. For appressorium differentiation,
100 µl of droplets containing 103 conidia were laid down
onto glass slides and incubated for 48 h at 24 °C in a highly
humid atmosphere in plastic boxes. For infection experiments,
hypocotyls of 7-day-old bean seedlings were excised and inoculated with
5 µl of a suspension containing 5 × 102 conidia.
After 48 h at 24 °C, strips of epidermal tissue were harvested
and mounted in distilled water for microscopy. All of the samples were
observed under fluorescence microscopy with an inverted microscope
Leitz DM IRBE and a computer monitored digital color camera (Photonic
Science). The figures were prepared from digitized images, and
fluorescence was quantified using ImageProPlus (Media Cybernetic).
Preparation of C. lindemuthianum Protein Extracts--
The
mycelium that was grown on glucose or pectin or recovered from
inoculated cotyledonary leaves was washed with water and ground to a
fine powder under liquid nitrogen. A crude protein extract was prepared
by stirring the powder in extraction buffer (25 mM Hepes,
pH 7.8, 12% glycerol, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 10 µM ZnCl2) containing a
fungal protease and phosphatase inhibitor mixture (Sigma). After incubation on ice for 1 h, the extract was centrifuged at
10,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The recovered supernatant was
retained at the source of soluble protein (1-2 mg protein/ml).
Gel Mobility Shift Assays (GMSAs)--
All of the DNA fragments
used for GMSA were generated by annealing two complementary primers.
The probe used for DNA binding reactions consisted of two annealed
complementary primers, gmsa-S and gmsa-R (Table I), labeled by end
filling with the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase using
[ -32P]dCTP. DNA-protein binding reactions were
performed by incubating 15 µg of total protein and 10 fmol of the
labeled probe at 22 °C for 20 min in 30 µl of 25 mM
Hepes, pH 7.8, 12% (v/v) glycerol, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 µM ZnCl2,
acetylated bovine serum albumin (0.25 mg/ml), 2 µg of
poly(dI-dC). In competition experiments, unlabeled DNA was added to the
reaction medium in a 50-1000-fold excess over the labeled probe. The
DNA-protein complexes were separated on a 10% nondenaturing
polyacrylamide gel in 1× Tris-borate-EDTA buffer.
 |
RESULTS |
Deletion Analysis of the CLPG2 Promoter--
Previous experiments
using transgenic strains containing a CLPG2-GFP construct
showed that a promoter fragment of 668 bp was sufficient to induce
expression of the reporter gene in the mycelium grown on pectin and
during appressorium formation both in vitro on glass slides
and in planta at early stages of pathogenesis (14). The
general organization of the CLPG2 promoter
(PG2-490) is depicted on Fig.
1A. Two transcription start
sites were identified 178 and 166 bp upstream from the initiation codon
by 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends-PCR, corresponding to
positions +1 and +12, respectively. A putative TATA (TATAA) box was
located at position 40.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Effect of promoter deletions on expression of
CLPG2-GFP fusions. A, organization of the
668-bp promoter region indicating the two transcription start sites at
positions +1 and +12 and the putative TATA box (gray
square). Promoter fragments, corresponding to nucleotides 490 to
+178 (PG2-490), 90 to +178 (PG2-90), 63 to
+178 (PG2-63), and a full-length promoter in which 27 bp
were removed from nucleotide 90 to nucleotide 63
(PG2-490 27) were fused to the GFP reporter gene.
B, detection by fluorescence microscopy of GFP expression
under the control of the various CLPG2 promoter
fragments. For each construct and condition, the transformants
were observed after 24 h of growth on glucose (column
a) or pectin medium (column b) and after 48 h on
glass slides for appressorium formation (column c) or on
hypocotyl segments for pathogenesis induction (column d).
Scale bar, 10 µm. A, appressorium;
C, conidia; GT, germ tube.
|
|
To identify cis-acting elements involved in transcriptional
control in vitro and in planta,
CLPG2-GFP constructs harboring sequential 5' deletions of
the promoter region of CLPG2 were introduced in the genome
of C. lindemuthianum (Fig. 1A). For each
construct, at least four independent transformants were isolated. The
presence of GFP was verified by PCR, and the number of GFP copies
integrated into the fungal genome was evaluated by Southern blotting.
Accumulation of GFP in conidia was detected by fluorescence microscopy.
Fig. 1B shows that induction of GFP expression by pectin and
appressorium formation was of the same magnitude in transformants
containing the full-length promoter (PG2-490) or the
promoter deleted to 90 (PG2-90). However, deletion of a
further 27 bp (construct PG2-63) abolished induction of the
reporter gene during the three growth conditions. Removal of this 27-bp
sequence only from the full-length promoter (construct
PG2-490 27) did not modify the promoter activity, showing
that additional regulatory elements were present upstream on the
promoter (Fig. 1B).
To confirm that the construct PG2-90 induced accumulation of
GFP transcript on pectin medium, a Northern blot experiment was performed on RNA extracted from the mycelium grown on glucose and
transferred on glucose or pectin. Hybridization with probes corresponding to CLPG2 DNA or to the GFP coding sequence
showed the simultaneous accumulation of CLPG2 and GFP RNAs
on pectin medium (data not shown). Taken together these results
indicated that the 27-bp DNA fragment contained regulatory elements
allowing GFP transcription in the fungus grown on pectin medium and
during appressorium formation in vitro and in
planta at the very first stages of pathogenesis.
Gel Mobility Shift Assays--
The 27-bp fragment corresponding to
nucleotides 90 to 63 was chosen as a probe for GMSA (Fig.
2). Protein extracts were prepared from
the mycelium, which was grown on glucose and subsequently transferred
either on glucose or pectin or on bean leaves. In the latter case, the
fungus was allowed to grow on a cellophane sheet laid down onto the
surface of cotyledonary leaves of the susceptible bean cultivar P12S.
Microscopy analysis showed that in these conditions, 24-48 h after
inoculation, appressoria were fully differentiated and started to
develop primary hyphae through the cellophane sheet, thereby mimicking
the first stages of pathogenesis. Removal of the cellophane sheet
allowed recovery of the mycelium.

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Detection of DNA-protein interactions by
GMSA. GMSAs were performed by using protein extracts derived from
pectin-induced (A) or plant-induced (B and
C) mycelium. Each line corresponds to DNA binding reactions
using 15 µg of protein and 10 fmol of radiolabeled probe in the
absence ( ) or in the presence of a 50-, 200-, or 1000-fold molar
excess of unlabeled probe as specific competitor. The arrows
indicate the specific DNA-protein complex. C, GMSA performed
with plant-induced protein (pathogenicity) in the absence ( ) or
presence of increasing proportions (0.01, 0.1, 0.5, and 2%, w/v) of
the chaotropic agent deoxycholic acid (DOC).
|
|
In preliminary experiments, we compared the formation of
protein-DNA complexes obtained with protein prepared from isolated nuclei or from mycelium. In each case, the same major protein-DNA complex was observed on the gel as shown in Fig. 2 (A and
B) with proteins extracted from the mycelium. Accordingly,
total protein extracts were used for further experiments. The signal
was more intense when the probe was incubated with protein extracts
prepared from the mycelium grown on pectin or during pathogenesis, but a signal was also observable with proteins extracted from the mycelium
grown on glucose. Competition experiments carried out with an excess of
the unlabeled DNA probe efficiently eliminated appearance of the
signal, whereas nonspecific competitor DNA did not affect the binding
(Fig. 2, A and B). The addition of deoxycholic acid, a chaotropic agent that dissociates protein complexes, led to
disappearance of the signal (Fig. 2C), suggesting that
protein-protein interactions are required for the formation of the
protein-DNA complex.
DNA Sequences Homologous to the Yeast Filamentation Response
Element Are Involved in Protein Binding--
Analysis of the 27-bp
sequence revealed the presence of two different putative regulatory
elements (Fig. 3A). The first
element showed a strong homology with the eukaryotic TCS motif
containing the TEA/ATTS consensus sequence CATTCY, which binds
transcriptional factors belonging to the TEA/ATTS family. Therefore,
this element was designated TLE because it contains the sequence
GATTCY. A second class of element containing the consensus sequence
WN(1, 2)AAN(1, 2)A was called the PRE-like
element (PLE) according to its homology with the yeast DNA regulatory
sequence WGAAACA called the pheromone response element (PRE), which
interacts with the STE12 trans-acting factor. Four TLEs and
PLEs were detected along the CLPG2 promoter (Fig.
3A). In yeast, a combination of TCS and PRE has been shown to play a major role in the regulation of genes during the
filamentation and invasive response through the binding of TEC1 and
STE12 transcription factors (21). Remarkably, TLEs and PLEs are also
arranged in tandem in the promoter of CLPG2.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Occurrence and analysis of PLE and TLE in the
CLPG2 promoter. A, the nature and
position of TLEs (gray ovals) and PLEs (black
rectangles) were deduced from PG2-490 and
PG2-90 by sequence homology with the consensus sequences of
the yeast PRE and of the yeast and A. nidulans
(A.n.) TCS. The signs (+) or ( )
indicate the DNA strand where TLE or PLE are located. W and
Y represent A or T and C or T, respectively. B
and C, determination of the DNA sequences involved in the
formation of the DNA-protein binding complex. The position of PLE and
TLE (TLE-90, PLE-79, and PLE-71) in the 27-bp radiolabeled probe used
in the GMSA experiments is shown. B, specific DNA-protein
complex (arrow) was detected with labeled probe and
plant-induced protein in the absence ( ) or in the presence of a
50-fold molar excess of unlabeled competitors. Competitors are either
the unlabeled probe (probe) or a repetition of three TLE-90
elements (3×TLE-90), three PLE-79 elements (3×PLE-79), or three
PLE-71 elements (3×PLE-71). C, GMSA experiments were
performed using mutated 3×PLE-71 as 50-fold molar excess unlabeled
competitor. The mutations consisted of replacing the first T by a C
(3×M1), the pair of As by two Cs (3×M2), GC by TT (3×M3), and AT by
CG (3×M4) as indicated. GMSA performed with protein extracts from
pectin-induced mycelium and 10 fmol of radiolabeled probe corresponding
to the 27-bp region (lane 1), the 27-bp region mutated in
TLE-90 and PLE-79 (lane 2), or in TLE-90 and PLE-71
(lane 3). The mutations consisted of replacing A doublets by
G doublets.
|
|
To determine whether the binding of protein factors on the 27-bp
fragment was due to the presence of TLEs and PLEs, GMSA was performed
with the 27-bp fragment as the probe and double-stranded oligonucleotides corresponding to three repetitions of either TLE-90
(3×TLE-90), PLE-79 (3×PLE-79), or PLE-71 (3×PLE-71) as cold
competitors (Fig. 3B). A 50 molar excess of 3×PLE-79 and 3×PLE-71 was sufficient to compete very efficiently with the formation of the complex (Fig. 3B), whereas a 1000-fold excess of
3×TLE-90 was necessary to disrupt the binding (data not shown). Thus,
the proteins binding to the 27-bp DNA fragment appeared to have more affinity for a combination of TLE and PLE than for three TLEs. To
further identify mutations in PLEs that alter the binding of nuclear
proteins, a competition experiment was performed in the presence of
different double-stranded mutated PLE-79 oligonucleotides containing
one or two base substitutions compared with the wild type sequence
(Fig. 3C). Oligonucleotides M1, M2, and M4, which contained
PLE mutated in the first nucleotide, the central adenine doublet, and
the terminal adenine residue, respectively, failed to inhibit the
formation of the complex. Thus, the nucleotides residues that are
totally conserved between the yeast STE12 binding site and the C. lindemuthianum PLEs are essential for the binding of protein factors.
In yeast, TEC1 and STE12 bind as heterodimers on FRE. To determine
whether a combination of PLE and TLE can also bind protein factors,
GMSA was performed with double-strand DNA fragments corresponding to
the 27-bp fragment mutagenized in each of the elements (Fig. 4A). It was found that
mutagenesis of TLE-90 alone did not significantly modify the binding of
proteins, whereas mutation of PLE-79 and to a lesser extent of PLE-71
strongly increased the formation of the protein-DNA complex. Mutation
of TLE-90 and PLE-71 eliminated the binding of protein factors (Fig.
4A). The same oligonucleotides were used as competitors with
the wild type sequence as probe (Fig. 4B). Mutations in
TLE-90 or PLE-71 strongly reduced the competition, showing that these
mutations decreased the affinity for nuclear factors. Altogether, these
experiments showed that a combination of TLE-90 and PLE-71 binds
nuclear factors with higher efficiency than two PLEs.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
A combination of TLE and PLE is required to
bind protein factors. A, GMSA was performed with
protein extracts from pectin-induced mycelium and 10 fmol of
radiolabeled probe corresponding to the wild type 27-bp region
(lane 1) or the 27 bp mutated in TLE, PLE, or both
(lanes 2-7). The mutations consisted of replacing A
doublets by G doublets. B, GMSA was performed with protein
extracts from pectin induced mycelium and 10 fmol of radiolabeled probe
corresponding to the wild type 27-bp region in the absence ( ) or in
the presence of a 50-fold molar excess of unlabeled competitors. The
mutations consisted of replacing A doublets by G doublets. For both
experiments, quantification of the signal corresponding to the
DNA-protein complex was done using a PhosphorImager system.
C, effect of double mutations in TLE-90 and PLE-79
(lane 2) present in the PG2-90 construct
(lane 1) on the induction of GFP accumulation by pectin. The
data represent the means ± S.D. of the specific fluorescence
measured on protein extracts from four independents transformants grown
on glucose or pectin.
|
|
In a further experiment, it was determined that transformants harboring
GFP under the control of a CLPG2 promoter mutated in the
TLE-90 and PLE-71 expressed only a basal level of fluorescence (Fig.
4C). Thus, the ability of DNA fragments to form a complex with proteins in vitro is correlated with the promoter
activity in vivo.
Transcriptional Repression Mediated by PRE-like Elements--
In
yeast, KSS1 is a negative regulator of invasive growth and binds in its
unphosphorylated form to STE12, thereby repressing the transcription of
target genes containing FRE (22). Because mutation of one PLE increased
the formation of the protein-DNA complex observed in inducing
conditions, we tested the hypothesis that PLEs could be involved in the
repression of CLPG2 in the fungus grown on glucose. A
synthetic promoter was constructed by fusing three copies of PLE-71 to
a constitutive promoter from the A. nidulans GPDA gene (23).
This DNA fragment was fused to GFP, and C. lindemuthianum
strains harboring this construct were analyzed by quantitative
fluorescence microscopy. The level of fluorescence exhibited by the
strains expressing the GFP gene under the control of the
GPDA promoter was of the same magnitude when grown on
glucose or pectin. However, the addition of 3×PLE-71 strongly reduced
the expression on glucose, whereas accumulation of GFP was unchanged on
pectin medium (Fig. 5). Thus, a
combination of PLEs is sufficient to confer glucose repression on a
constitutive promoter.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of three copies of PLE on GFP
expression. A synthetic promoter was constructed by fusing three
repetitions of PLE-71 to a 405-bp constitutive promoter from the
A. nidulans GPDA gene. A, comparison
of fluorescence intensity of transformants expressing GFP under the
control of PG2-490 (column 1), GPDA
(column 2), and 3×PLE-GPDA (column
3). The data were obtained by quantifying at least 110 fluorescence microscopic views from three independent transformants
grown on glucose or pectin. B, microscopic views of
representative transformants grown on glucose or pectin. Scale
bar, 10 µm. C, conidia; GT, germ
tube.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Despite the long lasting interest of plant pathology and
biotechnology in fungal pectinases, the molecular mechanisms governing their expression are still unknown. In the present study, we report on
the identification of regulatory elements involved in the
transcriptional control of CLPG2, a pectinase gene of
C. lindemuthianum. These elements bind protein factors and
are essential for expression of a reporter gene during saprophytic
growth of the fungus on pectin and during interaction with the host plant.
A search for homology with previously described nuclear factor-binding
sites revealed the presence of putative TCS. TCS have been reported to
bind transcription factors of the TEA/ATTS family mainly involved in
developmental processes in fungi and higher eukaryotes (24). A second
sequence was identified by homology with the yeast PRE found in
promoters of genes involved in the mating response (25). A combination
of the CLPG2 elements, called TLE and PLE, was sufficient to
bind protein factors and ensure promoter activity. These effects were
totally lost upon mutagenesis of these elements. Moreover, a construct
comprising three PLEs fused to a constitutive promoter was able to
repress the constitutive expression of a reporter gene in the fungus
grown on glucose medium. Taken together, these results show that the
regulation of CLPG2 requires the binding of transcription
factors to a DNA sequence comprising TLE and PLE. Up to now, such
combinations of elements were not reported in true filamentous fungi.
In yeast, a combination of TCS and PRE, also called the FRE, mediates
the binding of an heterodimer formed by the association of the
transcriptional activators TEC1 and STE12 (21, 26). The MAPK KSS1 plays
a key role in the transcriptional control of genes regulated by FRE
both by derepression and activation. Indeed, the unphosphorylated form
of KSS1 is part of a protein complex that also contains STE12, TEC1,
and the inhibitory proteins DIG1 or DIG2. Upon phosphorylation through
a MAPK cascade, KSS1 dissociates from the complex, thereby
destabilizing the STE12-DIG association leading to derepression of the
target genes. Simultaneously, phosphorylation of STE12 by KSS1
activates the STE12-driven transcription. The transcriptional
repression activity mediated by C. lindemuthianum PLEs
strongly suggests that similar mechanisms operate in this fungus.
The hypothesis that CLPG2 is regulated by transcription
factors related to the yeast STE12 and TEC1 proteins is strengthened by
the recent finding that expression of a polygalacturonase gene, PGU1, is induced in yeast during the haploid-invasive growth
and diploid pseudohyphal development (27). This induction requires a
functional filamentation MAPK pathway, including the presence of TEC1
and STE12. Thus, during the yeast invasive response, the same molecular
mechanisms activate genes involved in cell elongation and
differentiation and genes that encode extracellular proteins, allowing
the successful colonization of their natural substrates. Related
results have been obtained for two animal pathogens, Candida albicans and Cryptoccocus neoformans. In C. albicans, the TEA/ATTS transcription factor CaTEC1 controls hyphal
development and expression of genes encoding extracellular proteinases
(28). Similarly, a STE12 homologue from C. neoformans
regulates expression of virulence genes, notably encoding an
extracellular phospholipase (29). Recently, a STE12-like
gene that plays an essential role in sexual reproduction,
STEA, was isolated from a true filamentous fungi, A. nidulans (30). However, the role of this factor in the expression of pectinase genes was not investigated.
The likely involvement of transcriptional activators homologous to
STE12 in the regulation of the C. lindemuthianum pectinase gene CLPG2 could be related to the presence of MAPKs
belonging to the FUS3/KSS1 family. Interestingly, MAPKs homologous to
the yeast FUS3/KSS1 have been identified in a number of phytopathogenic fungi (31) where they play essential roles in pathogenicity. Thus,
disruption of the MAPK FMK1 in the tomato root pathogen Fusarium oxysporum greatly reduced the expression of the
endopectate lyase gene pl1 (32).
According to the results presented in this paper, homologues of the
yeast STE12 and TEC1 factors are likely to play a key role in pectinase
gene expression, suggesting that mechanisms regulating invasive growth
share striking similarities between saprophytic and pathogenic
microorganisms. Such similarities were already pointed out for
dimorphic fungi able to switch between a yeast and a multicellular
invasive filamentous form (21).
From our data and the above report, it emerges that the regulation of
CLPG2 might comply with the model proposed in Fig.
6. Thus, in repressive medium (glucose
medium), the MAPK pathway would not be activated, and binding of
protein factors related to the yeast STE12 would repress expression of
the gene. In inductive medium (pectin medium) or at early stages of
pathogenesis (appressorium development), activation of the MAPK pathway
would induce a rearrangement of the protein-DNA complex comprising a
STE12-like factor and a protein belonging to TEA/ATTS family of
transcription factors. Isolation and functional analysis of these
transcription factors are currently
underway.2 Their
characterization will help unravel the signaling pathways leading to
induction of fungal pathogenicity.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Model for the transcriptional regulation of
CLPG2. A, under repressive conditions
(glucose medium), binding of factors related to the yeast STE12
(gray ovals) represses expression of CLPG2.
B, upon induction by pectin and pathogenesis (appressorium
differentiation), the activation of a MAPK pathway leads to the binding
of a transcription factor related to the yeast TEC1 (black
symbols) and to a formation of an heterodimer with a STE12-like
protein that induces transcription of CLPG2.
|
|
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Philippe Rech for advice in GMSA
experiments and Alain Jauneau for help with fluorescence microscopy.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by a grant from Région
Midi-Pyrénées and by a fellowship from the Ministère
de la Recherche et de la Technologie (to C. H.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
33-05-62-19-35-03; Fax: 33-05-62-19-35-25; E-mail:
dumas@smcv.ups-tlse.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 31, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201489200
2
C. Herbert and B. Dumas, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GFP, green
fluorescent protein;
FRE, filamentation and invasion response element;
PRE, pheromone response element;
TCS, TEA/ATTS consensus sequence(s);
PLE, PRE-like elements;
TLE, TCS-like element;
GMSA, gel mobility shift
assay;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
endoPG, endopolygalacturonase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ten Have, A.,
Mulder, W.,
Visser, J.,
and Van Kan, J. A.
(1998)
Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.
11,
1009-1016[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Shieh, M. T.,
Brown, R. L.,
Whitehead, M. P.,
Cary, J. W.,
Cotty, P. J.,
Cleveland, T. E.,
and Dean, R. A.
(1997)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
63,
3548-3552[Abstract]
|
| 3.
|
Rogers, L. M.,
Kim, Y. K.,
Guo, W.,
Gonzalez-Candelas, L., Li, D.,
and Kolattukudy, P. E.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
9813-9818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Yakoby, N.,
Beno-Moualem, D.,
Keen, N. T.,
Dinoor, A.,
Pines, O.,
and Prusky, D.
(2001)
Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.
14,
988-995[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Prusky, D.,
McEvoy, J. L.,
Leverentz, B.,
and Conway, W. S.
(2001)
Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.
14,
1105-1113[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Wubben, J. P.,
ten Have, A.,
van Kan, J. A.,
and Visser, J.
(2000)
Curr. Genet.
37,
152-157[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Fraissinet-tachet, L.,
and Fèvre, M.
(1996)
Curr. Microbiol.
33,
49-53[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Hugouvieux, V.,
Centis, S.,
Lafitte, C.,
and Esquerré-Tugayé, M.-T.
(1997)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
63,
2287-2292[Abstract]
|
| 9.
|
Hugouvieux-Cotte-Pattat, N.,
Condemine, G.,
Nasser, W.,
and Reverchon, S.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
50,
213-257[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Tonukari, N. J.,
Scott-Craig, J. S.,
and Walton, J. D.
(2000)
Plant Cell
12,
237-248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Perfect, S. E.,
Hughes, H. B.,
O'Connell, R. J.,
and Green, J.
(1999)
Fungal. Genet. Biol.
27,
186-198[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Centis, S.,
Dumas, B.,
Fournier, J.,
Marolda, M.,
and Esquerré-Tugayé, M.-T.
(1996)
Gene (Amst.)
170,
125-129[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Centis, S.,
Guillas, I.,
Séjalon, N.,
Esquerré-Tugayé, M.-T.,
and Dumas, B.
(1997)
Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.
10,
769-775[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Dumas, B.,
Centis, S.,
Sarrazin, N.,
and Esquerré-Tugayé, M. T.
(1999)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65,
1769-1771[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Bannerot, H.
(1965)
Ann. Amélior. Plantes
15,
201-222
|
| 16.
|
Barthe, J. P.,
Cantenys, D.,
and Touzé, A.
(1981)
Phytopathology
100,
162-171
|
| 17.
|
Hargreaves, J.,
and Turner, G.
(1992)
in
Molecular Plant Pathology: A Practical Approach
(Gurr, S. J.
, MacPherson, M. J.
, and Bowles, D. J., eds)
, pp. 79-97, Oxford University Press, Oxford
|
| 18.
|
Yelton, M. M.,
Hamer, J. E.,
and Timberlake, W. E.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
1470-1474[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Sheen, J.,
Hwang, S.,
Niwa, Y.,
Kobayashi, H.,
and Galbraith, D. W.
(1995)
Plant J.
8,
777-784[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Punt, P.,
Oliver, R. P.,
Dingemanse, M. A.,
Pouwels, P. H.,
and Van Den Hondel, C. A. M. J. J.
(1987)
Gene (Amst.)
56,
117-124[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Madhani, H. D.,
and Fink, G. R.
(1998)
Trends Cell Biol.
8,
348-353[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Bardwell, L.,
Cook, J. G.,
Voora, D.,
Baggott, D. M.,
Martinez, A. R.,
and Thorner, J.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2887-2898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Punt, P. J.,
Kuyvenhoven, A.,
and van den Hondel, C. A.
(1995)
Gene (Amst.)
158,
119-123[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Madhani, H. D.,
and Fink, G. R.
(1997)
Science
275,
1314-1317[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Hagen, D. C.,
McCaffrey, G.,
and Sprague, G. F., Jr.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
2952-2961[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Gancedo, J. M.
(2001)
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
25,
107-123[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Madhani, H. D.,
Galitski, T.,
Lander, E. S.,
and Fink, G. R.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
12530-12535[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Schweizer, A.,
Rupp, S.,
Taylor, B. N.,
Rollinghoff, M.,
and Schroppel, K.
(2000)
Mol. Microbiol.
38,
435-445[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Chang, Y. C.,
Penoyer, L. A.,
and Kwon-Chung, K. J.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
3258-3263[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Vallim, M. A.,
Miller, K. Y.,
and Miller, B. L.
(2000)
Mol. Microbiol.
36,
290-301[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Tucker, S.,
and Talbot, N.
(2001)
Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.
39,
385-417[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Di Pietro, A.,
Garcia-MacEira, F. I.,
Meglecz, E.,
and Roncero, M. I.
(2001)
Mol. Microbiol.
39,
1140-1152[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Siriputthaiwan, A. Jauneau, C. Herbert, D. Garcin, and B. Dumas
Functional analysis of CLPT1, a Rab/GTPase required for protein secretion and pathogenesis in the plant fungal pathogen Colletotrichum lindemuthianum
J. Cell Sci.,
January 15, 2005;
118(2):
323 - 329.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|