Extracellular and Cytoplasmic Domains of Endoglin Interact with
the Transforming Growth Factor-
Receptors I and II*
Mercedes
Guerrero-Esteo
,
Tilman
Sánchez-Elsner§,
Ainhoa
Letamendia¶, and
Carmelo
Bernabéu
From the Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Consejo
Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Velázquez 144, Madrid 28006, Spain
Received for publication, December 17, 2001, and in revised form, May 9, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Endoglin is an auxiliary component of the
transforming growth factor-
(TGF-
) receptor system, able to
associate with the signaling receptor types I (T
RI) and II (T
RII)
in the presence of ligand and to modulate the cellular responses to
TGF-
1. Endoglin cannot bind ligand on its own but requires the
presence of the signaling receptors, supporting a critical role for the
interaction between endoglin and T
RI or T
RII. This study shows
that full-length endoglin interacts with both T
RI and T
RII,
independently of their kinase activation state or the presence of
exogenous TGF-
1. Truncated constructs encoding either the
extracellular or the cytoplasmic domains of endoglin demonstrated that
the association with the signaling receptors occurs through both
extracellular and cytoplasmic domains. However, a more specific mapping
revealed that the endoglin/T
RI interaction was different from that
of endoglin/T
RII. T
RII interacts with the amino acid region
437-558 of the extracellular domain of endoglin, whereas T
RI
interacts not only with the region 437-558 but also with the protein
region located between amino acid 437 and the N terminus. Both T
RI
and T
RII interact with the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin, but
T
RI only interacts when the kinase domain is inactive, whereas
T
RII remains associated in its active and inactive forms. Upon
association, T
RI and T
RII phosphorylate the endoglin cytoplasmic
domain, and then T
RI, but not T
RII, kinase dissociates from the
complex. Conversely, endoglin expression results in an altered
phosphorylation state of T
RII, T
RI, and downstream Smad proteins
as well as a modulation of TGF-
signaling, as measured by the
reporter gene expression. These results suggest that by interacting
through its extracellular and cytoplasmic domains with the signaling
receptors, endoglin might affect TGF-
responses.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Members of the transforming growth factor-
(TGF-
)1 superfamily (1, 2)
exert their biological effects through binding to a heteromeric complex
containing two different transmembrane serine/threonine kinases known
as type I and type II signaling receptors (3, 4). Upon ligand binding
to the type II receptor, the association between type I and type II
receptors is induced, leading to phosphorylation and activation of the
type I receptor by the constitutively active type II receptor (4, 5).
Then, activated type I receptor propagates intracellular signal to the nucleus by phosphorylating members of the Smad family of proteins (4,
6, 7).
The TGF-
receptor complex also contains two auxiliary co-receptors
named endoglin and betaglycan (8-10). These are transmembrane proteins
with large extracellular domains and serine/threonine-rich cytoplasmic
regions without consensus signaling motifs. Endoglin binds TGF-
1,
TGF-
3, activin-A, BMP-2, and BMP-7 in the presence of the signaling
receptor types I and II (8, 11, 12) and modulates
TGF-
1-dependent cellular responses (11, 13, 14). It is
highly expressed on endothelial cells and several lines of evidence
support an important role for endoglin in cardiovascular development
and vascular remodeling. Thus, endoglin expression is regulated during
heart development in humans and chicken (15, 16), and genetic
inactivation of endoglin in the mouse shows that embryos homozygous for
mutant endoglin die at 10-10.5 days postcoitum due to vascular and
cardiac anomalies (17-19). Furthermore, genes encoding endoglin and
ALK-1 (a type I TGF-
receptor) are targets for the autosomal
dominant disorder known as hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia
(20-22). Despite the data supporting an important role for endoglin in
the TGF-
system, the molecular basis of endoglin function is still
poorly understood.
Several lines of evidence suggest that endoglin is not a receptor
per se: (a) in endothelial cells, only a small
percentage of endoglin molecules is capable of binding TGF-
;
(b) endoglin does not bind ligand on its own but requires
the presence of the signaling receptors (11, 12), (c) even
in the presence of the signaling receptors, ligand association with
endoglin can only be visualized in the presence of a cross-linking
agent (12); and (d) cross-linking of endoglin transfectants
with radiolabeled TGF-
showed the existence of ligand-free endoglin
associated with TGF-
-loaded signaling receptors (11). All of these
data suggest that endoglin association with the signaling receptors is
critical for endoglin access to ligand and for its modulation of the
ligand-induced cellular responses. Here, we have investigated the
domains involved in the association between endoglin and the signaling
receptors as well as the consequences of this interaction on the
phosphorylation status of the proteins involved.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture and Transfections--
The monkey kidney COS-7 and
the rat myoblast L6E9 cell lines were grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf
serum in 5% CO2 at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with expression vectors encoding wild type and mutant constructs of endoglin, T
RI, or T
RII using LipofectAMINE Plus as indicated by the manufacturer (Invitrogen). Functional assays were carried out 48 h after
transfection. Treatment of cells with recombinant human TGF-
1
(Peprotech) was performed at a concentration of 10 ng/ml for 30 min.
Expression Vectors--
Wild type human endoglin cDNA
subcloned into the pCMV5 vector (11) was used to derive the truncated
endoglin constructs by PCR amplification. The resulting PCR fragments
were cloned into pDisplay (Invitrogen) expression vector, which allows
expression of proteins on the cell surface. All endoglin constructs
expressed from pDisplay contain the influenza hemagglutinin epitope HA
at the NH2 terminus. The oligonucleotides used to prime the
PCR synthesis of endoglin fragments were as follows: TMCT-Endo
(amino acids 573-658), GAAGATCTAACATCATCAGCCCTGAC and
TCCCCGCGGGGCTATGCCATGCTGCT; EC-Endo (amino acids 26-586),
GGGGCCCAGCCGGCCGAAACAGTCCATTGT and TCCCCGCGGGGCCTTTGCTTGT; ECTM-Endo
(amino acids 26-614), GGGGCCCAGCCGGCCGAAACAGTCCATTGT and
TCCCCGCGGTCAGTAGATGTACCA; 558-Endo (amino acids 26-558),
GGGGCCCAGCCGGCCGAAACAGTCCATTGT and TCCCCGCGGCCCGGTCTTGGG; 437-Endo
(amino acids 26-437), GGGGCCCAGCCGGCCGAAACAGTCCATTGT and
TCCCCGCGGTTTCCGCTGTGG; 437/586-Endo (amino acids 437-586), GGGGCCCAGCCGGCCGAAAAAGGTGCACTGC and TCCCCGCGGGCCTTTGCTTGT. The oligonucleotides were designed to introduce a SfiI
restriction site at the 5'-end (except for the TMCT-Endo mutant, which
contains a BglII restriction site) and a SacII
site at the 3'-end of the endoglin DNA fragments. The reverse primers
for TMCT-Endo and ECTM-Endo include a stop codon. All primer sequences
for this study are given from 5' to 3'. Full-length endoglin was also
subcloned into the pDisplay vector to generate an HA epitope-tagged
endoglin. The construct was engineered by PCR using forward primer that included a SfiI restriction site
(GGGGCCCAGCCGGCCGAAACAGTCCATTGT) and reverse primer that included a
stop codon and a SacII site (TCCCCGCGGGGCTATGCCATGCTGCT).
The pCMV5 expression constructs containing cDNAs for T
RII/HA
(tagged at the COOH terminus with the influenza hemagglutinin (HA)
epitope), HA/T
RII (K277R) (tagged at the NH2 terminus
with the HA epitope), T
RI/HA, T
RI (T204D)/HA, and T
RI
(K232R)/HA have been described (23) and were a generous gift from Dr.
Liliana Attisano (University of Toronto, Canada).
GST Fusion Constructs--
To generate the GST-Ecyt fusion
protein, the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin was amplified by PCR, using
forward (5'-GAATTCTGGTACATCTACTCGCACACGC-3') and reverse
(5'-GGCTATGCCATGCTGCTGGTGG-3') primers, and the product was cloned into
pGEX-1
T (Amersham Biosciences). To generate the GST-GS/T
RI fusion
protein, the juxtamembrane and GS domains of T
RI (amino acids
146-207) were amplified by PCR, using forward (5'-CGGGATCCATCTGCCACAACCGC-3') and reverse
(5'-CGGAATTCTTGTAACACAATAGTTCTCGC-3') primers, and the product was
cloned into pGEX4T-3 (Amersham Biosciences). Plasmids encoding
GST-Smad2, GST-Smad3, and GST-Smad4 were kindly provided by Dr. Liliana
Attisano (University of Toronto). Fusion proteins were expressed and
purified according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Antibodies--
The endoglin-specific monoclonal antibodies P4A4
and P3D1 have been previously described, and they recognize epitopes
contained within the fragments Tyr227-Gly331
and Glu26-Gly230 of human endoglin,
respectively (24). For recognition of T
RII and T
RI, specific
polyclonal antibodies were used (C16 and V22, respectively; Santa Cruz
Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA). Proteins tagged with the influenza
virus HA epitope were detected with the monoclonal antibody 12CA5
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals).
Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analyses--
Cells were
lysed at 4 °C for 30 min with lysis solution (50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA, 1% digitonin, 1 mM NaF, 10 mM NaVO4, 1 mM
Mo2VO4, and a mixture of protease inhibitors).
Aliquots of total cell lysates containing equivalent amounts of total
protein were precleared for 4 h with protein G or protein A
coupled to Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences) at 4 °C. Specific
immunoprecipitations of the precleared lysates were carried out in the
presence of the appropriate antibody, using protein G- or protein
A-Sepharose. After overnight incubation at 4 °C, immunoprecipitates
were isolated by centrifugation and washed three times with lysis
buffer. When required, immunoprecipitates were incubated with alkaline
phosphatase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) at 37 °C for 1 h.
Total lysates and the precipitated proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE
and electrotransferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane for
immunodetection with the indicated antibody. Immunodetection was
performed with the SuperSignal chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce)
according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Flow Cytometry Analysis--
COS cells were transiently
transfected with the indicated HA-tagged endoglin constructs. After
48 h, cells were incubated with the mouse monoclonal antibody
12CA5 (against the influenza virus HA epitope; Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) for 30 min at 4 °C. After two washes with
phosphate-buffered saline, fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled F(ab')2
rabbit anti-mouse Ig was added, and incubation proceeded for an
additional period of 30 min at 4 °C. Finally, cells were washed
twice with phosphate-buffered saline, and their fluorescence was
estimated with an EPICS-CS (Coulter Cientifica), using logarithmic
amplifiers. Results are expressed as an expression index calculated as
the percentage of marker-positive cells multiplied by their mean
fluorescence intensity.
Phosphorylation Assays in Vitro--
Immunoprecipitates of
T
RI or T
RII were washed twice with lysis buffer, washed once with
kinase buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM
MnCl2, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
CaCl2), and resuspended in 40 µl of kinase buffer with 5 µM ATP, 1 µCi of [
-32P]ATP (3000 Ci/mmol; Amersham Biosciences), and 2 µg of recombinant GST,
GST-Ecyt, GST-GS/T
RI, GST-Smad2, GST-Smad3, or GST-Smad4. The
reaction was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Phosphorylation was
stopped by the addition of Laemmli sample buffer, and the products were
resolved by SDS-PAGE. The incorporation of [32P]phosphate
was visualized by autoradiography. Assays for T
R-II kinase activity
were performed as described above but without adding GST proteins.
Phosphorylation Assays in Vivo--
COS-7 cells were transfected
with T
RI, T
RII, and endoglin, as indicated. After 48 h, the
cells were washed in phosphate-free medium (ICN Biomedicals) and
metabolically labeled with 0.5 mCi/ml [32P]orthophosphate
for 3 h. Cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline, lysed
with lysis buffer, and immunoprecipitated with the appropriate
antibodies. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and radiolabeled bands were detected by autoradiography and
quantified by densitometry using a PhosphorImager 410 and ImageQuant software.
Luciferase Assays--
The pARE-lux reporter vector, encoding
the activin response element of Xenopus
mix.2 promoter fused to the luciferase reporter gene,
and the TGF-
transcriptional co-activator Fast-1 have been previously described (25-27). L6E9 myoblasts
were selected for these studies, because they do not express endoglin
or its homologue betaglycan, and they have proved to be a useful model
system to analyze the function of endoglin and betaglycan in TGF-
responses (11, 28). Activity of the TGF-
reporter construct was
determined by transient transfection of L6E9
myoblasts using Superfect (Qiagen). Briefly, cells in 24-well plates
were transfected with the pARE reporter and the endoglin or Fast-1
expression vectors at densities of 5 × 104
cells/well. The amount of DNA in each transfection was normalized by
using the corresponding insertless expression vector as carrier. After
24 h, cells were washed with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
before incubation with 5 ng/ml TGF-
1 for an additional 24-h period.
Relative luciferase units from triplicate samples were determined in a
TD20/20 luminometer (Promega, Madison, WI). Each transfection
experiment was performed at least four times with different DNA
preparations. Correction for transfection efficiency was made by
cotransfection with the
-galactosidase expression vector
pCMV-
-galactosidase, and the corresponding enzymatic activity was
determined using the Galacto-Light kit (Tropix). The mean and S.D. were
calculated and experimental results of the promoter constructs were
displayed either as arbitrary units of luciferase activity, or as a
-fold induction with respect to the corresponding untreated sample.
 |
RESULTS |
Endoglin Associates with the TGF-
Signaling Receptors in the
Absence of Exogenous Ligand--
To study the interaction of endoglin
with T
RI or T
RII, COS cells were transfected with the
corresponding expression vectors in the absence of exogenous ligand,
and cell lysates were subjected to specific immunoprecipitation,
followed by Western blot analysis. As shown in Fig.
1, endoglin co-immunoprecipitates with
either T
RI or T
RII as revealed by immunodetection with antibodies
to T
RI and T
RII, respectively (lanes 3 and
6). Although the transfected COS cells express low levels of
signaling receptors, no association between endoglin and the endogenous
receptors could be detected (lanes 1 and
4). These results demonstrate that endoglin interacts with
T
RI and with T
RII in the absence of exogenous TGF-
and that
the formation of the endoglin-T
RI or endoglin-T
RII
complexes does not require the presence of T
RII or T
RI,
respectively.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Endoglin interacts with
T RI and T RII in the
absence of exogenous ligand. COS-7 cells were transiently
transfected with expression vectors encoding endoglin, T RI, or
T RII, as indicated. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated
(IP) with a mixture of P3D1 and P4A4 anti-endoglin
(upper panels) or anti-T RI or
anti-T RII (middle panels) antibodies.
Immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing
conditions, followed by Western blot (WB) with the indicated
antibodies to allow the detection of co-immunoprecipitated proteins. As
a control for transfection, total lysates (TL) were analyzed
by Western blot (lower panels). This is a
representative experiment of at least three different ones.
|
|
Formation of Endoglin-T
RI and Endoglin-T
RII Complexes Is Not
Affected by the Activation State of the Signaling Receptors--
To
analyze whether the complex formation of endoglin with T
RI or
T
RII was affected by the activation state of the signaling receptors, experiments were performed in the presence of exogenous ligand or signaling receptors with varying catalytic activities. First,
COS cells were transfected with endoglin and T
RI or T
RII and
cultured with different concentrations of fetal calf serum, either in
the absence or in the presence of 10 ng/ml exogenous TGF-
1. Fetal
calf serum is a minor source of TGF-
, and preliminary experiments
indicated that 0.2% is the minimal concentration of fetal calf serum
required for cell viability. As shown in Fig. 2A, the amount of T
RI
(left upper panel) or T
RII
(right upper panel)
co-immunoprecipitated by anti-endoglin antibodies is similar for all
treatments, suggesting that the addition of exogenous ligand does not
affect the formation of endoglin-T
RI or endoglin-T
RII complexes.
Since the active TGF-
receptor signaling complex requires both
T
RI and T
RII, endoglin association was analyzed when both signaling receptors were cotransfected (Fig. 2B). Again,
exogenous TGF-
did not affect the formation of endoglin complexes
with T
RI or T
RII. Next, COS cells were transfected with
expression vectors for endoglin as well as wild type and different
kinase mutant versions of the signaling receptors. As shown in Fig.
2C, the constitutively active T
RI (T204D) mutant, the
constitutively inactive T
RI (K232R) mutant, and the wild type T
RI
construct were able to associate with endoglin (upper
left panel). Similarly, the kinase-inactive
T
RII (K277R), and the wild type T
RII constructs showed
interaction with endoglin (upper right
panel). Taken together, these results suggest that endoglin
association with T
RI and T
RII is independent of the activation
state of the signaling receptors.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of the activation state of the
TGF- system on the endoglin association with
the signaling receptors. A and B, the
presence of TGF- does not affect the association between endoglin
and T RI or T RII. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with
expression vectors encoding HA-endoglin, T RI, or T RII and
cultured in the presence of 10% (A) or 0.2% (A
and B) fetal calf serum and recombinant TGF- 1 at 10 ng/ml, as indicated. Total lysates were immunoprecipitated
(IP) with anti-endoglin (P3D1 and P4A4), anti-T RI, or
anti-T RII antibodies. Immunoprecipitates were electrophoresed by
SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, followed by Western blot
(WB) with anti-HA, anti-T RI, or anti-T RII antibodies
(upper panels). As a control for transfection,
recombinant proteins were analyzed in total lysates (TL) by
Western blot (lower panels). C,
full-length endoglin associates with T RI and T RII kinases
independently of their activation state. COS-7 cells were transiently
transfected with expression vectors encoding endoglin, wild type T RI
kinase, constitutively active T RI kinase (T204D), kinase-deficient
T RI (K232R), wild type T RII, and kinase-deficient T RII (K277R)
as indicated. Total lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-endoglin
antibodies (P3D1 and P4A4), and immunoprecipitates were electrophoresed
by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, followed by Western blot with
anti-T RI or anti-T RII antibodies (upper
panels). As a control for transfection, recombinant proteins
were analyzed in total lysates by Western blot (lower
panels). Results shown in A and B are
representative of four different experiments.
|
|
The Extracellular Domain of Endoglin Interacts with T
RI and
T
RII--
To identify the region(s) involved in the association
with the signaling receptors, several truncated versions of endoglin were generated (Fig. 3). Construct
HA-TMCT-Endo lacks the extracellular domain, HA-EC-Endo lacks the
cytoplasmic and transmembrane regions, and HA-ECTM-Endo only lacks the
cytoplasmic domain. Additional mutants encoding only part of the
extracellular domain (558-Endo, 437-Endo, and 437/586-Endo) were also
analyzed. Constructs 437-Endo and 437/586-Endo were generated around
the arginine at position 437, because several lines of investigation
suggest that this residue might define a protein domain: (a)
it is located at a putative protease cleavage site of the protein;
(b) artificial constructs truncated at position 437 can be
expressed upon transfection of mammalian cells; and (c) its
codon is located in the border between exons 9b and 10 (29). In order
to facilitate the analysis of the mutants, all constructs contained an
epitope tag of HA at the amino terminus. Transfection of these
constructs in COS cells confirmed that all mutant versions of endoglin
were expressed as evidenced by Western blot analysis (Fig.
3B). Since the wild type endoglin is a disulfide-linked
dimer (30), we analyzed whether the truncated forms were also
disulfide-linked by subjecting the lysates to electrophoresis under
reducing or nonreducing conditions. As shown in Fig. 3B, all
of the constructs were expressed in a dimeric form. Interestingly, the
smallest construct, TMCT-Endo, contains only one cysteine residue at
position 582 of the extracellular domain, suggesting its involvement in
the dimerization process. This was further demonstrated by generating
the mutant construct TMCT-Endo/C582G, where the cysteine at 582 has been replaced by a glycine. Transfection of this mutant yielded a
monomeric form of endoglin, as opposed to the dimer obtained with the
TMCT-Endo plasmid (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, similar to the
wild type endoglin, all of the truncated forms were also expressed at
the cell surface as demonstrated by flow cytometry analysis (Fig.
3D).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Generation of different truncated forms of
endoglin. A, schematic representation showing the names
and the endoglin protein sequences. Numbers indicate the amino acid of
endoglin (starting at the N terminus) that limit the corresponding
fragment. The position of extracellular (EC), transmembrane
(TM), and cytoplasmic (CT) domains, is indicated.
As described under "Experimental Procedures," all of the constructs
contain the leader sequence of the IgG and the HA epitope at the N
terminus, and some constructs (EC-Endo, 558-endo, 437-Endo, and
437/586-Endo) encode the transmembrane domain of the pDisplay vector.
The number of amino acid residues, corresponding to each endoglin
construct expressed at the cell surface, is included in parenthesis.
B, Western blot analysis of endoglin mutants. Total lysates
from COS cells transiently transfected with expression vectors encoding
the indicated forms of endoglin were subjected to SDS-PAGE under either
reducing (R) or nonreducing (NR) conditions,
followed by Western blot (WB) with anti-HA antibody.
Analysis of the recombinant proteins under reducing and nonreducing
conditions demonstrates that all of the constructs are expressed in a
dimeric form. C, Western blot analysis of TMCT-Endo and
TMCT-Endo/C582G mutants. Total lysates from COS cells
transiently transfected with TMCT-Endo and TMCT-Endo/C582G expression
vectors were subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by Western blot with
anti-HA antibody. Analysis of the recombinant proteins under either
reducing or nonreducing conditions demonstrates that TMCT-Endo is
expressed in a dimeric form, whereas TMCT-Endo/C582G yields a monomer.
D, flow cytometry analysis. COS-7 cells were transiently
transfected with expression vectors encoding the indicated forms of
endoglin and 48 h later were collected and analyzed by
immunofluorescence flow cytometry with anti-HA antibodies. Data are
shown as an expression index (percentage of positive cells multiplied
by their mean fluorescence intensity). Results shown in B
and C are representative of four different experiments,
whereas those in D are representative of two different
experiments.
|
|
To investigate whether the extracellular domain of endoglin was
involved in the association with the signaling receptors, HA-ECTM-Endo,
T
RI, and T
RII were expressed upon transfection in COS cells.
Immunoprecipitation analysis with anti-T
RI and anti-T
RII
demonstrated that HA-ECTM-Endo was co-precipitated only when T
RI or
T
RII were expressed (Fig.
4A), indicating that the
extracellular domain of endoglin interacts with both signaling receptors. Parallel studies with HA-EC-Endo construct, which does not
contain the transmembrane domain of endoglin, revealed similar levels
of truncated protein co-precipitated with anti-T
RI and anti-T
RII
(Fig. 4A), further confirming the involvement of the extracellular domain and suggesting a nonrelevant role for the transmembrane region in the interaction with the signaling receptors. Next, the interactions of different truncations of the extracellular domain of endoglin with T
RI and T
RII were analyzed.
Immunoprecipitation studies with anti-endoglin, anti-T
RI, and
anti-T
RII demonstrated that HA-558-Endo, HA-437-Endo, and
HA-437/586-Endo co-precipitated with T
RI, whereas only HA-558-Endo
and HA-437/586-Endo co-precipitated with T
RII (Fig. 4, B
and C). These results suggest that (a) T
RII interacts with residues 437-558 of the extracellular domain of endoglin, a region proximal to the transmembrane domain and
(b) T
RI interacts not only with residues 437-558 but
also with a second region comprised between amino acids 26 and 437 of
the extracellular domain of endoglin.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Analysis of the interaction between the
extracellular domain of endoglin and T RI and
T RII. A, the extracellular
domain of endoglin associates with T RI and T RII. COS-7 cells were
transiently transfected with expression vectors encoding HA-ECTM-Endo,
HA-EC-Endo, T RI, or T RII, as indicated. Total lysates were
immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-T RI or anti-T RII
antibodies, and immunoprecipitates were electrophoresed by SDS-PAGE
under reducing conditions. The presence of endoglin was revealed by
Western blot (WB) with anti-HA antibodies (upper
panels). As a control for transfection, recombinant proteins
were analyzed in total lysates (TL) by Western blot
(lower panels). B and C,
mapping the extracellular regions of endoglin involved in the
association with T RI and T RII. COS-7 cells were transiently
transfected with T RI, T RII, HA-EC-Endo, HA-437-Endo, HA-558-Endo,
or HA-437/586-Endo, as indicated. Total lysates were immunoprecipitated
with a mixture of P3D1 and P4A4 antibodies ( -endoglin), anti-T RI,
or anti-T RII, and immunoprecipitates were electrophoresed by
SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. The presence of T RI, T RII, or
endoglin was revealed by Western blot with anti-T RI, anti-T RII,
or anti-HA antibodies, respectively. As a control for transfection,
recombinant proteins were analyzed in total lysates by Western blot.
T RI coprecipitates with the truncated endoglin mutants EC-Endo,
558-Endo, and 437-Endo, whereas T RII only coprecipitates with
EC-Endo and 558-Endo (B). T RI and T RII coprecipitate
with the truncated endoglin mutant 437/586-Endo (C). Results
shown in A-C are representative of at least four different
experiments.
|
|
The Cytoplasmic Domain of Endoglin Interacts with T
RI and
T
RII--
When studying the interaction between two different
transmembrane proteins, it is important to assess both the involvement of their extracellular domains and that of their cytoplasmic domains. Endoglin is constitutively phosphorylated in Ser/Thr residues (31, 32),
and both signaling receptors are Ser/Thr kinases (33, 34), thus
providing a hint for the participation of their cytoplasmic domains in
protein association. To study the interaction between endoglin
cytoplasmic domain and T
RI or T
RII, the HA-TMCT-Endo construct
(lacking the extracellular domain) was co-transfected with wild type or
kinase mutants of T
RI and T
RII (Fig.
5). Immunoprecipitation analysis with
anti-T
RI and anti-T
RII demonstrated that the cytoplasmic domain
of endoglin associates with T
RI when the kinase domain is inactive
(K232R) but not with the constitutively active (T204D) form (Fig.
5A). In the same experiment, a weak band of endoglin was
found associated with the wild type T
RI. This association is
probably due to the T
RI activation induced by oligomerization of the
signaling receptors that occurs upon transfection (35, 36). In
addition, the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin interacts with both the
active (wild type) and inactive (K277R) forms of T
RII (Fig.
5B). These results demonstrate that the endoglin cytoplasmic domain interacts with T
RI and with T
RII.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
The cytoplasmic domain of endoglin associates
with T RI and
T RII. COS-7 cells were transiently
transfected with expression vectors encoding HA-TMCT-Endo, wild type
T RI, constitutively active T RI kinase (T204D), kinase-deficient
T RI (K232R), wild type T RII, and kinase-deficient T RII
(K277R), as indicated. T RI or T RII constructs were
immunoprecipitated (IP) from total lysates with anti-T RI
or anti-T RII antibodies, and immunoprecipitates were subjected to
SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. The presence of endoglin was
revealed by Western blot (WB) with anti-HA antibodies
( -HA). As a control for transfection, recombinant
proteins were analyzed in total lysates (TL) by Western
blot. A, HA-TMCT-Endo coprecipitates with the
kinase-deficient form of T RI (K232R) but not with the constitutively
active T RI kinase (T204D). B and C,
HA-TMCT-Endo coprecipitates with both wild type (wt) T RII
and kinase-deficient T RII (K277R) but shows a different
electrophoretic migration in each case. The addition of alkaline
phosphatase to immunoprecipitates (rightmost
lane), indicates that the lower electrophoretic migration is
due to endoglin phosphorylation. It is worth noting that the intensity
of the endoglin band associated with the T RII (K277R) is similar to
that of the phosphatase-treated sample of T RII (wt),
suggesting that the lower intensity displayed by the untreated T RII
(wt) immunoprecipitate is probably due to a higher
heterogeneity of the associated endoglin band. Results shown in
A-C are representative of at least five different
experiments.
|
|
The Cytoplasmic Domain of Endoglin Is Phosphorylated by T
RI and
T
RII--
A detailed analysis of the bands separated by SDS-PAGE,
corresponding to the endoglin cytoplasmic domain, revealed that the electrophoretic mobility of the HA-TMCT-Endo associated with the constitutively active T
RII (wild type) was lower than that of the
HA-TMCT-Endo associated with the kinase-inactive (K277R) form of
T
RII (Fig. 5, B and C; upper
panels). Similar electrophoretic differences were observed when
analyzing the endoglin cytoplasmic domain in total lysates derived from
cells overexpressing either the wild type or the constitutively
inactive form of T
RII, respectively (Fig. 5, B and
C; lower panels). It is well known
that phosphorylated proteins migrate more slowly that the
unphosphorylated forms, suggesting that the electrophoretic differences
observed above might be due to different phosphorylation states of
endoglin. This interpretation would be compatible with the fact that
the migration displayed by HA-TMCT-Endo is dependent on the activation state of the associated kinase. To confirm this hypothesis,
co-precipitates of HA-TMCT-Endo and constitutively active T
RII were
treated or not with alkaline phosphatase. As shown in Fig.
5C, upon phosphatase treatment, endoglin associated with
wild type T
RII showed an electrophoretic mobility identical to that
of endoglin associated with the constitutively inactive T
RII,
suggesting that endoglin not only associates with T
RII but is also a
substrate for T
RII.
At variance with T
RII, no changes in the electrophoretic mobilities
among the HA-TMCT-Endo constructs associated with the different
versions of T
RI were observed (Fig. 5A). Since the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin associates with the kinase-inactive but
not with the constitutively active form (Fig. 5A), it is
possible that, if phosphorylated by T
RI, the endoglin cytoplasmic
domain would be detached from the active kinase complex.
To further analyze the phosphorylation of endoglin by the signaling
receptors, in vitro and in vivo studies were
carried out. First, immunoprecipitates of T
RI, T
RII, or their
mutant forms were incubated with a GST fusion protein containing the
cytoplasmic domain of endoglin (GST-Ecyt) in the presence of
[
-32P]ATP to allow kinase activity. As shown in Fig.
6A, the active forms of T
RI
(T204D) and T
RII (wild type) are able to phosphorylate the endoglin
cytoplasmic domain. The wild type T
RI also displays endoglin
phosphorylation activity despite the absence of TGF-
activation.
This is probably due to the T
RI activation induced by
oligomerization of the signaling receptors that occurs upon transfection (35, 36). By contrast, no significant endoglin phosphorylation was observed in the presence of inactive signaling receptors (T
RI/K232R and T
RII/K277R), excluding the possible contribution of endogenous signaling receptors due to heteromeric associations with the recombinant constructs. As a negative control for
specificity in all samples, no phosphorylation could be observed when
using GST alone as a substrate. Next, we analyzed endoglin phosphorylation in vivo. Cells transfected with full-length
endoglin and signaling receptors were metabolically labeled with
[32P]orthophosphate, and the phosphorylation state of
endoglin was analyzed by immunoprecipitation followed by SDS-PAGE
analysis (Fig. 6B). In mock-transfected cells, a basal level
of endoglin phosphorylation was observed (lane
2), probably due to the endogenous signaling receptors. Upon
transfection with the wild type T
RI (lane 6)
and T
RII (lane 3), a marked increase in
endoglin phosphorylation levels could be detected. Also, the
constitutively kinase-active T
RI (T204D) yielded similar levels of
endoglin phosphorylation as the wild type form (data not shown). By
contrast, expression of the kinase-inactive forms of T
RI
(lane 7) and T
RII (lane 4) yielded background signals, supporting the specificity of
the wild type signaling receptor-induced endoglin phosphorylation. In
addition, experiments performed with the truncated form TMCT-Endo, lacking the extracellular domain of endoglin, resulted in a similar phosphorylation pattern by the wild type and mutant forms of the signaling receptors (data not shown), indicating that phosphorylation of endoglin occurs at the serine/threonine-rich cytoplasmic domain.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Endoglin phosphorylation by
T RI and T RII
kinases. A, the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin is
phosphorylated by T RI and T RII kinases in vitro. COS-7
cells were transiently transfected with HA-tagged wild type T RI
kinase, constitutively active T RI kinase (T204D), kinase-deficient
T RI (K232R), wild type T RII, and kinase-deficient T RII
(K277R), as indicated. Cells were collected 48 h later, and their
lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-HA
antibodies. Immunoprecipitates were incubated with equal amounts of GST
or GST-Ecyt proteins in kinase buffer containing
[ -32P]ATP, and phosphorylation was allowed to proceed.
Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. The
positions of GST and GST-Ecyt are indicated by arrowheads.
As a control for transfection, recombinant T RI and T RII proteins
were analyzed in total lysates (TL) by Western blot
(WB). B, endoglin is phosphorylated by T RI and
T RII kinases in vivo. COS-7 cells were transiently
transfected with full-length endoglin, wild type T RI kinase,
kinase-deficient T RI (K232R), wild type T RII, and
kinase-deficient T RII (K277R), as indicated. Cells were
metabolically labeled 48 h later with
[32P]orthophosphate, lysed, and cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated with anti-endoglin antibodies (P4A4 and P3D1).
Immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing
conditions, and radiolabeled bands were detected by autoradiography. As
a control for transfection, recombinant endoglin, T RI, and T RII
proteins were analyzed in total lysates by Western blot. C,
radiolabeled bands from B were quantified by densitometry.
The sample number is the same as in B. Results shown in
A-C are representative of at least four different
experiments.
|
|
Endoglin Expression Modulates the Phosphorylation State of T
RII
and T
RI--
The phosphorylation state of T
RII and T
RI plays
a critical role in TGF-
-induced cell signaling (35, 36). Since
endoglin not only associates with these signaling receptors but is also a substrate for their kinase activity, we analyzed whether endoglin expression affected the phosphorylation state of T
RII and T
RI. Thus, in vivo and in vitro studies were carried
out. First, we investigated the effect of endoglin expression on
T
RII phosphorylation after metabolic labeling with
[32P]orthophosphate. Immunoprecipitation of transfected
T
RII from endoglin-deficient cells resulted in a broad band (between
70 and 90 kDa) of the autophosphorylated kinase (Fig.
7A), as previously described
(35). Similar experiments with cells cotransfected with full-length
endoglin yielded a weaker T
RII band overlapping with a strong signal
at 90 kDa of phosphorylated endoglin (Fig. 7A). Since the
overlapping between T
RII and endoglin bands interfered with the
estimation of T
RII phosphorylation levels, we decided to carry out
experiments using a smaller endoglin construct, HA-TMCT-Endo, which
contains only the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains. Thus,
cotransfection of HA-TMCT-Endo resulted in a marked decrease of T
RII
phosphorylation levels (Fig. 7, B and C; compare
lane 3 with lane 1). As
expected, no significant phosphorylation was obtained in the presence
of the kinase-inactive mutant of T
RII (lane
4). Since T
RII is constitutively autophosphorylated (35, 37), we analyzed whether the decrease of T
RII phosphorylation levels
observed in vivo was due to a decreased autokinase activity of T
RII. Thus, anti-T
RII immunoprecipitates from cell lysates, containing or not containing full-length endoglin, were incubated with
[
-32P]ATP, and the radiolabeled T
RII was analyzed
by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 7, D and E). As expected, the
T
RII present in endoglin-deficient cells (lane
2) showed a clear autophosphorylating activity as compared with a negative control (lane 1).
Interestingly, co-expression of endoglin resulted in a markedly reduced
level of T
RII phosphorylation (lane 3),
suggesting that endoglin inhibits the autophosphorylation of T
RII.
As expected, the kinase-inactive mutant showed background levels of
phosphorylation either in the presence (lane 4)
or in the absence of endoglin (not shown). These results suggest that endoglin expression inhibits the phosphorylation of T
RII.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
T RII phosphorylation
is diminished in the presence of endoglin. A, COS-7 cells
were transiently transfected with HA-endoglin and wild type T RII, as
indicated. Cells were metabolically labeled with
[32P]orthophosphate and lysed, and cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-T RII antibodies.
Immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing
conditions, and radiolabeled bands were detected by autoradiography. As
a control for transfection, recombinant endoglin and T RII proteins
were analyzed in total lysates (TL) by Western blot
(WB). B, COS-7 cells were transiently transfected
with HA-TMCT-Endo, wild type T RII, and kinase-deficient T RII
(K277R), as indicated. Cells were metabolically labeled with
[32P]orthophosphate and lysed, and cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated with anti-T RII antibodies. Immunoprecipitates
were subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, and radiolabeled
bands were detected by autoradiography. As a control for transfection,
recombinant endoglin and T RII proteins were analyzed in total
lysates by Western blot. C, radiolabeled bands from
B were quantified by densitometry. The sample number is the
same as in B. D, COS-7 cells were transiently
transfected with HA-endoglin, wild type T RII, and kinase-deficient
T RII (K277R), as indicated. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated
with anti-T RII antibodies, immunoprecipitates were subjected to
SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, and radiolabeled bands were
detected by autoradiography. The data show that the autophosphorylation
capacity of T RII kinase is diminished in the presence of endoglin.
As a control for transfection, recombinant endoglin and T RII
proteins were analyzed in total lysates by Western blot. E,
radiolabeled bands from D were quantified by densitometry.
The sample number is the same as in D. Results shown in
A-E are representative of at least four different
experiments.
|
|
The phosphorylation state of specific Ser/Thr residues in the T
RII
is able to regulate its kinase activity (2-4). Since the juxtamembrane
and GS regions of T
RI are direct substrates for the T
RII kinase,
we investigated whether the endoglin-dependent modulation
of the T
RII phosphorylation affected the T
RI phosphorylation. Anti-T
RII immunoprecipitates from cell lysates, with or without endoglin, were incubated with a recombinant protein containing the
juxtamembrane and GS regions of T
RI (GST-GS/T
RI) in the presence
of [
-32P]ATP, and the radiolabeled substrate was
analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 8,
A and B). In the absence of endoglin, T
RII
induced the specific phosphorylation of GST-GS/T
RI (lane
2), as compared with a negative control (lane
1). However, upon endoglin expression, a markedly enhanced
phosphorylation of the GST-GS/T
RI protein was observed
(lane 4). These results suggest that endoglin
expression leads to an increased phosphorylation of the T
RI within
the juxtamembrane and GS regions. This observation was confirmed by
analyzing the effect of endoglin expression on T
RI phosphorylation
after metabolic labeling with [32P]orthophosphate. As
depicted in Fig. 8, C and D, the basal
phosphorylation levels of T
RI (lane 3) were
clearly increased when endoglin was cotransfected (lane
4).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
T RI phosphorylation
is enhanced in the presence of endoglin. A,
phosphorylation of the juxtamembrane and GS regions of T RI in
vitro. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with HA-endoglin
and wild type T RII, as indicated. Cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-T RII antibodies, and
immunoprecipitates were incubated with GST or GST-GS/T RI in the
presence of [ -32P]ATP. Phosphorylated substrates were
subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, and radiolabeled bands
were detected by autoradiography. The data show that the
phosphorylation of the juxtamembrane/GS regions of T RI is increased
in the presence of endoglin. As a control for transfection, recombinant
endoglin and T RII proteins were analyzed in total lysates
(TL) by Western blot (WB). B,
radiolabeled bands from A were quantified by densitometry.
The sample number is the same as in A. These results are
representative of at least four different experiments. C,
phosphorylation of T RI in vivo. COS-7 cells were
transiently transfected with HA-endoglin and wild type T RI, as
indicated. Cells were metabolically labeled with
[32P]orthophosphate, lysed, and cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated with anti-T RI antibodies. Immunoprecipitates were
subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, and radiolabeled bands
were detected by autoradiography. As a control for transfection,
recombinant endoglin and T RI proteins were analyzed in total lysates
by Western blot. D, radiolabeled bands from C
were quantified by densitometry. The sample number is the same as in
C. These results are representative of at least four
different experiments.
|
|
Overall, these results indicate that endoglin modulates the
phosphorylation levels of both signaling receptors.
Effect of Endoglin on TGF-
Signaling--
Since endoglin
associates with the signaling receptors and modulates their
phosphorylation status, we examined whether endoglin expression
affected Smad phosphorylation and TGF-
gene responses. In the
TGF-
signaling pathway, phosphorylation of Smad2 and Smad3 by T
RI
is a necessary step for downstream signal transduction. Anti-T
RI
immunoprecipitates from cell lysates, with or without endoglin, were
incubated with Smad2, Smad3, or Smad4 recombinant proteins in the
presence of [
-32P]ATP, and radiolabeled Smad proteins
were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 9,
A and B). In the absence of endoglin, specific
phosphorylation of Smad2 and Smad3 could be observed, whereas the
presence of endoglin induced an increased phosphorylation of Smad2 but
not Smad3 (Fig. 9B). As expected, no phosphorylation was
found in Smad4, which lacks the T
RI target sequence within the MH2
domain. Since these results suggest that endoglin expression leads to an increased phosphorylation of Smad2, we investigated the reporter expression of the mix.2 gene promoter, whose activation by
TGF-
/activin involves the formation of a transcriptional
complex composed of Smad2/Smad4 and Fast-1 (26).
L6E9 cells were transfected with the pARE-lux
reporter vector in the absence or in the presence of endoglin (Fig. 9,
C and D). Endoglin was able to consistently increase the TGF-
responsiveness in a dose-dependent
fashion, as analyzed by both absolute activity (Fig. 9C) and
-fold induction with respect to untreated samples (Fig. 9D).
Interestingly, the basal activity of the pARE reporter vector was
inhibited with increasing concentrations of endoglin, consistent with
the reported role of endoglin in the absence of exogenous TGF-
(38).
Taken together, these results suggest that endoglin is able to increase the Smad2-mediated TGF-
responses of the mix.2 gene
promoter.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Endoglin modulates downstream
TGF- signaling. A,
phosphorylation of Smad proteins in vitro. COS-7 cells were
transiently transfected with HA-endoglin and wild type T RI, as
indicated. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with
anti-T RI antibodies, and immunoprecipitates were incubated with
GST-Smad2, GST-Smad3, or GST-Smad4 in the presence of
[ -32P]ATP. Phosphorylated substrates were subjected to
SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, and radiolabeled bands were
detected by autoradiography. The data show that the phosphorylation of
GST-Smad2 is increased in the presence of endoglin. As a control for
transfection, recombinant endoglin and T RI proteins were analyzed in
total lysates (TL) by Western blot (WB). The
position of the different GST constructs is indicated. B,
radiolabeled bands from A were quantified by densitometry.
The sample number is the same as in A. These results are
representative of at least three different experiments. C
and D, analysis of TGF- -induced reporter gene expression.
L6E9 cells were transiently cotransfected with
the pARE reporter construct, Fast-1, and increasing concentrations of
an expression vector encoding endoglin. TGF- 1 was added 24 h
after transfection, and luciferase activity was determined 48 h
after transfection. C shows the relative luciferase units of
treated and untreated samples; numbers above the
open bars indicate the actual values of untreated
cells for comparative purposes. D shows the TGF- -fold
induction values with respect to untreated controls. This is a
representative experiment of four different ones with similar
results.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Several laboratories have previously shown that endoglin forms
heteromeric complexes with several members of the TGF-
signaling receptor family in the presence of ligand (8, 11, 12, 13, 32, 39).
Here, we show that full-length endoglin physically interacts with
T
RI and T
RII, and this interaction is not modified by the
presence of exogenous ligand or by the activation state of the
signaling kinases. This finding is compatible with the existence of
ligand-free endoglin forming a complex with ligand-bound signaling
receptors (11) as well as with the requirement of signaling receptors
for ligand binding to endoglin (11, 12). Also, the direct interaction
of endoglin with T
RI and T
RII is supported by the existence of
ligand-independent complexes of endoglin and ALK-1 in endothelial cells
(40, 41). We have observed that the formation of the complex
endoglin-T
RI or endoglin-T
RII does not require the presence of
T
RII or T
RI, respectively. This finding agrees with the fact that
endoglin is co-immunoprecipitated with T
RII·TGF-
,
ActRII-activin-A, or ActRII-BMP-7 complexes, despite the
absence of the corresponding type I receptor in the cell (12). Taken
together, these results provide a solid molecular basis for ligand
binding to endoglin. Thus, endoglin could bind first to the signaling
receptors, and this interaction would then allow ligand access to endoglin.
Generation of a panel of endoglin constructs (Fig. 3) has facilitated a
more detailed analysis of the association between endoglin and the
signaling receptors. Similar to the wild type endoglin, the mutant
forms were expressed as disulfide-linked dimers. Interestingly,
mutation of Cys582 abrogated the formation of disulfide
linkages in the smallest construct (Fig. 3C), indicating its
direct involvement in interchain disulfide bonds. Other cysteine
residues contained within the endoglin fragment
Cys330-Cys412 have been previously proposed as
candidates in endoglin disulfide formation (29, 42), but
Cys582 is the first one to be specifically identified.
Analysis on the physical association between endoglin mutants and the
signaling receptors has revealed that both the extracellular and
cytoplasmic domains participate in this association. Thus, several
interaction sites can participate in the formation and stabilization of
the endoglin complexes, similarly to the contact sites mapped within
the T
RI·T
RII (34, 43) or betaglycan-T
RII (44) complexes.
Despite the structural homology between T
RI and T
RII, they show
two major differences in their association with endoglin. First, the
interaction of T
RII with the extracellular domain of endoglin maps
within the transmembrane proximal region 437-558, whereas T
RI
interacts not only with fragment 437-558, but also with the N-terminal
region(s) located above residue 437. Second, the interaction of T
RI
with the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin can only be detected when its
kinase domain is inactive; by contrast, both active and inactive forms
of T
RII can associate with the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin. Upon
interaction with the signaling receptors, the cytoplasmic domain of
endoglin is phosphorylated by T
RI or T
RII. This finding fully
agrees with the fact that endoglin is constitutively phosphorylated in
Ser/Thr residues (31, 32) and forms heteromeric complexes with the signaling receptors displaying Ser/Thr kinase activity (33, 34). Once
phosphorylated by the respective kinase, the cytoplasmic domain of
endoglin remains bound to the T
RII, whereas it is released from
T
RI. Since the kinase activity of T
RI is only induced in the
presence of ligand, these results suggest that the cytoplasmic domain
of endoglin dissociates from T
RI upon exposure to members of the
TGF-
family. This is not surprising, since in many enzymatic systems
the kinase/substrate association is usually transient. In fact, a
similar transient interaction has been described for T
RI-mediated
phosphorylation of R-Smads (45). In contrast, the association of
T
RII with the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin seems to be stable even
after phosphorylation has occurred. Similarly, phosphorylation of
T
RI by T
RII kinase does not affect the T
RI·T
RII association (43). Interestingly, at variance with our endoglin data,
the interaction of the T
RII with the cytoplasmic domain of
betaglycan does not occur with a kinase-inactive version of the
receptor (44). Since the T
RII is constitutively active within the
cell (35), our results suggests that the constitutive phosphorylation
of endoglin is mainly due to this kinase. Nevertheless, although we
find that T
RI or T
RII is able to phosphorylate endoglin, we
cannot exclude the possibility that some of the 19 Ser/Thr residues
within the cytoplasmic domain are targeted by additional Ser/Thr
kinases. In this regard, putative consensus motifs for protein kinase C
and casein kinase have been identified within the cytoplasmic sequence
(31) (data not shown).
The high degree of homology between the cytoplasmic domains of endoglin
and betaglycan suggests a conserved function/regulation for these
domains. Supporting this view, Blobe et al. (44) have described that the cytoplasmic domains of betaglycan and T
RII interact specifically, and this interaction results in the
phosphorylation of the betaglycan cytoplasmic domain, in agreement with
the results shown here for endoglin. Both endoglin and betaglycan
contain PDZ class I binding motifs (Ser/Thr-X-Ala/Val) at
their homologous cytoplasmic regions. Recently, GIPC was identified as
a PDZ domain-containing protein able to interact with betaglycan
cytoplasmic domain and regulate TGF-
signaling (46), although the
possible association of GIPC with the endoglin cytoplasmic region
remains to be established.
Endoglin has been shown to modulate cellular responses to TGF-
1 (11,
13, 14). However, the molecular mechanism of this modulation is not
known. The data shown here suggest that endoglin might regulate TGF-
signaling by its direct interaction with the signaling receptors.
Recently, betaglycan has been reported to inhibit TGF-
signaling by
preventing the association between T
RI and T
RII, an interference
mediated by the glycosaminoglycan modification of betaglycan (47).
Unlike betaglycan, endoglin does not seem to affect the formation of
T
RI·T
RII complexes (12). This, and the absence of
glycosaminoglycan recognition motifs in the endoglin molecule, suggests
a functional mechanism for endoglin distinct from that reported for
betaglycan (47). Endoglin could regulate either