JBC Focus on PI3-Kinase with Echelon

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111991200 on May 15, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 32, 29197-29209, August 9, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/32/29197    most recent
M111991200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guerrero-Esteo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bernabéu, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guerrero-Esteo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bernabéu, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Extracellular and Cytoplasmic Domains of Endoglin Interact with the Transforming Growth Factor-beta Receptors I and II*

Mercedes Guerrero-EsteoDagger, Tilman Sánchez-Elsner§, Ainhoa Letamendia, and Carmelo Bernabéu||

From the Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Velázquez 144, Madrid 28006, Spain

Received for publication, December 17, 2001, and in revised form, May 9, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Endoglin is an auxiliary component of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta ) receptor system, able to associate with the signaling receptor types I (Tbeta RI) and II (Tbeta RII) in the presence of ligand and to modulate the cellular responses to TGF-beta 1. Endoglin cannot bind ligand on its own but requires the presence of the signaling receptors, supporting a critical role for the interaction between endoglin and Tbeta RI or Tbeta RII. This study shows that full-length endoglin interacts with both Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII, independently of their kinase activation state or the presence of exogenous TGF-beta 1. Truncated constructs encoding either the extracellular or the cytoplasmic domains of endoglin demonstrated that the association with the signaling receptors occurs through both extracellular and cytoplasmic domains. However, a more specific mapping revealed that the endoglin/Tbeta RI interaction was different from that of endoglin/Tbeta RII. Tbeta RII interacts with the amino acid region 437-558 of the extracellular domain of endoglin, whereas Tbeta RI interacts not only with the region 437-558 but also with the protein region located between amino acid 437 and the N terminus. Both Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII interact with the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin, but Tbeta RI only interacts when the kinase domain is inactive, whereas Tbeta RII remains associated in its active and inactive forms. Upon association, Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII phosphorylate the endoglin cytoplasmic domain, and then Tbeta RI, but not Tbeta RII, kinase dissociates from the complex. Conversely, endoglin expression results in an altered phosphorylation state of Tbeta RII, Tbeta RI, and downstream Smad proteins as well as a modulation of TGF-beta signaling, as measured by the reporter gene expression. These results suggest that by interacting through its extracellular and cytoplasmic domains with the signaling receptors, endoglin might affect TGF-beta responses.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Members of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta )1 superfamily (1, 2) exert their biological effects through binding to a heteromeric complex containing two different transmembrane serine/threonine kinases known as type I and type II signaling receptors (3, 4). Upon ligand binding to the type II receptor, the association between type I and type II receptors is induced, leading to phosphorylation and activation of the type I receptor by the constitutively active type II receptor (4, 5). Then, activated type I receptor propagates intracellular signal to the nucleus by phosphorylating members of the Smad family of proteins (4, 6, 7).

The TGF-beta receptor complex also contains two auxiliary co-receptors named endoglin and betaglycan (8-10). These are transmembrane proteins with large extracellular domains and serine/threonine-rich cytoplasmic regions without consensus signaling motifs. Endoglin binds TGF-beta 1, TGF-beta 3, activin-A, BMP-2, and BMP-7 in the presence of the signaling receptor types I and II (8, 11, 12) and modulates TGF-beta 1-dependent cellular responses (11, 13, 14). It is highly expressed on endothelial cells and several lines of evidence support an important role for endoglin in cardiovascular development and vascular remodeling. Thus, endoglin expression is regulated during heart development in humans and chicken (15, 16), and genetic inactivation of endoglin in the mouse shows that embryos homozygous for mutant endoglin die at 10-10.5 days postcoitum due to vascular and cardiac anomalies (17-19). Furthermore, genes encoding endoglin and ALK-1 (a type I TGF-beta receptor) are targets for the autosomal dominant disorder known as hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (20-22). Despite the data supporting an important role for endoglin in the TGF-beta system, the molecular basis of endoglin function is still poorly understood.

Several lines of evidence suggest that endoglin is not a receptor per se: (a) in endothelial cells, only a small percentage of endoglin molecules is capable of binding TGF-beta ; (b) endoglin does not bind ligand on its own but requires the presence of the signaling receptors (11, 12), (c) even in the presence of the signaling receptors, ligand association with endoglin can only be visualized in the presence of a cross-linking agent (12); and (d) cross-linking of endoglin transfectants with radiolabeled TGF-beta showed the existence of ligand-free endoglin associated with TGF-beta -loaded signaling receptors (11). All of these data suggest that endoglin association with the signaling receptors is critical for endoglin access to ligand and for its modulation of the ligand-induced cellular responses. Here, we have investigated the domains involved in the association between endoglin and the signaling receptors as well as the consequences of this interaction on the phosphorylation status of the proteins involved.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Culture and Transfections-- The monkey kidney COS-7 and the rat myoblast L6E9 cell lines were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum in 5% CO2 at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with expression vectors encoding wild type and mutant constructs of endoglin, Tbeta RI, or Tbeta RII using LipofectAMINE Plus as indicated by the manufacturer (Invitrogen). Functional assays were carried out 48 h after transfection. Treatment of cells with recombinant human TGF-beta 1 (Peprotech) was performed at a concentration of 10 ng/ml for 30 min.

Expression Vectors-- Wild type human endoglin cDNA subcloned into the pCMV5 vector (11) was used to derive the truncated endoglin constructs by PCR amplification. The resulting PCR fragments were cloned into pDisplay (Invitrogen) expression vector, which allows expression of proteins on the cell surface. All endoglin constructs expressed from pDisplay contain the influenza hemagglutinin epitope HA at the NH2 terminus. The oligonucleotides used to prime the PCR synthesis of endoglin fragments were as follows: TMCT-Endo (amino acids 573-658), GAAGATCTAACATCATCAGCCCTGAC and TCCCCGCGGGGCTATGCCATGCTGCT; EC-Endo (amino acids 26-586), GGGGCCCAGCCGGCCGAAACAGTCCATTGT and TCCCCGCGGGGCCTTTGCTTGT; ECTM-Endo (amino acids 26-614), GGGGCCCAGCCGGCCGAAACAGTCCATTGT and TCCCCGCGGTCAGTAGATGTACCA; 558-Endo (amino acids 26-558), GGGGCCCAGCCGGCCGAAACAGTCCATTGT and TCCCCGCGGCCCGGTCTTGGG; 437-Endo (amino acids 26-437), GGGGCCCAGCCGGCCGAAACAGTCCATTGT and TCCCCGCGGTTTCCGCTGTGG; 437/586-Endo (amino acids 437-586), GGGGCCCAGCCGGCCGAAAAAGGTGCACTGC and TCCCCGCGGGCCTTTGCTTGT. The oligonucleotides were designed to introduce a SfiI restriction site at the 5'-end (except for the TMCT-Endo mutant, which contains a BglII restriction site) and a SacII site at the 3'-end of the endoglin DNA fragments. The reverse primers for TMCT-Endo and ECTM-Endo include a stop codon. All primer sequences for this study are given from 5' to 3'. Full-length endoglin was also subcloned into the pDisplay vector to generate an HA epitope-tagged endoglin. The construct was engineered by PCR using forward primer that included a SfiI restriction site (GGGGCCCAGCCGGCCGAAACAGTCCATTGT) and reverse primer that included a stop codon and a SacII site (TCCCCGCGGGGCTATGCCATGCTGCT).

The pCMV5 expression constructs containing cDNAs for Tbeta RII/HA (tagged at the COOH terminus with the influenza hemagglutinin (HA) epitope), HA/Tbeta RII (K277R) (tagged at the NH2 terminus with the HA epitope), Tbeta RI/HA, Tbeta RI (T204D)/HA, and Tbeta RI (K232R)/HA have been described (23) and were a generous gift from Dr. Liliana Attisano (University of Toronto, Canada).

GST Fusion Constructs-- To generate the GST-Ecyt fusion protein, the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin was amplified by PCR, using forward (5'-GAATTCTGGTACATCTACTCGCACACGC-3') and reverse (5'-GGCTATGCCATGCTGCTGGTGG-3') primers, and the product was cloned into pGEX-1lambda T (Amersham Biosciences). To generate the GST-GS/Tbeta RI fusion protein, the juxtamembrane and GS domains of Tbeta RI (amino acids 146-207) were amplified by PCR, using forward (5'-CGGGATCCATCTGCCACAACCGC-3') and reverse (5'-CGGAATTCTTGTAACACAATAGTTCTCGC-3') primers, and the product was cloned into pGEX4T-3 (Amersham Biosciences). Plasmids encoding GST-Smad2, GST-Smad3, and GST-Smad4 were kindly provided by Dr. Liliana Attisano (University of Toronto). Fusion proteins were expressed and purified according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Antibodies-- The endoglin-specific monoclonal antibodies P4A4 and P3D1 have been previously described, and they recognize epitopes contained within the fragments Tyr227-Gly331 and Glu26-Gly230 of human endoglin, respectively (24). For recognition of Tbeta RII and Tbeta RI, specific polyclonal antibodies were used (C16 and V22, respectively; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA). Proteins tagged with the influenza virus HA epitope were detected with the monoclonal antibody 12CA5 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analyses-- Cells were lysed at 4 °C for 30 min with lysis solution (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA, 1% digitonin, 1 mM NaF, 10 mM NaVO4, 1 mM Mo2VO4, and a mixture of protease inhibitors). Aliquots of total cell lysates containing equivalent amounts of total protein were precleared for 4 h with protein G or protein A coupled to Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences) at 4 °C. Specific immunoprecipitations of the precleared lysates were carried out in the presence of the appropriate antibody, using protein G- or protein A-Sepharose. After overnight incubation at 4 °C, immunoprecipitates were isolated by centrifugation and washed three times with lysis buffer. When required, immunoprecipitates were incubated with alkaline phosphatase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) at 37 °C for 1 h. Total lysates and the precipitated proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane for immunodetection with the indicated antibody. Immunodetection was performed with the SuperSignal chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Flow Cytometry Analysis-- COS cells were transiently transfected with the indicated HA-tagged endoglin constructs. After 48 h, cells were incubated with the mouse monoclonal antibody 12CA5 (against the influenza virus HA epitope; Roche Molecular Biochemicals) for 30 min at 4 °C. After two washes with phosphate-buffered saline, fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled F(ab')2 rabbit anti-mouse Ig was added, and incubation proceeded for an additional period of 30 min at 4 °C. Finally, cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, and their fluorescence was estimated with an EPICS-CS (Coulter Cientifica), using logarithmic amplifiers. Results are expressed as an expression index calculated as the percentage of marker-positive cells multiplied by their mean fluorescence intensity.

Phosphorylation Assays in Vitro-- Immunoprecipitates of Tbeta RI or Tbeta RII were washed twice with lysis buffer, washed once with kinase buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM MnCl2, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2), and resuspended in 40 µl of kinase buffer with 5 µM ATP, 1 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP (3000 Ci/mmol; Amersham Biosciences), and 2 µg of recombinant GST, GST-Ecyt, GST-GS/Tbeta RI, GST-Smad2, GST-Smad3, or GST-Smad4. The reaction was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Phosphorylation was stopped by the addition of Laemmli sample buffer, and the products were resolved by SDS-PAGE. The incorporation of [32P]phosphate was visualized by autoradiography. Assays for Tbeta R-II kinase activity were performed as described above but without adding GST proteins.

Phosphorylation Assays in Vivo-- COS-7 cells were transfected with Tbeta RI, Tbeta RII, and endoglin, as indicated. After 48 h, the cells were washed in phosphate-free medium (ICN Biomedicals) and metabolically labeled with 0.5 mCi/ml [32P]orthophosphate for 3 h. Cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline, lysed with lysis buffer, and immunoprecipitated with the appropriate antibodies. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and radiolabeled bands were detected by autoradiography and quantified by densitometry using a PhosphorImager 410 and ImageQuant software.

Luciferase Assays-- The pARE-lux reporter vector, encoding the activin response element of Xenopus mix.2 promoter fused to the luciferase reporter gene, and the TGF-beta transcriptional co-activator Fast-1 have been previously described (25-27). L6E9 myoblasts were selected for these studies, because they do not express endoglin or its homologue betaglycan, and they have proved to be a useful model system to analyze the function of endoglin and betaglycan in TGF-beta responses (11, 28). Activity of the TGF-beta reporter construct was determined by transient transfection of L6E9 myoblasts using Superfect (Qiagen). Briefly, cells in 24-well plates were transfected with the pARE reporter and the endoglin or Fast-1 expression vectors at densities of 5 × 104 cells/well. The amount of DNA in each transfection was normalized by using the corresponding insertless expression vector as carrier. After 24 h, cells were washed with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium before incubation with 5 ng/ml TGF-beta 1 for an additional 24-h period. Relative luciferase units from triplicate samples were determined in a TD20/20 luminometer (Promega, Madison, WI). Each transfection experiment was performed at least four times with different DNA preparations. Correction for transfection efficiency was made by cotransfection with the beta -galactosidase expression vector pCMV-beta -galactosidase, and the corresponding enzymatic activity was determined using the Galacto-Light kit (Tropix). The mean and S.D. were calculated and experimental results of the promoter constructs were displayed either as arbitrary units of luciferase activity, or as a -fold induction with respect to the corresponding untreated sample.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Endoglin Associates with the TGF-beta Signaling Receptors in the Absence of Exogenous Ligand-- To study the interaction of endoglin with Tbeta RI or Tbeta RII, COS cells were transfected with the corresponding expression vectors in the absence of exogenous ligand, and cell lysates were subjected to specific immunoprecipitation, followed by Western blot analysis. As shown in Fig. 1, endoglin co-immunoprecipitates with either Tbeta RI or Tbeta RII as revealed by immunodetection with antibodies to Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII, respectively (lanes 3 and 6). Although the transfected COS cells express low levels of signaling receptors, no association between endoglin and the endogenous receptors could be detected (lanes 1 and 4). These results demonstrate that endoglin interacts with Tbeta RI and with Tbeta RII in the absence of exogenous TGF-beta and that the formation of the endoglin-Tbeta RI or endoglin-Tbeta RII complexes does not require the presence of Tbeta RII or Tbeta RI, respectively.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Endoglin interacts with Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII in the absence of exogenous ligand. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with expression vectors encoding endoglin, Tbeta RI, or Tbeta RII, as indicated. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with a mixture of P3D1 and P4A4 anti-endoglin (upper panels) or anti-Tbeta RI or anti-Tbeta RII (middle panels) antibodies. Immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, followed by Western blot (WB) with the indicated antibodies to allow the detection of co-immunoprecipitated proteins. As a control for transfection, total lysates (TL) were analyzed by Western blot (lower panels). This is a representative experiment of at least three different ones.

Formation of Endoglin-Tbeta RI and Endoglin-Tbeta RII Complexes Is Not Affected by the Activation State of the Signaling Receptors-- To analyze whether the complex formation of endoglin with Tbeta RI or Tbeta RII was affected by the activation state of the signaling receptors, experiments were performed in the presence of exogenous ligand or signaling receptors with varying catalytic activities. First, COS cells were transfected with endoglin and Tbeta RI or Tbeta RII and cultured with different concentrations of fetal calf serum, either in the absence or in the presence of 10 ng/ml exogenous TGF-beta 1. Fetal calf serum is a minor source of TGF-beta , and preliminary experiments indicated that 0.2% is the minimal concentration of fetal calf serum required for cell viability. As shown in Fig. 2A, the amount of Tbeta RI (left upper panel) or Tbeta RII (right upper panel) co-immunoprecipitated by anti-endoglin antibodies is similar for all treatments, suggesting that the addition of exogenous ligand does not affect the formation of endoglin-Tbeta RI or endoglin-Tbeta RII complexes. Since the active TGF-beta receptor signaling complex requires both Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII, endoglin association was analyzed when both signaling receptors were cotransfected (Fig. 2B). Again, exogenous TGF-beta did not affect the formation of endoglin complexes with Tbeta RI or Tbeta RII. Next, COS cells were transfected with expression vectors for endoglin as well as wild type and different kinase mutant versions of the signaling receptors. As shown in Fig. 2C, the constitutively active Tbeta RI (T204D) mutant, the constitutively inactive Tbeta RI (K232R) mutant, and the wild type Tbeta RI construct were able to associate with endoglin (upper left panel). Similarly, the kinase-inactive Tbeta RII (K277R), and the wild type Tbeta RII constructs showed interaction with endoglin (upper right panel). Taken together, these results suggest that endoglin association with Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII is independent of the activation state of the signaling receptors.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Effect of the activation state of the TGF-beta system on the endoglin association with the signaling receptors. A and B, the presence of TGF-beta does not affect the association between endoglin and Tbeta RI or Tbeta RII. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with expression vectors encoding HA-endoglin, Tbeta RI, or Tbeta RII and cultured in the presence of 10% (A) or 0.2% (A and B) fetal calf serum and recombinant TGF-beta 1 at 10 ng/ml, as indicated. Total lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-endoglin (P3D1 and P4A4), anti-Tbeta RI, or anti-Tbeta RII antibodies. Immunoprecipitates were electrophoresed by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, followed by Western blot (WB) with anti-HA, anti-Tbeta RI, or anti-Tbeta RII antibodies (upper panels). As a control for transfection, recombinant proteins were analyzed in total lysates (TL) by Western blot (lower panels). C, full-length endoglin associates with Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII kinases independently of their activation state. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with expression vectors encoding endoglin, wild type Tbeta RI kinase, constitutively active Tbeta RI kinase (T204D), kinase-deficient Tbeta RI (K232R), wild type Tbeta RII, and kinase-deficient Tbeta RII (K277R) as indicated. Total lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-endoglin antibodies (P3D1 and P4A4), and immunoprecipitates were electrophoresed by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, followed by Western blot with anti-Tbeta RI or anti-Tbeta RII antibodies (upper panels). As a control for transfection, recombinant proteins were analyzed in total lysates by Western blot (lower panels). Results shown in A and B are representative of four different experiments.

The Extracellular Domain of Endoglin Interacts with Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII-- To identify the region(s) involved in the association with the signaling receptors, several truncated versions of endoglin were generated (Fig. 3). Construct HA-TMCT-Endo lacks the extracellular domain, HA-EC-Endo lacks the cytoplasmic and transmembrane regions, and HA-ECTM-Endo only lacks the cytoplasmic domain. Additional mutants encoding only part of the extracellular domain (558-Endo, 437-Endo, and 437/586-Endo) were also analyzed. Constructs 437-Endo and 437/586-Endo were generated around the arginine at position 437, because several lines of investigation suggest that this residue might define a protein domain: (a) it is located at a putative protease cleavage site of the protein; (b) artificial constructs truncated at position 437 can be expressed upon transfection of mammalian cells; and (c) its codon is located in the border between exons 9b and 10 (29). In order to facilitate the analysis of the mutants, all constructs contained an epitope tag of HA at the amino terminus. Transfection of these constructs in COS cells confirmed that all mutant versions of endoglin were expressed as evidenced by Western blot analysis (Fig. 3B). Since the wild type endoglin is a disulfide-linked dimer (30), we analyzed whether the truncated forms were also disulfide-linked by subjecting the lysates to electrophoresis under reducing or nonreducing conditions. As shown in Fig. 3B, all of the constructs were expressed in a dimeric form. Interestingly, the smallest construct, TMCT-Endo, contains only one cysteine residue at position 582 of the extracellular domain, suggesting its involvement in the dimerization process. This was further demonstrated by generating the mutant construct TMCT-Endo/C582G, where the cysteine at 582 has been replaced by a glycine. Transfection of this mutant yielded a monomeric form of endoglin, as opposed to the dimer obtained with the TMCT-Endo plasmid (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, similar to the wild type endoglin, all of the truncated forms were also expressed at the cell surface as demonstrated by flow cytometry analysis (Fig. 3D).


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Generation of different truncated forms of endoglin. A, schematic representation showing the names and the endoglin protein sequences. Numbers indicate the amino acid of endoglin (starting at the N terminus) that limit the corresponding fragment. The position of extracellular (EC), transmembrane (TM), and cytoplasmic (CT) domains, is indicated. As described under "Experimental Procedures," all of the constructs contain the leader sequence of the IgGkappa and the HA epitope at the N terminus, and some constructs (EC-Endo, 558-endo, 437-Endo, and 437/586-Endo) encode the transmembrane domain of the pDisplay vector. The number of amino acid residues, corresponding to each endoglin construct expressed at the cell surface, is included in parenthesis. B, Western blot analysis of endoglin mutants. Total lysates from COS cells transiently transfected with expression vectors encoding the indicated forms of endoglin were subjected to SDS-PAGE under either reducing (R) or nonreducing (NR) conditions, followed by Western blot (WB) with anti-HA antibody. Analysis of the recombinant proteins under reducing and nonreducing conditions demonstrates that all of the constructs are expressed in a dimeric form. C, Western blot analysis of TMCT-Endo and TMCT-Endo/C582G mutants. Total lysates from COS cells transiently transfected with TMCT-Endo and TMCT-Endo/C582G expression vectors were subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by Western blot with anti-HA antibody. Analysis of the recombinant proteins under either reducing or nonreducing conditions demonstrates that TMCT-Endo is expressed in a dimeric form, whereas TMCT-Endo/C582G yields a monomer. D, flow cytometry analysis. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with expression vectors encoding the indicated forms of endoglin and 48 h later were collected and analyzed by immunofluorescence flow cytometry with anti-HA antibodies. Data are shown as an expression index (percentage of positive cells multiplied by their mean fluorescence intensity). Results shown in B and C are representative of four different experiments, whereas those in D are representative of two different experiments.

To investigate whether the extracellular domain of endoglin was involved in the association with the signaling receptors, HA-ECTM-Endo, Tbeta RI, and Tbeta RII were expressed upon transfection in COS cells. Immunoprecipitation analysis with anti-Tbeta RI and anti-Tbeta RII demonstrated that HA-ECTM-Endo was co-precipitated only when Tbeta RI or Tbeta RII were expressed (Fig. 4A), indicating that the extracellular domain of endoglin interacts with both signaling receptors. Parallel studies with HA-EC-Endo construct, which does not contain the transmembrane domain of endoglin, revealed similar levels of truncated protein co-precipitated with anti-Tbeta RI and anti-Tbeta RII (Fig. 4A), further confirming the involvement of the extracellular domain and suggesting a nonrelevant role for the transmembrane region in the interaction with the signaling receptors. Next, the interactions of different truncations of the extracellular domain of endoglin with Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII were analyzed. Immunoprecipitation studies with anti-endoglin, anti-Tbeta RI, and anti-Tbeta RII demonstrated that HA-558-Endo, HA-437-Endo, and HA-437/586-Endo co-precipitated with Tbeta RI, whereas only HA-558-Endo and HA-437/586-Endo co-precipitated with Tbeta RII (Fig. 4, B and C). These results suggest that (a) Tbeta RII interacts with residues 437-558 of the extracellular domain of endoglin, a region proximal to the transmembrane domain and (b) Tbeta RI interacts not only with residues 437-558 but also with a second region comprised between amino acids 26 and 437 of the extracellular domain of endoglin.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Analysis of the interaction between the extracellular domain of endoglin and Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII. A, the extracellular domain of endoglin associates with Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with expression vectors encoding HA-ECTM-Endo, HA-EC-Endo, Tbeta RI, or Tbeta RII, as indicated. Total lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-Tbeta RI or anti-Tbeta RII antibodies, and immunoprecipitates were electrophoresed by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. The presence of endoglin was revealed by Western blot (WB) with anti-HA antibodies (upper panels). As a control for transfection, recombinant proteins were analyzed in total lysates (TL) by Western blot (lower panels). B and C, mapping the extracellular regions of endoglin involved in the association with Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with Tbeta RI, Tbeta RII, HA-EC-Endo, HA-437-Endo, HA-558-Endo, or HA-437/586-Endo, as indicated. Total lysates were immunoprecipitated with a mixture of P3D1 and P4A4 antibodies (alpha -endoglin), anti-Tbeta RI, or anti-Tbeta RII, and immunoprecipitates were electrophoresed by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. The presence of Tbeta RI, Tbeta RII, or endoglin was revealed by Western blot with anti-Tbeta RI, anti-Tbeta RII, or anti-HA antibodies, respectively. As a control for transfection, recombinant proteins were analyzed in total lysates by Western blot. Tbeta RI coprecipitates with the truncated endoglin mutants EC-Endo, 558-Endo, and 437-Endo, whereas Tbeta RII only coprecipitates with EC-Endo and 558-Endo (B). Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII coprecipitate with the truncated endoglin mutant 437/586-Endo (C). Results shown in A-C are representative of at least four different experiments.

The Cytoplasmic Domain of Endoglin Interacts with Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII-- When studying the interaction between two different transmembrane proteins, it is important to assess both the involvement of their extracellular domains and that of their cytoplasmic domains. Endoglin is constitutively phosphorylated in Ser/Thr residues (31, 32), and both signaling receptors are Ser/Thr kinases (33, 34), thus providing a hint for the participation of their cytoplasmic domains in protein association. To study the interaction between endoglin cytoplasmic domain and Tbeta RI or Tbeta RII, the HA-TMCT-Endo construct (lacking the extracellular domain) was co-transfected with wild type or kinase mutants of Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII (Fig. 5). Immunoprecipitation analysis with anti-Tbeta RI and anti-Tbeta RII demonstrated that the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin associates with Tbeta RI when the kinase domain is inactive (K232R) but not with the constitutively active (T204D) form (Fig. 5A). In the same experiment, a weak band of endoglin was found associated with the wild type Tbeta RI. This association is probably due to the Tbeta RI activation induced by oligomerization of the signaling receptors that occurs upon transfection (35, 36). In addition, the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin interacts with both the active (wild type) and inactive (K277R) forms of Tbeta RII (Fig. 5B). These results demonstrate that the endoglin cytoplasmic domain interacts with Tbeta RI and with Tbeta RII.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   The cytoplasmic domain of endoglin associates with Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with expression vectors encoding HA-TMCT-Endo, wild type Tbeta RI, constitutively active Tbeta RI kinase (T204D), kinase-deficient Tbeta RI (K232R), wild type Tbeta RII, and kinase-deficient Tbeta RII (K277R), as indicated. Tbeta RI or Tbeta RII constructs were immunoprecipitated (IP) from total lysates with anti-Tbeta RI or anti-Tbeta RII antibodies, and immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. The presence of endoglin was revealed by Western blot (WB) with anti-HA antibodies (alpha -HA). As a control for transfection, recombinant proteins were analyzed in total lysates (TL) by Western blot. A, HA-TMCT-Endo coprecipitates with the kinase-deficient form of Tbeta RI (K232R) but not with the constitutively active Tbeta RI kinase (T204D). B and C, HA-TMCT-Endo coprecipitates with both wild type (wt) Tbeta RII and kinase-deficient Tbeta RII (K277R) but shows a different electrophoretic migration in each case. The addition of alkaline phosphatase to immunoprecipitates (rightmost lane), indicates that the lower electrophoretic migration is due to endoglin phosphorylation. It is worth noting that the intensity of the endoglin band associated with the Tbeta RII (K277R) is similar to that of the phosphatase-treated sample of Tbeta RII (wt), suggesting that the lower intensity displayed by the untreated Tbeta RII (wt) immunoprecipitate is probably due to a higher heterogeneity of the associated endoglin band. Results shown in A-C are representative of at least five different experiments.

The Cytoplasmic Domain of Endoglin Is Phosphorylated by Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII-- A detailed analysis of the bands separated by SDS-PAGE, corresponding to the endoglin cytoplasmic domain, revealed that the electrophoretic mobility of the HA-TMCT-Endo associated with the constitutively active Tbeta RII (wild type) was lower than that of the HA-TMCT-Endo associated with the kinase-inactive (K277R) form of Tbeta RII (Fig. 5, B and C; upper panels). Similar electrophoretic differences were observed when analyzing the endoglin cytoplasmic domain in total lysates derived from cells overexpressing either the wild type or the constitutively inactive form of Tbeta RII, respectively (Fig. 5, B and C; lower panels). It is well known that phosphorylated proteins migrate more slowly that the unphosphorylated forms, suggesting that the electrophoretic differences observed above might be due to different phosphorylation states of endoglin. This interpretation would be compatible with the fact that the migration displayed by HA-TMCT-Endo is dependent on the activation state of the associated kinase. To confirm this hypothesis, co-precipitates of HA-TMCT-Endo and constitutively active Tbeta RII were treated or not with alkaline phosphatase. As shown in Fig. 5C, upon phosphatase treatment, endoglin associated with wild type Tbeta RII showed an electrophoretic mobility identical to that of endoglin associated with the constitutively inactive Tbeta RII, suggesting that endoglin not only associates with Tbeta RII but is also a substrate for Tbeta RII.

At variance with Tbeta RII, no changes in the electrophoretic mobilities among the HA-TMCT-Endo constructs associated with the different versions of Tbeta RI were observed (Fig. 5A). Since the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin associates with the kinase-inactive but not with the constitutively active form (Fig. 5A), it is possible that, if phosphorylated by Tbeta RI, the endoglin cytoplasmic domain would be detached from the active kinase complex.

To further analyze the phosphorylation of endoglin by the signaling receptors, in vitro and in vivo studies were carried out. First, immunoprecipitates of Tbeta RI, Tbeta RII, or their mutant forms were incubated with a GST fusion protein containing the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin (GST-Ecyt) in the presence of [gamma -32P]ATP to allow kinase activity. As shown in Fig. 6A, the active forms of Tbeta RI (T204D) and Tbeta RII (wild type) are able to phosphorylate the endoglin cytoplasmic domain. The wild type Tbeta RI also displays endoglin phosphorylation activity despite the absence of TGF-beta activation. This is probably due to the Tbeta RI activation induced by oligomerization of the signaling receptors that occurs upon transfection (35, 36). By contrast, no significant endoglin phosphorylation was observed in the presence of inactive signaling receptors (Tbeta RI/K232R and Tbeta RII/K277R), excluding the possible contribution of endogenous signaling receptors due to heteromeric associations with the recombinant constructs. As a negative control for specificity in all samples, no phosphorylation could be observed when using GST alone as a substrate. Next, we analyzed endoglin phosphorylation in vivo. Cells transfected with full-length endoglin and signaling receptors were metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphate, and the phosphorylation state of endoglin was analyzed by immunoprecipitation followed by SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig. 6B). In mock-transfected cells, a basal level of endoglin phosphorylation was observed (lane 2), probably due to the endogenous signaling receptors. Upon transfection with the wild type Tbeta RI (lane 6) and Tbeta RII (lane 3), a marked increase in endoglin phosphorylation levels could be detected. Also, the constitutively kinase-active Tbeta RI (T204D) yielded similar levels of endoglin phosphorylation as the wild type form (data not shown). By contrast, expression of the kinase-inactive forms of Tbeta RI (lane 7) and Tbeta RII (lane 4) yielded background signals, supporting the specificity of the wild type signaling receptor-induced endoglin phosphorylation. In addition, experiments performed with the truncated form TMCT-Endo, lacking the extracellular domain of endoglin, resulted in a similar phosphorylation pattern by the wild type and mutant forms of the signaling receptors (data not shown), indicating that phosphorylation of endoglin occurs at the serine/threonine-rich cytoplasmic domain.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Endoglin phosphorylation by Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII kinases. A, the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin is phosphorylated by Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII kinases in vitro. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with HA-tagged wild type Tbeta RI kinase, constitutively active Tbeta RI kinase (T204D), kinase-deficient Tbeta RI (K232R), wild type Tbeta RII, and kinase-deficient Tbeta RII (K277R), as indicated. Cells were collected 48 h later, and their lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-HA antibodies. Immunoprecipitates were incubated with equal amounts of GST or GST-Ecyt proteins in kinase buffer containing [gamma -32P]ATP, and phosphorylation was allowed to proceed. Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. The positions of GST and GST-Ecyt are indicated by arrowheads. As a control for transfection, recombinant Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII proteins were analyzed in total lysates (TL) by Western blot (WB). B, endoglin is phosphorylated by Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII kinases in vivo. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with full-length endoglin, wild type Tbeta RI kinase, kinase-deficient Tbeta RI (K232R), wild type Tbeta RII, and kinase-deficient Tbeta RII (K277R), as indicated. Cells were metabolically labeled 48 h later with [32P]orthophosphate, lysed, and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-endoglin antibodies (P4A4 and P3D1). Immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, and radiolabeled bands were detected by autoradiography. As a control for transfection, recombinant endoglin, Tbeta RI, and Tbeta RII proteins were analyzed in total lysates by Western blot. C, radiolabeled bands from B were quantified by densitometry. The sample number is the same as in B. Results shown in A-C are representative of at least four different experiments.

Endoglin Expression Modulates the Phosphorylation State of Tbeta RII and Tbeta RI-- The phosphorylation state of Tbeta RII and Tbeta RI plays a critical role in TGF-beta -induced cell signaling (35, 36). Since endoglin not only associates with these signaling receptors but is also a substrate for their kinase activity, we analyzed whether endoglin expression affected the phosphorylation state of Tbeta RII and Tbeta RI. Thus, in vivo and in vitro studies were carried out. First, we investigated the effect of endoglin expression on Tbeta RII phosphorylation after metabolic labeling with [32P]orthophosphate. Immunoprecipitation of transfected Tbeta RII from endoglin-deficient cells resulted in a broad band (between 70 and 90 kDa) of the autophosphorylated kinase (Fig. 7A), as previously described (35). Similar experiments with cells cotransfected with full-length endoglin yielded a weaker Tbeta RII band overlapping with a strong signal at 90 kDa of phosphorylated endoglin (Fig. 7A). Since the overlapping between Tbeta RII and endoglin bands interfered with the estimation of Tbeta RII phosphorylation levels, we decided to carry out experiments using a smaller endoglin construct, HA-TMCT-Endo, which contains only the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains. Thus, cotransfection of HA-TMCT-Endo resulted in a marked decrease of Tbeta RII phosphorylation levels (Fig. 7, B and C; compare lane 3 with lane 1). As expected, no significant phosphorylation was obtained in the presence of the kinase-inactive mutant of Tbeta RII (lane 4). Since Tbeta RII is constitutively autophosphorylated (35, 37), we analyzed whether the decrease of Tbeta RII phosphorylation levels observed in vivo was due to a decreased autokinase activity of Tbeta RII. Thus, anti-Tbeta RII immunoprecipitates from cell lysates, containing or not containing full-length endoglin, were incubated with [gamma -32P]ATP, and the radiolabeled Tbeta RII was analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 7, D and E). As expected, the Tbeta RII present in endoglin-deficient cells (lane 2) showed a clear autophosphorylating activity as compared with a negative control (lane 1). Interestingly, co-expression of endoglin resulted in a markedly reduced level of Tbeta RII phosphorylation (lane 3), suggesting that endoglin inhibits the autophosphorylation of Tbeta RII. As expected, the kinase-inactive mutant showed background levels of phosphorylation either in the presence (lane 4) or in the absence of endoglin (not shown). These results suggest that endoglin expression inhibits the phosphorylation of Tbeta RII.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Tbeta RII phosphorylation is diminished in the presence of endoglin. A, COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with HA-endoglin and wild type Tbeta RII, as indicated. Cells were metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphate and lysed, and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-Tbeta RII antibodies. Immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, and radiolabeled bands were detected by autoradiography. As a control for transfection, recombinant endoglin and Tbeta RII proteins were analyzed in total lysates (TL) by Western blot (WB). B, COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with HA-TMCT-Endo, wild type Tbeta RII, and kinase-deficient Tbeta RII (K277R), as indicated. Cells were metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphate and lysed, and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Tbeta RII antibodies. Immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, and radiolabeled bands were detected by autoradiography. As a control for transfection, recombinant endoglin and Tbeta RII proteins were analyzed in total lysates by Western blot. C, radiolabeled bands from B were quantified by densitometry. The sample number is the same as in B. D, COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with HA-endoglin, wild type Tbeta RII, and kinase-deficient Tbeta RII (K277R), as indicated. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Tbeta RII antibodies, immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, and radiolabeled bands were detected by autoradiography. The data show that the autophosphorylation capacity of Tbeta RII kinase is diminished in the presence of endoglin. As a control for transfection, recombinant endoglin and Tbeta RII proteins were analyzed in total lysates by Western blot. E, radiolabeled bands from D were quantified by densitometry. The sample number is the same as in D. Results shown in A-E are representative of at least four different experiments.

The phosphorylation state of specific Ser/Thr residues in the Tbeta RII is able to regulate its kinase activity (2-4). Since the juxtamembrane and GS regions of Tbeta RI are direct substrates for the Tbeta RII kinase, we investigated whether the endoglin-dependent modulation of the Tbeta RII phosphorylation affected the Tbeta RI phosphorylation. Anti-Tbeta RII immunoprecipitates from cell lysates, with or without endoglin, were incubated with a recombinant protein containing the juxtamembrane and GS regions of Tbeta RI (GST-GS/Tbeta RI) in the presence of [gamma -32P]ATP, and the radiolabeled substrate was analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 8, A and B). In the absence of endoglin, Tbeta RII induced the specific phosphorylation of GST-GS/Tbeta RI (lane 2), as compared with a negative control (lane 1). However, upon endoglin expression, a markedly enhanced phosphorylation of the GST-GS/Tbeta RI protein was observed (lane 4). These results suggest that endoglin expression leads to an increased phosphorylation of the Tbeta RI within the juxtamembrane and GS regions. This observation was confirmed by analyzing the effect of endoglin expression on Tbeta RI phosphorylation after metabolic labeling with [32P]orthophosphate. As depicted in Fig. 8, C and D, the basal phosphorylation levels of Tbeta RI (lane 3) were clearly increased when endoglin was cotransfected (lane 4).


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Tbeta RI phosphorylation is enhanced in the presence of endoglin. A, phosphorylation of the juxtamembrane and GS regions of Tbeta RI in vitro. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with HA-endoglin and wild type Tbeta RII, as indicated. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-Tbeta RII antibodies, and immunoprecipitates were incubated with GST or GST-GS/Tbeta RI in the presence of [gamma -32P]ATP. Phosphorylated substrates were subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, and radiolabeled bands were detected by autoradiography. The data show that the phosphorylation of the juxtamembrane/GS regions of Tbeta RI is increased in the presence of endoglin. As a control for transfection, recombinant endoglin and Tbeta RII proteins were analyzed in total lysates (TL) by Western blot (WB). B, radiolabeled bands from A were quantified by densitometry. The sample number is the same as in A. These results are representative of at least four different experiments. C, phosphorylation of Tbeta RI in vivo. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with HA-endoglin and wild type Tbeta RI, as indicated. Cells were metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphate, lysed, and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Tbeta RI antibodies. Immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, and radiolabeled bands were detected by autoradiography. As a control for transfection, recombinant endoglin and Tbeta RI proteins were analyzed in total lysates by Western blot. D, radiolabeled bands from C were quantified by densitometry. The sample number is the same as in C. These results are representative of at least four different experiments.

Overall, these results indicate that endoglin modulates the phosphorylation levels of both signaling receptors.

Effect of Endoglin on TGF-beta Signaling-- Since endoglin associates with the signaling receptors and modulates their phosphorylation status, we examined whether endoglin expression affected Smad phosphorylation and TGF-beta gene responses. In the TGF-beta signaling pathway, phosphorylation of Smad2 and Smad3 by Tbeta RI is a necessary step for downstream signal transduction. Anti-Tbeta RI immunoprecipitates from cell lysates, with or without endoglin, were incubated with Smad2, Smad3, or Smad4 recombinant proteins in the presence of [gamma -32P]ATP, and radiolabeled Smad proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 9, A and B). In the absence of endoglin, specific phosphorylation of Smad2 and Smad3 could be observed, whereas the presence of endoglin induced an increased phosphorylation of Smad2 but not Smad3 (Fig. 9B). As expected, no phosphorylation was found in Smad4, which lacks the Tbeta RI target sequence within the MH2 domain. Since these results suggest that endoglin expression leads to an increased phosphorylation of Smad2, we investigated the reporter expression of the mix.2 gene promoter, whose activation by TGF-beta /activin involves the formation of a transcriptional complex composed of Smad2/Smad4 and Fast-1 (26). L6E9 cells were transfected with the pARE-lux reporter vector in the absence or in the presence of endoglin (Fig. 9, C and D). Endoglin was able to consistently increase the TGF-beta responsiveness in a dose-dependent fashion, as analyzed by both absolute activity (Fig. 9C) and -fold induction with respect to untreated samples (Fig. 9D). Interestingly, the basal activity of the pARE reporter vector was inhibited with increasing concentrations of endoglin, consistent with the reported role of endoglin in the absence of exogenous TGF-beta (38). Taken together, these results suggest that endoglin is able to increase the Smad2-mediated TGF-beta responses of the mix.2 gene promoter.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Endoglin modulates downstream TGF-beta signaling. A, phosphorylation of Smad proteins in vitro. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with HA-endoglin and wild type Tbeta RI, as indicated. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-Tbeta RI antibodies, and immunoprecipitates were incubated with GST-Smad2, GST-Smad3, or GST-Smad4 in the presence of [gamma -32P]ATP. Phosphorylated substrates were subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions, and radiolabeled bands were detected by autoradiography. The data show that the phosphorylation of GST-Smad2 is increased in the presence of endoglin. As a control for transfection, recombinant endoglin and Tbeta RI proteins were analyzed in total lysates (TL) by Western blot (WB). The position of the different GST constructs is indicated. B, radiolabeled bands from A were quantified by densitometry. The sample number is the same as in A. These results are representative of at least three different experiments. C and D, analysis of TGF-beta -induced reporter gene expression. L6E9 cells were transiently cotransfected with the pARE reporter construct, Fast-1, and increasing concentrations of an expression vector encoding endoglin. TGF-beta 1 was added 24 h after transfection, and luciferase activity was determined 48 h after transfection. C shows the relative luciferase units of treated and untreated samples; numbers above the open bars indicate the actual values of untreated cells for comparative purposes. D shows the TGF-beta -fold induction values with respect to untreated controls. This is a representative experiment of four different ones with similar results.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Several laboratories have previously shown that endoglin forms heteromeric complexes with several members of the TGF-beta signaling receptor family in the presence of ligand (8, 11, 12, 13, 32, 39). Here, we show that full-length endoglin physically interacts with Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII, and this interaction is not modified by the presence of exogenous ligand or by the activation state of the signaling kinases. This finding is compatible with the existence of ligand-free endoglin forming a complex with ligand-bound signaling receptors (11) as well as with the requirement of signaling receptors for ligand binding to endoglin (11, 12). Also, the direct interaction of endoglin with Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII is supported by the existence of ligand-independent complexes of endoglin and ALK-1 in endothelial cells (40, 41). We have observed that the formation of the complex endoglin-Tbeta RI or endoglin-Tbeta RII does not require the presence of Tbeta RII or Tbeta RI, respectively. This finding agrees with the fact that endoglin is co-immunoprecipitated with Tbeta RII·TGF-beta , ActRII-activin-A, or ActRII-BMP-7 complexes, despite the absence of the corresponding type I receptor in the cell (12). Taken together, these results provide a solid molecular basis for ligand binding to endoglin. Thus, endoglin could bind first to the signaling receptors, and this interaction would then allow ligand access to endoglin.

Generation of a panel of endoglin constructs (Fig. 3) has facilitated a more detailed analysis of the association between endoglin and the signaling receptors. Similar to the wild type endoglin, the mutant forms were expressed as disulfide-linked dimers. Interestingly, mutation of Cys582 abrogated the formation of disulfide linkages in the smallest construct (Fig. 3C), indicating its direct involvement in interchain disulfide bonds. Other cysteine residues contained within the endoglin fragment Cys330-Cys412 have been previously proposed as candidates in endoglin disulfide formation (29, 42), but Cys582 is the first one to be specifically identified.

Analysis on the physical association between endoglin mutants and the signaling receptors has revealed that both the extracellular and cytoplasmic domains participate in this association. Thus, several interaction sites can participate in the formation and stabilization of the endoglin complexes, similarly to the contact sites mapped within the Tbeta RI·Tbeta RII (34, 43) or betaglycan-Tbeta RII (44) complexes. Despite the structural homology between Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII, they show two major differences in their association with endoglin. First, the interaction of Tbeta RII with the extracellular domain of endoglin maps within the transmembrane proximal region 437-558, whereas Tbeta RI interacts not only with fragment 437-558, but also with the N-terminal region(s) located above residue 437. Second, the interaction of Tbeta RI with the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin can only be detected when its kinase domain is inactive; by contrast, both active and inactive forms of Tbeta RII can associate with the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin. Upon interaction with the signaling receptors, the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin is phosphorylated by Tbeta RI or Tbeta RII. This finding fully agrees with the fact that endoglin is constitutively phosphorylated in Ser/Thr residues (31, 32) and forms heteromeric complexes with the signaling receptors displaying Ser/Thr kinase activity (33, 34). Once phosphorylated by the respective kinase, the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin remains bound to the Tbeta RII, whereas it is released from Tbeta RI. Since the kinase activity of Tbeta RI is only induced in the presence of ligand, these results suggest that the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin dissociates from Tbeta RI upon exposure to members of the TGF-beta family. This is not surprising, since in many enzymatic systems the kinase/substrate association is usually transient. In fact, a similar transient interaction has been described for Tbeta RI-mediated phosphorylation of R-Smads (45). In contrast, the association of Tbeta RII with the cytoplasmic domain of endoglin seems to be stable even after phosphorylation has occurred. Similarly, phosphorylation of Tbeta RI by Tbeta RII kinase does not affect the Tbeta RI·Tbeta RII association (43). Interestingly, at variance with our endoglin data, the interaction of the Tbeta RII with the cytoplasmic domain of betaglycan does not occur with a kinase-inactive version of the receptor (44). Since the Tbeta RII is constitutively active within the cell (35), our results suggests that the constitutive phosphorylation of endoglin is mainly due to this kinase. Nevertheless, although we find that Tbeta RI or Tbeta RII is able to phosphorylate endoglin, we cannot exclude the possibility that some of the 19 Ser/Thr residues within the cytoplasmic domain are targeted by additional Ser/Thr kinases. In this regard, putative consensus motifs for protein kinase C and casein kinase have been identified within the cytoplasmic sequence (31) (data not shown).

The high degree of homology between the cytoplasmic domains of endoglin and betaglycan suggests a conserved function/regulation for these domains. Supporting this view, Blobe et al. (44) have described that the cytoplasmic domains of betaglycan and Tbeta RII interact specifically, and this interaction results in the phosphorylation of the betaglycan cytoplasmic domain, in agreement with the results shown here for endoglin. Both endoglin and betaglycan contain PDZ class I binding motifs (Ser/Thr-X-Ala/Val) at their homologous cytoplasmic regions. Recently, GIPC was identified as a PDZ domain-containing protein able to interact with betaglycan cytoplasmic domain and regulate TGF-beta signaling (46), although the possible association of GIPC with the endoglin cytoplasmic region remains to be established.

Endoglin has been shown to modulate cellular responses to TGF-beta 1 (11, 13, 14). However, the molecular mechanism of this modulation is not known. The data shown here suggest that endoglin might regulate TGF-beta signaling by its direct interaction with the signaling receptors. Recently, betaglycan has been reported to inhibit TGF-beta signaling by preventing the association between Tbeta RI and Tbeta RII, an interference mediated by the glycosaminoglycan modification of betaglycan (47). Unlike betaglycan, endoglin does not seem to affect the formation of Tbeta RI·Tbeta RII complexes (12). This, and the absence of glycosaminoglycan recognition motifs in the endoglin molecule, suggests a functional mechanism for endoglin distinct from that reported for betaglycan (47). Endoglin could regulate either