|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M202411200 on May 29, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 32, 29342-29347, August 9, 2002
Ethanol Induces Fatty Acid Synthesis Pathways by Activation of
Sterol Regulatory Element-binding Protein (SREBP)*
Min
You ,
Monika
Fischer,
Mark A.
Deeg, and
David W.
Crabb
From the Departments of Medicine, Indiana University School of
Medicine and Richard Roudebush Veteran's Affairs Medical Center,
Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
Received for publication, March 12, 2002, and in revised form, May 23, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Alcoholic fatty liver is the earliest and most
common response of the liver to alcohol and may be a precursor of more
severe forms of liver injury. The mechanism by which ethanol causes
fatty liver and liver injury is complex. We found that in both rat
H4IIEC3 and McA-RH7777 hepatoma cell lines, ethanol induced
transcription of a sterol regulatory element-binding protein
(SREBP)-regulated promoter via increased levels of mature SREBP-1
protein. This effect of ethanol was blocked by addition of sterols.
This effect is likely mediated by acetaldehyde, because the effect was
only seen in cell lines expressing alcohol dehydrogenase, and
inhibition of ethanol oxidation by 4-methylpyrazole blocked the effect
in the hepatoma cells. Furthermore, the aldehyde dehydrogenase
inhibitor cyanamide enhanced the effect of ethanol in the hepatoma
cells. Consistent with these in vitro findings, feeding
mice a low fat diet with ethanol for 4 weeks resulted in a significant
increase in steady-state levels of the mature (active) form of SREBP-1. Activation of SREBP-1 by ethanol feeding was associated with increased expression of hepatic lipogenic genes as well as the accumulation of
triglyceride in the livers. These finding suggest that metabolism of
ethanol increased hepatic lipogenesis by activating SREBP-1 and that
this effect of ethanol may contribute to the development of alcoholic
fatty liver.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Fatty liver, characterized by accumulation of lipid droplets, and
of triglyceride and cholesterol in the liver, is a uniform response of
the liver to alcohol (1). Although previously considered to be a benign
consequence of alcohol use, it is now known that fatty livers are
unusually susceptible to the effects of endotoxin, which has been
implicated in the pathogenesis of alcoholic hepatitis and fibrosis
(2-4). Furthermore, obesity, a well-known factor predisposing to fatty
liver, has also been noted to be an independent risk factor for the
development of cirrhosis in alcoholics (5). In addition, fatty liver
occurring in the absence of significant alcohol consumption may be
associated with inflammation and fibrosis, a condition designated
non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (6). Thus, there is increased interest in
understanding the pathogenesis of fatty liver, with the hope that
effective therapies against alcohol-induced liver injury might be
targeted against the factors that maintain the steatosis.
The mechanisms by which ethanol causes fatty liver appear to be
complex. Historically, the main mechanism proposed was that reducing
equivalents (NADH) generated during ethanol oxidation inhibit the
NAD+-requiring steps of the tricarboxylic acid cycle
and -oxidation and, thereby, inhibit fatty acid oxidation (7, 8).
However, it was reported that, although the reductive stress on the
liver abates over time in the ethanol-fed baboon model (reflected by a
normalization of the ratio of lactate to pyruvate in the hepatic venous
blood), fatty infiltration persists (9). Alternative explanations for
the persistence of fatty liver include inhibition of lipoprotein export
(possibly via formation of acetaldehyde protein adducts with tubulin)
and oxidative stress leading to lipid peroxidation (10-12). Although
these mechanisms may contribute to the development of fatty liver,
additional regulatory systems for fat metabolism have recently been
elucidated, and may represent targets for ethanol toxicity. For
example, we have demonstrated that ethanol blocks the ability of
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor to activate
transcription, in part due to impairment of its ability to bind target
DNA sequences (13, 14). Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor is a fatty acid receptor that coordinates a number of metabolic
pathways that may serve to dispose of excess fatty acids
(e.g. by inducing fatty acid oxidizing systems in the
mitochondrion and peroxisomes, fatty acid transporters, and binding
proteins as well as several apolipoproteins) (15).
An additional mechanism that may underlie the development of alcoholic
fatty liver is enhanced lipogenesis. Several studies have demonstrated
that a significant increase in hepatic lipogenesis occurs in
chronically ethanol-treated animals (16-18) and is associated with a
significant increase of the activities of hepatic
L- -glycerophosphate acyltransferase, fatty acid
synthase (FAS),1 and malic
enzyme (ME) (18, 19). A study using KK-Ay mice, a model for
obesity and overt diabetes, indicated that acetyl-CoA carboxylase
(ACC), ATP citrate lyase (ACL), ME, and 6-phosphogluconate
dehydrogenase were markedly increased following administration of
ethanol (20). Others reported that the mRNA for the low density
lipoprotein receptor and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA)
reductase was significantly increased in ethanol-fed rats (21).
Increased fatty acid synthesis could even be observed in non-hepatic
cells overexpressing ADH and exposed to ethanol (22). More recently, it
was shown that the hepatic lipogenic pathway is activated after
consumption of a mere 24 g of ethanol per day in humans (23).
The battery of enzymes and proteins reported to be induced in liver by
ethanol feeding are a subset of those regulated by sterol regulatory
element-binding proteins (SREBP-1a, -1c, and -2). SREBPs are
synthesized as precursors (~125 kDa) bound to the endoplasmic
reticulum and nuclear envelope. Upon activation, SREBPs are released
from the membrane into the nucleus as a mature protein (~ 68 kDa) by
a sequential two-step cleavage process (24). A key role of SREBPs in
regulating fatty acid and cholesterol synthesis in liver was suggested
by studies of transgenic mice overexpressing the constitutively active
mature forms of SREBPs (25, 26). These transgenic mouse studies have
suggested that, broadly speaking, SREBP-1 plays an active role in
regulating the transcription of genes involved in hepatic triglyceride
synthesis (including ACC, FAS, stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 (SCD), ACL,
ME, and L- -glycerophosphate acyltransferase), whereas
SREBP-2 is more involved in regulation of genes involved in cholesterol
metabolism (such as the low density lipoprotein receptor, HMG-CoA
synthase, HMG-CoA reductase, and squalene synthase). The livers from
mice overexpressing SREBP-1 have massive fatty livers due to increased accumulation of cholesteryl esters and triglycerides (25). More interestingly, studies have shown that increased hepatic levels of
nuclear SREBP-1c contribute to the development of fatty liver in two
mouse models of diabetes (27).
Despite the overlap between genes induced by ethanol feeding and those
regulated by SREBPs, there have been no studies that examine the effect
of ethanol on SREBP activity. Therefore, in the present study, we
examined the effect of ethanol on the SREBP activation and
transcriptional function in cultured hepatoma cells as well as in mice
fed ethanol-containing diets.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Most chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical
Co. Trypsin and tissue culture media were purchased from Invitrogen.
Delipidated fetal bovine serum was purchased from Sigma. CV-1
(African green monkey kidney) and rat hepatoma (H4IIEC3 and
McA-RH7777) cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture
Collection. Cholesterol and 25-hydroxycholesterol were obtained from
Sigma. All radioisotopes were purchase from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. The pSyn SRE plasmid, containing a generic TATA and three SRE elements
(representing those found at 325 to 225 bp of the hamster HMG-CoA
synthase promoter fused into the luciferase pGL2 Basic vector), was a
kind gift of Dr. Timothy F. Osborne (University of California, Irvine,
CA). The JS-15 plasmid (identical to pSyn SRE, except for a
double-point mutation resulting in loss of sterol-regulated transcription) was a kind gift of Dr. Richard J. Deckelbaum (Columbia University, New York, NY). The cDNA probes for SREBP-1, FAS, SCD, ACL, ME, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase were kind gifts
of Dr. Jay D. Horton (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center,
Dallas, TX).
Transfection of Tissue Culture Cells--
All cells were grown
in modified Eagle's medium (MEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine
serum, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 63 µg/ml penicillin G. On the
day for transfection, the cells were washed with PBS and switched to
MEM supplemented 10% delipidated FBS serum. Ten µg of the reporter
plasmid and 5 µg of pSV2CAT (as an internal control for transfection
efficiency) were transfected by calcium phosphate precipitation. Four
hours later the cells were exposed to PBS containing 15% glycerol for
3 min. The cells were rinsed twice with PBS, and fresh medium was
added. When ethanol was present, the cells were incubated in a chamber
containing a beaker of 1 liter of water containing ethanol at the same
concentration to reduce the loss of ethanol from the cultures due to
evaporation. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were washed
twice with PBS and lysed in 150 µl of a buffer containing 25 mM Tris, pH 7.8, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM
dithiothreitol, 10% glycerol, and 1% Triton X-100. Fifty microliters
of cell extracts was incubated with luciferase assay reagent based on
the original protocol of de Wet et al. (28). Chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase activity was measured as described previously (29),
and quantified on a PhosphorImager (Amersham Biosciences).
Immunoblots--
Nuclear protein extracts from cells or animal
livers were prepared as described previously (30, 31). Measurement of
SREBP protein was performed using 100 µg of crude cell or liver
nuclear protein, separated by electrophoresis in an 8%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to nitrocellulose filters.
SREBP-1 and SREBP-2 were visualized using antibodies obtained from
Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Detection of the protein bands was performed
using the Amersham Biosciences ECL kit.
Northern Blots--
Total RNA was prepared from mouse liver
using an RNeasy Total RNA kit (Qiagen Inc.). Equal aliquots of total
RNA (40 µg) from each mouse liver was denatured with formaldehyde and
formamide, subjected to electrophoresis in a 1.2% agarose gel, and
transferred to Hybond N+ membrane (Amersham Biosciences) for
hybridization. The cDNA probes were labeled with
[ -32P]dCTP using the Megaprime DNA labeling system kit
(Amersham Biosciences). The filters were hybridized with the indicated
32P-labeled probes (~1 × 106 cpm/ml)
for 2 h at 65 °C using Rapid-hyb buffer (Amersham Biosciences), washed with 0.1% (w/v) SDS/0.1× SSC at 70 °C for 60 min, and
exposed at 80 °C to Reflection NFE496 film (PerkinElmer Life
Sciences Inc.) with intensifying screens for 3-36 h at room
temperature. The resulting bands were quantified by exposure of the
filter to a PhosphorImager screen, and the results were normalized to the signal generated from glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA.
Total Cholesterol and Triglyceride Levels--
Mouse livers were
homogenized in radioimmune precipitation lysis buffer. Lipids were
extracted using chloroform/methanol (2:1 v/v), evaporated under dry
nitrogen, and dissolved in 5% fatty acid free bovine serum albumin.
Protein was assayed using a Protein Assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories).
Colorimetric cholesterol and triglyceride assays were carried out using
the Sigma Diagnostics Cholesterol and Triglyceride Reagents (Sigma
Chemical Co.).
Animals and Diets--
6- to 8-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were
obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Animals were
housed individually in a room with controlled temperature
(20-22 °C), humidity (55-65%), and lighting (on at 6 a.m.
and off at 6 p.m.). For animals on an ethanol-containing diet,
animal cages were placed on heating pads to maintain body temperature
because ethanol consumption can induce hypothermia. Liquid diets
provide 1 kcal/ml (prepared by Dyets, Inc., Bethlehem, PA) and were
based upon the Lieber-DeCarli formulation (32). Protein content was
constant at 18% of calories, and each diet had identical mineral and
vitamin content. The animals were divided into two dietary groups:
(a) control diet (fat comprising 10% of total calories, 6%
from cocoa butter, and 4% from safflower oil, 72% of calories as
carbohydrate) and (b) ethanol-containing diet (identical to
the control diet but with ethanol added to account for 27.5% of total
calories and the caloric equivalent of carbohydrate (maltose-dextrin)
removed). The animals were pair-fed for 4 weeks then sacrificed. The
experimental protocols were approved by the Indiana University School
of Medicine Animal Care and Use Committee.
Histology of Liver--
Frozen sections of the liver were
stained with Oil Red O.
Data Analysis--
The paired t test was used to
evaluate statistical differences in values between ethanol- and
pair-fed mice. Both t tests and analysis of variance
were used to analyze the in vitro data. All data are
presented as the mean ± S.E.
 |
RESULTS |
Effects of Ethanol on Transcription of SRE-containing Promoters in
Vitro--
Effects of ethanol on cellular metabolism may be due
directly to ethanol, or to the products of its oxidation, including
NADH, acetaldehyde, and acetate. We chose two rat hepatoma cell lines and a non-hepatic cell line for study. Previous studies from our laboratory have shown that H4IIEC3 expresses moderately high levels of
class I (low Km) ADH and ALDH2 protein and enzyme activity (33). This line also expresses SREBP-1 and -2 (data not
shown). Studies by others demonstrated that the amount of SREBP-1c
mRNA was nearly 3-fold greater than that of SREBP-1a in the
McA-RH7777 cells, the ratio that approaches that of normal rat liver
(9:1) (34). Furthermore, Western blot analysis showed that McA-RH7777
cells have substantial protein expression of both ADH and ALDH2 (data
not shown). CV-1 cells were chosen as a cell type known not to express
ADH. We tested the cells for responsiveness to the effects of sterols
on a SRE reporter gene, pSyn SRE-luciferase. pSV2-CAT was used as
internal control. In each of three cell lines, the reporter activity
was markedly reduced by incubation with sterol (10 µg/ml cholesterol
plus 1 µg/ml 25-hydroxycholesterol) to 10-35% of control activity.
Thus, each cell appears to express functional SREBP whose activity can
be suppressed by sterol supplementation.
The effect of ethanol on pSyn SRE expression was then tested in the
three cell lines. The cells were transfected with the reporter, pSyn
SRE-luciferase, and the internal control plasmid (pSV2CAT) and exposed
to various concentrations of ethanol for 48 h then harvested for
assay of reporter enzymes. As shown in Fig.
1, ethanol markedly increased the
activity of the SREBP reporter in both hepatoma cell lines but not in
the CV-1 cells. Ethanol had no effect on the expression of luciferase
from the parent plasmid, pGL2 Basic (data not shown). To confirm that
the effect of ethanol was mediated by SREBPs, the hepatoma cells were
also transiently transfected with JS-15, a pSyn SRE plasmid mutated in
the SRE regions, resulting in insensitivity to sterol. Incubation of
these cells with sterols did not down-regulate SRE expression, and
ethanol had no effect on the activity of the reporter (data not
shown).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Ethanol enhances the expression of pSyn SRE
in hepatoma cells. CV-1, H4IIEC3, and McA-RH7777 cells were plated
in MEM (low glucose) supplemented with 10% delipidated FBS and
transfected with pSyn SRE and internal control (pSV2CAT) for 5 h,
and the cells were exposed to PBS containing 15% glycerol for 3 min.
Then the cells were incubated with varying concentrations of ethanol
for 48 h. The concentration of ethanol in the medium was
maintained by culturing the cells in an incubator containing a
reservoir of ethanol as indicated in water. The cells then were
harvested for assay of the reports. Luciferase and CAT activity were
determined as described under "Experimental Procedures." The data
are expressed as percentages of control (mean ± S.E.) from at
least five experiments performed in duplicate. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 by t test, compared with
control.
|
|
We further tested the effect of sterols on the ability of ethanol to
activate the pSyn SRE-luciferase reporter. If the effect of ethanol
were mediated through activation of SREBPs, it would be predicted to be
blocked by supplemental sterols. In both H4IIEC3 and McA-RH7777 cells,
addition of sterols completely blocked the effect of ethanol on
activation of the pSyn SRE reporter activity (Fig.
2). These data provide strong evidence
that ethanol induced expression of the reporter by way of activation of
one or more of the SREBP forms, which interacts with a sterol response
element of the reporter.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Sterols block the effect of ethanol on
activation of pSyn SRE reporter activity. H4IIEC3 and McA-RH7777
cells were plated in MEM (low glucose) supplemented with 10%
delipidated FBS and transfected with pSyn SRE and internal control
(pSV2CAT) for 5 h. Cells were then incubated with increasing
concentrations of ethanol and increasing amounts of sterol (indicated
as micrograms/ml cholesterol/25-hydroxycholesterol) for 48 h. The
cells then were harvested for assay of the reporter enzymes. Luciferase
and CAT activity were determined as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The data are expressed as percentages of control
(mean ± S.E.) from at least three experiments performed in
duplicate. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 by t test, compared with control.
|
|
The lack of effect of ethanol on pSyn SRE-luciferase in CV-1 cells
suggested that ethanol metabolism was required for this effect. This
was further substantiated by the use of inhibitors of ethanol
metabolism. We used the class I alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitor
4-methylpyrazole and the aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitor cyanamide.
Fig. 3 shows that neither inhibitor
significantly affected pSyn SRE-luciferase activity in McA-RH7777 cells
in control experiments. However, 4-methylpyrazole nearly abolished the
effect of ethanol on pSyn SRE-luciferase expression in
McA-RH7777 cells, whereas cyanamide augmented the effect markedly. The
results suggest that acetaldehyde generated from ethanol may be
responsible for the ability of ethanol to activate pSyn
SRE-luciferase.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of inhibitors of alcohol and aldehyde
dehydrogenase on the action of ethanol on pSyn SRE reporter activity in
hepatoma McA-RH7777 cells. McA-RH7777 cells were transfected as
described in Fig. 1 with the pSyn SRE reporter plasmid and internal
control (pSV2CAT); the inhibitors were added 24 h later, and the
cells were exposed to ethanol as indicated, beginning at the same time.
The cells then were harvested 24 h later for assay of the reports.
Luciferase and CAT activities were determined as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The data are expressed as percentages of
control (mean ± S.E.) from at least three experiments performed
in duplicate. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 by paired t test, compared with control.
|
|
Effect of Ethanol and Acetaldehyde on Levels of Mature SREBP
Protein--
We further examined the effect of ethanol and
acetaldehyde on the levels of the mature SREBP-1 protein. As shown in
Fig. 4, Western analysis of nuclear
extracts from hepatoma H4IIEC3 cell incubated with ethanol or
acetaldehyde showed a substantial but transient increase in the amount
of mature SREBP-1. The mass of the mature form of SREBP-1 was found to
increase ~2.5-fold after 30 min of exposure of the hepatoma cells to
ethanol (Fig. 4A). The amount of mature SREBP-1 returned to
control levels within 1 h. Similarly, acetaldehyde treatment
resulted in increase the mature form of SREBP-1 ~2-fold after 30 or
45 min (Fig. 4B), and the amount of mature SREBP-1 returned
to control levels within 1 h. There was no discernable change in
the mass of the precursor SREBP-1 protein. The amount of mature SREBP-2
protein was not altered by ethanol treatment (data not shown).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Immunoblot analysis of SREBP-1 in nuclear
extracts of rat hepatoma H4IIEC3 cells. H4IIEC3 cells were
incubated in MEM (low glucose) supplemented with 10% delipidated FBS
medium with or without 50 mM ethanol (A) or 200 µM acetaldehyde (B) for the indicated times.
Aliquots of nuclear extracts (100 µg of protein) were electrophoresed
on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels under reducing conditions, transferred
to nitrocellulose membranes, and immunostained with anti-SREBP-1
antibody.
|
|
Increase in Hepatic Lipids after Ethanol Feeding--
To determine
the effect of ethanol on SREBP in vivo, we first established
the effects of ethanol feeding of mice using the usual liquid diet pair
feeding protocol. The mice were fed a low fat, high carbohydrate diet
(4% safflower oil, 6% cocoa butter, and 72% carbohydrate) or the low
fat diet with ethanol substituted for 27.5% of the carbohydrate
calories for 4 weeks. Ethanol intake had no apparent effect on the
health status of the animals. A steady average 2- to 3-g increase in
the body weight was observed in both groups during the entire 4-week
study. As shown in Table I, no
significant differences in plasma triglycerides and cholesterol were
detected between ethanol- and pair-fed animals. Similar levels of
hepatic cholesterol (esterified plus unesterified) levels were also
found in both groups. However, hepatic triglycerides were significantly
elevated by about 3.5-fold by ethanol feeding compared with pair-fed
controls. The body weights did not vary between these groups, but the
liver weights were significantly increased in the low fat diet plus
ethanol group. Consistent with this observation, livers from
ethanol-fed mice were significantly larger than livers from control
group. Histological analysis showed prominent accumulation of lipid
droplets in the livers of ethanol-fed mice, whereas lipid droplets were
rare in the livers of control groups (Fig.
5). Our data clearly demonstrate that
ingestion of an ethanol-containing low fat diet for 4 weeks led to the
development of fatty liver.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Phenotypic comparison of mice fed low fat diet with or without
ethanol
6- to 8-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were divided into two dietary
groups (n = 7-8 mice): (a) Low fat (6% of
total calories from cocoa butter and 4% from safflower oil, 72% of
calories from carbohydrate); (b) the low fat diet plus
ethanol. Liquid diets provide 1 kcal/ml and were based upon the
Lieber-DeCarli formulation (32). When ethanol was
included, a caloric equivalent of maltose-dextrin was removed. Ethanol
was added to account for 27.5% of total calories. Protein content was
constant at 18% of calories, and all diets had identical mineral and
vitamin content. The animals were pair-fed for 4 weeks. All data are
expressed as the mean ± S.D.
|
|

View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Ethanol effects on liver. Oil red O
staining of liver sections of mice fed a low fat diet alone
(a) or the low fat diet with ethanol (b).
|
|
The Effect of Ethanol Feeding on Levels of Mature SREBP-1 Protein
in Mouse Livers--
To determine the effect of ethanol feeding on
SREBPs in mouse livers, immunoblot analysis of liver nuclear extracts
from these mice was performed. Fig. 6
showed that addition of ethanol to the low fat diet resulted in a
substantial increase in the amount of mature SREBP-1 protein. The
amount of mature SREBP-2 protein was not altered by addition of ethanol
to the diet. In contrast to the level of the mature SREBP-1 protein,
which was enhanced by ethanol feeding, no significant increase was
observed in either the membrane-bound precursor protein levels of
SREBP-1 or the corresponding mRNA (data not shown). This suggested
that ethanol regulates the abundance of mature SREBP-1 protein mainly
at a post-translational level. This is similar to the results observed with the hepatoma cells.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Immunoblot analysis of SREBP-1 and -2 in
nuclear extracts from livers of mice fed a low fat diet with or without
ethanol. Eight male C57BL/6J mice were fed a low fat diet with
(lanes 3 and 4) or without ethanol (lanes
1 and 2) for 4 weeks. Aliquots of nuclear extracts (80 µg of protein) from pooled livers from four pooled livers of each
group were electrophoresed on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels under
reducing conditions, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and
immunostained with anti-SREBP-1 or anti-SREBP-2 antibody. P
and N denote the precursor and cleaved nuclear forms of
SREBP, respectively. In the left lower panel, an intense
cross-reacting protein is indicated by an asterisk. The
positions to which prestained protein markers migrated to in the
polyacrylamide gel are indicated on the left of the
lumigrams.
|
|
Effect of Ethanol Feeding on Expression of Genes Regulated by
SREBPs--
To determine whether the ethanol-mediated induction of
SREBP-1 maturation was associated with a corresponding increase in expression of genes known to be regulated by SREBPs, a series of
Northern blot analyses were performed using total RNA from the livers
of mice described in Table I. As shown in Fig.
7, ethanol feeding increased the
expression of mRNAs from several SREBP target genes by ~2-fold
(normalized to the level of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase).
These targets included the major enzyme of fatty acid synthesis, FAS,
the enzymes that supply NADPH and acetyl-CoA for fatty acid synthesis
(ME and ACL, respectively), and the enzyme responsible for conversion
of palmitate and stearate to palmitoleate and oleate, SCD. Two isoforms
of SCD (SCD1 and SCD2) are currently known. SCD1 is the only SCD
isoform found in liver (35). Thus, our data mainly reflect SCD1
expression. We attempted to measure the abundance of ACC in the liver
RNA samples, but the signal was too low to quantify. These findings
suggest that the increase in the mature form of SREBP-1 by ethanol was
associated with increased transcriptional activity of this factor,
reflected in the increased mRNA levels of a battery of lipogenic
genes.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Northern blot analysis of lipogenic enzymes
from livers of mice fed a low fat diet with or without ethanol.
A, total RNA (20 µg) from livers of mice fed low fat diet
without (lanes 1 and 2) or with (lanes
3 and 4) ethanol was subjected to Northern blotting,
followed by hybridization with the indicated cDNA probes. A
cDNA probe for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase was used to
confirm equal loading. Northern blots from two representative mouse
livers are shown. B, results were quantified by
phosphorimaging. All RNA levels are expressed relative to low fat
pair-fed control (mean ± S.D., n = 4-5 animals).
*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 by paired
t test, compared with low fat diet control. FAS,
fatty acid synthase; SCD, stearoyl-CoA desaturase;
ACL, ATP citrate lyase; ME, malic enzyme.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the present study, we demonstrated that, in both rat H4IIEC3
and McA-RH7777 hepatoma cell lines, ethanol induced transcription of
SRE-regulated promoter via increased levels of mature SREBP-1 protein.
Expression of promoters was blocked by the presence of sterols known to
inhibit the activation of SREBPs. This effect of ethanol is likely
mediated by acetaldehyde, because inhibition of ethanol oxidation by
4-methylpyrazole, an inhibitor of the class I ADH known to be expressed
in these cells, blocked the effect. Conversely, the aldehyde
dehydrogenase inhibitor cyanamide enhanced the effect of ethanol.
Furthermore, ethanol did not have any effect on an SRE- regulated
promoter in CV-1 cells, which do not express ADH. Consistent with our
in vitro findings, feeding mice a low fat diet with ethanol
for 4 weeks resulted in a significant increase in the abundance of the
mature form of SREBP-1. Activation of SREBP-1 by ethanol feeding was
associated with increased expression of several hepatic lipogenic genes
known to be controlled by SREBP-1 as well as the accumulation of
triglyceride in the livers. It is interesting to note that increased
activity of these enzymes has already been reported in livers of
ethanol-fed animals (18-20). Our data indicate that the increased
activity is the result of increased levels of the corresponding
mRNAs. The increase in SCD activity in turn is reflected in the
increased amounts of palmitoleic and oleic acid in the triglyceride
stored in the liver of ethanol-fed animals (36).
The action of acetaldehyde could be due to increased rates of formation
of the mature SREBP-1 or impairment of its further degradation. The
current model of SREBP regulation holds that the 125-kDa precursors of
SREBPs are anchored to intracellular membranes as a complex with SREBP
cleavage-activating protein (SCAP), a membrane protein with a
sterol-sensing domain (24). When cells are deprived of sterols, SCAP is
activated and escorts SREBPs to the Golgi complex. In the Golgi, SREBPs
are activated by sequential proteolytic cleavage by two proteases, site
1 protease and site 2 protease. Thus, one effect of acetaldehyde could
be to reduce the concentration of sterols that influence SCAP activity. One enzyme that metabolizes sterols is known to be inhibited by acetaldehyde, namely 4-3-ketosteroid 5- -reductase, an
enzyme participating in the bile salt synthetic pathway (37-40). It is
not known if other enzymes that participate in sterol metabolism aside
from HMG-CoA reductase are affected by ethanol or acetaldehyde. When
cells are overloaded with sterols, the SCAP·SREBP complex
fails to move to the Golgi, and SREBPs are not processed. Our in
vitro study showed that addition of sterols blocked the effect of
ethanol on SRE-dependent gene expression in both hepatoma
cell lines. This would be consistent with either an effect of
acetaldehyde on sterol levels or with an effect mediated further downstream.
It is well known that the mature form of SREBP-1 is ultimately disposed
via the proteasomal pathway (24). Exposure to ethanol could affect the
level of the mature form of SREBP-1 via inhibition of proteasomal
degradation. Ethanol has been shown to inhibit proteasomal protein
degradation in rats fed ethanol chronically (41), although the
mechanism for this action is unknown. Furthermore, the effect of
ethanol appeared to be somewhat selective, because SREBP-1 but not
SREBP-2 levels were increased in the cells and the mouse livers. An
additional explanation could be the formation of acetaldehyde adducts
with mature SREBP-1 and, subsequently, inhibition of SREBP-1
degradation, because acetaldehyde is known to form adducts with a
number of proteins (36, 42, 43).
SREBPs are not only regulated by intracellular sterol levels but also
by MAPK signaling (44), and the SREBPs are possibly substrates
of MAPK (45). Several studies have shown that ethanol plays a positive
role in the regulating MAPK signaling pathway (46-48). Therefore,
ethanol could activate SREBPs indirectly via activation of MAPK.
Clearly, additional study will be needed to understand the exact
mechanism by which ethanol or acetaldehyde affects the SREBP pathway
both in vitro and in vivo.
The increased level of mature SREBP-1 after ethanol feeding was
associated with increased mRNAs for multiple SREBP-regulated lipogenic enzymes and triglyceride accumulation in liver. However, we
found that nuclear SREBP-2 levels were unchanged in livers from the
ethanol feeding mice as compared with the pair-fed mice, and similar
hepatic levels of total cholesterol were found in the control and
ethanol-fed groups. These results are consistent with the previous
in vitro and in vivo studies that SREBP-1
preferentially activates enzymes involved in lipogenesis, whereas
SREBP-2 is primarily responsible for the transcriptional regulation of
genes involved in cholesterol homeostasis (24). However, earlier
reports suggest that ethanol feeding increased cholesterol ester levels in rat liver (49); it is possible that the failure to see an increase
in cholesterol in the mice is a species-dependent effect or
is related to other differences in diets.
The importance of these findings is 3-fold. First, it was reported many
years ago that, with continued alcohol feeding, the redox stress
attributable to the generation of NADH by ADH and ALDH abates in the
ethanol-fed baboon. However, fatty liver persisted in these animals.
One explanation suggested by our studies is that the redox perturbation
may contribute to the retention of fat early in the course of heavy
alcohol use, but effects on transcription factors such as SREBP may be
responsible for maintenance of increased levels of fat synthesis and
fatty liver. In fact, activation of the lipogenic enzyme battery may
perpetuate increased rates of fatty acid synthesis even between periods
of heavy alcohol consumption.
Second, the SREBP-regulated battery of enzymes include ACC. ACC not
only supplies malonyl-CoA for fatty acid synthesis by FAS, but the
malonyl-CoA is a potent inhibitor of carnitine palmitoyl transferase I. This enzyme is the major regulator of fatty acid oxidation in the
liver, with a flux control coefficient of about 0.7-0.8 (50).
Surprisingly, the content of malonyl-CoA in the livers of animals fed
ethanol has not been reported, but it is expected to rise with
increased activity of ACC. This raises the possibility that inhibition
of fatty acid oxidation by malonyl-CoA contributes to the accumulation
of fat in the liver, and this effect may be independent of the effect
of ethanol on the redox state of the hepatocyte.
The third point is that the SREBP pathway is amenable to manipulation
by exogenous compounds, such as sterols. Thus, it may be possible to
reduce the rate of fat synthesis and the severity of fatty liver by
supplementing the diet of alcoholics with the appropriate sterols.
Although the long term goal of treatment is abstinence from alcohol,
there are conditions in which liver injury might be reduced by rapid
control of fatty liver. Fatty livers are exquisitely sensitive to
endotoxin, which in turn is felt to play an important role in the
pathogenesis of alcoholic hepatitis and cirrhosis. Resolution or
control of fatty liver might reduce the sensitivity of this organ to
ongoing injury from heavy drinking.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We are grateful to Ruth Ann Ross for her
excellent technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grant AA06463 from the National
Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (to D. W. C.) and Grant AA07611 from the Alcohol Research Center.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Veterans
Administration Research 151, Third Floor D-3035, 1481 West Tenth St., Indianapolis, IN 46202. Tel.: 317-554-0000 (ext. 4544); Fax:
317-554-0116; E-mail: miyou@iupui.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 29, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M202411200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
FAS, fatty acid
synthase;
SREBP, sterol regulatory element-binding protein;
SCD, stearoyl-CoA desaturase;
ACL, ATP citrate lyase;
ME, malic enzyme;
ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase;
HMG, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl;
MEM, modified
Eagle's medium;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
FBS, fetal bovine
serum;
SCAP, SREBP cleavage-activating protein;
MARK, mitogen-activated
protein kinase;
ADH, alcohol dehydrogenase;
ALDH, aldehyde
dehydrogenase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Nanji, A. A.,
and Zakim, D.
(1996)
in
Hepatology: A Textbook of Liver Disease
(Zakim, D.
, and Boyer, T. D., eds), 3rd. Ed.
, pp. 911-913, W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia
|
| 2.
|
Yang, S. Q.,
Lin, H. Z.,
Lane, M. D.,
Clemens, M.,
and Diehl, A. M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2557-2562[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Yang, S.,
Lin, H.,
and Diehl, A. M.
(2001)
Am. J. Physiol.
281,
G382-G392
|
| 4.
|
Diehl, A. M.
(2001)
Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.
25,
8S-14S[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Naveau, S.,
Giraud, V.,
Borotto, E.,
Aubert, A.,
Capron, F.,
and Chaput, J. C.
(1997)
Hepatology
25,
108-111[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Teli, M. R.,
James, O. F.,
Burt, A. D.,
Bennett, M. K.,
and Day, C. P.
(1995)
Hepatology
22,
1714-1719[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
| Crabb, D. W. (1993) 11, 207-230
|
| 8.
|
Grunnet, N.,
and Kondrup, J.
(1986)
Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.
10,
64S-68S[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Salaspuro, M. P.,
Shaw, S.,
Jayatilleke, E.,
Ross, W. A.,
and Lieber, C. S.
(1981)
Hepatology
1,
33-38[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Grunnet, N.,
Kondrup, J.,
and Dich, J.
(1987)
Alcohol Alcohol.
1,
257-261
|
| 11.
|
Reinke, L. A.,
Lai, E. K.,
DuBose, C. M.,
and McCay, P. B.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
9223-9227[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Kurose, I.,
Higuchi, H.,
Kato, S.,
Miura, S.,
and Ishii, H.
(1996)
Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.
20,
77A-85A[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Galli, A.,
Pinaire, J.,
Fischer, M.,
Dorris, R.,
and Crabb, D. W.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
68-75[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Crabb, D. W.
(1999)
Keio. J. Med.
48,
184-188[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Gearing, K. L.,
Gottlicher, M.,
Widmark, E.,
Banner, C. D.,
Tollet, P.,
Stromstedt, M.,
Rafter, J. J.,
Berge, R. K.,
and Gustafsson, J. A.
(1994)
J. Nutr.
124,
1284S-1288S[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Lieber, C. S.,
Spritz, N.,
and DeCarli, L. M.
(1966)
J. Clin. Invest.
45,
51-62[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Carrasco, M. P.,
Marco, C.,
and Segovia, J. L.
(2001)
Life Sci.
68,
1295-1304[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Muramatsu, M.,
Kuriyama, K.,
Yuki, T.,
and Ohkuma, S.
(1981)
Jpn. J. Pharmacol.
31,
931-940[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Joly, J. G.,
Feinman, L.,
Ishii, H.,
and Lieber, C. S.
(1973)
J. Lipid Res.
14,
337-343[Abstract]
|
| 20.
|
Arakawa, M.,
Taketomi, S.,
Furuno, K.,
Matsuo, T.,
and Iwatsuka, H.
(1975)
J. Nutr.
105,
1500-1508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Seitz, H. K.,
Kuhn, B.,
von Hodenberg, E.,
Fiehn, W.,
Conradt, C.,
and Simanowski, U. A.
(1994)
Hepatology
20,
487-493[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Galli, A.,
Price, D.,
and Crabb, D.
(1999)
Hepatology
29,
1164-1170[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Siler, S. Q.,
Neese, R. A.,
and Hellerstein, M. K.
(1999)
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
70,
928-936[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Brown, M. S.,
and Goldstein, J. L.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
11041-11048[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Shimano, H.,
Horton, J. D.,
Hammer, R. E.,
Shimomura, I.,
Brown, M. S.,
and Goldstein, J. L.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
98,
1575-1584[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Horton, J. D.,
Shimomura, I.,
Brown, M. S.,
Hammer, R. E.,
Goldstein, J. L,
and Shimano, H.
(1998)
J. Clin. Invest.
101,
2331-2339[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Shimomura, I.,
Bashmakov, Y.,
and Horton, J. D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
30028-30032[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
de Wet, J. R.,
Wood, K. V.,
DeLuca, M.,
Helinski, D. R.,
and Subramani, S.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
725-737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Crabb, D. W.,
and Dixon, J. E.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
163,
88-92[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Andrews, N. C.,
and Faller, D. V.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
2499[Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Sheng, Z.,
Otani, H.,
Brown, M. S.,
and Goldstein, J. L.
(1995)
Pro. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
935-938[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Lieber, C. S.,
DeCarli, L. M.,
and Sorrell, M. F.
(1989)
Hepatology
10,
501-510[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Crabb, D. W.,
Stewart, M. J.,
and Xiao, Q.
(1995)
Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.
19,
1414-1419[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
DeBose-Boyd, R. A., Ou, J.,
Goldstein, J. L.,
and Brown, M. S.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
1477-1482[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Kaestner, K. H.,
Ntambi, J. M.,
Kelly, T. J., Jr.,
and Lane, M. D.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
14755-14761[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Tsukamoto, H.,
Lew, G.,
Larkin, E. C.,
Largman, C.,
and Rao, G. A.
(1984)
Lipids
19,
419-422[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Zhu, Y.,
Fillenwarth, M. J.,
Crabb, D.,
Lumeng, L.,
and Lin, R. C.
(1996)
Hepatology
23,
115-122[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Lin, R. C.,
and Lumeng, L.
(1989)
Hepatology
10,
807-814[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Li, C. J.,
Nanji, A. A.,
Siakotos, A. N.,
and Lin, R. C.
(1997)
Hepatology
26,
650-657[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Lin, R. C.,
Fillenwarth, M. J.,
and Du, X.
(1998)
Hepatology
27,
100-107[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
| Bardag-Gorce, F., Yuan, Q. X., Li, J., French, B. A, Fang, C.,
Ingelman-Sundberg, M., and French, S. W. (2000) 279, 23-29
|
| 42.
|
Smith, S. L.,
Jennett, R. B.,
Sorrell, M. F.,
and Tuma, D. J.
(1989)
J. Clin. Invest.
84,
337-341[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Tuma, D. J.,
Thiele, G. M., Xu, D.,
Klassen, L. W.,
and Sorrell, M. F.
(1996)
Hepatology
23,
872-880[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Kotzka, J.,
Muller-Wieland, D.,
Roth, G.,
Kremer, L.,
Munck, M.,
Schurmann, S.,
Knebel, B.,
and Krone, W.
(2000)
J. Lipid Res.
41,
99-108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Roth, G.,
Kotzka, J.,
Kremer, L.,
Lehr, S.,
Lohaus, C.,
Meyer, H. E.,
Krone, W.,
and Muller-Wieland, D.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
33302-33307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Reddy, M. A.,
and Shukla, S. D.
(1996)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
51,
661-668[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Reddy, M. A.,
and Shukla, S. D.
(2000)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
149,
271-278
|
| 48.
|
Nguyen, V. A.,
Chen, J.,
Hong, F.,
Ishac, E. J.,
and Gao, B.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
349,
427-434[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Rao, G. A.,
Riley, D. E.,
and Larkin, E. C.
(1985)
Lipids
20,
531-535[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Spurway, T. D.,
Sherratt, H. A.,
Pogson, C. I.,
and Agius, L.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
323,
119-122[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Ajmo, X. Liang, C. Q. Rogers, B. Pennock, and M. You
Resveratrol alleviates alcoholic fatty liver in mice
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
October 1, 2008;
295(4):
G833 - G842.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. G. Pastorino and N. Shulga
Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Can Provoke Cleavage and Activation of Sterol Regulatory Element-binding Protein in Ethanol-exposed Cells via a Caspase-dependent Pathway That Is Cholesterol Insensitive
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 12, 2008;
283(37):
25638 - 25649.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Sozio and D. W. Crabb
Alcohol and lipid metabolism
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
July 1, 2008;
295(1):
E10 - E16.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. You, X. Liang, J. M. Ajmo, and G. C. Ness
Involvement of mammalian sirtuin 1 in the action of ethanol in the liver
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
April 1, 2008;
294(4):
G892 - G898.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. You, Q. Cao, X. Liang, J. M. Ajmo, and G. C. Ness
Mammalian Sirtuin 1 Is Involved in the Protective Action of Dietary Saturated Fat against Alcoholic Fatty Liver in Mice
J. Nutr.,
March 1, 2008;
138(3):
497 - 501.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. He, J. C. Marecki, G. Serrero, F. A. Simmen, M. J. J. Ronis, and T. M. Badger
Dose-Dependent Effects of Alcohol on Insulin Signaling: Partial Explanation for Biphasic Alcohol Impact on Human Health
Mol. Endocrinol.,
October 1, 2007;
21(10):
2541 - 2550.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Ringseis, A. Muschick, and K. Eder
Dietary Oxidized Fat Prevents Ethanol-Induced Triacylglycerol Accumulation and Increases Expression of PPAR{alpha} Target Genes in Rat Liver
J. Nutr.,
January 1, 2007;
137(1):
77 - 83.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Wang, G. Kouri, and C. B. Wollheim
ER stress and SREBP-1 activation are implicated in {beta}-cell glucolipotoxicity
J. Cell Sci.,
September 1, 2005;
118(17):
3905 - 3915.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Esfandiari, J. A. Villanueva, D. H. Wong, S. W. French, and C. H. Halsted
Chronic ethanol feeding and folate deficiency activate hepatic endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway in micropigs
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
July 1, 2005;
289(1):
G54 - G63.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Davies, K. L. H. Carpenter, I. R. Challis, N. L. Figg, R. McNair, D. Proudfoot, P. L. Weissberg, and C. M. Shanahan
Adipocytic Differentiation and Liver X Receptor Pathways Regulate the Accumulation of Triacylglycerols in Human Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 4, 2005;
280(5):
3911 - 3919.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. He, F. A. Simmen, M. J. J. Ronis, and T. M. Badger
Post-transcriptional Regulation of Sterol Regulatory Element-binding Protein-1 by Ethanol Induces Class I Alcohol Dehydrogenase in Rat Liver
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 2, 2004;
279(27):
28113 - 28121.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. You and D. W. Crabb
Recent Advances in Alcoholic Liver Disease II. Minireview: molecular mechanisms of alcoholic fatty liver
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
July 1, 2004;
287(1):
G1 - G6.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Hirayama, N. Fujishige, T. Kunii, N. Nishimura, S. Iuchi, and K. Shinozaki
A Novel Ethanol-Hypersensitive Mutant of Arabidopsis
Plant Cell Physiol.,
June 15, 2004;
45(6):
703 - 711.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. J. Ronis, S. Korourian, M. Zipperman, R. Hakkak, and T. M. Badger
Dietary Saturated Fat Reduces Alcoholic Hepatotoxicity in Rats by Altering Fatty Acid Metabolism and Membrane Composition
J. Nutr.,
April 1, 2004;
134(4):
904 - 912.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Fischer, M. You, M. Matsumoto, and D. W. Crabb
Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {alpha} (PPAR{alpha}) Agonist Treatment Reverses PPAR{alpha} Dysfunction and Abnormalities in Hepatic Lipid Metabolism in Ethanol-fed Mice
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 18, 2003;
278(30):
27997 - 28004.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Wang, P. Maechler, P. A. Antinozzi, L. Herrero, K. A. Hagenfeldt-Johansson, A. Bjorklund, and C. B. Wollheim
The Transcription Factor SREBP-1c Is Instrumental in the Development of beta -Cell Dysfunction
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 2, 2003;
278(19):
16622 - 16629.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|