|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M200219200 on May 28, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 33, 29477-29483, August 16, 2002
Regulation of Macrophage ApoE Expression and Processing by
Extracellular Matrix*
Yuwei
Zhao,
Lili
Yue,
DeSheng
Gu, and
Theodore
Mazzone
From the Departments of Medicine and Biochemistry, Rush
Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
60612
Received for publication, January 8, 2002, and in revised form, May 23, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Macrophage-derived apoE in the vessel wall has
important effects on atherogenesis in vivo,
making it important to understand factors that regulate its expression.
Vessel wall macrophages are embedded in an extracellular matrix
produced largely by arterial smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells.
In this series of studies, we evaluated the influence of extracellular
matrix on macrophage apoE expression. Subendothelial matrix,
fibronectin, or collagen I stimulated macrophage apoE gene expression
and apoE synthesis. Adhesion of macrophages to a polylysine substrate
had no effect. An increase in apoE synthesis after plating on
fibronectin could be observed by 2 h and was inhibited by blocking
antibodies to the 5 1 integrin receptor
for fibronectin. Fibronectin also regulated the post-translational
processing of newly synthesized macrophage apoE by inhibiting its
degradation. The increment in apoE resulting from suppressed
degradation was retained in the cell-fibronectin monolayer in a pool
that was resistant to release by exogenous high density
lipoprotein subfraction 3. These observations establish a new pathway
for the regulation of macrophage apoE expression in the vessel wall.
The composition of the extracellular matrix changes after vessel wall
injury and in response to locally produced cytokines and growth
factors. The evolving composition of this matrix will, therefore, be
important for regulating apoE expression and processing by vessel wall macrophages.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In the vessel wall, apoE is found in association with macrophages
and the extracellular matrix (1, 2). Macrophages are the major source
of newly synthesized apoE in the vessel wall, and a great deal of
information is available regarding the influence of macrophage-derived
apoE on vessel wall pathology (3, 4). Studies using bone marrow
transplantation approaches, to specifically modulate macrophage-derived
apoE production in the vessel wall, have shown an important influence
on atherogenesis in multiple models of atherosclerosis-prone mice. In
most of these studies, macrophage-derived apoE has been found to be
atheroprotective (3-6). Multiple mechanisms can be considered for the
atheroprotection afforded by macrophage-derived apoE. ApoE particles
secreted by macrophages have been shown to have antioxidant properties
and have been shown to influence the growth and motility of endothelial cells and arterial smooth muscle cells (3, 4, 7). Macrophage-derived apoE also transduces sterol efflux from macrophages and may, thereby, limit foam cell formation in the vessel wall (3, 4, 8-11).
Factors that regulate macrophage apoE expression in the vessel wall,
therefore, will have important effects on vessel wall disease. Cellular
sterol content regulates macrophage apoE gene expression via liver X
receptor (LXR) elements (12-14). Bacterial endotoxin and
cytokines have also been shown to influence macrophage apoE expression
(15, 16). In the vessel wall, macrophages are embedded in an
extracellular matrix, produced predominantly by endothelial cells and
arterial smooth muscle cells. The composition of this matrix evolves
after injury to the vessel wall, and this changing composition may have
important effects on the behavior of vessel wall cells (17-19). For
example, the composition of the extracellular matrix has been shown to
modulate the phenotype of arterial smooth muscle cells. In the current
studies, we explored the hypothesis that components of the
extracellular matrix modulate macrophage apoE expression. This
hypothesis was based on considerations regarding the importance of
macrophage-derived apoE in the vessel wall for atheroprotection and the
emerging role of matrix composition for modulating cellular behavior in
the vessel wall. We found that the subendothelial matrix as well as
specific components found in this matrix can stimulate macrophage apoE
gene expression. Furthermore, we found that fibronectin (an abundant
ECM1 component with modified
expression after vessel wall injury) can significantly modulate the
post-translational handling of apoE by the macrophage.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
The goat-derived anti-human apoE polyclonal
antibody was purchased from International Immunology Corp. (Murrieta,
CA). The mouse monoclonal anti-human integrin 1
(monoclonal antibody 2253) and the rat anti-mouse integrin
5 1 (monoclonal antibody 1984) were
obtained from Chemicon International Inc. (Temecula, CA). A monoclonal
anti-human cardiac myoglobin antibody was purchased from American
Research Products Inc. (Belmont, MA). Cell culture dishes coated with
fibronectin, collagen I, or polylysine were purchased from Becton
Dickinson (Bedford, MA). SuperFect transfection reagent was purchased
from Qiagen (Chatsworth, CA). Assay kits for luciferase,
-galactosidase, and plasmids pGL3 and pSV -galactosidase were
purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). All tissue culture reagents were
obtained from Invitrogen (Gaithersburg, MD).
[35S]Methionine was purchased from Amersham Biosciences
(Arlington Heights, IL). HDL3 (d = 1.125-1.210 g/ml) was isolated from human plasma as previously
described (8), and was free of apoE by SDS-PAGE. All other materials
were from previously described sources (20, 21).
Cells and Subendothelial Matrix--
Human monocytes were
isolated by elutriation, were ~95% pure, and were grown as
previously described (16, 22). The cells were allowed to differentiate
for 72 h in DMEM containing 20% FBS and 10% pooled human
AB serum before being used for experiments. THP-1 cells were
maintained as a suspension culture in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FBS and
2 × 10 5 M -mercaptoethanol. For
experiments, these cells were treated with 10 or 20 ng/ml PMA to induce
macrophage differentiation. RAW 264.7 cells were cultured in DMEM
supplemented with 10% FBS. Mouse peritoneal macrophages were collected
from CD1 mice (Charles Rivers Laboratory International Inc.) as
previously described (12). J774E+ cells are J774 murine
macrophages that do not express their endogenous apoE gene and that
have been transfected to constitutively and stably express a human
apoE3 cDNA under the control of the cytomegalovirus promoter by
methods described previously (21).
To coat plates with subendothelial matrix, bovine aortic endothelial
cells were isolated by collagenase treatment of bovine aorta and were
grown to confluence in 10% FBS in RPMI 1640. At confluence, the cells
were treated with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 20 mM
NH4OH in PBS for 7 min at room temperature, followed by four washes with PBS. The remaining matrix was washed once with 1%
BSA. This procedure has been shown to completely remove the cell
monolayer and leave behind matrix secreted by endothelial cells
(23).
Measurement of ApoE Synthesis and Stability--
The synthetic
rate for apoE was monitored by the quantitative immunoprecipitation of
radiolabeled apoE as previously described (21). After a pulse-labeling
incubation with [35S]methionine, macrophage monolayers
were washed twice with PBS, incubated with 100 µl of 2% SDS, and
heated at 95 °C for 5 min. Thereafter, 0.9 ml of lysis buffer (10 mM Na2HPO4, 15 mM NaOH, 10 mM methionine, 1% Triton X-100, and 1% deoxycholate,
pH 7.4) was added to each dish. The cells were incubated at room
temperature for 2 h, and the cell lysate was sheared with a
25-gauge needle and spun at 10,000 rpm to remove particulate debris.
The supernatant was utilized for quantitative immunoprecipitation by
methods previously described in detail (21). Immunoprecipitations were
begun using equal numbers of trichloroacetic acid-precipitable counts.
Therefore, changes in apoE synthesis are already corrected for any
changes in total protein synthesis and for any variability in the
number of cells attached to the different matrices. There were no
systematic differences in trichloroacetic acid-precipitable counts
between cells plated on control or matrix-coated substrates. The
post-translational processing of the newly synthesized cellular apoE
protein was evaluated using a pulse-chase experimental format. Cells
were pulse-labeled for 45 min in 200 µCi/ml
[35S]methionine and then chased with medium containing
500 µM unlabeled methionine for the times indicated in
the figures. ApoE remaining in cell lysates, or apoE secreted into the
medium, was recovered by quantitative immunoprecipitation as described
above. As above, radioactivity in apoE was corrected for any changes in
total cellular protein synthesis. For all experiments, the
immunoprecipitated apoE was resolved on SDS-PAGE. The radioactive
signal present in apoE was detected and quantitated using an Amersham
Biosciences PhosphorImager with ImageQuaNT software. The results
are expressed as scanning cpm. Appropriate experimental controls were
included on each SDS-PAGE gel to allow direct comparison of the effect of incubation conditions on apoE synthesis.
Quantitation of ApoE mRNA--
For Northern analysis, total
cellular RNA was isolated after solubilizing cells in guanidine
isothiocyanate, followed by sedimentation of the extract through cesium
chloride. Formaldehyde-treated RNA samples were fractionated by
electrophoresis in 1% agarose and transferred to nylon membranes as
previously described (16). The membranes were hybridized with a labeled
apoE cDNA probe as previously described (16). The radiolabeled apoE
cDNA probe was prepared by random prime synthesis utilizing the
full-length human apoE cDNA as a template. Each reaction was
carried out using 50 ng of cDNA with a minimum of 1 × 107 cpm. To provide an internal control, the nylon
membranes were stripped and reprobed with a labeled 0.7-kb PST1
fragment of the cDNA for -actin. ApoE and -actin signals were
detected and quantitated using the Amersham Biosciences PhosphorImager
and ImageQuaNT software. Results were expressed as apoE/ -actin
ratios from each sample to correct for loading or any difference in
mRNA abundance in each sample of total RNA.
For RT-PCR, cytoplasmic RNA was isolated from mouse peritoneal
macrophages grown on uncoated or fibronectin-coated substrates for
48 h using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). RT-PCR was performed using 10 ng of RNA and the Calypso RT-PCR kit from DNAmp Ltd. The apoE
primer pair (5' primer, AGG ATC TAC GCA ACC GAC TC; 3' primer, GGC GAT
GCA TGT CTT CCA CTA) produced a 503-bp product. The -actin primer
pair (5' primer, GGC CCA GAG CAA GAC AGG TA; 3' primer, GGA CTC ATC GTA
CTC CTG CT) produced a 924-bp product. Different amounts of input RNA,
cycling temperatures, and cycle number were evaluated to assure a
linear response of the apoE and -actin signals under the conditions
of our experiments. The PCR products were resolved on agarose gels and
stained with ethidium bromide. The images were captured using a
BioDoc-IT System (UVP, Upland, CA) and quantitated using ImageQuaNT.
Transient Transfection and Reporter Gene Analysis--
RAW 264.7 cells were transfected using SuperFect reagent according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 3 × 105 cells
were seeded in coated or uncoated 35-mm wells and allowed to adhere
overnight prior to transfection. The next morning, the cells were
~50% confluent, and DNA transfection complexes were prepared by
mixing 2 µg of the apoE-luciferase reporter plasmid, 1 µg of
pSV -galactosidase, and 4 µl of SuperFect reagent with 600 µl of cell growth medium. The cells were incubated with the transfection complexes for 3 h and then allowed to recover for 4 h in DMEM containing 10% FBS. At that time, cells were washed and incubated in DMEM containing 2.5% FBS and 0.2% BSA. After an
additional 24 h, the transfected cells were lysed, and luciferase and -galactosidase activities were measured. Total luciferase activity from each cell lysate was corrected for the -galactosidase activity in the same cell lysate to yield relative luciferase units
(RLU). The apoE-luciferase reporter plasmid was constructed by
inserting sequences from 623 to +86 bp of the apoE gene into the
multiple cloning site of pGL3 basic. The 620-bp macrophage-specific enhancer (24) was then inserted into the
SalI/BamHI site.
Statistical Analyses--
Statistical comparisons for
significance were performed using the non-paired, two-tailed Student's
t test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.
 |
RESULTS |
In the first series of experiments, we wished to obtain an overall
assessment of the response of macrophage apoE expression to matrix. We
utilized human THP-1 monocytic cells stimulated to differentiate into
macrophages by PMA and plated on an uncoated substrate or a substrate
coated with a matrix synthesized by endothelial cells (SEM). Cells were
grown for 46 h prior to a 2-h pulse with [35S]methionine, and radiolabeled apoE was then isolated
from the cell layer. As shown in Fig. 1,
exposure to the subendothelial matrix increased the level of cellular
apoE by 59% (p < 0.01). We next investigated one
potential mechanism for this apoE response by measuring apoE mRNA
levels in the same experimental system. THP-1 cells were plated on an
uncoated substrate or SEM and incubated with 10 or 20 ng/ml PMA to
induce differentiation. Cells were harvested after 24 h for
measurement of apoE mRNA abundance by Northern blot analysis. Fig.
2 shows the apoE signal and gives the
value of apoE mRNA abundance after correction for the abundance of
an internal control (apoE/ -actin ratio). Exposure of cells to the
subendothelial matrix increased apoE mRNA abundance by 2.8-fold in
the presence of 10 ng/ml PMA and 4.9-fold with 20 ng/ml PMA.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Subendothelial matrix stimulates macrophage
apoE synthesis. Human THP-1 monocytic cells were grown on uncoated
dishes (CON) or on dishes coated with a matrix synthesized
by endothelial cells (SEM). PMA (20 ng/ml) was included to
induce macrophage differentiation. After 46 h, cells were labeled
with [35S]methionine and harvested 2 h later for
isolation of cellular apoE. The values shown are the mean ± S.D.
from the triplicate lanes shown. The difference in cellular apoE
between cells grown in uncoated versus SEM-coated dishes is
significant at p < 0.01.
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Subendothelial matrix stimulates macrophage
apoE mRNA abundance. Human THP-1 monocytic cells were grown on
uncoated dishes (Control) or on a matrix synthesized by
endothelial cells (SEM). PMA (10 or 20 ng/ml) was included
to induce macrophage differentiation as indicated. After 24 h,
cells were harvested for measurement of apoE mRNA abundance. The
values shown represent the apoE signal after correction for the
-actin signal (ApoE/ -Actin) and are the
averages from duplicate lanes shown.
|
|
In the next series of experiments, we investigated the effect of
specific components of subendothelial matrix on the macrophage apoE
response and expanded our evaluation to include human monocyte-derived macrophages and mouse peritoneal macrophages. Also, in these
experiments, we reduced the pulse labeling time to 45 min to more
specifically measure apoE synthetic rates. For this evaluation, we
selected plates coated with fibronectin or collagen I. Each of these is abundant in SEM and vessel wall ECM, and the expression of each has
been shown to change during evolution of the atherosclerotic plaque
(17-19, 25, 26). THP-1 cells, human monocyte-derived macrophages, or
mouse peritoneal macrophages were plated on uncoated dishes or on
fibronectin or collagen I matrices. For mouse peritoneal macrophages
and human monocytes, we also utilized plates coated with a polylysine
substrate as a control for a nonspecific increase in cellular adhesion.
Polylysine is a positively charged amino acid homopolymer that
nonspecifically increases adhesion by interacting within the negatively
charged cell surface (27). As shown in Fig.
3, both fibronectin and collagen I
stimulated apoE synthesis as measured during 45-min pulse incubations
in each cell type. The increase in THP-1 cells was similar to that
observed in Fig. 1, approximating 40% on collagen I and 47% on
fibronectin. When cells were plated on an uncoated substrate, the
addition of soluble fibronectin at doses ranging from 2.5 to 10 µg/ml and in the presence of PMA (20 ng/ml) for 24-48 h produced no
increase in apoE synthesis (not shown). Therefore, we focused
experiments on the effect of immobilized matrix on apoE expression in
macrophages. In human monocyte-derived macrophages, the increase in
apoE synthesis approximated 3-fold; in mouse peritoneal macrophages it
approximated 2-fold after exposure to the specific immobilized matrix
components. Adhesion to polylysine, however, did not increase apoE
expression in either mouse peritoneal macrophages or human
monocyte-derived macrophages. ApoE mRNA abundance was quantitated
by RT-PCR using RNA isolated from mouse peritoneal macrophages plated
on uncoated or FN-coated substrates for 48 h. Using -actin as
an internal control, exposure to FN increased apoE mRNA abundance
by 4.3-fold (not shown), similar to the increase observed in THP-1
cells plated on SEM (Fig. 2).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Fibronectin and collagen I stimulate apoE
synthesis in THP-1, human monocyte-derived, and mouse peritoneal
macrophages. THP-1 cells (A), human monocyte-derived
macrophages (B), or mouse peritoneal macrophages
(C) were plated on uncoated surfaces (CON) or on
surfaces coated with fibronectin (FN), collagen I
(CNI), or polylysine (Poly-Ly) as indicated. For
THP-1 cells, 20 ng/ml PMA was included to induce macrophage
differentiation. After 48 h, cells were pulse-labeled with
[35S]methionine for 45 min. At that time, cell monolayers
were harvested for isolation and measurement of apoE. The values shown
represent the mean ± S.D. from triplicate wells of cells. For all
three cell types, the increase in apoE synthesis on fibronectin or
collagen is significant at p < 0.01, compared with
apoE synthesis from cells plated on uncoated or polylysine-coated
surfaces.
|
|
We next evaluated the response of apoE gene regulatory components to
incubation of macrophages with fibronectin or collagen I. The results
of a representative experiment are shown in Table I. For these experiments, we utilized the
RAW 264.7 macrophage cell line because of its ease of transfection, and
we used a reporter construct containing 623 bp of the proximal apoE
gene promoter and a 620-bp enhancer element recently described to be
important for specific regulation of apoE gene expression in
macrophages (24). RAW 264.7 cells were plated on fibronectin, collagen
I, or uncoated substrates and grown overnight before transfection with
the apoE-luciferase reporter. A -galactosidase reporter was also
included as an internal control for transfection efficiency. After the
incubations described in the legend of Table I, luciferase activity was
measured and, after correction for -galactosidase activity, was 4- to 5-fold higher in cells cultured on fibronectin or collagen I.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Extracellular matrix components activate expression of an apoE
reporter gene
RAW 264.7 cells were seeded at 3 × 105 cells in 35-mm
dishes that were uncoated (CON), or coated with fibronectin or collagen
I as shown. Cells were incubated overnight and then transfected with an
apoE reported construct along with a -galactosidase internal
control, as detailed under "Experimental Procedures." The cells
were incubated for an additional 24 h prior to harvest for
measurement of luciferase and -galactosidase activities. The values
shown represent the luciferase activity after correction for
-galactosidase expression and are the average ±S.D. from triplicate
wells of cells. The increase shown for cells on fibronectin or collagen
I compared to uncoated surfaces is significant at p < 0.001.
|
|
In considering mechanisms for how ECM could stimulate apoE expression
in macrophages, we considered the observations that components of ECM
have been shown to bind to specific cell surface receptors and to,
thereby, stimulate generation of second messengers (28-30). Such a
mechanism would likely lead to an early response, and therefore, we
evaluated the level of apoE synthesis in mouse peritoneal macrophages
after a short (2 h) incubation on matrix-coated or uncoated substrates.
As shown in Fig. 4, the response to
fibronectin after a 2-h incubation was ~2-fold. The level of apoE
expression after a 2-h incubation on collagen I was less consistent at
2 h over multiple experiments compared with the fibronectin
response. In evaluation of multiple time points for the fibronectin
response in mouse peritoneal macrophages, the 2-h increase in apoE
synthesis varied between 1.4- and 2.0-fold, whereas the response at 24 or 48 h varied between 2- and 3-fold. Because of the consistent
and significant increase observed in apoE synthesis after 2 h on
fibronectin, we focused on the fibronectin response and evaluated the
role of the 5 1 integrin receptor in
mediating the macrophage apoE response to fibronectin. These
experiments are shown in Fig. 5. We
utilized two different blocking antibodies: one specific for the
integrin 1 subunit, and the second for the
5 1 heterodimer. Each of these antibodies
significantly reduced the level of apoE synthesis in mouse peritoneal
macrophages during a 2-h incubation on fibronectin. The blocking
antibodies had no effect on apoE synthesis in cells cultured on
uncoated dishes (Fig. 5) or on collagen I (not shown). Inclusion of an
irrelevant antibody to cardiac myoglobin did not reduce apoE synthesis
in mouse peritoneal macrophages cultured on fibronectin (not
shown).

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Short-term exposure to matrix components
increases apoE synthesis. Mouse peritoneal macrophages were plated
on fibronectin (FN), collagen I (CNI), or
uncoated (CON) surfaces for 2 h and then pulse-labeled
for 45 min with [35S]methionine. Cells were then
harvested for isolation and measurement of apoE. The increase in apoE
synthesis on fibronectin compared with uncoated surface is significant
at p < 0.01. The increase in apoE synthesis on
collagen I compared with uncoated surface is significant at
p < 0.05. Values shown are mean ± S.D. from
triplicate wells of cells.
|
|

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Integrin blocking antibodies inhibit the
response of macrophage apoE to fibronectin. Mouse peritoneal
macrophages were plated on fibronectin (FN) or uncoated
(CON) surfaces for 2 h and labeled exactly as described
in the legend to Fig. 4. In the left panel, a blocking
antibody to the 1 integrin subunit was included (15 µg/ml) as indicated. In the right panel, a blocking
antibody to the 5 1 integrin heterodimer
(15 µg/ml) was included as indicated. Values shown are the mean ± S.D. from triplicate wells of cells. In each panel, apoE
synthesis in the absence of the blocking antibody is significantly
greater on fibronectin-coated compared with uncoated surfaces
(p < 0.01). The inhibition of apoE synthesis produced
by either blocking antibody on fibronectin-coated surfaces is
significant at p < 0.01. NA, no
antibody.
|
|
The above experiments demonstrated that extracellular matrix can
stimulate apoE gene expression, resulting in increased synthesis of
apoE. However, because a substantial portion of newly synthesized macrophage apoE is rapidly degraded (prior to secretion), factors that
regulate the post-translational processing of apoE can also significantly alter its net expression in the macrophage (21, 31-33).
Therefore, we next investigated whether FN could modulate apoE
expression at such a post-translational locus using a pulse-chase experimental format (Fig. 6). Mouse
peritoneal macrophages were plated on uncoated or fibronectin-coated
substrates for 48 h prior to pulse labeling with
[35S]methionine for 45 min. A chase incubation was then
started and is designated as "0 min" in the figures. Over the
subsequent 120 min of chase, more apoE was released from the cells
cultured on fibronectin-coated plates (panel A); however,
the magnitude of this increase was somewhat smaller than the increment
in synthesis (shown in panel B at 0 min). This reduced
release of apoE (compared with synthesis) could be due to increased
degradation of newly synthesized apoE by cells in the presence of FN or
increased retention of newly synthesized apoE in the cell-fibronectin
monolayer. Measuring the disappearance rate of cellular apoE
(panel B) provided information regarding this issue. At the
start of the chase incubation, there was an approximate 2-fold increase
in cellular apoE on FN-coated plates (reflecting the increased apoE
synthesis during the pulse incubation). Over the subsequent 120 min,
apoE levels fell in the cell monolayers plated on both
fibronectin-coated and uncoated substrates. However, the half-life of
apoE disappearance was longer in the fibronectin monolayer (87 min)
compared with the monolayer plated on an uncoated surface (36 min).
These results are consistent with increased retention of apoE in the
cell-FN monolayer as contributing to the smaller increment in apoE
secretion compared with synthesis. However, the increased retention of
apoE in the cell-FN monolayer raised an additional question. Because
newly synthesized apoE is removed from the cell layer by either
secretion or rapid degradation, the increased retention of apoE in the
FN-cell monolayer could also reflect suppressed degradation of newly
synthesized apoE. Evaluating a potential change in degradation in mouse
peritoneal macrophages is complicated by the different rates of apoE
synthesis in cells on the different substrates. To eliminate this
potential confounding influence, we utilized a model in which apoE
synthetic rates would be identical on uncoated and fibronectin-coated
plates. The J774 macrophage cell line, which does not express its
endogenous apoE gene, was transfected to stably express a human apoE3
cDNA under the control of a constitutively expressed
cytomegalovirus promoter (J774E+ cells). These cells were
plated on uncoated or fibronectin-coated substrates for 48 h prior
to a pulse-chase analysis conducted exactly as described for mouse
peritoneal macrophages. As shown in Fig.
7, in this cell model synthesis rates for
apoE at the end of the pulse incubation ("0 min" of chase) are
identical for the cells on the two different surfaces (panel
B). In panel A, it can be seen that the secretion of
apoE from J774E+ cells is similar on the two substrates
through 90 min of chase. Examination of the rate of disappearance of
apoE from the cell monolayer (in panel B) confirms its
slower disappearance rate in the presence of fibronectin
(t1/2 = 89 min on fibronectin compared with 56 min
on uncoated surface). The results of this experiment, therefore,
indicate that the increased retention of apoE in the FN-cell monolayer
also reflected suppressed degradation of newly synthesized apoE. To
estimate the degradation rate of newly synthesized apoE in cells plated
on fibronectin versus uncoated substrates, the scanning cpm
present in the cell monolayer and medium at 90 min were expressed as a
percentage of the total amount of apoE present at the start of the
chase (time 0). This calculation was performed using scanning cpm
obtained on a single gel to facilitate direct comparison, and the
result of this calculation is shown in Table
II. In cells plated on uncoated substrate, ~51.4% of newly synthesized apoE was degraded by 90 min
of chase. In the presence of fibronectin-coated matrix, however, this
level of degradation was reduced to 38.5%. Therefore, the presence of
extracellular fibronectin interrupts and suppresses the intracellular
degradation of newly synthesized apoE in macrophages.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Pulse-chase analysis of apoE in mouse
peritoneal macrophages. Mouse peritoneal macrophages were plated
on fibronectin-coated (closed circles) or uncoated
(open circles) surfaces for 48 h. Cells were then
pulse-labeled for 45 min as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Some cells were harvested at the start of the chase
incubation, which is designated as 0 min in the figure. The
chase incubation was then conducted in medium containing 500 µM unlabeled methionine, and additional cell lysates and
media were harvested at the times indicated. ApoE was recovered and
quantitated from cell lysates and media as described under
"Experimental Procedures." A, amount of apoE recovered
from the cell media. B, apoE recovered from the cell
monolayer. Values shown are the mean ± S.D. of results from
triplicate wells. The best-fit regression line for panel B
was generated using SigmaPlot (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Pulse-chase analysis of apoE in
J774E+ cells. J774 macrophages constitutively
expressing a human apoE3 cDNA were seeded, labeled, and harvested
as described in the legend to Fig. 6. A, apoE recovered from
the cell medium. B, apoE recovered from the cell monolayer.
Values shown are the mean ± S.D. of results from triplicate
wells. The best-fit regression line for panel B was
generated using SigmaPlot.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Suppressed degradation of newly synthesized apoE by fibronectin
J774 E+ cells were pulse-labeled and chased for 90 min as
described in the legend to Fig. 7. The scanning cpm measured in cell
lysate and medium at 90 min was divided by the scanning cpm present in
cell lysate at 0 min to yield the percentage released into the medium,
or the percentage retained in the cell lysate. These values were
subtracted from 100% to estimate degradation of newly synthesized apoE
at 90 min.
|
|
We have previously shown that newly synthesized macrophage apoE can be
mobilized from both a cell surface and an intracellular pool by the
addition of exogenous HDL3 (21, 31). We, therefore, performed an experiment to determine if the increment in apoE retained
in the cell-FN monolayer could also be released by HDL3. A
representative experiment is shown in Fig.
8. J774E+ cells were labeled
for 4 h and then incubated in chase medium for an additional 90 min, with or without HDL3, at 4 °C (panel A)
or 37 °C (panel B). In the absence of HDL3,
similar amounts of apoE are released into the medium from cells
plated on uncoated or fibronectin-coated surfaces (consistent with
results in Fig. 7). The addition of HDL3 caused a
substantial increase in the release of apoE from the cell monolayer on
both types of substrates. However, the amount of apoE released by
HDL3 at 4 °C (to mobilize the cell surface pool) is
actually smaller from the cells incubated on fibronectin-coated
surfaces (panel A). This could be consistent with an
intracellular location for the incremental apoE retained in the cell
monolayer of cells plated on fibronectin. Therefore, the experiment was
repeated with a chase incubation conducted at 37 °C to mobilize both
cell surface and intracellular apoE (panel B). Even at
37 °C, the amount of apoE released from the FN-cell monolayer by
HDL3 remains lower than that released from cells plated on
uncoated surfaces. The results of these experiments indicate that the
increment in apoE retained by the cell monolayer on fibronectin-coated
surfaces is retained in a pool that is resistant to mobilization by
HDL3.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Release of apoE from the cell monolayer by
HDL3. J774E+ cells were grown on
fibronectin-coated (FN) or uncoated (CON)
surfaces for 48 h. The cells were then labeled for 4 h in
medium containing 100 µCi/ml [35S]methionine and 2 µM unlabeled methionine. After 4 h, cells were
washed twice in PBS and incubated in chase medium containing 0.2% BSA,
500 µM unlabeled methionine, and with or without
HDL3 (400 µg/ml) as indicated. After an additional 90 min
at 4 °C (A) or 37 °C (B), the medium was
harvested for apoE immunoprecipitation. In both
panels, the difference in the amount of apoE released in the
presence compared with the absence of HDL3 is significant
at p < 0.01. The difference in the amount of apoE
released by HDL3 from "CON" cells compared
with "FN" cells is significant at p < 0.01.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The data in this report reveal a new pathway for regulation of
macrophage apoE gene expression that is highly relevant to the vessel
wall. Subendothelial matrix stimulates apoE gene expression and apoE
synthesis in macrophages. This stimulation can be accounted for by the
presence of collagen I or fibronectin in the subendothelial matrix.
This regulatory pathway is functional in the THP-1 human promonocyte
line, in primary human monocytes, and in mouse peritoneal macrophages.
In other reports, exposure of monocytes to ECM has been shown to
facilitate their differentiation into macrophages (19). This could have
contributed to the increased apoE expression observed in human
monocytes grown on ECM-coated substrates. However, the response of apoE
expression to ECM in fully differentiated mouse peritoneal macrophages
indicates that stimulation of apoE expression by ECM components can
occur independently of effects on monocyte differentiation.
Increased apoE synthesis can be detected by 2 h after exposure of
macrophages to fibronectin. Furthermore, this rapid response can be
inhibited by blocking antibodies to 5 1,
the major cell surface integrin receptor for fibronectin. Cell surface
integrins are a diverse group of heterodimeric transmembrane proteins
that mediate cell adhesion (28-30). However, beyond this, integrins also transduce signals that regulate organization of the cellular cytoskeleton and gene transcription (28-30). This signaling may be
cell-specific and is subject to affinity modulation by conformational changes in the integrins. It is interesting that such affinity modulation has been reported after stimulation of leukocytes with phorbol ester, and this may account for the enhanced response of apoE
mRNA levels to SEM that we observed in the presence of higher
concentrations of PMA (Fig. 2). It is also of interest that inclusion
of the 1 integrin-blocking antibody reduced apoE synthesis in the presence of fibronectin to a level below that observed
on control plates. This could reflect an effect of fibronectin on apoE
synthesis mediated through other cell surface receptors or by
mediating enhanced cell anchorage.
In addition to transcriptional regulation, it is also apparent that
fibronectin can modulate the net production of apoE by macrophages at a
post-translational level. Because newly synthesized macrophage apoE is
both secreted and degraded (21, 31-33), the reduced rates of
disappearance from cell lysate we observed in mouse peritoneal
macrophages grown on fibronectin are consistent with either lower rates
of secretion or suppressed degradation. In mouse peritoneal macrophages
the increment in apoE secretion did appear to be lower than that
expected for the increase in synthesis, supporting a reduction in
secretion as contributing to the reduced rate of disappearance from the
cell monolayer. Evaluating any additional contribution of suppressed
degradation in mouse peritoneal macrophages is complicated by different
synthesis and secretion rates in the presence of FN. However, this
issue was further clarified in a cell model in which synthesis of apoE was identical on uncoated and fibronectin-coated plates. The results of
this evaluation indicated that the persistence of apoE in the cell
layer in the presence of fibronectin was also due to suppressed degradation of newly synthesized apoE. Furthermore, the results in Fig.
7 rule out the possibility that the increased apoE present in the
cell-matrix monolayer on FN-coated plates is solely due to re-uptake of
secreted apoE, because this would be expected to reduce the amount of
apoE present in the medium. In fact, the observation that approximately
equal amounts of apoE are secreted from J774E+ grown on FN
or uncoated substrate, indicated that the increment of apoE in the FN
associated cell monolayer was not derived from secreted apoE or from a
pool of cellular apoE destined for secretion but most likely from a
pool destined for degradation.
We have previously shown that the newly synthesized apoE retained by
macrophages is present in an intracellular as well as a cell surface
location (22). We have also shown that apoE present on the cell surface
recycles to the intracellular compartment, and that a portion of this
apoE is degraded before it can be released (22). The release of both
cell surface and intracellular apoE can be facilitated by the addition
of extracellular HDL3 (21, 22, 31-33). When we utilized
HDL3 to mobilize cell surface (4 °C) and total cellular
(37 °C) apoE, less apoE was released from the cells on
fibronectin-coated plates, despite the fact that more apoE was
present in this monolayer. This suggested that the apoE sequestered in
the monolayer on fibronectin-coated plates was trapped in a pool not
present in cells grown on uncoated surfaces; i.e. trapped in
the fibronectin matrix. Because of our previous observations regarding
the recycling and degradation of cell surface apoE in the macrophage
(22), we believe the most likely explanation for suppressed apoE
degradation on fibronectin-coated plates is the interruption of apoE
recycling by the sequestration of cell surface apoE by extracellular
fibronectin, thereby sparing it from re-internalization and subsequent
intracellular degradation. This is the complete opposite of what occurs
when endogenously synthesized apoE is bound to an endogenously
synthesized pericellular proteoglycan matrix. In this circumstance, the
recycling and degradation of apoE is facilitated. An alternative
mechanism for suppressed degradation in the presence of fibronectin
could be integrin-mediated signaling and regulation of intracellular
degradation pathways. However, this explanation is somewhat less likely
in that it would not completely explain the failure to see a
proportionally increased secretion of apoE as a result of its
suppressed degradation. Furthermore, in preliminary experiments,
inhibitors of integrin-mediated signal transduction were not able to
suppress the effects of fibronectin on apoE degradation (not shown).
ApoE produced by macrophages in the vessel wall has important
implications for vessel wall physiology. In most in
vivo models, macrophage-derived apoE has been found to be
atheroprotective (3-6). Macrophage-derived apoE has been shown to have
antioxidant properties, can influence the behavior of multiple cell
types found in the vessel wall, and can modulate sterol efflux from cells in the vessel wall (3-6, 8-11). ApoE interaction with matrix components may also have important implications for retention of
lipoproteins or growth factors in the vessel wall (23). All of these
considerations make it important to understand factors that modulate
apoE expression in macrophages and that are relevant to vessel wall
biology. It has been well established that apoE interacts with
proteoglycans in the ECM, and it has been strongly associated with
biglycan (1, 34). The apoE interaction with biglycan is at least
bifunctional, involving an electrostatic association with charged
groups on glycosaminoglycans and a separate ionic interaction with the
biglycan core protein (35). Although it has been generally appreciated
that proteoglycans in the extracellular matrix can bind apoE, including
cell-derived apoE, it is becoming apparent that other components of ECM
can be involved. Huang et al. (36) have shown
that apoE has high avidity for laminin, probably via protein-protein
interactions. The composition of the vessel wall ECM changes after
injury and evolves with progression of the atherosclerotic plaque (17,
18, 25). Regions of increased synthesis of type I collagen and
fibronectin can be demonstrated; local production of cytokines or
growth factors modulate production of these ECM components by arterial
smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells (17, 18, 25, 37). For
example, transforming growth factor increases collagen I synthesis,
and lysophosphatidic acid (a phospholipid growth factor released by
platelets and contained in lipoproteins) stimulates fibronectin
synthesis. Furthermore, vessel wall injury not only promotes the
synthesis of fibronectin, it also leads to the appearance of
fibronectin isoforms that are usually absent from vessel wall (25).
Hypertension and angiotensin II also modulate fibronectin synthesis and
isoform distribution in the arterial wall (25). Our results establish,
therefore, that the changing composition of ECM (in response to vessel
wall injury, cytokines, or growth factors) will have importance for regulating the expression and processing of newly synthesized apoE by
vessel wall macrophages.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Stephanie Thompson for assistance
with manuscript preparation.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grants HL 59489 and HL 39653 from
the National Institutes of Health (to T. M.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Rush Medical Center,
1653 W. Congress Pkwy, Chicago, IL 60612. Tel.: 312-942-8231; Fax:
312-942-8233; E-mail: tmazzone@rush.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 28, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200219200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ECM, extracellular
matrix;
SEM, subendothelial matrix;
HDL3, high density
lipoprotein subfraction 3;
PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate;
FN, fibronectin;
RLU, relative luciferase units;
DMEM, Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium;
FBS, fetal bovine serum;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
RT, reverse
transcription.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
O'Brien, K. D.,
Deeb, S. S.,
Ferguson, M.,
McDonald, T. O.,
Allen, M. D.,
Alpers, C. E.,
and Chait, A.
(1994)
Am. J. Pathol.
144,
538-548[Abstract]
|
| 2.
|
Rosenfeld, M. E.,
Butler, S.,
Ord, V. A.,
Lipton, B. A.,
Dyer, C. A.,
Curtiss, L. K.,
Palinski, W.,
and Witztum, J. L.
(1993)
Arterioscler. Thromb.
13,
1382-1389[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Mazzone, T.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Lipidol.
7,
303-307[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Curtiss, L. K.,
and Boisvert, W. A.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Lipidol.
11,
243-251[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Linton, M. R.,
Atkinson, J. B.,
and Fazio, S.
(1995)
Science
267,
1034-1037[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Fazio, S.,
Babaev, V. R.,
Murray, A. B.,
Hasty, A. H.,
Carter, K. J.,
and Gleaves, L. A.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4647-4652[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Miyata, M.,
and Smith, J. D.
(1996)
Nat. Genet.
14,
55-61[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Mazzone, T.,
and Reardon, C.
(1994)
J. Lipid Res.
35,
1345-1353[Abstract]
|
| 9.
|
Lin, C.-Y.,
Duan, H.,
and Mazzone, T.
(1999)
J. Lipid Res.
40,
1618-1626[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Lin, C.-Y.,
Huang, Z. H.,
and Mazzone, T.
(2001)
J. Lipid Res.
42,
1125-1133[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Huang, Z. H.,
Lin, C. Y.,
Oram, J. F.,
and Mazzone, T.
(2001)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
21,
2019-2025[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Mazzone, T.,
Gump, H.,
Diller, P.,
and Getz, G. S.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
11657-11662[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Mazzone, T.,
Basheeruddin, K.,
and Poulos, C.
(1989)
J. Lipid Res.
30,
1055-1064[Abstract]
|
| 14.
|
Laffitte, B. A.,
Repa, J. J.,
Joseph, S. B.,
Wilpitz, D. C.,
Kas, H. R.,
Mangelsdorf, D. J.,
and Tontonoz, P.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
507-512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Werb, Z.,
and Chin, J. R.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
10642-10648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Duan, H., Li, Z.,
and Mazzone, T.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
96,
915-922[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Assoian, R. K.,
and Marcantonio, E. E.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
98,
2436-2439[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Wight, T. N.
(1995)
Curr. Opin. Lipidol.
6,
326-334[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Wesley, R. B.,
Meng, X.,
Godin, D.,
and Galis, Z. S.
(1998)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
18,
432-440[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Basheeruddin, K.,
Rechtoris, C.,
and Mazzone, T.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
1219-1224[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Mazzone, T.,
Pustelnikas, L.,
and Reardon, C. A.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
1081-1087[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Zhao, Y.,
and Mazzone, T.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
4759-4765[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Saxena, U.,
Ferguson, E.,
and Bisgaier, C. L.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
14812-14819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Shih, S.-J.,
Allan, C.,
Grehan, S.,
Tse, W.,
Moran, C.,
and Taylor, J. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
31567-31572[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Magnusson, M. K.,
and Mosher, D. F.
(1998)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
18,
1363-1370[Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Danen, E. H. J.,
and Yamada, K. M.
(2001)
J. Cell. Physiol.
189,
1-13[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Danilov, Y. N.,
and Juliano, R. L.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
108,
1925-1933[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Schmitz, G.,
Orso, E.,
Rothe, G.,
and Klucken, J.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Lipidol.
8,
287-300[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Shattil, S. J.,
and Ginsberg, M. H.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
100,
1-5[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Harris, E. S.,
McIntyre, T. M.,
Prescott, S. M.,
and Zimmerman, G. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
23409-23412[Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Lucas, M.,
and Mazzone, T.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
13454-13460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Duan, H.,
Lin, C.-Y.,
and Mazzone, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
31156-31162[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Dory, L.
(1991)
J. Lipid Res.
32,
783-792[Abstract]
|
| 34.
|
O'Brien, K. D.,
Olin, K. L.,
Alpers, C. E.,
Ferguson, M.,
Hudkins, K.,
Wight, T. N.,
and Chait, A.
(1998)
Circulation
98,
519-527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Klezovitch, O.,
Formato, M.,
Cherchi, G. M.,
Weisgraber, K. H.,
and Scanu, A. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
18913-18918[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Huang, D. Y.,
Weisgraber, K. H.,
and Matthew, W. D.
(1995)
Exp. Neurol.
136,
251-257[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
O'Blenes, C. A.,
Kinnear, C.,
and Rabinovitch, M.
(2001)
Circ. Res.
89,
26-32[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Lucic, Z. H. Huang, D. S. Gu, M. K. Altenburg, N. Maeda, and T. Mazzone
Regulation of macrophage apoE secretion and sterol efflux by the LDL receptor
J. Lipid Res.,
February 1, 2007;
48(2):
366 - 372.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Yue, N. Rasouli, G. Ranganathan, P. A. Kern, and T. Mazzone
Divergent Effects of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {gamma} Agonists and Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha} on Adipocyte ApoE Expression
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 12, 2004;
279(46):
47626 - 47632.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|