Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M203570200 on June 4, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 33, 29577-29583, August 16, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/33/29577    most recent
M203570200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodova, M.
Right arrow Articles by Calvet, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rodova, M.
Right arrow Articles by Calvet, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Polycystic Kidney Disease-1 Promoter Is a Target of the beta -Catenin/T-cell Factor Pathway*

Marianna Rodova, M. Rafiq IslamDagger , Robin L. Maser, and James P. Calvet§

From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and the Kidney Institute, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160 and the Dagger  Department of Chemistry/Physics, Northwest Missouri State University, Maryville, Missouri 64468

Received for publication, April 14, 2002, and in revised form, May 21, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Polycystic kidney disease (PKD) results from loss-of-function mutations in the PKD1 gene. There are also reports showing abnormally high levels of PKD1 expression in cystic epithelial cells. At present, nothing is known about the molecular mechanisms regulating the normal expression of the PKD1 gene or whether transcriptional disregulation of the PKD1 gene has a role in cyst formation. We have analyzed a 3.3-kb 5'-proximal portion of the human PKD1 gene. Sequence analysis revealed the presence of consensus sequences for numerous transactivating factors, including four T-cell factor (TCF) binding elements (TBEs). Transcriptional activity of the 3.3-kb fragment and a series of deletion constructs was assayed in HEK293T cells. A 2.0-kb proximal promoter region containing one of the four TBEs (TBE1) was inducible up to 6-fold by cotransfection with beta -catenin. beta -catenin-mediated induction was inhibited by dominant-negative TCF and by deletion of the TBE1 sequence. 15- or 109-bp sequences containing the TBE1 site, when cloned upstream of a minimal promoter, were shown to respond to beta -catenin induction. Gel shift assays confirmed that the TBE1 site is capable of forming complexes with TCF and beta -catenin. To determine whether expression of the endogenous PKD1 gene responds to beta -catenin, HT1080 cells were treated with LiCl, and HeLa cells were stably transfected with beta -catenin. In both cases, endogenous PKD1 mRNA levels were elevated in response to these treatments. Taken together, these studies define an active PKD1 promoter region and suggest that the PKD1 gene is a target of the beta -catenin/TCF pathway.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD)1 is a very common inherited disease worldwide, having a gene frequency of 1 in 200-1,000 individuals and causing 6-9% of all end-stage renal disease (1, 2). Mutations in the PKD1 gene are responsible for the vast majority (85-90%) of ADPKD cases (3, 4). PKD is characterized by the neoplastic growth of tubular epithelial cells, which gives rise to the formation of kidneys containing numerous fluid-filled cysts and ultimately to renal failure.

In situ and Northern hybridization and immunocytochemical analyses have shown that the PKD1 gene is widely expressed in a number of embryonic and adult tissues and organs, including the kidney (5-10). Targeted deletion of the PKD1 gene has shown that it is important for renal, pancreatic, cardiovascular, and skeletal development (9, 11-14). However, there are conflicting observations as to whether PKD results from abnormally decreased or increased expression of the PKD1 gene (15). On the one hand, there is evidence that loss-of-function germ line mutations can lead to haploinsufficiency at the PKD1 locus (16, 17) and additional evidence for a two-hit gene inactivation mechanism as a cause of PKD (18-20). On the other hand, there is immunocytochemical evidence for overexpression of the protein product of the PKD1 gene, polycystin-1, in cyst-lining epithelial cells of polycystic kidneys (15). Furthermore, transgenic overexpression of a functional PKD1 gene can cause PKD (21). At the present time, there is no information concerning the mechanisms regulating transcription of the PKD1 gene.

beta -catenin is a major component of adherens junctions, linking the actin cytoskeleton to members of the cadherin family of transmembrane cell-cell adhesion receptors (22-24). Together with alpha - and gamma -catenin, beta -catenin binds to the cytosolic domain of E-cadherin to form a complex that is necessary for adhesion to occur. In addition, soluble beta -catenin can translocate to the nucleus, where it associates with members of the TCF/LEF family of high mobility group (HMG)-box factors to alter the expression of certain target genes (25). By playing a dual role, a structural role at cell-cell junctions and a regulatory role in the nucleus, beta -catenin can transduce changes in cell adhesion and junction formation to control transmembrane signaling and gene expression. The level of soluble beta -catenin in the cell is regulated by its association with the tumor suppressor molecule adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), axin, and glycogen synthase kinase-3beta (GSK-3beta ). Phosphorylation of beta -catenin by the APC-axin-GSK-3beta complex leads to its degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. The failure of this degradation in cells expressing mutated beta -catenin leads to the accumulation of soluble beta -catenin that can result in activation of oncogenic beta -catenin-responsive genes (23-25).

A number of observations have implicated beta -catenin in the pathogenesis of PKD. Transgenic overexpression of either beta -catenin or c-Myc, which is a downstream target of beta -catenin, has been shown to give rise to PKD (26, 27). Also, high levels of expression of c-Myc mRNA and protein are found in the cysts of both human ADPKD (28) and the cpk mouse model of PKD (29-31), and the half-life of soluble beta -catenin is increased in cell lines from cpk mice (32). Transient overexpression of the C-terminal tail of polycystin-1 has been shown to stabilize beta -catenin and to activate transcription of the beta -catenin target gene, siamois (33). Finally, polycystin-1 has been shown to be in a complex with E-cadherin and alpha - and beta -catenin in normal cells (34), and E-cadherin has been shown to be mistargeted in ADPKD cells (35), possibly because of abnormal polycystin-1 function. In this study, we have investigated the transcriptional regulation of the PKD1 promoter and have determined that the PKD1 gene is a target for the beta -catenin/TCF complex.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

DNA Clones-- The cosmid clone 2H2 (LANL) (GenBank accession no. AC005346) was used to amplify a 3,414-bp sequence (29,490-32,904 of AC005346 or 77-3,490 of L39891) from -3,363 to +51, relative to the established transcription start site of the PKD1 gene (36). The DNA product was cloned in pGEM-T (Promega). A KpnI site was introduced near the 5'-end of the 3.3-kb fragment during the initial PCR reaction, and a HindIII site was introduced near the 3'-end. The fragment resulting from KpnI/HindIII digestion (-3,346 to +33; Fig. 1, 3.3 kb) was subcloned in the promoterless luciferase-reporter vector pGL2-Basic (Promega). Nested deletions were obtained by digestion with BglII (-2,018; Fig. 1, 2.0 kb), PvuII (-1,223; Fig. 1, 1.2 kb), XhoI (-947; Fig. 1, 0.95 kb), MluI (-200; Fig. 1, 0.20 kb), and ApaI (-1) (not shown). A 109-bp promoter fragment (-2018 to -1910) containing TBE1 was cloned in pTiLuc, which is pGL2-Basic with the adenovirus major late promoter TATA-box and the TdT initiator region (37). Site-directed deletion mutagenesis was performed with the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). All constructs, mutations, and deletions were checked by sequencing. A Myc epitope-tagged wild-type human beta -catenin pcDNA3 expression vector was a gift from P. Polakis. A Myc-tagged mutant (lacking amino acids 29-48), constitutively active (CA) beta -catenin pcDNA3, and a cyclin D1 reporter construct (originally from R. Pestell, Albert Einstein College of Medicine) were gifts from O. Tetsu and F. McCormick. A Myc-tagged dominant-negative (DN) TCF-4E pcDNA3 lacking the beta -catenin-binding domain (amino acids 2-53) also was from O. Tetsu and F. McCormick. pGST-TCF4 (DNA-binding domain) was a gift from K. Kinzler and B. Vogelstein.

Cell Lines, Transfection, Immunofluorescence, and Reporter Assays-- Human embryonic kidney 293T (HEK293T), human colon carcinoma HCT116 (HCT), and human fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. COS-1 and HeLa cells were obtained from R. Padmanabhan. HCT116 and COS-1 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/F12 (CellGro) with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum. HEK293T cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 4.5 g/liter glucose and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum. Transient transfections were performed by the calcium phosphate method with HEK293T cells and by LipofectAMINE with COS-1 cells. A beta -galactosidase expression plasmid was included in each transfection to monitor transfection efficiency. After 48 h the cells were lysed, and activities were determined using enzyme assay kits for luciferase (Packard Bio Science) and beta -galactosidase (Promega). Relative light units are the luciferase units normalized to beta -galactosidase. All experiments were carried out in triplicate and repeated at least twice. For stable transfections, HeLa cells were transfected with pcDNA3 as a control, and Myc-tagged CA beta -catenin in pcDNA3 using FuGENE6 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and were selected with 400 µg/ml G418. For immunofluorescence assays cells were grown to confluency, fixed in methanol at -20 °C, and incubated with primary and secondary antibodies for 1 h at 4 °C.

RT-PCR-- Total cellular RNA was extracted with TRIzol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The samples were then treated with DNase I (Ambion). 3 µg of RNA from each sample was incubated with random primers and Superscript reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) to yield cDNA as per the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was amplified in 50-µl reactions containing 2 µl of the cDNA reaction mix, 1× PCR buffer, 1 mM MgCl2 for PKD1 or 2 mM MgCl2 for beta -catenin and for the ribosomal protein L7, 200 µM of each dNTP, 25 pmol of each primer, and 2.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen). For each gene, PCR was performed to determine the linear range of amplification that would permit a quantitative assessment of expression levels. Primers specific for PKD1 (36) were: forward, 5'-CGC CGC TTC ACT AGC TTC GAC-3' and reverse, 5'-ACG CTC CAG AGG GAG TCC AC-3', giving a 260-bp product; primers specific for beta -catenin were: forward, 5'-TTC GCC TTC ACT ATG GAC TACC-3' and reverse, 5'-ATC AGC AGT CTC ATT CCA AGCC-3', giving a 559-bp product; and primers specific for the ribosomal protein L7 were: forward, 5'-GGG GGA AGC TTC GAA AGG CAA GGA GGA AGC-3' and reverse, 5'-GGG GGG TCG ACT CCT CCA TGC AGA TGA TGC-3', giving a 475-bp product. Each primer set was amplified at 95 °C for 30 s, 61 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s for the indicated number of cycles followed by a 10-min extension at 72 °C. Amplified PCR products were electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/ml). Bands were analyzed by NIH Image software. Net band intensity (background-subtracted intensity) was normalized to values for L7 and plotted as relative units.

Gel Mobility Shift Assays-- The following oligonucleotides (oligos) were synthesized (core consensus TCF sites are capitalized): wild-type PKD1 (-1,965 to -1,951) TBE1 (gtttCTTTGTTtttt); mutant PKD1 TBE1 (gcgcCTTTGggtttt); wild-type TBE1 core site (cgggCTTTGTTgggg); optimal (TOP) TCF-4 (5'-agctggtaagATCAAAGgg-3'); and mutant (FOP) TCF-4 (5'-agctggtaaggcCAAAGgg-3') (38). Complementary oligos were annealed and end-labeled with polynucleotide kinase and [gamma -32P]ATP. A GST-TCF-4 fusion protein was purified from DH5alpha cells by GSH-Sepharose affinity, and the protein product was confirmed by Western blotting with an anti-LEF/TCF antibody (Maine Biotechnology Services). Nuclear extracts were prepared using NuPer (Pierce) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Protein concentration was determined by the BCA assay (Pierce). Binding reactions containing 15,000 cpm of labeled DNA were incubated for 30 min on ice with 300 ng of fusion protein or 5 µg of nuclear extract and 500 ng of poly(dI·dC) in 20 mM Hepes, 60 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA, and 12.5% (v/v) glycerol. DNA-protein complexes were electrophoresed in 4% native polyacrylamide gels and visualized by autoradiography. For supershift analysis, 500 ng of an anti-beta -catenin antibody (Transduction Laboratories) or an anti-c-Myc antibody (9E10, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was preincubated with nuclear extract for 30 min on ice followed by incubation with DNA for 30 min on ice.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The PKD1 gene lies in a complex region of DNA on chromosome 16 (36). More than two-thirds of the 5'-end of the gene is duplicated several times in an area proximal to the PKD1 gene on chromosome 16. This PKD1 homologous region appears to give rise to multiple transcripts (39). A 38,849-bp cosmid clone (LANL) 2H2 has in its 3'-end, the 5'-portion of the PKD1 gene and a long 5'-upstream region. Based on homology with available PKD1 sequence and differences with PKD1 homologous regions,2 we can conclude that this cosmid clone contains the genuine PKD1 gene. This cosmid DNA was used to amplify a 3,414-bp sequence from -3,363 to +51, which was analyzed for putative cis-acting elements utilizing the OMIGA sequence analysis software (Oxford Molecular) and TESS (www.cbil.upenn.edu/tess/index.html).

Typical TATA- and CAAT-boxes are absent from this proximal 5'-flanking region; however, a GC-rich region was identified within close proximity to the transcription start site. Numerous transcription factor consensus binding motifs were found in the PKD1 promoter, including AP-1, AP-2, Sp1, Ets, and four TCF binding elements (CTTTGA/TA/T). To test for promoter activity, a number of deletion constructs were made, and their activities were determined following transfection into human (HEK293T) and monkey (COS-1) kidney cell lines (Fig. 1). The constructs appeared to have similar promoter activities in the two cell lines. The 2.0-kb construct containing the -2,018 to +33 region supported the highest level of transcription in both cell lines, suggesting that there may be a negative element in the distal 1.3 kb-region.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Activity of human PKD1 promoter nested deletions. Upper panel, nested deletions used in this study. Asterisks, potential TBEs; arrow, start site of transcription. Lower panel, promoter activity in HEK293T and COS-1 cells plotted as relative light units (RLU). DNA was introduced into cells seeded in 6-well plates using the calcium phosphate technique for HEK293T cells and LipofectAMINE for COS-1 cells. Relative light units are expressed as the mean of triplicate samples ± S.D. (the COS-1 experiment was carried out once only).

To determine whether beta -catenin is potentially capable of regulating the transcription of the PKD1 gene, we transfected PKD1 promoter-luciferase reporters into HEK293T cells and measured their responses to cotransfected beta -catenin expression vectors encoding wild-type or mutant CA beta -catenin. HEK293T cells had been shown previously to express TCF-4 and to support beta -catenin-dependent activation of the cyclin D1 promoter (40). beta -catenin induction of the 3.3-kb construct (data not shown) was less significant when compared with that of the 2.0-kb fragment. Therefore, we concentrated our studies on the 2.0-kb fragment, which contains the most proximal TCF site (TBE1). The transcriptional activity of the 2.0-kb fragment showed a dose-dependent response to increasing amounts of cotransfected wild-type beta -catenin (Fig. 2A). The response of the 2.0-kb fragment to a CA beta -catenin (Fig. 2B, left panel) was similar to that of the beta -catenin target, cyclin D1 (right panel) under the same transfection and assay conditions. To further confirm the role of beta -catenin/TCF-4 in the activation of the PKD1 promoter, we attempted to inhibit its activity in HEK293T cells with a dominant-negative TCF-4 mutant (DN TCF). As shown in Fig. 2C, cotransfected DN TCF suppressed the activity of the 2.0-kb promoter fragment in the presence or absence of exogenous beta -catenin.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Induction of the PKD1 promoter by beta -catenin. A, dose-dependent response to beta -catenin. A comparison (left panel) between the 3.3- and 2.0-kb fragments in the absence of transfected beta -catenin and the response of the 2.0-kb fragment to increasing amounts of cotransfected wild-type beta -catenin is shown. Western blot (right panel) showing the expression of transfected beta -catenin (lane beta , arrow) is compared with untransfected control cells (lane C). B, comparison between the PKD1 2.0-kb and cyclin D1 promoters in response to CA beta -catenin under the same conditions. C, inhibition by dominant-negative TCF. Cotransfected DN TCF (5 µg) suppressed the activity of the 2.0-kb fragment in the presence or absence of exogenous beta -catenin.

To determine whether the response of the 2.0-kb construct to induction by beta -catenin depends specifically on the TBE1 site, we tested the activities of several deletions in the TBE1 region. An extended deletion of 109-bp at the 5'-end of the 2.0-kb fragment (gatctctggc acattttatt tgctctgtct caccacatgg attttgtttt tttgtttCTT TGTTttttga gatggagtct cactcttgtt gcccaggctg gagtgccat) completely abrogated beta -catenin induction (Fig. 3A). Deletion of 15 bp (underlined) containing the TCF consensus motif (capital letters) did not abolish induction (data not shown), possibly because there are other AT-rich sequences in this region that could substitute as TCF binding sites. A 28-bp deletion (bold face) removing this AT-rich DNA and the TCF motif strongly reduced the effect of transfected beta -catenin (Fig. 3A). To further examine the 109-bp sequence, its functional response was tested when cloned upstream of a minimal promoter. As shown, the 109-bp sequence was capable of being induced by beta -catenin (Fig. 3B). These results, taken together, suggest that there might be interactions between beta -catenin and/or TCF with other transcription factors within this region that are involved in conferring the observed beta -catenin responsiveness.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Response of TBE1 deletions to beta -catenin induction. A, left pair of bars, the response of the wild-type 2.0-kb promoter fragment (wt 2.0 kb) to transfected CA beta -catenin in HEK293T cells. Middle pair of bars, an extended deletion of 109-bp (109 bp del) completely abrogated beta -catenin induction. Right pair of bars, deletion of 28 bp strongly reduced the effect of transfected beta -catenin. B, functional response of the TBE1-containing region in isolation. A 109-bp promoter fragment (-2018 to -1910) containing TBE1 cloned in TiLuc was capable of being induced ~6-fold in HEK293T cells by cotransfected beta -catenin.

To determine whether the TBE1 sequence is capable of binding TCF, we carried out electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) using a synthetic double-stranded DNA, gtttCTTTGTTtttt, containing the consensus TCF binding motif (capital letters). The oligo was able to form a DNA-protein complex with a GST-fusion protein containing the DNA-binding domain of human TCF-4 (Fig. 4A, GST-TCF). As a control, a DNA-protein complex was formed with GST-TCF and an optimal TCF-4 site, TOP (T), but failed to form with the mutated binding site, FOP (F). The TBE1 complex with GST-TCF could be competed with an excess of unlabeled TBE1. The 15-bp TBE1 oligo also formed DNA-protein complexes with nuclear extract from HEK293T cells (Fig. 4B, arrows), suggesting that the PKD1 TBE1 site can bind native TCF and beta -catenin. The TBE1 complexes were completely eliminated by competition with excess unlabeled TBE1 and partially eliminated by competition with excess unlabeled TOP (the asterisk indicates a remaining DNA-protein complex). EMSA using the TOP oligo also resulted in the formation of two DNA-protein complexes, which were completely eliminated by competition with excess TBE1 or TOP. As shown in Fig. 4C, the wild-type 15-bp oligo was able to form a complex with GST-TCF (but not GST alone) and with nuclear extracts from HCT, which have a beta -catenin-stabilizing mutation (41), and from HEK293T cells transfected with mutated constitutively active beta -catenin (293T). Mutation of this 15-bp oligo (gcgcCTTTGggtttt), leaving only 5 bp of the core of the TCF motif (capital letters), abrogated the binding both with GST-TCF and with the HCT and 293T nuclear extracts (Fig. 4C). Although we were unable to supershift the wild-type 15-bp oligo using an anti-beta -catenin antibody, possibly because of other protein factors preventing an interaction with the antibody, we did supershift a probe containing the TBE1 core site (cgggCTTTGTTgggg) and nuclear extract from HCT cells (Fig. 4C, right panel). As expected, no such complex was formed using an anti-c-Myc antibody. The functional response of this 15-bp TBE1 TCF site was also tested in isolation. A single copy of the wild-type 15-bp TBE1 sequence in pGL3-Basic was able to confer beta -catenin responsiveness in a dose-dependent manner, which was strongly inhibited by cotransfection with DN TCF (Fig. 5A), whereas mutation of the core TCF motif strongly reduced beta -catenin responsiveness (Fig. 5B), consistent with the wild-type sequence acting as a TCF binding site.


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   In vitro binding of TCF to TBE1. A, EMSA for TBE1 and GST-TCF. Left panel, TBE1 is a 15-bp synthetic double-stranded DNA oligo encompassing positions -1965 to -1951 of the human PKD1 promoter; TOP (T) is an optimal TCF-4 site; FOP (F) is a mutated TCF-4 site; and GST-TCF is a GST-fusion protein containing the DNA-binding domain of human TCF-4. Right panel, the TBE1 complex with GST-TCF could be competed with an excess of unlabeled TBE1. B, EMSA for TBE1, TOP, and FOP with nuclear extract from HEK293T cells. Left panel, TBE1 competed with either TBE1 or TOP (asterisk indicates a remaining DNA-protein complex). Right panel, TOP competed with either TBE1 or TOP. C, EMSA for wild-type and mutant TBE1. Left panel, wild-type (wt) and mutant (mt) oligos with GST-TCF and with nuclear extracts from HCT and HEK293T cells transfected with CA beta -catenin (293T). Right panel, supershift (arrow) using the wild-type (wt) TBE1 core site (cgggCTTTGTTgggg) and nuclear extract from HCT116 cells.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Response of the 15-bp TBE1 sequence to beta -catenin. A, a single copy of the wild-type 15-bp TBE1 sequence containing the consensus TCF binding motif (underlined) was able to confer beta -catenin responsiveness in a dose-dependent manner in HEK293T cells, which was strongly inhibited by cotransfection with DN TCF. B, mutation of the core TCF motif in the 15-bp TBE1 sequence (gg) strongly reduced the responsiveness to CA beta -catenin.

To determine whether expression of the endogenous PKD1 gene responds to beta -catenin, human fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells were treated with 20 mM LiCl, a known inhibitor of GSK-3beta activity that results in the stabilization of cytosolic beta -catenin and elevation of nuclear beta -catenin. PKD1 gene expression was assayed by RT-PCR and compared with the expression of a control that should not respond to beta -catenin, the ribosomal protein L7 gene. As shown in Fig. 6A, PKD1 mRNA levels increased ~1.6-fold in response to LiCl, whereas L7 mRNA did not increase. We also stably transfected HeLa cells with CA beta -catenin and determined the effect of overexpression of this mutant form of beta -catenin, which cannot be targeted for degradation. beta -catenin levels were shown to be increased in these transfected cells by RT-PCR (Fig. 6B) and by immunofluorescence (Fig. 6C). Cells transfected with beta -catenin showed ~3-fold increase in PKD1 mRNA levels, whereas L7 mRNA levels were unaffected (Fig. 6B). These results are consistent with the endogenous PKD1 gene being a target of the beta -catenin pathway.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   beta -catenin elevates endogenous PKD1 mRNA expression. A, RT-PCR analysis of HT1080 cells without (control, lane C) and with (LiCl) 20 mM LiCl treatment; left pair of bars, 30 PCR cycles for PKD1 mRNA; right pair of bars, 17 PCR cycles for ribosomal protein L7 mRNA. Quantitation of the data is shown by the bar graphs. B, RT-PCR analysis of control empty vector pcDNA3-transfected (lane C) and CA beta -catenin stably transfected HeLa cells (beta -catenin); left pair of bars, 30 PCR cycles for beta -catenin mRNA; middle pair of bars, 30 PCR cycles for PKD1 mRNA; right pair of bars, 20 PCR cycles for L7 mRNA. Quantitation of the data is shown by the bar graphs. C, immunofluorescence of control and CA beta -catenin stably transfected HeLa cells using anti-c-Myc antibodies.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The 5'-flanking 3.3-kb region of the human PKD1 gene was isolated and analyzed for promoter activity. Functional analysis of deletion constructs fused to a luciferase reporter in HEK293T and COS-1 cells revealed strong transcriptional activity within this 3.3-kb region, with the highest activity localized to the 2.0-kb proximal fragment. Analysis of the 5'-flanking region by TESS predicted a cluster of Sp-1 binding sites just upstream of the transcription start site. Sp-1 plays a key role in regulating the transcription initiation of TATA-less promoters (42) and is temporally and spatially regulated during nephrogenesis in a pattern that suggests that it may be important in kidney development (43).

Sequence analysis of the PKD1 promoter also revealed four core TCF/LEF binding element (TBE1-4) consensus sequences. We focused on the most proximal element, TBE1, which is the only TCF site contained within the 2.0-kb proximal fragment. The 2.0-kb fragment showed a dose-responsive induction by beta -catenin, which was inhibited by cotransfection with a dominant-negative TCF construct. Deletion of a 109-bp sequence containing the TBE1 site completely abolished the beta -catenin responsiveness of the 2.0-kb fragment. In addition, both this 109-bp fragment and a 15-bp fragment within it containing the TBE1 site were able to confer beta -catenin responsiveness when placed upstream of a minimal promoter. The response of the 15-bp TBE1 site was reduced or eliminated by mutation of the core consensus TCF motif or by dominant-negative TCF. Furthermore, the wild-type 15-bp sequence, but not the mutated 15-bp sequence, was able to form DNA-protein complexes using nuclear extracts from cells known to contain beta -catenin/TCF and with a GST-TCF fusion protein. We conclude from these experiments that the TBE1 site in the PKD1 promoter is a beta -catenin/TCF response element. Although we did not focus on the three upstream TBE elements (TBEs 2-4), it is quite possible that they are also beta -catenin/TCF response elements because we have shown that a 1.3-kb fragment containing all three (but lacking TBE1) is also induced by beta -catenin (data not shown). Further analysis will be required to determine which (one or whether all three) has the potential to act as a TCF response element. Finally, to determine whether expression of the endogenous PKD1 gene is able to respond to increases in beta -catenin, we treated human fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells with LiCl, which is a known inhibitor of GSK-3beta activity and results in the stabilization of beta -catenin. We also stably transfected HeLa cells with CA beta -catenin. In both cases, we were able to demonstrate that endogenous PKD1 mRNA levels were elevated in response to the treatments, supporting the idea that the PKD1 gene is a beta -catenin target. Genetic and biochemical studies have indicated that the secreted Wnt factors, through Frizzled receptors, activate Disheveled and inhibit GSK-3beta to stabilize beta -catenin (24, 25). It is also possible that beta -catenin levels are regulated by other mechanisms such as the PKB/akt pathway (44). The extent to which these pathways participate in the regulation of PKD1 expression will have to be determined in future studies.

A number of observations have suggested that the level of PKD1 expression may be important in PKD. Mice containing multiple copies of a human PKD1 transgene were found to have cystic kidneys, suggesting that PKD1 overexpression can play a role in cystic disease (21). Elevated polycystin-1 mRNA and protein levels have been reported in cystic epithelium (5, 8, 15, 45). Recent in situ hybridization analyses have shown persistent expression of PKD1 mRNA in proximal tubules of adult ADPKD kidneys (46), and PKD1 mRNA and polycystin-1 protein have been reported in end-stage ADPKD kidneys (47). These later observations may be explained by the dedifferentiated state of cystic epithelial cells or by a loss of a negative feedback loop regulating PKD1 gene expression. Because this work has shown that the PKD1 gene is a target of beta -catenin, it is interesting to note that several instances have been reported that may be relevant to PKD. beta -catenin has been shown to regulate the reorganization of renal epithelial cell aggregates into long tubules (48) and therefore may be important in normal tubulogenesis. Increased stability of beta -catenin was found in immortalized cpk cells (a mouse model of recessive PKD) (32) and in primary ADPKD cells.3 Transgenic mice overexpressing either beta -catenin (26) or c-Myc (a target of beta -catenin) (27) have PKD, and high levels of expression of c-Myc mRNA and protein are found in the cysts of both human ADPKD (28) and of the cpk mouse model of PKD (29-31) (however, see Ref. 49). Finally, Wnt-4 expression recently was reported to be induced in polycystic kidneys (50). Together, these results suggest that increased levels of soluble beta -catenin may cause overexpression of the normal (and/or mutated) PKD1 gene, which in turn may contribute to cyst formation in PKD.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. Osamu Tetsu and Frank McCormick (University of California, San Francisco) for the CA beta -catenin, cyclin D1 reporter, and DN TCF-4 constructs; Dr. P. Polakis (Onyx Pharmaceuticals) for the wild-type beta -catenin construct; Drs. K. Kinzler and B. Vogelstein (Johns Hopkins Oncology Center) for the pGST-TCF4 construct; Dr. R. Padmanabhan (University of Kansas Medical Center) for the COS-1 and HeLa cells; and members of the Calvet laboratory for helpful discussions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants P50 DK57301 (to J. P. C. and R. L. M.) and P01 DK53763 (to J. P. C.) and by grants from the Polycystic Kidney Disease Foundation and the University of Kansas Medical Center Research Institute.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160-7421. Tel.: 913-588-7424; Fax: 913-588-7440; E-mail: jcalvet@kumc.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 4, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203570200

2 P. Harris, personal communication.

3 J. S. van Adelsberg, personal communication.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ADPKD, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; PKD, polycystic kidney disease; TCF, T-cell factor; TBE, TCF binding element; GSK-3beta , glycogen synthase kinase-3beta ; CA, constitutively active; DN, dominant-negative; HEK293T, human embryonic kidney 293T; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-PCR; oligo, oligonucleotide; TOP, optimal TCF-4; FOP, mutant TCF-4; GST, glutathione S-transferase; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; HCT, HCT116 human colon carcinoma cells.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Grantham, J. J. (2000) Kidney Int. 57, 339-340[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Calvet, J. P., and Grantham, J. J. (2001) Semin. Nephrol. 21, 107-123[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Watnick, T., and Germino, G. G. (1999) Semin. Nephrol 19, 327-343[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Wu, G., and Somlo, S. (2000) Mol. Genet. Metab. 69, 1-15[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Ward, C. J., Turley, H., Ong, A. C., Comley, M., Biddolph, S., Chetty, R., Ratcliffe, P. J., Gattner, K., and Harris, P. C. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 1524-1528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Geng, L., Segal, Y., Pavlova, A., Barros, E. J., Lohning, C., Lu, W., Nigam, S. K., Frischauf, A. M., Reeders, S. T., and Zhou, J. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, F451-F459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Van Adelsberg, J., Chamberlain, S., and D'Agati, V. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, F602-F609[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Guillaume, R., D'Agati, V., Daoust, M., and Trudel, M. (1999) Dev. Dyn. 214, 337-348[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Boulter, C., Mulroy, S., Webb, S., Fleming, S., Brindle, K., and Sandford, R. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 12174-12179[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Chauvet, V., Qian, F., Boute, N., Cai, Y., Phakdeekitacharoen, B., Onuchic, L. F., Attie-Bitach, T., Guicharnaud, L., Devuyst, O., Germino, G. G., and Gubler, M. C. (2002) Am. J. Pathol. 160, 973-983[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Lu, W., Peissel, B., Babakhanlou, H., Pavlova, A., Geng, L., Fan, X., Larson, C., Brent, G., and Zhou, J. (1997) Nat. Genet. 17, 179-181[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Lu, W., Fan, X., Basora, N., Babakhanlou, H., Law, T., Rifai, N., Harris, P. C., Perez-Atayde, A. R., Rennke, H. G., and Zhou, J. (1999) Nat. Genet. 21, 160-161[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Kim, K., Drummond, I., Ibraghimov-Beskrovnaya, O., Klinger, K., and Arnaout, M. A. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 1731-1736[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Lu, W., Shen, X., Pavlova, A., Lakkis, M., Ward, C. J., Pritchard, L., Harris, P. C., Genest, D. R., Perez-Atayde, A. R., and Zhou, J. (2001) Hum. Mol. Genet. 10, 2385-2396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Ong, A. C., Harris, P. C., Davies, D. R., Pritchard, L., Rossetti, S., Biddolph, S., Vaux, D. J., Migone, N., and Ward, C. J. (1999) Kidney Int. 56, 1324-1333[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Koptides, M., Mean, R., Demetriou, K., Pierides, A., and Deltas, C. C. (2000) Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 447-452[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Watnick, T., He, N., Wang, K., Liang, Y., Parfrey, P., Hefferton, D., St., George-Hyslop, P., Germino, G., and Pei, Y. (2000) Nat. Genet. 25, 143-144[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Qian, F., and Germino, G. G. (1997) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61, 1000-1005[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Qian, F., Watnick, T. J., Onuchic, L. F., and Germino, G. G. (1996) Cell 87, 979-987[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Brasier, J. L., and Henske, E. P. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 99, 194-199[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Pritchard, L., Sloane-Stanley, J. A., Sharpe, J. A., Aspinwall, R., Lu, W., Buckle, V., Strmecki, L., Walker, D., Ward, C. J., Alpers, C. E., Zhou, J., Wood, W. G., and Harris, P. C. (2000) Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 2617-2627[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Ilyas, M., and Tomlinson, I. P. (1997) J. Pathol. 182, 128-137[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Wijnhoven, B. P., Dinjens, W. N., and Pignatelli, M. (2000) Br. J. Surg. 87, 992-1005[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Seidensticker, M. J., and Behrens, J. (2000) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1495, 168-182[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Roose, J., and Clevers, H. (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1424, M23-M37[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Romagnolo, B., Berrebi, D., Saadi-Keddoucci, S., Porteu, A., Pichard, A. L., Peuchmaur, M., Vandewalle, A., Kahn, A., and Perret, C. (1999) Cancer Res. 59, 3875-3879[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Trudel, M., Barisoni, L., Lanoix, J., and D'Agati, V. (1998) Am. J. Pathol. 152, 219-229[Abstract]
28. Lanoix, J., D'Agati, V., Szabolcs, M., and Trudel, M. (1996) Oncogene 13, 1153-1160[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Cowley, B. D., Smardo, F. L., Grantham, J. J., and Calvet, J. P. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 8394-8398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Cowley, B. D., Chadwick, L. J., Grantham, J. J., and Calvet, J. P. (1991) J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1, 1048-1053[Abstract]
31. Harding, M. A., Gattone, V. H., Grantham, J. J., and Calvet, J. P. (1992) Kidney Int. 41, 317-325[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. van Adelsberg, J. (2000) Nephrol. Dial. Transplant 15, 1-2[Free Full Text]
33. Kim, E., Arnould, T., Sellin, L. K., Benzing, T., Fan, M. J., Gruning, W., Sokol, S. Y., Drummond, I., and Walz, G. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 4947-4953[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Huan, Y., and van Adelsberg, J. (1999) J. Clin. Invest. 104, 1459-1468[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Charron, A. J., Nakamura, S., Bacallao, R., and Wandinger-Ness, A. (2000) J. Cell Biol. 149, 111-124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Hughes, J., Ward, C. J., Peral, B., Aspinwall, R., Clark, K., San Millan, J. L., Gamble, V., and Harris, P. C. (1995) Nat. Genet. 10, 151-160[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Smale, S. T., and Baltimore, D. (1989) Cell 57, 103-113[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Korinek, V., Barker, N., Morin, P. J., van Wichen, D., de Weger, R., Kinzler, K. W., Vogelstein, B., and Clevers, H. (1997) Science 275, 1784-1787[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Bogdanova, N., Markoff, A., Gerke, V., McCluskey, M., Horst, J., and Dworniczak, B. (2001) Genomics 74, 333-341[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Shtutman, M., Zhurinsky, J., Simcha, I., Albanese, C., D'Amico, M., Pestell, R., and Ben-Ze'ev, A. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 5522-5527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Morin, P. J., Sparks, A. B., Korinek, V., Barker, N., Clevers, H., Vogelstein, B., and Kinzler, K. W. (1997) Science 275, 1787-1790[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Blake, M. C., Jambou, R. C., Swick, A. G., Kahn, J. W., and Azizkhan, J. C. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 6632-6641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Cohen, H. T., Bossone, S. A., Zhu, G., McDonald, G. A., and Sukhatme, V. P. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 2901-2913[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Desbois-Mouthon, C., Cadoret, A., Blivet-Van Eggelpoel, M. J., Bertrand, F., Cherqui, G., Perret, C., and Capeau, J. (2001) Oncogene 20, 252-259[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Griffin, M. D., Torres, V. E., Grande, J. P., and Kumar, R. (1996) Proc. Assoc. Am. Physicians 108, 185-197[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Palsson, R., Sharma, C. P., Kim, K., McLaughlin, M., Brown, D., and Arnaout, M. A. (1996) Mol. Med. 2, 702-711[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Perrone, R. D., Grubman, S. A., Murray, S. L., Lee, D. W., Alper, S. L., and Jefferson, D. M. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, C1748-C1756[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Pollack, A. L., Barth, A. I., Altschuler, Y., Nelson, W. J., and Mostov, K. E. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 137, 1651-1662[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Saadi-Kheddouci, S., Berrebi, D., Romagnolo, B., Cluzeaud, F., Peuchmaur, M., Kahn, A., Vandewalle, A., and Perret, C. (2001) Oncogene 20, 5972-5981[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Surendran, K., McCaul, S. P., and Simon, T. C. (2002) Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 282, F431-F441[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
M. R. Islam, S. Puri, M. Rodova, B. S. Magenheimer, R. L. Maser, and J. P. Calvet
Retinoic acid-dependent activation of the polycystic kidney disease-1 (PKD1) promoter
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2008; 295(6): F1845 - F1854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. Kim, C. Li, D. Liang, X.-Z. Chen, R. J. Coffy, J. Ma, P. Zhao, and G. Wu
Polycystin-2 Expression Is Regulated by a PC2-binding Domain in the Intracellular Portion of Fibrocystin
J. Biol. Chem., November 14, 2008; 283(46): 31559 - 31566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Van Bodegom, Z. Saifudeen, S. Dipp, S. Puri, B. S. Magenheimer, J. P. Calvet, and S. S. El-Dahr
The Polycystic Kidney Disease-1 Gene Is a Target for p53-mediated Transcriptional Repression
J. Biol. Chem., October 20, 2006; 281(42): 31234 - 31244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. Peruzzi, G. Athauda, and D. P. Bottaro
The von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene product represses oncogenic beta-catenin signaling in renal carcinoma cells
PNAS, September 26, 2006; 103(39): 14531 - 14536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
M.-a. Nakaya, K. Biris, T. Tsukiyama, S. Jaime, J. A. Rawls, and T. P. Yamaguchi
Wnt3alinks left-right determination with segmentation and anteroposterior axis elongation
Development, December 15, 2005; 132(24): 5425 - 5436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C.-N. Qian, J. Knol, P. Igarashi, F. Lin, U. Zylstra, B. T. Teh, and B. O. Williams
Cystic Renal Neoplasia Following Conditional Inactivation of Apc in Mouse Renal Tubular Epithelium
J. Biol. Chem., February 4, 2005; 280(5): 3938 - 3945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. Rodova, K. F. Kelly, M. VanSaun, J. M. Daniel, and M. J. Werle
Regulation of the Rapsyn Promoter by Kaiso and {delta}-Catenin
Mol. Cell. Biol., August 15, 2004; 24(16): 7188 - 7196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. H. Le, P. van der Bent, G. Huls, M. van de Wetering, M. Loghman-Adham, A. C. M. Ong, J. P. Calvet, H. Clevers, M. H. Breuning, H. van Dam, et al.
Aberrant Polycystin-1 Expression Results in Modification of Activator Protein-1 Activity, whereas Wnt Signaling Remains Unaffected
J. Biol. Chem., June 25, 2004; 279(26): 27472 - 27481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Rodova, M. R. Islam, K. R. Peterson, and J. P. Calvet
Remarkable Sequence Conservation of the Last Intron in the PKD1 Gene
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2003; 20(10): 1669 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/33/29577    most recent
M203570200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodova, M.
Right arrow Articles by Calvet, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rodova, M.
Right arrow Articles by Calvet, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement