|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M203570200 on June 4, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 33, 29577-29583, August 16, 2002
The Polycystic Kidney Disease-1 Promoter Is a Target of the
-Catenin/T-cell Factor Pathway*
Marianna
Rodova,
M. Rafiq
Islam ,
Robin L.
Maser, and
James P.
Calvet§
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and the
Kidney Institute, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City,
Kansas 66160 and the Department of
Chemistry/Physics, Northwest Missouri State University,
Maryville, Missouri 64468
Received for publication, April 14, 2002, and in revised form, May 21, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Polycystic kidney disease (PKD) results from
loss-of-function mutations in the PKD1 gene. There
are also reports showing abnormally high levels of PKD1
expression in cystic epithelial cells. At present, nothing is known
about the molecular mechanisms regulating the normal expression of the
PKD1 gene or whether transcriptional disregulation
of the PKD1 gene has a role in cyst formation. We have
analyzed a 3.3-kb 5'-proximal portion of the human PKD1
gene. Sequence analysis revealed the presence of consensus
sequences for numerous transactivating factors, including four T-cell
factor (TCF) binding elements (TBEs). Transcriptional activity of the 3.3-kb fragment and a series of deletion constructs was assayed in
HEK293T cells. A 2.0-kb proximal promoter region containing one of the
four TBEs (TBE1) was inducible up to 6-fold by cotransfection with
-catenin. -catenin-mediated induction was inhibited by dominant-negative TCF and by deletion of the TBE1 sequence. 15- or
109-bp sequences containing the TBE1 site, when cloned upstream of a
minimal promoter, were shown to respond to -catenin induction. Gel
shift assays confirmed that the TBE1 site is capable of forming complexes with TCF and -catenin. To determine whether expression of
the endogenous PKD1 gene responds to -catenin, HT1080
cells were treated with LiCl, and HeLa cells were stably transfected with -catenin. In both cases, endogenous PKD1 mRNA levels were elevated in response to these treatments. Taken together, these studies define an active PKD1 promoter region and suggest
that the PKD1 gene is a target of the -catenin/TCF pathway.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease
(ADPKD)1 is a very common
inherited disease worldwide, having a gene frequency of 1 in 200-1,000
individuals and causing 6-9% of all end-stage renal disease (1, 2).
Mutations in the PKD1 gene are responsible for the vast
majority (85-90%) of ADPKD cases (3, 4). PKD is characterized by the
neoplastic growth of tubular epithelial cells, which gives rise to the
formation of kidneys containing numerous fluid-filled cysts and
ultimately to renal failure.
In situ and Northern hybridization and immunocytochemical
analyses have shown that the PKD1 gene is widely expressed
in a number of embryonic and adult tissues and organs, including the kidney (5-10). Targeted deletion of the PKD1 gene has shown
that it is important for renal, pancreatic, cardiovascular, and
skeletal development (9, 11-14). However, there are conflicting
observations as to whether PKD results from abnormally decreased or
increased expression of the PKD1 gene (15). On the one hand,
there is evidence that loss-of-function germ line mutations can lead to haploinsufficiency at the PKD1 locus (16, 17) and additional evidence for a two-hit gene inactivation mechanism as a cause of PKD
(18-20). On the other hand, there is immunocytochemical evidence for
overexpression of the protein product of the PKD1 gene,
polycystin-1, in cyst-lining epithelial cells of polycystic kidneys
(15). Furthermore, transgenic overexpression of a functional PKD1 gene can cause PKD (21). At the present time, there is no information concerning the mechanisms regulating transcription of
the PKD1 gene.
-catenin is a major component of adherens junctions, linking the
actin cytoskeleton to members of the cadherin family of transmembrane
cell-cell adhesion receptors (22-24). Together with - and
-catenin, -catenin binds to the cytosolic domain of E-cadherin to
form a complex that is necessary for adhesion to occur. In addition,
soluble -catenin can translocate to the nucleus, where it associates
with members of the TCF/LEF family of high mobility group
(HMG)-box factors to alter the expression of certain target genes (25).
By playing a dual role, a structural role at cell-cell junctions and a
regulatory role in the nucleus, -catenin can transduce changes in
cell adhesion and junction formation to control transmembrane signaling
and gene expression. The level of soluble -catenin in the cell is
regulated by its association with the tumor suppressor molecule
adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), axin, and glycogen synthase
kinase-3 (GSK-3 ). Phosphorylation of -catenin by the
APC-axin-GSK-3 complex leads to its degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. The failure of this degradation in cells
expressing mutated -catenin leads to the accumulation of soluble
-catenin that can result in activation of oncogenic
-catenin-responsive genes (23-25).
A number of observations have implicated -catenin in the
pathogenesis of PKD. Transgenic overexpression of either -catenin or
c-Myc, which is a downstream target of -catenin, has been shown to
give rise to PKD (26, 27). Also, high levels of expression of c-Myc
mRNA and protein are found in the cysts of both human ADPKD (28)
and the cpk mouse model of PKD (29-31), and the half-life of soluble
-catenin is increased in cell lines from cpk mice (32). Transient
overexpression of the C-terminal tail of polycystin-1 has been shown to
stabilize -catenin and to activate transcription of the -catenin
target gene, siamois (33). Finally, polycystin-1 has been shown to be
in a complex with E-cadherin and - and -catenin in normal cells
(34), and E-cadherin has been shown to be mistargeted in ADPKD cells
(35), possibly because of abnormal polycystin-1 function. In this
study, we have investigated the transcriptional regulation of the
PKD1 promoter and have determined that the PKD1 gene is a target for the -catenin/TCF complex.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
DNA Clones--
The cosmid clone 2H2 (LANL) (GenBank accession
no. AC005346) was used to amplify a 3,414-bp sequence
(29,490-32,904 of AC005346 or 77-3,490 of L39891) from 3,363 to
+51, relative to the established transcription start site of the
PKD1 gene (36). The DNA product was cloned in pGEM-T
(Promega). A KpnI site was introduced near the 5'-end of the
3.3-kb fragment during the initial PCR reaction, and a
HindIII site was introduced near the 3'-end. The fragment
resulting from KpnI/HindIII digestion ( 3,346 to +33; Fig. 1, 3.3 kb) was subcloned in the promoterless
luciferase-reporter vector pGL2-Basic (Promega). Nested deletions were
obtained by digestion with BglII ( 2,018; Fig. 1, 2.0 kb), PvuII ( 1,223; Fig. 1, 1.2 kb),
XhoI ( 947; Fig. 1, 0.95 kb), MluI
( 200; Fig. 1, 0.20 kb), and ApaI ( 1) (not
shown). A 109-bp promoter fragment ( 2018 to 1910) containing TBE1
was cloned in pTiLuc, which is pGL2-Basic with the adenovirus
major late promoter TATA-box and the TdT initiator region (37).
Site-directed deletion mutagenesis was performed with the QuikChange
site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). All constructs, mutations,
and deletions were checked by sequencing. A Myc epitope-tagged
wild-type human -catenin pcDNA3 expression vector was a gift
from P. Polakis. A Myc-tagged mutant (lacking amino acids 29-48),
constitutively active (CA) -catenin pcDNA3, and a cyclin D1
reporter construct (originally from R. Pestell, Albert Einstein College
of Medicine) were gifts from O. Tetsu and F. McCormick. A
Myc-tagged dominant-negative (DN) TCF-4E pcDNA3 lacking the
-catenin-binding domain (amino acids 2-53) also was from O. Tetsu
and F. McCormick. pGST-TCF4 (DNA-binding domain) was a gift from K. Kinzler and B. Vogelstein.
Cell Lines, Transfection, Immunofluorescence, and Reporter
Assays--
Human embryonic kidney 293T (HEK293T), human colon
carcinoma HCT116 (HCT), and human fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells were
obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. COS-1 and HeLa
cells were obtained from R. Padmanabhan. HCT116 and COS-1 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/F12 (CellGro) with
10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum. HEK293T cells were cultured in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 4.5 g/liter glucose and 10%
heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum. Transient transfections were
performed by the calcium phosphate method with HEK293T cells and by
LipofectAMINE with COS-1 cells. A -galactosidase expression plasmid
was included in each transfection to monitor transfection efficiency.
After 48 h the cells were lysed, and activities were determined
using enzyme assay kits for luciferase (Packard Bio Science) and
-galactosidase (Promega). Relative light units are the luciferase
units normalized to -galactosidase. All experiments were carried out
in triplicate and repeated at least twice. For stable transfections,
HeLa cells were transfected with pcDNA3 as a control, and
Myc-tagged CA -catenin in pcDNA3 using FuGENE6 (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) and were selected with 400 µg/ml G418. For
immunofluorescence assays cells were grown to confluency, fixed in
methanol at 20 °C, and incubated with primary and secondary antibodies for 1 h at 4 °C.
RT-PCR--
Total cellular RNA was extracted with TRIzol
(Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The
samples were then treated with DNase I (Ambion). 3 µg of RNA from
each sample was incubated with random primers and Superscript reverse
transcriptase (Invitrogen) to yield cDNA as per the manufacturer's
instructions. cDNA was amplified in 50-µl reactions containing 2 µl of the cDNA reaction mix, 1× PCR buffer, 1 mM
MgCl2 for PKD1 or 2 mM MgCl2 for
-catenin and for the ribosomal protein L7, 200 µM of
each dNTP, 25 pmol of each primer, and 2.5 units of Taq DNA
polymerase (Invitrogen). For each gene, PCR was performed to determine
the linear range of amplification that would permit a quantitative assessment of expression levels. Primers specific for PKD1 (36) were:
forward, 5'-CGC CGC TTC ACT AGC TTC GAC-3' and reverse, 5'-ACG CTC CAG
AGG GAG TCC AC-3', giving a 260-bp product; primers specific for
-catenin were: forward, 5'-TTC GCC TTC ACT ATG GAC TACC-3' and
reverse, 5'-ATC AGC AGT CTC ATT CCA AGCC-3', giving a 559-bp product;
and primers specific for the ribosomal protein L7 were: forward, 5'-GGG
GGA AGC TTC GAA AGG CAA GGA GGA AGC-3' and reverse, 5'-GGG GGG TCG ACT
CCT CCA TGC AGA TGA TGC-3', giving a 475-bp product. Each primer set
was amplified at 95 °C for 30 s, 61 °C for 30 s, and
72 °C for 30 s for the indicated number of cycles followed by a
10-min extension at 72 °C. Amplified PCR products were
electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide
(0.5 µg/ml). Bands were analyzed by NIH Image software. Net band
intensity (background-subtracted intensity) was normalized to values
for L7 and plotted as relative units.
Gel Mobility Shift Assays--
The following oligonucleotides
(oligos) were synthesized (core consensus TCF sites are capitalized):
wild-type PKD1 ( 1,965 to 1,951) TBE1 (gtttCTTTGTTtttt); mutant PKD1
TBE1 (gcgcCTTTGggtttt); wild-type TBE1 core site (cgggCTTTGTTgggg);
optimal (TOP) TCF-4 (5'-agctggtaagATCAAAGgg-3'); and mutant (FOP) TCF-4
(5'-agctggtaaggcCAAAGgg-3') (38). Complementary oligos were annealed
and end-labeled with polynucleotide kinase and
[ -32P]ATP. A GST-TCF-4 fusion protein was purified
from DH5 cells by GSH-Sepharose affinity, and the protein product
was confirmed by Western blotting with an anti-LEF/TCF antibody (Maine
Biotechnology Services). Nuclear extracts were prepared using NuPer
(Pierce) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Protein
concentration was determined by the BCA assay (Pierce). Binding
reactions containing 15,000 cpm of labeled DNA were incubated for 30 min on ice with 300 ng of fusion protein or 5 µg of nuclear extract
and 500 ng of poly(dI·dC) in 20 mM Hepes, 60 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM
EDTA, and 12.5% (v/v) glycerol. DNA-protein complexes were electrophoresed in 4% native polyacrylamide gels and visualized by
autoradiography. For supershift analysis, 500 ng of an anti- -catenin antibody (Transduction Laboratories) or an anti-c-Myc antibody (9E10,
Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was preincubated with nuclear extract for 30 min on ice followed by incubation with DNA for 30 min on ice.
 |
RESULTS |
The PKD1 gene lies in a complex region of DNA on
chromosome 16 (36). More than two-thirds of the 5'-end of the gene is
duplicated several times in an area proximal to the PKD1
gene on chromosome 16. This PKD1 homologous region appears
to give rise to multiple transcripts (39). A 38,849-bp cosmid clone
(LANL) 2H2 has in its 3'-end, the 5'-portion of the PKD1
gene and a long 5'-upstream region. Based on homology with available
PKD1 sequence and differences with PKD1
homologous regions,2 we can
conclude that this cosmid clone contains the genuine PKD1 gene. This cosmid DNA was used to amplify a 3,414-bp sequence from
3,363 to +51, which was analyzed for putative cis-acting elements utilizing the OMIGA sequence analysis software (Oxford Molecular) and TESS (www.cbil.upenn.edu/tess/index.html).
Typical TATA- and CAAT-boxes are absent from this proximal 5'-flanking
region; however, a GC-rich region was identified within close proximity
to the transcription start site. Numerous transcription factor
consensus binding motifs were found in the PKD1 promoter, including AP-1, AP-2, Sp1, Ets, and four TCF binding elements (CTTTGA/TA/T). To test for promoter activity, a number of deletion constructs were made, and their activities were determined following transfection into human (HEK293T) and monkey (COS-1) kidney cell lines
(Fig. 1). The constructs appeared to have
similar promoter activities in the two cell lines. The 2.0-kb construct
containing the 2,018 to +33 region supported the highest level of
transcription in both cell lines, suggesting that there may be a
negative element in the distal 1.3 kb-region.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Activity of human PKD1
promoter nested deletions. Upper panel, nested
deletions used in this study. Asterisks, potential TBEs;
arrow, start site of transcription. Lower panel,
promoter activity in HEK293T and COS-1 cells plotted as relative light
units (RLU). DNA was introduced into cells seeded in 6-well
plates using the calcium phosphate technique for HEK293T cells and
LipofectAMINE for COS-1 cells. Relative light units are expressed as
the mean of triplicate samples ± S.D. (the COS-1 experiment was
carried out once only).
|
|
To determine whether -catenin is potentially capable of regulating
the transcription of the PKD1 gene, we transfected
PKD1 promoter-luciferase reporters into HEK293T cells and
measured their responses to cotransfected -catenin expression
vectors encoding wild-type or mutant CA -catenin. HEK293T cells had
been shown previously to express TCF-4 and to support
-catenin-dependent activation of the cyclin D1 promoter
(40). -catenin induction of the 3.3-kb construct (data not shown)
was less significant when compared with that of the 2.0-kb fragment.
Therefore, we concentrated our studies on the 2.0-kb fragment, which
contains the most proximal TCF site (TBE1). The transcriptional
activity of the 2.0-kb fragment showed a dose-dependent
response to increasing amounts of cotransfected wild-type -catenin
(Fig. 2A). The response of the
2.0-kb fragment to a CA -catenin (Fig. 2B, left
panel) was similar to that of the -catenin target, cyclin D1
(right panel) under the same transfection and assay
conditions. To further confirm the role of -catenin/TCF-4 in the
activation of the PKD1 promoter, we attempted to inhibit its
activity in HEK293T cells with a dominant-negative TCF-4 mutant (DN
TCF). As shown in Fig. 2C, cotransfected DN TCF suppressed
the activity of the 2.0-kb promoter fragment in the presence or absence
of exogenous -catenin.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Induction of the PKD1
promoter by -catenin. A,
dose-dependent response to -catenin. A comparison
(left panel) between the 3.3- and 2.0-kb fragments in the
absence of transfected -catenin and the response of the 2.0-kb
fragment to increasing amounts of cotransfected wild-type -catenin
is shown. Western blot (right panel) showing the expression
of transfected -catenin (lane , arrow) is
compared with untransfected control cells (lane C).
B, comparison between the PKD1 2.0-kb and cyclin
D1 promoters in response to CA -catenin under the same conditions.
C, inhibition by dominant-negative TCF. Cotransfected DN TCF
(5 µg) suppressed the activity of the 2.0-kb fragment in the presence
or absence of exogenous -catenin.
|
|
To determine whether the response of the 2.0-kb construct to induction
by -catenin depends specifically on the TBE1 site, we tested the
activities of several deletions in the TBE1 region. An extended
deletion of 109-bp at the 5'-end of the 2.0-kb fragment (gatctctggc
acattttatt tgctctgtct caccacatgg attttgtttt
tttgtttCTT TGTTttttga gatggagtct cactcttgtt
gcccaggctg gagtgccat) completely abrogated -catenin induction (Fig.
3A). Deletion of 15 bp
(underlined) containing the TCF consensus motif (capital letters) did
not abolish induction (data not shown), possibly because there are
other AT-rich sequences in this region that could substitute as TCF
binding sites. A 28-bp deletion (bold face) removing this AT-rich DNA and the TCF motif strongly reduced the effect of transfected
-catenin (Fig. 3A). To further examine the 109-bp
sequence, its functional response was tested when cloned upstream of a
minimal promoter. As shown, the 109-bp sequence was capable of being
induced by -catenin (Fig. 3B). These results, taken
together, suggest that there might be interactions between -catenin
and/or TCF with other transcription factors within this region that are
involved in conferring the observed -catenin responsiveness.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Response of TBE1 deletions to
-catenin induction. A, left
pair of bars, the response of the wild-type 2.0-kb promoter
fragment (wt 2.0 kb) to transfected CA -catenin in
HEK293T cells. Middle pair of bars, an extended deletion of
109-bp (109 bp del) completely abrogated -catenin
induction. Right pair of bars, deletion of 28 bp strongly
reduced the effect of transfected -catenin. B, functional
response of the TBE1-containing region in isolation. A 109-bp promoter
fragment ( 2018 to 1910) containing TBE1 cloned in TiLuc was capable
of being induced ~6-fold in HEK293T cells by cotransfected
-catenin.
|
|
To determine whether the TBE1 sequence is capable of binding TCF, we
carried out electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) using a
synthetic double-stranded DNA, gtttCTTTGTTtttt, containing the
consensus TCF binding motif (capital letters). The oligo was able to
form a DNA-protein complex with a GST-fusion protein containing the
DNA-binding domain of human TCF-4 (Fig.
4A, GST-TCF). As a control, a DNA-protein complex was formed with GST-TCF and an optimal
TCF-4 site, TOP (T), but failed to form with the mutated binding site, FOP (F). The TBE1 complex with GST-TCF could
be competed with an excess of unlabeled TBE1. The 15-bp TBE1 oligo also
formed DNA-protein complexes with nuclear extract from HEK293T cells
(Fig. 4B, arrows), suggesting that the PKD1 TBE1
site can bind native TCF and -catenin. The TBE1 complexes were
completely eliminated by competition with excess unlabeled TBE1 and
partially eliminated by competition with excess unlabeled TOP (the
asterisk indicates a remaining DNA-protein complex). EMSA
using the TOP oligo also resulted in the formation of two DNA-protein
complexes, which were completely eliminated by competition with excess
TBE1 or TOP. As shown in Fig. 4C, the wild-type 15-bp oligo
was able to form a complex with GST-TCF (but not GST alone) and with
nuclear extracts from HCT, which have a -catenin-stabilizing
mutation (41), and from HEK293T cells transfected with mutated
constitutively active -catenin (293T). Mutation of this 15-bp oligo
(gcgcCTTTGggtttt), leaving only 5 bp of the core of the TCF motif
(capital letters), abrogated the binding both with GST-TCF and with the
HCT and 293T nuclear extracts (Fig. 4C). Although we were
unable to supershift the wild-type 15-bp oligo using an
anti- -catenin antibody, possibly because of other protein factors
preventing an interaction with the antibody, we did supershift a probe
containing the TBE1 core site (cgggCTTTGTTgggg) and nuclear extract
from HCT cells (Fig. 4C, right panel). As
expected, no such complex was formed using an anti-c-Myc antibody. The
functional response of this 15-bp TBE1 TCF site was also tested in
isolation. A single copy of the wild-type 15-bp TBE1 sequence in
pGL3-Basic was able to confer -catenin responsiveness in a
dose-dependent manner, which was strongly inhibited by
cotransfection with DN TCF (Fig.
5A), whereas mutation of the
core TCF motif strongly reduced -catenin responsiveness (Fig.
5B), consistent with the wild-type sequence acting as a TCF
binding site.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
In vitro binding of TCF to TBE1.
A, EMSA for TBE1 and GST-TCF. Left panel, TBE1 is
a 15-bp synthetic double-stranded DNA oligo encompassing positions
1965 to 1951 of the human PKD1 promoter; TOP
(T) is an optimal TCF-4 site; FOP (F) is a
mutated TCF-4 site; and GST-TCF is a GST-fusion protein containing the
DNA-binding domain of human TCF-4. Right panel, the TBE1
complex with GST-TCF could be competed with an excess of unlabeled
TBE1. B, EMSA for TBE1, TOP, and FOP with nuclear extract
from HEK293T cells. Left panel, TBE1 competed with either
TBE1 or TOP (asterisk indicates a remaining DNA-protein
complex). Right panel, TOP competed with either TBE1 or TOP.
C, EMSA for wild-type and mutant TBE1. Left
panel, wild-type (wt) and mutant (mt) oligos
with GST-TCF and with nuclear extracts from HCT and HEK293T cells
transfected with CA -catenin (293T). Right
panel, supershift (arrow) using the wild-type
(wt) TBE1 core site (cgggCTTTGTTgggg) and nuclear extract
from HCT116 cells.
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Response of the 15-bp TBE1 sequence to
-catenin. A, a single copy of the
wild-type 15-bp TBE1 sequence containing the consensus TCF binding
motif (underlined) was able to confer -catenin
responsiveness in a dose-dependent manner in HEK293T cells,
which was strongly inhibited by cotransfection with DN TCF.
B, mutation of the core TCF motif in the 15-bp TBE1 sequence
(gg) strongly reduced the responsiveness to CA
-catenin.
|
|
To determine whether expression of the endogenous PKD1 gene
responds to -catenin, human fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells were treated with 20 mM LiCl, a known inhibitor of GSK-3 activity
that results in the stabilization of cytosolic -catenin and
elevation of nuclear -catenin. PKD1 gene expression was
assayed by RT-PCR and compared with the expression of a control that
should not respond to -catenin, the ribosomal protein L7 gene. As
shown in Fig. 6A, PKD1
mRNA levels increased ~1.6-fold in response to LiCl, whereas L7
mRNA did not increase. We also stably transfected HeLa cells with
CA -catenin and determined the effect of overexpression of this mutant form of -catenin, which cannot be targeted for degradation. -catenin levels were shown to be increased in these transfected cells by RT-PCR (Fig. 6B) and by immunofluorescence (Fig.
6C). Cells transfected with -catenin showed ~3-fold
increase in PKD1 mRNA levels, whereas L7 mRNA levels were
unaffected (Fig. 6B). These results are consistent with the
endogenous PKD1 gene being a target of the -catenin
pathway.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
-catenin elevates endogenous
PKD1 mRNA expression. A, RT-PCR analysis of HT1080
cells without (control, lane C) and with (LiCl)
20 mM LiCl treatment; left pair of bars, 30 PCR
cycles for PKD1 mRNA; right pair of bars, 17 PCR cycles
for ribosomal protein L7 mRNA. Quantitation of the data is shown by
the bar graphs. B, RT-PCR analysis of control empty vector
pcDNA3-transfected (lane C) and CA -catenin stably
transfected HeLa cells ( -catenin); left pair of
bars, 30 PCR cycles for -catenin mRNA; middle pair of
bars, 30 PCR cycles for PKD1 mRNA; right pair of
bars, 20 PCR cycles for L7 mRNA. Quantitation of the data is
shown by the bar graphs. C, immunofluorescence of control
and CA -catenin stably transfected HeLa cells using anti-c-Myc
antibodies.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The 5'-flanking 3.3-kb region of the human PKD1 gene
was isolated and analyzed for promoter activity. Functional analysis of
deletion constructs fused to a luciferase reporter in HEK293T and COS-1
cells revealed strong transcriptional activity within this 3.3-kb
region, with the highest activity localized to the 2.0-kb proximal
fragment. Analysis of the 5'-flanking region by TESS predicted a
cluster of Sp-1 binding sites just upstream of the transcription start
site. Sp-1 plays a key role in regulating the transcription initiation
of TATA-less promoters (42) and is temporally and spatially regulated
during nephrogenesis in a pattern that suggests that it may be
important in kidney development (43).
Sequence analysis of the PKD1 promoter also revealed four
core TCF/LEF binding element (TBE1-4) consensus sequences. We focused on the most proximal element, TBE1, which is the only TCF site contained within the 2.0-kb proximal fragment. The 2.0-kb fragment showed a dose-responsive induction by -catenin, which was inhibited by cotransfection with a dominant-negative TCF construct. Deletion of a
109-bp sequence containing the TBE1 site completely abolished the
-catenin responsiveness of the 2.0-kb fragment. In addition, both
this 109-bp fragment and a 15-bp fragment within it containing the TBE1
site were able to confer -catenin responsiveness when placed
upstream of a minimal promoter. The response of the 15-bp TBE1 site was
reduced or eliminated by mutation of the core consensus TCF motif or by
dominant-negative TCF. Furthermore, the wild-type 15-bp sequence, but
not the mutated 15-bp sequence, was able to form DNA-protein complexes
using nuclear extracts from cells known to contain -catenin/TCF and
with a GST-TCF fusion protein. We conclude from these experiments that
the TBE1 site in the PKD1 promoter is a -catenin/TCF
response element. Although we did not focus on the three upstream TBE
elements (TBEs 2-4), it is quite possible that they are also
-catenin/TCF response elements because we have shown that a 1.3-kb
fragment containing all three (but lacking TBE1) is also induced by
-catenin (data not shown). Further analysis will be required
to determine which (one or whether all three) has the potential to act
as a TCF response element. Finally, to determine whether expression of
the endogenous PKD1 gene is able to respond to increases in
-catenin, we treated human fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells with LiCl,
which is a known inhibitor of GSK-3 activity and results in the
stabilization of -catenin. We also stably transfected HeLa cells
with CA -catenin. In both cases, we were able to demonstrate that
endogenous PKD1 mRNA levels were elevated in response to the
treatments, supporting the idea that the PKD1 gene is a
-catenin target. Genetic and biochemical studies have indicated that
the secreted Wnt factors, through Frizzled receptors, activate
Disheveled and inhibit GSK-3 to stabilize -catenin (24, 25). It
is also possible that -catenin levels are regulated by other
mechanisms such as the PKB/akt pathway (44). The extent to which these
pathways participate in the regulation of PKD1 expression will have to
be determined in future studies.
A number of observations have suggested that the level of PKD1
expression may be important in PKD. Mice containing multiple copies of
a human PKD1 transgene were found to have cystic kidneys, suggesting
that PKD1 overexpression can play a role in cystic disease (21).
Elevated polycystin-1 mRNA and protein levels have been reported in
cystic epithelium (5, 8, 15, 45). Recent in situ
hybridization analyses have shown persistent expression of PKD1
mRNA in proximal tubules of adult ADPKD kidneys (46), and PKD1
mRNA and polycystin-1 protein have been reported in end-stage ADPKD
kidneys (47). These later observations may be explained by the
dedifferentiated state of cystic epithelial cells or by a loss of a
negative feedback loop regulating PKD1 gene expression. Because this work has shown that the PKD1 gene is a target
of -catenin, it is interesting to note that several instances have been reported that may be relevant to PKD. -catenin has been shown
to regulate the reorganization of renal epithelial cell aggregates into
long tubules (48) and therefore may be important in normal
tubulogenesis. Increased stability of -catenin was found in
immortalized cpk cells (a mouse model of recessive PKD) (32) and in
primary ADPKD cells.3
Transgenic mice overexpressing either -catenin (26) or c-Myc (a
target of -catenin) (27) have PKD, and high levels of expression of
c-Myc mRNA and protein are found in the cysts of both human ADPKD
(28) and of the cpk mouse model of PKD (29-31) (however, see Ref. 49).
Finally, Wnt-4 expression recently was reported to be induced in
polycystic kidneys (50). Together, these results suggest that increased
levels of soluble -catenin may cause overexpression of the normal
(and/or mutated) PKD1 gene, which in turn may contribute to
cyst formation in PKD.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. Osamu Tetsu and Frank
McCormick (University of California, San Francisco) for the
CA -catenin, cyclin D1 reporter, and DN TCF-4 constructs; Dr. P. Polakis (Onyx Pharmaceuticals) for the wild-type -catenin construct;
Drs. K. Kinzler and B. Vogelstein (Johns Hopkins Oncology Center) for
the pGST-TCF4 construct; Dr. R. Padmanabhan (University of Kansas
Medical Center) for the COS-1 and HeLa cells; and members of the Calvet
laboratory for helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants P50 DK57301 (to J. P. C. and R. L. M.) and P01 DK53763 (to J. P. C.) and by grants from the Polycystic Kidney Disease Foundation and the University of Kansas Medical Center Research Institute.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160-7421. Tel.: 913-588-7424; Fax:
913-588-7440; E-mail: jcalvet@kumc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 4, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203570200
2
P. Harris, personal communication.
3
J. S. van Adelsberg, personal communication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ADPKD, autosomal
dominant polycystic kidney disease;
PKD, polycystic kidney disease;
TCF, T-cell factor;
TBE, TCF binding element;
GSK-3 , glycogen
synthase kinase-3 ;
CA, constitutively active;
DN, dominant-negative;
HEK293T, human embryonic kidney 293T;
RT-PCR, reverse
transcriptase-PCR;
oligo, oligonucleotide;
TOP, optimal TCF-4;
FOP, mutant TCF-4;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
HCT, HCT116 human colon
carcinoma cells.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Grantham, J. J.
(2000)
Kidney Int.
57,
339-340[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Calvet, J. P.,
and Grantham, J. J.
(2001)
Semin. Nephrol.
21,
107-123[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Watnick, T.,
and Germino, G. G.
(1999)
Semin. Nephrol
19,
327-343[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Wu, G.,
and Somlo, S.
(2000)
Mol. Genet. Metab.
69,
1-15[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Ward, C. J.,
Turley, H.,
Ong, A. C.,
Comley, M.,
Biddolph, S.,
Chetty, R.,
Ratcliffe, P. J.,
Gattner, K.,
and Harris, P. C.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
1524-1528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Geng, L.,
Segal, Y.,
Pavlova, A.,
Barros, E. J.,
Lohning, C., Lu, W.,
Nigam, S. K.,
Frischauf, A. M.,
Reeders, S. T.,
and Zhou, J.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
272,
F451-F459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Van Adelsberg, J.,
Chamberlain, S.,
and D'Agati, V.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
272,
F602-F609[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Guillaume, R.,
D'Agati, V.,
Daoust, M.,
and Trudel, M.
(1999)
Dev. Dyn.
214,
337-348[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Boulter, C.,
Mulroy, S.,
Webb, S.,
Fleming, S.,
Brindle, K.,
and Sandford, R.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
12174-12179[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Chauvet, V.,
Qian, F.,
Boute, N.,
Cai, Y.,
Phakdeekitacharoen, B.,
Onuchic, L. F.,
Attie-Bitach, T.,
Guicharnaud, L.,
Devuyst, O.,
Germino, G. G.,
and Gubler, M. C.
(2002)
Am. J. Pathol.
160,
973-983[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Lu, W.,
Peissel, B.,
Babakhanlou, H.,
Pavlova, A.,
Geng, L.,
Fan, X.,
Larson, C.,
Brent, G.,
and Zhou, J.
(1997)
Nat. Genet.
17,
179-181[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Lu, W.,
Fan, X.,
Basora, N.,
Babakhanlou, H.,
Law, T.,
Rifai, N.,
Harris, P. C.,
Perez-Atayde, A. R.,
Rennke, H. G.,
and Zhou, J.
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
21,
160-161[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Kim, K.,
Drummond, I.,
Ibraghimov-Beskrovnaya, O.,
Klinger, K.,
and Arnaout, M. A.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
1731-1736[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Lu, W.,
Shen, X.,
Pavlova, A.,
Lakkis, M.,
Ward, C. J.,
Pritchard, L.,
Harris, P. C.,
Genest, D. R.,
Perez-Atayde, A. R.,
and Zhou, J.
(2001)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
10,
2385-2396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Ong, A. C.,
Harris, P. C.,
Davies, D. R.,
Pritchard, L.,
Rossetti, S.,
Biddolph, S.,
Vaux, D. J.,
Migone, N.,
and Ward, C. J.
(1999)
Kidney Int.
56,
1324-1333[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Koptides, M.,
Mean, R.,
Demetriou, K.,
Pierides, A.,
and Deltas, C. C.
(2000)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
9,
447-452[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Watnick, T., He, N.,
Wang, K.,
Liang, Y.,
Parfrey, P.,
Hefferton, D., St.,
George-Hyslop, P.,
Germino, G.,
and Pei, Y.
(2000)
Nat. Genet.
25,
143-144[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Qian, F.,
and Germino, G. G.
(1997)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
61,
1000-1005[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Qian, F.,
Watnick, T. J.,
Onuchic, L. F.,
and Germino, G. G.
(1996)
Cell
87,
979-987[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Brasier, J. L.,
and Henske, E. P.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
99,
194-199[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Pritchard, L.,
Sloane-Stanley, J. A.,
Sharpe, J. A.,
Aspinwall, R., Lu, W.,
Buckle, V.,
Strmecki, L.,
Walker, D.,
Ward, C. J.,
Alpers, C. E.,
Zhou, J.,
Wood, W. G.,
and Harris, P. C.
(2000)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
9,
2617-2627[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Ilyas, M.,
and Tomlinson, I. P.
(1997)
J. Pathol.
182,
128-137[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Wijnhoven, B. P.,
Dinjens, W. N.,
and Pignatelli, M.
(2000)
Br. J. Surg.
87,
992-1005[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Seidensticker, M. J.,
and Behrens, J.
(2000)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1495,
168-182[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Roose, J.,
and Clevers, H.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1424,
M23-M37[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Romagnolo, B.,
Berrebi, D.,
Saadi-Keddoucci, S.,
Porteu, A.,
Pichard, A. L.,
Peuchmaur, M.,
Vandewalle, A.,
Kahn, A.,
and Perret, C.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
3875-3879[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Trudel, M.,
Barisoni, L.,
Lanoix, J.,
and D'Agati, V.
(1998)
Am. J. Pathol.
152,
219-229[Abstract]
|
| 28.
|
Lanoix, J.,
D'Agati, V.,
Szabolcs, M.,
and Trudel, M.
(1996)
Oncogene
13,
1153-1160[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Cowley, B. D.,
Smardo, F. L.,
Grantham, J. J.,
and Calvet, J. P.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
8394-8398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Cowley, B. D.,
Chadwick, L. J.,
Grantham, J. J.,
and Calvet, J. P.
(1991)
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.
1,
1048-1053[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Harding, M. A.,
Gattone, V. H.,
Grantham, J. J.,
and Calvet, J. P.
(1992)
Kidney Int.
41,
317-325[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
van Adelsberg, J.
(2000)
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant
15,
1-2[Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Kim, E.,
Arnould, T.,
Sellin, L. K.,
Benzing, T.,
Fan, M. J.,
Gruning, W.,
Sokol, S. Y.,
Drummond, I.,
and Walz, G.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
4947-4953[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Huan, Y.,
and van Adelsberg, J.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
104,
1459-1468[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Charron, A. J.,
Nakamura, S.,
Bacallao, R.,
and Wandinger-Ness, A.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
149,
111-124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Hughes, J.,
Ward, C. J.,
Peral, B.,
Aspinwall, R.,
Clark, K.,
San Millan, J. L.,
Gamble, V.,
and Harris, P. C.
(1995)
Nat. Genet.
10,
151-160[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Smale, S. T.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1989)
Cell
57,
103-113[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Korinek, V.,
Barker, N.,
Morin, P. J.,
van Wichen, D.,
de Weger, R.,
Kinzler, K. W.,
Vogelstein, B.,
and Clevers, H.
(1997)
Science
275,
1784-1787[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Bogdanova, N.,
Markoff, A.,
Gerke, V.,
McCluskey, M.,
Horst, J.,
and Dworniczak, B.
(2001)
Genomics
74,
333-341[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Shtutman, M.,
Zhurinsky, J.,
Simcha, I.,
Albanese, C.,
D'Amico, M.,
Pestell, R.,
and Ben-Ze'ev, A.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
5522-5527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Morin, P. J.,
Sparks, A. B.,
Korinek, V.,
Barker, N.,
Clevers, H.,
Vogelstein, B.,
and Kinzler, K. W.
(1997)
Science
275,
1787-1790[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Blake, M. C.,
Jambou, R. C.,
Swick, A. G.,
Kahn, J. W.,
and Azizkhan, J. C.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
6632-6641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Cohen, H. T.,
Bossone, S. A.,
Zhu, G.,
McDonald, G. A.,
and Sukhatme, V. P.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
2901-2913[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Desbois-Mouthon, C.,
Cadoret, A.,
Blivet-Van Eggelpoel, M. J.,
Bertrand, F.,
Cherqui, G.,
Perret, C.,
and Capeau, J.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
252-259[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Griffin, M. D.,
Torres, V. E.,
Grande, J. P.,
and Kumar, R.
(1996)
Proc. Assoc. Am. Physicians
108,
185-197[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Palsson, R.,
Sharma, C. P.,
Kim, K.,
McLaughlin, M.,
Brown, D.,
and Arnaout, M. A.
(1996)
Mol. Med.
2,
702-711[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Perrone, R. D.,
Grubman, S. A.,
Murray, S. L.,
Lee, D. W.,
Alper, S. L.,
and Jefferson, D. M.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
272,
C1748-C1756[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Pollack, A. L.,
Barth, A. I.,
Altschuler, Y.,
Nelson, W. J.,
and Mostov, K. E.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
137,
1651-1662[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Saadi-Kheddouci, S.,
Berrebi, D.,
Romagnolo, B.,
Cluzeaud, F.,
Peuchmaur, M.,
Kahn, A.,
Vandewalle, A.,
and Perret, C.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
5972-5981[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Surendran, K.,
McCaul, S. P.,
and Simon, T. C.
(2002)
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.
282,
F431-F441[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R. Islam, S. Puri, M. Rodova, B. S. Magenheimer, R. L. Maser, and J. P. Calvet
Retinoic acid-dependent activation of the polycystic kidney disease-1 (PKD1) promoter
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
December 1, 2008;
295(6):
F1845 - F1854.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Kim, C. Li, D. Liang, X.-Z. Chen, R. J. Coffy, J. Ma, P. Zhao, and G. Wu
Polycystin-2 Expression Is Regulated by a PC2-binding Domain in the Intracellular Portion of Fibrocystin
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 14, 2008;
283(46):
31559 - 31566.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Van Bodegom, Z. Saifudeen, S. Dipp, S. Puri, B. S. Magenheimer, J. P. Calvet, and S. S. El-Dahr
The Polycystic Kidney Disease-1 Gene Is a Target for p53-mediated Transcriptional Repression
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 20, 2006;
281(42):
31234 - 31244.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Peruzzi, G. Athauda, and D. P. Bottaro
The von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene product represses oncogenic beta-catenin signaling in renal carcinoma cells
PNAS,
September 26, 2006;
103(39):
14531 - 14536.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-a. Nakaya, K. Biris, T. Tsukiyama, S. Jaime, J. A. Rawls, and T. P. Yamaguchi
Wnt3alinks left-right determination with segmentation and anteroposterior axis elongation
Development,
December 15, 2005;
132(24):
5425 - 5436.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-N. Qian, J. Knol, P. Igarashi, F. Lin, U. Zylstra, B. T. Teh, and B. O. Williams
Cystic Renal Neoplasia Following Conditional Inactivation of Apc in Mouse Renal Tubular Epithelium
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 4, 2005;
280(5):
3938 - 3945.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Rodova, K. F. Kelly, M. VanSaun, J. M. Daniel, and M. J. Werle
Regulation of the Rapsyn Promoter by Kaiso and {delta}-Catenin
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
August 15, 2004;
24(16):
7188 - 7196.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. H. Le, P. van der Bent, G. Huls, M. van de Wetering, M. Loghman-Adham, A. C. M. Ong, J. P. Calvet, H. Clevers, M. H. Breuning, H. van Dam, et al.
Aberrant Polycystin-1 Expression Results in Modification of Activator Protein-1 Activity, whereas Wnt Signaling Remains Unaffected
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 25, 2004;
279(26):
27472 - 27481.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Rodova, M. R. Islam, K. R. Peterson, and J. P. Calvet
Remarkable Sequence Conservation of the Last Intron in the PKD1 Gene
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
October 1, 2003;
20(10):
1669 - 1674.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|