|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201191200 on May 21, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 33, 29908-29918, August 16, 2002
Vesicle-associated Membrane Protein-associated Protein-A (VAP-A)
Interacts with the Oxysterol-binding Protein to Modify Export from the
Endoplasmic Reticulum*
Jessica P.
Wyles ,
Christopher R.
McMaster, and
Neale D.
Ridgway§
From the Atlantic Research Center, Departments of Pediatrics and
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University,
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4H7, Canada
Received for publication, February 5, 2002, and in revised form, May 20, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Oxysterol-binding protein (OSBP) is
1 of 12 related proteins implicated in the regulation of vesicle
transport and sterol homeostasis. A yeast two-hybrid screen using
full-length OSBP as bait was undertaken to identify partner proteins
that would provide clues to the function of OSBP. This resulted in the
cloning of vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein-A
(VAP-A), a syntaxin-like protein implicated in endoplasmic reticulum
(ER)/Golgi vesicle transport, and phospholipid regulation in mammalian
cells and yeast, respectively. By using a combination of yeast
two-hybrid, glutathione S-transferase pull-down and
immunoprecipitation experiments, the VAP-A-binding region in OSBP was
localized to amino acids 351-442. This region did not include the
pleckstrin homology (PH) domain but overlapped with the N terminus of
the oxysterol binding and OSBP homology domains. C- and N-terminal
truncations or deletions of VAP prevented interaction with OSBP but did
not affect VAP multimerization. Although the OSBP PH domain was not
necessary for VAP-A binding in vitro, interaction with
VAP-A was enhanced in cells by mutation of the conserved PH domain
tryptophan (OSBP W174A) or deletion of the C-terminal half of the PH
domain (OSBP 132-182). OSBP W174A retained oxysterol binding
activity, association with phospholipid vesicles via the PH domain, and
localized with VAP in unusual ER-associated structures. At 40 °C,
misfolded ts045-vesicular stomatitis virus G protein fused to green
fluorescent protein was co-localized with VAP-A/OSBP W174A structures
on the ER but was exported to the Golgi when folded normally at
32 °C. A fluorescent ceramide analogue also accumulated in these ER
inclusions, and export to the Golgi was partially inhibited as
indicated by decreased Golgi staining and a 30% reduction in
sphingomyelin synthesis. These studies show that OSBP binding to the ER
and Golgi apparatus is regulated by its PH domain and VAP interactions,
and the complex is involved at a stage of protein and ceramide
transport from the ER.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Oxysterol-binding protein
(OSBP)1 and 11 other related
proteins constitute the recently identified OSBP-related (ORP) gene family. Family members share amino acid sequence identity in a 350-amino acid C-terminal OSBP homology (OH) domain that is encompassed in the oxysterol-binding region of OSBP. Most ORPs also contain an
N-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain (1-5). Initial analysis of
the distribution of this gene family suggested that ORPs and OSBP share
related functions in cells or have tissue-specific activities. The
precise nature of these activities is unclear, but preliminary evidence
in yeast and mammalian cells suggests a role in vesicular trafficking
and lipid and sterol regulation (3-7).
OSBP, the first member of the gene family to be characterized, was
identified by Kandutsch and Shown (8) as a high affinity cytosolic
receptor for a variety of oxysterol regulators of cholesterol synthesis, such as 25-hydroxycholesterol. Based on a correlation between the potency of oxysterols to suppress
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase activity and affinity for
OSBP, it was proposed that OSBP played a role in mediating the effects
of oxysterols on cholesterol homeostasis (9). Cloning and expression
studies revealed that OSBP was a soluble protein that underwent
translocation from a cytosolic/vesicular compartment to the Golgi
apparatus when cells were challenged with exogenous
25-hydroxycholesterol (10). Interaction with the Golgi apparatus has
since been shown to involve the OSBP PH domain and is mediated by
phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI-4,5-P2) and
possibly other unidentified protein or lipid factors (6, 11). The
interaction of OSBP with the Golgi apparatus via the PH domain is
important for function since overexpression of OSBP mutants with
deletions of the PH domain did not cause alterations in cholesterol
homeostasis that were evident with wild-type protein (6). In a model
for oxysterol-mediated translocation, 25-hydroxycholesterol binding to
the C-terminal region of OSBP could unmask the PH domain and thus
facilitate binding to lipid or protein targets in the Golgi apparatus.
Expression of the OSBP PH domain alone was sufficient to disrupt Golgi
structure and interfered with transport of vesicular stomatitis virus G
(VSVG) protein in the Golgi apparatus (11). This suggests that an
unidentified important step(s) in vesicle transport is regulated by
OSBP, and this activity either directly or indirectly affects sterol regulation.
OSBP also translocated to the Golgi in response to factors other than
oxysterols. For instance, depletion of cellular cholesterol with
cyclodextrins (12), by somatic mutations in CHO cells (13), or the
Niemann-Pick C disorder (14) promoted OSBP localization to the Golgi.
Because some of these models produced severe cholesterol depletion, it
was unlikely that endogenous oxysterol production could account for
translocation. Depletion of plasma membrane sphingomyelin (SM) and
phosphatidylcholine with bacterial phospholipases also promoted
translocation of OSBP to the Golgi apparatus (12). This raised the
intriguing possibility that OSBP movement is linked to the production
of the bioactive lipids ceramide and diglyceride. In yeast, a
functional link has been established between diglyceride, phosphatidic
acid, and Golgi vesicle biogenesis, mediated by the phosphatidylinositol/phosphatidylcholine transfer protein Sec14p (15-17). Deletion of the yeast OSBP homologue 4 (OSH4)KES1 bypassed the requirement for
SEC14 in regulation of Golgi vesicular transport, suggesting
Osh1p/Kes1p regulates Golgi secretory function in response to these
lipids (18). Although none of the seven yeast OSH-encoded proteins were essential, deletion of the entire gene family was lethal
(7). Depletion of all or some combinations of OSH genes was
accompanied by perturbations in ergosterol metabolism and membrane
function (7, 18, 19).
Although available evidence points to an important role for OSBP and
related family members in lipid and cholesterol homeostasis in the
Golgi/vesicular pathway, precise targets and mechanism of action are
unresolved. To address this question we undertook the identification of
proteins that interact with OSBP using the yeast two-hybrid method. The
sole OSBP-binding protein identified in our screen was
vesicle-associated membrane protein (VAMP)-associated protein-A
(VAP-A), one of a pair (VAP-A and -B) of related integral membrane
proteins localized to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)/Golgi pathway (20,
21). Interaction of VAP proteins with VAMP and other components of the
vesicle trafficking machinery (22) and similar topology and coiled-coil
structure to the t-SNARE syntaxin family (23) suggested a role in
vesicle transport. In support of this, VAP proteins have been shown to
have a number of potential functions related to vesicle transport
including regulation of COPI vesicle transport in the ER/Golgi
pathway (21), VAMP/synaptobrevin-mediated neurotransmitter release
(20), VAMP-2-mediated Glut-4 trafficking at the plasma membrane (24),
and interaction with the microtubule network (25) and tight junctions
(26). In the present study we define the regions of VAP-A and OSBP that
mediate interaction in the Golgi apparatus, and we show that the
VAP-A/OSBP interaction in vivo is regulated by the PH domain
and involved at a stage of protein and lipid export from the ER.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
G418, hygromycin B, tissue culture media,
and secondary rabbit and mouse antibodies coupled to horseradish
peroxidase were obtained from Invitrogen. Tet-On and Tet-Off system
plasmids, CHO cells, and Tet system fetal calf serum (FCS) were from
CLONTECH. Nutrient supplements, amino acids,
and media for growing yeast were from EM Science. Protein A-Sepharose
and glutathionine-Sepharose 4B were from Amersham Biosciences. Protease
inhibitor mixture was from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. A monoclonal
antibody to protein-disulfide isomerase (PDI) was from StressGen. A
vector expressing VSVG-GFP was provided by Dr. Jennifer
Lippincott-Schwartz (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda) (27). A
polyclonal antibody to human sec31 (28) was supplied by Dr. Fred
Gorlick (Yale University, New Haven, CT). A polyclonal antibody to p58 (ER-Golgi intermediate compartment-p58) was provided by Dr. Jaakko Saraste (University of Bergen, Norway). A rabbit polyclonal to -COP
was purchased from Affinity Bioreagents Inc.
N-(4,4-Difluoro-5-(2-thienyl)-4-boro-3a,4a-diaza-S-indacene-3-yl)phenoxy)acetyl) sphingosine (C5-DMB-ceramide) was from Amersham Biosciences.
Plasmid Constructs--
pAS1-CYH2-OSBP and pACT2-OSBP were
prepared by PCR amplification of the full-length rabbit OSBP cDNA
using Vent polymerase (Invitrogen) and primers containing
NdeI and BamHI sites (pAS1-CYH2) or
NcoI and BamHI sites (pACT2) at the 5' and 3'
ends of the cDNA, respectively. PCR products were subcloned into
pCR2.1-TOPO prior to digestion and ligation into pAS1-CYH2 or pACT2. In
order to remove 5'-untranslated sequence from pACT-VAP cloned during
the two-hybrid screen, the NcoI fragment of human VAP-A
cDNA was subcloned into pACT2. pAS1-CYH2-VAP was constructed by
subcloning an NdeI- BamHI fragment from pACT2-VAP
into pAS1-CYH2. pGEX-VAP and pTRE-VAP were prepared by PCR
amplification of the VAP cDNA using Vent polymerase and primers
containing EcoRI and BamHI restriction sites and
ligation into the aforementioned vectors. pTRE-OSBP was prepared by
ligation of an EcoRI/SspI fragment from pOSBP (10) into EcoRI/XbaI-digested pTRE (the
XbaI site was made blunt by filling in with Klenow). OSBP
deletion and truncations mutants in pOSBP, pTRE-OSBP, or in yeast
two-hybrid vectors were prepared using the Gene Editor mutagenesis
system (Promega) and confirmed by sequencing.
Yeast Two-hybrid Screen--
Two-hybrid vectors were transformed
into yeast strain PJ69 (ATCC 201450), which harbors ADE2 and
HIS3 under the control of the GAL4 promoter and
will grow in the absence of histidine and adenine only in the case of
positive interaction between bait and target proteins (29). Transformed
yeast were grown on synthetic media containing yeast nitrogen base
(without amino acids), glucose, histidine, methionine, uracil, adenine,
and lysine to confirm transformation, and on selective media containing
yeast nitrogen base (without amino acids), glucose, methionine, lysine,
and uracil to detect interacting partner proteins. A B-cell
library in pACT (provided by Dr. Chris Barnes, Department of
Microbiology and Immunology, Dalhousie University) was
transformed into strain PJ69 harboring pAS1-CYH2-OSBP. Expression of
the GAL4-OSBP fusion in yeast was confirmed by Western blotting using
monoclonal antibody 11H9. Plasmids from yeast colonies growing on
selective plates were isolated and transformed into JF1754, a DH5
strain deficient in leucine biosynthesis, and grown on
leucine-deficient agar plates. Plasmids isolated from JF1754 colonies
were transformed into PJ69-OSBP to confirm interactions or into
PJ69/pSE1112 to eliminate false positives.
Cell Culture and Transfections--
CHO-Tet-On or Tet-Off cells
were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 5%
Tet system fetal calf serum (FCS), and 33 µg/ml proline (medium A).
CHO-Tet-On cells were transfected with 10 µg of pTRE-VAP and 1 µg
of pTRE-Hyg using the calcium phosphate method. Cells expressing VAP
were selected in medium A containing 600 µg of G418/ml and 200 µg
of hygromycin B/ml (medium B). Individual colonies were expanded by
culturing in medium B for 10-20 days. Cell lines were screened for
VAP-A expression by immunoblotting with an anti-VAP polyclonal antibody (see below) after 24-48 h induction with 2 µg of doxycycline/ml. Overexpressing cell lines were maintained in medium A plus 300 µg of
G418 and 200 µg of hygromycin/ml but were subcultured in medium A for
experiments. CHO-Tet-Off cells expressing OSBP, OSBP W174A, or OSBP
132-182 were prepared as described above except that cells were
maintained in 1 µg of doxycycline/ml to prevent OSBP expression
during selection and for stock cultures. CHO-K1 cells were cultured in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 33 µg/ml proline and
5% FCS. COS cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium containing 10% FCS and were transfected by the DEAE-dextran
method (30). CHO cells stably overexpressing OSBP (CHO-OSBP cells) were
described previously (6).
Antibodies and Immunoblotting --
GST-VAP-A was expressed in
bacteria by isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside
induction at 25 °C for 3 h, extracted by lysozyme and Triton
X-100 treatment, and purified by affinity chromatography on a
glutathione-Sepharose 4B column (31). An anti-VAP antibody was prepared
by immunizing rabbits with the GST-VAP fusion protein. OSBP monoclonal
11H9 was described previously (32). Antibody 170 was raised against a
GST fusion protein containing the C-terminal 100 amino acids of human
ORP1 and is a pan.-OSBP antibody that recognizes several OSBP
family members.2 Proteins
were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes.
Filters were incubated with primary antibodies for 1 h at room
temperature in Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween
20, and 5% (w/v) skim milk powder (Blotto). The nitrocellulose filters
were washed three times for 10 min each in Blotto, incubated for 1 h with a secondary antibody coupled to horseradish peroxidase, and
washed extensively in Blotto and TBS prior to developing by the
enhanced chemiluminescence method (Amersham Biosciences).
Immunoprecipitation--
CHO-OSBP cells or transiently
transfected COS cells were rinsed once with 2 ml of cold PBS (10 mM phosphate (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl) and scraped
into 1 ml of PBS. The cells were collected by centrifugation for
30 s at 10,000 rpm and solubilized on ice for 15 min in 20 µl of
lysis buffer (10 mM phosphate (pH 7.4), 150 mM
NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM
EGTA, 0.5% Triton X-100, and 1× protease inhibitor mixture). The cell
lysate was subjected to centrifugation in a microcentrifuge at
14,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. Supernatant (20-50 µl) was
incubated with 2 µl of VAP-A immune, VAP-A preimmune serum or 11H9
overnight at 4 °C, or with T7 monoclonal for 2 h at 4 °C.
Protein A-Sepharose (50 µl in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100) was added
for 45 min at 20 °C. Sepharose beads were collected by
centrifugation and washed three times with 1 ml of PBS containing 0.1%
Triton X-100. The samples were heated to 90 °C in SDS sample buffer
under reducing conditions, separated by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by immunoblotting.
Oxysterol and Vesicle Binding
Assays--
25-[3H]Hydroxycholesterol binding to OSBP in
cytosol from transiently transfected COS cells was measured as
described previously (6). A GST-OSBP PH domain fusion protein (GST-PH)
encompassing amino acids 80-187, as well as a GST-PH W174A, was
assayed for binding to phospholipid vesicles using a sedimentation
assay (33). Briefly, PtdCho vesicles containing 5 mol % of other
phospholipids were prepared by bath sonication and 10 freeze-thaw
cycles and incubated with purified fusion proteins (2.5 mM)
in 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 100 mM NaCl at
20 °C for 5 min. Samples were subjected to centrifugation at
400,000 × g for 15 min, the supernatant (unbound) removed, and the pellet (bound) resuspended by sonication in a equivalent volume of buffer. Equal volumes of both fractions were resolved by SDS-12% PAGE and stained with Coomassie Blue.
GST Pull-down Assays--
COS cells were transfected with OSBP
constructs (see above), and a Triton X-100 extract was prepared as
described for co-immunoprecipitation experiments (100 µl of lysis
buffer/60-mm dish). Detergent extracts (10 µl) were incubated with 1 µM GST-VAP or GST for 30 min at 20 °C. A 1:1 (v/v)
slurry of glutathione-Sepharose 4B (20 µl) was added and incubated at
20 °C for 45 min. The Sepharose beads were collected by
centrifugation, washed three times with PBS containing 0.1% Triton
X-100, resolved on SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by immunoblotting with
monoclonal 11H9.
Immunofluorescence--
Cells grown on glass coverslips were
fixed and permeabilized as described previously (6). Polyclonal and
monoclonal antibodies directed against OSBP, VAP, PDI, p58, sec31, or
-COP were used in conjunction with cross-absorbed secondary goat
anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor-555
or -488 (Molecular Probes), or fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) or
Texas Red (Cappell Laboratories). Fluorescence images were obtained
using an Axiovert 200M microscope (equipped with an Axiocam HRC image
capture system) or Zeiss Axiovert 100M Laser Scanning Confocal
microscope 510 with a 100× objective.
VSVG-GFP was transiently transfected into CHO-OSBP or CHO-OSBP W174A
cells cultured in the absence of doxycycline at 40 °C. After 12 h at 40 °C, cells were switched to 32 °C for the indicated times
and subsequently fixed and counter-stained with OSBP monoclonal 11H9
and a secondary antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluor-555. Loading and
visualization of C5-DMB-ceramide in CHO-OSBP and CHO-OSBP W174A cells was performed as described previously (34).
 |
RESULTS |
OSBP and VAP-A Interaction--
A yeast two-hybrid screen of a
human B-cell cDNA library using a GAL4 DNA binding domain-OSBP
fusion as bait resulted in the cloning of 18 VAP-A cDNAs, all
predicted to encode the full-length protein. VAP-A, also referred to as
VAP-33 (20, 25), shares 60% identity at the amino acid level with a
VAP-B or ER/Golgi 30-kDa protein (ERG30) (21). By several criteria,
such as lack of OSBP interaction with irrelevant proteins fused to the
GAL4 DNA binding or activation domains and the GAL4 DNA binding domain alone, and positive interaction of VAP-A with OSBP fused to either the
GAL4 DNA or activation domain, VAP-A was deemed a valid candidate for
further evaluation. We initially verified the interaction in
vitro by GST-VAP binding to wild-type and mutant forms of OSBP in
extracts from transiently transfected COS cells (Fig.
1). OSBP in the Triton X-100-soluble
fraction from transfected COS cells was quantitatively recovered after
binding to increasing amounts of GST-VAP but not GST or glutathionine
beads (Fig. 1A). OSBP with complete or partial deletions of
the PH domain or mutation of the conserved PH domain tryptophan 174 to
alanine bound GST-VAP similar to the wild-type protein (Fig.
1B). OSBP truncated at amino acid 443 also bound GST-VAP,
but deletions further toward the N terminus abolished binding
(OSBP-(1-267) and -(1-217)) (Fig. 1C). The
quantitative nature of the in vitro interaction is
demonstrated by the input into each assay shown in Fig. 1D.
Collectively, these results indicate that the VAP interaction region in
OSBP is between amino acids 267 and 443 and does not directly involve
the PH domain.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Identification of VAP and OSBP interaction
domains by GST pull-down assays. OSBP cDNAs were transiently
overexpressed in COS cells for 48 h. Cells were harvested, and a
1% Triton X-100 lysate was prepared as described under "Experimental
Procedures." A, detergent lysates were incubated with 0, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, or 10 µM GST-VAP, or 1 µM
GST, at 20 °C for 30 min; glutathionine-Sepharose was added for 45 min, and beads were collected by brief centrifugation and washed 3 times with 0.5 ml of PBS and 0.5% Triton X-100. Bound proteins were
resolved on SDS-8% PAGE gels and transferred to nitrocellulose, and
OSBP was detected by immunoblotting with monoclonal antibody 11H9.
Extracts from COS cells transfected with the indicated PH domain
mutants (B) or C-terminal truncation mutants of OSBP
(C) were incubated with 1 µM GST ( ) or 1 GST-VAP (+) in PBS (pH 7.4). Complexes were isolated, and OSBP binding
was assessed by immunoblotting. D, the input for each OSBP
mutant shown in B and C was resolved on SDS-10%
PAGE and immunoblotted with monoclonal antibody 11H9.
|
|
The yeast-two hybrid interaction assay was used to identify further the
region of OSBP involved in VAP-A binding. A number of OSBP mutants
fused to the GAL4 DNA binding domain (pAS1) were monitored under
interaction of selective growth conditions in yeast harboring pACT-VAP
or pACT2-OSBP (Fig. 2A). Based
on results in Fig. 1, amino acids 261-296, which are involved in OSBP
homodimerization (9), could also be involved in VAP-A binding. The
OSBP-( 261-296) construct, and two others with deletions of the N-
and C-terminal halves of the dimerization domain ( 262-278 and
279-296), failed to interact with wild-type OSBP but were positive
for interaction with VAP-A. A deletion from 288 to 296 interacted with
both VAP and OSBP, thus narrowing the OSBP homodimerization domain to
amino acids 261-288. Deletion of OSBP amino acids 306-315 removed a potential SNARE V2 homology domain but did not affect interaction with
either VAP or OSBP. An OSBP construct expressing amino acids 351-809
did not interact with OSBP but retained VAP interaction. In conjunction
with GST pull-down experiments (Fig. 1), this indicated that VAP-A
binding requires amino acids 351-442. This region overlaps with the
ligand binding domain as well as the OSBP homology (OH) domain common
to ORP family members from different species (1, 7).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Identification of OSBP and VAP interaction
domains by yeast two-hybrid analysis. Wild-type and the indicated
deletion mutants of OSBP and VAP (in pAS1) were expressed in yeast
strain PJ69 expressing pACT2-VAP or pACT2-OSBP. Transformants were
grown on synthetic media under non-selective (to score for
transformation efficiency) or selective conditions (to score for
interaction between target proteins) as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Multiple transformants that grew under non-selective
conditions were restreaked on selective media to confirm interactions.
Abbreviations: CCD, coiled-coil domain; VCD, VAP
consensus domain, Dim, dimerization domain; G/A,
glycine/alanine-rich region; PH, pleckstrin homology domain;
OHD, OSBP homology domain, TMD, transmembrane
domain.
|
|
Results in Fig. 2B confirmed that VAP will multimerize in a
yeast two-hybrid assay (21). Truncation of VAP to remove the coiled-coil domain and transmembrane region (VAP-(1-160)), a portion of the highly conserved N-terminal sequence (VAP-( 43-49))
(35) or the transmembrane region (VAP TM) abolished
association with OSBP but did not affect VAP multimerization.
Association of OSBP and VAP was also confirmed by
co-immunoprecipitation experiments. To facilitate these studies a
polyclonal antibody was generated against the full-length VAP-A
protein. By immunoblotting, this antibody recognized a protein at 30 kDa, as well as minor bands at 33 and 65 kDa (Fig.
3A). The 30-kDa protein
represents the VAP-A isoform since the cDNA we cloned co-migrated
with this endogenous protein when expressed in CHO cells (see Fig.
4A). The 33-kDa protein could
either correspond to VAP-B or a modified version of VAP-A. Detection of
both proteins was competed by inclusion of the GST-VAP fusion protein.
A 65-kDa protein was observed sporadically and could be an incompletely dissociated VAP dimer (24). The VAP polyclonal antibody and OSBP
monoclonal 11H9 were used to co-immunoprecipitate the complex from CHO
cells stably overexpressing OSBP (Fig. 3B). Compared with
direct immunoprecipitation of OSBP by 11H9, the VAP antibody weakly
co-immunoprecipitated overexpressed OSBP (Fig. 3B). However, the co-immunoprecipitation was specific since OSBP was not detected using the VAP-A preimmune serum. Co-immunoprecipitation of VAP by the
OSBP monoclonal 11H9 was negligible. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments
were also performed using extracts from COS cells transiently
transfected with OSBP and T7 epitope-tagged VAP-A and VAP TM (Fig.
3C). When extracts were immunoprecipitated with the T7
monoclonal antibody, the 100-kDa OSBP was detected in both lanes by
immunoblotting with monoclonal antibody 11H9. The T7 monoclonal
antibody was effective in binding the majority of VAP-A in the extracts
(Fig. 3C, left panel), but this resulted
in co-immunoprecipitation of only 10-20% of the overexpressed OSBP
(see OSBP input panel). Less OSBP was co-immunoprecipitated
with VAP- TM due to decreased expression of this construct relative
to wild-type VAP-A. Repeated attempts to co-immunoprecipitate
endogenous or overexpressed VAP using monoclonal 11H9 or other
OSBP-specific antibodies were not successful. However, enhanced
co-immunoprecipitation of both proteins was achieved using PH domain
mutants of OSBP (see Fig.
5B).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Co-immunoprecipitation of VAP and OSBP.
A, Triton X-100 extracts of CHO K1 cells, heated for 5 min
in the presence or absence of -mercaptoethanol (BME),
were resolved by SDS-10% PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and
immunoblotted with the VAP polyclonal antibody in the presence or
absence of GST-VAP (5 µg/ml). B, Triton X-100 extracts of
CHO cells stably overexpressing OSBP were immunoprecipitated with
control antibodies (IA, irrelevant monoclonal antibody;
PI, VAP preimmune serum) or antibodies against VAP or OSBP
(11H9). Immunoprecipitates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted
with the VAP polyclonal antibody or OSBP monoclonal 11H9. C,
COS cells were co-transfected with OSBP/T7-tagged VAP or OSBP/T7-tagged
VAP TM. Triton X-100 cell extracts were immunoprecipitated
(IP) with T7 monoclonal antibody and the precipitates
immunoblotted versus the 11H9 or T7 antibody. The
input panel is an immunoblot of 30% of the cell extract
subject to immunoprecipitation.
|
|

View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Enforced expression of VAP increases membrane
localization of OSBP. A, CHO-Tet-VAP cells were
subcultured in medium A for 24 h prior to inducing VAP-A
expression with doxycycline (Dox, 2 µg/ml) for 12, 24, or
48 h. Cells cultured for 48 h in the absence of doxycycline
served as controls (0 h). Cells were harvested in PBS and
homogenized in lysis buffer without Triton X-100 by 20 passages through
a 23-gauge needle. Homogenates were subject to centrifugation at
10,000 × g for 15 min to isolate a heavy
membrane fraction. The supernatant was then fractionated into
cytosol and light membranes by centrifugation at 400,000 × g for 15 min. Heavy and light membrane fractions were
treated on ice with lysis buffer containing 1% Triton X-100, and
soluble and insoluble fractions were separated by centrifugation at
10,000 × g for 10 min. All procedures were performed
at 4 °C. Individual cell fractions (20 or 30 µg) were separated by
SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and immunoblotted with
anti-VAP or anti-OSBP antibody 170. B, CHO-Tet-VAP cells
were cultured on glass coverslips for 12 h in the presence
or absence of doxycycline. Cells were processed for
immunofluorescence using the VAP polyclonal antibody and a
FITC-labeled goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody.
|
|

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Enhanced association of VAP-A with OSBP PH
domain mutants. A, CHO-tet-OSBP, CHO-tet-OSBP W174A, or
CHO-tet-OSBP 132-182 cells were cultured in medium A without
(+Dox) or with ( Dox) 1 µg of doxycycline/ml
for the indicated times. Equivalent amounts of Triton X-100 extracts
(15 µg of protein) of cells were separated on SDS-8% PAGE and
immunoblotted with monoclonal 11H9. B, Triton X-100 extracts
were prepared from cells cultured in medium A with or without
doxycycline (Dox) for 24 h. Extracts were
immunoprecipitated (IP) with the VAP polyclonal or OSBP
monoclonal antibody 11H9 and immunoblotted (IB) with the
corresponding antibody as indicated under "Experimental Procedures"
and the legend to Fig. 3.
|
|
By using a CHO cell line expressing VAP under the control of the
tetracycline repressor (CHO-tet-VAP), we examined the effect of VAP-A
expression on OSBP localization, as well as the localization of
endogenous and overexpressed VAP (Fig. 4). In these experiments, CHO-tet-VAP cells were harvested at the indicated times after doxycycline induction, and VAP and OSBP expression in the cytosolic and
Triton X-100-soluble and -insoluble membrane fractions was assessed by
immunoblotting. In uninduced cells, the antibody detected two
endogenous VAP proteins of 30 and 33 kDa, primarily in the Triton
X-100-soluble and -insoluble fraction of the 100,000 × g light membrane fraction. Induction of wild-type VAP for up
to a 48-h period resulted in a progressive increase in expression of
the 30-kDa protein in both heavy and light membrane fractions (Fig.
4A). Expression of the endogenous 33-kDa VAP, which appeared to be the B isoform, was not affected. In uninduced and
doxycycline-induced cells, the majority of OSBP was cytosolic or in the
Triton-soluble fraction of light membranes. However, induction of VAP
expression for 12-48 h resulted in enhanced localization of OSBP to
the Triton-soluble fraction of heavy membranes. The localization of
endogenous and overexpressed VAP was monitored in these cells by
indirect immunofluorescence (Fig. 4B). In uninduced cells,
VAP was localized in a diffuse ER-like network, in small vesicles
clustered around the nucleus and in a perinuclear/Golgi region.
Induction of VAP-A expression by exposure to doxycycline for 12 h
resulted in a pronounced increase in expression in the reticular
network where it extensively co-localized with the ER marker PDI
(results not shown).
Enhancement of OSBP-VAP-A Interaction by PH Domain
Mutations--
To determine the functional consequences of VAP-A and
OSBP interaction, we have identified mutants of OSBP with altered
affinity for VAP-A. While focusing on the PH domain of OSBP, it became apparent that mutation of the conserved tryptophan (OSBP W174A) or a
deletion of the C-terminal 50 amino acids of this domain (OSBP-( 132-182)) increased affinity for membranes and altered cellular localization of OSBP. To facilitate studies of these mutant
proteins, the tetracycline-inducible cell lines (Tet-Off) CHO-tet-OSBP
W174A, CHO-tet-OSBP 132-182, and wild-type CHO-tet-OSBP were
established (Fig. 5). By using a monoclonal antibody that recognized
only the overexpressed OSBPs, it was found that the time courses for
induction and level of expression of wild-type and the OSBP mutants
were similar in the Tet-Off CHO cell lines (Fig. 5A).
Similar to wild-type OSBP, two molecular species were detected for the
PH domain mutants indicating normal phosphorylation (36). By using a
polyclonal antibody to detect both endogenous and overexpressed OSBP,
the level of overexpression relative to endogenous OSBP was estimated
to be 6-8-fold 3 days after removal of doxycycline (results not
shown). To compare the interaction of VAP with OSBP and the PH domain
mutants, extracts from CHO-Tet-Off cells (cultured in the absence or
presence of doxycycline) were immunoprecipitated with antibodies to
OSBP or VAP and immunoblotted with the corresponding antibodies (Fig.
5B). Similar to results in Fig. 3, it was difficult to
detect co-immunoprecipitation of wild-type OSBP and VAP (a faint signal
was detected upon overexposure of the OSBP blot). In contrast, OSBP
W174A or 132-182 formed stable complexes with VAP-A that were
easily detected with either combination of antibody. In the case of
OSBP W174A, the efficiency of co-immunoprecipitation was similar to
direct immunoprecipitation with either the OSBP or VAP-A antibodies.
Because of difficulties maintaining expression in CHO-tet-OSBP
132-182 cell lines, we focused on characterizing the W174A mutant
in subsequent experiments.
OSBP binds oxysterol ligands in a large C-terminal region (10) and
phosphatidylinositide (11, 37) and protein ligands (38) via the PH
domain. 25-[3H]Hydroxycholesterol binding by OSBP W174A
and 132-182 was measured to assess the impact of these mutations on
the adjacent oxysterol binding domain (Fig.
6). Wild-type OSBP was expressed in
soluble and particulate fractions from transiently transfected COS
cells and displayed high affinity oxysterol activity in the former
fraction. OSBP W174A and 132-182 mutants were expressed primarily
in the particulate fraction; however, the soluble fraction displayed oxysterol binding that was relatively proportional to expression and
significantly above activity in mock-transfected controls.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Oxysterol binding activity of OSBP W174A and
OSBP 132-182.
25-[3H]Hydroxycholesterol binding activity in the soluble
fraction of COS cells transiently transfected with OSBP, OSBP W174A,
and OSBP-( 132-182) (in pCMV) was assayed as described under
"Experimental Procedures." OSBP expression of the soluble
(S) and particulate (P) fraction (10 µg of
protein) of mock- and OSBP-transfected cells was determined by
immunoblotting with monoclonal antibody 11H9.
|
|
To determine whether the increased membrane and VAP-A binding of OSBP
W174A was due to altered affinity for phosphatidylinositide ligands,
binding of GST-PH domain fusion proteins to lipid vesicles was assayed
(Fig. 7). In these studies GST-PH or
GST-PH W174A was incubated with increasing concentrations of PtdCho
vesicles, supplemented with 5 mol % of the indicated phospholipids,
and fusion proteins bound to vesicles were separated by centrifugation and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Both fusion proteins bound quantitatively to
vesicles supplemented with PtdIns-4,5-P2 and PtdIns-4-P at the lowest vesicle concentration (0.25 mM). Binding to
vesicles supplemented with phosphatidylserine (PtdSer) or
phosphatidylinositol was relatively weak and increased slightly with
vesicle concentration. PH domain binding to lipid vesicles was specific
as indicated by lack of interaction of GST with
PtdIns-4,5-P2-supplemented vesicles. Results shown in Figs.
6 and 7 demonstrate that the W174A mutation did not affect the
oxysterol or phosphatidylinositide binding activity of OSBP.

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
The PH domain of OSBP W174A binds
PtdIns-4,5-P2 and PtdIns-4-P. GST, GST-PH, and GST-PH
W174A (2.5 mM) were incubated with 0.25-5 mM
PtdCho vesicles containing 5 mol % of the indicated phospholipids for
5 min at 20 °C. Mixtures were subjected to centrifugation for 15 min
at 400,000 × g, and equivalent volumes of the
supernatant (sup) and pellet fractions were resolved on
SDS-12% PAGE. Results were repeated several times with similar
results.
|
|
OSBP W174A Alters VAP Localization and Export from the ER--
The
site of interaction between VAP-A and OSBP was determined by indirect
immunofluorescence in Tet-Off cell lines (Fig.
8). In cells expressing wild-type OSBP
following removal of doxycycline, there was strong co-localization of
OSBP and VAP in the reticular network and a region adjacent to the
nucleus. VAP-A localization in this cell line was similar to CHO-K1
cells and was not altered by induction of OSBP expression. VAP-A
localization in CHO-tet-OSBP W174A cells cultured in the presence of
doxycycline was similar to uninduced CHO-tet-OSBP cells (results not
shown). When expression was induced by removal of doxycycline, OSBP
W174A was confined to a heterogeneous population of "vesicle-like"
structures, with some cells also having tubules that contained the OSBP
mutant (see Fig. 9). Occasional small
vesicles could be observed that lacked interior staining (see Fig.
10), indicating OSBP W174A binding to a
surrounding membrane, whereas most of the large structures had OSBP
localized throughout. VAP-A was strongly co-localized with OSBP W174A
in all these structures confirming the enhanced interaction observed by
co-immunoprecipitation (Fig. 5B).

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Co-localization of VAP-A and
OSBP. CHO-tet-OSBP or CHO-tet-OSBP W174A cells were cultured in
medium A on glass coverslips in the absence ( Dox) or
presence (+Dox) of 1 µg of doxycycline/ml for 24 h.
Cells were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence using the VAP
antibody and a FITC-conjugated secondary antibody, followed by OSBP
monoclonal antibody 11H9 and a Texas Red-conjugated secondary
antibody.
|
|

View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
OSBP W174A forms an ER-associated complex
with VAP-A. CHO-tet-OSBP W174A cells were cultured on glass
coverslips in medium A (without doxycycline) for 3 days. Fixed and
permeabilized cells were immunostained with VAP antibody or OSBP
monoclonal antibody 11H9 and Alexa Fluor-555-conjugated secondary
antibody, followed by antibodies to either PDI (monoclonal), p58
(polyclonal), or sec31 (polyclonal) and an Alexa Fluor-488-conjugated
secondary antibody. OSBP W174A and -COP were immunostained using
FITC- and Texas Red-conjugated antibodies. Images are the result of
projection of 6-8 confocal sections (0.2 µm). The PDI/VAP image is a
single 0.2-µm section.
|
|

View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Export of VSVG-GFP to the Golgi occurs via
VAP-A/OSBP W174A ER structures. CHO-tet-OSBP or CHO-tet-OSBP W174A
cells were cultured in medium A for 48 h, subsequently transfected
with VSVG-GFP at 40 °C, and analyzed for OSBP and VSVG-GFP
immunofluorescence as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Cells were either maintained at 40 °C or switched to the
transport-permissive temperature (32 °C) for 1 h. Images are
single confocal optical sections (0.2 µm).
|
|
The unusual nature of the OSBP W174A/VAP-A structures, and the
association of both proteins with membranes, suggested that these
represent a modified organellar membrane domain. To determine the
origin of these structures, co-immunofluorescence localization of VAP
or OSBP W174A with a variety of organelle markers was examined in
CHO-tet-OSBP W174A cells (Fig. 9). The luminal ER redox enzyme PDI
co-localized with VAP in the inclusions but only weakly elsewhere in
the cell. The ER-Golgi intermediate compartment resident protein p58
(39) and -COP, a coatomer protein found primarily in the Golgi
apparatus (40), did not overlap with OSBP W174A. Sec31, a component of
the COPII coat localized to ER export sites (41), was distributed in
small punctate structures throughout the cell. Some of these structures
co-localized with OSBP W174A. However, this was likely nonspecific and
due to the high density of sec31 staining. With the exception of PDI,
the localization of proteins shown in Fig. 9 was indistinguishable from
uninduced CHO-tet-OSBP W174A cells or CHO-tet-OSBP cells. This suggests
that the VAP-A/OSBP W174A structures are due to distortion of a region
of the ER membrane caused by expression of the mutant OSBP.
Effect of OSBP W174A on Protein and Ceramide Export from the
ER--
We used ts045-VSVG tagged on the cytoplasmic tail with GFP to
monitor the effect of the OSBP W174A on membrane protein export from
the ER (27) (Fig. 10). At 40 °C ts045-VSVG-GFP was blocked at a late
step in the folding pathway and retained in the ER in a misfolded state
(42). Correct folding of VSVG and export to the Golgi apparatus and
plasma membrane requires PDI, BIP, and calnexin (43). VSVG-GFP was
transiently transfected into CHO-tet-OSBP or OSBP W174A cells cultured
in the absence of doxycycline at 40 °C and subsequently shifted to
33 °C to promote export. In CHO cells expressing OSBP at 40 °C,
VSVG-GFP was found in small vesicles and the ER. Upon shifting to
32 °C for 1 h, VSVG-GFP exited the ER and was strongly
localized to the Golgi apparatus and, to a lesser extent, the plasma
membrane. In CHO-tet-OSBP W174A cells at 40 °C, VSVG-GFP was
localized to structures that coincided with OSBP W174A and the ER
network. Refolding of VSVG-GFP at 32 °C resulted in normal export to
the Golgi apparatus and plasma membrane and no residual localization to
OSBP W174A structures. Thus the ER structures formed by VAP-A/OSBP
W174A accumulated misfolded VSVG-GFP, but folding proceeded normally at
the permissive temperature.
Ceramide is synthesized in the ER and exported to the Golgi apparatus
where it is the precursor for sphingomyelin and glycosphingolipid synthesis (reviewed in Ref. 44). OSBP and 25-hydroxycholesterol stimulated de novo SM synthesis by a process that involved
increased ceramide export to the Golgi apparatus (45), and thus we were interested in the effect of the OSBP W174A mutation on ceramide transport and SM synthesis (Figs. 11
and 12). Cells were labeled with
C5-DMB-ceramide at 4 °C, and localization of the
fluorescent lipid was examined immediately (0 h) or after 1 h at
37 °C (Fig. 11). In CHO-tet-OSBP cells, C5-DMB-ceramide
staining of the Golgi apparatus was increased after 1 h, and this
was not affected by enforced expression of OSBP (Fig. 11,
Dox). CHO-tet-OSBP W174A cells grown in the presence of
doxycycline displayed a similar increase in C5-DMB-ceramide
staining of the Golgi apparatus after 1 h. Inducible expression of
OSBP W174A did not affect the initial localization of
C5-DMB-ceramide (0 h); however, after 1 h at 37 °C
there was prominent staining of structures (Fig. 11, indicated by
arrows) that corresponded to the ER inclusions caused by the OSBP W174A/VAP-A complex. Ceramide staining of these structures was
evident after 10 min at 37 °C (results not shown).
C5-DMB-ceramide was transported to the Golgi apparatus in
some cells as indicated by perinuclear staining, but this was reduced
or disorganized compared with controls. Synthesis of SM was measured by
[3H]serine incorporation as an index of ceramide export
to the Golgi apparatus in CHO-tet-OSBP and OSBP W174A cells (Fig. 12).
Consistent with what appeared to be partial suppression of fluorescent
ceramide export to the Golgi apparatus and accumulation in ER
inclusions, induction of OSBP W174A expression (Fig. 12,
Dox) resulted in a significant 30% reduction in de
novo SM synthesis. This was not evident in cells expressing
wild-type OSBP, nor was the incorporation of [3H]serine
into other phospholipids affected under any conditions.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
VAP-A/OSBP W174A structures interfere with
trafficking of a fluorescent ceramide analogue. CHO-tet-OSBP and
CHO-tet-OSBP W174A cells were cultured in the absence
( Dox) or presence (+Dox) of 1 µg of
doxycycline/ml for 72 h prior to loading and visualization of
C5-DMB-ceramide as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Images were captured using an Axiovert 200M fluorescence
microscope equipped with a 100× objective and Axiocam HRC image
capture system immediately after ceramide loading at 4 °C (0 h) or after 1 h at 37 °C.
|
|

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 12.
Expression of OSBP W194A causes a partial
suppression of sphingomyelin synthesis. CHO-tet-OSBP or
CHO-tet-OSBP W174A cells were cultured in medium A without
( Dox, stippled bar) or with (+Dox,
solid bar) 1 µg of doxycycline/ml for 48 h. Cells
were then pulse-labeled with 7.5 µCi of [3H]serine/ml
in serine-free medium A for 2 h. Cells were harvested, and the
lipids were extracted, and incorporation of [3H]serine
into SM, PtdEtn, and PtdSer was analyzed after separation by TLC as
described previously (46). Results are the mean and S.D. of 4-5
separate experiments. *, p < 0.005 versus
uninduced CHO-tet-OSBP W174A cells.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
By virtue of its oxysterol binding activity and altered
localization and phosphorylation in response to cholesterol levels and
transport, OSBP has been implicated in regulation of lipid and sterol
homeostasis. This could be the result of interaction with components of
the vesicle transport machinery since OSBP localized to the Golgi
apparatus in an oxysterol-dependent manner (10), and the
OSBP PH domain was shown to alter secretory function when expressed in
cells (11). In further support of this conclusion, we have shown that
OSBP interacts with VAP-A and that OSBP PH domain mutations
constitutively interact with VAP in the ER resulting in aberrant
compartmentation and export of VSVG and ceramide.
VAP-A is a type II integral membrane protein with a large N-terminal
domain facing the cytoplasm and a small 4-amino acid C terminus (21).
VAP contains three distinctive domains as follows: an 18-amino acid
segment proximal to the N terminus that is highly conserved among
different species (35), a coiled-coil motif, and a transmembrane region
at the C terminus. The function of these domains is unknown, but their
deletion effectively blocked OSBP binding, but not VAP multimerization,
as measured by yeast two-hybrid interaction (Fig. 2) (21). In mammalian
cells, VAP has been implicated in vesicle transport but at precisely
which stage is unknown (20, 21, 24). In the case of VAP-B, neutralizing antibodies as well as recombinant VAP-B were shown to inhibit in
vitro intra-Golgi transport (21). The accumulation of COPI-coated vesicles in the presence of VAP antibody suggested that VAP was involved in the uncoating of vesicles during retrograde transport between the Golgi apparatus and ER. Whether VAMP or another SNARE is
involved in these activities is unclear since VAMP and VAP did not
co-localize in cells, and reported interactions with other components
of the vesicle transport machinery were in vitro (22, 23).
Analysis of OSBP mutants by yeast two-hybrid and GST pull-down assays
was used to identify a region between amino acids 351 and 442 that
mediated VAP-A binding. This region overlapped with the N terminus of
the oxysterol binding domain and included a portion of the OH domain
between amino acids 416 and 442 that is shared by all OSBP family
members (1). We have evidence that two other OSBP family members
interact with VAP in yeast two-hybrid assays and by immunoprecipitation
thus supporting the concept that the OH region is involved and that VAP
is a partner for other OSBP family members.2 The truncation
mutant OSBP-(1-442) did not bind oxysterols (10), but a similar
truncation mutant (OSBP-(1-441)) interacted with GST-VAP, indicating
that intact oxysterol binding activity is not necessary for VAP-A
binding. In vitro VAP-A/OSBP interaction did not require the
PH domain; however, mutations of this domain caused enhanced
localization to ER-associated structures in intact cells. A possible
explanation for this result is that the PH domain is required for
targeting of OSBP to the Golgi apparatus, whereas VAP-A is primarily
involved in OSBP interaction at the ER. In support of this concept the
isolated OSBP PH localized to the Golgi apparatus in cells and to
isolated Golgi membranes in vitro (11). In CHO cells,
endogenous VAP co-localized with OSBP in a diffuse reticular network
but also in a perinuclear region that could correspond to the Golgi
apparatus. When the OSBP PH domain was mutated, it appeared that the
VAP-A interaction was dominant, and OSBP was constitutively localized
with VAP-A in ER structures. This is not a simple matter of competition
for OSBP binding to two receptors since complete deletion of the OSBP
PH domain rendered the protein cytoplasmic (6), and the W174A mutant
retained binding to PtdIns-4,5-P2, a proposed target in the
Golgi. Instead, our results suggest that another unidentified activity
associated with the PH domain is involved in stabilizing the
interaction with VAP-A. This could be another protein or lipid partner
whose affinity is altered by the W174A mutation or truncation of the PH
domain. For example RACK1, a WD-40 motif-containing scaffold protein,
binds the OSBP PH domain in vitro (38), and the OSBP PH
domain is reported to have other phosphatidylinositide ligands (Fig. 7)
(37). Finally, The OSBP W174A phenotype is not due to misfolding or
denaturation of the mutant protein as indicated by retention of the
following: 1) VAP-A binding, 2) 25-hydroxycholesterol binding, and 3)
interaction of the PH domain mutant with vesicles containing phosphatidylinositides.
The finding that fluorescent ceramide accumulated in the VAP/OSBP W174A
ER inclusions and SM synthesis was partially suppressed was not
unexpected since OSBP and oxysterols have been linked previously to SM
metabolism (12, 45, 46). Ceramide and protein transport from the ER
appear to involve different pathways (47, 48); thus, it is unclear why
ceramide and VSVG would occupy the same compartment in OSBP
W174A-expressing cells. It is possible that the primary effect of W174A
OSBP expression was on ceramide transport, and VSVG was nonspecifically
localized to the distorted ER. Indeed, VSVG was also found in the
normal reticular network and exited from VAP/OSBP W174A structures at
the permissive temperatures (Fig. 9). This was not the case for
C5-DMB-ceramide, which was retained in these structures and
appeared to have delayed export to the Golgi apparatus.
The appearance and accumulation of misfolded VSVG and ceramide in ER
inclusions formed by constitutive interaction between VAP-A and OSBP
suggests a role in an ER export or protein maturation pathway. This
would occur at a relatively early stage since these complexes did not
involve ER export sites (sec31) or the ER-Golgi intermediate
compartment (p58). The presence of misfolded VSVG suggests that
OSBP/VAP-A is involved in a protein folding pathway; misfolded VSVG was
present in the complexes, as were PDI and other soluble luminal
chaperones (HSP 90, results not shown). As stated above, VSVG-GFP could
be non-specifically concentrated in these structures and not
distinguish them from the normal ER. However, a relationship between
SCS2, the yeast VAP homologue, and the unfolded protein
response suggests that mammalian VAP and OSBP could have a related
function (49). Deletion of SCS2 resulted in inositol
auxotrophy above 34 °C, a defect that was rescued by Ino1p
overexpression. Genetic interactions between SCS2,
phospholipid regulation, and the unfolded protein response were
indicated by the rescue of inositol auxotrophy in IRE1/HAC1
mutants by Scs2p overexpression (49). Ire1p is a transmembrane protein
kinase/endoribonuclease that transduces the signals for the unfolded
protein response from the ER lumen to the nucleus by assisting in
splicing of the HAC1 transcription factor mRNA,
resulting in increased protein chaperone expression and lipid synthesis
(50). Increased lipid synthesis could expand the ER to accommodate the
increased pool of unfolded proteins. Considering its proposed role in
vesicle transport in mammalian cells, SCS2 could affect the
unfolded protein response of IRE1 mutants by altering lipid
synthesis or export from the ER during a stress response thus leading
to the observed phenotypes. It is feasible that the interaction between
OSBP and VAP could mediate a similar stress-activated response that
affects the export of specific proteins from the ER to the Golgi
apparatus. One such stress response could be to oxysterols, which are
apoptotic agents (51) and suppress sterol synthesis. As a specific
example, export of the sterol regulatory element-binding protein/sterol regulatory element-binding protein-cleavage activating protein complex
from the ER is regulated by oxysterols (52), but it is unknown if VAP
or OSBPs are involved in this process.
Recently, a large scale characterization of yeast multiprotein
complexes included analysis of a complex that was isolated using Scs2p
as bait (53). This resulted in identification of nine Scs2p interacting
components that included Osh1p and Osh2p, members of the yeast OSBP
family that contain N-terminal PH and ankyrin domains (7). Although
precise relationships between members of this complex remain to be
determined, it is notable that the complex also contained Opi1p, a
negative transcription regulator of inositol metabolism (54), and
Stt4p, a phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase (55). These findings further
confirm that OSBPs and SCS2 are involved at the interface
between lipid regulation and the unfolded protein response in yeast,
and together with our data demonstrate that interactions between VAP
and the ORP family is conserved among species. The presence of multiple
OSBP family members that potentially interact with VAP indicates that
numerous and related activities could be regulated by this complex.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
Robert Zwicker and Gladys Keddy provided
expert technical assistance in tissue culture. Abbas Mohammadi
developed the CHO-tet-OSBP-inducible cell lines.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by Program Grant (to
N. D. R. and C. R. M.), Scientist (to N. D. R.), and Scholar (to
C. R. M.) awards from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Recipient of Isaac Walton Killiam and Sumner graduate studentships.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Atlantic Research
Center, Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, 5849 University Ave., Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4H7, Canada.
Tel.: 902-494-7133; Fax: 902-494-1394; E-mail:
nridgway@is.dal.ca.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, May 21, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201191200
2
J. P. Wyles and N. D. Ridgway,
unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
OSBP, oxysterol-binding protein;
C5-DMB-ceramide, N-(4,4-difluoro-5-(2-thienyl)-4-boro-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene-3-yl)phenoxy)acetyl)sphingosine;
ER, endoplasmic reticulum;
FCS, fetal calf serum;
FITC, fluorescein
isothiocyanate;
GFP, green fluorescent protein;
ORP, OSBP-related
proteins;
OH, OSBP homology domain;
PH, pleckstrin homology;
PtdIns-4-P, phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate;
PtdIns-4, 5-P2, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate;
PtdSer, phosphatidylserine, PtdCho, phosphatidylcholine;
PtdEtn, phosphatidylethanolamine;
PDI, protein-disulfide isomerase;
SM, sphingomyelin;
VAMP, vesicle-associated membrane protein;
VAP, VAMP-associated protein;
VSVG, vesicular stomatitis virus G;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
Tet, tetracycline;
Dox, doxycycline;
SNARE, soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive
factor attachment protein receptors.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Lehto, M.,
Laitinen, S.,
Chinetti, G.,
Johansson, M.,
Ehnholm, C.,
Staels, B.,
Ikonen, E.,
and Olkkonen, V. M.
(2001)
J. Lipid Res.
42,
1203-1213[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Fournier, M. V.,
Guimaraes da Costa, F.,
Paschoal, M. E.,
Ronco, L. V.,
Carvalho, M. G.,
and Pardee, A. B.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
3748-3753[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Xu, Y.,
Liu, Y.,
Ridgway, N. D.,
and McMaster, C. M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
18407-18414[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Moreira, E. F.,
Jaworski, C., Li, A.,
and Rodriguez, I. R.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
18570-18578[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Wang, C.,
JeBailey, L.,
and Ridgway, N. D.
(2002)
Biochem. J.
361,
461-472[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Lagace, T. A.,
Byers, D. M.,
Cook, H. W.,
and Ridgway, N. D.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
326,
205-213[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Beh, C. T.,
Cool, L.,
Phillips, J.,
and Rine, J.
(2001)
Genetics
157,
1117-1140[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Kandutsch, A. A.,
and Shown, E. P.
(1981)
J. Biol. Chem.
256,
13068-13073[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Taylor, F. R.,
Saucier, S. E.,
Shown, E. P.,
Parish, E. J.,
and Kandutsch, A. A.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
12382-12387[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Ridgway, N. D.,
Dawson, P. A., Ho, Y. K.,
Brown, M. S.,
and Goldstein, J. L.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
116,
307-319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Levine, T. P.,
and Munro, S.
(1998)
Curr. Biol.
8,
729-739[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Ridgway, N. D.,
Lagace, T. A.,
Cook, H. W.,
and Byers, D. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
31621-31628[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Storey, M. K.,
Byers, D. M.,
Cook, H. W.,
and Ridgway, N. D.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
336,
247-256[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Mohammadi, A.,
Perry, R. J.,
Storey, M. K.,
Cook, H. W.,
Byers, D. M.,
and Ridgway, N. D.
(2001)
J. Lipid Res.
42,
1062-1071[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Xie, Z.,
Fang, M.,
Rivas, M. P.,
Faulkner, A. J.,
Sternweis, P. C.,
Engebrecht, J. A.,
and Bankaitis, V. A.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
12346-12351[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Kearns, B. G.,
McGee, T. P.,
Mayinger, P.,
Gedvilaite, A.,
Phillips, S. E.,
Kagiwada, S.,
and Bankaitis, V. A.
(1997)
Nature
387,
101-105[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Patton-Vogt, J. L.,
Griac, P.,
Sreenivas, A.,
Bruno, V.,
Dowd, S.,
Swede, M. J.,
and Henry, S. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20873-20883[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Fang, M.,
Kearns, B. G.,
Gedvilaite, A.,
Kagiwada, S.,
Kearns, M.,
Fung, M. K.,
and Bankaitis, V. A.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
6447-6459[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Jiang, B.,
Brown, J. L.,
Sheraton, J.,
Fortin, N.,
and Bussey, H.
(1994)
Yeast
10,
341-353[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Skehel, P. A.,
Martin, K. C.,
Kandel, E. R.,
and Bartsch, D.
(1995)
Science
269,
1580-1583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Soussan, L.,
Burakov, D.,
Daniels, M. P.,
Toister-Achituv, M.,
Porat, A.,
Yarden, Y.,
and Elazar, Z.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
146,
301-311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Weir, M. L.,
Xie, H.,
Klip, A.,
and Trimble, W. S.
(2001)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
286,
616-621[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Weir, M. L.,
Klip, A.,
and Trimble, W. S.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
333,
247-251[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Foster, L. J.,
Weir, M. L.,
Lim, D. Y.,
Liu, Z.,
Trimble, W. S.,
and Klip, A.
(2000)
Traffic
1,
512-521[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Skehel, P. A.,
Fabian-Fine, R.,
and Kandel, E. R.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
1101-1106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Lapierre, L. A.,
Tuma, P. L.,
Navarre, J.,
Goldenring, J. R.,
and Anderson, J. M.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
3723-3732[Abstract]
|
| 27.
|
Presley, J. F.,
Cole, N. B.,
Schroer, T. A.,
Hirschberg, K.,
Zaal, K. J.,
and Lippincott-Schwartz, J.
(1997)
Nature
389,
81-85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Shugrue, C. A.,
Kolen, E. R.,
Peters, H.,
Czernik, A.,
Kaiser, C.,
Matovcik, L.,
Hubbard, A. L.,
and Gorelick, F.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
4547-4556[Abstract]
|
| 29.
|
Phizicky, E. M.,
and Fields, S.
(1995)
Microbiol. Rev.
59,
94-123[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Esser, V.,
Limbird, L. E.,
Brown, M. S.,
Goldstein, J. L.,
and Russell, D. W.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
13282-13290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Smith, D. B.,
and Johnson, K. S.
(1988)
Gene (Amst.)
67,
31-40[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Dawson, P. A.,
Ridgway, N. D.,
Slaughter, C. A.,
Brown, M. S.,
and Goldstein, J. L.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
16798-16803[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Harlan, J. E.,
Hajduk, P. H.,
Yoon, H. S.,
and Fesik, S. W.
(1994)
Nature
371,
168-170[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Pagano, R. E.,
Martin, O. C.,
Kang, H. C.,
and Haugland, R. P.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
113,
1267-1279[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Kagiwada, S.,
Hosaka, K.,
Murata, M.,
Nikawa, J.,
and Takatsuki, A.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
1700-1708[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Ridgway, N. D.,
and Lagace, T. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
8023-8031[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Rameh, L. E.,
Arvidsson, A.,
Carraway, K. L., III,
Couvillon, A. D.,
Rathbun, G.,
Crompton, A.,
VanRenterghem, B.,
Czech, M. P.,
Ravichandran, K. S.,
Burakoff, S. J.,
Wang, D. S.,
Chen, C. S.,
and Cantley, L. C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
22059-22066[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Rodriguez, M. M.,
Ron, D.,
Touhara, K.,
Chen, C. H.,
and Mochly-Rosen, D.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
13787-13794[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Hauri, H.-P.,
Kappeler, F.,
Andersson, H.,
and Appenzeller, C.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
587-596[Abstract]
|
| 40.
|
Duden, R.,
Griffiths, G.,
Frank, R.,
Argos, P.,
and Kreis, T. E.
(1991)
Cell
64,
649-665[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Aridor, M.,
Weissman, J.,
Bannykh, S.,
Nuoffer, C.,
and Balch, W. E.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
141,
61-70[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Silva, A. D.,
Braakman, I.,
and Helenius, A.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
647-655[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Hammond, C.,
and Helenius, A.
(1994)
Science
266,
456-458[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Meer, G. V.,
and Holthuis, J. C. M.
(2000)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1486,
145-170[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Lagace, T. A.,
Byers, D. M.,
Cook, H. W.,
and Ridgway, N. D.
(1999)
J. Lipid Res.
40,
109-116[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Ridgway, N. D.
(1995)
J. Lipid Res.
36,
1345-1358[Abstract]
|
| 47.
|
Yasuda, S.,
Kitagawa, H.,
Ueno, M.,
Ishitani, H.,
Fukasawa, M.,
Nishijima, M.,
Kobayashi, S.,
and Hanada, K.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
43994-44002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Fukasawa, M.,
Nishijima, M.,
and Hanada, K.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
673-685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Nikawa, J.,
Murakami, A.,
Esumi, E.,
and Hosaka, K.
(1995)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
118,
39-45[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Kaufman, R. J.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
1211-1233[Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Miyashita, Y.,
Shirai, K.,
Ito, Y.,
Watanabe, J.,
Urano, Y.,
Murano, T.,
and Tomioka, H.
(1997)
J. Atheroscler. Thromb.
4,
73-78[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Nohturfft, A.,
Yabe, D.,
Goldstein, J. L.,
Brown, M. S.,
and Espenshade, P. J.
(2000)
Cell
102,
315-323[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Gavin, A. C.,
Bosche, M.,
Krause, R.,
Grandi, P.,
Marzioch, M.,
Bauer, A.,
Schultz, J.,
Rick, J. M.,
Michon, A. M.,
Cruciat, C. M.,
Remor, M.,
Hofert, C.,
Schelder, M.,
Brajenovic, M.,
Ruffner, H.,
Merino, A.,
Klein, K.,
Hudak, M.,
Dickson, D.,
Rudi, T.,
Gnau, V.,
Bauch, A.,
Bastuck, S.,
Huhse, B.,
Leutwein, C.,
Heurtier, M. A.,
Copley, R. R.,
Edelmann, A.,
Querfurth, E.,
Rybin, V.,
Drewes, G.,
Raida, M.,
Bouwmeester, T.,
Bork, P.,
Seraphin, B.,
Kuster, B.,
Neubauer, G.,
and Superti-Furga, G.
(2002)
Nature
415,
141-147[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Bachhawat, N.,
Ouyang, Q.,
and Henry, S. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
25087-25095[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Cutler, N. S.,
Heitman, J.,
and Cardenas, M. E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27671-27677[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Rocha, C. Kuijl, R. van der Kant, L. Janssen, D. Houben, H. Janssen, W. Zwart, and J. Neefjes
Cholesterol sensor ORP1L contacts the ER protein VAP to control Rab7-RILP-p150Glued and late endosome positioning
J. Cell Biol.,
June 29, 2009;
185(7):
1209 - 1225.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Saita, M. Shirane, T. Natume, S.-i. Iemura, and K. I. Nakayama
Promotion of Neurite Extension by Protrudin Requires Its Interaction with Vesicle-associated Membrane Protein-associated Protein
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 15, 2009;
284(20):
13766 - 13777.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Ngo and N. D. Ridgway
Oxysterol Binding Protein-related Protein 9 (ORP9) Is a Cholesterol Transfer Protein That Regulates Golgi Structure and Function
Mol. Biol. Cell,
March 1, 2009;
20(5):
1388 - 1399.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Revert, I. Ventura, P. Martinez-Martinez, F. Granero-Molto, F. Revert-Ros, J. Macias, and J. Saus
Goodpasture Antigen-binding Protein Is a Soluble Exportable Protein That Interacts with Type IV Collagen: IDENTIFICATION OF NOVEL MEMBRANE-BOUND ISOFORMS
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 31, 2008;
283(44):
30246 - 30255.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. C. Prosser, D. Tran, P.-Y. Gougeon, C. Verly, and J. K. Ngsee
FFAT rescues VAPA-mediated inhibition of ER-to-Golgi transport and VAPB-mediated ER aggregation
J. Cell Sci.,
September 15, 2008;
121(18):
3052 - 3061.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Peretti, N. Dahan, E. Shimoni, K. Hirschberg, and S. Lev
Coordinated Lipid Transfer between the Endoplasmic Reticulum and the Golgi Complex Requires the VAP Proteins and Is Essential for Golgi-mediated Transport
Mol. Biol. Cell,
September 1, 2008;
19(9):
3871 - 3884.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Bowden and N. D. Ridgway
OSBP Negatively Regulates ABCA1 Protein Stability
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 27, 2008;
283(26):
18210 - 18217.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. D'Angelo, M. Vicinanza, A. Di Campli, and M. A. De Matteis
The multiple roles of PtdIns(4)P - not just the precursor of PtdIns(4,5)P2
J. Cell Sci.,
June 15, 2008;
121(12):
1955 - 1963.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Charruyer, S. M. Bell, M. Kawano, S. Douangpanya, T.-Y. Yen, B. A. Macher, K. Kumagai, K. Hanada, W. M. Holleran, and Y. Uchida
Decreased Ceramide Transport Protein (CERT) Function Alters Sphingomyelin Production following UVB Irradiation
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 13, 2008;
283(24):
16682 - 16692.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Gkogkas, S. Middleton, A. M. Kremer, C. Wardrope, M. Hannah, T. H. Gillingwater, and P. Skehel
VAPB interacts with and modulates the activity of ATF6
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
June 1, 2008;
17(11):
1517 - 1526.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Saito, H. Matsui, M. Kawano, K. Kumagai, N. Tomishige, K. Hanada, S. Echigo, S. Tamura, and T. Kobayashi
Protein Phosphatase 2C{epsilon} Is an Endoplasmic Reticulum Integral Membrane Protein That Dephosphorylates the Ceramide Transport Protein CERT to Enhance Its Association with Organelle Membranes
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 7, 2008;
283(10):
6584 - 6593.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Moreau, F. Brandizzi, S. Hanton, L. Chatre, S. Melser, C. Hawes, and B. Satiat-Jeunemaitre
The plant ER-Golgi interface: a highly structured and dynamic membrane complex
J. Exp. Bot.,
January 1, 2007;
58(1):
49 - 64.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Kanekura, I. Nishimoto, S. Aiso, and M. Matsuoka
Characterization of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis-linked P56S Mutation of Vesicle-associated Membrane Protein-associated Protein B (VAPB/ALS8)
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 6, 2006;
281(40):
30223 - 30233.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kawano, K. Kumagai, M. Nishijima, and K. Hanada
Efficient Trafficking of Ceramide from the Endoplasmic Reticulum to the Golgi Apparatus Requires a VAMP-associated Protein-interacting FFAT Motif of CERT
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 6, 2006;
281(40):
30279 - 30288.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Perry and N. D. Ridgway
Oxysterol-binding Protein and Vesicle-associated Membrane Protein-associated Protein Are Required for Sterol-dependent Activation of the Ceramide Transport Protein
Mol. Biol. Cell,
June 1, 2006;
17(6):
2604 - 2616.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Siddiqi, J. Mahan, S. Siddiqi, F. S. Gorelick, and C. M. Mansbach II
Vesicle-associated membrane protein 7 is expressed in intestinal ER.
J. Cell Sci.,
March 1, 2006;
119(Pt 5):
943 - 950.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Nishimura, T. Inoue, N. Shibata, A. Sekine, W. Takabe, N. Noguchi, and H. Arai
Inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis by 25-hydroxycholesterol is independent of OSBP
Genes Cells,
August 1, 2005;
10(8):
793 - 801.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. R. Loewen and T. P. Levine
A Highly Conserved Binding Site in Vesicle-associated Membrane Protein-associated Protein (VAP) for the FFAT Motif of Lipid-binding Proteins
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 8, 2005;
280(14):
14097 - 14104.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P.-y. Wang, J. Weng, and R. G. W. Anderson
OSBP Is a Cholesterol-Regulated Scaffolding Protein in Control of ERK1/2 Activation
Science,
March 4, 2005;
307(5714):
1472 - 1476.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. A. Lagace and N. D. Ridgway
The Rate-limiting Enzyme in Phosphatidylcholine Synthesis Regulates Proliferation of the Nucleoplasmic Reticulum
Mol. Biol. Cell,
March 1, 2005;
16(3):
1120 - 1130.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Amarilio, S. Ramachandran, H. Sabanay, and S. Lev
Differential Regulation of Endoplasmic Reticulum Structure through VAP-Nir Protein Interaction
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 18, 2005;
280(7):
5934 - 5944.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Kvam and D. S. Goldfarb
Nvj1p is the outer-nuclear-membrane receptor for oxysterol-binding protein homolog Osh1p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
J. Cell Sci.,
October 1, 2004;
117(21):
4959 - 4968.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Evans, C. M. Rice, and S. P. Goff
Phosphorylation of hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 5A modulates its protein interactions and viral RNA replication
PNAS,
August 31, 2004;
101(35):
13038 - 13043.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. T. Beh and J. Rine
A role for yeast oxysterol-binding protein homologs in endocytosis and in the maintenance of intracellular sterol-lipid distribution
J. Cell Sci.,
June 15, 2004;
117(14):
2983 - 2996.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Gao, H. Aizaki, J.-W. He, and M. M. C. Lai
Interactions between Viral Nonstructural Proteins and Host Protein hVAP-33 Mediate the Formation of Hepatitis C Virus RNA Replication Complex on Lipid Raft
J. Virol.,
April 1, 2004;
78(7):
3480 - 3488.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Silva, A. Beckedorf, and E. Bieberich
Osteoblast-derived Oxysterol Is a Migration-inducing Factor for Human Breast Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 3, 2003;
278(28):
25376 - 25385.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kagiwada and R. Zen
Role of the Yeast VAP Homolog, Scs2p, in INO1 Expression and Phospholipid Metabolism
J. Biochem.,
April 1, 2003;
133(4):
515 - 522.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|