|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 34, 30606-30613, August 23, 2002
From the
Received for publication, April 15, 2002, and in revised form, June 6, 2002
We have found that RNase P from HeLa cells
specifically and efficiently cleaves hepatitis C virus (HCV)
transcripts in vitro. The evidence includes identification
of the 5'-phosphate polarity of the newly generated termini at
position A2860 as well as immunological and
biochemical assays. Active cleavage has been shown in five dominant
sequences of HCV "quasispecies" differing at or near the position
of cleavage, demonstrating that this is a general property of HCV RNA.
During the analysis, a second cleavage event was found in the 3' domain
of the internal ribosome entry site. We have found that HCV RNA
competitively inhibits pre-tRNA cleavage by RNase P, suggesting that
HCV RNA has structural similarities to tRNA. This finding sets HCV
apart from other pathogens causing serious human diseases and
represents the first description of human RNase P-viral RNA cleavage.
Here we discuss the possible meaning of these RNase P-accessible
structures built into the viral genome and their possible role in
vivo. Moreover, such structures within the viral genome might be
vulnerable to attack by therapeutic strategies.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV)1
is a human pathogen causing chronic liver disease in 170 million people
worldwide. The virus is classified within the family
Flaviviridae (1). The RNA genome is single-stranded and
functions as the sole mRNA species for translation (1) (Fig.
1A). It comprises a 5'-untranslated region, which functions as an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) (2), and a long open reading
frame, which encodes a polyprotein precursor of about 3010 amino acids,
that is cleaved into structural (core, envelope 1, envelope 2, and p7)
and nonstructural (NS-2, NS-3, NS-4, and NS-5) proteins (3), followed
by a 3'-noncoding region (4).
Analyzing significant numbers of cDNA clones of hepatitis C virus
from single isolates provides
unquestionable proof that the viral genome cannot be defined by a
single sequence but rather by a population of variant sequences closely
related to one another (5-7). In the infected patient, a master (the
most frequently represented sequence) and a spectrum of mutant
sequences (diverging by up to 5%) may be isolated at any given time
during chronic infection (7). This manner of organizing genetic
information, which characterizes most RNA viruses, is referred to as
"quasispecies" (8). It has been proven that the use of this
strategy provides RNA viruses with a rapid increase of fitness while
growing in cell culture conditions (9).
Many studies on genetic variability in recent years have focused on the
analysis of HCV quasispecies. Clinically relevant features, such as the
ability to produce chronic infections and severity of disease
(including the frequency of hepatocellular carcinoma), have been
related to the interplay between host influences and the array of viral
variants in each infected individual (10). HCV resistance to interferon
treatment (either alone or in combination with ribavirin) is one of the
most important clinical implications predicted by the quasispecies
model (11-14), suggesting the necessity to seek new therapies. HCV
therapeutic strategies based on ribozyme cleavage are leading
candidates. It may be argued that a sequence-dependent ribozyme designed to cleave viral RNA by interaction with a motif in
the viral RNA may, in fact, select for (mismatching) variants resistant
to the ribozyme. However, strategies could be designed to take
advantage of ribozyme capabilities to minimize the effect of virus
variability. Combination therapy with multiple ribozymes directed
against independent viral loci has been demonstrated to be efficient in
inhibiting influenza virus replication in cell culture (15). Making
conserved motifs within the viral genome accessible to therapy, as in
the case of the HCV IRES, could be another promising strategy.
The ribozyme activity of RNase P is among proposed
antiviral agents (16). RNase P is a ubiquitous cellular endonuclease and one of the most abundant and efficient enzymes in the cell. This
enzyme is a ribonucleoprotein complex that catalyzes a hydrolysis reaction to remove the leader sequence of precursor tRNA (pre-tRNA) to
generate the mature tRNA (17). RNase P from Escherichia coli contains a catalytic RNA subunit termed M1 RNA and a single polypeptide known as C5 protein (18). In the presence of a high concentration of
Mg2+, M1 RNA itself can hydrolyze tRNA precursors in
vitro (19). Human RNase P also contains an RNA subunit, H1 RNA,
but in the absence of protein factors, H1 RNA does not exhibit
enzymatic activity by itself in vitro (20, 21). Substrate
recognition by the RNase P ribozyme does not rely on sequence
requirements but on structural features of the RNA substrate.
Custom-designed ribo-oligonucleotides, which hybridize with the target,
called external guide sequences, may provide the RNA structure that
RNase P recognizes and cleaves in the hybridized complex (16).
Recognition of structures instead of sequences may
represent a great advantage in the fight against variable
viruses, because single or even double mutations in the target may be
tolerated for RNase P recognition (15). Also, it has already been shown that some forms of the catalytic RNA moiety from E. coli
RNase P, M1 RNA (either specifically modified or in vitro
selected), can be introduced into the cytoplasm of mammalian cells for
the purpose of carrying out targeted cleavage of mRNA molecules
(22, 23).
While performing targeting experiments on HCV RNA transcripts with
RNase P, we have found that, surprisingly, purified RNase P (peak
activity) from HeLa cells cleaved HCV genomic RNA efficiently at two
sites in the absence of external guide sequences. We report here the
techniques used to prove that the cleavage is specific to human RNase P
and to show where cleavage occurs. We further report that cleavage is
maintained in several variant sequences, which makes RNase P cleavage
an inherent property of HCV RNA. Since RNase P recognizes and cleaves
tRNA-like structures, these results suggest the presence of tRNA-like
structures within the viral genome.
Preparation of RNA Transcripts--
RNA transcripts used as
substrates in the human RNase P assays were derived from
plasmids pN(1-4728) Bluescript, which contains nt 1-4728 of hepatitis
C virus under the T7 promoter, and pUC19 TyrT, which contains the
sequence of the naturally occurring precursor to tRNATyr.
To obtain the radioactive substrates for peak RNase P activity from
HeLa cells, 1-2-µg DNA templates were transcribed in
vitro (1 h at 37 °C) with [ Partial Purification of Human RNase P--
RNase P was purified
from 30 g of HeLa cells according to the method of Bartkiewicz
et al. (20) with some modifications. Fractions eluted with a
linear gradient of 100-350 mM from a column of
DEAE-Sepharose CL-6B (bed volume, 150 ml) were tested to determine (i)
enzymatic activity using pre-tRNATyr as substrate and (ii)
the presence of the H1 RNA moiety from RNase P but also the presence of
RNA from MRP RNase, which could co-extract with RNase P during the
purification protocol. H1 RNA and MRP RNA were quantified by using
Taqman technology (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and real time reverse
transcriptase-PCR (Abi Prism 7700, PE Biosystems) following the
protocol used for the quantification of HCV RNA from human serum or
liver samples (24) (data not shown). We have used one set of specific
human RNase P primers (PH1-213, 5'-CCCGGCGGATGCCT-3'; PH1-274,
5'-TTGAACTCACTTCGCTGGCC-3') and a fluorogenic probe (PH1-228, 5'-(VIC;
Applied Biosystems) CTTTGCCGGAGCTTGGAACAGACTCA(6-carboxy-tetramethylrhodamine)-3') and a second set of specific human MRP primers (MRP-90,
5'-AGAGAGTGCCACGTGCATACG-3'; MRP-210, 5'-TAACTAGAGGGAGCTGACGGATG-3')
and a fluorogenic probe labeled with a different reporter (MRP-145,
5'-(6-carboxy
fluorescein)CGCCAAGAAGCGTATCCCGCTGA(6-carboxy-tetramethylrhodamine)-3'). Relative quantitation of both RNase P RNA and MRP RNA was
performed by comparing the amplification results for the different
fractions with those on standard curves generated from serial dilutions of total RNA extracted from HeLa cells. Using the purification protocol
described above, RNase P and MRP co-extracted together but with an
enrichment of RNase P versus MRP of several orders of
magnitude, in all of the tested fractions (3.3 × 1011
molecules of RNase P RNA versus 8.2 × 107
molecules of MRP RNA, on average, in the fractions from the ammonium chloride gradient).
Fractions with coincident peaks of enzymatic activity and H1 RNA
amplification were pooled and concentrated, using the Millipore Ultrafree-15 centrifugal filter device, to a final volume of ~6 ml.
The concentrated fractions were subjected to linear glycerol gradient
centrifugation, as described (20). Relative quantitation of RNase P and
MRP RNA molecules at this point confirmed previous results
(i.e. enrichment of RNase P versus MRP during the
purification process (6.7 × 1010 molecules of RNase P
RNA versus 6.7 × 107 molecules of MRP RNA,
on average, in the fractions from the glycerol gradient)). Again,
fractions containing the peak of enzymatic activity were concentrated
to a final volume of 0.1 ml and stored at RNase P Cleavage Assay--
Substrates for RNase P assays,
SI, SII, SIII, and SIV
transcripts (1.8 nM final concentration) were preheated at
90 °C for 1 min before the addition of reaction buffer (10 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgOAc, 100 mM NH4OAc) and left to cool to room
temperature. Cleavage reactions were performed with 4% polyethylene
glycol, 20 units of RNasin, and 2 µl of the RNase P peak activity and carried out at 30 °C in a volume of 10 µl for 30 min. Samples were
subjected to 2% SDS and 5 min at 60 °C to disrupt aggregates before
loading. Cleavage products were separated on 4% denaturing polyacrylamide gels and visualized by autoradiography.
Determination of Cleavage Site and Phosphate
Polarity--
Oligonucleotides released from RNase T1 digestions of
all four single or mixed labeled SI, 5' PI, and
3' PI RNAs were fractionated to yield two-dimensional
fingerprints (first separation by gel electrophoresis and second by
homochromatography) exactly as described (25). Standard conditions for
secondary analysis (with pancreatic RNase A, RNase U2, RNase T2, or 0.4 M NaOH) (26) were followed permitting the oligonucleotides
to be identified. One-dimensional electrophoresis on DEAE or 3MM paper
was done following Barrells' protocol (26).
Immunoprecipitation of RNase P Activity--
Serum containing
anti-Th antibodies from a patient with an autoimmune disease was used
to immunodeplete RNase P activity (27). Protein A-Sepharose beads (125 µg, dry weight; Amersham Biosciences) were washed with TMKT
buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM
MgCl2, 100 mM KCl, 0.02% Tween 20) before
incubation for 1 h at room temperature at different concentrations
of either normal serum or anti-Th serum (0.25, 0.5, or 1 µl) and in
30 µl of TMKT buffer. After washing four times in TMKT, followed by
three washes in RNase P buffer (10 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgOAc, 100 mM NH4OAc), the beads
were incubated for 2 h at 4 °C in 2.5 µl of RNase P extract.
The suspension was centrifuged, and both the supernatant and the
immunoprecipitate were assayed for enzyme activity. To facilitate
migration of products on the acrylamide gel, an additional step of
proteinase K treatment was carried out after phenol/SDS treatment on
each reaction tube.
Construction of Plasmids Containing HCV Variants--
HCV
variants were obtained from our library of cloned fragments
encompassing HCV nucleotides 2641-2872 from infected patients. Subsequently the fragments were extended by PCR at their 3'-ends using
primers HCV-2639 (5'-ACAGGATCCAGTCCTTCCTTGTGTTCTTCT-3') and
HCV-2871
(5'-AACGAATTCCCACACATGCAAGTGCGCCTCAGCTCTGGTGATAAGATATTGTAACCACCA-3'), corresponding to the "wild type" clone (this length of
3'-extension was required for cleavage (data not shown)). Amplified DNA
fragments were inserted in BamHI/EcoRI sites of
pGem-4Z. RNAs were synthesized from EcoRI-linearized
plasmids and contained an additional 45-nt stretch of plasmid
polylinker. SI transcript, the DNA template for which
has been cloned in the same manner as the variant sequences, was
referred as to wild type in these experiments.
Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers--
The nucleotide
sequence for the HCV wild type genome is available in the
GenBankTM data base under accession number S62220 (28). The
nucleotide sequence for HCV variants presented in this article can be
accessed through EMBL data base under EMBL data base accession numbers AJ248084, AJ391467, AJ391452, and AJ247989 (7).
Cleavage of HCV RNA Transcripts
Initial RNase P cleavage experiments involved a 554-base HCV RNA
transcript (SI nt 2486-3040). At the top of
Fig. 1A is a schematic drawing
of the HCV RNA genome, below which appears the SI
transcript located at the structural/nonstructural junction region. The
autoradiogram in Fig. 1B shows that, using the
SI transcript as a substrate, RNase P peak activity alone,
in the absence of any external guide sequence, cleaved the HCV
transcript very efficiently, producing two intense cleavage products
(5' PI and 3' PI). After this unexpected
result, we wanted to assess whether cleavage was maintained in a larger
transcript, encompassing the first one-third of the genome (Fig.
1A, SII nt 1-3032). In the course of that
demonstration, we detected a second HCV cleavage site in the IRES
region (Fig. 1, A and C). Subsequently, cleavage within the IRES was confirmed using a third transcript corresponding to
the first 1360 bases of HCV genome (Fig. 1A,
SIII nt 1-1360) as well as in a shorter fragment, 641 nt
long (SIV nt 1-641).
RNase P Is Responsible for the HCV RNA Cleavages
The key experimental question of the HCV RNA cleavages obtained in
the reactions involving unguided RNase P concerns a demonstration that
cleavages in different sized transcripts are performed by RNase P
itself and not by a co-extracted contaminant. To prove that, we have
used direct and indirect methods.
Direct Method: End Group Determination and Cleavage Precision by
RNA Fingerprinting
If RNase P were responsible for HCV RNA processing activity in our
RNase P peak activity (HeLa cell extract), the site of cleavage might
be expected to occur between precise nucleotide positions and release
products containing the 3'-hydroxyl and 5'-phosphate end groups (17).
Contaminating RNases almost invariably cleave to yield 5'-hydroxyl and
3'-phosphate end groups (29), and very few other RNases and ribozymes
cleave the phosphodiester backbone through the same mechanism used by
RNase P (30).
SI RNA Substrate--
To allow direct and
precise determination of the cleavage site as well as to identify the
phosphate polarity of the newly cleaved termini, substrate
SI was internally labeled either separately with
SIV RNA Substrate--
Fig.
3 depicts RNA fingerprinting analysis of
the substrate SIV RNA, corresponding to the HCV IRES, as
well as both cleavage products generated by RNase P. In each case,
T1-resistant oligonucleotides were eluted and subjected to further
enzymatic characterization as described elsewhere (26). As summarized
in the legend to Fig. 3, a spot (A, spot
1) from the intact SIV RNA fingerprint was
absent from the fingerprint pattern of both cleavage products. This
missing RNase T1-resistant oligonucleotide containing the RNase P
cleavage site(s) in the SIV RNA substrate is the 17-mer (nt
351-367), thus indicating precise cleavage of the RNA substrate in the
HCV IRES domain. This 17-mer is replaced by a new spot in each one of
the cleavage products' fingerprints (Fig. 3B,
spot 2; Fig. 3C, spot
3). Together, these two were found by secondary analysis to
contain the sequence of the missing 17-mer with the expected
composition indicating a cleavage site in the vicinity of bases
361-363. Further experiments are in progress to pin down exact termini
within this RNase P cleavage domain.
Indirect Methods: Immunoprecipitation and Competitive
Inhibition
Two indirect strategies were used to demonstrate that the activity
that cleaves SI and SII and exactly co-purified
with RNase P peak activity was in fact RNase P. The experiments were
carried out using SI, SII, and SIII
as substrates.
Immunoprecipitation--
Some patients with autoimmune diseases
produce antibodies against a 38-40-kDa protein (designated Th antigen)
which is an integral component of eukaryotic RNase P (27). In the
immunoprecipitation experiment, we have incubated a serum containing
anti-Th antibodies with our peak activity (RNase P extract), and we
have assayed both the supernatant and the pellet. The anti-Th serum
that immunodepleted pre-tRNATyr cleavage activity from our
glycerol gradient-purified enzyme (Fig.
4A,
lane 2) also immunodepleted cleavage of HCV
transcripts (Fig. 4, B, lanes 6-8,
and C, lanes 22-24). Moreover, the
autoimmune serum was able to precipitate the processing activity of HCV
transcripts SI and SII (Fig. 4, B,
lanes 9-11, and C, lanes
25-27) as well as pre-tRNATyr (Fig.
4A, lane 3) and a human suppressor
pre-tRNA (data not shown). In contrast, the normal human serum failed
to precipitate the processing activity (Fig. 4, B,
lanes 16-18, C, lane 21).
Control reactions of RNase P cleavage, using protein A-Sepharose beads with no added antiserum, showed that the cleavage activity remains in
the supernatant after the immunoprecipitation and is not found in the
pellet (Fig. 4B, lanes 5 and
12). An inverse correlation between the percentage of
cleavage with increasing anti-Th sera (Fig. 4C,
lanes 25-27) may be due to inactivation of RNase
P activity due to the presence of polyclonal antibodies reacting with
important motifs for substrate recognition.
Competitive Inhibition--
Like RNase P, MRP RNases cleave RNA to
generate 5'-phosphate and 3'-hydroxyl termini (31) and may be
immunoprecipitated with anti-Th serum. As a distinguishing feature, MRP
RNase does not cleave pre-tRNATyr (32). To rule out the
possibility that MRP enzymes were responsible for HCV cleavage, we
carried out competitive inhibition experiments between HCV RNA and
pre-tRNA. The experiments consisted of incubating the same amount of
HCV RNA (SI, SII, or SIII) with
increasing concentrations of pre-tRNA (from RNase P Cleaves HCV Variants The direct consequence of the high mutation rate in HCV
replication is that variant genomes are continuously being generated. Thus, multiple variant sequences (quasispecies) co-circulate within a
patient, and each patient carries a virus with a distinct
"master" (the most frequent) sequence (5, 10). To define cleavage by RNase P as a general property of HCV, four viral sequences obtained
from different patients, together with SI sequence
(referred to as wild type here), were compared for RNase P cleavage
accessibility (Fig. 6A). We
used transcripts from cloned HCV PCR fragments, representing the master
sequence from infected patients' quasispecies, with mutations at the
vicinity or exactly at the nucleotides adjacent to the scissile bond in
the structural/nonstructural junction. Cleavage was consistently
observed in all sequences tested although with different efficiencies
(Fig. 6B).
HCV RNA Competes with RNase P Cleavage of Pre-tRNA The concept of RNA mimicry has been defined for those cases where
the structure of an RNA molecule has evolved to fit a binding site on a
protein or a macromolecular complex that normally interacts with a
different RNA (33). The specific cleavage of HCV RNA by RNase P
suggests that the viral RNA has structural similarities to tRNA. We
wished to assess how much these HCV RNA structures resemble tRNA. In
competition experiments reciprocal to those shown in Fig. 5, we tested
the ability of HCV RNA transcripts SI and SIII
(0.9-180 nM) to compete for RNase P activity with the
natural substrate pre-tRNATyr (1.8 nM). Fig.
7 shows that by using an RNase P
concentration capable of cleaving around 25% of the
pre-tRNATyr in the reaction, the amount of pre-tRNA
cleavage products decreased with increasing HCV RNA concentration. The
amount of HCV RNAs required for half-inhibition were between 4- and
6-fold molar excess and were similar for both SI and
SIII. In contrast, similar amounts of an unrelated RNA of
400-nt length corresponding to hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen
mRNA (nt 1400-1800 of HBV adr subtype) (34), which is
not cleaved by RNase P, had no observable effect on RNase P activity on
pre-tRNA (data not shown). The fact that the HCV RNA is a competitive
inhibitor of pre-tRNA cleavage within a 1 order of magnitude range is
evidence of molecular mimicry between the HCV RNA motifs at the
cleavage sites and those in pre-tRNA. Furthermore, the inhibition of
pre-tRNA cleavage provides strong evidence that the interaction of HCV RNA is with RNase P and not with RNase MRP, in agreement with our
previous conclusion that RNase P is responsible for HCV RNA cleavage.
The results shown in Figs. 2 and 3, which were first completed using
RNAs produced and cleaved in the Barcelona laboratory, have also been
repeated in the New York laboratory. These experiments were repeated
using two different preparations of human RNase P (from Dr. Sidney
Altman), and the same results were reproduced.
We have defined a new specific interaction in vitro between HCV RNA and a host component, RNase P, and we have confirmed that HCV RNA transcripts act as competitive inhibitors of pre-tRNATyr processing. This represents evidence for a similarity in structure and/or function between both accessible motifs in HCV RNA and tRNA molecules. RNase P specifically cleaves pre-tRNA in all organisms to produce mature 5'-ends. There have been questions raised about the universal significance of RNase P cleavage in non-tRNA molecules, especially concerning yeast RNase P. Chamberlain et al. (35) have suggested that yeast RNase P can sometimes cleave 5.8 S rRNA at sites that lack properties normally associated with canonical tRNA. Given the uncertain evolutionary history of this rRNA species, however, it is hard to prove or disprove the acquisition of internal tRNA-like domains, which are in fact present in analogous prokaryotic spacer regions of rRNA precursors. It is also the case that RNase P cleavage has reliably identified a number of authenticated tRNA-like domains in non-tRNA molecules, including bacterial SRP and tmRNAs and various plant viral RNA genomes (36-40). Given that our two HCV domains undergo RNase P cleavage with the same efficiency as pre-tRNA, we believe that such recognition by RNase P is an indication for the presence of two possible tRNA-like structures in the HCV genome. The ability to mimic tRNA as we observe here in HCV RNA was first discovered 30 years ago at the 3'-end of the turnip yellow mosaic virus because of its ability to undergo covalent linkage with amino acids catalyzed by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (41). Subsequently, this and other plant viral RNAs were seen to be accessible to a battery of factors involved in other tRNA-related activities (including accessibility of bacterial RNase P) (37, 41, 42). Nevertheless, in vivo functional mimicry was not complete, since viral RNAs were not amino acid donors for protein synthesis but rather participated in virus replication. This proposed idea is further supported by the presence of a pseudoknot
near the HCV IRES (43) cleavage site (a common element in tRNA-like
structures including that which is known to interact with E. coli RNase P in the case of the tRNA-like motifs of plant viral
RNAs) (42) (Fig. 8). Such a structure
might contribute to the recruitment of the translational machinery in
the absence of a 5'-terminal cap. A recent study by J. R. Lytle
et al. (44) confirms that this pseudoknot domain of the HCV
IRES is among those protected from extensive pancreatic RNase A
digestion by initiating 80 S ribosomes.
During protein elongation, this RNA structure might also help a ribosomal frameshift, which has been described to happen within cleavage boundaries and generates a new antigen in HCV-infected patients (45, 46). Concerning the internal cleavage site, the predicted secondary structure formed by the RNA sequence flanking the cleavage site (the cleavage is 5' to a G residue (G2861) and is followed by two helices totaling 13 bases connected through a bulge (predicted by RNA Structure, version 3.5)) is in agreement with the characteristic features of the minimal model substrate for human RNase P (21) (Fig. 8). In particular, cleavage determinants are confined to the tRNA domain that contains the acceptor stem, the T stem and loop, and the junction between them (21), a recognition feature also shared by the E. coli elongation factor EFTu (33). Also, the internal HCV RNase P cleavage site resides in a highly structured domain of the viral RNA (data not shown), which might be also compatible with a tRNA structure. Nevertheless, there is no readily obvious functional explanation for such a structure at this site. The presence of HCV RNA in the nucleus (where most RNase P is found) has not been demonstrated (48), and no evidence of subgenomic HCV RNAs has been reported (49), arguing against an active role of RNase P cleavage in HCV biology. Whatever the role of the RNase P-sensitive structures, their importance for virus viability is apparent, despite the notorious heterogeneity and dynamics of change in HCV quasispecies within the infected patient. A cleavage site at residue A2860, present in the master sequences from individual patients (differing at or near the position of cleavage), should be interpreted in a context where variants arise continuously and are repeatedly subjected to competition pressures. Thus, the relative success of a mutant is the result of its ability to replicate. This strongly suggests that (i) the RNA structure that confers accessibility to RNase P is not affected by mutations that become fixed within the cleavage boundaries during error-prone replication, and (ii) there is a continuous selective advantage for the sequences within the quasispecies carrying the RNase P-accessible structure. Moreover, conservation of RNase P-cleavable structures in the genomes of different patients implies that this structure is even conserved during genetic bottlenecking of HCV quasispecies during host-to-host transmission, despite the fact that this area is one of the most variable regions of the HCV genome at the nucleotide sequence level (6). Altogether, this makes RNase P cleavability an inherent property of HCV. Higher order structures of RNA play functional roles, and the mutations that alter such higher order structures must be subjected to negative selection. Such a strong tendency to maintain RNase P-sensitive structures within the viral genome might be important in the development of therapeutic strategies against the virus because they can represent highly susceptible targets for E. coli RNase P M1 RNA (22, 23). The next phase of this work will involve investigation of the minimum
requirements for cleavage at both the IRES and internal site. Minimal
length substrates will serve to define to what extent tRNA processing
enzymes like aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, tRNA nucleotidyl transferase,
tRNA methyltransferases, and interacting factors (iEF2 and EF-1) react
with these HCV motifs. Comparison of such results at the two HCV RNase
P cleavage sites should help us to understand in greater detail HCV
substrate structure, tRNA mimicry, rules underlying recognition by
human RNase P, and, in the particular case of the IRES motif, possible
participation in translation.
We thank Drs. C. Gelpí and J. L. Rodriguez from the Servei d'Immunologia, Hospital Sant Pau (Barcelona, Spain) for providing the autoimmune serum. An HCV clone was kindly provided by Drs. M. Honda and S. Lemon, and tRNA precursors and RNase P were from Drs. S. Altman and C. Guerrier-Takada. We also thank Dr. E. Martinez-Salas for critical reading of the manuscript.
* Work in New York was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant DK-56424. Work in Barcelona was funded by Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología Grants SAF1999-0108 and BIO00-0347, Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo Grant FISS-01/1351, and the Hospital Vall d'Hebron.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ To whom correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed: Laboratorio de Medicina Interna-Hepatología, Area de Investigación Básica (B), Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Paseo Vall d'Hebrón 119-129, Barcelona 08035, Spain. Tel.: 34-93-4894034; Fax: 34-93-4894032; E-mail: jgomez@hg.vhebron.es.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 11, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203595200
The abbreviations used are: HCV, hepatitis C virus; nt, nucleotide(s); IRES, internal ribosome entry site; pre-tRNA, precursor tRNA; HBV, hepatitis B virus.
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||