|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M202460200 on June 17, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 34, 30707-30715, August 23, 2002
Peritoneal CD5+ B-1 Cells Have Signaling Properties
Similar to Tolerant B Cells*
Siew-Cheng
Wong ,
Weng-Keong
Chew ,
Joy En-Lin
Tan ,
Alirio
J.
Melendez§,
Florence
Francis , and
Kong-Peng
Lam ¶
From the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, 30 Medical Dr., Singapore 117609, Singapore and the
§ Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, National
University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
Received for publication, March 14, 2002, and in revised form, June 12, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
CD5+ B (or B-1) cells are the
normal precursors of B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. They
differ from conventional B (B-2) cells with respect to their phenotype
and mitogenic responses and are often secretors of the natural
polyreactive antibodies in the serum. The origin of B-1 cells remains
controversial, and the relationship between B-1 cells and autoreactive
B cells is unclear. Here, we compare the signaling pathways that are
activated by the engagement of the B cell antigen receptor (BCR) in B-1 and B-2 cells. Stimulation of the BCR leads to the induced activation of the three major classes of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), ERK, JNK, and p38 MAPK, as well as the Akt kinase and the
transcription factors nuclear factor of activated T cells (NF-AT) and
NF- B in B-2 cells. In contrast, B-1 cells have constitutive activation of ERK and NF-AT but exhibit delayed JNK and lack p38 MAPK
and NF- B induction upon BCR cross-linking. The lack of NF- B activation in B-1 cells may be due to a lack of Akt activation in these
cells. Furthermore, our study using specific inhibitors reveals that
the extended survival of B-1 cells in culture is not due to the
constitutive activation of ERK; nor is it due to Akt signaling or
Bcl-xL up-regulation, since these are not induced in B-1
cells. The current findings of altered MAPK and NF-AT activation and
lack of NF- B induction in B-1 cells indicate that these cells have
signaling properties similar to tolerant B cells that are chronically
exposed to self-antigens. Indeed, BCR stimulation of B-1 cells does not
lead to their full activation as indicated by their lack of maximal
up-regulation of specific markers such as CD25, CD69, and CD86.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
CD5+ B (or B-1) cells are a unique subset of B
cells that are distinguishable from the conventional B or B-2 cells in
terms of their phenotype, anatomical localization, and self-renewal properties (1). For example, B-1 cells are found in the pleural and
peritoneal cavities and express a high level of IgM and low levels of IgD and the pan B-cell marker B220 on their cell
surfaces. In addition, they express an intermediate level of the T-cell marker CD5. On the other hand, B-2 cells predominate in the spleen and
lymph nodes and express intermediate levels of IgM and IgD and a high
level of B220, and they lack CD5 expression on their cell surfaces. The
origin of B-1 cells is controversial, and it remains to be determined
whether they are derived from a separate B cell lineage (2) or
represent a state of differentiation or activation of normal B
lymphocytes (3). However, B-1 cells are known to secrete natural
polyreactive antibodies found in the serum and often have specificities
directed toward self-antigens such as phosphatidylcholine (4),
single-stranded DNA (5), ribonucleoprotein (6), and the cell surface
Thy-1 antigen (7). In addition, B-1 cells frequently give rise to
B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia
(B-CLL).1 B-1 cells also
differ from B-2 cells in their functional responses to external
stimuli. For example, engagement of the B cell antigen receptor (BCR)
leads to the proliferation of B-2 cells, but such entry into the cell
cycle is blocked in B-1 cells (8, 9). This difference in physiological
response suggests that B-1 cells may have signaling properties that are
different from B-2 cells.
The BCRs on both B-1 and B-2 cells are composed similarly of the Ig
heavy and light chains in complex with the signaling subunits Ig and
Ig (10). BCR signaling is known to activate numerous signal
transduction pathways, and the induction of a particular pathway may
depend on the state of differentiation of the B lymphocyte and may lead
to distinct cellular outcomes (11). Signaling differences in response
to BCR engagement have been documented between immature and mature B
cells, and these differences may lead to cell death in the former but
activation in the latter (12, 13). Naïve B cells that have yet to
encounter antigens and tolerant B cells that are chronically exposed to
self-antigens also differ in their BCR signaling events, in particular
the activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and the
transcription factors NF- B and NF-AT (14).
The MAPKs are serine/threonine protein kinases, and they couple
receptor signaling to cellular responses such as proliferation, differentiation, and cell death (15). The three major classes of MAPKs
are the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), the c-Jun
NH2-terminal kinase (JNK), and the p38 MAPK (16). ERK has
been implicated in cell growth and proliferation (17), whereas JNK and
p38 MAPK appear to be involved in stress response and apoptosis (18,
19). Cross-linking of the BCR activates all three classes of MAPKs in
naïve B cells, but only ERK is activated in tolerant B cells (14),
whereas the activation of p38 MAPK is not known. The transcription
factor NF- B regulates genes involved in survival and proliferation
(20), whereas NF-AT seems to regulate genes involved in cellular
homeostasis and differentiation (21). BCR signaling induces the
activation of both NF- B and NF-AT in naïve B cells, whereas the
activation of NF-AT is constitutive but that of NF- B is blocked in
tolerant B cells (14).
Since differences in BCR signaling have been documented between
immature and mature B cells and between naïve and tolerant B cells,
it is assumed that B-1 and B-2 cells may also differ in their induction
of the various signaling pathways. Indeed, it is known that the
activation of the transcription factor STAT-3 is constitutive in B-1
cells but only induced in B-2 cells (22). Therefore, in this report, we
systematically examine whether the various common signaling pathways
that are induced by BCR engagement in B-2 cells, namely those of
phospholipase C (PLC)- 2, MAPKs, Akt, NF- B, and NF-AT, are also
differentially activated in B-1 cells. The study of the signaling
pathways activated by BCR engagement on B-1 cells may shed light to the
origins of this subset of B lymphocytes.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Mice--
The VH12f (23) and wild-type BALB/c mice
were maintained in our animal facility and used to isolate B-1 and B-2
cells, respectively. All mice were used between 2 and 5 months of age
and in accordance with institutional guidelines.
Flow Cytometry--
Peritoneal cavity and splenic B cells were
stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies (Abs) for 15 min on
ice. After washing in phosphate-buffered saline containing 3% fetal
calf serum and 0.01% NaN3, the cells were analyzed on a
FACScan (Becton Dickinson) using Cell Quest Software. The following
Abs used in the FACS analyses were obtained from PharMingen (San Diego,
CA): anti-IgM (R6-60.2), anti-IgD, anti-B220 (RA3-6B2), anti-CD5,
anti-CD23, anti-CD25, anti-CD69, and anti-CD86 (B7.2). The
anti-VH12 (5C5) Ab was obtained previously from Dr. G. Haughton (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC).
Purification and Treatment of Cells--
To obtain a pure
population of B-1 cells, peritoneal cavity washout of VH12f
mice was seeded onto a tissue culture dish for 2-3 h to remove
adherent macrophages. B-2 cells were isolated from splenocytes of
wild-type mice by MACS using negative selection with anti-CD43
microbeads (Miltenyl Biotech). The purity of B-1 and B-2 cells obtained
is >85% as assessed by FACS analysis using anti-IgM and anti-B220
Abs. Purified cells were cultured in complete RPMI 1640 medium with
serum except in the JNK and p38 MAPK experiments, where the serum
supplement was omitted. For the NF- B experiment, the cells were
cultured in OPTI-MEM® I reduced serum medium (Invitrogen). For
the I B assays, cells were treated with 50 µM
cycloheximide (Sigma) before and during the various stimulations. B
cells (1-5 × 106) were left untreated or stimulated
with 10-50 µg/ml goat anti-mouse IgM F(ab')2 fragment
(Jackson Immunoresearch), a combination of 0.1 µg/ml PMA and 1 µg/ml ionomycin (Sigma), or 1 µg/ml lipopolysaccharide (LPS)
(Sigma) for various times at 37 °C prior to the conduct of the
various assays. Treatment of cells with the MEK1 inhibitor U0126 (Cell
Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA), PD98059, or the inactive analog
SB202474 (Calbiochem) was performed at concentrations ranging from 1 to
100 µM.
Proliferation Assay--
Purified B cells (5 × 105) that were either nontreated or stimulated with various
amounts of anti-IgM F(ab')2 antibody or LPS were cultured
for 42 h in a 96-well flat-bottomed plate at 37 °C in the
presence of 7% CO2. Cells were subsequently pulsed with 1 µCi of [3H]thymidine (Amersham Biosciences) and
harvested 6 h later with a Skatronas cell harvester (Skatronas
Instruments Inc.). The incorporation of radioactivity was measured by a
Wallac LKB 1219 Rackbeta liquid scintillation counter (PerkinElmer Life Sciences).
Preparation of Nuclear Extracts--
Cells were lysed on ice in
hypotonic buffer (10 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 10 mM
KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2.5 µg/ml aprotinin, and 2.5 µg/ml leupeptin) for 5 min. After the
addition of 0.2% Nonidet P-40, the cell lysate was passed through a
26-gauge needle to ensure the complete lysis of cells and centrifuged
at 13,000 rpm for 3 min at 4 °C. The nuclear pellet was washed twice
in the hypotonic buffer; resuspended in a high salt buffer that
contains 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 0.4 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.02% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2.5 µg/ml aprotinin, and 2.5 µg/ml leupeptin; and incubated on a
Spiramix roller mixer for 30 min at 4 °C. The nuclear
fraction was subsequently cleared of insoluble material by
centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C before desalting and
concentrating with a microcon-3 column (Millipore Corp.). The nuclear
extracts were stored at 80 °C prior to use, and the protein
content was measured using a Bio-Rad DC protein assay (Bio-Rad).
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays--
For the NF- B gel
shift assay, 10 µg of the nuclear extracts was incubated with a
[ -32P]dATP-labeled probe that contains the sequence
5'-AGTTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAGGC-3' and 5 µg of poly(dI·dC)
in buffer A (12 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 4 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 60 mM KCl, 30 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM dithiothreitol, and
12.5% glycerol). For the NF-AT gel shift assay, 10 µg of nuclear extracts was incubated with 1 µg of poly(dI·dC) and a labeled probe
that contains the sequence 5'-CGCCCAAAGAAGAAAATTTGTTTCATA-3' in gel
shift buffer B (21.5 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 84 mM
NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1.2 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1%
glycerol, and 300 µg/ml bovine serum albumin). The reaction mixture
was incubated for 20 min at room temperature prior to electrophoresis
in a 5% nondenaturing PAGE.
Immunoprecipitations and Western Blot Analyses--
Cells
(106 to 107) were lysed on ice for 15 min in a
buffer that contains 1% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 10 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and the debris
was removed by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 12 min at 4 °C. For
immunoprecipitations, cell lysates were sequentially incubated with
2-2.5 µg of appropriate antibodies and protein A/G PLUS-agarose
beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA). The
immunoprecipitates or lysates were electrophoresed in a 7-10%
SDS-PAGE, electroblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and
probed with Abs that recognize specific proteins. Protein bands were
visualized using horseradish peroxidase-coupled Abs and the enhanced
chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham Biosciences). The
following Abs were used: anti-phosphotyrosine (PY20); anti-PY20-agarose
and anti-Bcl-xL (Transduction Laboratories, San Diego, CA);
anti-Bruton's tyrosine kinase (anti-Btk) (PharMingen); anti-phospho-ERK, anti-ERK2, anti-JNK1, anti-TFIID, anti-I B , anti-PLC- 2, and anti-tubulin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology);
anti-phospho-JNK, anti-phospho-p38, anti-p38 MAPK, anti-Akt, and
anti-phospho-AktS473 (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly,
MA); and anti-phospho-AktT308 (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.,
Lake Placid, NY).
In Vitro Kinase Assay for ERK--
ERK was immunoprecipitated
from lysates of nontreated or anti-IgM-stimulated cells using anti-ERK2
Ab and protein A/G PLUS-agarose beads. After washing in 1% Nonidet
P-40 buffer, the immunoprecipitate was resuspended in a mixture that
contains the myelin basic protein substrate as detailed in the MAPK
assay kit (Upstate Biotechnology).
D-myo-Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Assay for PLC
Activity--
5 × 106 purified B cells that were
either nontreated or stimulated with anti-IgM were lysed, and the
generation of D-myo-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate
(IP3) was measured as previously described (24, 25), using
the BIOTRAK TRK 1000 kit (Amersham Biosciences). Briefly, unlabeled
IP3 generated by the cells was used to compete with a
fixed, known amount of [3H]IP3 for binding to
a limited number of IP3 receptors present in the bovine
adrenal glands homogenate provided by the kit. The bound
IP3 is separated from the free IP3 by
centrifugation, which pellets the IP3-receptor complexes.
The free IP3 in the supernatant was discarded by
decantation. Measurement of the amount of radioactivity bound to the
receptor enables one to estimate the amount of unlabelled IP3 in the sample as determined by interpolation from a
standard curve.
 |
RESULTS |
VH12-expressing B-1 Cells Are Found in Normal
Mice B-1 cells represent a minor B cell subset and typically
constitute 1-3% of the B cells found in the spleen, although they are
enriched in the peritoneum of mice (26). As shown in Fig.
1A, comparison of the B cells
found in the spleen and peritoneal cavity of normal mice revealed that
peritoneal B-1 cells differ from the splenic conventional B (or B-2)
cells with respect to their phenotypes. B-1 cells express a high level
of IgM and low levels of B220 and IgD compared with B-2 cells. In
addition, they are CD5+ and CD23 . Thus, B-1
and B-2 cells are distinct B cell subsets. Because of the paucity of
B-1 cells in normal mice, there is a need to obtain an enriched source
of these cells in order to study BCR signaling in B-1 cells.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Identification and purification of
VH12-expressing B-1 cells. A, FACS analysis
depicting the phenotypic differences between B-2 and B-1 cells found in
the spleen and peritoneal cavity (PerC) of normal mice,
respectively. The phenotype of transgenic VH12-expressing
B-1 cells is also shown. Cells were stained with anti-IgM and anti-IgD
or anti-B220 or anti-CD5 antibodies. The numbers indicate
percentage of total B cells. B, FACS analysis showing the
presence of VH12-expressing B cells in the peritoneal
cavity of wild-type and VH12f mice. The numbers
indicate percentage of total B cells present. C, FACS
analysis showing the purity of the B-1 and B-2 cell populations
isolated from the peritoneal cavity of VH12f and spleen of
wild-type mice, respectively. The numbers indicate
percentage of total B cells present.
|
|
We have previously generated a strain of immunoglobulin knock-in mice,
designated VH12f (23), that carry a VH12 Ig
heavy chain transgene. The VH12 heavy chain is derived from
an antibody that recognizes phosphatidylcholine (27), an antigenic
specificity that is enriched in B-1 cells. Not surprisingly, as shown
in Fig. 1A, VH12f mice develop predominantly B-1
cells that are
IgMhighB220lowCD5+IgD
(23). In addition, as shown in Fig. 1B, close to 90% of the B cells in the peritoneal cavity of VH12f mice express the
knock-in VH12 heavy chain as identified by FACS staining
with the idiotypic anti-VH12 Ab. As such, these mice would
provide an ideal source of B-1 cells for biochemical analyses. To
ensure the relevance of using the transgenic
VH12-expressing B-1 cells, we show that VH12-expressing B cells are naturally occurring and formed
a sizable fraction (close to 2%) of the normal B-1 cell repertoire in
the peritoneal cavity of wild-type mice.
Next, we showed that VH12-expressing B-1 cells can be
isolated with great purity from the peritoneal cavity of
VH12f mice (Fig. 1C) using a procedure that does
not lead to the stimulation of the BCR. Similarly, conventional B-2
cells can also be purified from the spleens of wild-type mice for
comparative study. Thus, the use of transgenic
VH12-expressing B-1 cells from the peritoneal cavity of
VH12f mice (23) would greatly facilitate the study of the
biochemical properties of B-1 cells.
Transgenic VH12-expressing B-1 Cells Do Not Proliferate
in Response to BCR Engagement but Exhibit Extended Survival in
Vitro--
To further ensure that the transgenic
VH12-expressing B-1 cells behave like normal B-1 cells
found in wild-type mice, we examined their response to BCR stimulation.
In all experiments described in this paper, BCR signaling is induced
using anti-IgM F(ab')2 antibodies. It is known that B-1
cells, unlike B-2 cells, do not proliferate when their BCRs are
cross-linked (28). Indeed, transgenic VH12-expressing B-1
cells did not respond to anti-IgM stimulation regardless of the dosage
given (Fig. 2A). This was in
contrast to the dose-dependent proliferation of B-2 cells.
However, as control, we showed that VH12-expressing B-1
cells were not completely refractory to stimulation, since they did
proliferate in response to LPS treatment, albeit to a much lesser
extent compared with B-2 cells (Fig. 2B).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
B-1 cells do not proliferate in
response to anti-IgM stimulation but exhibit extended survival in
culture. Purified B-1 and B-2 cells were stimulated for 48 h
with increasing concentrations of goat anti-mouse IgM
F(ab')2 fragment (A) or LPS (B). Cell
proliferation was quantified by H3 incorporation.
C, purified B-1 and B-2 cells were cultured for various
numbers of days, and the number of remaining live cells was quantified
by trypan blue exclusion. Results shown are representative of three
independent experiments.
|
|
Another property of B-1 cells is their extended survival in culture
compared with B-2 cells (29). In contrast to B-2 cells that undergo
apoptosis rapidly within a day in culture, VH12-expressing B-1 cells can survive for extended period of time in vitro
without dying, as shown in Fig. 2C. Taken together, the data
suggest that the transgenic VH12-expressing B-1 cells
behave like normal B-1 cells and further support the notion that they
would serve as a suitable model system to study the properties of this
unique subset of B cells. Henceforth, VH12-expressing B-1
cells will be designated simply as B-1 cells.
Lack of BCR-induced NF- B Activation in B-1 Cells--
Given the
physiological differences seen in B-1 and B-2 cells, in particular in
their different proliferative response to BCR cross-linking, we
proceeded to examine if BCR stimulation would induce different
signaling events in these two B cell subsets.
BCR signaling is known to activate the transcription factor NF- B
that regulates genes involved in cell proliferation and survival (30).
The predominant form of NF- B in B cells is the p50-c-Rel heterodimer
(31), and in particular, c-Rel is shown to be essential for B cell
proliferation after BCR engagement (31-33).
As expected, treatment of B-2 cells with anti-IgM or a combination of
PMA and ionomycin led to the activation of NF- B in these cells, as
evidenced by the increased binding of nuclear NF- B proteins to an
oligoprobe that contained the NF- B consensus binding site (Fig.
3A, right). In
contrast, there was no significant induction of NF- B above the
background level in BCR-stimulated B-1 cells, and as control, the
treatment of B-1 cells with PMA and ionomycin did result in the
activation of this transcription factor (Fig. 3A,
left).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Lack of NF- B
activation in B-1 cells due to the absence of induced degradation of
I B proteins. A, nuclear
extracts from nontreated (U), anti-IgM (Ig), or
PMA/ionomycin (P/I)-stimulated B-1 and B-2 cells were
examined for NF- B binding activity in an electrophoretic mobility
shift assay. B, Western blot analysis of Bcl-xL
expression in B-1 and B-2 cells that were nontreated (U) or
stimulated with anti-IgM (Ig) or LPS for 48 h. The
anti-tubulin blot serves as a control for the loading of whole cell
lysates. C, Western blot analysis of I B degradation in
nontreated (U) or PMA/ionomycin (P/I)- or
anti-IgM (Ig)-stimulated B-1 and B-2 cells. The anti-c-Rel
blot was used as a control for the loading of whole cell lysates.
D, Western blot analysis of c-Rel translocation into the
nuclei of B-1 and B-2 cells that were either nontreated (U)
or stimulated with anti-IgM (Ig) or PMA/ionomycin
(P/I). The blot was first probed with anti-c-Rel Ab and
subsequently reprobed with anti-TFIID Ab to control for the amount and
integrity of the nuclear extracts used.
|
|
To confirm that NF- B was indeed not activated in BCR-stimulated B-1
cells, we examined the induction of one of its target genes,
bcl-x (34, 35). As shown in Fig. 3B, the
expression of Bcl-xL was up-regulated in B-2 cells in
response to either anti-IgM or LPS treatment. However, treatment of B-1
cells with anti-IgM antibodies did not lead to the expression of
Bcl-xL, consistent with a lack of NF- B activation in
these cells. As control, B-1 cells did express Bcl-xL after
LPS treatment. Taken together, the data indicate that NF- B is not
activated in B-1 cells after BCR stimulation.
To determine the reason for the lack of NF- B activation in B-1
cells, we next examined the molecular events leading to its activation.
In nonstimulated cells, NF- B/Rel factors are sequestered in the
cytoplasm by the inhibitory (I)- B family of proteins (36). Upon
specific stimulation, the I B kinases are activated, and this leads
to the serine/threonine phosphorylation and subsequent degradation of
I B proteins and the release of NF- B/Rel proteins for
translocation into the nucleus to effect gene transcription (37,
38). As shown in Fig. 3C, treatment of B-2 cells with anti-IgM antibodies or a combination of PMA and ionomycin led to the
degradation of the I B proteins as indicated by the loss of I B
subunit in Western blot analyses of whole cell lysates. Concomitantly,
there was an increase in c-Rel translocation into the nucleus of
anti-IgM- or PMA/ionomycin-stimulated B-2 cells (Fig. 3D).
In contrast, I B proteins were not degraded in IgM-stimulated B-1
cells (Fig. 3C), and there was a lack of c-Rel translocation into the nucleus of these cells (Fig. 3D). Again, as
control, I B could be degraded, and nuclear translocation of c-Rel
was effected in PMA/ionomycin treated B-1 cells. Thus, in B-1
cells, I B proteins specifically do not degrade in response to BCR
signaling, and this results in a lack of NF- B activation in these cells.
Intact Btk but Reduced PLC- 2 and Lack of Protein Kinase
B/Akt Activation in IgM-stimulated B-1 Cells--
Two
signaling pathways have been linked to NF- B activation (39-41). In
B cells, the Btk-PLC- 2 pathway has been shown to be essential
for NF- B activation in B cells (42). Hence, it is possible that the
expression or activation of these signaling molecules may be altered in
B-1 compared with B-2 cells. Thus, we first examined the activation of
Btk in nontreated and anti-IgM-stimulated B-1 and B-2 cells. Western
blot analysis of tyrosine-phosphorylated Btk indicated that Btk was
activated with the same kinetics in both anti-IgM-stimulated B-1 and
B-2 cells (Fig. 4A). Next, we examined the activation of the downstream PLC- 2 in nontreated and
anti-IgM-stimulated B-1 and B-2 cells. As shown in Fig. 4B, PLC- 2 was expressed equivalently in both B-1 and B-2 cells and could
be activated by anti-IgM treatment. However, in B-1 cells, the PLC- 2
activation appeared to tail off faster at the 30 s time
point. Since the intact phosphorylation of PLC- 2 in B-1 cells seems
inconsistent with the lack of NF- B activation, we directly examined
the enzymatic activity of PLC- 2. PLC- 2 catalyzes the hydrolysis
of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2) into
diacylglycerol and IP3. Hence, its activity can
be assayed by measuring the production of IP3. As shown in
Fig. 4C, the generation of IP3 was observed to
be reduced in anti-IgM-stimulated B-1 cells as compared with that of
B-2 cells. Hence, the reduced activity of PLC- 2 in B-1 cells may
impact upon NF- B activation after BCR stimulation.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Intact Btk, reduced
PLC- 2, and lack of Akt activation in
anti-IgM-stimulated B-1 cells. A, normal activation of
Btk in B-1 and B-2 cells. Whole cell lysates from B-1 and B-2 cells
that were treated with 20 µg/ml anti-IgM Abs for various times were
immunoprecipitated with anti-phosphotyrosine (PY20)-agarose and probed
with anti-Btk Ab. The numbers below the blot
indicate the -fold difference in phosphorylation with respect to the
unstimulated sample. B, reduced phosphorylation of PLC- 2
in B-1 cells. Cell lysates from B-1 and B-2 cells treated as in
A were immunoprecipitated with anti-PLC- 2, probed with
anti-PY20, and later reprobed with the immunoprecipitating Ab for
loading control. Numbers below the blot indicate
the -fold difference in phosphorylation with respect to the
unstimulated sample. C, kinetics of IP3
generation from nontreated and anti-IgM stimulated B-1 and B-2 cells.
Results shown are representative of two separate experiments.
D, absence of Akt activation in B-1 cells. Whole cell
lysates from B-1 and B-2 cells treated as in A were
immunoprecipitated with anti-Akt and probed with
anti-pAktS473 (upper panel) or
anti-pAktT308 (lower panel) Abs. The
blots were reprobed with the immunoprecipitating Ab to check for equal
loading of cell lysates.
|
|
Another signaling pathway that is activated by the cross-linking of the
BCR on B-2 cells is that of the serine/threonine kinase, Akt, or
protein kinase B (43, 44). Akt is an important signaling molecule that
has also been implicated in the activation of NF- B (39, 45-47) and
in cell survival (48, 49) in many different biological systems. We
therefore also examined the activation status of Akt in B-1 cells.
The activity of Akt is dependent on phosphorylation, and Akt can be
phosphorylated on two potential sites: Thr308 and
Ser473. Western blot analyses using specific antibodies
that recognized either of the phosphorylated residues of Akt indicated
that both sites were phosphorylated in BCR-stimulated B-2 cells (Fig.
4D). In contrast, neither Thr308 nor
Ser473 was phosphorylated in B-1 cells, regardless of the
duration of BCR stimulation. Thus, Akt is not activated in
IgM-stimulated B-1 cells. This, together with the reduced PLC 2
activity, could explain the lack of NF- B activation in B-1 cells
upon BCR engagement.
Differential Induction of Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases in B-1
and B-2 Cells--
BCR engagement is also known to activate the MAPK
signaling pathways that have been shown to regulate cell growth,
differentiation, and death in various biological systems (15). The
three major classes of MAPKs are the ERK, JNK, and p38 MAPK. B cells at
different stages of differentiation may activate different MAPKs when
triggered via their BCRs (50); for example, tolerant B cells have
constitutive ERK but failed to induce JNK activation (14).
To determine the pattern of MAPK activation in B-1 cells, we stimulated
these cells with anti-IgM antibodies for various times, and the
activation of the different classes of MAPKs was examined using
phosphorylation state-specific antibodies. Anti-IgM-treated B-2
cells were used as controls, since all classes of MAPKs could be
activated in these cells following stimulation.
As shown in Fig. 5A, Western
blot analysis using anti-phospho-ERK antibody indicated that ex
vivo B-1 cells had a basal level of constitutive ERK activation
compared with B-2 cells. This basal level of ERK activation in B-1
cells could be further up-regulated as indicated by the increased
amount of phosphorylated ERK that was detected after anti-IgM
stimulation (Fig. 5B). An in vitro kinase assay
using myelin basic protein as a substrate indicates that this basal
level of phospho-ERK in B-1 cells was indeed active (Fig.
5C). In contrast, although ERK was activated in B-2 cells within 3 min and sustained for at least 30 min after anti-IgM stimulation, there was clearly a lack of basal ERK activity in these
cells as shown by a lack of anti-phospho-ERK antibody staining or ERK
activity in phosphorylating the myelin basic protein substrate (Fig. 5,
A and C). Furthermore, BCR stimulation seemed to
induce a greater level of phosphorylation and hence activation of ERK in B-1 cells compared with B-2 cells (Fig. 5B).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Differential activation of ERK, JNK, and p38
MAPK in B-1 and B-2 cells. A, ex vivo B-1
but not B-2 cells have constitutive ERK activation. Whole cell lysates
of ex vivo B-1 and B-2 cells were probed with
anti-phospho-ERK (p-ERK) and anti-ERK Abs in Western blot
analysis. B, ERK activation can be further up-regulated by
anti-IgM stimulation of B-1 cells. Cells were treated with 10 µg/ml
of anti-IgM Abs for various times, and Western blot analysis was
performed as in A. C, in vitro kinase
assay for ERK activity. ERK2 was immunoprecipitated from the lysates of
nontreated and anti-IgM-stimulated B-1 and B-2 cells and used to
phosphorylate myelin basic protein substrate. D, JNK
activation is delayed in B-1 cells. B-1 and B-2 cells were treated with
10 µg/ml anti-IgM Abs for various times, and whole cell lysates were
probed with anti-pJNK and anti-JNK Abs in Western blot analysis.
E, lack of p38 activation in B-1 cells. B-1 and B-2 cells
were treated with 10 µg/ml anti-IgM Abs for various times, and whole
cell lysates were probed with anti-phospho-p38 MAPK and anti-p38 MAPK
Abs in Western blot analysis.
|
|
Examination of JNK activation also revealed a difference in the
induction of this MAPK in B-1 and B-2 cells. Whereas JNK activation occurred within 3 min and was sustained for at least 10 min after anti-IgM treatment of B-2 cells, the kinetics of JNK activation was
very much delayed to the 10-min time point in B-1 cells (Fig. 5D).
Finally, analysis of p38 MAPK activation using anti-phospho-p38 MAPK
antibody indicated that there was hardly any induction of this kinase
above the basal level in anti-IgM-stimulated B-1 cells (Fig.
5E) compared with similarly treated B-2 cells, where the
activation of p38 MAPK was noticeable within 3 min and maintained for
at least 10 min after BCR stimulation.
Taken together, the above data indicate that B-1 cells have
constitutive basal ERK activity and delayed JNK and lack p38 MAPK activation compared with B-2 cells, where all of these MAPKs are inducibly activated after BCR engagement.
Extended Survival of B-1 Cells in Culture Is Not Due to
Constitutive ERK Activation--
The basal level of constitutive ERK
activation in B-1 cells is of potential interest. Ex vivo
B-1 cells possessed a considerable amount of the phosphorylated
form of ERK compared with ex vivo B-2 cells (Fig.
5A). Constitutive ERK activation has been implicated in the
maintenance of cell survival in many biological systems (51). One of
the distinguishing features of B-1 cells as shown in Fig. 2C
is their extended survival in culture compared with B-2 cells, which
undergo cell death rapidly ex vivo in the absence of
stimulation (52). Interestingly, the phosphorylated and hence activated
form of ERK could be detected not only in ex vivo B-1 cells
but also in B-1 cells that were in culture for up to 10 days without
any BCR stimulation (Fig. 6A).
We thus determined whether the constitutive activation of ERK plays a
role in B-1 cell survival in culture by incubating B-1 cells in the
continuous presence of the inhibitor PD98059 or U0126 that acts on the
upstream kinase MEK1, which phosphorylates ERK. The addition of the
compound PD98059 but not its inactive analog SB202474 at a
concentration of 50 µM was sufficient to completely
abrogate the phosphorylation of ERK and yet remained nontoxic to the
cells (Fig. 6B, upper panel).
Similarly, the addition of 1 µM U0126 was sufficient to inhibit ERK activation (Fig. 6B, lower
panel). However, the number of viable B-1 cells remained
unchanged after 24 h (Fig. 6C) or 48 h (data not
shown) of culture in the presence of either of the inhibitors. Thus,
the constitutive activation of ERK appears not to be responsible for
the extended survival of B-1 cells in culture.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Constitutive ERK activation is not
responsible for the extended survival of B-1 cells in culture.
A, detection of activated ERK in nonstimulated B-1 cells
that were in culture for various numbers of days. B,
titration of PD98059 and U0126 for the inhibition of ERK activation.
B-1 cells were cultured overnight with different concentrations (shown
in µM) of U0126 or PD98059 or the inactive analog
SB202474 (50 µM) and assayed for the presence of
phospho-ERK in Western blot analysis. C, viability of B-1
cells after 24 h of culture either in the absence (U)
or the continuous presence of a 50 µM concentration of
the inhibitor PD98059 (PD) or 10 µM of
U0126.
|
|
Constitutive Activation of NF-AT in B-1 Cells--
The lack of
NF- B activation and the differential induction of MAPKs in B-1 cells
are reminiscent of that of tolerant B cells that are chronically
exposed to self-antigens (14). This raises the interesting possibility
that B-1 cells may have signaling properties similar to those found in
tolerant B cells. Another signaling pathway that is differentially
induced in tolerant and naïve B-2 cells is that of NF-AT, which is
constitutively active in the former but inducible in the latter (14).
In addition, it was reported that human B-CLL cells, which are
CD5+, have constitutive NF-AT activation (53). Since B-1
cells frequently give rise to B-CLL (54, 55) and have BCR specificities
directed toward self-antigens, we examined the pattern of NF-AT
activation in B-1 cells. Indeed, as shown in Fig.
7, ex vivo B-1 cells had significant levels of constitutive NF-AT activation, as evidenced by
the enhanced binding of an oligoprobe that contained the NF-AT consensus site. Furthermore, the level of NF-AT activation in B-1 cells
could be further up-regulated by anti-IgM or PMA/ionomycin treatment.
In comparison, significant levels of NF-AT activation were only
observed in B-2 cells after anti-IgM or PMA/ionomycin stimulation.
Thus, normal B-1 cells, like tolerant B cells (14) and B-CLL cells
(53), exhibit constitutive NF-AT activation.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Constitutive activation of NF-AT in B-1
cells. Nuclear extracts from nontreated (U) or anti-IgM
(Ig)- or PMA/ionomycin (P/I)-stimulated B-1 and
B-2 cells were examined for NF-AT activity in an electrophoretic
mobility shift assay.
|
|
B-1 Cells Do Not Fully Up-regulate Their Activation Markers upon
BCR Stimulation--
Thus far, the biochemical analysis of BCR
signaling suggests that B-1 cells resemble tolerant B cells in the
induction of MAPKs, NF-AT, and NF- B and raises the interesting
possibility that B-1 cells may be anergic B cells. Indeed, unlike B-2
cells, B-1 cells also resemble anergic B cells in that they both do not enter the cell cycle upon BCR engagement (8, 9, 11, 14). To determine
whether other parameters of activation are also altered in B-1 cells,
we examined the up-regulation of activation markers on these cells
after BCR stimulation. As shown in Fig.
8, anti-IgM or LPS stimulation of B-2
cells and LPS stimulation of B-1 cells led to high level expression of
CD25 (IL-2R ), the early activation marker CD69, and the
co-stimulatory molecule CD86 (B7.2) on these cells. In contrast,
anti-IgM stimulation of B-1 cells only led to a partial increase in
cell surface expression of these activation molecules that was
significantly lower than the levels induced by LPS stimulation of B-1
cells or by anti-IgM and LPS stimulation of B-2 cells. Hence, B-1 cells
do not fully up-regulate their activation markers upon BCR
engagement.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Anti-IgM stimulation does not fully activate
B-1 cells. B-1 and B-2 cells were left untreated (U) or
stimulated overnight with 10 µg/ml anti-IgM Ab (Ig) or 1 µg/ml LPS and examined for the up-regulation of CD25 (IL-2R ), CD69
and CD86 (B7.2) in FACS analyses.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Studies presented here indicate that B-1 and B-2 cells have
differential induction of multiple signaling pathways. Specifically, B-1 cells have constitutive ERK and NF-AT signaling, reduced PLC- 2 activation, and delayed JNK activation, and they lack p38 MAPK, Akt and
NF- B induction upon BCR engagement. In contrast, all of these
signaling pathways are activated by BCR cross-linking in B-2 cells.
The lack of NF- B activity in the nucleus of BCR-stimulated B-1 cells
had previously been documented (56). However, in this report, we
explore further the reason for the lack of NF- B induction in
BCR-stimulated B-1 cells and show that this is due to a lack of induced
degradation of the I B proteins in the cytoplasm.
Two major signaling pathways are known to lead to NF- B activation,
namely that of the PLC- 2 and the Akt pathways. Whereas the
activation of the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase Btk is normal in both
BCR-stimulated B-1 and B-2 cells, the activity of PLC- 2 as assessed
by PI(4,5)P2 hydrolysis was observed to be reduced in B-1
cells in response to the cross-linking of the BCR. It is not clear at
present if the lower amount of IP3 generated in B-1 cells
is due to a reduction in PLC- 2 activation, its localization, or a
shortage of its substrate PI(4,5)P2. The reduction in
PLC- 2 activity and the impaired Akt activation in B-1 cells may
explain the lack of NF- B induction in these cells. In turn, the lack of NF- B activity in BCR-stimulated B-1 cells may be the reason why
these cells do not proliferate upon BCR stimulation, since NF- B is
known to induce the expression of cyclin D1 and Bcl-xL, both of which are required for cells to enter the cell cycle
(57-59).
Another interesting feature of B-1 cells is their ability to survive
for extended periods of time in culture in contrast to normal primary B
cells, which undergo rapid cell death ex vivo in the absence
of stimuli. The extended survival of B-1 cells is not due to NF- B or
Akt signaling, since these two pathways, which have been implicated in
cellular survival, are neither constitutively activated nor
induced by BCR engagement in these cells.
The MAPKs regulate cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, and
cell death in various biological systems (15-19), and it is currently
not known what aspects of B-1 cell physiology are regulated by these
kinases. Our data indicate that the enhanced survival of ex
vivo B-1 cells is also not due to the constitutive activation of
ERK, since inhibiting the activation of this kinase did not lead to
more pronounced cell death. Since both JNK and p38 MAPK have been
implicated in apoptosis (18, 19), future experiments involving the
enforced expression of these kinases are required to examine whether
the failure to induce or sustain p38 MAPK and JNK activation in B-1
cell may explain their extended survival in vitro (52).
One interesting finding in this report is the constitutive activation
of the transcription factor NF-AT in B-1 cells. NFAT activation is
regulated by Ca2+ flux, which in turn can be regulated by
PLC- 2 activation through its hydrolysis of PI(4,5)P2
into IP3 and diacylglycerol. However, we are at present
unable to correlate the constitute activation of NFAT in B-1 cells with
the inducible manner of PLC- 2 activation. Perhaps some intermediate
product downstream of PLC- 2 is altered in B-1 cells that leads to
this phenomenon.
It was reported previously that human B-CLL cells, which were
often CD5+, had constitutive activation of NF-AT (53).
Recently, the enhancer region of the CD5 gene was found to contain
multiple NF-AT binding sites (60). Taken together, the data temptingly
suggest that one of the characteristic features of the B-1 cell
phenotype, namely the cell surface expression of CD5, may be due to the
constitutive activation of this transcription factor. Indeed,
consistent with this view, treatment of VH12 transgenic
mice that develop predominantly B-1 cells with cyclosporin A, an
immunosuppressive drug that interferes with calcium signaling and hence
NF-AT activation, prevented the generation of CD5+ B cells
(61).
The origins of B-1 cells have been controversial and debated for years
(2, 3). The pattern of MAPK, NF-AT, and NF- B signaling in B-1 cells
described in this study closely resembles that of tolerant B cells that
are chronically exposed to self-antigens (Table
I). B-1 cells also behave like tolerant B
cells in that they do not proliferate upon BCR engagement (8, 9). In
addition, we show here that BCR-stimulated B-1 cells are not fully
activated in terms of the expression of specific activation markers.
These findings and the fact that B-1 cells often have autoreactive
specificities temptingly suggest that B-1 cells may be a special class
of anergic or tolerant B cells. They differ from the classical anergic
B cells only in that B-1 cells persist in vivo and can
survive for extended periods of time ex vivo.
In support of the argument that B-1 cells may be a special class of
anergic B cells, we noted that B-1 cells are part of a normal B cell
repertoire and often have specificities directed toward self-antigens
such as DNA (5), ribonucleoprotein (6), and Thy-1 (7). The acquisition
of CD5 expression on B-1 cells may be a consequence of the continuous
recognition of self-antigen by their BCR, which constitutively
activates the transcription factor NF-AT that may regulate CD5 gene
expression (60). Consistent with this observation, anti-Thy-1 B cells
are CD5+ only in the presence of Thy-1 (7). In the absence
of Thy-1, anti-Thy-1 B cells resemble normal B-2 cells. Furthermore,
transgenic B cells chronically exposed to the specific soluble antigen
hen egg lysozyme do express low levels of cell surface CD5 and become unresponsive to BCR stimulation. However, upon the removal of CD5,
these cells become hyperresponsive (62). The expression of CD5, an
inhibitory molecule that dampens BCR signaling (63), may allow for the
persistence of B-1 cells with polyreactive specificities and, at the
same time, prevent a full-blown autoimmunity.
Finally, the hypothesis that B-1 cells are anergic B cells would argue
against the lineage origin of B-1 cells and support the
activation-induced model for their generation. Indeed, altering the
strength of BCR signaling could alter the phenotype of B-1 cells.
VH12-expressing B-1 cells that are normally
CD5+ become B-2-like in their phenotype in the absence of
Btk (64) and BLNK (65), which are the signaling molecules directly in the BCR signal transduction pathway. Mutations in other molecules or
co-receptors such as CD19, PLC- 2, Vav, and the p85 subunit of PI-3K
that have a positive effect on BCR signaling or CD22, SHP-1, and Lyn,
which exert a negative effect on BCR signal, resulted in mice with
reduced or increased B-1 cells, respectively.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank the Institute of Molecular and Cell
Biology In Vivo Model Unit and Koon-Guan Lee for
the care and maintenance of mice and Prof. Bee-Wah Lee (Dept. of
Pediatrics, National University of Singapore) for use of the Skatronas
cell harvester.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work is supported by grants from the Biomedical
Research Council of the Agency for Science, Technology, and Research.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
65-6874-3784; Fax: 65-6779-1117; E-mail:
mcblamkp@imcb.nus.edu.sg.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 17, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M202460200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
B-CLL, B-cell
chronic lymphocytic leukemia;
Ab, antibody;
BCR, B cell antigen
receptor;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
IP3, inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate;
JNK, c-Jun
NH2-terminal kinase;
LPS, lipopolysaccharide;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinases;
NF-AT, nuclear factor of activated T
cells;
PI(4, 5)P2, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate;
PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate;
PLC, phospholipase C;
FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting;
Btk, Bruton's tyrosine
kinase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kipps, T. J.
(1989)
Adv. Immunol.
47,
117-185[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Herzenberg, L. A.,
and Kantor, A. B.
(1993)
Immunol. Today
14,
79-83[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve], 88-90
|
| 3.
|
Haughton, G.,
Arnold, L. W.,
Whitmore, A. C.,
and Clarke, S. H.
(1993)
Immunol. Today
14,
84-91[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Mercolino, T. J.,
Arnold, L. W.,
Hawkins, L. A.,
and Haughton, G.
(1988)
J. Exp. Med.
168,
687-698[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Casali, P.,
Burastero, S. E.,
Nakamura, M.,
Inghirami, G.,
and Notkins, A. L.
(1987)
Science
236,
77-81[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Qian, Y.,
Santiago, C.,
Borrero, M.,
Tedder, T. F.,
and Clarke, S. H.
(2001)
J. Immunol.
166,
2412-2419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Hayakawa, K.,
Asano, M.,
Shinton, S. A.,
Gui, M.,
Allman, D.,
Stewart, C. L.,
Silver, J.,
and Hardy, R. R.
(1999)
Science
285,
113-116[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Rothstein, T. L.,
and Kolber, D. L.
(1988)
J. Immunol.
141,
4089-4093[Abstract]
|
| 9.
|
Rothstein, T. L.,
and Kolber, D. L.
(1988)
J. Immunol.
140,
2880-2885[Abstract]
|
| 10.
|
Reth, M.,
and Wienands, J.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
15,
453-479[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Goodnow, C. C.,
Cyster, J. G.,
Hartley, S. B.,
Bell, S. E.,
Cooke, M. P.,
Healy, J. I.,
Akkaraju, S.,
Rathmell, J. C.,
Pogue, S. L.,
and Shokat, K. P.
(1995)
Adv. Immunol.
59,
279-368[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Monroe, J. G.,
and Kass, M. J.
(1985)
J. Immunol.
135,
1674-1682[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
Norvell, A.,
Mandik, L.,
and Monroe, J. G.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
154,
4404-4413[Abstract]
|
| 14.
|
Healy, J. I.,
Dolmetsch, R. E.,
Timmerman, L. A.,
Cyster, J. G.,
Thomas, M. L.,
Crabtree, G. R.,
Lewis, R. S.,
and Goodnow, C. C.
(1997)
Immunity
6,
419-428[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Cross, T. G.,
Scheel-Toellner, D.,
Henriquez, N. V.,
Deacon, E.,
Salmon, M.,
and Lord, J. M.
(2000)
Exp. Cell Res.
256,
34-41[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Robinson, M. J.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
180-186[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Marshall, C. J.
(1995)
Cell
80,
179-185[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Graves, J. D.,
Draves, K. E.,
Craxton, A.,
Saklatvala, J.,
Krebs, E. G.,
and Clark, E. A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13814-13818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Ichijo, H.,
Nishida, E.,
Irie, K.,
ten Dijke, P.,
Saitoh, M.,
Moriguchi, T.,
Takagi, M.,
Matsumoto, K.,
Miyazono, K.,
and Gotoh, Y.
(1997)
Science
275,
90-94[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Thanos, D.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1995)
Cell
80,
529-532[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Peng, S. L.,
Gerth, A. J.,
Ranger, A. M.,
and Glimcher, L. H.
(2001)
Immunity
14,
13-20[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Karras, J. G.,
Wang, Z.,
Huo, L.,
Howard, R. G.,
Frank, D. A.,
and Rothstein, T. L.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
185,
1035-1042[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Lam, K. P.,
and Rajewsky, K.
(1999)
J. Exp. Med.
190,
471-477[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Melendez, A. J.,
and Khaw, A. K.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
17255-17262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Melendez, A. J.,
Harnett, M. M.,
and Allen, J. M.
(1999)
Immunology
98,
1-8[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Kantor, A. B.,
and Herzenberg, L. A.
(1993)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
11,
501-538[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Mercolino, T. J.,
Locke, A. L.,
Afshari, A.,
Sasser, D.,
Travis, W. W.,
Arnold, L. W.,
and Haughton, G.
(1989)
J. Exp. Med.
169,
1869-1877[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Bikah, G.,
Carey, J.,
Ciallella, J. R.,
Tarakhovsky, A.,
and Bondada, S.
(1996)
Science
274,
1906-1909[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Hayakawa, K.,
and Hardy, R. R.
(1988)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
6,
197-218[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Liu, J. L.,
Chiles, T. C.,
Sen, R. J.,
and Rothstein, T. L.
(1991)
J. Immunol.
146,
1685-1691[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Baldwin, A. S., Jr.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
14,
649-683[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Gerondakis, S.,
Grumont, R.,
Rourke, I.,
and Grossmann, M.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
10,
353-359[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Owyang, A. M.,
Tumang, J. R.,
Schram, B. R.,
Hsia, C. Y.,
Behrens, T. W.,
Rothstein, T. L.,
and Liou, H. C.
(2001)
J. Immunol.
167,
4948-4956[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Lee, H. H.,
Dadgostar, H.,
Cheng, Q.,
Shu, J.,
and Cheng, G.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
9136-9141[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Glasgow, J. N.,
Wood, T.,
and Perez-Polo, J. R.
(2000)
J. Neurochem.
75,
1377-1389[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Beg, A. A.,
Ruben, S. M.,
Scheinman, R. I.,
Haskill, S.,
Rosen, C. A.,
and Baldwin, A. S., Jr.
(1992)
Genes Dev.
6,
1899-1913[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Baeuerle, P. A.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1996)
Cell
87,
13-20[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Sha, W. C.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
187,
143-146[Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Jones, R. G.,
Parsons, M.,
Bonnard, M.,
Chan, V. S.,
Yeh, W. C.,
Woodgett, J. R.,
and Ohashi, P. S.
(2000)
J. Exp. Med.
191,
1721-1734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Petro, J. B.,
Rahman, S. M.,
Ballard, D. W.,
and Khan, W. N.
(2000)
J. Exp. Med.
191,
1745-1754[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Bajpai, U. D.,
Zhang, K.,
Teutsch, M.,
Sen, R.,
and Wortis, H. H.
(2000)
J. Exp. Med.
191,
1735-1744[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Petro, J. B.,
and Khan, W. N.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
1715-1719[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Gold, M. R.,
Scheid, M. P.,
Santos, L.,
Dang-Lawson, M.,
Roth, R. A.,
Matsuuchi, L.,
Duronio, V.,
and Krebs, D. L.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
163,
1894-1905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Astoul, E.,
Watton, S.,
and Cantrell, D.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
1511-1520[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Kane, L. P.,
Shapiro, V. S.,
Stokoe, D.,
and Weiss, A.
(1999)
Curr. Biol.
9,
601-604[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Ozes, O. N.,
Mayo, L. D.,
Gustin, J. A.,
Pfeffer, S. R.,
Pfeffer, L. M.,
and Donner, D. B.
(1999)
Nature
401,
82-85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Romashkova, J. A.,
and Makarov, S. S.
(1999)
Nature
401,
86-90[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Coffer, P. J.,
Jin, J.,
and Woodgett, J. R.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
335,
1-13
|
| 49.
|
Pogue, S. L.,
Kurosaki, T.,
Bolen, J.,
and Herbst, R.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
165,
1300-1306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Sutherland, C. L.,
Heath, A. W.,
Pelech, S. L.,
Young, P. R.,
and Gold, M. R.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
157,
3381-3390[Abstract]
|
| 51.
|
Ishikawa, Y.,
and Kitamura, M.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
264,
696-701[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Chumley, M. J.,
Dal Porto, J. M.,
Kawaguchi, S.,
Cambier, J. C.,
Nemazee, D.,
and Hardy, R. R.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
164,
4586-4593[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Schuh, K.,
Avots, A.,
Tony, H. P.,
Serfling, E.,
and Kneitz, C.
(1996)
Leuk. Lymphoma
23,
583-592[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Kocks, C.,
and Rajewsky, K.
(1989)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
7,
537-559[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Rajewsky, K., Gu, H.,
Vieira, P.,
and Forster, I.
(1989)
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
54,
209-217
|
| 56.
|
Morris, D. L.,
and Rothstein, T. L.
(1993)
J. Exp. Med.
177,
857-861[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 57.
|
Guttridge, D. C.,
Albanese, C.,
Reuther, J. Y.,
Pestell, R. G.,
and Baldwin, A. S., Jr.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
5785-5799[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Hinz, M.,
Krappmann, D.,
Eichten, A.,
Heder, A.,
Scheidereit, C.,
and Strauss, M.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
2690-2698[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
|
Chen, C.,
Edelstein, L. C.,
and Gelinas, C.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
2687-2895[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 60.
|
Berland, R.,
and Wortis, H. H.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
161,
277-285[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 61.
|
Arnold, L. W.,
McCray, S. K.,
Tatu, C.,
and Clarke, S. H.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
164,
2924-2930[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 62.
|
Hippen, K. L.,
Tze, L. E.,
and Behrens, T. W.
(2000)
J. Exp. Med.
191,
883-890[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 63.
|
Bondada, S.,
Bikah, G.,
Robertson, D. A.,
and Sen, G.
(2000)
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
252,
141-149[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 64.
|
Clarke, S. H.,
and Arnold, L. W.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
187,
1325-1334[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 65.
|
Xu, S.,
Tan, J. E.,
Wong, E. P.,
Manickam, A.,
Ponniah, S.,
and Lam, K. P.
(2000)
Int. Immunol.
12,
397-404[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Muzio, B. Apollonio, C. Scielzo, M. Frenquelli, I. Vandoni, V. Boussiotis, F. Caligaris-Cappio, and P. Ghia
Constitutive activation of distinct BCR-signaling pathways in a subset of CLL patients: a molecular signature of anergy
Blood,
July 1, 2008;
112(1):
188 - 195.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Frances, J. R. Tumang, and T. L. Rothstein
Extreme skewing of annexin II and S100A6 expression identified by proteomic analysis of peritoneal B-1 cells
Int. Immunol.,
January 1, 2007;
19(1):
59 - 65.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Stamatopoulos, C. Belessi, C. Moreno, M. Boudjograh, G. Guida, T. Smilevska, L. Belhoul, S. Stella, N. Stavroyianni, M. Crespo, et al.
Over 20% of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia carry stereotyped receptors: pathogenetic implications and clinical correlations
Blood,
January 1, 2007;
109(1):
259 - 270.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Rui, J. I. Healy, J. Blasioli, and C. C. Goodnow
ERK Signaling Is a Molecular Switch Integrating Opposing Inputs from B Cell Receptor and T Cell Cytokines to Control TLR4-Driven Plasma Cell Differentiation
J. Immunol.,
October 15, 2006;
177(8):
5337 - 5346.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Blery, L. Tze, L. A. Miosge, J. E. Jun, and C. C. Goodnow
Essential role of membrane cholesterol in accelerated BCR internalization and uncoupling from NF-{kappa}B in B cell clonal anergy
J. Exp. Med.,
July 10, 2006;
203(7):
1773 - 1783.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-C. Chen, J. C. Byrd, and N. Muthusamy
Differential Role for Cyclic AMP Response Element Binding Protein-1 in Multiple Stages of B Cell Development, Differentiation, and Survival
J. Immunol.,
February 15, 2006;
176(4):
2208 - 2218.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Itakura, M. Szczepanik, R. A. Campos, V. Paliwal, M. Majewska, H. Matsuda, K. Takatsu, and P. W. Askenase
An Hour after Immunization Peritoneal B-1 Cells Are Activated to Migrate to Lymphoid Organs Where within 1 Day They Produce IgM Antibodies That Initiate Elicitation of Contact Sensitivity
J. Immunol.,
December 1, 2005;
175(11):
7170 - 7178.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Frances, J. R. Tumang, and T. L. Rothstein
Cutting Edge: B-1 Cells Are Deficient in Lck: Defective B Cell Receptor Signal Transduction in B-1 Cells Occurs in the Absence of Elevated Lck Expression
J. Immunol.,
July 1, 2005;
175(1):
27 - 31.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Petlickovski, L. Laurenti, X. Li, S. Marietti, P. Chiusolo, S. Sica, G. Leone, and D. G. Efremov
Sustained signaling through the B-cell receptor induces Mcl-1 and promotes survival of chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells
Blood,
June 15, 2005;
105(12):
4820 - 4827.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Tumang, R. Frances, S. G. Yeo, and T. L. Rothstein
Cutting Edge: Spontaneously Ig-Secreting B-1 Cells Violate the Accepted Paradigm for Expression of Differentiation-Associated Transcription Factors
J. Immunol.,
March 15, 2005;
174(6):
3173 - 3177.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Lyubchenko, J. Dal Porto, J. C. Cambier, and V. M. Holers
Coligation of the B Cell Receptor with Complement Receptor Type 2 (CR2/CD21) Using Its Natural Ligand C3dg: Activation without Engagement of an Inhibitory Signaling Pathway
J. Immunol.,
March 15, 2005;
174(6):
3264 - 3272.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|