![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 34, 30838-30843, August 23, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
, and
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oregon
Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97201 and the
Molecular Oncology Group, Department of Medicine,
McGill University Health Center, Montreal,
Quebec H3A 1A1, Canada
Received for publication, April 25, 2002, and in revised form, June 13, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our previous study shows that MDM2, a
negative feedback regulator of the tumor suppressor p53, inhibits
p300-mediated p53 acetylation. Because PCAF (p300/CREB-binding
protein-associated factor) also acetylates and activates p53 after DNA
damage, in this study we have examined the effect of MDM2 on
PCAF-mediated p53 acetylation. We have found that MDM2 inhibited p53
acetylation by PCAF in vitro. In addition, when
overexpressed, MDM2 inhibited PCAF-mediated p53 acetylation in cells.
MDM2 interacted with PCAF both in vitro and in cells, as
assessed using GST fusion protein interaction and immunoprecipitation
assays, respectively. Consistent with the above results, MDM2
significantly repressed the activation of p53 transcriptional activity
by PCAF without apparently affecting the level of p53. In
addition, MDM2 co-resided with p53 at the p53-responsive
mdm2 and p21waf1/cip1 promoters,
inhibiting expression of the endogenous
p21waf1/cip1. These results demonstrate
that MDM2 can inhibit PCAF-mediated p53 acetylation and activation.
The tumor suppressor p53 protein is a transcriptional activator
that induces expression of many target genes whose protein products
mediate p53-dependent cell growth arrest and apoptosis, thus suppressing cell transformation and tumorigenesis (1, 2). This
protein is tightly regulated under physiological and pathological
conditions. Post-translational modifications of p53 play crucial but
different roles in regulating p53 stability and activity (3). For
example, phosphorylation of p53, stimulated by UV and However, p53 is also negatively regulated by post-translational
ubiquitination. This modification is mediated by the p53 suppressor, MDM2, which possesses a Ring finger E3-like ubiquitin ligase activity (27-29). It is believed that under physiological or normal conditions, the turnover rate of p53 is controlled by MDM2 through the
ubiquitin-mediated proteasome system (30-32). Upon cellular insults,
p53 is phosphorylated and/or acetylated (3). These modifications
prevent p53 from attack by MDM2. Thus, p53 becomes stabilized and
activated, transcriptionally activating the expression of its target
genes. Because mdm2 is a p53 target (33, 34), more MDM2
proteins are produced after DNA damage to repress p53 function. Hence,
under pathological or abnormal conditions, MDM2 must antagonize
multiple enzymes, including kinases and acetylases, in order to monitor
p53 function. How these proteins interplay to finely tune p53 activity
becomes an important question.
In an attempt to address this issue, we (16) and others (14) have
recently shown that MDM2 inhibits p53 acetylation by p300 both in
vitro and in vivo. Functionally, MDM2 blocked the ability of p300 to stimulate the sequence-specific DNA binding and
transcriptional activities of p53 (16). Because interaction between p53
and MDM2 or MDM2 and p300 is required for inhibiting p300-mediated p53
acetylation by MDM2, MDM2 inhibits p53 acetylation by forming a ternary
complex with p53 and p300 (16). This finding prompted us to determine
whether MDM2 is able to inhibit PCAF-mediated p53 acetylation and
activation. In the study described here, we found that MDM2 inhibited
p53 acetylation by PCAF in vitro. Furthermore, when
overexpressed in cells, MDM2 inhibited PCAF-mediated p53 acetylation
in vivo. MDM2 interacted with PCAF both in vitro
and in cells, as assessed using GST fusion protein interaction and immunoprecipitation assays. In addition, MDM2 significantly repressed the activation of p53 transcriptional activity by PCAF. These results
demonstrate that MDM2 can also inhibit PCAF-mediated p53 acetylation
and activation. These studies support the idea that after DNA damage,
MDM2, once induced by p53, needs to prevent p53 acetylation in order to
efficiently ubiquitinate and degrade this protein.
Cell Culture--
Human lung small cell carcinoma H1299 cells
and human embryonic kidney epithelial 293 cells were cultured as
previously described (35, 36).
Buffers--
Lysis buffer consisted of 50 mM
Tris/HCl (pH 8.0), 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. SNNTE buffer contained 50 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.4), 5 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 500 mM NaCl, and 5%
sucrose. RIPA was comprised of 50 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, and 1% (w/v) sodium
deoxycholate. Buffer C 100 (BC100) included 20 mM Tris/HCl
(pH 7.9), 0.1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 100 mM
KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and
0.25 µg/ml pepstatin A.
Antibodies and Reagents--
The anti-acetylated lysine antibody
and anti-acetylated lysine 320 antibody were purchased from Upstate
Biotechnology, Inc. The monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody was purchased
from Sigma. The monoclonal anti-p53 antibody Pab421 and polyclonal or
monoclonal anti-MDM2 antibodies, 4B11 and 2A10, were described
previously (37). Polyclonal anti-PCAF antibodies (H-369 and FL-393) and monoclonal anti-JNK1 (F-3) antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc. Baculovirus harboring human PCAF, p300, or MDM2 was
as previously described (37-39). pCDNA3-MDM2, pCMV-p53, pCDNA3- Construction of pRSV-PCAF, pRSV-PCAF/1--
529, and
pRSV-PCAF/ Purification of Recombinant p300, PCAF, MDM2, and p53--
PCAF
and p300 were purified from baculovirus-infected SF9 insect cells using
immunoaffinity columns as described (37, 39). His-p53 was purified from
bacteria using a nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid column as described (37,
38). MDM2 and p53 were purified using an immunoaffinity column as
described (37).
Establishment of HA-MDM2 Expression Cell Lines--
Human
embryonic kidney epithelial 293 cells were transfected with
pCDNA3-HA-MDM2 or pCDNA3 vector. Transfected cells
expressing HA-MDM2 were selected in the presence of neomycin (0.5 mg/ml) and screened by immunoprecipitation with anti-HA antibodies
followed by Western blot with the monoclonal anti-MDM2 antibody 2A10.
p53 Acetylation Reaction--
p53 acetylation assays were
carried out according to the published method (16). 20 µl of reaction
mixture contained 50 mM Tris/Hcl (pH 8.0), 10% glycerol
(v/v), 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 mM Na butyrate, 5 µM acetyl-CoA (Sigma), 50 ng of p53, 200 ng of p300, 200 ng of PCAF, and MDM2 (see figure legends
for the amount of MDM2 used in each reaction). MDM2 was preincubated
with p300 or PCAF in ice for 30 min prior to being added into the
reaction mixture containing acetyl-CoA. The mixture was then incubated at 30 °C for 60 min and analyzed on SDS-PAGE afterward. Acetylated p53 was detected by Western blot using the polyclonal anti-acetylated lysine antibody. Monoclonal anti-p53 antibody 421, polyclonal anti-MDM2
antibody, and polyclonal anti-p300 or polyclonal anti-PCAF antibody
from Upstate Biotechnology were used to detect corresponding proteins.
Western Blot Analysis--
Transfected cells were harvested for
preparation of nuclear extracts. Nuclear extracts containing 150 µg
of proteins were directly loaded onto an SDS gel; proteins were
detected by ECL reagents (Bio-Rad) after Western blotting using
antibodies as indicated in the figure legends.
Transient Transfection and Luciferase Assay--
H1299 cells
(60% confluence in a 12-well plate) were transfected with a
pCMV- Immunoprecipitation-Western Blot (IP-WB)
Analysis--
Transfected H1299, 293, or MDM2 expression 293 cells
were harvested for preparation of nuclear extracts. Nuclear extracts containing 250 µg of proteins were used for IP, followed by WB as
previously described (37).
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-PCR--
H1299 cells were
transfected with pcDNA3-p53 or pCMV-MDM2 vector, alone or together.
ChIP analysis was performed as described (42, 43) with minor
modifications. Briefly, cells were cross-linked with a 1% formaldehyde
solution in phosphate-buffered saline 36 h after transfection. The
cross-linking was stopped by incubating the cells on 0.125 M glycine for 5 min. The cells were then harvested in 1 ml
of lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5%
deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 5 mM EDTA) containing the protease inhibitors pepstatin A (10 µg/ml), leupeptin (10 µg/ml), dithiothreitol (1 mM),
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (10 µg/ml). Cell lysates were sonicated
4 times for 15 s each at maximal setting to yield chromatin
fragments of ~600 bp as assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis, followed by centrifugation for 10 min to remove the cell debris. Cell
lysates were precleared with 50 µl of protein A-Sepharose/2 µg of
sheared salmon sperm DNA slurry for 30 min at 4 °C. A total of 2 µg of anti-Myc or anti-FLAG antibodies was incubated with the
precleared extracts overnight at 4 °C followed by incubation with
protein A/G agarose for 2 h at 4 °C. The immunocomplexes were
washed twice with lysis buffer, 4 times with IP wash buffer (100 mM Tris (pH 8.5), 50 mM LiCl, 1% Nonidet P-40,
1% deoxycholic acid), and twice more with lysis buffer. The
precipitates were then extracted twice, each with 150 µl of IP
elution buffer (50 mM NaHCO3, 1% SDS).
The eluates were pooled, mixed with 2 µl of 5 mg/ml RNase A
and 12 µl of 5 M NaCl (to 0.2 M), and
incubated at 65 °C for at least 6 h to reverse the formaldehyde
cross-linking. DNA fragments were purified by phenol/chloroform
extraction and ethanol precipitation and dissolved in 100 µl of
sterile H2O.
DNA samples were then analyzed with 25 or 28 cycles of PCR to amplify
mdm2 and p21waf1 promoter sequences
containing the p53RE sequence. Each cycle consisted of denaturation at
94 °C for 30 s and annealing at 60 °C (mdm2
promoter) or 65 °C (p21waf1 promoter) for
30 s, followed by extension at 72 °C for 2 min. A total of 0.5 µCi of [32P]dCTP was added in each 50 µl of PCR
mixture. The primers for amplifying the mdm2 promoter
sequence (33) are 5'-GGTTGACTCAGCTTTTCCTCTTG-3' and
5'-GGAAAATGCATGGTTT-AAATAGCC-3' (inverse); the primers for amplifying
the p21 promoter sequence (44) are 5'-GTGGCTCTGATTGGCTTTCTG-3' and
5'-CTGAAAACAGGCAGCCCAAGG-3' (inverse); the primers for amplifying the
sequence located 2.5 kb upstream from the p53RE site of the mdm2 promoter (33) are 5'-TGAATCTACTCTTGGTGGTCC-3' and
5'-AAGGAAATTTGGGCTTTCGAC-3' (inverse). PCR products were resolved
onto 6% polyacrylamide gel, dried, and exposed on film.
GST Fusion Protein Association Assay--
The fusion proteins
were expressed in Escherichia coli and purified on a
glutathione-Sepharose 12B column. Protein-protein association assays
were conducted as reported (37) using fusion protein-containing beads.
Approximately 250 ng of FLAG-PCAF or in vitro translated and
35S-labeled PCAF (4 µl), PCAF/1-529 (4 µl), or
PCAF/ MDM2 Inhibits PCAF-mediated p53 Acetylation in Vitro--
It has
been shown that MDM2 inhibits p300/CBP-mediated p53 acetylation (14,
16). PCAF-mediated p53 acetylation can also be inhibited by the
adenovirus-encoding E1B 55-kDa oncoprotein (26), which like MDM2
represses p53 activity by binding to its N terminus (45) and leads to
p53 degradation (46). To determine whether MDM2 is also able to affect
PCAF-mediated p53 acetylation, we performed an in vitro
acetylation assay using purified proteins. As shown in Fig.
1A, as in the case of p300
(lane 3) (16), MDM2 also repressed PCAF-catalyzed p53
acetylation in a dose-dependent fashion in vitro
(lanes 5 and 6). With 2-fold more MDM2 than PCAF in molar ratio, less than 10% of p53 molecules were acetylated based
upon densitometry (lane 6). This result was reproducible. By
contrast, the p53-binding defective mutant MDM2 in the same molar ratio
was unable to inhibit p53 acetylation by PCAF (Fig. 1B).
PCAF did not appear to acetylate MDM2 in vitro (Fig.
1C). Therefore, these results suggest that MDM2 can also
inhibit p53 acetylation by PCAF, which specifically targets lysine 320 (12, 13). This inhibition requires the interaction between p53 and MDM2.
MDM2 Inhibits PCAF-mediated p53 Acetylation in Cells--
To
further determine whether MDM2 inhibits PCAF-mediated p53 acetylation
in cells, human p53-deficient small cell carcinoma H1299 cells were
transfected with plasmids encoding p53 and/or FLAG-PCAF alone or
together. Cells were harvested to assess the levels of these proteins
and the acetylation status of p53 lysine 320 using antibodies
specifically against acetylated lysine 320. As expected (12, 13),
FLAG-PCAF, when overexpressed, acetylated p53 at lysine 320 without
significantly affecting the level of p53 (Fig.
2A, compare lanes 2 and 4). The same transfection was carried out in the
presence or absence of the MDM2-encoding plasmid. In this
experiment, the proteasome inhibitor, MG132, was added to medium
12 h prior to harvesting cells to prevent p53 degradation mediated
by MDM2. As shown in Fig. 2B, PCAF again acetylated the lysine 320 of p53 (lanes 3 and 4). However,
overexpression of MDM2 significantly reduced the level of this
acetylation (lane 5 with lane 6). This reduction
was not due to the low level of p53, because the level of p53 did not
change in the presence or absence of MDM2. Furthermore, this inhibition
was not due to the nonspecific effect of the plasmid, because it was
not observed when the MDM2 deletion lacking the amino acid 130-250
region was used (Fig. 2C). This deletion mutant was unable
to affect PCAF-mediated p53 acetylation largely because it lacks the
nuclear localization sequence and is excluded from the nucleus (data
not shown) (47). These results thus indicate that MDM2 inhibits
PCAF-mediated p53 acetylation in cells.
MDM2 Directly Binds to PCAF in Vitro--
The finding that MDM2
inhibits PCAF-mediated p53 acetylation suggests a possible interaction
between MDM2 and PCAF. To test this and also to define their potential
binding domains, we performed a series of in vitro GST
fusion protein-protein association assays. In the first experiment,
purified FLAG-PCAF proteins were incubated with GST-MDM2 or GST-MDM2
deletion mutants as described under "Experimental Procedures."
After rigorous washing, bound proteins were analyzed by SDS
electrophoresis and Western blot, using anti-FLAG antibodies. As shown
in Fig. 3A, PCAF bound to the
full-length as well as the N-terminal region from amino acid 1 to 295. These bindings appeared to be specific because PCAF rarely bound
to GST alone or GST fusion proteins containing the C terminus (amino acids 384-491) of MDM2. Because PCAF also interacted with the N
terminus-deleted MDM2 (data not shown), which lacks amino acids 1-50,
these results suggest that PCAF can bind to the amino acid 50-384
region of MDM2.
To map the MDM2-binding domain of PCAF, we carried out a similar
GST-MDM2 pull-down experiment using in vitro translated and 35S-labeled PCAF and deletion mutants. As shown in Fig.
3B, PCAF as well as the N terminus (amino acids 1-529), but
not the N terminus-deleted, fragment of PCAF bound to the GST-MDM2
protein (compare lanes 1 and 2 with lane
3). This binding was specific because none of these PCAF proteins
interacted with the GST-MDM2 C-terminal domain (lanes 4-6).
Taken together, these results demonstrate that MDM2 directly interacts
with the N terminus of PCAF in vitro, whereas PCAF appears
to bind to the same region of MDM2 to which p300/CBP binds (48).
MDM2 Associates with PCAF in Cells--
To determine the
interaction between MDM2 and PCAF in cells, human embryonic kidney 293 cells, which contain endogenous MDM2, were transfected with
pCX-FLAG-PCAF or pCX alone. Cell lysates were prepared 48 h
after transfection for immunoprecipitation using antibodies against
FLAG, MDM2, and Jnk1, followed by Western blot with antibodies against
MDM2 and FLAG. As shown in Fig.
4A, endogenous MDM2 proteins
were co-immunoprecipitated with FLAG-PCAF by the anti-FLAG antibody in
FLAG-PCAF expression cells but not in mock-transfected cells
(lanes 1 and 2). Consistently, FLAG-PCAF was also
co-immunoprecipitated with the endogenous MDM2 by the monoclonal MDM2
antibody in the FLAG-PCAF expression cells but not in mock-transfected
cells (lanes 3 and 4). These results indicate that exogenous FLAG-PCAF associates with MDM2 in cells. This
association was specific because none of these proteins was pulled down
by the antibody against Jnk1 (lanes 5 and 6).
To make sure that endogenous PCAF interacts with MDM2, we conducted an
additional immunoprecipitation-Western blot experiment using 293 cells
and an MDM2-expressing 293 stable cell line. The MDM2 cell line was
used because the level of endogenous MDM2 in 293 cells is low (Fig.
4A). As shown in Fig. 4B, both endogenous (lane 2) and exogenous (lane 1) MDM2 proteins
were co-immunoprecipitated by the anti-PCAF antibody but not by the
anti-Jnk1 antibody (lanes 3 and 4). Thus, this
result confirms that MDM2 and PCAF interact with each other in cells.
MDM2 Inhibits PCAF-activated p53 Transcriptional Activity in
Cells--
To determine the functional consequence of the inhibition
of PCAF-mediated p53 acetylation by MDM2, we carried out transient transfection/luciferase assays. As shown in Fig.
5A, expression of the
exogenous PCAF enhanced p53-dependent transcription as measured by the luciferase activity that was driven by the
p21waf1/cip1 promoter containing the
p53RE motif. However, further expression of the exogenous MDM2 reversed
the p53 activation by PCAF and brought p53-dependent
luciferase activity down almost to the basal level. This decrease was
not due to the loss of p53 proteins, because the level of p53 did not
change dramatically in the presence of the proteasome inhibitor, MG132.
This result, which was reproducible, demonstrates that MDM2 can also
inhibit PCAF-enhanced p53 transcriptional activity without apparently
affecting its level. Together with our previous report (16), this
suggests that MDM2 negatively regulates p53 activity at least in part
by inhibiting its acetylation, which is catalyzed by p300/CBP and by
PCAF.
MDM2 Co-resides with p53 at the Endogenous p53RE Motifs of the mdm2
and p21 Promoters--
Because MDM2 can interact with p53RE-bound p53
in vitro (49), it is possible that MDM2 may repress p53
activity by directly associating with the promoter-bound p53 in cells.
To test this idea, we performed a set of chromatin-immunoprecipitation
assays, following transient transfection. As described under
"Experimental Procedures," H1299 cells were transfected with
plasmids encoding p53 or MDM2 alone or together. Immunoprecipitations
were conducted with polyclonal anti-p53 and monoclonal anti-MDM2
antibodies. PCR reactions were carried out using primers that encompass
the p53RE-containing sequence of either the mdm2 or the
p21waf1/cip1 promoter. The results
are shown in Fig. 5B. As expected, p53 resided at both the
mdm2 and p21 promoters. Interestingly, MDM2 also localized
at these promoters. This must be due to the association of MDM2 with
p53, because MDM2 does not bind to DNA. In fact, without p53,
overexpression of MDM2 (Fig. 5C) alone did not display detectable PCR products from the promoters (Fig. 5B,
lane 5). Furthermore, when nonspecific primers upstream from
the mdm2 promoter were used, no PCR product was detected
from the immunoprecipitates with either anti-p53 or anti-HA-MDM2
antibodies. Consistently, MDM2 significantly repressed p53-mediated
expression of the endogenous p21waf1/cip1 (Fig. 5C).
Hence, these results demonstrate that MDM2 indeed associates with the
promoter-bound p53, and this association might also play a role in
negatively modulating p53 transcriptional activity.
We previously showed (16) that MDM2 inhibited p300-catalyzed p53
acetylation by directly associating with these two proteins. Here, we
have extended this work by demonstrating that MDM2 is also able to
negate PCAF-mediated p53 acetylation at lysine 320. MDM2 inhibited
PCAF-mediated p53 acetylation both in vitro and in cells
(Figs. 1 and 2). As in the case of p300 (16), the N-terminal domain of
MDM2 is required for this inhibition, suggesting that interaction with
p53 is essential for the inhibitory effect of MDM2 on p53 acetylation
by the acetylases that have been tested. Interestingly, MDM2 also
directly interacted with PCAF in vitro and in cells (Figs. 3
and 4). Similar to p300 (14, 48), PCAF bound to the MDM2 region from
amino acids 50 to 350 (Fig. 3A and data not shown).
Functionally, MDM2 also repressed PCAF-enhanced p53 transcriptional
activity. Because MDM2 co-resided with p53 on the endogenous
p53-responsive promoters and repressed p53-dependent expression of the endogenous
p21waf1/cip1 (Fig. 5, B
and C), MDM2 might block p53 function by interfering with
the communication between p53 and the transcriptional machinery (50,
51). Yet it needs to be tested whether MDM2 inhibits p53 acetylation
while it sits with p53 on the promoters.
This study consistent with previous reports (14, 16) suggests a general
model for MDM2 repression of p53 function after DNA damage (Fig.
5D). In response to DNA damage, p53 is activated to
induce expression of its target genes, including mdm2.
Overexpression of MDM2, on the one hand, binds to p53 and its
acetylases, such as p300/CBP or PCAF, to prevent p53 modifications by
these proteins. In addition, deacetylases, such as HDCA1 and Sir2
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
irradiation,
stabilizes p53 and subsequently activates its activity (4-11). In
addition, p53 is acetylated at several C-terminal lysines in response
to genotoxic agents (12-14). One group of acetylases, p300 and
CBP,1 has been shown to
acetylate p53 in vitro and in cells (12, 14-16). Thus, by
acetylating p53, p300/CBP may stabilize and activate p53 (17-20).
Although less studied, the
p300/CBP-associated factor (PCAF) has also been shown to specifically acetylate the lysine 320 of
p53, leading to the enhancement of the sequence-specific DNA binding
activity of p53 in vitro (13). The acetylation at lysine 320 is responsive to DNA damage as well (12, 13). Hence, these types of
modifications generally result in up-regulation of p53 function.
Consistent with this, deacetylation of p53 by HDAC1 and Sir2
deacetylases has been recently shown to inactivate p53 function
(21-24). Additionally, adenovirus E1A and E1B 55-kDa oncoproteins
inhibit p53 acetylation catalyzed by PCAF (25, 26).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
N-MDM2, and pCDNA3-
150-230 (MDM2) were as
described (40). pCX-FLAG-PCAF was described previously (39).
66-466 Plasmids
To express PCAF under
the control of the RSV and T7 promoters, NcoI and
KpnI sites were first introduced at the translation
initiation codon and after the stop codon of the PCAF coding sequence,
respectively. The full-length coding sequence was then cloned between
the NcoI and KpnI sites of the expression vector
pExpress-O (41). pRSV-1-529 was constructed similarly by creating
NcoI and KpnI sites at the translation initiation
codon and after the codon for residue 529, respectively. A stop codon
was also inserted between codon 529 and the KpnI site. The
resulting 1.6-kb NcoI/KpnI fragment was subsequently cloned between the NcoI and KpnI
sites of pExpress-O (41). pRSV-
66-466 was constructed by digesting
pRSV-PCAF with PstI, followed by subsequent religation.
These vectors were used for in vitro translation of PCAF and
PCAF deletion mutants with the TNT translation kit (Invitrogen).
-galactoside reporter plasmid (0.2 ug) and a luciferase
reporter plasmid (0.1 ug) driven by two copies of the p53RE motif
derived from the mdm2 promoter (37), together with a
combination of different plasmids (total plasmid DNA, 1 µg/well) as
indicated in Fig. 5, using LipofectAMINE (Promega, WI). 48 h
post-transfection, cells were harvested for luciferase assays as
described previously (38). Luciferase activity was normalized by a
factor of
-galactosidase activity tested in the same assay.
66-466 (8 µl) proteins were incubated with the GSH-Sepharose
4B beads (50% slurry) containing ~100 ng of GST-MDM2,
GST-MDM2/1-150, GST-MDM2/295-491, GST-MDM2/384-491,
GST-MDM2/425-491, or GST, respectively. One hour after incubation at
room temperature, the mixtures were washed once in BC100 containing
0.1% Nonidet P-40, twice in SNNTE, and once in RIPA. Bound proteins
were analyzed on a 10% SDS gel and detected by WB using the anti-FLAG
or anti-PCAF monoclonal antibody to detect PCAF-GST-MDM2 interactions.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
MDM2, but not
N-MDM2, inhibits p53 acetylation by PCAF in
vitro. A, the in vitro p53
acetylation assay was carried out as described under "Experimental
Procedures." 75 ng of p53, 200 ng of p300, 250 ng of PCAF, and 500 nM of acetyl-CoA were used as indicated at the
top. 200 ng (1×) and 400 ng (2×) of MDM2 were used. These
proteins and acetylated p53 were detected with antibodies against MDM2,
p53, and acetylated lysine. B, the same p53 acetylation
assay as above was conducted except 200 (1×) and 400 (2×) ng of
N-MDM2 mutant were used. C, PCAF did not acetylate MDM2
in vitro. The same acetylation assay was conducted as
described above except 200 ng of GST-MDM2 (G-MDM2) and
[1-14C]acetyl-CoA were also used here as substrates. The
acetylated proteins were detected by autoradiography.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
MDM2 inhibits p53 acetylation by PCAF in
cells. A, H1299 cells (105 cells/60-mm dish)
were transfected with plasmids encoding p53 (300 ng) and/or FLAG-PCAF
(500 ng, 1× and 1 µg, 2×) as indicated at the top and
harvested 36 h post-transfection. 100 µg of cell lysates were
directly loaded onto a 10% SDS gel. Proteins and acetylated p53 were
detected by WB using antibodies against FLAG (top), p53
(middle), and acetylated lysine 320 (bottom).
Asterisks denote nonspecific signals. B, the same
transfection-WB assay as described in panel A was carried
out except that plasmids encoding MDM2 (1 µg, 1× and 2 µg, 2×)
were also used as indicated at the top. C, the
same transfection followed by WB analysis as that in panel B
was conducted except that the plasmid encoding the MDM2 deletion
lacking the amino acid 130-250 region was included (lanes 6 and 7).

View larger version (47K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
MDM2 binds to PCAF in
vitro. A, the GST-MDM2 protein association
assay was conducted as described under "Experimental Procedures"
using purified proteins. FLAG-PCAF was detected by WB using antibodies
against FLAG. B, the same GST-MDM2 protein association assay
was performed as described in panel A. PCAF and its deletion
mutants were in vitro translated and labeled with
[35S]methionine. 80% of the inputs for wild type and
deletion mutants of PCAF were directly loaded onto the SDS gel.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
MDM2 binds to PCAF in cells.
A, exogenous PCAF binds to endogenous MDM2. Human 293 cells
(60% confluence per 6-cm dish) were transfected with 3 µg of
plasmids encoding pCX-FLAG vector or pCX-FLAG-PCAF and harvested
40 h after transfection. 250 µg of cell lysates were used for IP
with monoclonal antibodies against FLAG (
FLAG), MDM2 (2A10), and
Jnk1 (
Jnk1), followed by WB with antibodies against MDM2 and FLAG.
B, endogenous PCAF binds to endogenous MDM2. 250 µg of
cell lysates prepared from human 293 cells (293) or stable
HA-MDM2-expressing 293 cells (293(MDM2)) were used for IP
with the antibodies anti-PCAF and -Jnk1, followed by WB with antibodies
against PCAF and MDM2. H and L chains of IgG are indicated on
right.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
MDM2 reverses the activation of p53 activity
by PCAF. A, MDM2 inhibits PCAF-activated p53
transcriptional activity. H1299 cells were used for a
transfection/luciferase assay as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Plasmids encoding p53 (50 ng), PCAF (100 ng), and/or
MDM2 (200 ng, 1× and 400 ng, 2×) were used. The levels of PCAF, MDM2,
and p53 were detected by WB using antibodies against these proteins as
shown in the bottom panel. Luciferase activity is presented
in arbitrary units. Asterisks denote nonspecific signals.
B and C, MDM2 co-resides with p53 at the
p53-responsive mdm2 and p21 promoters. CHiP was conducted as
described under "Experimental Procedures." The top panel
shows the PCR products from the immunoprecipitates using
antibodies against p53 and HA-MDM2. C, protein levels of
these proteins and the endogenous p21. 150 µg of total proteins were
loaded onto an SDS gel. D, a model of p53 inactivation by
MDM2. Arrows denote stimulation, and bars
indicate inhibition.
,
are activated by unknown mechanisms to deacetylate p53 (21-24).
Whether MDM2 promotes this deacetylation is not yet clear. Inhibition
of p53 acetylation or deacetylation at the C-terminal lysines residues would allow MDM2 to efficiently ubiquitinate the same lysine residues of p53 (52), thus leading to p53 degradation through the
ubiquitin-mediated proteasome machinery (27, 30, 31), although evidence
linking p53 ubiquitination to its degradation has not yet been
obtained. One study (53) suggests that MDM2 might target multiple
C-terminal lysines for mono-ubiquitination. If this is true, it is
likely that MDM2 might target lysine 320 for ubiquitination as well. On
the other hand, MDM2 also blocks p53 transcriptional activity by
directly associating with this activator on the promoters and by
inhibiting its acetylation at the C-terminal lysines. Through these
multiple mechanisms, MDM2, as a feedback regulator (33), effectively
controls or balances p53 activity after DNA damage.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Hunjoo Lee for preparing some reagents for this study, Jiandong Chen for the MDM2 mutant plasmids, David M. Keller for critically reading this manuscript, and other members of the lab for active discussions.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by grants (to H. L.) from the National Institutes of Health and the American Cancer Society.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR 97201. Tel.: 503-494-7414; Fax: 503-494-8393; E-mail: luh@ohsu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 14, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M204078200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: CBP, CREB-binding protein; CREB, cAMP-response element-binding protein; HA, hemagglutinin; PCAF, p300/CBP-associated factor; IP, immunoprecipitation; ChIP, chromatin IP; GST, glutathione S-transferase; WB, Western blot.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Ko, L. J.,
and Prives, C.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
1054-1072 |
| 2. | Levine, A. J. (1997) Cell 88, 323-331[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Giaccia, A. J.,
and Kastan, M. B.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2973-2983 |
| 4. |
Chehab, N. H.,
Malikzay, A.,
Appel, M.,
and Halazonetis, T. D.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
278-288 |
| 5. |
Hirao, A.,
Kong, Y. Y.,
Matsuoka, S.,
Wakeham, A.,
Ruland, J.,
Yoshida, H.,
Liu, D.,
Elledge, S. J.,
and Mak, T. W.
(2000)
Science
287,
1824-1827 |
| 6. |
Kapoor, M.,
and Lozano, G.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
2834-2837 |
| 7. |
Lu, H.,
Taya, Y.,
Ikeda, M.,
and Levine, A. J.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
6399-6402 |
| 8. |
Shieh, S. Y.,
Ahn, J.,
Tamai, K.,
Taya, Y.,
and Prives, C.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
289-300 |
| 9. | Unger, T., Juven-Gershon, T., Moallem, E., Berger, M., Vogt Sionov, R., Lozano, G., Oren, M., and Haupt, Y. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 1805-1814[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Siliciano, J. D.,
Canman, C. E.,
Taya, Y.,
Sakaguchi, K.,
Appella, E.,
and Kastan, M. B.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
3471-3481 |
| 11. |
Wright, J. A.,
Keegan, K. S.,
Herendeen, D. R.,
Bentley, N. J.,
Carr, A. M.,
Hoekstra, M. F.,
and Concannon, P.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
7445-7450 |
| 12. |
Sakaguchi, K.,
Herrera, J. E.,
Saito, S.,
Miki, T.,
Bustin, M.,
Vassilev, A.,
Anderson, C. W.,
and Appella, E.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2831-2841 |
| 13. |
Liu, L.,
Scolnick, D. M.,
Trievel, R. C.,
Zhang, H. B.,
Marmorstein, R.,
Halazonetis, T. D.,
and Berger, S. L.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
1202-1209 |
| 14. | Ito, A., Lai, C. H., Zhao, X., Saito, S., Hamilton, M. H., Appella, E., and Yao, T. P. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 1331-1340[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Gu, W., and Roeder, R. G. (1997) Cell 90, 595-606[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Kobet, E.,
Zeng, X.,
Zhu, Y.,
Keller, D.,
and Lu, H.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
12547-12552 |
| 17. | Gu, W., Shi, X. L., and Roeder, R. G. (1997) Nature 387, 819-823[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Avantaggiati, M. L., Ogryzko, V., Gardner, K., Giordano, A., Levine, A. S., and Kelly, K. (1997) Cell 89, 1175-1184[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | Lill, N. L., Grossman, S. R., Ginsberg, D., DeCaprio, J., and Livingston, D. M. (1997) Nature 387, 823-827[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Yuan, Z. M.,
Huang, Y.,
Ishiko, T.,
Nakada, S.,
Utsugisawa, T.,
Shioya, H.,
Utsugisawa, Y.,
Yokoyama, K.,
Weichselbaum, R.,
Shi, Y.,
and Kufe, D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
1883-1886 |
| 21. | Luo, J., Su, F., Chen, D., Shiloh, A., and Gu, W. (2000) Nature 408, 377-381[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Luo, J., Nikolaev, A. Y., Imai, S., Chen, D., Su, F., Shiloh, A., Guarente, L., and Gu, W. (2001) Cell 107, 137-148[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Vaziri, H., Dessain, S. K., Ng, Eaton, E., Imai, S. I., Frye, R. A., Pandita, T. K., Guarente, L., and Weinberg, R. A. (2001) Cell 107, 149-159[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Juan, L. J.,
Shia, W. J.,
Chen, M. H.,
Yang, W. M.,
Seto, E.,
Lin, Y. S.,
and Wu, C. W.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
20436-20443 |
| 25. | Chakravarti, D., Ogryzko, V., Kao, H. Y., Nash, A., Chen, H., Nakatani, Y., and Evans, R. M. (1999) Cell 96, 393-403[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Liu, Y.,
Colosimo, A. L.,
Yang, X. J.,
and Liao, D.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
5540-5553 |
| 27. | Honda, R., Tanaka, H., and Yasuda, H. (1997) FEBS Lett. 420, 25-27[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Fuchs, S. Y., Adler, V., Buschmann, T., Wu, X., and Ronai, Z. (1998) Oncogene 17, 2543-2547[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
Fang, S.,
Jensen, J. P.,
Ludwig, R. L.,
Vousden, K. H.,
and Weissman, A. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
8945-8951 |
| 30. | Haupt, Y., Maya, R., Kazaz, A., and Oren, M. (1997) Nature 387, 296-299[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Kubbutat, M. H., Jones, S. N., and Vousden, K. H. (1997) Nature 387, 299-303[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Mendrysa, S. M.,
and Perry, M. E.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
2023-2030 |
| 33. |
Wu, X.,
Bayle, J. H.,
Olson, D.,
and Levine, A. J.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
1126-1132 |
| 34. | Juven, T., Barak, Y., Zauberman, A., George, D. L., and Oren, M. (1993) Oncogene 8, 3411-3416[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. |
Lu, H.,
and Levine, A. J.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
5154-5158 |
| 36. | Grand, R. J., Lecane, P. S., Owen, D., Grant, M. L., Roberts, S., Levine, A. J., and Gallimore, P. H. (1995) Virology 210, 323-334[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. |
Zeng, X.,
Chen, L.,
Jost, C. A.,
Maya, R.,
Keller, D.,
Wang, X.,
Kaelin, W. G., Jr.,
Oren, M.,
Chen, J.,
and Lu, H.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
3257-3266 |
| 38. |
Zeng, X., Li, X.,
Miller, A.,
Yuan, Z.,
Yuan, W.,
Kwok, R. P.,
Goodman, R.,
and Lu, H.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
1299-1310 |
| 39. | Yang, X. J., Ogryzko, V. V., Nishikawa, J., Howard, B. H., and Nakatani, Y. (1996) Nature 382, 319-324[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. |
Chen, J.,
Marechal, V.,
and Levine, A. J.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
4107-4114 |
| 41. | Forman, B. M., and Samuels, H. H. (1991) Gene 105, 9-15[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. | Shang, Y., Hu, X., DiRenzo, J., Lazar, M. A., and Brown, M. (2000) Cell 103, 843-852[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. |
Szak, S. T.,
Mays, D.,
and Pietenpol, J. A.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
3375-3386 |
| 44. | el-Deiry, W. S., Tokino, T., Velculescu, V. E., Levy, D. B., Parsons, R., Trent, J. M., Lin, D., Mercer, W. E., Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. (1993) Cell 75, 817-825[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 45. |
Lin, J.,
Chen, J.,
Elenbaas, B.,
and Levine, A. J.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
1235-1246 |
| 46. |
Querido, E.,
Blanchette, P.,
Yan, Q.,
Kamura, T.,
Morrison, M.,
Boivin, D.,
Kaelin, W. G.,
Conaway, R. C.,
Conaway, J. W.,
and Branton, P. E.
(2001)
Genes Dev.
15,
3104-3117 |
| 47. | Son, K., Hong, S. J., Green, A., Chen, J. J., Tzeng, E., Hierholzer, C., Billiar, T. R., and Chen, L. (1998) Mol. Med. 4, 179-190[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 48. | Grossman, S. R., Perez, M., Kung, A. L., Joseph, M., Mansur, C., Xiao, Z. X., Kumar, S., Howley, P. M., and Livingston, D. M. (1998) Mol. Cell 2, 405-415[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 49. |
Liu, Y.,
Asch, H.,
and Kulesz-Martin, M. F.
(2001)
Cancer Res.
61,
5402-5406 |
| 50. | Lu, H., Lin, J., Chen, J., and Levine, A. J. (1994) Harvey Lect. 90, 81-93[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 51. |
Thut, C. J.,
Goodrich, J. A.,
and Tjian, R.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
1974-1986 |
| 52. |
Nakamura, S.,
Roth, J. A.,
and Mukhopadhyay, T.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
9391-9398 |
| 53. |
Lai, Z.,
Ferry, K. V.,
Diamond, M. A.,
Wee, K. E.,
Kim, Y. B., Ma, J.,
Yang, T.,
Benfield, P. A.,
Copeland, R. A.,
and Auger, K. R.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
31357-31367 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Jin, S. X. Zeng, X.-X. Sun, H. Lee, C. Blattner, Z. Xiao, and H. Lu MDMX Promotes Proteasomal Turnover of p21 at G1 and Early S Phases Independently of, but in Cooperation with, MDM2 Mol. Cell. Biol., February 15, 2008; 28(4): 1218 - 1229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ohkubo, T. Tanaka, Y. Taya, K. Kitazato, and C. Prives Excess HDM2 Impacts Cell Cycle and Apoptosis and Has a Selective Effect on p53-dependent Transcription J. Biol. Chem., June 23, 2006; 281(25): 16943 - 16950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-S. Dai and H. Lu Inhibition of MDM2-mediated p53 Ubiquitination and Degradation by Ribosomal Protein L5 J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 2004; 279(43): 44475 - 44482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Legube, L. K. Linares, S. Tyteca, C. Caron, M. Scheffner, M. Chevillard-Briet, and D. Trouche Role of the Histone Acetyl Transferase Tip60 in the p53 Pathway J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 2004; 279(43): 44825 - 44833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-S. Dai, S. X. Zeng, Y. Jin, X.-X. Sun, L. David, and H. Lu Ribosomal Protein L23 Activates p53 by Inhibiting MDM2 Function in Response to Ribosomal Perturbation but Not to Translation Inhibition Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2004; 24(17): 7654 - 7668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Jin, S. X. Zeng, H. Lee, and H. Lu MDM2 Mediates p300/CREB-binding Protein-associated Factor Ubiquitination and Degradation J. Biol. Chem., May 7, 2004; 279(19): 20035 - 20043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Frisch E1A as a Tumor Suppressor Gene: Commentary re S. Madhusudan et al. A Multicenter Phase I Gene Therapy Clinical Trial Involving Intraperitoneal Administration of E1A-Lipid Complex in Patients with Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Overexpressing HER-2/neu Oncogene. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:2905-2907. Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2004; 10(9): 2905 - 2907. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Knights, Y. Liu, E. Appella, and M. Kulesz-Martin Defective p53 Post-translational Modification Required for Wild Type p53 Inactivation in Malignant Epithelial Cells with mdm2 Gene Amplification J. Biol. Chem., December 26, 2003; 278(52): 52890 - 52900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Iwakuma and G. Lozano MDM2, An Introduction Mol. Cancer Res., December 1, 2003; 1(14): 993 - 1000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Harrod, J. Nacsa, C. Van Lint, J. Hansen, T. Karpova, J. McNally, and G. Franchini Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type-1 Tat/Co-activator Acetyltransferase Interactions Inhibit p53Lys-320 Acetylation and p53-responsive Transcription J. Biol. Chem., March 28, 2003; 278(14): 12310 - 12318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. X. Zeng, Y. Jin, D. T. Kuninger, P. Rotwein, and H. Lu The Acetylase Activity of p300 Is Dispensable for MDM2 Stabilization J. Biol. Chem., February 21, 2003; 278(9): 7453 - 7458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||