JBC Ideal method for primary cell transfection

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M203640200 on June 13, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 34, 31257-31262, August 23, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/34/31257    most recent
M203640200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kilts, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kwatra, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kilts, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Kwatra, M. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Age Increases Cardiac Galpha i2 Expression, Resulting in Enhanced Coupling to G Protein-coupled Receptors*

Jason D. KiltsDagger , Toshimasa AkazawaDagger , Mark D. RichardsonDagger §, and Madan M. KwatraDagger §||

From the Departments of Dagger  Anesthesiology and  Pharmacology and Cancer Biology and the § Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710

Received for publication, April 15, 2002, and in revised form, May 30, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cardiac G protein-coupled receptors that function through stimulatory G protein Galpha s, such as beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic receptors (beta 1ARs and beta 2ARs), play a key role in cardiac contractility. Recent data indicate that several Galpha s-coupled receptors in heart also activate Galpha i, including beta 2ARs (but not beta 1ARs). Coupling of cardiac beta 2ARs to Galpha i inhibits adenylyl cyclase and opposes beta 1AR-mediated apoptosis. Dual coupling of beta 2AR to both Galpha s and Galpha i is likely to alter beta 2AR function in disease, such as congestive heart failure in which Galpha i levels are increased. Indeed, heart failure is characterized by reduced responsiveness of beta ARs. Cardiac beta AR-responsiveness is also decreased with aging. However, whether age increases cardiac Galpha i has been controversial, with some studies reporting an increase and others reporting no change. The present study examines Galpha i in left ventricular membranes from young and old Fisher 344 rats by employing a comprehensive battery of biochemical assays. Immunoblotting reveals significant increases with age in left ventricular Galpha i2, but no changes in Galpha i3, Galpha o, Galpha s, Gbeta 1, or Gbeta 2. Aging also increases ADP-ribosylation of pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins. Consistent with these results, basal as well as receptor-mediated incorporation of photoaffinity label [32P]azidoanilido-GTP indicates higher amounts of Galpha i2 in older left ventricular membranes. Moreover, both basal and receptor-mediated adenylyl cyclase activities are lower in left ventricular membranes from older rats, and disabling of Galpha i with pertussis toxin increases both basal and receptor-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity. Finally, age produces small but significant increases in muscarinic potency for the inhibition of both beta 1AR- and beta 2AR-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity. The present study establishes that Galpha i2 increases with age and provides data indicating that this increase dampens adenylyl cyclase activity.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cardiac contractility is controlled by several G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs),1 such as beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic receptors (beta 1ARs and beta 2ARs), that function through stimulatory GTP-binding regulatory proteins (Galpha s) and activate adenylyl cyclase (AC). Activation of AC increases the formation of cAMP, which activates cAMP-dependent protein kinase A resulting in the phosphorylation of proteins controlling cardiac excitation-contraction (1). An important recent discovery is that beta 2ARs (but not beta 1ARs) in both rat (2, 3) and human heart (4) also activate Galpha i, a Galpha -subunit that inhibits AC (5). We also demonstrated that Galpha i couples to several other Galpha s-coupled receptors in human heart, including receptors for histamine, glucagon, and serotonin (4). Coupling of beta 2AR and other Galpha s-coupled receptors to Galpha i is relevant to cardiac function because inactivation of Galpha i by pertussis toxin (PTX) increases myocyte contractility in rat heart (6) and increases both basal and receptor-mediated AC activity in human heart (4). In addition to inhibiting AC, the Galpha i pathway in heart is involved in anti-apoptotic effects (7-9).

The dual coupling of beta 2AR to both Galpha s and Galpha i is likely to alter beta AR function in diseases in which cardiac Galpha i levels are increased, such as congestive heart failure and hypertensive cardiac hypertrophy (10-13). Indeed, both congestive heart failure and cardiac hypertrophy are characterized by a reduced responsiveness of beta ARs. Similarly, a decline in the responsiveness of cardiac beta ARs due to aging has been demonstrated in both humans (14-17) and rodents (18-21). The age-induced decrease in beta AR responsiveness is characterized at the molecular level by decreased stimulation of AC and at the whole organ level by a decrease in heart rate, ejection fraction, and cardiac output.

There have been conflicting reports about the effect of age on cardiac Galpha i levels in both humans and rodents. In one study of human heart, Galpha i levels were measured in atrial appendages received from surgical patients, and it was found that Galpha i expression increased with age (17). Another study examined Galpha i expression in human ventricles from hearts that were not suitable for transplant and found no change in Galpha i with age (16). Similar studies in rat heart have yielded inconsistent results even when the same strain of rat was used. In Fisher 344 rats, Roth et al. (21) reported an age-associated increase in cardiac Galpha i, which is reduced by chronic dynamic exercise. Johnson et al. (22) found an increase in Galpha i mRNA but no change in Galpha i protein. Two other reports found no increase in cardiac Galpha i protein (23, 24). In Sprague-Dawley rats, Bohm et al. (19) found that age increases cardiac Galpha i, and the increase in Galpha i is reduced by exercise. In Wistar rats, Bazan et al. (25) reported an increase in cardiac Galpha i with age, but Xiao et al. (6) and Miyamoto et al. (26) found no change. Some of the reported differences on the effect of age may be attributable to experimental design. For example, the finding of Chin et al. (24) that age does not increase cardiac Galpha i in Fisher 344 rats may be explained by the fact that these investigators used 16-month-old rats for their old age group versus 24-month-old rats used by others. Moreover, most studies examined Galpha i expression by immunoblotting only, and different Galpha i antibodies were used. Nevertheless, the available evidence favors an increase in Galpha i with age, as indicated by the recent review of Roka et al. (27). However, two recent reviews by Lakatta (28, 29) on global changes in cardiovascular aging state that Galpha i in heart does not increase with age. We believe that this conclusion is premature.

The importance of Galpha i in cardiac function underscores the need to establish whether or not cardiac Galpha i is affected with age. Therefore, we undertook a detailed study on the effect of age on Galpha i expression in rat ventricular membranes. We used Fisher 344 rats because these rats have been the most widely used rat strain for aging studies (30), and age-induced changes in cardiac structure have been characterized (31). Expression of the predominant cardiac subtypes of Galpha i, as well as of Galpha s, Galpha o, and the major subtypes of Gbeta , was assessed by immunoblotting. Levels of PTX-sensitive Galpha i/Galpha o proteins were also examined by radiolabeling through PTX-catalyzed ADP-ribosylation. In addition, Galpha i2 activity was assessed using photoaffinity labeling with [32P]azidoanilido-GTP (AA-[32P]GTP). We show age-dependent increases in both Galpha i2 expression levels and activation of Galpha i2 by beta 2AR and other G protein-coupled receptors in heart. The age-induced increase in Galpha i2 has the functional effect of suppressing AC activity, which is restored by disrupting receptor-Galpha i coupling with PTX.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- R(-)-isoproterenol-(+)-bitartrate, ICI 118,551, and CGP 20712A were obtained from Research Biochemicals International (Natick, MA). Glucagon was from Peninsula Laboratories (San Carlos, CA). Forskolin, carbachol, alprenolol, and Ponceau S were from Sigma. [alpha -32P]ATP, [alpha -32P]GTP, [3H]cAMP, (-)-[125I]iodocyanopindolol ([125I]CYP), RM/1 antibody specific for Galpha s raised against the peptide sequence RMHLRQYELL, and AS/7 antibody specific for Galpha i1 and Galpha i2 raised against the peptide sequence KNNLKDCGLF, were from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. Antibody specific for Galpha i1 and Galpha i3, antibodies specific for Gbeta 1 and Gbeta 2, and goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). GK-1 antibody for Galpha o was prepared by our laboratory and was characterized previously (32). Recombinant Galpha protein standards from Escherichia coli were from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). Protein A-Sepharose and [32P]nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide ([32P]NAD) were from Amersham Biosciences. PTX was from List Biological Laboratories (Campbell, CA). SuperSignal® chemiluminescent reagent was from Pierce.

Animals-- Sixteen Fisher 344 rats (eight 3-month-olds and eight 24-month-olds) were obtained from the National Institute on Aging under an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee-approved protocol. Animals were sacrificed by decapitation, and left ventricles were extracted immediately, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 °C.

Membrane Preparation-- Samples were thawed, then homogenized for 25 s in a Polytron PT3000 (Brinkmann Instruments, Westbury, NY) at medium speed, in 20 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 mM benzamidine, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 5 µg/ml aprotinin. Membranes were pelleted by centrifugation at 100,000 × g in an Optima TL Ultracentrifuge (Beckman, Fullerton, CA). Membranes were resuspended, repelleted, and then resuspended again in the appropriate final resuspension buffer (see below) at ~2-4 mg of protein/ml. For photoaffinity labeling assays, the final resuspension buffer contained 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaCl, and 2 mM benzamidine. For immunoblotting, ADP-ribosylations, and AC assays, the final resuspension buffer contained 75 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 12.5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM benzamidine, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 5 µg/ml aprotinin.

Immunoblot Analysis-- Immunoblotting was performed by separating 10 µg of membrane protein by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), followed by electrophoretic transfer onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membranes were stained for 5 min with 0.5% Ponceau S in 1% acetic acid to check for equal protein loading and transfer. The membranes were then blocked for 1 h with 10% nonfat milk in 20 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 500 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20, probed with either a 1:6000 dilution of RM/1, AS/7, or GK-1 antibody, a 1:200 dilution of anti-Galpha i3 antibody, or a 1:500 dilution of Gbeta antibodies, then incubated with a 1:2000 dilution of goat-anti-rabbit secondary antibody coupled to horseradish peroxidase. The immunoreactive proteins were visualized by incubation with SuperSignal® chemiluminescent reagent and exposure to x-ray film. Protein bands were quantified by densitometry using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Electrophoresis and subsequent analysis of various amounts of protein yielded linear densitometric results.

Photoaffinity Labeling with AA-[32P]GTP-- AA-[32P]GTP was synthesized according to published procedures and purified by thin layer chromatography on polyethylenimine cellulose (J.T. Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ) (32, 33). Photoaffinity labeling of membranes (30 µg of protein) was performed using 2 µCi of AA-[32P]GTP in a total volume of 60 µl in the presence of various drugs indicated in the figure legends. Photolabeled Galpha subunits were separated and subsequently analyzed by SDS-PAGE/autoradiography. The autoradiograms showed a prominent band below the 45-kDa molecular mass marker that represented Galpha i2 because it was immunoprecipitated with AS/7 antibody.

Pertussin Toxin Treatment of Ventricular Membranes for AC Assays-- PTX (50 ng/µl) was activated by incubation with 100 mM DTT and 0.25% SDS for 30 min at 30 °C as described (34). The activation reaction was stopped by the addition of four volumes of 1 mg/ml ice-cold bovine serum albumin (BSA). Activated PTX (1 ng/µl) was added to membranes (1.0-1.5 mg/ml protein) in a buffer containing 37.5 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 6.25 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM NAD, 2.5 mM ATP, 4 mM GTP, 10 mM thymidine, 10 mM DTT, 0.005% SDS, 0.08 mg/ml BSA, 0.5 mM benzamidine, 5 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, and 2.5 µg/ml aprotinin. The mixture was incubated for 30 min at 30 °C, then an equal volume was added of ice-cold 50 mM Tris (pH 7.4) with 1 mM benzamidine, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 5 µg/ml aprotinin. Membranes were pelleted by centrifugation at 100,000 × g in an Optima TL ultracentrifuge and resuspended in the final resuspension buffer containing 75 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 12.5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM benzamidine, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 5 µg/ml aprotinin, at ~0.5-1.5 mg of protein/ml. A second tube containing the same volumes of all constituents, with the exception of H2O in place of PTX, was treated in the same fashion and used as a control.

ADP-ribosylation of PTX-sensitive G Proteins-- PTX (50 ng/µl) was activated by incubation with 100 mM DTT and 0.25% SDS for 30 min at 30 °C as described (34). The activation reaction was stopped by the addition of four volumes of 1 mg/ml ice-cold BSA. Activated PTX (1 ng/µl) was added to membranes (1.0-1.5 mg/ml protein) in a buffer containing 37.5 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 6.25 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 2.5 mM ATP, 4 mM GTP, 10 mM thymidine, 10 mM DTT, 0.005% SDS, 50 µM NAD, 10 Ci/mmol [32P]NAD, 0.08 mg/ml BSA, 0.5 mM benzamidine, 5 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, and 2.5 µg/ml aprotinin. The mixture was incubated for 30 min at 30 °C, and then 100 µl of sample buffer (22.5 mM Tris (pH 6.8), 7.2% SDS, 9% glycerol, 0.01% bromphenol blue, and 10% 2-mercaptoethanol) was added to each tube, and samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and exposed to autoradiographic film. A second tube containing the same volumes of all constituents, with the exception of H2O in place of PTX, was treated in the same fashion and used as a control. Specific phosphorylation bands were identified on autoradiograms of the dried gels. 32P incorporation was quantified by excision of the radioactive bands, addition of 7 ml of Lefkofluor scintillant (Research Products International, Mount Prospect, IL), and counting in a liquid scintillation counter (Wallac 1409, EG&G Wallac, Gaithersburg, MD).

Adenylyl Cyclase Assays-- AC activity was measured according to the method of Salomon and coworkers (35, 36) as detailed previously (4). Briefly, 20 µl of control or PTX-treated ventricular membranes (20-30 µg protein) were added into a total volume of 50 µl containing 30 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 5 mM MgCl2, 0.8 mM EDTA, 0.12 mM ATP, 0.06 mM GTP, 2.8 mM phosphoenolpyruvate, 50 µg/ml myokinase, 0.1 mM cAMP, 10 µg/ml pyruvate kinase, 0.4 mM 3-isobutylmethylxanthine, 1 µCi of [alpha -32P]ATP, and the indicated drugs. After incubating the samples for 15 min at 37 °C, the reaction was terminated with 900 µl of stop buffer (360 µM ATP, 285 µM cAMP, and 50,000 cpm/ml [3H]cAMP), and cAMP was isolated by sequential chromatography over Dowex and alumina columns. 14 ml of Lefkofluor scintillant was added to each sample, and [32P]cAMP and [3H]cAMP were counted in a liquid scintillation counter.

Radioreceptor Binding Assays-- beta AR density was determined by [125I]CYP binding using a saturating concentration of 200 pM. Nonspecific binding of [125I]CYP was determined by the inclusion of 1 µM alprenolol. Ligand binding was performed in triplicate (15 µg of membrane protein per tube) in a final volume of 500 µl consisting of 75 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 12.5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM benzamidine, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 5 µg/ml aprotinin. The reaction was incubated and agitated for 2 h at room temperature. Bound [125I]CYP was separated from free [125I]CYP by rapid vacuum filtration onto glass fiber (GF/C) filters (Whatman International, Maidstone, UK). Filters were washed three times with 4 ml of ice-cold 50 mM Tris (pH 7.4) using a Brandel cell harvester (Brandel, Gaithersburg, MD) and counted in a gamma counter (Packard, Downers Grove, IL).

Statistical Analysis-- Results are presented as mean ± S.E. Each set of data was analyzed by Shapiro-Wilk tests for normality, then the statistical significance of comparisons between data from young and old samples was determined by performing unpaired Student's t tests and exact Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney tests on the mean values of each data set. p < 0.05 was considered significant for all comparisons.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Expression of Galpha i2 in Rat Left Ventricular Membranes Increases with Age-- Fig. 1 shows immunoblots for several Galpha and Gbeta protein subunits in left ventricular membranes from young (3 months) and old (24 months) rat hearts. We examined the expression of Galpha i2, Galpha i3, Galpha o, Galpha s, Gbeta 1, and Gbeta 2, all of which previously have been detected in rat heart (26, 37). Quantitation of bands by densitometry reveals that, on average, there is a significant increase of 58 ± 7% in Galpha i2 in old rat ventricles. In contrast, immunoblotting of each of the other G protein subtypes indicates that expression is unchanged between young and old rat ventricles.


View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Age increases Galpha i2 in rat left ventricle. Young (Y) and old (O) rat ventricular membranes were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, probed with antibodies selective for Galpha and Gbeta subunits, and visualized by chemiluminescence as described under "Experimental Procedures." n = 6 for each age group. Each tissue was assayed at least twice, and representative immunoblots are shown.

PTX-sensitive G Proteins in Left Ventricular Membranes Increase with Age-- To confirm the increase in Galpha i2 observed by immunoblotting by another independent method, we examined ADP-ribosylation of PTX-sensitive G proteins (Galpha i/Galpha o) in ventricles from young and old rats. This method has been used previously by Feldman et al. (10) to demonstrate a Galpha i increase in the failing human heart and by Bohm et al. (19) to demonstrate a Galpha i increase in the hearts of old Sprague-Dawley rats. As Fig. 2 shows, the amount of Galpha i/Galpha o labeled with [32P]NAD in PTX-treated membranes is significantly increased by 39 ± 8% in ventricles from older rats.


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Age increases levels of PTX-sensitive G proteins. Young (Y) and old (O) rat ventricular membranes were ADP-ribosylated by incubation with activated PTX and [32P]NAD then subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. The radioactive bands were excised and counted as described under "Experimental Procedures." n = 6 for each age group. Each tissue was assayed twice, and a representative autoradiogram is shown.

More Galpha i2 Is Activated in Left Ventricular Membranes from Older Hearts-- We next determined whether the increased expression of Galpha i2 in older left ventricular membranes is accompanied by increased activation of Galpha i2. To this end, we assessed the effect of age on the ability of beta 2AR and other GPCRs to stimulate photoaffinity labeling of Galpha i2 with AA-[32P]GTP. Activated GPCRs catalyze the exchange of GTP for GDP on alpha -subunits of G proteins associated with the GPCR, so the amount of AA-[32P]GTP incorporated into the alpha -subunit gives a direct measure of the extent of G protein activation. Fig. 3A shows that stimulations through beta 2ARs and glucagon receptors are significantly increased with age, from 102 ± 25% and 101 ± 31% above basal levels in young ventricles, to 226 ± 33% and 244 ± 40% above young basal levels, respectively. These results indicate that, as age increases, more Galpha i2 is activated upon stimulation of beta 2ARs and glucagon receptors. Basal labeling of Galpha i2 also significantly increases (by 83 ± 18%) in older membranes (Fig. 3A), consistent with the increased expression of Galpha i2 in older ventricles shown in Fig. 1. Photoaffinity labeling of stimulatory Galpha s is not altered with age (data not shown).


View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Increased activation of Galpha i2 proteins in old hearts. A, photoaffinity labeling of old rat ventricular membranes reveals greater basal, beta 2AR-stimulated, and glucagon receptor-stimulated incorporation of AA-[32P]GTP into Galpha i2 than in young ventricles. Membranes were photolabeled with AA-[32P]GTP in the presence of no drug (Basal), 100 µM isoproterenol (Iso), or 50 µM glucagon (Gluc), as described under "Experimental Procedures." The photolabeled membranes were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. n = 6 for each age group, and a representative autoradiogram is shown. Histogram data are expressed as percentage of basal incorporation in young atria. *, p < 0.05 compared with same condition in young samples. B, muscarinic receptor-induced photoaffinity labeling also reveals greater incorporation of AA-[32P]GTP into Galpha i2 in older ventricles. Membranes were photolabeled with AA-[32P]GTP in the presence of no drug (Basal), 100 µM isoproterenol (Iso), or 100 µM carbachol (Carb), as described under "Experimental Procedures." The photolabeled membranes were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. n = 4 for each age group. A representative autoradiogram is shown.

We next determined whether activation of Galpha i2 is also increased in aged heart through muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, a GPCR that interacts with Galpha i but not Galpha s. As shown in Fig. 3B, stimulation of muscarinic receptors in older left ventricular membranes produces greater photoaffinity labeling of Galpha i2 with AA-[32P]GTP than in young membranes.

AC Activity Is Decreased in Older Rat Ventricles-- Figs. 1, 2, and 3 show increased Galpha i2 protein expression and activation in old rat heart. Because stimulation of Galpha i-coupled receptors inhibits AC, we determined whether there are age-dependent increases in inhibition of cardiac AC production of cAMP. As shown in Table I, basal AC activity is significantly lower in old hearts, as are stimulations by beta 2ARs (isoproterenol + beta 1AR antagonist CGP 20712A) and glucagon receptors. Age-dependent decreases in stimulations by beta 1ARs (isoproterenol + beta 2AR antagonist ICI 118,551) and forskolin are not significant. To ascertain that the decrease in AC activity in older membranes was not because of a decrease in receptor number, we examined the expression level of beta ARs in both young and old ventricular membranes. We determined beta AR density using a saturating concentration of [125I]CYP, and found no difference in the mean density of beta ARs between young and old rat ventricles (Table I). These results are similar to other reports on beta AR density in Fisher 344 rat hearts (21, 38-42), though Mader et al. (43) did report a decrease in affinity. In other rat strains there may be moderate decreases in receptor number (6, 19, 25, 44).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
AC activity and beta AR expression in young and old rat left ventricular membranes
Receptors tested were beta 1ARs (measured by inclusion of 100 µM isoproterenol + 100 µM ICI 118,551 (beta 2AR antagonist)), beta 2ARs (100 µM isoproterenol + 100 µM CGP 20712A (beta 1AR antagonist)), glucagon receptors (50 µM glucagon) and muscarinic receptors (100 µM carbachol (Carb)). Direct activation of AC was tested with forskolin (50 µM). n = 6 for each age group, AC assays were performed in duplicate, and binding assays were performed in triplicate. *, p < 0.05 compared with AC stimulation by same condition in young membranes.

We also examined whether there are age-dependent changes in the ability of muscarinic receptors to inhibit beta 1AR- and beta 2AR-stimulated AC in rat ventricle. As shown in Table I, stimulation of muscarinic receptors strongly inhibits beta AR-stimulated AC in both young and old rat hearts. Because muscarinic receptors are able to inhibit AC stimulation almost completely in these membrane preparations, there is no significant difference between the maximal percent inhibition in young and old hearts, despite the increased coupling of muscarinic receptors to Galpha i2 shown in Fig. 3B. When the dose-response relationships were examined between muscarinic agonist concentration and inhibition of beta AR-stimulated AC activity, small but significant increases were seen in the potency of muscarinic inhibition (Fig. 4). EC50s for muscarinic inhibition of beta 1AR- and beta 2AR-stimulated activity are 0.84 ± 0.10 and 0.25 ± 0.06 µM in young ventricles, respectively, and 0.48 ± 0.10 and 0.14 ± 0.04 µM in old ventricles. Previous studies (45) in Fisher 344 rats also indicate that maximal muscarinic inhibition of beta AR-stimulated AC activity is similar in young and old rats. Detailed dose-response curves were not reported.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Age increases the potency of muscarinic inhibition of beta AR-mediated stimulation of AC. Dose-response assays reveal small but significant decreases in the EC50 for carbachol-mediated inhibition of cAMP production stimulated by either beta 1ARs or beta 2ARs in old (open squares or circles, respectively) versus young (filled squares or circles, respectively) rat ventricular membranes. beta 1AR stimulation was achieved with 100 µM isoproterenol + 100 µM ICI 118,551 (beta 2AR antagonist), and beta 2AR stimulation was achieved with 100 µM isoproterenol + 100 µM CGP 20712A (beta 1AR antagonist). n = 4 for each age group. Assays were performed in duplicate, and representative curves are shown.

PTX Treatment Causes a Greater Increase in AC Activity in Old Hearts than in Young Hearts-- We further examined the relationship between increased Galpha i2 levels and decreased basal and receptor-stimulated AC activity by eliminating Galpha i activity through PTX treatment. PTX ADP-ribosylates Galpha i/Galpha o and prevents their interaction with receptors, thereby removing the inhibition of AC by these G protein subtypes (46, 47). Our previous studies have shown that PTX treatment of human atrial membranes results in an increase in AC stimulation through beta 2AR and other Galpha s-coupled receptors (4), and others have shown that PTX treatment of myocytes increases beta 2AR-mediated contractility (2, 6). As shown in Table II, the inactivation of Galpha i/Galpha o by PTX increases both basal and GPCR-stimulated AC activity, and this effect is greater in the old than in the young left ventricular membranes for the Galpha i-coupled beta 2ARs and glucagon receptors. Galpha i inactivation in old membranes restores receptor-stimulated cAMP production to the levels achieved in the younger tissue. These data are consistent with our finding that more Galpha i2 is activated upon stimulation of beta 2ARs and other receptors in old heart (Fig. 3). beta 1ARs do not couple to Galpha i. Accordingly, the increase in beta 1AR-mediated stimulation of AC following PTX treatment was not significantly affected by age. The increase in stimulation by forskolin, a direct activator of AC, also is not affected by age. As expected, PTX treatment completely eliminated the inhibition of beta AR-stimulated AC activity by muscarinic receptors (data not shown).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Effect of PTX on AC activity in young and old rat left ventricular membranes
Receptors tested were beta 1ARs (measured by inclusion of 100 µM isoproterenol + 100 µM ICI 118,551 (beta 2AR antagonist)), beta 2ARs (100 µM isoproterenol + 100 µM CGP 20712A (beta 1AR antagonist)), and glucagon receptors (50 µM glucagon). Direct activation of AC was tested with forskolin (50 µM). Percent Change is the increase in cAMP production above the control level in the respective tissue in Table I. n = 6 for each age group, and assays were performed in duplicate. *, p < 0.05 compared with percent change in response following PTX treatment in young membranes.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The main finding of the present study is that Galpha i2 expression in rat left ventricle increases with age. The increase in Galpha i2 expression is demonstrated using several biochemical techniques including immunoblotting, ADP-ribosylation, and photoaffinity labeling with AA-[32P]GTP. The increase in Galpha i2 results in enhanced coupling to Galpha s-coupled receptors such as beta 2ARs and glucagon receptors, as well as to Galpha i-coupled muscarinic receptors. Thus, the net effect of the increase in Galpha i2 expression with age is an increase in Galpha i2 signaling. This results in reductions in both basal and receptor-mediated AC activities in aged heart, both of which are restored by disabling of Galpha i with PTX.

The present study examined the effect of age on cardiac Galpha i, an important issue about which conflicting data exist in the literature. Determination of the effects of age on Galpha i has become increasingly important in light of the recent demonstrations that many cardiac Galpha s-coupled receptors, including beta 2AR, also couple to Galpha i (2-4). The data in the present study clearly indicate an increased level of Galpha i2 in old Fisher 344 rats, and importantly, also demonstrate an elevation in the receptor-stimulated activation of Galpha i2. Prior studies in rats had not provided a consensus as to the effects of age on cardiac Galpha i. There have been reports of increased Galpha i expression in Fisher 344 (21), Sprague-Dawley (19) and Wistar rats (25), as well as an increase in Fisher 344 Galpha i mRNA (22). However, there also have been reports of no change in Galpha i expression in Fisher 344 (22, 23) and Wistar rats (6, 26). These differences make it necessary to examine Galpha i by multiple biochemical approaches. Our data indicating Galpha i2 increases in immunoblotting, ADP-ribosylation and photoaffinity labeling lead us to conclude that there is a significant age-dependent elevation in Fisher 344 cardiac Galpha i2. The increase in Galpha i2 in aged hearts is likely not due to hypertrophy because in Fisher 344 rats hypertrophy is seen at senescence, which occurs at 27-30 months of age (31).

In agreement with previous reports in both human (15-17) and rat heart (21, 23, 48-51), we also demonstrate decreases in AC activity in old heart. To explain this phenomenon, some studies have implicated changes at the level of AC. There has been a report of a decrease in the number of forskolin binding sites in old rats (23), indicating a lower amount of AC in old tissue, though there have been no reports on AC mRNA levels in Fisher 344 rats. Although decreases in AC activity with age could be due to decreased amounts of AC or its targets, the fact that PTX treatment restores beta 2AR- and glucagon receptor-stimulated AC signals in older hearts to the levels in younger hearts indicates that PTX-sensitive proteins are responsible for the decreased receptor-stimulated enzyme activity. PTX treatment in both guinea pig heart and rat bladder results in similar reversals of age-induced decreases in AC (20, 52). We conclude that elevated Galpha i is the main cause of reduced AC activity in aged rat left ventricles.

Apparently, an increase in cardiac Galpha i in aged rat heart does not affect beta AR-mediated contractility. Although coupling of beta 1ARs to stimulation of AC and contractility through Galpha s is widely accepted, questions remain as to whether effects on contractility through beta 2AR involve cAMP. In humans, stimulation of contractility via beta 2ARs has been reported to occur through a cAMP-dependent mechanism that results in protein kinase A-catalyzed phosphorylation of phospholamban, troponin I, and C-protein, as well as enhancement of both inotropy and lusitropy, in both non-failing (53) and failing human heart (54), as well as in non-failing myocardium from infants with Fallot tetralogy (55). Therefore, one would expect that in humans, an increase in the coupling of beta 2AR to Galpha i would lower contractility. In contrast, cAMP-independent pathways control beta 2AR-mediated contractility in rat (2, 56-58), cat (59), sheep (60), and dog (61). Thus, in these species, an age-induced increase in Galpha i would not decrease beta 2AR-mediated contractility. Consistent with this notion is the finding of Jain et al. (62) who found no difference in basal contractile and relaxation function in mice lacking either Galpha i2 or Galpha i3.

An important functional consequence of an age-induced increase in the coupling of cardiac beta 2AR to Galpha i2 may be increased inhibition of apoptosis. It was shown recently that norepinephrine, acting through a Galpha s pathway, increases cardiac apoptosis (63, 64). More recent data indicate that beta 1ARs cause apoptosis, whereas beta 2ARs acting through a Galpha i pathway oppose apoptosis (7-9). In adult rat ventricular myocytes, stimulation of a PTX-sensitive Galpha i-coupled pathway by beta 2AR inhibits the number of apoptotic cells as measured by flow cytometry (7). Using a neonatal rat myocyte model, it was shown that beta 2AR/Galpha i-mediated protection from apoptosis occurs through phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) and Akt/protein kinase B pathways (8). The beta 2AR/Galpha i/PI 3-kinase signaling mechanism also has been shown to mediate the stimulation of NO production (65), a key mechanism in the cardioprotection conferred by ischemic preconditioning (66). Finally, beta 2AR- mediated protection from apoptosis recently has been reported to occur through a Galpha i-dependent stimulation of p38 kinase (67), though another study reports that beta 2AR activates p38 kinase through a protein kinase A-dependent pathway that does not involve Galpha i (68). Thus, although the downstream signaling molecules involved have yet to be fully elucidated, an increase in cardiac Galpha i seen in aging or failing heart may be an adaptive mechanism to protect the heart from apoptosis, because apoptosis has been shown to occur in both aged (69, 70) and failing heart (71, 72).

In summary, the present study provides evidence that age increases Galpha i2 in older rat ventricles, and this results in more activated Galpha i2 upon stimulation of various GPCRs.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Habib El-Moalem for assistance with statistical analyses and Dr. David Kellogg for editorial assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

* This study was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants AG15817 (to M. M. K.) and 5 T32 AG00024 (to M. D. R.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Anesthesiology, 146 Sands Bldg., Box 3094, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. Tel.: 919-681-4775; Fax: 919-681-8089; E-mail: kwatr001@mc.duke.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 13, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203640200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; beta AR, beta -adrenergic receptor; AC, adenylyl cyclase; PTX, pertussis toxin; AA-[32P]GTP, [32P]azidoanilido-GTP; [125I]CYP, (-)-[125I]iodocyanopindolol; [32P]NAD, [32P]nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; DTT, dithiothreitol; BSA, bovine serum albumin.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Opie, L. H. (1998) The Heart: Physiology, from Cell to Circulation , pp. 173-204, Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, PA
2. Xiao, R. P., Ji, X., and Lakatta, E. G. (1995) Mol. Pharmacol. 47, 322-329[Abstract]
3. Xiao, R. P., Avdonin, P., Zhou, Y. Y., Cheng, H., Akhter, S. A., Eschenhagen, T., Lefkowitz, R. J., Koch, W. J., and Lakatta, E. G. (1999) Circ. Res. 84, 43-52[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Kilts, J. D., Gerhardt, M. A., Richardson, M. D., Sreeram, G., Mackensen, G. B., Grocott, H. P., White, W. D., Davis, R. D., Newman, M. F., Reves, J. G., Schwinn, D. A., and Kwatra, M. M. (2000) Circ. Res. 87, 705-709[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Lefkowitz, R. J. (1995) N. Engl. J. Med. 332, 186-187[Free Full Text]
6. Xiao, R. P., Tomhave, E. D., Wang, D. J., Ji, X., Boluyt, M. O., Cheng, H., Lakatta, E. G., and Koch, W. J. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101, 1273-1282[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Communal, C., Singh, K., Sawyer, D. B., and Colucci, W. S. (1999) Circulation 100, 2210-2212[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Chesley, A., Lundberg, M. S., Asai, T., Xiao, R. P., Ohtani, S., Lakatta, E. G., and Crow, M. T. (2000) Circ. Res. 87, 1172-1179[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Zhu, W. Z., Zheng, M., Koch, W. J., Lefkowitz, R. J., Kobilka, B. K., and Xiao, R. P. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 1607-1612[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Feldman, A. M., Cates, A. E., Veazey, W. B., Hershberger, R. E., Bristow, M. R., Baughman, K. L., Baumgartner, W. A., and van Dop, C. (1988) J. Clin. Invest. 82, 189-197[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Bristow, M. R., and Feldman, A. M. (1992) Basic Res. Cardiol. 87, 15-35
12. Bohm, M. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biochem. 147, 147-160[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Brodde, O. E., Michel, M. C., and Zerkowski, H. R. (1995) Cardiovasc. Res. 30, 570-584[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Vestal, R. E., Wood, A. J., and Shand, D. G. (1979) Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 26, 181-186[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Kelly, J., and O'Malley, K. (1984) Clin. Sci. (Colch.) 66, 509-515
16. White, M., Roden, R., Minobe, W., Khan, M. F., Larrabee, P., Wollmering, M., Port, J. D., Anderson, F., Campbell, D., Feldman, A. M., and Bristow, M. R. (1994) Circulation 90, 1225-1238[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Brodde, O. E., Zerkowski, H. R., Schranz, D., Broede-Sitz, A., Michel-Reher, M., Schafer-Beisenbusch, E., Piotrowski, J. A., and Oelert, H. (1995) J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 26, 20-26[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Urasawa, K., Murakami, T., and Yasuda, H. (1991) Jpn. Circ. J. 55, 676-684[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Bohm, M., Dorner, H., Htun, P., Lensche, H., Platt, D., and Erdmann, E. (1993) Am. J. Physiol. 264, H805-H814[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Ferrara, N., Bohm, M., Zolk, O., O'Gara, P., and Harding, S. E. (1997) J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 29, 439-448[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Roth, D. A., White, C. D., Podolin, D. A., and Mazzeo, R. S. (1998) J. Appl. Physiol. 84, 177-184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Johnson, M. D., Zhou, Y., Friedman, E., and Roberts, J. (1995) J. Gerontol. A. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci 50A, B14-B19[Abstract]
23. Shu, Y., and Scarpace, P. J. (1994) J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 23, 188-193[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Chin, J. H., Hiremath, A. N., and Hoffman, B. B. (1996) Mech. Ageing. Dev. 86, 11-26[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Bazan, A., van de Velde, E., and Fraeyman, N. (1994) Biochem. Pharmacol. 48, 479-486[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Miyamoto, A., Kawana, S., Kimura, H., and Ohshika, H. (1994) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 266, 147-154[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Roka, F., Freissmuth, M., and Nanoff, C. (2000) Exp. Gerontol. 35, 133-143[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Lakatta, E. G. (1999) J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 47, 613-625[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Lakatta, E. G. (2000) Am. J. Geriatr. Cardiol. 9, 251-262[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Weindruch, R., and Masoro, E. J. (1991) J. Gerontol. 46, B87-B88[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Anversa, P., Palackal, T., Sonnenblick, E. H., Olivetti, G., Meggs, L. G., and Capasso, J. M. (1990) Circ. Res. 67, 871-885[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Roush, E. D., and Kwatra, M. M. (1998) FEBS Lett. 428, 291-294[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Offermanns, S., Schultz, G., and Rosenthal, W. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 195, 286-301[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Niroomand, F., Mura, R. A., Piacentini, L., and Kubler, W. (1996) Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 354, 643-649[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Salomon, Y., Londos, C., and Rodbell, M. (1974) Anal. Biochem. 58, 541-548[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Johnson, R. A., and Salomon, Y. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 195, 3-21[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Robishaw, J. D., and Hansen, C. A. (1994) Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 18, 115-120[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Scarpace, P. J., Lowenthal, D. T., and Tumer, N. (1992) Exp. Gerontol. 27, 169-177[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Kusumoto, F. M., Lurie, K. G., Dutton, J., Capili, H., and Schwartz, J. B. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 266, H1408-H1415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Mazzeo, R. S., Podolin, D. A., and Henry, V. (1995) Mech. Ageing Dev. 84, 157-169[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Scarpace, P. J., and Baresi, L. A. (1988) J. Gerontol. 43, B163-B167[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Tumer, N., Houck, W. T., and Roberts, J. (1990) J. Gerontol. 45, B48-B51[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Mader, S. L., Downing, C. L., and van Lunteren, E. (1991) J. Appl. Physiol. 71, 2094-2098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Slotkin, T. A., Thai, L., McCook, E. C., Saleh, J. L., Zhang, J., and Seidler, F. J. (1996) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 279, 478-491[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Gao, E., Snyder, D. L., Johnson, M. D., Friedman, E., Roberts, J., and Horwitz, J. (1997) J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 29, 593-602[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Gilman, A. G. (1984) J. Clin. Invest. 73, 1-4[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Moss, J., Bruni, P., Hsia, J. A., Tsai, S. C., Watkins, P. A., Halpern, J. L., Burns, D. L., Kanaho, Y., Chang, P. P., Hewlett, E. L., and Vaughan, M. (1984) J. Recept. Res. 4, 459-474[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. O'Connor, S. W., Scarpace, P. J., and Abrass, I. B. (1983) Mech. Ageing Dev. 21, 357-363[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Fan, T. H., and Banerjee, S. P. (1985) Gerontology 31, 373-380[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Scarpace, P. J. (1990) Mech. Ageing Dev. 52, 169-178[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Scarpace, P. J., Shu, Y., and Tumer, N. (1994) J. Appl. Physiol. 77, 737-741[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Derweesh, I. H., Wheeler, M. A., and Weiss, R. M. (2000) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 294, 969-974[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Kaumann, A. J., Sanders, L., Lynham, J. A., Bartel, S., Kuschel, M., Karczewski, P., and Krause, E. G. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biochem. 163/164, 113-123
54. Kaumann, A., Bart